Having Problems with apt-get update and apt-get upgrade
I just completed an apt-get update and apt-get upgrade on my Debian lenny machine. I noticed that evolution, which is installed on this machine, is still at version 2.10 and the latest in testing is version 2.22. If I do an apt-get install evolution, apt wants to delete a huge number of packages and update another long list: 54 upgraded, 34 newly installed, 22 to remove and 454 not upgraded. Need to get 154MB of archives. After unpacking 6995kB of additional disk space will be used. My question is why didn't evolution get updated when I did an apt-get update and apt-get upgrade? Aren't lenny and testing the same thing? I don't have evolution pinned to any version in my sources.list - they are all vanilla lenny sources: deb http://security.debian.org/ lenny/updates main contrib non-free deb-src http://security.debian.org/ lenny/updates main contrib non-free deb ftp://mirrors.kernel.org/debian/ lenny main contrib non-free deb-src ftp://mirrors.kernel.org/debian/ lenny main contrib non-free # alternate sites in case kernel.org is down deb ftp://linux.csua.berkeley.edu/debian/ lenny main contrib non-free deb-src ftp://linux.csua.berkeley.edu/debian/ lenny main contrib non-free deb ftp://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/linux/distributions/debian/ lenny main contrib non-free deb-src ftp://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/linux/distributions/debian/ lenny main contrib non-free # For w32codecs deb http://www.debian-multimedia.org/ lenny main # For Cinelerra deb http://www.kiberpipa.org/~minmax/cinelerra/builds/pentium4/ ./ # for syncevolution deb http://www.estamos.de/download/apt stable main My /etc/apt/preferences Package: * Pin release a=testing Pin-Priority: 800 Package: * Pin release a=stable Pin-Priority: 600 Thanks! Mark
Re: Having Problems with apt-get update and apt-get upgrade
On Monday 11 August 2008 23:42, Mark Phillips wrote: I just completed an apt-get update and apt-get upgrade on my Debian lenny machine. I noticed that evolution, which is installed on this machine, is still at version 2.10 and the latest in testing is version 2.22. If I do an apt-get install evolution, apt wants to delete a huge number of packages and update another long list: Aptitude is the preffered package manager. You can use it's interface to get all the information to answer many if not all of your questions. Thanks! Mark -- Shachar Or | שחר אור http://ox.freeallweb.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Having Problems with apt-get update and apt-get upgrade
Mark Phillips wrote: I just completed an apt-get update and apt-get upgrade on my Debian lenny machine. I noticed that evolution, which is installed on this machine, is still at version 2.10 and the latest in testing is version 2.22. If I do an apt-get install evolution, apt wants to delete a huge number of packages and update another long list: 54 upgraded, 34 newly installed, 22 to remove and 454 not upgraded. Need to get 154MB of archives. After unpacking 6995kB of additional disk space will be used. My question is why didn't evolution get updated when I did an apt-get update and apt-get upgrade? Aren't lenny and testing the same thing? I don't have evolution pinned to any version in my sources.list - they are all vanilla lenny sources: deb http://security.debian.org/ lenny/updates main contrib non-free deb-src http://security.debian.org/ lenny/updates main contrib non-free deb ftp://mirrors.kernel.org/debian/ lenny main contrib non-free deb-src ftp://mirrors.kernel.org/debian/ lenny main contrib non-free # alternate sites in case kernel.org is down deb ftp://linux.csua.berkeley.edu/debian/ lenny main contrib non-free deb-src ftp://linux.csua.berkeley.edu/debian/ lenny main contrib non-free deb ftp://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/linux/distributions/debian/ lenny main contrib non-free deb-src ftp://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/linux/distributions/debian/ lenny main contrib non-free # For w32codecs deb http://www.debian-multimedia.org/ lenny main # For Cinelerra deb http://www.kiberpipa.org/~minmax/cinelerra/builds/pentium4/ ./ # for syncevolution deb http://www.estamos.de/download/apt stable main My /etc/apt/preferences Package: * Pin release a=testing Pin-Priority: 800 Package: * Pin release a=stable Pin-Priority: 600 Thanks! Mark 'apt-get upgrade' cannot remove any package, you should try 'dist-upgrade' then -- Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, Ukrainian C++ developer. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Having Problems with apt-get update and apt-get upgrade
On Mon,11.Aug.08, 16:42:39, Mark Phillips wrote: I just completed an apt-get update and apt-get upgrade on my Debian lenny machine. I noticed that evolution, which is installed on this machine, is still at version 2.10 and the latest in testing is version 2.22. If I do an apt-get install evolution, apt wants to delete a huge number of packages and update another long list: 54 upgraded, 34 newly installed, 22 to remove and 454 not upgraded. Need to get 154MB of archives. After unpacking 6995kB of additional disk space will be used. My question is why didn't evolution get updated when I did an apt-get update and apt-get upgrade? Aren't lenny and testing the same thing? Currently yes, they are. My guess is that evolution (and probably lots of other packages) hasn't been upgraded because you used 'upgrade' instead of 'dist-upgrade'. Most of the times it is enough, but with testing and unstable you sometimes have to use 'dist-upgrade'. If you have packages on hold after 'upgrade' you should also try 'dist-upgrade' Read the manpage apt-get(8) for the differences between the two. Regards, Andrei -- If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. (Albert Einstein) signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: problems with apt-get update
Hola David, Am 2007-03-08 10:44:53, schrieb David Primero Segundo: linex-inWpyZ:/var/lib/dpkg# apt-get update Des:1 http://apt.linex.org sarge/linex2006 Packages [491kB] Obj http://ftp.de.debian.org sarge/main Packages Obj http://ftp.de.debian.org sarge/main Release Obj http://security.debian.org sarge/updates/main Packages Obj http://security.debian.org sarge/updates/main Release Obj http://ftp.de.debian.org sarge/contrib Packages Obj http://ftp.de.debian.org sarge/contrib Release Obj http://ftp.de.debian.org sarge/non-free Packages Obj http://ftp.de.debian.org sarge/non-free Release Obj http://security.debian.org sarge/updates/contrib Packages Obj http://security.debian.org sarge/updates/contrib Release Obj http://apt.linex.org sarge/linex2006 Release First of all: with this bunch of Servers you should increase your Apt-Cache value in /etc/apt/apt.conf i detected that the file into /var/lib/dpkg/, which is named 'available' is corrupt because i can't open it to read, and the same happens with the 'status' files, also into the same directory. Delete the file /var/lib/dpkg/available, the copy the file /var/lib/dpkg/status.old to /var/lib/dpkg/status and rerun apt-get update. If you have NO /var/lib/dpkg/status.old then look for the newest file in /var/backups/dpkg.satus.X.gz which you uncompress and copy to /var/lib/dpkg/status. Thanks, Greetings and nice Day Michelle Konzack Systemadministrator Tamay Dogan Network Debian GNU/Linux Consultant -- Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ # Debian GNU/Linux Consultant # Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886 50, rue de Soultz MSN LinuxMichi 0033/6/6192519367100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com) signature.pgp Description: Digital signature
problems with apt-get update
hi, my problem is the next: when i run apt-get update, debian says me: linex-inWpyZ:/var/lib/dpkg# apt-get update Des:1 http://apt.linex.org sarge/linex2006 Packages [491kB] Obj http://ftp.de.debian.org sarge/main Packages Obj http://ftp.de.debian.org sarge/main Release Obj http://security.debian.org sarge/updates/main Packages Obj http://security.debian.org sarge/updates/main Release Obj http://ftp.de.debian.org sarge/contrib Packages Obj http://ftp.de.debian.org sarge/contrib Release Obj http://ftp.de.debian.org sarge/non-free Packages Obj http://ftp.de.debian.org sarge/non-free Release Obj http://security.debian.org sarge/updates/contrib Packages Obj http://security.debian.org sarge/updates/contrib Release Obj http://apt.linex.org sarge/linex2006 Release Descargados 491kB en 7s (70,1kB/s) Leyendo lista de paquetes... ¡Error! E: Error de lectura - read (5 Error de entrada/salida) E: No se pudieron analizar o abrir las listas de paquetes o el archivo de estado. my sourcelist is this: deb http://apt.linex.org/linex2006 sarge linex2006 # gnuLinEx 2006 deb http://security.debian.org/ sarge/updates main contrib # Seguridad de Debian deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian sarge main contrib non-free # Copia de Debian en Alemania and i don't be able to fix it, i tried with: apt-get clean, un apt-get autoclean, un apt-get -f install, un dpkg --configure -a, and nothing, the error continues. i detected that the file into /var/lib/dpkg/, which is named 'available' is corrupt because i can't open it to read, and the same happens with the 'status' files, also into the same directory. till i got this error before, but i can fix it doing apt-get clean, autoclean... but now i can't. please can you help me? _ Dale rienda suelta a tu tiempo libre. Mil ideas para exprimir tu ocio con MSN Entretenimiento. http://entretenimiento.msn.es/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: problems with apt-get update
Hellol David. David Primero Segundo, 08.03.2007 11:44: hi, my problem is the next: when i run apt-get update, debian says me: linex-inWpyZ:/var/lib/dpkg# apt-get update Des:1 http://apt.linex.org sarge/linex2006 Packages [491kB] Obj http://ftp.de.debian.org sarge/main Packages Obj http://ftp.de.debian.org sarge/main Release Obj http://security.debian.org sarge/updates/main Packages Obj http://security.debian.org sarge/updates/main Release Obj http://ftp.de.debian.org sarge/contrib Packages Obj http://ftp.de.debian.org sarge/contrib Release Obj http://ftp.de.debian.org sarge/non-free Packages Obj http://ftp.de.debian.org sarge/non-free Release Obj http://security.debian.org sarge/updates/contrib Packages Obj http://security.debian.org sarge/updates/contrib Release Obj http://apt.linex.org sarge/linex2006 Release Descargados 491kB en 7s (70,1kB/s) Leyendo lista de paquetes... ¡Error! E: Error de lectura - read (5 Error de entrada/salida) E: No se pudieron analizar o abrir las listas de paquetes o el archivo de estado. Please run the command as follows and post the output: # LC_ALL=C apt-get update Regards, Mathias -- debian/rules signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: problems with apt-get update
Hi, hi, my problem is the next: when i run apt-get update, debian says me: ... E: Error de lectura - read (5 Error de entrada/salida) E: No se pudieron analizar o abrir las listas de paquetes o el archivo de estado. my sourcelist is this: deb http://apt.linex.org/linex2006 sarge linex2006 # gnuLinEx 2006 deb http://security.debian.org/ sarge/updates main contrib # Seguridad de Debian deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian sarge main contrib non-free # Copia de Debian en Alemania and i don't be able to fix it, i tried with: apt-get clean, un apt-get autoclean, un apt-get -f install, un dpkg --configure -a, and nothing, the error continues. i detected that the file into /var/lib/dpkg/, which is named 'available' is corrupt because i can't open it to read, and the same happens with the 'status' files, also into the same directory. I had a similar problem in the past and solved it by adding the following line in /etc/apt/apt.conf (create the file if you don't have one) : APT::Cache-Limit 1; then re-run apt-get update try a higher value if it does not work, but I don't know what it means exactly so maybe there's a risk of breaking something -- Cédric Lucantis
Re: problems with apt-get update
no friend, the error continues, i try this:
linex-inWpyZ:/etc/apt# cat apt.conf
APT
{
APT::Cache-Limit 1;
CDROM
{
NoMount True;
};
};
Acquire
{
cdrom
{
mount /media/cdrecorder;
};
};
and then, with: apt-get update, but i don't get luck.
From: Cédric Lucantis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: problems with apt-get update
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 12:14:32 +0100
Hi,
hi, my problem is the next:
when i run apt-get update, debian says me:
...
E: Error de lectura - read (5 Error de entrada/salida)
E: No se pudieron analizar o abrir las listas de paquetes o el
archivo de estado.
my sourcelist is this:
deb http://apt.linex.org/linex2006 sarge linex2006 # gnuLinEx 2006
deb http://security.debian.org/ sarge/updates main contrib #
Seguridad de Debian
deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian sarge main contrib non-free #
Copia de Debian en Alemania
and i don't be able to fix it, i tried with:
apt-get clean, un apt-get autoclean, un apt-get -f install, un dpkg
--configure -a,
and nothing, the error continues.
i detected that the file into /var/lib/dpkg/, which is named 'available'
is
corrupt because i can't open it to read, and the same happens with the
'status' files, also into the same directory.
I had a similar problem in the past and solved it by adding the following
line
in /etc/apt/apt.conf (create the file if you don't have one) :
APT::Cache-Limit 1;
then re-run apt-get update
try a higher value if it does not work, but I don't know what it means
exactly
so maybe there's a risk of breaking something
--
Cédric Lucantis
_
Dale rienda suelta a tu tiempo libre. Mil ideas para exprimir tu ocio con
MSN Entretenimiento. http://entretenimiento.msn.es/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: problems with apt-get update
no friend, the error continues, i try this:
linex-inWpyZ:/etc/apt# cat apt.conf
APT
{
APT::Cache-Limit 1;
CDROM
{
NoMount True;
};
};
hmm, not sure about it, but maybe APT::Cache-Limit inside APT{} is redundant
and not understood by apt. Try either APT { Cache-Limit ... } or
APT::Cache-Limit outside of the braces.
--
Cédric Lucantis
Re: Package installation problems after `apt-get update'
Rodolfo Medina wrote: In order to install the kmobiletools package, which is not present in the stable repository, I added to my sources.list the following lines: deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian testing main contrib non-free deb-src http://http.us.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free , then did # apt-get update # apt-get install kmobiletools , but the output was: Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: kmobiletools: Depends: kdelibs4c2a (= 4:3.5.2-1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libqt3-mt (= 3:3.3.6) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libxinerama1 but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages . I'm quite lost here, any suggestion? On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 16:38:53 +0100, Liam O'Toole wrote: Note the mismatch above. You are getting binary packages from testing and source packages from unstable. Try this: apt-get install kmobiletools -t testing Beware! This will pull in various packages from testing in addition to kmobiletools. Are you sure you want to do that? Instead, you might want to consider compiling the package yourself, or seeing if it is available from backports.org. Or wait until testing becomes stable :-) Florian Kulzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The problem is that there was a major change related to the C++ library of KDE on Debian between versions 3.3 and 3.4. All KDE applications on stable are version 3.3 and depend on package kdelibs4. Testing has KDE 3.5 now and those applications depend on kdelibs4c2a. The two versions of the library are incompatible and therefore the different versions of the Debian KDE packages cannot be mixed. kmobiletools does not seem to be on backports.org, therefore your only options seem to be to wait or to try to compile the program yourself, unless you are ready to take the plunge and dist-upgrade your entire system to Etch now. Thanks indeed to Liam and Florian. I compiled kmobiletools from source. Cheers, Rodolfo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package installation problems after `apt-get update' (was: Handling apt-get, apt-cdrom, sources.list, cdroms.list)
Hi all. In order to install the kmobiletools package, which is not present in the stable repository, I added to my sources.list the following lines: deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian testing main contrib non-free deb-src http://http.us.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free , then did # apt-get update # apt-get install kmobiletools , but the output was: Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: kmobiletools: Depends: kdelibs4c2a (= 4:3.5.2-1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libqt3-mt (= 3:3.3.6) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libxinerama1 but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages . I'm quite lost here, any suggestion? Thanks, Rodolfo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Package installation problems after `apt-get update' (was: Handling apt-get, apt-cdrom, sources.list, cdroms.list)
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 15:44:54 +0200 Rodolfo Medina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all. In order to install the kmobiletools package, which is not present in the stable repository, I added to my sources.list the following lines: deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian testing main contrib non-free deb-src http://http.us.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free Note the mismatch above. You are getting binary packages from testing and source packages from unstable. , then did # apt-get update # apt-get install kmobiletools , but the output was: Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: kmobiletools: Depends: kdelibs4c2a (= 4:3.5.2-1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libqt3-mt (= 3:3.3.6) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libxinerama1 but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages . I'm quite lost here, any suggestion? Thanks, Rodolfo Try this: apt-get install kmobiletools -t testing Beware! This will pull in various packages from testing in addition to kmobiletools. Are you sure you want to do that? Instead, you might want to consider compiling the package yourself, or seeing if it is available from backports.org. Or wait until testing becomes stable :-) -- Liam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Package installation problems after `apt-get update' (was: Handling apt-get, apt-cdrom, sources.list, cdroms.list)
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 16:38:53 +0100, Liam O'Toole wrote: On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 15:44:54 +0200 Rodolfo Medina wrote: Hi all. In order to install the kmobiletools package, which is not present in the stable repository, I added to my sources.list the following lines: deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian testing main contrib non-free deb-src http://http.us.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free Note the mismatch above. You are getting binary packages from testing and source packages from unstable. , then did # apt-get update # apt-get install kmobiletools , but the output was: Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: kmobiletools: Depends: kdelibs4c2a (= 4:3.5.2-1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libqt3-mt (= 3:3.3.6) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libxinerama1 but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages . I'm quite lost here, any suggestion? Thanks, Rodolfo Try this: apt-get install kmobiletools -t testing Beware! This will pull in various packages from testing in addition to kmobiletools. Are you sure you want to do that? Instead, you might want to consider compiling the package yourself, or seeing if it is available from backports.org. Or wait until testing becomes stable :-) The problem is that there was a major change related to the C++ library of KDE on Debian between versions 3.3 and 3.4. All KDE applications on stable are version 3.3 and depend on package kdelibs4. Testing has KDE 3.5 now and those applications depend on kdelibs4c2a. The two versions of the library are incompatible and therefore the different versions of the Debian KDE packages cannot be mixed. kmobiletools does not seem to be on backports.org, therefore your only options seem to be to wait or to try to compile the program yourself, unless you are ready to take the plunge and dist-upgrade your entire system to Etch now. -- Regards, Florian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Solved]Re: Problems with apt-get update
On Fri, 2004-01-02 at 00:09, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. wrote: snip What's going on here? I can't do anything (at least not without commenting out those sources) with apt-get because of this problem. apt-get install debian-keys -t experimental Can you give me your sources for this experimental? I use deb ftp://ftp.us.debian.org/debian ../project/experimental main or with browser ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/project/experimental/main/binary-i386/Packages and there is no debian-keys package there. Thanks Vlada -- Ing. Vladimir M. Kerka [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Solved]Re: Problems with apt-get update
On Friday January 2 at 03:26pm Ing. Vladimir M. Kerka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2004-01-02 at 00:09, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. wrote: snip What's going on here? I can't do anything (at least not without commenting out those sources) with apt-get because of this problem. apt-get install debian-keys -t experimental Can you give me your sources for this experimental? I use deb ftp://ftp.us.debian.org/debian ../project/experimental main or with browser ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/project/experimental/main/binary-i386/Packages and there is no debian-keys package there. I think the package is actually 'debian-keyring,' because I have all the trees (stable/testing/unstable/experimental) set up properly in my sources.list, and the closest thing 'apt-cache search debian key' found was debian-keyring -- -johann koenig Now Playing: Agent Orange - Pipeline : Living In Darkness Today is Boomtime, the 2nd day of Chaos in the YOLD 3170 My public pgp key: http://mental-graffiti.com/pgp/johannkoenig.pgp pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Solved]Re: Problems with apt-get update
Johann Koenig wrote: On Friday January 2 at 03:26pm Ing. Vladimir M. Kerka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2004-01-02 at 00:09, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. wrote: snip What's going on here? I can't do anything (at least not without commenting out those sources) with apt-get because of this problem. apt-get install debian-keys -t experimental Can you give me your sources for this experimental? I use deb ftp://ftp.us.debian.org/debian ../project/experimental main or with browser ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/project/experimental/main/binary-i386/Packages and there is no debian-keys package there. I think the package is actually 'debian-keyring,' because I have all the trees (stable/testing/unstable/experimental) set up properly in my sources.list, and the closest thing 'apt-cache search debian key' found was debian-keyring You are correct, my bad (and much apologies). [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# apt-get install debian-keyring -t experimental -- Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. Student at Motlow State Community College Political Activist Extrodinaire The only fallacy is the inaction on our part to stave off the worst of horrors, the stripping of personal freedom. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Solved]Re: Problems with apt-get update
On Fri, 2004-01-02 at 16:09, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. wrote: Johann Koenig wrote: On Friday January 2 at 03:26pm Ing. Vladimir M. Kerka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2004-01-02 at 00:09, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. wrote: snip What's going on here? I can't do anything (at least not without commenting out those sources) with apt-get because of this problem. apt-get install debian-keys -t experimental Can you give me your sources for this experimental? I use deb ftp://ftp.us.debian.org/debian ../project/experimental main or with browser ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/project/experimental/main/binary-i386/Packages and there is no debian-keys package there. I think the package is actually 'debian-keyring,' because I have all the trees (stable/testing/unstable/experimental) set up properly in my sources.list, and the closest thing 'apt-cache search debian key' found was debian-keyring You are correct, my bad (and much apologies). [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# apt-get install debian-keyring -t experimental Thanks to both of you, I found and installed the package. BTW it's in unstable now, there is no reason to use switch -t experimental: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache policy debian-keyring debian-keyring: Installed: (none) Candidate: 2003.11.03 Version Table: 2003.11.03 0 500 ftp://ftp.cz.debian.org unstable/main Packages 500 ftp://ftp.cz.debian.org testing/main Packages 2001.09.22 0 500 ftp://ftp.cz.debian.org stable/non-US/main Packages Vlada -- Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. Student at Motlow State Community College Political Activist Extrodinaire The only fallacy is the inaction on our part to stave off the worst of horrors, the stripping of personal freedom. -- Ing. Vladimir M. Kerka Klukovicka 1530 155 00 Praha 5 - Stodulky Czech Republic e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] web:www.dinmont.cz NOTE: rm -rf /bin/ladin Nedostavam a nerozesilam viry, protoze nepouzivam M$ Windows -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GE/CM d++ s+:++ a+? C+++ UL++ P? L+++ E--- W++ N- o? K- w- o? M- V-- PS PE++ Y-- PGP++ t+++ 5? X-- R tv+ b?! DI++ D++ G++ e+++* h-- r+++ y+++ --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Solved]Re: Problems with apt-get update
On Friday January 2 at 09:09am Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Johann Koenig wrote: On Friday January 2 at 03:26pm Ing. Vladimir M. Kerka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2004-01-02 at 00:09, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. wrote: snip What's going on here? I can't do anything (at least not without commenting out those sources) with apt-get because of this problem. apt-get install debian-keys -t experimental Can you give me your sources for this experimental? I use deb ftp://ftp.us.debian.org/debian ../project/experimental main or with browser ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/project/experimental/main/binary-i386/P ackagesand there is no debian-keys package there. I think the package is actually 'debian-keyring,' because I have all the trees (stable/testing/unstable/experimental) set up properly in my sources.list, and the closest thing 'apt-cache search debian key' found was debian-keyring You are correct, my bad (and much apologies). [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# apt-get install debian-keyring -t experimental Additionally, I can't seem to find the version in experimental. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache policy debian-keyring debian-keyring: Installed: 2003.11.03 Candidate: 2003.11.03 Version Table: *** 2003.11.03 0 500 ftp://ftp.us.debian.org testing/main Packages 500 ftp://ftp.us.debian.org unstable/main Packages 500 ftp://mirrors.kernel.org testing/main Packages 500 ftp://mirrors.kernel.org unstable/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 2001.09.22 0 500 http://non-us.debian.org stable/non-US/main Packages and on mirror.kernel.org's server: ftp ls 200 PORT command successful. 150 Opening ASCII mode data connection for file list. -rw-r--r-- 1 debian debian502 Nov 4 00:32 debian-keyring_2003.11.03.dsc-rw-r--r-- 1 debian debian6559201 Nov 4 00:32 debian-keyring_2003.11.03.tar.gz-rw-r--r-- 1 debian debian6088688 Nov 4 00:32 debian-keyring_2003.11.03_all.deb 226 Transfer complete. The wrapping is screwed, but its version 2003.11.03, same as testing and unstable -- -johann koenig Now Playing: Skasmopolitan - He Loves Me : They're Only Shoes Today is Boomtime, the 2nd day of Chaos in the YOLD 3170 My public pgp key: http://mental-graffiti.com/pgp/johannkoenig.pgp pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Problems with apt-get update
W: GPG error: http://http.us.debian.org stable Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY B629A24C38C6029A W: GPG error: http://non-us.debian.org stable/non-US Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY B629A24C38C6029A W: GPG error: http://non-us.debian.org testing/non-US Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY B629A24C38C6029A W: GPG error: http://non-us.debian.org unstable/non-US Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY B629A24C38C6029A W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems What's going on here? I can't do anything (at least not without commenting out those sources) with apt-get because of this problem. -- Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. Student at Motlow State Community College Political Activist Extrodinaire The only fallacy is the inaction on our part to stave off the worst of horrors, the stripping of personal freedom. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problems with apt-get update
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 02:32:49PM -0600, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. said W: GPG error: http://http.us.debian.org stable Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY B629A24C38C6029A W: GPG error: http://non-us.debian.org stable/non-US Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY B629A24C38C6029A W: GPG error: http://non-us.debian.org testing/non-US Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY B629A24C38C6029A W: GPG error: http://non-us.debian.org unstable/non-US Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY B629A24C38C6029A W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems What's going on here? I can't do anything (at least not without commenting out those sources) with apt-get because of this problem. You're using apt from EXPERIMENTAL. That required a deliberate and concious decision, accepting that it was not even ready for unstable, and would quite posibly have serious problems. You need to go read the recent thread on debian-devel about this new version of apt, where you'll find out that non-US is signed with an old, revoked key. Remove the non-US lines from your sources.list and try again. -- Rob Weir [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Do I look like I want a CC? Words of the day:ANDVT Cocaine bullion defense information warfare Audiotel signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Problems with apt-get update
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 02:32:49PM -0600, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. wrote: W: GPG error: http://http.us.debian.org stable Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY B629A24C38C6029A W: GPG error: http://non-us.debian.org stable/non-US Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY B629A24C38C6029A W: GPG error: http://non-us.debian.org testing/non-US Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY B629A24C38C6029A W: GPG error: http://non-us.debian.org unstable/non-US Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY B629A24C38C6029A W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems What's going on here? I can't do anything (at least not without commenting out those sources) with apt-get because of this problem. You're using apt from experimental, aren't you? Perhaps you should look over the recent discussion of apt 0.6 on debian-devel; following -devel or any other appropriate mailing list is usually a good idea if you choose to use packages from experimental. That's the old Debian archive signing key, revoked following the recent compromise. However, stable and non-US have not yet had their Release.gpg files reissued with the new key. Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Solved]Re: Problems with apt-get update
Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. wrote: W: GPG error: http://http.us.debian.org stable Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY B629A24C38C6029A W: GPG error: http://non-us.debian.org stable/non-US Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY B629A24C38C6029A W: GPG error: http://non-us.debian.org testing/non-US Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY B629A24C38C6029A W: GPG error: http://non-us.debian.org unstable/non-US Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY B629A24C38C6029A W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems What's going on here? I can't do anything (at least not without commenting out those sources) with apt-get because of this problem. apt-get install debian-keys -t experimental gpg --import /usr/share/keyrings/debian-keyring.gpg apt-get update (after uncomment some sources) I should note that http://http.us.debian.org stable is still unverifiable via GPG even though I imported 859 keys. gpg: Total number processed: 850 gpg: w/o user IDs: 1 gpg: imported: 849 (RSA: 5) sorry to the folks I haven't responded to, I got involved with a huge update (159 packages) after switching to a friends sources.list Yes, I am using packages from experimental (not many, but a few) because testing and stable are too far behind (sorry, GAIM .58 and .64 are really old news) for me (I use Yahoo, MSN, ICQ and AIM, as well as really old packages for other programs). -- Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. Student at Motlow State Community College Political Activist Extrodinaire The only fallacy is the inaction on our part to stave off the worst of horrors, the stripping of personal freedom. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Solved]Re: Problems with apt-get update
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 05:09:27PM -0600, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. wrote: Yes, I am using packages from experimental (not many, but a few) because testing and stable are too far behind (sorry, GAIM .58 and .64 are really old news) for me (I use Yahoo, MSN, ICQ and AIM, as well as really old packages for other programs). How about moving to unstable? Currently gaim v0.72. A -- Please don't CC me. Also _please_ read the following before posting: Documentation - http://www.debian.org/doc/ FAQ - http://www.debian.org/doc/FAQ/ Install manual (i386) - http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/install -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Solved]Re: Problems with apt-get update
Antony Gelberg wrote: On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 05:09:27PM -0600, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. wrote: Yes, I am using packages from experimental (not many, but a few) because testing and stable are too far behind (sorry, GAIM .58 and .64 are really old news) for me (I use Yahoo, MSN, ICQ and AIM, as well as really old packages for other programs). How about moving to unstable? Currently gaim v0.72. A I already h ave .72, I got it with an entry in my old sources.list I think I'm going to stick with testing, for now. After all, I am running a production server[0] on this box, too. [0]: http://joseph-a-nagy-jr.homelinux.org -- Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. Student at Motlow State Community College Political Activist Extrodinaire The only fallacy is the inaction on our part to stave off the worst of horrors, the stripping of personal freedom. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
