Re: [PROPOSE] Backup and Recovery Framework

2018-06-07 Thread Todd Pigram
Now outside of our ACS, I use Veeam for vCloud and vSphere and use Alike
for our XS pools. Inside ACS, the VMs use MaxBackup

On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 11:09 AM, Todd Pigram  wrote:

> I agree completely. That is why I use inside VM backup products currently.
>
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 11:07 AM, Will Stevens 
> wrote:
>
>> I have not been following this thread entirely, but I would not count on
>> our snapshot mechanism for backups.  If something like Veeam is used, then
>> an agent is in play and that agent will quiesce the running processes,
>> such
>> as MySQL.  This is important in order to do backup and DR as you will lose
>> transactions in memory and can potentially have a corrupted backup.
>>
>> Snapshots are not backups!!!
>>
>> *Will Stevens*
>> Chief Technology Officer
>> c 514.826.0190
>>
>> <https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 10:13 AM Rafael Weingärtner <
>> rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Ok, now I start to understand.  So, we will be handling snapshots and
>> they
>> > will be sent to a third-party system.
>> >
>> > Now let’s proceed. If I configure this “feature” with external=false.
>> What
>> > does it do? Nothing? I mean, what is the purpose of this “external”
>> > parameter?
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 4:09 PM, Nicolas Vazquez <
>> > nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Its format may depend on the provider, but under the hood it is a
>> > snapshot
>> > > which can be full or incremental and it is copied and stored in a
>> backup
>> > > repository in one of the backup servers. For example, if you use
>> Veeam,
>> > you
>> > > will find your backups stored as .vbk (for full backups) and .vib (for
>> > > incremental backups). It is the task of the backup provider to create
>> and
>> > > move these files to the backup repository.
>> > >
>> > > 
>> > > From: Rafael Weingärtner 
>> > > Sent: Thursday, June 7, 2018 10:39:35 AM
>> > > To: dev
>> > > Subject: Re: [PROPOSE] Backup and Recovery Framework
>> > >
>> > > Ok, there are a lot of things, which are kind of blurry to me. So,
>> let’s
>> > > try to go step by step.
>> > >
>> > > Let me ask again. What is a backup of the VM? You mention
>> restore-point.
>> > > What is it? Is it a snapshot in the hypervisor (complete/partial
>> > snapshot)?
>> > > If it is not a snapshot,  what is it then? Are you installing some
>> agent
>> > in
>> > > the VM and then copying/mirroring the files in the VM’s file system?
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 3:26 PM, Nicolas Vazquez <
>> > > nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hi Daniel and Rafael,
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > I have updated the diagram picture on the FS, please let me know if
>> the
>> > > > problem persists.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > @<mailto:daniel.herrm...@zv.fraunhofer.de>Daniel you are right
>> about
>> > > > restoring VMs, please let me update the FS. Regarding your
>> question, we
>> > > > have considered the backups as a first class citizens, meaning that
>> a
>> > > > backup would continue existing unless its originating VM has been
>> > > > removed/expunged. This way, listBackups API method would list them
>> in
>> > > order
>> > > > to allow a user to restore a deleted VM from a backup.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > @Rafael the idea of the Dummy provider is simply returning the
>> expected
>> > > > entities from a backup provider. For example, the BackupManager
>> could
>> > ask
>> > > > the BackupProvider to list its backups and would expect a list of
>> > > backups.
>> > > > As the Dummy Provider implements the BackupProvider interface, it
>> has
>> > its
>> > > > own implementation of listBackups() method and simply returns some
>> mock
>> > > > entities to the Backup Manager. It does not store any backup, it
>> simply
>> > > > creates them in execution time and returns them.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> &

Re: [PROPOSE] Backup and Recovery Framework

2018-06-07 Thread Todd Pigram
eriods as well as backup times. For
> > > example,
> > > > the provider may expose Golden, Silver and Bronze policies and have
> > > > different options for each of them.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The 'external' parameter on the listBackupPolicies API method would
> > only
> > > > ask the Backup and Recovery provider to list their policies if it is
> > set
> > > to
> > > > true. If it is not set, or set to false, it just simply returns the
> > > > existing mapped policies in CloudStack. Initially, CloudStack does
> not
> > > > store any backup policy, those should be imported/mapped by the
> > > > 'importBackupPolicy' API method.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Finally, we consider backups as restore points. As mentioned above,
> > > > backups are stored on the Backup and Recovery provider servers, so we
> > > keep
> > > > a mapping between the CloudStack entity and the backup, which can be
> > used
> > > > to restore VMs.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Please let me know if anything.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Nicolas Vazquez
> > > >
> > > > 
> > > > From: Rafael Weingärtner 
> > > > Sent: Thursday, June 7, 2018 6:55:57 AM
> > > > To: dev
> > > > Subject: Re: [PROPOSE] Backup and Recovery Framework
> > > >
> > > > Hi Nicolas,
> > > >
> > > > The idea is great. I have some questions though.
> > > >
> > > > Before getting to the questions, your pictures are broken, or at
> least
> > > they
> > > > seem broken to me.
> > > >
> > > > How would the “dummy” backup provider work? I mean, what does it do?
> > > where
> > > > does it storage the "backup"?
> > > > What is the difference from this Backup to a Snapshot? Is it simply
> > > storing
> > > > a snapshot outside the cloud structure?
> > > > How would these “backup policies” look like? I mean, what can I
> > > configure?
> > > > Regarding that parameter “external” of your backup policy, how would
> it
> > > > work if we set it to false?
> > > > What are you defining as a backup (what do you mean by backup in the
> > > > context of this feature?)? I mean, is it simply a snapshot file that
> > you
> > > > store somewhere else?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com
> > > > www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> > > > ,
> > > > @shapeblue
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com
> > > www.shapeblue.com
> > > ,
> > > @shapeblue
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 6:05 AM, 
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 for this feature request, thank you for bringing this to life!
> > > Volume
> > > > > snapshots are what our users currently use as backup solution,
> which
> > > has
> > > > > some inherent problems such as handling large volumes and the
> > handling
> > > of
> > > > > multiple volumes (consistency).
> > > > >
> > > > > One thought: when restoring a VM, I think there are two cases to
> > > > consider:
> > > > >
> > > > > - The VM is still in CS and the user just wants to restore an old
> > > version
> > > > > of the VM
> > > > > - The VM has already been deleted and the user wants to restore the
> > > > > deleted VM
> > > > >
> > > > > As listBackups is described as " listBackups API method. List
> > existing
> > > > > backups for a VM". Is the second use case supported at all?
> > > > >
> > > > > I like the approach not to define the backup policies in CS but in
> > > > > whatever tool is used in the end, as otherwise a lot of features
> > might
> > > be
> > > > > lost. We as services providers need to create them in the first
> > place,
> > > > but
> > > > > I think this is the better solution.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards
> > > > > Daniel
> > > > >
> > > > > On 06.06.18, 14:43, "Nicolas Vazquez" <
> > nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > We would like to introduce a new framework into CloudStack that
> > > will
> > > > > allow adding Backup and Recovery providers as plugins. This
> framework
> > > > goal
> > > > > is allowing users to backup their guest VMs for recovery purposes.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Please find the FS on this link: https://cwiki.apache.org/
> > > > > confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Backup+and+Recovery+Framework
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Nicolas Vazquez
> > > > >
> > > > > nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com
> > > > > www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> > > > > ,
> > > > > @shapeblue
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Rafael Weingärtner
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Rafael Weingärtner
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Rafael Weingärtner
> >
>



-- 


Todd Pigram
http://about.me/ToddPigram
www.linkedin.com/in/toddpigram/
@pigram86 on twitter
https://plus.google.com/+ToddPigram86
Mobile - 216-224-5769

PGP Public Key
<http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get=0x96B7B0F0C55933BB>


Re: [PROPOSE] Backup and Recovery Framework

2018-06-07 Thread Todd Pigram
Rafael,

I would agree with that as well as how Quadric spins up a ABD at time of
backup. I have tried both Alike and Unitrends (old PHD virtual) and ACS
removed the device before it works, but that was back on v4.3.



On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 11:03 AM, Rafael Weingärtner <
rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I believe the framework is going to be agnostic, but we need to implement
> "driver" to deal with different vendors API, right?
>
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 5:01 PM, Todd Pigram  wrote:
>
> > Nicolas,
> >
> > Given you Veeam example, this framework is backup vendor independent? So
> I
> > could use Veeam for vSphere or Hyper-V or use Quadric (Alike) for
> XenServer
> > or Hyper-V. This would sure beat the way I am doing it now, inside the
> VM.
> >
> > I will be following this closely.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 10:13 AM, Rafael Weingärtner <
> > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Ok, now I start to understand.  So, we will be handling snapshots and
> > they
> > > will be sent to a third-party system.
> > >
> > > Now let’s proceed. If I configure this “feature” with external=false.
> > What
> > > does it do? Nothing? I mean, what is the purpose of this “external”
> > > parameter?
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 4:09 PM, Nicolas Vazquez <
> > > nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Its format may depend on the provider, but under the hood it is a
> > > snapshot
> > > > which can be full or incremental and it is copied and stored in a
> > backup
> > > > repository in one of the backup servers. For example, if you use
> Veeam,
> > > you
> > > > will find your backups stored as .vbk (for full backups) and .vib
> (for
> > > > incremental backups). It is the task of the backup provider to create
> > and
> > > > move these files to the backup repository.
> > > >
> > > > 
> > > > From: Rafael Weingärtner 
> > > > Sent: Thursday, June 7, 2018 10:39:35 AM
> > > > To: dev
> > > > Subject: Re: [PROPOSE] Backup and Recovery Framework
> > > >
> > > > Ok, there are a lot of things, which are kind of blurry to me. So,
> > let’s
> > > > try to go step by step.
> > > >
> > > > Let me ask again. What is a backup of the VM? You mention
> > restore-point.
> > > > What is it? Is it a snapshot in the hypervisor (complete/partial
> > > snapshot)?
> > > > If it is not a snapshot,  what is it then? Are you installing some
> > agent
> > > in
> > > > the VM and then copying/mirroring the files in the VM’s file system?
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 3:26 PM, Nicolas Vazquez <
> > > > nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Daniel and Rafael,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I have updated the diagram picture on the FS, please let me know if
> > the
> > > > > problem persists.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > @<mailto:daniel.herrm...@zv.fraunhofer.de>Daniel you are right
> about
> > > > > restoring VMs, please let me update the FS. Regarding your
> question,
> > we
> > > > > have considered the backups as a first class citizens, meaning
> that a
> > > > > backup would continue existing unless its originating VM has been
> > > > > removed/expunged. This way, listBackups API method would list them
> in
> > > > order
> > > > > to allow a user to restore a deleted VM from a backup.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > @Rafael the idea of the Dummy provider is simply returning the
> > expected
> > > > > entities from a backup provider. For example, the BackupManager
> could
> > > ask
> > > > > the BackupProvider to list its backups and would expect a list of
> > > > backups.
> > > > > As the Dummy Provider implements the BackupProvider interface, it
> has
> > > its
> > > > > own implementation of listBackups() method and simply returns some
> > mock
> > > > > entities to the Backup Manager. It does not store any backup, it
> > simply
> > > > > creates them in execution time and returns them.
> > > > >
> > 

Re: [PROPOSE] Backup and Recovery Framework

2018-06-07 Thread Todd Pigram
covery provider servers, so we
> > keep
> > > a mapping between the CloudStack entity and the backup, which can be
> used
> > > to restore VMs.
> > >
> > >
> > > Please let me know if anything.
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Nicolas Vazquez
> > >
> > > 
> > > From: Rafael Weingärtner 
> > > Sent: Thursday, June 7, 2018 6:55:57 AM
> > > To: dev
> > > Subject: Re: [PROPOSE] Backup and Recovery Framework
> > >
> > > Hi Nicolas,
> > >
> > > The idea is great. I have some questions though.
> > >
> > > Before getting to the questions, your pictures are broken, or at least
> > they
> > > seem broken to me.
> > >
> > > How would the “dummy” backup provider work? I mean, what does it do?
> > where
> > > does it storage the "backup"?
> > > What is the difference from this Backup to a Snapshot? Is it simply
> > storing
> > > a snapshot outside the cloud structure?
> > > How would these “backup policies” look like? I mean, what can I
> > configure?
> > > Regarding that parameter “external” of your backup policy, how would it
> > > work if we set it to false?
> > > What are you defining as a backup (what do you mean by backup in the
> > > context of this feature?)? I mean, is it simply a snapshot file that
> you
> > > store somewhere else?
> > >
> > >
> > > nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com
> > > www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> > > ,
> > > @shapeblue
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com
> > www.shapeblue.com
> > ,
> > @shapeblue
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 6:05 AM, 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > +1 for this feature request, thank you for bringing this to life!
> > Volume
> > > > snapshots are what our users currently use as backup solution, which
> > has
> > > > some inherent problems such as handling large volumes and the
> handling
> > of
> > > > multiple volumes (consistency).
> > > >
> > > > One thought: when restoring a VM, I think there are two cases to
> > > consider:
> > > >
> > > > - The VM is still in CS and the user just wants to restore an old
> > version
> > > > of the VM
> > > > - The VM has already been deleted and the user wants to restore the
> > > > deleted VM
> > > >
> > > > As listBackups is described as " listBackups API method. List
> existing
> > > > backups for a VM". Is the second use case supported at all?
> > > >
> > > > I like the approach not to define the backup policies in CS but in
> > > > whatever tool is used in the end, as otherwise a lot of features
> might
> > be
> > > > lost. We as services providers need to create them in the first
> place,
> > > but
> > > > I think this is the better solution.
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > > Daniel
> > > >
> > > > On 06.06.18, 14:43, "Nicolas Vazquez" <
> nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > We would like to introduce a new framework into CloudStack that
> > will
> > > > allow adding Backup and Recovery providers as plugins. This framework
> > > goal
> > > > is allowing users to backup their guest VMs for recovery purposes.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Please find the FS on this link: https://cwiki.apache.org/
> > > > confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Backup+and+Recovery+Framework
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Nicolas Vazquez
> > > >
> > > > nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com
> > > > www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> > > > ,
> > > > @shapeblue
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Rafael Weingärtner
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Rafael Weingärtner
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Rafael Weingärtner
>



-- 


Todd Pigram
http://about.me/ToddPigram
www.linkedin.com/in/toddpigram/
@pigram86 on twitter
https://plus.google.com/+ToddPigram86
Mobile - 216-224-5769

PGP Public Key
<http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get=0x96B7B0F0C55933BB>


Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache(R) CloudStack(R) v4.11 (LTS)

2018-02-12 Thread Todd Pigram
arket through collaborative Open Source development,"
> > said Simon Weller, Director of Technology at Education Networks America.
> > "We're particularly excited by the Host-HA framework, which brings a much
> > greater level of hypervisor automation to KVM based service providers."
> >
> > "Feedback from our community helps us solve real-world problems and
> > strengthens our development process," added den Hollander. "I look
> forward
> > to Apache CloudStack users and developers continuing to work closely
> > together to make future releases even better!"
> >
> > Catch Apache CloudStack in action 28 February 2018 at the German
> CloudStack
> > Meetup in Frankfurt.
> >
> > Availability and Oversight
> > Apache CloudStack software is released under the Apache License v2.0 and
> is
> > overseen by a self-selected team of active contributors to the project. A
> > Project Management Committee (PMC) guides the Project's day-to-day
> > operations, including community development and product releases. For
> > downloads, documentation, and ways to become involved with Apache
> > CloudStack, visit http://cloudstack.apache.org/ and
> > https://twitter.com/CloudStack
> >
> > About The Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
> > Established in 1999, the all-volunteer Foundation oversees more than 350
> > leading Open Source projects, including Apache HTTP Server --the world's
> > most popular Web server software. Through the ASF's meritocratic process
> > known as "The Apache Way," more than 680 individual Members and 6,500
> > Committers across six continents successfully collaborate to develop
> freely
> > available enterprise-grade software, benefiting millions of users
> > worldwide: thousands of software solutions are distributed under the
> Apache
> > License; and the community actively participates in ASF mailing lists,
> > mentoring initiatives, and ApacheCon, the Foundation's official user
> > conference, trainings, and expo. The ASF is a US 501(c)(3) charitable
> > organization, funded by individual donations and corporate sponsors
> > including Aetna, Alibaba Cloud Computing, ARM, Baidu, Bloomberg, Budget
> > Direct, Capital One, Cash Store, Cerner, Cloudera, Comcast, Facebook,
> > Google, Hortonworks, Huawei, IBM, Inspur, iSIGMA, ODPi, LeaseWeb,
> > Microsoft, PhoenixNAP, Pivotal, Private Internet Access, Red Hat, Target,
> > Union Investment, and Yahoo. For more information, visit
> > http://apache.org/
> > and https://twitter.com/TheASF
> >
> > © The Apache Software Foundation. "Apache", "CloudStack", "Apache
> > CloudStack", and "ApacheCon" are registered trademarks or trademarks of
> the
> > Apache Software Foundation in the United States and/or other countries.
> All
> > other brands and trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
> >
>



-- 


Todd Pigram
http://about.me/ToddPigram
www.linkedin.com/in/toddpigram/
@pigram86 on twitter
https://plus.google.com/+ToddPigram86
Mobile - 216-224-5769

PGP Public Key
<http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get=0x96B7B0F0C55933BB>


Re: Creating Windows Server 2016 template for CloudStack

2017-08-14 Thread Todd Pigram
No problem.

On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 1:18 AM, Cloud List <cloud-l...@sg.or.id> wrote:

> Hi Todd,
>
> Just a quick update -- below solution works! Thanks for pointing me to the
> right direction.
>
> Cheers.
>
> -ip-
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 8:50 AM, Cloud List <cloud-l...@sg.or.id> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Todd.
> >
> > I found out that the correct syntax is:
> >
> > cd c:\windows\system32\sysprep
> > sysprep.exe /oobe /generalize /shutdown /unattend:c:\windows\system32\
> > sysprep\unattend.xml
> >
> > Trying this now and will share the outcome shortly.
> >
> > Thank you for your advice.
> >
> > Cheers.
> >
> > -ip-
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 6:21 PM, Todd Pigram <t...@toddpigram.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> You need to specify the xml in the command.
> >>
> >> sysprep.exe /oobe /generalize /shutdown c:\system32\sysprep\unattend.
> xml.
> >>
> >> On w2016, its Autounattend.xml for the file name.
> >>
> >> On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 5:28 AM, Cloud List <cloud-l...@sg.or.id>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Dear all,
> >> >
> >> > I am using CloudStack 4.8 and KVM hypervisor, andI tried creating a
> >> Windows
> >> > Server 2016 OS template using sysprep following the instruction on the
> >> > "System Preparation for Windows Server 2008 R2" section of the
> >> > documentation at below URL:
> >> >
> >> > http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-
> >> > administration/en/4.8/templates/_create_windows.html
> >> >
> >> > However, after the template is created and I tried to spin off a new
> VM
> >> > using the template, the console is still prompting the Language and
> >> > Country/Region selection, EULA and change password selection when
> >> > booting-up. It seems that the sysprep process to automate those steps
> >> > didn't work.
> >> >
> >> > I did saved the unattend.xml file into the C:\Windows\System32\sysprep
> >> > folder and run "sysprep.exe /oobe /generalize /shutdown" before
> creating
> >> > the template from the main VM.
> >> >
> >> > Did I miss anything, or is the sysprep process for Windows Server 2016
> >> is
> >> > different from 2008? The same method worked for 2012 last time.
> >> >
> >> > Any advice is appreciated, thank you.
> >> >
> >> > Cheers.
> >> >
> >> > -ip-
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >>
> >> Todd Pigram
> >> http://about.me/ToddPigram
> >> www.linkedin.com/in/toddpigram/
> >> @pigram86 on twitter
> >> https://plus.google.com/+ToddPigram86
> >> Mobile - 216-224-5769
> >>
> >> PGP Public Key
> >> <http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get=0x96B7B0F0C55933BB>
> >>
> >
> >
>



-- 


Todd Pigram
http://about.me/ToddPigram
www.linkedin.com/in/toddpigram/
@pigram86 on twitter
https://plus.google.com/+ToddPigram86
Mobile - 216-224-5769

PGP Public Key
<http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get=0x96B7B0F0C55933BB>


Re: Citrix CloudPltform Question-Hyper-V

2016-01-28 Thread Todd Pigram
Clifford,

I assume your running CCP 4.5.1, in the install guide did you follow section 
5.4.10 Prepare the SystemVM Template?

I am a Citrix partner as well, but I run CCP on XenServer. I will try and 
assist any way I can.





Todd Pigram
about.me/ToddPigram
 
<https://about.me/ToddPigram?promo=email_sig_source=email_sig_medium=email_sig_campaign=external_links>

www.linkedin.com/in/toddpigram/ <http://www.linkedin.com/in/toddpigram/>
@pigram86 on twitter
https://plus.google.com/+ToddPigram86 <https://plus.google.com/+ToddPigram86>
Mobile - 216-224-5769

PGP Public Key <http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get=0x96B7B0F0C55933BB>
> On Jan 28, 2016, at 5:26 PM, Pinnock Jr., Clifford R 
> <clifford.pinnoc...@ca.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi.
> I am with a Citrix partner and we are trying to deploy CloudPlatform 
> integrated with Hyper-V, all is well except we get exceptionCould not find a 
> part of the path /”secondary”tmpl/1/9 when creating the system vm’s. The 
> thing is how are we supposed to get the system vm template onto the secondary 
> if it is SMB and we can’t mount it onto management? Any thoughts on this 
> issue would be appreciated.
> 
> Clifford Pinnock Jr.
> Principal, Platform Engineer
> 
> CA Technologies | 160 Bridge St Hartfield Executive Pk | East Windsor, CT 
> 06088-9548
> Mobile: +1 860 861 6744 | clifford.pinnoc...@ca.com
> 
>  <mailto:clifford.pinnoc...@ca.com> <http://www.ca.com/us/default.aspx> 
> <http://twitter.com/CAInc> <http://www.slideshare.net/cainc> 
> <https://www.facebook.com/CATechnologies> 
> <http://www.youtube.com/user/catechnologies> 
> <http://www.linkedin.com/company/1372?goback=.cps_1244823420724_1> 
> <https://plus.google.com/+CATechnologies> 
> <http://www.ca.com/us/rss.aspx?intcmp=footernav>


signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail


Re: Dynamic Scalable Template issue

2015-09-09 Thread Todd Pigram
Vadium,

Yes to both with the new tools from XS62ESP1028. Both Windows and CentOS have 
‘Dynamic Scalable’ Option selected and in XenCenter they show the correct RAM.


Todd Pigram
http://about.me/ToddPigram <http://about.me/ToddPigram>
www.linkedin.com/in/toddpigram/ <http://www.linkedin.com/in/toddpigram/>
@pigram86 on twitter
https://plus.google.com/+ToddPigram86 <https://plus.google.com/+ToddPigram86>
Mobile - 216-224-5769

PGP Public Key <http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get=0x96B7B0F0C55933BB>
> On Sep 9, 2015, at 2:49 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk <va...@kickcloud.net> wrote:
> 
> Todd,
> 
>   Have you tried to do the following manual tests on the cluster where 
> you have problem:
>1. Dynamically scalable with CentOS ?
>2. Dynamically scalable with Windows ?
> 
>   What do they show as available RAM?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> On 2015-09-08 19:44, Todd Pigram wrote:
> 
>> Vadium,
>> After installing XS62ESP1028 via CLI (no reboot on hosts yet) and building 
>> an Centos65 instance w/o 'Dynamic Scalable' option checked, it showed right 
>> in XenCenter. I installed the new tools from (XS62ESP1028) and still good. I 
>> created a template from this instance. Deployed said template, and the 
>> memory is still good in XenCenter.
>> I tested on a Windows VM and it is the same with the new tools, however, as 
>> this particular tenant bypasses the virtual router, I have to reboot twice 
>> and reset networking as the new XenTools reset the networking stack.
>> Todd Pigram
>> http://about.me/ToddPigram [1]
>> www.linkedin.com/in/toddpigram/ [2] @pigram86 on twitter
>> https://plus.google.com/+ToddPigram86 [3] Mobile - 216-224-5769
>> PGP Public Key [4]
>> On Sep 6, 2015, at 4:57 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk <va...@kickcloud.net> wrote:
>> Todd,
>> Can you try Linux template with same dynamic scale option on the same pool? 
>> I wonder if there is a problem with Windows or any guest OS.
>> Regards,
>> Vadim.
>> On 2015-09-05 21:04, Todd Pigram wrote:
>> Vadium
>> That makes sense. I will see if I can replicate the issue in a lab. But 
>> given the holiday weekend, might not be until next week
>> On Saturday, September 5, 2015, Vadim Kimlaychuk <va...@kickcloud.net> wrote:
>> Todd,
>> I have seeing similar problem with Xen 4.1 (not XenServer). Linux guests 
>> were able to see (and use) entire host resources on any guest VM. That was a 
>> bug of configuration. If you think about what could be different after CS 
>> update - it could be VM registration procedure. Still guest VM should not be 
>> able to see static max. Your XenCenter shows that effective dynamic VM 
>> memory size is 8Gb while maximium is 32Gb. So CS configured VM guest 
>> correctly. This is problem of hypervisor <-> guest VM communitcation. That 
>> is why I asked you to try to register VM manually. I believe you will have 
>> the same result. Than means your server pool of XS62ESP1027 is broken. 3 
>> other pools are not. I see no reason to update to 4.5.1, because I think 
>> this is not the problem of CS, but particularly this XenServer pool + this 
>> type of Windows guest (if other templates with dynamic offer are good).
>> Vadim.
>> On 2015-09-05 14:45, Todd Pigram wrote:
>> Vadim
>> I have 3 other pools (1 XS6.2sp1 and 2x xs65sp1) I have no issue with these.
>> Based on the Design doc, what i was experiencing is by design. Ok I will 
>> turn it off.
>> But now my question is, why on 4.3 I didn't have this issue but after 
>> installing 4.3.0.2 it changed.
>> Was 4.3 broken or is 4.3.0.2? Will upgrading to CCP 4.5.1 will be better?
>> If this is truely by design, I will not be able to use dynamic scalable for 
>> my windows instances
>> On Saturday, September 5, 2015, Vadim Kimlaychuk <va...@kickcloud.net> wrote:
>> Todd,
>> You may try to create VM at XenServer without CloudStack just using XE tool 
>> (or XenCenter). If your manually created VM with static max <> dynamic max 
>> will be OK, then there is a problem with Cloudstack.
>> Vadim.
>> On 2015-09-04 21:51, Todd Pigram wrote:
>> Latest as of XS62ESP1027. I know XS62ESP1028 comes with new XenTools.
>> On Friday, September 4, 2015, Vadim Kimlaychuk <va...@kickcloud.net> wrote:
>> I am afraid this issue has nothing to do with Cloudstack. If VM "sees"
>> maximum memory size available instead of effective -- this is problem of
>> hypervisor and/or guest utilities. Do you have guest utilities that come
>> with XenServer version or older in your template?
>> Vadim.
>> On 2015-09-04 19:34, Tod

Re: Dynamic Scalable Template issue

2015-09-08 Thread Todd Pigram
Vadium,

After installing XS62ESP1028 via CLI (no reboot on hosts yet) and building an 
Centos65 instance w/o ‘Dynamic Scalable’ option checked, it showed right in 
XenCenter. I installed the new tools from (XS62ESP1028) and still good. I 
created a template from this instance. Deployed said template, and the memory 
is still good in XenCenter.

I tested on a Windows VM and it is the same with the new tools, however, as 
this particular tenant bypasses the virtual router, I have to reboot twice and 
reset networking as the new XenTools reset the networking stack.


Todd Pigram
http://about.me/ToddPigram <http://about.me/ToddPigram>
www.linkedin.com/in/toddpigram/ <http://www.linkedin.com/in/toddpigram/>
@pigram86 on twitter
https://plus.google.com/+ToddPigram86 <https://plus.google.com/+ToddPigram86>
Mobile - 216-224-5769

PGP Public Key <http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get=0x96B7B0F0C55933BB>
> On Sep 6, 2015, at 4:57 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk <va...@kickcloud.net> wrote:
> 
> Todd,
> 
>  Can you try Linux template with same dynamic scale option on the same 
> pool? I wonder if there is a problem with Windows or any guest OS.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Vadim.
> 
> On 2015-09-05 21:04, Todd Pigram wrote:
> 
>> Vadium
>> That makes sense. I will see if I can replicate the issue in a lab. But 
>> given the holiday weekend, might not be until next week
>> On Saturday, September 5, 2015, Vadim Kimlaychuk <va...@kickcloud.net> wrote:
>> Todd,
>> I have seeing similar problem with Xen 4.1 (not XenServer). Linux guests 
>> were able to see (and use) entire host resources on any guest VM. That was a 
>> bug of configuration. If you think about what could be different after CS 
>> update - it could be VM registration procedure. Still guest VM should not be 
>> able to see static max. Your XenCenter shows that effective dynamic VM 
>> memory size is 8Gb while maximium is 32Gb. So CS configured VM guest 
>> correctly. This is problem of hypervisor <-> guest VM communitcation. That 
>> is why I asked you to try to register VM manually. I believe you will have 
>> the same result. Than means your server pool of XS62ESP1027 is broken. 3 
>> other pools are not. I see no reason to update to 4.5.1, because I think 
>> this is not the problem of CS, but particularly this XenServer pool + this 
>> type of Windows guest (if other templates with dynamic offer are good).
>> Vadim.
>> On 2015-09-05 14:45, Todd Pigram wrote:
>> Vadim
>> I have 3 other pools (1 XS6.2sp1 and 2x xs65sp1) I have no issue with these.
>> Based on the Design doc, what i was experiencing is by design. Ok I will 
>> turn it off.
>> But now my question is, why on 4.3 I didn't have this issue but after 
>> installing 4.3.0.2 it changed.
>> Was 4.3 broken or is 4.3.0.2? Will upgrading to CCP 4.5.1 will be better?
>> If this is truely by design, I will not be able to use dynamic scalable for 
>> my windows instances
>> On Saturday, September 5, 2015, Vadim Kimlaychuk <va...@kickcloud.net> wrote:
>> Todd,
>> You may try to create VM at XenServer without CloudStack just using XE tool 
>> (or XenCenter). If your manually created VM with static max <> dynamic max 
>> will be OK, then there is a problem with Cloudstack.
>> Vadim.
>> On 2015-09-04 21:51, Todd Pigram wrote:
>> Latest as of XS62ESP1027. I know XS62ESP1028 comes with new XenTools.
>> On Friday, September 4, 2015, Vadim Kimlaychuk <va...@kickcloud.net> wrote:
>> I am afraid this issue has nothing to do with Cloudstack. If VM "sees"
>> maximum memory size available instead of effective -- this is problem of
>> hypervisor and/or guest utilities. Do you have guest utilities that come
>> with XenServer version or older in your template?
>> Vadim.
>> On 2015-09-04 19:34, Todd Pigram wrote:
>> Ok. After rebooting the instance still no change after disabling globally. I 
>> modified all my templates to remove 'Dynamic Scalable', then I have to
>> shutdown every instance and unselect 'Dynamic Scalable', then restart for
>> it to be correct.
>> This may need to be looked at closer for a Windows/XenDesktop(XenApp)
>> environment as MS SQL will consume all the RAM windows sees.
>> My other question is why CCP 4.3 (which is certified for Citrix Ready for
>> IaaS for XD) didn't have this issue until I upgraded to 4.3.0.2 in July.
>> This feature was released in 4.2.
>> Thanks for all the help.
>> Todd Pigram
>> http://about.me/ToddPigram <http://about.me/ToddPigram> [1] [1] [1] [1 [1]] 
>> <http://about.me/ToddPigram [1] [1] [1] [1 [1]] 
>> <http://about.me/Todd

Re: Dynamic Scalable Template issue

2015-09-04 Thread Todd Pigram
Ok. After rebooting the instance still no change after disabling globally. I 
modified all my templates to remove ‘Dynamic Scalable’,  then I have to 
shutdown every instance and unselect ‘Dynamic Scalable’, then restart for it to 
be correct.

This may need to be looked at closer for a Windows/XenDesktop(XenApp) 
environment as MS SQL will consume all the RAM windows sees.

My other question is why CCP 4.3 (which is certified for Citrix Ready for IaaS 
for XD) didn’t have this issue until I upgraded to 4.3.0.2 in July. This 
feature was released in 4.2…..


Thanks for all the help. 

Todd Pigram
http://about.me/ToddPigram <http://about.me/ToddPigram>
www.linkedin.com/in/toddpigram/ <http://www.linkedin.com/in/toddpigram/>
@pigram86 on twitter
https://plus.google.com/+ToddPigram86 <https://plus.google.com/+ToddPigram86>
Mobile - 216-224-5769

PGP Public Key <http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get=0x96B7B0F0C55933BB>
> On Sep 4, 2015, at 12:04 PM, Todd Pigram <t...@toddpigram.com> wrote:
> 
> Thanks. 
> 
> Just funny that on CCP 4.3 it wasn’t an issue and only after upgrading to 
> 4.3.0.2 and a host reboot did it change my instances.
> 
> This issue is that the instance below is a SQL server. As Windows see 32GB, 
> it shows the used RAM in windows as 31.6GB. The Server only has 8GB. That is 
> what really is the issue. Causing slowness for my users.
> 
> I have set ‘enable.dynamic.scale.vm’  to false and restarted 
> cloudstack-management. I will reboot an instance that is out of prod and let 
> you know the results.  
> 
> Todd Pigram
> http://about.me/ToddPigram <http://about.me/ToddPigram>
> www.linkedin.com/in/toddpigram/ <http://www.linkedin.com/in/toddpigram/>
> @pigram86 on twitter
> https://plus.google.com/+ToddPigram86 <https://plus.google.com/+ToddPigram86>
> Mobile - 216-224-5769
> 
> PGP Public Key 
> <http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get=0x96B7B0F0C55933BB>
>> On Sep 4, 2015, at 11:41 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk <va...@kickcloud.net 
>> <mailto:va...@kickcloud.net>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hello Todd,
>> 
>>If I understood you correctly, you wonder why you have static max as 4x 
>> of the offering, isn't it?  This article should answer your question:
>> 
>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Dynamic+scaling+of+CPU+and+RAM#DynamicscalingofCPUandRAM-Xenserver
>>  
>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Dynamic+scaling+of+CPU+and+RAM#DynamicscalingofCPUandRAM-Xenserver>
>> 
>>Look chapter for XenServer changes. As it is stated there: static max = 
>> f_min (4 * service_offering) / memory_overprovisioning_of_cluster
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Vadim.
>> 
>> 
>> On 2015-09-04 17:41, Todd Pigram wrote:
>> 
>>> Just wondering if anyone has seen similar. I already have a case open. But 
>>> seeing if the forum has an answer?
>>> Issue, Upgraded to CCP 4.3.0.2 back in July. Afterwards everything was 
>>> great. Hosts rebooted two weeks ago. Any instance built with a template 
>>> with Dynamic Scalable set to yes, shows in XenCenter as min/max memory as 
>>> what system offering is but has a Static Max of 4x the RAM.
>>> Screen shot of instance built from template with Dynamic Scalable = yes
>>> https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/8AoU3kQRQjZccdnUrrAIAXjKBWkv3JXG-X1pm5S52Ks?feat=directlink
>>>  
>>> <https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/8AoU3kQRQjZccdnUrrAIAXjKBWkv3JXG-X1pm5S52Ks?feat=directlink>
>>>  [1]
>>> XenCenter of same instance
>>> https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/IATy1WmgkbdYHtfzpOcqVnjKBWkv3JXG-X1pm5S52Ks?feat=directlink
>>>  
>>> <https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/IATy1WmgkbdYHtfzpOcqVnjKBWkv3JXG-X1pm5S52Ks?feat=directlink>
>>>  [2]
>>> In Windows 2012r2 sees Static Max
>>> https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/AQ_xkMQhmBsJuKALKJ5vBnjKBWkv3JXG-X1pm5S52Ks?feat=directlink
>>>  
>>> <https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/AQ_xkMQhmBsJuKALKJ5vBnjKBWkv3JXG-X1pm5S52Ks?feat=directlink>
>>>  [3]
>>> Now if I build a new w2012r2 template without Dynamic Scalable, it works as 
>>> it should. But I lose the ability to Dynamically scale.
>>> Screenshots of instance built form template without Dynamic Scaling and 
>>> also in XC
>>> https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/3DorqjATJilaUl-B1_7B_3jKBWkv3JXG-X1pm5S52Ks?feat=directlink
>>>  
>>> <https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/3DorqjATJilaUl-B1_7B_3jKBWkv3JXG-X1pm5S52Ks?feat=directlink>
>>>  [4]
>>> https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/QSMuaRocZj

Re: Remi Bergsma joins the PMC

2015-08-10 Thread Todd Pigram
Congrats!!

On Monday, August 10, 2015, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:

 LS,

 Today the PMC has invited Remi Bergsma to join its ranks. I am happy to say
 that he accepted. Please join me in congratulating Remi.

 ​regards,​
 --
 Daan



-- 


Todd Pigram
http://about.me/ToddPigram
www.linkedin.com/in/toddpigram/
@pigram86 on twitter
https://plus.google.com/+ToddPigram86
Mobile - 216-224-5769

PGP Public Key
http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x96B7B0F0C55933BB


Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Remi Bergsma

2015-05-04 Thread Todd Pigram
Congats, Remi!

On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Karen Vuong karenvuon...@gmail.com wrote:

 Congrats, Remi!

 On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 11:45 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
  has asked Remi Bergsma to become a committer and we are pleased to
  announce that he has accepted.
 
  Remi has reported and helped in investigating and solving many bugs. He
 has
  given talks on managing clouds on several occasions.
 
  Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more
  autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and
  eliminates the need to have contributions reviewed via the patch
  submission process. Whether contributions are development-related or
  otherwise, it is a recognition of a contributor's participation in the
  project and commitment to the project and the Apache Way.
 
  Please join me in congratulating Remi
 
  --Daan Hoogland
  on behalf of the CloudStack PMC
 




-- 


Todd Pigram
http://about.me/ToddPigram
www.linkedin.com/in/toddpigram/
@pigram86 on twitter
https://plus.google.com/+ToddPigram86
Mobile - 216-224-5769


Re: [Announce] - New VP Apache Cloudstack

2015-03-23 Thread Todd Pigram
Congrats  Sebastien!

Thanks Hugo!

On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 8:59 AM, Srikanteswararao Talluri 
srikanteswararao.tall...@citrix.com wrote:

 Congratulations Sebastien!

 And Thanks Hugo.

 ~Talluri

 On 23/03/15 5:46 pm, Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.com wrote:

 Congratulations Sebastien!!
 
 Regards,
 
 Paul Angus
 Cloud Architect
 D: +44 20 3468 5163 |S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +44 7711 418 784 | T:
 @CloudyAngus
 paul.an...@shapeblue.com
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com]
 Sent: 23 March 2015 12:04
 To: dev
 Subject: Re: [Announce] - New VP Apache Cloudstack
 
 On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Giles Sirett
 giles.sir...@shapeblue.com
 wrote:
 
   All
 
  The Apache Cloudstack PMC is delighted to announce that on March 18 an
  ASF board resolution was passed to make Sebastien Goasguen the new
  Chair/VP of Apache CloudStack.
 
 
 
  Sebastien replaces Hugo in this role
 
 
 
 
 
  I¹m sure you¹ll all join me in wishing Sebastien all the best for the
  next
  12 months and also in thanking Hugo for all of his hard work over the
  last year.
 
 
 
 
 Congratulations Sebastien!
 
 Thanks for all your work Hugo!
 
 --
 Erik
 Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
 
 IaaS Cloud Design 
 Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//
 CSForge ­ rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/
 CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/
 CloudStack Software
 Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/
 CloudStack Infrastructure
 Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/
 CloudStack Bootcamp Training
 Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/
 
 This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
 solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views
 or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not
 necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If
 you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take
 any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please
 contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error.
 Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England  Wales. ShapeBlue
 Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated
 under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is
 a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape
 Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of
 South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue
 is a registered trademark.




-- 


Todd Pigram
http://about.me/ToddPigram
www.linkedin.com/in/toddpigram/
@pigram86 on twitter
https://plus.google.com/+ToddPigram86
Mobile - 216-224-5769


Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Karen Vuong

2015-03-19 Thread Todd Pigram
Congratulations Karen!

On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:

 Congratulations, Karen - keep up the good work! :)

 Lucian

 --
 Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

 Nux!
 www.nux.ro

 - Original Message -
  From: Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com
  To: dev dev@cloudstack.apache.org
  Sent: Thursday, 19 March, 2015 22:10:22
  Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Karen Vuong

  On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:07 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com
  wrote:
 
  The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
  has asked Karen Vuong to become a committer and we are pleased to
  announce that she have accepted.
 
  Karen is doing a huge effort on promoting CloudStack and organizing
  events such as CloudStack days, CloudStack collaboration conferences
  and meetups. She is helping a lot on the marketing effort as well.
 
  Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more
  autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and
  eliminates the need to have contributions reviewed via the patch
  submission process. Whether contributions are development-related or
  otherwise, it is a recognition of a contributor's participation in the
  project and commitment to the project and the Apache Way.
 
  Please join me in congratulating Karen (karenv)
 
 
  Congratulations Karen!
 
  --
  Erik




-- 


Todd Pigram
http://about.me/ToddPigram
www.linkedin.com/in/toddpigram/
@pigram86 on twitter
https://plus.google.com/+ToddPigram86
Mobile - 216-224-5769


Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Erik Weber (terbolous)

2014-12-13 Thread Todd Pigram
Congrats!

On Saturday, December 13, 2014, ilya musayev ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com
wrote:

 Congrats and welcome!
 On 12/13/14, 12:27 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:

 Congrats Erik!

  On 14-Dec-2014, at 1:27 am, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:

 Gratulerer :-)

 Lucian

 --
 Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

 Nux!
 www.nux.ro

 - Original Message -

 From: Pierre-Luc Dion pdion...@apache.org
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Sent: Saturday, 13 December, 2014 17:03:32
 Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Erik Weber (terbolous)
 The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
 has asked Erik Weber to become a committer and we are pleased to
 announce that they have accepted.

 Erik is doing a great job on helping the community thru the mailing
 list.
 He helped a lot on testing and troubleshooting new releases of
 CloudStack
 as well as contributing to the documentation. Thanks Erik and Congrat!


 Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more
 autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and
 eliminates the need to have contributions reviewed via the patch
 submission process. Whether contributions are development-related or
 otherwise, it is a recognition of a contributor's participation in the
 project and commitment to the project and the Apache Way.

 Please join me in congratulating Erik

 Pierre-Luc
 on behalf of the CloudStack PMC

 Regards,
 Rohit Yadav
 Software Architect, ShapeBlue
 M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
 Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab



 Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

 IaaS Cloud Design  Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/
 iaas-cloud-design-and-build//
 CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/
 CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/
 CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-
 engineering/
 CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/
 cloudstack-infrastructure-support/
 CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/
 cloudstack-training/

 This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
 solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
 opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
 represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
 intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
 upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
 if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
 company incorporated in England  Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
 company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
 Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil
 and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is
 a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under
 license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.





-- 


Todd Pigram
http://about.me/ToddPigram
www.linkedin.com/in/toddpigram/
@pigram86 on twitter
https://plus.google.com/+ToddPigram86
Mobile - 216-224-5769


Re: root resize support in the UI

2014-12-01 Thread Todd Pigram
 the disk.
  
   Thus it's not feasible to assume that the orchestration layer should
   be capable of doing it.
  
   --
   Erik
  
 
 
 
  --
 
  Andrija Panić
 
 
 
 
  --
 
  Andrija Panić




-- 


Todd Pigram
http://about.me/ToddPigram
www.linkedin.com/in/toddpigram/
@pigram86 on twitter
https://plus.google.com/+ToddPigram86
Mobile - 216-224-5769


Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Member: Ian Duffy

2014-09-30 Thread Todd Pigram
Congrats!

On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org
wrote:

 The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
 Ian Duffy to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that he has
 accepted.

 Join me in congratulating Ian!

 -chip
 On behalf of the Apache CloudStack PMC




-- 


Todd Pigram
http://about.me/ToddPigram
www.linkedin.com/in/toddpigram/
@pigram86 on twitter
https://plus.google.com/+ToddPigram86
Mobile - 216-224-5769


Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Member: Pierre-Luc Dion

2014-09-30 Thread Todd Pigram
Congrats!

On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org
wrote:

 The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
 Pierre-Luc Dion to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that he
 has accepted.

 Join me in congratulating Pierre-Luc!

 -chip
 On behalf of the Apache CloudStack PMC




-- 


Todd Pigram
http://about.me/ToddPigram
www.linkedin.com/in/toddpigram/
@pigram86 on twitter
https://plus.google.com/+ToddPigram86
Mobile - 216-224-5769


Re: [DISCUSS] How xs-tools gets installed for xen vms and systemvms

2014-09-09 Thread Todd Pigram
 incorporated in England  Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
 company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
 Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil
 and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is
 a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under
 license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.



-- 


Todd Pigram
http://about.me/ToddPigram
www.linkedin.com/in/toddpigram/
@pigram86 on twitter
https://plus.google.com/+ToddPigram86
Mobile - 216-224-5769


Re: [ACS44][BUG] SystemVM not working on 4.4

2014-07-31 Thread Todd Pigram
...@northstar-tg.com
(701) 237-9096 x7122
   
  
  
 



 --
 Antone
 @thehyperadvisor
 http://thehyperadvisor.com




-- 


Todd Pigram
http://about.me/ToddPigram
www.linkedin.com/in/toddpigram/
@pigram86 on twitter
https://plus.google.com/+ToddPigram86
Mobile - 216-224-5769


Re: [DISCUSS] extending the libvirt/KVM plugin to also support libvirt/Xen

2014-06-12 Thread Todd Pigram
 to maximise
  the
   chance that adding a feature for “Xen” causes it to work for “KVM”
  and
   vice-versa. In particular this means that, if a genuinely-useful
  capability
   is currently missing from the libvirt libxl driver, I want to
  implement it
   rather than work around it.
  
  
   Seems like a great route to me! You also want to support Xen+Qemu
 with
   this way?
  
  
   Yes, it should be possible to run fully virtualised VMs with Xen +
  Qemu. I
   think we’ll be able to choose whether to run VMs as PV or HVM.
  
  
   Ok, but those will be different code paths at some level.
  
  
  
   We have to be aware that there might be some storage differences
  between
   KVM and Xen like Ceph which is not fully supported yet by Xen.
  
  
   Ceph is an interesting one. Xen itself doesn’t know anything about
   storage— instead the dom0 takes care of it either via a kernel driver
   (blkback) or userspace program (qemu or tapdisk). When I tried to
 make
  Ceph
   work about a year ago[1] I hit a bug in libxl (the Xen control
  library). The
   good news is the fix made it into Xen 4.4, so with luck we can get it
  to
   work.
  
  
   When Xen runs with Qemu as full HVM it's Qemu which takes care of the
  Ceph
   storage, so in that case it's fixed.
  
   I haven't got a lot of experience with PV Xen. I heard stories of Ceph
  being
   integrated in blktap(2), but never tested it.
  
  
  
   If anything is missing in libvirt or the Java bindings we have to
 fix
   that indeed instead of hacking around it.
  
  
   Great :)
  
   Cheers,
   Dave
  
   [1]
  
 
 http://xenserver.org/discuss-virtualization/virtualization-blog/entry/tech-preview-of-xenserver-libvirt-ceph.html
  
  
   Wido
  
   Comments appreciated!
  
   Cheers,
   Dave
  
   [1]
  
 
 http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cloudstack-users/201403.mbox/%3ccajgxtbnbmqtq81ralgh2kma7v5wjyzkr3xnyasmkc_br+uk...@mail.gmail.com%3e
  
  
  
 
 




-- 


Todd Pigram
http://about.me/ToddPigram
www.linkedin.com/in/toddpigram/
@pigram86 on twitter
https://plus.google.com/+ToddPigram86
Mobile - 216-224-5769


Re: [DISCUSS] Increasing VM IOPS by separating golden image in high IOPS partition in Xen Server ?

2014-06-06 Thread Todd Pigram
Sorry, thought you were based off the link you provided in this reply.

In our case, we are using CloudStack integrated in VDI solution to provived
pooled VM type[1]. So may be my approach can bring better UX for user with
lower bootime ...

A short change in design are followings
- VM will be deployed with golden primary storage if primary storage is
marked golden and this VM template is also marked as golden.
- Choosing the best deploy destionation for both golden primary storage and
normal root volume primary storage. Chosen host can also access both
storage pools.
- New Xen Server plug-in for modifying VHD parent id.

Is there some place for me to submit my design and code. Can I write a new
proposal in CS wiki ?

[1]:
http://support.citrix.com/proddocs/topic/xendesktop-rho/cds-choose-scheme-type-rho.html
 


On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Hieu LE hieul...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Todd,


 On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Todd Pigram t...@toddpigram.com wrote:

  Hieu,
 
  I assume you are using MCS for you golden image? What version of XD?
 Given
  you are using pooled desktops, have you thought about using a PVS BDM iso
  and mount it with in your 1000 VMs? This way you can stagger reboots via
  PVS console or Studio. This would require a change to your delivery
 group.
 
 
 Sorry but I did not use MCS or XenDesktop in my company :-)


 
  On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Mike Tutkowski 
  mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
   wrote:
 
   6) The copy_vhd_from_secondarystorage XenServer plug-in is not used
 when
   you're using XenServer + XS62ESP1 + XS62ESP1004. In that case, please
  refer
   to copyTemplateToPrimaryStorage(CopyCommand) method in the
   Xenserver625StorageProcessor class.
  
 

 Thank Mike, I will take note of that.


   
   On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Mike Tutkowski 
   mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
wrote:
  
Other than going through a for loop and deploying VM after VM, I
  don't
think CloudStack currently supports a bulk-VM-deploy operation.
   
It would be nice if CS did so at some point in the future; however,
  that
is probably a separate proposal from Hieu's.
   
   
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 12:13 AM, Amit Das amit@cloudbyte.com
   wrote:
   
Hi Hieu,
   
Will it be good to include bulk operation of this feature? In
  addition,
does Xen support parallel execution of these operations ?
   
Regards,
Amit
*CloudByte Inc.* http://www.cloudbyte.com/
   
   
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Hieu LE hieul...@gmail.com wrote:
   
 Mike, Punith,

 Please review Golden Primary Storage proposal. [1]

 Thank you.

 [1]:

   
  
 
 https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Golden+Primary+Storage


 On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 10:32 PM, Mike Tutkowski 
 mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:

 Daan helped out with this. You should be good to go now.


 On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Hieu LE hieul...@gmail.com
  wrote:

  Hi Mike,
 
  Could you please give edit/create permission on ASF Jira/Wiki
 confluence ?
  I can not add a new Wiki page.
 
  My Jira ID: hieulq
  Wiki: hieulq89
  Review Board: hieulq
 
  Thanks !
 
 
  On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Mike Tutkowski 
  mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
   wrote:
 
   Hi,
  
   Yes, please feel free to add a new Wiki page for your design.
  
   Here is a link to applicable design info:
  
  
 https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Design
  
   Also, feel free to ask more questions and have me review your
design.
  
   Thanks!
   Mike
  
  
   On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Hieu LE hieul...@gmail.com
wrote:
  
Hi Mike,
   
You are right, performance will be decreased over time
  because
 writes
   IOPS
will always end up on slower storage pool.
   
In our case, we are using CloudStack integrated in VDI
  solution
to
   provived
pooled VM type[1]. So may be my approach can bring better
 UX
   for
 user
   with
lower bootime ...
   
A short change in design are followings
- VM will be deployed with golden primary storage if
 primary
 storage is
marked golden and this VM template is also marked as
 golden.
- Choosing the best deploy destionation for both golden
  primary
 storage
   and
normal root volume primary storage. Chosen host can also
  access
both
storage pools.
- New Xen Server plug-in for modifying VHD parent id.
   
Is there some place for me to submit my design and code.
 Can
  I
 write a
   new
proposal in CS wiki ?
   
[1]:
   
   
  
 

   
  
 
 http://support.citrix.com/proddocs/topic/xendesktop-rho/cds-choose-scheme-type-rho.html

Re: [DISCUSS] Increasing VM IOPS by separating golden image in high IOPS partition in Xen Server ?

2014-06-05 Thread Todd Pigram
++(+++) h-- r(++)+++ y-
--END GEEK CODE BLOCK--
   
  
  
  
   --
   *Mike Tutkowski*
   *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
   e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
   o: 303.746.7302
   Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
   http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*
  
 
 
 
  --
  -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
  Version: 3.1
  GCS/CM/IT/M/MU d-@? s+(++):+(++) !a C()$ ULC(++)$
 P
 L++(+++)$
  E
  !W N* o+ K w O- M V- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+ t 5 X R tv+ b+(++)+++
 DI-
  D+
   G
  e++(+++) h-- r(++)+++ y-
  --END GEEK CODE BLOCK--
 



 --
 *Mike Tutkowski*
 *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
 e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
 o: 303.746.7302
 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
 http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*

   
   
   
--
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.1
GCS/CM/IT/M/MU d-@? s+(++):+(++) !a C()$ ULC(++)$ P
   L++(+++)$
E
!W N* o+ K w O- M V- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+ t 5 X R tv+ b+(++)+++ DI-
 D+ G
e++(+++) h-- r(++)+++ y-
--END GEEK CODE BLOCK--
   
  
  
  
   --
   *Mike Tutkowski*
   *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
   e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
   o: 303.746.7302
   Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
   http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*
  
  
  
  
   --
   -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
   Version: 3.1
   GCS/CM/IT/M/MU d-@? s+(++):+(++) !a C()$ ULC(++)$ P
  L++(+++)$
   E !W N* o+ K w O- M V- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+ t 5 X R tv+ b+(++)+++ DI- D+
 G
   e++(+++) h-- r(++)+++ y-
   --END GEEK CODE BLOCK--
  
 
 
 
 
  --
  *Mike Tutkowski*
  *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
  e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
  o: 303.746.7302
  Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
  http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*
 



 --
 *Mike Tutkowski*
 *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
 e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
 o: 303.746.7302
 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
 http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*




-- 


Todd Pigram
http://about.me/ToddPigram
www.linkedin.com/in/toddpigram/
@pigram86 on twitter
https://plus.google.com/+ToddPigram86
Mobile - 216-224-5769


Re: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS

2014-02-26 Thread Todd Pigram
 of the author and do not necessarily
 represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
 intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
 upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
 if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
 company incorporated in England  Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
 company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
 Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil
 and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a
 registered trademark.




-- 


Todd Pigram
http://about.me/ToddPigram
www.linkedin.com/in/toddpigram/
@pigram86 on twitter
https://plus.google.com/+ToddPigram86
Mobile - 216-224-5769


Re: Citrix CloudPlatform Source Code

2013-09-04 Thread Todd Pigram
You can still get CCP 3.0.5 from Citrix downloads.




On Wednesday, September 4, 2013, Musayev, Ilya wrote:

 Would anyone know if Citrix CloudPlatform Source Code, specifically
 version 3.0.5 is out on the open?

 What would be the closest match in Apache CloudStack and are there major
 differences?

 We've developed a feature for CCP 3.0.5 and used ACS 4.0.0 as code based.
 Since we are touching few files, we were under impression we can repackage
 the jars with classes that we've modified. This approach is not exactly
 smooth, and we have some issues integrating the code.

 Thanks for the feedback,

 Regards
 ilya



Re: CloudStack distros

2013-08-27 Thread Todd Pigram
Not that I am aware of. Also I believe once ACS 4.2 is released, ACS and
CCP will be the same code base. I could be wrong.


On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 2:24 PM, La Motta, David
david.lamo...@netapp.comwrote:

 Hi all, was curious to know if there are other flavors of CloudStack
 besides CloudPlatform.

 Anybody have some insight in that space?

 Thanks.


 David La Motta
 Technical Marketing Engineer - Citrix Solutions | NetApp
 Direct: 1.919.476.5042





Re: CloudStack distros

2013-08-27 Thread Todd Pigram
I haven't heard CloudSand either, interesting...

Thanks

On Tuesday, August 27, 2013, La Motta, David wrote:

 Interesting, and thanks for the replies.  I had not heard of CloudSand, so
 thanks for bringing it up.


 David La Motta
 Technical Marketing Engineer - Citrix Solutions | NetApp
 Direct: 1.919.476.5042



 On 8/27/13 3:28 PM, Musayev, Ilya imusa...@webmd.net javascript:;
 wrote:

 My understanding of future of CPP was the same as Todd's. Post ACS 4.2
 release, it will be the same code base -just a different name and support.
 
 I manage a flavor of CloudStack called CloudSand, but its only to bring
 most needed features from dev branch into a stable release - with ability
 to upgrade to next stable ACS release that has these features. So its not
 a completely new spin, just something to help with CloudStack adoption
 process.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Todd Pigram [mailto:t...@toddpigram.com javascript:;]
 Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 2:54 PM
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org javascript:;
 Subject: Re: CloudStack distros
 
 Not that I am aware of. Also I believe once ACS 4.2 is released, ACS and
 CCP will be the same code base. I could be wrong.
 
 
 On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 2:24 PM, La Motta, David
 david.lamo...@netapp.com javascript:;wrote:
 
  Hi all, was curious to know if there are other flavors of CloudStack
  besides CloudPlatform.
 
  Anybody have some insight in that space?
 
  Thanks.
 
 
  David La Motta
  Technical Marketing Engineer - Citrix Solutions | NetApp
  Direct: 1.919.476.5042
 
 
 
 




Re: Instance Names

2013-08-19 Thread Todd Pigram
vm_instance

On Monday, August 19, 2013, Maurice Lawler wrote:

 Greetings,

 I'm hoping someone can point me into the right direction, I have
 provisioned an instanced; however, I failed to create a name for it. Now in
 my list of instances, I see the UUID and not a 'custom' name so to speak.
 I'm sure this can easily be manipulated via the database, however; I am
 looking through docs etc, unsure where to make changes.

 Any guidance would be greatly appreciate!

 - M.