Re: Netscape y rendimiento

1999-03-08 Thread Antonio Castro
On Sun, 7 Mar 1999, Hue-Bond wrote:

 El domingo 07 de marzo de 1999 a la(s) 10:26:36 +0100, Antonio Castro contaba:
 
 Mientras tanto no se me pasa por la cabeza que llegado al punto de que el 
 sistema este degradado y sabiendo que esta es la causa no hagais otra cosa 
 que 'killall netscape' es lo más rápido y ensas situaciones eso se agradece.
 
  Estaría de acuerdo  si previamente se avisa a  los usuarios (si
  los recursos del sistema lo permiten ;-)).

En mi opinión cuando el administrador va a alterar el funcionamiento normal
por alguna razón justificada debería hablar por telefono o en persona. El
correo electrónico sirve si avisa con un día. Es una descortesía no dar
opción a escuchar la opnión de los usuarios y muchas veces descubre uno
que no es el mejor momento para hacer las cosas. 

Por el contrario cuando el sistema está degradado y la gente no puede
trabajar normalmente más vale no hacer muchas preguntas y solucionar
el problema rápidamente.

 La solución buena de verdad es contactar con más gente afectada por este
 problema y entre todos meterle mano a los fuentes de netscape
 
  Exactamente, pero no hay tantos programadores como usuarios.

Si ya lo sé. Incluso conozco muchos programadores de sistemas UNIX que no 
tienen ni idea de 'C'.

 -- 
 El servidor de NT se ha ido a tomar por c***. (Dakota)
 
 David Serrano [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Linux Registered User no. 87069
  http://come.to/Hue-Bond.world In love with TuX. Linux 2.2.2
 PGP Public key at http://www.ctv.es/USERS/fserrano/pgp_pubkey.asc

---
En caso de contestar a la lista mandame copia personal.

/\ /\  Los mas importantes desarrolladores de Bases de datos 
  \\W//están portando sus productos a Linux. Porque crees tu
 _|0 0|_   que será ?Yo creo que Linux es el futuro.
+-oOOO--(___o___)--OOOo--+ 
|  . . . . U U . . . . Antonio Castro Snurmacher |  
| http://slug.ctv.es/~acastro.[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
+()()()--()()()--+  


Re: Kernel 2.2.1: últimos pasos de instalación

1999-03-08 Thread Jesus M. Gonzalez

Quizás te interese mirar
http://www.openresources.com/es/magazine/linux-kernel-22/, un artículo
sobre el kernel 2.2, en castellano. Entre otras cosas, cuenta con
cierto detalle el proceso de instalación.

Jesus.

Miquel Escarrà writes:
  Hola:
  
  He compilado el kernel 2.2.1, siguiendo al punto los pasos del README. 
  
  Al llegar al make zImage tengo que hacer un make bzImage para que el sistema 
  se
  compile correctamente.
  
  A partir de ahí las instrucciones del fichero README me confunden:
  
  - en el directorio /usr/src/linux/arch/i386/boot aparece un fichero zImage 
  con a
  penas 3000 bytes; también aparece un subdirectorio compressed que parece 
  tener
  todos --algunos?-- componentes de la nueva instalación. 
  
  - yo he copiado estos ficheros al directorio /boot y he modificado lilo.conf
  para que la imagen del kernel fuera, como me parece más lógico, el zImage del
  directorio /usr/src/linux/arch/i386/boot.
  
  - dado que aún tengo un arranque dual que me gestiona LILO, lo he vuelto a
  instalar.
  
  -ahora lo que me pasa es que en el momento del arranque del PC sólo sigue
  adelante el arranque de W95, si intento arrancar con linux se reinicia.
  
  Pido ayuda para que alguien me indique cuáles son los últimos pasos, 
  teniendo el
  kernel compilado con make bzImage para poner el sistema a punto y además 
  tener
  el arranque dual estable.
  
  Saludos y gracias
  Miquel Escarrà
  
  
  --
  Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]  /dev/null
  
-- 
Jesus M. Gonzalez Barahona | Departamento de Informatica
tel +3491 624 9458, fax +3491 624 9129 | Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] | avd. Universidad, 30
Grupo de Sistemas y Comunicaciones | 28911 Leganes, Spain


RV: LiNUX en la calle ???

1999-03-08 Thread juanma



Estimados amigos de Debian:

Yo os voy a comentar mi punto de vista personal en cuanto a Linux.
Mi profesión no se acerca (ni con mucho) a la informática y simplemente me
quedo en un usuario más de windows. Más bien lo padezco aunque poco a poco y
con la ayuda de otras personas voy emigrando (en concreto a la distribución
Debian).

Lo que veo en despachos profesionales son como mucho un ordenador en cada
habitáculo y para imprimir cualquier archivo o bien se hace en el mismo
habitáculo o se le lleva un diskette a la secretaria para que lo imprima en
la laser.

Existen multitud de despachos formados por dos profesionales y la secretaria
a los que les instalan una redecilla con win95 o win 3.11 creando la
ilusión de que trabajan en equipo. ¿que comentar de cuelgues y demás
esquisiteces? porque un simple bloqueo hace perder más de media hora entre
que qué me ha pasado y chicos, voy a apagar la red. Además como esa
media hora se acerque a la hora del café, la mañana perdida.

Con respecto a Linux, veo un grán futuro a pesar de que se diga que es un
sistema operativo difícil.

Los usuarios normales no se defienden ni con windows. En los despachos hasta
les tienen que instalar el windows porque son incapaces, además les instalan
las herramoenatas que precisan. Lo justo saben escribir en un programa de
tratamiento de textos y lo imprimen. Esa es la realidad y no otra la que
aparece en la mayoría de los sitios. Para muestra un botón: cuántas veces he
visto en curriculums informática a nivel de usuario y ni siquiera saben
insertar un campo con la fecha en el documento (no digo ya hacer macros
sencillas con MSWord).


Por eso, a un usuario normal, le da igual lo que tiene delante mientras el
programa no le haga muchas preguntas. Linux se instala una vez, se prueba
una vez, se configura para que el usuario no haga el burro Y PRÁCTICAMENTE
TE PUEDES OLVIDAR (perdón por el grito pues es alegría). Por esa razón puede
servir de alternativa a windows u otros SO, pero ¿qué se necesita? un
linuxero cerca. Un linuxero que puede atender a muchos amigos a la vez. Pero
a partir de ahí, a partir de la instalación es raro, muy raro, que precises
otra vez al que te lo instaló, a no ser que quieras sacarle mucho más jugo a
la máquina. Por detrás queda el programa instalado que no va a colgarse
práctcamente nunca.

Entonces nos encontramos con tres tipos de usuario de un ordenador:

1.- el que enreda (tarde o temprano usará linux)
2.- el que no lo hace pero que solo utiliza un ordenador en casita y que
seguirá siempre con windows conformándose con la típica enciclopedia en
CDRom.
3.- El que no enreda y tiene el ordenador como una herramienta de trabajo. A
este, si se le instala (solo instalar) lo que necesita, podrá tirar con
linux y con toda su filosofía y no querrá windows para nada.

¿A quién va dirigido Linux? Al inquieto y no a otro. Y el inquieto no quiere
que le sirvan a la rusa quiere cortar él la carne.

Y pienso que vale la pena luchar por linux, es más que un sistema operativo,
es una forma de ver las cosas con mucho menos egoismo que el que proporciona
otros sistemas operativos.

Un saludo a todos.





Re: LiNUX en la calle ???

1999-03-08 Thread Jose M. Bello Dieguez
At 09:48 05/03/99 +, you wrote:

'amigabilidad' del sistema. Pero esto nos lleva a una cuestion 
importante : Que es un sistema amigable ?. Para mi, LiNUX es un sistema 
totalmente amigable, en tanto en cuanto es el S.O que conozco que mejor 
se cuida a si mismo, y por ende al usuario. En la otra vertiente, esta la 
gente que opina que un sistema 'amigable' es aquel que proporciona una 
mayor facilidad de uso. Y esta gente, con pocas excepciones, esta formada 
por el usuario pequenio y medio, que podrian englobarse en el 'usuario 
final'. Al igual que LiNUX hace pagar su potencia y fiabilidad, otros S.O 


Estando muy de acuerdo contigo, señalo dos cosas:

(1) La falsa amigabilidad de W95. ¿Cuántas personas conocéis a las que,
tras instalar y desinstalar programas share, se les ha quedado el sistema
hecho un auténtico higo?

(2) Una buena parte de los usuarios finales pasan de amigabilidad.
Utilizan los programas que les han instalado en la tienda, o llaman a un
amigo para que les instale los nuevos. Emplean las utilidades de los
programas, pero pasan completamente de intentar comprenderlo mínimamente.
Cosa que me parece muy bien por otra parte, pues no tiene por qué
interesarle ni gustarle la informática a todo el mundo.


Y esto es lo que debe entender el usuario de a pie. Este usuario, en 
la mayoria de los casos, empezo su vida informatica con Windows, hace 
pocos anios, y hay que comprender que a ese usuario le cueste moverse. De 
hecho, y me duele decir esto, el cambio a LiNUX no es recomendable en 
muchos casos, hasta que se haga un buen tejado, confortable y bondadoso 
para este usuario final. Muy a mi pesar, y con toda mi buena fe, a 
algunas personas que me han pedido consejo respecto a que S.O utilizar, y 
despues de exponerme el uso que le van a dar a la maquina, le he 
recomendado instalarse un Windows, que, para escribir cartas, le va a dar 
el mismo servicio que LiNUX, y de manera mas grata. Que nadie me 


Este es el típico usuario final que comentaba en el (2). Muchos de ellos ni
siquiera instalan sus propios programas en W95, sino que acuden a un amigo
o al servicio técnico de la tienda a que se los instalen. La clave está, de
momento, en que hay muchos amigos y muchas tiendas que saben usar la patata
95-98, y pocos que sepan hacerlo en Linux. Pero el problema no está en el
usuario final (un linux instalado con su X-Window bien configurado, su
staroffice, su KDE (o su vwf995, para que le resulte conocido), su WP, su
Gimp o los programas que necesite, no le va a ser más difícil de manejar
que un W95-98. Y cuando quiera cambiar o añadir algo, llama al amigo o va a
la tienda, como hacía con el otro producto. Con la garantía añadida de que
mientras no se ponga a jugar como su no va a hacer nada realmente
peligroso, cosa que no se puede decir de W95-98.


  - Se discute en la comunidad de vecinos la compra de un ordenador para 
la gestion de la comunidad ?. Apoya la mocion y cuidate de que este 
ordenador vaya equipado con LiNUX (si es necesario, hazte cargo tu del 
mismo).


Mejor todavía, que se haga cargo la tienda con su servicio técnico. Hay que
crear la demanda de linux, para que las tiendas se doten de técnicos en el
asunto. Además, es trabajo para linuxeros :-)


  - El jefe se queja de que la red ya se ha caido ocho veces en lo que va 
de mes ?. Pues recomiendale LiNUX, y si es necesario da un pequenio 
seminario a tus companieros para su manejo.

  - Que en el barrio nadie ha oido hablar de LiNUX ni de nada semejante 
?. Buscate unos cuantos linuxeros del mismo (que los habra) y organiza 
unas charlas.


Plenamente de acuerdo. 


   Y asi en muchos casos mas. Como se puede observar, todas ellas llevan 
implicitas un trabajo 'gratuito', que no lo es en ningun caso. En mi 
opinion, los linuxeros somos una de las congregaciones mas egoistas, pues 
si nos pasamos tres horas al dia manteniendo un paquete, haciendo un 
parche para el kernel, impartiendo un seminario, organizando unas 
jornadas, u otra actividad parecida, nos estamos ayudando a nosotros 
mismos, llevando para adelante el proyecto LiNUX.


Además del trabajo gratuito, que ya existe en W95-98 y mucho más en linux,
configurando una comunidad solidaria francamente admirable en el mundo que
hoy vivimos, insisto en que si la cosa fructifica puede haber trabajo
remunerado para linuxeros, en el sentido de montar y mantener equipos
dotados de linux para el usuario final. 

Saludos

JM

PS: En lo del trabajo remunerado no creáis que arrimo el ascua a mi
sardina, que un servidor come de la arqueología ;-)

Y ahora que me doy cuenta, estoy mandando esto desde windows... problemas
de escribir desde el trabajo :-)


--
* SE BUSCA *
José M. Bello Dieguez
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


RE: LiNUX en la calle ???

1999-03-08 Thread juanma
Estimados amigos de Debian:

Yo os voy a comentar mi punto de vista personal en cuanto a Linux.
Mi profesión no se acerca (ni con mucho) a la informática y simplemente me
quedo en un usuario más de windows. Más bien lo padezco aunque poco a poco y
con la ayuda de otras personas voy emigrando (en concreto a la distribución
Debian).

Lo que veo en despachos profesionales son como mucho un ordenador en cada
habitáculo y para imprimir cualquier archivo o bien se hace en el mismo
habitáculo o se le lleva un diskette a la secretaria para que lo imprima en
la laser.

Existen multitud de despachos formados por dos profesionales y la secretaria
a los que les instalan una redecilla con win95 o win 3.11 creando la
ilusión de que trabajan en equipo. ¿que comentar de cuelgues y demás
esquisiteces? porque un simple bloqueo hace perder más de media hora entre
que qué me ha pasado y chicos, voy a apagar la red. Además como esa
media hora se acerque a la hora del café, la mañana perdida.

Con respecto a Linux, veo un grán futuro a pesar de que se diga que es un
sistema operativo difícil.

Los usuarios normales no se defienden ni con windows. En los despachos hasta
les tienen que instalar el windows porque son incapaces, además les instalan
las herramoenatas que precisan. Lo justo saben escribir en un programa de
tratamiento de textos y lo imprimen. Esa es la realidad y no otra la que
aparece en la mayoría de los sitios. Para muestra un botón: cuántas veces he
visto en curriculums informática a nivel de usuario y ni siquiera saben
insertar un campo con la fecha en el documento (no digo ya hacer macros
sencillas con MSWord).


Por eso, a un usuario normal, le da igual lo que tiene delante mientras el
programa no le haga muchas preguntas. Linux se instala una vez, se prueba
una vez, se configura para que el usuario no haga el burro Y PRÁCTICAMENTE
TE PUEDES OLVIDAR (perdón por el grito pues es alegría). Por esa razón puede
servir de alternativa a windows u otros SO, pero ¿qué se necesita? un
linuxero cerca. Un linuxero que puede atender a muchos amigos a la vez. Pero
a partir de ahí, a partir de la instalación es raro, muy raro, que precises
otra vez al que te lo instaló, a no ser que quieras sacarle mucho más jugo a
la máquina. Por detrás queda el programa instalado que no va a colgarse
práctcamente nunca.

Entonces nos encontramos con tres tipos de usuario de un ordenador:

1.- el que enreda (tarde o temprano usará linux)
2.- el que no lo hace pero que solo utiliza un ordenador en casita y que
seguirá siempre con windows conformándose con la típica enciclopedia en
CDRom.
3.- El que no enreda y tiene el ordenador como una herramienta de trabajo. A
este, si se le instala (solo instalar) lo que necesita, podrá tirar con
linux y con toda su filosofía y no querrá windows para nada.

¿A quién va dirigido Linux? Al inquieto y no a otro. Y el inquieto no quiere
que le sirvan a la rusa quiere cortar él la carne.

Y pienso que vale la pena luchar por linux, es más que un sistema operativo,
es una forma de ver las cosas con mucho menos egoismo que el que proporciona
otros sistemas operativos.

Un saludo a todos.





Re: version de window maker

1999-03-08 Thread Xose Manoel Ramos
El mantenedor del paquete del WindowMaker (y de casi todas las
DockApps) participa en la lista o sea que me imagino que te
responderá el.

Yo te puedo decir que en Debian una vez que se ha sacado una versión
(la Hamm por ejemplo), ya no se hacen cambios en esa versión. Las
nuevas versiones de los programas se van añadiendo a la próxima
distribución.

De hecho actualmente la Debian 2.1 traerá wmaker 0.2x, pero la
próxima versión ya tiene paquettes 0.5x.

Yo lo que he hecho toda mi vida es bajarme esos paquetes nuevos de
Internet, y de paso sirvo de beta tester de los programas (de hecho
el wmaker 0.2x tenía un bug bastante tonto).

Pero bueno, como muchas veces pasa que los nuevos paquetes están
enlazados con nuevas versiones, pues puede pasar que te tengas que
bajar 6 o 7 liberías nuevas.

Como esto es un latazo, pues el menda (yo) lo que hago es bajarme las
fuentes del paquete wmaker 0.50 y recompilarlo enlazandolo con las
librerías de Hamm.

Hace unos meses dije en esta lista que tenía unos paquetes de la
Wmaker 0.2 para Hamm, y sé que hay un par de personas usandolo (y no
tuvieron que actualizarse de distribución).

Estoy a punto de hacer lo mismo con la Wmaker 0.5 o sea que ya os
comentaré si quereis usar el paquete de marras.

(PD/ que quede claro que el que se curra los paquetes es Marcelo. Yo
me limito a recompilarlos con versiones antiguas de las librerías).

-- 
Saudos:
ose[EMAIL PROTECTED]   (Vigo/Galicia/España)
 http://pagina.de/xmanoel/
 http://w3.to/mikkeli/

03/07   Last Gilbert  Sullivan opera produced, 1896


Re: modems

1999-03-08 Thread Xose Manoel Ramos
No necesariamente todos los winmodems son más baratos. En muchas
marcas existe la versión interna (PCI y me imagino que WinModem) y el
modem externo (que seguro que es de verdad) y los venden a precios
iguales (o muy similares).

A quien sí le interesa es a los fabricantes pues los costes son mucho
menores en los módems emulados.

Por cierto, ya que hablamos del tema, ya han aparecido las tarjetas
de sonido emuladas. Por ejemplo el caso de la Sound Blaster PCI 64.
Si bien funcionan en Linux, pues lo cierto es que yo no las
recomendaría demasiado.

-- 
Saudos:
ose[EMAIL PROTECTED]   (Vigo/Galicia/España)
 http://pagina.de/xmanoel/
 http://w3.to/mikkeli/

03/07   Last Gilbert  Sullivan opera produced, 1896


Re: Instalar .deb con dselect de fuera del CD de distribucion

1999-03-08 Thread Santiago Vila
On Sat, 6 Mar 1999, Andres Seco Hernandez wrote:

 Hasta ahora, he usado dselect para instalar paquetes que vienen con
 la distribucion hamm.
 
 ¿Como lo hago para instalar paquetes que
 vienen con CDs de revistas?

Puedes usar el método dpkg-multicd que trae la Debian 2.1 (no lo he
probado, pero puesto que Debian 2.1 necesita 2 CD-ROMs, puede que te
funcione).

O bien puedes usar dpkg a mano:

dpkg -i paquete1.deb paquete2.deb paquete3.deb ...

-- 
 a771bba08ef1b6042b86b9909097b6e5 (a truly random sig)


Re: LiNUX en la calle ???

1999-03-08 Thread Juanmi Mora
On Sun, 7 Mar 1999, TooManySecrets wrote:

  La verdad, no seré yo quien vaya aconsejando a los amigos que se instalen un
  Linux... quiero tener tiempo para seguir viviendo :-)
 
 ¡Jodón! Cualquiera diría... Pues yo lo hago, y muchos lo prueban.
 Afortunadamente, hoy día y gracias a Gnome y KDE (personalmente Gnome), la
 gente entra en el círculo linuxero y la gran mayoría, de los basados en mi
 experiencia, no vuelven a salir... Qué quieres que te diga...

Seguro que no estás hablando de un usuario final, final, final. A muchos
usuarios finales les cambias los iconos de sitio y no saben continuar. A
estos usuarios no les hables del /dev/hdb.

A mí me encanta Linux tal como está, lo único que me gustaría es que ganara
un poco más de prestigio en el mundillo profesional, que esto se está
consiguiendo, vale, pero todos los días me encuentro con alguién que saca
una sonrisilla asquerosa cuando le hablas de Linux.

Yo creo que Linux debe estar muy orientado al mercado de los servidores y no
pensar tanto en ser el sucesor de Güindos 98, esto no sería bueno para
Linux. Que conste que tampoco estoy en contra de las Suites, sólo digo que
el gran público no exige más que lo que Güindos le ofrece.

Saludos!!!


 Juanmi Mora 
  Barcelona - España
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 - Powered by Linux -
Debian 2.0 Hamm



Re: version de window maker

1999-03-08 Thread Marcelo E. Magallon
On Mon, Mar 08, 1999 at 01:33:21PM +0100, Xose Manoel Ramos wrote:

 De hecho actualmente la Debian 2.1 traerá wmaker 0.2x, pero la
 próxima versión ya tiene paquettes 0.5x.

Cierto.  La cosa es:

hamm   -- wmaker 0.14.1-7
slink  -- wmaker 0.20.3-4
potato -- wmaker 0.51.1-1 (subiendo en este instante)

 Pero bueno, como muchas veces pasa que los nuevos paquetes están
 enlazados con nuevas versiones, pues puede pasar que te tengas que
 bajar 6 o 7 liberías nuevas.
 
 Como esto es un latazo, pues el menda (yo) lo que hago es bajarme las
 fuentes del paquete wmaker 0.50 y recompilarlo enlazandolo con las
 librerías de Hamm.

Bueno, la máquina que uso para compilar wmaker (el paquete) tiene instalado
slink, y seguirá teniendo slink durante un buen rato, así que
momentáneamente los nuevos paquetes de wmaker deben funcionar en cualquier
máquina con slink.

Para hamm, este, bueno, no tengo a mi disposición ninguna máquina con Debian
2.0, así que no me es posible -- por eso agradezco el trabajo de Xose.


Marcelo


Como instalar GNOME

1999-03-08 Thread Lucky




Me han dicho que GNOME es un buen gestor de 
ventanas y ahora lo tengo, pero son muchos arxivos y no se en que orden van para 
instalarlos.

Me podeis ayudar?


svgalib

1999-03-08 Thread jon
hola,alguien que programe con la svgalib?




Re: Debian-Release-Party

1999-03-08 Thread Bob Nielsen
On Mon, 8 Mar 1999, Wolfgang Gernot Bauer wrote:

 Where, when (March 9, 00:00:00 GMT that means in about 20 minutes)?

No, you are 24 hours too early.  March 9 is Tuesday (or Dienstag if you
prefer).

Bob


Bob Nielsen Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson, AZ  AMPRnet:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DM42nh  http://www.primenet.com/~nielsen



Re: LinuxDos assmebler

1999-03-08 Thread Richard Lyon

 I was thinking about learning assembler, but there is a
 problem.
 I heard about DOS interrupts, which I guess work only in
 DOS.
 Which I guess means that if I buy a book about x86
 assembler,
 and it speak a lot about that interrupt things,
 I have a fair chance it wouldn't work in Linux, is that
 right?
 Maybe in that case, there are Linux x86 assembler books?
 
 Another question: How assembler works in the secure Linux
 environment?
 Linux checks that calls are not a threat to the system?
 

Funny how this question has come up again. You might like to check the list 
archive for the previous discussion.

To start this you will need to learn:

X86 assembler - Get a good general purpose book without too many references to 
any operating system.

GAS The GNU assembler. It comes with it's own documentation.

Writing assembler in LINUX. See the Assembly-HOWTO that comes with all linux 
distros (ie look in /usr/doc/HOWTO).

The simplest way to test a few assembler instructions is to use the assembler 
in-line capabilities of gcc . Forget anything you learnt about DOS software 
interrupts.

There nothing wrong with staying with DOS until you feel confident with 
assembler. At least it is simple. Linux is good as a host platform if you want 
to write assembler for what is known as a embedded target.

Regards 


Re: packages missing

1999-03-08 Thread Richard Lyon
Are we talking about HAMM?

 are there some x-packages missing from stable? (xfree86-common and so
 on) if so, when are they going to get here?




Re: Linux

1999-03-08 Thread Richard Lyon
 I would like to invest in Linux but can't find a stock in that name --
 can you help

I suggest the fastest and best way to lose your money is to send it to me.


hamm/slink gotcha

1999-03-08 Thread Nathan O. Siemers


Hello all:

Hamm (up to date as of about 3 months ago) update to slink using
dselect gives the errors (upon Install):

internal error - no filename at -e line 12, P chunk 14.

installation script returned error exit status 1.
Press RETURN to continue.

Anyone have a clue why I am getting this behavior?  I have a local
mirror of the debian archive that I believe I am pointing to
correctly.

Thanks,

nathan






-- 
Nathan O. Siemers - Transcriptional Profiling, Bioinformatics -
Division of Applied Genomics - Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical
Research Institute - Hopewell Building 3B - P.O. Box 5400, Princeton,
NJ 08543-5400 - 609 818-6568 - [EMAIL PROTECTED]


(no problems) Re: X, new video card, and servers.

1999-03-08 Thread Daniel J. Brosemer
  When you say that it's a 3.3.3.1 server, I assume this means it won't work
  with 3.3.2, and I've heard that compiling xfree is a pain (though haven't
  tried it).  Is there an experimental version somewhere (I've looked in
  /debian/project/experimental -- is there another repository of
  experimental packages?)
 
 It's working without a hint of trouble on my system.  I'm currently
 running the most current X packages out of slink (3.3.2.3), plus the
 pre-compiled 3DLabs server (glibc2, 3.3.3.1) from the XFree86 site.  Now
 whether it's by chance or design that the two versions co-exist peacefully,
 I really can't say...

This is excellent news!

 I heard on debian-devel a week or so ago that someone had some
 experimental 3.3.3.1 packages available, though I don't have the address
 handy.  A quick search through the mailing-list archives ought to turn
 it up, tho.

I'll have a look.

Thanks for the info, I'll report back when I pop the card in.

-Dano


Re: LinuxDos assmebler

1999-03-08 Thread ivan
At 04:53 PM 3/6/99 -0500, Alexander Gutfraind wrote:
Hello fellows!

Hello Alexander !

I was thinking about learning assembler

Me too ...

but there is a problem.

Probably many problems - you just haven't discovered them yet :)

I heard about DOS interrupts, which I guess work only in
DOS.

Correct

Which I guess means that if I buy a book about x86
assembler,
and it speak a lot about that interrupt things,
I have a fair chance it wouldn't work in Linux, is that
right?

Yes - the Linux interrupts are completely different to MS-DOS.  Pls refer
to the archives for further discussion particularly referring to int 10h
(video bios calls).  I asked these questions very recently.

You may not need interrupt driven routines.  Check out the list of system
calls that are available.  The Kernel Hackers guide is a good place to start.

Also check out the libraries that are available - for example I am trying
to work with svgalib/vgagl for graphics routines.

You may also want to learn more about in-line assembler which gives you
access to the high level constructs of the language of your choice and
assembler routines for time critical code - this also may eliminate the
need for interrupt calls.

Maybe in that case, there are Linux x86 assembler books?


I've looked but was unable to find one - essentially assembler language is
the same regardless of the OS but the permissions change.  Linux does not
allow a user to access memory space outside of the allocated user space
whereas MS-DOS allows you to access anything at any time.  So, if you are
trying to code an example written for MS-DOS that uses absolute memory
addresses this may not work but AFAIK examples using relative addressing
should work fine.

Another question: How assembler works in the secure Linux
environment?

That depends specifically upon your requirements.  Most assembler will
translate directly and correctly (be sure you know the difference between
ATT syntax and Intel syntax though - depending on which compiler you use)
but see the comments above.

I have found that I/O functions are the biggest difficulty because you have
such limitations placed on you by Linux.  Once again, I can only suggest
that you refer to system calls, system libraries and learning in-line
assembler for these requirements

Linux checks that calls are not a threat to the system?


Yes 

TIA! :)

HTH :)

You should read the Assembler How-To if you haven't already and pls check
the archives as there was comprehensive discussion as mentioned above.
There are many web sites which give some instruction on assembler also.

If you are unable to find these feel free to write to me privately and I
will give you my list that I found mostly useful.

Ivan.


Attachment Converted: c:\eudora\attach\vcard2.vcf



TAGS file for gzipped source in emacs/xemacs

1999-03-08 Thread Miguel Wooding SF Ten.Union
 
Does anyone know how to make and use a TAGS file when the source files
are gzipped? I installed the xemacs20-supportel package, which
installs all of the *.el elisp files in gzipped form.  (I would guess
that emacs[19,20]-el also install the sources in gzipped form.) I
suppose I could simply unzip them, but I'd rather not use all the
extra space, and then any upgrade wouldn't work properly since dpkg
would only overwrite the gzipped files. I like to have the option of
looking at the source when I'm trying to understand what a command
does; plus it helps me understand elisp better.  I'm not, however,
planning to modify the source right now.
 
It seems that this might be a two step problem: (1) Generate the TAGS 
file, using etags, from the gzipped sources, and (2) Make {x}emacs 
auto-decompress the sources.  I don't really know a good easy 
solution.  
 
If anyone has any ideas, I'd appreciate it.   
 
Thanks, 
--Miguel 
  


uploading a website (reverse mirror)?

1999-03-08 Thread Frankie
I have a slow modem. My website is ~9MB. When I change files in it, I
don't want to have to a) upload the whole site or b) remember which
files I've changed, and upload them manually.

ftp-upload and sitecopy both upload a site based on local changes. They
do not consult the remote site to see which files need updating. They
base it on what they THINK have changed. There may be times when I will
upload files from another OS, so I do not want to have to upload files
twice, depending on which OS I upload them with.

Is there an upload utility that compares local and remote file versions
and uploads the changed version based on the differences between local
and remote systems rather than local and old_local versions?

cheers,
frankie
-- 
Confession is good for the soul only in the sense that a tweed coat is
good
for dandruff.

--Peter de Vries

http://www.skunkpussy.freeserve.co.uk - Drum'n'Bass music, samples and
links.

ICQ://25576761begin:vcard 
n:;Frankie
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:http://www.skunkpussy.freeserve.co.uk
adr:;;;Birmingham;;;UK
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Mr
x-mozilla-cpt:;-8160
fn:Frankie
end:vcard


CD-R Win95 to Debian

1999-03-08 Thread Brian Clark

Hello all:

I recently installed Debian (frozen/slink) on a Linux box here. My primary
machine, for now, is running Windows 95.
I installed Debian using the Driver and Rescue diskettes (which I made) and
installed the base system from an archive which I downloaded to an existing
RedHat partition.

With a *great deal* of help from a friend, the setup that I have now is
terrific! However, I would like to have a Debian CD-Rom so that I don't
have to do it this way again (or maybe install on another system here (like
this one!) without doing an Internet-install).

I have a cd-writer, so I would love to be able to make my own Debian CD
from the files at the Debian.org FTP. 

Has anyone done/tried this?

I have heard that there is a special way that one would have to do this
(maybe a special program), in order for this to work - i.e., write to cd-r
and be able to install Debian from that homegrown cd-r.

I would be writing the Debian CD on a Win95 machine with files downloaded
via FTP, and I would love to know if there are any problems in doing so.

Any advice or suggestions would be appreciated very much, as I couldn't
find any written information on this subject.

Thanks -

Brian


Re: uploading a website (reverse mirror)?

1999-03-08 Thread servis
*- On  8 Mar, Frankie wrote about uploading a website (reverse mirror)?
 
 Is there an upload utility that compares local and remote file versions
 and uploads the changed version based on the differences between local
 and remote systems rather than local and old_local versions?
 
 cheers,
 frankie

Look at the rsync package.  It is what is used for the Debian mirror
sites. From the man page:

DESCRIPTION
   rsync  is a program that behaves in much the same way that
   rcp does, but has many more options  and  uses  the  rsync
   remote-update  protocol  to greatly speedup file transfers
   when the destination file already exists.

   The rsync remote-update protocol allows rsync to  transfer
   just  the differences between two sets of files across the
   network link, using an efficient checksum-search algorithm
   described  in  the  technical report that accompanies this
   package.


-- 
Brian 
-
Never criticize anybody until you have walked a mile in their shoes,  
 because by that time you will be a mile away and have their shoes. 
   - unknown  

Mechanical Engineering[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Purdue University   http://www.ecn.purdue.edu/~servis
-


PGP complaint mail programs

1999-03-08 Thread Emil Soleyman-Zomalan
I know that there is a multitude of email clients that provide pgp
complaincy. However, as a newbie I am not as well versed in their
advantages/disadvantages (and more importantly user satisfaction).
I would greatly appreciate it if anyone can direct me to a link or
provide information about this topic.

Thanks,
Emil Soleyman-Zomalan


Re: Linux won't work with RAM 64 MB

1999-03-08 Thread Hamish Moffatt
Werner: I do not know why your system would not boot correctly with
 64Mb RAM. Linux 2.0 will not recognise more than 64Mb RAM automatically,
but it will still boot (but ignore the extra memory). I have 128Mb RAM
in my system here and Linux 2.0 works fine.

On Sun, Mar 07, 1999 at 12:12:34PM -0700, Mark Yobb wrote:
 You can get Debian to use your 128M of memory by passing a command to
 the kernel with your boot loader.  I use lilo and this is what I put in
 my /etc/lilo.conf file
 
 append=mem=80M

Mark: this tells Linux about the extra memory, but it will still work
without it.


Hamish
-- 
Hamish Moffatt VK3TYD  [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Debian packages at ftp://ftp.rising.com.au/pub/hamish. PGP#EFA6B9D5
CCs of replies from mailing lists are welcome.   http://hamish.home.ml.org


Favorite WP/Office software...

1999-03-08 Thread Paul Nathan Puri
I'm curious what people feel is their favorite word processor/ office
productivity suite (i.e., star office, word perfect, lyx, TeX, siag
office, etc.).

NatePuri
Certified Law Student
 Debian GNU/Linux Monk
McGeorge School of Law
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://ompages.com


lilo win/linux for 2 large HDD

1999-03-08 Thread Vitaliy Ababiy
I have two HDD
hda: FUJITSU MPA3026AT, 2503MB w/0kB Cache, CHS=635/128/63, DMA
hdb: ASUS CD-S340, ATAPI CDROM drive
hdc: QUANTUM FIREBALL ST4.3A, 4110MB w/81kB Cache, CHS=14848/9/63, UDMA
Partition check:
 hda: hda1 hda2 hda3
 hdc: hdc1 hdc2 hdc3
With next partition:
fdisk -l /dev/fda

   Device Boot   BeginStart  End   Blocks   Id  System
/dev/hda1   *11  127   512032+  83  Linux native
/dev/hda2  128  128  13844352   82  Linux swap
/dev/hda3  139  139  635  2003904   83  Linux native

   Device Boot   BeginStart  End   Blocks   Id  System
/dev/hdc1   *11 4371  1239147c  Unknown
/dev/hdc2 4096 437210909  1853523c  Unknown
/dev/hdc3102401091014848  1116706+  83  Linux native

hdc1 - Windows95 (system)
hdc2 - windows95 too 
mount
/dev/hda1 on / type ext2 (rw)
/dev/hdc3 on /usr type ext2 (rw)
/dev/hda3 on /home type ext2 (rw,usrquota)
/dev/hdc1 on /mnt/b_system type vfat ...
/dev/hdc2 on /mnt/b_work type vfat

Usually i choice through bios what boot (C or D disk)
C - Linux, D- windows
but want choice from lilo (without destroy win boot) and try

#my lilo.conf
boot=/dev/hda1  
root=/dev/hda1
compact   
install=/boot/boot.b
message=/boot/message   
prompt  
map=/boot/map   
vga=normal  
delay=100   
image=/vmlinuz  
label=Linux 
read-only   
other=/dev/hdc1 
label=win   
table=/dev/hdc  

Problem: when i try win from lilo 
then  it stop without any message  (reset can help only)
(try Linux - all OK)

Thanks




beowulf clusters?

1999-03-08 Thread Paul Nathan Puri
Do nodes in a beowulf cluster all have to have the same hw configuration?

or can different types of intel based configurations work?

NatePuri
Certified Law Student
 Debian GNU/Linux Monk
McGeorge School of Law
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://ompages.com


Conflict

1999-03-08 Thread Bal K. Paudyal
Hi Friends,

Does anybody know why:

When DNS server is running (as a daemon), telnet and ftp to that server
does not work properly. It gets connected but nothing is seen on the remote
host.

Thanks


route: SIOCADDRT: Invalid argument

1999-03-08 Thread Oz Dror
When I type
ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1
route add -net 127.0.0.0
I get 
SIOCADDRT: Invalid argument

When I type 
IPADDR=192.168.0.4
NETMASK=255.255.255.0
NETWORK=192.168.0.0
BROADCAST=192.168.0.255
GATEWAY=192.168.0.4
ifconfig eth0 ${IPADDR} netmask ${NETMASK} broadcast ${BROADCAST}
route add -net ${NETWORK}

I get the same error

but my network works fine.

if I type
ping 192.168.0.1 it works

Any help will be appreciated.

What is the equivalent of these commands when using IP_ALIAS

Thanks
Oz Dror
-- 

NAME   Oz Dror, Los Angeles, California   
EMAIL  [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux  since 8/15/94
PHONE  Fax (310) 474-3126





Laptop install Help Needed

1999-03-08 Thread Chris Brown
Hello,

I'm a newbie to Linux and want to install debian on my laptop as my 
primary (only) machine, its a compaq armada 1535 w/ 3com 3c575 
pcmcia ethernet.

I've got nfs/ftp access to a linux box on the local network which
has a copy of the hamm distribution and have made the rescue and
driver disks, partitioned the drive but haven't got much further. My
questions are;

1. I'm not using the tecra version disks, but have not had any 
lockups with the standard ones I'm using. Which is the right choice?

2. I can't get the machine to talk on the network. How do I do this?

I know there are a hundred right answers to this question, I'm
looking for the easiest/quickest ways How do I get 3c575
support? I'm not sure I'm up to compiling a kernel yet. Should I
consider other pcmcia cards that I have access to like NE200 or
3c589, or is pcmcia problematic and should I look for a pocket
adatper or something else?

3. Once I get the network working should I use NFS or FTP to access 
the packages? (are there important pro's and con's of each?)

TIA for any suggestions,

Chris



 *
 Chris Brown   [EMAIL PROTECTED] !!! HELP FIGHT SPAM !!!

 Join; www.cauce.org  See; spam.abuse.net, spamsucks.com, www.cm.org
 
 


xserver fixated on tty7?

1999-03-08 Thread Alan Su
i probably missed something as i upgraded to slink today, but is the
tty that the xserver uses somehow changed to be in some config file
(rather than taking the first unused one)?

i had a couple extra virtual consoles which i used to use on tty7 and
tty8.  after the upgrade, the xserver periodically got hosed (no
response to keyboard input/mouse clicks) and when i was able to switch
over to virtual consoles, i saw that the one sitting on tty7 was
hosed.  i modified inittab to remove the two extra getty's, and now
everything's back to normal.

anyone have any ideas?  thanks.

-alan


Re: Linux

1999-03-08 Thread Paul Nathan Puri
There are no linux based corps. that currently have offered IPOs.

RedHat will likely be the first (and potentially VAResearch); pay
attention to those names.

NatePuri
Certified Law Student
 Debian GNU/Linux Monk
McGeorge School of Law
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://ompages.com

On Mon, 8 Mar 1999, Richard Lyon wrote:

  I would like to invest in Linux but can't find a stock in that name --
  can you help
 
 I suggest the fastest and best way to lose your money is to send it to me.
 
 
 -- 
 Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]  /dev/null
 
 


Re: Qmail to Exim woes

1999-03-08 Thread Johann Spies
On Fri, 5 Mar 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 So my questions are :  
 Is the eximconfig script setting exim up for anyone else?  

It did not work for me.  I had a lot of trouble getting exim to work in a
similar setup than yours. People on this list helped me otherwise I would
not have succeeded. 

Johann

 --
| Johann Spies Windsorlaan 19  |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]3201 Pietermaritzburg |
| Tel/Faks Nr. +27 331-46-1310 Suid-Afrika (South Africa)  |
 --

 Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them
  in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the 
  Holy Ghost; Teaching them to observe all things  
  whatsoever I have commanded you; and, lo, I am with 
  you alway, even unto the end of the world. Amen. 
 Matthew 28:19,20 


Re: it's far, far more than a mere editor.

1999-03-08 Thread Johann Spies
On Thu, 4 Mar 1999, mike shupp wrote:

 
 I hadn't been intending to ask about this, but since folks are
 exposing their prej--er-- discussing fine points of editors,
 has there ever been a UNIX or Linux port of XyWrite in any of
 its incarnations or of NotaBena?  (or Atex, a dedicated word
 processing system from which XyWrite was derived?)

Not what I know of.  But did you have a look at LaTeX?  When I showed
Latex to a former NotaBena-user, he mentioned that there are similarities
in approach.

Johann

 --
| Johann Spies Windsorlaan 19  |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]3201 Pietermaritzburg |
| Tel/Faks Nr. +27 331-46-1310 Suid-Afrika (South Africa)  |
 --

 Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them
  in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the 
  Holy Ghost; Teaching them to observe all things  
  whatsoever I have commanded you; and, lo, I am with 
  you alway, even unto the end of the world. Amen. 
 Matthew 28:19,20 


Re: I can't believe this

1999-03-08 Thread Brian Clark
George Bonser said:
//http://www.zdnet.com/pcmag/features/opensource/390823.html
//
//zdnet did a review of Debian. Included are such comments as:
//
//Debian GNU/Linux 2.0 ($38.95 direct) ...
//...Windows users should steer clear of Debian.
//
//...The company says it will include a new application installer in Debian
//GNU/Linux 2.1.
//
//Uhm, which company would this be?
//
//...Debian is distributed by Linux Press...
//
//Yeah, and a whole bunch of other people. Basicly the article's slant is
//be afraid of Debian, be very afraid.
---

Oh, and consider the page before it, on Caldera:
http://www.zdnet.com/pcmag/features/opensource/390822.html

One of Caldera's greatest strengths is KDE (Kool Desktop Environment), a
graphical desktop environment that essentially makes Linux look and act
like Windows.

Sure, KDE is a pretty good (I've used it also). But, the whole purpose in
choosing Linux is because you would rather not use MS Windows. Aside from
that, the quoted statement above just *sounds* like, This is as 'good' as
Windows 95, so we like it. 

As far as comparisons go, for the distributions listed there, I've used
RedHat. Debian, to me, has been 400% easier to manage than RedHat. The
difference between RPM and Debian's package system is insane; RPMs made a
total mess of my system.

Also, things like the PPP setup on Debian was much easier. 


Red Hat is known for its package manager (RPM), an open-source program
that is used in many other distributions as well. RPM lets you safely
install and uninstall applications, avoid conflicts between programs, and
even upgrade the kernel itself without having to reinstall your system
software or files.

That's crazy, and it's certainly not true.

If you're trying Linux for the first time, Red Hat is the best choice.

If I had to choose for the first time again, there is no doubt in my mind
that I would go with Debian. Period.

b.




Re: I can't believe this

1999-03-08 Thread Ben Collins
On Sun, Mar 07, 1999 at 08:44:34PM -0800, George Bonser wrote:

 http://www.zdnet.com/pcmag/features/opensource/390823.html

 zdnet did a review of Debian. Included are such comments as:

 Debian GNU/Linux 2.0 ($38.95 direct) ...
 ...Windows users should steer clear of Debian.

Aside from the obvious errors, I think we should note the criticisms,
they are actually quite true (they didn't beat around the bush when
mentioning them either).

--
--- -  -   ---  -  - - ---   
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Debian GNU/Linux
OpenLDAP Core - [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
UnixGroup Admin - Jordan Systems The Choice of the GNU Generation
-- -- - - - ---   --- --  -  - ---  -  --


Re: uploading a website (reverse mirror)?

1999-03-08 Thread Frankie
George Bonser wrote:
 
 On Mon, 8 Mar 1999, Frankie wrote:
 
  Is there an upload utility that compares local and remote file versions
  and uploads the changed version based on the differences between local
  and remote systems rather than local and old_local versions?
 
 You might be able to run something like mirror on the remote system that
 looks at your local system at regular intervals and grabs any changes.
 As long as the local files are accessable with ftp from the remote site,
 it should be OK.

Sorry I should have said - I do not have an account on this machine. I
have FTP only. :-(


-- 
Confession is good for the soul only in the sense that a tweed coat is
good
for dandruff.

--Peter de Vries

http://www.skunkpussy.freeserve.co.uk - Drum'n'Bass music, samples and
links.

ICQ://25576761begin:vcard 
n:;Frankie
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:http://www.skunkpussy.freeserve.co.uk
adr:;;;Birmingham;;;UK
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Mr
x-mozilla-cpt:;-8160
fn:Frankie
end:vcard


RE: route: SIOCADDRT: Invalid argument

1999-03-08 Thread Shaleh

On 08-Mar-99 Oz Dror wrote:
 When I type
 ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1
 route add -net 127.0.0.0
 I get 
 SIOCADDRT: Invalid argument
 

2.2.x (and later 2.1.x) kernels do not need route statements.  Unless you have
to set a gateway that is non-obvious.


RE: Laptop install Help Needed

1999-03-08 Thread Shaleh

On 08-Mar-99 Chris Brown wrote:
 Hello,
 
 I'm a newbie to Linux and want to install debian on my laptop as my 
 primary (only) machine, its a compaq armada 1535 w/ 3com 3c575 
 pcmcia ethernet.
 

there is now a debian-laptop list.  You can ask laptop specific questions there.

 
 1. I'm not using the tecra version disks, but have not had any 
 lockups with the standard ones I'm using. Which is the right choice?
 

If you needed a tecra disk, you would have used it (-:

 2. I can't get the machine to talk on the network. How do I do this?
 
 I know there are a hundred right answers to this question, I'm
 looking for the easiest/quickest ways How do I get 3c575
 support? I'm not sure I'm up to compiling a kernel yet. Should I
 consider other pcmcia cards that I have access to like NE200 or
 3c589, or is pcmcia problematic and should I look for a pocket
 adatper or something else?
 

Grab the latest pcmcia-cs package from unstable.  The one in hamm lacks support
for many 100mbit based cards.  Unfortunately, if the kernel version of the
package does not match your kernel, a recompile is needed.  This is VERY easy. 
Just install the kernel-package and read the docs.

 3. Once I get the network working should I use NFS or FTP to access 
 the packages? (are there important pro's and con's of each?)
 

Either on a local network.  Just depends on which one works fastest and easiest
for you.  Over ppp at home I would definately suggest ftp.


Re: Kernel Image

1999-03-08 Thread Doug Dine
At 3/7/99 11:57:00 AM, you wrote:

Did you install the kernel-image-...deb file  (in the directory above the
one with the source code) using dpkg?

I used Dselect and installed the kernel source package.


Doug Dine

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.xoom.com/dougdine
http://members.xoom.com/loveless


NetZero - We believe in a FREE Internet.  Shouldn't you?
Get your FREE Internet Access and Email at
http://www.netzero.net/download.html


Compiling Kernel

1999-03-08 Thread Doug Dine
Hi,

I am going to compile the kernel again as the first attempt
apparently didn't suceed. My users manual describes
the steps as follows. Is this correct?

1. change to directory /usr/src/linux

2. make config

3. make dep ; make clean

4. make zImage

5. make modules

6. make modules_install
Doug Dine

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.xoom.com/dougdine
http://members.xoom.com/loveless


NetZero - We believe in a FREE Internet.  Shouldn't you?
Get your FREE Internet Access and Email at
http://www.netzero.net/download.html


RE: Compiling Kernel

1999-03-08 Thread Shaleh

On 08-Mar-99 Doug Dine wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I am going to compile the kernel again as the first attempt
 apparently didn't suceed. My users manual describes
 the steps as follows. Is this correct?
 
 1. change to directory /usr/src/linux
 
 2. make config

make menuconfig is a lot easier to handle

 
 3. make dep ; make clean
 
 4. make zImage
 
 5. make modules
 
 6. make modules_install
 Doug Dine

Try installing the kernel-package and use make-kpkg.  it will make a deb
package of the kernel image and handle all the steps after make config.


Re: I can't believe this

1999-03-08 Thread Mark Wagnon
George Bonser wrote:
 
 I think these criticisms are overstated in many cases.  Ever try to get
 ppp running on Solaris? I have installed many distributions. The initial
 install is only a portion of the problem. The rest comes in getting the
 system configured the way that you need it.  That is where Debian excels.
 

I've tried most of the distributions. I started with slackware, dabbled
with redhat, tried debian 1.3 but wasn't able to get past dselect back
then, used suse for more that a year, and now I'm settled with debian. 

IMO, dselect takes a little getting used to, but after playing with it
for a while, it really is quite powerful. I really like apt though.

Debian has been the *easiest* to get a ppp connection up and running.
I've never really had any problem with X, except for my early
experiences with trident card (don't go there!).

I can't really find any criticisms that were mentioned that reading
through the docs, or asking on this list wouldn't solve.

Maybe one of us should write a rebuttal to point out the author's
misconceptions about debian. Maybe it might even get published.

 Oh, BTW, has anyone ever tried porting the SuSE sax X configuration
 program to Debian? I downloaded the source but have not gotten it to build
 yet ... still shanging stuff in Makefiles, etc.
 

I don't know, but if you manage, let us know. sax is one of the programs
I miss from SuSE.

Mark


Re: uploading a website (reverse mirror)?

1999-03-08 Thread oneiros
Thus spake Frankie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):

 I have a slow modem. My website is ~9MB. When I change files in it, I
 don't want to have to a) upload the whole site or b) remember which
 files I've changed, and upload them manually.

mirrordir works very nicely for this purpose, and more.  You can use it to
transfer only new / changed files, optionally delete no longer existent files,
handle permissions, and such.

It's very robust mirroring and synchronisation program, I think it's defiantly
worth your consideration.

-- 
 .oO,.. oneiros ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ..,Oo.
... and the `fortune -s` for this e-mail is ...
 Any clod can have the facts, but having opinions is an art.
  -- Charles McCabe


Re: I can't believe this

1999-03-08 Thread Allan M. Wind
On 1999-03-07 22:47, Mark Wagnon wrote:

 George Bonser wrote:

 I've tried most of the distributions. I started with slackware, dabbled
 with redhat, tried debian 1.3 but wasn't able to get past dselect back
 then, used suse for more that a year, and now I'm settled with debian. 

Nothing beats the Windows installation feeling - click next, set
time, click next you're doing GREAT, click yeah, select printer,
click next.  Done (of course I'm leaving out the 3, 5 or 10
reboots).  The clicking gives some accomplishment and there are visual
feedback that we progressing - doesn't that Printer Test feel good
(even when you KNOW that it will work)?

[stuff deleted]

 Maybe one of us should write a rebuttal to point out the author's
 misconceptions about debian. Maybe it might even get published.

I would say the odds are 100 to 1 that the author is going to eat his
_opnion_.  The odds of getting any response is of course also against
you.


/Allan
-- 
Allan M. Wind   Phone:  781.938.5272 (home)
687 Main St., 2nd fl.   Fax:781.938.6641 (fax/modem)
Woburn, MA 01801Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] (home)


Re: Favorite WP/Office software...

1999-03-08 Thread Michael Bonetsmueller

Paul Nathan Puri [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I'm curious what people feel is their favorite word processor/ office
 productivity suite (i.e., star office, word perfect, lyx, TeX, siag
 office, etc.).
 

EMACS + AucTeX + LaTeX. 

Only missing thing is a useable UNIX-native free spreadsheet. (I'm
running Linux on a 486 so SO is a clear no no for me. Besides, I think
that ports like WP and SO are a nice thing, but not the Final
Solution. They necessarily have a very un-UNIX-y touch-and-feel. Why
escape from Windows to use SO, which tries very hard to look like the
Big Stinker?

Michael.

-- 
Michael Bonetsmüller   The least we can do is wave to each other
[EMAIL PROTECTED] --Van der Graaf Generator


re: Laptop install Help Needed

1999-03-08 Thread etienne grossmann



  Hello,

 
 2. I can't get the machine to talk on the network. How do I do this?
 

  Do you have an IP number for the laptop? Your sysadmin should give/lend
you one, and also tell you what the values for broadcast, gateway
are. 

 I know there are a hundred right answers to this question, I'm
 looking for the easiest/quickest ways How do I get 3c575
 support? I'm not sure I'm up to compiling a kernel yet. Should I

  As of the pcmcia 2.9.6, driver I am not sure 3c575 is
supported. 3c589 is. I am not sure, but hamm/slink may have built-in
pcmcia support. 

 consider other pcmcia cards that I have access to like NE200 or
 3c589, or is pcmcia problematic and should I look for a pocket
 adatper or something else?

  

 3. Once I get the network working should I use NFS or FTP to access 
 the packages? (are there important pro's and con's of each?)


  It may be easier to do it by ftp, because for nfsm, your sysadmin
will need to give you mount authorization on a server. 


  Hope that helps, 

  Etienne


Re: printer_help_please?

1999-03-08 Thread Jiri Baum
Harold G. Stevenson:
...
  Status: cannot open '/dev/lp1' - 'Device or resource busy', attempt 34,
  sleeping 20 at 10:34:02

What else is using /dev/lp1?

fuser -v /dev/lp1

(That's if you have the psmisc package.)


Jiri
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
We'll know the future has arrived when every mailer transparently
quotes lines that begin with From , but no-one remembers why.


Re: Undersanding bootable media

1999-03-08 Thread Jiri Baum
Marlon Urias:

  In my quest to understand booting/LILO/MBR's  I've come a cross
  a phenomenon I dont understand. Friend of mine (linux guru-ish)
  said that to make a linux bootable floppy you had to use a lowlevel
  tool like dd as opposed to just copying the files over to the floppy.

Yes.

  But dos floppies boot just fine by making copies of other dos boot disks.

That's because every DOS floppy has a valid boot sector on it. Try looking
at the first sector of a DOS floppy (umount /dev/fd0; less -f /dev/fd0).

Daniel J. Brosemer:
...
 (I'm not real clear on whether floppies have an MBR or just Hard Disks
 do).

No, they don't - they just have a Boot Sector.

Hard disks have a Boot sector in each partition, so there's a Master Boot
Record at the start that decides which of the partitions will be booted.

BTW, if you want to play with boot sectors, be aware that DOS in its
infinite wisdom keeps drive geometry there. Even when there's a perfectly
good partition table nearby, it still takes the data from the Boot sector.

 Short answer:  There are non-files which are important and I would guess
 that you are using a lowlevel tool in DOS without knowing it. 

No, it's because all DOS-formatted floppies already have a boot sector.

 Your friend is correct when he says you must use a lowlevel tool.

Yup. The DOS boot sector doesn't work for linux.


HTH

Jiri
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
We'll know the future has arrived when every mailer transparently
quotes lines that begin with From , but no-one remembers why.


APT: packages held back

1999-03-08 Thread Maarten Boekhold
[Note: this is a repost, since nobody responded to it, yet I find it
hard to believe that nobody knows the answer to my question.]

Hi,

Yesterday I wondered how much MBs I'd have to download to upgrade my
hamm
system (plus *some* slink stuff in there) to slink, so I set my
sources.list
and did 'apt-get update' + 'apt-get upgrade' (and answered 'no' ;).

This showed numerous packages as being 'kept back':

The following packages have been kept back
  zgv libtiff3g-dev mc most aalib1 lynx eeyes xv ncftp gnome-panel xbase
aumix
  elvis g++ util-linux imlib-progs xemacs20-nomule tk8.0 minicom
jdk1.1-dev
  apache transfig whiptail libreadlineg2-dev dialog gnome-utils
tk8.0-dev
  libobgnome0 octave screen tcl8.0-dev libgtkxmhtml0 xemacs20-bin tcl8.0
  xdelta bsdmainutils libjpeg-progs egcc ddd xserver-common ncurses-bin
gdb
  netstd bash libtiff3g kbd xpaint gnome-core libgpmg1 procps joe dpkg
ncftp
  libobgtk1 gpm libgnome0 gimp tcsh-i18n statserial bc ae less lftp rpm
  libreadlineg2 tcsh tya

Now to my understanding this means that these packages *are* already
installed, but will not be upgraded to the versions in slink because of
some
potential dependency/conflict problems.

What kind of effect will this have on my system? How to find out what
kind of
conflicts there are, and how to go about to fix them?

I also have a remark concerning the current apt package in slink:
Although the
man-pages refer to documentation in /usr/doc/apt (ie. guide.text.gz),
these
documents are no longer available. My previous version of apt (0.16-1 I
think,
pretty old), did have these docs in the package. Could this be
considered as a
bug?

Maarten

-- 

Maarten Boekhold, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TIBCO Finance Technology Inc.
The Atrium
Strawinskylaan 3051
1077 ZX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
tel: +31 20 3012158, fax: +31 20 3012358
http://www.tibco.com


Re: GUI stuff

1999-03-08 Thread Joeri van Ruth
On Tue, Feb 16, 1999 at 04:24:12PM -0600, Havoc Pennington wrote:
 Gnome has two faces. From the developer's point of view it is an
 application development framework. It adds a lot of useful widgets to Gtk,
 adds some convenience functions, adds some things like configuration file
 loading/saving, adds CORBA (analagous to DCOM), adds image file loading,
 etc. This is all in the 'gnome-libs' package. 
 
 The other face of Gnome is a desktop environment and set of applications
 built using the developer's framework. However, if you use the framework
 your users are not forced to use Gnome; gnome-apt, for example, runs just
 fine without any of the desktop stuff installed. (The desktop environment
 includes a file manager like Windows Explorer, a start-menu type thing,
 etc.)

I am wondering which part of gnome-libs gnome-apt uses.  I would imagine
it to have little use for image file manipulation and CORBA, for example.
So does it use some of the added widgets?  Or configuration file management?

Joeri van Ruth [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: route: SIOCADDRT: Invalid argument

1999-03-08 Thread Gregory T. Norris
I assume you're running with a 2.2.x kernel?  If so, you just need to
add netmask ???.???.???.??? to the route add -net command.  The
2.0.x kernel series would supply it's own default value if none was
specifically given, but in 2.2.x that is no longer the case.

Also, the kernel will now automatically generate a network-route when
you ifconfig the interface (the loopback device seems to be an
exception), so you may be able to remove the route commands entirely.

On Sun, Mar 07, 1999 at 08:41:11PM -0800, Oz Dror wrote:
 When I type
 ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1
 route add -net 127.0.0.0
 I get 
 SIOCADDRT: Invalid argument
 
 When I type 
 IPADDR=192.168.0.4
 NETMASK=255.255.255.0
 NETWORK=192.168.0.0
 BROADCAST=192.168.0.255
 GATEWAY=192.168.0.4
 ifconfig eth0 ${IPADDR} netmask ${NETMASK} broadcast ${BROADCAST}
 route add -net ${NETWORK}
 
 I get the same error
 
 but my network works fine.
 
 if I type
 ping 192.168.0.1 it works
 
 Any help will be appreciated.
 
 What is the equivalent of these commands when using IP_ALIAS


Hamm -- Slink now no color ....

1999-03-08 Thread Jonathan D. Proulx
I have recently upgraded to slink and now the following apps only display in 
monochrome:

lynx 2.8.1rel.2
mutt 0.95.3i
slrn 0.9.5.3

I don't get any error mesages and the config files are set to use color.
(minicom is still in color)



Re: Favorite WP/Office software...

1999-03-08 Thread Randy Edwards
 I'm curious what people feel is their favorite word processor/ office
 productivity suite 

   I use primarily WordPerfect and StarOffice.  Out of these two I think
WordPerfect is a more elegant program/environment.  WP is definitely faster
loading and I tend to use it more.   However, I think SO's Word97 filter is
much better than WP's, so I wind up using that a lot to import Word documents.

-- 
 Regards,  | REDMOND, WA (API) --- MICROSOFT (MSFT) announced today
 . | the the official release date for the new operating
 Randy | system Windows 2000 will be delayed until the second
   | quarter of 1901 due to year 2000 problems.


Re: I can't believe this

1999-03-08 Thread Randy Edwards
 Yeah, and a whole bunch of other people. Basicly the article's slant is
 be afraid of Debian, be very afraid.

   I couldn't believe the way they portrayed Debian as a commercial product --
even the X days of support (that's your job George:-).

   The one strong positive they noted -- the package management -- wasn't
explained very clearly at all.  Gosh, after reading that article you'd wonder
how Debian became the second-largest Linux...what a bunch of idiots we are for
running it, eh?! :-)

   I think this calls for a calm, well-reasoned letter (perhaps from the
project leader or someone in a Debian position of authority?) explaining the
non-commercial slant of Debian and correcting a few errors.

-- 
 Regards,  | REDMOND, WA (API) --- MICROSOFT (MSFT) announced today
 . | the the official release date for the new operating
 Randy | system Windows 2000 will be delayed until the second
   | quarter of 1901 due to year 2000 problems.


Re: Repartition

1999-03-08 Thread homega
Mark Yobb dixit:
 A rough step by step would help me out a whole bunch.  Thanks

You might copy the whole filesystem (or by directories) to a different
location.  That depends on whether you have an empty partition where to do
this, or a tape drive like a zip drive.

A straight forward method would be by using the `cp' (copy) command or, if
you have not enough space available you could use `tar' (to archive and
compress).  In either case you should keep in mind the need to preserve
file and directories permissions as they are, as well as to copying symbolic
links as such, and not as files.  This can be achieved by passing the `a'
option to the copy command (`cp -a'), or the `preserve' option to the tar
command (`tar --preserve') (I haven't tried it with tar, but in theory,
 ^
`tar --preserve -zcvvf filename' should work).

You should have a thorough reading of the Hard-Disk-Upgrade mini-howto, as
Tom Pfeifer suggested.  Also, have a look at `man cp' and `man tar'.

Now, if you change the partition you will have to reflect this on your
/etc/fstab file.  For instance, if you currently have the entire Linux on
/dev/hda2, and decide to make several logical partitions out of it, so that
different partitions hold different directories, then you should change
/etc/fstab to something like this:

# /etc/fstab: static file system information.
#
# file system mount point   type  options   dump  pass
/dev/hda2   /   ext2defaults,errors=remount-ro   0  1
/dev/hda3   noneswapsw  0   0
proc/proc   procdefaults0   0
/dev/hda4 /usr ext2 defaults 0 2
/dev/hda5   /home   ext2defaults0   2
/dev/hda6   /usr/local  ext2defaults0   2
/dev/hda7   /varext2defaults0   2

For all the above you will need a boot disk with which to run fdisk,
repartition, and then replacing the filesystem.

A more secure way to do this would be to just copying those directories where
you have your personal data, such as /home, /root, /etc, (probably /var, and
/usr/local if you have installed programs there)... then resizing the
partition and reinstalling Debian.  After that, you'll just have to replace
the directories you want to preserve.  This way is more secure and less
painful, in my opinion.

Whichever method you choose (the ones mentioned, those in Hard-Disk-Upgrade
mini-howto, or else) plan it carefully before starting, as you risk loosing
data or worst if you make a silly mistake.

Finally, wait for some more insights on this message, since I do decline all
responsibility on any damages this may cause.

One problem I did find was that `cp -a' did not preserve /tmp and /var/tmp
permissions (drwxrwxrwt), and since some programs could not write to them
(eg. mutt), they would not properly work until I restored them to their
original permission by hand.

Good luck,

Horacio.


Re: APT: packages held back

1999-03-08 Thread sjb

 This showed numerous packages as being 'kept back':

Packages are held back when you choose Hold in dselect. When there are
dependancy/conflict errors apt tells you.

Regards
Sarel Botha


Re: Linux

1999-03-08 Thread homega
[EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit:
 I would like to invest in Linux but can't find a stock in that name --
 can you help

Could anyone check if the real sender behind this email might be someone at
the M$ Corporation?

;o)


X-Window and AfterStep

1999-03-08 Thread homega
After adding new applications (eg. /opt/netscape/netscape), to
/etc/X11/afterstep/menudefs.hook, the menu works fine for a while, but after
some time, menudefs.hook goes back to its original configuration, wiping out
any trace of the new additions (well, it keeps them on menudefs.hook~). 
What's the reason for such behaviour?

Also, I can run `startx' as a normal user, and even as root, though I can't
run it if I'm logged in as SU, is this normal?
homega:~# startx
bash: startx: command not found

TIA,

Horacio.


Re: APT: packages held back

1999-03-08 Thread Maarten Boekhold


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  This showed numerous packages as being 'kept back':
 
 Packages are held back when you choose Hold in dselect. When there are
 dependancy/conflict errors apt tells you.

So, does this mean I'll have to go into dselect and see if these
packages are placed on hold? I wonder how this happens, cos for sure I
never did this myself, and I can't remember ever having had serious
problems with dpkg etc. which might have automagically marked these
packages as on hold.

Maarten

-- 

Maarten Boekhold, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TIBCO Finance Technology Inc.
The Atrium
Strawinskylaan 3051
1077 ZX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
tel: +31 20 3012158, fax: +31 20 3012358
http://www.tibco.com


Re: CD-R Win95 to Debian

1999-03-08 Thread eric Farris
I did this when 2.0 came out. The Debian distribution is available as an ISO 
image
under here:
   ftp://ftp.eecs.umich.edu/pub/linux/debian-cd/
(there are other mirrors; take a look at http://cdimage.debian.org/)

Debian cautions you from simply mirroring the ftp.debian.org site, because of 
the
special directory structure and the liberal amount of symbolic links. Use the 
ISO
images.

I used Gear, but any pgm that can handle an ISO (RAW) image should be able to 
handle
it. Bear in mind these are 600MB files; not only do they take a while, but it 
is
risky to d'load a file that large and burn a useable cd from it. Definately do 
a test
run first to be sure your image is good.

If you're installing from a machine that is live on the net, use the FTP 
installation
instead. Not only is it really cool to be able to install your OS from the net, 
but
you won't waste time getting packages you won't use.

Brian Clark wrote:

 SNIP, SNIP: Content edited to run in the time allotted

 I have a cd-writer, so I would love to be able to make my own Debian CD
 from the files at the Debian.org FTP.
 Has anyone done/tried this?
 I have heard that there is a special way that one would have to do this
 (maybe a special program), in order for this to work - i.e., write to cd-r
 and be able to install Debian from that homegrown cd-r.
 I would be writing the Debian CD on a Win95 machine with files downloaded
 via FTP, and I would love to know if there are any problems in doing so.
 Thanks -
 Brian

--
eric Farris  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  www.bigfoot.com/~eafarris
Microcomputer Support Specialist
Academic Computing
Frostburg State University  www.frostburg.edu

Wealth is not acquired by taking the most from others, but by giving
the most away.



Re: beowulf clusters?

1999-03-08 Thread Norris Preyer
Paul Nathan Puri [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Do nodes in a beowulf cluster all have to have the same hw configuration?
 
 or can different types of intel based configurations work?

There is no reason for the nodes to have the same hardware, or even
the same kind of hardware--lots of people run with intel, alphas, and
sparcs simultaneously.  The node-node communication software (pvm,
mpi, etc) handles big/little-endian translations transparently.
System administration-type issues are obviously simpler with uniform
hardware, but most people use whatever hardware they can scrounge up.

BTW, these sorts of questions will find more knowledgeable readers in
the beowulf mail-list.

 
 NatePuri
 Certified Law Student
  Debian GNU/Linux Monk
 McGeorge School of Law
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://ompages.com
 

--Norris

-- 
Dr. Norris Preyer   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dept. of Physics and Astronomy  (843) 953-7997 (voice)
College of Charleston   (843) 953-4824 (fax)
Charleston, SC  29424   http://galaxy.cofc.edu/


Re: APT: packages held back

1999-03-08 Thread sjb

 So, does this mean I'll have to go into dselect and see if these
 packages are placed on hold? I wonder how this happens, cos for sure I

yip

 never did this myself, and I can't remember ever having had serious
 problems with dpkg etc. which might have automagically marked these
 packages as on hold.
i'm not sure if dpkg ever puts packages on hold, i sure do though


kernel 2.2.2

1999-03-08 Thread Shao Zhang
Hi,
I am getting some strange kernel messages. I did not happen
before. If I run a dmesg, the following is what I get, anyone know what it
is?? Thx.

bmap of 3a2,block 155 is 6fe6
super 200
bmap 156
result 6fe7
bmap of 3a2,block 156 is 6fe7
super 200
bmap 157
result 6fe8
bmap of 3a2,block 157 is 6fe8
super 200
bmap 160
result 6ff1
bmap of 3a2,block 160 is 6ff1
super 200
bmap 161
result 6ff2
bmap of 3a2,block 161 is 6ff2
super 200
bmap 162
result 6ff3
bmap of 3a2,block 162 is 6ff3
super 200
bmap 163
result 6ff4
bmap of 3a2,block 163 is 6ff4
super 200
bmap 164
result 6ff5
bmap of 3a2,block 164 is 6ff5
super 200
bmap 165
result 6ff6
bmap of 3a2,block 165 is 6ff6
super 200
bmap 166
result 6ff7
bmap of 3a2,block 166 is 6ff7
super 200
bmap 167
result 6ff8
bmap of 3a2,block 167 is 6ff8
super 200



Shao Zhang - Running Debian 2.1  ___ _   _
Department of Communications/ __| |_  __ _ ___  |_  / |_  __ _ _ _  __ _ 
University of New South Wales   \__ \ ' \/ _` / _ \  / /| ' \/ _` | ' \/ _` |
Sydney, Australia   |___/_||_\__,_\___/ /___|_||_\__,_|_||_\__, |
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  |___/ 
_


failing print jobs

1999-03-08 Thread E.L. Meijer \(Eric\)
Hi all,

I have a print setup with lpr from the lpr package, and simple print
filters using gs.  If for some reason gs fails, lpr keeps retrying to
print the file anyway, and the result is a loop that doesn't end until
the print job is removed with lprm.  Is there anything that can be done
about this?  Usually retries make no sense, since the problem is that
gs cannot deal with a particular file, and it stays this
way, no matter how many tries are made.

Eric


-- 
 E.L. Meijer ([EMAIL PROTECTED])  | tel. office +31 40 2472189
 Eindhoven Univ. of Technology | tel. lab.   +31 40 2475032
 Lab. for Catalysis and Inorg. Chem. (TAK) | tel. fax+31 40 2455054


Re: Qmail to Exim woes

1999-03-08 Thread Wayne Topa

Subject: Re: Qmail to Exim woes
Date: Sun, Mar 07, 1999 at 09:58:20PM +0200

In reply to:Johann Spies

Quoting Johann Spies([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
 On Fri, 5 Mar 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
  So my questions are :  
  Is the eximconfig script setting exim up for anyone else?  
 
 It did not work for me.  I had a lot of trouble getting exim to work in a
 similar setup than yours. People on this list helped me otherwise I would
 not have succeeded. 
 
 Johann

Thanks.  I finally got it working.  I think that the exim config
script lead me down the garden path.  After a lot of reading and
changing the exim.conf script, I finally got it working.

Now if I could only get it to send mail while my crom job was getting
mail I would be a happy camper.

And George likes this better then qmail

Wayne

-- 
A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming is
not worth knowing.
___
Wayne T. Topa [EMAIL PROTECTED]


[no subject]

1999-03-08 Thread Adam Linford - Prima House
subscribe


Re: I can't believe this

1999-03-08 Thread Ben Collins
On Sun, Mar 07, 1999 at 09:43:11PM -0800, George Bonser wrote:
 On Mon, 8 Mar 1999, Ben Collins wrote:

  Aside from the obvious errors, I think we should note the criticisms,
  they are actually quite true (they didn't beat around the bush when
  mentioning them either).

 Ben,

 I think these criticisms are overstated in many cases.  Ever try to get
 ppp running on Solaris? I have installed many distributions. The initial
 install is only a portion of the problem. The rest comes in getting the
 system configured the way that you need it.  That is where Debian excels.

Yes, I have gotten Solaris's PPP configured and, yes it did suck
royally. But that's not the point, Debian does have short comings, and
poeple are aware of them. No matter how much they overstated it, we
need to address these issues.

 Oh, BTW, has anyone ever tried porting the SuSE sax X configuration
 program to Debian? I downloaded the source but have not gotten it to build
 yet ... still shanging stuff in Makefiles, etc.

Some one is messing with RedHat's Xconfigurator.

--
--- -  -   ---  -  - - ---   
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Debian GNU/Linux
OpenLDAP Core - [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
UnixGroup Admin - Jordan Systems The Choice of the GNU Generation
-- -- - - - ---   --- --  -  - ---  -  --


Re: Smartlist not sending to sender

1999-03-08 Thread Santiago Vila Doncel
On Sat, 6 Mar 1999, Erik Forsberg wrote:

 I'm using smartlist for some small mailinglists on a Debian machine (I
 hope this isn't too offtopic)
 
 Is there a way to configure smartlist NOT to distribute a message to
 the sender of the message ? I don't want my own postings.

Short answer: no, that I know of.

If you don't want your own postings, you may divert them to /dev/null
using procmail.

(I would not recommend this, I like to receive my own postings, tyis way
I know that they reached the list).

Thanks.


writing device drivers for fbsd

1999-03-08 Thread Wayne Cuddy
What is a good reference to learn to to write device drivers for fbsd?  I
remember some recommended a good book a few months ago but forgot to save the
message.

I saw Writing Unix Device Drivers by George Pajari, this weekend at the 
store,is this a good book?  Where would I look in the kernel source to find out 
that functions the kernel exports for driver usage and driver interfaces?


Thanks,
Wayne



Re: Favorite WP/Office software...

1999-03-08 Thread Johann Spies
On Sun, 7 Mar 1999, Paul Nathan Puri wrote:

 I'm curious what people feel is their favorite word processor/ office
 productivity suite (i.e., star office, word perfect, lyx, TeX, siag
 office, etc.).

I have WP8 and Staroffice 4.  I use WP8 most of the time just to read
documents created by other user's mostly on Windows. Of Staroffice I only
use the spreadsheet.  I do my own wordprocessing work on emacs + Latex |
auctex.  Sometimes I do a less complex jobs using Lyx, but I prefer emacs
+ latex.

Johann.

 --
| Johann Spies Windsorlaan 19  |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]3201 Pietermaritzburg |
| Tel/Faks Nr. +27 331-46-1310 Suid-Afrika (South Africa)  |
 --

 Come unto me, all ye that labor and are heavy laden, 
  and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you, and 
  learn of me; for I am meek and lowly in heart; and ye 
  shall find rest unto your souls.   
 Matthew 11:28,29 


Using Procmail

1999-03-08 Thread XRDLAB
Hi,

Currently I am using fetchmail and pine to get the mail from my isp
account and to read/send the messages respectively. As the number of
messages I am getting has increased, I
am feeling the need to use procmail to sort the mail into different
folders. How do I go about putting the messages in different folders
(should be readable by pine)? Much of the documentation talks about MH
folders. Are they same?

TIA,

sridhar



Sridhar M. A.
Department of Physics
University of Mysore, Manasagangotri
Mysore 570 006, INDIA

Tel: +91-821-516133
Fax: +91-821-516133

E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***


Re: I can't believe this

1999-03-08 Thread Dave Swegen
On Mon, Mar 08, 1999 at 00:22 -0500, Brian Clark wrote:
 
 If you're trying Linux for the first time, Red Hat is the best choice.
 
 If I had to choose for the first time again, there is no doubt in my mind
 that I would go with Debian. Period.

As horrible as it sounds I think I would have to agree that RedHat is
probably better for the first time linux user. The reason? Well, in Hamm
the installation process was an utter mess. The lilo setup was _bad_, and
the options were far from obvious. X windows installation didn't work first
time round, so I had to reinstall completely to a base system. It was in
fact as bad as the very OS we are trying to get users away from.

That said once it's up and running Debian is far better than RH. The fact
that there are strict guidelines where packages should place stuff makes
life so much easier it's just not funny. The documentation is way better,
and the community spirit is very strong.

Hopefully the dreadful installation process has been sorted out for Slink,
and that recommendation can be changed to Debian.

Cheers
Dave

-- 
 Dave Swegen   | Debian 2.0 on Linux i386 2.2.1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP key available on request
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Linux: The Choice of a GNU Generation
--


Re: Hamm -- Slink now no color ....

1999-03-08 Thread Dave Swegen
On Mon, Mar 08, 1999 at 06:00 -0500, Jonathan D. Proulx wrote:
 I have recently upgraded to slink and now the following apps only display in 
 monochrome:
 
 lynx 2.8.1rel.2
 mutt 0.95.3i
 slrn 0.9.5.3
 
 I don't get any error mesages and the config files are set to use color.
 (minicom is still in color)

You need to install the xbase package (well, that is what fixed the same
problem for me).

Cheers
Dave

-- 
 Dave Swegen   | Debian 2.0 on Linux i386 2.2.1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP key available on request
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Linux: The Choice of a GNU Generation
--


dselect problem

1999-03-08 Thread Mans Joling




Dear Sir
I have just installed debian 2.0.36 slink on 
hda5.
I have make a connection with my 
'ISP.
When I use dselect and fillin in apt acquistion 
ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian he 
still says ftp_connect : Could not connect.
What could be wrong.
Any help would be 
appriciated
Mans Joling


Re: ppp

1999-03-08 Thread Kirk Hogenson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  *- On  5 Mar, Ole J. Tetlie wrote about ppp

   I'm having a little trouble with ppp. Everything seems normal 
   until the line with Hangup. I don't know why that happens.

  Are you using PAP or CHAP authentication?  It looks like the type of
  behavior I had when I had my authentication wrong.
 
 PAP on both ends. debug is on, but it doesn't seem like anything
 is sent at all.

Maybe this is too obvious to suggest, but could it be that the ppp module isn't
being loaded or that you forgot to recompile your kernel 
with ppp support?  I think what you described is exactly what happens
when ppp isn't compiled in.

I once recompiled my kernel 3 or 4 times (on a 486!), thinking I had
got the options wrong, when I'd just been messing up the part where
I re-ran lilo.  D'oh!

Kirk


Re: failing print jobs

1999-03-08 Thread Mark Wagnon
E.L. Meijer (Eric) wrote:
 
 Hi all,
 
 I have a print setup with lpr from the lpr package, and simple print
 filters using gs.  If for some reason gs fails, lpr keeps retrying to
 print the file anyway, and the result is a loop that doesn't end until
 the print job is removed with lprm.  Is there anything that can be done
 about this?  Usually retries make no sense, since the problem is that
 gs cannot deal with a particular file, and it stays this
 way, no matter how many tries are made.
 

Did you run magicfilterconfig first? If so, I don't know if this will
help, but I had problems with printing too. I would get partial
printouts, and some docs wouldn't even print at all. I switched gs with
gs-aladdin and that fixed my problem. If you're trying to stick with a
'free' system, then I believe that gs-aladdin is in the non-free
section.

HTH

Mark


Re: dselect problem

1999-03-08 Thread J.H.M. Dassen
[Please disable the HTML. This is mail, not the web]

On Mon, Mar 08, 1999 at 17:04:33 +0100, Mans Joling wrote:
When I use dselect and fillin in apt acquistion
[1]ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian he still says ftp_connect : Could
not connect.

Can you ping ftp.de.debian.org?
Can you connect via ftp manually?

Does using a /etc/apt/sources.list like this work?

deb http://sunsite.org.uk/pub/unix/Linux/debian stable main contrib non-free
deb ftp://nonUS.debian.org/debian-non-US stable non-US


HTH,
Ray
-- 
UNFAIR  Term applied to advantages enjoyed by other people which we tried 
to cheat them out of and didn't manage. See also DISHONESTY, SNEAKY, 
UNDERHAND and JUST LUCKY I GUESS. 
- The Hipcrime Vocab by Chad C. Mulligan  


Re: I can't beleive this

1999-03-08 Thread John
Hi All,

Much as I hated to, I had to crank up my win95 drive (the list won't
accept my linux root email. I know! I know!) and forward the following
email to the list. I sent this last night to the PC Magazine Editor. I
hope others with more experience than I with Debian also write. I think
what insulted me the most was the casual way he blew off the system. He
evidently didn't find it worthy enought to even attempt to be correct.

John Carline

P.S. I'm a fairly new linux user and I actually like dselect. Should I
seek counseling?  :)



From: John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Larry Seltzer
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Hi,
 
 I've been a subscriber to the ZDNET newsletter for years and am
 currently a subscriber to Computer Shopper. Lately I've been
 encouraged by the increasing coverage of linux on ZDNet. (Linux is the
 system I use 95% of the time.) I was hoping that magazines like PC Mag
 would begin to honestly cover the OS. Perhaps they would then be worth
 a subscription. As it is now, the only Magazines of value to me are
 Computer Shopper and the Linux Gazette and I have subscriptions to
 both.
 
 The Linux distribution I use is Debian, and today I was shocked by
 your article on Debian. Is that review typical of PC Magazine
 quality???
 
 If any employee of mine submitted a report with as many errors as the
 review of  Debian GNU/Linux 2.0 by Larry Seltzer, he/she would be out
 of a job within the hour. I'd list all the errors, but it would take
 too long. The only thing he got right is the name Debian. He doesn't
 have a clue who distributes the system or what it costs, so I guess I
 shouldn't expect him to know that it's the largest distribution (1800
 to 2000+ programs depending on the version) and arguably the best
 system out there.
 
 
 Disappointed and Disgusted
 
 John Carline
 
 
 
 
 Powered by the Penguin


Re: I can't believe this

1999-03-08 Thread MallarJ
In a message dated 3/7/99 10:45:21 PM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Debian GNU/Linux 2.0 ($38.95 direct) ...
  ...Windows users should steer clear of Debian.

I completely agree.   Your forget, the targe of Windows is those people that
DON'T know an IRQ from an I/O address.  Windows takes all the work (or is
supposed to) out of configuring and running your system.  I'd say 99% of the
people running Windows would be forever lost in Debian/Linux.  I've been
working on PCs since 1980/81 and it took me several months to be able to run
Linux/Debian with any effectivness - and I *DO* know and IRQ from and I/O
address.

  ...The company says it will include a new application installer in Debian
  GNU/Linux 2.1.
  
  Uhm, which company would this be?
  
  ...Debian is distributed by Linux Press...

I do have a problem with this - it shows lack of research on ZDNet's part -
which isn't entirely unsusual.

  Yeah, and a whole bunch of other people. Basicly the article's slant is
  be afraid of Debian, be very afraid.

Again, this article was written for the person who is new to Linux, and I
agree - for the newbie - be afraid.  It can be done, but it takes HOURS of
work and HOURS of reading.  Most new users of an operating system aren't going
to want to mess with it.  I have to admit, there were several times even *I*
was ready to delete everything Linux on my PC - but my continual displeasure
with everything MicroSoft kept me going.  Having said that, there really isn't
anything productive I can do with my Linux box - yet.  I do have WP on it, but
hardly use it.  I can browse the net - which is nice, but I can do that in
Win95 too.  I still use my Win box for Quicken and AOL - two apps I use
constantly - and neither of which will run on Linux.

-Jay


Re: Laptop install Help Needed

1999-03-08 Thread MallarJ
In a message dated 3/7/99 11:55:54 PM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  I'm a newbie to Linux and want to install debian on my laptop as my 
   primary (only) machine, its a compaq armada 1535 w/ 3com 3c575 
   pcmcia ethernet.
   
  
  there is now a debian-laptop list.  You can ask laptop specific questions 
 there.
  

Another great source of laptop info - Go to www.linux.org - then select the
hardware section - and find the info about running Debian/Linux on a laptop.


Reoccuring Problem with network

1999-03-08 Thread Jay Barbee
Well it seems to happen every 16 days or so.

My home Linux box that I use as my IPmasq dial up box for my home network
his not connecting with most of the standard network (client/server) apps.

Now, when my system is at home and make a PPP connection to the Internet, I
cannot use the clients on that server to get anywhere (with Lynx, FTP,
telnet, etc).  Ssh, however, does work and I can use that to get anyone of
my Debian servers.

This is not just limited to traffic through PPP it holds true for the home
networked machines as well via ethernet.  Here is what I get in my log file
on the SERVER end at work when I try to FTP home my home dial up box:

Mar  8 11:05:54 torch wu-ftpd[686]: warning: can't get client address:
Connection reset by peer
Mar  8 11:05:54 torch wu-ftpd[686]: connect from unknown
Mar  8 11:05:54 torch syslog: getpeername (wu-ftpd): Transport endpoint is
not connected
Mar  8 11:05:57 torch wu-ftpd[686]: FTP session closed

This has happened two other times, and I have noticed it after 16 days of
uptime on my client box (home dial up).

A reboot will fix the problem, but I would like to know what is going on.

--Jay Barbee


portforwarding question

1999-03-08 Thread whbell
Hello again,

I have a web site on my Debian box visible to the
world.  Of course this is using xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:80.

I also have an internal web site visible to the world
using portforwarding xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:port.

Question 1- Which port(s) should I forward to allow
this visibility and not overrun my real web site already
on port 80?

Question 2- This internal site is a management tool for
my bridge. I am not too worried about security on that
site.  Does having a port opened exposes me to other
site security issues?

As always, Thanks for the great help on this list!

-Bill


-
This mail sent through IMP: http://web.horde.org/imp/


Re: Using Procmail

1999-03-08 Thread Santiago Vila Doncel
On Mon, 8 Mar 1999, XRDLAB wrote:

 Currently I am using fetchmail and pine to get the mail from my isp
 account and to read/send the messages respectively. As the number of
 messages I am getting has increased, I
 am feeling the need to use procmail to sort the mail into different
 folders. How do I go about putting the messages in different folders
 (should be readable by pine)?

Please, read:

/usr/doc/procmail/QuickStart

Thanks.


Re: is postgresql free?

1999-03-08 Thread Immanuel Yap
On Fri Mar  5, 1999, Eliezer Figueroa wrote:
 can I have unlimited clients conected to postgresql with no licese 
 payment.

Yes.  See http://www.postgresql.org for more info.

Noel


Re: Using Procmail

1999-03-08 Thread Dave Swegen
Try searching yahoo for the mail filtering faq, as it has all the info you
need. Note though that if you are running exim as your MTA you need to use
a different .forward. I use this:

# Exim filter
pipe /usr/bin/procmail -f- 

Cheers
Dave

On Mon, Mar 08, 1999 at 20:41 +0530, XRDLAB wrote:
 Hi,
 
 Currently I am using fetchmail and pine to get the mail from my isp
 account and to read/send the messages respectively. As the number of
 messages I am getting has increased, I
 am feeling the need to use procmail to sort the mail into different
 folders. How do I go about putting the messages in different folders
 (should be readable by pine)? Much of the documentation talks about MH
 folders. Are they same?
 
 TIA,
 
 sridhar
 
 
 
 Sridhar M. A.
 Department of Physics
 University of Mysore, Manasagangotri
 Mysore 570 006, INDIA
 
 Tel: +91-821-516133
 Fax: +91-821-516133
 
 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***
 
 
 -- 
 Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]  /dev/null
 
 

-- 
 Dave Swegen   | Debian 2.0 on Linux i386 2.2.1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP key available on request
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Linux: The Choice of a GNU Generation
--


Re: Vote Linus for Person of the Century

1999-03-08 Thread Keith G. Murphy
Frankie wrote:
 
 George Bonser wrote:
 
  On Fri, 5 Mar 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
   just did, but is this list not moderated, Jesus Christ is so far I now,
   from a different century and he is on top?
  
   Matth
 
  Don't even think Linus should BE the person of the century. That honor
  probably goes to Thomas Edison. We owe our current culture and style of
  living to that guy. His experiments with his lightbulb led to the
  discovery of the Edison effect which led DeForest to do some more
  experiments which led to the Vacuum Tube which led to the Transistor,
  which lead to the IC Chip.  Not only was Edison's work responsible for
  laying the ground work for radio and television, he also played vital
  roles in bringing motion pictures and recorded music to the public.
 
 
 True. I agree with you about electricity. It has made a HUGE impact on
 our lives. So, I nominate gallileo, because (if I'm wrong, subsitute
 some ridiculously ancient bod that experimented with electricity) he
 messed about with electricity and frogs legs. This directly led to
 further experimentation by a variety of scientists, (including Edison)
 which ultimately led to a complete change in our [the western world's]
 lifestyles.
 
That doesn't sound right.  Wasn't it Galvani, perhaps?

WRT Linus, let's save him or Stallman for the 21st Century.  They'll
still be around, God willing, and I suspect their impact will be far
greater then.  In fact, I suspect it will be the century in which issues
of information propagation/replication/ownership become recognized as
overridingly serious (like fightin'-and-dyin' serious).


Re: Compiling Kernel

1999-03-08 Thread Andrei Ivanov
 Hi,
 
 I am going to compile the kernel again as the first attempt
 apparently didn't suceed. My users manual describes
 the steps as follows. Is this correct?
 
 1. change to directory /usr/src/linux
 
 2. make config

Or, if under X, make xconfig.
Which is a GUI, lets you jump from one section to another without having
to cycle through everything.
 
 3. make dep ; make clean
 
 4. make zImage

Or make bzImage, depending upon how many things you want to include in
your kernel. There is a size limit on uncompressed kernel, before it
becomes unbootable, and you have to use bzImage (compressed kernel).

 
 5. make modules
 

If you have any modules to make, that is.

 6. make modules_install

Same as #5.

Andrew

---
 Andrei S. Ivanov  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]   
 UIN 12402354  
 http://members.tripod.com/AnSIv   --Little things for Linux.


Re: Vote Linus for Person of the Century

1999-03-08 Thread Kirk Hogenson
Branden Robinson wrote:
 
  Nope I don't think I will vote for any person on the basis of 
  scientific or technical merit. A more global view is required.
 
 I was thinking of RMS, too.

LOL - Spoken like a true Debian-ite.
I'd put RMS #2, right after Mr. T.

 There is no gravity in space.
 Then how could astronauts walk around on the Moon?
 Because they were wearing heavy boots.

I always look forward to your mailings, not only for the excellent
information, but also for the amusing .sigs.

Kirk


Apt 0.3 lost ftp-method ???

1999-03-08 Thread Andy Spiegl
Hi,
after installing gnome-apt (with the necessary packages from potato)
onto my hamm system, apt seems to have lost the ftp method.  When
I try apt-get update I get:
 E: The method driver /usr/lib/apt/methods/ftp could not be found.
 Exitcode 100

What happened?  Is there any cure except downgrading?

Thanks a lot,
 Andy.

-- 
 Andy Spiegl, University of Technology, Muenchen, Germany
 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL: http://www.spiegl.de
 Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for my PGP key
o  _ _ _
  - __o   __o  /\_   _ \\o  (_)\__/o  (_)
  --- _`\,__`\,__(_) (_)/_\_| \   _|/' \/
  -- (_)/ (_)  (_)/ (_)  (_)(_)   (_)(_)'  _\o_
 ~~~


do I need to tell any one....

1999-03-08 Thread Lawrence Walton
Do I need to tell anyone that I am going to mirror
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian? this is not a high bandwith link mostly for
private use. Can someone do a df -h on ftp.debian.org? I am guessing
3 or four gigs of stuff in /debian/ am I off?

ftp://ftp.otak-k.com/debian/

*--* Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*--* Voice: 425.739.4247
*--* Fax: 425.827.9577
*--* HTTP://www.otak-k.com/~lawrence/
--
- - - - - - O t a k  i n c . - - - - - 




Re: Color Depth [was: X Font Problem]

1999-03-08 Thread Oleg Krivosheev


   Ok, guys this is a call for help again. I solved my other problem for now. 

   Blackbox was listed on the first line of my window-managers file. (yes, I'm
   very new to Linux in general).
   I changed that first like to Window Maker and now I'm able to get a window
   manager up.

   As for the subject line in this email, I'm having a but of a problem with
   severe dithering.

   I'm running a pretty typical (I think) video card / display. 

   My video card is a Matrox Millennium 2MB PCI, and my display is an older
   Gateway 2000 Vivitron 17

   Before I became a Debian user, I was running RedHat 5.2 (which was an
   extreme nightmare for me). Since I switched, I know now that I will never
   even think of going back to a RedHat system ever again. For one, my system
   isn't full of crap anymore.

   Anyway, back to the topic: 

   I setup XFree86 manually, which I didn't have to do with RH 5.2. With
   RedHat my display looked great, no dithering; it looked like a typical 16
   million color display etc..nice looking images etc. As it would appear in
   Win95 at 1024x768 in 16 bit color or 24 bit color.

2meg card? 1024x768 and 24bpp? hmm... i believe it is impossible and
Win95 is lying to you

   Now, with the Debian system I have now, and the fact that I set up Xfree86
   manually using xf86config, I am almost positive that I made a mistake,
   because I have seen it the way it is supposed to be when I was running
   RedHell..err Hat.

   So, does anyone out there in Debian land use a Matrox Millennium 2mb video
   card (and maybe the same monitor?) that would share their XF86Config file
   contents with me? Or, at least point me in the right direction? I don't
   know if I can live with the mess that I'm seeing on my display right now --
   crappy colors.

   AFAIK, I'm running the SVGA server, in 1024x768.

   If someone can help, what would you need me to post here as far as my setup
   is concerned?

you're probably running at 8bpp...

try startx -- -bpp 16 and look what happens

   Many, many thanks - 

   Brian

OK


Nevermind Re: writing device drivers for fbsd

1999-03-08 Thread Wayne Cuddy
Sorry, wrong list.

On Mon, 8 Mar 1999, Wayne Cuddy wrote:

 Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 10:50:07 -0500 (EST)
 From: Wayne Cuddy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: debian-user list debian-user@lists.debian.org
 Subject: writing device drivers for fbsd
 Resent-Date: 8 Mar 1999 15:08:25 -
 Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
 Resent-cc: recipient list not shown: ;
 
 What is a good reference to learn to to write device drivers for fbsd?  I
 remember some recommended a good book a few months ago but forgot to save the
 message.
 
 I saw Writing Unix Device Drivers by George Pajari, this weekend at the 
 store,is this a good book?  Where would I look in the kernel source to find 
 out that functions the kernel exports for driver usage and driver interfaces?
 
 
 Thanks,
 Wayne
 
 
 
 -- 
 Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]  /dev/null
 



Re: CDROM

1999-03-08 Thread Oleg Krivosheev
   Date: Sun, 07 Mar 1999 13:56:02 -0600
   Resent-from: debian-user@lists.debian.org
   From: Gordon von Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Resent-sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Resent-cc: recipient list not shown: ;
   Precedence: list
   X-Envelope-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   X-EveryThing: Net-Tamer 1.10.1 Unregistered
   X-Mailing-List: debian-user@lists.debian.org archive/latest/39574
   X-Loop: debian-user@lists.debian.org
   Content-Type: text
   Content-Length: 429


   Hello,

   I tried to install Debian 2.0.2, and it would not recognize my
   cdrom which is a Nec cd-rom drive:260 ATAPI.  Debian
   says that it is either a cdrom or a  floppy, probably a floppy.
   The  cdrom works in Dos and in a previous version of SuSE.
   Any ideas short of buying a new cdrom?

try to set the CD in the BIOS to AUTO

   Thanks.

   Gordon

OK


Setting time - Question

1999-03-08 Thread Christian Dysthe
Hello Debian-user,

  this might be a stupid newbie question, but I have really tried to
  figure out how to do this.

  I would like the clock in my X-window environment to show my local
  time, not GMT/UTC. When I type in date I get my local time, when I type
  in date -u I get GMT, but how do I get a clock on
  my desktop to show local time? It now shows GMTm, which now is 6
  hours ahead of me since I am located US CST. I have the
  understanding the kernel clock is to be set to GMT. Is this right?


//Christian

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.bigfoot.com/~cdysthe


If everything is coming your way, you are probably
in the wrong lane



RE: Setting time - Question

1999-03-08 Thread Shaleh

On 08-Mar-99 Christian Dysthe wrote:
 Hello Debian-user,
 
   this might be a stupid newbie question, but I have really tried to
   figure out how to do this.
 
   I would like the clock in my X-window environment to show my local
   time, not GMT/UTC. When I type in date I get my local time, when I type
   in date -u I get GMT, but how do I get a clock on
   my desktop to show local time? It now shows GMTm, which now is 6
   hours ahead of me since I am located US CST. I have the
   understanding the kernel clock is to be set to GMT. Is this right?
 
 

The clock in BIOS should be set to GMT and the system told the timezone you
live in.  This will make apps that make correct time calls get the correct time.

All the clocks I have access to work if I do this.


Re: I can't believe this

1999-03-08 Thread eferen1
I read similar articles like this too.  They are not really biased simply
because they promote Redhat's Linux.  The Debian system is a collection of
high level puzzle pieces that an under-experienced user would have great
difficulty using.

On the other hand, you have Redhat and Caldera with their user-friendly
installs (more or less).  The both have config progs for setting up
dula-boot boot, X-windows, etc.  Much like Windows 95/98.  This is why ZDNet
does not promote Debian.  They don't see any value for someone other than a
developer (or developer-like) individual.  It's just too difficult for the
average person to set up.

If Debian wants to reach the same or similar populace, then it's mandatory
that simpler installs and configurators be developed.  But then, you have
volunteers develping Debian.  Doing it in their spare time.  It will take
longer.  Others have salaried employees.  It makes a difference.  It did
with me.  I'm now taking a course in Linux.  It's the only way I can learn
it.  Dos, Windows, Assembler, AppleDos, etc are all self -intuitive.  Linux
is not.

Any other input?

Ed
-Original Message-
From: George Bonser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org debian-user@lists.debian.org
Date: Monday, March 08, 1999 04:45
Subject: I can't believe this



http://www.zdnet.com/pcmag/features/opensource/390823.html

zdnet did a review of Debian. Included are such comments as:

Debian GNU/Linux 2.0 ($38.95 direct) ...
...Windows users should steer clear of Debian.

...The company says it will include a new application installer in Debian
GNU/Linux 2.1.

Uhm, which company would this be?

...Debian is distributed by Linux Press...

Yeah, and a whole bunch of other people. Basicly the article's slant is
be afraid of Debian, be very afraid.








--
Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
/dev/null





Re: I can't believe this

1999-03-08 Thread eferen1
--
 Regards,  | REDMOND, WA (API) --- MICROSOFT (MSFT) announced today
 . | the the official release date for the new operating
 Randy | system Windows 2000 will be delayed until the second
   | quarter of 1901 due to year 2000 problems.

This is really good!  I will put this in my scrap book.

Ed




Re: Hamm--Slink, now fetchmail/exim behaves strangely

1999-03-08 Thread Helge Hafting

you wrote:
 Graham Ashton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  On Tuesday 02 March, Mark Phillips wrote:
  
   I've just upgraded from Hamm to Slink.  Fetchmail seems to work the
   same as before, except that now, only the first 10 messages get to my
   mail box straight away.
  
  I've got the same problem. Strange, isn't it.
 
 when looking in the log file there is:
 no immediate delivery: more than 10 messages received in one connection
 
 if you want the other messages immediatly you can do:
 exim -q
 
 I suppose it would be possible to change this behaviour, but I haven't
 found how;

I find it useful for dialup connection, the mail download can be faster when
it doesn't deliver simultaneously.  I have the exim -q thing in
my disconnection script. so the queue is run as soon as the 
line goes down. (And a fetchmail in the script that runs when 
the connection is made.)

Helge Hafting 


  1   2   >