from:"Milamber"


Hello Remi,

I've tested with router.aggregation.command.each.timeout global set to 
20 without success: same issue (kill in around 5-7 min after the restart 
command)

and with 3600 sec : same issue (kill)

(on 4.7.1 RC fresh install)

Milamber

On 24/01/2016 06:57, Remi Bergsma wrote:

Hi,

We have seen this issue sometimes in the VRs from 4.6 and on. There have been 
several improvements in the code in 4.7.

Also, setting router.aggregation.command.each.timeout global setting to 15 or 
20 also may help (restart mgt server after change).

@Milamber can you test this setting with 4.7.1RC please? I haven't seen this 
issue in my test and production systems.

Thanks, Remi

Sent from my iPhone


On 24 Jan 2016, at 00:49, Milamber <milam...@apache.org> wrote:


Hello,

I've have a similiar issue without solution (but not with an upgrade from 4.5), 
please see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9255

Milamber


On 24/01/2016 03:32, Daniel Mezentsev wrote:
Hi All,

I've got some issue after i did cloudstack upgrade 4.5 -> 4.6.2.
Environment has 8 VR, 6 were upgraded and restarted successfully, 2 of them
stuck. I removed them - the same result, i can't boot them, restarted
network with clean-up - no luck.
VR actually is starting, i can ssh to it, but it's shuting down in approx 5
minutes. I can extend it runing
"init 3" command, but cloudstack is not detecting router state.

I can bing some VMs within the same subnet, so it's not VLAN/network issue.

Completely ran out of ideas.
Should mention network offering is Isolated network without NAT.

Any help is more then welcome. I can provide any related log, but i need
some heads-up what i should look for.
Daniel Mezentsev, founder
(+1) 604 313 8592.
Soleks Data Group.
Shaping the clouds.

Re: Issue with VR after upgrade to 4.6.2



If I disassociated 10 public IPs and keep 10 public IPs (but keep 20 vms 
associated with the network), the network (virtual router) restart with 
clean up successfully (around in 3 min).
I thinks that is a timeout problem (or VR scripts performance)... but 
which timeout parameter?




On 24/01/2016 09:43, Milamber wrote:


Please note, my installation type is Advanced network without security 
groups (vlan isolation).


On 24/01/2016 06:57, Remi Bergsma wrote:

Hi,

We have seen this issue sometimes in the VRs from 4.6 and on. There 
have been several improvements in the code in 4.7.


Also, setting router.aggregation.command.each.timeout global setting 
to 15 or 20 also may help (restart mgt server after change).


@Milamber can you test this setting with 4.7.1RC please? I haven't 
seen this issue in my test and production systems.


Thanks, Remi

Sent from my iPhone


On 24 Jan 2016, at 00:49, Milamber <milam...@apache.org> wrote:


Hello,

I've have a similiar issue without solution (but not with an upgrade 
from 4.5), please see

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9255

Milamber


On 24/01/2016 03:32, Daniel Mezentsev wrote:
Hi All,

I've got some issue after i did cloudstack upgrade 4.5 -> 4.6.2.
Environment has 8 VR, 6 were upgraded and restarted successfully, 2 
of them

stuck. I removed them - the same result, i can't boot them, restarted
network with clean-up - no luck.
VR actually is starting, i can ssh to it, but it's shuting down in 
approx 5

minutes. I can extend it runing
"init 3" command, but cloudstack is not detecting router state.

I can bing some VMs within the same subnet, so it's not 
VLAN/network issue.


Completely ran out of ideas.
Should mention network offering is Isolated network without NAT.

Any help is more then welcome. I can provide any related log, but i 
need

some heads-up what i should look for.
Daniel Mezentsev, founder
(+1) 604 313 8592.
Soleks Data Group.
Shaping the clouds.

Re: Issue with VR after upgrade to 4.6.2



Please note, my installation type is Advanced network without security 
groups (vlan isolation).


On 24/01/2016 06:57, Remi Bergsma wrote:

Hi,

We have seen this issue sometimes in the VRs from 4.6 and on. There have been 
several improvements in the code in 4.7.

Also, setting router.aggregation.command.each.timeout global setting to 15 or 
20 also may help (restart mgt server after change).

@Milamber can you test this setting with 4.7.1RC please? I haven't seen this 
issue in my test and production systems.

Thanks, Remi

Sent from my iPhone


On 24 Jan 2016, at 00:49, Milamber <milam...@apache.org> wrote:


Hello,

I've have a similiar issue without solution (but not with an upgrade from 4.5), 
please see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9255

Milamber


On 24/01/2016 03:32, Daniel Mezentsev wrote:
Hi All,

I've got some issue after i did cloudstack upgrade 4.5 -> 4.6.2.
Environment has 8 VR, 6 were upgraded and restarted successfully, 2 of them
stuck. I removed them - the same result, i can't boot them, restarted
network with clean-up - no luck.
VR actually is starting, i can ssh to it, but it's shuting down in approx 5
minutes. I can extend it runing
"init 3" command, but cloudstack is not detecting router state.

I can bing some VMs within the same subnet, so it's not VLAN/network issue.

Completely ran out of ideas.
Should mention network offering is Isolated network without NAT.

Any help is more then welcome. I can provide any related log, but i need
some heads-up what i should look for.
Daniel Mezentsev, founder
(+1) 604 313 8592.
Soleks Data Group.
Shaping the clouds.

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.8.0


Hello,

My vote +1 (binding)


My tests (Tests are passed on a CloudStack (1mgr+4nodes+2nfs) in real 
servers topology) :


1/ Fresh install of 4.8.0RC1 (adv net) on Ubuntu 14.04.3 + KVM + NFS : OK
Some standard tests (create vm, migration, HA, create networks (normal 
and RVR), create user, create ssh key, destroy vm, register template, 
create snapshot, restore snapshot, create template, ip association, ip 
release, static nat, firewall rule)
Some tests with cloudstack ansible module (create network, register 
templates, create vm, ip, firewall rule)


2/ Test upgrade from 4.7.0 to 4.8.0RC1 : OK

3/ Test upgrade from 4.7.1RC1 to 4.8.0RC1 : OK

4/ Tests all localization of Web UI (with a complete installation of CS) 
: local strings works wells except some strings in Spanish and Arabic.



Known issue (but not only for this version): 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9255


Thanks to RM team.

Milamber

On 20/01/2016 23:01, Remi Bergsma wrote:

Hi all,

I've created a 4.8.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a 
vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=4.8.0-RC20160120T2343

Commit: 62f218b7bd005d201d1c8516180d8e6d6797

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.8.0/

PGP release keys (signed using A47DDC4F):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for at least 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate 
"(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.7.1


Hello,

My vote +1 (binding)


My tests (Tests are passed on a CloudStack (1mgr+4nodes+2nfs) in real 
servers topology) :


1/ Fresh install of 4.7.1RC1 (adv net) on Ubuntu 14.04.3 + KVM + NFS : OK
Some standard tests (create vm, migration, HA, create networks (normal 
and RVR), create user, create ssh key, destroy vm, register template, 
create snapshot, restore snapshot, create template, ip association, ip 
release, static nat, firewall rule)
Some tests with cloudstack ansible module (create network, register 
templates, create vm, ip, firewall rule)


2/ Tests all localization of Web UI (with a complete installation of CS) 
: local strings works wells except some strings in Spanish and Arabic.



Known issue (but not only for this version): 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9255


Thanks to RM team.

Milamber


On 20/01/2016 22:27, Remi Bergsma wrote:

Hi all,

I've created a 4.7.1 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a 
vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=4.7.1-RC20160120T2318

Commit: 5ea07dc93799f28dd6c268b17514867d92dc53f7

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.7.1/

PGP release keys (signed using A47DDC4F):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for at least 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate 
"(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

Re: Issue with VR after upgrade to 4.6.2

2016-01-23 Thread Milamber



Hello,

I've have a similiar issue without solution (but not with an upgrade 
from 4.5), please see

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9255

Milamber

On 24/01/2016 03:32, Daniel Mezentsev wrote:

Hi All,

I've got some issue after i did cloudstack upgrade 4.5 -> 4.6.2.
Environment has 8 VR, 6 were upgraded and restarted successfully, 2 of 
them

stuck. I removed them - the same result, i can't boot them, restarted
network with clean-up - no luck.
VR actually is starting, i can ssh to it, but it's shuting down in 
approx 5

minutes. I can extend it runing
"init 3" command, but cloudstack is not detecting router state.

I can bing some VMs within the same subnet, so it's not VLAN/network 
issue.


Completely ran out of ideas.
Should mention network offering is Isolated network without NAT.

Any help is more then welcome. I can provide any related log, but i need
some heads-up what i should look for.
 Daniel Mezentsev, founder
(+1) 604 313 8592.
Soleks Data Group.
Shaping the clouds.

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.7.0


Hello,

My vote +1 (binding)


My tests (all tests are passed on a CloudStack (1mgr+2nodes+1nfs) inside 
CloudStack topology) :


1/ Fresh install of 4.7.0 (adv net) on Ubuntu 14.04.3 + KVM + NFS : OK
Some standard tests (create vm, migration, HA, create network, create 
user, create ssh key, destroy vm, register template, create snapshot, 
restore snapshot, create template, ip association, ip release, static 
nat, firewall rule)
Some tests with cloudstack ansible module (create network, register 
templates, create vm, ip, firewall rule)


2/ Fresh install of 4.5.2 (adv net) on Ubuntu 14.04.3 + KVM + NFS, and 
after migration to 4.7.0 : OK
Some standard tests (create vm, migration, HA (crash host), create 
network, create user, create ssh key, destroy vm, register template, 
create snapshot, restore snapshot, create template, resize volume)
Some tests with cloudstack ansible module (create network, register 
templates, create vm, ip, firewall rule)
Special tests with Redondant Virtual Router (RVR) VR master destroy 
(only 8 icmp packets lost after the 'virtual crash')


3/ Tests all localizations of Web UI (with a complete installation of 
CS) : local strings works wells except Spanish and Arabic (expected, 
some strings needs to be fixes on Transifex)



Known minor issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9183

Thanks to RM team. Double sprints with 4.6.2/4.7.0!

Milamber

On 13/12/2015 20:27, Remi Bergsma wrote:

Hi all,

Since our 4.6.0 release (on Nov 13th, exactly 1 month ago), we have merged 100+ 
pull requests [1] with lots of bug fixes, refactoring and of course new 
features. Time for a new release!


I've created a 4.7.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a 
vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=4.7.0-RC20151213T2109

Commit: 2f26a859a971a9852ed9f6f34fe35e52fe6028a9

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.7.0/

PGP release keys (signed using A47DDC4F):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for at least 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate 
"(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)


[1] git log --pretty=oneline --abbrev-commit origin/4.6..4.7.0-RC20151213T2109 | grep 
"Merge pull request"

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.2


Hello,

My vote +1 (binding)


My tests (all tests are passed on a CloudStack (1mgr+2nodes+1nfs) inside 
CloudStack topology) :


1/ Fresh install of 4.6.2 (adv net) on Ubuntu 14.04.3 + KVM + NFS : OK
Some standard tests (create vm, migration, HA, create network, create 
user, create ssh key, destroy vm, register template, create snapshot, 
restore snapshot, create template, ip association, ip release, static 
nat, firewall rule)
Some tests with cloudstack ansible module (create network, register 
templates, create vm, ip, firewall rule)


2/ Fresh install of 4.5.2 (adv net) on Ubuntu 14.04.3 + KVM + NFS and 
after migration to CS 4.6.2 : OK
Some standard tests (create vm, migration, HA (crash host), create 
network, create user, create ssh key, destroy vm, register template, 
create snapshot, restore snapshot, create template, resize volume)
Some tests with cloudstack ansible module (create network, register 
templates, create vm, ip, firewall rule)


3/ Tests all localizations of Web UI (with a complete installation of 
CS) : local strings works wells except Spanish and Arabic (expected, 
some strings needs to be fixes on Transifex)


Thanks to RM team.

Milamber

On 13/12/2015 18:36, Remi Bergsma wrote:

Hi all,

In the past two weeks (since 4.6.1), 23 pull [1] requests have been merged to 
4.6 branch and then to master/4.7.0. Therefore it makes sense to wrap-up the 
4.6 release cycle with a final release and bring all the improvements to our 
users. Vote e-mail below. Later today we will send another RC for 4.7.0.


I've created a 4.6.2 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a 
vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=4.6.2-RC20151213T1914

Commit: 10e0130dd6e0c06deae4f5ccfd43d5bcecea57b6

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.6.2/

PGP release keys (signed using A47DDC4F):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for at least 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate 
"(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)


[1] git log --pretty=oneline --abbrev-commit 4.6.1..4.6.2-RC20151213T1914 | grep 
"Merge pull request"

Re: CS 4.7.0 RC1: bash: /opt/cloud/bin/getRouterAlerts.sh: No such file or directory




On 16/12/2015 12:54, Wilder Rodrigues wrote:

Hi there…

What kind of hypervisor do you have?


KVM on Ubuntu 14.04.3

Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9183



Cheers,
Wilder



On 16 Dec 2015, at 09:15, Milamber <milam...@apache.org> wrote:

Hello,

On my 4.7.0 RC1 test environment, I've this warning message:
2015-12-15 23:57:35,165 WARN [c.c.n.r.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] 
(RouterStatusMonitor-1:ctx-f1556e81) (logid:db80c3d4) Unable to get alerts from 
router r-11-VM bash: /opt/cloud/bin/getRouterAlerts.sh: No such file or 
directory

I don't find this bash script anywhere (on management node, host node and 
inside the VR)

I find theses references to this script inside:

public static final String ROUTER_ALERTS = "getRouterAlerts.sh";
./core/src/com/cloud/agent/resource/virtualnetwork/VRScripts.java

ExecutionResult result = _vrDeployer.executeInVR(routerIp, 
VRScripts.ROUTER_ALERTS, args);
./core/src/com/cloud/agent/resource/virtualnetwork/VirtualRoutingResource.java


I use the system vm template from jenkins [1] dated from 02-Dec-2015.

I my understand, the CS 4.7.0 can use the systemvm 4.6?

This is a bug or just I use the wrong systemvm?


[1] 
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-systemvm64-master/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/tools/appliance/dist/systemvm64template-master-4.6.0-kvm.qcow2.bz2

Re: CS 4.7.0 RC1: bash: /opt/cloud/bin/getRouterAlerts.sh: No such file or directory




On 16/12/2015 11:02, Remi Bergsma wrote:

Hi Milamber,

Nice find! Yes, the 4.6 systemvm template is fine. The 4.7 systemvm.iso 
contains all changed files that we need.

I see getRouterAlerts.sh in 4.6 but not in 4.7/master. Since I upgraded it 
still works for me somehow. Will need to investigate why that is.

It looks like regression from 6477bd8ff7f982e10d0d20a97857262897dc05ed, PR 1084.


Reference : CLOUDSTACK-9067




Did you create an issue for it?



Done : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9183




  It’s not a big issue I’d say.


I suppose, that could be fix in 4.7.1.



Regards,
Remi





On 16/12/15 09:15, "Milamber" <milam...@apache.org> wrote:


Hello,

On my 4.7.0 RC1 test environment, I've this warning message:
2015-12-15 23:57:35,165 WARN
[c.c.n.r.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
(RouterStatusMonitor-1:ctx-f1556e81) (logid:db80c3d4) Unable to get
alerts from router r-11-VM bash: /opt/cloud/bin/getRouterAlerts.sh: No
such file or directory

I don't find this bash script anywhere (on management node, host node
and inside the VR)

I find theses references to this script inside:

 public static final String ROUTER_ALERTS = "getRouterAlerts.sh";
./core/src/com/cloud/agent/resource/virtualnetwork/VRScripts.java

 ExecutionResult result = _vrDeployer.executeInVR(routerIp,
VRScripts.ROUTER_ALERTS, args);
./core/src/com/cloud/agent/resource/virtualnetwork/VirtualRoutingResource.java


I use the system vm template from jenkins [1] dated from 02-Dec-2015.

I my understand, the CS 4.7.0 can use the systemvm 4.6?

This is a bug or just I use the wrong systemvm?


[1]
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-systemvm64-master/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/tools/appliance/dist/systemvm64template-master-4.6.0-kvm.qcow2.bz2

CS 4.7.0 RC1: bash: /opt/cloud/bin/getRouterAlerts.sh: No such file or directory


Hello,

On my 4.7.0 RC1 test environment, I've this warning message:
2015-12-15 23:57:35,165 WARN 
[c.c.n.r.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] 
(RouterStatusMonitor-1:ctx-f1556e81) (logid:db80c3d4) Unable to get 
alerts from router r-11-VM bash: /opt/cloud/bin/getRouterAlerts.sh: No 
such file or directory


I don't find this bash script anywhere (on management node, host node 
and inside the VR)


I find theses references to this script inside:

public static final String ROUTER_ALERTS = "getRouterAlerts.sh";
./core/src/com/cloud/agent/resource/virtualnetwork/VRScripts.java

ExecutionResult result = _vrDeployer.executeInVR(routerIp, 
VRScripts.ROUTER_ALERTS, args);

./core/src/com/cloud/agent/resource/virtualnetwork/VirtualRoutingResource.java


I use the system vm template from jenkins [1] dated from 02-Dec-2015.

I my understand, the CS 4.7.0 can use the systemvm 4.6?

This is a bug or just I use the wrong systemvm?


[1] 
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-systemvm64-master/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/tools/appliance/dist/systemvm64template-master-4.6.0-kvm.qcow2.bz2

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.1

2015-12-03 Thread Milamber


Hello,

My vote +1 (binding)

My tests :
1/ Fresh install of 4.6.1 (adv net) on Ubuntu 14.04 + KVM + NFS : OK
Some standard tests (create vm, migration, HA, create network, create 
user, create ssh key, destroy vm, register template, create snapshot, 
restore snapshot, create template, ip association, ip release, static 
nat, firewall rule)
Some tests with cloudstack ansible module (create network, register 
templates, create vm, ip, firewall rule)


2/ On fresh install of 4.5.2 (adv net) on Ubuntu 14.04 + KVM + NFS, 
migration to 4.6.1 : OK
Some standard tests (create vm, migration, HA, create network, create 
user, create ssh key, destroy vm, register template, create snapshot, 
restore snapshot, create template)
Some tests with cloudstack ansible module (create network, register 
templates, create vm, ip, firewall rule)


3/ Tests all localizations of Web UI (with a complete installation of 
CS) : local strings works wells except Spanish and Arabic (expected, 
some strings needs to be fixes on Transifex)


Thanks to RM team.

Milamber


On 30/11/2015 22:12, Remi Bergsma wrote:

Hi all,

I've created a 4.6.1 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a 
vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=4.6.1-RC20151130T2258

Commit: beb840fc1cdfa5ba3c76ce4071cf5c4b775362cd

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.6.1/

PGP release keys (signed using A47DDC4F):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate 
"(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

Re: [DISCUSS] ACS 4.5.3 release

2015-11-21 Thread Milamber


Hello Rohit,

I think that the PR 626 [1] on the debian/rules must be apply on the 4.5 
branch to release 4.5.3 version to allow the good building of CS 4.53 on 
Ubuntu. (snapshot suffix issue on cloud-agent package)



$ git diff
diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
index 45461bb..78dd487 100755
--- a/debian/rules
+++ b/debian/rules
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
 # build-arch and build-indep targets  by Bill Allombert 2001

 DEBVERS := $(shell dpkg-parsechangelog | sed -n -e 's/^Version: //p')
-VERSION := $(shell echo '$(DEBVERS)' | sed -e 's/^[[:digit:]]*://' -e 
's/[~-].*//')

+VERSION := $(shell cat pom.xml |sed '22!d'| cut -d'>' -f2 |cut -d'<' -f1)
 MVNADD := $(shell if echo '$(DEBVERS)' | grep -q snapshot; then echo ; 
fi )

 PACKAGE = $(shell dh_listpackages|head -n 1|cut -d '-' -f 1)
 SYSCONFDIR = "/etc"

Milamber

[1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/626/files



On 20/11/2015 15:16, Stephan Seitz wrote:

Hi Rohit,

I've reported one Bug[1], that affects the network.throttling.rate. I
assume, this is just some bad calculation.

Maybe this could be fixed for 4.5.3? :)

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8936


Am Freitag, den 20.11.2015, 06:27 + schrieb Rohit Yadav:

Hi all,


I want to ask how happy people are with the last 4.5.2 release and if
there are any issues they want to report or want to be fixed in a
future minor release. If we’ve enough demand, we can work towards a
last 4.5 minor release. Thanks.


Rohit Yadav
Software Architect





D: +44 20 3642 6102 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +91 88 262 30892

  
rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@ShapeBlue
  
ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS



Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related
services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses


This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do
not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related
companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you
must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show
it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have
received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated
in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in
Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA
Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is
traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered
trademark.

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0 (round 2)

2015-11-13 Thread Milamber


Hello,

My vote : +1 (binding)

Tests on Ubuntu 14.04 / KVM / Adv Network without SG

Some tests (register template, create vm, create network, etc) with the 
ansible cloudstack module : ok
Manual tests (register template, create vm, migration, start/stop vm, 
user mgt, snapshot volume, view stats) with French UI : OK


Checking if the localization of all languages displays correctly : OK 
(without Javascript errors).
Just note: with Spanish and Arabic, some strings have some corrupted 
characters, needs to be fixed by the translators on Transifex (I follow 
this issue with translators)


Thanks to the RM team.

Milamber

On 10/11/2015 15:03, Remi Bergsma wrote:

Hi all,

I've created a 4.6.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a 
vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=4.6.0-RC20151110T1545

Commit: e31ade03c66368c64f0cd66cb7b0b754cddfb79d

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.6.0/

PGP release keys (signed using A47DDC4F):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for at least 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate 
"(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

2015-11-07 Thread Milamber


Hello,

My vote : +1 (binding)

Tests on Ubuntu 14.04 / KVM / Adv Network without SG

Some tests (register template, create vm, network, etc) with the ansible 
cloudstack module : ok


Checking if the localization of all languages displays correctly. Found 
2 with errors : German and Chinese. See PR 1043 / CLOUDSTACK-9043
Spanish and Arabic have some corrupted strings, needs to be fixed by the 
translators on Transifex


Thanks to the RM team.

Milamber

On 04/11/2015 14:55, Remi Bergsma wrote:

Hi all,

I've created a 4.6.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a 
vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=4.6.0-RC20151104T1522

Commit: b0ebe68e375432b28eef031ab62ccd5831234c77

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.6.0/

PGP release keys (signed using A47DDC4F):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for at least 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate 
"(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

Re: Discuss & Vote for invitation to become Commiter ou PMC

2015-11-02 Thread Milamber



Ignore. Bad list. Sorry.

On 02/11/2015 11:00, Milamber wrote:

Hello,

Perhaps, we need let open at least 72h the discuss for promote a 
contributor to Commiter level or an Committer to PMC level, to allow 
all PMCs to discuss on this ?


I would like say too, the Discuss thread is not a vote thread, the 
"+1" must be avoided, and some comments are better in this discuss 
thread.


Milamber

Discuss & Vote for invitation to become Commiter ou PMC

2015-11-02 Thread Milamber


Hello,

Perhaps, we need let open at least 72h the discuss for promote a 
contributor to Commiter level or an Committer to PMC level, to allow all 
PMCs to discuss on this ?


I would like say too, the Discuss thread is not a vote thread, the "+1" 
must be avoided, and some comments are better in this discuss thread.


Milamber

Re: UI translation for 4.6

2015-10-31 Thread Milamber


Hello,

Last call to the translators before localization resources integration 
into the CS 4.6 release candidate. The last update of resource files is 
planned to Sunday afternoon(tomorrow).


Currently we have 6 languages fully translated, only 19 strings to 
translate for Hungarian, only 27 strings for German to reach 8 languages!


Link to translate on Transifex:
https://www.transifex.com/ke4qqq/CloudStack_UI/46xmessagesproperties/

Thanks

Milamber

On 23/10/2015 22:39, Milamber wrote:

Hello translators,

The way to translate the web UI of CloudStack is to go on Transifex 
website [1]. Apache CloudStack uses this specialized service to 
facilitate the translation process.


It's very easy, you just need to create an account (free) and start to 
translate with the Transifex friendly interface (suggestions for 
strings, history, comments, issues, etc.)


Currently we focus on the 4.6 resources strings for make the next 
version of CloudStack a great localized version. You can can translate 
too the other versions (especially 4.5) because a minor update is 
planned (4.5.3)).


Regularly or after a ping me, I launch the process [2] to update the 
L10N resources files on the source code of CloudStack.


Currently for the next version 4.6, if you are a dev, you can apply 
this pull request [3] on a local git branch from master branch and 
launch the web UI to check the localization web UI.


Below, the complete list of current languages opened to the 
translation. If your languages isn't in the list, you can ask on 
Transifex to open it.


All languages and translators are welcome!

Milamber

[1] https://www.transifex.com/ke4qqq/CloudStack_UI/
[2] 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Update+L10N+files+from+Transifex+to+git+repo

[3] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/974

The full list:

Acoli (ach)
Arabic (ar)
Catalan (ca)
Chinese (China) (zh_CN)
Chinese (Taiwan) (zh_TW)
Dutch (Belgium) (nl_BE)
Dutch (Netherlands) (nl_NL)
Dutch (nl)
French (fr)
French (France) (fr_FR)
Georgian (ka)
German (de)
German (Germany) (de_DE)
Hindi (hi)
Hungarian (hu)
Indonesian (id)
Indonesian (Indonesia) (id_ID)
Italian (it)
Italian (Italy) (it_IT)
Japanese (Japan) (ja_JP)
Korean (Korea) (ko_KR)
Norwegian Bokmål (Norway) (nb_NO)
Persian (fa)
Polish (pl)
Portuguese (Brazil) (pt_BR)
Romanian (Romania) (ro_RO)
Russian (Russia) (ru_RU)
Spanish (es)
Tatar (tt)
Telugu (India) (te_IN)
Thai (Thailand) (th_TH)
Turkish (Turkey) (tr_TR)
Vietnamese (Viet Nam) (vi_VN)



On 23/10/2015 21:54, Stavros Konstantaras wrote:

Hi there,

Maybe I could start a Greek translation as well.

Just send me the “how to”.

Cheers
Stavros Konstantaras


Stavros Konstantaras
Science faculty Research IT support (FEIOG)
University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH

Fingerprint: E5E5 9B19 D1CD 88CD 4763  3465 A8DC 7C92 330F D59A

On 23 Oct 2015, at 22:49, Jaime Orlando Rojas Sanchez 
<jaime.ro...@kumo.com.co> wrote:


Hello, I can help with Spanish translations. Let me know how could I 
help.


Regards / Cordialmente,

Jaime O. Rojas S.
Technology Manager
jaime.ro...@kumo.com.co
Mobile: +57 301-3382382
Office: +57-1-8766767 x215

-Mensaje original-
De: Milamber [mailto:milam...@apache.org]
Enviado el: viernes, 23 de octubre de 2015 11:12 a. m.
Para: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Asunto: Re: UI translation for 4.6

Hello,

The new stats for the translations of Web UI 4.6 (languages over 50%):

French (France) 100%
Portuguese (Brazil) 99%
Japanese (Japan)99%
Chinese (China) 99%
Norwegian Bokmål (Norway)   99%
Hungarian   98%
Dutch (Netherlands) 94%
German (Germany)76%
Russian (Russia)75%
Korean (Korea)  66%
Spanish 53%

Thanks for the translators! (especially to the Norwegian 70%->99%, 
655 new translated strings!)


I will integrate all this new strings in a new PR the next week 
around the 30/31st October.


Hungarian / Dutch (@dahn), just a small work to go to 100%!

The transifex project to translate the Web UI:
https://www.transifex.com/ke4qqq/CloudStack_UI/

That would be great to have a lot of localization Web UI for 
CloudStack 4.6!


Thanks

Milamber

PS. All languages stats for 4.6:
https://www.transifex.com/ke4qqq/CloudStack_UI/46xmessagesproperties/


On 09/10/2015 09:49, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
Milamber reminded me that before releasing 4.6 we should include 
the latest translated strings for the UI.
If you care about translation, you might be interested to work on 
it in the coming days.


Here is where we stand:

Portuguese (Brazil) 100%
French (France) 100%

Japanese (Japan)99%
Hungarian   98%
Chinese (China) 93%
Dutch (Netherlands) 89%
Russian (Russia)75%
German

Add Debian 8.0 in OS List for Template

2015-10-30 Thread Milamber


Hello,

There are any special reason to not add Debian 8.0 32/64 bits on the 
list of OS in the template form ? like missing support from kvm or 
xenserver?


Or we just need to add the INSERT into the sql schema like this commit [1] ?

That would be great if the next release 4.6 could have the Debian 8.0 in 
their list (and perhaps too: Debian testing)


Thanks

Mialber


[1] 
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blobdiff;f=setup/db/db/schema-442to450.sql;h=cd2bf6e5a3756bf3ea499f20f5bc81ab219dbd89;hp=e2615d6cf6541cc7a6b6763421ba8398d593;hb=66afce66b469e9772989ffcef3015bdab9584ffc;hpb=9928d66fdaf71b43412e20b129975c42e0552d6f

Re: New PMC member: Erik Weber

2015-10-30 Thread Milamber



Congrats Erik! Good works!

On 30/10/2015 14:01, Giles Sirett wrote:

All
The PMC is delighted to announce that we have asked Erik weber to join the PMC 
and he has accepted

Please join me in congratulating Erik

Kind Regards
Giles

D: +44 20 3603 0541 | M: +44 796 111 
2055
giles.sir...@shapeblue.com
Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software 
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely 
for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions 
expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this 
email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show 
it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email 
in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. 
ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated 
under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company 
incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue 
SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded 
under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: Add Debian 8.0 in OS List for Template

2015-10-30 Thread Milamber



Oh! I need to test this asap. Thanks Daan.

On 30/10/2015 11:18, Daan Hoogland wrote:

Milamber, there are api's for this:
http://cloudstack.apache.org/api/apidocs-4.5/root_admin/addGuestOs.html and
http://cloudstack.apache.org/api/apidocs-4.5/root_admin/addGuestOsMapping.html

Or am I missing your point?

On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 8:48 AM, Milamber <milam...@apache.org> wrote:


Hello,

There are any special reason to not add Debian 8.0 32/64 bits on the list
of OS in the template form ? like missing support from kvm or xenserver?

Or we just need to add the INSERT into the sql schema like this commit [1]
?

That would be great if the next release 4.6 could have the Debian 8.0 in
their list (and perhaps too: Debian testing)

Thanks

Mialber


[1]
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blobdiff;f=setup/db/db/schema-442to450.sql;h=cd2bf6e5a3756bf3ea499f20f5bc81ab219dbd89;hp=e2615d6cf6541cc7a6b6763421ba8398d593;hb=66afce66b469e9772989ffcef3015bdab9584ffc;hpb=9928d66fdaf71b43412e20b129975c42e0552d6f

Reduce Subject length from GitHub

2015-10-27 Thread Milamber


Hello,

Probably that is a Infra task, but before I would like ask to you, if 
that would be better if the prefix of subject could be reduce to allow 
to see the main subject of a mail send by Github ?


See this screen shot from my SeaMonkey (mail client), the prefix is the 
only visible text.


A new prefix like "[GH] CS PR: xx" seems 
better ?

(currently: "[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8991 ...")

Any thoughts?

Milamber

Re: Reduce Subject length from GitHub

2015-10-27 Thread Milamber



Attachment don't work on this ML.
the screen screenshot on SeaMonkey:
http://www.milamberspace.net/cs/seamonkey-prefix_cloudstack.png

Milamber

On 27/10/2015 23:16, Milamber wrote:

Hello,

Probably that is a Infra task, but before I would like ask to you, if 
that would be better if the prefix of subject could be reduce to allow 
to see the main subject of a mail send by Github ?


See this screen shot from my SeaMonkey (mail client), the prefix is 
the only visible text.


A new prefix like "[GH] CS PR: xx" 
seems better ?

(currently: "[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8991 ...")

Any thoughts?

Milamber

Re: [DISCUSS] Move to GitHub

2015-10-25 Thread Milamber




On 25/10/2015 07:05, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:

Folks,

We have been using GitHub for PR now for a while, it seems to work despite the 
fact that we still have to get used to the workflow.
We lack some privileges on the mirror to be able to use labels etc.

I would also be in favor of using Issues and why not the Wiki. Basically I 
personally would be in favor of a 100% move to GitHub.

There is some core discussions happening with ASF members about what that means 
for the very nature of an ASF project.

But I am curious,

What do you think about moving our source repo to GitHub (instead of it being a 
mirror) and start using the other features of github ?


If we do abstract all issues around a infra for a Open Source project 
inside/provide a business company. (Free service = you are the product, 
end of free service depends of business decision, etc.) , this could be 
a good thing to move to Github for their functionalities.


But, I thinks that would be better to keep the control of the source 
code repo. This is the core of your work.


If we need to use the labels, and others github behaviors, why not 
create a new ASF service provided by GitLab open source project ?


Milamber





-Sebastien

Re: UI translation for 4.6


Hello,

The new stats for the translations of Web UI 4.6 (languages over 50%):

French (France) 100%
Portuguese (Brazil) 99%
Japanese (Japan)99%
Chinese (China) 99%
Norwegian Bokmål (Norway)   99%
Hungarian   98%
Dutch (Netherlands) 94%
German (Germany)76%
Russian (Russia)75%
Korean (Korea)  66%
Spanish 53%

Thanks for the translators! (especially to the Norwegian 70%->99%, 655 
new translated strings!)


I will integrate all this new strings in a new PR the next week around 
the 30/31st October.


Hungarian / Dutch (@dahn), just a small work to go to 100%!

The transifex project to translate the Web UI:
https://www.transifex.com/ke4qqq/CloudStack_UI/

That would be great to have a lot of localization Web UI for CloudStack 4.6!

Thanks

Milamber

PS. All languages stats for 4.6:
https://www.transifex.com/ke4qqq/CloudStack_UI/46xmessagesproperties/


On 09/10/2015 09:49, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:

Milamber reminded me that before releasing 4.6 we should include the latest 
translated strings for the UI.
If you care about translation, you might be interested to work on it in the 
coming days.

Here is where we stand:

Portuguese (Brazil) 100%
French (France) 100%

Japanese (Japan)99%
Hungarian   98%
Chinese (China) 93%
Dutch (Netherlands) 89%
Russian (Russia)75%
German (Germany)71%
Norwegian Bokmål (Norway)   70%
Korean (Korea)  66%
Spanish 53%


Italian (Italy) 36%
Polish  21%
Catalan 13%
Arabic  12%
Persian 11%
Romanian (Romania)  9%
Chinese (Taiwan)7%
Georgian5%
Thai (Thailand) 5%
Turkish (Turkey)2%
Tatar   2%
Indonesian  1%

you can see that Japanese, Hungarian, Chinese and Dutch are really close to 
100%:

https://www.transifex.com/ke4qqq/CloudStack_UI/


-sebastien

Re: UI translation for 4.6


Hello,

Thanks for the translation.

I've just open the 2.2 resource for acceptance of translated strings, 
you can now grow to 100% for All versions of CloudStack.


Milamber


On 23/10/2015 21:58, Yiping Zhang wrote:

I took a look at Chinese, and finished last two messages for 4.5/4.6.   All the 
remaining untranslated messages are for 2.2, but that one does not accept any 
more translations.  So there is no way to get it to reach 100% :(

Yiping



On 10/23/15, 12:05 PM, "Erik Weber" <terbol...@gmail.com> wrote:


On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Milamber <milam...@apache.org> wrote:


Hello,

The new stats for the translations of Web UI 4.6 (languages over 50%):

French (France) 100%
Portuguese (Brazil) 99%
Japanese (Japan)99%
Chinese (China) 99%
Norwegian Bokmål (Norway)   99%
Hungarian   98%
Dutch (Netherlands) 94%
German (Germany)76%
Russian (Russia)75%
Korean (Korea)  66%
Spanish 53%

Thanks for the translators! (especially to the Norwegian 70%->99%, 655 new
translated strings!)



I just finished the 2.2 strings that were missing and got us up to 100%.

Thanks to Dag S. and Jan-Arve N. as well for their efforts!

--
Erik

Re: UI translation for 4.6


Hello translators,

The way to translate the web UI of CloudStack is to go on Transifex 
website [1]. Apache CloudStack uses this specialized service to 
facilitate the translation process.


It's very easy, you just need to create an account (free) and start to 
translate with the Transifex friendly interface (suggestions for 
strings, history, comments, issues, etc.)


Currently we focus on the 4.6 resources strings for make the next 
version of CloudStack a great localized version. You can can translate 
too the other versions (especially 4.5) because a minor update is 
planned (4.5.3)).


Regularly or after a ping me, I launch the process [2] to update the 
L10N resources files on the source code of CloudStack.


Currently for the next version 4.6, if you are a dev, you can apply this 
pull request [3] on a local git branch from master branch and launch the 
web UI to check the localization web UI.


Below, the complete list of current languages opened to the translation. 
If your languages isn't in the list, you can ask on Transifex to open it.


All languages and translators are welcome!

Milamber

[1] https://www.transifex.com/ke4qqq/CloudStack_UI/
[2] 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Update+L10N+files+from+Transifex+to+git+repo

[3] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/974

The full list:

Acoli (ach)
Arabic (ar)
Catalan (ca)
Chinese (China) (zh_CN)
Chinese (Taiwan) (zh_TW)
Dutch (Belgium) (nl_BE)
Dutch (Netherlands) (nl_NL)
Dutch (nl)
French (fr)
French (France) (fr_FR)
Georgian (ka)
German (de)
German (Germany) (de_DE)
Hindi (hi)
Hungarian (hu)
Indonesian (id)
Indonesian (Indonesia) (id_ID)
Italian (it)
Italian (Italy) (it_IT)
Japanese (Japan) (ja_JP)
Korean (Korea) (ko_KR)
Norwegian Bokmål (Norway) (nb_NO)
Persian (fa)
Polish (pl)
Portuguese (Brazil) (pt_BR)
Romanian (Romania) (ro_RO)
Russian (Russia) (ru_RU)
Spanish (es)
Tatar (tt)
Telugu (India) (te_IN)
Thai (Thailand) (th_TH)
Turkish (Turkey) (tr_TR)
Vietnamese (Viet Nam) (vi_VN)



On 23/10/2015 21:54, Stavros Konstantaras wrote:

Hi there,

Maybe I could start a Greek translation as well.

Just send me the “how to”.

Cheers
Stavros Konstantaras


Stavros Konstantaras
Science faculty Research IT support (FEIOG)
University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH

Fingerprint: E5E5 9B19 D1CD 88CD 4763  3465 A8DC 7C92 330F D59A


On 23 Oct 2015, at 22:49, Jaime Orlando Rojas Sanchez <jaime.ro...@kumo.com.co> 
wrote:

Hello, I can help with Spanish translations. Let me know how could I help.

Regards / Cordialmente,

Jaime O. Rojas S.
Technology Manager
jaime.ro...@kumo.com.co
Mobile: +57 301-3382382
Office: +57-1-8766767 x215

-Mensaje original-
De: Milamber [mailto:milam...@apache.org]
Enviado el: viernes, 23 de octubre de 2015 11:12 a. m.
Para: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Asunto: Re: UI translation for 4.6

Hello,

The new stats for the translations of Web UI 4.6 (languages over 50%):

French (France) 100%
Portuguese (Brazil) 99%
Japanese (Japan)99%
Chinese (China) 99%
Norwegian Bokmål (Norway)   99%
Hungarian   98%
Dutch (Netherlands) 94%
German (Germany)76%
Russian (Russia)75%
Korean (Korea)  66%
Spanish 53%

Thanks for the translators! (especially to the Norwegian 70%->99%, 655 new 
translated strings!)

I will integrate all this new strings in a new PR the next week around the 
30/31st October.

Hungarian / Dutch (@dahn), just a small work to go to 100%!

The transifex project to translate the Web UI:
https://www.transifex.com/ke4qqq/CloudStack_UI/

That would be great to have a lot of localization Web UI for CloudStack 4.6!

Thanks

Milamber

PS. All languages stats for 4.6:
https://www.transifex.com/ke4qqq/CloudStack_UI/46xmessagesproperties/


On 09/10/2015 09:49, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:

Milamber reminded me that before releasing 4.6 we should include the latest 
translated strings for the UI.
If you care about translation, you might be interested to work on it in the 
coming days.

Here is where we stand:

Portuguese (Brazil) 100%
French (France) 100%

Japanese (Japan)99%
Hungarian   98%
Chinese (China) 93%
Dutch (Netherlands) 89%
Russian (Russia)75%
German (Germany)71%
Norwegian Bokmål (Norway)   70%
Korean (Korea)  66%
Spanish 53%


Italian (Italy) 36%
Polish  21%
Catalan 13%
Arabic  12%
Persian 11%
Romanian (Romania)  9%
Chinese (Taiwan)7%
Georgian5%
Thai (Thailand) 5%
Turkish (Turkey)

Re: UI translation for 4.6




On 23/10/2015 22:17, Yiping Zhang wrote:

Well, is version 2.2 still relevant at all ?  Why waste time on it ?


Just if you can a 100% score on cloudstack homepage on transifex website.


Probably we must remove this version 2.2 (and perhaps all unsupported 
versions of CS)


@David & @Seb have you some opinion to remove the resources files for 
old versions?







On 10/23/15, 2:09 PM, "Milamber" <milam...@apache.org> wrote:


Hello,

Thanks for the translation.

I've just open the 2.2 resource for acceptance of translated strings,
you can now grow to 100% for All versions of CloudStack.

Milamber


On 23/10/2015 21:58, Yiping Zhang wrote:

I took a look at Chinese, and finished last two messages for 4.5/4.6.   All the 
remaining untranslated messages are for 2.2, but that one does not accept any 
more translations.  So there is no way to get it to reach 100% :(

Yiping



On 10/23/15, 12:05 PM, "Erik Weber" <terbol...@gmail.com> wrote:


On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Milamber <milam...@apache.org> wrote:


Hello,

The new stats for the translations of Web UI 4.6 (languages over 50%):

French (France) 100%
Portuguese (Brazil) 99%
Japanese (Japan)99%
Chinese (China) 99%
Norwegian Bokmål (Norway)   99%
Hungarian   98%
Dutch (Netherlands) 94%
German (Germany)76%
Russian (Russia)75%
Korean (Korea)  66%
Spanish 53%

Thanks for the translators! (especially to the Norwegian 70%->99%, 655 new
translated strings!)



I just finished the 2.2 strings that were missing and got us up to 100%.

Thanks to Dag S. and Jan-Arve N. as well for their efforts!

--
Erik

Re: UI translation for 4.6


Hi Erik,

Thanks to the norwegian translators.

I've opened an "open" PR until the merge by the release manager team 
just before the future RC1 of CS 4.6.


You can view and check the web UI in norwegian localization if you apply 
the PR #974 [1] on your local git branch


Milamber

[1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/974



On 23/10/2015 20:05, Erik Weber wrote:

On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Milamber <milam...@apache.org> wrote:


Hello,

The new stats for the translations of Web UI 4.6 (languages over 50%):

French (France) 100%
Portuguese (Brazil) 99%
Japanese (Japan)99%
Chinese (China) 99%
Norwegian Bokmål (Norway)   99%
Hungarian   98%
Dutch (Netherlands) 94%
German (Germany)76%
Russian (Russia)75%
Korean (Korea)  66%
Spanish 53%

Thanks for the translators! (especially to the Norwegian 70%->99%, 655 new
translated strings!)



I just finished the 2.2 strings that were missing and got us up to 100%.

Thanks to Dag S. and Jan-Arve N. as well for their efforts!

Re: UI translation for 4.6

2015-10-10 Thread Milamber


Hello,

Thanks Go.
I will get the localization strings from Transifex to a new PR (for all 
languages) on master, but only in a couple of days, because I'm waiting 
for others languages completion.


In all cases, I will made a PR just before the first RC of 4.6 (arround 
24h before after Remi ping me)


Thanks again.

Milamber

On 10/10/2015 10:17, Go Chiba wrote:

Hi guys,

I just finished to translate Japanese UI resources last night, and can you 
anyone merge it to 4.6?

from my iPhone

2015/10/09 10:49、Sebastien Goasguen <run...@gmail.com> のメッセージ:


Milamber reminded me that before releasing 4.6 we should include the latest 
translated strings for the UI.
If you care about translation, you might be interested to work on it in the 
coming days.

Here is where we stand:

Portuguese (Brazil) 100%
French (France) 100%

Japanese (Japan)99%
Hungarian   98%
Chinese (China) 93%
Dutch (Netherlands) 89%
Russian (Russia)75%
German (Germany)71%
Norwegian Bokmål (Norway)   70%
Korean (Korea)  66%
Spanish 53%


Italian (Italy) 36%
Polish  21%
Catalan 13%
Arabic  12%
Persian 11%
Romanian (Romania)  9%
Chinese (Taiwan)7%
Georgian5%
Thai (Thailand) 5%
Turkish (Turkey)2%
Tatar   2%
Indonesian  1%

you can see that Japanese, Hungarian, Chinese and Dutch are really close to 
100%:

https://www.transifex.com/ke4qqq/CloudStack_UI/


-sebastien

Re: zone creation wizard

2015-10-07 Thread Milamber



Done with PR #915

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/915

Thanks.



On 06/10/2015 12:49, Daan Hoogland wrote:

Bruno, Nitin,

I would like to test PRs 906 and 912 combined, maybe one of you can 
pull in the other ones changes and make one PR a combined one?


We can also create a new one merging in both of yours but this seems 
useless overhead

thanks,
--
Daan

Re: BVT report 9/29

2015-09-30 Thread Milamber

:124)
at com.cloud.api.ApiServlet.doGet(ApiServlet.java:86)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:617)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:723)
at 
org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:290)
at 
org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206)
at 
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:233)
at 
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:191)
at 
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:127)
at 
org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:103)
at 
org.apache.catalina.valves.AccessLogValve.invoke(AccessLogValve.java:615)
at 
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:109)
at 
org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:293)
at 
org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProcessor.process(Http11NioProcessor.java:891)
at 
org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process(Http11NioProtocol.java:750)
at 
org.apache.tomcat.util.net.NioEndpoint$SocketProcessor.run(NioEndpoint.java:2283)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)

at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)




On 29/09/2015 22:40, Milamber wrote:


If I change my ansible script to install the tomcat6 package before 
cloudstack-management, that's works.


Tomorrow I will test a full ACS advanced network installation.

root@cs-mgr1:~# service cloudstack-management status
 * CloudStack-specific Tomcat servlet engine is running with pid 5798
root@cs-mgr1:~# dpkg -l|grep cloudstack
ii  cloudstack-common 4.6.0-SNAPSHOT all  A common package 
which contains files which are shared by several CloudStack packages
ii  cloudstack-management 4.6.0-SNAPSHOT all  CloudStack 
server library

root@cs-mgr1:~# dpkg -l|grep tomcat
ii  libtomcat6-java 6.0.39-1 all Servlet and 
JSP engine -- core libraries
ii  tomcat6 6.0.39-1 all  Servlet and 
JSP engine
ii  tomcat6-common 6.0.39-1 all Servlet and 
JSP engine -- common files




On 29/09/2015 22:07, Milamber wrote:


I have tested an installation of the CS 4.6.0 SNAPSHOT (today) on 
Ubuntu 14.04 LTS with latest update (installation with a ansible script)


The cloudstack-management don't works.


I don't known the root cause, but I suppose that is the (new?) 
dependency of Tomcat v7 (before ~1 month: tomcat6 was the tomcat 
dependency)


I need to made some other tests to confirm if the issue come from my 
ansible script or other things.


Some results commands (and visibly at least 1 bug):

root@cs-mgr1:/var/log/cloudstack/management# service 
cloudstack-management status

 * cloudstack-management is not installed

root@cs-mgr1:/var/log/cloudstack/management# dpkg -l|grep cloudstack
ii  cloudstack-common 4.6.0-SNAPSHOT all  A common package 
which contains files which are shared by several CloudStack packages
ii  cloudstack-management 4.6.0-SNAPSHOT all  CloudStack 
server library


root@cs-mgr1:/var/log/cloudstack/management# dpkg -l|grep tomcat
ii  libtomcat7-java 7.0.52-1ubuntu0.3all Servlet and 
JSP engine -- core libraries

ii  tomcat7 7.0.52-1ubuntu0.3all Servlet and JSP engine
ii  tomcat7-common 7.0.52-1ubuntu0.3all Servlet and 
JSP engine -- common files



On 29/09/2015 19:42, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:

Hi folks, let’s try to shed some lights on those tests errors.

First off, it appears some of those tests are not included in our 
Travis run…:( If anyone wants to check that list of tests and cross 
check with Travis, we could run them as well.


@miguel, looks like smoke/test_scale_vm is reporting errors. It 
seems you were the last one to touch that test. Could you try to run 
the tests on some cloudstack setup you have and report back to use 
your finding. From below you can see, the test seems to be failing 
on simulator/basic.


@boris, any chance you can run the tests listed under KVM/basic in 
your test environment ? I don’t know if you know how to use Marvin. 
You can check the Marvin scripts used in .travis.yml for a clue.


The NAT tests errors might be related to the “VPC” errors Wilder and 
Remi just solved, so we can see tomorrow what BVT says.


(pinging pdion and milamber in that email to see what they can do on 
spare cycles)


Thanks everyone, let’s knock those down.

-Sebastien

On Sep 29, 2015, at 2:49 PM, Raja Pullela <raja.pull...@citrix.com> 
wrote:


Hopefully the format of this email stays as I compose ?

Bugs to be fixed for BVTs:
a. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-891

Re: BVT report 9/29

2015-09-30 Thread Milamber



The advanced network installation without SG seems works, but the final 
screen of setup wizard stills blank until the activation zone pop-up. A 
lot of error in the browser console. I need make more test (clean my 
browser cache before setup)


See screenshot: http://s27.postimg.org/qr7pijrer/Selection_151.png


On 29/09/2015 22:40, Milamber wrote:


If I change my ansible script to install the tomcat6 package before 
cloudstack-management, that's works.


Tomorrow I will test a full ACS advanced network installation.

root@cs-mgr1:~# service cloudstack-management status
 * CloudStack-specific Tomcat servlet engine is running with pid 5798
root@cs-mgr1:~# dpkg -l|grep cloudstack
ii  cloudstack-common 4.6.0-SNAPSHOT all  A common package 
which contains files which are shared by several CloudStack packages
ii  cloudstack-management 4.6.0-SNAPSHOT all  CloudStack 
server library

root@cs-mgr1:~# dpkg -l|grep tomcat
ii  libtomcat6-java 6.0.39-1 all Servlet and 
JSP engine -- core libraries
ii  tomcat6 6.0.39-1 all  Servlet and 
JSP engine
ii  tomcat6-common 6.0.39-1 all Servlet and 
JSP engine -- common files




On 29/09/2015 22:07, Milamber wrote:


I have tested an installation of the CS 4.6.0 SNAPSHOT (today) on 
Ubuntu 14.04 LTS with latest update (installation with a ansible script)


The cloudstack-management don't works.


I don't known the root cause, but I suppose that is the (new?) 
dependency of Tomcat v7 (before ~1 month: tomcat6 was the tomcat 
dependency)


I need to made some other tests to confirm if the issue come from my 
ansible script or other things.


Some results commands (and visibly at least 1 bug):

root@cs-mgr1:/var/log/cloudstack/management# service 
cloudstack-management status

 * cloudstack-management is not installed

root@cs-mgr1:/var/log/cloudstack/management# dpkg -l|grep cloudstack
ii  cloudstack-common 4.6.0-SNAPSHOT all  A common package 
which contains files which are shared by several CloudStack packages
ii  cloudstack-management 4.6.0-SNAPSHOT all  CloudStack 
server library


root@cs-mgr1:/var/log/cloudstack/management# dpkg -l|grep tomcat
ii  libtomcat7-java 7.0.52-1ubuntu0.3all Servlet and 
JSP engine -- core libraries

ii  tomcat7 7.0.52-1ubuntu0.3all Servlet and JSP engine
ii  tomcat7-common 7.0.52-1ubuntu0.3all Servlet and 
JSP engine -- common files



On 29/09/2015 19:42, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:

Hi folks, let’s try to shed some lights on those tests errors.

First off, it appears some of those tests are not included in our 
Travis run…:( If anyone wants to check that list of tests and cross 
check with Travis, we could run them as well.


@miguel, looks like smoke/test_scale_vm is reporting errors. It 
seems you were the last one to touch that test. Could you try to run 
the tests on some cloudstack setup you have and report back to use 
your finding. From below you can see, the test seems to be failing 
on simulator/basic.


@boris, any chance you can run the tests listed under KVM/basic in 
your test environment ? I don’t know if you know how to use Marvin. 
You can check the Marvin scripts used in .travis.yml for a clue.


The NAT tests errors might be related to the “VPC” errors Wilder and 
Remi just solved, so we can see tomorrow what BVT says.


(pinging pdion and milamber in that email to see what they can do on 
spare cycles)


Thanks everyone, let’s knock those down.

-Sebastien

On Sep 29, 2015, at 2:49 PM, Raja Pullela <raja.pull...@citrix.com> 
wrote:


Hopefully the format of this email stays as I compose ?

Bugs to be fixed for BVTs:
a. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8915
b. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8697
c. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8891 - Should 
be a blocker
d. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8876 - Should 
be a blocker



BVT Passrate for 9/25:


* Simulator Basic - 97.6%,  Failed tests 1

* Simulator Adv - 100%

* XS Basic - 97.1%, Failed tests 2

* XS Adv - 94.3%, Failed tests 6

* KVM Basic - 94.2%, Failed tests 4

* KVM Adv - 92.6%, Failed tests 8

Test cases failed:

Simulator Basic

* 
integration.smoke.test_scale_vm.TestScaleVm.test_02_scale_vm_without_hypervisor_specifics 
(Failure: test case issue)



XS Basic

* 
integration.smoke.test_scale_vm.TestScaleVm.test_02_scale_vm_without_hypervisor_specifics 
(Failure: test case issue)


* integration.smoke.test_volumes.TestVolumes.test_02_attach_volume 
/Failure: SSH connection failed


XS Adv

* 
integration.smoke.test_loadbalance.TestLoadBalance.test_01_create_lb_rule_src_nat 
(Failure: SSH connection failed)


* 
integration.smoke.test_loadbalance.TestLoadBalance.test_02_create_lb_rule_non_nat 
(Failure: SSH connection

Re: BVT report 9/29

2015-09-29 Thread Milamber



I have tested an installation of the CS 4.6.0 SNAPSHOT (today) on Ubuntu 
14.04 LTS with latest update (installation with a ansible script)


The cloudstack-management don't works.


I don't known the root cause, but I suppose that is the (new?) 
dependency of Tomcat v7 (before ~1 month: tomcat6 was the tomcat dependency)


I need to made some other tests to confirm if the issue come from my 
ansible script or other things.


Some results commands (and visibly at least 1 bug):

root@cs-mgr1:/var/log/cloudstack/management# service 
cloudstack-management status

 * cloudstack-management is not installed

root@cs-mgr1:/var/log/cloudstack/management# dpkg -l|grep cloudstack
ii  cloudstack-common 4.6.0-SNAPSHOT   all  A 
common package which contains files which are shared by several 
CloudStack packages
ii  cloudstack-management 4.6.0-SNAPSHOT   all  
CloudStack server library


root@cs-mgr1:/var/log/cloudstack/management# dpkg -l|grep tomcat
ii  libtomcat7-java 7.0.52-1ubuntu0.3all  
Servlet and JSP engine -- core libraries
ii  tomcat7 7.0.52-1ubuntu0.3all  Servlet and 
JSP engine
ii  tomcat7-common 7.0.52-1ubuntu0.3all  Servlet 
and JSP engine -- common files



On 29/09/2015 19:42, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:

Hi folks, let’s try to shed some lights on those tests errors.

First off, it appears some of those tests are not included in our Travis run…:( 
If anyone wants to check that list of tests and cross check with Travis, we 
could run them as well.

@miguel, looks like smoke/test_scale_vm is reporting errors. It seems you were 
the last one to touch that test. Could you try to run the tests on some 
cloudstack setup you have and report back to use your finding. From below you 
can see, the test seems to be failing on simulator/basic.

@boris, any chance you can run the tests listed under KVM/basic in your test 
environment ? I don’t know if you know how to use Marvin. You can check the 
Marvin scripts used in .travis.yml for a clue.

The NAT tests errors might be related to the “VPC” errors Wilder and Remi just 
solved, so we can see tomorrow what BVT says.

(pinging pdion and milamber in that email to see what they can do on spare 
cycles)

Thanks everyone, let’s knock those down.

-Sebastien


On Sep 29, 2015, at 2:49 PM, Raja Pullela <raja.pull...@citrix.com> wrote:

Hopefully the format of this email stays as I compose ?

Bugs to be fixed for BVTs:
a.   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8915
b.  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8697
c.   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8891 - Should be a 
blocker
d.  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8876 - Should be a 
blocker


BVT Passrate for 9/25:


* Simulator Basic - 97.6%,  Failed tests 1

* Simulator Adv - 100%

* XS Basic - 97.1%, Failed tests 2

* XS Adv - 94.3%, Failed tests 6

* KVM Basic - 94.2%, Failed tests 4

* KVM Adv - 92.6%, Failed tests 8

Test cases failed:

Simulator Basic

* 
integration.smoke.test_scale_vm.TestScaleVm.test_02_scale_vm_without_hypervisor_specifics
  (Failure: test case issue)


XS Basic

* 
integration.smoke.test_scale_vm.TestScaleVm.test_02_scale_vm_without_hypervisor_specifics
  (Failure: test case issue)

* integration.smoke.test_volumes.TestVolumes.test_02_attach_volume 
/Failure: SSH connection failed

XS Adv

* 
integration.smoke.test_loadbalance.TestLoadBalance.test_01_create_lb_rule_src_nat
 (Failure: SSH connection failed)

* 
integration.smoke.test_loadbalance.TestLoadBalance.test_02_create_lb_rule_non_nat
 (Failure: SSH connection failed)

* 
integration.smoke.test_loadbalance.TestLoadBalance.test_assign_and_removal_lb 
(Failure: SSH connection failed)

* integration.smoke.test_internal_lb.TestInternalLb.test_internallb 
(Failure: 'Failed to assign load balancer rule')

* 
integration.smoke.test_scale_vm.TestScaleVm.test_02_scale_vm_without_hypervisor_specifics
  (Failure: test case issue)

* :setup (Failure: 
test setup issue)
KVM Basic

* integration.smoke.test_volumes.TestVolumes.test_02_attach_volume 
(Failure: SSH connection failed)

* integration.smoke.test_ssvm.TestSSVMs.test_07_reboot_ssvm (Failure: 
Timed out waiting for SSVM agent to be Up)

* integration.smoke.test_ssvm.TestSSVMs.test_08_reboot_cpvm (Failure: 
Timed out waiting for SSVM agent to be Up)

* 
integration.smoke.test_vm_life_cycle.TestVMLifeCycle.test_10_attachAndDetach_iso
 (Failure: SSH connection failed)


KVM Adv

* 
integration.smoke.test_loadbalance.TestLoadBalance.test_01_create_lb_rule_src_nat
  (Failure: SSH connection failed)

* 
integration.smoke.test_loadbalance.TestLoadBalance.test_02_create_lb_rule_non_nat
 (Failure: SSH connection

Re: BVT report 9/29

2015-09-29 Thread Milamber



If I change my ansible script to install the tomcat6 package before 
cloudstack-management, that's works.


Tomorrow I will test a full ACS advanced network installation.

root@cs-mgr1:~# service cloudstack-management status
 * CloudStack-specific Tomcat servlet engine is running with pid 5798
root@cs-mgr1:~# dpkg -l|grep cloudstack
ii  cloudstack-common 4.6.0-SNAPSHOT   all  A 
common package which contains files which are shared by several 
CloudStack packages
ii  cloudstack-management 4.6.0-SNAPSHOT   all  
CloudStack server library

root@cs-mgr1:~# dpkg -l|grep tomcat
ii  libtomcat6-java 6.0.39-1 all  
Servlet and JSP engine -- core libraries
ii  tomcat6 6.0.39-1 all  Servlet and 
JSP engine
ii  tomcat6-common 6.0.39-1 all  Servlet 
and JSP engine -- common files




On 29/09/2015 22:07, Milamber wrote:


I have tested an installation of the CS 4.6.0 SNAPSHOT (today) on 
Ubuntu 14.04 LTS with latest update (installation with a ansible script)


The cloudstack-management don't works.


I don't known the root cause, but I suppose that is the (new?) 
dependency of Tomcat v7 (before ~1 month: tomcat6 was the tomcat 
dependency)


I need to made some other tests to confirm if the issue come from my 
ansible script or other things.


Some results commands (and visibly at least 1 bug):

root@cs-mgr1:/var/log/cloudstack/management# service 
cloudstack-management status

 * cloudstack-management is not installed

root@cs-mgr1:/var/log/cloudstack/management# dpkg -l|grep cloudstack
ii  cloudstack-common 4.6.0-SNAPSHOT all  A common package 
which contains files which are shared by several CloudStack packages
ii  cloudstack-management 4.6.0-SNAPSHOT all  CloudStack 
server library


root@cs-mgr1:/var/log/cloudstack/management# dpkg -l|grep tomcat
ii  libtomcat7-java 7.0.52-1ubuntu0.3all Servlet and 
JSP engine -- core libraries
ii  tomcat7 7.0.52-1ubuntu0.3all  Servlet and 
JSP engine
ii  tomcat7-common 7.0.52-1ubuntu0.3all Servlet and 
JSP engine -- common files



On 29/09/2015 19:42, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:

Hi folks, let’s try to shed some lights on those tests errors.

First off, it appears some of those tests are not included in our 
Travis run…:( If anyone wants to check that list of tests and cross 
check with Travis, we could run them as well.


@miguel, looks like smoke/test_scale_vm is reporting errors. It seems 
you were the last one to touch that test. Could you try to run the 
tests on some cloudstack setup you have and report back to use your 
finding. From below you can see, the test seems to be failing on 
simulator/basic.


@boris, any chance you can run the tests listed under KVM/basic in 
your test environment ? I don’t know if you know how to use Marvin. 
You can check the Marvin scripts used in .travis.yml for a clue.


The NAT tests errors might be related to the “VPC” errors Wilder and 
Remi just solved, so we can see tomorrow what BVT says.


(pinging pdion and milamber in that email to see what they can do on 
spare cycles)


Thanks everyone, let’s knock those down.

-Sebastien

On Sep 29, 2015, at 2:49 PM, Raja Pullela <raja.pull...@citrix.com> 
wrote:


Hopefully the format of this email stays as I compose ?

Bugs to be fixed for BVTs:
a.   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8915
b.  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8697
c.   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8891 - 
Should be a blocker
d.  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8876 - 
Should be a blocker



BVT Passrate for 9/25:


* Simulator Basic - 97.6%,  Failed tests 1

* Simulator Adv - 100%

* XS Basic - 97.1%, Failed tests 2

* XS Adv - 94.3%, Failed tests 6

* KVM Basic - 94.2%, Failed tests 4

* KVM Adv - 92.6%, Failed tests 8

Test cases failed:

Simulator Basic

* 
integration.smoke.test_scale_vm.TestScaleVm.test_02_scale_vm_without_hypervisor_specifics 
(Failure: test case issue)



XS Basic

* 
integration.smoke.test_scale_vm.TestScaleVm.test_02_scale_vm_without_hypervisor_specifics 
(Failure: test case issue)


* integration.smoke.test_volumes.TestVolumes.test_02_attach_volume 
/Failure: SSH connection failed


XS Adv

* 
integration.smoke.test_loadbalance.TestLoadBalance.test_01_create_lb_rule_src_nat 
(Failure: SSH connection failed)


* 
integration.smoke.test_loadbalance.TestLoadBalance.test_02_create_lb_rule_non_nat 
(Failure: SSH connection failed)


* 
integration.smoke.test_loadbalance.TestLoadBalance.test_assign_and_removal_lb 
(Failure: SSH connection failed)


* integration.smoke.test_internal_lb.TestInternalLb.test_internallb 
(Failure: 'Failed to assign load balancer rule')


* 
integration.smoke.test_scale_vm.TestScaleVm.test_02_scale_vm_without_hypervisor_spe

Re: Update on ACS 4.6

2015-09-12 Thread Milamber


(missing information)

The place to translate is on Transifex:
https://www.transifex.com/ke4qqq/CloudStack_UI/


On 12/09/2015 18:02, Milamber wrote:

Hello,

In addition, if you have some time to translate the strings for the 
Web UI. Some languages are near the 100% level:


(- French (France) (fr_FR) 100% (0 strings to translate) (done!))
- Japanese (Japan) (ja_JP) 99% (10 strings to translate)
- Portuguese (Brazil) (pt_BR) 99% (5 strings to translate)
- Chinese (China) (zh_CN) 98% (189 strings to translate)
- Hungarian (hu) 98% (177 strings to translate)
- Dutch (Netherlands) (nl_NL) 96% (425 strings to translate)
- Russian (Russia) (ru_RU) 89% (1,354 strings to translate)
- Korean (Korea) (ko_KR) 83% (2,076 strings to translate)
- German (Germany) (de_DE) 76% (3,061 strings to translate)
- Norwegian Bokmål (Norway) (nb_NO) 74% (3,272 strings to translate)
- Spanish (es) 67% (4,126 strings to translate)
- Italian (Italy) (it_IT) 43% (7,248 strings to translate)
- Polish (pl) 26% (9,438 strings to translate)
- Catalan (ca) 15% (10,868 strings to translate)
- Arabic (ar) 14% (11,063 strings to translate)
- Persian (fa) 13% (11,102 strings to translate)
- Romanian (Romania) (ro_RO) 10% (11,487 strings to translate)
- Chinese (Taiwan) (zh_TW) 9% (11,687 strings to translate)
- Georgian (ka) 7% (11,944 strings to translate)
- Thai (Thailand) (th_TH) 6% (12,050 strings to translate)
- Indonesian (id) 2% (12,600 strings to translate)
- Tatar (tt) 2% (12,570 strings to translate)
- Turkish (Turkey) (tr_TR) 2% (12,545 strings to translate)
- Hindi (hi) 0% (12,879 strings to translate)
- Indonesian (Indonesia) (id_ID) 0% (12,879 strings to translate)
- Vietnamese (Viet Nam) (vi_VN) 0% (12,879 strings to translate)

Thanks.

Milamber

On 10/09/2015 10:22, Remi Bergsma wrote:

Hi all,


A lot of work is being done to make 4.6 ready for a release. It's 
great to see it's getting better every day!



Today Rajani and myself looked at all blocker and critical issues on 
4.6. We decided to bump some of them to blocker. Two more issues need 
to verified against current master. In case still broken, they will 
be marked blocker as well. This means we'll have 6-8 blocker issues 
to resolve. Most of them are virtual router related and we feel we 
cannot do a RC without properly fixing them.



If you have some time, please:


Look at the 4.6 release dashboard:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12326765 




Fix one of the blockers (or critical issues):

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8697?filter=12332940


It also helps if people help reviewing PRs:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pulls


Apart from these issues, 4.6 (aka master) is pretty stable. Feel free 
to test-drive it and verify your key functionality.



Thanks!


Regards from the 4.6 RMs,


Rajani / Remi

Re: Update on ACS 4.6

2015-09-12 Thread Milamber


Hello,

In addition, if you have some time to translate the strings for the Web 
UI. Some languages are near the 100% level:


(- French (France) (fr_FR) 100% (0 strings to translate) (done!))
- Japanese (Japan) (ja_JP) 99% (10 strings to translate)
- Portuguese (Brazil) (pt_BR) 99% (5 strings to translate)
- Chinese (China) (zh_CN) 98% (189 strings to translate)
- Hungarian (hu) 98% (177 strings to translate)
- Dutch (Netherlands) (nl_NL) 96% (425 strings to translate)
- Russian (Russia) (ru_RU) 89% (1,354 strings to translate)
- Korean (Korea) (ko_KR) 83% (2,076 strings to translate)
- German (Germany) (de_DE) 76% (3,061 strings to translate)
- Norwegian Bokmål (Norway) (nb_NO) 74% (3,272 strings to translate)
- Spanish (es) 67% (4,126 strings to translate)
- Italian (Italy) (it_IT) 43% (7,248 strings to translate)
- Polish (pl) 26% (9,438 strings to translate)
- Catalan (ca) 15% (10,868 strings to translate)
- Arabic (ar) 14% (11,063 strings to translate)
- Persian (fa) 13% (11,102 strings to translate)
- Romanian (Romania) (ro_RO) 10% (11,487 strings to translate)
- Chinese (Taiwan) (zh_TW) 9% (11,687 strings to translate)
- Georgian (ka) 7% (11,944 strings to translate)
- Thai (Thailand) (th_TH) 6% (12,050 strings to translate)
- Indonesian (id) 2% (12,600 strings to translate)
- Tatar (tt) 2% (12,570 strings to translate)
- Turkish (Turkey) (tr_TR) 2% (12,545 strings to translate)
- Hindi (hi) 0% (12,879 strings to translate)
- Indonesian (Indonesia) (id_ID) 0% (12,879 strings to translate)
- Vietnamese (Viet Nam) (vi_VN) 0% (12,879 strings to translate)

Thanks.

Milamber

On 10/09/2015 10:22, Remi Bergsma wrote:

Hi all,


A lot of work is being done to make 4.6 ready for a release. It's great to see 
it's getting better every day!


Today Rajani and myself looked at all blocker and critical issues on 4.6. We 
decided to bump some of them to blocker. Two more issues need to verified 
against current master. In case still broken, they will be marked blocker as 
well. This means we'll have 6-8 blocker issues to resolve. Most of them are 
virtual router related and we feel we cannot do a RC without properly fixing 
them.


If you have some time, please:


Look at the 4.6 release dashboard:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12326765


Fix one of the blockers (or critical issues):

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8697?filter=12332940


It also helps if people help reviewing PRs:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pulls


Apart from these issues, 4.6 (aka master) is pretty stable. Feel free to 
test-drive it and verify your key functionality.


Thanks!


Regards from the 4.6 RMs,


Rajani / Remi

Re: Hypervisors disconnected - java.io.IOException Fail to init SSL java.io.IOException: Connection closed with -1 on reading size

2015-08-31 Thread Milamber


Hello,

Perhaps an issue on SSL/TLS requirement. Check difference of the file 
below (now and after the update)


JAVA_HOME/jre/lib/security/java.security

Particularly the keys:
jdk.certpath.disabledAlgorithms
and
jdk.tls.legacyAlgorithms


Also, check the keystore contains the ssl keys with the keytool command (from 
the updated packages). Can you read-it, check the key size, etc.


Some reference:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/6u17-141447.html
6861062 java classes_security Disable MD2 in certificate 
chain validation


http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/7u40-relnotes-2004172.html
Default x.509 Certificates Have Longer Key Length

Starting from 7u40, the use of x.509 certificates with RSA keys less 
than 1024 bits in length is restricted. This restriction is applied via 
the Java Security property, jdk.certpath.disabledAlgorithms. The default 
value of jdk.certpath.disabledAlgorithms is now as follows:

jdk.certpath.disabledAlgorithms=MD2, RSA keySize < 1024

In order to avoid the compatibility issue, users who use X.509 
certificates with RSA keys less than 1024 bits, are recommended to 
update their certificates with stronger keys. As a workaround, at their 
own risk, users can adjust the key size to permit smaller key sizes 
through the security property jdk.certpath.disabledAlgorithms.


=



On 31/08/2015 12:11, Nux! wrote:

Rajani,

Yes, you read right.
The rpm changelog shows:
  Tue Jul 28 2015 Andrew Hughes  - 1:1.6.0.36-1.13.8.1
- Update tarball to fix TCK regression (PR2565)
- Resolves: rhbz#1235150

* Wed Jul 22 2015 Andrew Hughes  - 1:1.6.0.36-1.13.8.0
- Update to IcedTea 1.13.8
- Update no_pr2125.patch to work against new version.
- Resolves: rhbz#1235150

Nothing dramatic, though I do not have permission to read those bugzilla 
entries.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -

From: "Rajani Karuturi" 
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Monday, 31 August, 2015 11:59:04
Subject: Re: Hypervisors disconnected - java.io.IOException Fail to init SSL 
java.io.IOException: Connection closed with
-1 on reading size
If I am reading it right, java 1.7 has no version change and 1.6 is changed
from 1.6.0.35 to 16.0.36 which caused the failure

Interestingly, I do not see release notes for 1.6.0_36
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/releasenotes-136954.html

~Rajani

On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Nux!  wrote:


Rajani,

Sure:

Downgrade  java-1.6.0-openjdk-1:1.6.0.35-1.13.7.1.el6_6.x86_64  @base
Downgraded1:1.6.0.36-1.13.8.1.el6_7.x86_64
@updates
Downgrade  java-1.7.0-openjdk-1:1.7.0.85-2.6.1.3.el6_6.x86_64
  @updates
Downgraded1:1.7.0.85-2.6.1.3.el6_7.x86_64
  @updates
Downgrade  java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel-1:1.7.0.85-2.6.1.3.el6_6.x86_64
@updates
Downgraded  1:1.7.0.85-2.6.1.3.el6_7.x86_64
@updates

The differences seem trivial and there's always the risk it may not have
been the java change at all doing this, but I do not know what else could
have triggered it.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -

From: "Rajani Karuturi" 
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Monday, 31 August, 2015 11:21:45
Subject: Re: Hypervisors disconnected - java.io.IOException Fail to init

SSL java.io.IOException: Connection closed with

-1 on reading size
Hi Lucian,
Can you share the point release numbers of java before and after the
upgrade? (May be that would help us find the issue.)

~Rajani

On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Nux!  wrote:


A downgrade of both java-1.6.0-openjdk and java-1.7.0-openjdk followed

by

a reboot of the management server seems to have fixed it, but it's not a
solution I like very much.

Anyone has any clues as to what causes that error?

Lucian

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -

From: "Nux!" 
To: "dev" 
Sent: Monday, 31 August, 2015 10:58:16
Subject: Hypervisors disconnected - java.io.IOException Fail to init

SSL

java.io.IOException: Connection closed with -1

on reading size
Hi,

Has anyone seen this before and can translate to English? The logs

don't

say

much, it's obviously SSL related somehow.

The agent says:

java.io.IOException: SSL: Fail to init SSL! java.io.IOException:

Connection

closed with -1 on reading size.
   at com.cloud.utils.nio.NioClient.init(NioClient.java:87)
   at com.cloud.utils.nio.NioConnection.run(NioConnection.java:111)
   at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
2015-08-31 10:27:56,315 INFO  [utils.nio.NioClient]

(Agent-Selector:null)

Connecting to 192.168.168.2:8250

2015-08-31 10:28:06,333 ERROR [utils.nio.NioConnection]

(Agent-Selector:null)

Unable to initialize the

Re: [DISCUSS] Improving community experience for (new) contributors

2015-08-26 Thread Milamber


Hello,

I think that the stability of the master (and other living branches) is 
(very) important too.
The 2 LGTM requirement can be annoying but if it's permit to have less 
(regression) bugs and better stability then we can continue in this way 
IMHO.


That said, perhaps we need update this page [1] to indicate the 2 LGTM 
process and add to the ping process, a sentence like don't hesitate 
to ping the dev list, particular if you are new in the community



[1] http://cloudstack.apache.org/developers.html

Section: Review

Once you've submitted your pull request, you should receive a response 
within a few days. If you receive no response within a week, please ping 
the cloudstack-dev mailing list (dev@cloudstack.apache.org).


Milamber


On 26/08/2015 17:09, Rajani Karuturi wrote:

A stable master is very important for new contributors to feel welcomed. This 
also saves lot of time for devs who work on acs.
We do not have good test coverage (and we do not have infra to even run the 
existing tests against real hardware and hypervisors). Once we have that, we 
can accept anything that passes tests. Until then, I think manual reviews is 
the only way.

There used to be long queues and abandoned prs/reviews even before.
I think the current process is more time consuming for existing committers( 
than new contributors) who used to directly checkin. But, it is definitely 
better for committers to get their code reviewed than to wakeup to a broken 
master.

~Rajani
Sent from my Windows Phone

From: Wido den Hollandermailto:w...@widodh.nl
Sent: ‎26-‎08-‎2015 19:36
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Improving community experience for (new) contributors



On 08/26/2015 03:53 PM, Remi Bergsma wrote:

Hi Rohit,

Thanks for sharing your observations. I agree with you that anybody that 
contributes (or uses) Apache CloudStack should feel welcome in the community.

In the past weeks I tried to respond to as many PRs as I could and merge them 
as soon as it met the requirements. When I can not review myself, I usually 
ping someone and ask to do the review. This way I hope new contributors too get 
a fast response. I agree this is important so let us all have a look at the PRs 
on a regular basis and review them if possible.

Also, I dropped the closing of PRs for now. I get your point and propose to 
leave it as-is. It’s not important now.

I see a master that gets more stable every day and I think that’s awesome. Also 
for new contributors or new users this is great, as most new devs will checkout 
master to see if it is any good. In the current state, I’d say we improved 
greatly.


And that's something that makes me happy. In the past we had tons of
broken code coming into master which made development against master
painful. Very painful.

We indeed slow development down now, but I think that is a good thing at
this point. We need to stabilize a lot.


So, it’s true that our review process takes time and effort, but IMHO it’s 
worth it. Running tests before anything hits master shows us problems in 
advance. And in case it doesn’t, we can always go ahead and improve the tests.


+1

I don't say it's perfect now, but it's better then it was.


If you see things we can improve, please share.

Regards,
Remi



On 26 Aug 2015, at 12:20, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote:

Hi all,

I’ve identified few issues around the recent changes that I don’t know
how we can fix or improve but I hope to get feedback from the
community.

I understand that you may disagree with what I’m sharing which is
alright, even in your disagreement I hope that you don’t take an
offence on that, that is certainly not my aim. I personally want to
the community to be felt welcoming so that we can attract and retain
new contributors and have a nice environment for everyone.

Some observations and comments:

- Generally those of us who have worked for long in the community or
have colleagues from dayjob working in the ACS community - we have
better chances in getting their PRs merged; for new contributors this
pattern is not encouraging and certainly not welcoming if their PRs
get closed.

- The recent drive to use Github PRs seems to be really working great
for us, but still the requirements of at least 2 +1s/LGTM, unit tests
and pedantic bike-shedding has cost us new developers/contributors and
kills the joy of programming for some; for experienced and
commercially backed developers this makes sense. I personally try to
be pragmatic and lenient on code reviews as long as smoke tests
(Travis) pass.

- Contributions are process-oriented that cost time and effort; there
have been initiative to satisfy the tool but not the human, and not
optimizing on developer time.

- What should we do to get more developer contributors and how to
attract hobbyists or casual contributors.

Regards.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.3.2 (Round 2)

2015-08-23 Thread Milamber

Hello,

+1 (binding)

Some basics tests (list, create vm, static nat, fw rule, stop vm, etc.)
on CS 4.5.1, KVM.

Thanks to the RM.

Milamber

On 23/08/2015 16:08, Rohit Yadav wrote:

Hi all,

The 72 hours voting window has finished and we lack enough votes to
pass this candidate. The voting thread will be indefinitely open now,
unless we find a major issue or blocker.

Please consider testing and voting this candidate. Thanks.

On 20-Aug-2015, at 12:20 pm, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org
mailto:raj...@apache.org wrote:

+1 (binding)

built from source, could deply vm, create disk, attack disk, list vms
etc.

~Rajani

On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Rohit Yadav
rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com

wrote:

+1 (binding)

Tested to deploy KVM zones using an existing cloudmonkey/bash
script, and

tested to register ssh public keys.

On 19-Aug-2015, at 2:39 pm, Rohit Yadav rohityada...@gmail.com
mailto:rohityada...@gmail.com wrote:

Hi All,

I've created a 5.3.2 release of CloudMonkey, with the following
artifacts up for a vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-cloudmonkey.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/master
Commit: 653dcca9e008e20fee83f0b40f388611ad931d15

List of changes:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-cloudmonkey.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES.md;hb=master

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/cloudmonkey-5.3.2/

PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

The vote will be open for 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
indicate (binding) with their vote?

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

Regards.

Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue

M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab

Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related
services

IaaS Cloud Design Build
http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
http://shapeblue.com/csforge/

CloudStack Consulting http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/
CloudStack Software Engineering
http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/
CloudStack Infrastructure Support
http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses
http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
intended
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any
views or

opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are
not the

intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the
sender
if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd
is a
company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India
LLP is a
company incorporated in India and is operated under license from
Shape Blue
Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in
Brasil
and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty
Ltd is

a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under
license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue

M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com

Blog: bhaisaab.org http://bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab

Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design Build
http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//

CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework http://shapeblue.com/csforge/
CloudStack Consulting http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/
CloudStack Software Engineering
http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/
CloudStack Infrastructure Support
http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses
http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do
not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related
companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you
must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show
it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have
received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated
in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.2 (Round 2)

2015-08-19 Thread Milamber


Hello,

+1 (binding)

* Building CloudStack ubuntu packages from Git 4.5.2 RC2 tag.

* Tests migration from 4.4.4 - 4.5.2rc2 on Ubuntu 14.04.3 (1 mgr, 2 
nodes, 1 nfs), basic install, NFS storage, KVM, SystemVM shapeblue, 
After migration: some tests on HA (crash node), some tests with 
templates, account management in webui, test localization french, and 
CS-cloud-init on debian.


* Tests fresh install on Ubuntu 14.04.3 (1 mgr, 2 nodes, 1 nfs), 
advanced network install NFS storage, KVM, SystemVM shapeblue, some 
tests on HA (crash node), some tests with templates, and CS-cloud-init 
on debian.


* Some tests (register template, create network, register ssh key, 
create instance, get IP) with Ansible + ansible-cloudstack module from 
@resmo


Thanks for the RM.

Milamber


Please note this bug message in the last migration step (when I rebooted 
all systemvm/router).


root@cs-mgr1:~# cloudstack-sysvmadm -d 127.0.0.1 -u cloud -p cloudPass -a
/usr/bin/cloudstack-sysvmadm: line 21: /etc/rc.d/init.d/functions: No 
such file or directory


Stopping and starting 1 secondary storage vm(s)...
Done stopping and starting secondary storage vm(s)

Stopping and starting 1 console proxy vm(s)...
Done stopping and starting console proxy vm(s) .

Stopping and starting 1 running routing vm(s)...
Done restarting router(s).



On 19/08/2015 10:22, Rohit Yadav wrote:

Hi All,

I've created a 4.5.2 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150819T1442
Commit: 7385441807ba3fde3d45c226df6b1bdd2f36ae26
Tag: 4.5.2-rc2

List of changes:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150819T1442

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.2/

PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

The vote will be open for 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
indicate (binding) with their vote?

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

Regards.

Re: Review PRs: please help!

2015-08-19 Thread Milamber


Hello Wido,

PR from me are on the localization and web UI, easy to review ;-)

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/697

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/699

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/712

Milamber

On 19/08/2015 08:22, Wido den Hollander wrote:

Hi,

Understood :) I'm trying, but most PRs are VMWare or Xen and I
personally don't know anything about that code, so I don't feel good in
giving in LGTM on such a PR.

This is from my personal view, but I only want to give a LGTM on code I
understand.

KVM and RBD storage PRs? Happy to review them!

Wido

On 18-08-15 17:29, Remi Bergsma wrote:

Hi all,

Could you please have a look at the PRs we have waiting [1] and review them? 
Test it, look at the code or otherwise review them. Add comments, or add a LGTM 
when you think it’s OK. Even if you review just one PR per day it already helps 
:-)

I’ll keep an eye on them as well and will merge when the requirements are met.

Thanks,
Remi

[1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pulls

Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8744 Add missing localization ...

2015-08-18 Thread Milamber


Hello,

@remi: Thanks would great if this PR can be included in master before 
the release process of 4.6. Thanks.


@all (translators): New strings needs to be translated on Transifex[1].
I will make an update of the l10n properties files just before the start 
of 4.6 release process.


Milamber

PS: cc user list for touch the translators.

[1] https://www.transifex.com/ke4qqq/CloudStack_UI/



On 18/08/2015 11:22, milamberspace wrote:

GitHub user milamberspace opened a pull request:

 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/712

 CLOUDSTACK-8744 Add missing localization (l10n) for several parts in …

 …the UI
 
 - l10n for the SSH Key Pairs behavior

 - l10n for Autoscaling / LB sections
 - l10n for Reset password
 - l10n on some strings for the installation Wizard
 - l10n on some strings in VPN/VPC section
 - l10n on Service offerings sections
 - improve some FR translations

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

 $ git pull https://github.com/milamberspace/cloudstack 
CLOUDSTACK-8744-AnotherMissingL10N-4-master

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/712.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

 This closes #712
 


commit 267994fa0b3f9a5a773e691be0fc43d1c4f05d16
Author: Milamber milam...@apache.org
Date:   2015-08-18T10:16:14Z

 CLOUDSTACK-8744 Add missing localization (l10n) for several parts in the UI
 - l10n for the SSH Key Pairs behavior
 - l10n for Autoscaling / LB sections
 - l10n for Reset password
 - l10n on some strings for the installation Wizard
 - l10n on some strings in VPN/VPC section
 - l10n on Service offerings sections
 - improve some FR translations




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: [SHARE] VM migrations failing with Ubuntu 14.04.3

Hello Rohit,

No issue for migration in my test environment (KVM over KVM) with the
4.5.2 RC1 on Ubuntu 10.04.3 (up to date)

AppArmor is disabled for libvirtd and virt-aa-helper

(see my ansible script:
https://github.com/milamberspace/ansible-cloudstack-ubuntu-aio/blob/master/roles/cloudstack-node/tasks/libvirtd.yml)

Milamber

On 14/08/2015 09:49, Wido den Hollander wrote:

On 13-08-15 14:06, Rohit Yadav wrote:

Hi all,

I’ve been testing a bug on KVM which involves VM migration, and in that
process I found that VM migrations failed in my environment twice even
with clean setups of Ubuntu 14.04.3 (lastest and updated packages) based
KVM hosts against CloudStack 4.5.2-SNAPSHOT (latest 4.5).

We haven't seen issue with migrations in production, but I'd have to
look more closely.

I wanted to share this issue to confirm if this is just my environment
or if someone experienced similar issue with latest Ubuntu 14.04 based
KVM hosts.

The specific errors I found in the logs were something like
qemuMigrationCancelDriveMirror:1421 : Unable to stop block job”, which
are likely reproduced by others such as:

https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/2014-June/msg00057.html
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-12/msg03093.html

A possible solution could be to download libvirt to 1.1.x.

Have you disabled AppArmor on that machine? We've seen many machines
with random weird issues when AppArmor was enabled.

Wido

Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue

M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org http://bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab

Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design Build
http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework http://shapeblue.com/csforge/
CloudStack Consulting http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/
CloudStack Software Engineering
http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/
CloudStack Infrastructure Support
http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses
http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do
not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies.
If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither
take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone.
Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in
error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales.
ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil
Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated
under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license
from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.5.2 RC and CloudMonkey 5.3.2 RC




On 14/08/2015 09:38, Rohit Yadav wrote:

Hi Milamber,

Your effort is not wasted, we’ll merge them on 4.5. The first RC 
(4.5.2-rc1) was created just to get the release process started. 
Historically we never done any ACS release with the first RC itself. 
I’m guessing we’ll see some bug reports pretty soon and we’ll need to 
do rc2, rc3 etc.


You're right. But my first tests on 4.5.2RC1 seems look good... so I 
crossing my fingers to have a -1 on the vote :-) (I know, it isn't good 
to hope a new RC :-))


The PR for the update of L10N files
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/697





On 14-Aug-2015, at 1:49 pm, Milamber milam...@apache.org 
mailto:milam...@apache.org wrote:


Hello,

If anyone can be check for the second LGTM on theses PR before the 
next 4.5 RC:


https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/687 (missing localization 
on CS45 web ui)


https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/676 (just change a debug 
message for more informative scheduler when its prepare a snapshot)


@Rohit, I would update the localization messages properties with the 
transifex data. I will prepare the PR today for the 4.5 branch.


Milamber

On 14/08/2015 08:59, Rohit Yadav wrote:

Hi all,

Just to update, all major pending important/security patches from my 
side have been applied, I’ll shortly start with a RC just to 
kickstart the testing process after triaging bugs on JIRA and given 
that there are no blockers reported on 4.5.x.


I’m sure we may discover more bugs so we may need to publish more 
RCs next weeks. If you have found any last minute blocker/critical 
issue please discuss here.


On 11-Aug-2015, at 10:29 am, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
wrote:


Hi all,

Starting tomorrow I’ll be working towards the release management of 
next ACS 4.5 release, ACS 4.5.2 and next CloudMonkey release, CM 5.3.2.


I’ve identified 4 issues (some of them are security related and 
private, others have open PRs and are SAML related) targeting 4.5 
branch that I’ll be personally working on, other than that are 
there any issues that are blockers/critical for 4.5.2 release, or 
something major enough to be fixed for 4.5.2?


On CloudMonkey’s side, I think we’ve seen few fixes since the last 
5.3.1 release and the next in line release (5.3.2) will be a minor 
release that aims to include few bugfixes, enhancement and 
an updated API precache (precached APIs against 
4.6.0-SNAPSHOT/master to get the superset of all APIs since 4.0) 
with no major changes.


Comments, questions, feedback?

Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue





M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com

Blog: bhaisaab.org http://bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab




Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related 
services


IaaS Cloud Design  Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is 
addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or 
related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this 
email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, 
nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a 
company incorporated in England  Wales. ShapeBlue Services India 
LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under 
license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is 
a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license 
from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered 
by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.


Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue




M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org http://bhaisaab.org http://bhaisaab.org | 
Twitter: @_bhaisaab





Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related 
services


IaaS Cloud Design  Build 
http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework 
http://shapeblue.com/csforge/

CloudStack Consulting http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/
CloudStack Software Engineering 
http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/
CloudStack Infrastructure Support 
http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses 
http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/


This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are 
intended solely for the use

Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.5.2 RC and CloudMonkey 5.3.2 RC


Hello,

If anyone can be check for the second LGTM on theses PR before the next 
4.5 RC:


https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/687 (missing localization on 
CS45 web ui)


https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/676 (just change a debug 
message for more informative scheduler when its prepare a snapshot)


@Rohit, I would update the localization messages properties with the 
transifex data. I will prepare the PR today for the 4.5 branch.


Milamber

On 14/08/2015 08:59, Rohit Yadav wrote:

Hi all,

Just to update, all major pending important/security patches from my 
side have been applied, I’ll shortly start with a RC just to kickstart 
the testing process after triaging bugs on JIRA and given that there 
are no blockers reported on 4.5.x.


I’m sure we may discover more bugs so we may need to publish more RCs 
next weeks. If you have found any last minute blocker/critical issue 
please discuss here.


On 11-Aug-2015, at 10:29 am, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote:


Hi all,

Starting tomorrow I’ll be working towards the release management of 
next ACS 4.5 release, ACS 4.5.2 and next CloudMonkey release, CM 5.3.2.


I’ve identified 4 issues (some of them are security related and 
private, others have open PRs and are SAML related) targeting 4.5 
branch that I’ll be personally working on, other than that are there 
any issues that are blockers/critical for 4.5.2 release, or something 
major enough to be fixed for 4.5.2?


On CloudMonkey’s side, I think we’ve seen few fixes since the last 
5.3.1 release and the next in line release (5.3.2) will be a minor 
release that aims to include few bugfixes, enhancement and an 
updated API precache (precached APIs against 4.6.0-SNAPSHOT/master to 
get the superset of all APIs since 4.0) with no major changes.


Comments, questions, feedback?

Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue





M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com

Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab




Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related 
services


IaaS Cloud Design  Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it 
is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or 
related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this 
email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor 
copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a 
company incorporated in England  Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP 
is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a 
company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The 
Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue 
Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.


Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue




M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com

Blog: bhaisaab.org http://bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab




Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design  Build 
http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//

CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework http://shapeblue.com/csforge/
CloudStack Consulting http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/
CloudStack Software Engineering 
http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/
CloudStack Infrastructure Support 
http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses 
http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/


This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related 
companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you 
must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show 
it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have 
received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated 
in England  Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue 
Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in 
Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA 
Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is 
traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue

Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.5.2 RC and CloudMonkey 5.3.2 RC