Re: sendmail 8.7.5-4 is still a.out?

1996-06-16 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi,

I don't have the deb file anymore, so I can't do a contents,
 but I have a elf sendmail as well.
manoj

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[.../debian] dpkg -l sendmail
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge
|Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err:uppercase=bad)
||/ NameVersionDescription
+++-===-==-
ii  sendmail8.7.5-4A complex mail transport agent.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[.../debian] file /usr/sbin/sendmail
/usr/sbin/sendmail: setuid ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1, 
stripped
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[.../debian] ls -l /usr/sbin/sendmail
-rwsr-xr-x   1 root root   235864 May  7 00:44 /usr/sbin/sendmail*

-- 
Manoj Srivastava   Systems Research Programmer, Project Pilgrim,
Phone: (413) 545-3918A143B Lederle Graduate Research Center,
Fax:   (413) 545-1249 University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003
[EMAIL PROTECTED] URL:http://www.pilgrim.umass.edu/%7Esrivasta/


Re: kernel-package and Lilo

1996-06-16 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi,

I now have fixed the postinst script so that it first runs a
 test using lilo -t  /tmp/lilo_log.$$; and then runs lilo proper. If
 an error occurs, it prints something to the tune of:
There was an error with running lilo in test mode, a log is 
available in file /tmp/lilo_log.39678. Please edit /etc/lilo.conf
manually and re-run lilo, or make other arrangements to boot 
your machine.
Please hit return to continue
 And waits there till you hit return. This should handle most problems
 mentioned here ...

manoj
-- 
 Dammit, we're all going to die, let's die doing something *useful*!
 Hal Clement, on comments that space exploration is dangerous

Manoj Srivastava   Systems Research Programmer, Project Pilgrim,
Phone: (413) 545-3918A143B Lederle Graduate Research Center,
Fax:   (413) 545-1249 University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003
[EMAIL PROTECTED] URL:http://www.pilgrim.umass.edu/%7Esrivasta/


3 Questions

1996-06-16 Thread Mark Phillips
I have 3 problems I would appreciate help with.

1. How does TERM get set?  When bash is the login shell for a user, it
seems that TERM gets set to linux when logging in from the console.
But when I changed my shell to tcsh, TERM no longer gets set to linux
as it should.  Why?

P.S. Is there any advantage to using bash instead of tcsh?  Does bash
have all the features that tcsh has?

2. I use the following command:

# pppd -d -detach /dev/cua1 

To establish my ppp link to uni.  However I have been finding that
often I get a message saying that this job is done, even though the
ppp connection has not been broken at the other end.  I just run this
command again and the link is reestablished, but it is annoying the
way it just dies every now and then for no reason.  Why?

Also, why is there no ppp-off script included with the ppp package?

3. My machine name is destiny, yet I cannot rlogin to my own
machine.  When I type rlogin destiny I get:

destiny.phillips.com.au: No route to host

I don't know why it doesn't work.  What follows is all the information
that I thought might be relevant.  I hope someone can help me.

My hosts file is:

127.0.0.1   localhost
192.1.1.1   destiny.phillips.com.au destiny


I have setup my resolv.conf for my uni ppp connection, namely:

domain  cc.flinders.edu.au
search  maths.flinders.edu.au cs.flinders.edu.au
stats.flinders.edu.au
nameserver  129.96.252.31
nameserver  129.96.252.46
nameserver  129.96.1.21

These nameservers are the ones at uni.

I would have thought though that doing rlogin destiny would use the
lo interface?

When I run route I get:

Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
Iface
localhost   *   255.255.255.255 UH0  0 1
lo
annex05.cc.flin *   255.255.255.255 UH0  0 0
ppp0
default annex05.cc.flin 0.0.0.0 UG0  0 3
ppp0

(when not connected via ppp, I only get the first two lines).

When I run ifconfig I get:

loLink encap:Local Loopback
  inet addr:127.0.0.1  Bcast:127.255.255.255  Mask:255.0.0.0
  UP BROADCAST LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:3584  Metric:1
  RX packets:1 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
  TX packets:1 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0

ppp0  Link encap:Point-Point Protocol
  inet addr:129.96.250.55  P-t-P:129.96.250.15
Mask:255.255.0.0
  UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING  MTU:552  Metric:1
  RX packets:2783 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
  TX packets:4456 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0

Does anything here seem wrong?  I can't work out why it doesn't
work as I compared it with my slackware system (which does work) and
can't see any significant differences.


Thank's in advance for your help.

Mark Phillips.  ([EMAIL PROTECTED])


Re: sendmail 8.7.5-4 is still a.out?

1996-06-16 Thread Amos Shapira
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write:
|
|On Sun, 16 Jun 1996, Amos Shapira wrote:
|
| What are the sizes and times on your binary?  
|
|$ ls -l /usr/sbin/sendmail
|-rwsr-xr-x   1 root root   235864 May  7 14:44 /usr/sbin/sendmail
|
|$ file /usr/sbin/sendmail
|/usr/sbin/sendmail: setuid ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1, 
|stripped
|
|
| |[EMAIL PROTECTED]| ls -l /usr/sbin/sendmail
| -rwsr-xr-x   1 root root   229376 May 22 16:14 /usr/sbin/sendmail*
| 
| These times and sizes match the ones in the .deb file (do 'dpkg -c
| sendmail-8.7.5-4.deb').
|
|$ cd /debian/unstable/binary-i386/mail
|
|$ ls -l sendmail-8.7.5-4.deb 
|-r--r--r--   1 root root   563907 May  7 12:16 sendmail-8.7.5-4.deb
|
|$ dpkg -c sendmail-8.7.5-4.deb  | grep sbin/sendmail
|
|-rwsr-xr-x root/root235864 May  7 14:44 1996 usr/sbin/sendmail
|  matches what's 
|installed on my system
|
|
|Weird.  
|
|Two possibilities spring to mind:
|
|1. yours is dated may 22, mine is may 7.  maybe a new version came out which
|was accidentally compiled as a.out

Then the minor number would have been advanced (= 5 instead of 4),
wouldn't it?

|
|2. your may 22 is referring to 1995, not 1996 and you have an old package
|which somehow got renamed to the current release filename.

As for the '95 theory, I doubt that since it should have showed the year if
it was that old.  As for the renaming - maybe.  dpkg -I shows:

|birnam| dpkg -I sendmail-8.7.5-4.deb 
 old debian package, version 0.939000.
 ^

|my sendmail-8.7.5-4.deb is from my mirror, which is updated every night.  
|where did you get your sendmail.deb file from?

From tsx-11, as far as I remember (just grabbed things yesterday, but
tsx didn't have everything so I took some things from ftp.debian.org).

Will try to fetch from another archive.

--Amos

--Amos Shapira| Of course Australia was marked for
133 Shlomo Ben-Yosef st.  |  glory, for its people had been chosen
Jerusalem 93 805  |  by the finest judges in England.
ISRAEL [EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Anonymous


Re: 3 Questions

1996-06-16 Thread Jeffery S. Coy Jr.
On Sun, 16 Jun 1996, Mark Phillips wrote:

 1. How does TERM get set?


it is set by login(1).

 P.S. Is there any advantage to using bash instead of tcsh?  Does bash
 have all the features that tcsh has?
 

well, being a LONG time tcsh user, no, bash can't do everything tcsh does.
tcsh can do command line spell checking, has a better (IMO) built in
``which'' (it recognizes aliases), amoung other things.

but bash will help prevent you from learning bad skills (auto-spell
correction only teaches you that you don't have to spell well).  and bash
is more standard.  i highly recommend working with bash rather than tcsh,
i switched for a variety of reasons, especially for shell programming.

Linus dislikes tcsh a great deal, and also urges not to use it, and there
is a rather good FAQ on the dangers of (t)csh programming posted
regularly to comp.unix.programmer

 Also, why is there no ppp-off script included with the ppp package?
 

good question.  and why isn't pppd setuid root?  if it's a security issue,
a ppp group would be in order.

jeff
---
Why Linux?  source code. POSIX. tcpip. job control. support from the authors.
drivers for most hardware.  because one terminal or process is never enough.
forget the other O/Ss, i use Linux- the choice of a gnu generation.



sendmail-8.7.5-4 fixed - bad copy at tsx-11?

1996-06-16 Thread Amos Shapira
Hi,

Thanks for the response.  Looks like the file I fetched from tsx-11 was
bad.  Probably a very old copy which was renamed.  I got a copy from
ftp.debian.org and everything is fine  -  No a.out files on my system!

Cheers,

--Amos

--Amos Shapira| Of course Australia was marked for
133 Shlomo Ben-Yosef st.  |  glory, for its people had been chosen
Jerusalem 93 805  |  by the finest judges in England.
ISRAEL[EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Anonymous


Ok where are the disks?

1996-06-16 Thread ' ALLAN W. BART

Hello,

Now i would like to install debian, so where do i get the system ?

allan


Re: Ok where are the disks?

1996-06-16 Thread Kai Grossjohann
 On Sun, 16 Jun 1996 09:12:06 -0400 (EDT), ' ALLAN W. BART
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

  Allan Now i would like to install debian, so where do i get the
  Allan system ?

You get all of this from ftp.debian.org, or one of its mirrors (the
message listing the mirrors will be printed when you connect to the
site).  Debian needs a boot disk, a root disk, and three base disks.
Everything else is installed from a local disk partition, or an NFS
mounted partition, or from CD, or via FTP (for this you will need
dpkg-ftp which I think is in the tools directory).

On the WWW site there is a document explaining the installation
process.

hth,
kai
-- 
Life is hard and then you die.




pine 3.94's Copyright

1996-06-16 Thread Richard G. Roberto
Why is this in non-free?  It sounds like they _want_ to be
included in linux distributions!  What about this copyright
is keeping it out of the Debian distribution?  I obviously
need to familiarize myself with Debian's rules and regs, but
it seems strange that this copyright is keeping pine in
non-free.

 included copyright from PINE3.94 ---


Pine and Pico are registered trademarks of the University of Washington.
No commercial use of these trademarks may be made without prior written
permission of the University of Washington.
 
Pine, Pico, and Pilot software and its included text are Copyright
1989-1996 by the University of Washington. 
 
Use of Pine/Pico/Pilot:  You may compile and execute these programs for
any purpose, including commercial, without paying anything to the
University of Washington, provided that the legal notices are maintained
intact and honored.

Local modification of this release is permitted as follows, or by mutual
agreement: In order to reduce confusion and facilitate debugging, we
request that locally modified versions be denoted by appending the letter
\L\ to the current version number, and that the local changes be
enumerated in the integral release notes and associated documentation.

Redistribution of this release is permitted as follows, or by mutual
agreement:
 (a) In free-of-charge or at-cost distributions by non-profit concerns;
 (b) In free-of-charge distributions by for-profit concerns;
 (c) Inclusion in a CD-ROM collection of free-of-charge, shareware, or
 non-proprietary software for which a fee may be charged for the 
 packaged distribution.

UW encourages unrestricted distribution of individual patches to the Pine
system.  By \patches\ we mean \difference\ files that can be applied
to the UW Pine source distribution in order to accomplish bug fixes, minor
enhancements, or adaptation to new operating systems.  Submission of these
patches to UW for possible inclusion in future Pine versions is also 
encouraged.
 
The above permissions are hereby granted, provided that the Pine and Pico
copyright and trademark notices appear in all copies and that both the
above copyright notice and this permission notice appear in supporting
documentation, and that the name of the University of Washington not be
used in advertising or publicity pertaining to distribution of the
software without specific, prior written permission.  This software is
made available \as is\, and
 
THE UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
WITH REGARD TO THIS SOFTWARE, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION ALL IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, AND IN
NO EVENT SHALL THE UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL,
INDIRECT OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER RESULTING FROM
LOSS OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT
(INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE) OR STRICT LIABILITY, ARISING OUT OF OR IN
CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE. 

-- end copyright from PINE3.94 -


Richard G. Roberto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
201-739-2886, whippany, nj


--
***
Bear Stearns is not responsible for any recommendation, solicitation, offer or
agreement or any information about any transaction, customer account or account
activity contained in this communication.
***


Re: Debian 1.1 will include the Linux 2.0 kernel

1996-06-16 Thread Nils Rennebarth
On Tue, 11 Jun 1996, Bruce Perens wrote:

 I see everyone wants to know. Yes, I will include the Linux 2.0 kernel in the
 latest boot disk set, which will be uploaded this evening. I also have a
 kernel-image package, although I am not the official kernel maintainer.
Could you (or Simon) also upload a bootdisk having g_ncr53c810 *not* as a
module? I looked on master.debian.org in buzz/disks-i386 and still found
no bootdisk supporting my configuration.

Nils

--
Coming again: Best quotes of the net. Today:  | Nils Rennebarth
Kristian Köhntopp [EMAIL PROTECTED]| Schillerstr. 61 
I'd also be interested in the comparison [of Linux] | 37083 Göttingen
with a cisco router. I assume a factor of about ten.| ++49-551-71626
What? faster or slower?  | http://www.nus.
Cheaper!  | pan-net.de/~nils


Re: pine 3.94's Copyright

1996-06-16 Thread Dale Scheetz
On Sun, 16 Jun 1996, Richard G. Roberto wrote:

 Why is this in non-free?  It sounds like they _want_ to be
 included in linux distributions!  What about this copyright
 is keeping it out of the Debian distribution?  I obviously
 need to familiarize myself with Debian's rules and regs, but
 it seems strange that this copyright is keeping pine in
 non-free.
 
  included copyright from PINE3.94 ---
 
The primary reason, is that the version in non-free is 3.93.

The major difference that I can see between the 3.93 copyright and
the 3.94 one is in the following paragraph:

 Local modification of this release is permitted as follows, or by mutual
 agreement: In order to reduce confusion and facilitate debugging, we
 request that locally modified versions be denoted by appending the letter
 \L\ to the current version number, and that the local changes be
 enumerated in the integral release notes and associated documentation.

The paragraph in the 3.93 version reads:

We request that any local modifications be denoted by appending the letter
\L\ to the current version number, and that the changes be enumerated in
the integral release notes and associated documentation. Re-distribution
by for-profit organizations requires permission from the University of
Washington. 

It is the last line of this paragraph that lands this package in non-free.

If there is nothing else troublesome about the new copyright (Bruce?) you
may look for 3.94 as soon as I can get some time to build it.
 
Luck,

Dwarf

  --

aka   Dale Scheetz   Phone:   1 (904) 877-0257
  Flexible Software  Fax: NONE 
  Black Creek Critters   e-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 If you don't see what you want, just ask --


cron: does not understand sat-sun

1996-06-16 Thread Derek Lee
Hi,

Something funny happened to my cron utility recently. 

Cron stopped understanding the following crontab entry:
12 14 * * sat-sun  cdplay /dev/null 21
It does however understand:
12 14 * * 6-7  cdplay /dev/null 21
and
12 14 * * sun  cdplay /dev/null 21

I also could not find any error messages (even if I leave out the
redirection to /dev/null). Syslogd captured the following:
Jun 16 14:12:00 boson /usr/sbin/cron[7602]: (derek) RELOAD (crontabs/derek)

This seems to coincide with my upgrading to v2.0 (which I built myself
using kernel-package-1.03). The package I use is
cron-3.0pl1-31.deb. (I removed and reinstalled the package but it does
not help.)

I have libc-5.2.18, and use bsdutil-3.0-2.deb package.

--Derek Lee


Re: Ok where are the disks?

1996-06-16 Thread Rick Hawkins

   Allan Now i would like to install debian, so where do i get the
   Allan system ?
 
 You get all of this from ftp.debian.org, or one of its mirrors (the
 message listing the mirrors will be printed when you connect to the
 site).  Debian needs a boot disk, a root disk, and three base disks.

or you can use just the first two files, and the base1_1.tgz file, which
must be in either / or an immediate subdirectory.  IE, if you will keep
a dos partition, leave the file in c:\, and mount c:\ as /dos (or whatever)

 Everything else is installed from a local disk partition, or an NFS
 mounted partition, or from CD, or via FTP (for this you will need
 dpkg-ftp which I think is in the tools directory).

you no longer need dpkg-ftp; it (or at least enough of it) is included
in the 5 disks/ 2disks+file.

(note:  for versions prior to tomorrows, there are about 5 missing
files, so it doesn't work unless you install perl, or add these five
files.  I manually added them, confirmed that worked, and Bruce is
adding them.)


Herculers graphics on debian?

1996-06-16 Thread ' ALLAN W. BART

hello,

thanks for the assitance folks, i think this should be more fun than 
reading all of the cue and sams guides-btw, i kind of get the feeling 
that most of the commerical linux books are a rip-off?

so here is the question, can i use hercules monochrome grahics in the 
text mode on debian, this is to be on my old 386, which has this mode, my 
compaq persario has svga, and any ideas on how to efficiently use both of 
these sytems together would be appreciated. the compaq has a relatively 
small disk and besides i need to put the old northgate to work and 
running linux is a reeducation project.

yours,

allan


where's Xforms?

1996-06-16 Thread Gerry Jensen
I see that the xforms library is listed in the Packages file under section
x11.  But, when I look under the x11 subdirectory, I don't see it.  Does
anyone know what happened to it? 

Gerry
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: 3 Questions

1996-06-16 Thread Christian Hudon
On Sun, 16 Jun 1996, Jeffery S. Coy Jr. wrote:

 On Sun, 16 Jun 1996, Mark Phillips wrote:
 
 good question.  and why isn't pppd setuid root?  if it's a security issue,
 a ppp group would be in order.

I'd say 'because it doesn't neeed to be' is a good justification.

If you need to have non-root users execute ppp as root, take a look at the
'sudo' or 'super' packages. They allow you to define commands that can be
executed as root by a set of users... without forcing your choice of 'this
should be setuid root' programs on all other Debian users.

  Christian




Debian 1.1 ready for use

1996-06-16 Thread Bruce Perens
Debian 1.1 is available as ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/Debian-1.1 .
I will wait 24 hours for the mirror sites to catch up with the last few
changes, and will then post the public announcement.

Thanks

Bruce


Re: Herculers graphics on debian?

1996-06-16 Thread Bruce Perens
There are some #ifdef CONFIG_HGA lines in /usr/src/linux/drivers/char/vga.c .
I'd be interested in hearing about what happens when you try them.

Bruce


xbiff: cannot convert to type Pixmap

1996-06-16 Thread Gerry Jensen
I recently upgraded our system to 1.1.  Now, when I run xbiff, I get:

Warning: Cannot convert string flagup to type Pixmap
Warning: Cannot convert string flagdown to type Pixmap

And a silly pixmap of shelves or something is shown instead of the
mailbox pixmap.  I had this same problem on my home system when I upgraded
some time ago, but the problem was solved by adding some other packages.
I *thought* the packages I needed to add were aout-xpm and xcompat so I
installed these packages but it hasn't solved the problem this time.  Does
anyone know what other package I need to add to make xbiff display the
pixmaps properly?

Thanks,

Gerry
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


pppd and setuidness (was Re: 3 Questions)

1996-06-16 Thread Richard Kettlewell
good question.  and why isn't pppd setuid root?  if it's a security issue,
a ppp group would be in order.

I'd say 'because it doesn't neeed to be' is a good justification.

If you need to have non-root users execute ppp as root, take a look
at the 'sudo' or 'super' packages. They allow you to define commands
that can be executed as root by a set of users... without forcing
your choice of 'this should be setuid root' programs on all other
Debian users.

Personally I find that the diald package is an excellent way of
avoiding this whole issue.  However:

As someone pointed out last time this came up, when your machine is
acting as a PPP server you need to run the pppd as root from a dialin
account.  One way of doing this (with the commercial PPP with which I
am familiar) is to make the pppd setuid root and run it from a shell
script which is that user's login shell.

(I suppose you could run the pppd directly, but doing it from scripts
is more convenient as it allows you to pass arguments to the pppd and
set various options on a per-user basis.)

One could make the uid of the account zero to achieve this without
making pppd setuid, though I can imagine this making people jump up
and down about security - can anyone think of an attack on this?

- Richard

-- 
http://www.elmail.co.uk/staff/richard/
GCS d- s+:- a-- C++ ULVS+++$ P+++ L++ E++ W(++,--) N(++,+) o? K w---
O? M- V? PS(+,+++) PE Y+ PGP+ t- 5++ X+@ R tv--- b++ DI+ D+ G e++
h r% y++


Re: 3 Questions

1996-06-16 Thread Guy Maor
On Sun, 16 Jun 1996, Mark Phillips wrote:

 1. How does TERM get set?

TERM is set from the kernel in init/main.c to linux.  init, login, et
al, propagaate it.

  When bash is the login shell for a user, it
 seems that TERM gets set to linux when logging in from the console.
 But when I changed my shell to tcsh, TERM no longer gets set to linux
 as it should.  Why?

Perhaps your .tcshrc or .cshrc is messing with it.

 P.S. Is there any advantage to using bash instead of tcsh?  Does bash
 have all the features that tcsh has?

Read csh programming considered harmful.  Just do a web search and
you'll have many hits.

 # pppd -d -detach /dev/cua1 

Use ppd -d /dev/cua1 instead, and your program will go away.

 Also, why is there no ppp-off script included with the ppp package?

There is - /etc/ppp/ip-down

 3. My machine name is destiny, yet I cannot rlogin to my own
 machine.  When I type rlogin destiny I get:
 
 destiny.phillips.com.au: No route to host

 192.1.1.1   destiny.phillips.com.au destiny

 I would have thought though that doing rlogin destiny would use the
 lo interface?

Look at what you've told it destiny's address was.


Guy


Re: pine 3.94's Copyright

1996-06-16 Thread Guy Maor
 Redistribution of this release is permitted as follows, or by mutual
 agreement:
  (a) In free-of-charge or at-cost distributions by non-profit concerns;
  (b) In free-of-charge distributions by for-profit concerns;
  (c) Inclusion in a CD-ROM collection of free-of-charge, shareware, or
  non-proprietary software for which a fee may be charged for the 
  packaged distribution.

It can't be bundled with proprietary software.  That's a not uncommon
restriction of packages in non-free.


Guy


mc requires gpm

1996-06-16 Thread Gerry Jensen
When trying to run mc (Midnight Commander) I get:

mc: can't load library 'libgpm.so.1'

Gpm is only listed as suggested under mc.  However, since mc won't even
run without gpm, shouldn't mc be changed to depend on gpm rather than just
suggest gpm?

Gerry
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: where's Xforms?

1996-06-16 Thread Guy Maor
On Sun, 16 Jun 1996, Gerry Jensen wrote:

 I see that the xforms library is listed in the Packages file under section
 x11.  But, when I look under the x11 subdirectory, I don't see it.  Does
 anyone know what happened to it? 

It's in contrib.  A decision was made that packages without source must
go in contrib.  I moved it but neglected to rebuild the Packages file.
I'll fix that now.


Guy


Re: pppd and setuidness (was Re: 3 Questions)

1996-06-16 Thread Jeffery S. Coy Jr.
On Sun, 16 Jun 1996, Richard Kettlewell wrote:

 good question.  and why isn't pppd setuid root?  if it's a security issue,
 a ppp group would be in order.
 
 
 Personally I find that the diald package is an excellent way of
 avoiding this whole issue.  However:
 

i've been using kerneld (and request-route) to do this for some time now,
so it really wasn't an issue.  i was merely asking a question (since pppd
installs itself setuid root when you build your own).

jeff
---
Why Linux?  source code. POSIX. tcpip. job control. support from the authors.
drivers for most hardware.  because one terminal or process is never enough.
forget the other O/Ss, i use Linux- the choice of a gnu generation.




uucp still a.out?

1996-06-16 Thread Olaf Erb
Hi,

uucp-1.06.1-2 was a.out some time ago, is there now (as real 1.1 is coming)
a ELF version available? The same about pbmplus, cnews and nntp, a2gs, 
a2ps.. 

I can't find anything different from my versions on ftp.debian.org, so I 
suppose there's nothing newer available. Should this be reported as a bug?
And, what else is left that need a rebuild as ELF before going official?

Maybe the still-aout packages should be marked/listed in some way to avoid 
confusion...

73,
Olaf
-- 
-
! [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ! Finger me for !
!   A HREF=http://home.pages.de/~grotto/;click/A   ! PGP-public key!
-


Re: 3 Questions

1996-06-16 Thread Mark Phillips
Thanks for your help.

  When bash is the login shell for a user, it
 seems that TERM gets set to linux when logging in from the console.
 But when I changed my shell to tcsh, TERM no longer gets set to linux
 as it should.  Why?

Perhaps your .tcshrc or .cshrc is messing with it.

No - I checked, plus I even removed .cshrc and the problem remained.
The strange thing is that TERM is set okay for xterms, but not for
linux consoles.  Could there be a bug in tcsh?


 # pppd -d -detach /dev/cua1 

Use ppd -d /dev/cua1 instead, and your program will go away.

program or do you mean problem?  My problem is that this process
keeps on terminating prematurely.  I get a message saying the job is
finished even though I haven't told it to finish and even though the
modem link hasn't been broken.  I thought that all the -detach
option did was to stop the pppd process from detaching itself from the
terminal I ran it from.  I don't understand why this would solve my
problem.


 Also, why is there no ppp-off script included with the ppp package?

There is - /etc/ppp/ip-down

But isn't this only executed after the link goes down?  How do I tell
the link that I want it to go down - that's what I thought ppp-off was
for?  Also, if I put things like reset the modem in ip-down, won't
this happen even when pppd dies prematurely like I mention above (in
which case I want to restart pppd rather than resetting the modem.)


Thanks again for your help - I appreciate it.

Mark Phillips.  ([EMAIL PROTECTED])


Re: critical :) nethack question

1996-06-16 Thread Kevin M Bealer
On Sat, 15 Jun 1996, Syrus Nemat-Nasser wrote:

 On Sat, 15 Jun 1996, Rick Hawkins wrote:
 
  Is there a way to open the chests other than kicking them?  would this
  stop the potions from shattering?
 
 This is the wrong forum, but you can use a skeleton key or credit card.
 
(clip)
 
 Syrus.
 
 --
 Syrus Nemat-Nasser [EMAIL PROTECTED]UCSD Physics Dept.

A good place to discuss this (or anything really) is debian-talk... That's
what it is for... (anything which is not debian only but is debianated ;)


If you want to learn about computer programming, the best book to read is
Lewis Caroll's Alice in Wonderland -- but that's just because it's the
best book to read on _any_ subject.
-- fortune cookie

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.
(Whatever is said in Latin sounds profound.)


Re: 3 Questions

1996-06-16 Thread Guy Maor
On Sun, 16 Jun 1996, Mark Phillips wrote:

 No - I checked, plus I even removed .cshrc and the problem remained.
 The strange thing is that TERM is set okay for xterms, but not for
 linux consoles.  Could there be a bug in tcsh?

Maybe - do this on a running tcsh whose pid is xxx:

cat /proc/xxx/environ | xargs -0n1 | grep '^TERM='

to see what tcsh was passed as the TERM.  It should be the same in the
actual shell.

 Use pppd -d /dev/cua1 instead, and your program will go away.

oops - I meant problem.

  Also, why is there no ppp-off script included with the ppp package?
 
 There is - /etc/ppp/ip-down
 
 But isn't this only executed after the link goes down?  How do I tell
 the link that I want it to go down - that's what I thought ppp-off was
 for?

Read the manpage for ppp under the signals option.  Send it a SIGTERM
with for example killall pppd.

  Also, if I put things like reset the modem in ip-down, won't
 this happen even when pppd dies prematurely like I mention above (in
 which case I want to restart pppd rather than resetting the modem.)

Use the persist option for this.


Guy


Re: X-window keys

1996-06-16 Thread Stephen Early
On Fri, 14 Jun 1996, Max Hyre wrote:

Martin Alonso Soto Jacome's [EMAIL PROTECTED] answer got to
 me first:
 
  Well, that's exactly what xdm is intended for.  xdm tries to keep an 
  xserver running permanently, so that you can always login to the system 
  using a nice graphical login prompt dialog box.
 
   ``Oh'', he said in a quiet voice.  (I've just started using X under
 Linux, and hadn't grasped the differences between startx and xdm.)
 
At the time I was tweaking the ModeLines to get the display size
 best suited to the screen, and thus was starting and killing X
 constantly.  Next time, I'll just use startx, and save myself some
 hassle.

You can also leave xdm running in the background, and start the server 
manually whenever you want to use X. Remove the line
:0 local /usr/X11R6/bin/X
from the /etc/X11/xdm/Xservers file, and xdm won't start an X server 
automatically. You can then use a command like
X -query localhost
...to start an X server when you need one.

If it's present, it might also be an idea to remove the line
xdm-start-server
from /etc/X11/config, as if it's present then the X configuration scripts 
will add the line back to /etc/X11/xdm/Xservers next time you configure 
or update the X packages. Replace it with no-xdm-start-server, and you 
shouldn't ever be prompted about xdm starting a server again.

Steve Early
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


debian.93 and inn

1996-06-16 Thread Chris Rhodes
Hello to all,

I have just changed from Slackware with kernel 1.2.8 to Debian .93 with
kernel 1.2.13 only to discover that it doesn't appear to come with the inn
news server.

After checking out the packages available for Debian, it appears that the
only inn package for Debian is the ELM version.

Rather than install Debian 1.1, I would prefer to stay with Debian .93
because my reason for changing from Slackware is it's general unreliablity
(and I have already spent a lot of time getting this far!)

Can somebody Please tell me the best way to get an inn news server on Debian
.93?

Or where to get a non ELM version to suit Debian .93?

Alternatively, can I just install the libc5 C library that the current inn
server depends on and then install the current inn server?

I have a running inn server on my Slackware setup that I could copy over,
but I presume that Debian would lose the dependancy checking abilities if I
use it?

Regards Chris Rhodes...


Re: critical :) nethack question

1996-06-16 Thread Dale Scheetz
On Sun, 16 Jun 1996, Kevin M Bealer wrote:

 A good place to discuss this (or anything really) is debian-talk... That's
 what it is for... (anything which is not debian only but is debianated ;)
 
So, how do we subscribe to this list Kevin?

Dwarf

  --

aka   Dale Scheetz   Phone:   1 (904) 877-0257
  Flexible Software  Fax: NONE 
  Black Creek Critters   e-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 If you don't see what you want, just ask --


Re: Majordomo install problem

1996-06-16 Thread Richard Kettlewell
Juhani Luhtanen writes:
Failed to create group majordom:
adduser: the user you specified already exist

when I try to run dpkg --install with the majordomo.deb file. 

It looks to me like the base disks now have the `majordom' user but
not the corresponding group (before you even install Majordomo, that
is).  Can someone confirm or refute this please - I don't have time to
check right now.

Since the base disks for 0.93 had neither the user nor the group the
preinst attemps to create them.  It then checks that both are there.

If that is the problem ... as a temporary workaround create a
`majordom' group, preferrably with the same GID as the `majordom'
group.  Make the default group for the `majordom' user be the GID of
the `majordom' group.  Then try reinstalling the majordomo package.

- Richard

-- 
http://www.elmail.co.uk/staff/richard/
GCS d- s+:- a-- C++ ULVS+++$ P+++ L++ E++ W(++,--) N(++,+) o? K w---
O? M- V? PS(+,+++) PE Y+ PGP+ t- 5++ X+@ R tv--- b++ DI+ D+ G e++
h r% y++


Re: debian.93 and inn

1996-06-16 Thread Rob Browning
Chris Rhodes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Rather than install Debian 1.1, I would prefer to stay with Debian .93
 because my reason for changing from Slackware is it's general unreliablity
 (and I have already spent a lot of time getting this far!)

Don't take this the wrong way, but you are wasting your time with
0.93.  1.1 has been a long time in the making and is more stable than
0.93.  I highly recommend you bite the bullet and go with 1.1.
Besides all the bug/security fixes, new packages etc. will be for 1.1.

--
Rob


Unidentified subject!

1996-06-16 Thread Greg Kirmayer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


aout svgalib problem

1996-06-16 Thread Jeffery S. Coy Jr.
i just installed the aout-svgalib-1.28-6.deb package, and noticed it
installs to /usr/i486-linuxaout rather than /usr/lib/i486-linuxaout, so
the system can't find it.

i tried writing the maintainer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), but the host
appears not to exist.

on a side note, has anyone made a doom package for debian?

jeff
---
Why Linux?  source code. POSIX. tcpip. job control. support from the authors.
drivers for most hardware.  because one terminal or process is never enough.
forget the other O/Ss, i use Linux- the choice of a gnu generation.




Re: debian.93 and inn

1996-06-16 Thread Bruce Perens
Chris,

We've just released Debian 1.1 and we removed Debian 0.93 from the FTP
sites. It doens't make sense to stick with 0.93 . I assure you that
1.1 is robust. Please install it, and you'll find that inn is there.

Thanks

Bruce