Re: need help with xorg.conf

2010-03-14 Thread Stephen Powell
On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 00:21:29 -0500 (EST), Paul E Condon wrote:
 On 20100313_223702, Stephen Powell wrote:
 I've done some digging.  Apparently, there is an Option statement
 That is valid for at least some drivers:
 
Option NoDDC
 
 that can be put into the Device section, but it is not documented
 in the man page for xorg.conf.  I'll have to play around to see if
 I can get it to work.  But that will have to wait for tomorrow.
 It's time for me to go to bed.
 
 The option UseBIOS documented in man savage, not in man xorg.conf
 There is a list of driver man pages in man xorg.conf

Yes, I know.  But I'm not talking about the UseBIOS option right now.
I'm talking about the NoDDC option.  I did find it documented
on the Internet.  For example,
see this link - http://www.x.org/archive/X11R6.8.0/doc/rendition5.html.
The option was still under development then, and was documented as
a previews of coming attractions option.  The NoDDC option is referred
to in man savage, but the NoDDC option is not a savage-specific option.
It is a generic option for the Device section and should be documented
in man xorg.conf.  I have also seen bug reports complaining about the
lack of documentation for the NoDDC option.  For example,
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=364610.

The above bug report implies that NoDDC is specific to the s3virge driver,
but it is actually a generic option that apparently works with all
drivers.  I just tried it on my machine with the nv driver for an
Nvidia video card.  It works great!  I can now override the DDC2/EDID-probed
values if I want or need to!  But why is the option not documented?
Is that X.Org's version of a disclaimer?  The man pages for radeon and
savage allude to it, but don't document it.  The man page for rendition
actually documents it, but as a soon-to-be-implemented feature rather than
as a production option.  Oh well, at least it works.

Sorry to rain on your parade, Ron, -- er, I mean shine sun on your
funeral procession -- but you lose this time.

-- 
  .''`. Stephen Powellzlinux...@wowway.com
 : :'  :
 `. `'`
   `-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/354927792.19005391268584194840.javamail.r...@md01.wow.synacor.com



Re: need help with xorg.conf

2010-03-13 Thread Stephen Powell
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:09:27 -0500 (EST), Tony Nelson wrote:
 On 10-03-12 13:11:14, Stephen Powell wrote:
 On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:58:08 -0500 (EST), Paul E Condon wrote:
 ...
 (--) SAVAGE(0): probed videoram:  32768k
 
 Plenty of video RAM to do true color mode even at 1366x768 
 resolution.
 
 1366x768x24/1024 = 24588k; 1366x768x32/1024 = 32784k.
 Hmm.  If we have to use 32 bits of RAM per pixel, we may not have
 enough.  We'll see about that later.
 ...
 
 You did the math wrong.  Use bytes, not bits.  Also allow for 3 
 buffers.

(1366*768*3*3)/1024 =  9220K
(1366*768*4*3)/1024 = 12294K

I did indeed do the math incorrectly!  What a schoolboy mistake!
I neglected to convert from bits to bytes.  But I don't understand
your version either.  The correct math, by the way I have traditionally
done it, is 

   1366*768*3/1024 = 3073.5k
   1366*768*4/1024 = 4098k

This is based on a formula obtained from Upgrading and Repairing
PCs, Sixth Edition, by Scott Mueller, page 443.  (This book is
quite dated, having been copyrighted in 1996.)

Where did you get the stuff about three buffers?  Does this have
something to do with 3D graphics acceleration?

-- 
  .''`. Stephen Powellzlinux...@wowway.com
 : :'  :
 `. `'`
   `-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1624648332.18895011268507830796.javamail.r...@md01.wow.synacor.com



Re: need help with xorg.conf

2010-03-13 Thread Stephen Powell
On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 00:13:38 -0500 (EST), Mark Allums wrote:
 I am asking such silly-seeming questions because xorg.conf these days 
 tends to be ignored by the Xservers if it seems inconvenient to the 
 driver+server.  That is, in my experience, if the monitor is 
 plug-and-play, then X goes by whatever the monitor hardware reports, and 
 xorg.conf might as well not exist.

I wouldn't say that the X server *ignores* xorg.conf.  But it is true that
configuration statements such as HorizSync and VertRefresh are ignored
in a monitor section if the monitor is plug-and-play.  The values reported
by the monitor are used instead.

I'm not sure I like that behavior.  One could argue that point either way,
I suppose.  On the one hand, one could argue that the monitor knows best,
and if it reports its characteristics via EDID, they should be used.
On the other hand, one may wish to override these values for the purpose
of experimentation.  Being an engineer, I want to be able to override
things for the purpose of experimentation.  But the designers of X are
probably more interested in preventing damage to the monitor.  Therefore,
they took the other approach.

In the solution to the problem at hand, I did not override any monitor
characteristics.  I simply told the driver to use a different (non-default)
algorithm for setting the video mode.

-- 
  .''`. Stephen Powellzlinux...@wowway.com
 : :'  :
 `. `'`
   `-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1616584946.18897901268508719875.javamail.r...@md01.wow.synacor.com



Re: need help with xorg.conf

2010-03-13 Thread Hugo Vanwoerkom

Ron Johnson wrote:

On 2010-03-12 23:27, Mark Allums wrote:

On 3/12/2010 12:11 PM, Stephen Powell wrote:

On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:58:08 -0500 (EST), Paul E Condon wrote:

On 20100312_092355, Stephen Powell wrote:


Paul, please provide the following information:




(5) The contents of /var/log/Xorg.0.log

  There follows 858 lines of the above named file:


OK, we learn a lot from the /var/log/Xorg.0.log file.




And things are all downhill from there.

The bottom line: the problem is not with your monitor.  The problem 
is that

the savage driver wants to use the video BIOS to set the video mode.

The single most important thing you must have in any xorg.conf file is

Option  UseBIOS   off

This goes in the Device section.  If you need more help, let me know,
and I'll try to come up with a specific xorg.conf file for you.




First of all, thanks for the running commentary, it is well done. 
Second, it shows that X tends to ignore stuff it finds inconvenient. 


Inconvenient, or can't handle?

Better error/informational messages would help, though.

 From one other post, we see that xorg.conf is optional these days, 
and from a different post (from OP), we see that a somewhat obscure 
setting is required if you *do* use an xorg.conf file.  (Option 
UseBIOS off worked.)


This shows the tendency of Linux more and more these days to eschew 
the old philosophy of using simple, user-edited configurations, and 
instead try to add more and more magic.  Not sure I like this trend.




As long as there's a manual override, I don't mind the magic.  After 
all, self-configuration (i.e. minimizing the work of the user) is what 
computers are supposed to do!




I run a 2-seater: 2 graphics cards (nVidia GeForce 6200), 2 monitors, 2 
keyboards and 2 mice for 2 separate users.


The latest xserver-xorg from Sid (1:7.5+3) freezes the system solid 
after about 6 minutes *always*.


http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=567700

'X -configure' sees the 2 cards and the 2 monitors but not the 2 
keyboards and the 2 mice and has no clue that it is a 2-seater.


Upgrading I have no choice but to pin X to the last version that works 
faultlessly: 1:7.4+4


But that will eventually get me into trouble of course...

Hugo


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/hngpip$k0...@dough.gmane.org



Re: need help with xorg.conf

2010-03-13 Thread Stephen Powell
On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 00:27:48 -0500 (EST), Mark Allums wrote:
 First of all, thanks for the running commentary, it is well done. 
 Second, it shows that X tends to ignore stuff it finds inconvenient. 
 From one other post, we see that xorg.conf is optional these days, and 
 from a different post (from OP), we see that a somewhat obscure setting 
 is required if you *do* use an xorg.conf file.  (Option UseBIOS off 
 worked.)

This option is specific to the savage driver and is only needed if
the monitor's resolution is not supported by the video BIOS.

 This shows the tendency of Linux more and more these days to eschew the 
 old philosophy of using simple, user-edited configurations, and instead 
 try to add more and more magic.  Not sure I like this trend.

I hear you.  For me, I don't mind if the software is smart enough
to figure some things out on its own.  But I want a way to override things
if the defaults are not to my liking.  As I mentioned in another post,
there are some things, such as HorizSync and VertRefresh, that cannot
be overridden for a plug-and-play monitor.  I don't like that trend at all.

-- 
  .''`. Stephen Powellzlinux...@wowway.com
 : :'  :
 `. `'`
   `-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1278354342.18901591268510248894.javamail.r...@md01.wow.synacor.com



Re: need help with xorg.conf

2010-03-13 Thread John Hasler
Stephen Powell writes:
 But the designers of X are probably more interested in preventing
 damage to the monitor.

It is rather unlikely that any monitor modern enough to have EDID would
be damaged by incorrect synch.  It would just shut down if it was sent
something it couldn't deal with.
-- 
John Hasler


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87iq90xaye@thumper.dhh.gt.org



Re: need help with xorg.conf

2010-03-13 Thread Stephen Powell
On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 14:45:13 -0500 (EST), John Hasler wrote:
 Stephen Powell writes:
 But the designers of X are probably more interested in preventing
 damage to the monitor.

 It is rather unlikely that any monitor modern enough to have EDID would
 be damaged by incorrect synch.  It would just shut down if it was sent
 something it couldn't deal with.

One would hope so.  But the X server does,
in fact, ignore any HorizSync, VertRefresh, Option MaxClock, and
a number of other monitor configuration statements when this information
is obtained from EDID data.  And I don't like that.  I want to be
able to override things.  I want it to use the EDID data if there are
no corresponding explicit configuration statements.  But an explicit
configuration statement should always, in my opinion, be able to override
any probed value.

-- 
  .''`. Stephen Powellzlinux...@wowway.com
 : :'  :
 `. `'`
   `-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1254453288.18911201268513890614.javamail.r...@md01.wow.synacor.com



Re: need help with xorg.conf

2010-03-13 Thread Ron Johnson

On 2010-03-13 13:57, Stephen Powell wrote:
[snip]

if the defaults are not to my liking.  As I mentioned in another post,
there are some things, such as HorizSync and VertRefresh, that cannot
be overridden for a plug-and-play monitor.  I don't like that trend at all.



Incorrect values might bzzt the monitor??

--
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA  USA

If God had wanted man to play soccer, he wouldn't have given
us arms.  Mike Ditka


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4b9c04d7.8050...@cox.net



Re: need help with xorg.conf

2010-03-13 Thread Stephen Powell
On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 14:17:10 -0500 (EST), Stephen Powell wrote:
 I did indeed do the math incorrectly!  What a schoolboy mistake!
 I neglected to convert from bits to bytes.  But I don't understand
 your version either.  The correct math, by the way I have traditionally
 done it, is 
 
1366*768*3/1024 = 3073.5k
1366*768*4/1024 = 4098k
 
 This is based on a formula obtained from Upgrading and Repairing
 PCs, Sixth Edition, by Scott Mueller, page 443.  (This book is
 quite dated, having been copyrighted in 1996.)
 
 Where did you get the stuff about three buffers?  Does this have
 something to do with 3D graphics acceleration?

I did some more research and answered my own question.  I decided
to consult a much more recent version of Upgrading and Repairing
PCs.  In particular, I consulted the Seventeenth Edition, which
was copyrighted in 2006, ten years later than the Sixth Edition.

It does indeed have to do with 3D graphics.
The three buffers are the front buffer, back buffer, and Z buffer.
So multiply the numbers above by 3, which is what you said.  That's
assuming that double buffering is used.  But if triple buffering
is used, multiply by 4, not 3.

-- 
  .''`. Stephen Powellzlinux...@wowway.com
 : :'  :
 `. `'`
   `-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/993838866.18918121268517038668.javamail.r...@md01.wow.synacor.com



Re: need help with xorg.conf

2010-03-13 Thread Stephen Powell
On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 16:34:15 -0500 (EST), Ron Johnson wrote:
 On 2010-03-13 13:57, Stephen Powell wrote:
 As I mentioned in another post,
 there are some things, such as HorizSync and VertRefresh, that cannot
 be overridden for a plug-and-play monitor.  I don't like that trend at all.
 
 
 Incorrect values might bzzt the monitor??

Possibly, but not likely.  In the early days, some of the cheapest
monitors did not have protection circuitry that will shut them
down if they are driven beyond safe limits.  But as another poster pointed
out, any monitor modern enough to support plug-and-play (DDC2/EDID)
is almost certain to have internal protection circuitry that will
shut it down if driven outside of safe limits.

Nevertheless, in the unlikely event that I fry my monitor by overriding the
EDID specs, I asked for it, didn't I?  I'm an engineer.  Give me full
control.  If I fry my monitor, I have no-one to blame but myself.

-- 
  .''`. Stephen Powellzlinux...@wowway.com
 : :'  :
 `. `'`
   `-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1449666297.18920291268517968815.javamail.r...@md01.wow.synacor.com



Re: need help with xorg.conf

2010-03-13 Thread John Hasler
Stephan Powell writes:
 But an explicit configuration statement should always, in my opinion,
 be able to override any probed value.

I agree.  It might damage the monitor would not really be an excuse
even if there were vulnerable EDID monitors.  Newbies are not going to
put modelines in xorg.conf: they will never have heard of it.  Software
should do as it is told.
-- 
John Hasler


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87eijnyj85@thumper.dhh.gt.org



Re: need help with xorg.conf

2010-03-13 Thread Ron Johnson

On 2010-03-13 16:06, Stephen Powell wrote:

On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 16:34:15 -0500 (EST), Ron Johnson wrote:

On 2010-03-13 13:57, Stephen Powell wrote:

As I mentioned in another post,
there are some things, such as HorizSync and VertRefresh, that cannot
be overridden for a plug-and-play monitor.  I don't like that trend at all.


Incorrect values might bzzt the monitor??


Possibly, but not likely.  In the early days, some of the cheapest
monitors did not have protection circuitry that will shut them
down if they are driven beyond safe limits.  But as another poster pointed
out, any monitor modern enough to support plug-and-play (DDC2/EDID)
is almost certain to have internal protection circuitry that will
shut it down if driven outside of safe limits.

Nevertheless, in the unlikely event that I fry my monitor by overriding the
EDID specs, I asked for it, didn't I?


Stephen, Stephen, Stephen.  There's a butt-load more lawyers than 
there are engineers, and there's 1500 metric ass loads more stupid 
people than there are engineers.


I want control!!!
OK, you have control.
Bzzt.
Why didn't you protect me from myself?


  I'm an engineer.


0.29% of the population.


   Give me full
control.  If I fry my monitor, I have no-one to blame but myself.



Three words: hot McDonalds coffee.

--
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA  USA

If God had wanted man to play soccer, he wouldn't have given
us arms.  Mike Ditka


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4b9c0f60.5060...@cox.net



Re: need help with xorg.conf

2010-03-13 Thread John Hasler
Stephen Powell writes:
 But I want a way to override things if the defaults are not to my
 liking.  As I mentioned in another post, there are some things, such
 as HorizSync and VertRefresh, that cannot be overridden for a
 plug-and-play monitor.

You _could_ cut off pin 12 on the connector...
-- 
John Hasler


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87aaubyio2@thumper.dhh.gt.org



Re: need help with xorg.conf

2010-03-13 Thread John Hasler
Ron Johnson writes:
 Incorrect values might bzzt the monitor??

No way are there any monitors new enough to support EDID but still
vulnerable to wrong synch.  That problem was solved before EDIDwas
invented.

Besides, maybe I _want_ to bzzt my monitor.
-- 
John Hasler


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87634zyijq@thumper.dhh.gt.org



Re: need help with xorg.conf

2010-03-13 Thread Stephen Powell
On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 17:19:12 -0500 (EST), Ron Johnson wrote:
 On 2010-03-13 16:06, Stephen Powell wrote:
 Nevertheless, in the unlikely event that I fry my monitor by overriding the
 EDID specs, I asked for it, didn't I?
 
 Stephen, Stephen, Stephen.  There's a butt-load more lawyers than 
 there are engineers, and there's 1500 metric ass loads more stupid 
 people than there are engineers.
 
 I want control!!!
 OK, you have control.
 Bzzt.
 Why didn't you protect me from myself?

   I'm an engineer.
 
 0.29% of the population.

 Give me full control.
 If I fry my monitor, I have no-one to blame but myself.
 

 Three words: hot McDonalds coffee.

Yes, I've heard of that stupid case.  But
McDonalds didn't solve that problem by serving cold coffee.
They put a disclaimer on the lids saying, Caution: coffee is hot.
A disclaimer should be able to solve this problem too.

-- 
  .''`. Stephen Powellzlinux...@wowway.com
 : :'  :
 `. `'`
   `-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/963033316.18925651268520285376.javamail.r...@md01.wow.synacor.com



Re: need help with xorg.conf

2010-03-13 Thread Stephen Powell
On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 17:13:17 -0500 (EST), John Hasler wrote:
 Stephen Powell writes:
 But I want a way to override things if the defaults are not to my
 liking.  As I mentioned in another post, there are some things, such
 as HorizSync and VertRefresh, that cannot be overridden for a
 plug-and-play monitor.

 You _could_ cut off pin 12 on the connector...

Well, I suppose I *could*.  But I don't like that solution.
Changing the software to allow overrides is what I want.

-- 
  .''`. Stephen Powellzlinux...@wowway.com
 : :'  :
 `. `'`
   `-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/2117529271.18926321268520707655.javamail.r...@md01.wow.synacor.com



Re: need help with xorg.conf

2010-03-13 Thread Mark Allums

On 3/13/2010 4:51 PM, Stephen Powell wrote:

On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 17:13:17 -0500 (EST), John Hasler wrote:

Stephen Powell writes:

But I want a way to override things if the defaults are not to my
liking.  As I mentioned in another post, there are some things, such
as HorizSync and VertRefresh, that cannot be overridden for a
plug-and-play monitor.


You _could_ cut off pin 12 on the connector...


Well, I suppose I *could*.  But I don't like that solution.
Changing the software to allow overrides is what I want.



No need to destroy a cable.  Just create an adapter.  Pin 12 goes in, 
but doesn't come out.*



MAA

* Roaches check in, but they don't check out.





--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4b9c4c30.5040...@allums.com



Re: need help with xorg.conf

2010-03-13 Thread Stephen Powell
On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 21:38:40 -0500 (EST), Mark Allums wrote:
 On 3/13/2010 4:51 PM, Stephen Powell wrote:
 On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 17:13:17 -0500 (EST), John Hasler wrote:
 Stephen Powell writes:
 But I want a way to override things if the defaults are not to my
 liking.  As I mentioned in another post, there are some things, such
 as HorizSync and VertRefresh, that cannot be overridden for a
 plug-and-play monitor.

 You _could_ cut off pin 12 on the connector...

 Well, I suppose I *could*.  But I don't like that solution.
 Changing the software to allow overrides is what I want.


 No need to destroy a cable.  Just create an adapter.  Pin 12 goes in, 
 but doesn't come out.

Yes, that would be better.  I'm sure I would have to hand-make such
a device.  I doubt that I could find such a thing at my local computer
store.  But still, philosophically, configuration statements should
be able to override probed values.

I've done some digging.  Apparently, there is an Option statement
That is valid for at least some drivers:

   Option NoDDC

that can be put into the Device section, but it is not documented
in the man page for xorg.conf.  I'll have to play around to see if
I can get it to work.  But that will have to wait for tomorrow.
It's time for me to go to bed.

-- 
  .''`. Stephen Powellzlinux...@wowway.com
 : :'  :
 `. `'`
   `-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/188411216.18955951268537822903.javamail.r...@md01.wow.synacor.com



Re: need help with xorg.conf

2010-03-13 Thread Paul E Condon
On 20100313_223702, Stephen Powell wrote:
 On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 21:38:40 -0500 (EST), Mark Allums wrote:
  On 3/13/2010 4:51 PM, Stephen Powell wrote:
  On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 17:13:17 -0500 (EST), John Hasler wrote:
  Stephen Powell writes:
  But I want a way to override things if the defaults are not to my
  liking.  As I mentioned in another post, there are some things, such
  as HorizSync and VertRefresh, that cannot be overridden for a
  plug-and-play monitor.
 
  You _could_ cut off pin 12 on the connector...
 
  Well, I suppose I *could*.  But I don't like that solution.
  Changing the software to allow overrides is what I want.
 
 
  No need to destroy a cable.  Just create an adapter.  Pin 12 goes in, 
  but doesn't come out.
 
 Yes, that would be better.  I'm sure I would have to hand-make such
 a device.  I doubt that I could find such a thing at my local computer
 store.  But still, philosophically, configuration statements should
 be able to override probed values.
 
 I've done some digging.  Apparently, there is an Option statement
 That is valid for at least some drivers:
 
Option NoDDC
 
 that can be put into the Device section, but it is not documented
 in the man page for xorg.conf.  I'll have to play around to see if
 I can get it to work.  But that will have to wait for tomorrow.
 It's time for me to go to bed.
 

The option UseBIOS documented in man savage, not in man xorg.conf
There is a list of driver man pages in man xorg.conf

-- 
Paul E Condon   
pecon...@mesanetworks.net


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100314052129.ge2...@big.lan.gnu



Re: need help with xorg.conf

2010-03-13 Thread Ron Johnson

On 2010-03-13 16:44, Stephen Powell wrote:

On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 17:19:12 -0500 (EST), Ron Johnson wrote:

On 2010-03-13 16:06, Stephen Powell wrote:

Nevertheless, in the unlikely event that I fry my monitor by overriding the
EDID specs, I asked for it, didn't I?
Stephen, Stephen, Stephen.  There's a butt-load more lawyers than 
there are engineers, and there's 1500 metric ass loads more stupid 
people than there are engineers.


I want control!!!
OK, you have control.
Bzzt.
Why didn't you protect me from myself?


  I'm an engineer.

0.29% of the population.


Give me full control.
If I fry my monitor, I have no-one to blame but myself.


Three words: hot McDonalds coffee.


Yes, I've heard of that stupid case.  But
McDonalds didn't solve that problem by serving cold coffee.
They put a disclaimer on the lids saying, Caution: coffee is hot.
A disclaimer should be able to solve this problem too.



People want hot coffee.  Only 0.29% of the population wants to 
maybe fry their LCD.


Besides, (probably understating) 95% of people use either Windows or 
Mac, and want their LCDs auto-configured.


Manufacturers play the odds, and apparently so do the X Dev Team. 
I'd ask them why.


--
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA  USA

If God had wanted man to play soccer, he wouldn't have given
us arms.  Mike Ditka


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4b9c7fe1.4030...@cox.net



Re: need help with xorg.conf

2010-03-12 Thread daniele

On 03/12/10 07:42, Paul E Condon wrote:

I have a cheap flat screen monitor on one of my computers. I works
nicely, but not perfectly with Lenny. But in a much inferior way when
I switch to Squeeze.

In particular:

The screen is 1366x768 according to the user manual that came with it.
Under Lenny, X chooses to run it at 1280x768 which is OK, but
Under Squeeze, X chooses 1024x768 which makes things that should be
circle into broad elipses. And wastes a lot of the resolution on
over-size characters.

I would like to try composing some configuration lines and inserting
them in a conf file, xorg.conf, I think, but I'm not sure.

Some quidance would be greatly appreciated.


Hello Paul,

As of my experience the automatic configuration did not work so I 
manually configured the resolution following these steps (NOTEs : 
change the values to suit your hardware and be sure the video card 
supports the resolution and try to also follow xorg.conf man page ---)



1 - I found the suggested monitor resolution (1920x1...@60hz) in the 
User Manual


2 - I used the gtf utility to calculate a vesa compliant ModeLine, 
running at the command prompt the following:


gtf 1920 1080 60

3 - I Inserted in xorg.conf (section Monitor) the ModeLine that I got in 
step 2 (naming it 1920x1080_60.00)


4 - I set up VertRefresh e HorizSync (section Monitor) according to the 
monitor specs


5 - I inserted in xorg.conf (section Screen, subsection Display) in the 
Modes option listing  the already found 1920x1080_60.00 ModeLine


cheers

d


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/blu0-smtp33c1066e4c76d2c7a307eadc...@phx.gbl



Re: need help with xorg.conf

2010-03-12 Thread Camaleón
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:42:16 -0700, Paul E Condon wrote:

(...)
 
 The screen is 1366x768 according to the user manual that came with it.
 Under Lenny, X chooses to run it at 1280x768 which is OK, but Under
 Squeeze, X chooses 1024x768 which makes things that should be circle
 into broad elipses. And wastes a lot of the resolution on over-size
 characters.
 
 I would like to try composing some configuration lines and inserting
 them in a conf file, xorg.conf, I think, but I'm not sure.

I would try first to get the recommended resolution (1366x...@60) by 
using xrandr on-the-fly to test things:

http://wiki.debian.org/XStrikeForce/HowToRandR12

Once accomplished that, you can go on with another fancy settings on 
xorg.conf file.

Greetings,

-- 
Camaleón


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2010.03.12.09.54...@gmail.com



Re: need help with xorg.conf

2010-03-12 Thread Ron Johnson

On 2010-03-12 03:31, daniele wrote:

On 03/12/10 07:42, Paul E Condon wrote:

I have a cheap flat screen monitor on one of my computers. I works
nicely, but not perfectly with Lenny. But in a much inferior way when
I switch to Squeeze.

In particular:

The screen is 1366x768 according to the user manual that came with it.
Under Lenny, X chooses to run it at 1280x768 which is OK, but
Under Squeeze, X chooses 1024x768 which makes things that should be
circle into broad elipses. And wastes a lot of the resolution on
over-size characters.

I would like to try composing some configuration lines and inserting
them in a conf file, xorg.conf, I think, but I'm not sure.

Some quidance would be greatly appreciated.


Hello Paul,

As of my experience the automatic configuration did not work so I 
manually configured the resolution following these steps (NOTEs : 
change the values to suit your hardware and be sure the video card 
supports the resolution and try to also follow xorg.conf man page ---)



1 - I found the suggested monitor resolution (1920x1...@60hz) in the 
User Manual


2 - I used the gtf utility to calculate a vesa compliant ModeLine, 
running at the command prompt the following:


gtf 1920 1080 60

3 - I Inserted in xorg.conf (section Monitor) the ModeLine that I got in 
step 2 (naming it 1920x1080_60.00)


4 - I set up VertRefresh e HorizSync (section Monitor) according to the 
monitor specs


5 - I inserted in xorg.conf (section Screen, subsection Display) in the 
Modes option listing  the already found 1920x1080_60.00 ModeLine




What monitor, video card, video driver and x.org version do you use?

This auto-configured perfectly:
- Hanns-G HH251
- Nvidia 7300SE
- nividia v190.42 blob
- every Sid x.org since Nov-2009

--
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA  USA

If God had wanted man to play soccer, he wouldn't have given
us arms.  Mike Ditka


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4b9a11c7.9020...@cox.net



Re: need help with xorg.conf

2010-03-12 Thread Brad Rogers
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:54:49 + (UTC)
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:

Hello Camaleón,

 I would try first to get the recommended resolution (1366x...@60) by 
 using xrandr on-the-fly to test things:

IM(admittedly limted)E, if X doesn't get the resolution right, xrandr
won't be able to detect it any better.

Here, X runs at 1280x1024, but the monitor is capable of 1680x1050

xrandr outputs;

Screen 0: minimum 640 x 480, current 1280 x 1024, maximum 1280 x 1024
default connected 1280x1024+0+0 0mm x 0mm
   1280x1024   0.0*
   1024x7680.0
   800x600 0.0
   640x480 0.0

Note the maximum is incorrect. In fact, doing X -configure resulted
in errors, so I've got to write an xorg.conf file to sort the issue out.

-- 
 Regards  _
 / )   The blindingly obvious is
/ _)radnever immediately apparent

You're the psychotic daughter of a psychotic mother
Pure Mania - The Vibrators


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: need help with xorg.conf

2010-03-12 Thread Camaleón
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:35:16 +, Brad Rogers wrote:

 On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:54:49 + (UTC) Camaleón wrote:
 
 Hello Camaleón,
 
 I would try first to get the recommended resolution (1366x...@60) by
 using xrandr on-the-fly to test things:
 
 IM(admittedly limted)E, if X doesn't get the resolution right, xrandr
 won't be able to detect it any better.

To be sincere, nowadays that X in dinamically setup, I'm not sure.

I had previous experiences with xorg configuration that couldn't properly
detect the display resolution but just by forcing it (writing up in 
xorg.conf file) it just worked :-?

 Here, X runs at 1280x1024, but the monitor is capable of 1680x1050

Also, using a digital output -DVI instead VGA- (if available) can help X 
to detect the screen size and adjust it accordingly.
 
 xrandr outputs;
 
 Screen 0: minimum 640 x 480, current 1280 x 1024, maximum 1280 x 1024
 default connected 1280x1024+0+0 0mm x 0mm
1280x1024   0.0*
1024x7680.0
800x600 0.0
640x480 0.0
 
 Note the maximum is incorrect. In fact, doing X -configure resulted in
 errors, so I've got to write an xorg.conf file to sort the issue out.

Another thing to look into is the driver in use. Different drivers 
deliver different results. Yes, I know that not everyone likes using 
closed drivers but is just another option to test.

Greetings,

-- 
Camaleón


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2010.03.12.14.13...@gmail.com



Re: need help with xorg.conf

2010-03-12 Thread Stephen Powell
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 01:42:16 -0500 (EST), Paul E Condon wrote:
 
 I have a cheap flat screen monitor on one of my computers. I works
 nicely, but not perfectly with Lenny. But in a much inferior way when
 I switch to Squeeze.
 
 In particular:
 
 The screen is 1366x768 according to the user manual that came with it.
 Under Lenny, X chooses to run it at 1280x768 which is OK, but
 Under Squeeze, X chooses 1024x768 which makes things that should be
 circle into broad elipses. And wastes a lot of the resolution on
 over-size characters. 
 
 I would like to try composing some configuration lines and inserting
 them in a conf file, xorg.conf, I think, but I'm not sure.
 
 Some quidance would be greatly appreciated.

Paul, please provide the following information:

(1) Make and model of your computer
(2) Make and model of your video card
(3) Make and model of your monitor
(4) Your existing /etc/X11/xorg.conf file
(5) The contents of /var/log/Xorg.0.log

-- 
  .''`. Stephen Powellzlinux...@wowway.com
 : :'  :
 `. `'`
   `-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/25097827.18615101268403835097.javamail.r...@md01.wow.synacor.com



Re: need help with xorg.conf

2010-03-12 Thread Paul E Condon
On 20100312_092355, Stephen Powell wrote:
 On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 01:42:16 -0500 (EST), Paul E Condon wrote:
  
  I have a cheap flat screen monitor on one of my computers. I works
  nicely, but not perfectly with Lenny. But in a much inferior way when
  I switch to Squeeze.
  
  In particular:
  
  The screen is 1366x768 according to the user manual that came with it.
  Under Lenny, X chooses to run it at 1280x768 which is OK, but
  Under Squeeze, X chooses 1024x768 which makes things that should be
  circle into broad elipses. And wastes a lot of the resolution on
  over-size characters. 
  
  I would like to try composing some configuration lines and inserting
  them in a conf file, xorg.conf, I think, but I'm not sure.
  
  Some quidance would be greatly appreciated.
 
 Paul, please provide the following information:
 
 (1) Make and model of your computer
   Compaq Presario S3200NX (sn MX31028632)
 (2) Make and model of your video card
   integrated graphics on mother board
 (3) Make and model of your monitor
   Acer X163W
 (4) Your existing /etc/X11/xorg.conf file
   there is no such file. this is a new install done yesterday
   and I have not yet attempted any hacking
 (5) The contents of /var/log/Xorg.0.log
  There follows 858 lines of the above named file:
X.Org X Server 1.7.5
Release Date: 2010-02-16
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0
Build Operating System: Linux 2.6.32-trunk-686 i686 Debian
Current Operating System: Linux cmpq 2.6.32-trunk-686 #1 SMP Sun Jan 10 
06:32:16 UTC 2010 i686
Kernel command line: root=UUID=5a02e986-8aa3-4790-aa3f-41f7f565533f ro quiet 
Build Date: 16 February 2010  08:37:23AM
xorg-server 2:1.7.5-1 (bgog...@debian.org) 
Current version of pixman: 0.16.4
Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org
to make sure that you have the latest version.
Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting,
(++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
(WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
(==) Log file: /var/log/Xorg.0.log, Time: Fri Mar 12 08:23:27 2010
(II) Loader magic: 0x81e7020
(II) Module ABI versions:
X.Org ANSI C Emulation: 0.4
X.Org Video Driver: 6.0
X.Org XInput driver : 7.0
X.Org Server Extension : 2.0
(++) using VT number 7

(--) PCI:*(0:1:0:0) 5333:8d04:1462:3908 S3 Inc. VT8375 [ProSavage8 KM266/KL266] 
rev 0, Mem @ 0xe100/524288, 0xd800/134217728, BIOS @ 0x/65536
(==) Using default built-in configuration (30 lines)
(==) --- Start of built-in configuration ---
Section Device
Identifier  Builtin Default savage Device 0
Driver  savage
EndSection
Section Screen
Identifier  Builtin Default savage Screen 0
Device  Builtin Default savage Device 0
EndSection
Section Device
Identifier  Builtin Default vesa Device 0
Driver  vesa
EndSection
Section Screen
Identifier  Builtin Default vesa Screen 0
Device  Builtin Default vesa Device 0
EndSection
Section Device
Identifier  Builtin Default fbdev Device 0
Driver  fbdev
EndSection
Section Screen
Identifier  Builtin Default fbdev Screen 0
Device  Builtin Default fbdev Device 0
EndSection
Section ServerLayout
Identifier  Builtin Default Layout
Screen  Builtin Default savage Screen 0
Screen  Builtin Default vesa Screen 0
Screen  Builtin Default fbdev Screen 0
EndSection
(==) --- End of built-in configuration ---
(==) ServerLayout Builtin Default Layout
(**) |--Screen Builtin Default savage Screen 0 (0)
(**) |   |--Monitor default monitor
(**) |   |--Device Builtin Default savage Device 0
(==) No monitor specified for screen Builtin Default savage Screen 0.
Using a default monitor configuration.
(**) |--Screen Builtin Default vesa Screen 0 (1)
(**) |   |--Monitor default monitor
(**) |   |--Device Builtin Default vesa Device 0
(==) No monitor specified for screen Builtin Default vesa Screen 0.
Using a default monitor configuration.
(**) |--Screen Builtin Default fbdev Screen 0 (2)
(**) |   |--Monitor default monitor
(**) |   |--Device Builtin Default fbdev Device 0
(==) No monitor specified for screen Builtin Default fbdev Screen 0.
Using a default monitor configuration.
(==) Automatically adding devices
(==) Automatically enabling devices
(WW) The directory /usr/share/fonts/X11/cyrillic does not exist.
Entry deleted from font path.
(==) FontPath set to:
/usr/share/fonts/X11/misc,
/usr/share/fonts/X11/100dpi/:unscaled,
/usr/share/fonts/X11/75dpi/:unscaled,
/usr/share/fonts/X11/Type1,

Re: need help with xorg.conf

2010-03-12 Thread Brad Rogers
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:13:04 + (UTC)
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:

Hello Camaleón,

 On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:35:16 +, Brad Rogers wrote:
  IM(admittedly limted)E, if X doesn't get the resolution right, xrandr
  won't be able to detect it any better.
 To be sincere, nowadays that X in dinamically setup, I'm not sure.

My experience relates to now.  However, what I'm seeing is an
improvement on what I got about 6 months ago, when X woudn't even start
on this hardware.

 I had previous experiences with xorg configuration that couldn't
 properly detect the display resolution but just by forcing it (writing
 up in xorg.conf file) it just worked :-?

Which is what I'll be doing tonight, probably.

 Also, using a digital output -DVI instead VGA- (if available) can help
 X to detect the screen size and adjust it accordingly.

Sadly, not an option;  No DVI o/p on this machine.

 Another thing to look into is the driver in use. Different drivers 
 deliver different results. Yes, I know that not everyone likes using 
 closed drivers but is just another option to test.

I'm not that bothered about whenther I use nv or nvidia, so yes, that
opens another avenue for me to explore.

-- 
 Regards  _
 / )   The blindingly obvious is
/ _)radnever immediately apparent

To the ends of the earth, you look for sense in it
No Time To Be 21 - The Adverts


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: need help with xorg.conf

2010-03-12 Thread Paul E Condon
More information

On 20100312_092355, Stephen Powell wrote:
 On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 01:42:16 -0500 (EST), Paul E Condon wrote:
  
  I have a cheap flat screen monitor on one of my computers. I works
  nicely, but not perfectly with Lenny. But in a much inferior way when
  I switch to Squeeze.
... snip 

Both Lenny and Squeeze on this computer are recent, clean installations,
each in its own separate partition. Both installations were done with
tasksel set for Desktop Environment and Base System. The log file is
from the Squeeze install, which is the one that I am most desireous of
fixing.


-- 
Paul E Condon   
pecon...@mesanetworks.net


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100312160501.gg4...@big.lan.gnu



Re: need help with xorg.conf

2010-03-12 Thread Paul E Condon
On 20100312_102211, John W Foster wrote:
 -Original Message-
 From: Paul E Condon pecon...@mesanetworks.net
 To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
snip
 Hi Paul: 
 I read thru the install log from xorg  it looks like everything is
 doing as it should. I am wondering if this new flat screen is a
 letterbox shaped screen or a standard shaped screen. I suspect this is
 an aspect ratio issue rather than a screen resolution issue though
 it may be a combination of both. I have little experience with the
 letterbox screens but I am planing to buy one soon  am studying the
 list  other tings for compatibility as I do not want to incur this type
 of issue. Please post your solution when you get it going correctly.
 Best wishes!
 -- 
 John Foster
 

The pixels are specified to be 0.252mm(H)x0.252mm(V), which implies an
aspect ratio of 1366:768. This is close to 16:9, but not exact. To be
exact would have to be e.g. 1366:768.375 or 1365.333:768. Both have
fractional number of pixels, which of course is impossible. So there 
must be some 'engineering hack'. I have no idea what ugly hacks are
done to make beautiful Xwindows design concept fit with ugly real world
of integer arithmetic ;-)

What really puzzles me is the fact that two recent installs of X arrive
at different kludge solutions -on-the-same-hardware-.

-- 
Paul E Condon   
pecon...@mesanetworks.net


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100312165417.gh4...@big.lan.gnu



Re: need help with xorg.conf

2010-03-12 Thread John W Foster
-Original Message-
From: Paul E Condon pecon...@mesanetworks.net
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: need help with xorg.conf
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:42:16 -0700

I have a cheap flat screen monitor on one of my computers. I works
nicely, but not perfectly with Lenny. But in a much inferior way when
I switch to Squeeze.

In particular:

The screen is 1366x768 according to the user manual that came with it.
Under Lenny, X chooses to run it at 1280x768 which is OK, but
Under Squeeze, X chooses 1024x768 which makes things that should be
circle into broad elipses. And wastes a lot of the resolution on
over-size characters. 

I would like to try composing some configuration lines and inserting
them in a conf file, xorg.conf, I think, but I'm not sure.

Some quidance would be greatly appreciated.

-- 
Paul E Condon   
pecon...@mesanetworks.net


Hi Paul: 
I read thru the install log from xorg  it looks like everything is
doing as it should. I am wondering if this new flat screen is a
letterbox shaped screen or a standard shaped screen. I suspect this is
an aspect ratio issue rather than a screen resolution issue though
it may be a combination of both. I have little experience with the
letterbox screens but I am planing to buy one soon  am studying the
list  other tings for compatibility as I do not want to incur this type
of issue. Please post your solution when you get it going correctly.
Best wishes!
-- 
John Foster


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1268410931.28649.5.ca...@brutus



Re: need help with xorg.conf

2010-03-12 Thread Aioanei Rares

John W Foster wrote:

-Original Message-
From: Paul E Condon pecon...@mesanetworks.net
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: need help with xorg.conf
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:42:16 -0700

I have a cheap flat screen monitor on one of my computers. I works
nicely, but not perfectly with Lenny. But in a much inferior way when
I switch to Squeeze.

In particular:

The screen is 1366x768 according to the user manual that came with it.
Under Lenny, X chooses to run it at 1280x768 which is OK, but
Under Squeeze, X chooses 1024x768 which makes things that should be
circle into broad elipses. And wastes a lot of the resolution on
over-size characters. 


I would like to try composing some configuration lines and inserting
them in a conf file, xorg.conf, I think, but I'm not sure.

Some quidance would be greatly appreciated.

  
X --configure (as root); alter the xorg.conf as desired, test it with X 
--config xorg.conf.filename, and if you like it, copy the file in 
/etc/X11/ as xorg.conf



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4b9a7949.70...@gmail.com



Re: need help with xorg.conf

2010-03-12 Thread Stephen Powell
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:58:08 -0500 (EST), Paul E Condon wrote:
 On 20100312_092355, Stephen Powell wrote:
 
 Paul, please provide the following information:
 
 (1) Make and model of your computer
  Compaq Presario S3200NX (sn MX31028632)
 (2) Make and model of your video card
  integrated graphics on mother board
 (3) Make and model of your monitor
  Acer X163W
 (4) Your existing /etc/X11/xorg.conf file
  there is no such file. this is a new install done yesterday
  and I have not yet attempted any hacking
 (5) The contents of /var/log/Xorg.0.log
 There follows 858 lines of the above named file:

OK, we learn a lot from the /var/log/Xorg.0.log file.

Your Integrated graphics card is

 (--) PCI:*(0:1:0:0) 5333:8d04:1462:3908 S3 Inc. VT8375 [ProSavage8 
 KM266/KL266] rev 0, Mem @ 0xe100/524288, 0xd800/134217728, BIOS @ 
 0x/65536

I thought at first that the stuff within parentheses might be the chipset.
But I found out later that I was wrong.  We'll see why in a minute.
X chose the savage driver.  It lists the chipsets which it supports.

 (II) SAVAGE: driver (version 2.3.1) for S3 Savage chipsets: Savage4,
   Savage3D, Savage3D-MV, Savage2000, Savage/MX-MV, Savage/MX,
   Savage/IX-MV, Savage/IX, ProSavage PM133, ProSavage KM133,
   Twister PN133, Twister KN133, SuperSavage/MX 128, SuperSavage/MX 64,
   SuperSavage/MX 64C, SuperSavage/IX 128, SuperSavage/IX 128,
   SuperSavage/IX 64, SuperSavage/IX 64, SuperSavage/IXC 64,
   SuperSavage/IXC 64, ProSavage DDR, ProSavage DDR-K

I'm not sure what to make of this next section.  First it says it's defaulting
to 16 bit color.

 (II) SAVAGE(0): Creating default Display subsection in Screen section
   Builtin Default savage Screen 0 for depth/fbbpp 16/16
 (==) SAVAGE(0): Depth 16, (--) framebuffer bpp 16
 (==) SAVAGE(0): RGB weight 565

But then it says it's going to use true color mode, which requires at least 24 
bits!

 (==) SAVAGE(0): Default visual is TrueColor

And then we have this little tidbit.

 (==) SAVAGE(0): Using video BIOS to set modes

That's trouble.  If it uses this method, then you're limited to the video modes 
that are
pre-defined in the video BIOS.  And if 1366x768 isn't one of them, too bad.

 (--) SAVAGE(0): Chip: id 8d04, ProSavage DDR-K

There's the actual chipset: ProSavage DDR-K, which is one of the supported
chipsets for this driver.  (It's the last one listed.)

 (--) SAVAGE(0): probed videoram:  32768k

Plenty of video RAM to do true color mode even at 1366x768 resolution.

1366x768x24/1024 = 24588k; 1366x768x32/1024 = 32784k.
Hmm.  If we have to use 32 bits of RAM per pixel, we may not have enough.
We'll see about that later.

It did find the DDC2/EDID information about your monitor though:

 (II) SAVAGE(0): Manufacturer: ACR  Model: 15  Serial#: 2441181409
 (II) SAVAGE(0): Year: 2009  Week: 18
 (II) SAVAGE(0): EDID Version: 1.3
 (II) SAVAGE(0): Analog Display Input,  Input Voltage Level: 0.700/0.700 V
 (II) SAVAGE(0): Sync:  Separate
 (II) SAVAGE(0): Max Image Size [cm]: horiz.: 34  vert.: 19
 (II) SAVAGE(0): Gamma: 2.20
 (II) SAVAGE(0): DPMS capabilities: Off; RGB/Color Display
 (II) SAVAGE(0): Default color space is primary color space
 (II) SAVAGE(0): First detailed timing is preferred mode
 (II) SAVAGE(0): redX: 0.637 redY: 0.333   greenX: 0.284 greenY: 0.596
 (II) SAVAGE(0): blueX: 0.154 blueY: 0.083   whiteX: 0.313 whiteY: 0.329

These are the VESA standard modes that the monitor supports:

 (II) SAVAGE(0): Supported established timings:
 (II) SAVAGE(0): 720x...@70hz
 (II) SAVAGE(0): 640x...@60hz
 (II) SAVAGE(0): 640x...@67hz
 (II) SAVAGE(0): 640x...@72hz
 (II) SAVAGE(0): 640x...@75hz
 (II) SAVAGE(0): 800x...@56hz
 (II) SAVAGE(0): 800x...@60hz
 (II) SAVAGE(0): 800x...@72hz
 (II) SAVAGE(0): 800x...@75hz
 (II) SAVAGE(0): 832x...@75hz
 (II) SAVAGE(0): 1024x...@60hz
 (II) SAVAGE(0): 1024x...@70hz
 (II) SAVAGE(0): 1024x...@75hz

More monitor stuff:

 (II) SAVAGE(0): Manufacturer's mask: 0
 (II) SAVAGE(0): Supported standard timings:
 (II) SAVAGE(0): #0: hsize: 1280  vsize 720  refresh: 60  vid: 49281
 (II) SAVAGE(0): Supported detailed timing:
 (II) SAVAGE(0): clock: 85.5 MHz   Image Size:  344 x 193 mm
 (II) SAVAGE(0): h_active: 1366  h_sync: 1435  h_sync_end 1578 h_blank_end 
 1790 h_border: 0
 (II) SAVAGE(0): v_active: 768  v_sync: 771  v_sync_end 781 v_blanking: 798 
 v_border: 0
 (II) SAVAGE(0): Ranges: V min: 50 V max: 75 Hz, H min: 30 H max: 80 kHz, 
 PixClock max 160 MHz
 (II) SAVAGE(0): Monitor name: Acer X163W
 (II) SAVAGE(0): Serial No: LBF080014210
 (II) SAVAGE(0): EDID (in hex):
 (II) SAVAGE(0):   000004721500e1788191
 (II) SAVAGE(0):   12130103682213782e1e95a355489827
 (II) SAVAGE(0):   155054bfee0081c00101010101010101
 (II) SAVAGE(0):   010101010101662156a851001e30458f
 (II) SAVAGE(0):   3a0058c1101c00fd00324b1e
 (II) SAVAGE(0):   501a20202020202000fc0041
 (II) SAVAGE(0):

Re: need help with xorg.conf

2010-03-12 Thread Paul E Condon
Wow! Thanks. But I need more help. See below.

On 20100312_131114, Stephen Powell wrote:
 On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:58:08 -0500 (EST), Paul E Condon wrote:
  On 20100312_092355, Stephen Powell wrote:
  
  Paul, please provide the following information:
  
  (1) Make and model of your computer
 Compaq Presario S3200NX (sn MX31028632)
  (2) Make and model of your video card
 integrated graphics on mother board
  (3) Make and model of your monitor
 Acer X163W
  (4) Your existing /etc/X11/xorg.conf file
 there is no such file. this is a new install done yesterday
 and I have not yet attempted any hacking
  (5) The contents of /var/log/Xorg.0.log
There follows 858 lines of the above named file:
 
 OK, we learn a lot from the /var/log/Xorg.0.log file.
 
 Your Integrated graphics card is
 
  (--) PCI:*(0:1:0:0) 5333:8d04:1462:3908 S3 Inc. VT8375 [ProSavage8 
  KM266/KL266] rev 0, Mem @ 0xe100/524288, 0xd800/134217728, BIOS @ 
  0x/65536
 
 I thought at first that the stuff within parentheses might be the chipset.
 But I found out later that I was wrong.  We'll see why in a minute.
 X chose the savage driver.  It lists the chipsets which it supports.
 
  (II) SAVAGE: driver (version 2.3.1) for S3 Savage chipsets: Savage4,
  Savage3D, Savage3D-MV, Savage2000, Savage/MX-MV, Savage/MX,
  Savage/IX-MV, Savage/IX, ProSavage PM133, ProSavage KM133,
  Twister PN133, Twister KN133, SuperSavage/MX 128, SuperSavage/MX 64,
  SuperSavage/MX 64C, SuperSavage/IX 128, SuperSavage/IX 128,
  SuperSavage/IX 64, SuperSavage/IX 64, SuperSavage/IXC 64,
  SuperSavage/IXC 64, ProSavage DDR, ProSavage DDR-K
 
 I'm not sure what to make of this next section.  First it says it's defaulting
 to 16 bit color.
 
  (II) SAVAGE(0): Creating default Display subsection in Screen section
  Builtin Default savage Screen 0 for depth/fbbpp 16/16
  (==) SAVAGE(0): Depth 16, (--) framebuffer bpp 16
  (==) SAVAGE(0): RGB weight 565
 
 But then it says it's going to use true color mode, which requires at least 
 24 bits!
 
  (==) SAVAGE(0): Default visual is TrueColor
 
 And then we have this little tidbit.
 
  (==) SAVAGE(0): Using video BIOS to set modes
 
 That's trouble.  If it uses this method, then you're limited to the video 
 modes that are
 pre-defined in the video BIOS.  And if 1366x768 isn't one of them, too bad.
 
  (--) SAVAGE(0): Chip: id 8d04, ProSavage DDR-K
 
 There's the actual chipset: ProSavage DDR-K, which is one of the supported
 chipsets for this driver.  (It's the last one listed.)
 
  (--) SAVAGE(0): probed videoram:  32768k
 
 Plenty of video RAM to do true color mode even at 1366x768 resolution.
 
 1366x768x24/1024 = 24588k; 1366x768x32/1024 = 32784k.
 Hmm.  If we have to use 32 bits of RAM per pixel, we may not have enough.
 We'll see about that later.
 
 It did find the DDC2/EDID information about your monitor though:
 
  (II) SAVAGE(0): Manufacturer: ACR  Model: 15  Serial#: 2441181409
  (II) SAVAGE(0): Year: 2009  Week: 18
  (II) SAVAGE(0): EDID Version: 1.3
  (II) SAVAGE(0): Analog Display Input,  Input Voltage Level: 0.700/0.700 V
  (II) SAVAGE(0): Sync:  Separate
  (II) SAVAGE(0): Max Image Size [cm]: horiz.: 34  vert.: 19
  (II) SAVAGE(0): Gamma: 2.20
  (II) SAVAGE(0): DPMS capabilities: Off; RGB/Color Display
  (II) SAVAGE(0): Default color space is primary color space
  (II) SAVAGE(0): First detailed timing is preferred mode
  (II) SAVAGE(0): redX: 0.637 redY: 0.333   greenX: 0.284 greenY: 0.596
  (II) SAVAGE(0): blueX: 0.154 blueY: 0.083   whiteX: 0.313 whiteY: 0.329
 
 These are the VESA standard modes that the monitor supports:
 
  (II) SAVAGE(0): Supported established timings:
  (II) SAVAGE(0): 720x...@70hz
  (II) SAVAGE(0): 640x...@60hz
  (II) SAVAGE(0): 640x...@67hz
  (II) SAVAGE(0): 640x...@72hz
  (II) SAVAGE(0): 640x...@75hz
  (II) SAVAGE(0): 800x...@56hz
  (II) SAVAGE(0): 800x...@60hz
  (II) SAVAGE(0): 800x...@72hz
  (II) SAVAGE(0): 800x...@75hz
  (II) SAVAGE(0): 832x...@75hz
  (II) SAVAGE(0): 1024x...@60hz
  (II) SAVAGE(0): 1024x...@70hz
  (II) SAVAGE(0): 1024x...@75hz
 
 More monitor stuff:
 
  (II) SAVAGE(0): Manufacturer's mask: 0
  (II) SAVAGE(0): Supported standard timings:
  (II) SAVAGE(0): #0: hsize: 1280  vsize 720  refresh: 60  vid: 49281
  (II) SAVAGE(0): Supported detailed timing:
  (II) SAVAGE(0): clock: 85.5 MHz   Image Size:  344 x 193 mm
  (II) SAVAGE(0): h_active: 1366  h_sync: 1435  h_sync_end 1578 h_blank_end 
  1790 h_border: 0
  (II) SAVAGE(0): v_active: 768  v_sync: 771  v_sync_end 781 v_blanking: 798 
  v_border: 0
  (II) SAVAGE(0): Ranges: V min: 50 V max: 75 Hz, H min: 30 H max: 80 kHz, 
  PixClock max 160 MHz
  (II) SAVAGE(0): Monitor name: Acer X163W
  (II) SAVAGE(0): Serial No: LBF080014210
  (II) SAVAGE(0): EDID (in hex):
  (II) SAVAGE(0): 000004721500e1788191
  (II) SAVAGE(0): 12130103682213782e1e95a355489827
  (II) SAVAGE(0): 

Re: need help with xorg.conf

2010-03-12 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 01:11:14PM -0500, Stephen Powell wrote:
[...]
 
 OK, we learn a lot from the /var/log/Xorg.0.log file.
 
 Your Integrated graphics card is
 
  (--) PCI:*(0:1:0:0) 5333:8d04:1462:3908 S3 Inc. VT8375 [ProSavage8 
  KM266/KL266] rev 0, Mem @ 0xe100/524288, 0xd800/134217728, BIOS @ 
  0x/65536
 
 I thought at first that the stuff within parentheses might be the chipset.
 But I found out later that I was wrong.  We'll see why in a minute.
 X chose the savage driver.  It lists the chipsets which it supports.
 
  (II) SAVAGE: driver (version 2.3.1) for S3 Savage chipsets: Savage4,
  Savage3D, Savage3D-MV, Savage2000, Savage/MX-MV, Savage/MX,
  Savage/IX-MV, Savage/IX, ProSavage PM133, ProSavage KM133,

[... snip a lot of great stuff...]

 
 After tossing out all the modes that aren't supported by the video BIOS,
 or that won't work for some other reason, it decides to reduce the virtual
 screen size.
 
  (--) SAVAGE(0): Virtual size is 1024x768 (pitch 1024)
 
 And things are all downhill from there.
 
 The bottom line: the problem is not with your monitor.  The problem is that
 the savage driver wants to use the video BIOS to set the video mode.
 
 The single most important thing you must have in any xorg.conf file is
 
Option  UseBIOS   off
 
 This goes in the Device section.  If you need more help, let me know,
 and I'll try to come up with a specific xorg.conf file for you.

I just wanted to say this is just a fantastic explanation of the log
file. nice job.

A


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: need help with xorg.conf

2010-03-12 Thread Wayne

Andrew Sackville-West wrote:

On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 01:11:14PM -0500, Stephen Powell wrote:
[...]

OK, we learn a lot from the /var/log/Xorg.0.log file.

Your Integrated graphics card is


(--) PCI:*(0:1:0:0) 5333:8d04:1462:3908 S3 Inc. VT8375 [ProSavage8 KM266/KL266] 
rev 0, Mem @ 0xe100/524288, 0xd800/134217728, BIOS @ 0x/65536

I thought at first that the stuff within parentheses might be the chipset.
But I found out later that I was wrong.  We'll see why in a minute.
X chose the savage driver.  It lists the chipsets which it supports.


(II) SAVAGE: driver (version 2.3.1) for S3 Savage chipsets: Savage4,
Savage3D, Savage3D-MV, Savage2000, Savage/MX-MV, Savage/MX,
Savage/IX-MV, Savage/IX, ProSavage PM133, ProSavage KM133,


[... snip a lot of great stuff...]


After tossing out all the modes that aren't supported by the video BIOS,
or that won't work for some other reason, it decides to reduce the virtual
screen size.


(--) SAVAGE(0): Virtual size is 1024x768 (pitch 1024)

And things are all downhill from there.

The bottom line: the problem is not with your monitor.  The problem is that
the savage driver wants to use the video BIOS to set the video mode.

The single most important thing you must have in any xorg.conf file is

   Option  UseBIOS   off

This goes in the Device section.  If you need more help, let me know,
and I'll try to come up with a specific xorg.conf file for you.


I just wanted to say this is just a fantastic explanation of the log
file. nice job.

A


+1 X 10

Wayne


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4b9aa054.10...@gmail.com



[SOLVED] need help with xorg.conf

2010-03-12 Thread Stephen Powell
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:36:07 -0500 (EST), Paul E Condon wrote:
 Wow! Thanks.

You're welcome.  I'm glad I could help.

 But I need more help.  See below.
 ...
 The log file that you examined was for the Squeeze installation, which
 had no file named /etc/X11/xorg.conf. So, at first, I was wondering
 what else must I put in the file? Surely something that identified a
 Device section, at least. Then I remembered that there was a file,
 /etc/X11/xorg.conf, in the Lenny installation. When I looked at it, I
 realized that it was a skeletal generic xorg.conf file that just
 introduced generic names for required sections.
 
 I put your Option line in that, and Lenny went from 1280x768 to the ideal
 1366x768 ! 
 
 I copied that file into the Squeeze partition and it also worked there !!!
 
 And !!! we have your wonderful commentary on the /var/log/Xorg.0.log text,
 for study in how to solve X problems by reading the log.
 
 I wonder why there is no generic /etc/X11/xorg.conf installed by
 Squeeze.

X.Org has been working hard for a long time to produce a self-configuring
server.  They finally succeeded.  The Lenny version still requires manual
configuration of the keyboard and mouse.  The Squeeze version is, for
the most part, self-configuring.  But even the Squeeze version needs manual
configuration tweaking sometimes.

 And why there is not your magic line pre-configured in
 /etc/X11/xorg.conf in Lenny.

Here is an excerpt from the man page for the savage driver that explains
why UseBIOS defaults to yes.

--

Option UseBIOS boolean
Enable or disable use of the video BIOS to change modes.  Ordinarily,
the savage driver tries to use the video BIOS to do mode switches.  This
generally produces the best results with the mobile chips (/MX and /IX),
since the BIOS knows how to handle the critical but unusual timing
requirements of the various LCD panels supported by the chip.  To do this,
the driver searches through the BIOS mode list, looking for the mode
which most closely matches the xorg.conf mode line.  Some purists find
this scheme objectionable.  If you would rather have the savage driver
use your mode line timing exactly, turn off the UseBios option.
Note: Use of the BIOS is required for dualhead operation.
Default: on (use the BIOS).

--

Since your chipset is not one of the /MX or /IX chipsets, and since
the modeline to use came directly from the monitor itself, I was confident
that we could safely bypass the BIOS and alter the VGA registers directly.

Here is a link to a web page that gives an xorg.conf file for Lenny.

http://www.wowway.com/~zlinuxman/tp600.htm#ConfigX

This is for use in an IBM ThinkPad 600.  You can't copy it verbatim,
as it is tweaked for this specific laptop.  But it may provide a
useful template for you.

-- 
  .''`. Stephen Powellzlinux...@wowway.com
 : :'  :
 `. `'`
   `-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/554150029.18715711268425133416.javamail.r...@md01.wow.synacor.com



Re: need help with xorg.conf

2010-03-12 Thread Stephen Powell
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:36:27 -0500 (EST), Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
 I just wanted to say this is just a fantastic explanation of the log
 file. nice job.

Well, there was other stuff in the log that I skipped over because it
wasn't relevant to the problem.  But thanks.  I am grateful to those
from whom I learned this stuff.

-- 
  .''`. Stephen Powellzlinux...@wowway.com
 : :'  :
 `. `'`
   `-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/921643445.18718681268425719673.javamail.r...@md01.wow.synacor.com



Re: need help with xorg.conf

2010-03-12 Thread Freeman
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 11:36:27AM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
 On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 01:11:14PM -0500, Stephen Powell wrote:
 [...]
  
  OK, we learn a lot from the /var/log/Xorg.0.log file.
  
  Your Integrated graphics card is
  
   (--) PCI:*(0:1:0:0) 5333:8d04:1462:3908 S3 Inc. VT8375 [ProSavage8 
   KM266/KL266] rev 0, Mem @ 0xe100/524288, 0xd800/134217728, BIOS @ 
   0x/65536
  
  I thought at first that the stuff within parentheses might be the chipset.
  But I found out later that I was wrong.  We'll see why in a minute.
  X chose the savage driver.  It lists the chipsets which it supports.
  
   (II) SAVAGE: driver (version 2.3.1) for S3 Savage chipsets: Savage4,
 Savage3D, Savage3D-MV, Savage2000, Savage/MX-MV, Savage/MX,
 Savage/IX-MV, Savage/IX, ProSavage PM133, ProSavage KM133,
 
 [... snip a lot of great stuff...]
 
  
  After tossing out all the modes that aren't supported by the video BIOS,
  or that won't work for some other reason, it decides to reduce the virtual
  screen size.
  
   (--) SAVAGE(0): Virtual size is 1024x768 (pitch 1024)
  
  And things are all downhill from there.
  
  The bottom line: the problem is not with your monitor.  The problem is that
  the savage driver wants to use the video BIOS to set the video mode.
  
  The single most important thing you must have in any xorg.conf file is
  
 Option  UseBIOS   off
  
  This goes in the Device section.  If you need more help, let me know,
  and I'll try to come up with a specific xorg.conf file for you.
 
 I just wanted to say this is just a fantastic explanation of the log
 file. nice job.
 

'Twas a truly great read, even for the clueless.

-- 
Kind Regards,
Freeman

http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100312210618.ga4...@europa.office



Re: need help with xorg.conf

2010-03-12 Thread Tony Nelson
On 10-03-12 13:11:14, Stephen Powell wrote:
 On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:58:08 -0500 (EST), Paul E Condon wrote:
 ...
  (--) SAVAGE(0): probed videoram:  32768k
 
 Plenty of video RAM to do true color mode even at 1366x768 
 resolution.
 
 1366x768x24/1024 = 24588k; 1366x768x32/1024 = 32784k.
 Hmm.  If we have to use 32 bits of RAM per pixel, we may not have
 enough.  We'll see about that later.
 ...

You did the math wrong.  Use bytes, not bits.  Also allow for 3 
buffers.

(1366*768*3*3)/1024 =  9220K
(1366*768*4*3)/1024 = 12294K

-- 

TonyN.:'   mailto:tonynel...@georgeanelson.com
  '  http://www.georgeanelson.com/


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1268453367.1424...@localhost.localdomain



Re: need help with xorg.conf

2010-03-12 Thread Mark Allums

On 3/12/2010 10:22 AM, John W Foster wrote:

-Original Message-
From: Paul E Condonpecon...@mesanetworks.net
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: need help with xorg.conf
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:42:16 -0700

I have a cheap flat screen monitor on one of my computers. I works
nicely, but not perfectly with Lenny. But in a much inferior way when
I switch to Squeeze.

In particular:

The screen is 1366x768 according to the user manual that came with it.
Under Lenny, X chooses to run it at 1280x768 which is OK, but
Under Squeeze, X chooses 1024x768 which makes things that should be
circle into broad elipses. And wastes a lot of the resolution on
over-size characters.

I would like to try composing some configuration lines and inserting
them in a conf file, xorg.conf, I think, but I'm not sure.

Some quidance would be greatly appreciated.



I never heard of 1366x768, this seems non-standard to me.  A wide screen 
monitor might be 1440x900.  What is the diagonal measurement in inches 
or centimeters?  What is the aspect ratio? 4:3, 3:2, 16:10, 16:9? 
(1366x768 is physically 16:9 assuming square pixels)


I am asking such silly-seeming questions because xorg.conf these days 
tends to be ignored by the Xservers if it seems inconvenient to the 
driver+server.  That is, in my experience, if the monitor is 
plug-and-play, then X goes by whatever the monitor hardware reports, and 
xorg.conf might as well not exist.


For the record, my experiences have been with early Squeeze and Sid.

Mark Allums


(Also, Virtualbox, but my difficulties with X under vbox, I attributed 
to vbox, since the vbox X driver needs help knowing what the size of the 
view is---and why it's important to install the additions helper.)




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4b9b1f02.3050...@allums.com



Re: need help with xorg.conf

2010-03-12 Thread Mark Allums

On 3/12/2010 12:11 PM, Stephen Powell wrote:

On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:58:08 -0500 (EST), Paul E Condon wrote:

On 20100312_092355, Stephen Powell wrote:


Paul, please provide the following information:




(5) The contents of /var/log/Xorg.0.log

There follows 858 lines of the above named file:


OK, we learn a lot from the /var/log/Xorg.0.log file.




And things are all downhill from there.

The bottom line: the problem is not with your monitor.  The problem is that
the savage driver wants to use the video BIOS to set the video mode.

The single most important thing you must have in any xorg.conf file is

Option  UseBIOS   off

This goes in the Device section.  If you need more help, let me know,
and I'll try to come up with a specific xorg.conf file for you.




First of all, thanks for the running commentary, it is well done. 
Second, it shows that X tends to ignore stuff it finds inconvenient. 
From one other post, we see that xorg.conf is optional these days, and 
from a different post (from OP), we see that a somewhat obscure setting 
is required if you *do* use an xorg.conf file.  (Option UseBIOS off 
worked.)


This shows the tendency of Linux more and more these days to eschew the 
old philosophy of using simple, user-edited configurations, and instead 
try to add more and more magic.  Not sure I like this trend.


Mark Allums


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4b9b2254.4030...@allums.com



Re: need help with xorg.conf

2010-03-12 Thread Ron Johnson

On 2010-03-12 23:27, Mark Allums wrote:

On 3/12/2010 12:11 PM, Stephen Powell wrote:

On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:58:08 -0500 (EST), Paul E Condon wrote:

On 20100312_092355, Stephen Powell wrote:


Paul, please provide the following information:




(5) The contents of /var/log/Xorg.0.log

  There follows 858 lines of the above named file:


OK, we learn a lot from the /var/log/Xorg.0.log file.




And things are all downhill from there.

The bottom line: the problem is not with your monitor.  The problem is 
that

the savage driver wants to use the video BIOS to set the video mode.

The single most important thing you must have in any xorg.conf file is

Option  UseBIOS   off

This goes in the Device section.  If you need more help, let me know,
and I'll try to come up with a specific xorg.conf file for you.




First of all, thanks for the running commentary, it is well done. 
Second, it shows that X tends to ignore stuff it finds inconvenient. 


Inconvenient, or can't handle?

Better error/informational messages would help, though.

 From one other post, we see that xorg.conf is optional these days, and 
from a different post (from OP), we see that a somewhat obscure setting 
is required if you *do* use an xorg.conf file.  (Option UseBIOS off 
worked.)


This shows the tendency of Linux more and more these days to eschew the 
old philosophy of using simple, user-edited configurations, and instead 
try to add more and more magic.  Not sure I like this trend.




As long as there's a manual override, I don't mind the magic.  After 
all, self-configuration (i.e. minimizing the work of the user) is 
what computers are supposed to do!


--
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA  USA

If God had wanted man to play soccer, he wouldn't have given
us arms.  Mike Ditka


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4b9b2bf6.8060...@cox.net



need help with xorg.conf

2010-03-11 Thread Paul E Condon
I have a cheap flat screen monitor on one of my computers. I works
nicely, but not perfectly with Lenny. But in a much inferior way when
I switch to Squeeze.

In particular:

The screen is 1366x768 according to the user manual that came with it.
Under Lenny, X chooses to run it at 1280x768 which is OK, but
Under Squeeze, X chooses 1024x768 which makes things that should be
circle into broad elipses. And wastes a lot of the resolution on
over-size characters. 

I would like to try composing some configuration lines and inserting
them in a conf file, xorg.conf, I think, but I'm not sure.

Some quidance would be greatly appreciated.

-- 
Paul E Condon   
pecon...@mesanetworks.net


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100312064216.ge4...@big.lan.gnu



Re: need help with xorg.conf

2010-03-11 Thread Ron Johnson

On 2010-03-12 00:42, Paul E Condon wrote:

I have a cheap flat screen monitor on one of my computers. I works
nicely, but not perfectly with Lenny. But in a much inferior way when
I switch to Squeeze.

In particular:

The screen is 1366x768 according to the user manual that came with it.
Under Lenny, X chooses to run it at 1280x768 which is OK, but
Under Squeeze, X chooses 1024x768 which makes things that should be
circle into broad elipses. And wastes a lot of the resolution on
over-size characters. 


I would like to try composing some configuration lines and inserting
them in a conf file, xorg.conf, I think, but I'm not sure.

Some quidance would be greatly appreciated.



Move away your existing xorg.conf and then try again.  Log in as a 
separate user and see what happens.


When moving from a 1280x1024 monitor to one that's 1980x1024, I got 
really really concerned because the new monitor only functioned at 
1280x1024.  Then I logged in as root, and it was 1980x1024.  Very 
puzzling!


Finally, I thought to peek in the Control Panel, and saw that the 
Display (or whatever GNOME calls it) -- for *myself* -- was set to 
1280x1024.  Two seconds later, I'm at 1980x1024.


--
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA  USA

If God had wanted man to play soccer, he wouldn't have given
us arms.  Mike Ditka


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4b99ebff.4070...@cox.net



Re: need help with xorg.conf

2010-03-11 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:42:16PM -0700, Paul E Condon wrote:
 I have a cheap flat screen monitor on one of my computers. I works
 nicely, but not perfectly with Lenny. But in a much inferior way when
 I switch to Squeeze.
 
 In particular:
 
 The screen is 1366x768 according to the user manual that came with it.
 Under Lenny, X chooses to run it at 1280x768 which is OK, but
 Under Squeeze, X chooses 1024x768 which makes things that should be
 circle into broad elipses. And wastes a lot of the resolution on
 over-size characters. 
 
 I would like to try composing some configuration lines and inserting
 them in a conf file, xorg.conf, I think, but I'm not sure.
 
 Some quidance would be greatly appreciated.
 
 -- 
 Paul E Condon   
 pecon...@mesanetworks.net
 

Switch to a text mode virtual terminal (away from X) e.g. Alt-F1

Login as / become root with sudo

killall kdm / gdm (killing your running X session).

Run

X -configure

This will endeavour to force the X configuration programs to do a best 
guess as to your hardware and dump an xorg.conf.new in your home 
directory as the root user.

If you run the command given

'X -config /root/xorg.conf.new'

and get the familiar grey background and X shaped cursor (bare X, no 
window manager) it's working.

At that point you can copy the xorg.conf.new file to /etc/X11/xorg.conf
and carry on / use it as a basis for your own customisation.

All the best,

AndyC


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100312075159.ga15...@galactic.demon.co.uk



Re: up-to-date Sid, Need help with xorg.conf

2009-06-06 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Fri,05.Jun.09, 17:03:57, Curt Howland wrote:
 Hi. Running up-to-date Sid.
 
 I bought a new monitor, and it seems somewhat limited in its screen 
 modes. The manual gives some particulars, but I can't seem to get 
 dpkg-reconfigure to give me the old interactive way of defining 
 Xwindows.

Because it's not needed anymore, especially with new monitors.

 So, I'm stuck creating my own screen/modline, and I could use a bit of 
 help.
 
 The values I want to use are 1360x768, 47.7KHz h., 60Hz v. 24/32 bits 
 of course.

Is this the native resolution of the monitor? Xorg should be able to 
detect and use it automatically.
 
 Anyone want to take a stab at it? We can work it through off-list and 
 I'll post a solution when we have it.

Try without xorg.conf. Mine has only:

Section Device
Identifier  Configured Video Device
Driver  nvidia
EndSection

Regards,
Andrei
-- 
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
(Albert Einstein)


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: : up-to-date Sid, Need help with xorg.conf

2009-06-06 Thread Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
Please reply to the list.

Curt Howland wrote:

  There should be no need for a modeline at all. xorg should detect
 its
  available modes and select the best one automatically.

 Wouldn't that be nice? Too bad it doesn't.

What does xrandr say when you run it? It should list detected modes.


-- 
Is it really you, Fuzz, or is it Memorex, or is it radiation sickness?
-- Sonic Disruptors comics

Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
edua...@kalinowski.com.br


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



[Solved] Re: up-to-date Sid, Need help with xorg.conf

2009-06-06 Thread Curt Howland
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


So trying to make the VGA input on a Sharp TV work, we have the 
following:

Using these elements from Wayne Topa:

On Friday 05 June 2009 Wayne Topa linux...@gmail.com wrote:
 The DFP is for an LCD.

 Section Device
...
  Option  Metamodes 1680x1050, 1280x1024. 1280x1024
 EndSection

 Section Monitor
  Identifier  Generic Monitor
  Option  DPMS
  HorizSync   24-831
  VertRefresh 56-75
 EndSection

And starting with Andrew's generic xorg.conf so I'd have the right 
sections:

On Saturday 06 June 2009, Andrew M.A. Cater 
amaca...@galactic.demon.co.uk was heard to say:
 Once you're sure no X is running, as root issue the command

 Xorg -configure

 This will attempt to generate an old style xorg.conf file based on
 the Xorg best guess

It was otherwise empty of details except the SiS driver definition, 
but it was good to make sure that the correct headings existed for 
everything in the new file.

So it turned out the answer was to put the screen's input h/v 
frequencies and their matching pixel MetaModes, as detailed in the 
manual one at a time, into the xorg.conf and startx until something 
worked...

Option Metamodes 1280x1024

HorizSync 64
VertRefresh 60

...is the highest resolution for which everything worked.

Sadly, the 1360x768 h.47.7 v.60 ends up putting a refresh out of 
sync error in Xorg.0.log, so the ancient SiS onboard video is living 
up to its ancientness. And not specifying the frequencies but only 
the 1360x768 launches X just fine, but puts the screen into 
an invalid frequencies error.

Oh well.

On Sat Jun  6 07:54:01 2009, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI 
edua...@kalinowski.com.br wrote:
 Please reply to the list.

I didn't want the completely obvious statement that autoconfig wasn't 
working to go to the list. But if that's the way you want it,

 There should be no need for a modeline at all. xorg should detect
 its
 available modes and select the best one automatically.

Wouldn't that be nice? Too bad it doesn't.

 What does xrandr say when you run it? It should list detected modes.

Thank you. In fact it does list the widescreen 1360x768 mode I want, 
but the frequency requirements of the screen do not allow it to be 
used.

So much for a gnarly wide-screen display. I guess I have one more good 
reason to upgrade this box to an HDMI-output machine. I'm sure this 
wouldn't have happened with hardware anywhere near new.

Thank you to everyone who chimed in with suggestions. The Command Line 
Rules where automagical stuff fails.

Curt-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iQEVAwUBSisFKy9Y35yItIgBAQLfhwf+JK+Vd/jRMHNlPYe72kgRwkAqbE2J0L/T
H0TdGpaE9VemMkjc6d3nMQa5+f+vzXczgd1Wyazv6dV7nGiZoI8VY1unNLp+lKaq
u3xy5GaxPrC47Fy9Yi+t0+EysFdBa4vzfb2g3L6wO5ukxV2nPEzwokH9XDbn6eSs
NmJpijbkHT2VRNgHXOVy9lRP72Hcx+4fSQpL3CKIiQej6nZjYMSzsOEFsY5R437z
adTQ3StjJwqjlVWC/zDlWcSvBigWsyPA+6Pz36tOAvVmH2gYuW6AckZ23VSk/YDw
+7pgSQ1DN9ruOk89FZAtEExsMRG0qz/v5cAN/xgwNdIr4zd5iq/jUw==
=4a1X
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



up-to-date Sid, Need help with xorg.conf

2009-06-05 Thread Curt Howland
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi. Running up-to-date Sid.

I bought a new monitor, and it seems somewhat limited in its screen 
modes. The manual gives some particulars, but I can't seem to get 
dpkg-reconfigure to give me the old interactive way of defining 
Xwindows.

So, I'm stuck creating my own screen/modline, and I could use a bit of 
help.

The values I want to use are 1360x768, 47.7KHz h., 60Hz v. 24/32 bits 
of course.

Anyone want to take a stab at it? We can work it through off-list and 
I'll post a solution when we have it.

Curt-

- -- 
The Magistrate, enrobed in taxes, condemns the thief in stolen rags.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iQEVAwUBSimIPS9Y35yItIgBAQIqmgf9EI6miJHfplBsYkBYrIuIt4BjEq9RdEML
EhzdwAmjfQ99x47z4+dw75lBb7xnKdTHHuROmQjMPkuEKoofs7Ji3D+A/gFYynXa
Wkmuiu2IVo188Sx02fuCpkPnRXsBtET64v7YrhayFd2e3uQlKshIbPJ4LG77jO1n
hcjlpKWIKXtqmdDILbRJuDXBTYs4RtoKPKv3xMZfSK+gr8BoQGdrAXg2b6jLAMoj
zJ8dpzb7pPvsekblYSeQkxVSXBUCW43Qq2jARHoOt0sPzG1xL4etHQhdLCgAG95j
V7m59Fuj0QdlTxiKatvY2DRveikPXf/hs6fl9Sm1jxgh0TH+EW1LuA==
=JSVt
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: up-to-date Sid, Need help with xorg.conf

2009-06-05 Thread Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
Curt Howland wrote:
 Hi. Running up-to-date Sid.

 I bought a new monitor, and it seems somewhat limited in its screen
 modes. The manual gives some particulars, but I can't seem to get
 dpkg-reconfigure to give me the old interactive way of defining
 Xwindows.

 So, I'm stuck creating my own screen/modline, and I could use a bit of
 help.

 The values I want to use are 1360x768, 47.7KHz h., 60Hz v. 24/32 bits
 of course.

 Anyone want to take a stab at it? We can work it through off-list and
 I'll post a solution when we have it.


There should be no need for a modeline at all. xorg should detect its
available modes and select the best one automatically.


-- 
It is easier to get forgiveness than permission.

Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
edua...@kalinowski.com.br


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: up-to-date Sid, Need help with xorg.conf

2009-06-05 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 06:54:55PM -0300, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
 Curt Howland wrote:
 
  So, I'm stuck creating my own screen/modline, and I could use a bit of
  help.
 
  The values I want to use are 1360x768, 47.7KHz h., 60Hz v. 24/32 bits
  of course.
 
  Anyone want to take a stab at it? We can work it through off-list and
  I'll post a solution when we have it.
 
 
 There should be no need for a modeline at all. xorg should detect its
 available modes and select the best one automatically.
 

If all else fails, kill any running X and kill kdm/gdm/xdm. [Use a 
command line from a VT]

Once you're sure no X is running, as root issue the command

Xorg -configure

This will attempt to generate an old style xorg.conf file based on the 
Xorg best guess

Your xorg.conf file is /root/xorg.conf.new

To test the server, run 'X -config /root/xorg.conf.new'

If you do that, you should end up with the classic grey screen with a 
large X shaped cursor. No window manager, but at least you know the X 
server is running fine. If that works, then copy the /root/xorg.conf.new 
file to /etc/X11/xorg.conf

If it doesn't, then at least you've got the best guess config to hand 
edit. 

I dictated this command to someone over the phone the other day
to configure a PowerMac where he'd tried and failed. I discovered the 
command myself and used it on a rack mounted server where the 
configuration was guessed correctly but the console switch wouldn't 
work with the modelines - I needed the xorg.conf config file to hand 
substitute vesa for ati to see anything at all under X :)

Hope this helps,

Andy

 
 -- 
 It is easier to get forgiveness than permission.
 
 Eduardo M KALINOWSKI


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org