Bug#1070252: reassign 1070252 to python3-mpv
reassign 1070252 python3-mpv 1.0.4-1 retitle 1070252 python3-mpv: playback broken by libmpv 0.38 tags 1070252 fixed-upstream thanks It seems this is caused by the python3-mpv package and has been fixed upstream. I'll make an upload as soon as I find the time. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄
Bug#1070252: sublime-music: playback broken by libmpv 0.38
Package: sublime-music
Version: 0.12.0-1
Severity: critical
Forwarded: https://github.com/sublime-music/sublime-music/issues/462
Using libmpv2 0.38, the playback is broken an results in the following trace:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/sublime_music/dbus/manager.py", line 24,
in wrapper
function(*args)
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/sublime_music/app.py", line 629, in
on_play_pause
self.play_song(self.app_config.state.current_song_index)
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/sublime_music/app.py", line 1415, in
play_song
song_details_future.add_done_callback(
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/sublime_music/adapters/manager.py", line
140, in add_done_callback
fn(self, *args)
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/sublime_music/app.py", line 1416, in
lambda f: do_play_song(self.song_playing_order_token, f.result())
^^^
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/sublime_music/dbus/manager.py", line 24,
in wrapper
function(*args)
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/sublime_music/app.py", line 1166, in
do_play_song
self.player_manager.play_media(
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/sublime_music/players/manager.py", line
188, in play_media
current_player.play_media(uri, progress, song)
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/sublime_music/players/mpv.py", line 137,
in play_media
self.mpv.command(
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/mpv.py", line 1233, in command
_mpv_command_node(self.handle, ppointer, out)
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/mpv.py", line 148, in raise_for_ec
raise ex
ValueError: ('Invalid value for mpv parameter', -4, (,
, ))
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org
⠈⠳⣄
Bug#1067121: marked as pending in supysonic
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1067121 in supysonic reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/supysonic/-/commit/7fc70468ecbb65857d31c162dc7940ae4d425624 d/rules: skip test_move_out to fix flaky test timing out. (Closes: #1067121) (this message was generated automatically) -- Greetings https://bugs.debian.org/1067121
Bug#1057484: marked as pending in pelican
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1057484 in pelican reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/pelican/-/commit/3fba8714e054efe2ba1d9982bc9225bb7c9d3f44 d/control: add needed B-D on python3-watchfiles. (Closes: #1057484) (this message was generated automatically) -- Greetings https://bugs.debian.org/1057484
Bug#1057484: pelican: "ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'watchfiles"
It seems this library isn't currently packaged in Debian? I've just ITPed the package and will be uploading it to NEW ASAP. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_0xE1E5457C8BAD4113.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1058702: marked as pending in pius
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1058702 in pius reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/pius/-/commit/f6627368ab01b327a3f3a2d6d7a18391b071ce74 d/patches: add 0003 to use more modern gpg defaults. (Closes: #1058702) (this message was generated automatically) -- Greetings https://bugs.debian.org/1058702
Bug#1056829: marked as pending in peewee
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1056829 in peewee reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/peewee/-/commit/215d93e69c1855fb5f535a9e58af3344795071d0 New upstream release. (Closes: #1056829, #978683) (this message was generated automatically) -- Greetings https://bugs.debian.org/1056829
Bug#1056829: peewee: ftbfs with cython 3.0.x
owner 1056829 Louis-Philippe Véronneau thanks This is apparently fixed in version 3.16.3. I'll try to update the package. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ On Sun, 26 Nov 2023 10:05:53 + Matthias Klose wrote: Package: src:peewee Version: 3.14.10+dfsg-1 Severity: important Tags: sid trixie User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: cython3 [This bug is targeted to the upcoming trixie release] The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least arm64 with cython 3.0.5, but succeeds to build with cython 0.29.36. Please update the package to build with cython 3.0.5 (available in experimental). If the package cannot be built with cython 3.0.5, please change the build dependency from cython3 to cython3-legacy (available now in unstable). There is no replacement for cython3-dbg. Build logs building with cython 3.0.5 can be found at https://people.debian.org/~stefanor/cython3/cython-3.0.5/ See also https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2023/11/msg00034.html OpenPGP_0xE1E5457C8BAD4113.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1057484: pelican: "ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'watchfiles"
Had a quick look at the Debian package and it seems that all tests are disabled. In my opinion, this is a very good example of why tests at build (and in autopkgtests) are important. How do you know the package you're shipping isn't broken without tests? (you don't know, that's why there are tests :D). I would thus strongly suggest you to run tests, or at least part of the testsuite if some locale-specific tests are unhelpful. Cheers, -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_0xE1E5457C8BAD4113.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1057484: pelican: "ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'watchfiles"
Package: pelican Version: 4.9.1+dfsg-1 Severity: critical Dear maintainers, Running `pelican content` to generate HTML files, I get the following crash: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/pelican", line 5, in from pelican.__main__ import main File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pelican/__init__.py", line 24, in from pelican.generators import ( File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pelican/generators.py", line 20, in from pelican.cache import FileStampDataCacher File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pelican/cache.py", line 6, in from pelican.utils import mkdir_p File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pelican/utils.py", line 28, in import watchfiles ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'watchfiles' It seems this library isn't currently packaged in Debian? Cheers, -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄
Bug#1040066: RM: python-marshmallow-enum -- RoM; replaced by python-marshmallow >= 3.18.0
retitle 1040066 RM: python-marshmallow-enum -- RoM; replaced by python-marshmallow >= 3.18.0 reassign 1040066 ftp.debian.org severity 1040066 normal thanks $ ssh po...@mirror.ftp-master.debian.org "dak rm -Rn flask-appbuilder" Will remove the following packages from unstable: flask-appbuilder | 4.1.4+ds-3 | source python-flask-appbuilder-doc | 4.1.4+ds-3 | all python3-flask-appbuilder | 4.1.4+ds-3 | all Maintainer: Debian Python Team --- Reason --- -- Checking reverse dependencies... No dependency problem found. flask-appbuilder still depends on this package, but: * it is not in bookworm (removed from testing in 2022-12-16) * it currently FTBFS from #1036167 and upstream still hasn't got a fix Since flask-appbuilder is team-maintained, I did try to be a good citizen and make it build again. Although I failed (since upstream still hasn't fixed #1036167), I did update the VCS to the latest upstream version and triaged the BTS! (maybe this will get me some more leniency?? :D) All in all: * python-marshmallow-enum not being available anymore won't change anything for flask-appbuilder (it'll stay broken) * the fix for flask-appbuilder with regards to the removal of python-marshmallow-enum is trivial and has already been committed in the VCS [1] As such, please remove python-marshmallow-enum from the archive. [1]: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/flask-appbuilder/-/commit/ccc94f13af57d72b1335ffb262e793b61d74ffd5 -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_0xE1E5457C8BAD4113.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1036167: flask-appbuilder: Fails to build against python3-flask-sqlalchemy 3.0.3-1
I can confirm this is still the case with upstream version 4.3.6. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_0xE1E5457C8BAD4113.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1040066: python-marshmallow-enum: Intent to remove from the archive
Source: python-marshmallow-enum Severity: serious Owner: po...@debian.org X-Debbugs-CC: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org I maintain the python-marshmallow-enum package. Since it has been deprecated upstream [1] (marshmallow 3.18.0 added Enum support), I'm planning on removing it from the archive as soon as possible. This bug should be enough to have python3-marshmallow-enum be removed from testing in the meantime and will help me link the bugs blocking the RM. Once those are closed, I'll turn this bug into a formal RM request. Cheers, [1]: https://github.com/justanr/marshmallow_enum/issues/51 -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_0xE1E5457C8BAD4113.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1028743: python-bottle: diff for NMU version 0.12.23-1.1
Control: tags 1028743 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for python-bottle (versioned as 0.12.23-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
I've attached the debdiff to this message, but I've also opened a MR on
Salsa, if you prefer to merge this.
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/python-bottle/-/merge_requests/1
Regards.
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org
⠈⠳⣄diff -Nru python-bottle-0.12.23/debian/changelog
python-bottle-0.12.23/debian/changelog
--- python-bottle-0.12.23/debian/changelog 2022-09-17 06:37:25.0
-0400
+++ python-bottle-0.12.23/debian/changelog 2023-02-26 15:59:44.0
-0500
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+python-bottle (0.12.23-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+
+ [ James Addison ]
+ * d/patches: add 0004 to disable the local proxy for the tests. (Closes:
+#1028743)
+
+ -- Louis-Philippe Véronneau Sun, 26 Feb 2023 15:59:44
-0500
+
python-bottle (0.12.23-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* New upstream release
diff -Nru
python-bottle-0.12.23/debian/patches/0004-Localhost-request-no-proxy.patch
python-bottle-0.12.23/debian/patches/0004-Localhost-request-no-proxy.patch
--- python-bottle-0.12.23/debian/patches/0004-Localhost-request-no-proxy.patch
1969-12-31 19:00:00.0 -0500
+++ python-bottle-0.12.23/debian/patches/0004-Localhost-request-no-proxy.patch
2023-02-26 15:59:44.0 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+Description: Fix the test_server 'fetch' method to disable proxying within
+ tests cases where it is used. This resolve the connection refused errors due
to
+ the HTTP proxy enabled by default during autopkgtests.
+Author: James Addison
+--- a/test/test_server.py
b/test/test_server.py
+@@ -11,9 +11,9 @@
+ from bottle import _e
+
+ try:
+-from urllib.request import urlopen
++from urllib.request import ProxyHandler, build_opener
+ except:
+-from urllib2 import urlopen
++from urllib2 import ProxyHandler, build_opener
+
+ serverscript = os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__), 'servertest.py')
+
+@@ -77,8 +77,10 @@
+ raise AssertionError(line.strip().decode('utf8'))
+
+ def fetch(self, url):
++proxy_handler = ProxyHandler(proxies={})
++url_opener = build_opener(proxy_handler)
+ try:
+-return urlopen('http://127.0.0.1:%d/%s' % (self.port, url)).read()
++return url_opener.open('http://127.0.0.1:%d/%s' % (self.port,
url)).read()
+ except Exception:
+ return repr(_e())
+
diff -Nru python-bottle-0.12.23/debian/patches/series
python-bottle-0.12.23/debian/patches/series
--- python-bottle-0.12.23/debian/patches/series 2022-09-17 06:37:25.0
-0400
+++ python-bottle-0.12.23/debian/patches/series 2023-02-26 15:50:45.0
-0500
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
0001-Remove-bottle.py-from-scripts.patch
0002-Add-CLI-manpage.patch
0003-Disable-failing-tests.patch
+0004-Localhost-request-no-proxy.patch
Bug#1031880: Downgrade u-u bug
user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org usertag 1031880 + bsp-2023-02-ca-montreal severity 1031880 normal thank you Hi, Although this seems like a real bug, I feel like the conditions to reproduce it are very specific and do not justify the current severity. As such, I'm downgrading it to severity: normal. Cheers, -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄
Bug#1019273: apt: diff for NMU version 2.5.6+nmu1
Control: tags 1019273 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for apt (versioned as 2.5.6+nmu1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Attached is the actual debdiff. Regards. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄diff -Nru apt-2.5.6/COPYING apt-2.5.6+nmu1/COPYING --- apt-2.5.6/COPYING 2023-02-08 11:07:38.0 -0500 +++ apt-2.5.6+nmu1/COPYING 2023-02-26 13:17:23.0 -0500 @@ -1,22 +1,174 @@ -Apt is copyright 1997, 1998, 1999 Jason Gunthorpe and others. -Apt is currently developed by APT Development Team . +Format: https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/ +Upstream-Name: apt +Upstream-Contact: APT Development Team +Source: https://salsa.debian.org/apt-team/apt -License: GPLv2+ +Files: * +Copyright: 1997-1999 Jason Gunthorpe and others +License: GPL-2+ -This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify -it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by -the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or -(at your option) any later version. - -This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, -but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of -MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the -GNU General Public License for more details. - -You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License -along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software -Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA. - -See /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2, or -<http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.txt> for the terms of the latest version -of the GNU General Public License. +Files: apt-pkg/cachefilter-patterns.* + apt-private/private-json-hooks.* + test/libapt/pattern_test.cc +Copyright: 2018, 2019 Canonical Ltd +License: GPL-2+ + +Files: po/lt.po +Copyright: 2006 Canonical Ltd, and Rosetta Contributors 2006 +License: GPL-2+ + +Files: apt-pkg/contrib/weakptr.h + apt-pkg/contrib/string_view.h + CMakeLists.txt +Copyright: 2009, 2010, 2015, 2016 Julian Andres Klode +License: GPL-2+ + +Files: debian/apt.postrm +Copyright: 1998, Ben Gertzfield +License: GPL-2+ + +Files: doc/po/pt.po + po/bg.po + po/it.po + po/sv.po + po/th.po +Copyright: 2002-2019 Free Software Foundation, Inc. +License: GPL-2+ + +Files: doc/po/es.po + po/tl.po +Copyright: 2003, 2004, 2005, 2009, 2010, 2012 Software in the Public Interest +License: GPL-2+ + +Files: po/nb.po +Copyright: 2002-2003 Lars Bahner + 2003-2004 Axel Bojer + 2004 Klaus Ade Johnstad + 2004 Bjorn Steensrud + 2003, 2005-2010 Hans Fredrik Nordhaug + 2016, 2018 Petter Reinholdtsen +License: GPL-2 + +Files: po/tr.po +Copyright: 2009 Rosetta Contributors and Canonical Ltd 2009 + 2013 Debian L10n Turkish 2013 + 2013-2018 Mert Dirik +License: GPL-2+ + +Files: doc/po/pl.po +Copyright: 2004 Krzysztof Fiertek + 2000-2004, 2010, 2012 Robert Luberda +License: GPL-2+ + +Files: doc/po/it.po +Copyright: 2000-2017 Debian Italian l10n team +License: GPL-2+ + +Files: doc/po/ja.po +Copyright: 2003-2017 Debian Japanese List +License: GPL-2+ + +Files: doc/po/fr.po +Copyright: 2000-2018 Debian French l10n team +License: GPL-2+ + +Files: doc/design.dbk +Copyright: 1997 Manoj Srivastava +License: GPL-2+ + +Files: doc/dpkg-tech.dbk +Copyright: 1997 Tom Lees +License: GPL-2+ + +Files: methods/rred.cc +Copyright: 2014 Anthony Towns +License: GPL-2+ + +Files: methods/rsh.cc +Copyright: 2000 Ben Collins +License: GPL-2 + +Files: CMake/FindBerkeley.cmake +Copyright: 2006, Alexander Dymo, + 2016, Julian Andres Klode +License: BSD-3-clause + Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without + modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions + are met: + . + 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the copyright +notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. + 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the copyright +notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the +documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. + 3. The name of the author may not be used to endorse or promote products +derived from this software without specific prior written permission. + . + THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE AUTHOR ``AS IS'' AND ANY EXPRESS OR + IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES + OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. + IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, + INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT + NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, + DATA, OR P
Bug#1019273: package built and lintian passed
I've had a look at this, and I'm planning on making an NMU to patch this package's copyright file with the proposed patch today. Although this is an RC bug and has been open for a while, I'll make it DELAYED 5, so if the maintainers disagree for some reason, they should have plenty of time to cancel the upload. I'll make a Merge Request on Salsa to make sure the git repo is up to date with the archive. Cheers, -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄
Bug#1031966: python-pydata-sphinx-theme-doc is empty
block 1031966 by 896460 user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org usertag 1031966 + bsp-2023-02-ca-montreal thanks It seems this is the result of the doc not being built in Debian, since it requires ipywidgets 7 and we have version 6. The fix for this is probably to stop building python-pydata-sphinx-theme-doc altogether, but I'll let Sandro have a go at this :) Cheers, -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄
Bug#1032013: terminator retitle bugs
retitle 901245 terminator: x-terminal-emulator -c stumbles upon shell oneliner severity 901245 normal found 901245 2.1.2-1 retitle 1032013 terminator: --execute flag is broken thanks I've split this bug in two, since it's actually two different bugs. The original bug about "-c " is different from the one John reported about the --execute flag being broken. I'll upload a patch for 1032013 today, but I won't be fixing the original bug. In my opinion, it's not as severe as 1032013, as it's not a policy violation. Cheers, -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄
Bug#901245: Handling of -e violates policy for x-terminal-emulator
Ok, so pushing further. -e does seem to work fine with terminator 2.1.2-1. At least, these commands works fine: x-terminal-emulator -e 'if test -x /bin/ss ; then watch -t ss -putsw; else netstat -c; fi' x-terminal-emulator -e 'watch /' Adding "sh -c" fails though: $ x-terminal-emulator -e bash -c 'watch /' (x-terminal-emulator:98199): dbind-WARNING **: 14:48:34.964: AT-SPI: Error retrieving accessibility bus address: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name org.a11y.Bus was not provided by any .service files usage: x-terminal-emulator [-h] [-v] [-m] [-M] [-f] [-b] [-H] [-T FORCEDTITLE] [--geometry GEOMETRY] [--command COMMAND] [-e EXECUTE] [-g CONFIG] [-j CONFIGJSON] [-x EXECUTE] [--working-directory DIR] [-i FORCEDICON] [-r ROLE] [-l LAYOUT] [-s] [-p PROFILE] [-u] [-d] [--debug-classes DEBUG_CLASSES] [--debug-methods DEBUG_METHODS] [--new-tab] [--unhide] [--list-profiles] [--list-layouts] This error does seem to be caused by the issue John pointed out. Applying the upstream patch, calling this command doesn't error out anymore, but now replicates the "the window comes up and disappears immediately." issue: x-terminal-emulator -e bash -c 'watch /' This command still works fine though: x-terminal-emulator -e 'watch /' All this to say, I'm not sure this bug is serious? It seems the -e option does work? I'll try to see what to do with this bug tomorrow. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄
Bug#901245: Handling of -e violates policy for x-terminal-emulator
user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org usertag 901245 + bsp-2023-02-ca-montreal thank you Thanks for the excellent debugging session :) I've tried to apply the patch [1] but it does not seem to fix the bug itself. I'll try to dig further during the Montreal BSP. Cheers, [1]: https://github.com/gnome-terminator/terminator/commit/91cc928f0de1f9d6d51136cf50f06c35b5faca62.patch -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄
Bug#1031478: nrepl-clojure: FTBFS: E: Build killed with signal TERM after 150 minutes of inactivity
tags 1031478 moreinfo unreproducible thanks Hi! Thanks for the rebuild. I can't reproduce this issue on my machine, but I see that neither DebCI (which runs the same exact testsuite, as an autopkgtest) nor Reproducible builds [2] (which just rebuilds the package) have had issues with this... The Clojure ecosystem in Debian still isn't the most stable one, and we changed a bunch of stuff right before the freeze... Could you give this another go and see if you still get a failure? Cheers, [1]: https://ci.debian.net/packages/n/nrepl-clojure/ [2]: https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/nrepl-clojure.html -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_0xE1E5457C8BAD4113.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1026514: python-param: FTBFS: TypeError: The only supported seed types are: None,
On 2023-02-03 11 h 58, FC Stegerman wrote: > Presumably there is a way to get the version from e.g. > "dpkg-parsechangelog -S Version" (minus the -1 revision) instead. I'm > not sure how other packages handle this. You can get those values via the variables provided by /usr/share/dpkg/pkg-info.mk You can "source" those in your d/rules makefile by using: include /usr/share/dpkg/pkg-info.mk NB: Sorry if people get this twice, I forgot to email the BTS the first time around ... -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄
Bug#1027403: marked as pending in metalfinder
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1027403 in metalfinder reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/metalfinder/-/commit/7ea6232620b4e1c48a626d982c4a4a8f1cfb3904 d/patches: add 0002 to skip flaky test. (Closes: #1027403) (this message was generated automatically) -- Greetings https://bugs.debian.org/1027403
Bug#1028333: puppetserver: find an upgrade path from puppet-master
Package: puppetserver Severity: grave At the moment, this package doesn't acknowledge the existence of the puppet-master package at all. As such, if the two packages are installed on the same machines, important breakage is likely. A proper upgrade path should be found, to make the transition from puppet-master to puppetserver seamless. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_0xE1E5457C8BAD4113.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1026647: marked as pending in trapperkeeper-metrics-clojure
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1026647 in trapperkeeper-metrics-clojure reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/clojure-team/trapperkeeper-metrics-clojure/-/commit/c5cdb37f1844117c009bb8e3cfe44bd7ca3f0c4a d/patches/0001: remove Java version restriction. (Closes: #1026647) (this message was generated automatically) -- Greetings https://bugs.debian.org/1026647
Bug#1027389: marked as pending in prismatic-plumbing-clojure
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1027389 in prismatic-plumbing-clojure reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/clojure-team/prismatic-plumbing-clojure/-/commit/be0a1dc5e314d5c1eb9771f2cc2a35ba376968da d/tests: allow stderr. (Closes: #1027389) (this message was generated automatically) -- Greetings https://bugs.debian.org/1027389
Bug#1026723: close bugs created by leiningen breakage
Hi, These bugs have been fixed with the upload of leiningen 2.10.0-1. Cheers, -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_0xE1E5457C8BAD4113.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1024785: marked as pending in supysonic
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1024785 in supysonic reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/supysonic/-/commit/0a4e6dde6fce76482a1dc8b6af8c5c88beec4c21 d/control: add versionned dependency on python3-pony. (Closes: #1024785) (this message was generated automatically) -- Greetings https://bugs.debian.org/1024785
Bug#1024812: marked as pending in ponyorm
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1024812 in ponyorm reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/ponyorm/-/commit/e4a6d7985bdc2d06023bf111d8755cd2bccca87b d/patches: add 0003 to fix Python 3.11 compatibility. (Closes: #1024812) (this message was generated automatically) -- Greetings https://bugs.debian.org/1024812
Bug#1024953: jsonpickle: (autopkgtest) needs update for python3.11: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'keys'
fixed 1024953 3.0.0 tags 1024953 fixed-upstream thanks Hi! Note that this bug has been fixed upstream, but haven't been released in a git tag yet. I think the changes are too substantial (major version) to patch the issue in Debian via quilt. I asked the upstream maintainer to make a release here: https://github.com/jsonpickle/jsonpickle/issues/416 Cheers, -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_0xE1E5457C8BAD4113.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1024907: deepdiff: (autopkgtest) needs update for python3.11: AssertionError
found 1024907 6.2.1 thanks Note that I've updated this package to the latest upstream version (6.2.1) on Salsa and the problem is still there. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_0xE1E5457C8BAD4113.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1025192: marked as pending in sublime-music
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1025192 in sublime-music reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/sublime-music/-/commit/139847707ac6cca516a1869e0700dbdec6fcb5be d/patches: add 0004 to fix Python 3.11 issue. (Closes: #1025192) (this message was generated automatically) -- Greetings https://bugs.debian.org/1025192
Bug#1024900: marked as pending in python-mpv
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1024900 in python-mpv reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-mpv/-/commit/49cf62a5c113ea977ac7a23de60d1dd8798dd772 d/control: depend on libmpv2. (Closes: #1024900) (this message was generated automatically) -- Greetings https://bugs.debian.org/1024900
Bug#1024900: python-mpv: requires update for mpv 0.35.0
On 2022-11-27 13 h 04, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: Source: python-mpv Version: 1.0.1-2 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org mpv is transitioning from libmpv1 to libmpv2. As python-mpv has a hardcoded dependency on libmpv1, it needs to be updated for libmpv2. Cheers Thanks for the heads up. I've ran the testsuite with libmpv2 and I've reported what I think might be failure upstream. It seems libmpv2 isn't in unstable yet though. I'll wait for it to make it through the buildds and I'll make an upload. Cheers, -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_0xE1E5457C8BAD4113.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1024166: blist: dead upstream, no maintainer upload since 2015
Package: src:blist Severity: serious X-Debbugs-CC: s...@debian.org Hi, The blist package, currently team-maintained by the Debian Python Team, has not been updated by its maintainer since 2015. 4 uploads fixing either important bugs, or making sure it respects the DPT policy have been made since then. As such, I consider this package is not currently maintained by anyone, and thus violates the DPT policy. Moreover, blist is dead upstream: no commit has been made to the project since 2014. This is problematic, as we are now carrying patches for Python 3.9, 3.10 and 3.11. As such, I don't think this package should make it to Bookworm. It probably should eventually be RMed too. I'm CC-ing Sebastien Delafond explicitly, as he seems to be the maintainer of all the packages in the archive that depend or build-depend on blist (python-raccoon, python-panwid, elastalert). In a perfect world, those packages should migrate away from blist in time for the freeze. If not possible, it would be nice if it could have an active maintainer again. Cheers, -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_0xE1E5457C8BAD4113.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1020120: marked as pending in jsonpickle
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1020120 in jsonpickle reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/jsonpickle/-/commit/7f3c488096aaa6397335501990ef433f28ecea4d d/tests/unittests: run tests with the upstream .flake8 configuration file. Closes: #1020120 (this message was generated automatically) -- Greetings https://bugs.debian.org/1020120
Bug#1020120: marked as pending in jsonpickle
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1020120 in jsonpickle reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/jsonpickle/-/commit/c6ae6084d2f0e8ad0323ad77339c3a819f76f594 d/pybuild.testfiles, d/tests/unittests: run tests with the upstream .flake8 configuration file. Closes: #1020120 (this message was generated automatically) -- Greetings https://bugs.debian.org/1020120
Bug#1020120: taking ownership of BTS 1020120
Even better, I think that the upstream .flake8 file isn't copied by pybuild when running tests? A d/pybuild.testfiles file should do the trick and I'll try that when that pam build fix has propagated. The same should be done for the autopkgtests. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_0xE1E5457C8BAD4113.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1020120: taking ownership of BTS 1020120
I started looking at this bug, but bug #1021336 currently breaks my sbuild, so I might as well take ownership of it. flake8 tests clearly aren't important to us, so the "easy" way out is disabling those. I'll try upgrading the package to the latest upstream version before doing this though, as 2.1.0 has official python 3.10 support. Cheers, -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_0xE1E5457C8BAD4113.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1019391: more info on 1019391
forwarded 1019391 https://github.com/ilevkivskyi/typing_inspect/issues/91 thanks This bug has been reported upstream and it seems the two projects are playing the "This issue should be fixed on your side" game... https://github.com/ilevkivskyi/typing_inspect/issues/91 https://github.com/lovasoa/marshmallow_dataclass/pull/207 I think we can wait and see what happens, but there are 4 possible solutions (in my personal preference order): 1. a new version of marshmallow dataclass fixes the issue 2. a new version of typing inspect fixes the issue 3. we add the patch in marshmallow dataclass PR 207 to the Debian package 4. we downgrade typing inspect back to 0.7.1-2 Cheers, -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_0xE1E5457C8BAD4113.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1011421: marked as pending in python-clevercsv
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1011421 in python-clevercsv reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-clevercsv/-/commit/47ee3292abc65de1ddbd0fcd3d0f49812286c43b d/python3-clevercsv.manpapges: install manpages in only 1 binary package. (Closes: #1011421) (this message was generated automatically) -- Greetings https://bugs.debian.org/1011421
Bug#1011421: python3-clevercsv,python3-clevercsv-doc: both ship /usr/share/man/man1/clevercsv*.1.gz
On Sun, 22 May 2022 15:00:26 +0200 Andreas Beckmann wrote: Package: python3-clevercsv,python3-clevercsv-doc Version: 0.7.4+ds-1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install because it tries to overwrite other packages files. From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...): Selecting previously unselected package python3-clevercsv-doc. Preparing to unpack .../6-python3-clevercsv-doc_0.7.4+ds-1_all.deb ... Unpacking python3-clevercsv-doc (0.7.4+ds-1) ... dpkg: error processing archive /tmp/apt-dpkg-install-8i4axm/6-python3-clevercsv-doc_0.7.4+ds-1_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man1/clevercsv-code.1.gz', which is also in package python3-clevercsv 0.7.4+ds-1 Errors were encountered while processing: /tmp/apt-dpkg-install-8i4axm/6-python3-clevercsv-doc_0.7.4+ds-1_all.deb These manpages are shipped in both packages: usr/share/man/man1/clevercsv-code.1.gz usr/share/man/man1/clevercsv-detect.1.gz usr/share/man/man1/clevercsv-explore.1.gz usr/share/man/man1/clevercsv-help.1.gz usr/share/man/man1/clevercsv-standardize.1.gz usr/share/man/man1/clevercsv-view.1.gz usr/share/man/man1/clevercsv.1.gz cheers, Andreas Oops, sorry for not taking care of this (pretty dumb) bug. I wasn't subscribed for this package on tracker.d.o and I never got the bug :) I'm preparing a fix. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_0xE1E5457C8BAD4113.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1015096: qpdfview mupdf plugin not built anymore
retitle 1015096 qpdfview-mupdf-plugin fails to build with mupdf 1.20.0 severity 1015096 normal thanks Upstream says the mupdf+fitz plugin is experimental and should probably not be built. I thus removed qpdfview-pdf-mupdf-plugin for now. AFAIU, it should be removed from the archive by some decrufting scripts? If people _really_ want this back in the archive, they should help upstream maintain it, as they are looking for help :) -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄
Bug#1011970: downgrade nrepl ftbfs bug
severity 1011970 normal thanks I'm downgrading this bug for multiple reasons: 1. nrepl-clojure 0.9.0-2 has a patch that skips the tests that fail on i386 and armhf. This should let it migrate to testing. 2. The actual issue seems not to be with nrepl, but with something we're doing with the dependencies it uses. The failing tests are testing how dependencies are loaded and we're doing things quite differently in Debian than what upstream does. 3. I don't think just skipping the tests is an issue, as: 3.1 There is probably very few people using Clojure on i386 and armhf 3.2 It is not clear that tests failing mean something is actually broken So this is still very much a bug, just not a very severe one IMO. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄
Bug#1015096: 1015096 is caused by a newer version of mupdf
retitle 1015096 qpdfview: FTBFS with mupdf 1.20.0 forwarded 1015096 https://bugs.launchpad.net/qpdfview/+bug/1982513 thanks I've confirmed this FTBFS is caused by the upgrade from mupdf from 1.19.0 to 1.20.0. I've forwarded this bug upstream. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄
Bug#1011970: nrepl-clojure: autopkgtest regression on armhf and i386
retitle 1011970 src:nrpepl-clojure: FTBFS on i386 (and maybe on armhf?) tags 1011970 ftbfs thanks So I tried building on i386 and I get the same error as the autopkgtest (who's running the upstream testsuite). So this is FTBFS and not just an autopkgtest regression. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄
Bug#1011970: Fwd: src:nrepl-clojure: fails to migrate to testing for too long: autopkgtest regression
So the arches that the autopkgtest fails on are all 32 bits (i386, armhf), which looked suspicious to me. I (finally) got around to test upstream's 0.9.0 tag fetching libraries from Maven using `lein test` in an i386 chroot, and all tests pass fine :( I guess this means it's not an upstream issue and is created by something we're doing in Debian. More debug needed! NB: the "java.io.FileNotFoundException: Could not locate unknown_middleware__init.class" is expected, the actual testsuite failure is "FAIL in (hotloading-common-classloader-test) (core_test.clj:1182)" -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄
Bug#1014918: src:nrepl-clojure: fails to migrate to testing for too long: autopkgtest regression
So the arches that the autopkgtest fails on are all 32 bits (i386, armhf), which looked suspicious to me. I (finally) got around to test upstream's 0.9.0 tag fetching libraries from Maven using `lein test` in an i386 chroot, and all tests pass fine :( I guess this means it's not an upstream issue and is created by something we're doing in Debian. More debug needed! NB: the "java.io.FileNotFoundException: Could not locate unknown_middleware__init.class" is expected, the actual testsuite failure is "FAIL in (hotloading-common-classloader-test) (core_test.clj:1182)" -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄
Bug#1014689: leiningen-clojure breaks cljx-clojure autopkgtest: artifact nrepl:nrepl:jar:0.9.0 has not been downloaded
The autopkgtests pass locally, but britney is stuck in a loop where: * leiningen-clojure 2.9.1-6 can't migrate because it breaks the cljx-clojure autopkgtest * nrepl-clojure 0.9.0-1 can't migrate because it breaks the cljx-clojure autopkgtest * leiningen-clojure 2.9.1-6 needs nrepl-clojure 0.9.0-1 * the cljx-clojure autopkgtest runs with either leiningen-clojure 2.9.1-6 or nrepl-clojure 0.9.0-1, but never with both. In leiningen-clojure 2.9.1-7 I tightened the versioned dependency on nrepl-clojure. Hopefully, this should fix the problem. Waiting it to build and for debci to run to close this bug. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄
Bug#1014487: python-parameterized: autopkgtest regression on amd64; arm64; armhf; i386; ppc64el; s390x: pytest7 migration - AssertionError
Source: python-parameterized Version: 0.8.1-3 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Control: affects -1 src:pytest Dear maintainer(s), The latest version of pytest in unstable (7.1.2-2) seems to be breaking the autopkgtests for this package. This regression currently keeps pytest from migrating to testing. You can find the CI logs here: https://ci.debian.net/packages/d/python-parameterized/ I had a closer look at the error logs and identified the regression as: 'AssertionError'. Hopefully, that's helpful! If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with the one provided so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1014486: python-etelemetry: autopkgtest regression on amd64; arm64; armhf; i386; ppc64el; s390x: pytest7 migration - non-zero exit status 1
Source: python-etelemetry Version: 0.3.0-1 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Control: affects -1 src:pytest Dear maintainer(s), The latest version of pytest in unstable (7.1.2-2) seems to be breaking the autopkgtests for this package. This regression currently keeps pytest from migrating to testing. You can find the CI logs here: https://ci.debian.net/packages/d/python-etelemetry/ I had a closer look at the error logs and identified the regression as: 'non-zero exit status 1'. Hopefully, that's helpful! If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with the one provided so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1014485: python-b2sdk: autopkgtest regression on amd64; arm64; armhf; i386; ppc64el; s390x: pytest7 migration - non-zero exit status 5
Source: python-b2sdk Version: 1.3.0-3 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Control: affects -1 src:pytest Dear maintainer(s), The latest version of pytest in unstable (7.1.2-2) seems to be breaking the autopkgtests for this package. This regression currently keeps pytest from migrating to testing. You can find the CI logs here: https://ci.debian.net/packages/d/python-b2sdk/ I had a closer look at the error logs and identified the regression as: 'non-zero exit status 5'. Hopefully, that's helpful! If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with the one provided so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1014484: python-async-lru: autopkgtest regression on amd64; arm64; armhf; i386; ppc64el; s390x: pytest7 migration - Future exception was never retrieved; ZeroDivisionError
Source: python-async-lru Version: 1.0.3-2 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Control: affects -1 src:pytest Dear maintainer(s), The latest version of pytest in unstable (7.1.2-2) seems to be breaking the autopkgtests for this package. This regression currently keeps pytest from migrating to testing. You can find the CI logs here: https://ci.debian.net/packages/d/python-async-lru/ I had a closer look at the error logs and identified the regression as: 'Future exception was never retrieved; ZeroDivisionError'. Hopefully, that's helpful! If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with the one provided so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1014483: pytest-twisted: autopkgtest regression on amd64; arm64; armhf; i386; ppc64el; s390x: pytest7 migration - fixture 'testdir' not found
Source: pytest-twisted Version: 1.13.2-1 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Control: affects -1 src:pytest Dear maintainer(s), The latest version of pytest in unstable (7.1.2-2) seems to be breaking the autopkgtests for this package. This regression currently keeps pytest from migrating to testing. You can find the CI logs here: https://ci.debian.net/packages/d/pytest-twisted/ I had a closer look at the error logs and identified the regression as: 'fixture 'testdir' not found'. Hopefully, that's helpful! If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with the one provided so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1014482: nibabel: autopkgtest regression on amd64; arm64; armhf; i386; ppc64el; s390x: pytest7 migration - ResourceWarning: unclosed file
Source: nibabel Version: 3.2.2-1 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Control: affects -1 src:pytest Dear maintainer(s), The latest version of pytest in unstable (7.1.2-2) seems to be breaking the autopkgtests for this package. This regression currently keeps pytest from migrating to testing. You can find the CI logs here: https://ci.debian.net/packages/d/nibabel/ I had a closer look at the error logs and identified the regression as: 'ResourceWarning: unclosed file'. Hopefully, that's helpful! If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with the one provided so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1014481: junitparser: autopkgtest regression on amd64; arm64; armhf; i386; ppc64el; s390x: pytest7 migration - deprecated pytest feature: -k-
Source: junitparser Version: 2.7.0-1 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Control: affects -1 src:pytest Dear maintainer(s), The latest version of pytest in unstable (7.1.2-2) seems to be breaking the autopkgtests for this package. This regression currently keeps pytest from migrating to testing. You can find the CI logs here: https://ci.debian.net/packages/d/junitparser/ I had a closer look at the error logs and identified the regression as: 'deprecated pytest feature: -k-'. Hopefully, that's helpful! If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with the one provided so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1014480: deepdiff: autopkgtest regression on amd64; arm64; armhf; i386; ppc64el; s390x: pytest7 migration - ImportError: Toml needs to be installed.
Source: deepdiff Version: 5.8.2-2 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Control: affects -1 src:pytest Dear maintainer(s), The latest version of pytest in unstable (7.1.2-2) seems to be breaking the autopkgtests for this package. This regression currently keeps pytest from migrating to testing. You can find the CI logs here: https://ci.debian.net/packages/d/deepdiff/ I had a closer look at the error logs and identified the regression as: 'ImportError: Toml needs to be installed.'. Hopefully, that's helpful! If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with the one provided so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1013727: openlp: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, deprecated pytest feature: -k-
Source: openlp Version: 2.9.4-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build log is available from: http://qa-logs.debian.net/2022/06/09/pytest/openlp_2.9.4-2_unstable_pytest-exp.log I had a closer look at the error log and identified the regression as: 'deprecated pytest feature: -k-'. Hopefully, that's helpful! All bugs filed during this rebuild are listed at: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=pytest7;users=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org or: https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na=ign=7=7=only=pytest7=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org=1=1=1=1#results If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with the one provided so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1013726: python-astor: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, deprecated pytest feature: -k-
Source: python-astor Version: 0.8.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build log is available from: http://qa-logs.debian.net/2022/06/09/pytest/python-astor_0.8.1-2_unstable_pytest-exp.log I had a closer look at the error log and identified the regression as: 'deprecated pytest feature: -k-'. Hopefully, that's helpful! All bugs filed during this rebuild are listed at: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=pytest7;users=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org or: https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na=ign=7=7=only=pytest7=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org=1=1=1=1#results If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with the one provided so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1013725: python-aws-xray-sdk: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, deprecated pytest feature: -k-
Source: python-aws-xray-sdk Version: 0.95-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build log is available from: http://qa-logs.debian.net/2022/06/09/pytest/python-aws-xray-sdk_0.95-2_unstable_pytest-exp.log I had a closer look at the error log and identified the regression as: 'deprecated pytest feature: -k-'. Hopefully, that's helpful! All bugs filed during this rebuild are listed at: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=pytest7;users=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org or: https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na=ign=7=7=only=pytest7=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org=1=1=1=1#results If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with the one provided so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1013724: python-b2sdk: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, deprecated pytest feature: -k-
Source: python-b2sdk Version: 1.3.0-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build log is available from: http://qa-logs.debian.net/2022/06/09/pytest/python-b2sdk_1.3.0-2_unstable_pytest-exp.log I had a closer look at the error log and identified the regression as: 'deprecated pytest feature: -k-'. Hopefully, that's helpful! All bugs filed during this rebuild are listed at: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=pytest7;users=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org or: https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na=ign=7=7=only=pytest7=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org=1=1=1=1#results If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with the one provided so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1013723: python-easydev: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, deprecated pytest feature: -k-
Source: python-easydev Version: 0.12.0+dfsg-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build log is available from: http://qa-logs.debian.net/2022/06/09/pytest/python-easydev_0.12.0+dfsg-2_unstable_pytest-exp.log I had a closer look at the error log and identified the regression as: 'deprecated pytest feature: -k-'. Hopefully, that's helpful! All bugs filed during this rebuild are listed at: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=pytest7;users=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org or: https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na=ign=7=7=only=pytest7=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org=1=1=1=1#results If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with the one provided so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1013722: python-h11: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, deprecated pytest feature: -k-
Source: python-h11 Version: 0.13.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build log is available from: http://qa-logs.debian.net/2022/06/09/pytest/python-h11_0.13.0-1_unstable_pytest-exp.log I had a closer look at the error log and identified the regression as: 'deprecated pytest feature: -k-'. Hopefully, that's helpful! All bugs filed during this rebuild are listed at: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=pytest7;users=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org or: https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na=ign=7=7=only=pytest7=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org=1=1=1=1#results If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with the one provided so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1013721: python-jose: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, deprecated pytest feature: -k-
Source: python-jose Version: 3.3.0+dfsg-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build log is available from: http://qa-logs.debian.net/2022/06/09/pytest/python-jose_3.3.0+dfsg-2_unstable_pytest-exp.log I had a closer look at the error log and identified the regression as: 'deprecated pytest feature: -k-'. Hopefully, that's helpful! All bugs filed during this rebuild are listed at: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=pytest7;users=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org or: https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na=ign=7=7=only=pytest7=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org=1=1=1=1#results If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with the one provided so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1013720: python-matrix-nio: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, deprecated pytest feature: -k-
Source: python-matrix-nio Version: 0.19.0-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build log is available from: http://qa-logs.debian.net/2022/06/09/pytest/python-matrix-nio_0.19.0-2_unstable_pytest-exp.log I had a closer look at the error log and identified the regression as: 'deprecated pytest feature: -k-'. Hopefully, that's helpful! All bugs filed during this rebuild are listed at: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=pytest7;users=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org or: https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na=ign=7=7=only=pytest7=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org=1=1=1=1#results If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with the one provided so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1013719: python-twitter: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, deprecated pytest feature: -k-
Source: python-twitter Version: 3.3-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build log is available from: http://qa-logs.debian.net/2022/06/09/pytest/python-twitter_3.3-3_unstable_pytest-exp.log I had a closer look at the error log and identified the regression as: 'deprecated pytest feature: -k-'. Hopefully, that's helpful! All bugs filed during this rebuild are listed at: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=pytest7;users=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org or: https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na=ign=7=7=only=pytest7=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org=1=1=1=1#results If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with the one provided so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1013718: sphinx-gallery: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, deprecated pytest feature: -k-
Source: sphinx-gallery Version: 0.10.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build log is available from: http://qa-logs.debian.net/2022/06/09/pytest/sphinx-gallery_0.10.1-1_unstable_pytest-exp.log I had a closer look at the error log and identified the regression as: 'deprecated pytest feature: -k-'. Hopefully, that's helpful! All bugs filed during this rebuild are listed at: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=pytest7;users=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org or: https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na=ign=7=7=only=pytest7=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org=1=1=1=1#results If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with the one provided so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1013717: spyne: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, deprecated pytest feature: -k-
Source: spyne Version: 2.14.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build log is available from: http://qa-logs.debian.net/2022/06/09/pytest/spyne_2.14.0-1_unstable_pytest-exp.log I had a closer look at the error log and identified the regression as: 'deprecated pytest feature: -k-'. Hopefully, that's helpful! All bugs filed during this rebuild are listed at: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=pytest7;users=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org or: https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na=ign=7=7=only=pytest7=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org=1=1=1=1#results If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with the one provided so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1013716: flask: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, deprecated pytest feature: pytest.warnsNone
Source: flask Version: 2.0.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build log is available from: http://qa-logs.debian.net/2022/06/09/pytest/flask_2.0.1-2_unstable_pytest-exp.log I had a closer look at the error log and identified the regression as: 'deprecated pytest feature: pytest.warnsNone'. Hopefully, that's helpful! All bugs filed during this rebuild are listed at: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=pytest7;users=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org or: https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na=ign=7=7=only=pytest7=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org=1=1=1=1#results If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with the one provided so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1013715: photutils: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, deprecated pytest feature: pytest.warnsNone
Source: photutils Version: 1.4.0-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build log is available from: http://qa-logs.debian.net/2022/06/09/pytest/photutils_1.4.0-3_unstable_pytest-exp.log I had a closer look at the error log and identified the regression as: 'deprecated pytest feature: pytest.warnsNone'. Hopefully, that's helpful! All bugs filed during this rebuild are listed at: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=pytest7;users=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org or: https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na=ign=7=7=only=pytest7=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org=1=1=1=1#results If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with the one provided so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1013714: python-ase: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, deprecated pytest feature: pytest.warnsNone
Source: python-ase Version: 3.22.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build log is available from: http://qa-logs.debian.net/2022/06/09/pytest/python-ase_3.22.1-1_unstable_pytest-exp.log I had a closer look at the error log and identified the regression as: 'deprecated pytest feature: pytest.warnsNone'. Hopefully, that's helpful! All bugs filed during this rebuild are listed at: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=pytest7;users=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org or: https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na=ign=7=7=only=pytest7=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org=1=1=1=1#results If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with the one provided so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1013713: python-biom-format: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, not sure what the problem is
Source: python-biom-format Version: 2.1.10-4 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build log is available from: http://qa-logs.debian.net/2022/06/09/pytest/python-biom-format_2.1.10-4_unstable_pytest-exp.log I had a closer look at the error log and identified the regression as: 'not sure what the problem is'. Hopefully, that's helpful! All bugs filed during this rebuild are listed at: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=pytest7;users=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org or: https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na=ign=7=7=only=pytest7=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org=1=1=1=1#results If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with the one provided so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1013712: python-httplib2: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, not sure what the problem is
Source: python-httplib2 Version: 0.20.2-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build log is available from: http://qa-logs.debian.net/2022/06/09/pytest/python-httplib2_0.20.2-3_unstable_pytest-exp.log I had a closer look at the error log and identified the regression as: 'not sure what the problem is'. Hopefully, that's helpful! All bugs filed during this rebuild are listed at: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=pytest7;users=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org or: https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na=ign=7=7=only=pytest7=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org=1=1=1=1#results If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with the one provided so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1013711: python-pytest-subtests: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, not sure what the problem is
Source: python-pytest-subtests Version: 0.6.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build log is available from: http://qa-logs.debian.net/2022/06/09/pytest/python-pytest-subtests_0.6.0-1_unstable_pytest-exp.log I had a closer look at the error log and identified the regression as: 'not sure what the problem is'. Hopefully, that's helpful! All bugs filed during this rebuild are listed at: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=pytest7;users=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org or: https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na=ign=7=7=only=pytest7=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org=1=1=1=1#results If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with the one provided so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1013710: python-can: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, AttributeError: pytest.approx is not supported in a boolean context
Source: python-can Version: 3.3.2.final~github-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build log is available from: http://qa-logs.debian.net/2022/06/09/pytest/python-can_3.3.2.final~github-3_unstable_pytest-exp.log I had a closer look at the error log and identified the regression as: 'AttributeError: pytest.approx is not supported in a boolean context'. Hopefully, that's helpful! All bugs filed during this rebuild are listed at: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=pytest7;users=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org or: https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na=ign=7=7=only=pytest7=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org=1=1=1=1#results If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with the one provided so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1013709: python-protobix: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, plugin distutils failed with: exit code=5
Source: python-protobix Version: 1.0.2-11 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build log is available from: http://qa-logs.debian.net/2022/06/09/pytest/python-protobix_1.0.2-11_unstable_pytest-exp.log I had a closer look at the error log and identified the regression as: 'plugin distutils failed with: exit code=5'. Hopefully, that's helpful! All bugs filed during this rebuild are listed at: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=pytest7;users=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org or: https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na=ign=7=7=only=pytest7=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org=1=1=1=1#results If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with the one provided so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1013708: python-pykka: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, AttributeError: module pytest has no attribute collect
Source: python-pykka Version: 2.0.3-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build log is available from: http://qa-logs.debian.net/2022/06/09/pytest/python-pykka_2.0.3-2_unstable_pytest-exp.log I had a closer look at the error log and identified the regression as: 'AttributeError: module pytest has no attribute collect'. Hopefully, that's helpful! All bugs filed during this rebuild are listed at: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=pytest7;users=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org or: https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na=ign=7=7=only=pytest7=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org=1=1=1=1#results If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with the one provided so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1013707: python-ratelimiter: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, AttributeError: module pytest has no attribute collect
Source: python-ratelimiter Version: 1.2.0.post0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build log is available from: http://qa-logs.debian.net/2022/06/09/pytest/python-ratelimiter_1.2.0.post0-1_unstable_pytest-exp.log I had a closer look at the error log and identified the regression as: 'AttributeError: module pytest has no attribute collect'. Hopefully, that's helpful! All bugs filed during this rebuild are listed at: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=pytest7;users=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org or: https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na=ign=7=7=only=pytest7=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org=1=1=1=1#results If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with the one provided so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1013706: python-pytest-xprocess: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, pytest.PytestUnraisableExceptionWarning: Exception ignored
Source: python-pytest-xprocess Version: 0.18.1-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build log is available from: http://qa-logs.debian.net/2022/06/09/pytest/python-pytest-xprocess_0.18.1-3_unstable_pytest-exp.log I had a closer look at the error log and identified the regression as: 'pytest.PytestUnraisableExceptionWarning: Exception ignored'. Hopefully, that's helpful! All bugs filed during this rebuild are listed at: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=pytest7;users=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org or: https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na=ign=7=7=only=pytest7=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org=1=1=1=1#results If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with the one provided so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1013702: pytest-pylint: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, AssertionError
Source: pytest-pylint Version: 0.18.0-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build log is available from: http://qa-logs.debian.net/2022/06/09/pytest/pytest-pylint_0.18.0-3_unstable_pytest-exp.log I had a closer look at the error log and identified the regression as: 'AssertionError'. Hopefully, that's helpful! All bugs filed during this rebuild are listed at: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=pytest7;users=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org or: https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na=ign=7=7=only=pytest7=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org=1=1=1=1#results If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with the one provided so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1013705: humanfriendly: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, upstream doesn't actually use pytest?
Source: humanfriendly Version: 10.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build log is available from: http://qa-logs.debian.net/2022/06/09/pytest/humanfriendly_10.0-1_unstable_pytest-exp.log I had a closer look at the error log and identified the regression as: 'upstream doesn't actually use pytest?'. Hopefully, that's helpful! All bugs filed during this rebuild are listed at: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=pytest7;users=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org or: https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na=ign=7=7=only=pytest7=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org=1=1=1=1#results If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with the one provided so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1013704: pyglet: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, py3.9 OK; py3.10 fails
Source: pyglet Version: 1.5.14-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build log is available from: http://qa-logs.debian.net/2022/06/09/pytest/pyglet_1.5.14-2_unstable_pytest-exp.log I had a closer look at the error log and identified the regression as: 'py3.9 OK; py3.10 fails'. Hopefully, that's helpful! All bugs filed during this rebuild are listed at: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=pytest7;users=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org or: https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na=ign=7=7=only=pytest7=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org=1=1=1=1#results If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with the one provided so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1013703: pyranges: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, py3.9 OK; py3.10 fails with Fatal Python error: Bus error
Source: pyranges Version: 0.0.111+ds-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build log is available from: http://qa-logs.debian.net/2022/06/09/pytest/pyranges_0.0.111+ds-1_unstable_pytest-exp.log I had a closer look at the error log and identified the regression as: 'py3.9 OK; py3.10 fails with Fatal Python error: Bus error'. Hopefully, that's helpful! All bugs filed during this rebuild are listed at: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=pytest7;users=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org or: https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na=ign=7=7=only=pytest7=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org=1=1=1=1#results If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with the one provided so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1013701: junitparser: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, deprecated pytest feature: -k-
Source: junitparser Version: 2.5.0-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build log is available from: http://qa-logs.debian.net/2022/06/09/pytest/junitparser_2.5.0-2_unstable_pytest-exp.log I had a closer look at the error log and identified the regression as: 'deprecated pytest feature: -k-'. Hopefully, that's helpful! All bugs filed during this rebuild are listed at: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=pytest7;users=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org or: https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na=ign=7=7=only=pytest7=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org=1=1=1=1#results If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with the one provided so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1013700: python-qtpy: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, TypeError: the 'package' argument is required to perform a relative import
Source: python-qtpy Version: 2.1.0-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build log is available from: http://qa-logs.debian.net/2022/06/09/pytest/python-qtpy_2.1.0-2_unstable_pytest-exp.log I had a closer look at the error log and identified the regression as: 'TypeError: the 'package' argument is required to perform a relative import'. Hopefully, that's helpful! All bugs filed during this rebuild are listed at: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=pytest7;users=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org or: https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na=ign=7=7=only=pytest7=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org=1=1=1=1#results If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with the one provided so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1013699: asyncpg: FTBFS: pytest7 regression, deprecated pytest feature: -k-
Source: asyncpg Version: 0.25.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pytest7 Hi, During a selected rebuild of python packages in sid, your package failed to build with pytest version 7.1.2-1. The full build log is available from: http://qa-logs.debian.net/2022/06/09/pytest/asyncpg_0.25.0-1_unstable_pytest-exp.log I had a closer look at the error log and identified the regression as: 'deprecated pytest feature: -k-'. Hopefully, that's helpful! All bugs filed during this rebuild are listed at: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=pytest7;users=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org or: https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na=ign=7=7=only=pytest7=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org=1=1=1=1#results If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with the one provided so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1010556: undefined symbol extract_begin
On 2022-05-05 04 h 46, Sven Bartscher wrote: > > Since the fix was relatively simple, I opened a merge request on salsa[1]. > > Regards > Sven > > [1]: https://salsa.debian.org/pollo/qpdfview/-/merge_requests/1 Many thanks for the patch. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄
Bug#990872: puppetdb.jar crashes out of the box with clojure classpath error
Had a look at similar failures today and I fixed the way libcore-async-clojure exports its classpath [1]. This should _at least_ fix the need for adding tools.analyzer.jar and tools.analyzer.jvm.jar manually to the classpath. I'd be curious to know how that changed things for puppetdb! (maybe this bug is fixed?) [1]: https://tracker.debian.org/news/1324649/accepted-core-async-clojure-13610-5-source-into-unstable/ -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄
Bug#1010556: undefined symbol extract_begin
Thanks for reporting this bug. I confirm I can reproduce it on my system running unstable. Never caught it since I was running the poppler plugin. I'll have a closer look at this in the coming days. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄
Bug#1006144: marked as pending in pychromecast
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1006144 in pychromecast reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/pychromecast/-/commit/852b424fa5db5b1447e1244bfd12706a826f73d2 d/control: add dependency on python3-requests. (Closes: #1006144) (this message was generated automatically) -- Greetings https://bugs.debian.org/1006144
Bug#1002848: marked as pending in python-zipstream-ng
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1002848 in python-zipstream-ng reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-zipstream-ng/-/commit/da68fd82baf84ae5a2c15e12f2c47a8db4071ea3 d/control: advertise this package as a drop-in replacement for python3-zipstream (and thus, incompatible with it). (Closes: #1002848) (this message was generated automatically) -- Greetings https://bugs.debian.org/1002848
Bug#1000717: supysonic: FTBFS on Python 3.10
forwarded 1000717 https://github.com/spl0k/supysonic/issues/229 thanks Pony has been updated to a version that supports python3.10, but using it, I get this testsuite error, so I can't build: == FAIL: test_add_nowait_stop (tests.base.test_watcher.AudioWatcherTestCase) -- Traceback (most recent call last): File "/<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.9/build/tests/base/test_watcher.py", line 117, in test_add_nowait_stop self.assertTrackCountEqual(1) File "", line 2, in assertTrackCountEqual File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pony/orm/core.py", line 531, in new_func result = func(*args, **kwargs) File "/<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.9/build/tests/base/test_watcher.py", line 106, in assertTrackCountEqual self.assertEqual(Track.select().count(), expected) AssertionError: 0 != 1 -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1001292: deepdiff: needs update for python3.10: 'Mapping' from 'collections' is removed
This package is also pretty old, as upstream is at 5.6.0. It seems upstream tests for 3.10 in their CI and it passes? I would argue the "right" course of action here, instead of adding a Debian-specific patch, would be to update the package to the latest upstream version. Cheers, -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1000716: ponyorm 3.10 additional details
reassign 1000716 src:ponyorm rename 1000716 ponyorm: FTBFS on Python 3.10 thanks Oh well, it seems it does sys.exit(1) when trying to build the package, just not when running the testsuite by itself... I: pybuild base:237: python3.10 setup.py clean Sorry, but pony 0.7.14 requires Python of one of the following versions: 2.7, 3.3-3.9. You have version 3.10.0+ E: pybuild pybuild:354: clean: plugin distutils failed with: exit code=1: python3.10 setup.py clean -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1000717: supysonic: FTBFS on Python 3.10
Source: supysonic Version: 0.6.2+ds-4 Severity: serious User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.10 supysonic FTBFS when using Python 3.10. This is caused by python3-pony not supporting Python 3.10 yet. === python3.10 === tests (unittest.loader._FailedTest) ... ERROR == ERROR: tests (unittest.loader._FailedTest) -- ImportError: Failed to import test module: tests Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python3.10/unittest/loader.py", line 154, in loadTestsFromName module = __import__(module_name) File "/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.l2p5og5f/downtmp/autopkgtest_tmp/tests/__init__.py", line 11, in from . import base File "/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.l2p5og5f/downtmp/autopkgtest_tmp/tests/base/__init__.py", line 10, in from .test_cli import CLITestCase File "/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.l2p5og5f/downtmp/autopkgtest_tmp/tests/base/test_cli.py", line 14, in from pony.orm import db_session File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pony/orm/__init__.py", line 3, in from pony.orm.core import * File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pony/orm/core.py", line 18, in from pony.thirdparty.compiler import ast, parse File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pony/thirdparty/compiler/__init__.py", line 24, in from .transformer import parse, parseFile File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pony/thirdparty/compiler/transformer.py", line 32, in import parser ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'parser' -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1000716: python3-pony: fails on Python 3.10 with "ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'parser'"
Package: python3-pony Version: 0.7.14-1 Severity: serious User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.10 Hello, It seems the current version of ponyorm is broken on python3.10. If you look closely at the logs from the latest DebCI run [1], it outputs (without failing): > Sorry, but pony 0.7.14 requires Python of one of the following > versions: 2.7, 3.3-3.9. You have version 3.10.0+ Actually running pony on 3.10 outputs something like: == ERROR: tests (unittest.loader._FailedTest) -- ImportError: Failed to import test module: tests Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python3.10/unittest/loader.py", line 154, in loadTestsFromName module = __import__(module_name) File "/<>/tests/__init__.py", line 11, in from . import base File "/<>/tests/base/__init__.py", line 10, in from .test_cli import CLITestCase File "/<>/tests/base/test_cli.py", line 14, in from pony.orm import db_session File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pony/orm/__init__.py", line 3, in from pony.orm.core import * File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pony/orm/core.py", line 18, in from pony.thirdparty.compiler import ast, parse File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pony/thirdparty/compiler/__init__.py", line 24, in from .transformer import parse, parseFile File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pony/thirdparty/compiler/transformer.py", line 32, in import parser ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'parser' This is because the parser module has been removed in Python 3.10 in favor of ast [2]. I'll suggest upstream to fail their testsuite when ran on Python 3.10. [1]: https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstable/amd64/p/ponyorm/17023056/log.gz [2]: https://docs.python.org/3/whatsnew/3.9.html#new-parser -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1000255: mpv: autopkgtest failures
1e0, image=image@entry=0x5a2ca8, req_xoffset=0, >> req_yoffset=req_yoffset@entry=0, x=0, y=y@entry=0, req_width=2096928, >> req_height=req_height@entry=1, >> dest_bits_per_pixel=dest_bits_per_pixel@entry=32, >> dest_scanline_pad=dest_scanline_pad@entry=32) at ../../src/PutImage.c:920 >> #8 0xf4f3e7a4 in PutSubImage (dpy=dpy@entry=0x5776b8, d=d@entry=2097154, >> gc=gc@entry=0x5a01e0, image=image@entry=0x5a2ca8, req_xoffset=0, >> req_yoffset=req_yoffset@entry=0, x=0, y=y@entry=0, req_width=2096928, >> req_height=req_height@entry=1, >> dest_bits_per_pixel=dest_bits_per_pixel@entry=32, >> dest_scanline_pad=dest_scanline_pad@entry=32) at ../../src/PutImage.c:920 >> #9 0xf4f3e7a4 in PutSubImage (dpy=dpy@entry=0x5776b8, d=d@entry=2097154, >> gc=gc@entry=0x5a01e0, image=image@entry=0x5a2ca8, req_xoffset=0, >> req_yoffset=req_yoffset@entry=0, x=0, y=y@entry=0, req_width=2096928, >> req_height=req_height@entry=1, >> dest_bits_per_pixel=dest_bits_per_pixel@entry=32, >> dest_scanline_pad=dest_scanline_pad@entry=32) at ../../src/PutImage.c:920 >> #10 0xf4f3e7a4 in PutSubImage (dpy=dpy@entry=0x5776b8, d=d@entry=2097154, >> gc=gc@entry=0x5a01e0, image=image@entry=0x5a2ca8, req_xoffset=0, >> req_yoffset=req_yoffset@entry=0, x=0, y=y@entry=0, req_width=2096928, >> req_height=req_height@entry=1, >> dest_bits_per_pixel=dest_bits_per_pixel@entry=32, >> dest_scanline_pad=dest_scanline_pad@entry=32) at ../../src/PutImage.c:920 >> #11 0xf4f3e7a4 in PutSubImage (dpy=dpy@entry=0x5776b8, d=d@entry=2097154, >> gc=gc@entry=0x5a01e0, image=image@entry=0x5a2ca8, req_xoffset=0, >> req_yoffset=req_yoffset@entry=0, x=0, y=y@entry=0, req_width=2096928, >> req_height=req_height@entry=1, >> dest_bits_per_pixel=dest_bits_per_pixel@entry=32, >> dest_scanline_pad=dest_scanline_pad@entry=32) at ../../src/PutImage.c:920 >> #12 0xf4f3e7a4 in PutSubImage (dpy=dpy@entry=0x5776b8, d=d@entry=2097154, >> gc=gc@entry=0x5a01e0, image=image@entry=0x5a2ca8, req_xoffset=0, >> req_yoffset=req_yoffset@entry=0, x=0, y=y@entry=0, req_width=2096928, >> req_height=req_height@entry=1, >> dest_bits_per_pixel=dest_bits_per_pixel@entry=32, >> dest_scanline_pad=dest_scanline_pad@entry=32) at ../../src/PutImage.c:920 >> #13 0xf4f3e7a4 in PutSubImage (dpy=dpy@entry=0x5776b8, d=d@entry=2097154, >> gc=gc@entry=0x5a01e0, image=image@entry=0x5a2ca8, req_xoffset=0, >> req_yoffset=req_yoffset@entry=0, x=0, y=y@entry=0, req_width=2096928, >> req_height=req_height@entry=1, >> dest_bits_per_pixel=dest_bits_per_pixel@entry=32, >> dest_scanline_pad=dest_scanline_pad@entry=32) at ../../src/PutImage.c:920 >> #14 0xf4f3e7a4 in PutSubImage (dpy=dpy@entry=0x5776b8, d=d@entry=2097154, >> gc=gc@entry=0x5a01e0, image=image@entry=0x5a2ca8, req_xoffset=0, >> req_yoffset=req_yoffset@entry=0, x=0, y=y@entry=0, req_width=2096928, >> req_height=req_height@entry=1, >> dest_bits_per_pixel=dest_bits_per_pixel@entry=32, >> dest_scanline_pad=dest_scanline_pad@entry=32) at ../../src/PutImage.c:920 >> >> and so on. I have no idea why that's happening, so any help is welcome. >> CCing the ARM porters and the libx11 maintainer for input. > > After debugging this issue some more, I think that python-mpv'S > test_write is flaky. As it has list of properties that may cause issues > and are to be skipped while testing, this list will need to be extended. Thanks for debugging. In the past, the python-mpv testsuite has indeed be somewhat flaky and we didn't run the aforementioned `test_write` test for a while because of that. I've added some more info upstream, but I don't believe this is really problematic for the debian package, so I'll patch out `test_write` again until it's fixed upstream. Cheers, -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#997482: sublime-music: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p 3.9 returned exit code 13
Upstream version 0.11.14 seems to fix this issue, but the patch seems to create a new bug: https://gitlab.com/sublime-music/sublime-music/-/issues/325 Currently waiting for feedback from upstream. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#990872: puppetdb.jar crashes out of the box with clojure classpath error
On Fri, 09 Jul 2021 23:14:22 -0700 "Gabriel G. Rosa" wrote: > Package: puppetdb > Version: 6.2.0-5 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > Dear Maintainer, > > When installing puppetdb and configuring it to listen on http port, the > puppetdb.jar crashes with the following lines in syslog: > > Jul 9 23:01:46 puppet java[25194]: Syntax error (FileNotFoundException) > compiling at (clojure/core/async/impl/ioc_macros.clj:1:1). > Jul 9 23:01:46 puppet java[25194]: Could not locate > clojure/tools/analyzer__init.class, clojure/tools/analyzer.clj or > clojure/tools/analyzer.cljc on classpath. > Jul 9 23:01:46 puppet java[25194]: Full report at: > Jul 9 23:01:46 puppet java[25194]: /tmp/clojure-1064777479875377538.edn I've seen that error elsewhere while running clojure testsuites for packages depending on libcore-async-clojure [1] and never got to debug it... I've just re-built libcore-async-clojure and libtools-analyzer-clojure locally and their full testsuites passes though. I've also checked, and libtools-analyzer-clojure does ship the right jar files: usr/ └── share ├── doc │ └── libtools-analyzer-clojure │ ├── changelog.Debian.gz │ ├── changelog.gz │ ├── CONTRIBUTING.md │ ├── copyright │ └── README.md.gz ├── java │ ├── tools.analyzer-1.0.0.jar │ └── tools.analyzer.jar -> tools.analyzer-1.0.0.jar └── maven-repo └── org └── clojure └── tools.analyzer ├── 1.0.0 │ ├── tools.analyzer-1.0.0.jar │ └── tools.analyzer-1.0.0.pom └── debian ├── tools.analyzer-debian.jar -> ../1.0.0/tools.analyzer-1.0.0.jar └── tools.analyzer-debian.pom Those jars do contain the right clojure files too... clojure/ └── tools ├── analyzer │ ├── ast │ │ └── query.clj │ ├── ast.clj │ ├── env.clj │ ├── passes │ │ ├── add_binding_atom.clj │ │ ├── cleanup.clj │ │ ├── collect_closed_overs.clj │ │ ├── constant_lifter.clj │ │ ├── elide_meta.clj │ │ ├── emit_form.clj │ │ ├── index_vector_nodes.clj │ │ ├── source_info.clj │ │ ├── trim.clj │ │ ├── uniquify.clj │ │ └── warn_earmuff.clj │ ├── passes.clj │ └── utils.clj └── analyzer.clj Although this package is built using the old "lets use `jar cf` to cram things in a jar manually" way instead of using leiningen directly and would certainly benefit in being migrated to it, I don't think this is a bug in puppetdb's packaging per say, but spawns from either one of those libs. Which one though... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ [1]: https://salsa.debian.org/clojure-team/puppetlabs-ring-middleware-clojure/-/blob/debian/main/debian/tests/control#L5-7 -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
