date:20170301

Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1868
  
Do we need to add a global setting to determine whether deploy to other 
hosts if the specified host is out of capacity ?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #874: CLOUDSTACK-8897: baremetal:addHost:make host tag info...

Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/874
  
### ACS CI BVT Run
 **Sumarry:**
 Build Number 411
 Hypervisor xenserver
 NetworkType Advanced
 Passed=103
 Failed=2
 Skipped=7

_Link to logs Folder (search by build_no):_ 
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/yj3wnzbceo9uef2/AAB6u-Iap-xztdm6jHX9SjPja?dl=0


**Failed tests:**
* test_routers_network_ops.py

 * test_01_RVR_Network_FW_PF_SSH_default_routes_egress_true Failed

 * test_02_RVR_Network_FW_PF_SSH_default_routes_egress_false Failed


**Skipped tests:**
test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot
test_vm_nic_adapter_vmxnet3
test_static_role_account_acls
test_11_ss_nfs_version_on_ssvm
test_nested_virtualization_vmware
test_3d_gpu_support
test_deploy_vgpu_enabled_vm

**Passed test suits:**
test_deploy_vm_with_userdata.py
test_affinity_groups_projects.py
test_portable_publicip.py
test_over_provisioning.py
test_global_settings.py
test_scale_vm.py
test_service_offerings.py
test_routers_iptables_default_policy.py
test_loadbalance.py
test_routers.py
test_reset_vm_on_reboot.py
test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners.py
test_network.py
test_router_dns.py
test_non_contigiousvlan.py
test_login.py
test_deploy_vm_iso.py
test_list_ids_parameter.py
test_public_ip_range.py
test_multipleips_per_nic.py
test_regions.py
test_affinity_groups.py
test_network_acl.py
test_pvlan.py
test_volumes.py
test_nic.py
test_deploy_vm_root_resize.py
test_resource_detail.py
test_secondary_storage.py
test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_disk_offerings.py


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

2017-03-01 Thread Rajani Karuturi

On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Wido den Hollander  wrote:

>
> > Op 1 maart 2017 om 2:12 schreef Rajani Karuturi :
> >
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've created a 4.10.0.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
> vote:
> >
> > Git Branch and Commit
> > SH:https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.
> git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.10.0.0-RC20170301T0634
> > Commit:7c1d003b5269b375d87f4f6cfff8a144f0608b67
> >  git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.10.0.0-RC20170301T0634Commit:
> 7c1d003b5269b375d87f4f6cfff8a144f0608b67>
> >
> > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> > location):https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.10.0.0/
> >
>
> I get a 404 here. Am I too early to fetch the tarball?
>
> I always prefer to test with a tarball instead of a Git repo. Trying to
> prevent I accidentally test with a wrong commit/branch.
>


Thanks for bringing this up Wido. My svn command didnt work after the
upgrade to sierra and I didnt notice the errors. I pushed it now.
You should be able to download now.


>
> Wido
>
> > PGP release keys (signed using
> > CBB44821):https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> >
> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> > indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
> >
> > [ ] +1  approve
> > [ ] +0  no opinion
> > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> >
> >
> > ~Rajani
> > http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
>

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1866: Advanced isolated network egress destination ...

2017-03-01 Thread jayapalu

Github user jayapalu commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1866#discussion_r103863373
  
--- Diff: engine/schema/src/com/cloud/upgrade/dao/Upgrade4920to41000.java 
---
@@ -53,6 +55,7 @@ public boolean supportsRollingUpgrade() {
 
 @Override
 public void performDataMigration(Connection conn) {
+updateSourceCidrs(conn);
--- End diff --

Updated


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1940: CLOUDSTACK-9781:ACS records ID in events tables inst...

2017-03-01 Thread jayantpatil1234

Github user jayantpatil1234 commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1940
  
@blueorangutan test cases which are failing, not related to my code 
changes. Could you restart test suites once again. 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1866: Advanced isolated network egress destination ...

2017-03-01 Thread kishankavala

Github user kishankavala commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1866#discussion_r103861501
  
--- Diff: engine/schema/src/com/cloud/upgrade/dao/Upgrade4920to41000.java 
---
@@ -53,6 +55,7 @@ public boolean supportsRollingUpgrade() {
 
 @Override
 public void performDataMigration(Connection conn) {
+updateSourceCidrs(conn);
--- End diff --

Please add comment on why source cidr is updated


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1866: Advanced isolated network egress destination ...

2017-03-01 Thread kishankavala

Github user kishankavala commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1866#discussion_r103861408
  
--- Diff: 
tools/appliance/definitions/systemvmtemplate/install_systemvm_packages.sh ---
@@ -67,6 +67,8 @@ function install_packages() {
 xenstore-utils libxenstore3.0 \
 conntrackd ipvsadm libnetfilter-conntrack3 libnl-3-200 
libnl-genl-3-200 \
 ipcalc \
+ipset \
+openjdk-7-jre-headless \
--- End diff --

Only ipset is required here


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: GSoC projects

2017-03-01 Thread sachin patil

Hello, Projects can be selected from student proposals as well which start
on 20th march '17 there are a couple of JIRA tickets tagged as gsoc2017 and
gsoc2016 which can be taken up by students. You can have a look at this
.

On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Daan Hoogland 
wrote:

> It is public as far as I know. These are the jira tickets labelled GSoC,
> there are GSoC as well for several years and there are GSOC. I
> don’t think every suitable ticket is indeed labelled but that’s the general
> idea.
>
> On 02/03/17 04:12, "Raja Pullela"  wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> As I understand from the GSoC page, Student volunteers now have to
> register and propose a project.  But, there is a one issue, couple of
> student volunteers that I know wanted some help and direction on
> choosing/proposing the projects.  I have asked them to join our Devlist.
> If we can make our list of potential projects public on our wiki, it will
> be easy for them to pick up and work?
>
> Best,
> Raja
> Engineering Team,
> Accelerite, 2055 Laurelwood Road,
> Santa Clara, CA, 95054
>
> On 3/2/17, 3:54 AM, "Daan Hoogland" 
> wrote:
>
> Syed, At the time I started the thread we had 4 days. We can still try
> to have some student in under the apache umbrella but I’m not sure if we
> have much chance, they need to specifically pick our project (for which no
> proposals are out).
>
> On 01/03/17 19:30, "Syed Ahmed"  wrote:
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> I am trying to understand the process here. Are there deadlines by
> which we
> have to submit the proposals? Who are the participants? Do we have
> a wiki
> page? If not, I can create one.
>
> Thanks,
> -Syed
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 7:29 PM, Sergey Levitskiy <
> sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote:
>
> > I like it very much!
> >
> >
>
>
>
> daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> DISCLAIMER
> ==
> This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which
> is the property of Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business. It is
> intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is
> addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to
> read, retain, copy, print, distribute or use this message. If you have
> received this communication in error, please notify the sender and delete
> all copies of this message. Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business does
> not accept any liability for virus infected mails.
>
>
>
> daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>

Re: GSoC projects

2017-03-01 Thread Daan Hoogland

It is public as far as I know. These are the jira tickets labelled GSoC, there 
are GSoC as well for several years and there are GSOC. I don’t think 
every suitable ticket is indeed labelled but that’s the general idea.

On 02/03/17 04:12, "Raja Pullela"  wrote:

Hi, 

As I understand from the GSoC page, Student volunteers now have to register 
and propose a project.  But, there is a one issue, couple of student volunteers 
that I know wanted some help and direction on choosing/proposing the projects.  
I have asked them to join our Devlist.  If we can make our list of potential 
projects public on our wiki, it will be easy for them to pick up and work?  

Best,
Raja
Engineering Team,
Accelerite, 2055 Laurelwood Road,
Santa Clara, CA, 95054

On 3/2/17, 3:54 AM, "Daan Hoogland"  wrote:

Syed, At the time I started the thread we had 4 days. We can still try to 
have some student in under the apache umbrella but I’m not sure if we have much 
chance, they need to specifically pick our project (for which no proposals are 
out).

On 01/03/17 19:30, "Syed Ahmed"  wrote:

Hi Guys,

I am trying to understand the process here. Are there deadlines by 
which we
have to submit the proposals? Who are the participants? Do we have a 
wiki
page? If not, I can create one.

Thanks,
-Syed

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 7:29 PM, Sergey Levitskiy <
sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote:

> I like it very much!
>
>

daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue

DISCLAIMER
==
This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is 
the property of Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business. It is intended only 
for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are 
not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain, copy, 
print, distribute or use this message. If you have received this communication 
in error, please notify the sender and delete all copies of this message. 
Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business does not accept any liability for 
virus infected mails.

daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1908: CLOUDSTACK-9317: Fixed disable static nat on leaving...

2017-03-01 Thread jayapalu

Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908
  
@ProjectMoon  The ip issue can be worked as separate ticket/PR. It is an 
isolated issue, it is not having any dependency with this PR. So we will get 
this PR in and create a separate ticket for the ip issue. What do you say ?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1955: CLOUDSTACK-8239 Add VirtIO SCSI support for KVM host...

2017-03-01 Thread nathanejohnson

Github user nathanejohnson commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1955
  
@borisstoyanov so the good news is it didn't skip the test.  the bad news 
is it didn't seem to have proper credentials for ssh'ing into your hosts.  It 
did pass the test where it ssh'ed into the guest, however.  So this at least 
demonstrates a guest is happy.

Do you have any tips on ways of making the smoke test play nice with BO wrt 
ssh'ing into the kvm hosts?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: Removed IPs with add = true in /etc/cloudstack/ips.json on router

2017-03-01 Thread Jayapal Uradi

Because of removed ips get configured again on VR, it is giving the perception 
that  PR #1908 is not removing the static nat ips in VR.

Thanks,
Jayapal

> On Mar 1, 2017, at 10:12 PM, Will Stevens  wrote:
>
> Hey Jeff,
> We were having this issue as well before we implemented 1907 and we have
> not had it since.  We don't user RvR yet though, so that could be a
> different story.
>
> We had tried a couple other implementations previously and we were still
> having the issue.  So far 1907 has been working without issues for us.  We
> have been running it in production for a couple months now and we were
> running into the issue you described quite a bit before that.
>
> *Will STEVENS*
> Lead Developer
>
> 
>
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 8:41 AM, Jeff Hair  wrote:
>
>> Yes, i know it's been merged. The problem is that this issue seems to come
>> up "randomly" (of course, nothing is ever really random), and I was
>> wondering if anyone else has run into it.
>>
>> My initial testing of PR 1907 hasn't yielded the issue happening yet, and
>> the only place I've seen it so far is on a router that doesn't have 1907
>> applied. But I'm not convinced that it won't happen ever after applying
>> 1907...
>>
>> *Jeff Hair*
>> Technical Lead and Software Developer
>>
>> Tel: (+354) 415 0200
>> j...@greenqloud.com
>> www.greenqloud.com
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Wei ZHOU  wrote:
>>
>>> PR 1907 has been merged. You can test with it.
>>>
>>>
>>> 2017-03-01 14:12 GMT+01:00 Jeff Hair :
>>>
 Hi,

 In the testing of PR 1908 (https://github.com/apache/
>>> cloudstack/pull/1908
 ),
 it has come up that some IPs which are removed from the router get put
>>> into
 the /etc/cloudstack/ips.json data bag with add = True. This causes the
>>> IPs
 to be re-added to the interface and arpinged, breaking connectivity and
 causing IP conflicts.

 Does anyone know anything about this? Is it due to old routers that
>> were
 affected by CLOUDSTACK-9500 (fixed in PR 1907), or is this behavior
>> still
 actively happening on master?

 Jeff

>>>
>>




DISCLAIMER
==
This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is the 
property of Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business. It is intended only for 
the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain, copy, print, 
distribute or use this message. If you have received this communication in 
error, please notify the sender and delete all copies of this message. 
Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business does not accept any liability for 
virus infected mails.

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1278: CLOUDSTACK-9198: Virtual router gets deployed...

GitHub user anshul1886 reopened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1278

CLOUDSTACK-9198: Virtual router gets deployed in disabled Pod

While starting the router, send the user from the callingContext instead of 
defaulting to System user.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9198
## To test:

Verify that Virtual Router is not getting deployed in disabled Pod.


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/anshul1886/cloudstack-1 CLOUDSTACK-9198

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1278.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1278


commit d3594526294601bcfda01415f370f4bc0e71e910
Author: Anshul Gangwar 
Date:   2015-11-02T08:28:44Z

CLOUDSTACK-9198: Virtual router gets deployed in disabled Pod. While 
starting the
router, send the user from the callingContext instead of defaulting to 
System user




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1278: CLOUDSTACK-9198: Virtual router gets deployed...

Github user anshul1886 closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1278


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1955: CLOUDSTACK-8239 Add VirtIO SCSI support for KVM host...

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1955
  
Trillian test result (tid-921)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 36820 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1955-t921-kvm-centos7.zip
Intermitten failure detected: 
/marvin/tests/smoke/test_deploy_virtio_scsi_vm.py
Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_privategw_acl.py
Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_snapshots.py
Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_vpc_vpn.py
Test completed. 47 look ok, 3 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 334.38 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_02_list_snapshots_with_removed_data_store | `Error` | 0.03 | 
test_snapshots.py
test_03_verify_libvirt_attach_disk | `Error` | 610.88 | 
test_deploy_virtio_scsi_vm.py
test_02_verify_libvirt_after_restart | `Error` | 615.96 | 
test_deploy_virtio_scsi_vm.py
test_01_verify_libvirt | `Error` | 600.73 | test_deploy_virtio_scsi_vm.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 159.71 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 65.83 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 240.43 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 292.11 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 551.36 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 514.33 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Success | 1404.34 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
Success | 568.61 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | Success | 737.39 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | Success | 1271.92 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 156.17 | test_volumes.py
test_08_resize_volume | Success | 156.09 | test_volumes.py
test_07_resize_fail | Success | 156.08 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 156.01 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 150.53 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 150.91 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 155.98 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 94.76 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 711.91 | test_volumes.py
test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 275.10 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | Success | 100.69 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_create_vm_snapshots | Success | 163.74 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 256.93 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.49 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.12 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 40.64 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.09 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 125.64 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 125.79 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 10.12 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 40.25 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 35.32 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.02 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.03 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 5.11 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.09 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.09 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 45.35 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 161.57 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 133.41 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 101.46 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 133.47 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 131.58 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 133.56 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.17 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.57 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.08 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.09 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 10.92 | test_snapshots.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 234.31 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.03 | test_service_offerings.py

Re: GSoC projects

2017-03-01 Thread Raja Pullela

Hi, 

As I understand from the GSoC page, Student volunteers now have to register and 
propose a project.  But, there is a one issue, couple of student volunteers 
that I know wanted some help and direction on choosing/proposing the projects.  
I have asked them to join our Devlist.  If we can make our list of potential 
projects public on our wiki, it will be easy for them to pick up and work?  

Best,
Raja
Engineering Team,
Accelerite, 2055 Laurelwood Road,
Santa Clara, CA, 95054

On 3/2/17, 3:54 AM, "Daan Hoogland"  wrote:

Syed, At the time I started the thread we had 4 days. We can still try to have 
some student in under the apache umbrella but I’m not sure if we have much 
chance, they need to specifically pick our project (for which no proposals are 
out).

On 01/03/17 19:30, "Syed Ahmed"  wrote:

Hi Guys,

I am trying to understand the process here. Are there deadlines by which we
have to submit the proposals? Who are the participants? Do we have a wiki
page? If not, I can create one.

Thanks,
-Syed

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 7:29 PM, Sergey Levitskiy <
sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote:

> I like it very much!
>
>

daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue

DISCLAIMER
==
This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is the 
property of Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business. It is intended only for 
the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain, copy, print, 
distribute or use this message. If you have received this communication in 
error, please notify the sender and delete all copies of this message. 
Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business does not accept any liability for 
virus infected mails.

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #892: CLOUDSTACK-8910: The reserved_capacity field increase...

Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/892
  
### ACS CI BVT Run
 **Sumarry:**
 Build Number 410
 Hypervisor xenserver
 NetworkType Advanced
 Passed=104
 Failed=1
 Skipped=7

_Link to logs Folder (search by build_no):_ 
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/yj3wnzbceo9uef2/AAB6u-Iap-xztdm6jHX9SjPja?dl=0


**Failed tests:**
* test_routers_network_ops.py

 * test_03_RVR_Network_check_router_state Failing since 2 runs


**Skipped tests:**
test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot
test_vm_nic_adapter_vmxnet3
test_static_role_account_acls
test_11_ss_nfs_version_on_ssvm
test_nested_virtualization_vmware
test_3d_gpu_support
test_deploy_vgpu_enabled_vm

**Passed test suits:**
test_deploy_vm_with_userdata.py
test_affinity_groups_projects.py
test_portable_publicip.py
test_over_provisioning.py
test_global_settings.py
test_scale_vm.py
test_service_offerings.py
test_routers_iptables_default_policy.py
test_loadbalance.py
test_routers.py
test_reset_vm_on_reboot.py
test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners.py
test_network.py
test_router_dns.py
test_non_contigiousvlan.py
test_login.py
test_deploy_vm_iso.py
test_list_ids_parameter.py
test_public_ip_range.py
test_multipleips_per_nic.py
test_regions.py
test_affinity_groups.py
test_network_acl.py
test_pvlan.py
test_volumes.py
test_nic.py
test_deploy_vm_root_resize.py
test_resource_detail.py
test_secondary_storage.py
test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_disk_offerings.py


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: GSoC projects

2017-03-01 Thread Daan Hoogland

Syed, At the time I started the thread we had 4 days. We can still try to have 
some student in under the apache umbrella but I’m not sure if we have much 
chance, they need to specifically pick our project (for which no proposals are 
out).

On 01/03/17 19:30, "Syed Ahmed"  wrote:

Hi Guys,

I am trying to understand the process here. Are there deadlines by which we
have to submit the proposals? Who are the participants? Do we have a wiki
page? If not, I can create one.

Thanks,
-Syed

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 7:29 PM, Sergey Levitskiy <
sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote:

> I like it very much!
>
>

daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue

Re: Some Jira tickets clean up

2017-03-01 Thread Rafael Weingärtner

Volks,

It has been almost a week. I am assuming that no one knows about these
tickets.

In the last years, our workflow has been improved greatly; most of the PRs
I see have Jira ticket associated and everything seems to be getting better
by the time. However, we have some (a lot?) Jira tickets that seem to be
left behind. I think a cleanup from time to time is a good thing.


In 48 ours I will close all of the tickets mentioned here. If I close
something that should not have been closed, please pardon me ;).



After this, I will proceed with a new batch of tickets. Hopefully, in some
iterations of this process, we can get rid of these forgotten tickets.

On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Rafael Weingärtner <
rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks ;)
>
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 3:14 PM, Tutkowski, Mike <
> mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks, Rafael. I uploaded an ISO and walked through the necessary parts
>> of the wizard. I agree with you that it has been fixed. I commented on the
>> ticket, then resolved and closed it just now.
>>
>> On 2/23/17, 12:46 PM, "Rafael Weingärtner" 
>> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for taking time to look at this Mike.
>> The ticket (CLOUDSTACK-4164
>> ) I managed to
>> check, and I believe it can be closed.
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 2:39 PM, Tutkowski, Mike <
>> mike.tutkow...@netapp.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Thanks for compiling this list, Rafael!
>> >
>> > I see I was the reporter for this issue:
>> >
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4164
>> >
>> > I plan to take a look at it and see what the current state is.
>> >
>> > On 2/23/17, 10:26 AM, "Rafael Weingärtner" <
>> rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi folks,
>> > I have been reviewing old Jira tickets and we have a bunch that
>> can be
>> > closed. The following are the ones I have gone through. Before
>> I close
>> > any
>> > ticket I would like to check them with you, especially the ones
>> from a
>> > category called “Seems to be fixed has to be checked”. I will be
>> > waiting
>> > for your feedback before I proceed to close any ticket.
>> >
>> > - Have a title that does say much and the ticket does not have a
>> > detailed
>> > description
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2225
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-917
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-947
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1259
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1441
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1576
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2705
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5793
>> >
>> >
>> > - Already solved
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2532
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6735
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6837
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7161
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8202
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8781
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8817
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9065
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1069
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1460
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1702
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1870
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2075
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2213
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2439
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6009
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5219
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4847
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4778
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4238
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4164
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4071
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4055
>> >
>> > - Seems to be fixed has to be checked (I did not have how to
>> check
>> > these
>> > right now)
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8873
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8918
>> > --

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1955: CLOUDSTACK-8239 Add VirtIO SCSI support for KVM host...

2017-03-01 Thread nathanejohnson

Github user nathanejohnson commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1955
  
@borisstoyanov Quick questions, what tags need to be present to get picked 
up by BO?  I'm worried my smoke test might get skipped.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1774: CLOUDSTACK-9608: Errored State and Abandoned state T...

2017-03-01 Thread serg38

Github user serg38 commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1774
  
@borisstoyanov That would be awesome . 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1866: Advanced isolated network egress destination cidr su...

Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1866
  
### ACS CI BVT Run
 **Sumarry:**
 Build Number 409
 Hypervisor xenserver
 NetworkType Advanced
 Passed=100
 Failed=5
 Skipped=7

_Link to logs Folder (search by build_no):_ 
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/yj3wnzbceo9uef2/AAB6u-Iap-xztdm6jHX9SjPja?dl=0


**Failed tests:**
* test_routers_network_ops.py

 * test_01_isolate_network_FW_PF_default_routes_egress_true Failed

 * test_02_isolate_network_FW_PF_default_routes_egress_false Failed

 * test_01_RVR_Network_FW_PF_SSH_default_routes_egress_true Failed

 * test_02_RVR_Network_FW_PF_SSH_default_routes_egress_false Failed

 * test_03_RVR_Network_check_router_state Failed


**Skipped tests:**
test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot
test_vm_nic_adapter_vmxnet3
test_static_role_account_acls
test_11_ss_nfs_version_on_ssvm
test_nested_virtualization_vmware
test_3d_gpu_support
test_deploy_vgpu_enabled_vm

**Passed test suits:**
test_deploy_vm_with_userdata.py
test_affinity_groups_projects.py
test_portable_publicip.py
test_over_provisioning.py
test_global_settings.py
test_scale_vm.py
test_service_offerings.py
test_routers_iptables_default_policy.py
test_loadbalance.py
test_routers.py
test_reset_vm_on_reboot.py
test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners.py
test_network.py
test_router_dns.py
test_non_contigiousvlan.py
test_login.py
test_deploy_vm_iso.py
test_list_ids_parameter.py
test_public_ip_range.py
test_multipleips_per_nic.py
test_regions.py
test_affinity_groups.py
test_network_acl.py
test_pvlan.py
test_volumes.py
test_nic.py
test_deploy_vm_root_resize.py
test_resource_detail.py
test_secondary_storage.py
test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_disk_offerings.py


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

2017-03-01 Thread Tutkowski, Mike

I see the following exception when trying to deploy a user VM in a Basic Zone 
with two XenServer 6.5 hosts in one cluster. My system VMs have all deployed 
properly. The user template gets downloaded fine. I can see the user VM begin 
to start on a XenServer host, then it goes away. We then automatically try on 
the other host. I can see the VM begin to start there for a moment, then it 
goes away.

I am just deploying the user VM’s template and root disk to NFS (same place 
where the template and root disks of my system VMs are).

I am using the built-in XenServer CentOS 5.6 (64 bit) template with 1 vCPU, 500 
MHz, and 256 MB memory.

WARN  [c.c.a.r.v.VirtualRoutingResource] (DirectAgent-7:ctx-35aded78) 
(logid:aab9c320) Expected 1 answers while executing VmDataCommand but received 2
WARN  [c.c.v.VirtualMachinePowerStateSyncImpl] 
(DirectAgentCronJob-14:ctx-27fb1ac3) (logid:2c342f23) VM state was updated but 
update time is null?! vm id: 6
INFO  [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (AsyncJobMgr-Heartbeat-1:ctx-2c7d2dce) 
(logid:a56a9a8c) Begin cleanup expired async-jobs
INFO  [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (AsyncJobMgr-Heartbeat-1:ctx-2c7d2dce) 
(logid:a56a9a8c) End cleanup expired async-jobs
INFO  [c.c.u.AccountManagerImpl] (AccountChecker-1:ctx-383a632c) 
(logid:541e9ba5) Found 0 removed accounts to cleanup
INFO  [c.c.u.AccountManagerImpl] (AccountChecker-1:ctx-383a632c) 
(logid:541e9ba5) Found 0 disabled accounts to cleanup
INFO  [c.c.u.AccountManagerImpl] (AccountChecker-1:ctx-383a632c) 
(logid:541e9ba5) Found 0 inactive domains to cleanup
INFO  [c.c.u.AccountManagerImpl] (AccountChecker-1:ctx-383a632c) 
(logid:541e9ba5) Found 0 disabled projects to cleanup
WARN  [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-16:ctx-7c901443) 
(logid:aab9c320) callHostPlugin failed for cmd: default_network_rules with args 
secIps: 0:, vmName: i-2-6-VM, vmID: 6, vmIP: 10.117.40.53, vmMAC: 
06:b2:f4:00:00:22,  due to There was a failure communicating with the plugin.
WARN  [c.c.h.x.r.w.x.CitrixStartCommandWrapper] (DirectAgent-16:ctx-7c901443) 
(logid:aab9c320) Catch Exception: class 
com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException due to 
com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: callHostPlugin failed for cmd: 
default_network_rules with args secIps: 0:, vmName: i-2-6-VM, vmID: 6, vmIP: 
10.117.40.53, vmMAC: 06:b2:f4:00:00:22,  due to There was a failure 
communicating with the plugin.
com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: callHostPlugin failed for cmd: 
default_network_rules with args secIps: 0:, vmName: i-2-6-VM, vmID: 6, vmIP: 
10.117.40.53, vmMAC: 06:b2:f4:00:00:22,  due to There was a failure 
communicating with the plugin.
at 
com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.CitrixResourceBase.callHostPlugin(CitrixResourceBase.java:338)
at 
com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.wrapper.xenbase.CitrixStartCommandWrapper.execute(CitrixStartCommandWrapper.java:188)
at 
com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.wrapper.xenbase.CitrixStartCommandWrapper.execute(CitrixStartCommandWrapper.java:53)
at 
com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.wrapper.xenbase.CitrixRequestWrapper.execute(CitrixRequestWrapper.java:122)
at 
com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.CitrixResourceBase.executeRequest(CitrixResourceBase.java:1691)
at 
com.cloud.agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache$Task.runInContext(DirectAgentAttache.java:315)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:49)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:56)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:103)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:46)
at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
WARN  [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-16:ctx-7c901443) 
(logid:aab9c320) Unable to start i-2-6-VM due to 
com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: callHostPlugin failed for cmd: 
default_network_rules with args secIps: 0:, vmName: i-2-6-VM, vmID: 6, vmIP: 
10.117.40.53, vmMAC: 06:b2:f4:00:00:22,  due to There was a failure 
communicating with the plugin.
at

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1836: [4.10/master] Smoketest Health

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1836
  
Trillian test result (tid-919)
Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 44150 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1836-t919-vmware-55u3.zip
Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_privategw_acl.py
Intermitten failure detected: 
/marvin/tests/smoke/test_routers_network_ops.py
Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_snapshots.py
Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_vm_snapshots.py
Test completed. 46 look ok, 3 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot | `Failure` | 372.53 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 873.50 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_02_list_snapshots_with_removed_data_store | `Error` | 80.94 | 
test_snapshots.py
test_02_list_snapshots_with_removed_data_store | `Error` | 86.03 | 
test_snapshots.py
test_03_vpc_privategw_restart_vpc_cleanup | `Error` | 1138.63 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 373.03 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 171.70 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 612.94 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 349.74 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 786.76 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 656.04 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Success | 1538.42 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
Success | 746.48 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | Success | 700.01 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | Success | 1395.01 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 31.07 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 60.52 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 105.30 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 10.18 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 25.35 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 53.77 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 511.59 | test_volumes.py
test_change_service_offering_for_vm_with_snapshots | Success | 543.19 | 
test_vm_snapshots.py
test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 275.16 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | Success | 232.17 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_create_vm_snapshots | Success | 161.72 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 257.51 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.82 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.38 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 66.11 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.10 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 5.11 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 5.14 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 20.23 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 10.14 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 241.53 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.03 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.05 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 10.24 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.10 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.18 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 120.88 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 236.81 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 238.70 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 156.51 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 158.48 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 176.80 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 173.69 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.14 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.35 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.12 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.12 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 21.13 | test_snapshots.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 91.78 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.04 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_edit_service_offering |

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1836: [4.10/master] Smoketest Health

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1836
  
Trillian test result (tid-917)
Environment: xenserver-65sp1 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 6
Total time taken: 43307 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1836-t917-xenserver-65sp1.zip
Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_privategw_acl.py
Intermitten failure detected: 
/marvin/tests/smoke/test_routers_network_ops.py
Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_snapshots.py
Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_vpc_redundant.py
Test completed. 46 look ok, 3 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | `Failure` | 535.47 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | `Failure` | 1371.16 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | `Failure` | 552.63 
| test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 770.07 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_02_list_snapshots_with_removed_data_store | `Error` | 94.69 | 
test_snapshots.py
test_02_list_snapshots_with_removed_data_store | `Error` | 99.81 | 
test_snapshots.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 332.81 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 131.68 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 603.89 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 335.56 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 660.23 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
Success | 819.93 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | Success | 1110.36 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 15.76 | test_volumes.py
test_08_resize_volume | Success | 85.92 | test_volumes.py
test_07_resize_fail | Success | 101.11 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 20.45 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 100.32 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 10.23 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 15.30 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 10.74 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 393.10 | test_volumes.py
test_change_service_offering_for_vm_with_snapshots | Success | 394.69 | 
test_vm_snapshots.py
test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 280.28 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | Success | 186.39 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_create_vm_snapshots | Success | 100.71 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 298.21 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 41.86 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.22 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 66.25 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.12 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 10.18 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 15.23 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 25.29 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 30.28 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 86.24 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.03 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.07 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 5.17 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.12 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.12 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 60.65 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 197.01 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 199.21 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 141.65 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 143.94 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 136.74 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 164.13 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.13 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.42 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.12 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.14 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 26.48 | test_snapshots.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 86.32 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.04 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.06 |

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1774: CLOUDSTACK-9608: Errored State and Abandoned state T...

Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1774
  
I've been thinking of writing an extension in marvin to login at management 
an grab management log at that point -15 sec time, will see when will write 
that... 
Let me address this tomorrow


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: GSoC projects

2017-03-01 Thread Syed Ahmed

Hi Guys,

I am trying to understand the process here. Are there deadlines by which we
have to submit the proposals? Who are the participants? Do we have a wiki
page? If not, I can create one.

Thanks,
-Syed

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 7:29 PM, Sergey Levitskiy <
sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote:

> I like it very much!
>
>

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1955: CLOUDSTACK-8239 Add VirtIO SCSI support for KVM host...

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1955
  
@borisstoyanov a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has 
been kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1961: Fix for test_snapshots.py using nfs2 instead of nfs ...

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1961
  
@borisstoyanov a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep 
you posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1955: CLOUDSTACK-8239 Add VirtIO SCSI support for KVM host...

Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1955
  
@blueorangutan test


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1961: Fix for test_snapshots.py using nfs2 instead of nfs ...

Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1961
  
thanks @nvazquez let me package again
@blueorangutan package 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1955: CLOUDSTACK-8239 Add VirtIO SCSI support for KVM host...

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1955
  
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-552


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1955: CLOUDSTACK-8239 Add VirtIO SCSI support for KVM host...

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1955
  
@borisstoyanov a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep 
you posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1955: CLOUDSTACK-8239 Add VirtIO SCSI support for KVM host...

Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1955
  
Thanks @nathanejohnson, lets run that with BO
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: Removed IPs with add = true in /etc/cloudstack/ips.json on router

2017-03-01 Thread Will Stevens

Hey Jeff,
We were having this issue as well before we implemented 1907 and we have
not had it since.  We don't user RvR yet though, so that could be a
different story.

We had tried a couple other implementations previously and we were still
having the issue.  So far 1907 has been working without issues for us.  We
have been running it in production for a couple months now and we were
running into the issue you described quite a bit before that.

*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer



On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 8:41 AM, Jeff Hair  wrote:

> Yes, i know it's been merged. The problem is that this issue seems to come
> up "randomly" (of course, nothing is ever really random), and I was
> wondering if anyone else has run into it.
>
> My initial testing of PR 1907 hasn't yielded the issue happening yet, and
> the only place I've seen it so far is on a router that doesn't have 1907
> applied. But I'm not convinced that it won't happen ever after applying
> 1907...
>
> *Jeff Hair*
> Technical Lead and Software Developer
>
> Tel: (+354) 415 0200
> j...@greenqloud.com
> www.greenqloud.com
>
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Wei ZHOU  wrote:
>
> > PR 1907 has been merged. You can test with it.
> >
> >
> > 2017-03-01 14:12 GMT+01:00 Jeff Hair :
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > In the testing of PR 1908 (https://github.com/apache/
> > cloudstack/pull/1908
> > > ),
> > > it has come up that some IPs which are removed from the router get put
> > into
> > > the /etc/cloudstack/ips.json data bag with add = True. This causes the
> > IPs
> > > to be re-added to the interface and arpinged, breaking connectivity and
> > > causing IP conflicts.
> > >
> > > Does anyone know anything about this? Is it due to old routers that
> were
> > > affected by CLOUDSTACK-9500 (fixed in PR 1907), or is this behavior
> still
> > > actively happening on master?
> > >
> > > Jeff
> > >
> >
>

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1779: CLOUDSTACK-9610: Disabled Host Keeps Being up status...

2017-03-01 Thread DaanHoogland

Github user DaanHoogland commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1779
  
@priyankparihar I agree that host should not show as up but indeed why hide 
it? Unless we show no details for an unmanaged cluster we should be able to 
find the host in there. It should still show as disabled of course. 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: Modern template hosting

2017-03-01 Thread Will Stevens

I am building a short term solution right now.  I hopefully will have the
building blocks in place by the weekend so we can start working with Infra
to get it in place.

We will have a web server which we can point something like
downloads.cloudstack.org (or whatever url) at.  Then we will have an ASF
repo which tracks a mirror list and exposes a static site to be able to
query the mirror list.

The web server will receive a request and will do a 302 redirect to the
appropriate resource on one of the mirrors.

This gets us started.  Legacy environments will have to do a DB change to
change from 'download.cloud.com' to 'downloads.cloudstack.org' (or
whatever), but otherwise it should be pretty simple.

We can improve how we deliver templates going forward, but this obviously
requires some discussion still.  I will try to buy us some time with an
implementation which solves our problems today...

*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer



On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 7:52 AM, Abhinandan Prateek <
abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com> wrote:

>
> Initial seeding is a manual step and that is not going to change in near
> future. A handy list of official places from where these templates can be
> downloaded won’t harm this part of the installation. Just allow anyone
> credible who follows democratic process to publish their templates with
> apache’s blessings.
>
>
> Coming to urls hard coded in db, the popular suggestion is to point them
> to mirrors. This looks good but this is going to take some effort that has
> not materialised yet. Once this change is made it will be going in some
> future release like 4.11; the problem still remains for the releases that
> are already out there. In case access to download.cloud.com is dropped at
> some point we will have to document the procedure such that people know how
> to make these stable releases work. That is where the procedure documented
> here https://shankerbalan.net/blog/seed-cloudstack-templates-offline/
> should be officially adapted with a marketplace to pick up templates of
> choosing. Maybe we can have a pre-setup script to make choices instead of
> written wiki. Note that this will be anyway needed by the older releases.
>
>
>
>
> On 01/03/17, 4:24 PM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:
>
> >-1
> >
> >We are trying to get MORE people to use CloudStack.  And raising the
> barrier to entry does nothing to help that.
> >
> >
> >Kind regards,
> >
> >Paul Angus
> >
> >paul.an...@shapeblue.com
> >www.shapeblue.com
> >53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> >@shapeblue
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com]
> >Sent: 01 March 2017 09:39
> >To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >Subject: Re: Modern template hosting
> >
> >+1
> >
> >After seeing this discussion running in circles several times, I think we
> should at least get started with the simplest option.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >On 27/02/17, 11:54 PM, "Chiradeep Vittal"  wrote:
> >
> >>The alternative foolproof way is to simply not provide the automatic
> >>download.
> >>
> >>Just document the mirror list URL where the templates can be found. I
> >>don't know why people reject this option.
> >>
> >>https://shankerbalan.net/blog/seed-cloudstack-templates-offline/
> >>
> >>On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Will Stevens
> >>
> >>wrote:
> >>
> >>> OK. Thanks for the heads up.
> >>>
> >>> On Feb 27, 2017 1:08 PM, "Chiradeep Vittal" 
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Sounds workable. The downloader code in the SSVM won't follow
> >>> > redirects I think.
> >>> > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/5511065fc20787619d9cd0444
> >>> > a65a3 155fc9c921/core/src/com/cloud/storage/template/
> >>> > HttpTemplateDownloader.java#L93
> >>> > https://goo.gl/dSi0r5
> >>> >  Might need to add
> >>> > client.setRedirectStrategy(new LaxRedirectStrategy());
> >>> >
> >>> > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Will Stevens
> >>> > 
> >>> > wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > > We haven't opened a ticket yet because we don't have a strategy
> yet.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > What do you guys think of this:
> >>> > > - We setup a new github repo in the 'apache' org which consists
> >>> > > of a
> >>> > single
> >>> > > file with a list of active/supported mirrors.
> >>> > > - I write a small web server, distributed as a binary, which can
> >>> > > be
> >>> > hosted
> >>> > > by ASF Infra.  This web server will query the current list of
> >>> > > mirrors
> >>> and
> >>> > > will select one and then do a 302 redirect to that mirror.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > The act of 'choosing' a mirror could be done in a number of ways.
> >>> > > - If we want to define an order, then it could just try from the
> >>> > > top of
> >>> > the
> >>> > > list and work its way down.  It would curl the target to make
> >>> > > sure it
> >>> > gets
> >>> > > a 200 and if it does, it would do a 302 redirect.

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1779: CLOUDSTACK-9610: Disabled Host Keeps Being up status...

Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1779
  
### ACS CI BVT Run
 **Sumarry:**
 Build Number 408
 Hypervisor xenserver
 NetworkType Advanced
 Passed=104
 Failed=1
 Skipped=7

_Link to logs Folder (search by build_no):_ 
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/yj3wnzbceo9uef2/AAB6u-Iap-xztdm6jHX9SjPja?dl=0


**Failed tests:**
* test_non_contigiousvlan.py

 * test_extendPhysicalNetworkVlan Failed


**Skipped tests:**
test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot
test_vm_nic_adapter_vmxnet3
test_static_role_account_acls
test_11_ss_nfs_version_on_ssvm
test_nested_virtualization_vmware
test_3d_gpu_support
test_deploy_vgpu_enabled_vm

**Passed test suits:**
test_deploy_vm_with_userdata.py
test_affinity_groups_projects.py
test_portable_publicip.py
test_over_provisioning.py
test_global_settings.py
test_scale_vm.py
test_service_offerings.py
test_routers_iptables_default_policy.py
test_loadbalance.py
test_routers.py
test_reset_vm_on_reboot.py
test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners.py
test_network.py
test_router_dns.py
test_login.py
test_deploy_vm_iso.py
test_list_ids_parameter.py
test_public_ip_range.py
test_multipleips_per_nic.py
test_regions.py
test_affinity_groups.py
test_network_acl.py
test_pvlan.py
test_volumes.py
test_nic.py
test_deploy_vm_root_resize.py
test_resource_detail.py
test_secondary_storage.py
test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_routers_network_ops.py
test_disk_offerings.py


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1923: CLOUDSTACK-9765: centos: packaging: fix missing path...

2017-03-01 Thread Slair1

Github user Slair1 commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1923
  
This LGTM too, we hit this issue during our upgrade


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1813: CLOUDSTACK-9604: Root disk resize support for...

2017-03-01 Thread serg38

Github user serg38 commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1813#discussion_r103719599
  
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/vm/UserVmManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -3614,6 +3604,26 @@ public UserVmVO doInTransaction(TransactionStatus 
status) throws InsufficientCap
 });
 }
 
+public void validateRootDiskResize(final HypervisorType 
hypervisorType, Long rootDiskSize, VMTemplateVO templateVO, UserVmVO vm, final 
Map customParameters) throws InvalidParameterValueException
+{
+// rootdisksize must be larger than template.
+if ((rootDiskSize << 30) < templateVO.getSize()) {
+Long templateVOSizeGB = templateVO.getSize() / 1024 / 1024 / 
1024;
+s_logger.error("unsupported: rootdisksize override is smaller 
than template size " + templateVO.getSize() + "B (" + templateVOSizeGB + "GB)");
+throw new InvalidParameterValueException("unsupported: 
rootdisksize override is smaller than template size " + templateVO.getSize() + 
"B (" + templateVOSizeGB + "GB)");
+} else if ((rootDiskSize << 30) > templateVO.getSize()){
+if (hypervisorType == HypervisorType.VMware && 
!vm.getDetails().get("rootDiskController").toLowerCase().contains("scsi")) {
+s_logger.error("Found unsupported root disk controller : " 
+ vm.getDetails().get("rootDiskController"));
--- End diff --

I think NPE on line 3615 is due to rootdiskcontroller might be not set for 
VM. If template is imported without explicitly specifying root disk controller 
than a global setting will be in effect.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1961: Fix for test_snapshots.py using nfs2 instead of nfs ...

2017-03-01 Thread nvazquez

Github user nvazquez commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1961
  
Hi @karuturi @rhtyd @borisstoyanov,
I've pushed a new commit for fixing `test_snapshots.py` failure. Can you 
please run tests against Vmware and Kvm?

These were results in our env, using Vmware:

[root@ussarlabcsmgt41 cloudstack]# cat /tmp//MarvinLogs//XJVTRH/results.txt
Test Snapshot Root Disk ... === TestName: test_01_snapshot_root_disk | 
Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test listing volume snapshots with removed data stores ... === TestName: 
test_02_list_snapshots_with_removed_data_store | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok

--
Ran 2 tests in 410.231s

OK



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

2017-03-01 Thread Pierre-Luc Dion

Do we support  centos6  with this 4.10 on jdk8?

Because I did not had much success to install 4.10 jdk8 on centos6  and it
would make more sense to drop support of centos6 so our packages would use
centos7 with distro packages for tomcat7 and jdk8.  Should also be the same
with ubuntu 16.04 that use jdk8 and tomcat7 by default ?


thanks,


On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 9:01 AM, Rene Moser  wrote:

> Hi
>
> While not be directly related to the clodustack java source code, any
> RPM created using the specs from the repo e.g. from packages/centos7
> and proceeding an upgrade, will hit CLOUDSTACK-9765, PR
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1923 fixes the issue.
>
> Regards
> René
>
>
> On 03/01/2017 02:12 AM, Rajani Karuturi wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've created a 4.10.0.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
> vote:
> >
> > Git Branch and Commit
> > SH:https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.
> git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.10.0.0-RC20170301T0634
> > Commit:7c1d003b5269b375d87f4f6cfff8a144f0608b67
> >  git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.10.0.0-RC20170301T0634Commit:
> 7c1d003b5269b375d87f4f6cfff8a144f0608b67>
> >
> > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> > location):https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.10.0.0/
> >
> > PGP release keys (signed using
> > CBB44821):https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> >
> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> > indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
> >
> > [ ] +1  approve
> > [ ] +0  no opinion
> > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> >
> >
> > ~Rajani
> > http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
> >
>

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1923: CLOUDSTACK-9765: centos: packaging: fix missing path...

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1923
  
LGTM. @karuturi not a blocker, but then we'll need to document the 
workaround (manual fix) in the release notes. If RC1 has any blockers, let's 
include this in RC2.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: [PROPOSAL] add native vm-cluster orchestration service (was: [PROPOSAL] add native container orchestration service)

2017-03-01 Thread Syed Ahmed

+1 for ApplicationCluster. I think it is generic and not tied to a specific
concept (machine,VM, service etc)

On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 1:54 AM, Daan Hoogland 
wrote:

> Syed, Kilham, et. al.
>
> After some thought I came up with ApplicationCluster. It is not purely
> machines or instances but includes network and storage resources and maybe
> more. Next to that these are meant for running application like k8, mesos
> or DBaaS. I don't like service as prefix because it implies the cluster is
> for servicing the cloud or VMs that may be broken or need a kind of extra
> feature while from user perspective they are an addition, hence application
> to cloudstack.
>
> Any push back?
>
> Sent from Nine
> 
>
> daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
> From: Daan Hoogland
> Sent: 28 Feb 2017 6:49 pm
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] add native vm-cluster orchestration service (was:
> [PROPOSAL] add native container orchestration service)
>
> Syed, I chose machine as they might be bare metal in some cases.
>
> Sent from Nine
> 
> From: Syed Ahmed 
> Sent: 28 Feb 2017 4:22 pm
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] add native vm-cluster orchestration service (was:
> [PROPOSAL] add native container orchestration service)
>
> We already call the VMs as Instances. So, InstanceCluster would be a better
> name imo.
>
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 10:05 AM, Daan Hoogland <
> daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com
> > wrote:
>
> > Kishan, I see some sensible additions but also some unnecessary
> omissions.
> > Most of it seems to be Murali’s text so I’ll c your improvements back
> and
> > rename the page to the more sensible title of “MachineCluster service”
> and
> > delete the other.
> >
> > About naming, I was thinking MachineCluster instead of ServiceCluster,
> > makes sense? Or even GuestMachineCluster. ServiceCluster could mean a
> > supporting cluster that delivers e.g. backup as a service to guests, or
> > maybe some build, artifact or networking service. For this ambiguity im
> am
> > :-1: on the name ServiceCluster.
> >
> >
> > On 28/02/17 11:16, "Kishan Kavala"  wrote:
> >
> > Daan,
> >  I've updated the earlier spec to support any Vm cluster. Please let
> > me know your thoughts on this.
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/
> > Service+Cluster+Functional+Specification
> >
> > regards,
> > Kishan
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com]
> > Sent: 27 February 2017 04:02 PM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] add native vm-cluster orchestration service
> > (was: [PROPOSAL] add native container orchestration service)
> >
> > Any follow up Koushik? I want to refactor our proof of concept and
> > integrate it in master.
> >
> > On 21/02/17 10:42, "Kishan Kavala" 
> > wrote:
> >
> > Sure Daan. I'll publish the design on cwiki and share the link.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com]
> > Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 7:27 PM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: [PROPOSAL] add native vm-cluster orchestration service
> > (was: [PROPOSAL] add native container orchestration service)
> >
> > So, being very late in the discussion but havingread the whole
> > thread before editting the title of this thread,
> >
> > Can we agree that we want a generic vm-cluster service and leave
> > the container bits to containers? Kishan can you share your design?
> > Shapeblue wants to rebase their k8 service on top of this and I would
> like
> > yours and Murali's work to not conflict.
> >
> > daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com
> > www.shapeblue.com
> > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, Utrecht Utrecht 3531
> > VENetherlands @shapeblue
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com]
> > Sent: dinsdag 7 februari 2017 08:14
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] add native container orchestration
> service
> >
> > Will is 100% correct.  As I mentioned the Title is misleading.
> > However, Murali did clarify in his explanation; this is really about vm
> > cluster orchestration.
> >
> >
> >
> > 
> > From: Will Stevens 
> > Sent: 6 Feb 2017 22:54
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] add native container orchestration
> service
> >
> > My

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1955: CLOUDSTACK-8239 Add VirtIO SCSI support for KVM host...

2017-03-01 Thread nathanejohnson

Github user nathanejohnson commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1955
  
@wido I have removed the extraneous log messages.

@boris I have added a smoke test for this that tests both virsh output from 
the host and lspci / lsblk output from the guest.  Here is the output from me 
running this in a bubble:

Test that libvirt properly created domain with scsi controller ... === 
TestName: test_01_verify_libvirt | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Verify that libvirt settings are as expected after a VM stop / start ... 
=== TestName: test_02_verify_libvirt_after_restart | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Verify that libvirt settings are expected after a disk add ... === 
TestName: test_03_verify_libvirt_attach_disk | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Verify that guest sees scsi controller and disks ... === TestName: 
test_04_verify_guest_lspci | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok

--
Ran 4 tests in 658.770s

OK



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

ACS 4.9.x + VMware/ESXi 6.0: Sometimes VRs are failing to fully come up into running state

2017-03-01 Thread Prashanth Manthena

Hi All,

Is anyone aware of the following issue in ACS 4.9.x + VMware/ESXi 6.0
environment:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9575

Note: cloudstack management server and ESXi hotd logs are attached in the
above Jira issue.

I am hitting this issue randomly, mostly with restart networks with cleanup
(destroying and re-deploying VR). Moreover, VR comes up after one or more
retries of the same operation (or) manually restarting the VR (or) powering
on the VR from the vcenter.

Any help in debugging this issue will be greatly appreciated.

With regards,
Prashanth

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1836: [4.10/master] Smoketest Health

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1836
  
Trillian test result (tid-918)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 26568 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1836-t918-kvm-centos7.zip
Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_privategw_acl.py
Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_snapshots.py
Test completed. 47 look ok, 2 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 295.21 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_02_list_snapshots_with_removed_data_store | `Error` | 0.03 | 
test_snapshots.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 144.92 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 61.10 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 226.50 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 282.63 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 464.99 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 500.83 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Success | 1272.00 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
Success | 516.79 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | Success | 728.65 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | Success | 1268.47 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 151.41 | test_volumes.py
test_08_resize_volume | Success | 156.36 | test_volumes.py
test_07_resize_fail | Success | 156.51 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 151.28 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 150.78 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 151.23 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 156.47 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 89.08 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 621.04 | test_volumes.py
test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 275.28 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | Success | 100.78 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_create_vm_snapshots | Success | 134.17 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 262.59 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.55 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.21 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 46.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.15 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 125.89 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 125.83 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 10.19 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 35.29 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 40.49 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.08 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 5.12 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.10 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.15 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 45.46 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 161.41 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 133.22 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 101.28 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 103.01 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 131.43 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 133.16 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 0.96 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 2.86 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.12 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.12 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 11.06 | test_snapshots.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 209.49 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.04 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.05 | test_service_offerings.py
test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.10 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.14 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_sys_vm_start | Success | 0.18 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_09_reboot_router | Success | 35.30 | test_routers.py
test_08_start_router | Success | 25.26 |

Re: Removed IPs with add = true in /etc/cloudstack/ips.json on router

2017-03-01 Thread Wei ZHOU

Jeff,

We had several VR issues in the testing of 4.7.1, including this one. We
fixed it by removing unused IPs from ips.json.
As there are lot of changes between 4.7.1 and master, I do not know the
current status in master/4.10
PR 1907 seems to fix this issue (not tested). There might be other issue
caused by unused IPs in ips.json.

-Wei

2017-03-01 14:41 GMT+01:00 Jeff Hair :

> Yes, i know it's been merged. The problem is that this issue seems to come
> up "randomly" (of course, nothing is ever really random), and I was
> wondering if anyone else has run into it.
>
> My initial testing of PR 1907 hasn't yielded the issue happening yet, and
> the only place I've seen it so far is on a router that doesn't have 1907
> applied. But I'm not convinced that it won't happen ever after applying
> 1907...
>
> *Jeff Hair*
> Technical Lead and Software Developer
>
> Tel: (+354) 415 0200
> j...@greenqloud.com
> www.greenqloud.com
>
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Wei ZHOU  wrote:
>
> > PR 1907 has been merged. You can test with it.
> >
> >
> > 2017-03-01 14:12 GMT+01:00 Jeff Hair :
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > In the testing of PR 1908 (https://github.com/apache/
> > cloudstack/pull/1908
> > > ),
> > > it has come up that some IPs which are removed from the router get put
> > into
> > > the /etc/cloudstack/ips.json data bag with add = True. This causes the
> > IPs
> > > to be re-added to the interface and arpinged, breaking connectivity and
> > > causing IP conflicts.
> > >
> > > Does anyone know anything about this? Is it due to old routers that
> were
> > > affected by CLOUDSTACK-9500 (fixed in PR 1907), or is this behavior
> still
> > > actively happening on master?
> > >
> > > Jeff
> > >
> >
>

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

2017-03-01 Thread Rene Moser

Hi

While not be directly related to the clodustack java source code, any
RPM created using the specs from the repo e.g. from packages/centos7
and proceeding an upgrade, will hit CLOUDSTACK-9765, PR
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1923 fixes the issue.

Regards
René


On 03/01/2017 02:12 AM, Rajani Karuturi wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> I've created a 4.10.0.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
> 
> Git Branch and Commit
> SH:https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.10.0.0-RC20170301T0634
> Commit:7c1d003b5269b375d87f4f6cfff8a144f0608b67
> 
> 
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.10.0.0/
> 
> PGP release keys (signed using
> CBB44821):https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> 
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> 
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
> 
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> 
> 
> 
> ~Rajani
> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
>

Re: Removed IPs with add = true in /etc/cloudstack/ips.json on router

2017-03-01 Thread Jeff Hair

Yes, i know it's been merged. The problem is that this issue seems to come
up "randomly" (of course, nothing is ever really random), and I was
wondering if anyone else has run into it.

My initial testing of PR 1907 hasn't yielded the issue happening yet, and
the only place I've seen it so far is on a router that doesn't have 1907
applied. But I'm not convinced that it won't happen ever after applying
1907...

*Jeff Hair*
Technical Lead and Software Developer

Tel: (+354) 415 0200
j...@greenqloud.com
www.greenqloud.com

On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Wei ZHOU  wrote:

> PR 1907 has been merged. You can test with it.
>
>
> 2017-03-01 14:12 GMT+01:00 Jeff Hair :
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > In the testing of PR 1908 (https://github.com/apache/
> cloudstack/pull/1908
> > ),
> > it has come up that some IPs which are removed from the router get put
> into
> > the /etc/cloudstack/ips.json data bag with add = True. This causes the
> IPs
> > to be re-added to the interface and arpinged, breaking connectivity and
> > causing IP conflicts.
> >
> > Does anyone know anything about this? Is it due to old routers that were
> > affected by CLOUDSTACK-9500 (fixed in PR 1907), or is this behavior still
> > actively happening on master?
> >
> > Jeff
> >
>

Re: Removed IPs with add = true in /etc/cloudstack/ips.json on router

2017-03-01 Thread Wei ZHOU

PR 1907 has been merged. You can test with it.


2017-03-01 14:12 GMT+01:00 Jeff Hair :

> Hi,
>
> In the testing of PR 1908 (https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908
> ),
> it has come up that some IPs which are removed from the router get put into
> the /etc/cloudstack/ips.json data bag with add = True. This causes the IPs
> to be re-added to the interface and arpinged, breaking connectivity and
> causing IP conflicts.
>
> Does anyone know anything about this? Is it due to old routers that were
> affected by CLOUDSTACK-9500 (fixed in PR 1907), or is this behavior still
> actively happening on master?
>
> Jeff
>

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

2017-03-01 Thread Boris Stoyanov

Hi all,

Thanks for creating this release candidate Rajani.

I’ve run some upgrade tests and have some results to share with you all.
Hopefully we could address them.

4.5 -> 4.10

Following the upgrade instructions from this page:
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-release-notes/en/4.10/upgrade/upgrade-4.5.html

I’ve registered the template with the right naming: "systemvm-kvm-4.10”, waited
until it was in Ready status.

Then following the upgrade procedure, upgraded the management and the cs-agent.

Upon starting the management the db.upgrade kicked in, but it failed with the
following error:
com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: 4.6.0KVM SystemVm template not
found. Cannot upgrade system Vms

It appears that the upgrade script is still looking for 4.6 ssvm template while
a newer version is installed.

Created an issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9807

4.9 -> 4.10

Following the same source of information
(http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-release-notes/en/4.10/upgrade/upgrade-4.9.html)
I’ve registered the template with the right naming: "systemvm-kvm-4.10”, waited
until it was in Ready status.

Then upgraded management and the cloudstack-agent on all hosts.

Upon starting the management, the DB upgrade was successful. I’ve logged in the
system and observed that it was still using 4.6.0 ssvm templates. The option to
upgrade the VR wasn’t available as well. Checking global settings it turns out
minreq.sysvmtemplate.version = 4.6.0 and router.template.kvm was pointing to
the original ssmv template (not systemvm-kvm-4.10). The original ssvm template
is still in active state but it should be in InActive.
This basically leaves the user unable to upgrade ssvm (which are not working
btw) without hacking the DB and global settings

Created an issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9808

I think these two issues should be addressed in the db upgrade script.

Also it is worth mentioning that when you get to the point where you can see
the upgrade button on the VR, when clicking on it, it doesn’t do anything but
restarting. In order to actually upgrade the router you’ll need to do a network
restart (with cleanup option), which will recreate the router.

There are also smoketests running on fresh installations of 4.10. I’m expecting
the results to come up soon, I’ll keep you posted.

Thanks,
Boris Stoyanov

boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue

On Mar 1, 2017, at 9:21 AM, Wido den Hollander
> wrote:

Op 1 maart 2017 om 2:12 schreef Rajani Karuturi
>:

Hi All,

I've created a 4.10.0.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:

Git Branch and Commit
SH:https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.10.0.0-RC20170301T0634
Commit:7c1d003b5269b375d87f4f6cfff8a144f0608b67

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.10.0.0/

I get a 404 here. Am I too early to fetch the tarball?

I always prefer to test with a tarball instead of a Git repo. Trying to prevent
I accidentally test with a wrong commit/branch.

Wido

PGP release keys (signed using
CBB44821):https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
indicate "(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

~Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

Removed IPs with add = true in /etc/cloudstack/ips.json on router

2017-03-01 Thread Jeff Hair

Hi,

In the testing of PR 1908 (https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908),
it has come up that some IPs which are removed from the router get put into
the /etc/cloudstack/ips.json data bag with add = True. This causes the IPs
to be re-added to the interface and arpinged, breaking connectivity and
causing IP conflicts.

Does anyone know anything about this? Is it due to old routers that were
affected by CLOUDSTACK-9500 (fixed in PR 1907), or is this behavior still
actively happening on master?

Jeff

Re: Modern template hosting

2017-03-01 Thread Abhinandan Prateek


Initial seeding is a manual step and that is not going to change in near 
future. A handy list of official places from where these templates can be 
downloaded won’t harm this part of the installation. Just allow anyone credible 
who follows democratic process to publish their templates with apache’s 
blessings.


Coming to urls hard coded in db, the popular suggestion is to point them to 
mirrors. This looks good but this is going to take some effort that has not 
materialised yet. Once this change is made it will be going in some future 
release like 4.11; the problem still remains for the releases that are already 
out there. In case access to download.cloud.com is dropped at some point we 
will have to document the procedure such that people know how to make these 
stable releases work. That is where the procedure documented here 
https://shankerbalan.net/blog/seed-cloudstack-templates-offline/ should be 
officially adapted with a marketplace to pick up templates of choosing. Maybe 
we can have a pre-setup script to make choices instead of written wiki. Note 
that this will be anyway needed by the older releases.




On 01/03/17, 4:24 PM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:

>-1
>
>We are trying to get MORE people to use CloudStack.  And raising the barrier 
>to entry does nothing to help that.
>
>
>Kind regards,
>
>Paul Angus
>
>paul.an...@shapeblue.com 
>www.shapeblue.com
>53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
>@shapeblue
>  
> 
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com] 
>Sent: 01 March 2017 09:39
>To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Modern template hosting
>
>+1
>
>After seeing this discussion running in circles several times, I think we 
>should at least get started with the simplest option.
>
>
>
>
>On 27/02/17, 11:54 PM, "Chiradeep Vittal"  wrote:
>
>>The alternative foolproof way is to simply not provide the automatic 
>>download.
>>
>>Just document the mirror list URL where the templates can be found. I 
>>don't know why people reject this option.
>>
>>https://shankerbalan.net/blog/seed-cloudstack-templates-offline/
>>
>>On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Will Stevens 
>>
>>wrote:
>>
>>> OK. Thanks for the heads up.
>>>
>>> On Feb 27, 2017 1:08 PM, "Chiradeep Vittal"  wrote:
>>>
>>> > Sounds workable. The downloader code in the SSVM won't follow 
>>> > redirects I think.
>>> > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/5511065fc20787619d9cd0444
>>> > a65a3 155fc9c921/core/src/com/cloud/storage/template/
>>> > HttpTemplateDownloader.java#L93
>>> > https://goo.gl/dSi0r5
>>> >  Might need to add
>>> > client.setRedirectStrategy(new LaxRedirectStrategy());
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Will Stevens 
>>> > 
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > We haven't opened a ticket yet because we don't have a strategy yet.
>>> > >
>>> > > What do you guys think of this:
>>> > > - We setup a new github repo in the 'apache' org which consists 
>>> > > of a
>>> > single
>>> > > file with a list of active/supported mirrors.
>>> > > - I write a small web server, distributed as a binary, which can 
>>> > > be
>>> > hosted
>>> > > by ASF Infra.  This web server will query the current list of 
>>> > > mirrors
>>> and
>>> > > will select one and then do a 302 redirect to that mirror.
>>> > >
>>> > > The act of 'choosing' a mirror could be done in a number of ways.
>>> > > - If we want to define an order, then it could just try from the 
>>> > > top of
>>> > the
>>> > > list and work its way down.  It would curl the target to make 
>>> > > sure it
>>> > gets
>>> > > a 200 and if it does, it would do a 302 redirect.
>>> > > - Or, if we want to distribute the load across the mirrors, we 
>>> > > could
>>> pick
>>> > > from the list randomly.  Again, doing a curl to verify the mirror 
>>> > > is up
>>> > and
>>> > > then doing a redirect.
>>> > > - If we want to get fancy, we could do a reverse IP lookup and 
>>> > > try to
>>> > match
>>> > > the requester with their closest geographical mirror.
>>> > >
>>> > > Thoughts?
>>> > >
>>> > > *Will STEVENS*
>>> > > Lead Developer
>>> > >
>>> > > 
>>> > >
>>> > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <
>>> chirade...@gmail.com
>>> > >
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > What steps are needed to set up a mirror? What does Infra need to do?
>>> > Has
>>> > > > anybody filed a ticket with Infra?
>>> > > >
>>> > > > On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 10:17 PM, Raja Pullela < 
>>> > > > raja.pull...@accelerite.com>
>>> > > > wrote:
>>> > > >
>>> > > > > Hi will,
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > I believe, we didn’t get to close ‘getting a mirror on Apache’
>>> > because
>>> > > we
>>> > > > > needed someone on the Apache Infra side to close this. BTW, 
>>> > > > > cloudstack-apt.get.eu (I think Nux manages this?) has 
>>> > > > > all/most of
>>> > the
>>> > > > > content.  Once we can

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1257: CLOUDSTACK-9175: [VMware DRS] Adding new host to DRS...

2017-03-01 Thread sureshanaparti

Github user sureshanaparti commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1257
  
@rhtyd Above failures in the test results are not related to the changes in 
this PR.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1734: CLOUDSTACK-9567 Difference in the api call outputs f...

2017-03-01 Thread yvsubhash

Github user yvsubhash commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1734
  
LGTM for the code


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1734: CLOUDSTACK-9567 Difference in the api call outputs f...

Github user SudharmaJain commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1734
  
Rebased against master.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #868: CLOUDSTACK-8894: Restrict vGPU enabled VMs dynamic sc...

Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/868
  
### ACS CI BVT Run
 **Sumarry:**
 Build Number 407
 Hypervisor xenserver
 NetworkType Advanced
 Passed=105
 Failed=0
 Skipped=7

_Link to logs Folder (search by build_no):_ 
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/yj3wnzbceo9uef2/AAB6u-Iap-xztdm6jHX9SjPja?dl=0


**Failed tests:**

**Skipped tests:**
test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot
test_vm_nic_adapter_vmxnet3
test_static_role_account_acls
test_11_ss_nfs_version_on_ssvm
test_nested_virtualization_vmware
test_3d_gpu_support
test_deploy_vgpu_enabled_vm

**Passed test suits:**
test_deploy_vm_with_userdata.py
test_affinity_groups_projects.py
test_portable_publicip.py
test_over_provisioning.py
test_global_settings.py
test_scale_vm.py
test_service_offerings.py
test_routers_iptables_default_policy.py
test_loadbalance.py
test_routers.py
test_reset_vm_on_reboot.py
test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners.py
test_network.py
test_router_dns.py
test_non_contigiousvlan.py
test_login.py
test_deploy_vm_iso.py
test_list_ids_parameter.py
test_public_ip_range.py
test_multipleips_per_nic.py
test_regions.py
test_affinity_groups.py
test_network_acl.py
test_pvlan.py
test_volumes.py
test_nic.py
test_deploy_vm_root_resize.py
test_resource_detail.py
test_secondary_storage.py
test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_routers_network_ops.py
test_disk_offerings.py


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1980: CLOUDSTACK-9805: Display VR list in network details

2017-03-01 Thread koushik-das

Github user koushik-das commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1980
  
Is it only showing VR or other appliances providing service in that 
network? If it is the latter then the tab name is appropriate otherwise it is 
better to name it something like "Virtual Routers" to avoid confusion.
Verify that it is working as expected for RVR, VPC, basic zone network and 
other possible scenarios.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

RE: Introducing Vishwas

2017-03-01 Thread Vishwas Pathak

Thanks Everyone for Warm welcome.. ..:-) 

-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2017 12:52 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Introducing Vishwas

Welcome Vishwas.

Regards.

From: Vishwas Pathak 
Sent: 24 February 2017 14:38:10
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Introducing Vishwas

Hello CloudStack team,

My name is Vishwas Pathak and I am working with Accelerite CloudPlatform 
testing team. Earlier I have worked in storage systems, cloud computing, 
virtualization and telecom messaging domains. Excited to be part of this 
community and happy to contribute.

Currently I am working on testing the Accelerite CloudPlatform product. So far 
have worked on Xen server and VMWare based environments. Did some testing for 
KVM as well.

Looking forward to work with all of you.

Regards,
Vishwas Pathak
www.accelerite.com

DISCLAIMER
==
This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is the 
property of Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business. It is intended only for 
the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain, copy, print, 
distribute or use this message. If you have received this communication in 
error, please notify the sender and delete all copies of this message. 
Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business does not accept any liability for 
virus infected mails.

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue

DISCLAIMER
==
This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is the 
property of Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business. It is intended only for 
the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain, copy, print, 
distribute or use this message. If you have received this communication in 
error, please notify the sender and delete all copies of this message. 
Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business does not accept any liability for 
virus infected mails.

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #892: CLOUDSTACK-8910: The reserved_capacity field increase...

2017-03-01 Thread sudhansu7

Github user sudhansu7 commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/892
  
LGTM for code changes.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #892: CLOUDSTACK-8910: The reserved_capacity field increase...

Github user SudharmaJain commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/892
  
Rebased against master.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1978: CLOUDSTACK-9779 : Releasing secondary guest IP fails...

Github user SudharmaJain commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1978
  
LGTM for the code changes. 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1949: Automated Cloudstack bugs 9277 9276 9275 9274 9273 9...

2017-03-01 Thread shwetaag

Github user shwetaag commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1949
  
Closing and reopening this PR as two travis runs have given two different 
failures


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1949: Automated Cloudstack bugs 9277 9276 9275 9274...

2017-03-01 Thread shwetaag

Github user shwetaag closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1949


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1949: Automated Cloudstack bugs 9277 9276 9275 9274...

2017-03-01 Thread shwetaag

GitHub user shwetaag reopened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1949

Automated Cloudstack bugs 9277 9276 9275 9274 9273 9179 9178 9177 

Addressed all review comments. Changed all URL to pubic available url where 
ever possible . For few  tests needing rhel7 template or windows server 
templates added a comment in test case to provide a valid urls for those 
templates before executing those test cases

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/shwetaag/cloudstack cruds2

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1949.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1949


commit 3e3a403208d07a2cbd61da916224a4ffda17fbc7
Author: shweta agarwal 
Date:   2016-02-04T06:49:39Z

automated 9277 9276 9275 9274 9273 9179 9178 9177

commit 15badc456b039ab40378c30df7285cf638cc1fd7
Author: shweta 
Date:   2017-02-17T10:03:45Z

Adressed review comment for automating bugs 9277 9276 9275 9274 9273 9179 
9178 9177




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1981: CLOUDSTACK-9806: Nuage domain template selection per...

2017-03-01 Thread prashanthvarma

Github user prashanthvarma commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1981
  
PEP8 & PyFlakes compliance of our marvin test code:

CloudStack$
CloudStack$ pep8 test/integration/plugins/nuagevsp/.py
CloudStack$
CloudStack$ pyflakes test/integration/plugins/nuagevsp/.py
CloudStack$

Validations:

Marvin test results:

nosetests --with-marvin --marvin-config=nuage.cfg 
nuagevsp/test_nuage_vsp_domain_template.py

Test Nuage VSP Domain Template selection per VPC ... === TestName: 
test_01_nuage_Domain_Template_selection_per_VPC | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Nuage VSP Domain Template selection per VPC as ROOT domain ... === 
TestName: test_02_nuage_Domain_Template_selection_per_VPC_as_ROOT_user | Status 
: SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Nuage VSP Domain Template selection per VPC as domain admin ... === 
TestName: test_03_nuage_Domain_Template_selection_per_VPC_as_domain_admin | 
Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Nuage VSP Domain Template selection per VPC as domain ... === 
TestName: test_04_nuage_Domain_Template_selection_per_VPC_as_domain_user | 
Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Nuage VSP Domain Template selection per VPC as subdomain admin ... === 
TestName: test_05_nuage_Domain_Template_selection_per_VPC_as_subdom_admin | 
Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Nuage VSP Domain Template selection per VPC as subdomain ... === 
TestName: test_06_nuage_Domain_Template_selection_per_VPC_as_subdom_user | 
Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Nuage VSP Global Domain Template ... === TestName: 
test_07_nuage_Global_Domain_Template | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Nuage VSP Global Domain Template as ROOT domain regular user ... === 
TestName: test_08_nuage_Global_Domain_Template_as_ROOT_user | Status : SUCCESS 
===
ok
Test Nuage VSP Global Domain Template as domain admin user ... === 
TestName: test_09_nuage_Global_Domain_Template_as_domain_admin | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Nuage VSP Global Domain Template as domain regular user ... === 
TestName: test_10_nuage_Global_Domain_Template_as_domain_user | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Nuage VSP Global Domain Template as subdomain admin user ... === 
TestName: test_11_nuage_Global_Domain_Template_as_subdomain_admin | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Nuage VSP Global Domain Template as subdomain regular user ... === 
TestName: test_12_nuage_Global_Domain_Template_as_subdomain_user | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok

--
Ran 12 tests in 6203.613s

OK


[results.txt](https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/files/810482/results.txt)
[runinfo.txt](https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/files/810483/runinfo.txt)



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1980: CLOUDSTACK-9805: Display VR list in network details

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1980
  
@PaulAngus @ustcweizhou fixed now, the tab is displayed only to admins.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1981: CLOUDSTACK-9806: Nuage domain template selection per...

2017-03-01 Thread prashanthvarma

Github user prashanthvarma commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1981
  
Design document for this feature: 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Nuage+domain+template+selection+per+VPC


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1981: CLOUDSTACK-9806: Nuage domain template select...

2017-03-01 Thread prashanthvarma

GitHub user prashanthvarma opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1981

CLOUDSTACK-9806: Nuage domain template selection per VPC

Co-Authored-By: Prashanth Manthena 
Co-Authored-By: Frank Maximus 

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/nuagenetworks/cloudstack 
feature/nuage_vpc_selectable_domain_template

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1981.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1981


commit 55ce0d91805fc4807952ead3f8160eae589038ab
Author: Sigert Goeminne 
Date:   2016-10-06T12:30:59Z

CLOUDSTACK-9806: Nuage domain template selection per VPC

Co-Authored-By: Prashanth Manthena 
Co-Authored-By: Frank Maximus 




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

RE: Modern template hosting

2017-03-01 Thread Paul Angus

-1

We are trying to get MORE people to use CloudStack.  And raising the barrier to 
entry does nothing to help that.


Kind regards,

Paul Angus

paul.an...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 


-Original Message-
From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com] 
Sent: 01 March 2017 09:39
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Modern template hosting

+1

After seeing this discussion running in circles several times, I think we 
should at least get started with the simplest option.




On 27/02/17, 11:54 PM, "Chiradeep Vittal"  wrote:

>The alternative foolproof way is to simply not provide the automatic 
>download.
>
>Just document the mirror list URL where the templates can be found. I 
>don't know why people reject this option.
>
>https://shankerbalan.net/blog/seed-cloudstack-templates-offline/
>
>On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Will Stevens 
>
>wrote:
>
>> OK. Thanks for the heads up.
>>
>> On Feb 27, 2017 1:08 PM, "Chiradeep Vittal"  wrote:
>>
>> > Sounds workable. The downloader code in the SSVM won't follow 
>> > redirects I think.
>> > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/5511065fc20787619d9cd0444
>> > a65a3 155fc9c921/core/src/com/cloud/storage/template/
>> > HttpTemplateDownloader.java#L93
>> > https://goo.gl/dSi0r5
>> >  Might need to add
>> > client.setRedirectStrategy(new LaxRedirectStrategy());
>> >
>> > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Will Stevens 
>> > 
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > We haven't opened a ticket yet because we don't have a strategy yet.
>> > >
>> > > What do you guys think of this:
>> > > - We setup a new github repo in the 'apache' org which consists 
>> > > of a
>> > single
>> > > file with a list of active/supported mirrors.
>> > > - I write a small web server, distributed as a binary, which can 
>> > > be
>> > hosted
>> > > by ASF Infra.  This web server will query the current list of 
>> > > mirrors
>> and
>> > > will select one and then do a 302 redirect to that mirror.
>> > >
>> > > The act of 'choosing' a mirror could be done in a number of ways.
>> > > - If we want to define an order, then it could just try from the 
>> > > top of
>> > the
>> > > list and work its way down.  It would curl the target to make 
>> > > sure it
>> > gets
>> > > a 200 and if it does, it would do a 302 redirect.
>> > > - Or, if we want to distribute the load across the mirrors, we 
>> > > could
>> pick
>> > > from the list randomly.  Again, doing a curl to verify the mirror 
>> > > is up
>> > and
>> > > then doing a redirect.
>> > > - If we want to get fancy, we could do a reverse IP lookup and 
>> > > try to
>> > match
>> > > the requester with their closest geographical mirror.
>> > >
>> > > Thoughts?
>> > >
>> > > *Will STEVENS*
>> > > Lead Developer
>> > >
>> > > 
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <
>> chirade...@gmail.com
>> > >
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > What steps are needed to set up a mirror? What does Infra need to do?
>> > Has
>> > > > anybody filed a ticket with Infra?
>> > > >
>> > > > On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 10:17 PM, Raja Pullela < 
>> > > > raja.pull...@accelerite.com>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Hi will,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I believe, we didn’t get to close ‘getting a mirror on Apache’
>> > because
>> > > we
>> > > > > needed someone on the Apache Infra side to close this. BTW, 
>> > > > > cloudstack-apt.get.eu (I think Nux manages this?) has 
>> > > > > all/most of
>> > the
>> > > > > content.  Once we can close on the Apache mirror for hosting 
>> > > > > the
>> > > > content, I
>> > > > > can help assist getting the content there.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > For now, we have replicated the download.cloud.com content to 
>> > > > > ‘ s3.download.accelerite.com’.
>> > > > > Also, we are working on a set of steps/procedure to help with 
>> > > > > this change.  I will update everyone in about a week’s time 
>> > > > > on the
>> > details.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Best,
>> > > > > Raja Pullela
>> > > > > Engineering Team,
>> > > > > Accelerite, 2055 Laurelwood Road, Santa Clara, CA, 95054
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On 2/24/17, 11:23 PM, "williamstev...@gmail.com on behalf of 
>> > > > > Will Stevens" > > wstev...@cloudops.com>
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > unfortunately the template mirror conversation got caught up 
>> > > > > in
>> > details
>> > > > and
>> > > > > nobody took the lead on implementing a solution.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > citrix has been pinging me every couple months to say 'dude, 
>> > > > > we
>> need
>> > to
>> > > > > remove the dependency on download.citrix.com', but i have not 
>> > > > > had
>> > the
>> > > > > cycles to get in and solve the problem.  the shutdown of that 
>> > > > > is
>> > > imminent
>> > > > > right now, so we need to solve it asap.
>> > > > >

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1734: CLOUDSTACK-9567 Difference in the api call outputs f...

Github user SudharmaJain commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1734
  
@jburwell As suggested, I have added a marvin test case to verify the fix. 
Should I add it to smoke test suite.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1771: CLOUDSTACK-9611: Dedicating a Guest VLAN range to Pr...

2017-03-01 Thread nitin-maharana

Github user nitin-maharana commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1771
  
@ustcweizhou : I have modified the code, can you review it one more time. 
Please see the below snapshot.

https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/12583725/23455743/b4d7be00-fe96-11e6-8a41-398c41f6d019.png;>


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1980: CLOUDSTACK-9805: Display VR list in network details

Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1980
  
tested. LGTM


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1278: CLOUDSTACK-9198: Virtual router gets deployed in dis...

Github user abhinandanprateek commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1278
  
@anshul1886 @koushik-das I think with above info the fix looks good.

LGTM.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1278: CLOUDSTACK-9198: Virtual router gets deployed in dis...

Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1278
  
@abhinandanprateek @koushik-das That change is intentional to allow admin 
users to deploy VM on disabled. Ticket which shows that it is intentional  
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7047.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1908: CLOUDSTACK-9317: Fixed disable static nat on leaving...

2017-03-01 Thread ProjectMoon

Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908
  
@jayapalu Quite possible, yes. It could be fixed by adding another 
condition to the check that was added with #1907. It could also be "fixed" by 
checkiing if `configured()` returns `True` in the `arpPing()` method of the 
`CsIp` class. But I'm guessing that it doesn't get properly deleted from the 
DataBag when it's removed from the router. Thus it just gets written to 
`/etc/cloudstack/ips.json` again.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1980: CLOUDSTACK-9805: Display VR list in network details

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1980
  
@ustcweizhou @PaulAngus sure, I can add a tab filter to allow only admins 
to see this. Right now, whoever can see the network tab(s) can see this tab 
too. I'll fix this asap.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1774: CLOUDSTACK-9608: Errored State and Abandoned state T...

2017-03-01 Thread priyankparihar

Github user priyankparihar commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1774
  
@borisstoyanov Could you please provide management server log for analyzing 
this failure ?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1773: CLOUDSTACK-9607: Preventing template deletion when t...

Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1773
  
LGTM


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: Modern template hosting

2017-03-01 Thread Abhinandan Prateek

+1

After seeing this discussion running in circles several times, I think we 
should at least get started with the simplest option.




On 27/02/17, 11:54 PM, "Chiradeep Vittal"  wrote:

>The alternative foolproof way is to simply not provide the automatic
>download.
>
>Just document the mirror list URL where the templates can be found. I don't
>know why people reject this option.
>
>https://shankerbalan.net/blog/seed-cloudstack-templates-offline/
>
>On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Will Stevens 
>wrote:
>
>> OK. Thanks for the heads up.
>>
>> On Feb 27, 2017 1:08 PM, "Chiradeep Vittal"  wrote:
>>
>> > Sounds workable. The downloader code in the SSVM won't follow redirects I
>> > think.
>> > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/5511065fc20787619d9cd0444a65a3
>> > 155fc9c921/core/src/com/cloud/storage/template/
>> > HttpTemplateDownloader.java#L93
>> > https://goo.gl/dSi0r5
>> >  Might need to add
>> > client.setRedirectStrategy(new LaxRedirectStrategy());
>> >
>> > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Will Stevens 
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > We haven't opened a ticket yet because we don't have a strategy yet.
>> > >
>> > > What do you guys think of this:
>> > > - We setup a new github repo in the 'apache' org which consists of a
>> > single
>> > > file with a list of active/supported mirrors.
>> > > - I write a small web server, distributed as a binary, which can be
>> > hosted
>> > > by ASF Infra.  This web server will query the current list of mirrors
>> and
>> > > will select one and then do a 302 redirect to that mirror.
>> > >
>> > > The act of 'choosing' a mirror could be done in a number of ways.
>> > > - If we want to define an order, then it could just try from the top of
>> > the
>> > > list and work its way down.  It would curl the target to make sure it
>> > gets
>> > > a 200 and if it does, it would do a 302 redirect.
>> > > - Or, if we want to distribute the load across the mirrors, we could
>> pick
>> > > from the list randomly.  Again, doing a curl to verify the mirror is up
>> > and
>> > > then doing a redirect.
>> > > - If we want to get fancy, we could do a reverse IP lookup and try to
>> > match
>> > > the requester with their closest geographical mirror.
>> > >
>> > > Thoughts?
>> > >
>> > > *Will STEVENS*
>> > > Lead Developer
>> > >
>> > > 
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <
>> chirade...@gmail.com
>> > >
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > What steps are needed to set up a mirror? What does Infra need to do?
>> > Has
>> > > > anybody filed a ticket with Infra?
>> > > >
>> > > > On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 10:17 PM, Raja Pullela <
>> > > > raja.pull...@accelerite.com>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Hi will,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I believe, we didn’t get to close ‘getting a mirror on Apache’
>> > because
>> > > we
>> > > > > needed someone on the Apache Infra side to close this. BTW,
>> > > > > cloudstack-apt.get.eu (I think Nux manages this?) has all/most of
>> > the
>> > > > > content.  Once we can close on the Apache mirror for hosting the
>> > > > content, I
>> > > > > can help assist getting the content there.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > For now, we have replicated the download.cloud.com content to ‘
>> > > > > s3.download.accelerite.com’.
>> > > > > Also, we are working on a set of steps/procedure to help with this
>> > > > > change.  I will update everyone in about a week’s time on the
>> > details.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Best,
>> > > > > Raja Pullela
>> > > > > Engineering Team,
>> > > > > Accelerite, 2055 Laurelwood Road,
>> > > > > Santa Clara, CA, 95054
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On 2/24/17, 11:23 PM, "williamstev...@gmail.com on behalf of Will
>> > > > > Stevens" > > wstev...@cloudops.com>
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > unfortunately the template mirror conversation got caught up in
>> > details
>> > > > and
>> > > > > nobody took the lead on implementing a solution.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > citrix has been pinging me every couple months to say 'dude, we
>> need
>> > to
>> > > > > remove the dependency on download.citrix.com', but i have not had
>> > the
>> > > > > cycles to get in and solve the problem.  the shutdown of that is
>> > > imminent
>> > > > > right now, so we need to solve it asap.
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > *Will STEVENS*
>> > > > > Lead Developer
>> > > > >
>> > > > > 
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Paul Angus <
>> > paul.an...@shapeblue.com
>> > > >
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Hi Nathan,
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Ideally, if you put the template location in (or use a template
>> > > defined
>> > > > > > in)  test_data.py then the actual location can be overridden by
>> > > anyone
>> > > > > > testing.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > For Trillian, we've copied all of the templates that people have
>> > > define

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1980: CLOUDSTACK-9805: Display VR list in network details

Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1980
  
is there any issue for normal users ?



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1771: CLOUDSTACK-9611: Dedicating a Guest VLAN range to Pr...

2017-03-01 Thread nitin-maharana

Github user nitin-maharana commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1771
  
@ustcweizhou : You are correct. We have to remove the domain scope. If we 
support the domain scope, we need more changes on the logic. In that case we 
can create a new ticket for that. 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1980: CLOUDSTACK-9805: Display VR list in network details

2017-03-01 Thread PaulAngus

Github user PaulAngus commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1980
  
Who (user type) has visibility tab of this tab?
can it be hidden ? many service providers **_may_** not want users to see 
this.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1771: CLOUDSTACK-9611: Dedicating a Guest VLAN range to Pr...

Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1771
  
@nitin-maharana I thought dedicating guest vlan range is already 
implemented in CLOUDSTACK-8958.
Actually they are two stories.
In this case, we have to remove the Domain scope from UI as it is not 
supported, unless you make more changes to support it (similar to 
37301ed4540450c29be4f975d58b38dbeec6c296 for CLOUDSTACK-8958).


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1278: CLOUDSTACK-9198: Virtual router gets deployed in dis...

Github user abhinandanprateek commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1278
  
@koushik-das @anshul1886 If we allow admin to deploy resources on disabled 
resources then this fix is fine. Even with the fix a non admin user will be 
able to restart a VM on a disabled resource, so limited by that. Boils down to 
definition of disabled.
I had done a fix in past that will prevent deployment on disabled pods even 
for admin, created a Pr for that now, check this out too: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1979/files. I think it just boils 
down to the definition of disabled.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1980: CLOUDSTACK-9805: Display VR list in network d...

GitHub user rhtyd opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1980

CLOUDSTACK-9805: Display VR list in network details

![screenshot from 2017-03-01 
14-52-26](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/95203/23453709/64f31f8a-fe8f-11e6-8281-a06e27bf3a14.png)

Displays a VR tab that lists VRs for the network in the detail views. This 
has come up several times, and useful for admins when they want to 
reboot/destroy or view VR associated with a network.

Pinging for review - @abhinandanprateek @borisstoyanov @DaanHoogland 
@PaulAngus @karuturi @koushik-das 

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/shapeblue/cloudstack vr-ui-tab

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1980.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1980


commit 20d16c8c272faaf78a17d64f2e4a129f45504775
Author: Rohit Yadav 
Date:   2017-03-01T09:22:13Z

CLOUDSTACK-9805: Display VR list in network details

Displays a VR tab that lists VRs for the network in the detail views

Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav 




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1813: CLOUDSTACK-9604: Root disk resize support for VMware...

Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1813
  
It's a NPE
```
2017-03-01 09:18:09,343 INFO  [c.c.h.v.r.VmwareResource] 
(DirectAgentCronJob-70:ctx-46e74661) (logid:9541e85e) Scan hung worker VM to 
recycle
2017-03-01 09:18:09,399 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache] 
(DirectAgentCronJob-70:ctx-46e74661) (logid:9541e85e) Ping from 2(10.2.2.88)
2017-03-01 09:18:09,399 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachinePowerStateSyncImpl] 
(DirectAgentCronJob-70:ctx-46e74661) (logid:9541e85e) Process host VM state 
report from ping process. host: 2
2017-03-01 09:18:09,403 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachinePowerStateSyncImpl] 
(DirectAgentCronJob-70:ctx-46e74661) (logid:9541e85e) Process VM state report. 
host: 2, number of records in report: 2
2017-03-01 09:18:09,403 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachinePowerStateSyncImpl] 
(DirectAgentCronJob-70:ctx-46e74661) (logid:9541e85e) VM state report. host: 2, 
vm id: 1, power state: PowerOn
2017-03-01 09:18:09,405 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachinePowerStateSyncImpl] 
(DirectAgentCronJob-70:ctx-46e74661) (logid:9541e85e) VM power state does not 
change, skip DB writing. vm id: 1
2017-03-01 09:18:09,405 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachinePowerStateSyncImpl] 
(DirectAgentCronJob-70:ctx-46e74661) (logid:9541e85e) VM state report. host: 2, 
vm id: 2, power state: PowerOn
2017-03-01 09:18:09,407 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachinePowerStateSyncImpl] 
(DirectAgentCronJob-70:ctx-46e74661) (logid:9541e85e) VM power state does not 
change, skip DB writing. vm id: 2
2017-03-01 09:18:09,409 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachinePowerStateSyncImpl] 
(DirectAgentCronJob-70:ctx-46e74661) (logid:9541e85e) Done with process of VM 
state report. host: 2
2017-03-01 09:18:10,686 DEBUG [c.c.s.StatsCollector] 
(StatsCollector-3:ctx-7fe352c2) (logid:5171a11d) 
HostOutOfBandManagementStatsCollector is running...
2017-03-01 09:18:11,018 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.AgentManagerImpl] 
(AgentManager-Handler-11:null) (logid:) SeqA 3-119: Processing Seq 3-119:  { 
Cmd , MgmtId: -1, via: 3, Ver: v1, Flags: 11, 
[{"com.cloud.agent.api.ConsoleProxyLoadReportCommand":{"_proxyVmId":1,"_loadInfo":"{\n
  \"connections\": []\n}","wait":0}}] }
2017-03-01 09:18:11,023 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.AgentManagerImpl] 
(AgentManager-Handler-11:null) (logid:) SeqA 3-119: Sending Seq 3-119:  { Ans: 
, MgmtId: 7222893545287, via: 3, Ver: v1, Flags: 100010, 
[{"com.cloud.agent.api.AgentControlAnswer":{"result":true,"wait":0}}] }
2017-03-01 09:18:11,571 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.AgentManagerImpl] 
(AgentManager-Handler-10:null) (logid:) Ping from 4(s-2-VM)
2017-03-01 09:18:11,755 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.AgentManagerImpl] 
(AgentManager-Handler-14:null) (logid:) Ping from 3(v-1-VM)
^[[1;9D2017-03-01 09:18:14,974 INFO  [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl] 
(AsyncJobMgr-Heartbeat-1:ctx-d9c806b4) (logid:1458d11b) Begin cleanup expired 
async-jobs
2017-03-01 09:18:14,980 INFO  [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl] 
(AsyncJobMgr-Heartbeat-1:ctx-d9c806b4) (logid:1458d11b) End cleanup expired 
async-jobs
2017-03-01 09:18:15,320 DEBUG [c.c.n.r.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] 
(RouterStatusMonitor-1:ctx-4ff63676) (logid:883b6d34) Found 0 routers to update 
status.
2017-03-01 09:18:15,321 DEBUG [c.c.n.r.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] 
(RouterStatusMonitor-1:ctx-4ff63676) (logid:883b6d34) Found 0 VPC networks to 
update Redundant State.
2017-03-01 09:18:15,322 DEBUG [c.c.n.r.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] 
(RouterStatusMonitor-1:ctx-4ff63676) (logid:883b6d34) Found 0 networks to 
update RvR status.
2017-03-01 09:18:15,687 DEBUG [c.c.s.StatsCollector] 
(StatsCollector-3:ctx-0dd9) (logid:51552762) 
HostOutOfBandManagementStatsCollector is running...
2017-03-01 09:18:17,306 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet] 
(catalina-exec-7:ctx-353f8336) (logid:0d215557) ===START===  10.5.0.15 -- GET  
apiKey=LIN6rqXuaJwMPfGYFh13qDwYz5VNNz1J2J6qIOWcd3oLQOq0WtD4CwRundBL6rzXToa3lQOC_vKjI3nkHtiD8Q=listDomains=taHWwbdB2MfrjDaU2iur%2FdKK3ew%3D=json
2017-03-01 09:18:17,321 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet] 
(catalina-exec-7:ctx-353f8336 ctx-ac65f9a7 ctx-2f0b4e99) (logid:0d215557) 
===END===  10.5.0.15 -- GET  
apiKey=LIN6rqXuaJwMPfGYFh13qDwYz5VNNz1J2J6qIOWcd3oLQOq0WtD4CwRundBL6rzXToa3lQOC_vKjI3nkHtiD8Q=listDomains=taHWwbdB2MfrjDaU2iur%2FdKK3ew%3D=json
2017-03-01 09:18:17,328 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet] 
(catalina-exec-6:ctx-3f88e3d1) (logid:b5e4e800) ===START===  10.5.0.15 -- GET  
apiKey=LIN6rqXuaJwMPfGYFh13qDwYz5VNNz1J2J6qIOWcd3oLQOq0WtD4CwRundBL6rzXToa3lQOC_vKjI3nkHtiD8Q=pr1813-t920-vmware-60u2=listZones=2WSEhLiR742m7RumG99EfWta9xU%3D=json
2017-03-01 09:18:17,339 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet] 
(catalina-exec-6:ctx-3f88e3d1 ctx-e7fcbc14 ctx-77e33e86) (logid:b5e4e800) 
===END===  10.5.0.15 -- GET  
apiKey=LIN6rqXuaJwMPfGYFh13qDwYz5VNNz1J2J6qIOWcd3oLQOq0WtD4CwRundBL6rzXToa3lQOC_vKjI3nkHtiD8Q=pr1813-t920-vmware-60u2=listZones=2WSEhLiR742m7RumG99EfWta9xU%3D=json
2017-03-01 09:18:17,345 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet]

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1771: CLOUDSTACK-9611: Dedicating a Guest VLAN range to Pr...

2017-03-01 Thread nitin-maharana

Github user nitin-maharana commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1771
  
@ustcweizhou : Passing project with domain won't create any issue but not 
passing any account details when we call the API from default view creates an 
issue. Because the internal logic expects account owner of VLAN when dedicated 
from the default view. In the case of project view, it gets the account detail 
from selected project.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1979: CLOUDSTACK-9198: Donot allow VMs to be deplye...

GitHub user abhinandanprateek opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1979

CLOUDSTACK-9198: Donot allow VMs to be deplyed on host that are in diâ¦

â¦sabled pod


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/shapeblue/cloudstack CLOUDSTACK-9198

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1979.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1979


commit c7ba2124bbfd03ca2835b5b1affc8fc876fb4154
Author: Abhinandan Prateek 
Date:   2017-01-13T08:07:42Z

CLOUDSTACK-9198: Donot allow VMs to be deplyed on host that are in disabled 
pod

Signed-off-by: Abhinandan Prateek 




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #874: CLOUDSTACK-8897: baremetal:addHost:make host tag info...

2017-03-01 Thread harikrishna-patnala

Github user harikrishna-patnala commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/874
  
I have updated the PR based on the comments. Please review.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1813: CLOUDSTACK-9604: Root disk resize support for VMware...

Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1813
  
@serg38 Unfortunately the instances are being expunged right after tests 
are complete. I can create an env manually and run the root_resize test for 
you. Will keep you posted. 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1278: CLOUDSTACK-9198: Virtual router gets deployed in dis...

Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1278
  
@abhinandanprateek #1860 should take care of last host id scenario. Other 
case of user specifying host, should we not allow deploying VM in disabled Pod? 
That's a separate issue by the way.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1278: CLOUDSTACK-9198: Virtual router gets deployed in dis...

2017-03-01 Thread koushik-das

Github user koushik-das commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1278
  
I think disabled resource related checks are only applicable for regular 
users, root/system users can go ahead and deploy VMs in disabled resources as 
well.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1278: CLOUDSTACK-9198: Virtual router gets deployed in dis...