RE: [Declude.Virus] Brief Update

2005-06-29 Thread Bill Billman








You’re spot on Mike.  In cases
like this it comes down to finding the circumstances that trigger the problem
and then simulating those conditions.  It is difficult but at the very
least a potential problem is identified and removed.  If all goes well analysis
of the fix and conditions will give a high degree of confidence that the target
problem is the one that has been fixed.  That confidence will grow as
testing without failure continues through beta.

 

Bill

 









From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Nice
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005
3:51 PM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Brief
Update



 



 





   This one must be a bugger - we changed nothing
in our configuration and the SMTPd memory problem has not reoccurred since May
29.  So how is it possible to test unless it can be reproduced?





 





    







- Original Message - 





From: Bill Billman






To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
; Declude.JunkMail@declude.com 





Sent: Wednesday, June
29, 2005 3:13 PM





Subject: [Declude.Virus]
Brief Update





 



Hi Folks,

 

Declude development is still in the process of investigating
issues surrounding resource utilization and we will report back in two weeks or
sooner if possible.

 










--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.6/33 - Release Date: 6/28/2005
 

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.6/33 - Release Date: 6/28/2005
 


Re: [Declude.Virus] Brief Update

2005-06-29 Thread Mike Nice



 
   This one must be a bugger - we changed 
nothing in our configuration and the SMTPd memory problem has not reoccurred 
since May 29.  So how is it possible to test unless it can be 
reproduced?
 
    

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Bill 
  Billman 
  To: Declude.Virus@declude.com ; Declude.JunkMail@declude.com 
  
  Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 3:13 
  PM
  Subject: [Declude.Virus] Brief 
  Update
  
  
  Hi 
  Folks,
   
  Declude development is still in 
  the process of investigating issues surrounding resource utilization and we 
  will report back in two weeks or sooner if 
  possible.
   


[Declude.Virus] Brief Update

2005-06-29 Thread Bill Billman








Hi Folks,

 

Declude development is still in the
process of investigating issues surrounding resource utilization and we will
report back in two weeks or sooner if possible.

 

We take our customer's satisfaction
very seriously and are in the process of; hiring and training additional
customer support staff, improving quality assurance and ease of use and
documentation is in a constant improvement phase. Many customers are now taking
advantage of telephone support which is available during the normal working day
as well as submitting questions through the support system at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] We do pay attention to every message and appreciate your
feedback. We will continue to improve our processes until we are offering the
best support possible.

 

All the best,

 

Bill Billman

Director of Engineering

Declude - internet
security software

 








--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.6/33 - Release Date: 6/28/2005
 


RE: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring "Boundary Space Gap" Vulnerability

2005-06-29 Thread David Barker
Dan,

1. Yes these will work anywhere in your virus.cfg.
2. If you run the log on debug, check to see if you have an error message
with the words "access scanner" if you do call us 1-866-332-5833

David B
www.declude.com 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Geiser
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 3:00 PM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring "Boundary Space Gap" Vulnerability

Hello, All,
I just upgraded to Declude 2.0.6 using the manual method.  I had 2
questions...

---
#1)  I added the following test to my virus.cfg file...

#
# The ALLOWVULNERABILITIESFROM option will...
#

ALLOWVULNERABILITIESFROM @domain.com

It wasn't clear where to put this in virus.cfg so I just dropped it at the
end.  Will that get the job done?
---

---
#2)  Now that I've upgraded is there a specific file I should watch closely
to make sure that I'm not experiencing any of the bugs I've read about in
the newer versions?  I'd rather not hear it from the customer but instead
would like to monitor things closely myself.  Perhaps evidence of any issues
will show up in the log file?
---

Thanks, Much!
Dan

- Original Message -
From: "Dan Geiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 4:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring "Boundary Space Gap" Vulnerability


> Hi, Again,
> I was able to find the "ALLOWVULNERABILITIESFROM" in the Declude Release 
> Notes, http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=122.  It looks like this 
> feature was added in Declude 2.0.  But it appears the current version of 
> Declude 2.0.6.  Since we are running 1.82 I assume that I'll have to 
> upgrade to 2.0 at least.  Is 2.0.6 a safe version to upgrade to in light 
> of the issues people have added with bugs and the like?  If so, is there a

> special place where I can go to get instructions on doing a Manual Upgrade

> to 2.0.6?
>
> Thanks In Advance,
> Dan Geiser
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> - Original Message - 
> From: "Dan Geiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 
> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 3:52 PM
> Subject: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring "Boundary Space Gap" Vulnerability
>
>
>> Hello, All,
>> We are running...
>>
>> Declude 1.82
>> Declude JunkMail Status: PRO version registered.
>> Declude Virus Status:Standard Version Registered.
>>
>> We have a customer who has an important e-mail which is being blocked by 
>> our
>> virus protection with the "Outlook 'Boundary Space Gap' Vulnerability".
>>
>> Is there anyway that I can turn off checking for the "Outlook 'Boundary
>> Space Gap' Vulnerability" on either a specific incoming e-mail address or

>> a
>> specific incoming e-mail domain?
>>
>> Thanks In Advance,
>> Dan Geiser
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> ---
>> E-mail scanned for viruses by Nexus (http://www.ntgrp.com/mailscan)
>>
>> ---
>> This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
>> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
>> type "unsubscribe Declude.Virus".The archives can be found
>> at http://www.mail-archive.com.
>> ---
>> E-mail scanned for viruses by Nexus (http://www.ntgrp.com/mailscan)
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> ---
> E-mail scanned for viruses by Nexus (http://www.ntgrp.com/mailscan)
>
> ---
> This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> type "unsubscribe Declude.Virus".The archives can be found
> at http://www.mail-archive.com.
> ---
> E-mail scanned for viruses by Nexus (http://www.ntgrp.com/mailscan)
>
> 


---
E-mail scanned for viruses by Nexus (http://www.ntgrp.com/mailscan)

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.Virus".The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


__ NOD32 1.1152 (20050623) Information __

This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.Virus".The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring "Boundary Space Gap" Vulnerability

2005-06-29 Thread Dan Geiser

Hello, All,
I just upgraded to Declude 2.0.6 using the manual method.  I had 2 
questions...


---
#1)  I added the following test to my virus.cfg file...

#
# The ALLOWVULNERABILITIESFROM option will...
#

ALLOWVULNERABILITIESFROM @domain.com

It wasn't clear where to put this in virus.cfg so I just dropped it at the 
end.  Will that get the job done?

---

---
#2)  Now that I've upgraded is there a specific file I should watch closely 
to make sure that I'm not experiencing any of the bugs I've read about in 
the newer versions?  I'd rather not hear it from the customer but instead 
would like to monitor things closely myself.  Perhaps evidence of any issues 
will show up in the log file?

---

Thanks, Much!
Dan

- Original Message - 
From: "Dan Geiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: 
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 4:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring "Boundary Space Gap" Vulnerability



Hi, Again,
I was able to find the "ALLOWVULNERABILITIESFROM" in the Declude Release 
Notes, http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=122.  It looks like this 
feature was added in Declude 2.0.  But it appears the current version of 
Declude 2.0.6.  Since we are running 1.82 I assume that I'll have to 
upgrade to 2.0 at least.  Is 2.0.6 a safe version to upgrade to in light 
of the issues people have added with bugs and the like?  If so, is there a 
special place where I can go to get instructions on doing a Manual Upgrade 
to 2.0.6?


Thanks In Advance,
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

- Original Message - 
From: "Dan Geiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: 
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 3:52 PM
Subject: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring "Boundary Space Gap" Vulnerability



Hello, All,
We are running...

Declude 1.82
Declude JunkMail Status: PRO version registered.
Declude Virus Status:Standard Version Registered.

We have a customer who has an important e-mail which is being blocked by 
our

virus protection with the "Outlook 'Boundary Space Gap' Vulnerability".

Is there anyway that I can turn off checking for the "Outlook 'Boundary
Space Gap' Vulnerability" on either a specific incoming e-mail address or 
a

specific incoming e-mail domain?

Thanks In Advance,
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
E-mail scanned for viruses by Nexus (http://www.ntgrp.com/mailscan)

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.Virus".The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
E-mail scanned for viruses by Nexus (http://www.ntgrp.com/mailscan)






---
E-mail scanned for viruses by Nexus (http://www.ntgrp.com/mailscan)

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.Virus".The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
E-mail scanned for viruses by Nexus (http://www.ntgrp.com/mailscan)





---
E-mail scanned for viruses by Nexus (http://www.ntgrp.com/mailscan)

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.Virus".The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring "Boundary Space Gap" Vulnerability

2005-06-29 Thread Darin Cox
Yep.  I've had that confirmed by Barry in the past.

Though if you renew 6 months later, they back date your renewal so you only
get 6 months of additional coverage.

Darin.


- Original Message - 
From: "Dan Geiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 11:57 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring "Boundary Space Gap" Vulnerability


Hi, All,
OK, then.  Well since it may be some time before I hear anything from
Declude perhaps someone on here can help answer my question.

We are currently running...

Declude 1.82
Declude JunkMail Status: PRO version registered.
Declude Virus Status:Standard Version Registered.

Our Service Agreement expired on June 15th.

Since our Service Agreement ended on June 15th I assume this means we can
legally upgrade to any version which was released before that date?

During the conversations I had with Scott in the past that was the case but
I just wanted to make sure before I upgraded to 2.0.6.

TIA,
Dan

- Original Message - 
From: "Darin Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 10:02 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring "Boundary Space Gap" Vulnerability


> Yep... I find that typically only a few questions or comments on the list
> get formal response by Declude nowadays, so email to their support address
> is the only way to get a response.  There's just not the same level of
> service or customer attention.
>
> Darin.
>
>
> - Original Message - 
> From: "Dan Geiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 
> Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 9:28 AM
> Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring "Boundary Space Gap" Vulnerability
>
>
> Thanks for the info, Darrell.  I'm sure that'll be enough to get me
> pointed
> in the right direction.
>
> I had another quick question for anyone willing to answer.  Typically I
> get
> most of my questions answered through these Declude discussion lists.
> Yesterday afternoon I submitted a request to [EMAIL PROTECTED] regarding
> this issue (and a few tertiary issues) and I have yet to get any sort of
> response whatsoever.  I checked their web site and they said that e-mail
> is
> the best way to get support.  Is this typical of Declude's support to be
> unresponsive like this?
>
> TIA,
> Dan
>
> - Original Message - 
> From: "Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 
> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 5:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring "Boundary Space Gap" Vulnerability
>
>
>> Dan,
>> I have been running 2.0.6 with no "major" issues that plague me on a
>> daily
>> basis.  The only issue I have encountered is when the server is under
>> high
>> load and Declude spawns processes until the server starts generating
>> errors. Since I upgraded the server it doesnt happen very often.
>> For the install you can grab the package from "your account" on the
>> declude site.  The manual install was pretty easy - just install and
>> select manual along with a directory.  The upgrade for 2.0.6.16 the last
>> beta is just an exe download.
>> Hope this helps,
>> Darrell
>> 
>> Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And
>> Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration,
>> MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.
>>
>>
>> Dan Geiser writes:
>>> Hi, Again,
>>> I was able to find the "ALLOWVULNERABILITIESFROM" in the Declude Release
>>> Notes, http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=122.  It looks like this
>>> feature was added in Declude 2.0.  But it appears the current version of
>>> Declude 2.0.6.  Since we are running 1.82 I assume that I'll have to
>>> upgrade to 2.0 at least.  Is 2.0.6 a safe version to upgrade to in light
>>> of the issues people have added with bugs and the like?  If so, is there
>>> a special place where I can go to get instructions on doing a Manual
>>> Upgrade to 2.0.6? Thanks In Advance,
>>> Dan Geiser
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Dan
>>> Geiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> To: 
>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 3:52 PM
>>> Subject: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring "Boundary Space Gap" Vulnerability
 Hello, All,
 We are running... Declude 1.82
 Declude JunkMail Status: PRO version registered.
 Declude Virus Status:Standard Version Registered. We
 have a customer who has an important e-mail which is being blocked by
 our
 virus protection with the "Outlook 'Boundary Space Gap' Vulnerability".
 Is there anyway that I can turn off checking for the "Outlook 'Boundary
 Space Gap' Vulnerability" on either a specific incoming e-mail address
 or a
 specific incoming e-mail domain? Thanks In Advance,
 Dan Geiser

>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -
> --
 E-mail scanned for viruses by Nexus (http://www.ntgrp.com/mailscan) ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.Viru

RE: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring "Boundary Space Gap" Vulnerability

2005-06-29 Thread David Barker
Dan,

You are correct you can upgrade to any release that was put out while your
service agreement was valid. So if your Service Agreement expired June 15th
2005 then any release up-to that date you are legally entitled to, i.e.
Declude 2.0.6.16

David B
www.declude.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Geiser
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 11:58 AM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring "Boundary Space Gap" Vulnerability

Hi, All,
OK, then.  Well since it may be some time before I hear anything from
Declude perhaps someone on here can help answer my question.

We are currently running...

Declude 1.82
Declude JunkMail Status: PRO version registered.
Declude Virus Status:Standard Version Registered.

Our Service Agreement expired on June 15th.

Since our Service Agreement ended on June 15th I assume this means we can
legally upgrade to any version which was released before that date?

During the conversations I had with Scott in the past that was the case but
I just wanted to make sure before I upgraded to 2.0.6.

TIA,
Dan

- Original Message -
From: "Darin Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 10:02 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring "Boundary Space Gap" Vulnerability


> Yep... I find that typically only a few questions or comments on the list
> get formal response by Declude nowadays, so email to their support address
> is the only way to get a response.  There's just not the same level of
> service or customer attention.
>
> Darin.
>
>
> - Original Message - 
> From: "Dan Geiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 
> Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 9:28 AM
> Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring "Boundary Space Gap" Vulnerability
>
>
> Thanks for the info, Darrell.  I'm sure that'll be enough to get me 
> pointed
> in the right direction.
>
> I had another quick question for anyone willing to answer.  Typically I 
> get
> most of my questions answered through these Declude discussion lists.
> Yesterday afternoon I submitted a request to [EMAIL PROTECTED] regarding
> this issue (and a few tertiary issues) and I have yet to get any sort of
> response whatsoever.  I checked their web site and they said that e-mail 
> is
> the best way to get support.  Is this typical of Declude's support to be
> unresponsive like this?
>
> TIA,
> Dan
>
> - Original Message - 
> From: "Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 
> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 5:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring "Boundary Space Gap" Vulnerability
>
>
>> Dan,
>> I have been running 2.0.6 with no "major" issues that plague me on a 
>> daily
>> basis.  The only issue I have encountered is when the server is under 
>> high
>> load and Declude spawns processes until the server starts generating
>> errors. Since I upgraded the server it doesnt happen very often.
>> For the install you can grab the package from "your account" on the
>> declude site.  The manual install was pretty easy - just install and
>> select manual along with a directory.  The upgrade for 2.0.6.16 the last
>> beta is just an exe download.
>> Hope this helps,
>> Darrell
>> 
>> Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And
>> Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration,
>> MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.
>>
>>
>> Dan Geiser writes:
>>> Hi, Again,
>>> I was able to find the "ALLOWVULNERABILITIESFROM" in the Declude Release
>>> Notes, http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=122.  It looks like this
>>> feature was added in Declude 2.0.  But it appears the current version of
>>> Declude 2.0.6.  Since we are running 1.82 I assume that I'll have to
>>> upgrade to 2.0 at least.  Is 2.0.6 a safe version to upgrade to in light
>>> of the issues people have added with bugs and the like?  If so, is there
>>> a special place where I can go to get instructions on doing a Manual
>>> Upgrade to 2.0.6? Thanks In Advance,
>>> Dan Geiser
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Dan
>>> Geiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> To: 
>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 3:52 PM
>>> Subject: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring "Boundary Space Gap" Vulnerability
 Hello, All,
 We are running... Declude 1.82
 Declude JunkMail Status: PRO version registered.
 Declude Virus Status:Standard Version Registered. We
 have a customer who has an important e-mail which is being blocked by
 our
 virus protection with the "Outlook 'Boundary Space Gap' Vulnerability".
 Is there anyway that I can turn off checking for the "Outlook 'Boundary
 Space Gap' Vulnerability" on either a specific incoming e-mail address
 or a
 specific incoming e-mail domain? Thanks In Advance,
 Dan Geiser

> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---

Re: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring "Boundary Space Gap" Vulnerability

2005-06-29 Thread Dan Geiser

Hi, All,
OK, then.  Well since it may be some time before I hear anything from 
Declude perhaps someone on here can help answer my question.


We are currently running...

Declude 1.82
Declude JunkMail Status: PRO version registered.
Declude Virus Status:Standard Version Registered.

Our Service Agreement expired on June 15th.

Since our Service Agreement ended on June 15th I assume this means we can 
legally upgrade to any version which was released before that date?


During the conversations I had with Scott in the past that was the case but 
I just wanted to make sure before I upgraded to 2.0.6.


TIA,
Dan

- Original Message - 
From: "Darin Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: 
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 10:02 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring "Boundary Space Gap" Vulnerability



Yep... I find that typically only a few questions or comments on the list
get formal response by Declude nowadays, so email to their support address
is the only way to get a response.  There's just not the same level of
service or customer attention.

Darin.


- Original Message - 
From: "Dan Geiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: 
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 9:28 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring "Boundary Space Gap" Vulnerability


Thanks for the info, Darrell.  I'm sure that'll be enough to get me 
pointed

in the right direction.

I had another quick question for anyone willing to answer.  Typically I 
get

most of my questions answered through these Declude discussion lists.
Yesterday afternoon I submitted a request to [EMAIL PROTECTED] regarding
this issue (and a few tertiary issues) and I have yet to get any sort of
response whatsoever.  I checked their web site and they said that e-mail 
is

the best way to get support.  Is this typical of Declude's support to be
unresponsive like this?

TIA,
Dan

- Original Message - 
From: "Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: 
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 5:35 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring "Boundary Space Gap" Vulnerability



Dan,
I have been running 2.0.6 with no "major" issues that plague me on a 
daily
basis.  The only issue I have encountered is when the server is under 
high

load and Declude spawns processes until the server starts generating
errors. Since I upgraded the server it doesnt happen very often.
For the install you can grab the package from "your account" on the
declude site.  The manual install was pretty easy - just install and
select manual along with a directory.  The upgrade for 2.0.6.16 the last
beta is just an exe download.
Hope this helps,
Darrell

Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration,
MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.


Dan Geiser writes:

Hi, Again,
I was able to find the "ALLOWVULNERABILITIESFROM" in the Declude Release
Notes, http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=122.  It looks like this
feature was added in Declude 2.0.  But it appears the current version of
Declude 2.0.6.  Since we are running 1.82 I assume that I'll have to
upgrade to 2.0 at least.  Is 2.0.6 a safe version to upgrade to in light
of the issues people have added with bugs and the like?  If so, is there
a special place where I can go to get instructions on doing a Manual
Upgrade to 2.0.6? Thanks In Advance,
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Dan
Geiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 3:52 PM
Subject: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring "Boundary Space Gap" Vulnerability

Hello, All,
We are running... Declude 1.82
Declude JunkMail Status: PRO version registered.
Declude Virus Status:Standard Version Registered. We
have a customer who has an important e-mail which is being blocked by
our
virus protection with the "Outlook 'Boundary Space Gap' Vulnerability".
Is there anyway that I can turn off checking for the "Outlook 'Boundary
Space Gap' Vulnerability" on either a specific incoming e-mail address
or a
specific incoming e-mail domain? Thanks In Advance,
Dan Geiser


[EMAIL PROTECTED] -
--

E-mail scanned for viruses by Nexus (http://www.ntgrp.com/mailscan) ---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.Virus".The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
E-mail scanned for viruses by Nexus (http://www.ntgrp.com/mailscan)

 ---
E-mail scanned for viruses by Nexus (http://www.ntgrp.com/mailscan) ---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.Virus".  

Re: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring "Boundary Space Gap" Vulnerability

2005-06-29 Thread Darin Cox
Yep... I find that typically only a few questions or comments on the list
get formal response by Declude nowadays, so email to their support address
is the only way to get a response.  There's just not the same level of
service or customer attention.

Darin.


- Original Message - 
From: "Dan Geiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 9:28 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring "Boundary Space Gap" Vulnerability


Thanks for the info, Darrell.  I'm sure that'll be enough to get me pointed
in the right direction.

I had another quick question for anyone willing to answer.  Typically I get
most of my questions answered through these Declude discussion lists.
Yesterday afternoon I submitted a request to [EMAIL PROTECTED] regarding
this issue (and a few tertiary issues) and I have yet to get any sort of
response whatsoever.  I checked their web site and they said that e-mail is
the best way to get support.  Is this typical of Declude's support to be
unresponsive like this?

TIA,
Dan

- Original Message - 
From: "Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 5:35 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring "Boundary Space Gap" Vulnerability


> Dan,
> I have been running 2.0.6 with no "major" issues that plague me on a daily
> basis.  The only issue I have encountered is when the server is under high
> load and Declude spawns processes until the server starts generating
> errors. Since I upgraded the server it doesnt happen very often.
> For the install you can grab the package from "your account" on the
> declude site.  The manual install was pretty easy - just install and
> select manual along with a directory.  The upgrade for 2.0.6.16 the last
> beta is just an exe download.
> Hope this helps,
> Darrell
> 
> Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And
> Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration,
> MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.
>
>
> Dan Geiser writes:
>> Hi, Again,
>> I was able to find the "ALLOWVULNERABILITIESFROM" in the Declude Release
>> Notes, http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=122.  It looks like this
>> feature was added in Declude 2.0.  But it appears the current version of
>> Declude 2.0.6.  Since we are running 1.82 I assume that I'll have to
>> upgrade to 2.0 at least.  Is 2.0.6 a safe version to upgrade to in light
>> of the issues people have added with bugs and the like?  If so, is there
>> a special place where I can go to get instructions on doing a Manual
>> Upgrade to 2.0.6? Thanks In Advance,
>> Dan Geiser
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Dan
>> Geiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: 
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 3:52 PM
>> Subject: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring "Boundary Space Gap" Vulnerability
>>> Hello, All,
>>> We are running... Declude 1.82
>>> Declude JunkMail Status: PRO version registered.
>>> Declude Virus Status:Standard Version Registered. We
>>> have a customer who has an important e-mail which is being blocked by
>>> our
>>> virus protection with the "Outlook 'Boundary Space Gap' Vulnerability".
>>> Is there anyway that I can turn off checking for the "Outlook 'Boundary
>>> Space Gap' Vulnerability" on either a specific incoming e-mail address
>>> or a
>>> specific incoming e-mail domain? Thanks In Advance,
>>> Dan Geiser
>>>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -
--
>>> E-mail scanned for viruses by Nexus (http://www.ntgrp.com/mailscan) ---
>>> This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
>>> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
>>> type "unsubscribe Declude.Virus".The archives can be found
>>> at http://www.mail-archive.com.
>>> ---
>>> E-mail scanned for viruses by Nexus (http://www.ntgrp.com/mailscan)
>>  ---
>> E-mail scanned for viruses by Nexus (http://www.ntgrp.com/mailscan) ---
>> This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
>> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
>> type "unsubscribe Declude.Virus".The archives can be found
>> at http://www.mail-archive.com.
>
>
> ---
> This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> type "unsubscribe Declude.Virus".The archives can be found
> at http://www.mail-archive.com.
> ---
> E-mail scanned for viruses by Nexus (http://www.ntgrp.com/mailscan)
>
>


---
E-mail scanned for viruses by Nexus (http://www.ntgrp.com/mailscan)

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL P

RE: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring "Boundary Space Gap" Vulnerability

2005-06-29 Thread Grant Griffith
It has taken as long as a week for me to get a response before.  Although
most times it is within a day or two.  Not as quick as it used to be with
Scott where you heard back within an hour or so.

Thanks,
Grant Griffith
EI8HTLEGS, A Division of ETC
(812)932-1000

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Geiser
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 8:28 AM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring "Boundary Space Gap" Vulnerability

Thanks for the info, Darrell.  I'm sure that'll be enough to get me pointed 
in the right direction.

I had another quick question for anyone willing to answer.  Typically I get 
most of my questions answered through these Declude discussion lists. 
Yesterday afternoon I submitted a request to [EMAIL PROTECTED] regarding 
this issue (and a few tertiary issues) and I have yet to get any sort of 
response whatsoever.  I checked their web site and they said that e-mail is 
the best way to get support.  Is this typical of Declude's support to be 
unresponsive like this?

TIA,
Dan

- Original Message - 
From: "Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 5:35 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring "Boundary Space Gap" Vulnerability


> Dan,
> I have been running 2.0.6 with no "major" issues that plague me on a daily

> basis.  The only issue I have encountered is when the server is under high

> load and Declude spawns processes until the server starts generating 
> errors. Since I upgraded the server it doesnt happen very often.
> For the install you can grab the package from "your account" on the 
> declude site.  The manual install was pretty easy - just install and 
> select manual along with a directory.  The upgrade for 2.0.6.16 the last 
> beta is just an exe download.
> Hope this helps,
> Darrell
> 
> Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
> Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, 
> MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.
>
>
> Dan Geiser writes:
>> Hi, Again,
>> I was able to find the "ALLOWVULNERABILITIESFROM" in the Declude Release 
>> Notes, http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=122.  It looks like this 
>> feature was added in Declude 2.0.  But it appears the current version of 
>> Declude 2.0.6.  Since we are running 1.82 I assume that I'll have to 
>> upgrade to 2.0 at least.  Is 2.0.6 a safe version to upgrade to in light 
>> of the issues people have added with bugs and the like?  If so, is there 
>> a special place where I can go to get instructions on doing a Manual 
>> Upgrade to 2.0.6? Thanks In Advance,
>> Dan Geiser
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Dan 
>> Geiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: 
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 3:52 PM
>> Subject: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring "Boundary Space Gap" Vulnerability
>>> Hello, All,
>>> We are running... Declude 1.82
>>> Declude JunkMail Status: PRO version registered.
>>> Declude Virus Status:Standard Version Registered. We 
>>> have a customer who has an important e-mail which is being blocked by 
>>> our
>>> virus protection with the "Outlook 'Boundary Space Gap' Vulnerability". 
>>> Is there anyway that I can turn off checking for the "Outlook 'Boundary
>>> Space Gap' Vulnerability" on either a specific incoming e-mail address 
>>> or a
>>> specific incoming e-mail domain? Thanks In Advance,
>>> Dan Geiser
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
>>> E-mail scanned for viruses by Nexus (http://www.ntgrp.com/mailscan) ---
>>> This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
>>> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
>>> type "unsubscribe Declude.Virus".The archives can be found
>>> at http://www.mail-archive.com.
>>> ---
>>> E-mail scanned for viruses by Nexus (http://www.ntgrp.com/mailscan)
>>  ---
>> E-mail scanned for viruses by Nexus (http://www.ntgrp.com/mailscan) ---
>> This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
>> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
>> type "unsubscribe Declude.Virus".The archives can be found
>> at http://www.mail-archive.com.
>
>
> ---
> This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> type "unsubscribe Declude.Virus".The archives can be found
> at http://www.mail-archive.com.
> ---
> E-mail scanned for viruses by Nexus (http://www.ntgrp.com/mailscan)
>
> 


---
E-mail scanned for viruses by Nexus (http://www.ntgrp.com/mailscan)

---
This E-mail cam

Re: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring "Boundary Space Gap" Vulnerability

2005-06-29 Thread Dan Geiser
Thanks for the info, Darrell.  I'm sure that'll be enough to get me pointed 
in the right direction.


I had another quick question for anyone willing to answer.  Typically I get 
most of my questions answered through these Declude discussion lists. 
Yesterday afternoon I submitted a request to [EMAIL PROTECTED] regarding 
this issue (and a few tertiary issues) and I have yet to get any sort of 
response whatsoever.  I checked their web site and they said that e-mail is 
the best way to get support.  Is this typical of Declude's support to be 
unresponsive like this?


TIA,
Dan

- Original Message - 
From: "Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: 
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 5:35 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring "Boundary Space Gap" Vulnerability



Dan,
I have been running 2.0.6 with no "major" issues that plague me on a daily 
basis.  The only issue I have encountered is when the server is under high 
load and Declude spawns processes until the server starts generating 
errors. Since I upgraded the server it doesnt happen very often.
For the install you can grab the package from "your account" on the 
declude site.  The manual install was pretty easy - just install and 
select manual along with a directory.  The upgrade for 2.0.6.16 the last 
beta is just an exe download.

Hope this helps,
Darrell

Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, 
MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.



Dan Geiser writes:

Hi, Again,
I was able to find the "ALLOWVULNERABILITIESFROM" in the Declude Release 
Notes, http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=122.  It looks like this 
feature was added in Declude 2.0.  But it appears the current version of 
Declude 2.0.6.  Since we are running 1.82 I assume that I'll have to 
upgrade to 2.0 at least.  Is 2.0.6 a safe version to upgrade to in light 
of the issues people have added with bugs and the like?  If so, is there 
a special place where I can go to get instructions on doing a Manual 
Upgrade to 2.0.6? Thanks In Advance,

Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Dan 
Geiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: 
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 3:52 PM
Subject: [Declude.Virus] Ignoring "Boundary Space Gap" Vulnerability

Hello, All,
We are running... Declude 1.82
Declude JunkMail Status: PRO version registered.
Declude Virus Status:Standard Version Registered. We 
have a customer who has an important e-mail which is being blocked by 
our
virus protection with the "Outlook 'Boundary Space Gap' Vulnerability". 
Is there anyway that I can turn off checking for the "Outlook 'Boundary
Space Gap' Vulnerability" on either a specific incoming e-mail address 
or a

specific incoming e-mail domain? Thanks In Advance,
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
---
E-mail scanned for viruses by Nexus (http://www.ntgrp.com/mailscan) ---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.Virus".The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
E-mail scanned for viruses by Nexus (http://www.ntgrp.com/mailscan)

 ---
E-mail scanned for viruses by Nexus (http://www.ntgrp.com/mailscan) ---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.Virus".The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.Virus".The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
E-mail scanned for viruses by Nexus (http://www.ntgrp.com/mailscan)





---
E-mail scanned for viruses by Nexus (http://www.ntgrp.com/mailscan)

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.Virus".The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.