Re: Github Issues
Using Github issues is already a standard now, for reference this was the voting thread: https://markmail.org/message/y5zgkssmwp4sh43t I agree that Github milestone tagging on a pull request is limited to one per PR which I don't like as well. However, there is a workaround that may be used. A PR can be part of multiple projects that can have lists of 'todo', 'in progress', 'done' etc. I had experimented with them here: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/projects We can experiment if milestone can be used to map a PR towards a release (useful for RM-ing) and use Github projects towards tagging/mapping a PR towards multiple releases? The other way in-addition we can explore could be to use Github labels? - Rohit <https://cloudstack.apache.org> From: Paul Angus Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2018 2:23:10 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Github Issues Hi All, We have been trialling replacing Jira with Github Issues. I think that we should have a conversation about it before it become the new standard by default. From my perspective, I don't like it. Searching has become far more difficult, categorising has also. When there is a bug fix it can only be targeted for a single version, which makes them easy to lose track of, and when looking at milestones issues and PRs get jumbled up and people are commenting on issues when it should by the PR and vice-versa (yes I've done it too). In summary, from an administrative point of view it causes a lot more problems than it solves. I yield the floor to hear other people's opinions... Kind regards, Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
Re: Github Issues
+1 as a new developer for this community, I find Github much easier for me to create/track both issues and PRs. From: Will Stevens Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2018 3:35:00 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users Subject: Re: Github Issues Github is the platform that is most comfortable for most users and developers to collaborate. Everyone knows it, regardless of their background, so it opens our community to a wider group of people. Those are my thoughts anyway... Will On Wed, Jul 18, 2018, 2:10 PM Rafael Weingärtner < rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote: > There is something else that might be worth mentioning. Since we moved to > Github, it seems that the project is attracting more people. I mean, it > seems that there are new players coming and reporting issues and opening > PRs. > > I might be totally mistaken though. > > > On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Will Stevens > wrote: > > > +1 to access to better automation and integration. > > > > On Wed, Jul 18, 2018, 12:16 PM Rene Moser wrote: > > > > > Hi > > > > > > On 07/17/2018 02:01 PM, Marc-Aurèle Brothier wrote: > > > > Hi Paul, > > > > > > > > My 2 cents on the topic. > > > > > > > > people are commenting on issues when it should by the PR and > vice-versa > > > >> > > > > > > > > I think this is simply due to the fact that with one login you can do > > > both, > > > > versus before you had to have a JIRA login which people might have > > tried > > > to > > > > avoid, preferring using github directly, ensuring the conversation > will > > > > only be on the PR. Most of the issues in Jira didn't have any > > > conversation > > > > at all. > > > > > > > > But I do feel also the pain of searching the issues on github as it's > > > more > > > > free-hand than a jira system. At the same time it's easier and > quicker > > to > > > > navigate, so it ease the pain at the same time ;-) > > > > I would say that the current labels isn't well organized to be able > to > > > > search like in jira but it could. For example any label has a prefix > > > > describing the jira attribute type (component, version, ...) Then a > bot > > > > scanning the issue content could set some of them as other open > source > > > > project are doing. The bad thing here is that you might end up with > too > > > > many labels. Maybe @resmo can give his point of view on how things > are > > > > managed in Ansible (https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pulls - lots > of > > > > labels, lots of issues and PRs). I don't know if that's a solution > but > > > > labels seem the only way to organize things. > > > > > > Personally, I don't care much if jira or github issues. Github issues > > > worked pretty well for me so far. > > > > > > However, We don't use all the things that make the work easier with > > > github issues. I assume we invested much more efforts in making "jira" > > > the way we wanted, now we assume that github just works? > > > > > > The benefit about github issues is, that it has an extensive api which > > > let you automate. There are many helpful tools making our life easier. > > > > > > Let a bot do the issue labeling, workflowing, and user guiding and even > > > merging PR after ci passed when 2 comments have LGTM. > > > > > > Look at https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes e.g. > > > > > > Short: If we want to automate things and evolve, github may be the > > > better platform, if we want to keep things manual, then jira is > probably > > > more suitable. > > > > > > Regards > > > René > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Rafael Weingärtner > dingane.hlal...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com , @shapeblue
Re: Github Issues
Github is the platform that is most comfortable for most users and developers to collaborate. Everyone knows it, regardless of their background, so it opens our community to a wider group of people. Those are my thoughts anyway... Will On Wed, Jul 18, 2018, 2:10 PM Rafael Weingärtner < rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote: > There is something else that might be worth mentioning. Since we moved to > Github, it seems that the project is attracting more people. I mean, it > seems that there are new players coming and reporting issues and opening > PRs. > > I might be totally mistaken though. > > > On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Will Stevens > wrote: > > > +1 to access to better automation and integration. > > > > On Wed, Jul 18, 2018, 12:16 PM Rene Moser wrote: > > > > > Hi > > > > > > On 07/17/2018 02:01 PM, Marc-Aurèle Brothier wrote: > > > > Hi Paul, > > > > > > > > My 2 cents on the topic. > > > > > > > > people are commenting on issues when it should by the PR and > vice-versa > > > >> > > > > > > > > I think this is simply due to the fact that with one login you can do > > > both, > > > > versus before you had to have a JIRA login which people might have > > tried > > > to > > > > avoid, preferring using github directly, ensuring the conversation > will > > > > only be on the PR. Most of the issues in Jira didn't have any > > > conversation > > > > at all. > > > > > > > > But I do feel also the pain of searching the issues on github as it's > > > more > > > > free-hand than a jira system. At the same time it's easier and > quicker > > to > > > > navigate, so it ease the pain at the same time ;-) > > > > I would say that the current labels isn't well organized to be able > to > > > > search like in jira but it could. For example any label has a prefix > > > > describing the jira attribute type (component, version, ...) Then a > bot > > > > scanning the issue content could set some of them as other open > source > > > > project are doing. The bad thing here is that you might end up with > too > > > > many labels. Maybe @resmo can give his point of view on how things > are > > > > managed in Ansible (https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pulls - lots > of > > > > labels, lots of issues and PRs). I don't know if that's a solution > but > > > > labels seem the only way to organize things. > > > > > > Personally, I don't care much if jira or github issues. Github issues > > > worked pretty well for me so far. > > > > > > However, We don't use all the things that make the work easier with > > > github issues. I assume we invested much more efforts in making "jira" > > > the way we wanted, now we assume that github just works? > > > > > > The benefit about github issues is, that it has an extensive api which > > > let you automate. There are many helpful tools making our life easier. > > > > > > Let a bot do the issue labeling, workflowing, and user guiding and even > > > merging PR after ci passed when 2 comments have LGTM. > > > > > > Look at https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes e.g. > > > > > > Short: If we want to automate things and evolve, github may be the > > > better platform, if we want to keep things manual, then jira is > probably > > > more suitable. > > > > > > Regards > > > René > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Rafael Weingärtner >
Re: Github Issues
There is something else that might be worth mentioning. Since we moved to Github, it seems that the project is attracting more people. I mean, it seems that there are new players coming and reporting issues and opening PRs. I might be totally mistaken though. On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > +1 to access to better automation and integration. > > On Wed, Jul 18, 2018, 12:16 PM Rene Moser wrote: > > > Hi > > > > On 07/17/2018 02:01 PM, Marc-Aurèle Brothier wrote: > > > Hi Paul, > > > > > > My 2 cents on the topic. > > > > > > people are commenting on issues when it should by the PR and vice-versa > > >> > > > > > > I think this is simply due to the fact that with one login you can do > > both, > > > versus before you had to have a JIRA login which people might have > tried > > to > > > avoid, preferring using github directly, ensuring the conversation will > > > only be on the PR. Most of the issues in Jira didn't have any > > conversation > > > at all. > > > > > > But I do feel also the pain of searching the issues on github as it's > > more > > > free-hand than a jira system. At the same time it's easier and quicker > to > > > navigate, so it ease the pain at the same time ;-) > > > I would say that the current labels isn't well organized to be able to > > > search like in jira but it could. For example any label has a prefix > > > describing the jira attribute type (component, version, ...) Then a bot > > > scanning the issue content could set some of them as other open source > > > project are doing. The bad thing here is that you might end up with too > > > many labels. Maybe @resmo can give his point of view on how things are > > > managed in Ansible (https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pulls - lots of > > > labels, lots of issues and PRs). I don't know if that's a solution but > > > labels seem the only way to organize things. > > > > Personally, I don't care much if jira or github issues. Github issues > > worked pretty well for me so far. > > > > However, We don't use all the things that make the work easier with > > github issues. I assume we invested much more efforts in making "jira" > > the way we wanted, now we assume that github just works? > > > > The benefit about github issues is, that it has an extensive api which > > let you automate. There are many helpful tools making our life easier. > > > > Let a bot do the issue labeling, workflowing, and user guiding and even > > merging PR after ci passed when 2 comments have LGTM. > > > > Look at https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes e.g. > > > > Short: If we want to automate things and evolve, github may be the > > better platform, if we want to keep things manual, then jira is probably > > more suitable. > > > > Regards > > René > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Rafael Weingärtner
Re: Github Issues
+1 to access to better automation and integration. On Wed, Jul 18, 2018, 12:16 PM Rene Moser wrote: > Hi > > On 07/17/2018 02:01 PM, Marc-Aurèle Brothier wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > > > My 2 cents on the topic. > > > > people are commenting on issues when it should by the PR and vice-versa > >> > > > > I think this is simply due to the fact that with one login you can do > both, > > versus before you had to have a JIRA login which people might have tried > to > > avoid, preferring using github directly, ensuring the conversation will > > only be on the PR. Most of the issues in Jira didn't have any > conversation > > at all. > > > > But I do feel also the pain of searching the issues on github as it's > more > > free-hand than a jira system. At the same time it's easier and quicker to > > navigate, so it ease the pain at the same time ;-) > > I would say that the current labels isn't well organized to be able to > > search like in jira but it could. For example any label has a prefix > > describing the jira attribute type (component, version, ...) Then a bot > > scanning the issue content could set some of them as other open source > > project are doing. The bad thing here is that you might end up with too > > many labels. Maybe @resmo can give his point of view on how things are > > managed in Ansible (https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pulls - lots of > > labels, lots of issues and PRs). I don't know if that's a solution but > > labels seem the only way to organize things. > > Personally, I don't care much if jira or github issues. Github issues > worked pretty well for me so far. > > However, We don't use all the things that make the work easier with > github issues. I assume we invested much more efforts in making "jira" > the way we wanted, now we assume that github just works? > > The benefit about github issues is, that it has an extensive api which > let you automate. There are many helpful tools making our life easier. > > Let a bot do the issue labeling, workflowing, and user guiding and even > merging PR after ci passed when 2 comments have LGTM. > > Look at https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes e.g. > > Short: If we want to automate things and evolve, github may be the > better platform, if we want to keep things manual, then jira is probably > more suitable. > > Regards > René > > > > > >
Re: Github Issues
Hi On 07/17/2018 02:01 PM, Marc-Aurèle Brothier wrote: > Hi Paul, > > My 2 cents on the topic. > > people are commenting on issues when it should by the PR and vice-versa >> > > I think this is simply due to the fact that with one login you can do both, > versus before you had to have a JIRA login which people might have tried to > avoid, preferring using github directly, ensuring the conversation will > only be on the PR. Most of the issues in Jira didn't have any conversation > at all. > > But I do feel also the pain of searching the issues on github as it's more > free-hand than a jira system. At the same time it's easier and quicker to > navigate, so it ease the pain at the same time ;-) > I would say that the current labels isn't well organized to be able to > search like in jira but it could. For example any label has a prefix > describing the jira attribute type (component, version, ...) Then a bot > scanning the issue content could set some of them as other open source > project are doing. The bad thing here is that you might end up with too > many labels. Maybe @resmo can give his point of view on how things are > managed in Ansible (https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pulls - lots of > labels, lots of issues and PRs). I don't know if that's a solution but > labels seem the only way to organize things. Personally, I don't care much if jira or github issues. Github issues worked pretty well for me so far. However, We don't use all the things that make the work easier with github issues. I assume we invested much more efforts in making "jira" the way we wanted, now we assume that github just works? The benefit about github issues is, that it has an extensive api which let you automate. There are many helpful tools making our life easier. Let a bot do the issue labeling, workflowing, and user guiding and even merging PR after ci passed when 2 comments have LGTM. Look at https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes e.g. Short: If we want to automate things and evolve, github may be the better platform, if we want to keep things manual, then jira is probably more suitable. Regards René
Re: Github Issues
I sort of agree with Marc-Aurèle and Will, and like github issues way better than Jira. It definitely is easier that both the issues and fix for those issues live in the same place and easily can be referenced from one another. The only thing is that we need to come up with good set of labels (for both issues and PRs) for tracking purpose. Discussing the issue at hand under the issue itself can be even good, it will leave a trail of what has been discussed around the issue which led to the fix and potentially discussion can be continued under PR itself. Essentially they are targeting the same "problem". As for the point Ron brought up, if one issue was that big that required multiple PR for it to be fixed, it only makes sens to me to create subset of issues all referencing the "parent" issue, and each individual PR fixes one of those smaller issue. Khosrow On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:08 AM Will Stevens wrote: > Ron, keep in mind that PRs on Github are different from Issues. They are > two different features. > > There will be a much cleaner, tighter integration between issues and the > solution when everything is on Github. > > will > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018, 9:33 AM Ron Wheeler > wrote: > > > I may have voiced my concerns earlier but as a user, I think that JIRA > > issues are easier to follow than PRs. > > - As Paul said an issue may affect more than one version. > > - It may also require more than one PR to fully resolve the issue. > > - Issues tend to be described in terms of a problem that the user would > > recognize while PRs are most often described as what was done to fix the > > problem. The JIRA could be much easier to relate to what the user is > > seeing and more likely to show up in Google. > > > > Ron > > On 17/07/2018 4:53 AM, Paul Angus wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > > > We have been trialling replacing Jira with Github Issues. I think > that > > we should have a conversation about it before it become the new standard > by > > default. > > > > > > From my perspective, I don't like it. Searching has become far more > > difficult, categorising has also. When there is a bug fix it can only be > > targeted for a single version, which makes them easy to lose track of, > and > > when looking at milestones issues and PRs get jumbled up and people are > > commenting on issues when it should by the PR and vice-versa (yes I've > done > > it too). > > > In summary, from an administrative point of view it causes a lot more > > problems than it solves. > > > > > > I yield the floor to hear other people's opinions... > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > Paul Angus > > > > > > > > > paul.an...@shapeblue.com > > > www.shapeblue.com > > > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > > > @shapeblue > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Ron Wheeler > > President > > Artifact Software Inc > > email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com > > skype: ronaldmwheeler > > phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102 > > > > >
Re: Github Issues
Ron, keep in mind that PRs on Github are different from Issues. They are two different features. There will be a much cleaner, tighter integration between issues and the solution when everything is on Github. will On Tue, Jul 17, 2018, 9:33 AM Ron Wheeler wrote: > I may have voiced my concerns earlier but as a user, I think that JIRA > issues are easier to follow than PRs. > - As Paul said an issue may affect more than one version. > - It may also require more than one PR to fully resolve the issue. > - Issues tend to be described in terms of a problem that the user would > recognize while PRs are most often described as what was done to fix the > problem. The JIRA could be much easier to relate to what the user is > seeing and more likely to show up in Google. > > Ron > On 17/07/2018 4:53 AM, Paul Angus wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > We have been trialling replacing Jira with Github Issues. I think that > we should have a conversation about it before it become the new standard by > default. > > > > From my perspective, I don't like it. Searching has become far more > difficult, categorising has also. When there is a bug fix it can only be > targeted for a single version, which makes them easy to lose track of, and > when looking at milestones issues and PRs get jumbled up and people are > commenting on issues when it should by the PR and vice-versa (yes I've done > it too). > > In summary, from an administrative point of view it causes a lot more > problems than it solves. > > > > I yield the floor to hear other people's opinions... > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Paul Angus > > > > > > paul.an...@shapeblue.com > > www.shapeblue.com > > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > > @shapeblue > > > > > > > > -- > Ron Wheeler > President > Artifact Software Inc > email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com > skype: ronaldmwheeler > phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102 > >
Re: Github Issues
I may have voiced my concerns earlier but as a user, I think that JIRA issues are easier to follow than PRs. - As Paul said an issue may affect more than one version. - It may also require more than one PR to fully resolve the issue. - Issues tend to be described in terms of a problem that the user would recognize while PRs are most often described as what was done to fix the problem. The JIRA could be much easier to relate to what the user is seeing and more likely to show up in Google. Ron On 17/07/2018 4:53 AM, Paul Angus wrote: Hi All, We have been trialling replacing Jira with Github Issues. I think that we should have a conversation about it before it become the new standard by default. From my perspective, I don't like it. Searching has become far more difficult, categorising has also. When there is a bug fix it can only be targeted for a single version, which makes them easy to lose track of, and when looking at milestones issues and PRs get jumbled up and people are commenting on issues when it should by the PR and vice-versa (yes I've done it too). In summary, from an administrative point of view it causes a lot more problems than it solves. I yield the floor to hear other people's opinions... Kind regards, Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue -- Ron Wheeler President Artifact Software Inc email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com skype: ronaldmwheeler phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
Re: Github Issues
Hi Paul, My 2 cents on the topic. people are commenting on issues when it should by the PR and vice-versa > I think this is simply due to the fact that with one login you can do both, versus before you had to have a JIRA login which people might have tried to avoid, preferring using github directly, ensuring the conversation will only be on the PR. Most of the issues in Jira didn't have any conversation at all. But I do feel also the pain of searching the issues on github as it's more free-hand than a jira system. At the same time it's easier and quicker to navigate, so it ease the pain at the same time ;-) I would say that the current labels isn't well organized to be able to search like in jira but it could. For example any label has a prefix describing the jira attribute type (component, version, ...) Then a bot scanning the issue content could set some of them as other open source project are doing. The bad thing here is that you might end up with too many labels. Maybe @resmo can give his point of view on how things are managed in Ansible (https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pulls - lots of labels, lots of issues and PRs). I don't know if that's a solution but labels seem the only way to organize things. Marc-Aurèle On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:53 AM, Paul Angus wrote: > Hi All, > > We have been trialling replacing Jira with Github Issues. I think that > we should have a conversation about it before it become the new standard by > default. > > From my perspective, I don't like it. Searching has become far more > difficult, categorising has also. When there is a bug fix it can only be > targeted for a single version, which makes them easy to lose track of, and > when looking at milestones issues and PRs get jumbled up and people are > commenting on issues when it should by the PR and vice-versa (yes I've done > it too). > In summary, from an administrative point of view it causes a lot more > problems than it solves. > > I yield the floor to hear other people's opinions... > > > Kind regards, > > Paul Angus > > > paul.an...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > @shapeblue > > > >
Github Issues
Hi All, We have been trialling replacing Jira with Github Issues. I think that we should have a conversation about it before it become the new standard by default. From my perspective, I don't like it. Searching has become far more difficult, categorising has also. When there is a bug fix it can only be targeted for a single version, which makes them easy to lose track of, and when looking at milestones issues and PRs get jumbled up and people are commenting on issues when it should by the PR and vice-versa (yes I've done it too). In summary, from an administrative point of view it causes a lot more problems than it solves. I yield the floor to hear other people's opinions... Kind regards, Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
Re: Request to enable Github issues, wiki for apache/cloudstack* repos
Enabled for your repos: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16186 Cheers On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 1:23 PM, Rohit Yadavwrote: > Ping infra? > > - Rohit > > On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 1:51 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: >> >> All, >> >> Based on a vote [1] on Apache CloudStack MLs, I would like to request >> infra to enable Github issue and wiki features for all cloudstack >> repositories: >> >> https://github.com/apache?q=cloudstack+ >> >> [1] https://markmail.org/message/y5zgkssmwp4sh43t >> >> Regards, >> Rohit Yadav >> PMC member and committer, >> Apache CloudStack > >
Re: Request to enable Github issues, wiki for apache/cloudstack* repos
Ping infra? - Rohit On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 1:51 PM, Rohit Yadavwrote: > All, > > Based on a vote [1] on Apache CloudStack MLs, I would like to request > infra to enable Github issue and wiki features for all cloudstack > repositories: > > https://github.com/apache?q=cloudstack+ > > [1] https://markmail.org/message/y5zgkssmwp4sh43t > > Regards, > Rohit Yadav > PMC member and committer, > Apache CloudStack >
Re: [VOTE] Move to Github issues
My bad, I just saw the e-mail to infra after replying to this one :( Thanks for taking the lead on this matter. On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 11:30 AM, Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > Rafael, yes I did see the other email to infra cc-ed to dev@. I've also > reopened a ticket. > > Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> > > > From: Rafael Weingärtner <rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> > Sent: Friday, March 30, 2018 4:53:57 PM > To: dev > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move to Github issues > > Awesome Rohit.Can you also ask Infra to enable Wiki? Then, we could already > experiment using it. > > On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 5:13 AM, Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> > wrote: > > > Thanks all, after 5days the vote *passes* with all in favour of the > > proposal. > > > > I'll request infra immediately to enable the Github features for us, and > > update the website/docs over the next few days. > > > > After issues is available, users should use Github issues for logging > > bugs/features etc. Developers who have submitted PRs without a jira id > may > > be accepted now provided their PRs have a milestone and qualify merge > > guidelines (2 lgtms, test results etc). > > > > PS. Happy Easter! > > > > Regards. > > > > Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> > > > > > > From: Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> > > Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2018 11:08:36 PM > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move to Github issues > > > > +1 > > > > On 3/26/18, 12:33 AM, "Rohit Yadav" <ro...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > All, > > > > Based on the discussion last week [1], I would like to start a vote > to > > put > > the proposal into effect: > > > > - Enable Github issues, wiki features in CloudStack repositories. > > - Both user and developers can use Github issues for tracking issues. > > - Developers can use #id references while fixing an existing/open > > issue in > > a PR [2]. PRs can be sent without requiring to open/create an issue. > > - Use Github milestone to track both issues and pull requests > towards a > > CloudStack release, and generate release notes. > > - Relax requirement for JIRA IDs, JIRA still to be used for > historical > > reference and security issues. Use of JIRA will be discouraged. > > - The current requirement of two(+) non-author LGTMs will continue > for > > PR > > acceptance. The two(+) PR non-authors can advise resolution to any > > issue > > that we've not already discussed/agreed upon. > > > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to > > indicate > > "(binding)" with their vote? > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > > > Vote will be open for 120 hours. If the vote passes the following > > actions > > will be taken: > > - Get Github features enabled from ASF INFRA > > - Update CONTRIBUTING.md and other relevant cwiki pages. > > - Update project website > > > > [1] https://markmail.org/message/llodbwsmzgx5hod6 > > [2] https://blog.github.com/2013-05-14-closing-issues-via-pull- > > requests/ > > > > Regards, > > Rohit Yadav > > > > > > > > rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com > > www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> > > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > > @shapeblue > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Rafael Weingärtner > > rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > @shapeblue > > > > -- Rafael Weingärtner
Re: [VOTE] Move to Github issues
Rafael, yes I did see the other email to infra cc-ed to dev@. I've also reopened a ticket. Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> From: Rafael Weingärtner <rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, March 30, 2018 4:53:57 PM To: dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move to Github issues Awesome Rohit.Can you also ask Infra to enable Wiki? Then, we could already experiment using it. On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 5:13 AM, Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > Thanks all, after 5days the vote *passes* with all in favour of the > proposal. > > I'll request infra immediately to enable the Github features for us, and > update the website/docs over the next few days. > > After issues is available, users should use Github issues for logging > bugs/features etc. Developers who have submitted PRs without a jira id may > be accepted now provided their PRs have a milestone and qualify merge > guidelines (2 lgtms, test results etc). > > PS. Happy Easter! > > Regards. > > Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> > > > From: Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> > Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2018 11:08:36 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move to Github issues > > +1 > > On 3/26/18, 12:33 AM, "Rohit Yadav" <ro...@apache.org> wrote: > > All, > > Based on the discussion last week [1], I would like to start a vote to > put > the proposal into effect: > > - Enable Github issues, wiki features in CloudStack repositories. > - Both user and developers can use Github issues for tracking issues. > - Developers can use #id references while fixing an existing/open > issue in > a PR [2]. PRs can be sent without requiring to open/create an issue. > - Use Github milestone to track both issues and pull requests towards a > CloudStack release, and generate release notes. > - Relax requirement for JIRA IDs, JIRA still to be used for historical > reference and security issues. Use of JIRA will be discouraged. > - The current requirement of two(+) non-author LGTMs will continue for > PR > acceptance. The two(+) PR non-authors can advise resolution to any > issue > that we've not already discussed/agreed upon. > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to > indicate > "(binding)" with their vote? > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > Vote will be open for 120 hours. If the vote passes the following > actions > will be taken: > - Get Github features enabled from ASF INFRA > - Update CONTRIBUTING.md and other relevant cwiki pages. > - Update project website > > [1] https://markmail.org/message/llodbwsmzgx5hod6 > [2] https://blog.github.com/2013-05-14-closing-issues-via-pull- > requests/ > > Regards, > Rohit Yadav > > > > rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > @shapeblue > > > > -- Rafael Weingärtner rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
Re: [VOTE] Move to Github issues
Awesome Rohit.Can you also ask Infra to enable Wiki? Then, we could already experiment using it. On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 5:13 AM, Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > Thanks all, after 5days the vote *passes* with all in favour of the > proposal. > > I'll request infra immediately to enable the Github features for us, and > update the website/docs over the next few days. > > After issues is available, users should use Github issues for logging > bugs/features etc. Developers who have submitted PRs without a jira id may > be accepted now provided their PRs have a milestone and qualify merge > guidelines (2 lgtms, test results etc). > > PS. Happy Easter! > > Regards. > > Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> > > > From: Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> > Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2018 11:08:36 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move to Github issues > > +1 > > On 3/26/18, 12:33 AM, "Rohit Yadav" <ro...@apache.org> wrote: > > All, > > Based on the discussion last week [1], I would like to start a vote to > put > the proposal into effect: > > - Enable Github issues, wiki features in CloudStack repositories. > - Both user and developers can use Github issues for tracking issues. > - Developers can use #id references while fixing an existing/open > issue in > a PR [2]. PRs can be sent without requiring to open/create an issue. > - Use Github milestone to track both issues and pull requests towards a > CloudStack release, and generate release notes. > - Relax requirement for JIRA IDs, JIRA still to be used for historical > reference and security issues. Use of JIRA will be discouraged. > - The current requirement of two(+) non-author LGTMs will continue for > PR > acceptance. The two(+) PR non-authors can advise resolution to any > issue > that we've not already discussed/agreed upon. > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to > indicate > "(binding)" with their vote? > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > Vote will be open for 120 hours. If the vote passes the following > actions > will be taken: > - Get Github features enabled from ASF INFRA > - Update CONTRIBUTING.md and other relevant cwiki pages. > - Update project website > > [1] https://markmail.org/message/llodbwsmzgx5hod6 > [2] https://blog.github.com/2013-05-14-closing-issues-via-pull- > requests/ > > Regards, > Rohit Yadav > > > > rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > @shapeblue > > > > -- Rafael Weingärtner
Request to enable Github issues, wiki for apache/cloudstack* repos
All, Based on a vote [1] on Apache CloudStack MLs, I would like to request infra to enable Github issue and wiki features for all cloudstack repositories: https://github.com/apache?q=cloudstack+ [1] https://markmail.org/message/y5zgkssmwp4sh43t Regards, Rohit Yadav PMC member and committer, Apache CloudStack
Re: [VOTE] Move to Github issues
Thanks all, after 5days the vote *passes* with all in favour of the proposal. I'll request infra immediately to enable the Github features for us, and update the website/docs over the next few days. After issues is available, users should use Github issues for logging bugs/features etc. Developers who have submitted PRs without a jira id may be accepted now provided their PRs have a milestone and qualify merge guidelines (2 lgtms, test results etc). PS. Happy Easter! Regards. Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> From: Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2018 11:08:36 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move to Github issues +1 On 3/26/18, 12:33 AM, "Rohit Yadav" <ro...@apache.org> wrote: All, Based on the discussion last week [1], I would like to start a vote to put the proposal into effect: - Enable Github issues, wiki features in CloudStack repositories. - Both user and developers can use Github issues for tracking issues. - Developers can use #id references while fixing an existing/open issue in a PR [2]. PRs can be sent without requiring to open/create an issue. - Use Github milestone to track both issues and pull requests towards a CloudStack release, and generate release notes. - Relax requirement for JIRA IDs, JIRA still to be used for historical reference and security issues. Use of JIRA will be discouraged. - The current requirement of two(+) non-author LGTMs will continue for PR acceptance. The two(+) PR non-authors can advise resolution to any issue that we've not already discussed/agreed upon. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Vote will be open for 120 hours. If the vote passes the following actions will be taken: - Get Github features enabled from ASF INFRA - Update CONTRIBUTING.md and other relevant cwiki pages. - Update project website [1] https://markmail.org/message/llodbwsmzgx5hod6 [2] https://blog.github.com/2013-05-14-closing-issues-via-pull-requests/ Regards, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
Re: [VOTE] Move to Github issues
+1 On 3/26/18, 12:33 AM, "Rohit Yadav" <ro...@apache.org> wrote: All, Based on the discussion last week [1], I would like to start a vote to put the proposal into effect: - Enable Github issues, wiki features in CloudStack repositories. - Both user and developers can use Github issues for tracking issues. - Developers can use #id references while fixing an existing/open issue in a PR [2]. PRs can be sent without requiring to open/create an issue. - Use Github milestone to track both issues and pull requests towards a CloudStack release, and generate release notes. - Relax requirement for JIRA IDs, JIRA still to be used for historical reference and security issues. Use of JIRA will be discouraged. - The current requirement of two(+) non-author LGTMs will continue for PR acceptance. The two(+) PR non-authors can advise resolution to any issue that we've not already discussed/agreed upon. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Vote will be open for 120 hours. If the vote passes the following actions will be taken: - Get Github features enabled from ASF INFRA - Update CONTRIBUTING.md and other relevant cwiki pages. - Update project website [1] https://markmail.org/message/llodbwsmzgx5hod6 [2] https://blog.github.com/2013-05-14-closing-issues-via-pull-requests/ Regards, Rohit Yadav
Re: [VOTE] Move to Github issues
+1 On Mon, 26 Mar 2018 at 21:25 Glenn Wagner <glenn.wag...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > +1 > > glenn.wag...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > Winter Suite, 1st Floor, The Avenues, Drama Street, Somerset West, Cape > Town 7129South Africa > @shapeblue > > > > > -Original Message- > From: David Mabry <dma...@ena.com.INVALID> > Sent: Monday, 26 March 2018 4:51 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: users <us...@cloudstack.apache.org> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move to Github issues > > +1 > > On 3/26/18, 8:05 AM, "Will Stevens" <wstev...@cloudops.com> wrote: > > +1 > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018, 5:51 AM Nicolas Vazquez, < > nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > From: Dag Sonstebo <dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com> > > Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 5:06:29 AM > > To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move to Github issues > > > > +1 > > > > Regards, > > Dag Sonstebo > > Cloud Architect > > ShapeBlue > > > > On 26/03/2018, 07:33, "Rohit Yadav" <ro...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > All, > > > > Based on the discussion last week [1], I would like to start a > vote to > > put > > the proposal into effect: > > > > - Enable Github issues, wiki features in CloudStack repositories. > > - Both user and developers can use Github issues for tracking > issues. > > - Developers can use #id references while fixing an existing/open > > issue in > > a PR [2]. PRs can be sent without requiring to open/create an > issue. > > - Use Github milestone to track both issues and pull requests > towards a > > CloudStack release, and generate release notes. > > - Relax requirement for JIRA IDs, JIRA still to be used for > historical > > reference and security issues. Use of JIRA will be discouraged. > > - The current requirement of two(+) non-author LGTMs will > continue for > > PR > > acceptance. The two(+) PR non-authors can advise resolution to > any > > issue > > that we've not already discussed/agreed upon. > > > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure > to > > indicate > > "(binding)" with their vote? > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > > > Vote will be open for 120 hours. If the vote passes the following > > actions > > will be taken: > > - Get Github features enabled from ASF INFRA > > - Update CONTRIBUTING.md and other relevant cwik > <https://maps.google.com/?q=pdate+CONTRIBUTING.md+and+other+relevant+cwik=gmail=g>i > pages. > > - Update project website > > > > [1] https://markmail.org/message/llodbwsmzgx5hod6 > > [2] > > https://blog.github.com/2013-05-14-closing-issues-via-pull-requests/ > > > > Regards, > > Rohit Yadav > > > > > > > > dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com > > www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> > > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > > @shapeblue > > > > > > > > > > nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com > > www.shapeblue.com > > , > > @shapeblue > > > > > > > > > > >
RE: [VOTE] Move to Github issues
+1 glenn.wag...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com Winter Suite, 1st Floor, The Avenues, Drama Street, Somerset West, Cape Town 7129South Africa @shapeblue -Original Message- From: David Mabry <dma...@ena.com.INVALID> Sent: Monday, 26 March 2018 4:51 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users <us...@cloudstack.apache.org> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move to Github issues +1 On 3/26/18, 8:05 AM, "Will Stevens" <wstev...@cloudops.com> wrote: +1 On Mon, Mar 26, 2018, 5:51 AM Nicolas Vazquez, < nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > +1 > > > From: Dag Sonstebo <dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com> > Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 5:06:29 AM > To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move to Github issues > > +1 > > Regards, > Dag Sonstebo > Cloud Architect > ShapeBlue > > On 26/03/2018, 07:33, "Rohit Yadav" <ro...@apache.org> wrote: > > All, > > Based on the discussion last week [1], I would like to start a vote to > put > the proposal into effect: > > - Enable Github issues, wiki features in CloudStack repositories. > - Both user and developers can use Github issues for tracking issues. > - Developers can use #id references while fixing an existing/open > issue in > a PR [2]. PRs can be sent without requiring to open/create an issue. > - Use Github milestone to track both issues and pull requests towards a > CloudStack release, and generate release notes. > - Relax requirement for JIRA IDs, JIRA still to be used for historical > reference and security issues. Use of JIRA will be discouraged. > - The current requirement of two(+) non-author LGTMs will continue for > PR > acceptance. The two(+) PR non-authors can advise resolution to any > issue > that we've not already discussed/agreed upon. > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to > indicate > "(binding)" with their vote? > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > Vote will be open for 120 hours. If the vote passes the following > actions > will be taken: > - Get Github features enabled from ASF INFRA > - Update CONTRIBUTING.md and other relevant cwiki pages. > - Update project website > > [1] https://markmail.org/message/llodbwsmzgx5hod6 > [2] > https://blog.github.com/2013-05-14-closing-issues-via-pull-requests/ > > Regards, > Rohit Yadav > > > > dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > @shapeblue > > > > > nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > , > @shapeblue > > > >
Re: [VOTE] Move to Github issues
+1 On 3/26/18, 8:05 AM, "Will Stevens" <wstev...@cloudops.com> wrote: +1 On Mon, Mar 26, 2018, 5:51 AM Nicolas Vazquez, < nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > +1 > > > From: Dag Sonstebo <dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com> > Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 5:06:29 AM > To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move to Github issues > > +1 > > Regards, > Dag Sonstebo > Cloud Architect > ShapeBlue > > On 26/03/2018, 07:33, "Rohit Yadav" <ro...@apache.org> wrote: > > All, > > Based on the discussion last week [1], I would like to start a vote to > put > the proposal into effect: > > - Enable Github issues, wiki features in CloudStack repositories. > - Both user and developers can use Github issues for tracking issues. > - Developers can use #id references while fixing an existing/open > issue in > a PR [2]. PRs can be sent without requiring to open/create an issue. > - Use Github milestone to track both issues and pull requests towards a > CloudStack release, and generate release notes. > - Relax requirement for JIRA IDs, JIRA still to be used for historical > reference and security issues. Use of JIRA will be discouraged. > - The current requirement of two(+) non-author LGTMs will continue for > PR > acceptance. The two(+) PR non-authors can advise resolution to any > issue > that we've not already discussed/agreed upon. > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to > indicate > "(binding)" with their vote? > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > Vote will be open for 120 hours. If the vote passes the following > actions > will be taken: > - Get Github features enabled from ASF INFRA > - Update CONTRIBUTING.md and other relevant cwiki pages. > - Update project website > > [1] https://markmail.org/message/llodbwsmzgx5hod6 > [2] > https://blog.github.com/2013-05-14-closing-issues-via-pull-requests/ > > Regards, > Rohit Yadav > > > > dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > @shapeblue > > > > > nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > , > @shapeblue > > > >
Re: [VOTE] Move to Github issues
+1 On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 9:05 AM, Will Stevens <wstev...@cloudops.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018, 5:51 AM Nicolas Vazquez, < > nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > From: Dag Sonstebo <dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com> > > Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 5:06:29 AM > > To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move to Github issues > > > > +1 > > > > Regards, > > Dag Sonstebo > > Cloud Architect > > ShapeBlue > > > > On 26/03/2018, 07:33, "Rohit Yadav" <ro...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > All, > > > > Based on the discussion last week [1], I would like to start a vote > to > > put > > the proposal into effect: > > > > - Enable Github issues, wiki features in CloudStack repositories. > > - Both user and developers can use Github issues for tracking issues. > > - Developers can use #id references while fixing an existing/open > > issue in > > a PR [2]. PRs can be sent without requiring to open/create an issue. > > - Use Github milestone to track both issues and pull requests > towards a > > CloudStack release, and generate release notes. > > - Relax requirement for JIRA IDs, JIRA still to be used for > historical > > reference and security issues. Use of JIRA will be discouraged. > > - The current requirement of two(+) non-author LGTMs will continue > for > > PR > > acceptance. The two(+) PR non-authors can advise resolution to any > > issue > > that we've not already discussed/agreed upon. > > > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to > > indicate > > "(binding)" with their vote? > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > > > Vote will be open for 120 hours. If the vote passes the following > > actions > > will be taken: > > - Get Github features enabled from ASF INFRA > > - Update CONTRIBUTING.md and other relevant cwiki pages. > > - Update project website > > > > [1] https://markmail.org/message/llodbwsmzgx5hod6 > > [2] > > https://blog.github.com/2013-05-14-closing-issues-via-pull-requests/ > > > > Regards, > > Rohit Yadav > > > > > > > > dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com > > www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> > > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > > @shapeblue > > > > > > > > > > nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com > > www.shapeblue.com > > , > > @shapeblue > > > > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] Move to Github issues
+1 On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 3:05 PM, Will Stevens <wstev...@cloudops.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018, 5:51 AM Nicolas Vazquez, < > nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > From: Dag Sonstebo <dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com> > > Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 5:06:29 AM > > To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move to Github issues > > > > +1 > > > > Regards, > > Dag Sonstebo > > Cloud Architect > > ShapeBlue > > > > On 26/03/2018, 07:33, "Rohit Yadav" <ro...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > All, > > > > Based on the discussion last week [1], I would like to start a vote > to > > put > > the proposal into effect: > > > > - Enable Github issues, wiki features in CloudStack repositories. > > - Both user and developers can use Github issues for tracking issues. > > - Developers can use #id references while fixing an existing/open > > issue in > > a PR [2]. PRs can be sent without requiring to open/create an issue. > > - Use Github milestone to track both issues and pull requests > towards a > > CloudStack release, and generate release notes. > > - Relax requirement for JIRA IDs, JIRA still to be used for > historical > > reference and security issues. Use of JIRA will be discouraged. > > - The current requirement of two(+) non-author LGTMs will continue > for > > PR > > acceptance. The two(+) PR non-authors can advise resolution to any > > issue > > that we've not already discussed/agreed upon. > > > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to > > indicate > > "(binding)" with their vote? > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > > > Vote will be open for 120 hours. If the vote passes the following > > actions > > will be taken: > > - Get Github features enabled from ASF INFRA > > - Update CONTRIBUTING.md and other relevant cwiki pages. > > - Update project website > > > > [1] https://markmail.org/message/llodbwsmzgx5hod6 > > [2] > > https://blog.github.com/2013-05-14-closing-issues-via-pull-requests/ > > > > Regards, > > Rohit Yadav > > > > > > > > dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com > > www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> > > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > > @shapeblue > > > > > > > > > > nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com > > www.shapeblue.com > > , > > @shapeblue > > > > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] Move to Github issues
+1 (binding). From: Rohit Yadav <ro...@apache.org> Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 1:33 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Move to Github issues All, Based on the discussion last week [1], I would like to start a vote to put the proposal into effect: - Enable Github issues, wiki features in CloudStack repositories. - Both user and developers can use Github issues for tracking issues. - Developers can use #id references while fixing an existing/open issue in a PR [2]. PRs can be sent without requiring to open/create an issue. - Use Github milestone to track both issues and pull requests towards a CloudStack release, and generate release notes. - Relax requirement for JIRA IDs, JIRA still to be used for historical reference and security issues. Use of JIRA will be discouraged. - The current requirement of two(+) non-author LGTMs will continue for PR acceptance. The two(+) PR non-authors can advise resolution to any issue that we've not already discussed/agreed upon. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Vote will be open for 120 hours. If the vote passes the following actions will be taken: - Get Github features enabled from ASF INFRA - Update CONTRIBUTING.md and other relevant cwiki pages. - Update project website [1] https://markmail.org/message/llodbwsmzgx5hod6 [2] https://blog.github.com/2013-05-14-closing-issues-via-pull-requests/ Regards, Rohit Yadav
Re: [VOTE] Move to Github issues
+1 On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 6:05 AM Will Stevens <wstev...@cloudops.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018, 5:51 AM Nicolas Vazquez, < > nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > From: Dag Sonstebo <dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com> > > Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 5:06:29 AM > > To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move to Github issues > > > > +1 > > > > Regards, > > Dag Sonstebo > > Cloud Architect > > ShapeBlue > > > > On 26/03/2018, 07:33, "Rohit Yadav" <ro...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > All, > > > > Based on the discussion last week [1], I would like to start a vote > to > > put > > the proposal into effect: > > > > - Enable Github issues, wiki features in CloudStack repositories. > > - Both user and developers can use Github issues for tracking issues. > > - Developers can use #id references while fixing an existing/open > > issue in > > a PR [2]. PRs can be sent without requiring to open/create an issue. > > - Use Github milestone to track both issues and pull requests > towards a > > CloudStack release, and generate release notes. > > - Relax requirement for JIRA IDs, JIRA still to be used for > historical > > reference and security issues. Use of JIRA will be discouraged. > > - The current requirement of two(+) non-author LGTMs will continue > for > > PR > > acceptance. The two(+) PR non-authors can advise resolution to any > > issue > > that we've not already discussed/agreed upon. > > > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to > > indicate > > "(binding)" with their vote? > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > > > Vote will be open for 120 hours. If the vote passes the following > > actions > > will be taken: > > - Get Github features enabled from ASF INFRA > > - Update CONTRIBUTING.md and other relevant cwiki pages. > > - Update project website > > > > [1] https://markmail.org/message/llodbwsmzgx5hod6 > > [2] > > https://blog.github.com/2013-05-14-closing-issues-via-pull-requests/ > > > > Regards, > > Rohit Yadav > > > > > > > > dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com > > www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> > > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > > @shapeblue > > > > > > > > > > nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com > > www.shapeblue.com > > , > > @shapeblue > > > > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] Move to Github issues
+1 On Mon, Mar 26, 2018, 5:51 AM Nicolas Vazquez, < nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > +1 > > > From: Dag Sonstebo <dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com> > Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 5:06:29 AM > To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move to Github issues > > +1 > > Regards, > Dag Sonstebo > Cloud Architect > ShapeBlue > > On 26/03/2018, 07:33, "Rohit Yadav" <ro...@apache.org> wrote: > > All, > > Based on the discussion last week [1], I would like to start a vote to > put > the proposal into effect: > > - Enable Github issues, wiki features in CloudStack repositories. > - Both user and developers can use Github issues for tracking issues. > - Developers can use #id references while fixing an existing/open > issue in > a PR [2]. PRs can be sent without requiring to open/create an issue. > - Use Github milestone to track both issues and pull requests towards a > CloudStack release, and generate release notes. > - Relax requirement for JIRA IDs, JIRA still to be used for historical > reference and security issues. Use of JIRA will be discouraged. > - The current requirement of two(+) non-author LGTMs will continue for > PR > acceptance. The two(+) PR non-authors can advise resolution to any > issue > that we've not already discussed/agreed upon. > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to > indicate > "(binding)" with their vote? > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > Vote will be open for 120 hours. If the vote passes the following > actions > will be taken: > - Get Github features enabled from ASF INFRA > - Update CONTRIBUTING.md and other relevant cwiki pages. > - Update project website > > [1] https://markmail.org/message/llodbwsmzgx5hod6 > [2] > https://blog.github.com/2013-05-14-closing-issues-via-pull-requests/ > > Regards, > Rohit Yadav > > > > dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > @shapeblue > > > > > nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > , > @shapeblue > > > >
Re: [VOTE] Move to Github issues
+1 From: Dag Sonstebo <dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com> Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 5:06:29 AM To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move to Github issues +1 Regards, Dag Sonstebo Cloud Architect ShapeBlue On 26/03/2018, 07:33, "Rohit Yadav" <ro...@apache.org> wrote: All, Based on the discussion last week [1], I would like to start a vote to put the proposal into effect: - Enable Github issues, wiki features in CloudStack repositories. - Both user and developers can use Github issues for tracking issues. - Developers can use #id references while fixing an existing/open issue in a PR [2]. PRs can be sent without requiring to open/create an issue. - Use Github milestone to track both issues and pull requests towards a CloudStack release, and generate release notes. - Relax requirement for JIRA IDs, JIRA still to be used for historical reference and security issues. Use of JIRA will be discouraged. - The current requirement of two(+) non-author LGTMs will continue for PR acceptance. The two(+) PR non-authors can advise resolution to any issue that we've not already discussed/agreed upon. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Vote will be open for 120 hours. If the vote passes the following actions will be taken: - Get Github features enabled from ASF INFRA - Update CONTRIBUTING.md and other relevant cwiki pages. - Update project website [1] https://markmail.org/message/llodbwsmzgx5hod6 [2] https://blog.github.com/2013-05-14-closing-issues-via-pull-requests/ Regards, Rohit Yadav dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com , @shapeblue
Re: [VOTE] Move to Github issues
+1 On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 5:06 AM, Dag Sonstebo <dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > +1 > > Regards, > Dag Sonstebo > Cloud Architect > ShapeBlue > > On 26/03/2018, 07:33, "Rohit Yadav" <ro...@apache.org> wrote: > > All, > > Based on the discussion last week [1], I would like to start a vote to > put > the proposal into effect: > > - Enable Github issues, wiki features in CloudStack repositories. > - Both user and developers can use Github issues for tracking issues. > - Developers can use #id references while fixing an existing/open > issue in > a PR [2]. PRs can be sent without requiring to open/create an issue. > - Use Github milestone to track both issues and pull requests towards a > CloudStack release, and generate release notes. > - Relax requirement for JIRA IDs, JIRA still to be used for historical > reference and security issues. Use of JIRA will be discouraged. > - The current requirement of two(+) non-author LGTMs will continue for > PR > acceptance. The two(+) PR non-authors can advise resolution to any > issue > that we've not already discussed/agreed upon. > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to > indicate > "(binding)" with their vote? > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > Vote will be open for 120 hours. If the vote passes the following > actions > will be taken: > - Get Github features enabled from ASF INFRA > - Update CONTRIBUTING.md and other relevant cwiki pages. > - Update project website > > [1] https://markmail.org/message/llodbwsmzgx5hod6 > [2] https://blog.github.com/2013-05-14-closing-issues-via-pull- > requests/ > > Regards, > Rohit Yadav > > > > dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > @shapeblue > > > > -- Rafael Weingärtner
Re: [VOTE] Move to Github issues
+1 Regards, Dag Sonstebo Cloud Architect ShapeBlue On 26/03/2018, 07:33, "Rohit Yadav" <ro...@apache.org> wrote: All, Based on the discussion last week [1], I would like to start a vote to put the proposal into effect: - Enable Github issues, wiki features in CloudStack repositories. - Both user and developers can use Github issues for tracking issues. - Developers can use #id references while fixing an existing/open issue in a PR [2]. PRs can be sent without requiring to open/create an issue. - Use Github milestone to track both issues and pull requests towards a CloudStack release, and generate release notes. - Relax requirement for JIRA IDs, JIRA still to be used for historical reference and security issues. Use of JIRA will be discouraged. - The current requirement of two(+) non-author LGTMs will continue for PR acceptance. The two(+) PR non-authors can advise resolution to any issue that we've not already discussed/agreed upon. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Vote will be open for 120 hours. If the vote passes the following actions will be taken: - Get Github features enabled from ASF INFRA - Update CONTRIBUTING.md and other relevant cwiki pages. - Update project website [1] https://markmail.org/message/llodbwsmzgx5hod6 [2] https://blog.github.com/2013-05-14-closing-issues-via-pull-requests/ Regards, Rohit Yadav dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
Re: [VOTE] Move to Github issues
+1 > On 26 Mar 2018, at 10:21, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote: > > +1 > > -- > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > > Nux! > www.nux.ro > > boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue - Original Message - >> From: "Rohit Yadav" <ro...@apache.org> >> To: "dev" <dev@cloudstack.apache.org>, "users" <us...@cloudstack.apache.org> >> Sent: Monday, 26 March, 2018 07:33:08 >> Subject: [VOTE] Move to Github issues > >> All, >> >> Based on the discussion last week [1], I would like to start a vote to put >> the proposal into effect: >> >> - Enable Github issues, wiki features in CloudStack repositories. >> - Both user and developers can use Github issues for tracking issues. >> - Developers can use #id references while fixing an existing/open issue in >> a PR [2]. PRs can be sent without requiring to open/create an issue. >> - Use Github milestone to track both issues and pull requests towards a >> CloudStack release, and generate release notes. >> - Relax requirement for JIRA IDs, JIRA still to be used for historical >> reference and security issues. Use of JIRA will be discouraged. >> - The current requirement of two(+) non-author LGTMs will continue for PR >> acceptance. The two(+) PR non-authors can advise resolution to any issue >> that we've not already discussed/agreed upon. >> >> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate >> "(binding)" with their vote? >> >> [ ] +1 approve >> [ ] +0 no opinion >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >> >> Vote will be open for 120 hours. If the vote passes the following actions >> will be taken: >> - Get Github features enabled from ASF INFRA >> - Update CONTRIBUTING.md and other relevant cwiki pages. >> - Update project website >> >> [1] https://markmail.org/message/llodbwsmzgx5hod6 >> [2] https://blog.github.com/2013-05-14-closing-issues-via-pull-requests/ >> >> Regards, >> Rohit Yadav
Re: [VOTE] Move to Github issues
+1 -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Rohit Yadav" <ro...@apache.org> > To: "dev" <dev@cloudstack.apache.org>, "users" <us...@cloudstack.apache.org> > Sent: Monday, 26 March, 2018 07:33:08 > Subject: [VOTE] Move to Github issues > All, > > Based on the discussion last week [1], I would like to start a vote to put > the proposal into effect: > > - Enable Github issues, wiki features in CloudStack repositories. > - Both user and developers can use Github issues for tracking issues. > - Developers can use #id references while fixing an existing/open issue in > a PR [2]. PRs can be sent without requiring to open/create an issue. > - Use Github milestone to track both issues and pull requests towards a > CloudStack release, and generate release notes. > - Relax requirement for JIRA IDs, JIRA still to be used for historical > reference and security issues. Use of JIRA will be discouraged. > - The current requirement of two(+) non-author LGTMs will continue for PR > acceptance. The two(+) PR non-authors can advise resolution to any issue > that we've not already discussed/agreed upon. > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate > "(binding)" with their vote? > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > Vote will be open for 120 hours. If the vote passes the following actions > will be taken: > - Get Github features enabled from ASF INFRA > - Update CONTRIBUTING.md and other relevant cwiki pages. > - Update project website > > [1] https://markmail.org/message/llodbwsmzgx5hod6 > [2] https://blog.github.com/2013-05-14-closing-issues-via-pull-requests/ > > Regards, > Rohit Yadav
Re: [VOTE] Move to Github issues
+1
Re: [VOTE] Move to Github issues
+1 On 03/26/2018 08:33 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > All, > > Based on the discussion last week [1], I would like to start a vote to put > the proposal into effect: > > - Enable Github issues, wiki features in CloudStack repositories. > - Both user and developers can use Github issues for tracking issues. > - Developers can use #id references while fixing an existing/open issue in > a PR [2]. PRs can be sent without requiring to open/create an issue. > - Use Github milestone to track both issues and pull requests towards a > CloudStack release, and generate release notes. > - Relax requirement for JIRA IDs, JIRA still to be used for historical > reference and security issues. Use of JIRA will be discouraged. > - The current requirement of two(+) non-author LGTMs will continue for PR > acceptance. The two(+) PR non-authors can advise resolution to any issue > that we've not already discussed/agreed upon. > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate > "(binding)" with their vote? > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > Vote will be open for 120 hours. If the vote passes the following actions > will be taken: > - Get Github features enabled from ASF INFRA > - Update CONTRIBUTING.md and other relevant cwiki pages. > - Update project website > > [1] https://markmail.org/message/llodbwsmzgx5hod6 > [2] https://blog.github.com/2013-05-14-closing-issues-via-pull-requests/ > > Regards, > Rohit Yadav >
[VOTE] Move to Github issues
All, Based on the discussion last week [1], I would like to start a vote to put the proposal into effect: - Enable Github issues, wiki features in CloudStack repositories. - Both user and developers can use Github issues for tracking issues. - Developers can use #id references while fixing an existing/open issue in a PR [2]. PRs can be sent without requiring to open/create an issue. - Use Github milestone to track both issues and pull requests towards a CloudStack release, and generate release notes. - Relax requirement for JIRA IDs, JIRA still to be used for historical reference and security issues. Use of JIRA will be discouraged. - The current requirement of two(+) non-author LGTMs will continue for PR acceptance. The two(+) PR non-authors can advise resolution to any issue that we've not already discussed/agreed upon. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Vote will be open for 120 hours. If the vote passes the following actions will be taken: - Get Github features enabled from ASF INFRA - Update CONTRIBUTING.md and other relevant cwiki pages. - Update project website [1] https://markmail.org/message/llodbwsmzgx5hod6 [2] https://blog.github.com/2013-05-14-closing-issues-via-pull-requests/ Regards, Rohit Yadav