[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-06-15 Thread Akira AJISAKA (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15333108#comment-15333108
 ] 

Akira AJISAKA commented on HADOOP-12892:


After backporting this issue, we need to backport HDFS-10353, HADOOP-13149, and 
HADOOP-13245 as well. Let's do this.

> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 2.8.0
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-12892.00.patch, HADOOP-12892.01.branch-2.8.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.01.branch-2.patch, HADOOP-12892.01.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.02.branch-2.patch, HADOOP-12892.02.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.03.branch-2.patch, HADOOP-12892.03.patch
>
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-06-15 Thread Andrew Wang (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15332648#comment-15332648
 ] 

Andrew Wang commented on HADOOP-12892:
--

Forgot to mention, I looked at the shellcheck/shell doc errors too, these exist 
in the trunk version too. I'm not sure why they weren't picked up by the 
original precommit run.

> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha1
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-12892.00.patch, HADOOP-12892.01.branch-2.8.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.01.branch-2.patch, HADOOP-12892.01.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.02.branch-2.patch, HADOOP-12892.02.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.03.branch-2.patch, HADOOP-12892.03.patch
>
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-06-15 Thread Andrew Wang (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15332646#comment-15332646
 ] 

Andrew Wang commented on HADOOP-12892:
--

Took a quick look, LGTM thanks Akira, also thanks Wangda for validating.

> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha1
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-12892.00.patch, HADOOP-12892.01.branch-2.8.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.01.branch-2.patch, HADOOP-12892.01.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.02.branch-2.patch, HADOOP-12892.02.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.03.branch-2.patch, HADOOP-12892.03.patch
>
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-06-15 Thread Akira AJISAKA (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15331258#comment-15331258
 ] 

Akira AJISAKA commented on HADOOP-12892:


Hi [~andrew.wang], would you review the latest patches? (03.branch-2 and 
01.branch-2.8)

> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha1
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-12892.00.patch, HADOOP-12892.01.branch-2.8.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.01.branch-2.patch, HADOOP-12892.01.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.02.branch-2.patch, HADOOP-12892.02.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.03.branch-2.patch, HADOOP-12892.03.patch
>
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-06-10 Thread Wangda Tan (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15324849#comment-15324849
 ] 

Wangda Tan commented on HADOOP-12892:
-

[~ajisakaa], Thanks for rebasing the patch.

I have tried this patch on branch-2.8, and artifacts can be built locally, I 
have also verified sites and launch YARN pseudo cluster using built binaries.

For the fix itself, I will +1 since the problem is already fixed. Not sure 
about shell check and shell doc -1, should we treat it like an error or just a 
warning.

I would like to get someone more familiar with this field to review and commit 
the patch.
cc: [~andrew.wang]. 

> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha1
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-12892.00.patch, HADOOP-12892.01.branch-2.8.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.01.branch-2.patch, HADOOP-12892.01.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.02.branch-2.patch, HADOOP-12892.02.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.03.branch-2.patch, HADOOP-12892.03.patch
>
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-06-10 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15324277#comment-15324277
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-12892:


| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
23s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} test4tests {color} | {color:red}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:red} The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please 
list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
31s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  7m 
39s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.8 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  8m  
0s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.8 passed with JDK v1.8.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  7m 
49s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.8 passed with JDK v1.7.0_101 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  1m 
32s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.8 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green}  1m 
11s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.8 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  1m 
15s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.8 passed with JDK v1.8.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  1m 
21s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.8 passed with JDK v1.7.0_101 {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
17s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  1m 
27s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  7m 
45s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} cc {color} | {color:green}  7m 
45s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green}  7m 
45s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  8m  
2s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_101 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} cc {color} | {color:green}  8m  
2s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green}  8m  
2s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  1m 
39s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green}  1m 
11s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} shellcheck {color} | {color:red}  0m  
9s{color} | {color:red} The patch generated 5 new + 496 unchanged - 46 fixed = 
501 total (was 542) {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} shelldocs {color} | {color:red}  0m 
10s{color} | {color:red} The patch generated 34 new + 14 unchanged - 0 fixed = 
48 total (was 14) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} xml {color} | {color:green}  0m  
3s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no ill-formed XML file. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  1m 
12s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  1m 
18s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_101 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  0m 
12s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-project-dist in the patch passed with JDK 
v1.7.0_101. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  0m 
12s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-assemblies in the patch passed with JDK 
v1.7.0_101. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  1m  
8s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-hdfs-client in the patch passed with JDK 
v1.7.0_101. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | 

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-06-10 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15324154#comment-15324154
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-12892:


(!) A patch to the testing environment has been detected. 
Re-executing against the patched versions to perform further tests. 
The console is at 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/9720/console in case of 
problems.


> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha1
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-12892.00.patch, HADOOP-12892.01.branch-2.8.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.01.branch-2.patch, HADOOP-12892.01.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.02.branch-2.patch, HADOOP-12892.02.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.03.branch-2.patch, HADOOP-12892.03.patch
>
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-06-09 Thread Wangda Tan (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15323424#comment-15323424
 ] 

Wangda Tan commented on HADOOP-12892:
-

Thanks [~ajisakaa]!

I've tried to run create-release on my local box (without --docker) on branch-2.

It succeeded and can generate artifacts. I've manually take a look at generated 
sites, and start a simple YARN cluster runs few distributed shell job, all 
succeeded.

The patch has few conflicts while applying to branch-2.8. Could you update 
patch for branch-2.8? I can help with verification.

> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha1
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-12892.00.patch, HADOOP-12892.01.branch-2.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.01.patch, HADOOP-12892.02.branch-2.patch, HADOOP-12892.02.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.03.branch-2.patch, HADOOP-12892.03.patch
>
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-06-09 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15322929#comment-15322929
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-12892:


| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
16s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} test4tests {color} | {color:red}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:red} The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please 
list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
39s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  6m 
42s{color} | {color:green} branch-2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  6m 
51s{color} | {color:green} branch-2 passed with JDK v1.8.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  7m 
15s{color} | {color:green} branch-2 passed with JDK v1.7.0_101 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  1m 
43s{color} | {color:green} branch-2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green}  1m 
13s{color} | {color:green} branch-2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  1m 
12s{color} | {color:green} branch-2 passed with JDK v1.8.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  1m 
18s{color} | {color:green} branch-2 passed with JDK v1.7.0_101 {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
16s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  1m 
20s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  6m 
48s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} cc {color} | {color:green}  6m 
48s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green}  6m 
48s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  7m 
19s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_101 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} cc {color} | {color:green}  7m 
19s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green}  7m 
19s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  1m 
37s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green}  1m 
15s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} shellcheck {color} | {color:red}  0m 
10s{color} | {color:red} The patch generated 5 new + 496 unchanged - 46 fixed = 
501 total (was 542) {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} shelldocs {color} | {color:red}  0m  
9s{color} | {color:red} The patch generated 34 new + 14 unchanged - 0 fixed = 
48 total (was 14) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} xml {color} | {color:green}  0m  
3s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no ill-formed XML file. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  1m 
13s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  1m 
22s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_101 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  0m 
11s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-project-dist in the patch passed with JDK 
v1.7.0_101. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  0m 
12s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-assemblies in the patch passed with JDK 
v1.7.0_101. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  1m  
6s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-hdfs-client in the patch passed with JDK 
v1.7.0_101. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-06-09 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15322831#comment-15322831
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-12892:


(!) A patch to the testing environment has been detected. 
Re-executing against the patched versions to perform further tests. 
The console is at 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/9706/console in case of 
problems.


> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha1
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-12892.00.patch, HADOOP-12892.01.branch-2.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.01.patch, HADOOP-12892.02.branch-2.patch, HADOOP-12892.02.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.03.branch-2.patch, HADOOP-12892.03.patch
>
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-06-09 Thread Akira AJISAKA (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15322604#comment-15322604
 ] 

Akira AJISAKA commented on HADOOP-12892:


bq. It changes it back just prior to execution.
Thank you for the reply. This is true after HADOOP-12743, which it is not in 
branch-2. I'll backport this.

> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha1
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-12892.00.patch, HADOOP-12892.01.branch-2.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.01.patch, HADOOP-12892.02.branch-2.patch, HADOOP-12892.02.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.03.patch
>
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-06-09 Thread Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15322467#comment-15322467
 ] 

Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-12892:
---

(Although, now that releasedocmaker supports a location in yetus 0.3.0, we 
should probably change the pom.xml to use it.)

> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha1
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-12892.00.patch, HADOOP-12892.01.branch-2.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.01.patch, HADOOP-12892.02.branch-2.patch, HADOOP-12892.02.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.03.patch
>
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-06-09 Thread Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15322457#comment-15322457
 ] 

Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-12892:
---

bq. yetus-wrapper changes the working directory to patchprocess/ and execute 
the script specified by the first argument, so the workingDirectory does not 
work.

It changes it back just prior to execution.  

> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha1
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-12892.00.patch, HADOOP-12892.01.branch-2.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.01.patch, HADOOP-12892.02.branch-2.patch, HADOOP-12892.02.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.03.patch
>
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-06-09 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15322405#comment-15322405
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-12892:


| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 10m 
34s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} test4tests {color} | {color:red}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:red} The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please 
list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  1m 
38s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  6m 
27s{color} | {color:green} branch-2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  5m 
50s{color} | {color:green} branch-2 passed with JDK v1.8.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  6m 
23s{color} | {color:green} branch-2 passed with JDK v1.7.0_101 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  2m 
34s{color} | {color:green} branch-2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green}  1m 
22s{color} | {color:green} branch-2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  2m  
9s{color} | {color:green} branch-2 passed with JDK v1.8.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  2m 
22s{color} | {color:green} branch-2 passed with JDK v1.7.0_101 {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
15s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  2m 
 1s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  5m 
46s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} cc {color} | {color:green}  5m 
46s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green}  5m 
46s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  6m 
21s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_101 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} cc {color} | {color:green}  6m 
21s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green}  6m 
21s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  2m 
34s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green}  1m 
23s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} shellcheck {color} | {color:red}  0m  
8s{color} | {color:red} The patch generated 5 new + 496 unchanged - 46 fixed = 
501 total (was 542) {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} shelldocs {color} | {color:red}  0m  
8s{color} | {color:red} The patch generated 34 new + 14 unchanged - 0 fixed = 
48 total (was 14) {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} whitespace {color} | {color:red}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:red} The patch has 49 line(s) that end in whitespace. Use 
git apply --whitespace=fix. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} xml {color} | {color:green}  0m  
2s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no ill-formed XML file. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  2m  
9s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  2m 
20s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_101 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  0m 
12s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-project-dist in the patch passed with JDK 
v1.7.0_101. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  0m 
12s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-assemblies in the patch passed with JDK 
v1.7.0_101. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  8m 
22s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-common in the patch passed with JDK 
v1.7.0_101. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | 

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-06-09 Thread Akira AJISAKA (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15322370#comment-15322370
 ] 

Akira AJISAKA commented on HADOOP-12892:


FYI: {{create-release --asfrelease}} option requires {{--docker}} option and 
the option requires HADOOP-13245.

> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha1
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-12892.00.patch, HADOOP-12892.01.branch-2.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.01.patch, HADOOP-12892.02.branch-2.patch, HADOOP-12892.02.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.03.patch
>
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-06-09 Thread Akira AJISAKA (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15322344#comment-15322344
 ] 

Akira AJISAKA commented on HADOOP-12892:


02.branch-2 patch:
* Removed {{workingDirectory}}
* Copy CHANGES*.md from patchprocess instead of {{workingDirectory}}
* Create the destination directory before copying documents into the directory.

> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha1
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-12892.00.patch, HADOOP-12892.01.branch-2.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.01.patch, HADOOP-12892.02.branch-2.patch, HADOOP-12892.02.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.03.patch
>
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-06-09 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15322342#comment-15322342
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-12892:


(!) A patch to the testing environment has been detected. 
Re-executing against the patched versions to perform further tests. 
The console is at 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/9702/console in case of 
problems.


> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha1
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-12892.00.patch, HADOOP-12892.01.branch-2.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.01.patch, HADOOP-12892.02.branch-2.patch, HADOOP-12892.02.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.03.patch
>
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-06-09 Thread Akira AJISAKA (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15322134#comment-15322134
 ] 

Akira AJISAKA commented on HADOOP-12892:


{{yetus-wrapper}} changes the working directory to {{patchprocess/}} and 
execute the script specified by the first argument, so the {{workingDirectory}} 
does not work.
{code:title=yetus-wrapper}
pushd "${HADOOP_PATCHPROCESS}" >/dev/null
if [[ $? != 0 ]]; then
  yetus_error "ERROR: yetus-dl: Cannot pushd to ${HADOOP_PATCHPROCESS}"
  exit 1
fi
{code}
We need to copy {{2.9.0/CHANGES*.md}} from {{patchprocess/}}.

> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha1
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-12892.00.patch, HADOOP-12892.01.branch-2.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.01.patch, HADOOP-12892.02.patch, HADOOP-12892.03.patch
>
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-06-09 Thread Akira AJISAKA (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15322044#comment-15322044
 ] 

Akira AJISAKA commented on HADOOP-12892:


I noticed
* We need to set the version to 2.9.0 before running create-release in branch-2
* {{2.9.0/CHANGES*.md}} should be in {{$\{basedir\}/src/site/markdown/release}} 
but it is in {{patchprocess/}}. It seems that the {{workingDirectory}} does not 
work. 
{code:title=hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common/pom.xml}

${basedir}/../../dev-support/bin/releasedocmaker

src/site/markdown/release/
{code}

> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha1
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-12892.00.patch, HADOOP-12892.01.branch-2.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.01.patch, HADOOP-12892.02.patch, HADOOP-12892.03.patch
>
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-06-08 Thread Akira AJISAKA (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15321918#comment-15321918
 ] 

Akira AJISAKA commented on HADOOP-12892:


I hadn't tested locally, and I faced the same error. I'll look into the cause.

> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha1
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-12892.00.patch, HADOOP-12892.01.branch-2.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.01.patch, HADOOP-12892.02.patch, HADOOP-12892.03.patch
>
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-06-08 Thread Wangda Tan (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15321412#comment-15321412
 ] 

Wangda Tan commented on HADOOP-12892:
-

Thanks [~ajisakaa] working on this fix.

I just tried to run the create-release locally (OSX) without any parameters. It 
fails by following errors:
{code}

Staging the release



$ mv /Users/wtan/sandbox/hadoop/target/staging/hadoop-project 
/Users/wtan/sandbox/hadoop/target/r2.9.0-SNAPSHOT/
$ cd /Users/wtan/sandbox/hadoop/target/
$ tar czpf hadoop-site-2.9.0-SNAPSHOT.tar.gz r2.9.0-SNAPSHOT/api 
r2.9.0-SNAPSHOT/css r2.9.0-SNAPSHOT/dependency-analysis.html 
r2.9.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-annotations r2.9.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-ant 
r2.9.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-archive-logs r2.9.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-archives 
r2.9.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-assemblies r2.9.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-auth 
r2.9.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-auth-examples r2.9.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-aws 
r2.9.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-azure r2.9.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-common-project 
r2.9.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-datajoin r2.9.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-dist 
r2.9.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-distcp r2.9.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-extras 
r2.9.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-gridmix r2.9.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-hdfs-bkjournal 
r2.9.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-hdfs-httpfs r2.9.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-hdfs-nfs 
r2.9.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-hdfs-project r2.9.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-kms 
r2.9.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-mapreduce r2.9.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-mapreduce-client 
r2.9.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-mapreduce-examples r2.9.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-maven-plugins 
r2.9.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-minicluster r2.9.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-minikdc 
r2.9.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-nfs r2.9.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-openstack 
r2.9.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-pipes r2.9.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-project-dist 
r2.9.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-rumen r2.9.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-sls 
r2.9.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-streaming r2.9.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-tools 
r2.9.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-yarn r2.9.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-yarn-project 
r2.9.0-SNAPSHOT/images r2.9.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html 
r2.9.0-SNAPSHOT/project-reports.html
$ cd /Users/wtan/sandbox/hadoop
$ cp -p 
/Users/wtan/sandbox/hadoop/hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common/src/site/markdown/release/2.9.0-SNAPSHOT/CHANGES*.md
 /Users/wtan/sandbox/hadoop/target/artifacts/CHANGES.md
cp: 
/Users/wtan/sandbox/hadoop/hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common/src/site/markdown/release/2.9.0-SNAPSHOT/CHANGES*.md:
 No such file or directory

Failed!
{code}

Could you let me know which parameter you are using to do tests locally? 

Thanks,

> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha1
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-12892.00.patch, HADOOP-12892.01.branch-2.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.01.patch, HADOOP-12892.02.patch, HADOOP-12892.03.patch
>
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-06-08 Thread Andrew Wang (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15321409#comment-15321409
 ] 

Andrew Wang commented on HADOOP-12892:
--

Backport LGTM +1, thanks Akira. I'll assume you did appropriate local testing 
(running create-release with some different args). Will let you confirm and 
commit.

> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha1
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-12892.00.patch, HADOOP-12892.01.branch-2.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.01.patch, HADOOP-12892.02.patch, HADOOP-12892.03.patch
>
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-06-08 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15321137#comment-15321137
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-12892:


| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 10m 
33s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} test4tests {color} | {color:red}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:red} The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please 
list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
41s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  6m 
52s{color} | {color:green} branch-2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  5m 
39s{color} | {color:green} branch-2 passed with JDK v1.8.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  6m 
26s{color} | {color:green} branch-2 passed with JDK v1.7.0_101 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  1m 
35s{color} | {color:green} branch-2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green}  1m 
 8s{color} | {color:green} branch-2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  1m  
6s{color} | {color:green} branch-2 passed with JDK v1.8.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  1m 
15s{color} | {color:green} branch-2 passed with JDK v1.7.0_101 {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
15s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  1m 
15s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  6m 
57s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_91 {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} cc {color} | {color:red}  6m 57s{color} | 
{color:red} root-jdk1.8.0_91 with JDK v1.8.0_91 generated 1 new + 5 unchanged - 
1 fixed = 6 total (was 6) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green}  6m 
57s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  7m 
20s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_101 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} cc {color} | {color:green}  7m 
20s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green}  7m 
20s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  1m 
44s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green}  1m 
14s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} shellcheck {color} | {color:red}  0m  
9s{color} | {color:red} The patch generated 5 new + 496 unchanged - 46 fixed = 
501 total (was 542) {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} shelldocs {color} | {color:red}  0m  
9s{color} | {color:red} The patch generated 34 new + 14 unchanged - 0 fixed = 
48 total (was 14) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} xml {color} | {color:green}  0m  
2s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no ill-formed XML file. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  1m 
16s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  1m 
23s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_101 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  0m 
11s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-project-dist in the patch passed with JDK 
v1.7.0_101. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  0m 
13s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-assemblies in the patch passed with JDK 
v1.7.0_101. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  1m  
6s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-hdfs-client in the patch passed with JDK 
v1.7.0_101. {color} |

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-06-08 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15320974#comment-15320974
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-12892:


(!) A patch to the testing environment has been detected. 
Re-executing against the patched versions to perform further tests. 
The console is at 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/9692/console in case of 
problems.


> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha1
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-12892.00.patch, HADOOP-12892.01.branch-2.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.01.patch, HADOOP-12892.02.patch, HADOOP-12892.03.patch
>
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-06-07 Thread Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15319636#comment-15319636
 ] 

Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-12892:
---

I've updated HowToRelease based upon having dev-support/bin/create-release and 
fixing quite a few things that were missing (jdiff!) or wrong 
(people.apache.org!).  Also note that I filed HADOOP-13245 to fix up a few more 
things in the source and add some functionality.

> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha1
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-12892.00.patch, HADOOP-12892.01.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.02.patch, HADOOP-12892.03.patch
>
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-06-07 Thread Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15318519#comment-15318519
 ] 

Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-12892:
---

Sorry, branch-2 is not a priority of my volunteer time.

> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha1
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-12892.00.patch, HADOOP-12892.01.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.02.patch, HADOOP-12892.03.patch
>
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-06-06 Thread Wangda Tan (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15317024#comment-15317024
 ] 

Wangda Tan commented on HADOOP-12892:
-

If -PreleaseDocs is relatively easy to be fixed in branch-2/branch-2.8, we 
should look at it. [~aw], could you add your points regarding to which JIRA we 
need to backport to branch-2 to support -Preleasedocs? I can try to backport 
them.

Since I have very limited understanding of shell scripts, I don't really know 
what will be broken if we don't include HADOOP-12850.

Is the create-release in branch-2 broken by HADOOP-11792?

> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha1
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-12892.00.patch, HADOOP-12892.01.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.02.patch, HADOOP-12892.03.patch
>
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-06-06 Thread Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15317020#comment-15317020
 ] 

Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-12892:
---

Just a reminder that the old method of building on Jenkins violates ASF policy. 
 Also:
* I need to update the HowToRelease docs to use create-release
* -Pdocs is missing from the build, just like it was in the original 
create-release.sh file. :(

> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha1
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-12892.00.patch, HADOOP-12892.01.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.02.patch, HADOOP-12892.03.patch
>
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-06-06 Thread Andrew Wang (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15316982#comment-15316982
 ] 

Andrew Wang commented on HADOOP-12892:
--

So one missing feature in the branch-2/branch-2.8 create-release script is that 
it doesn't use the new -Preleasedocs to build the CHANGES.txt file. I'm not 
sure how much work it is to add this support, but that's the alternative if we 
don't backport this JIRA.

Could you provide some more context on what breaks if we don't include 
HADOOP-12850 and so on? It might be less work to tweak the backport to avoid 
these dependent JIRAs compared to adding Preleasedocs support to the old script.

> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha1
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-12892.00.patch, HADOOP-12892.01.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.02.patch, HADOOP-12892.03.patch
>
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-06-06 Thread Wangda Tan (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15316864#comment-15316864
 ] 

Wangda Tan commented on HADOOP-12892:
-

Thanks [~andrew.wang], sorry for my late response, I missed your comment above.

I took a quick try to backport this patch to branch-2.8, it has a couple of 
conflicts. At least, it depends on HADOOP-12850, and HADOOP-12850 depends on 
more commits like HADOOP-10115, which again are marked as an incompatible 
change.

Given a couple of incompatible dependencies of this patch, I felt risky to 
backport all of them to branch-2.8. Since create-release works in branch-2 
before branch-2.8, do you know which JIRA introduced failures of create-release 
in branch-2? Can we revert problematic commits which leads to the failure?

> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha1
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-12892.00.patch, HADOOP-12892.01.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.02.patch, HADOOP-12892.03.patch
>
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-05-25 Thread Andrew Wang (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15301334#comment-15301334
 ] 

Andrew Wang commented on HADOOP-12892:
--

I think Allen was the one who flagged it as incompatible (so he can correct me 
if I'm wrong), but my understanding is that it's only incompatible for people 
who are building releases. This might affect Bigtop or distribution vendors, 
but in the end it should be producing the same src and bin tarballs.

So I think it's safe to backport to 2.8, and probably doesn't need to be 
flagged as incompatible since it doesn't affect end users.

> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha1
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-12892.00.patch, HADOOP-12892.01.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.02.patch, HADOOP-12892.03.patch
>
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-05-20 Thread Wangda Tan (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15293909#comment-15293909
 ] 

Wangda Tan commented on HADOOP-12892:
-

[~andrew.wang], this is marked to be a incompatible change, do you know why it 
is marked to that? How can we back port an incompatible change to 2.8?

Thanks,

> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha1
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-12892.00.patch, HADOOP-12892.01.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.02.patch, HADOOP-12892.03.patch
>
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-05-14 Thread Chris Nauroth (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15283688#comment-15283688
 ] 

Chris Nauroth commented on HADOOP-12892:


I discovered this broke the Windows distro build, and I'm filing a patch on 
HADOOP-13149 to fix it.

> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha1
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-12892.00.patch, HADOOP-12892.01.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.02.patch, HADOOP-12892.03.patch
>
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-05-02 Thread Yahoo! No Reply (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15267878#comment-15267878
 ] 

Yahoo! No Reply commented on HADOOP-12892:
--


This is an automatically generated message.

ran...@yahoo-inc.com is no longer with Yahoo! Inc.

Your message will not be forwarded.

If you have a sales inquiry, please email yahoosa...@yahoo-inc.com and someone 
will follow up with you shortly.

If you require assistance with a legal matter, please send a message to 
legal-noti...@yahoo-inc.com

Thank you!


> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 3.0.0
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-12892.00.patch, HADOOP-12892.01.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.02.patch, HADOOP-12892.03.patch
>
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-05-02 Thread Brahma Reddy Battula (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15267015#comment-15267015
 ] 

Brahma Reddy Battula commented on HADOOP-12892:
---

Raised HDFS-10353 to fix this compilation error in windows..

> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 3.0.0
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-12892.00.patch, HADOOP-12892.01.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.02.patch, HADOOP-12892.03.patch
>
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-05-02 Thread Brahma Reddy Battula (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15266945#comment-15266945
 ] 

Brahma Reddy Battula commented on HADOOP-12892:
---

[~busbey] thanks for calrification..
 
I thought based on commit date, git log will be generated ( even in the Jira, 
Filed : 
[Development|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?devStatusDetailDialog=repository]
 ) which makes little confusion atleast to me..
{noformat}
$ git log --grep HADOOP-12892
commit 7b1c37a13a55dc184f1b64439b9928b53e352ee7
Author: Allen Wittenauer 
Date:   Fri Mar 4 15:42:04 2016 -0800

HADOOP-12892. fix/rewrite create-release (aw)

{noformat}

bytheway I came to know {{--format=fuller}} now.:).

> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 3.0.0
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-12892.00.patch, HADOOP-12892.01.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.02.patch, HADOOP-12892.03.patch
>
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-05-02 Thread Sean Busbey (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15266828#comment-15266828
 ] 

Sean Busbey commented on HADOOP-12892:
--

And the canonical commit date you should look at is the message to the 
common-commits@hadoop mailing list:

https://s.apache.org/hadoop-commit-7b1c37a13a55dc184f1b64439b9928b53e352ee7

> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 3.0.0
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-12892.00.patch, HADOOP-12892.01.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.02.patch, HADOOP-12892.03.patch
>
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-05-02 Thread Sean Busbey (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15266819#comment-15266819
 ] 

Sean Busbey commented on HADOOP-12892:
--

that is the author date, and presumably when Allen first committed work related 
to this fix. If you look at the full commit you'll see the commit date is in 
fact on the 27th of April:

{code}
$ git log --format=fuller --grep HADOOP-12892
commit 7b1c37a13a55dc184f1b64439b9928b53e352ee7
Author: Allen Wittenauer 
AuthorDate: Fri Mar 4 15:42:04 2016 -0800
Commit: Allen Wittenauer 
CommitDate: Wed Apr 27 08:38:22 2016 -0700

HADOOP-12892. fix/rewrite create-release (aw)
{code}

> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 3.0.0
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-12892.00.patch, HADOOP-12892.01.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.02.patch, HADOOP-12892.03.patch
>
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-05-02 Thread Brahma Reddy Battula (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15266210#comment-15266210
 ] 

Brahma Reddy Battula commented on HADOOP-12892:
---

Commit date given as " *Date: 05-03-2016 05:12:04* ". I think, it should be 
April-27th,2016.

{noformat}
Revision: 7b1c37a13a55dc184f1b64439b9928b53e352ee7
Author: Allen Wittenauer 
Date: 05-03-2016 05:12:04
Message:
HADOOP-12892. fix/rewrite create-release (aw)
{noformat}

> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 3.0.0
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-12892.00.patch, HADOOP-12892.01.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.02.patch, HADOOP-12892.03.patch
>
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-04-30 Thread Brahma Reddy Battula (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15265452#comment-15265452
 ] 

Brahma Reddy Battula commented on HADOOP-12892:
---

After this in..hadoop-hdfs-native-client compilation failing by throwing the 
following...


{noformat}
F:\Trunk\hadoop\hadoop-hdfs-project\hadoop-hdfs-native-client\target\antrun\build-main.xml
[ERROR] -> [Help 1]
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.LifecycleExecutionException: Failed to execute goal 
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-antrun-plugin:1.7:run (make) on project 
hadoop-hdfs-native-client: An Ant BuildException has occured: 
F:\GitCode\Trunk\hadoop\hadoop-hdfs-project\hadoop-hdfs-native-client\target\native\target\bin\RelWithDebInfo
 does not exist.
around Ant part ..
 @ 14:98 in 
F:\Trunk\hadoop\hadoop-hdfs-project\hadoop-hdfs-native-client\target\antrun\build-main.xml
at 
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.MojoExecutor.execute(MojoExecutor.java:216)
at 
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.MojoExecutor.execute(MojoExecutor.java:153)
at 
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.MojoExecutor.execute(MojoExecutor.java:145)
at 
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.LifecycleModuleBuilder.buildProject(LifecycleModuleBuilder.java:84)
at 
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.LifecycleModuleBuilder.buildProject(LifecycleModuleBuilder.java:59)
at 
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.LifecycleStarter.singleThreadedBuild(LifecycleStarter.java:183)
at 
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.LifecycleStarter.execute(LifecycleStarter.java:161)
at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.doExecute(DefaultMaven.java:317)
at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.execute(DefaultMaven.java:152)
at org.apache.maven.cli.MavenCli.execute(MavenCli.java:555)
at org.apache.maven.cli.MavenCli.doMain(MavenCli.java:214)
at org.apache.maven.cli.MavenCli.main(MavenCli.java:158)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
at 
org.codehaus.plexus.classworlds.launcher.Launcher.launchEnhanced(Launcher.java:289)
at 
org.codehaus.plexus.classworlds.launcher.Launcher.launch(Launcher.java:229)
at 
org.codehaus.plexus.classworlds.launcher.Launcher.mainWithExitCode(Launcher.java:415)
at 
org.codehaus.plexus.classworlds.launcher.Launcher.main(Launcher.java:356)
Caused by: org.apache.maven.plugin.MojoExecutionException: An Ant 
BuildException has occured: 
F:\Trunk\hadoop\hadoop-hdfs-project\hadoop-hdfs-native-client\target\native\target\bin\RelWithDebInfo
 does not exist.
around Ant part ..
 @ 14:98 in 
F:\Trunk\hadoop\hadoop-hdfs-project\hadoop-hdfs-native-client\target\antrun\build-main.xml
at 
org.apache.maven.plugin.antrun.AntRunMojo.execute(AntRunMojo.java:355)
at 
org.apache.maven.plugin.DefaultBuildPluginManager.executeMojo(DefaultBuildPluginManager.java:106)
at 
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.MojoExecutor.execute(MojoExecutor.java:208)
... 19 more
{noformat}

 *IIUC, following fix should be fine,, didn't run in Linux 
environment[~andrew.wang] and [~aw] if you people agree, will raise 
separate Jira and upload the patch..Thanks..* 

{code}
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd;>
 
 
 
-  
+  

{code}

> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 3.0.0
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-12892.00.patch, HADOOP-12892.01.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.02.patch, HADOOP-12892.03.patch
>
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-04-27 Thread Hudson (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15260367#comment-15260367
 ] 

Hudson commented on HADOOP-12892:
-

FAILURE: Integrated in Hadoop-trunk-Commit #9681 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-trunk-Commit/9681/])
HADOOP-12892. fix/rewrite create-release (aw) (aw: rev 
7b1c37a13a55dc184f1b64439b9928b53e352ee7)
* dev-support/create-release.sh
* dev-support/bin/dist-layout-stitching
* dev-support/bin/dist-copynativelibs
* hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs-native-client/src/CMakeLists.txt
* hadoop-assemblies/src/main/resources/assemblies/hadoop-dist.xml
* dev-support/docker/Dockerfile
* hadoop-project-dist/pom.xml
* hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs-client/pom.xml
* hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs-native-client/pom.xml
* dev-support/bin/create-release


> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 3.0.0
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-12892.00.patch, HADOOP-12892.01.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.02.patch, HADOOP-12892.03.patch
>
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-04-27 Thread Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15260332#comment-15260332
 ] 

Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-12892:
---

Thanks for the review.

There are somethings I wanted to fix yet (e.g., fuse), but I can do those later.

Committed to trunk.

> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
>Priority: Blocker
> Attachments: HADOOP-12892.00.patch, HADOOP-12892.01.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.02.patch, HADOOP-12892.03.patch
>
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-04-26 Thread Andrew Wang (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15259373#comment-15259373
 ] 

Andrew Wang commented on HADOOP-12892:
--

Thanks for the rev Allen, LGTM +1. Tested locally and seems to have worked. I 
see you chose not to do some of the option validations I recommended, but 
that's a matter of taste.

Only nit is that there's an extra space in --asfrelease usage text. Minor 
enough that we can fix on at commit time? IDK if you have anything else 
feature-wise you want to add.

> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
>Priority: Blocker
> Attachments: HADOOP-12892.00.patch, HADOOP-12892.01.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.02.patch, HADOOP-12892.03.patch
>
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-04-24 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15255674#comment-15255674
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-12892:


| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m 15s 
{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} shelldocs {color} | {color:blue} 0m 4s 
{color} | {color:blue} Shelldocs was not available. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s 
{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} test4tests {color} | {color:red} 0m 0s 
{color} | {color:red} The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please 
list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m 14s 
{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 6m 
30s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 5m 37s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.8.0_77 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 6m 33s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 1m 21s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m 
55s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 54s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.8.0_77 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 1m 3s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m 14s 
{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 1m 
4s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 5m 32s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_77 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} cc {color} | {color:green} 5m 32s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 5m 32s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 6m 35s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} cc {color} | {color:green} 6m 35s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 6m 35s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 1m 22s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m 
54s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shellcheck {color} | {color:green} 0m 
9s {color} | {color:green} There were no new shellcheck issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m 
0s {color} | {color:green} Patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} xml {color} | {color:green} 0m 1s 
{color} | {color:green} The patch has no ill-formed XML file. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 55s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_77 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 1m 5s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 0m 8s 
{color} | {color:green} hadoop-project-dist in the patch passed with JDK 
v1.8.0_77. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 0m 8s 
{color} | {color:green} hadoop-assemblies in the patch passed with JDK 
v1.8.0_77. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 0m 9s 
{color} | {color:green} hadoop-assemblies in the patch passed with JDK 
v1.8.0_77. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 0m 50s 
{color} | {color:green} hadoop-hdfs-client in the patch passed with JDK 
v1.8.0_77. {color} |
| 

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-04-24 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15255661#comment-15255661
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-12892:


(!) A patch to the testing environment has been detected. 
Re-executing against the patched versions to perform further tests. 
The console is at 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/9165/console in case of 
problems.


> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
>Priority: Blocker
> Attachments: HADOOP-12892.00.patch, HADOOP-12892.01.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.02.patch, HADOOP-12892.03.patch
>
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-04-23 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15255369#comment-15255369
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-12892:


| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 10m 10s 
{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} shelldocs {color} | {color:blue} 0m 4s 
{color} | {color:blue} Shelldocs was not available. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s 
{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} test4tests {color} | {color:red} 0m 0s 
{color} | {color:red} The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please 
list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m 14s 
{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 6m 
29s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 5m 36s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.8.0_77 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 6m 32s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m 58s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m 
34s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 37s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.8.0_77 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 45s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m 14s 
{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m 
48s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 5m 32s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_77 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} cc {color} | {color:green} 5m 32s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 5m 32s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 6m 31s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} cc {color} | {color:green} 6m 31s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 6m 31s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m 59s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m 
34s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shellcheck {color} | {color:green} 0m 
9s {color} | {color:green} There were no new shellcheck issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m 
0s {color} | {color:green} Patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} xml {color} | {color:green} 0m 1s 
{color} | {color:green} The patch has no ill-formed XML file. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 37s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_77 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 45s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 0m 8s 
{color} | {color:green} hadoop-project-dist in the patch passed with JDK 
v1.8.0_77. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 0m 49s 
{color} | {color:green} hadoop-hdfs-client in the patch passed with JDK 
v1.8.0_77. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 0m 31s 
{color} | {color:green} hadoop-hdfs-native-client in the patch passed with JDK 
v1.8.0_77. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 0m 9s 
{color} | {color:green} hadoop-project-dist in the patch passed with JDK 
v1.7.0_95. {color} |

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-04-23 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15255352#comment-15255352
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-12892:


(!) A patch to the testing environment has been detected. 
Re-executing against the patched versions to perform further tests. 
The console is at 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/9161/console in case of 
problems.


> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
>Priority: Blocker
> Attachments: HADOOP-12892.00.patch, HADOOP-12892.01.patch, 
> HADOOP-12892.02.patch
>
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-04-12 Thread Andrew Wang (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15238333#comment-15238333
 ] 

Andrew Wang commented on HADOOP-12892:
--

Thanks Allen, sounds reasonable overall. Looking forward to the rev.

bq. In other words, if there is no .gnupg directory, then override the user's 
request for signing support as a warning. But if an ASF release is requested, 
fail out.

Missed that, gotcha. Maybe instead of ERROR we say WARNING when we aren't 
exiting, since ERRORs are typically fatal.

bq. There's no reason why someone can't use create-release to build non-Apache 
releases...

Not sure who is using create-release to build non-ASF releases. Anyway, perhaps 
we only do OS enforcement when running with asfrelease? I think this fits with 
"lock in stone" as you say.

> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
>Priority: Blocker
> Attachments: HADOOP-12892.00.patch, HADOOP-12892.01.patch
>
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-04-12 Thread Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15236793#comment-15236793
 ] 

Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-12892:
---

Thanks for the review.  Clearly some bugs.  But some clarification/comments:

bq. Shall we change "patchprocess" to "releaseprocess" or some such for LOGDIR?

patchprocess is in .gitignore and who knows where else and I didn't want to add 
another one to reduce the amount of pollution.

bq.  \-\-asfrelease sets NATIVE and SIGN, so the "\-\-asfrelease requires 
\-\-sign" validation will never trigger

Actually, it can:

{code}
  if [[ ! -d "${HOME}/.gnupg" ]]; then
hadoop_error "ERROR: No .gnupg dir. Disabling signing capability."
SIGN=false
  fi
...
  if [[ "${ASFRELEASE}" = true ]]; then
if [[ "${SIGN}" = false ]]; then
  hadoop_error "ERROR: --asfrelease requires --sign. Exiting."
  exit
fi
{code}

In other words, if there is no .gnupg directory, then override the user's 
request for signing support as a warning.  But if an ASF release is requested, 
fail out.

bq. Should we even support building on Darwin? I'd rather it just abort for 
unsupported platforms. Is windows supported for that matter?

There's no reason why someone can't use create-release to build non-Apache 
releases...

bq. Related to previous, it'd be nice to be able to do \-\-sign independent of 
the build.

IMO, but that's an outside of the Apache process and outside of create-release 
problem.  I don't think I'd trust an RM that can't write a simple shell for 
loop.  One of my goals here is to lock in stone the ASF release process since 
it's pretty clear that people screw it up all the time and/or do very bad 
things (like build them on Jenkins).

> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
>Priority: Blocker
> Attachments: HADOOP-12892.00.patch, HADOOP-12892.01.patch
>
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-04-11 Thread Andrew Wang (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15236415#comment-15236415
 ] 

Andrew Wang commented on HADOOP-12892:
--

Thanks for the rev Allen, sorry for not getting to this sooner. Some review 
comments:

* Typo "relase" in help text and the docker imgname
* Shall we change "patchprocess" to "releaseprocess" or some such for LOGDIR?
* --asfrelease sets NATIVE and SIGN, so the "--asfrelease requires --sign" 
validation will never trigger
* Should we even support building on Darwin? I'd rather it just abort for 
unsupported platforms. Is windows supported for that matter?
* The docker run command will pass along --dockercache, which then prints a 
spurious error msg:

{noformat}
$ docker run -i -t --privileged -v /home/andrew/.gnupg:/home/andrew/.gnupg -v 
/home/andrew/dev/apache/trunk/patchprocess:/home/andrew/dev/apache/trunk/patchprocess
 -v 
/home/andrew/dev/apache/trunk/target/artifacts:/home/andrew/dev/apache/trunk/target/artifacts
 -v /home/andrew/dev/apache/trunk:/build/source -u andrew -w /build/source 
hadoop/createrelase:3.0.0-SNAPSHOT_norc 
/build/source/dev-support/bin/create-release --mvncache=/maven --asfrelease 
--dockercache --indocker
ERROR: docker mode not enabled. Disabling dockercache.
{noformat}

* DOCKERAN isn't set anywhere, remove this check?
* MVNCACHE is ignored when --dockercache is specified and not --indocker right? 
That would be a good validation.
* Nit: some extra newlines at the end of makearelease
* When I did --asfrelease with --docker, it hung without output waiting for my 
GPG passphrase. I typed in my PW a few times, but it kept prompting, possibly 
because there wasn't a GPG agent running. Ended up Ctrl-D'ing it.
* Related to previous, it'd be nice to be able to do --sign independent of the 
build. Means we should filter out ".asc" and ".mds" files in signartifacts in 
case it's invoked twice though. I moved signartifacts out of its if statement 
as a test, which worked.

> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
>Priority: Blocker
> Attachments: HADOOP-12892.00.patch, HADOOP-12892.01.patch
>
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-04-01 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15222654#comment-15222654
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-12892:


| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m 15s 
{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} shelldocs {color} | {color:blue} 0m 4s 
{color} | {color:blue} Shelldocs was not available. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s 
{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} test4tests {color} | {color:red} 0m 0s 
{color} | {color:red} The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please 
list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m 46s 
{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 7m 
46s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 8m 23s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.8.0_74 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 7m 43s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m 59s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m 
33s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 46s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.8.0_74 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 46s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m 16s 
{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m 
52s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 8m 30s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_74 {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} cc {color} | {color:red} 9m 38s {color} | 
{color:red} root-jdk1.8.0_74 with JDK v1.8.0_74 generated 1 new + 10 unchanged 
- 1 fixed = 11 total (was 11) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} cc {color} | {color:green} 8m 30s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 8m 30s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 7m 44s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} cc {color} | {color:red} 17m 22s {color} | 
{color:red} root-jdk1.7.0_95 with JDK v1.7.0_95 generated 1 new + 20 unchanged 
- 1 fixed = 21 total (was 21) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} cc {color} | {color:green} 7m 44s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 7m 44s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m 58s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m 
32s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shellcheck {color} | {color:green} 0m 
10s {color} | {color:green} There were no new shellcheck issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m 
0s {color} | {color:green} Patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} xml {color} | {color:green} 0m 1s 
{color} | {color:green} The patch has no ill-formed XML file. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 45s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_74 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 44s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 0m 8s 
{color} | {color:green} hadoop-project-dist in the patch passed with JDK 
v1.8.0_74. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 1m 2s 
{color} | {color:green} hadoop-hdfs-client in 

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-04-01 Thread Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15222308#comment-15222308
 ] 

Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-12892:
---

I've been digging into our release artifacts today while testing my latest 
iteration of this and found some concerning things...

>From what I can tell, there are effectively 4 ways in which bits can appear in 
>the final dist:

* Use the dist-tar-stitching script (either in hadoop-dist/pom.xml in branch-2 
or pulled out into dev-support in trunk)
* Custom handling in hadoop-assemblies
* Custom handling in that modules's pom.xml
* Custom handling elsewhere that needs to be dug out (e.g., 
hadoop-mapreduce-project specifically handling the stuff in 
hadoop-mapreduce-client-nativetask)

If a module is added that doesn't do any of these things, then they effectively 
disappear.  For trunk, I've noticed two oddities:

* hdfs-client source and test jars are missing
* hadoop-hdfs-native-client completely disappears

There are likely more.

> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
> Attachments: HADOOP-12892.00.patch
>
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-03-22 Thread Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15206639#comment-15206639
 ] 

Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-12892:
---

bq. So, is the fix specifying an independent m2 dir?

With all the wrappings that need to go into making that work effectively, yes.  
That at least solves the maven cache problem.

bq. This means we end up downloading the world

Let's not forget that this is for a *release*.  Downloading the world is a 
*good thing*.

BTW, don't forget that HADOOP-12893 still needs to be taken care of as well.

> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
> Attachments: HADOOP-12892.00.patch
>
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-03-21 Thread Andrew Wang (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15205330#comment-15205330
 ] 

Andrew Wang commented on HADOOP-12892:
--

So, is the fix specifying an independent m2 dir? This means we end up 
downloading the world, but I've seen some good improvements by bumping the # of 
download threads and using Google's maven mirror.

> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
> Attachments: HADOOP-12892.00.patch
>
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-03-21 Thread Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15204994#comment-15204994
 ] 

Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-12892:
---

That was my assessment too. 


Hadoop's release process is ... not good.  I've been gearing up to make a run 
at a 3.x release for while now. Every corner I turn seems to be littered with 
more crud that needs to be cleaned up and manual processes that make no sense. 
:(

> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
> Attachments: HADOOP-12892.00.patch
>
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-03-21 Thread Sean Busbey (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15204974#comment-15204974
 ] 

Sean Busbey commented on HADOOP-12892:
--

the apache-release profile is usually defined in the apache parent pom (ex: 
[the profile in 
org.apache:apache:17|http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/pom/tags/apache-17/pom.xml?view=markup#l341]).

It's usually set up to help make sure projects are generating valid release 
artifacts. It looks like Hadoop doesn't use the ASF parent pom though?

> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
> Attachments: HADOOP-12892.00.patch
>
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-03-21 Thread Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15204930#comment-15204930
 ] 

Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-12892:
---

bq. Regarding the maven cache, is this at all addressed by the release builds 
not being SNAPSHOT versions? All the precommit stuff should be SNAPSHOT, and I 
doubt there are multiple RMs building the same non-SNAPSHOT release version.

I'll get to this in a second, but be aware there is still a process problem 
here:

a) RM fires off a job on a shared machine to make a release
b) Someone submits a patch that changes hadoop's or some other project's build 
such that it either mistakenly nukes the .m2 directory or maliciously changes 
the contents of jars or other blackhat stuff to other running processes on the 
Jenkins server
c) RM takes release artifacts, signs them (!) and then puts them up for vote, 
completely unaware of what is actually in the package...

In other words, doing releases on the Jenkins slaves is an absolutely terrible 
idea.  Docker is not going to protect us here. (See also 
http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#owned-controlled-hardware, which means 
if we're not breaking the letter of the law, we're definitely breaking the 
spirit...)

Now that we've eliminated running this on jenkins for anything real, we're back 
to RMs running this on their own boxes.  RM who are much more likely to be 
running things in parallel, even on the same branch



> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
> Attachments: HADOOP-12892.00.patch
>
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-03-21 Thread Andrew Wang (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15204783#comment-15204783
 ] 

Andrew Wang commented on HADOOP-12892:
--

Great, thanks for the updates!

bq. I thought about doing it that way, but the bash way is significantly faster 
due to no JVM overhead. But I can change it if people want.

Dropping a comment about the help plugin is sufficient. The build takes about 
15 mins though, so not sure a couple seconds of savings are a big deal.

bq. Yes. I absolutely must fix the maven cache problem.

Regarding the maven cache, is this at all addressed by the release builds not 
being SNAPSHOT versions? All the precommit stuff should be SNAPSHOT, and I 
doubt there are multiple RMs building the same non-SNAPSHOT release version.

Otherwise, is the fix specifying a fresh maven.repo.local?

Happy to help out however, I'm gonna start trying 3.0 builds as soon as this 
goes in.

> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
> Attachments: HADOOP-12892.00.patch
>
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-03-19 Thread Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15202875#comment-15202875
 ] 

Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-12892:
---

Thanks for the review!

bq. it worked except for needing to change /usr/bin/bash to /bin/bash in the 
two scripts. Or should we be using /usr/bin/env to find bash instead?

I'll modify to use env. 

bq. "yetus_abs" doesn't seem yetus specific, rename to something more generic?

Sure.  (At some point, I'm planning on making all of Hadoop's shell code 
dependent upon the yetus bash library so that I've got all the code in one 
place... especially since most of the performance enhancements will likely go 
there first since it's easier for me to get code committed there.)

bq. set_defaults_part1 does some grepping to determine maven variables, can 
also do that with the help plugin:

I thought about doing it that way, but the bash way is significantly faster due 
to no JVM overhead.  But I can change it if people want.

bq.  What does the -Papache-release profile do?

It's part of the maven-release-plugin. I popped it in there as I want to try 
and use it to generate signed jars, fix version numbers, etc during the build 
process.  That's a work in progress.

bq.  If this is generating signatures, then it'd be good to adjust the success 
message to also indicate the paths.

apache-release (or using --sign option) should be triggering a signing phase.  
Agreed that the script should probably remind the user where --artifactsdir is 
located.

bq. typo for imgname in dockermode: "createrelase" -> "createrelease"

Easy fix. :) 

bq. do you think there is anything important feature-wise that is still missing?

Yes. I absolutely must fix the maven cache problem. Any sort of parallel maven 
builds have race conditions.  This means that there is a potential of incorrect 
release artifacts since Hadoop switched to maven and almost with 100% certainty 
since a) Hadoop release instructions moved to building on Jenkins and b) 
parallel builds were enabled on Jenkins in late 2014.  (This means that 
releases made since about 2.6.0 are highly suspect. Whee!)  One of the key 
reasons I added the docker support was to make it easier to force RMs into a 
pseudo-protected customized environment.  Now I just need to complete that 
work. :)

> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
> Attachments: HADOOP-12892.00.patch
>
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-03-18 Thread Andrew Wang (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15202358#comment-15202358
 ] 

Andrew Wang commented on HADOOP-12892:
--

Hi Allen, thanks for working on this. I gave this a try on my machine, and it 
worked except for needing to change /usr/bin/bash to /bin/bash in the two 
scripts. Or should we be using /usr/bin/env to find bash instead?

Some other misc review comments:

* "yetus_abs" doesn't seem yetus specific, rename to something more generic?
* set_defaults_part1 does some grepping to determine maven variables, can also 
do that with the help plugin:

{noformat}
-> % mvn -f hadoop-project/pom.xml help:evaluate -Dexpression=javac.version | 
grep -v "\["
1.7
-> % mvn help:evaluate -Dexpression=project.version | grep -v "\["
3.0.0-SNAPSHOT
{noformat}

* What does the -Papache-release profile do? I don't see it mentioned in our 
pom.xml's, and it at the end it always prints the "don't forget to sign" 
message. If this is generating signatures, then it'd be good to adjust the 
success message to also indicate the paths.
* typo for imgname in dockermode: "createrelase" -> "createrelease"

These comments are all pretty minor though, do you think there is anything 
important feature-wise that is still missing? If not, we could check this in 
after a rev and do the rest as follow-on.

> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
> Attachments: HADOOP-12892.00.patch
>
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-03-07 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15184168#comment-15184168
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-12892:


| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m 9s 
{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} shelldocs {color} | {color:blue} 0m 3s 
{color} | {color:blue} Shelldocs was not available. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s 
{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} test4tests {color} | {color:red} 0m 0s 
{color} | {color:red} The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please 
list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 1m 8s 
{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 6m 
43s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 5m 42s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.8.0_74 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 6m 42s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 9m 0s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m 
43s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 5m 16s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.8.0_74 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 9m 17s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m 14s 
{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 6m 
39s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 5m 40s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_74 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 5m 40s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 6m 40s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 6m 40s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 8m 59s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m 
40s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shellcheck {color} | {color:green} 0m 
9s {color} | {color:green} There were no new shellcheck issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m 
0s {color} | {color:green} Patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} xml {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s 
{color} | {color:green} The patch has no ill-formed XML file. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 5m 24s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_74 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 9m 21s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 94m 53s {color} 
| {color:red} root in the patch failed with JDK v1.8.0_74. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 12m 37s {color} 
| {color:red} root in the patch failed with JDK v1.7.0_95. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m 
27s {color} | {color:green} Patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 197m 25s {color} 
| {color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| JDK v1.8.0_74 Failed junit tests | hadoop.hdfs.TestSafeModeWithStripedFile |
| JDK v1.8.0_74 Timed out junit tests | 
org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.TestLeaseRecovery2 |
| JDK v1.7.0_95 Failed junit tests | hadoop.hdfs.TestSafeModeWithStripedFile |
|   | hadoop.fs.shell.find.TestName |
|   | hadoop.fs.shell.find.TestIname |
|   | 

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-03-07 Thread Chris Nauroth (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15183542#comment-15183542
 ] 

Chris Nauroth commented on HADOOP-12892:


bq. I'll throw some comments in the code so that others aren't confused by it.

Great idea.  Much appreciated.

> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-03-07 Thread Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15183540#comment-15183540
 ] 

Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-12892:
---

OK, that kind of makes sense now.  I missed that Windows wasn't setting 
LIB_DIR.  I'll throw some comments in the code so that others aren't confused 
by it.  Thanks!

> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-03-07 Thread Chris Nauroth (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15183433#comment-15183433
 ] 

Chris Nauroth commented on HADOOP-12892:


[~aw], yes, this is Windows-specific logic.  Windows wants DLLs to be in bin 
instead of the standard lib directory structure.  On Windows, the native build 
artifacts get placed into a bin sub-directory as part of the hadoop-common 
build.  The hadoop-common pom.xml also sets bundle.snappy.in.bin to true, so 
that later the distro knows snappy.dll needs to go here.

bq. This seems to imply that on Windows (which appears to be the only place 
this is used), the libraries have been copied to two different directories...

I don't think so, because there are {{-d}} checks to trigger the copies only if 
the directories exist.  On Windows, {{LIB_DIR}} will not exist and {{BIN_DIR}} 
will exist, so it will only do the copy for {{BIN_DIR}}.  On non-Windows, 
{{LIB_DIR}} will exist and {{BIN_DIR}} will not exist, so it will only do the 
copy for {{LIB_DIR}}.

BTW, it looks like lifting out the dist-layout-stitching script to an external 
file on trunk isn't working for Windows.  I filed HADOOP-12899, and I'll take a 
closer look.


> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-03-07 Thread Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15183354#comment-15183354
 ] 

Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-12892:
---

{code}
if [[ "${bundle.snappy.in.bin}" == "true" ]]; then
  if [[ "${bundle.snappy}" == "true" ]]; then
cd "${snappy.lib}"
$$TAR *snappy* | (cd $${TARGET_BIN_DIR}/; $$UNTAR)
if [[ $? -ne 0 ]]; then
  echo "Bundling snappy bin files failed"
  exit 1
fi
  fi
{code}

Ping [~cnauroth].  I have a question about the logic here...

Why does this cd to snappy.lib and copy the contents into bin when all those 
bits should have already been copied as part of the bundle.snappy into the lib 
directory? This seems to imply that on Windows (which appears to be the only 
place this is used), the libraries have been copied to two different 
directories...

> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-03-05 Thread Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15181821#comment-15181821
 ] 

Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-12892:
---

We could eliminate the vast majority of the manual instructions if we require 
everyone to

* build locally
* use the docker image to make the build


> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-12892) fix/rewrite create-release

2016-03-04 Thread Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15181538#comment-15181538
 ] 

Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-12892:
---

I'm removing -Pnative due to HADOOP-12893 and various other issues with library 
incompatibilities. 

> fix/rewrite create-release
> --
>
> Key: HADOOP-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12892
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: build
>Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
>Assignee: Allen Wittenauer
>
> create-release needs some major surgery.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)