[l10n]core - Romanian translation
This file has the core di translations in Romanian. Eddy __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search - Find what youre looking for faster http://search.yahoo.com debian-installer.tar.bz2 Description: debian-installer.tar.bz2
Bug#235964: partman-auto: Seems to hang when starting
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): I can reproduce this in vmware. It is not just vmware being slow either. set -x shows it is in decode_recipe. It gets the ram size, and then apparently $1 is not set, so the cat without an argument hangs. decode_recipe is being called without a recipe name to decode. partman-auto/choose_recipe is somehow set to . I did not go back further. Either this is somehow triggered by the vmware environment, or it is fixed in version 7 of partman-auto. Version 7 will be in tonight's CD images, so we can see then. The problem is still there with the night's CD. The only difference is the progress bar showing 90% and no more 88%...:-)) In VmWare, of course... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#236257: Part of text not visible
Package: languagechooser when the text (the selections in the menu) is wider than the screen , there is no way to see the part that is out of screen About the version : it is sarge I created a CD with jigdo, using this URL : http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/cd/jigdo-area/i386/sarge-i386-1.jigd o on 2-mar-2004 --- David Balazic mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] HERMES Softlab http://www.hermes-softlab.com Zolajeva 30 Phone: +386 2 450 8851 SI-2000 Maribor Slovenija --- Be excellent to each other. - Bill S. Preston, Esq. Ted Theodore Logan --- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#236125: Dutch string fixed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 just commited fixed string to cvs - -- Cheers, cobaco 1. Encrypted mail preferred (GPG KeyID: 0x86624ABB) 2. Plain-text mail recommended since I move html and double format mails to a low priority folder (they're mainly spam) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFASEKc5ihPJ4ZiSrsRAiMvAJ4s4eOsORO3y+qs+CCCs2T7U1ALIQCfUCv0 hRVYA7bA96JCCOzk7c64LYY= =FUQu -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#235998: partman: DOes not properly display the french E circumflex
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 07:18:48AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Just add a file to build/ with the set of characters you want to add in it, and then we can cat that onto all the other stuff the font reduction runs against.. I don't really understand?. You mean a text file with all these characters, change an existing file (if so, which one?). Please create a new file that lists all of the characters that you'd like to be included in the reduced font. I don't understand if this is an existing feature and you just need me to compelte the file...or create a new file and then you'll take care of doing the magic... You create the new file, we take care of doing the sufficiently advanced technology. -- Matt Kraai[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://ftbfs.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cdebconf - backup support in text frontend
hi folks anyone knows how much work is necessary to finish the backup support in the text frontend? bastian -- Spock: The odds of surviving another attack are 13562190123 to 1, Captain. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#235998: partman: DOes not properly display the french E circumflex
Il ven, 2004-03-05 alle 10:11, Matt Kraai ha scritto: On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 07:18:48AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): [..] Please create a new file that lists all of the characters that you'd like to be included in the reduced font. I don't understand if this is an existing feature and you just need me to compelte the file...or create a new file and then you'll take care of doing the magic... You create the new file, we take care of doing the sufficiently advanced technology. We have the same problem with italian, at least for two characters: 'À' and '°'. Could you please, Christian, add these chars to your file? Thanks, Giuseppe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#235998: partman: DOes not properly display the french E circumflex
2004 03 05 10:47 +0100, Giuseppe Sacco ra: We have the same problem with italian, at least for two characters: '' and ''. Could you please, Christian, add these chars to your file? And for lithuanian, character - '' (E acute). Thanks, -- Kstutis Bilinas [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [l10n]core - Romanian translation
Quoting Eddy Petrisor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): This file has the core di translations in Romanian. Looks like the file is corrupted: .../... -rw-r--r-- / 3224 2004-03-04 22:44:42 debian-installer/utils/debian/po/ro.po tar: Read 512 bytes from debian-installer.tar.bz2 tar: A lone zero block at 161 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Partman : please review templates changes before commiting them
On 5.III.2004 at 6:59 Christian Perrier wrote: Please try to avoid really trivial mistakes like partiton for partition or latter for laterwhen making changes to templates. Sorry about that. I really didn't realise that the translators are going to work on this wrong template before you or someone else manages to improve it. You did so much work to improve the templates of partman that apparently now I am less careful. Anton Zinoviev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: E-mail virus attached account disabling warning
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 11:37:19PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello user of Debian.org e-mail server, Our antivirus software has detected a large ammount of viruses outgoing This has managed to hit a bunch of different mail lists. But at least this is one list where it won't find anyone dumb enough to open the attached virus. -- -- Dale Amon [EMAIL PROTECTED]+44-7802-188325 International linux systems consultancy Hardware software system design, security and networking, systems programming and Admin Have Laptop, Will Travel -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#236286: Sarge: wrong link to the debian bug tracking system
Package: install-doc Severity: minor There's a link http://bugs.debian.org/installer; in the section B.2. Contributing to This Document hooked with the text open bugs against install-doc. I suppose to chage the link to point to http://bugs.debian.org/install-doc;. Regards Medon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian-installer - tar: unrecognized file type
Comments/Problems: 1. Base system install ended in the error message Debootstrap ended with an error followed by tar: unrecognized file type debootstrap.log contained only a copy of tar: unrecognized file type The error log was empty. I get exactly the same, but on an old Pentium I, using floppy disks too. I have built the installer - type netboot - from cvs sources on a powerpc system, and get the same error. I tried different mirrors in different countries but the problem is still the same. Was somebody able to fix this problem? I've got no answer for this problem and all the other postings in this list with the same error ended without a solution. In /target/var/cache/apt/archives I found packages with character sequence 1%3a in its name. Maybe this is the reason for the tar: unrecognized file type errror? How can I find out which package causes this error? -rw-r--r--1 root root61794 May 6 11:55 bsdutils_1%3a2.12-3_powerpc.deb -rw-r--r--1 root root 325394 May 6 11:55 console-tools_1%3a0.2.3dbs-48_powerpc.deb -rw-r--r--1 root root 143618 May 6 11:56 gcc-3.3-base_1%3a3.3.3-0pre3_powerpc.deb -rw-r--r--1 root root42998 May 6 11:56 iputils-ping_3%3a20020927-2_powerpc.deb -rw-r--r--1 root root10836 May 6 11:56 libcap1_1%3a1.10-13_powerpc.deb -rw-r--r--1 root root 115276 May 6 11:56 libconsole_1%3a0.2.3dbs-48_powerpc.deb -rw-r--r--1 root root 306818 May 6 11:56 libdb2_2%3a2.7.7.0-8.1_powerpc.deb -rw-r--r--1 root root82328 May 6 11:56 libgcc1_1%3a3.3.3-0pre3_powerpc.deb -rw-r--r--1 root root 287262 May 6 11:57 libstdc++5_1%3a3.3.3-0pre3_powerpc.deb -rw-r--r--1 root root 255562 May 6 11:57 login_1%3a4.0.3-17_powerpc.deb -rw-r--r--1 root root 130066 May 6 11:57 mailx_1%3a8.1.2-0.20031014cvs-1_powerpc.deb -rw-r--r--1 root root 468490 May 6 11:57 passwd_1%3a4.0.3-17_powerpc.deb -rw-r--r--1 root root 127168 May 6 11:57 pciutils_1%3a2.1.11-7_powerpc.deb -rw-r--r--1 root root 200308 May 6 11:57 procps_1%3a3.1.14-1_powerpc.deb -rw-r--r--1 root root67898 May 6 11:57 zlib1g_1%3a1.2.1-4_powerpc.deb Karl Kappel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#236285: Sarge: Xfree version is 4.2.1
Package: install-doc Severity: minor There's written Debian (maybe 3.1) ships with X11 revision 4.1.0 in the section 2.1.3. Graphics Card, but sarge has XFree version 4.2.1. I even thing the X11 revision x.x.x is not correct. X11 is specification, current revision is R6, while XFree is implementation, version 4.2.1 in Sarge. Regards Medon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ICH5/R SATA disk installation
For my system (ICH5) it turned out to require APIC. Take a look at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=224494 for the full details. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Debian-installer - tar: unrecognized file type
On Friday 05 March 2004 13:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In /target/var/cache/apt/archives I found packages with character sequence
1%3a in its name.
This sequence is caused when you download packages. Colons (':') are changed
to '%3a'.
Try the script below to rename files back to their original names.
#!/bin/bash
# Replace '%3a' in names of packages by ':'
echo Renaming any packages containing %...
for file in `find . -name *%3a*.deb`
do
newfile=`echo $file | sed s/%3a/:/g`
mv -v $file $newfile
done
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#235998: partman: DOes not properly display the french E circumflex
Quoting Matt Kraai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Please create a new file that lists all of the characters that you'd like to be included in the reduced font. I create build/needed-characters and put there a fr file which lists all non ASCII characters we need for our language, and for debconf templates (no, no Euro sign and so on). We can then ask each language coordinator to create such file for his/her own language. Sounds a bit overkill but this will help knowing which language need which character. This is of course targeted on ISO-8859-* (or even only ISO-8859-1) based languages Be aware that the first character is the non breaking space. I did not want to forget it. The file is UTF-8 encoded. If this scheme is OK to you, I can write a README file there and put a note in doc/translations.txt as well as sending a mail to -boot about this. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Debian-installer - tar: unrecognized file type
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 01:38:43PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Comments/Problems: 1. Base system install ended in the error message Debootstrap ended with an error followed by tar: unrecognized file type debootstrap.log contained only a copy of tar: unrecognized file type The error log was empty. I get exactly the same, but on an old Pentium I, using floppy disks too. I have built the installer - type netboot - from cvs sources on a powerpc system, and get the same error. I tried different mirrors in different countries but the problem is still the same. Was somebody able to fix this problem? I've got no answer for this problem and all the other postings in this list with the same error ended without a solution. For a short time there was tar programma the produced tar files that busybox, the program that debian-installer use for tar, not could handle. AFAIK it is fixed. In /target/var/cache/apt/archives I found packages with character sequence 1%3a in its name. snip/ Try a recent version. Geert Stappers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#236293: unresolved symbols when insmod 8390
Package: install Version: 20040303 (floppies) Severity: normal I have used the net-drivers.img (20040303) floppy. Since I have problems with my nic I tried to insmod 8390 from the command line of the console (2nd VT, alt+F2). I got: Using /lib/modules/2.4.25-1-386/kernel/drivers/net/8390.o insmod: Unresolved symbol bitreverse_Rbaeb160c insmod: Unresolved symbol crc32_le_Ra34f1ef5 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i586) Kernel: Linux 2.6.3-2.custom586.1 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#236293: unresolved symbols when insmod 8390
Shaul Karl a écrit : Package: install Version: 20040303 (floppies) Severity: normal I have used the net-drivers.img (20040303) floppy. Since I have problems with my nic I tried to insmod 8390 try 'modprobe 8390' instead sylvain from the command line of the console (2nd VT, alt+F2). I got: Using /lib/modules/2.4.25-1-386/kernel/drivers/net/8390.o insmod: Unresolved symbol bitreverse_Rbaeb160c insmod: Unresolved symbol crc32_le_Ra34f1ef5 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i586) Kernel: Linux 2.6.3-2.custom586.1 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: d-i manual license
On Thu, 2004-03-04 at 17:41, Joey Hess wrote: It's phrased as a request; contrast it with the earlier requirement (which restates requirements of the GPL and copyright in general). I see no indicaton that it is intended to be logally binding or part of the license. I see, I was confusing require and request. Sorry, I'm not a native English speaker. Keep up the good work. Gerardo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#235998: partman: DOes not properly display the french E circumflex
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 01:58:35PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: Quoting Matt Kraai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Please create a new file that lists all of the characters that you'd like to be included in the reduced font. I create build/needed-characters and put there a fr file which lists all non ASCII characters we need for our language, and for debconf templates (no, no Euro sign and so on). We can then ask each language coordinator to create such file for his/her own language. Sounds a bit overkill but this will help knowing which language need which character. This is of course targeted on ISO-8859-* (or even only ISO-8859-1) based languages Be aware that the first character is the non breaking space. I did not want to forget it. The file is UTF-8 encoded. If this scheme is OK to you, I can write a README file there and put a note in doc/translations.txt as well as sending a mail to -boot about this. OK. -- Matt Kraai[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://ftbfs.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#222630: acknowledged by developer (no longer uses ext2)
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 12:39:17PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 07:55:53AM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote: On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 10:37:27AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: partconf no longer offers ext2 as a choice, so this bug is resolved. Yoiks, what about people who want ext2? Erm. Yeah. Please keep. hurd-i386 only has ext2 and ufs as reasonable choices right now. I've not gotten definite proof that aboot (Alpha bootloader) will handle ext3 partitions altogether correctly, so this would be a problem there as well. Also, the pegasos OF can boot from ext2 partitions, but it knows nothing about ext3. I know that a cleanly unmounted ext3 can pass for an ext2, but i believe that this is not a safe way to handle it. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: partman review
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 12:51:10AM +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote: Attached to this mail you will find a small script `client' and a small C-program server.c. Compile the server and then start the client. The client should print infininte number of strings 'How do you do'. If it doesn't do this on your machine I will be happy as this means that you have to debug two very short programs. Acording to the log file you send the server has finished 8. from the scenario only once and then never reaches again 1. The client waits for it. This means that the problem is somewhere between 9. and 13. Ok, i did that and : 1) when compiling, i get a warning : server.c:26: attention : comparison is always true due to limited range of data type 2) Launching first the server, it exits immediately. Launching then the client, it prints Hod do you do ? 1 time, and then waits. Launching the server again hangs. 3) launching first the client prints How do you do ? 1 time, and doesn't seem to care about the server running or not. launching the server does the same as above. So, i suppose this does make it happy for you ? What should we debug in order to get it working ? Anyway, the situation is a bit different right now, since i do see the interface, but the progress bar stops at 33%, Scanning disks, i think. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[l10n] What to do when package is just released?
Hi, Many d-i packages are released recently and I would like to know what to do when package is just released. Is the following command OK, followed by adding UNRELEASED after (version)? It's good if this is documented in doc/translations.txt. $ dch -i BTW I did this for retriever/choose-mirror, but without adding UNRELEASED. Regards, ogi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [l10n] List of packages for which debian/changelog is updated automatically
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 04:34:26PM +0200, Ognyan Kulev wrote: For which packages automatic changelogs for translations are generated? I only know about partman. It's best if this list is in doc/translations.txt. We are currently in the early testing stage, I think, it will cover all of the changelogs pretty soon, but for now, every changelog, which is being updated by a script, contains an appropriate note. So there is no need for a list now -- as soon as we convert, the notice about updating changelog will just disappear from the translations.txt. Packages that are updated by the script I am aware of: partman-*, aboot-installer, netcfg. -- Nikolai Prokoschenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] / Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [l10n] What to do when package is just released?
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 04:39:24PM +0200, Ognyan Kulev wrote: Many d-i packages are released recently and I would like to know what to do when package is just released. Is the following command OK, followed by adding UNRELEASED after (version)? It's good if this is documented in doc/translations.txt. $ dch -i BTW I did this for retriever/choose-mirror, but without adding UNRELEASED. It is actualy documented, at least I think I got my information from there. ;) 'dch -i' increases the version of the package, which is not appropriate if the changelog already contains an UNRELEASED tag. Some maintainers provided such a tag immediately after the release, so that the translators do not junk their logs. In general: if you see an 'unstable' in the top ne, do a dch -i and change the top line to 'UNRELEASED'. If there is an 'UNRELEASED', put your changes below it. So, in short: you have understood it right, except for the last paragraph with choose-mirror -- you should have changed 'unstable' to 'UNRELEASED'. -- Nikolai Prokoschenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] / Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: partman review
On 5.III.2004 at 15:13 Sven Luther wrote:
1) when compiling, i get a warning :
server.c:26: attention : comparison is always true due to limited
range of data type
This discovered the cause of the problem, thanks. In the following
expression:
while (EOF != (c = fgetc(outfifo))) {}
I have defined `c' as char, but it should be int instead.
So, i suppose this does make it happy for you ? What should we debug in
order to get it working ?
I am twice happy -- because now the problem is resolved. :-))
Anton Zinoviev
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: partman review
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 05:19:56PM +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
On 5.III.2004 at 15:13 Sven Luther wrote:
1) when compiling, i get a warning :
server.c:26: attention : comparison is always true due to limited
range of data type
This discovered the cause of the problem, thanks. In the following
expression:
while (EOF != (c = fgetc(outfifo))) {}
I have defined `c' as char, but it should be int instead.
Ok, indeed, this solves the problem.
So, i suppose this does make it happy for you ? What should we debug in
order to get it working ?
I am twice happy -- because now the problem is resolved. :-))
Cool.
Can you then upload a fixed version as soon as possible, so that we can
further test debian-installer on powerpc ? Well, probably not before
tomorrow, but still.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [l10n] What to do when package is just released?
Nikolai Prokoschenko wrote: So, in short: you have understood it right, except for the last paragraph with choose-mirror -- you should have changed 'unstable' to 'UNRELEASED'. I've just changed it. Thanks for the explanation. Regards, ogi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#235376: copying disk leads to error about resize
On 28.II.2004 at 19:14 Joey Hess wrote: I decided to copy the contents of my usb key to /tmp using partman. After a while, I got an error message, saying GNU parted can not resize this partition to this size. We're working on it!. I will not be able fix this before beta3. So we have two options: 1. remove from partman the menu item for copying. 2. keep this bug and go with it (it can be documented) How we will proceed? Anton Zinoviev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#236320: installation-reports
Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: 22/02/2004 16:19 sarge-i386-netinst-1.iso Date: 22/02/2004 16:30 Method: I installed from the cd Processor: AMD ATHLON 2200+ on ASUS MB Memory: 512 DDR Root Device: IDE? SCSI? Name of device? Base System Installation Checklist: Initial boot worked:[ O ] Configure network HW: [ O ] Config network: [ O ] Detect CD: [ O ] Load installer modules: [ O ] Detect hard drives: [ O ] Partition hard drives: [ O ] Create file systems:[ E ] Mount partitions: [ ] Install base system:[ ] Install boot loader:[ ] Reboot: [ ] [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Comments/Problems: I'm belgian, speaking french and using a belgian keyboard. I launched the installer from the cd, the normal way (without specifying any option). It launched perfectly ;-), seemed to detect the hardware very well. I've choosen my language and keyboard , but when I had to format my partition, with cfdisk, this one had problems with special characters, such as accents , ç and so on. An english version of cfdisk showhs those options : # [Bootable] [ Delete ] [ Help ] [Maximize] [ Print ] [ Quit ] [ Type ] [ Units ] # But in french, Bootable is translated amorçable , and this word needs a special character so the output was [amor ], and sometinmes the option was empty, like [] . I think there is (was ) a problem with the encoding of the characters (UTF-8 or anything like that). Of course this is not a critical bug, but for thos who will discover Debian , in french , this may be annoying. I hope that fixing this bug will not take too much time, and that the stable version of the sarge will be released soon. QTN -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Debian-installer - tar: unrecognized file type
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 01:38:43PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Comments/Problems: 1. Base system install ended in the error message Debootstrap ended with an error followed by tar: unrecognized file type debootstrap.log contained only a copy of tar: unrecognized file type The error log was empty. I get exactly the same, but on an old Pentium I, using floppy disks too. I have built the installer - type netboot - from cvs sources on a powerpc system, and get the same error. I tried different mirrors in different countries but the problem is still the same. Was somebody able to fix this problem? I've got no answer for this problem and all the other postings in this list with the same error ended without a solution. For a short time there was tar programma the produced tar files that busybox, the program that debian-installer use for tar, not could handle. AFAIK it is fixed. In /target/var/cache/apt/archives I found packages with character sequence 1%3a in its name. snip/ Try a recent version. Geert Stappers Thanks, I used busybox-cvs-20040101-4 which worked until last week. Now I fetched and compiled the latest busybox-cvs-20040101-7 and package names are correct now and tar works again. Karl Kappel
Bug#231755: marked as done (rootfs is not replaced correctly)
Your message dated Fri, 5 Mar 2004 17:38:37 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#230657: rootfs is not replaced correctly has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Feb 2004 18:19:19 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 01 10:19:19 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from (smtp.fmi.uni-sofia.bg) [62.44.101.9] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AnMB0-00068Z-00; Sun, 01 Feb 2004 10:19:19 -0800 Received: from fmi.uni-sofia.bg ([62.44.101.57]) by smtp.fmi.uni-sofia.bg for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 1 Feb 2004 20:16:21 +0200 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2004 20:16:21 +0200 From: Ognyan Kulev [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: Faculty of Mathematics and Informatics User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5a (Windows/20040120) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: rootfs is not replaced correctly Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 X-Spam-Level: Package: installation-reports I've installed Debian using 2004-01-30 build from http://people.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sid_d-i/netinst/i386/ . I used partman and set swap partition and root partition. But later grub couldn't install. The reason was that there was something like that in /target/etc/fstab: rootfs / That is, rootfs is not replaced with name of root partition, although I set in partman that /dev/hda6 should be root partition. After fixing this, grub installed correctly. That's all that I see as problem. Regards, ogi --- Received: (at 231755-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Mar 2004 15:33:37 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 05 07:33:37 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from lml.bas.bg [195.96.224.121] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AzHKT-0003Tl-00; Fri, 05 Mar 2004 07:33:37 -0800 Received: from anton by lml.bas.bg with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AzHPJ-0001Oy-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 05 Mar 2004 17:38:37 +0200 Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 17:38:37 +0200 From: Anton Zinoviev [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#230657: rootfs is not replaced correctly Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_05 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_05 X-Spam-Level: On 1.II.2004 at 20:16 Ognyan Kulev wrote: The reason was that there was something like that in /target/etc/fstab: rootfs/ Thanks for your bug-report. I belive that it was fixed in version 10 of partman. Anton Zinoviev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tasksel translations
Christian Perrier wrote: On Monday, the repos were sometimes up, sometimes down... This SVN thing needs to be sorted out now. Who then could we bother about this ? wiggy arch.d.o and svn.d.o are stable now wiggy almost all preparation for moving alioth have been made joeyh so they're only locked until alioth move is complete? wiggy I intend to do the move tomorrow afternoon and estimate it to take about 3 hours wiggy joeyh: they're locked until the machine actually knows the unix accounts again wiggy and those are stored in the alioth database which I haved copied over yet -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Partitioning schemes for partman-auto
Hi! So far we have two usefull partitioning schemes. Please review the numbers and the names of the schemes (the names will be shown to the users in a menu). = Name: All files in one partition (recommended for new users) Minimal Typical Maximal / 1000Mb 10GbGb swap 64Mb512Mb 512Mb = Name: Separate home directories (future installations can preserve users data) Minimal Typical Maximal / 300Mb 3Gb 7Gb /home 100Mb 10Gb1000Gb swap 64Mb400%512Mb = I was thinking also for a partitioning scheme that tries to follow the recommendations in Securing Debian Manual, but as Falk Hueffner pointed, more advanced partitioning schemes are used by people who do this stuff manually. Anton Zinoviev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
queries re ARM port
OK, I've spent a couple of evenings reading the docs and trying to grok the whole thing. I think I've mostly got it but I have a few questions: 1) Some .cfg files in build/config/ specify MEDIA_TYPE instead of TYPE. Type seems to be the main things that decides which package lists are used, but I don't quite see how it works with MEDIA_TYPE - can someone explain the difference? I started adding some text on the bottom of build/README about what the various makfile variables are for (as most of the job seems to be filling in the right variables in your .cfg fragment so long as you don't want to do anything too exotic) - a crib sheet for these would be handier than having to work through the makefile and scrits to work out what to fill in. As I don't know what I'm doing I am in danger of talking rubbish of course - feel free to correct me, or add some more :-) 2) I haven't worked out yet where I have to tell the system that I want to use a serial console. Does it need to be set in Cdebconf or in a kernel boot string somewhere? This feels like a dumb question, but wandering about hasn't answered it for me yet. 3)d-i 'doesn't support cross-compiling'. This makes life slightly harder for me, although it's better than bootfloppies, where native compiles took forever. Looking at it, I can't see that much needs to change to make this possible except getting the various instances of dpkg-architecture to give the right answers (which I think can be done with dpkg-cross). Then it should just get .udebs of the correct arch. Is there something I haven't appreciated about how it works which is going to make cross-compiling really tricky? If not I might try and get it working, just because it's convenient for me. TIA (I'm away next week so nothing doing for a while - it's peter's turn for a bit now :-) Wookey -- Aleph One Ltd, Bottisham, CAMBRIDGE, CB5 9BA, UK Tel +44 (0) 1223 811679 work: http://www.aleph1.co.uk/ play: http://www.chaos.org.uk/~wookey/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Reassign 235375 from partman to partman-auto
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 235375 partman-auto Bug#235375: autopartitioning scheme makes /var too small Bug reassigned from package `partman' to `partman-auto'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#235444: base-config loops over the same questions
That was helpful. It seems this problem is probably limited to the el_GR utf-8 locale. In the log file I see it grep for the menu item for configuring the MTA, and somehow it fails to find the greek translation in the menu mapping file. It could be some 8-bit cleanness issue corrupting the string as it goes around in base-config. I am not able to reproduce it locally. I'll try on a fresh install. Failing anything else, we could probably remove the translation of that menu item, but I'd like to track down the real bug. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: queries re ARM port
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wookey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 3)d-i 'doesn't support cross-compiling'. This makes life slightly harder for me, although it's better than bootfloppies, where native compiles took forever. Looking at it, I can't see that much needs to change to make this possible except getting the various instances of dpkg-architecture to give the right answers (which I think can be done with dpkg-cross). Then it should just get .udebs of the correct arch. Is there something I haven't appreciated about how it works which is going to make cross-compiling really tricky? If not I might try and get it working, just because it's convenient for me. TIA (I'm away next week so nothing doing for a while - it's peter's turn for a bit now :-) I'm actually pretty busy next week, but I'm following this as closely as possible nevertheless. The issue of cross compiling may or may not be of increasing importance. It's not as bad for me, as I have a relatively fast ARM machine, and can compile everything on it natively for other ARM architectures. I don't know how feasable it might be to use scratchbox, or the mechanisms Wookey has named. Under boot-floppies, it was the documentation that took by far the longest, although that only had to be done once. It may well be that we see an explosion of ARM architectures this year that can sensibly run Debian, but on which compiling things like this might be suitably tedious that there's increased demand for cross compiling. -- Peter Naulls - [EMAIL PROTECTED]| http://www.chocky.org/ AcornSearch - http://www.drobe.co.uk/ | Relevant RISC OS searches -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#236330: partman - blocks on s390
Package: partman Version: 12 Severity: grave partman is unusable on s390 and blocks completely after issuing a error about the sector size. Bastian -- I'm a soldier, not a diplomat. I can only tell the truth. -- Kirk, Errand of Mercy, stardate 3198.9 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#235964: partman-auto: Seems to hang when starting
Christian Perrier wrote: Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): I can reproduce this in vmware. It is not just vmware being slow either. set -x shows it is in decode_recipe. It gets the ram size, and then apparently $1 is not set, so the cat without an argument hangs. decode_recipe is being called without a recipe name to decode. partman-auto/choose_recipe is somehow set to . I did not go back further. Either this is somehow triggered by the vmware environment, or it is fixed in version 7 of partman-auto. Version 7 will be in tonight's CD images, so we can see then. The problem is still there with the night's CD. The only difference is the progress bar showing 90% and no more 88%...:-)) In VmWare, of course... Ok, I've found that this is just that we have small drives and partman-auto is not able to come up with any recipes that fit (which is why it doesn't prompt for any), and it lacks a check for this. I'll add a check. My vmware drive is 300 mb. Memory is 95 mb. Yours? -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#235998: partman: DOes not properly display the french E circumflex
Quoting Giuseppe Sacco ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): We have the same problem with italian, at least for two characters: 'À' and '°'. Could you please, Christian, add these chars to your file? I encourage you, Giuseppe, to add these character to an 'i' file in build/needed-characters. See the fr file there. Please be redundant : even if À is already mentioned in fr, please mention it in it. INdeed mention here ALL non ASCII characters you need for italian templates in d-i EVEN if they are already mentioned elsewhere. As I wrote in another mail, I'll put a note about this in a README file there as well as in doc/translations.txt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of nobootloader_0.0.8_i386.changes
nobootloader_0.0.8_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: nobootloader_0.0.8.dsc nobootloader_0.0.8.tar.gz nobootloader_0.0.8_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#228922: marked as done (partman-partitioning: Incorrect title for dialog boxes)
Your message dated Fri, 5 Mar 2004 18:11:02 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Partman already has correct title for its dialog boxes has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2004 17:57:30 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 21 09:57:30 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from lns-th2-5f-81-56-227-253.adsl.proxad.net (kheops.homeunix.org) [81.56.227.253] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AjMbY-0007NS-00; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 09:57:30 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kheops.homeunix.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC500410D; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 18:56:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from kheops.homeunix.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kheops [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23059-08; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 18:56:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org (mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org [192.168.1.3]) by kheops.homeunix.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DA20410C; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 18:56:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org [127.0.0.1]) by mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3521D064; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 18:56:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mykerinos [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07386-05; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 18:56:48 +0100 (CET) Received: by mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org (Postfix, from userid 7426) id 5C0B6D05B; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 18:56:48 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: partman-partitioning: Incorrect title for dialog boxes X-Mailer: reportbug 2.38 Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 18:56:48 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p5 (Debian) at mykerinos X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p5 (Debian) at kheops.frmug.org Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_20 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_20 X-Spam-Level: Package: partman-partitioning Severity: normal Partman-* packages do not seem to have a correct title on their dialog boxes. All of them display Debian installer main menu instead of something like Partition storage devices of something like this. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux mykerinos 2.6.1 #1 Tue Jan 20 16:37:55 CET 2004 i686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) --- Received: (at 228922-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Mar 2004 17:01:54 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 05 09:01:54 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from lml.bas.bg [195.96.224.121] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AzIhu-0002SX-00; Fri, 05 Mar 2004 09:01:54 -0800 Received: from anton by lml.bas.bg with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AzImm-0003qz-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 05 Mar 2004 19:06:56 +0200 Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 18:11:02 +0200 From: Anton Zinoviev [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 228922-done Subject: Partman already has correct title for its dialog boxes Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Resent-Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 19:06:56 +0200 Resent-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Resent-Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_05 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.1 required=4.0 tests=TO_MALFORMED autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_05 X-Spam-Level: *** I don't know when thas was fixed (probably by you), but it is. :-) Anton Zinoviev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Accuse de Reception] fr.usenet.reponses
Bonjour, Vous avez posté un article sur le forum fr.usenet.reponses, ce présent message est une réponse automatique, il est inutile d'y répondre. fr.usenet.reponses est destiné à recevoir les Conseils d'utilisations et les documents relatifs à Usenet en général. Si l'article que vous venez d'envoyer sur fr.usenet.reponses est un document à ajouter, un modérateur va vous répondre sous peu de manière à ce que cet ajout soit fait. Si ce n'est pas un document à ajouter, alors aucune réponse personnelle ne vous sera faite par les modérateurs. En effet, le forum fr.usenet.reponses est un forum en lecture seule, c'est à dire qu'il est inutile d'y poster une question à propos d'Usenet. Ces questions doivent être posté dans le forum news:fr.bienvenue.questions. Nous vous encourageons fortement à lire les articles présents dans le forum news:fr.usenet.reponses et dans le forum news:fr.bienvenue. Dans ce dernier, vous trouverez une table des forums fr.*, disponible à l'adresse : http://www.aminautes.org/forums/tablefr.html Nous vous encourageons vivement à lire ce document pour trouver le bon forum où poster votre question. Cordialement, -- L'équipe de modération de fr.usenet.reponses. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
nobootloader_0.0.8_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: nobootloader_0.0.8.dsc to pool/main/n/nobootloader/nobootloader_0.0.8.dsc nobootloader_0.0.8.tar.gz to pool/main/n/nobootloader/nobootloader_0.0.8.tar.gz nobootloader_0.0.8_all.udeb to pool/main/n/nobootloader/nobootloader_0.0.8_all.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
nobootloader override disparity
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): nobootloader_0.0.8_all.udeb: package says priority is standard, override says optional. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload. If you feel the override is incorrect then please reply to this mail and explain why. [NB: this is an automatically generated mail; if you replied to one like it before and have not received a response yet, please ignore this mail. Your reply needs to be processed by a human and will be in due course, but until then the installer will send these automated mails; sorry.] -- Debian distribution maintenance software (This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [l10n] List of packages for which debian/changelog is updated automatically
Nikolai Prokoschenko wrote: We are currently in the early testing stage, I think, it will cover all of the changelogs pretty soon, but for now, every changelog, which is being updated by a script, contains an appropriate note. So there is no need for a list now -- as soon as we convert, the notice about updating changelog will just disappear from the translations.txt. Packages that are updated by the script I am aware of: partman-*, aboot-installer, netcfg. I just released version 8 of partman-auto, and the script seemed to think that the same set of translations were updated in this version as in version 7. I doubt they did. Anyone know why? -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processing of partman_14_i386.changes
partman_14_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: partman_14.dsc partman_14.tar.gz partman_14_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
debian-installer_20040303_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: debian-installer-demo_20040303_i386.deb to pool/main/d/debian-installer/debian-installer-demo_20040303_i386.deb debian-installer_20040303.dsc to pool/main/d/debian-installer/debian-installer_20040303.dsc debian-installer_20040303.tar.gz to pool/main/d/debian-installer/debian-installer_20040303.tar.gz Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
partman-xfs_1_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: partman-xfs_1.dsc to pool/main/p/partman-xfs/partman-xfs_1.dsc partman-xfs_1.tar.gz to pool/main/p/partman-xfs/partman-xfs_1.tar.gz partman-xfs_1_all.udeb to pool/main/p/partman-xfs/partman-xfs_1_all.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Closing bugs: 235368 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
linux-kernel-di_0.42_source+i386+alpha+ia64+m68k+mips+mipsel+powerpc+sparc.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: affs-modules-2.2.25-mac-di_0.42_m68k.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/affs-modules-2.2.25-mac-di_0.42_m68k.udeb affs-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-di_0.42_powerpc.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/affs-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-di_0.42_powerpc.udeb affs-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-small-di_0.42_powerpc.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/affs-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-small-di_0.42_powerpc.udeb brltty-modules-2.4.22-itanium-di_0.42_ia64.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/brltty-modules-2.4.22-itanium-di_0.42_ia64.udeb brltty-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-small-di_0.42_powerpc.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/brltty-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-small-di_0.42_powerpc.udeb brltty-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.42_i386.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/brltty-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.42_i386.udeb brltty-modules-2.4.24-1-generic-di_0.42_alpha.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/brltty-modules-2.4.24-1-generic-di_0.42_alpha.udeb brltty-modules-2.4.24-speakup-di_0.42_i386.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/brltty-modules-2.4.24-speakup-di_0.42_i386.udeb brltty-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.42_i386.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/brltty-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.42_i386.udeb cdrom-core-modules-2.4.22-itanium-di_0.42_ia64.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/cdrom-core-modules-2.4.22-itanium-di_0.42_ia64.udeb cdrom-core-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-small-di_0.42_powerpc.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/cdrom-core-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-small-di_0.42_powerpc.udeb cdrom-core-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.42_i386.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/cdrom-core-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.42_i386.udeb cdrom-core-modules-2.4.24-1-generic-di_0.42_alpha.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/cdrom-core-modules-2.4.24-1-generic-di_0.42_alpha.udeb cdrom-core-modules-2.4.24-speakup-di_0.42_i386.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/cdrom-core-modules-2.4.24-speakup-di_0.42_i386.udeb cdrom-core-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.42_i386.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/cdrom-core-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.42_i386.udeb cdrom-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.42_i386.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/cdrom-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.42_i386.udeb cdrom-modules-2.4.24-1-generic-di_0.42_alpha.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/cdrom-modules-2.4.24-1-generic-di_0.42_alpha.udeb cdrom-modules-2.4.24-speakup-di_0.42_i386.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/cdrom-modules-2.4.24-speakup-di_0.42_i386.udeb cdrom-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.42_i386.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/cdrom-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.42_i386.udeb ext3-modules-2.4.22-itanium-di_0.42_ia64.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/ext3-modules-2.4.22-itanium-di_0.42_ia64.udeb ext3-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-small-di_0.42_powerpc.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/ext3-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-small-di_0.42_powerpc.udeb ext3-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.42_i386.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/ext3-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.42_i386.udeb ext3-modules-2.4.24-1-generic-di_0.42_alpha.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/ext3-modules-2.4.24-1-generic-di_0.42_alpha.udeb ext3-modules-2.4.24-speakup-di_0.42_i386.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/ext3-modules-2.4.24-speakup-di_0.42_i386.udeb ext3-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.42_i386.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/ext3-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.42_i386.udeb fat-modules-2.2.25-mac-di_0.42_m68k.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/fat-modules-2.2.25-mac-di_0.42_m68k.udeb fat-modules-2.4.22-itanium-di_0.42_ia64.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/fat-modules-2.4.22-itanium-di_0.42_ia64.udeb fat-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-small-di_0.42_powerpc.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/fat-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-small-di_0.42_powerpc.udeb fat-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.42_i386.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/fat-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.42_i386.udeb fat-modules-2.4.24-amiga-di_0.42_m68k.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/fat-modules-2.4.24-amiga-di_0.42_m68k.udeb fat-modules-2.4.24-speakup-di_0.42_i386.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/fat-modules-2.4.24-speakup-di_0.42_i386.udeb fat-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.42_i386.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/fat-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.42_i386.udeb fb-modules-2.4.22-itanium-di_0.42_ia64.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/fb-modules-2.4.22-itanium-di_0.42_ia64.udeb fb-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-small-di_0.42_powerpc.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/fb-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-small-di_0.42_powerpc.udeb fb-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.42_i386.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/fb-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.42_i386.udeb fb-modules-2.4.24-1-generic-di_0.42_alpha.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/fb-modules-2.4.24-1-generic-di_0.42_alpha.udeb fb-modules-2.4.24-speakup-di_0.42_i386.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/fb-modules-2.4.24-speakup-di_0.42_i386.udeb fb-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.42_i386.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/fb-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.42_i386.udeb firewire-core-modules-2.4.22-itanium-di_0.42_ia64.udeb to
Fixed in NMU of partman 14
tag 235968 + fixed quit This message was generated automatically in response to a non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows. -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 13:57:23 -0500 Source: partman Binary: partman Architecture: source i386 Version: 14 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Install System Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: partman- Partition the storage devices (partman) (udeb) Closes: 235968 Changes: partman (14) unstable; urgency=low . * Anton Zinoviev - add dependency on archdetect. New function in definitions.sh: default_disk_label. * Joey Hess - Change partman/text/finished_with_partition yet. again. Closes: #235968 - New cdebconf is in the archive, so re-enable the space escape code. * Christian Perrier - templates: s/partiton/partition s/latter/later * Updated translations: - Czech (cs.po) by Miroslav Kure - Greek, Modern (1453-) (el.po) by Konstantinos Margaritis - Finnish (fi.po) by Tapio Lehtonen - French (fr.po) by Christian Perrier - Hungarian (hu.po) by VERÓK István - Italian (it.po) by Stefano Canepa - Japanese (ja.po) by Kenshi Muto - Korean (ko.po) by Changwoo Ryu - Lithuanian (lt.po) by Kęstutis Biliūnas - Bokmal, Norwegian (nb.po) by Axel Bojer - (nn.po) by Håvard Korsvoll - Portuguese (pt.po) by Miguel Figueiredo - Portuguese (Brazil) (pt_BR.po) by André Luís Lopes - Romanian (ro.po) by Eddy Petrisor - Slovak (sk.po) by Peter KLFMANiK Mann - Albanian (sq.po) by Elian Myftiu - Ukrainian (uk.po) by Eugeniy Meshcheryakov - Simplified Chinese (zh_CN.po) by Carlos Z.F. Liu Files: d783e425539aa753f90ea574a3bf1641 624 debian-installer standard partman_14.dsc 63681e560c787f557eff8bbf3a6a38c6 55761 debian-installer standard partman_14.tar.gz e4ea85c0a2f5beace61773d0b6d0da31 52022 debian-installer standard partman_14_i386.udeb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFASLzE2tp5zXiKP0wRAnpbAKCV29UJac9Xsx0DAbYIeXP8onr5WwCgkAVQ DI71yF0AeWh+VPSTf2F1wb0= =sqLO -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
partman_14_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: partman_14.dsc to pool/main/p/partman/partman_14.dsc partman_14.tar.gz to pool/main/p/partman/partman_14.tar.gz partman_14_i386.udeb to pool/main/p/partman/partman_14_i386.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting bugs to severity fixed: 235968 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
partman-reiserfs_1_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: partman-reiserfs_1.dsc to pool/main/p/partman-reiserfs/partman-reiserfs_1.dsc partman-reiserfs_1.tar.gz to pool/main/p/partman-reiserfs/partman-reiserfs_1.tar.gz partman-reiserfs_1_all.udeb to pool/main/p/partman-reiserfs/partman-reiserfs_1_all.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Closing bugs: 236202 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Partitioning schemes for partman-auto
Anton Zinoviev wrote: Hi! So far we have two usefull partitioning schemes. Please review the numbers and the names of the schemes (the names will be shown to the users in a menu). = Name: All files in one partition (recommended for new users) Minimal Typical Maximal / 1000Mb 10GbGb I think more like 500 mb should do for minimal. swap 64Mb512Mb 512Mb = Name: Separate home directories (future installations can preserve users data) I think that the bit in parens here is too complicated. Users are probably not thinking about future installations when installing Debian and autopartitioning. Minimal Typical Maximal / 300Mb 3Gb 7Gb /home 100Mb 10Gb1000Gb swap 64Mb400%512Mb = I was thinking also for a partitioning scheme that tries to follow the recommendations in Securing Debian Manual, but as Falk Hueffner pointed, more advanced partitioning schemes are used by people who do this stuff manually. There might be something to be said for just slapping on one large partition or some other suitable generic scheme and not asking the user for a scheme at all in high priority. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Fixed in NMU of partman 14
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 235968 + fixed Bug#235968: partman/text/finished_with_partition text not clear enough Tags were: pending Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#235368: marked as done (need xfs support)
Your message dated Fri, 05 Mar 2004 13:03:35 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#235368: fixed in partman-xfs 1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Feb 2004 00:04:44 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 28 16:04:44 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AxERo-0008NO-00; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 16:04:44 -0800
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (pm3naxs21-20.access.naxs.com [216.98.95.20])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN Joey Hess, Issuer Joey Hess (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9765217FCE
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 00:04:37 + (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id A43AB6F3B0; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 19:04:52 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 19:04:52 -0500
From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: need xfs and reiserfs support
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=17pEHd4RhPHOinZp
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.48
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_27
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_27
X-Spam-Level:
--17pEHd4RhPHOinZp
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: partman
Severity: important
Tags: d-i
We cannot use partman as our default partitioner until it supports these
two often-requested filesystems.
-- System Information:
Found unknown policy: ('1', 'pool')Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.25
Locale: LANG=3Den_US, LC_CTYPE=3Den_US
--=20
see shy jo
--17pEHd4RhPHOinZp
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAQSykd8HHehbQuO8RAnfoAKC8ypkrIb17eL7vm3Nc649hfYZEGwCffM5T
I8JQ4bxRikrROwbD2g2sxe4=
=5dQK
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--17pEHd4RhPHOinZp--
---
Received: (at 235368-close) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Mar 2004 18:08:06 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 05 10:08:06 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AzJjy-0008OY-00; Fri, 05 Mar 2004 10:08:06 -0800
Received: from troup by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AzJfb-00087z-00; Fri, 05 Mar 2004 13:03:35 -0500
From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.28 $
Subject: Bug#235368: fixed in partman-xfs 1
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: James Troup [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 13:03:35 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_05
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_05
X-Spam-Level:
Source: partman-xfs
Source-Version: 1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
partman-xfs, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
partman-xfs_1.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-xfs/partman-xfs_1.dsc
partman-xfs_1.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-xfs/partman-xfs_1.tar.gz
partman-xfs_1_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-xfs/partman-xfs_1_all.udeb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated partman-xfs package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
Bug#236202: marked as done (need reiserfs support)
Your message dated Fri, 05 Mar 2004 13:03:25 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#236202: fixed in partman-reiserfs 1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Feb 2004 00:04:44 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 28 16:04:44 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AxERo-0008NO-00; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 16:04:44 -0800
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (pm3naxs21-20.access.naxs.com [216.98.95.20])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN Joey Hess, Issuer Joey Hess (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9765217FCE
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 00:04:37 + (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id A43AB6F3B0; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 19:04:52 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 19:04:52 -0500
From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: need xfs and reiserfs support
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=17pEHd4RhPHOinZp
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.48
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_27
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_27
X-Spam-Level:
--17pEHd4RhPHOinZp
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: partman
Severity: important
Tags: d-i
We cannot use partman as our default partitioner until it supports these
two often-requested filesystems.
-- System Information:
Found unknown policy: ('1', 'pool')Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.25
Locale: LANG=3Den_US, LC_CTYPE=3Den_US
--=20
see shy jo
--17pEHd4RhPHOinZp
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAQSykd8HHehbQuO8RAnfoAKC8ypkrIb17eL7vm3Nc649hfYZEGwCffM5T
I8JQ4bxRikrROwbD2g2sxe4=
=5dQK
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--17pEHd4RhPHOinZp--
---
Received: (at 236202-close) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Mar 2004 18:08:16 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 05 10:08:16 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AzJk8-0008Oo-00; Fri, 05 Mar 2004 10:08:16 -0800
Received: from troup by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AzJfR-00087i-00; Fri, 05 Mar 2004 13:03:25 -0500
From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.28 $
Subject: Bug#236202: fixed in partman-reiserfs 1
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: James Troup [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 13:03:25 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_05
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_05
X-Spam-Level:
Source: partman-reiserfs
Source-Version: 1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
partman-reiserfs, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
partman-reiserfs_1.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-reiserfs/partman-reiserfs_1.dsc
partman-reiserfs_1.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-reiserfs/partman-reiserfs_1.tar.gz
partman-reiserfs_1_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-reiserfs/partman-reiserfs_1_all.udeb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated partman-reiserfs package)
broken greek translation causes infinite loop
I noticed that installing d-i from a usb stick in greek leads to an infinite loop; iso-scan is run over and over. Looks like iso-scan and load-iso have identical menu texts in greek (one is obviously wrong, but I don't read greek). main-menu runs the first, advances to the second, then when that is selected, thinks the first item was selected again. I have corrected this by commenting out both items and reuploading both load-iso and iso-scan. Please make sure it's fixed before unfuzzying. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processing of partman-auto_8_i386.changes
partman-auto_8_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: partman-auto_8.dsc partman-auto_8.tar.gz partman-auto_8_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#236341: partconf - don't find any partition on s390
Package: partconf Version: 0.23 Severity: important partconf don't find any partition on s390. bastian -- Yes, it is written. Good shall always destroy evil. -- Sirah the Yang, The Omega Glory, stardate unknown signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: queries re ARM port
Wookey wrote:
OK, I've spent a couple of evenings reading the docs and trying to grok the
whole thing. I think I've mostly got it but I have a few questions:
1) Some .cfg files in build/config/ specify MEDIA_TYPE instead of TYPE.
Type seems to be the main things that decides which package lists are used,
but I don't quite see how it works with MEDIA_TYPE - can someone explain the
difference?
MEDIA_TYPE is a medium length English representation of the type of boot
media. It is currently used only on some boot screens. For example
somewhere in the CD-ROM boot screen help texts it says This is a Debian
${MEDIA-TYPE}. At the moment I think this is only used for i386 and
powerpc anyway.
2) I haven't worked out yet where I have to tell the system that I want to use
a serial console. Does it need to be set in Cdebconf or in a kernel boot
string somewhere? This feels like a dumb question, but wandering about
hasn't answered it for me yet.
There is some code in rootskel that trys to work this out. See
rootskel/src/lib/debian-installer.d/S30term-linux and
S30term-linux-s390 may also be useful.
3)d-i 'doesn't support cross-compiling'. This makes life slightly harder for
me, although it's better than bootfloppies, where native compiles took
forever. Looking at it, I can't see that much needs to change to make this
possible except getting the various instances of dpkg-architecture to give
the right answers (which I think can be done with dpkg-cross). Then it
should just get .udebs of the correct arch. Is there something I haven't
appreciated about how it works which is going to make cross-compiling really
tricky? If not I might try and get it working, just because it's convenient
for me.
Library reduction?
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: broken greek translation causes infinite loop
On Friday 05 March 2004 21:04, Joey Hess wrote: I noticed that installing d-i from a usb stick in greek leads to an infinite loop; iso-scan is run over and over. Looks like iso-scan and load-iso have identical menu texts in greek (one is obviously wrong, but I don't read greek). main-menu runs the first, advances to the second, then when that is selected, thinks the first item was selected again. I have corrected this by commenting out both items and reuploading both load-iso and iso-scan. Please make sure it's fixed before unfuzzying. I suppose you mean these entries, right? tools/iso-scan/debian/po/el.po: # XXX This is commented out because it is identical to the text in # load-iso, and that breaks main-menu. ##: ../templates:4 #msgid Scan hard drives for an installer ISO image #msgstr ISO retriever/cdrom/debian/po/el.po: # XXX This is commented out because it is identical to the text in # load-iso, and that breaks main-menu. #msgid Load installer components from CD #msgstr CD I can tell you -since I read greek (!)- that these are definately not the same text. Something else must be happening. Konstantinos -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: broken greek translation causes infinite loop
Konstantinos Margaritis wrote: On Friday 05 March 2004 21:04, Joey Hess wrote: I noticed that installing d-i from a usb stick in greek leads to an infinite loop; iso-scan is run over and over. Looks like iso-scan and load-iso have identical menu texts in greek (one is obviously wrong, but I don't read greek). main-menu runs the first, advances to the second, then when that is selected, thinks the first item was selected again. I have corrected this by commenting out both items and reuploading both load-iso and iso-scan. Please make sure it's fixed before unfuzzying. I suppose you mean these entries, right? tools/iso-scan/debian/po/el.po: # XXX This is commented out because it is identical to the text in # load-iso, and that breaks main-menu. ##: ../templates:4 #msgid Scan hard drives for an installer ISO image #msgstr ? ??? ISO ? ??? retriever/cdrom/debian/po/el.po: # XXX This is commented out because it is identical to the text in # load-iso, and that breaks main-menu. #msgid Load installer components from CD #msgstr ??? ??? ?? ??? ?? CD I can tell you -since I read greek (!)- that these are definately not the same text. Something else must be happening. Huh, now that I look at them side by side, I can tell that too. Well, I definitly saw the same text in 2 places in the menu, where these two menu items should be. I tried several other languages and all the others had different texts there. After commenting it out, the loop problem went away. So I don't know what it is, but something about these texts is causing a problem. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: broken greek translation causes infinite loop
Konstantinos Margaritis wrote: I suppose you mean these entries, right? tools/iso-scan/debian/po/el.po: # XXX This is commented out because it is identical to the text in # load-iso, and that breaks main-menu. ##: ../templates:4 #msgid Scan hard drives for an installer ISO image #msgstr ? ??? ISO ? ??? retriever/cdrom/debian/po/el.po: # XXX This is commented out because it is identical to the text in # load-iso, and that breaks main-menu. #msgid Load installer components from CD #msgstr ??? ??? ?? ??? ?? CD I can tell you -since I read greek (!)- that these are definately not the same text. Something else must be happening. Ok, I commented out the wrong ones. The problem ones are both in iso-scan, the two menu items have the same text. cdrom-retreicer is fine, change reverted there. #. Type: text #. Description #. Main menu item ##: ../templates:4 msgid Scan hard drives for an installer ISO image msgstr ÎναζήÏηÏη ενÏÏ ÎµÎ¹Î´ÏÎ»Î¿Ï ÎµÎ³ÎºÎ±ÏάÏÏαÏÎ·Ï ISO ÏÏÎ¿Ï Ï ÏκληÏοÏÏ Î´Î¯ÏÎºÎ¿Ï Ï #. Type: text #. Description #. Main menu item #: ../load-iso.templates:4 msgid Load installer components from an installer ISO msgstr ÎναζήÏηÏη ενÏÏ ÎµÎ¹Î´ÏÎ»Î¿Ï ÎµÎ³ÎºÎ±ÏάÏÏαÏÎ·Ï ISO ÏÏÎ¿Ï Ï ÏκληÏοÏÏ Î´Î¯ÏÎºÎ¿Ï Ï -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
partman-auto_8_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: partman-auto_8.dsc to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_8.dsc partman-auto_8.tar.gz to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_8.tar.gz partman-auto_8_all.udeb to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_8_all.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Closing bugs: 235923 235964 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of partman-ext3_12_i386.changes
partman-ext3_12_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: partman-ext3_12.dsc partman-ext3_12.tar.gz partman-ext3_12_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ug#233294: installation report - tar: Unrecognised file type
Hello, I'm still seeing this on perl-base in i386 boot/floppy images which I downloaded from http://us.debian.org today... Any fixes? thanks --brendan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
partman-ext3_12_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: partman-ext3_12.dsc to pool/main/p/partman-ext3/partman-ext3_12.dsc partman-ext3_12.tar.gz to pool/main/p/partman-ext3/partman-ext3_12.tar.gz partman-ext3_12_all.udeb to pool/main/p/partman-ext3/partman-ext3_12_all.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#235968: marked as done (partman/text/finished_with_partition text not clear enough)
Your message dated Fri, 5 Mar 2004 09:36:36 -0900 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Mar 2004 14:06:05 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 03 06:06:05 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from onera.onera.fr [144.204.65.4] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AyX0f-0006lt-00; Wed, 03 Mar 2004 06:06:05 -0800 Received: from cc-mykerinos.onera (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by onera.onera.fr with ESMTP id i23E62T9005972; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 15:06:03 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost (mykerinos.onera [127.0.0.1]) by cc-mykerinos.onera (Postfix) with ESMTP id F4118D064; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 15:06:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from cc-mykerinos.onera ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (cc-mykerinos [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21869-07; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 15:06:01 +0100 (CET) Received: by cc-mykerinos.onera (Postfix, from userid 7426) id 4643AD05D; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 15:06:01 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: partman/text/finished_with_partition text not clear enough X-Mailer: reportbug 2.49 Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 15:06:01 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p7 (Debian) at mykerinos Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_01 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_01 X-Spam-Level: Package: partman Severity: normal The current text Finished with this partition is not clear enough and I first had trouble identifying that I had to choose it for continuing. It should probably be separated from other menu choices and reworded. I propose something like Accept these options and continue partitioning -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (400, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.2 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) --- Received: (at 235968-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Mar 2004 18:36:35 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 05 10:36:35 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AzKBX-0001Md-00; Fri, 05 Mar 2004 10:36:35 -0800 Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (216-98-95-58.access.naxs.com [216.98.95.58]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN Joey Hess, Issuer Joey Hess (verified OK)) by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5586817F2C for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 18:36:34 + (GMT) Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8A4596F3FD; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 09:36:37 -0900 (AKST) Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 09:36:36 -0900 From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Fixed. Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_05 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_05 X-Spam-Level: --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This is is fixed. --=20 see shy jo --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFASMi0d8HHehbQuO8RAjQqAJ44FgsW/53BeKA2v/4PrS/qJ67sbACfbobB M/G81bSFzLyLZ6MHo9EtLKM= =D7aE -END PGP SIGNATURE- --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb-- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Bug#235964: marked as done (partman-auto: Seems to hang when starting)
Your message dated Fri, 05 Mar 2004 13:32:15 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#235964: fixed in partman-auto 8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Mar 2004 13:53:39 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 03 05:53:39 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from onera.onera.fr [144.204.65.4] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AyWoc-000417-00; Wed, 03 Mar 2004 05:53:39 -0800 Received: from cc-mykerinos.onera (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by onera.onera.fr with ESMTP id i23DrYT9003864; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 14:53:36 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost (mykerinos.onera [127.0.0.1]) by cc-mykerinos.onera (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1643DD064; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 14:53:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from cc-mykerinos.onera ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (cc-mykerinos [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20835-07; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 14:53:28 +0100 (CET) Received: by cc-mykerinos.onera (Postfix, from userid 7426) id 8ECB6D05D; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 14:53:23 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: partman-auto: Seems to hang when starting X-Mailer: reportbug 2.49 Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 14:53:18 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p7 (Debian) at mykerinos Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_01 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_01 X-Spam-Level: Package: partman-auto Severity: normal When choosing any of both choices partman first shows for automatitioning (use the larget continuous space or the whole disk), a progress bar appear and is hanged at 88%Nothing happens anymore further. Nothing weird on other consoles... This, with the 3/2/2004 netinst ISO image. The manual partitioning works. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (400, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.2 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) --- Received: (at 235964-close) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Mar 2004 18:38:04 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 05 10:38:04 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AzKCy-0001V8-00; Fri, 05 Mar 2004 10:38:04 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AzK7L-pT-00; Fri, 05 Mar 2004 13:32:15 -0500 From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.44 $ Subject: Bug#235964: fixed in partman-auto 8 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 13:32:15 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_05 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_05 X-Spam-Level: Source: partman-auto Source-Version: 8 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of partman-auto, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: partman-auto_8.dsc to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_8.dsc partman-auto_8.tar.gz to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_8.tar.gz partman-auto_8_all.udeb to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_8_all.udeb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated partman-auto package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Bug#235923: marked as done (Autopartitioning the whole disk always creates msdos partition table)
Your message dated Fri, 05 Mar 2004 13:32:15 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#235923: fixed in partman-auto 8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Mar 2004 07:52:11 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 02 23:52:11 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from lml.bas.bg [195.96.224.121] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AyRAp-0003qx-00; Tue, 02 Mar 2004 23:52:11 -0800 Received: from anton by lml.bas.bg with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AyRFg-0006YQ-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 03 Mar 2004 09:57:12 +0200 Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 09:57:12 +0200 From: Anton Zinoviev [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Autopartitioning the whole disk always creates msdos partition table Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_01 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_01 X-Spam-Level: Package: partman-auto Severity: important When the user requests autopartitioning of the whole drive, partman-auto creates msdos partition table even on non-i386 architectures. Instead it had to discover the default partition table type for the architecture. --- Received: (at 235923-close) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Mar 2004 18:38:05 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 05 10:38:05 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AzKCz-0001VK-00; Fri, 05 Mar 2004 10:38:05 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AzK7L-pR-00; Fri, 05 Mar 2004 13:32:15 -0500 From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.44 $ Subject: Bug#235923: fixed in partman-auto 8 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 13:32:15 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_05 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_05 X-Spam-Level: Source: partman-auto Source-Version: 8 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of partman-auto, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: partman-auto_8.dsc to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_8.dsc partman-auto_8.tar.gz to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_8.tar.gz partman-auto_8_all.udeb to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_8_all.udeb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated partman-auto package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 09:17:48 -0900 Source: partman-auto Binary: partman-auto Architecture: source all Version: 8 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Install System Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: partman-auto - Automatically partition storage devices (partman) (udeb) Closes: 235923 235964 Changes: partman-auto (8) unstable; urgency=low . * Anton Zinoviev - automatically_partition/some_device/do_option: creates new partition table with the default for the architecture type. Closes: #235923 - perform_recipe: start progress bar, as autopartitioning can be quiet slow * Joey Hess - add xfs and reiserfs to the valid fs list (should this use info from the plugins?) - if there is no valid recipe, bail with an error instead of hanging. Closes:
Bug#236347: discover-data: Use yenta_socket for Ricoh Co Ltd RL5c476 II
Package: discover-data-udeb Version: 1.2004.02.08-1 Tags:d-i The cardbus bridge in my laptop is incorrectly detected by discover. It reports module i82365, while the correct one is yenta_socket. This is the PCI info on this bridge. minerva:~# lspci -s 01:00 01:00.0 CardBus bridge: Ricoh Co Ltd RL5c476 II (rev a8) 01:00.1 CardBus bridge: Ricoh Co Ltd RL5c476 II (rev a8) 01:00.2 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Ricoh Co Ltd: Unknown device 0552 minerva:~# lspci -n -s 01:00 01:00.0 Class 0607: 1180:0476 (rev a8) 01:00.1 Class 0607: 1180:0476 (rev a8) 01:00.2 Class 0c00: 1180:0552 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [l10n] List of packages for which debian/changelog is updated automatically
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 09:24:43AM -0900, Joey Hess wrote: Packages that are updated by the script I am aware of: partman-*, aboot-installer, netcfg. I just released version 8 of partman-auto, and the script seemed to think that the same set of translations were updated in this version as in version 7. I doubt they did. Anyone know why? I'll check that. -- Nikolai Prokoschenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] / Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New Debian Boot logo proposals
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 05:42:58PM +0100, Alessandro Polverini wrote: we have prepared three new proposals of the new boot logo for the Sarge installer. If you ask me, I'm all for the second shot. Its features: 1. It's solid -- i.e. without black space at the top, which looked like I need to calibrate my display. 2. It's pretty -- don't take my word for it, it's just my opinion ;) 3. It looks professional and serious -- Debian is a serious distribution, it is for serious work, not for script kiddies, who might like some over-cool GFX 4. It is extraordinary clean, nothing distracts the user from the main thing: it's Debian! -- Nikolai Prokoschenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] / Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [l10n] List of packages for which debian/changelog is updated automatically
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 08:54:33PM +0100, Nikolai Prokoschenko wrote: Packages that are updated by the script I am aware of: partman-*, aboot-installer, netcfg. I just released version 8 of partman-auto, and the script seemed to think that the same set of translations were updated in this version as in version 7. I doubt they did. Anyone know why? I'll check that. I've got it -- it is because I'm dumb :( I have forgotten to remove the .credits_log file as soon, as it is not used anymore. Patch folgt. -- Nikolai Prokoschenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] / Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of cdrom-retriever_0.16_i386.changes
cdrom-retriever_0.16_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: cdrom-retriever_0.16.dsc cdrom-retriever_0.16.tar.gz cdrom-retriever_0.16_all.udeb load-cdrom_0.16_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of iso-scan_0.18_i386.changes
iso-scan_0.18_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: iso-scan_0.18.dsc iso-scan_0.18.tar.gz iso-scan_0.18_all.udeb load-iso_0.18_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of cdrom-retriever_0.17_i386.changes
cdrom-retriever_0.17_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: cdrom-retriever_0.17.dsc cdrom-retriever_0.17.tar.gz cdrom-retriever_0.17_all.udeb load-cdrom_0.17_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of countrychooser_0.009_i386.changes
countrychooser_0.009_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: countrychooser_0.009.dsc countrychooser_0.009.tar.gz countrychooser_0.009_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#236351: installation-reports bug
Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: I believe it was the i386 100MB CD from http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/, downloaded about 24 Feb 2004 uname -a: 2.4.22-1-386 (having already upgraded at this time, I don't have the other details) Date: about 2 March 2004 Method: Booted off the CD; configured networking, dual-boot with WinXP, after base install reconfigured sources.list to point to unstable and dist-upgraded Machine: Dell Optiplex GX270 Processor: 2.20 GHz Celeron Memory: 256MB Root Device: 40 GB IDE /dev/hda (brand/model unknown) Root Size/partition table: Disk /dev/hda: 41.1 GB, 41110142976 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 4998 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/hda1 * 1255020482843+ 7 HPFS/NTFS WinXP /dev/hda225514998196635605 Extended /dev/hda525513766 9767488+ c W95 FAT32 (LBA) /dos (for sharing between the two OSes) /dev/hda637673790 192748+ 83 Linux / /dev/hda737913814 192748+ 83 Linux /boot /dev/hda838154179 2931831 83 Linux /usr /dev/hda941804270 730926 83 Linux /var /dev/hda10 42714732 3710983+ 83 Linux /home /dev/hda11 47334856 995998+ 83 Linux /tmp /dev/hda12 48574998 1140583+ 82 Linux swap Output of lspci: 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 82865G/PE/P Processor to I/O Controller (rev 02) 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corp. 82865G Integrated Graphics Device (rev 02) 00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB USB (rev 02) 00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB USB (rev 02) 00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB USB (rev 02) 00:1d.3 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB USB (rev 02) 00:1d.7 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB USB2 (rev 02) 00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82801BA/CA/DB/EB PCI Bridge (rev c2) 00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82801EB LPC Interface Controller (rev 02) 00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82801EB Ultra ATA Storage Controller (rev 02) 00:1f.2 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82801EB Ultra ATA Storage Controller (rev 02) 00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corp. 82801EB SMBus Controller (rev 02) 00:1f.5 Multimedia audio controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB AC'97 Audio Controller (rev 02) 01:0c.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82540EM Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 02) Base System Installation Checklist: Initial boot worked:[O] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Create file systems:[O] Mount partitions: [E] Install base system:[O] Install boot loader:[E] Reboot: [O] [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Comments/Problems: First, apologies for not taking better notes/remembering better/having this form in front of me when I did the install. Second . . . When mounting partitions, after I mounted the FAT32 partition on /dos, the swap partition was listed as already mounted. I don't remember the exact details, but it seems that I had to unmount swap and then remount, or maybe do the same to the /dos partition. When it came time to install the boot loader, it did not offer me a chance to dual-boot, nor did it include the WinXP boot capability; I had to manually fix that later (which for me wasn't a problem, but for a newbie it would've been). In the Configure and Mount Partitions screen, I was surprised to see that the nomenclature had changed from something like /dev/hda to /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target-/lun0/part1. A help screen with what this terminology means, how it relates to the older terminology, and why the change, would go a long way toward making the installation friendlier. When deciding on the type of file system to use (ext2, reiser, etc), it would be very helpful to have a help screen with a brief explanation of the different types, pros and cons, when I might want to use this vs that, should I mix types, etc. I really like the Go Back button on several of the screens. On the partitioning screen, it was not clear that some of my partitions would not be overwritten/reformatted; it would be very helpful if the screen marked such partitions with something like won't be touched or leave as is, etc. During the initialization, there needs to be some feedback; once I hit the continue button (or whatever it was), the next minute or few the computer just sat there, and I had no idea if the installation had hung, or if the partitions were being initialized, or what. If I had been the impatient type, especially a newbie coming from the world of Windows where reboots are expected, I might would've hit the reset button to recover from the freeze-up. I
Bug#236354: installation-reports: Archive mirror country should be alphabetical by name, not country code
Package: installation-reports Subject: installation-reports: Archive mirror country should be alphabetical by name, not country code Version: beta 2 Severity: minor Trying to install using debian-installer on ppc (writing this from another ppc Debian box). Don't know if this is an OK place to report this bug. When prompting for an appropriate mirror, the alphabetization is done based on the country code (US, FR, DE). It should be done on the user-visible, localized country name. The obvious country that this affects is Switzerland, which has at least 4 name (Schweiz, Suisse, Svizzera, and Switzerland), but it's country code is CH (Latin for Confederatio Helvetica). Looking for Switzerland under 'C' is not very user-friendly, but it's a common mistake. Spain under 'E' is also a problem. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Kernel: Linux 2.4.21-powerpc Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cdrom-retriever_0.17_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: cdrom-retriever_0.17.dsc to pool/main/c/cdrom-retriever/cdrom-retriever_0.17.dsc cdrom-retriever_0.17.tar.gz to pool/main/c/cdrom-retriever/cdrom-retriever_0.17.tar.gz cdrom-retriever_0.17_all.udeb to pool/main/c/cdrom-retriever/cdrom-retriever_0.17_all.udeb load-cdrom_0.17_all.udeb to pool/main/c/cdrom-retriever/load-cdrom_0.17_all.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cdrom-retriever_0.16_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: cdrom-retriever_0.16.dsc to pool/main/c/cdrom-retriever/cdrom-retriever_0.16.dsc cdrom-retriever_0.16.tar.gz to pool/main/c/cdrom-retriever/cdrom-retriever_0.16.tar.gz cdrom-retriever_0.16_all.udeb to pool/main/c/cdrom-retriever/cdrom-retriever_0.16_all.udeb load-cdrom_0.16_all.udeb to pool/main/c/cdrom-retriever/load-cdrom_0.16_all.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
countrychooser_0.009_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: countrychooser_0.009.dsc to pool/main/c/countrychooser/countrychooser_0.009.dsc countrychooser_0.009.tar.gz to pool/main/c/countrychooser/countrychooser_0.009.tar.gz countrychooser_0.009_all.udeb to pool/main/c/countrychooser/countrychooser_0.009_all.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
iso-scan_0.18_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: iso-scan_0.18.dsc to pool/main/i/iso-scan/iso-scan_0.18.dsc iso-scan_0.18.tar.gz to pool/main/i/iso-scan/iso-scan_0.18.tar.gz iso-scan_0.18_all.udeb to pool/main/i/iso-scan/iso-scan_0.18_all.udeb load-iso_0.18_all.udeb to pool/main/i/iso-scan/load-iso_0.18_all.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#236285: marked as done (Sarge: Xfree version is 4.2.1)
Your message dated Fri, 5 Mar 2004 20:42:13 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#236285: Sarge: Xfree version is 4.2.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Mar 2004 12:15:20 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 05 04:15:20 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from zeus05.fsv.cvut.cz [147.32.153.5] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AzEEa-0002OC-00; Fri, 05 Mar 2004 04:15:20 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=sh.cvut.cz) by zeus05.fsv.cvut.cz with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AzEE3-AK-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 05 Mar 2004 13:14:47 +0100 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 13:14:45 +0100 From: MeDon [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/2003 Debian/1.5-1.byczech.0 X-Accept-Language: cs, sk, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Sarge: Xfree version is 4.2.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_05 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_05 X-Spam-Level: Package: install-doc Severity: minor There's written Debian (maybe 3.1) ships with X11 revision 4.1.0 in the section 2.1.3. Graphics Card, but sarge has XFree version 4.2.1. I even thing the X11 revision x.x.x is not correct. X11 is specification, current revision is R6, while XFree is implementation, version 4.2.1 in Sarge. Regards Medon --- Received: (at 236285-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Mar 2004 19:44:17 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 05 11:44:17 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from csnt.inf.upol.cz [158.194.80.80] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AzLF3-0006O9-00; Fri, 05 Mar 2004 11:44:17 -0800 Received: from vychodil.inf.upol.cz ([158.194.80.12]) by CSNT.inf.upol.cz with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Fri, 5 Mar 2004 20:44:14 +0100 Received: from kurem by vychodil.inf.upol.cz with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AzLD3-0004J9-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 05 Mar 2004 20:42:13 +0100 Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 20:42:13 +0100 From: Miroslav Kure [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#236285: Sarge: Xfree version is 4.2.1 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: Miroslav Kure [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Mar 2004 19:44:14.0201 (UTC) FILETIME=[3CFCA690:01C402EA] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_05 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_05 X-Spam-Level: On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 01:14:45PM +0100, MeDon wrote: There's written Debian (maybe 3.1) ships with X11 revision 4.1.0 in the section 2.1.3. Graphics Card, but sarge has XFree version 4.2.1. Build constant updated in cvs. (Current value is 4.3.0.) I even thing the X11 revision x.x.x is not correct. X11 is specification, current revision is R6, while XFree is implementation, version 4.2.1 in Sarge. Sentence updated in cvs. -- Miroslav Kure -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [l10n] List of packages for which debian/changelog is updated automatically
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 09:24:43AM -0900, Joey Hess wrote: I just released version 8 of partman-auto, and the script seemed to think that the same set of translations were updated in this version as in version 7. I doubt they did. Anyone know why? I've updated the script and added an option -d which enables the release mode in which every information about intermediate translators will be lost. BTW, I don't think that the translations has not been updated: you 7-er release was on the 4th of March, while many translations have been last updated on the 5th. -- Nikolai Prokoschenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] / Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
debian-installer - some oddities
hi folks i do some work on the s390 port and see the following not realy bugs: - cdebconf uses \r for the progress bar which the terminal don't support, it looks like this: |Y 1.5% Y 1.5% Unpacking autopartkit | Y 3.0% Y 3.0% Retrieving base-installer | Y 4.5% Y 4.5% Unpacking base-installer | Y 6.1% Y 6.1% Retrieving baseconfig-udeb |Y 7.6% Y 7.6% Unpacking basec | onfig-udebY 9.1% Y 9.1% Retr | ieving bugreporter-udeb Y 10.6% Y | 10.6% Unpacking bugreporter-udeb | Y 12.1% Y 12.1% Retrieving cdebconf-priority - netcfg-static recalculates the gateway and dns if the ip is changed within the same network. - cdebconf should not use translated strings on dumb terminals. - anything uses parted now which neither supports block sizes != 512 bytes properly, s390 internal storage is a variable record size storage and linux uses 4096 byte blocks by default, nor does it support ibm disklabels. things which needs to be fixed: - it must be possible to restart main-menu within a telnet session, the internal s390 is too limited - the archive is full with not longer builded binary packages (hw-detect-full, netcfg for example) bastian -- There are always alternatives. -- Spock, The Galileo Seven, stardate 2822.3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#236359: installation-reports: Install hangs on partitioner scanning
Package: installation-reports Subject: installation-reports: Install hangs on partitioner scanning Version: 20040304-dailybuild Severity: normal Trying to install on an Apple G4 ppc using debian-installer. When it tries to start the partitioner, it hangs at 33% never to return. I will try the beta 2 version and report back to this bug. I have already partitioned this machine with 2 HFS+ partitions and an ext2 (from a previous Mandrake install). -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Kernel: Linux 2.4.21-powerpc Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of s390-netdevice_0.0.4_s390.changes
s390-netdevice_0.0.4_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: s390-netdevice_0.0.4.dsc s390-netdevice_0.0.4.tar.gz s390-netdevice_0.0.4_s390.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of s390-dasd_0.0.5_s390.changes
s390-dasd_0.0.5_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: s390-dasd_0.0.5.dsc s390-dasd_0.0.5.tar.gz s390-dasd_0.0.5_s390.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Out of the office from 2/11 - 3/8
I will be out of the office from 2/11 - 3/8 with limited access to e-mail. In my absence you may contact Ryan Peters at (312)665-7454 or [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
s390-dasd_0.0.5_s390.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: s390-dasd_0.0.5.dsc to pool/main/s/s390-dasd/s390-dasd_0.0.5.dsc s390-dasd_0.0.5.tar.gz to pool/main/s/s390-dasd/s390-dasd_0.0.5.tar.gz s390-dasd_0.0.5_s390.udeb to pool/main/s/s390-dasd/s390-dasd_0.0.5_s390.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Closing bugs: 218884 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
s390-netdevice_0.0.4_s390.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: s390-netdevice_0.0.4.dsc to pool/main/s/s390-netdevice/s390-netdevice_0.0.4.dsc s390-netdevice_0.0.4.tar.gz to pool/main/s/s390-netdevice/s390-netdevice_0.0.4.tar.gz s390-netdevice_0.0.4_s390.udeb to pool/main/s/s390-netdevice/s390-netdevice_0.0.4_s390.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Closing bugs: 220543 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
s390-netdevice override disparity
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): s390-netdevice_0.0.4_s390.udeb: package says priority is optional, override says standard. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload. If you feel the override is incorrect then please reply to this mail and explain why. [NB: this is an automatically generated mail; if you replied to one like it before and have not received a response yet, please ignore this mail. Your reply needs to be processed by a human and will be in due course, but until then the installer will send these automated mails; sorry.] -- Debian distribution maintenance software (This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#236364: SPARCstation 5 installation report
Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: 2004/03/04 daily image from http://people.debian.org/~jbailey/d-i/sparc/daily/ uname -a: Linux opal 2.4.24-sparc32 #1 Fri Jan 30 16:04:55 EST 2004 sparc unknown Date: 2004/03/04 Method: network installation, CD-ROM, mirror: sunsite.ualberta.ca, not proxied Machine: Sun SPARCstation 5 Processor: 25MHz(?) sun4m Memory: 64 MB Root Device: SCSI /dev/hda 1GB Root Size/partition table: scsi(0,3,0)part1ext332MB/boot scsi(0,3,0)part2swap128MB scsi(0,3,0)part4ext3256MB /root scsi(0,3,0)part5ext3256MB /var scsi(0,3,0)part6ext2324MB /tmp scsi(0,4,0)part1ext32GB /usr scsi(0,4,0)part2reiser 2GB /home Output of lspci: N/A Base System Installation Checklist: Initial boot worked:[O] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [O] Detect CD: [ ] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Create file systems:[O] Mount partitions: [O] Install base system:[E] Install boot loader:[ ] Reboot: [ ] [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Comments/Problems: Installed unstable. With the standard boot I was not given the choice of setting up static addressing so I ended up using 'linux DEBCONF_PRIORITY=medium'. Also, I had to specify language en rather that en_US so I could select my country and an appropriate (fast) local mirror (sunsite.ualberta.ca). The base system install failed with the following: - Base system installation error The deboostrap program exited with an error (return value 127). /var/log/messages ended with: Errors were encountered while processing exim4-daemon-light mailx at exim4 exim4-config exim4-base /usr/sbin/deboostrap: 1: sleep: not found umount: /target/proc/bus/usb: No such file or directory - The latest versions of exim4-daemon-light and exim4-base (4.30-7) depend on libgnutls10 but have not shown up in the archives for sparc. The older versions (4.30-5) depend on libgnutls7 which is not installed. The failure to configure exim causes the failures for mailx and at. The version of busybox on the CD does not have sleep (applet not found) and neither does last night's image. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#218884: marked as done (s390-dasd: Debconf templates polishing + jargon removal)
Your message dated Fri, 05 Mar 2004 15:47:03 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#218884: fixed in s390-dasd 0.0.5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Nov 2003 07:51:07 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 03 01:51:04 2003
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from onera.onera.fr [144.204.65.4]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AGZUO-0001wV-00; Mon, 03 Nov 2003 01:51:04 -0600
Received: from mykerinos.onera (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by onera.onera.fr with ESMTP id hA37p2WE017098;
Mon, 3 Nov 2003 08:51:02 +0100 (MET)
Received: by mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org (Postfix, from userid 7426)
id A730AD06C; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 07:39:04 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary1455873115==
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: s390-dasd: Debconf templates polishing + jargon removal
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 07:39:04 +0100
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.9 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,PATCH_UNIFIED_DIFF
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_1
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.
--===1455873115==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: s390-dasd
Severity: normal
Tags: patch d-i
See recent BR about debconf templates polishing.
The DASD templates seem to use a lot of jargon. Mostly DASD for disk.
As wrote Blars Larson in -boot :
DASD is mainframe IBMese for Disk. (Direct access storage device)
Most english speakers won't know what it is either. It would probably
reduce confusion to replace DASD with disk, since I think even IBM
mainfraimers would understand that. (Non-disk DASD devices exist, but
are relitivly rare.)
I suggest reworking the templates for having them more user-friendlyto
the 0.01% of users installing Debian on IBM mainframes.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux mykerinos 2.4.22 #2 Mon Sep 29 15:12:10 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8)
--===1455873115==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename=/home/bubulle/src/debian/translation/po/debian-install/TO_COMMIT/tools/s390/dasd/debian/patch
--- s390-dasd.templates.ori 2003-11-03 07:36:55.0 +0100
+++ s390-dasd.templates 2003-11-03 07:36:45.0 +0100
@@ -1,46 +1,43 @@
Template: debian-install/s390/dasd/choose_select
Type: select
_Choices: ${choices} Quit
-_Description: Following DASD are available
- Following DASD are available. Please select.
+_Description: Available disks:
+ The following DASD (Disk Access Storage Device) are available.
+ Please choose one of them.
Template: debian-install/s390/dasd/choose
Type: string
-_Description: Please specify DASD
- Please specify DASD. You have to specify the complete device number,
+_Description: Choose disk:
+ Please choose a disk. You have to specify the complete device number,
including leading zeros.
Template: debian-install/s390/dasd/choose_invalid
-Type: note
-_Description: Invalid DASD
- Invalid DASD.
+Type: error
+_Description: Invalid disk
+ An invalid device number has been chosen.
Template: debian-installer/s390/dasd/common/error
-Type: note
-_Description: An error occured and I cannot continue.
- Feel free to retry.
+Type: error
+_Description: Error: impossible to continue
+ An undefined error occurred. You may try to continue.
Template: debian-install/s390/dasd/format
Type: boolean
_Description: Format the disk?
- Device ${device} seems to be a fresh disk not yet prepared for Linux. If
- it is, you must format the disk before you can create partitions.
- .
- Format the disk?
+ The device ${device} seems to be a fresh disk not yet prepared for Linux.
+ Such disk should be formatted before you can create partitions.
Template: debian-install/s390/dasd/format_unclean
Type: boolean
_Description: Format the disk?
- Device ${device} seems to be an
