Re: Fwd: Interested in becoming a Clerezza committer ?

[Hasan Hasan]

Hi Reto,

so basically we could implement a server side rdf type handling and
rendering without using triaxrs?
If yes, wouldn't it be a good part of clerezza to introduce?
And A.Soroka might also be interested in implementing that?

@A. Soroka, yes... if I am not mistaken... we want to have Clerezza
independent of a particular JAX-RS implementation.

Cheers
Hasan


On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 7:27 AM, Reto Gmür  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Check out https://github.com/linked-solutions/tlds for a clerezza based
> linked data server applying client-side type-based rendering. It would be
> possible to have a very similar implementation that implements e.g.
> scala-server pages.
>
> Cheers,
> Reto
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: aj...@apache.org [mailto:aj...@apache.org]
> > Sent: Monday, November 13, 2017 12:34 PM
> > To: dev@clerezza.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Fwd: Interested in becoming a Clerezza committer ?
> >
> > Hey, Hasan--
> >
> > Are you thinking of some particular issues to avoid when bringing
> type-based
> > rendering back? I.e. were there reasons we can point at that it was
> removed
> > the first time that we want to avoid in future?
> >
> >
> > ajs6f
> >
> > Hasan wrote on 11/13/17 10:46 AM:
> > > Hi all
> > >
> > > I think ajs6f (A. Soroka, sorry, don't know your firstname) has a good
> > > point here.
> > > Is clerezza without the legacy code still attractive for people to
> > > contribute?
> > >
> > > @A. Soroka: IMO, if you could propose a functionality to implement on
> top
> > > of clerezza in a clean way
> > > e.g. the type-based rendering stuff but without adding a whole bunch of
> > > other issues,
> > > we might want to make that a part of clerezza in a new stack.
> > > By being a committer, one could participate in defining the further
> > > development of clerezza.
> > >
> > > I'd be glad to hear the opinions of other clerezza devs.
> > >
> > > regards
> > > hasan
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 3:51 PM,  wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hello, Hasan--
> > >>
> > >> I didn't make very much progress (really any) on resuscitating the
> > >> type-based rendering system because about that time I got heavily
> involved
> > >> as a committer for Jena. I'm still interested in pursuing that work,
> tho'.
> > >>
> > >> I'm certainly interested in being a committer for Clerezza, but I feel
> > >> that I have to ask, what is Clerezza? I don't mean that in a joking
> way, I
> > >> mean that without the type-based rendering system, I'm not sure
> exactly
> > >> when I would use Clerezza instead of a more well-developed and older
> RDF
> > >> framework like Jena or RDF4J. And if I need a measure of independence
> > from
> > >> specific implementations, I could use Commons RDF to achieve that for
> > most
> > >> core RDF concepts.
> > >>
> > >> I got interested in Clerezza because of the type-based-rendering
> system,
> > >> which seemed to offer the possibility (a little bit like LDPath
> templating)
> > >> of an elegant stack that could take me from persistence in a
> triplestore
> > >> all the way through into a browser or phone, without making me work at
> > >> spending time gluing together different layers that were never
> intended to
> > >> handle linked data.
> > >>
> > >> Can we articulate some clear, simple use cases for Clerezza?
> > >>
> > >> ajs6f
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> A. Soroka wrote on 11/13/17 9:36 AM:
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Begin forwarded message:
> > 
> >  *From: *Hasan >
> >  *Subject: **Re: Interested in becoming a Clerezza committer ?*
> >  *Date: *November 12, 2017 at 4:52:11 AM EST
> >  *To: *"dev@clerezza.apache.org " <
> >  dev@clerezza.apache.org
> >  >
> >  *Reply-To: *dev@clerezza.apache.org  >
> > 
> >  Hi Reto, Stian, A. Soroka, and all Clerezza Devs.
> > 
> >  A year ago I started this thread.
> >  I have made some small improvements to the website esp. the
> tutorials.
> >  I admit It is a slow progress, but better slow than not at all.
> >  I'd like to count on you all to make a faster progress.
> >  So, if you have some ideas or would like to write or co-write
> tutorials,
> >  please let us know.
> > 
> >  Further, I would like to ask for suggestions on how to improve our
> >  existing
> >  codes.
> >  Do you have issues that can be resolved within this project?
> > 
> >  @A. Soroka: How was the outcome of your efforts to use parts of
> Apache
> >  Clerezza Legacy codes (typerendering and typehandlerspace) ?
> > 
> >  @all: Would you like to become a new committer to further develop
> > Apache
> >  Clerezza?
> >  Is there anything you miss that you want to see within Apache
> Clerezza?
> > 
> >  @Reto: What would you suggest to make Apache Clerezza more usable?
> > 

RE: Fwd: Interested in becoming a Clerezza committer ?

[Reto Gmür]

Hi,

Check out https://github.com/linked-solutions/tlds for a clerezza based linked 
data server applying client-side type-based rendering. It would be possible to 
have a very similar implementation that implements e.g. scala-server pages.

Cheers,
Reto

> -Original Message-
> From: aj...@apache.org [mailto:aj...@apache.org]
> Sent: Monday, November 13, 2017 12:34 PM
> To: dev@clerezza.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Fwd: Interested in becoming a Clerezza committer ?
> 
> Hey, Hasan--
> 
> Are you thinking of some particular issues to avoid when bringing type-based
> rendering back? I.e. were there reasons we can point at that it was removed
> the first time that we want to avoid in future?
> 
> 
> ajs6f
> 
> Hasan wrote on 11/13/17 10:46 AM:
> > Hi all
> >
> > I think ajs6f (A. Soroka, sorry, don't know your firstname) has a good
> > point here.
> > Is clerezza without the legacy code still attractive for people to
> > contribute?
> >
> > @A. Soroka: IMO, if you could propose a functionality to implement on top
> > of clerezza in a clean way
> > e.g. the type-based rendering stuff but without adding a whole bunch of
> > other issues,
> > we might want to make that a part of clerezza in a new stack.
> > By being a committer, one could participate in defining the further
> > development of clerezza.
> >
> > I'd be glad to hear the opinions of other clerezza devs.
> >
> > regards
> > hasan
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 3:51 PM,  wrote:
> >
> >> Hello, Hasan--
> >>
> >> I didn't make very much progress (really any) on resuscitating the
> >> type-based rendering system because about that time I got heavily involved
> >> as a committer for Jena. I'm still interested in pursuing that work, tho'.
> >>
> >> I'm certainly interested in being a committer for Clerezza, but I feel
> >> that I have to ask, what is Clerezza? I don't mean that in a joking way, I
> >> mean that without the type-based rendering system, I'm not sure exactly
> >> when I would use Clerezza instead of a more well-developed and older RDF
> >> framework like Jena or RDF4J. And if I need a measure of independence
> from
> >> specific implementations, I could use Commons RDF to achieve that for
> most
> >> core RDF concepts.
> >>
> >> I got interested in Clerezza because of the type-based-rendering system,
> >> which seemed to offer the possibility (a little bit like LDPath templating)
> >> of an elegant stack that could take me from persistence in a triplestore
> >> all the way through into a browser or phone, without making me work at
> >> spending time gluing together different layers that were never intended to
> >> handle linked data.
> >>
> >> Can we articulate some clear, simple use cases for Clerezza?
> >>
> >> ajs6f
> >>
> >>
> >> A. Soroka wrote on 11/13/17 9:36 AM:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Begin forwarded message:
> 
>  *From: *Hasan >
>  *Subject: **Re: Interested in becoming a Clerezza committer ?*
>  *Date: *November 12, 2017 at 4:52:11 AM EST
>  *To: *"dev@clerezza.apache.org " <
>  dev@clerezza.apache.org
>  >
>  *Reply-To: *dev@clerezza.apache.org 
> 
>  Hi Reto, Stian, A. Soroka, and all Clerezza Devs.
> 
>  A year ago I started this thread.
>  I have made some small improvements to the website esp. the tutorials.
>  I admit It is a slow progress, but better slow than not at all.
>  I'd like to count on you all to make a faster progress.
>  So, if you have some ideas or would like to write or co-write tutorials,
>  please let us know.
> 
>  Further, I would like to ask for suggestions on how to improve our
>  existing
>  codes.
>  Do you have issues that can be resolved within this project?
> 
>  @A. Soroka: How was the outcome of your efforts to use parts of Apache
>  Clerezza Legacy codes (typerendering and typehandlerspace) ?
> 
>  @all: Would you like to become a new committer to further develop
> Apache
>  Clerezza?
>  Is there anything you miss that you want to see within Apache Clerezza?
> 
>  @Reto: What would you suggest to make Apache Clerezza more usable?
> 
> 
>  Cheers
>  Hasan
> 
> 
> 
>  On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Hasan Hasan    ha...@trialox.org>> wrote:
> 
>  Hi Stian
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes
>  > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > Agree for playing on Clerezzas strengths on JAX-RS and I would say to
> >> actually include the SPARQL-as-Graph binding as well.
> >>
> >> Also worth seeing if there is possible crossover with the new incubator
> >> podling Apache Juneau which is also looking for contributors:
> >> 

Re: Fwd: Interested in becoming a Clerezza committer ?

[ajs6f]

Hey, Hasan--

Are you thinking of some particular issues to avoid when bringing type-based rendering back? I.e. were there reasons we 
can point at that it was removed the first time that we want to avoid in future?



ajs6f

Hasan wrote on 11/13/17 10:46 AM:

Hi all

I think ajs6f (A. Soroka, sorry, don't know your firstname) has a good
point here.
Is clerezza without the legacy code still attractive for people to
contribute?

@A. Soroka: IMO, if you could propose a functionality to implement on top
of clerezza in a clean way
e.g. the type-based rendering stuff but without adding a whole bunch of
other issues,
we might want to make that a part of clerezza in a new stack.
By being a committer, one could participate in defining the further
development of clerezza.

I'd be glad to hear the opinions of other clerezza devs.

regards
hasan


On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 3:51 PM,  wrote:


Hello, Hasan--

I didn't make very much progress (really any) on resuscitating the
type-based rendering system because about that time I got heavily involved
as a committer for Jena. I'm still interested in pursuing that work, tho'.

I'm certainly interested in being a committer for Clerezza, but I feel
that I have to ask, what is Clerezza? I don't mean that in a joking way, I
mean that without the type-based rendering system, I'm not sure exactly
when I would use Clerezza instead of a more well-developed and older RDF
framework like Jena or RDF4J. And if I need a measure of independence from
specific implementations, I could use Commons RDF to achieve that for most
core RDF concepts.

I got interested in Clerezza because of the type-based-rendering system,
which seemed to offer the possibility (a little bit like LDPath templating)
of an elegant stack that could take me from persistence in a triplestore
all the way through into a browser or phone, without making me work at
spending time gluing together different layers that were never intended to
handle linked data.

Can we articulate some clear, simple use cases for Clerezza?

ajs6f


A. Soroka wrote on 11/13/17 9:36 AM:




Begin forwarded message:


*From: *Hasan >
*Subject: **Re: Interested in becoming a Clerezza committer ?*
*Date: *November 12, 2017 at 4:52:11 AM EST
*To: *"dev@clerezza.apache.org " <
dev@clerezza.apache.org
>
*Reply-To: *dev@clerezza.apache.org 

Hi Reto, Stian, A. Soroka, and all Clerezza Devs.

A year ago I started this thread.
I have made some small improvements to the website esp. the tutorials.
I admit It is a slow progress, but better slow than not at all.
I'd like to count on you all to make a faster progress.
So, if you have some ideas or would like to write or co-write tutorials,
please let us know.

Further, I would like to ask for suggestions on how to improve our
existing
codes.
Do you have issues that can be resolved within this project?

@A. Soroka: How was the outcome of your efforts to use parts of Apache
Clerezza Legacy codes (typerendering and typehandlerspace) ?

@all: Would you like to become a new committer to further develop Apache
Clerezza?
Is there anything you miss that you want to see within Apache Clerezza?

@Reto: What would you suggest to make Apache Clerezza more usable?


Cheers
Hasan



On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Hasan Hasan  wrote:

Hi Stian


On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes >
wrote:

Agree for playing on Clerezzas strengths on JAX-RS and I would say to

actually include the SPARQL-as-Graph binding as well.

Also worth seeing if there is possible crossover with the new incubator
podling Apache Juneau which is also looking for contributors:
http://juneau.incubator.apache.org/#about.html

I think the Clerezza website need a bit of similar tutorials to get
started
so potential contributors understand what it is all about.



Yes, it urgently needs an update.



http://clerezza.apache.org/getting-started/ links to "RESTful Web
Service
Framework (JAX-RS) Tutorial", "RDF Tutorial" and "Tutorial: Combining
JAX-RS and RDF"  which are all 404 :-(



Should probably be removed since it is not what Clerezza currently is
now?
It's a pity to remove a good tutorial,
but what do you think?

Cheers
Hasan





On 10 Nov 2016 4:18 pm, "A. Soroka"  wrote:

Hi, Clerezza-folks!


The most exciting part of Clerezza to me, by far, is the JAX-RS
support.

I'd rather work on Commons RDF (or Jena, where I am a committer now)
to
move RDF APIs forward, and there are lots of powerful SPARQL impls out
there, each with its own streangths and weaknesses. But the JAX-RS


thing--


that's completely unique to Clerezza, and it's a really cool idea.
It's


not


always easy to move RDF to and from the Web, and JAX-RS is a powerful,
stable, enormously-well-supported technology so reusing it is a 

Re: Fwd: [DISCUSS] Release rdf-core 0.3

[ajs6f]

I think this is a good idea, if for no other reason than exercising the release machinery-- it tends to get rusty if not 
used. Presumably, this will have a ripple effect up the (large) collection of Clerezza modules? Or is the public API 
unchanged?



ajs6f

A. Soroka wrote on 11/13/17 1:34 PM:




Begin forwarded message:

*From: *Hasan >
*Subject: **[DISCUSS] Release rdf-core 0.3*
*Date: *November 13, 2017 at 8:22:19 AM EST
*To: *dev@clerezza.apache.org 
*Reply-To: *dev@clerezza.apache.org 

Dear all,

What do you think if we release current 0.3-snapshot of rdf-core?
Version 0.2 was released in Nov. 2015 and there are some changes made since
then.

Thanks for feedback.

Cheers
Hasan

Re: Fwd: Interested in becoming a Clerezza committer ?

[Hasan]

Hi all

I think ajs6f (A. Soroka, sorry, don't know your firstname) has a good
point here.
Is clerezza without the legacy code still attractive for people to
contribute?

@A. Soroka: IMO, if you could propose a functionality to implement on top
of clerezza in a clean way
e.g. the type-based rendering stuff but without adding a whole bunch of
other issues,
we might want to make that a part of clerezza in a new stack.
By being a committer, one could participate in defining the further
development of clerezza.

I'd be glad to hear the opinions of other clerezza devs.

regards
hasan


On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 3:51 PM,  wrote:

> Hello, Hasan--
>
> I didn't make very much progress (really any) on resuscitating the
> type-based rendering system because about that time I got heavily involved
> as a committer for Jena. I'm still interested in pursuing that work, tho'.
>
> I'm certainly interested in being a committer for Clerezza, but I feel
> that I have to ask, what is Clerezza? I don't mean that in a joking way, I
> mean that without the type-based rendering system, I'm not sure exactly
> when I would use Clerezza instead of a more well-developed and older RDF
> framework like Jena or RDF4J. And if I need a measure of independence from
> specific implementations, I could use Commons RDF to achieve that for most
> core RDF concepts.
>
> I got interested in Clerezza because of the type-based-rendering system,
> which seemed to offer the possibility (a little bit like LDPath templating)
> of an elegant stack that could take me from persistence in a triplestore
> all the way through into a browser or phone, without making me work at
> spending time gluing together different layers that were never intended to
> handle linked data.
>
> Can we articulate some clear, simple use cases for Clerezza?
>
> ajs6f
>
>
> A. Soroka wrote on 11/13/17 9:36 AM:
>
>>
>>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>
>>> *From: *Hasan >
>>> *Subject: **Re: Interested in becoming a Clerezza committer ?*
>>> *Date: *November 12, 2017 at 4:52:11 AM EST
>>> *To: *"dev@clerezza.apache.org " <
>>> dev@clerezza.apache.org
>>> >
>>> *Reply-To: *dev@clerezza.apache.org 
>>>
>>> Hi Reto, Stian, A. Soroka, and all Clerezza Devs.
>>>
>>> A year ago I started this thread.
>>> I have made some small improvements to the website esp. the tutorials.
>>> I admit It is a slow progress, but better slow than not at all.
>>> I'd like to count on you all to make a faster progress.
>>> So, if you have some ideas or would like to write or co-write tutorials,
>>> please let us know.
>>>
>>> Further, I would like to ask for suggestions on how to improve our
>>> existing
>>> codes.
>>> Do you have issues that can be resolved within this project?
>>>
>>> @A. Soroka: How was the outcome of your efforts to use parts of Apache
>>> Clerezza Legacy codes (typerendering and typehandlerspace) ?
>>>
>>> @all: Would you like to become a new committer to further develop Apache
>>> Clerezza?
>>> Is there anything you miss that you want to see within Apache Clerezza?
>>>
>>> @Reto: What would you suggest to make Apache Clerezza more usable?
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Hasan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Hasan Hasan > ha...@trialox.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Stian

 On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes >
 wrote:

 Agree for playing on Clerezzas strengths on JAX-RS and I would say to
> actually include the SPARQL-as-Graph binding as well.
>
> Also worth seeing if there is possible crossover with the new incubator
> podling Apache Juneau which is also looking for contributors:
> http://juneau.incubator.apache.org/#about.html
>
> I think the Clerezza website need a bit of similar tutorials to get
> started
> so potential contributors understand what it is all about.
>
>
 Yes, it urgently needs an update.


> http://clerezza.apache.org/getting-started/ links to "RESTful Web
> Service
> Framework (JAX-RS) Tutorial", "RDF Tutorial" and "Tutorial: Combining
> JAX-RS and RDF"  which are all 404 :-(
>
>
 Should probably be removed since it is not what Clerezza currently is
 now?
 It's a pity to remove a good tutorial,
 but what do you think?

 Cheers
 Hasan



>
> On 10 Nov 2016 4:18 pm, "A. Soroka" > wrote:
>
> Hi, Clerezza-folks!
>>
>> The most exciting part of Clerezza to me, by far, is the JAX-RS
>> support.
>>
>> I'd rather work on Commons RDF (or Jena, where I am a committer now)
>> to
>> move RDF APIs forward, and there are lots of powerful SPARQL impls out
>> there, each with its own streangths and weaknesses. But 

Re: Fwd: Interested in becoming a Clerezza committer ?

[ajs6f]

Hello, Hasan--

I didn't make very much progress (really any) on resuscitating the type-based rendering system because about that time I 
got heavily involved as a committer for Jena. I'm still interested in pursuing that work, tho'.


I'm certainly interested in being a committer for Clerezza, but I feel that I have to ask, what is Clerezza? I don't 
mean that in a joking way, I mean that without the type-based rendering system, I'm not sure exactly when I would use 
Clerezza instead of a more well-developed and older RDF framework like Jena or RDF4J. And if I need a measure of 
independence from specific implementations, I could use Commons RDF to achieve that for most core RDF concepts.


I got interested in Clerezza because of the type-based-rendering system, which seemed to offer the possibility (a little 
bit like LDPath templating) of an elegant stack that could take me from persistence in a triplestore all the way through 
into a browser or phone, without making me work at spending time gluing together different layers that were never 
intended to handle linked data.


Can we articulate some clear, simple use cases for Clerezza?

ajs6f


A. Soroka wrote on 11/13/17 9:36 AM:




Begin forwarded message:

*From: *Hasan >
*Subject: **Re: Interested in becoming a Clerezza committer ?*
*Date: *November 12, 2017 at 4:52:11 AM EST
*To: *"dev@clerezza.apache.org " 
>
*Reply-To: *dev@clerezza.apache.org 

Hi Reto, Stian, A. Soroka, and all Clerezza Devs.

A year ago I started this thread.
I have made some small improvements to the website esp. the tutorials.
I admit It is a slow progress, but better slow than not at all.
I'd like to count on you all to make a faster progress.
So, if you have some ideas or would like to write or co-write tutorials,
please let us know.

Further, I would like to ask for suggestions on how to improve our existing
codes.
Do you have issues that can be resolved within this project?

@A. Soroka: How was the outcome of your efforts to use parts of Apache
Clerezza Legacy codes (typerendering and typehandlerspace) ?

@all: Would you like to become a new committer to further develop Apache
Clerezza?
Is there anything you miss that you want to see within Apache Clerezza?

@Reto: What would you suggest to make Apache Clerezza more usable?


Cheers
Hasan



On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Hasan Hasan > wrote:


Hi Stian

On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes >
wrote:


Agree for playing on Clerezzas strengths on JAX-RS and I would say to
actually include the SPARQL-as-Graph binding as well.

Also worth seeing if there is possible crossover with the new incubator
podling Apache Juneau which is also looking for contributors:
http://juneau.incubator.apache.org/#about.html

I think the Clerezza website need a bit of similar tutorials to get
started
so potential contributors understand what it is all about.



Yes, it urgently needs an update.



http://clerezza.apache.org/getting-started/ links to "RESTful Web Service
Framework (JAX-RS) Tutorial", "RDF Tutorial" and "Tutorial: Combining
JAX-RS and RDF"  which are all 404 :-(



Should probably be removed since it is not what Clerezza currently is now?
It's a pity to remove a good tutorial,
but what do you think?

Cheers
Hasan





On 10 Nov 2016 4:18 pm, "A. Soroka" > wrote:


Hi, Clerezza-folks!

The most exciting part of Clerezza to me, by far, is the JAX-RS support.

I'd rather work on Commons RDF (or Jena, where I am a committer now) to
move RDF APIs forward, and there are lots of powerful SPARQL impls out
there, each with its own streangths and weaknesses. But the JAX-RS

thing--

that's completely unique to Clerezza, and it's a really cool idea. It's

not

always easy to move RDF to and from the Web, and JAX-RS is a powerful,
stable, enormously-well-supported technology so reusing it is a great
tactical move. I'd be interested in working on Clerezza, but really only
for the JAX-RS part. I'd actually be happy to see the RDF API move

towards

Commons (focus the efforts for more power!).

---
A. Soroka
Apache Jena PMC



On Nov 8, 2016, at 12:25 AM, Hasan > 
wrote:

Dear Clerezza Developers

Clerezza PMC is currently looking for new committers to help

developing

and

improving Apache Clerezza.

Apache Clerezza allows to easily develop semantic web application by
providing the following:
- An API to access RDF Graphs
- SPARQL Support
- Support of JAX-RS

If you or your colleagues are interested in being a Clerezza

committer,

please don't hesitate to contact us through this list.
You may and are encouraged to forward this email to the mailing lists

you

are involved in.

Best 

[jira] [Commented] (CLEREZZA-1021) Update download page

[ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLEREZZA-1021?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16249662#comment-16249662
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on CLEREZZA-1021:
---

Commit 1815105 from ha...@apache.org
[ https://svn.apache.org/r1815105 ]

CLEREZZA-1021: Reorganize download page

> Update download page
> 
>
> Key: CLEREZZA-1021
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLEREZZA-1021
> Project: Clerezza
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Hasan
>Assignee: Hasan
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

[jira] [Assigned] (CLEREZZA-767) Update Clerezza Website

[Hasan (JIRA)]

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLEREZZA-767?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Hasan reassigned CLEREZZA-767:
--

Assignee: Hasan

> Update Clerezza Website
> ---
>
> Key: CLEREZZA-767
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLEREZZA-767
> Project: Clerezza
>  Issue Type: Task
>Reporter: Hasan
>Assignee: Hasan
>Priority: Minor
>
> This task is intended to be there for all subtasks dealing with updating 
> clerezza website.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

[DISCUSS] Release rdf-core 0.3

[Hasan]

Dear all,

What do you think if we release current 0.3-snapshot of rdf-core?
Version 0.2 was released in Nov. 2015 and there are some changes made since
then.

Thanks for feedback.

Cheers
Hasan