Re: DUL: Re: [Declude.Virus] v1.15 Released

2001-03-15 Thread Don Brown

So, in the case of Imail with a real mail server (MX10 name) and a virtual 
server:

1) the new variables of senderhost and reciphost will reflect the real mail 
server; and,
2) the existing variables of localhost and remotehost will reflect the 
virtual server.

Correct?


At 10:59 AM 3/15/01 -0500, you wrote:

What is the difference between %REMOTEHOST% vs %SENDERHOST% and between 
%RECIPHOST% vs %LOCALHOST%

%LOCALHOST% and %REMOTEHOST% are a local domain on your IMail server, and 
a remote domain.  These come from the To/From addresses, and could be 
either from the sender or recipient.  They determine which domain of yours 
was used, and what the remote domain was (regardless of whether the E-mail 
is going to the remote domain or coming from it).

The %SENDERHOST% and %RECIPHOST% variables are the domain that the sender 
of the E-mail is from, and the domain the recipient is from.

As an example, if I send an E-mail from "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" to 
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ("declude.com" being a local domain here), 
you would have:

%LOCALHOST% = declude.com
%REMOTEHOST% = list.ipswitch.com
%SENDERHOST% = declude.com
%RECIPHOST% = list.ipswitch.com

On the other hand, if "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" sends an E-mail to 
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]", you would see:

%LOCALHOST% = declude.com
%REMOTEHOST% = list.ipswitch.com
%SENDERHOST% = list.ipswitch.com
%RECIPHOST% = declude.com
   -Scott

[ This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To ]
[ unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and ]
[ type "unsubscribe Declude.Virus yourname".  You can E-mail]
[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web   ]
[ site at http://www.declude.com .  ]


Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA   Internet Concepts, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.inetconcepts.net
PGP Key ID: 04C99A55  (972) 788-2364  Fax: (972) 788-5049
Providing Internet Solutions Worldwide - An eDataWeb Affiliate


[ This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To ]
[ unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and ]
[ type "unsubscribe Declude.Virus yourname".  You can E-mail]
[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web   ]
[ site at http://www.declude.com .  ]



[Declude.Virus] BANnotify.EML

2001-12-08 Thread Don Brown

Does BANnotify.EML get sent to the intended recipients or to the sender.

The example of BANnotify.EML doesn't show a from or to address.  Are these 
addresses configurable, like with the other templates?

Thanks,

Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA   Internet Concepts, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.inetconcepts.net
PGP Key ID: 04C99A55  (972) 788-2364  Fax: (972) 788-5049
Providing Internet Solutions Worldwide - An eDataWeb Affiliate


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]




[Declude.Virus] TempDir

2001-12-18 Thread Don Brown

Scott,

What is the advantage, if any, of specifying a Temporary directory for AV 
to scan files?  They're are scanned in the spool directory by default, 
aren't they?

Thanks,


Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA   Internet Concepts, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.inetconcepts.net
PGP Key ID: 04C99A55  (972) 788-2364  Fax: (972) 788-5049
Providing Internet Solutions Worldwide - An eDataWeb Affiliate


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .



Re: [Declude.Virus] Declude v1.30 released (beta) Delete Virus

2001-12-21 Thread Don Brown

Yes. DELETEVIRUSES ON is in the config file.

Well, I was wrong.  It is e-mail with banned attachments which is being 
quarantined.

Can you add a similar config option to delete them, as well?


At 09:33 PM 12/20/01 -0500, you wrote:

It looks like 1.30 broke the Delete Virus option.  The virus files are 
going to the virus directory, instead of being deleted.

It's working here.  Do you have a line:

 DELETEVIRUSES ON

in the \IMail\Declude\virus.cfg file?

If you don't have that line, you can use the Declude debug mode to help 
track down the problem.  To do this, change the LOGLEVEL LOW line in the 
virus.cfg file to LOGLEVEL DEBUG.  Then, send the test eicar.com file 
through, and then switch back to LOGLEVEL LOW.  You can then send me the 
\IMail\Declude\vir.log file, and I can take a look at it to see what 
the problem is.
 -Scott

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)]

This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .


Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA   Internet Concepts, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.inetconcepts.net
PGP Key ID: 04C99A55  (972) 788-2364  Fax: (972) 788-5049
Providing Internet Solutions Worldwide - An eDataWeb Affiliate


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .



Re: MISSING_REVERSE_DNS:Re: [Declude.Virus] Kudos from Customers!!

2002-01-30 Thread Don Brown

No.  That is not what it means.  We notify the intended recipient (and
include the headers) whenever we catch a virus or quarantine an e-mail
and attachment.  Both the email and the attachment are quarantined.


Wednesday, January 30, 2002, 1:38:26 PM, gf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
g Do you mean that is it possible to quarantine just the attachments and let
g the message to be delivered?

g If yes how can I apply this function?

g Thank you

g Giuseppe


g - Original Message -
g From: Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
g To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
g Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 8:14 PM
g Subject: [Declude.Virus] Kudos from Customers!!


 I just thought I would share this with the group.  It is little things
 like this that can really make my day.

 Below is one, of many, unsolicited kudos from customers, which is a
 direct result of running Declude.

 This one is particular to quarantining attachments, which helped us
 block the new party virus until the virus companies had identified
 it and incorporated its signature into the definition file.

  Not 2 or 3 hours ago Mark and I talked about how we appreciated the
g service
 you provide in helping guard against viruses.   You do what you think is
 best.  Thanks again 



 
 Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.inetconcepts.net
 PGP Key ID: 04C99A55  (972) 788-2364  Fax: (972) 788-5049
 Providing Internet Solutions Worldwide - An eDataWeb Affiliate
 

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
g (http://www.declude.com)]

 This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.  You can E-mail
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
 site at http://www.declude.com .
 =
 [This message has been scanned for viruses and it is virus-free]
 [Questo messaggio e' stato analizzato ed e' esente da virus]



g =
g [This message has been scanned for viruses and it is virus-free]
g [Questo messaggio e' stato analizzato ed e' esente da virus]

g ---
g [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

g This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
g unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
g type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.  You can E-mail
g [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
g site at http://www.declude.com .




Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.inetconcepts.net
PGP Key ID: 04C99A55  (972) 788-2364  Fax: (972) 788-5049
Providing Internet Solutions Worldwide - An eDataWeb Affiliate


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .



[Declude.Virus] Problem with FreeMail

2002-01-30 Thread Don Brown

Why did these get a Freemail weight of 4?

01/30/2002 15:24:40 Q6475032 BADHEADERS:4 SPAMHEADERS:4 nFREEMAIL:4 .  Total weight = 
12
01/30/2002 15:24:40 Q6475032 Msg failed WEIGHT10 (Weight of 12 exceeds the limit of 
10.).
01/30/2002 15:24:40 Q6475032 Subject: omain Transfer Request for xxx
01/30/2002 15:24:40 Q6475032 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
01/30/2002 15:24:40 Q6475032 Message FAILED: Deleting message!
01/30/2002 15:24:41 Q6475148 BADHEADERS:4 SPAMHEADERS:4 nFREEMAIL:4 .  Total weight = 
12
01/30/2002 15:24:41 Q6475148 Msg failed WEIGHT10 (Weight of 12 exceeds the limit of 
10.).
01/30/2002 15:24:41 Q6475148 Subject: omain Transfer Request for xxx
01/30/2002 15:24:41 Q6475148 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
01/30/2002 15:24:41 Q6475148 Message FAILED: Deleting message!

Global Config:
FREEMAILfromfilex:\imail\declude\freemail.lst   x   x   4  
 0

FreeMail.lst:
@yahoo.com
@hotmail.com
@excite.com

Running Version 1.35

Thanks,


Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.inetconcepts.net
PGP Key ID: 04C99A55  (972) 788-2364  Fax: (972) 788-5049
Providing Internet Solutions Worldwide - An eDataWeb Affiliate


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .



[Declude.Virus] DELIVERERRORS

2002-02-01 Thread Don Brown

Scott,

Does DELIVERERRORS apply to incoming mail, outgoing mail or both
incoming and outgoing?

Does this variable have any impact upon a scanner time-out?

Thanks,



Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.inetconcepts.net
PGP Key ID: 04C99A55  (972) 788-2364  Fax: (972) 788-5049
Providing Internet Solutions Worldwide - An eDataWeb Affiliate


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .



Re: [Declude.Virus] korea.services.net blacklist

2002-08-13 Thread Don Brown

What a great idea!  Spam routing works great, too.


Tuesday, August 13, 2002, 8:31:26 PM, R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I think I'm OT here .. but I don't think I'm subscribed to the Junkmail 
list. Is there a separate one?

RSP Yes -- you can send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with subscribe 
RSP declude.junkmail your name in the body to subscribe.

Either way, is anyone using korea.services.net for an RBL?  By the sounds 
of it, it's pretty much every ARIN block registered in korea.  It might be 
alright for a weighted rule .. any success or deny stories to tell?

RSP FWIW, we're working on an automatic IP-country lookup in Declude JunkMail 
RSP that would allow for weighting based on countries the E-mail passed through.
RSP   -Scott

RSP ---
RSP [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

RSP ---
RSP This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
RSP unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
RSP type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
RSP at http://www.mail-archive.com.




Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.inetconcepts.net
PGP Key ID: 04C99A55  (972) 788-2364  Fax: (972) 788-5049
Providing Internet Solutions Worldwide - An eDataWeb Affiliate


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



[Declude.Virus] Manifest

2003-08-24 Thread Don Brown
Hi Scott,

I like the idea of an e-mail notification when a dangerous attachment
is quarantined and when a virus is killed.  They remind the customers
of the services we are providing them.

However, these notifications became a significant impact during the
recent outbreak and now, I'm wondering about the possibility of
incorporating a daily manifest, as an option.

Do you think that a manifest option is a possibility for the future?

Thanks,



Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.inetconcepts.net
PGP Key ID: 04C99A55  (972) 788-2364  Fax: (972) 788-5049
Providing Internet Solutions Worldwide - An eDataWeb Affiliate


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.Virus] Mime Segments

2003-11-18 Thread Don Brown
Over the last few days, the majority (about 98%) of entries in our
Virus log look like this:

11/18/2003 04:10:10 Qeff80ed6013007fe 50 is too many MIME levels to recurse
11/18/2003 04:10:10 Qeff80ed6013007fe 50 is too many MIME levels to recurse
11/18/2003 04:10:10 Qeff80ed6013007fe 50 is too many MIME levels to recurse

Could it be true that 98%+ of our inbound traffic has too many mime
levels?

We're running Declude PRO 1.76i9, F-Prot 3.14b under W2k3 Server, web
edition.

Any ideas?

Thanks,


Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.inetconcepts.net
PGP Key ID: 04C99A55  (972) 788-2364  Fax: (972) 788-5049
Providing Internet Solutions Worldwide - An eDataWeb Affiliate


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] Log error with latest interim release

2004-03-18 Thread Don Brown
You might want to use the 32b version of the scanner, as well.

# F-PROT - 1st scanner
SCANFILE1   C:\Progra~1\FSI\F-Prot\fpcmd.exe /TYPE /SILENT /NOMEM /ARCHIVE /NOBOOT 
/DUMB /REPORT=report.txt
VIRUSCODE1  3
VIRUSCODE1  6
REPORT1 Infection:


Thursday, March 18, 2004, 9:57:41 AM, R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

We have been running the latest interims for a couple of weeks (since
the EZIP stuff came out).  We are seeing the following error in the
virus logs:

03/18/2004 07:25:33 Qa32252df006a099c Could not find parse string
Infection: in report.txt
03/18/2004 07:25:33 Qa32252df006a099c Error 8 in virus scanner 1.
03/18/2004 07:25:33 Qa32252df006a099c Scanned: Error in virus scanner.
[MIME: 3 23481]

RSP That is normal.  The Error 8 indicates that F-Prot detected a suspicious 
RSP file, in which case it will not know the name of the virus (since it didn't 
RSP detect one).

We have f-prot 3.14e and Declude v1.78i27.  Running on Imail 7.15.  Here
is the Scan line from the virus.cfg:

SCANFILEC:\Progra~1\FSI\F-Prot\F-Prot.exe /TYPE /SILENT /NOMEM
/ARCHIVE /NOFLOPPY /NOBOOT /DUMB /SERVER /REPORT=report.txt

RSP The /SERVER is not recommended, and will cause the Error 8's.

RSP -Scott
RSP ---
RSP Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers 
RSP since 2000.
RSP Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver 
RSP vulnerability detection.
RSP Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

RSP ---
RSP [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

RSP ---
RSP This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
RSP unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
RSP type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
RSP at http://www.mail-archive.com.




Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.inetconcepts.net
PGP Key ID: 04C99A55  (972) 788-2364  Fax: (972) 788-5049
Providing Internet Solutions Worldwide - An eDataWeb Affiliate


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: Possible Spam: [Declude.Virus] OT - Need IP from MAC address

2004-05-23 Thread Don Brown
Get a command prompt and type ipconfig (without the quotes) and a
carriage return.

To get a command prompt, Select Start/Run and type CMD (without the
quotes) in the box and click the ok button.

If you need to change the IP address, then Select
Start/Settings/Network Connections. Select something other than make
a new network connection. Next, click properties, choose Internet
Protocol (TCP/IP) and click Properties. You should be able to find
your way around from there.

HTH

Thanks,


Sunday, May 23, 2004, 12:05:12 PM, Jeff Pereira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JP Windows..sorry I left that out.
JP  
JP jeff
  
JP - Original Message - 
  
JP From:  Rich
  
JP To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
JP Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2004 11:57 AM
  
JP Subject: Re: Possible Spam:   [Declude.Virus] OT - Need IP from MAC address
  


  
JP What OS?
  
  
JP - Original Message - 
  
JP From:  Jeff Pereira
  
JP To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
JP Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2004 8:22 AM
  
JP Subject: Possible Spam: [Declude.Virus] OT - Need IP from MAC address
  


  
JP Sorry for the OT post, but I am in need of help.
  
JP  
  
JP I have a piece of equipment that I inherited that was
JP assigned a fixed IP address, but I do not know what it is.
  
JP  
  
JP I am pretty sure that there is a way to determine the IP
JP by way of the MAC address, but I am unable to figure out how.
  
JP  
  
JP Any help will be appreciated.
  
JP  
  
JP jeff
  
JP  










Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.inetconcepts.net
(972) 788-2364Fax: (972) 788-5049


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.Virus] F-Prot 3.15b break Declude Virus?

2004-10-01 Thread Don Brown
I read the thread about this, but I didn't determine the final
conclusion.  Does F-Prot 3.15b break Declude virus?



Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.inetconcepts.net
(972) 788-2364Fax: (972) 788-5049


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] Declude and Linux?

2005-03-30 Thread Don Brown
Both have merit and there is a place for both, AFAIC.  They don't have
to agree or even like each other, as long each product just works :-)


Wednesday, March 30, 2005, 4:05:48 PM, Dan Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DH I'd definitely like to see Declude plug into postfix.  But then wouldn't
DH that be kind of like Len and Scott holding hands?  ~Shudder~ 

DH -Original Message-
DH From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DH [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Franco-Rocha
DH Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 4:52 PM
DH To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
DH Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Declude and Linux?

DH That is definitely in the stack of cards, Jeff. But we cannot yet
DH project a release date. We will, however, keep you informed as we get
DH closer to formulating that project. We would be interested in hearing
DH any input you would care to provide, such as: your Linux platform, the
DH mail server(s) you would like to see targeted, etc.

DH David Franco-Rocha

DH - Original Message -
DH From: Jeff Kratka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DH To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
DH Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 4:29 PM
DH Subject: [Declude.Virus] Declude and Linux?


 Will there be a version of Declude for Linux?

 Jeff Kratka
 
 TymeWyse Internet
 P.O.Box 84 - 110 Ecklund St., Canyonville, OR 97417
 tel/fax: (541) 839-6027  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 

DH ---
DH This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
DH unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
DH type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
DH at http://www.mail-archive.com.

DH ---
DH This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
DH unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
DH type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
DH at http://www.mail-archive.com.




Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.inetconcepts.net
(972) 788-2364Fax: (972) 788-5049


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] Update

2005-05-26 Thread Don Brown
Wednesday, May 25, 2005, 3:42:59 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
[SNIP]

BD Customer Information
BD We have migrated a large portion of our customer accounts from the older
BD system. The majority of customers can now view their Host information at the
BD foot of the 'My Account' page on www.declude.com. Please review it and let
BD us know of any discrepancies, missing hosts, wrong names, etc.
BD Barry

Merchant Card Service is listed on our account, but they should have
their own account. We sold the initial product to them, but we will
not be involved in maintenance.




Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.inetconcepts.net
(972) 788-2364Fax: (972) 788-5049


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] Outlook 'CR' Vulnerability from Thunderbird ???

2005-08-12 Thread Don Brown



Thursday, August 11, 2005, 10:50:32 PM, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
M David,

M With 2.0.6.16, which is available from the Declude site, you can turn 
M off the Outlook CR Vulnerability.  I have turned off all but a couple of
M these because of numerous false positive issues.

Which ones have you turned off and what is the syntax to use?





Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.inetconcepts.net
(972) 788-2364Fax: (972) 788-5049


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] Outlook 'CR' Vulnerability from Thunderbird ???

2005-08-12 Thread Don Brown
Thanks.


Friday, August 12, 2005, 9:47:16 AM, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
M Here's what I turned off:

M ALLOWVULNERABILITYOLCR
M ALLOWVULNERABILITYOLSPACEGAP
M ALLOWVULNERABILITYOLMIMESEGMIMEPRE
M ALLOWVULNERABILITYOLMIMESEGMIMEPOST
M ALLOWVULNERABILITYOLLONGFILENAME
M ALLOWVULNERABILITYOLBLANKFOLDING
M ALLOWVULNERABILITYOBJECTDATA
M ALLOWVULNERABILITYOLBOUNDARYSPACEGAP

M This only works with 2.0.6.14+.  There are more that are listed when you
M log into your account on declude.com and go to the page for 2.0.6.16.
M All of the above were producing repeated false positives from multiple
M sources, and ones like OLCR were especially problematic.

M Matt



M Don Brown wrote:


Thursday, August 11, 2005, 10:50:32 PM, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
M David,

M With 2.0.6.16, which is available from the Declude site, you can turn 
M off the Outlook CR Vulnerability.  I have turned off all but a couple of
M these because of numerous false positive issues.

Which ones have you turned off and what is the syntax to use?





Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.inetconcepts.net
(972) 788-2364Fax: (972) 788-5049


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


  

M ---
M This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
M unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
M type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
M at http://www.mail-archive.com.




Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.inetconcepts.net
(972) 788-2364Fax: (972) 788-5049


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] Virus Config Update

2005-11-23 Thread Don Brown



Wednesday, November 23, 2005, 2:55:34 PM, David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
Snip

DB The complete SCANFILE config would be something like this:

DB SCANFILEC:\Progra~1\Grisoft\AVG7\avg.exe /NOBOOT /NOMEM /NOSELF /ARC

Is it avgscan.exe or avg.exe in the above for the 32 bit scanner?


Snip


DB David B
DB www.declude.com

DB ---
DB This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
DB unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
DB type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
DB at http://www.mail-archive.com.




Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.inetconcepts.net
(972) 788-2364Fax: (972) 788-5049


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] Feature request: DELETEVIRUSNAME

2006-01-27 Thread Don Brown
Instead of doing something like that, which will require on-going,
hands-on maint, why not just tag to hold those which are identified by
the scanner as suspicious or generic and delete the rest?


Wednesday, January 25, 2006, 4:37:28 PM, Markus Gufler [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
MG Maybe someone has already requested it:

MG Why not allow commands like 

MG DELETEVIRUSNAME Netsky
MG DELETEVIRUSNAME Bagle
MG ...

MG in the virus.cfg file?

MG I won't and can't delete all viruses on our server because there is always
MG the possibility that a scanner is catching something as suspicious or
MG generic 

MG But commands to delete certain virusnames should be very easy to implement
MG and allow us to eliminate  95% of all hold viruses on out servers.

MG Markus

MG ---
MG [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

MG ---
MG This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
MG unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
MG type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
MG at http://www.mail-archive.com.




Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.inetconcepts.net
(972) 788-2364Fax: (972) 788-5049


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] Feature request: DELETEVIRUSNAME

2006-01-27 Thread Don Brown
Thursday, January 26, 2006, 2:33:11 AM, Colbeck, Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

CA[SNIP]
CA Like you, I have a system that blocks a ton of mail, so I run AVAFTERJM
CA to cut down on the work, and this definitely leaves a gap in my
CA statistics.  Similarly, it follows that I wouldn't want to scan my whole
CA SPAM folder.  Even reading the directory of the filenames is a disk
CA workout.
[SNIP]

How does AVAFTERJM cut down on work?  I thought it only affected the
order in which JM and AV ran, and that AV ran each time, regardless of
this setting.



Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.inetconcepts.net
(972) 788-2364Fax: (972) 788-5049


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] Feature request: DELETEVIRUSNAME

2006-01-27 Thread Don Brown
As a practical matter, about what percent fall into the category of
the Virus Scanner making a false positive? IOW, aren't you out hunting
mosquitos with hand grenades?


Friday, January 27, 2006, 8:58:25 AM, Markus Gufler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Instead of doing something like that, which will require 
 on-going, hands-on maint, why not just tag to hold those 
 which are identified by the scanner as suspicious or generic 
 and delete the rest?

MG This is another possible solution but my intention is to clean my server
MG from messages containing certain viruses. Thus are the well know top viri
MG like Sober, Netsky and Co.
MG Deleting them immediatly there will remain only a little crowd of viruses
MG and suspicious files. Whatever will happen in the future I have them on my
MG server and can keep it there also for one or two weeks in the case it turns
MG out that some user is missing a legit message. In this cas I can find the
MG message in my virus-folder on the server and requeue it even if it was
MG false positive-identified by some scanner as a fiften year old
MG tequila-Virus.

MG Andrews idea to parse the virus logfile instead of the content from each
MG virus-message is definitively an excellent idea. However there is a more
MG simplier and efficient possibility if we could delete infected messages by
MG the virus name.

MG Markus



 
 
 Wednesday, January 25, 2006, 4:37:28 PM, Markus Gufler 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 MG Maybe someone has already requested it:
 
 MG Why not allow commands like
 
 MG DELETEVIRUSNAME Netsky
 MG DELETEVIRUSNAME Bagle
 MG ...
 
 MG in the virus.cfg file?
 
 MG I won't and can't delete all viruses on our server 
 because there is 
 MG always the possibility that a scanner is catching something as 
 MG suspicious or generic
 
 MG But commands to delete certain virusnames should be very easy to 
 MG implement and allow us to eliminate  95% of all hold 
 viruses on out servers.
 
 MG Markus
 
 MG ---
 MG [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA 
 www.declude.com]
 
 MG ---
 MG This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To 
 MG unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 MG type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
 MG at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 
 
 
 
 Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.inetconcepts.net
 (972) 788-2364Fax: (972) 788-5049
 
 
 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To 
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 

MG ---
MG [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

MG ---
MG This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
MG unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
MG type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
MG at http://www.mail-archive.com.




Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.inetconcepts.net
(972) 788-2364Fax: (972) 788-5049


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] Feature request: DELETEVIRUSNAME

2006-01-27 Thread Don Brown
Your first and second message seem to be contradictory or I'm dense.

#1 The main benefit is that it cuts down on the amount of messages
virus scanned thus saving resources.

#2 It still gets virus scanned.

So, with or without AVAFTERJM, it looks like each message is scanned by the 
virus
scanner (which makes sense to me).  If that is so, then how does it
cut down on machine resources?



Friday, January 27, 2006, 9:43:19 AM, Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] wrote:
Dsic Keith, 

Dsic It still gets virus scanned.  I have tons of viruses in my virus drop 
point
Dsic for ROUTETO accounts. 

Dsic Darrell
Dsic  ---
Dsic Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude, 
Imail,
Dsic mxGuard, and ORF.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI 
Dsic integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers. 


Dsic Keith Johnson writes: 

 Darrell,
   What happens in this scenario.  Virus file comes in, AVAFTERJM
 is turned on, thus Declude scans it for spam content, lets say it is
 spam, thus ROUTETO sends it to a specific mailbox for customer to review
 for certain amount of days.  Does Declude Virus still run against it
 prior to ROUTETO?  My fear is that the virus file will land in their
 spam box untouched and the user will fire the virus off by looking at
 file.   
 
 Keith 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell
 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
 Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 10:02 AM
 To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
 Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Feature request: DELETEVIRUSNAME 
 
 
 How does AVAFTERJM cut down on work?  I thought it only affected the 
 order in which JM and AV ran, and that AV ran each time, regardless of
 
 this setting.
 
 The main benefit is that it cuts down on the amount of messages virus 
 scanned thus saving resources.  It has been a MAJOR help for me.  
 
 Darrell
  ---
 Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude,
 Imail, 
 mxGuard, and ORF.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI 
 integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.  
 
 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com] 
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To unsubscribe,
 just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com] 
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Dsic  

Dsic ---
Dsic [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

Dsic ---
Dsic This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
Dsic unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
Dsic type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
Dsic at http://www.mail-archive.com.




Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.inetconcepts.net
(972) 788-2364Fax: (972) 788-5049


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] Feature request: DELETEVIRUSNAME

2006-01-27 Thread Don Brown
Seems there is some confusion about whether or not AVAFTERJM prevents
AV from running.  Some say it does and some say it doesn't matter - AV
still runs on all messages.

So, I guess we first need to have someone from Declude tell us, FOR
SURE, which it is. There isn't much in either section 9.1 or elsewhere
in the JM manual and I didn't find anything in the AV manual about
AVAFTERJM. So, DECLUDE, does, under any circumstances, AVAFTERJM cause
AV not to be ran on a message?

In the event that Declude responds that AV is prevented from running
under some or all circumstances by using AVAFTERJM, then:

  1. It seems to me that if you are holding messages which were not AV
  scanned and which could later be dropped into the queue for
  processing, that eventually Murphy will make sure that a virus
  infected message is released to an end-user.

  2. You are putting a bandaid on a gunshot wound or treating the
  symptom rather than the disease. If you are starved for cycles, plan
  to scale up or use gateways to separate the processes and reduce the
  bottleneck.

  FWIW

Friday, January 27, 2006, 11:02:32 AM, Markus Gufler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 So, with or without AVAFTERJM, it looks like each message is 
 scanned by the virus scanner (which makes sense to me). 

MG Wrong... if you block the messages on the servers:

As we know usualy 50% of all incomming messages are spam.
MG We know too that resource usage of one or two scan-engines is way above the
MG entire spam filtering even if you use 5-6 external applications like
MG sniffer, inv-uribl, spamchk, ...

MG So if you're spam filters are set up properly they will filter out at least
MG 50% of all incomming messages before they will reach the av-engines.

MG Markus

MG ---
MG [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

MG ---
MG This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
MG unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
MG type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
MG at http://www.mail-archive.com.




Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.inetconcepts.net
(972) 788-2364Fax: (972) 788-5049


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] Feature request: DELETEVIRUSNAME

2006-01-27 Thread Don Brown
There is no perfect Spam or Virus system.  There will either be false
positives, missed Spam or Viruses or a combination of both.
Therefore, if the customer is expecting absolute perfection, then I
think the problem is one of a customer with unrealistic expectations.

You said, what happens if tommorow turns out that scan engines has
catched many legit messages as viruses due to a new buggy singature.
Well, then you need to HOLD ALL messages tagged as containing a virus,
if you are that anal about it and that makes your original point moot.
For instance, you've solved nothing if you had bagal hard coded to
be deleted and that was the buggy one in the signature file.  How
often does this really happen - does it happen more than 1% of the
time?  It hasn't shown to be an issue in our case, but I think we'd
all be interested in your statistics which show it as a significant
exposure to false positives.

You said, or because a legit message unexpected contains something
sospicious. My previous comment was to hold all of those tagged as
suspicious. Do you have good statistics on these, which show a
significant false positive rate?  I think we'd all be interested in
your finding . . .

Thanks,


Friday, January 27, 2006, 10:56:56 AM, Markus Gufler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 aren't you out hunting mosquitos with hand grenades?

MG If the mosquito is a very nasty but important customer it's bether using
MG tank's, mg's and whatever you can organize in order to prevent painfull
MG stings...

MG On a day liky today I could turn on DELETEVIRUSES with nearly zero risk in
MG order to keep the server disk clean. But what happens if tommorow turns out
MG that one of the scan engines has catched many legit messages as viruses due
MG to a new buggy singature or because a legit message unexpected contains
MG something sospicious. How do you explain to customers that the messages
MG are already deleted?

MG F-Prot's exit code 8 (suspicious files) has catched a lot of new unknow
MG viruses before singatures was available. So I use this exit code in my
MG config to hold messages. But suspicous could also be something legit we
MG don't know at the moment.

MG As I can understand a feature like DELETEVIRUSNAME wouldn't require more
MG then 30 lines of code and 3 hours of work and it would eliminate any need
MG for own scripts on each server. This is not what I consider a hand
MG grenade...

MG Markus


MG ---
MG [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

MG ---
MG This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
MG unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
MG type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
MG at http://www.mail-archive.com.




Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.inetconcepts.net
(972) 788-2364Fax: (972) 788-5049


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] Feature request: DELETEVIRUSNAME

2006-01-27 Thread Don Brown
Thanks.

We use both hold and delete, but not routeto.

I don't mind saving cycles.

I guess that instead of using HOLD we could ROUTETO the Spam Hold
folder and mitigate the risk of dropping a virus infected message back
into the queue.  Comments about this??

Thanks,

Friday, January 27, 2006, 12:51:41 PM, Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] wrote:
Dsic Don, 

Dsic Messages that are HOLD or DELETE are not virus scanned.  ROUTETO gets
Dsic virus scanned.  In summary you have to look at your situation and if it
Dsic makes sense for you.  We don't do much ROUTETO so it makes sense for us 
and
Dsic saves a signifigant amount of CPU. 

Dsic Darrell 

Dsic  ---
Dsic Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude, 
Imail,
Dsic mxGuard, and ORF.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI 
Dsic integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers. 


Dsic Don Brown writes: 

 Your first and second message seem to be contradictory or I'm dense. 
 
 #1 The main benefit is that it cuts down on the amount of messages
 virus scanned thus saving resources. 
 
 #2 It still gets virus scanned. 
 
 So, with or without AVAFTERJM, it looks like each message is scanned by the 
 virus
 scanner (which makes sense to me).  If that is so, then how does it
 cut down on machine resources? 
 
  
 
 Friday, January 27, 2006, 9:43:19 AM, Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL 
 PROTECTED] wrote:
 Dsic Keith,  
 
 Dsic It still gets virus scanned.  I have tons of viruses in my virus drop 
 point
 Dsic for ROUTETO accounts.  
 
 Dsic Darrell
 Dsic  ---
 Dsic Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude, 
 Imail,
 Dsic mxGuard, and ORF.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI 
 Dsic integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.  
 
 
 Dsic Keith Johnson writes:  
 
 Darrell,
   What happens in this scenario.  Virus file comes in, AVAFTERJM
 is turned on, thus Declude scans it for spam content, lets say it is
 spam, thus ROUTETO sends it to a specific mailbox for customer to review
 for certain amount of days.  Does Declude Virus still run against it
 prior to ROUTETO?  My fear is that the virus file will land in their
 spam box untouched and the user will fire the virus off by looking at
 file.
 
 Keith  
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell
 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
 Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 10:02 AM
 To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
 Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Feature request: DELETEVIRUSNAME  
 
 
 How does AVAFTERJM cut down on work?  I thought it only affected the 
 order in which JM and AV ran, and that AV ran each time, regardless of
 
 this setting.
 
 The main benefit is that it cuts down on the amount of messages virus 
 scanned thus saving resources.  It has been a MAJOR help for me.   
 
 Darrell
  ---
 Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude,
 Imail, 
 mxGuard, and ORF.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI 
 integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.   
 
 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]  
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To unsubscribe,
 just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]  
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 Dsic   
 
 Dsic ---
 Dsic [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com] 
 
 Dsic ---
 Dsic This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
 Dsic unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 Dsic type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
 Dsic at http://www.mail-archive.com. 
 
  
 
 
 Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.inetconcepts.net
 (972) 788-2364Fax: (972) 788-5049
  
 
 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com] 
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Dsic  

Dsic ---
Dsic [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

Dsic ---
Dsic This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
Dsic unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
Dsic type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
Dsic at http://www.mail-archive.com.




Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA

Re: [Declude.Virus] Feature request: DELETEVIRUSNAME

2006-01-27 Thread Don Brown



Friday, January 27, 2006, 1:12:04 PM, Dan Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DH [SNIP]
DH IMO, AVAFTERJM should be changed so that only deleted emails, not held
DH ones, by pass the AV scan.   In other words, all messages should be
DH first scanned for spam, then the ones that are not DELETED should all be
DH scanned for viruses.  This would close the security risk from re-queued
DH messages.
DH [SNIP]
DH --DH
[SNIP]
I agree.  However, as a work-around for now, could we use ROUTETO and
a mailbox, but on the 'directory' tab for that user/mailbox, change to
specify the Spam hold folder?




Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.inetconcepts.net
(972) 788-2364Fax: (972) 788-5049


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] Feature request: DELETEVIRUSNAME

2006-01-27 Thread Don Brown
A single piece of software can't possibly be all things to all people.
I think the best that can be expected is that it reasonably addresses
all, or most, of those objectives which the user community shares.

It is easy to say that it only costs $xx when it's not your money, the
same as it is to say that it will only take 30 lines of code when you
don't have to write it, test it, maintain it and fix it when it
breaks.

I was the culprit who introduced the HOP feature in Declude a long
time ago. It was effective back then in combating dynamic servers in
the delivery chain. As intimate as Scott was with his code and with
the challenges we all faced, we debated it on and off the list for a
long time, before he was convinced it would be a good thing for the
entire user community. IOW, he had to see the beef - the evidence,
that there was an issue and that it was one which Declude could
address effectively.

Scott is gone and Imail has changed requiring a major overhaul in
Declude.  Many of the old timers on this list are still NOT running
the most current release, due to certain challenges and anomalies.

I'm not trying to be a horses tail or beat you up and there is nothing
personal involved. I just think that unless a feature request can be
justified with facts, which you admit that yours cannot, that we
refrain from distracting the community and particularly the people at
Declude.

I'd rather see Declude keep pumping the water out of the bilge to the
point they can fix the hull, rather than taking the time to hang a new
pennant from the mast.  Wouldn't you?

Thanks,


Friday, January 27, 2006, 6:05:46 PM, Markus Gufler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MG I hav no stat's or numbers.

MG Only the fact that AV-Engines has introduced a suspicious category that is
MG catching more and more new outbreaks. Additionaly it seems that the scanning
MG process is becoming more and more complex. Each variant (we have up to
MG two-letter versions!) seems to need complete new definitions. Another more
MG alarming: certain virus-signatures seems catching only a part of one single
MG but polymorphic and encrypted virus variant.

MG Try to send a vb-script containing one single call of the filesystem-object
MG even if zipped or with renamed file extension trough some av-engines.
MG DELETEVIRUS ON will delete the entire message and you will have to tell some
MG fairy story to the customer who call you because he misses some messages.

MG Don't deleting messages immediately as many of us do is one way.
MG Adding 5 DELETEVIRUSNAME-lines in the global.cfg would be a very simple
MG possibility to keep clean and small the virus folder. And I repeat: It
MG should be something very very simple to implement. Anyone who doesn't want
MG or need it could simply not turn it on.

MG Regarding the allready existing FORGINGVIRUS DNS lookup feature and a
MG possible enhancement like AUTODELETEKNOWNWORMS.
MG I wouldn't say that I don't trust declude's FORGINGVIRUS list. But first of
MG all I realy want to know what I categorize FORGING and what not an my
MG server. Beside the fact that since we don't send out notfications to
MG customers anymore my personal FORGINGVIRUS list is simply a good way to
MG filter out 99% of all postmaster notifications, and so a wave of thus
MG notifications is an excellent indicator that something new is around that I
MG should give a look.
MG An additional DNS lookup for each hold virus in my eyes is not really
MG usefull if the number of forging viruses is so small as it is today. Ok it's
MG a nice thing for someone who doesn't want daily care his server.
MG Another unclear aspect is how this DNS-based list handles different virus
MG names. We have seen in the last months that there is no more consistent
MG naming between AV-Companies. Does Declude maintain and serve forging virus
MG names for all AV-Engines? 

MG I still consider Declude my swiss army knife for handling SMTP-traffic and
MG keep our customer mailboxes usable for the daily work. And even if I know
MG that some tools in my knife can be dangerous I want to have them when it
MG will become neccessary. 

MG Markus




 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Brown
 Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 8:24 PM
 To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
 Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Feature request: DELETEVIRUSNAME
 
 There is no perfect Spam or Virus system.  There will either 
 be false positives, missed Spam or Viruses or a combination of both.
 Therefore, if the customer is expecting absolute perfection, 
 then I think the problem is one of a customer with 
 unrealistic expectations.
 
 You said, what happens if tommorow turns out that scan 
 engines has catched many legit messages as viruses due to a 
 new buggy singature.
 Well, then you need to HOLD ALL messages tagged as containing 
 a virus, if you are that anal about it and that makes your 
 original point moot.
 For instance, you've solved nothing if you had

Re: [Declude.Virus] Feature request: DELETEVIRUSNAME

2006-01-29 Thread Don Brown
We are also running the latest release of v 3.  We only have one open
question to Declude Tech support as to why Base64 does not trigger
sometimes.  No crashes or other problems with either AV or JM.

It is a lot faster.

Thanks,


Sunday, January 29, 2006, 4:06:28 AM, Markus Gufler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I'm still on Declude v2.x and am comfortable there, as Don 
 points out, many of us are waiting for the v3.x to be utterly 
 stable and to have desired new features before going to it.  
 As the software is maturing, so is much of the userbase; 
 there used to be a lot of early adopters when the releases 
 were coming out fast and furious.

MG I've running it on 3 different servers and except the strangenes with the
MG declude.cfg file on one if this servers that was solved be recreating it I'm
MG very impressioned from stability and performance of v3. The amount of
MG incomming messages is growing rapidly and so the number of hold viruses and
MG spam too. (v3 can process much more messages the previous versions!)

MG So I search for something simple to clean out all this stuff as fast as it's
MG comming in.

MG Markus

MG ---
MG [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

MG ---
MG This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
MG unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
MG type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
MG at http://www.mail-archive.com.




Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.inetconcepts.net
(972) 788-2364Fax: (972) 788-5049


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] Encoded viruses...worried

2006-02-01 Thread Don Brown
  severe
MG damage to one's enterprise.  I cross my fingers hoping that   
MG none of this would be necessary, but that's not enough to be   safe.

MG Matt


MG   



Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.inetconcepts.net
(972) 788-2364Fax: (972) 788-5049


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] Changes @ Declude

2006-02-12 Thread Don Brown
Friday, February 10, 2006, 3:20:03 PM, Kevin Bilbee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
KB [Snip]
KB
KB On the  buying issue what do you get, the two products will be kept in 
parity feature  wise.
KB
KB Kevin  Bilbee
KB  
KB [Snip]

If that is truly the case, then it makes sense to have only one
version, 4.0.  Then, the only difference will be that some customers
are on an annual maint agreement and others pay an annual
subscription.



Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.inetconcepts.net
(972) 788-2364Fax: (972) 788-5049


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0 / 4.0

2006-02-12 Thread Don Brown
Saturday, February 11, 2006, 9:47:07 AM, David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DB [Snip]

DB 5. With regards to Version 3.0 and 4.0 there is NO major difference in
DB functionality except that 4.0 runs as a single product with Declude EVA PRO,
DB Junkmail PRO and Hijack. Where as Version 3.0 still supports 3 individual
DB products.

DB [Snip]

DB 7. I am pulling together some additional release notes on a comparison
DB between version version 3.0 and 4.0 which I hope to have available next
DB week.

DB David B
DB www.declude.com
DB [Snip]

Items 5  7 are contradictory, to the extent that no comparison, as
promised in 7, would be needed, if the only difference was, as quoted
in 5.



Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.inetconcepts.net
(972) 788-2364Fax: (972) 788-5049


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0 / 4.0

2006-02-12 Thread Don Brown
 think most of us expect that you will eventually try to force us out of SAs
DB into annual licensing, which we don't want.  Moreover, most of us worry that
DB your new pricing scheme will not be accepted by your customer base, and that
DB could lead to the death of Declude.  So while I may not be directly impacted
DB by version 4.0, I have good reason to worry about the future success of
DB Declude and whether  I can expect you to continue to provide a growing and
DB satisfactory product.  I may have to look at alternatives just to protect my
DB future.

DB The third problem that you haven't addressed at all is your poor timing.
DB You know that the vast majority of your users are current/former IMail users
DB who are still stinging from their fiasco, and yet you walk into the same
DB stupid trap, with the same lack of forethought and customer communications.
DB You also do this at a time when a lot of your clients are upset about a lack
DB of true improvements (how about just a stable, current product??).  So you
DB have all of these customers who are losing patience over your upgrades, who
DB are still upset at Ipswitch, and then you ambush them with this new scheme.
DB Any wonder people are upset?

DB I really suggest you take a good, long look at the troubles experienced by
DB Ipswitch over the last year, and decide if you really want to go through all
DB that.  And if you do, then change the names to something besides 3.0 and
DB 4.0.

DB Ben Bednarz
DB BC Web

DB - Original Message -
DB From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DB To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com; Declude.Virus@declude.com
DB Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2006 8:37 AM
DB Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0 / 4.0


 Let me quote myself on point 5.

 EXCEPT that 4.0 runs as a single product with Declude EVA PRO, Junkmail 
 PRO
 and Hijack. Where as Version 3.0 still supports 3 individual products.

 As to NO major differences, there are NO major differences in 
 functionality
 but rather minor differences which have to do with integration into
 SmarterMail 3.0 which makes it a little easier for New Customers which I
 will explain in greater detail with the notes I promised in point 7, but
 again these differences do NOT effect existing customers.

 David B
 www.declude.com

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Brown
 Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2006 11:23 AM
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com; Declude.Virus@declude.com
 Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0 / 4.0

 Saturday, February 11, 2006, 9:47:07 AM, David Barker 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 DB [Snip]

 DB 5. With regards to Version 3.0 and 4.0 there is NO major difference
 DB in functionality except that 4.0 runs as a single product with
 DB Declude EVA PRO, Junkmail PRO and Hijack. Where as Version 3.0 still
 DB supports 3 individual products.

 DB [Snip]

 DB 7. I am pulling together some additional release notes on a
 DB comparison between version version 3.0 and 4.0 which I hope to have
 DB available next week.

 DB David B
 DB www.declude.com
 DB [Snip]

 Items 5  7 are contradictory, to the extent that no comparison, as 
 promised
 in 7, would be needed, if the only difference was, as quoted in 5.


 
 Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.inetconcepts.net
 (972) 788-2364Fax: (972) 788-5049
 

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To unsubscribe, 
 just
 send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.


 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 

DB ---
DB [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

DB ---
DB This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
DB unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
DB type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
DB at http://www.mail-archive.com.


DB ---
DB [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

DB ---
DB This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
DB unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
DB type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
DB at http://www.mail-archive.com.




Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.inetconcepts.net
(972) 788-2364Fax: (972) 788-5049


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list

[Declude.Virus] Vulnerability Flag Codes = 862

2006-09-21 Thread Don Brown
I think there used to be a way to lookup the meaning of a
vulnerability code on the Declude web site, but I can't find it.

I need to figure out what 862 means.  Can anyone point me to the
lookup or tell me the translation?

Thanks.



Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.inetconcepts.net
(972) 788-2364Fax: (972) 788-5049




---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



Re: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.Virus] On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned

2006-10-22 Thread Don Brown
If the root of the problem is that they are unbalanced, then why
should I care if there are more Lf than Cr or more Cr than Lf?  What
am I missing?


Sunday, October 22, 2006, 11:28:14 AM, Michael Thomas - Mathbox [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] wrote:
MTM Don,

MTM CrLf indicates only that they are not balanced. LfCr and CrLf indicates
MTM which is missing, so one can choose their own poison and apply different
MTM weights. If you were to test a sample batch of messages, you would find 
that
MTM one is more prevalent than the other, by a large factor.


MTM Michael Thomas
MTM Mathbox
MTM 978-683-6718
MTM 1-877-MATHBOX (Toll Free)
MTM  
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
 Behalf Of Don Brown
 Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2006 6:03 AM
 To: declude.virus@declude.com
 Subject: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.Virus] On RFC Violation - 
 Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through 
 untouched and unscanned
 
 Michael,
 
 Why is it necessary to run two tests (failing on CrLf and on LfCR)?
 Why not just one test (failing on CrLf)?
 
 
 Thursday, October 19, 2006, 9:49:07 PM, Michael Thomas - 
 Mathbox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 MTM Hi All,
 
 MTM[SNIP]
 
 MTM Finally, if you want to test for these RFC violations, see
 MTM http://www.mathbox.com/NoCrTest/NoCrTest.zip
 
 MTM Michael Thomas
 MTM Mathbox
 MTM 978-683-6718
 MTM 1-877-MATHBOX (Toll Free)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.inetconcepts.net
 (972) 788-2364Fax: (972) 788-5049
 
 
 
 
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 
 
 





MTM ---
MTM This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
MTM unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
MTM type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
MTM at http://www.mail-archive.com.





Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.inetconcepts.net
(972) 788-2364Fax: (972) 788-5049





---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



Re: [Declude.Virus] Sender.eml was sent even though forging virus?

2006-12-23 Thread Don Brown
Perhaps there is some marketing value to notifying the client.  It
reminds them of the valuable service which is being delivered behind
the scenes.

We stopped sending to the sending parties, some time ago. It was
useless noise. At some point, long ago, we also killed the client
notification because it had become spam, to a certain extent. At that
time, I thought a daily or weekly manifest or report to the client
would have been better.



Friday, December 22, 2006, 7:04:55 PM, Douglas Cohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DC Isn't it better to just remove all the eml files so as to be more of the
DC solution and less of the problem.

DC It just seems that is all of us stopped sending eml's that millions of
DC useless messages would be stopped.

DC What am I missing?  What value do these messages possibly have?

DC Doug 


DC -Original Message-
DC From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy
DC Schmidt
DC Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 1:45 PM
DC To: declude.virus@declude.com
DC Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Sender.eml was sent even though forging virus?

DC Oh?

DC I've never had the problem with my external McAfee scanner.

DC Could this be a problem with Declude's internal AVG scanner?

DC Best Regards
DC Andy Schmidt

DC Phone:  +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
DC Fax:+1 201 934-9206 


DC -Original Message-
DC From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary
DC Steiner
DC Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 01:11 PM
DC To: declude.virus@declude.com
DC Subject: re: [Declude.Virus] Sender.eml was sent even though forging virus?

DC I've seen similar behavior with viruses found by AVG.


DC  Original Message 
 From: Andy Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 12:42 PM
 To: 'Declude Virus List' declude.virus@declude.com
 Subject: [Declude.Virus] Sender.eml was sent even though forging virus?
 
 Hi,
 
 My sender.eml has the line:
 SKIPIFFORGING
 
 And my virus.CFG has:
 
 AUTOFORGE ON
 
 FORGINGVIRUS Anonymous Driver
 FORGINGVIRUS Antiman
 FORGINGVIRUS  Avril
 FORGINGVIRUS  Bagle
 
 Yet, declude virus just sent the sender.eml for the following details:
  
   File:Unknown File
   Result:  FoundI-Worm/Bagle
   Message ID:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Our Domain:Schmidt.AS for Schmidt.AS
   Queue ID:  D324e0153b795.smd
 
 Based on these headers:
 
 -Original Message Headers-
 Received: from [62.93.44.11] [62.93.44.11] by hm-software.com with ESMTP
   (SMTPD-9.10) id A24E331D0; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:03:10 -0500
 Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:03:11 +0100
 To: Andy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 From: Webmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: price 13-Dec-2006
 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 MIME-Version: 1.0
 Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
 boundary=oibzhbgyvnajpcxfwpdt
 
 
 
 
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To unsubscribe, 
 just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com. 





DC ---
DC This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To unsubscribe, just
DC send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
DC type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
DC at http://www.mail-archive.com.




DC ---
DC This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
DC unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
DC type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
DC at http://www.mail-archive.com.




DC ---
DC This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
DC unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
DC type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
DC at http://www.mail-archive.com.





Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.inetconcepts.net
(972) 788-2364Fax: (972) 788-5049




---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



[Declude.Virus] bloodhound exploit 163 - Slipping Through

2007-10-26 Thread Don Brown
A customer running Norton reports receiving several infected e-mails today.

We are only running the built-in AVG scanner at this time, which isn't
catching this new virus.

The Symantec site is not too helpful about the characteristics, which
would better enable writing a filter.

http://www.symantec.com/security_response/writeup.jsp?docid=2007-102318-0451-99

Our customer reports they show: From: Lorena Bernal, Subject:
Statement of retained earnings  However, no doubt there are other
variants.

They are caught upon receipt by his Norton anti-virus and quarantined,
so he really can't (and I don't want him to) supply more info.

Anyone else noticing this virus slipping through?

Any suggestions appreciated.

Thanks,


Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts®
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.inetconcepts.net
(972) 788-2364Fax: (972) 788-5049




---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.