Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 22:46:07 +, Otavio Salvador wrote: Hello folks, I have prepare some branches that has what I am intending to upload to stable-proposed-updates. The modules I have changed are the following: grub-installer linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6 tasksel cdebconf debootstrap kernel-wedge Please take a look and comment on those. If you think anything is missing please say so. AFAIK everything needed for d-i is now in squeeze-proposed-updates, so the updated debian-installer can be uploaded. I'm planning to do that in a couple hours if I don't hear otherwise (and Otavio doesn't get to it first). Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110313210823.gy2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
Excerpts from Adam D. Barratt's message of 2011-03-06 16:20:51 +0100: - console-setup Looks okay, other than the version number should be 1.68+squeeze1. Fixed in unstable but not migrated to testing yet; could we unblock it? I prepared a squeeze branch for this and pushed it to the repo[1], but was told that I should not upload myself because this will be done in a mass upload. The squeeze branch only contains the fix for #610843 and not all the other changes that are in unstable. Gaudenz [1] http://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/1297716143-sup-9233@meteor.durcheinandertal.local -- Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better. ~ Samuel Beckett ~ signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
On Wed, March 9, 2011 15:12, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: Excerpts from Adam D. Barratt's message of 2011-03-06 16:20:51 +0100: - console-setup Looks okay, other than the version number should be 1.68+squeeze1. Fixed in unstable but not migrated to testing yet; could we unblock it? I prepared a squeeze branch for this and pushed it to the repo[1], but was told that I should not upload myself because this will be done in a mass upload. The squeeze branch only contains the fix for #610843 and not all the other changes that are in unstable. In case there was any confusion, my looks okay above was in reference to the contents of the squeeze branch. The unstable package should ideally probably also be unblocked so that it can reach testing before the point release, otherwise the squeeze package will end up being pushed in to testing to ensure that stable isn't newer than testing. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/d83f3218df153c0bda3a0f656ec7c2ac.squir...@adsl.funky-badger.org
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 22:46 +, Otavio Salvador wrote: I have prepare some branches that has what I am intending to upload to stable-proposed-updates. The modules I have changed are the following: grub-installer Doesn't look like this got uploaded yet? The relevant fix is in unstable but not testing yet; could we unblock the unstable package? linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6 Presumably needs the kernel to be in before uploading. Also, I'd assumed that each of the l-k-d-i-* would get re-uploaded after the kernel had been updated? That's certainly what tended to happen for lenny. tasksel We agreed to skip this. cdebconf Was this a checksum-related change? I can't immediately find a repository for it in order to check. debootstrap Uploaded and accepted minus the checksum changes, as agreed. kernel-wedge Not uploaded yet? - kernel Planned for this weekend, although not uploaded yet afaics. - libdebian-installer tbm's fixes for the new devices look fine. Not updated in unstable yet though, so you'll end up with the squeeze version being propagated upwards. - debian-installer Needs everything else (except d-i-n-i) to be in place first. Is the current proposed upload everything between the 20110106 tag and the head of the squeeze branch? (i.e. up to 60f4ca5) As there hasn't been a d-i upload in unstable since the release, and assuming there isn't one beforehand, the updated images from p-u should get copied to testing and unstable during the point release; not sure how you (-boot) and ftp-master feel about that. - debian-installer-netboot-images Needs updating for #616014, both for sanity and license compliance reasons. See above r.e. versioning. - colo-installer Updated in both p-u and unstable, but not in testing yet as it's on britney's needs-approval list. Could we unblock it? Otherwise 1.17 +squeeze1 will end up in testing during the point release. - console-setup Looks okay, other than the version number should be 1.68+squeeze1. Fixed in unstable but not migrated to testing yet; could we unblock it? - hw-detect The fix for #611314 was previously acked and is fine. The comment removed as part of 4b40c64 says # Loading snd-powermac locks up G5 systems; is that no longer the case? Again, this has been fixed in unstable but not unblocked for testing yet. - apt-setup Admittedly I have a slight vested interest here, but getting #613910 fixed in squeeze (and preferably unstable and testing) should help reduce the support burden on #debian from people who chose not to use a network mirror during install uncommenting the broken sources.list entries, either manually or using e.g. update-manager, and then being surprised when they don't work. - anything I missed? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1299424851.25972.11607.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
On 06/03/11 11:20 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: - anything I missed? netcfg. #614884 blocks #606268 against network-manager. We have a working solution with the two fixes I mentioned in 614884 and my supplied patch for NM's ifblacklist_migrate.sh filed against 606268. The NM bug is RC but had no immediate solution forthcoming and was therefore deferred. For over a month I've hung out on #debian and have seen plenty of users affected by this bug, which is why I made the effort to fix both the netcfg and NM halves of the problem myself. But now it seems both the d-i and gnome teams have been rather busy and unable to do anything with my patches. Is there anything more I can do to help ensure this makes it? Ben -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d73aaba.4000...@debian.org
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 11:39 -0400, Ben Armstrong wrote: On 06/03/11 11:20 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: - anything I missed? netcfg. #614884 blocks #606268 against network-manager. We have a working solution with the two fixes I mentioned in 614884 and my supplied patch for NM's ifblacklist_migrate.sh filed against 606268. The NM bug is RC but had no immediate solution forthcoming and was therefore deferred. For over a month I've hung out on #debian and have seen plenty of users affected by this bug, which is why I made the effort to fix both the netcfg and NM halves of the problem myself. But now it seems both the d-i and gnome teams have been rather busy and unable to do anything with my patches. Is there anything more I can do to help ensure this makes it? Well, having it fixed in unstable would be a good start. The problem doesn't just affect stable so having the first time the patch is in the archive be a stable point release isn't generally appropriate. Where would one find the patch for #614884? Is it purely the snippet in your message #21 in the bug log? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1299427710.25972.11809.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
On 06/03/11 12:08 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Well, having it fixed in unstable would be a good start. The problem doesn't just affect stable so having the first time the patch is in the archive be a stable point release isn't generally appropriate. Where would one find the patch for #614884? Is it purely the snippet in your message #21 in the bug log? There were two problems. One was the wrong filepath to the migrate script (yes, the snippet,) and the other was the missing execution bit. With both fixes applied, the migrate script was executed as intended, and once I patched the migrate script, NM worked properly after an install. Ben -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d73b286.5040...@debian.org
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
On 06/03/11 12:08 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Well, having it fixed in unstable would be a good start. The problem doesn't just affect stable so having the first time the patch is in the archive be a stable point release isn't generally appropriate. The biggest barrier to this is that Matt said he'd commit upload as soon as someone confirmed the bug is fixed by his patch. Well, I did that, but don't have the source for the patched netcfg so we at least need the commit ... Ben -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d73b6fb.9000...@debian.org
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 15:20 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 22:46 +, Otavio Salvador wrote: I have prepare some branches that has what I am intending to upload to stable-proposed-updates. The modules I have changed are the following: grub-installer Doesn't look like this got uploaded yet? The relevant fix is in unstable but not testing yet; could we unblock the unstable package? It looks like this got uploaded, but targeted at unstable where there's already a newer version, so it got rejected: grub-installer_1.60+squeeze1.dsc: old version (1.62) in unstable = new version (1.60+squeeze1) targeted at unstable. The earlier question regarding unblocking the unstable version still stands. [...] kernel-wedge Not uploaded yet? Uploaded, but to (I assume) the wrong target: kernel-wedge | 2.74+squeeze1 | unstable | source, all Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1299434998.25972.12296.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 18:09, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: It looks like this got uploaded, but targeted at unstable where there's already a newer version, so it got rejected: Yes. I did it wrong :-( My fault. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTi=duGdtpn2tVfAKkHL6bvT4xXW_rp=piojov...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 22:46 +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I have prepare some branches that has what I am intending to upload to
stable-proposed-updates. The modules I have changed are the following:
For the record, after a discussion on #-boot earlier this evening, we
concluded that checksum-related fixes for d-i components, or software
used by them, will be skipped for 6.0.1 due to time constraints.
In order to allow us to be confident that nothing in the installer
breaks when such changes are introduced, we plan to introduce them
shortly after the point release, giving us at least a month to get the
fixes tested and updated if required. From the packages which have been
discussed so far, this would mean deferring the checksum-related
components of fixes for:
{c,}debootstrap
base-installer
libdebian-installer
If the above doesn't match your recollection of the discussion, or
anyone has strong objections to the above, please yell. :-)
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/1298927928.24807.668.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
* Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br [2011-02-12 22:46]: I have prepare some branches that has what I am intending to upload to stable-proposed-updates. The modules I have changed are the following: There are two more updates I'd like to see in 6.0.1: - libdebian-installer: I added a one-liner to recognize a new ARM device. - colo-installer: bug fix to generate a correct config file. Without this fix, all installations of Debian on Cobalt fail. (Well, the installer works, but they will fail to boot the newly installed system). -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110224181009.ga...@jirafa.cyrius.com
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 18:10, Martin Michlmayr t...@cyrius.com wrote: * Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br [2011-02-12 22:46]: I have prepare some branches that has what I am intending to upload to stable-proposed-updates. The modules I have changed are the following: There are two more updates I'd like to see in 6.0.1: - libdebian-installer: I added a one-liner to recognize a new ARM device. - colo-installer: bug fix to generate a correct config file. Without this fix, all installations of Debian on Cobalt fail. (Well, the installer works, but they will fail to boot the newly installed system). Please preparae and push the respective squeeze branches so we start uploading soon. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktik1thsu4sgeketjwz4yka7qak6xeilg9s7is...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
* Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br [2011-02-24 18:28]: Please preparae and push the respective squeeze branches so we start uploading soon. They should be there already (unless I made a mistake with git). -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110224190241.gc31...@jirafa.cyrius.com
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
Quoting Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org): Please take a look and comment on those. If you think anything is missing please say so. Is there any chance we can update the apt-setup debconf templates to stop talking about volatile? As people probably noticed, I haven't managed to get anywhere with this. Another more urgent issue took most of my hacking time. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org writes: On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 21:52:53 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote: In short, I know that volatile is now named squeeze-updates...but how is it called more generically? 'Urgent bug fixes', or something to that effect? Timely updates, or (world-)tracking updates? -- Cheers, Feri. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/8762sg4b59@tac.ki.iif.hu
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 06:33:39AM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote: Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@ossystems.com.br): 'Urgent bug fixes', or something to that effect? They're not only bug fixes but also database updates and like. Important system updates? One might argue that they're not important as well (think about the updates we plan to do for iso-codes). Actually volatile was very well suited, indeed..:-) They won't be pushed through -updates, no? Normal updates are included into stable through point releases. Kind regards Philipp Kern signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
On 02/18/2011 09:02 AM, Philipp Kern wrote: On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 06:33:39AM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote: Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@ossystems.com.br): 'Urgent bug fixes', or something to that effect? They're not only bug fixes but also database updates and like. Important system updates? One might argue that they're not important as well (think about the updates we plan to do for iso-codes). Actually volatile was very well suited, indeed..:-) They won't be pushed through -updates, no? Normal updates are included into stable through point releases. AFAICT -updates should be used when changes should be pushed to users right now aka even before a point release. So all in -updates would be included in the point release together with other things accepted in proposed-updates. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d5ef06b.9000...@debian.org
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 11:19:23PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: On 02/18/2011 09:02 AM, Philipp Kern wrote: On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 06:33:39AM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote: Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@ossystems.com.br): 'Urgent bug fixes', or something to that effect? They're not only bug fixes but also database updates and like. Important system updates? One might argue that they're not important as well (think about the updates we plan to do for iso-codes). Actually volatile was very well suited, indeed..:-) They won't be pushed through -updates, no? Normal updates are included into stable through point releases. AFAICT -updates should be used when changes should be pushed to users right now aka even before a point release. Sure. But iso-codes most certainly won't qualify? Also database updates is quite a stretch. tzdata, yeah, but the case there's somewhat different. Kind regards Philipp Kern signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
Quoting Philipp Kern (pk...@debian.org): Sure. But iso-codes most certainly won't qualify? Also database updates is quite a stretch. tzdata, yeah, but the case there's somewhat different. You're right: it probably won't qualify and point releases are probably enough. This discussion still doesn't really solve the problem of explaining what squeeze-updates isI really have trouble finding the right explanation to users (except volatile that was indeed quite good..:-)) signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 22:46:07 +, Otavio Salvador wrote: Hello folks, I have prepare some branches that has what I am intending to upload to stable-proposed-updates. The modules I have changed are the following: grub-installer linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6 tasksel cdebconf debootstrap kernel-wedge Please take a look and comment on those. If you think anything is missing please say so. Is there any chance we can update the apt-setup debconf templates to stop talking about volatile? Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110217111902.gq12...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:19, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 22:46:07 +, Otavio Salvador wrote: ... Is there any chance we can update the apt-setup debconf templates to stop talking about volatile? I guess so. It is more a translation issue then a technical one. Christian? :-) -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTi=dwtcc+mqcpah38ydvxqxlkiqw1j_ceuv7z...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
Otavio Salvador a écrit : On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:19, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 22:46:07 +, Otavio Salvador wrote: ... Is there any chance we can update the apt-setup debconf templates to stop talking about volatile? I guess so. It is more a translation issue then a technical one. Christian? :-) I can consider that. But that requires trying to unfuzzy translations is the templates wording is changed. I need time for looking at this. (I also probably need help in not messing up with branches in git..:-)) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d5d14aa.2010...@debian.org
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 15:49:31 +, Otavio Salvador wrote: On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 15:15, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 15:51:50 +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: IMHO console-setup should be uploaded as well to fix #610843. AFAIR it was agreed that this is 6.0.1 material when the bug first appeared. If you want I can prepare a branch and upload the fix. It needs to be fixed and tested in sid first. This is right. Samuel, can you upload console-setup (to sid) plz? I'll do that later this evening unless somebody tells me not to. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110217204129.gb12...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
Quoting Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org):
Please take a look and comment on those. If you think anything is
missing please say so.
Is there any chance we can update the apt-setup debconf templates to
stop talking about volatile?
I'm afraid I can't find any good formulation that doesn't fuzzy all
translations and avoids having a full translation update round (which
means collecting 64 updates if we want to keep the same localization
level).
Even for 20-30 languages, I need a very significant amount of time for
this to happen. More than the 6.0.1 timeframe, I think.
Also , we need to find a way to name the formerly volatile updates
to fit in this:
# All services are enabled by default to allow preseeding
Template: apt-setup/services-select
Type: multiselect
Choices-C: security, volatile
# SEC_HOST and VOL_HOST are host names (e.g. security.debian.org)
# Translators: the *entire* string should be under 55 columns
# including host name. In short, KEEP THIS SHORT and, yes, that's tricky
# :sl3:
__Choices: security updates (from ${SEC_HOST}), volatile updates (from
${VOL_HOST})
Default: security, volatile
# :sl3:
_Description: Services to use:
Debian has two services that provide updates to releases: security and
volatile.
.
Security updates help to keep your system secured against attacks. Enabling
this service is strongly recommended.
.
Volatile updates provide more current versions for software that changes
relatively frequently and where not having the latest version could reduce
the usability of the software. An example is the virus signatures for a virus
scanner. This service is only available for stable and oldstable releases.
In short, I know that volatile is now named squeeze-updates...but
how is it called more generically?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 21:52:53 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote: In short, I know that volatile is now named squeeze-updates...but how is it called more generically? 'Urgent bug fixes', or something to that effect? Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110217210250.gc12...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 21:02, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 21:52:53 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote: In short, I know that volatile is now named squeeze-updates...but how is it called more generically? 'Urgent bug fixes', or something to that effect? They're not only bug fixes but also database updates and like. Important system updates? -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktikfqgx+_y+l_hdbijjfnwymwh9ozrwr3q0zt...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
Julien Cristau wrote: Is there any chance we can update the apt-setup debconf templates to stop talking about volatile? Since squeeze-updates (volatile) vs squeeze/updates (security) are now being seen as confusingly similar names -- And, since this thread demonstrates that we don't have an agreed on human-understandable name for it -- Perhaps we should determine what the suite will finally be called in wheezy, and use that name in d-i? -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 00:41, Joey Hess jo...@debian.org wrote: Julien Cristau wrote: Is there any chance we can update the apt-setup debconf templates to stop talking about volatile? Since squeeze-updates (volatile) vs squeeze/updates (security) are now being seen as confusingly similar names -- And, since this thread demonstrates that we don't have an agreed on human-understandable name for it -- Perhaps we should determine what the suite will finally be called in wheezy, and use that name in d-i? +1 -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTik+OVUqEHQ8c5rEs5K4oeJ_1Kj2aoO=3wssa...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@ossystems.com.br): 'Urgent bug fixes', or something to that effect? They're not only bug fixes but also database updates and like. Important system updates? One might argue that they're not important as well (think about the updates we plan to do for iso-codes). Actually volatile was very well suited, indeed..:-) signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
* Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br [2011-02-12 22:46]: Please take a look and comment on those. If you think anything is missing please say so. I just made a change to linux-kernel-di-armel-2.6 that should be included too. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110215194334.gs...@jirafa.cyrius.com
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 23:13, Jurij Smakov ju...@wooyd.org wrote: On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 10:46:07PM +, Otavio Salvador wrote: ... linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6 This should probably be uploaded once the update kernel for 6.0.1 is available? Yes. But all kernel udebs will be uploaded again but sparc is the only one with a specific change for now. tasksel cdebconf debootstrap kernel-wedge Please include debian-installer as well, I've committed a patch targeting 6.0.1. Sure. Forgot to add it here. I will create the branch for it. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktik_a--phigms4a-dleyh7jbxdizfwhatu7ob...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 02:52, Joey Hess jo...@debian.org wrote: Otavio Salvador wrote: grub-installer I don't see a squeeze branch, but assuming it's fixing the debconf title bug, all for it. humm. My bad. I am uploading the branch right now. tasksel I'd prefer to note remove software from packages in stable that users could already expect to get installed. #611951 can wait until wheezy. Any changes to desktop tasks are inherently dangerous, the KDE CD was barely made to fit at the very last minute (by dropping the release notes from it). So while I'm sad that #610790 didn't get fixed in squeeze (accessability is important), someone would need to do a lot of checking to get that in. :-( I agree with you. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTi}oqazfdnxhul9wz_9rk6uo6zwgsbcrtiw...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 00:03, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 23:13 +, Jurij Smakov wrote: I have prepare some branches that has what I am intending to upload to stable-proposed-updates. The modules I have changed are the following: The below shouldn't be assumed to be an ack or nack for the particular uploads at this point. grub-installer There doesn't appear to be a squeeze branch for this listed on gitweb; for a stable update, the hurd fixes wouldn't be appropriate for instance. I uploaded the branch. My fault. Please take a look. tasksel Would this include all of the changes between 2.88 and 2.89, or just some subset? As I think I've mentioned before, changes which might affect what ends up on CD1 for any given CD set worry me, particularly given the last minute problems we had for 6.0.0 with getting the release notes on to the CDs and trying to get all of the packages required for KDE CD1 to fit on a single CD for some architectures. It is sad but I will agree with you. I will drop the branch :-( cdebconf debootstrap kernel-wedge Please include debian-installer as well, I've committed a patch targeting 6.0.1. I'd imagine this would want to be uploaded closer to the point release, or at least we'll need to rebuild it later on to pick up any further builds of lkdi-* or other udebs. cdebconf and debootstrap can go soon. installer itself neeeds lkdi. kernel-wedge I will wait a bit more to see if nothing important shows up to avoid doing another upload in a roll. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTim2uyugEnY=U6Z2V7n8_9nHRS8gQG37sMT-TO=p...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
Excerpts from Otavio Salvador's message of 2011-02-12 23:46:07 +0100: Hello folks, I have prepare some branches that has what I am intending to upload to stable-proposed-updates. The modules I have changed are the following: grub-installer linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6 tasksel cdebconf debootstrap kernel-wedge IMHO console-setup should be uploaded as well to fix #610843. AFAIR it was agreed that this is 6.0.1 material when the bug first appeared. If you want I can prepare a branch and upload the fix. Gaudenz -- Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better. ~ Samuel Beckett ~ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1297694546-sup-9160@meteor.durcheinandertal.local
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 15:51:50 +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: IMHO console-setup should be uploaded as well to fix #610843. AFAIR it was agreed that this is 6.0.1 material when the bug first appeared. If you want I can prepare a branch and upload the fix. It needs to be fixed and tested in sid first. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110214151540.gn3...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 14:51, Gaudenz Steinlin gaud...@debian.org wrote: IMHO console-setup should be uploaded as well to fix #610843. AFAIR it was agreed that this is 6.0.1 material when the bug first appeared. If you want I can prepare a branch and upload the fix. Please prepare the branch so near of 6.0.1 we do all the uploads. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktimwgkejofuopqceef9zvxagolv8zrjrbekc6...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 15:15, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 15:51:50 +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: IMHO console-setup should be uploaded as well to fix #610843. AFAIR it was agreed that this is 6.0.1 material when the bug first appeared. If you want I can prepare a branch and upload the fix. It needs to be fixed and tested in sid first. This is right. Samuel, can you upload console-setup (to sid) plz? -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktiknddc6egrc2ug7lxia-jm1eupopxvsovcsd...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 11:23 +, Otavio Salvador wrote: On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 00:03, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: grub-installer There doesn't appear to be a squeeze branch for this listed on gitweb; for a stable update, the hurd fixes wouldn't be appropriate for instance. I uploaded the branch. Thanks. My fault. Please take a look. Just the debconf title fix so far? That looks fine; thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1297712959.401.76.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 19:49, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: My fault. Please take a look. Just the debconf title fix so far? That looks fine; thanks. Up to now, yes. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTi=cjk8vg7berge9bwkifnk+f7fnqkv0v7+1a...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
Hi Excerpts from Otavio Salvador's message of 2011-02-14 16:47:00 +0100: On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 14:51, Gaudenz Steinlin gaud...@debian.org wrote: IMHO console-setup should be uploaded as well to fix #610843. AFAIR it was agreed that this is 6.0.1 material when the bug first appeared. If you want I can prepare a branch and upload the fix. Please prepare the branch so near of 6.0.1 we do all the uploads. I've created a squeeze branch for console-setup branched from the version in squeeze with only the change to fix #610843 and pushed this branch to the d-i repo. I also tested the package with a netboot-gtk mini.iso built from squeeze (and localudebs) and it indeed fixes the bug and AFAICS does not introduce any regressions. Gaudenz -- Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better. ~ Samuel Beckett ~ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1297716143-sup-9233@meteor.durcheinandertal.local
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 20:45, Gaudenz Steinlin gaud...@debian.org wrote: I've created a squeeze branch for console-setup branched from the version in squeeze with only the change to fix #610843 and pushed this branch to the d-i repo. Thanks by doing that. Cheers, -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTikb7musBnYnZpG=ymaptnegbs+tvapbreejz...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
Otavio Salvador wrote: grub-installer I don't see a squeeze branch, but assuming it's fixing the debconf title bug, all for it. tasksel I'd prefer to note remove software from packages in stable that users could already expect to get installed. #611951 can wait until wheezy. Any changes to desktop tasks are inherently dangerous, the KDE CD was barely made to fit at the very last minute (by dropping the release notes from it). So while I'm sad that #610790 didn't get fixed in squeeze (accessability is important), someone would need to do a lot of checking to get that in. debootstrap This seems important to allow stable to debootstrap unstable going forward. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 10:46:07PM +, Otavio Salvador wrote: Hello folks, I have prepare some branches that has what I am intending to upload to stable-proposed-updates. The modules I have changed are the following: grub-installer linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6 This should probably be uploaded once the update kernel for 6.0.1 is available? tasksel cdebconf debootstrap kernel-wedge Please include debian-installer as well, I've committed a patch targeting 6.0.1. Thanks for doing this. Please take a look and comment on those. If you think anything is missing please say so. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTinTbvVOnR0xcET=0GMbA3rHO6Hkg48JQJYK6a=8...@mail.gmail.com -- Jurij Smakov ju...@wooyd.org Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/ KeyID: C99E03CC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110212231312.ga5...@droopy.oc.cox.net
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 23:13 +, Jurij Smakov wrote: I have prepare some branches that has what I am intending to upload to stable-proposed-updates. The modules I have changed are the following: The below shouldn't be assumed to be an ack or nack for the particular uploads at this point. grub-installer There doesn't appear to be a squeeze branch for this listed on gitweb; for a stable update, the hurd fixes wouldn't be appropriate for instance. linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6 This should probably be uploaded once the update kernel for 6.0.1 is available? Yes; or at least it will need rebuilding once a final(ish) kernel for 6.0.1 is in place; Dann's often uploaded lkdi-* nearer to the point release to get it built against the kernel we're including. tasksel Would this include all of the changes between 2.88 and 2.89, or just some subset? As I think I've mentioned before, changes which might affect what ends up on CD1 for any given CD set worry me, particularly given the last minute problems we had for 6.0.0 with getting the release notes on to the CDs and trying to get all of the packages required for KDE CD1 to fit on a single CD for some architectures. cdebconf debootstrap kernel-wedge Please include debian-installer as well, I've committed a patch targeting 6.0.1. I'd imagine this would want to be uploaded closer to the point release, or at least we'll need to rebuild it later on to pick up any further builds of lkdi-* or other udebs. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1297555390.27877.4029.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
