Re: There's still hope for 2.2...

[frapien]

are there any new release plans for 2.2?
3Q2009 is over and needs an update under
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-22-release-status.html
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/There%27s-still-hope-for-2.2...-tp25395776s134p26156696.html
Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: There's still hope for 2.2...

[Jack Cai]

David, are you working on a new TranQL release in order to include the stale
connection patch?

-Jack

On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 4:01 AM, Donald Woods  wrote:

> Just rolled back to the 1.7 level of javamail.
>
> Also, Jarek updated the openejbVersion to 3.1.2.
>
>
> -Donald
>
>
>
> Donald Woods wrote:
>
>> Agree, if that is the last set of artifacts holding up the release, then
>> we can roll back to 1.7.
>>
>>
>> -Donald
>>
>>
>> Rick McGuire wrote:
>>
>>> Donald Woods wrote:
>>>
 I did upgrade the javamail version to 1.8-SNAPSHOT, as Rick has checked
 in several fixes in the past few months

>>> I'm not sure those fixes are worth spinning a new javamail release just
>>> for inclusion on the 2.2 release.
>>>
>>> Rick
>>>
>>>

 -Donald


 David Jencks wrote:

> We may be able to release 2.2 soon.  Activemq has fixed the last bug we
> had problems with and is fast approaching a release, openejb is getting 
> very
> close to a release for 2.2, and I've started votes on a number of our
> snapshot dependencies.
>
> At this point I'd like anyone who is working on something they'd like
> to get into 2.2 to reply to this with a description of what they are 
> working
> on and an estimate for completion.
>
> Also, if there is something you think is really necessary to get into
> 2.2 please reply and describe what you'd like.
>
> many thanks
> david jencks
>
>
>

>>>
>>>
>>

Re: There's still hope for 2.2...

[Donald Woods]

Just rolled back to the 1.7 level of javamail.

Also, Jarek updated the openejbVersion to 3.1.2.


-Donald


Donald Woods wrote:
Agree, if that is the last set of artifacts holding up the release, then 
we can roll back to 1.7.



-Donald


Rick McGuire wrote:

Donald Woods wrote:
I did upgrade the javamail version to 1.8-SNAPSHOT, as Rick has 
checked in several fixes in the past few months
I'm not sure those fixes are worth spinning a new javamail release 
just for inclusion on the 2.2 release.


Rick




-Donald


David Jencks wrote:
We may be able to release 2.2 soon.  Activemq has fixed the last bug 
we had problems with and is fast approaching a release, openejb is 
getting very close to a release for 2.2, and I've started votes on a 
number of our snapshot dependencies.


At this point I'd like anyone who is working on something they'd 
like to get into 2.2 to reply to this with a description of what 
they are working on and an estimate for completion.


Also, if there is something you think is really necessary to get 
into 2.2 please reply and describe what you'd like.


many thanks
david jencks

Re: There's still hope for 2.2...

[Donald Woods]

Agree, if that is the last set of artifacts holding up the release, then 
we can roll back to 1.7.



-Donald


Rick McGuire wrote:

Donald Woods wrote:
I did upgrade the javamail version to 1.8-SNAPSHOT, as Rick has 
checked in several fixes in the past few months
I'm not sure those fixes are worth spinning a new javamail release just 
for inclusion on the 2.2 release.


Rick




-Donald


David Jencks wrote:
We may be able to release 2.2 soon.  Activemq has fixed the last bug 
we had problems with and is fast approaching a release, openejb is 
getting very close to a release for 2.2, and I've started votes on a 
number of our snapshot dependencies.


At this point I'd like anyone who is working on something they'd like 
to get into 2.2 to reply to this with a description of what they are 
working on and an estimate for completion.


Also, if there is something you think is really necessary to get into 
2.2 please reply and describe what you'd like.


many thanks
david jencks

Re: There's still hope for 2.2...

[Rick McGuire]

Donald Woods wrote:
I did upgrade the javamail version to 1.8-SNAPSHOT, as Rick has 
checked in several fixes in the past few months
I'm not sure those fixes are worth spinning a new javamail release just 
for inclusion on the 2.2 release.


Rick




-Donald


David Jencks wrote:
We may be able to release 2.2 soon.  Activemq has fixed the last bug 
we had problems with and is fast approaching a release, openejb is 
getting very close to a release for 2.2, and I've started votes on a 
number of our snapshot dependencies.


At this point I'd like anyone who is working on something they'd like 
to get into 2.2 to reply to this with a description of what they are 
working on and an estimate for completion.


Also, if there is something you think is really necessary to get into 
2.2 please reply and describe what you'd like.


many thanks
david jencks

Re: There's still hope for 2.2...

[Donald Woods]

I did upgrade the javamail version to 1.8-SNAPSHOT, as Rick has checked 
in several fixes in the past few months



-Donald


David Jencks wrote:
We may be able to release 2.2 soon.  Activemq has fixed the last bug we 
had problems with and is fast approaching a release, openejb is getting 
very close to a release for 2.2, and I've started votes on a number of 
our snapshot dependencies.


At this point I'd like anyone who is working on something they'd like to 
get into 2.2 to reply to this with a description of what they are 
working on and an estimate for completion.


Also, if there is something you think is really necessary to get into 
2.2 please reply and describe what you'd like.


many thanks
david jencks

Re: There's still hope for 2.2...

[Donald Woods]

AMQ 5.3.0 and Jetty v7 have been released.

http://www.h-online.com/open/Jetty-7-arrives-from-Eclipse-and-Webtide--/news/114427


-Donald

David Jencks wrote:
We may be able to release 2.2 soon.  Activemq has fixed the last bug we 
had problems with and is fast approaching a release, openejb is getting 
very close to a release for 2.2, and I've started votes on a number of 
our snapshot dependencies.


At this point I'd like anyone who is working on something they'd like to 
get into 2.2 to reply to this with a description of what they are 
working on and an estimate for completion.


Also, if there is something you think is really necessary to get into 
2.2 please reply and describe what you'd like.


many thanks
david jencks

Re: There's still hope for 2.2...

[Jack Cai]

I finished the patch for the console filter to improve its performance:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4874

Hopefully someone could review it...

-Jack

On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Forrest Xia  wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Donald Woods  wrote:
>
>> I'm still working on Daytrader 2.2, but could use some help updating and
>> testing the Daytrader plugins and plans.
>>
>>
>> -Donald
>
>
> Donald, once you roll out all of changes on daytrader 2.2, I will have a
> testing on it.
>

Re: There's still hope for 2.2...

[Forrest Xia]

On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Donald Woods  wrote:

> I'm still working on Daytrader 2.2, but could use some help updating and
> testing the Daytrader plugins and plans.
>
>
> -Donald


Donald, once you roll out all of changes on daytrader 2.2, I will have a
testing on it.

Re: There's still hope for 2.2...

[Forrest Xia]

Hope someone could look into
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4222. It's an important
reliability issue about db connectivity.

Re: There's still hope for 2.2...

[Donald Woods]

I'm still working on Daytrader 2.2, but could use some help updating and 
testing the Daytrader plugins and plans.



-Donald


Forrest Xia wrote:
I am working on G 2.2 samples. Basically, I hope the existing G 2.2 
samples plugins could be installable and runable on G 2.2 server.
 
I will post my results here soon.

Re: There's still hope for 2.2...

[Forrest Xia]

I am working on G 2.2 samples. Basically, I hope the existing G 2.2 samples
plugins could be installable and runable on G 2.2 server.

I will post my results here soon.

Re: There's still hope for 2.2...

[Ivan]

 Is there an approximate date of Geronimo 2.2 release ? I remembered that
last time, what I got is in the early October.
Thanks !

2009/9/14 Jack Cai 

> I'm working on improving the console filter performance. Will open a
> JIRA...
>
> -Jack
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Quintin Beukes wrote:
>
>> There are some bugs I reported regarding adding/removing connectors. I
>> seriously think they need to be addressed. They are:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4867
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1070
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4860
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4861
>>
>> The last one is a regression of sorts (in other words is wasn't present in
>> 2.1).
>>
>> They're all small errors, and I listed them because they can
>> potentially damage Geronimo's image by complicating a user's
>> experience. User experience is the biggest factor in a product's
>> success.
>>
>> Q
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Ivan  wrote:
>> > Sorry, I make a mistaken, I did not mean
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4603, I mean
>> GERONIMO-4625
>> >
>> >
>> > 2009/9/11 Ivan 
>> >>
>> >> I wish those JIRAs to be included in Geronimo 2.2
>> >>
>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4801
>> >> Please check my comment, I think we could just ignore the
>> alreadyexisted
>> >> exception
>> >>
>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4821
>> >> Please check my comment, I need more help on it :-(
>> >>
>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4836
>> >> If anyone could help to check the patch in the current pluto snapshot,
>> >> that will be fine. or, I wish to fix it in Geronimo 2.2 firstly
>> >>
>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4493
>> >> I am working on it, and it will be finished soon
>> >>
>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4603
>> >> I am working on it, and it will be finished soon
>> >>
>> >> Thanks !
>> >>
>> >> 2009/9/11 David Jencks 
>> >>>
>> >>> We may be able to release 2.2 soon.  Activemq has fixed the last bug
>> we
>> >>> had problems with and is fast approaching a release, openejb is
>> getting very
>> >>> close to a release for 2.2, and I've started votes on a number of our
>> >>> snapshot dependencies.
>> >>>
>> >>> At this point I'd like anyone who is working on something they'd like
>> to
>> >>> get into 2.2 to reply to this with a description of what they are
>> working on
>> >>> and an estimate for completion.
>> >>>
>> >>> Also, if there is something you think is really necessary to get into
>> 2.2
>> >>> please reply and describe what you'd like.
>> >>>
>> >>> many thanks
>> >>> david jencks
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Ivan
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Ivan
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Quintin Beukes
>>
>
>


-- 
Ivan

Re: There's still hope for 2.2...

[Jack Cai]

I'm working on improving the console filter performance. Will open a JIRA...

-Jack

On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Quintin Beukes wrote:

> There are some bugs I reported regarding adding/removing connectors. I
> seriously think they need to be addressed. They are:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4867
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1070
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4860
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4861
>
> The last one is a regression of sorts (in other words is wasn't present in
> 2.1).
>
> They're all small errors, and I listed them because they can
> potentially damage Geronimo's image by complicating a user's
> experience. User experience is the biggest factor in a product's
> success.
>
> Q
>
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Ivan  wrote:
> > Sorry, I make a mistaken, I did not mean
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4603, I mean
> GERONIMO-4625
> >
> >
> > 2009/9/11 Ivan 
> >>
> >> I wish those JIRAs to be included in Geronimo 2.2
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4801
> >> Please check my comment, I think we could just ignore the alreadyexisted
> >> exception
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4821
> >> Please check my comment, I need more help on it :-(
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4836
> >> If anyone could help to check the patch in the current pluto snapshot,
> >> that will be fine. or, I wish to fix it in Geronimo 2.2 firstly
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4493
> >> I am working on it, and it will be finished soon
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4603
> >> I am working on it, and it will be finished soon
> >>
> >> Thanks !
> >>
> >> 2009/9/11 David Jencks 
> >>>
> >>> We may be able to release 2.2 soon.  Activemq has fixed the last bug we
> >>> had problems with and is fast approaching a release, openejb is getting
> very
> >>> close to a release for 2.2, and I've started votes on a number of our
> >>> snapshot dependencies.
> >>>
> >>> At this point I'd like anyone who is working on something they'd like
> to
> >>> get into 2.2 to reply to this with a description of what they are
> working on
> >>> and an estimate for completion.
> >>>
> >>> Also, if there is something you think is really necessary to get into
> 2.2
> >>> please reply and describe what you'd like.
> >>>
> >>> many thanks
> >>> david jencks
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Ivan
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ivan
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Quintin Beukes
>

Re: There's still hope for 2.2...

[Quintin Beukes]

There are some bugs I reported regarding adding/removing connectors. I
seriously think they need to be addressed. They are:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4867
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1070
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4860
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4861

The last one is a regression of sorts (in other words is wasn't present in 2.1).

They're all small errors, and I listed them because they can
potentially damage Geronimo's image by complicating a user's
experience. User experience is the biggest factor in a product's
success.

Q

On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Ivan  wrote:
> Sorry, I make a mistaken, I did not mean
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4603, I mean GERONIMO-4625
>
>
> 2009/9/11 Ivan 
>>
>> I wish those JIRAs to be included in Geronimo 2.2
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4801
>> Please check my comment, I think we could just ignore the alreadyexisted
>> exception
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4821
>> Please check my comment, I need more help on it :-(
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4836
>> If anyone could help to check the patch in the current pluto snapshot,
>> that will be fine. or, I wish to fix it in Geronimo 2.2 firstly
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4493
>> I am working on it, and it will be finished soon
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4603
>> I am working on it, and it will be finished soon
>>
>> Thanks !
>>
>> 2009/9/11 David Jencks 
>>>
>>> We may be able to release 2.2 soon.  Activemq has fixed the last bug we
>>> had problems with and is fast approaching a release, openejb is getting very
>>> close to a release for 2.2, and I've started votes on a number of our
>>> snapshot dependencies.
>>>
>>> At this point I'd like anyone who is working on something they'd like to
>>> get into 2.2 to reply to this with a description of what they are working on
>>> and an estimate for completion.
>>>
>>> Also, if there is something you think is really necessary to get into 2.2
>>> please reply and describe what you'd like.
>>>
>>> many thanks
>>> david jencks
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ivan
>
>
>
> --
> Ivan
>



-- 
Quintin Beukes

Re: There's still hope for 2.2...

[Ivan]

Sorry, I make a mistaken, I did not mean
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4603, I mean
GERONIMO-4625


2009/9/11 Ivan 

> I wish those JIRAs to be included in Geronimo 2.2
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4801
> Please check my comment, I think we could just ignore the alreadyexisted
> exception
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4821
> Please check my comment, I need more help on it :-(
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4836
> If anyone could help to check the patch in the current pluto snapshot, that
> will be fine. or, I wish to fix it in Geronimo 2.2 firstly
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4493
> I am working on it, and it will be finished soon
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4603
> I am working on it, and it will be finished soon
>
> Thanks !
>
> 2009/9/11 David Jencks 
>
> We may be able to release 2.2 soon.  Activemq has fixed the last bug we had
>> problems with and is fast approaching a release, openejb is getting very
>> close to a release for 2.2, and I've started votes on a number of our
>> snapshot dependencies.
>>
>> At this point I'd like anyone who is working on something they'd like to
>> get into 2.2 to reply to this with a description of what they are working on
>> and an estimate for completion.
>>
>> Also, if there is something you think is really necessary to get into 2.2
>> please reply and describe what you'd like.
>>
>> many thanks
>> david jencks
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Ivan
>



-- 
Ivan

Re: There's still hope for 2.2...

[Shawn Jiang]

I'm working on

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4852
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4851
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4850

And hopefully they can be included in G22

On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Ivan  wrote:

> I wish those JIRAs to be included in Geronimo 2.2
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4801
> Please check my comment, I think we could just ignore the alreadyexisted
> exception
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4821
> Please check my comment, I need more help on it :-(
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4836
> If anyone could help to check the patch in the current pluto snapshot, that
> will be fine. or, I wish to fix it in Geronimo 2.2 firstly
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4493
> I am working on it, and it will be finished soon
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4603
> I am working on it, and it will be finished soon
>
> Thanks !
>
> 2009/9/11 David Jencks 
>
> We may be able to release 2.2 soon.  Activemq has fixed the last bug we had
>> problems with and is fast approaching a release, openejb is getting very
>> close to a release for 2.2, and I've started votes on a number of our
>> snapshot dependencies.
>>
>> At this point I'd like anyone who is working on something they'd like to
>> get into 2.2 to reply to this with a description of what they are working on
>> and an estimate for completion.
>>
>> Also, if there is something you think is really necessary to get into 2.2
>> please reply and describe what you'd like.
>>
>> many thanks
>> david jencks
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Ivan
>



-- 
Shawn

Re: There's still hope for 2.2...

[Ivan]

I wish those JIRAs to be included in Geronimo 2.2

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4801
Please check my comment, I think we could just ignore the alreadyexisted
exception

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4821
Please check my comment, I need more help on it :-(

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4836
If anyone could help to check the patch in the current pluto snapshot, that
will be fine. or, I wish to fix it in Geronimo 2.2 firstly

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4493
I am working on it, and it will be finished soon

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4603
I am working on it, and it will be finished soon

Thanks !

2009/9/11 David Jencks 

> We may be able to release 2.2 soon.  Activemq has fixed the last bug we had
> problems with and is fast approaching a release, openejb is getting very
> close to a release for 2.2, and I've started votes on a number of our
> snapshot dependencies.
>
> At this point I'd like anyone who is working on something they'd like to
> get into 2.2 to reply to this with a description of what they are working on
> and an estimate for completion.
>
> Also, if there is something you think is really necessary to get into 2.2
> please reply and describe what you'd like.
>
> many thanks
> david jencks
>
>


-- 
Ivan