[Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0.3 update
We installed the latest 3.0.3 beta tonight; the decludeproc service shot to 99% of CPU and stayed there for 15 minutes. During this time we accumulated over 1000 items in the proc folder; nothing was going out. Anyone else experienced this? We stopped/re-started the decludeproc service, as well as the SMTPd32 and Queuemgr and no change for the better. We had same experience when trying to load the initial 3.0 beta. Had to revert back to the 2.0.6.16 again. Randy Armbrecht Global Web Solutions, Inc. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail gateway setup not working
notepad %windir%\system32\drivers\etc\hosts. everything checks out with thisno problems opening it. I've doubled checked again to be sure that there is a blank line after the last entry... I'm stumped... 8.2 has the relay for addresses as 8.15 did. Any one else have any problems with this? Randy --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
[Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail gateway setup not working
I've posted this to the IMailo forum; no replies so far. So I wanted to shoot this out here. We just fired up a new server on Friday with Imail 8.20hf2, JM Pro, Declude Virus Std w/ FProt, Hijack and Sniffer. (old server was 8.15hf2 and starting thursday, the QueueMgr just quit working) We have a couple of customers we do gateway services for and the setup is not working . We have their IP/Domain listed in the host file and have thier IP in the relay addresses list. When anyone sends email in we see this in the logs... 06:18 17:31 SMTPD(92b506f87dcb) [208.253.112.161] RCPT To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 06:18 17:31 SMTPD(92b506f87dcb) [x] looking up vacva.com in HOSTS 06:18 17:31 SMTPD(92b506f87dcb) [208.253.112.161] ERR imail.globalweb.net invalid user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Note: there is no closing on the invalid user line. Any one k now of any poroblems with this in 8.20? I really do not want to have to re-load a new setup of 8.15. Any ideas would be greatly appreciated! Thank you! Randy Armbrecht Global Web Solutions, Inc. 804-346-5509 -- Original Message -- From: Michael Thomas - Mathbox [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 01:37:08 -0400 Hi, No, actually they monitor specific channels to determine if advertisements appeared on that channel and at what times. They also collect information on what shows were running when the advertisements appeared. Because much of cable advertising is geographically driven, they need access to cable TV in specific geographic areas. Mike - Original Message - From: William Stillwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 11:42 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Co-Location Space It sounds like there trying to start a service like WebVCR which was of course shutdown by the MPAA.. - Original Message - From: Michael Thomas - Mathbox [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 5:51 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Co-Location Space Hi All, I have a customer that is looking for co-location space in 50+ locations all over the US. There main requirement is a local cable TV feed. They will pay to have their own drop installed from the street. Their equipment is 50% rack-mount and 50% tower. Cabinet, rack, or wire shelf will work. Their requirements are: 10U 128k 2 IP's 3-5 amps Cable TV feed If you are interested, please contact me off list at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Below is a list of locations. Thank You, Michael Thomas Mathbox Anchorage AK Fairbanks AK Juneau AK Dothan AL Jonesboro AR Palm Springs CA Yuma-El Centro CA Eureka CA Grand Junction-Montrose CO Panama City FL Gainesville FL Ottumwa-Kirksville IA Idaho Falls-Pocatello ID Twin Falls ID Lafayette IN Bowling Green KY Alexandra LA Lake Charles LA Bangor ME Presque Isle ME Marquette MI Alpena MI Mankato MN St Joseph MO Biloxi-Gulfport MS Hattiesburg-Laurel MS Greenwood-Greenville MS Meridian MS Missoula MT Billings MT Great Falls MT Butte-Boseman MT Helena MT Glendive MT Minot-Bismarck-Dickinson ND North Platte NE Binghamton NY Utica NY Watertown NY Wheeling-Steubenville OH Lima OH Zanesville OH Bend OR Rapod City SD Jackson TN Odessa-Midland TX Abilene-Sweetwater TX Laredo TX San Angelo TX Victoria TX Sherman-Ada TX/OK Harrisonburg VA Charlottesville VA Clarksburg-Weston WV Parkersburg WV Casper-Riverton WY Cheyenne-Scottsbluff WY/NE --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This email has been scanned for possible viruses by Declude Antivirus. For more information on Declude Antivirus, Visit www.declude.com --- This email has been scanned for possible viruses by Declude Antivirus. For more information on Declude Antivirus, Visit www.declude.com --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Message Sniffer Confidence
we too offer 2 levels - weight10 marks the subj with an indicator they can filter on - weight20 gets the email held; the legit emails i have seen come across usually fail only sniffer, which has a physical weight in our system of only 5, so by itself, it doesn;t flag the lower level of our testing; in combo with most other tests however, it would. Sincerely, Randy ArmbrechtGlobal Web Solutions®, Inc.804-346-5300 x102877-800-GLOBAL (4562) x102 - Original Message - From: Trent M. Davenport To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 1:24 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Message Sniffer Confidence So, after seeing the last 2 months that message sniffer is around 90% accurate, what confidence has everyone put in it? We offer our clients 2 levels of SPAM blocking. Regular (using a WEIGHT20) and Aggressive (using a WEIGHT10). Because we're an ISP, we have to be really careful about deleting legitimate email. We purchased Message Sniffer and implemented it and it is catching a bunch of messages, but the default weight is 7. With the percentage as high as it is, I'd like to give it a 17 so that if a message fails it plus 1 other test, it'll fail the regular test. Need I be that cautious? Just looking for feedback from other users of Sniffer. Trent ---Trent M. Davenport - Systems AdministratorNorthern Television Systems Ltd - WHTV203-4103 4th Avenue, Whitehorse, YT Y1A 1H6(867) 393-2225 X204, (867) 393-2224 FAXwww.whtvcable.com( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Feedback
highly recommend it - we use JM Pro and wouldn;t trade it for the world. Sincerely, Randy ArmbrechtGlobal Web Solutions®, Inc.804-346-5300 x102877-800-GLOBAL (4562) x102 - Original Message - From: steve To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 3:57 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Feedback Hello, We are a small ISP in Southeastern Massachusetts. We presently use IMail as our mail server platform. Would be interested to here from some folks who've used Declude's JunkMail software (Opinions). Any feedback would be appreciated. Thanks in advance, Steve C TMLP Online www.tmlp.com
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spews News
we had a run-in with SPEWS last month; a customer of ours uses DSL supplied by COVAD with an 8-IP block; SPEWS blocked the entire class-C due to another complaints about another organization with another 8-block on that same class-C - requests to SPEWS were on no use - It took me calling covad to get involved before it was taken care of - another case of the innocent guys falling victim to trigger happy soles Sincerely, Randy Armbrecht Global Web Solutions®, Inc. 804-346-5300 x102 877-800-GLOBAL (4562) x102 - Original Message - From: Mark Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 8:46 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spews News FWIW, We fell victim to SPEWS in the same way. We were lucky to have an ISP that was working hard on the problem and assigned us an additional /28 network. We assigned that to another interface on our firewall and are relaying outbound email from that network. The author of this article is correct: Trying to deal with the spews admins is equivalent to dealing with children - conversations are circular and not very productive. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-owner;declude.com] On Behalf Of Tom Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 2:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spews News The following article about Spews is from the Langa List. - Fred, I saw your article regarding SpamCop and wanted to let you and your readers know about a service that is even worse called Spews. Spews doesn't blacklist sites, it blacklists entire ip ranges as a way to force domain owners, most of whom are completely innocent but happen to be within the range of the IP block, to pressure their ISP or service provider to shutdown the supposed offending spammer. It is my opinion that Spews (which is completely unreachable if you wish to object to your being included in an IP range), is actually run by spammers - as their actions are so heavy handed that they cause most users to end up dropping the use of RBLs, and as a consequence more spam ends up getting through to people's inboxes. More information about my experience is available at http://www.allpm.com/article.php?sid=261mode=order=0thold=0 Regards, Michael Lines --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by F-Proto Virus Scanner] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- [Scanned for viruses by www.GlobalWeb.net using Declude/F-Prot AV] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] declude errors?
Scott, Thanks for all of your help on this - as I soon suspected after replying to you, it turned out to be one of my guys here playing with the word filters, and had turned the WEIGHT10 value to 0 in testing various things...Sorry for the false alarm. I do have one other thingI accidently ran the declude.exe file again today (I'm a keyboard shortcut person - doesn;t always fair well in windows) and the junkmail and virus processes are now not running; i stopped/started smtp several times with no liuck; have search mail archives and cannot find anything directly to thisany suggestions? Thanks! Sincerely, Randy Armbrecht Global Web Solutions®, Inc. 804-346-5300 x102 877-800-GLOBAL (4562) x102 - Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Webmaster - GlobalWeb.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 4:24 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] declude errors? Here it is: That is strange -- it is set up correctly. Could you send me the \IMail\spool\dec1016.log file? -Scott --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- [Scanned for viruses on GlobalWeb.net's system using Declude/F-Prot AV] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] declude errors?
Declude (C) Copyright 2000-2002 Computerized Horizons. All Rights Reserved. Diagnostics ON (Declude v1.60). Declude JunkMail: Config file found (C:\imail\Declude\global.CFG). Declude Virus: Config file found (C:\imail\Declude\Virus.CFG). Declude Hijack:Not installed (no C:\imail\Declude\Hijack.CFG file). Declude Confirm: Not installed (no C:\imail\Declude\Confirm.CFG file). 27 spam tests defined: LOOSENSPAMHEADERS MONKEYFORMMAIL MONKIEPROXIES ORDB OSDUL OSFORM OSLIST OSPROXY OSRELAY OSSMART OSSOFT OSSRC SPAMCOP DSN NOABUSE NOPOSTMASTER BADHEADERS HELOBOGUS MAILFROM PERCENT REVDNS ROUTING SPAMHEADERS SNIFFER WEIGHT10 WEIGHT20 DSBL IMail reports Official Host Name as: imail.globalweb.net. IMail's SendName registry seems OK: C:\IMAIL\Declude.exe. Declude JunkMail Status: PRO version registered. Declude Virus Status:Standard Version Registered. Declude Hijack Status: NOT REGISTERED: No activation code. End of diagnostics. We have hijack turned Off right now trying to diagnose some IMail Spool build ups. Sincerely, Randy Armbrecht Global Web Solutions®, Inc. 804-346-5300 x102 877-800-GLOBAL (4562) x102 - Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 11:18 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] declude errors? I do have one other thingI accidently ran the declude.exe file again today (I'm a keyboard shortcut person - doesn;t always fair well in windows) and the junkmail and virus processes are now not running; i stopped/started smtp several times with no liuck; have search mail archives and cannot find anything directly to thisany suggestions? Normally, running the Declude.exe file manually won't cause any problems if Declude has already been installed. The only problem should be if Declude hasn't already been installed. Could you save the Declude diagnostics (by going to a command prompt and typing \IMail\declude -diag diag.txt (*exactly* like that, with no changes). This will report the diagnostic information to a file diag.txt, which you can send me. From that, I should be able to tell where the problem is. -Scott --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] declude errors?
I had previously stopped/restarted smtp service, both from the IMAIL admin/SMTP tab and the win control panel services; declude logs are not being generated - junkmail and virus both stopped logging at 10.28am; have dbl checked to be sure that log file directories are all correclty entered in the config files - I was initially thinking at first that the 're-install' had overwrote the spool file directory entry modifications we have made in the past, but not the case Sincerely, Randy Armbrecht Global Web Solutions®, Inc. 804-346-5300 x102 877-800-GLOBAL (4562) x102 - Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 11:34 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] declude errors? We have hijack turned Off right now trying to diagnose some IMail Spool build ups. The diagnostics look fine. I would recommend stopping/restarting the IMail SMTP service. If that doesn't fix it, some more details of the problem would be helpful (such as whether or not a log file is being created, or whether there is any indication that Declude is working). -Scott --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
[Declude.JunkMail] declude errors?
we have noticed over the last day or 2 that some messages are getting marked with our WEIGHT 10 Header mark of [SPAM ??] even though the message didn;t fail any tests - the header says it failed WEIGHT 10, but WEIGHT 10 is not a test is it? just a tier level of sorts, correct? Anyone have any idea what could be causing this? We are battling the typical (at least what I feel is typical) spool sluggish-nish of IMail during peak times of the day, but that's for another list... here's the headers of one of those emails.(email of sender has been changed to protect the innocent) Message-ID: 005601c2752a$aba6b260$8d82d043@desktop From: Tori B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Randy Armbrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SPAM ??]sample page Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 11:42:43 -0400 Organization: Domain2, Inc. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary==_NextPart_000_0053_01C27509.23CBA7E0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600. X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600. X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [207.217.120.122] X-Note: Scanned by Declude JunkMail sent from pintail.mail.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.122]). X-Spam-Tests-Failed: WEIGHT10 sent from pintail.mail.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.122]). X-RCPT-TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status: U X-UIDL: 327984042 SYS Log shows: 10:16 11:44 SMTPD(096300D8) [207.217.120.122] MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 10:16 11:44 SMTPD(096300D8) [207.217.120.122] RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 10:16 11:44 SMTPD(096300D8) [207.217.120.122] C:\IMAIL\spool\D8963096300d8b474.SMD 3196 10:16 11:44 SMTP-(0CB4) processing C:\IMAIL\spool\Q8963006f00f0b36a.SMD 10:16 11:44 SMTP-(0CB4) finished C:\IMAIL\spool\Q8963006f00f0b36a.SMD status=1 Declude log shows: 10/16/2002 11:44:41 Q8963096300d8b474 Msg failed WEIGHT10 (Weight of 0 reaches or exceeds the limit of 0.) Any thoughts? Thanks! Sincerely, Randy Armbrecht Global Web Solutions®, Inc. 804-346-5300 x102 877-800-GLOBAL (4562) x102 - Original Message - From: John Tolmachoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 1:26 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Way OT now! I get email that talks about situations like that all the time, describing mythical joys and riches beyond belief. I call it spam, and I'm looking for something that helps me control it. Do you have any suggestions? Now see what I started. ;) Sheesh. John Tolmachoff IT Manager, Network Engineer RelianceSoft, Inc. Fullerton, CA 92835 www.reliancesoft.com --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- [Scanned for viruses on GlobalWeb.net's system using Declude/F-Prot AV] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] declude errors?
that is the puzzling part - that is the only line shown in declude logs. Sincerely, Randy Armbrecht Global Web Solutions®, Inc. 804-346-5300 x102 877-800-GLOBAL (4562) x102 - Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 3:59 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] declude errors? we have noticed over the last day or 2 that some messages are getting marked with our WEIGHT 10 Header mark of [SPAM ??] even though the message didn;t fail any tests - the header says it failed WEIGHT 10, but WEIGHT 10 is not a test is it? just a tier level of sorts, correct? WEIGHT10 is a pseudo test -- Declude JunkMail treats it as if it were a test, but since it relies on the results of other tests, it isn't really a test by itself. Declude log shows: 10/16/2002 11:44:41 Q8963096300d8b474 Msg failed WEIGHT10 (Weight of 0 reaches or exceeds the limit of 0.) What else does the Declude JunkMail log file show for this E-mail (the other lines with 8963096300d8b474 in them)? -Scott --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- [Scanned for viruses on GlobalWeb.net's system using Declude/F-Prot AV] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
