Re: Build Error
Thanks Adrian, Yes I did not care and build with ant from Eclipse where I use the 1.6 JDK. I'm on it, not as simple as I thought some problem appeared... In the meantime can you use 1.6 to build ? BTW, could we not change from 1.5 to 1.6, is there any blocking reasons I don't remember ? Jacques From: Adrian Crum adrian.c...@yahoo.com Latest trunk: Compiling 129 source files to C:\ofbiz\framework\entity\build\classes [javac15] C:\ofbiz\framework\entity\src\org\ofbiz\entity\connection\DBCPConnectionFactory.java:21: cannot access org.apache.commons.dbcp.ConnectionFactory [javac15] bad class file: C:\ofbiz\framework\entity\lib\commons-dbcp-1.3-2009-r834702.jar(org/apache/commons/dbcp/ConnectionFactory.class) [javac15] class file has wrong version 50.0, should be 49.0 [javac15] Please remove or make sure it appears in the correct subdirectory of the classpath. [javac15] import org.apache.commons.dbcp.ConnectionFactory; [javac15]^ [javac15] 1 error
Re: adding salesOrder data to the BI component
Thank you Jacopo, we will work in that direction... Regards, hans On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 08:43 +0100, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: Hans, first of all: it is great that you are interested on enhancing the star schemas and dimensions; also using Birt on top of them will be a great way of using them. I would really suggest the following book: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0471200247 If you can get it (or a digital copy of it) you will appreciate the way it is written; I can also help to point you to the most important sections to speed up. BTW, regarding sales orders: 1) I would suggest to implement the new star schema (and supporting eca/services) for sales orders in the order component (org.ofbiz.bi.starschema.order) 2) the start schema could be based on the schema described in the book at page 116; 2.1) its name could be SalesOrderItemFact and its field could be: orderId*, orderItemSeqId*, dateDimensionId, productDimentionId, currencyDimensionId, orderQuantity, grossOrderTotalAmount, orderDiscountDollarAmount, netOrderDollarAmount Let me know if I can help more, I would be happy to. Jacopo On Nov 13, 2009, at 7:19 AM, Hans Bakker wrote: for example we like to see which sales oriented data: which orders where made through promotions, which orders are back-ordered etc... should be start a org.ofbiz.bi.starschema.salesOrders next to org.ofbiz.bi.starschema.accounting? are there any rules to follow? The reason for all this: using birt to do sales reporting. -- Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates -- Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates
Re: Build Error in Tools?
In 1.6 it also not builds. The error: BUILD FAILED /home/hans/ofbiz/svn/build.xml:182: The following error occurred while executing this line: /home/hans/ofbiz/svn/framework/build.xml:147: The following error occurred while executing this line: /home/hans/ofbiz/svn/macros.xml:27: The following error occurred while executing this line: /home/hans/ofbiz/svn/framework/entity/build.xml:56: The following error occurred while executing this line: /home/hans/ofbiz/svn/macros.xml:83: Problem: failed to create task or type javacc Cause: the class org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.javacc.JavaCC was not found. This looks like one of Ant's optional components. Action: Check that the appropriate optional JAR exists in -/home/hans/ofbiz/svn/framework/base/lib -/home/hans/.ant/lib -a directory added on the command line with the -lib argument Do not panic, this is a common problem. The commonest cause is a missing JAR. This is not a bug; it is a configuration problem On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 08:59 +0100, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Thanks Adrian, Yes I did not care and build with ant from Eclipse where I use the 1.6 JDK. I'm on it, not as simple as I thought some problem appeared... In the meantime can you use 1.6 to build ? BTW, could we not change from 1.5 to 1.6, is there any blocking reasons I don't remember ? Jacques From: Adrian Crum adrian.c...@yahoo.com Latest trunk: Compiling 129 source files to C:\ofbiz\framework\entity\build\classes [javac15] C:\ofbiz\framework\entity\src\org\ofbiz\entity\connection\DBCPConnectionFactory.java:21: cannot access org.apache.commons.dbcp.ConnectionFactory [javac15] bad class file: C:\ofbiz\framework\entity\lib\commons-dbcp-1.3-2009-r834702.jar(org/apache/commons/dbcp/ConnectionFactory.class) [javac15] class file has wrong version 50.0, should be 49.0 [javac15] Please remove or make sure it appears in the correct subdirectory of the classpath. [javac15] import org.apache.commons.dbcp.ConnectionFactory; [javac15]^ [javac15] 1 error -- Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates
Re: Build Error in Tools?
Hans Bakker wrote: In 1.6 it also not builds. The error: BUILD FAILED /home/hans/ofbiz/svn/build.xml:182: The following error occurred while executing this line: /home/hans/ofbiz/svn/framework/build.xml:147: The following error occurred while executing this line: /home/hans/ofbiz/svn/macros.xml:27: The following error occurred while executing this line: /home/hans/ofbiz/svn/framework/entity/build.xml:56: The following error occurred while executing this line: /home/hans/ofbiz/svn/macros.xml:83: Problem: failed to create task or type javacc Cause: the class org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.javacc.JavaCC was not found. This looks like one of Ant's optional components. Action: Check that the appropriate optional JAR exists in -/home/hans/ofbiz/svn/framework/base/lib -/home/hans/.ant/lib -a directory added on the command line with the -lib argument Do not panic, this is a common problem. The commonest cause is a missing JAR. This is not a bug; it is a configuration problem Fixed in 835774.
Re: Build Error in Tools?
It seems that this it's a combination with recent Adam's changes. I have an instance that I have not updated and I'm able to compile it with 1.6. But with an updated instance I get the same error with 1.6. The problem I get compiling DBCP with 1.5 is about JDBC 4, still on... Jacques From: Hans Bakker mailingl...@antwebsystems.com In 1.6 it also not builds. The error: BUILD FAILED /home/hans/ofbiz/svn/build.xml:182: The following error occurred while executing this line: /home/hans/ofbiz/svn/framework/build.xml:147: The following error occurred while executing this line: /home/hans/ofbiz/svn/macros.xml:27: The following error occurred while executing this line: /home/hans/ofbiz/svn/framework/entity/build.xml:56: The following error occurred while executing this line: /home/hans/ofbiz/svn/macros.xml:83: Problem: failed to create task or type javacc Cause: the class org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.javacc.JavaCC was not found. This looks like one of Ant's optional components. Action: Check that the appropriate optional JAR exists in -/home/hans/ofbiz/svn/framework/base/lib -/home/hans/.ant/lib -a directory added on the command line with the -lib argument Do not panic, this is a common problem. The commonest cause is a missing JAR. This is not a bug; it is a configuration problem On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 08:59 +0100, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Thanks Adrian, Yes I did not care and build with ant from Eclipse where I use the 1.6 JDK. I'm on it, not as simple as I thought some problem appeared... In the meantime can you use 1.6 to build ? BTW, could we not change from 1.5 to 1.6, is there any blocking reasons I don't remember ? Jacques From: Adrian Crum adrian.c...@yahoo.com Latest trunk: Compiling 129 source files to C:\ofbiz\framework\entity\build\classes [javac15] C:\ofbiz\framework\entity\src\org\ofbiz\entity\connection\DBCPConnectionFactory.java:21: cannot access org.apache.commons.dbcp.ConnectionFactory [javac15] bad class file: C:\ofbiz\framework\entity\lib\commons-dbcp-1.3-2009-r834702.jar(org/apache/commons/dbcp/ConnectionFactory.class) [javac15] class file has wrong version 50.0, should be 49.0 [javac15] Please remove or make sure it appears in the correct subdirectory of the classpath. [javac15] import org.apache.commons.dbcp.ConnectionFactory; [javac15]^ [javac15] 1 error -- Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates
Re: svn commit: r831098 - /ofbiz/trunk/framework/webapp/src/org/ofbiz/webapp/event/ServiceMultiEventHandler.java (Manual return functionality is broken)
Hello Bilgin and others,
I found that Manual refund functionality is broken due to this commit .
Steps to reproduce the error:
1) Create a sales order from Order manager application with two or more
items.
2) Then approve and Quick ship the entire Order which will complete
the order.
3) Then click on Create Return button on Actions Block.
4) You will land on Create new Return Page: Also attaching the screen
shot. (Screenshot-1)
5) Click on select all check box and then click on Return Selected
items button.
6) You will find that page is broken. Also attaching the screen shot for
the same. (Screenshot-2)
After doing research on this I found that reason for this code failure
is in createReturnAndItemOrAdjustment simple method in
OrderReturnServices.xml. This is because in below given code snippet :
1if-empty field=parameters.returnId
2 set-service-fields service-name=createReturnHeader
map=parameters to-map=returnHeaderInMap/
3 call-service service-name=createReturnHeader
in-map-name=returnHeaderInMap
4 result-to-field result-name=returnId field=returnId/
5 /call-service
6 check-errors/
7 set field=parameters.returnId from-field=returnId/
8 field-to-result field=returnId result-name=returnId/
9 /if-empty
parameters.returnId field is always empty when this service is called as
service-multi even though it is set in line #7.
And if I revert your this commit then this functionality is working fine.
So It will be great if you or any one else, give the reason of this
commit and also provide fix or alternate way to solve this issue.
Thanks
--
Divesh Dutta.
bibr...@apache.org wrote:
Author: bibryam
Date: Thu Oct 29 21:35:49 2009
New Revision: 831098
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=831098view=rev
Log:
Prevent overriding of service results in a service-multi type events.
Modified:
ofbiz/trunk/framework/webapp/src/org/ofbiz/webapp/event/ServiceMultiEventHandler.java
Modified:
ofbiz/trunk/framework/webapp/src/org/ofbiz/webapp/event/ServiceMultiEventHandler.java
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/framework/webapp/src/org/ofbiz/webapp/event/ServiceMultiEventHandler.java?rev=831098r1=831097r2=831098view=diff
==
---
ofbiz/trunk/framework/webapp/src/org/ofbiz/webapp/event/ServiceMultiEventHandler.java
(original)
+++
ofbiz/trunk/framework/webapp/src/org/ofbiz/webapp/event/ServiceMultiEventHandler.java
Thu Oct 29 21:35:49 2009
@@ -339,7 +339,7 @@
if
(!UtilValidate.isEmpty(result.get(ModelService.SUCCESS_MESSAGE_LIST))) {
ListString newSuccessMessages =
UtilGenerics.StringcheckList(result.get(ModelService.SUCCESS_MESSAGE_LIST));
for (int j = 0; j newSuccessMessages.size(); j++) {
-String newSuccessMessage =
(String)newSuccessMessages.get(j);
+String newSuccessMessage =
newSuccessMessages.get(j);
if (!successMessages.contains(newSuccessMessage)) {
successMessages.add(newSuccessMessage);
}
@@ -355,7 +355,7 @@
if (resultKey != null
!ModelService.RESPONSE_MESSAGE.equals(resultKey)
!ModelService.ERROR_MESSAGE.equals(resultKey)
!ModelService.ERROR_MESSAGE_LIST.equals(resultKey)
!ModelService.ERROR_MESSAGE_MAP.equals(resultKey)
!ModelService.SUCCESS_MESSAGE.equals(resultKey)
!ModelService.SUCCESS_MESSAGE_LIST.equals(resultKey)) {
-request.setAttribute(resultKey, resultValue);
+request.setAttribute(resultKey + curSuffix,
resultValue);
}
}
}
Re: Build Error
I not totally sure but yet it seems that new versions of DBCP needs the 1.6 jdk (or jdk 1.4) . Extract from README.TXT : This release of JDBC compiles with and supports JDK 1.3 (JDBC 2.0), JDK 1.4-1.5 (JDBC 3.0) and JDK 1.6 (JDBC 4.0). I tried to build with 1.5 but it failed and I began to find a way out, not obvious... So the alternative is 1) revert DBCP upgrade (fix a bug) 2) Decide to use jdk 1.6 for OFBiz I would not like to push now for the 2d solution but as this upgrade was intended to fix a bug, I wonder if it's not the right time In the meantime (before a decision is taken), I will continue to search a solution to compile with 1.5 but does not seem easy (conditional ANT compile deal with JDBC versions), and I'd not like to rewrite DBCP, even a part, I've other fish to fry ;o) Jacques From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com Thanks Adrian, Yes I did not care and build with ant from Eclipse where I use the 1.6 JDK. I'm on it, not as simple as I thought some problem appeared... In the meantime can you use 1.6 to build ? BTW, could we not change from 1.5 to 1.6, is there any blocking reasons I don't remember ? Jacques From: Adrian Crum adrian.c...@yahoo.com Latest trunk: Compiling 129 source files to C:\ofbiz\framework\entity\build\classes [javac15] C:\ofbiz\framework\entity\src\org\ofbiz\entity\connection\DBCPConnectionFactory.java:21: cannot access org.apache.commons.dbcp.ConnectionFactory [javac15] bad class file: C:\ofbiz\framework\entity\lib\commons-dbcp-1.3-2009-r834702.jar(org/apache/commons/dbcp/ConnectionFactory.class) [javac15] class file has wrong version 50.0, should be 49.0 [javac15] Please remove or make sure it appears in the correct subdirectory of the classpath. [javac15] import org.apache.commons.dbcp.ConnectionFactory; [javac15]^ [javac15] 1 error
Re: svn commit: r831098 - /ofbiz/trunk/framework/webapp/src/org/ofbiz/webapp/event/ServiceMultiEventHandler.java (Manual return functionality is broken)
Also Adding urls of the image which I described. Please see my comments
inline:
Divesh Dutta wrote:
Hello Bilgin and others,
I found that Manual refund functionality is broken due to this commit
. Steps to reproduce the error:
1) Create a sales order from Order manager application with two or
more items.
2) Then approve and Quick ship the entire Order which will complete
the order.
3) Then click on Create Return button on Actions Block.
4) You will land on Create new Return Page: Also attaching the screen
shot. (Screenshot-1)
http://img156.yfrog.com/i/screenshot1jw.png/
5) Click on select all check box and then click on Return Selected
items button.
6) You will find that page is broken. Also attaching the screen shot
for the same. (Screenshot-2)
http://img156.yfrog.com/i/screenshot2kn.png/
After doing research on this I found that reason for this code failure
is in createReturnAndItemOrAdjustment simple method in
OrderReturnServices.xml. This is because in below given code snippet :
1if-empty field=parameters.returnId
2 set-service-fields service-name=createReturnHeader
map=parameters to-map=returnHeaderInMap/
3 call-service service-name=createReturnHeader
in-map-name=returnHeaderInMap
4 result-to-field result-name=returnId field=returnId/
5 /call-service
6 check-errors/
7 set field=parameters.returnId from-field=returnId/
8 field-to-result field=returnId result-name=returnId/
9 /if-empty
parameters.returnId field is always empty when this service is called
as service-multi even though it is set in line #7.
And if I revert your this commit then this functionality is working fine.
So It will be great if you or any one else, give the reason of this
commit and also provide fix or alternate way to solve this issue.
Thanks
--
Divesh Dutta.
bibr...@apache.org wrote:
Author: bibryam
Date: Thu Oct 29 21:35:49 2009
New Revision: 831098
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=831098view=rev
Log:
Prevent overriding of service results in a service-multi type events.
Modified:
ofbiz/trunk/framework/webapp/src/org/ofbiz/webapp/event/ServiceMultiEventHandler.java
Modified:
ofbiz/trunk/framework/webapp/src/org/ofbiz/webapp/event/ServiceMultiEventHandler.java
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/framework/webapp/src/org/ofbiz/webapp/event/ServiceMultiEventHandler.java?rev=831098r1=831097r2=831098view=diff
==
---
ofbiz/trunk/framework/webapp/src/org/ofbiz/webapp/event/ServiceMultiEventHandler.java
(original)
+++
ofbiz/trunk/framework/webapp/src/org/ofbiz/webapp/event/ServiceMultiEventHandler.java
Thu Oct 29 21:35:49 2009
@@ -339,7 +339,7 @@
if
(!UtilValidate.isEmpty(result.get(ModelService.SUCCESS_MESSAGE_LIST))) {
ListString newSuccessMessages =
UtilGenerics.StringcheckList(result.get(ModelService.SUCCESS_MESSAGE_LIST));
for (int j = 0; j
newSuccessMessages.size(); j++) {
-String newSuccessMessage =
(String)newSuccessMessages.get(j);
+String newSuccessMessage =
newSuccessMessages.get(j);
if
(!successMessages.contains(newSuccessMessage)) {
successMessages.add(newSuccessMessage);
}
@@ -355,7 +355,7 @@
if (resultKey != null
!ModelService.RESPONSE_MESSAGE.equals(resultKey)
!ModelService.ERROR_MESSAGE.equals(resultKey)
!ModelService.ERROR_MESSAGE_LIST.equals(resultKey)
!ModelService.ERROR_MESSAGE_MAP.equals(resultKey)
!ModelService.SUCCESS_MESSAGE.equals(resultKey)
!ModelService.SUCCESS_MESSAGE_LIST.equals(resultKey)) {
-request.setAttribute(resultKey,
resultValue);
+request.setAttribute(resultKey +
curSuffix, resultValue);
}
}
}
Re: ERROR : Conversion from java.sql.Timestamp to java.sql.Date is not working
Thanks Adrian for your quick turn around on this. Regards -- Divesh Dutta. Adrian Crum wrote: Fixed, rev 835032. -Adrian Divesh Dutta wrote: Hello Adrian, I saw your commits conversion related commits to use only new conversion framework. I am working on latest revision number, and facing issue in Quick ship entire order functionality. Reason is below given code snippet in simple-method, findCustomTimePeriods of PeriodServices.xml file : condition-expr field-name=fromDate operator=less-equals from-field=parameters.findDate/ (here parameters.findDate is java.sql.Timestamp and fromDate is java.sql.Date) is blocking the order to complete. Here is the error which I am getting in console: Could not convert field value for the field: [fromDate] on the [CustomTimePeriod] entity to the [java.sql.Date] type for the value [2009-11-11 16:41:09.053]: org.ofbiz.base.util.GeneralException: Conversion from java.sql.Timestamp to java.sql.Date not currently supported Exception: org.ofbiz.base.util.GeneralException Message: Conversion from java.sql.Timestamp to java.sql.Date not currently supported i.e Currently OFBiz is not supporting conversion from java.sql.Timestamp to java.sql.Date. It will be great if you look into the issue, as you asked to report on developer mailing list. Thanks -- Divesh Dutta
Re: Build Error
I'd suggest that you revert it for now. Regards Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 13/11/2009, at 10:20 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: I not totally sure but yet it seems that new versions of DBCP needs the 1.6 jdk (or jdk 1.4) . Extract from README.TXT : This release of JDBC compiles with and supports JDK 1.3 (JDBC 2.0), JDK 1.4-1.5 (JDBC 3.0) and JDK 1.6 (JDBC 4.0). I tried to build with 1.5 but it failed and I began to find a way out, not obvious... So the alternative is 1) revert DBCP upgrade (fix a bug) 2) Decide to use jdk 1.6 for OFBiz I would not like to push now for the 2d solution but as this upgrade was intended to fix a bug, I wonder if it's not the right time In the meantime (before a decision is taken), I will continue to search a solution to compile with 1.5 but does not seem easy (conditional ANT compile deal with JDBC versions), and I'd not like to rewrite DBCP, even a part, I've other fish to fry ;o) Jacques From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com Thanks Adrian, Yes I did not care and build with ant from Eclipse where I use the 1.6 JDK. I'm on it, not as simple as I thought some problem appeared... In the meantime can you use 1.6 to build ? BTW, could we not change from 1.5 to 1.6, is there any blocking reasons I don't remember ? Jacques From: Adrian Crum adrian.c...@yahoo.com Latest trunk: Compiling 129 source files to C:\ofbiz\framework\entity\build \classes [javac15] C:\ofbiz\framework\entity\src\org\ofbiz\entity\connection \DBCPConnectionFactory.java:21: cannot access org.apache.commons.dbcp.ConnectionFactory [javac15] bad class file: C:\ofbiz\framework\entity\lib\commons-dbcp-1.3-2009- r834702.jar(org/apache/commons/dbcp/ConnectionFactory.class) [javac15] class file has wrong version 50.0, should be 49.0 [javac15] Please remove or make sure it appears in the correct subdirectory of the classpath. [javac15] import org.apache.commons.dbcp.ConnectionFactory; [javac15]^ [javac15] 1 error smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: svn commit: r834479 - in /ofbiz/trunk: applications/manufacturing/src/org/ofbiz/manufacturing/jobshopmgt/ applications/order/config/ applications/order/webapp/ordermgr/WEB-INF/ applications/order/
Thanks for the appreciation Jacques :-) Regards -- Divesh Dutta. Jacques Le Roux wrote: Thank you Divesh! Jacques From: Ashish Vijaywargiya vijaywargiya.ash...@gmail.com Thanks Jacques for your appreciation. It really encourage us to work more and more for the community. PS: Divesh please don't get upset - Jacques also said thank you by saying to me ;-). -- Ashish On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com wrote: Hi Ashish, I had a look, I like it very much (notably the production run link) Thanks! Jacques Author: ashish Date: Tue Nov 10 14:32:53 2009 New Revision: 834479 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=834479view=rev Log: Applied patch from jira issue OFBIZ-3173 - Better supportability for products of type MARKETING_PKG_AUTO in order processing and fulfillment process. Following points are covered in this patch: 1) Show associated products for product of type MARKETING_PKG_AUTO on order items section of show cart page in order manager application. 2) Marketing packages should only shown backordered when ATP of product which compose Marketing packages product are less than quantity added in cart. 3) Pick sheets should show Products of type Marketing Packages along with the products which compose Marketing Packages. 4) Show link of production run created on order items section of Order detail page while placing order for product of type MARKETING_PKG_AUTO. 5) Product of type Marketing Packages should be shown on Verify Pick Screen along with Products they are composed of. Thanks Divesh for the contribution - this is very nice addition to the trunk. I would be more then happy to see comments / concern from - Jacopo? Scott? Anil? or others?
Re: Build Error
+1 Regards -- Divesh Dutta. Scott Gray wrote: I'd suggest that you revert it for now. Regards Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 13/11/2009, at 10:20 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: I not totally sure but yet it seems that new versions of DBCP needs the 1.6 jdk (or jdk 1.4) . Extract from README.TXT : This release of JDBC compiles with and supports JDK 1.3 (JDBC 2.0), JDK 1.4-1.5 (JDBC 3.0) and JDK 1.6 (JDBC 4.0). I tried to build with 1.5 but it failed and I began to find a way out, not obvious... So the alternative is 1) revert DBCP upgrade (fix a bug) 2) Decide to use jdk 1.6 for OFBiz I would not like to push now for the 2d solution but as this upgrade was intended to fix a bug, I wonder if it's not the right time In the meantime (before a decision is taken), I will continue to search a solution to compile with 1.5 but does not seem easy (conditional ANT compile deal with JDBC versions), and I'd not like to rewrite DBCP, even a part, I've other fish to fry ;o) Jacques From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com Thanks Adrian, Yes I did not care and build with ant from Eclipse where I use the 1.6 JDK. I'm on it, not as simple as I thought some problem appeared... In the meantime can you use 1.6 to build ? BTW, could we not change from 1.5 to 1.6, is there any blocking reasons I don't remember ? Jacques From: Adrian Crum adrian.c...@yahoo.com Latest trunk: Compiling 129 source files to C:\ofbiz\framework\entity\build\classes [javac15] C:\ofbiz\framework\entity\src\org\ofbiz\entity\connection\DBCPConnectionFactory.java:21: cannot access org.apache.commons.dbcp.ConnectionFactory [javac15] bad class file: C:\ofbiz\framework\entity\lib\commons-dbcp-1.3-2009-r834702.jar(org/apache/commons/dbcp/ConnectionFactory.class) [javac15] class file has wrong version 50.0, should be 49.0 [javac15] Please remove or make sure it appears in the correct subdirectory of the classpath. [javac15] import org.apache.commons.dbcp.ConnectionFactory; [javac15]^ [javac15] 1 error
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3071) assigning security group to a party without validations
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12777427#action_12777427 ] Abdullah Shaikh commented on OFBIZ-3071: Hmm.. yes I agree with David's explanation but there were some doubts in my mind, but I couldn't recollect them as its been a long time I opened this issue. But the doubt I remember is regarding the permission without thruDate, I couldn't understand you could not create a temporary permission for a limited span of time, I guess if its a temporary permission it should be for a limited time. Let me modify my example as per my argument regarding thruDate: 2007-10-10 10:55:10.000 NO THRU DATE 2007-11-10 10:55:10.000 NO THRU DATE In the above example the first permission 2007-10-10 as been specified without thruDate this means the records will go on forever. The second permission 2007-11-10 also doesn't have thruDate and this too will go on forever. So as per the above scenario both the permissions will go on forever, for the same thing there are 2 permissions. What I feel is we shouldn't allow the user to enter one more record without thruDate for the same permission type as no use of the second record. If the second record is enter with thruDate then it makes sense as it will expire on the mentioned thruDate and the record without thruDate will be active. I don't know if this is making sense, I mean this was what I was having in mind. Maybe I am missing something else. Let me know what do you think of this. assigning security group to a party without validations --- Key: OFBIZ-3071 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3071 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Abdullah Shaikh Priority: Minor Attachments: OFBIZ-3071_assigning security group to a party without validations.patch When adding user login to Security Group, the fromDate thruDate input fields are not mandatory, if not specified the fromDate is set to current timestamop and thruDate is entered in database as null, which means the user login is assigned that Security Group forever, but when if the same Security Group is added, it again adds it, but instead it should check that if the thruDate is null in the already entered record then shouldn't add new record. If incase the thruDate is specified during the creation of 1st record then while adding the 2nd record for the same Security Group, it should check if the thruDate of previous record is before the fromDate of the new record, this check also doesn't happen. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: Build Error
+1 for reverting the changes unless and until we find stable solution of problem with Jdk1.5. Thanks Jacques for your quick comment on this. -- Ashish On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com wrote: I not totally sure but yet it seems that new versions of DBCP needs the 1.6 jdk (or jdk 1.4) . Extract from README.TXT : This release of JDBC compiles with and supports JDK 1.3 (JDBC 2.0), JDK 1.4-1.5 (JDBC 3.0) and JDK 1.6 (JDBC 4.0). I tried to build with 1.5 but it failed and I began to find a way out, not obvious... So the alternative is 1) revert DBCP upgrade (fix a bug) 2) Decide to use jdk 1.6 for OFBiz I would not like to push now for the 2d solution but as this upgrade was intended to fix a bug, I wonder if it's not the right time In the meantime (before a decision is taken), I will continue to search a solution to compile with 1.5 but does not seem easy (conditional ANT compile deal with JDBC versions), and I'd not like to rewrite DBCP, even a part, I've other fish to fry ;o) Jacques From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com Thanks Adrian, Yes I did not care and build with ant from Eclipse where I use the 1.6 JDK. I'm on it, not as simple as I thought some problem appeared... In the meantime can you use 1.6 to build ? BTW, could we not change from 1.5 to 1.6, is there any blocking reasons I don't remember ? Jacques From: Adrian Crum adrian.c...@yahoo.com Latest trunk: Compiling 129 source files to C:\ofbiz\framework\entity\build\classes [javac15] C:\ofbiz\framework\entity\src\org\ofbiz\entity\connection\DBCPConnectionFactory.java:21: cannot access org.apache.commons.dbcp.ConnectionFactory [javac15] bad class file: C:\ofbiz\framework\entity\lib\commons-dbcp-1.3-2009-r834702.jar(org/apache/commons/dbcp/ConnectionFactory.class) [javac15] class file has wrong version 50.0, should be 49.0 [javac15] Please remove or make sure it appears in the correct subdirectory of the classpath. [javac15] import org.apache.commons.dbcp.ConnectionFactory; [javac15]^ [javac15] 1 error
Re: Build Error
BTW, the latest nightly build from dbcp works just fine on 1.5 for me, why are you trying to compile dbcp? Regards Scott On 13/11/2009, at 10:36 PM, Scott Gray wrote: I'd suggest that you revert it for now. Regards Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 13/11/2009, at 10:20 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: I not totally sure but yet it seems that new versions of DBCP needs the 1.6 jdk (or jdk 1.4) . Extract from README.TXT : This release of JDBC compiles with and supports JDK 1.3 (JDBC 2.0), JDK 1.4-1.5 (JDBC 3.0) and JDK 1.6 (JDBC 4.0). I tried to build with 1.5 but it failed and I began to find a way out, not obvious... So the alternative is 1) revert DBCP upgrade (fix a bug) 2) Decide to use jdk 1.6 for OFBiz I would not like to push now for the 2d solution but as this upgrade was intended to fix a bug, I wonder if it's not the right time In the meantime (before a decision is taken), I will continue to search a solution to compile with 1.5 but does not seem easy (conditional ANT compile deal with JDBC versions), and I'd not like to rewrite DBCP, even a part, I've other fish to fry ;o) Jacques From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com Thanks Adrian, Yes I did not care and build with ant from Eclipse where I use the 1.6 JDK. I'm on it, not as simple as I thought some problem appeared... In the meantime can you use 1.6 to build ? BTW, could we not change from 1.5 to 1.6, is there any blocking reasons I don't remember ? Jacques From: Adrian Crum adrian.c...@yahoo.com Latest trunk: Compiling 129 source files to C:\ofbiz\framework\entity\build \classes [javac15] C:\ofbiz\framework\entity\src\org\ofbiz\entity \connection\DBCPConnectionFactory.java:21: cannot access org.apache.commons.dbcp.ConnectionFactory [javac15] bad class file: C:\ofbiz\framework\entity\lib\commons-dbcp-1.3-2009- r834702.jar(org/apache/commons/dbcp/ConnectionFactory.class) [javac15] class file has wrong version 50.0, should be 49.0 [javac15] Please remove or make sure it appears in the correct subdirectory of the classpath. [javac15] import org.apache.commons.dbcp.ConnectionFactory; [javac15]^ [javac15] 1 error smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3190) Drag 'n' Drop for myPortal + update prototype and script.aculo.us
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12777437#action_12777437 ] Bruno Busco commented on OFBIZ-3190: Hi Sascha, thank you for the great job you did. I have reviewed your patch. Here are my comments: 1) It seems to me that the patch includes two different contributions: a) A script.aculo.us upgrade b) The portlet drag drop feature. The best would be to submit two different patches for this so that two different commits can be done. 2) I have noted that if I drag a portlet in a screen zone where no drop area is activated, the portlet remains in this position while it should go back to the original position aborting the move. Thank you again for this work. Drag 'n' Drop for myPortal + update prototype and script.aculo.us - Key: OFBIZ-3190 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3190 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: New Feature Components: framework Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: Sascha Rodekamp Fix For: SVN trunk Attachments: Editing icon.jpg, myPortalDragNDrop.patch My first patch :-) Hi, I try to extend the myPortal component with a drag 'n' drop feature, using the script.aculo.us libary. Therefor i updated prototype and script.aculo.us. What do you think of the implementation? Best regards Sascha -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: Build Error
Hi Scott, At which date was done this nightly build ? Where did you find it ? BTW I have reverted both trunk and 9.04 Jacques From: Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com BTW, the latest nightly build from dbcp works just fine on 1.5 for me, why are you trying to compile dbcp? Regards Scott On 13/11/2009, at 10:36 PM, Scott Gray wrote: I'd suggest that you revert it for now. Regards Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 13/11/2009, at 10:20 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: I not totally sure but yet it seems that new versions of DBCP needs the 1.6 jdk (or jdk 1.4) . Extract from README.TXT : This release of JDBC compiles with and supports JDK 1.3 (JDBC 2.0), JDK 1.4-1.5 (JDBC 3.0) and JDK 1.6 (JDBC 4.0). I tried to build with 1.5 but it failed and I began to find a way out, not obvious... So the alternative is 1) revert DBCP upgrade (fix a bug) 2) Decide to use jdk 1.6 for OFBiz I would not like to push now for the 2d solution but as this upgrade was intended to fix a bug, I wonder if it's not the right time In the meantime (before a decision is taken), I will continue to search a solution to compile with 1.5 but does not seem easy (conditional ANT compile deal with JDBC versions), and I'd not like to rewrite DBCP, even a part, I've other fish to fry ;o) Jacques From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com Thanks Adrian, Yes I did not care and build with ant from Eclipse where I use the 1.6 JDK. I'm on it, not as simple as I thought some problem appeared... In the meantime can you use 1.6 to build ? BTW, could we not change from 1.5 to 1.6, is there any blocking reasons I don't remember ? Jacques From: Adrian Crum adrian.c...@yahoo.com Latest trunk: Compiling 129 source files to C:\ofbiz\framework\entity\build \classes [javac15] C:\ofbiz\framework\entity\src\org\ofbiz\entity \connection\DBCPConnectionFactory.java:21: cannot access org.apache.commons.dbcp.ConnectionFactory [javac15] bad class file: C:\ofbiz\framework\entity\lib\commons-dbcp-1.3-2009- r834702.jar(org/apache/commons/dbcp/ConnectionFactory.class) [javac15] class file has wrong version 50.0, should be 49.0 [javac15] Please remove or make sure it appears in the correct subdirectory of the classpath. [javac15] import org.apache.commons.dbcp.ConnectionFactory; [javac15]^ [javac15] 1 error
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3071) assigning security group to a party without validations
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12777439#action_12777439 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3071: Yes it makes sens but do we really need to constrain that ? What kind of trouble may we have ? For me it's only redundant and not a big deal; Also is your patch handling this issue and only this issue ? assigning security group to a party without validations --- Key: OFBIZ-3071 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3071 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Abdullah Shaikh Priority: Minor Attachments: OFBIZ-3071_assigning security group to a party without validations.patch When adding user login to Security Group, the fromDate thruDate input fields are not mandatory, if not specified the fromDate is set to current timestamop and thruDate is entered in database as null, which means the user login is assigned that Security Group forever, but when if the same Security Group is added, it again adds it, but instead it should check that if the thruDate is null in the already entered record then shouldn't add new record. If incase the thruDate is specified during the creation of 1st record then while adding the 2nd record for the same Security Group, it should check if the thruDate of previous record is before the fromDate of the new record, this check also doesn't happen. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: Build Error
http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/nightly/commons-dbcp/ Jacopo On Nov 13, 2009, at 11:29 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi Scott, At which date was done this nightly build ? Where did you find it ? BTW I have reverted both trunk and 9.04 Jacques From: Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com BTW, the latest nightly build from dbcp works just fine on 1.5 for me, why are you trying to compile dbcp? Regards Scott On 13/11/2009, at 10:36 PM, Scott Gray wrote: I'd suggest that you revert it for now. Regards Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 13/11/2009, at 10:20 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: I not totally sure but yet it seems that new versions of DBCP needs the 1.6 jdk (or jdk 1.4) . Extract from README.TXT : This release of JDBC compiles with and supports JDK 1.3 (JDBC 2.0), JDK 1.4-1.5 (JDBC 3.0) and JDK 1.6 (JDBC 4.0). I tried to build with 1.5 but it failed and I began to find a way out, not obvious... So the alternative is 1) revert DBCP upgrade (fix a bug) 2) Decide to use jdk 1.6 for OFBiz I would not like to push now for the 2d solution but as this upgrade was intended to fix a bug, I wonder if it's not the right time In the meantime (before a decision is taken), I will continue to search a solution to compile with 1.5 but does not seem easy (conditional ANT compile deal with JDBC versions), and I'd not like to rewrite DBCP, even a part, I've other fish to fry ;o) Jacques From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com Thanks Adrian, Yes I did not care and build with ant from Eclipse where I use the 1.6 JDK. I'm on it, not as simple as I thought some problem appeared... In the meantime can you use 1.6 to build ? BTW, could we not change from 1.5 to 1.6, is there any blocking reasons I don't remember ? Jacques From: Adrian Crum adrian.c...@yahoo.com Latest trunk: Compiling 129 source files to C:\ofbiz\framework\entity\build \classes [javac15] C:\ofbiz\framework\entity\src\org\ofbiz\entity \connection\DBCPConnectionFactory.java:21: cannot access org.apache.commons.dbcp.ConnectionFactory [javac15] bad class file: C:\ofbiz\framework\entity\lib\commons-dbcp-1.3-2009- r834702.jar(org/apache/commons/dbcp/ConnectionFactory.class) [javac15] class file has wrong version 50.0, should be 49.0 [javac15] Please remove or make sure it appears in the correct subdirectory of the classpath. [javac15] import org.apache.commons.dbcp.ConnectionFactory; [javac15]^ [javac15] 1 error
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3084) Order with service type product payed with an offline payment generates multi invoices
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12777443#action_12777443 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3084: Scott, Yes, it works well in R9.04 Thanks Order with service type product payed with an offline payment generates multi invoices -- Key: OFBIZ-3084 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3084 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: accounting, order Affects Versions: Release Branch 9.04, SVN trunk Reporter: Jacques Le Roux Assignee: Scott Gray Fix For: SVN trunk If I buy a service type product with an offline payment an invoice with an outstanding payment is generated automatically for the corresponding order. If I hold the order and approve it again a new invoice is generated, and this of course again and again. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: Build Error
Thanks Jacopo, These are really old ones or do I miss something ? Jacques From: Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/nightly/commons-dbcp/ Jacopo On Nov 13, 2009, at 11:29 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi Scott, At which date was done this nightly build ? Where did you find it ? BTW I have reverted both trunk and 9.04 Jacques From: Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com BTW, the latest nightly build from dbcp works just fine on 1.5 for me, why are you trying to compile dbcp? Regards Scott On 13/11/2009, at 10:36 PM, Scott Gray wrote: I'd suggest that you revert it for now. Regards Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 13/11/2009, at 10:20 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: I not totally sure but yet it seems that new versions of DBCP needs the 1.6 jdk (or jdk 1.4) . Extract from README.TXT : This release of JDBC compiles with and supports JDK 1.3 (JDBC 2.0), JDK 1.4-1.5 (JDBC 3.0) and JDK 1.6 (JDBC 4.0). I tried to build with 1.5 but it failed and I began to find a way out, not obvious... So the alternative is 1) revert DBCP upgrade (fix a bug) 2) Decide to use jdk 1.6 for OFBiz I would not like to push now for the 2d solution but as this upgrade was intended to fix a bug, I wonder if it's not the right time In the meantime (before a decision is taken), I will continue to search a solution to compile with 1.5 but does not seem easy (conditional ANT compile deal with JDBC versions), and I'd not like to rewrite DBCP, even a part, I've other fish to fry ;o) Jacques From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com Thanks Adrian, Yes I did not care and build with ant from Eclipse where I use the 1.6 JDK. I'm on it, not as simple as I thought some problem appeared... In the meantime can you use 1.6 to build ? BTW, could we not change from 1.5 to 1.6, is there any blocking reasons I don't remember ? Jacques From: Adrian Crum adrian.c...@yahoo.com Latest trunk: Compiling 129 source files to C:\ofbiz\framework\entity\build \classes [javac15] C:\ofbiz\framework\entity\src\org\ofbiz\entity \connection\DBCPConnectionFactory.java:21: cannot access org.apache.commons.dbcp.ConnectionFactory [javac15] bad class file: C:\ofbiz\framework\entity\lib\commons-dbcp-1.3-2009- r834702.jar(org/apache/commons/dbcp/ConnectionFactory.class) [javac15] class file has wrong version 50.0, should be 49.0 [javac15] Please remove or make sure it appears in the correct subdirectory of the classpath. [javac15] import org.apache.commons.dbcp.ConnectionFactory; [javac15]^ [javac15] 1 error
Re: Build Error
Yep that's where I went and I now realize the latest nightly build was actually from 2007 :-/ Regards Scott On 13/11/2009, at 11:45 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/nightly/commons-dbcp/ Jacopo On Nov 13, 2009, at 11:29 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi Scott, At which date was done this nightly build ? Where did you find it ? BTW I have reverted both trunk and 9.04 Jacques From: Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com BTW, the latest nightly build from dbcp works just fine on 1.5 for me, why are you trying to compile dbcp? Regards Scott On 13/11/2009, at 10:36 PM, Scott Gray wrote: I'd suggest that you revert it for now. Regards Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 13/11/2009, at 10:20 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: I not totally sure but yet it seems that new versions of DBCP needs the 1.6 jdk (or jdk 1.4) . Extract from README.TXT : This release of JDBC compiles with and supports JDK 1.3 (JDBC 2.0), JDK 1.4-1.5 (JDBC 3.0) and JDK 1.6 (JDBC 4.0). I tried to build with 1.5 but it failed and I began to find a way out, not obvious... So the alternative is 1) revert DBCP upgrade (fix a bug) 2) Decide to use jdk 1.6 for OFBiz I would not like to push now for the 2d solution but as this upgrade was intended to fix a bug, I wonder if it's not the right time In the meantime (before a decision is taken), I will continue to search a solution to compile with 1.5 but does not seem easy (conditional ANT compile deal with JDBC versions), and I'd not like to rewrite DBCP, even a part, I've other fish to fry ;o) Jacques From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com Thanks Adrian, Yes I did not care and build with ant from Eclipse where I use the 1.6 JDK. I'm on it, not as simple as I thought some problem appeared... In the meantime can you use 1.6 to build ? BTW, could we not change from 1.5 to 1.6, is there any blocking reasons I don't remember ? Jacques From: Adrian Crum adrian.c...@yahoo.com Latest trunk: Compiling 129 source files to C:\ofbiz\framework\entity\build \classes [javac15] C:\ofbiz\framework\entity\src\org\ofbiz\entity \connection\DBCPConnectionFactory.java:21: cannot access org.apache.commons.dbcp.ConnectionFactory [javac15] bad class file: C:\ofbiz\framework\entity\lib\commons-dbcp-1.3-2009- r834702.jar(org/apache/commons/dbcp/ConnectionFactory.class) [javac15] class file has wrong version 50.0, should be 49.0 [javac15] Please remove or make sure it appears in the correct subdirectory of the classpath. [javac15] import org.apache.commons.dbcp.ConnectionFactory; [javac15]^ [javac15] 1 error smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3071) assigning security group to a party without validations
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12777446#action_12777446 ] Abdullah Shaikh commented on OFBIZ-3071: Good to hear that it makes sense .. Even if we don't constrain that it should work just fine, we wont have any trouble. But what I feel is if we have found the issue then lets just fix it, only because it wont cause any trouble or it's only redundant that will do, will accumulate more and more of this kind of issues and maybe later we will start finding this kind of issues and fixing it later. As Ofbiz is an ERP it maybe grow more more bigger, it's better if we fix the issues irrespective of how big or small the issue is. I dont remember but I guess the patch was handling more than this .. If you feel that we can commit the thruDate fix, then I can work on the patch to just fix this issue and remove the other stuff, let me know. assigning security group to a party without validations --- Key: OFBIZ-3071 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3071 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Abdullah Shaikh Priority: Minor Attachments: OFBIZ-3071_assigning security group to a party without validations.patch When adding user login to Security Group, the fromDate thruDate input fields are not mandatory, if not specified the fromDate is set to current timestamop and thruDate is entered in database as null, which means the user login is assigned that Security Group forever, but when if the same Security Group is added, it again adds it, but instead it should check that if the thruDate is null in the already entered record then shouldn't add new record. If incase the thruDate is specified during the creation of 1st record then while adding the 2nd record for the same Security Group, it should check if the thruDate of previous record is before the fromDate of the new record, this check also doesn't happen. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-2984) HTML cleanup for Product Detail page
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rohit Jain updated OFBIZ-2984: -- Attachment: productDetailCodeCleanUp.patch Here is slightly modified patch for latest ofbiz revision. in this patch first pass of html code clean and css for generated layout issue. HTML cleanup for Product Detail page Key: OFBIZ-2984 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2984 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Sub-task Components: specialpurpose/ecommerce Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: Rohit Jain Priority: Minor Fix For: SVN trunk Attachments: productDetailCodeCleanUp.patch, productDetailCodeCleanUp.patch HTML code cleanup and related layout fixes for product detail page. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3190) Drag 'n' Drop for myPortal + update prototype and script.aculo.us
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sascha Rodekamp updated OFBIZ-3190: --- Attachment: script.aculo.us.patch myPortalDragNDrop.patch Drag 'n' Drop for myPortal + update prototype and script.aculo.us - Key: OFBIZ-3190 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3190 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: New Feature Components: framework Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: Sascha Rodekamp Fix For: SVN trunk Attachments: Editing icon.jpg, myPortalDragNDrop.patch, myPortalDragNDrop.patch, script.aculo.us.patch My first patch :-) Hi, I try to extend the myPortal component with a drag 'n' drop feature, using the script.aculo.us libary. Therefor i updated prototype and script.aculo.us. What do you think of the implementation? Best regards Sascha -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3190) Drag 'n' Drop for myPortal + update prototype and script.aculo.us
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12777452#action_12777452 ] Sascha Rodekamp commented on OFBIZ-3190: Hi Bruno, many thanks for reviewing. I split the Patch file and made a seperate one for the script.aculo.us upgrade. The Drag'n'Drop patch contains now a reverting to the original position when its not dropped over a droppable area. Drag 'n' Drop for myPortal + update prototype and script.aculo.us - Key: OFBIZ-3190 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3190 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: New Feature Components: framework Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: Sascha Rodekamp Fix For: SVN trunk Attachments: Editing icon.jpg, myPortalDragNDrop.patch, myPortalDragNDrop.patch, script.aculo.us.patch My first patch :-) Hi, I try to extend the myPortal component with a drag 'n' drop feature, using the script.aculo.us libary. Therefor i updated prototype and script.aculo.us. What do you think of the implementation? Best regards Sascha -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: Build Error
I think Jacques is right about the current source code, there are a few minor issues that make it 1.6 only. I made some changes and got it to compile, I'll give it a test run and see how it goes. Regards Scott On 14/11/2009, at 12:00 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: Hmm... yes you are right, Jacques, sorry for that. I will try to find out more information... Jacopo On Nov 13, 2009, at 11:49 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Thanks Jacopo, These are really old ones or do I miss something ? Jacques From: Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/nightly/commons-dbcp/ Jacopo On Nov 13, 2009, at 11:29 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi Scott, At which date was done this nightly build ? Where did you find it ? BTW I have reverted both trunk and 9.04 Jacques From: Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com BTW, the latest nightly build from dbcp works just fine on 1.5 for me, why are you trying to compile dbcp? Regards Scott On 13/11/2009, at 10:36 PM, Scott Gray wrote: I'd suggest that you revert it for now. Regards Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 13/11/2009, at 10:20 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: I not totally sure but yet it seems that new versions of DBCP needs the 1.6 jdk (or jdk 1.4) . Extract from README.TXT : This release of JDBC compiles with and supports JDK 1.3 (JDBC 2.0), JDK 1.4-1.5 (JDBC 3.0) and JDK 1.6 (JDBC 4.0). I tried to build with 1.5 but it failed and I began to find a way out, not obvious... So the alternative is 1) revert DBCP upgrade (fix a bug) 2) Decide to use jdk 1.6 for OFBiz I would not like to push now for the 2d solution but as this upgrade was intended to fix a bug, I wonder if it's not the right time In the meantime (before a decision is taken), I will continue to search a solution to compile with 1.5 but does not seem easy (conditional ANT compile deal with JDBC versions), and I'd not like to rewrite DBCP, even a part, I've other fish to fry ;o) Jacques From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com Thanks Adrian, Yes I did not care and build with ant from Eclipse where I use the 1.6 JDK. I'm on it, not as simple as I thought some problem appeared... In the meantime can you use 1.6 to build ? BTW, could we not change from 1.5 to 1.6, is there any blocking reasons I don't remember ? Jacques From: Adrian Crum adrian.c...@yahoo.com Latest trunk: Compiling 129 source files to C:\ofbiz\framework\entity \build \classes [javac15] C:\ofbiz\framework\entity\src\org\ofbiz\entity \connection\DBCPConnectionFactory.java:21: cannot access org.apache.commons.dbcp.ConnectionFactory [javac15] bad class file: C:\ofbiz\framework\entity\lib\commons-dbcp-1.3-2009- r834702.jar(org/apache/commons/dbcp/ConnectionFactory.class) [javac15] class file has wrong version 50.0, should be 49.0 [javac15] Please remove or make sure it appears in the correct subdirectory of the classpath. [javac15] import org.apache.commons.dbcp.ConnectionFactory; [javac15]^ [javac15] 1 error smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: svn commit: r831676 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework: common/config/CommonUiLabels.xml widget/src/org/ofbiz/widget/form/MacroFormRenderer.java widget/src/org/ofbiz/widget/form/ModelForm.java widget/tem
Hi,
Could someone explain me the patch at the bottom ? more precisely the
#if listSize gt 20. It seems that with a view-size less than 20 (eg:
5), and only 19 results (ie between view-size and 20), there will be no
prev/next stuff.
So, should the condition in htmlFormMacroLibrary be deleted, set to
view-size, or should every view-size be set to something greater than
20, or did I miss something ?
Thanks,
Matthieu.
Le dimanche 01 novembre 2009 à 13:51 +, bibr...@apache.org a écrit :
Modified:
ofbiz/trunk/framework/widget/templates/htmlFormMacroLibrary.ftl
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/framework/widget/templates/htmlFormMacroLibrary.ftl?rev=831676r1=831675r2=831676view=diff
==
--- ofbiz/trunk/framework/widget/templates/htmlFormMacroLibrary.ftl (original)
+++ ofbiz/trunk/framework/widget/templates/htmlFormMacroLibrary.ftl Sun Nov
1 13:51:42 2009
@@ -422,7 +422,8 @@
);#rt
img src=${imgSrc}width=15 height=14 border=0 alt=Lookup//a#rt
/#macro
-#macro renderNextPrev paginateStyle paginateFirstStyle viewIndex highIndex
listSize viewSize ajaxEnabled javaScriptEnabled ajaxFirstUrl firstUrl
paginateFirstLabel paginatePreviousStyle ajaxPreviousUrl previousUrl
paginatePreviousLabel pageLabel ajaxSelectUrl selectUrl commonDisplaying
paginateNextStyle ajaxNextUrl nextUrl paginateNextLabel paginateLastStyle
ajaxLastUrl lastUrl paginateLastLabel
+#macro renderNextPrev paginateStyle paginateFirstStyle viewIndex highIndex
listSize viewSize ajaxEnabled javaScriptEnabled ajaxFirstUrl firstUrl
paginateFirstLabel paginatePreviousStyle ajaxPreviousUrl previousUrl
paginatePreviousLabel pageLabel ajaxSelectUrl selectUrl ajaxSelectSizeUrl
selectSizeUrl commonDisplaying paginateNextStyle ajaxNextUrl nextUrl
paginateNextLabel paginateLastStyle ajaxLastUrl lastUrl paginateLastLabel
paginateViewSizeLabel
+#if listSize gt 20
div class=${paginateStyle}nbsp; ul
li class=${paginateFirstStyle}#if viewIndex gt 0a href=#if
ajaxEnabledjavascript:ajaxUpdateAreas('${ajaxFirstUrl}')#else${firstUrl}/#if${paginateFirstLabel}/a#else-disabled${paginateFirstLabel}/#if/li
li class=${paginatePreviousStyle}#if viewIndex gt 0a href=#if
ajaxEnabledjavascript:ajaxUpdateAreas('${ajaxPreviousUrl}')#else${previousUrl}/#if${paginatePreviousLabel}/a#else-disabled${paginatePreviousLabel}/#if/li
@@ -432,11 +433,18 @@
#list 1..x as i
#if i == (viewIndex+1)option selected=selected value=#elseoption
value=/#if${i-1}${i}/option
/#list
-/select/lili${commonDisplaying}/li
-/#if
+/select/li/#if
+li${commonDisplaying}/li
li class=${paginateNextStyle}#if highIndex lt listSizea href=#if
ajaxEnabledjavascript:ajaxUpdateAreas('${ajaxNextUrl}')#else${nextUrl}/#if${paginateNextLabel}/a#else-disabled${paginateNextLabel}/#if/li
li class=${paginateLastStyle}#if highIndex lt listSizea href=#if
ajaxEnabledjavascript:ajaxUpdateAreas('${ajaxLastUrl}')#else${lastUrl}/#if${paginateLastLabel}/a#else-disabled${paginateLastLabel}/#if/li
+#if javaScriptEnabledli class=nav-pagesizeselect name=pageSize
size=1 onchange=#if
ajaxEnabledjavascript:ajaxUpdateAreas('${ajaxSelectSizeUrl}')#elselocation.href='${selectSizeUrl}';/#if#rt/
+#assign availPageSizes = [20, 30, 50, 100, 200]
+#list availPageSizes as ps
+ option #if viewSize == psselected=selected /#if
value=${ps}${ps}/option
+/#list
+/select ${paginateViewSizeLabel}/li/#if
/ul/divbr/
+/#if
/#macro
#macro renderFileField className alert name value size maxlength
autocompleteinput type=file @renderClass className alert /#if
name?has_content name=${name}/#if#if value?has_content
value=${value}/#if#if size?has_content size=${size}/#if#if
maxlength?has_content maxlength=${maxlength}/#if#if
autocomplete?has_content autocomplete=off/#if/#rt//#macro
#macro renderPasswordField className alert name value size maxlength id
autocompleteinput type=password @renderClass className alert /#if
name?has_content name=${name}/#if#if value?has_content
value=${value}/#if#if size?has_content size=${size}/#if#if
maxlength?has_content maxlength=${maxlength}/#if#if id?has_content
id=${id}/#if#if autocomplete?has_content
autocomplete=off/#if//#macro
[jira] Reopened: (OFBIZ-2599) Memory leak due to transaction management
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux reopened OFBIZ-2599: I had to revert at r835801 (trunk) and r835802 (R9.04) because we still use jdk 1.5 in OFBiz and I was not able to build DBCP OOTB with it (was ok with 1.6) I asked for on u...@commons.apache.org... Memory leak due to transaction management - Key: OFBIZ-2599 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2599 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: framework Affects Versions: Release Branch 9.04, SVN trunk Environment: jdk5, commons-dbcp-head Reporter: Philippe Mouawad Assignee: Jacques Le Roux Priority: Critical Fix For: Release Branch 9.04, SVN trunk Attachments: commons-dbcp-1.3-r674758-patched.jar, memory.png, patch-DBCPConneectionFactory.txt Hello, We are been using Ofbiz with DBCP based implementation. Ofbiz uses a Head revision of DBCP (package org.apache.commons.dbcp.managed is the same as current TRUNK) and geronimo-transaction-1.0. We are having recurrent OutOfMemory which occur on a 2 days basis. See: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBCP-294 Philippe Mouawad http://www.ubik-ingenierie.com -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: Build Error
Hi Scott, FYI, I have asked about it on u...@commons.apache.org ... BTW, I can't remember the reasons why we stay to 1.5, are they still valid ? Jacques From: Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com I think Jacques is right about the current source code, there are a few minor issues that make it 1.6 only. I made some changes and got it to compile, I'll give it a test run and see how it goes. Regards Scott On 14/11/2009, at 12:00 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: Hmm... yes you are right, Jacques, sorry for that. I will try to find out more information... Jacopo On Nov 13, 2009, at 11:49 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Thanks Jacopo, These are really old ones or do I miss something ? Jacques From: Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/nightly/commons-dbcp/ Jacopo On Nov 13, 2009, at 11:29 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi Scott, At which date was done this nightly build ? Where did you find it ? BTW I have reverted both trunk and 9.04 Jacques From: Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com BTW, the latest nightly build from dbcp works just fine on 1.5 for me, why are you trying to compile dbcp? Regards Scott On 13/11/2009, at 10:36 PM, Scott Gray wrote: I'd suggest that you revert it for now. Regards Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 13/11/2009, at 10:20 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: I not totally sure but yet it seems that new versions of DBCP needs the 1.6 jdk (or jdk 1.4) . Extract from README.TXT : This release of JDBC compiles with and supports JDK 1.3 (JDBC 2.0), JDK 1.4-1.5 (JDBC 3.0) and JDK 1.6 (JDBC 4.0). I tried to build with 1.5 but it failed and I began to find a way out, not obvious... So the alternative is 1) revert DBCP upgrade (fix a bug) 2) Decide to use jdk 1.6 for OFBiz I would not like to push now for the 2d solution but as this upgrade was intended to fix a bug, I wonder if it's not the right time In the meantime (before a decision is taken), I will continue to search a solution to compile with 1.5 but does not seem easy (conditional ANT compile deal with JDBC versions), and I'd not like to rewrite DBCP, even a part, I've other fish to fry ;o) Jacques From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com Thanks Adrian, Yes I did not care and build with ant from Eclipse where I use the 1.6 JDK. I'm on it, not as simple as I thought some problem appeared... In the meantime can you use 1.6 to build ? BTW, could we not change from 1.5 to 1.6, is there any blocking reasons I don't remember ? Jacques From: Adrian Crum adrian.c...@yahoo.com Latest trunk: Compiling 129 source files to C:\ofbiz\framework\entity \build \classes [javac15] C:\ofbiz\framework\entity\src\org\ofbiz\entity \connection\DBCPConnectionFactory.java:21: cannot access org.apache.commons.dbcp.ConnectionFactory [javac15] bad class file: C:\ofbiz\framework\entity\lib\commons-dbcp-1.3-2009- r834702.jar(org/apache/commons/dbcp/ConnectionFactory.class) [javac15] class file has wrong version 50.0, should be 49.0 [javac15] Please remove or make sure it appears in the correct subdirectory of the classpath. [javac15] import org.apache.commons.dbcp.ConnectionFactory; [javac15]^ [javac15] 1 error
[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3190) Drag 'n' Drop for myPortal + update prototype and script.aculo.us
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sascha Rodekamp updated OFBIZ-3190: --- Attachment: myportal_load_bg.png loader.gif Images for Loading Screen loader.gif Location framework/images/webapp/images/loader.gif myportal_load_bg.png location: framework/images/webapp/images/myportal_load_bg.png Drag 'n' Drop for myPortal + update prototype and script.aculo.us - Key: OFBIZ-3190 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3190 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: New Feature Components: framework Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: Sascha Rodekamp Fix For: SVN trunk Attachments: Editing icon.jpg, loader.gif, myportal_load_bg.png, myPortalDragNDrop.patch, myPortalDragNDrop.patch, script.aculo.us.patch My first patch :-) Hi, I try to extend the myPortal component with a drag 'n' drop feature, using the script.aculo.us libary. Therefor i updated prototype and script.aculo.us. What do you think of the implementation? Best regards Sascha -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3087) Error with accents and special characters rendering at large in PDF
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-3087: --- Attachment: 9.04.jpg Error with accents and special characters rendering at large in PDF --- Key: OFBIZ-3087 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3087 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: ALL COMPONENTS Reporter: Jacques Le Roux Fix For: Release Branch 9.04, SVN trunk Attachments: 9.04.jpg this thread speak about that http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@ofbiz.apache.org/msg29471.html -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-2984) HTML cleanup for Product Detail page
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rohit Jain updated OFBIZ-2984: -- Attachment: productDetailCodeCleanUp.patch HTML cleanup for Product Detail page Key: OFBIZ-2984 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2984 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Sub-task Components: specialpurpose/ecommerce Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: Rohit Jain Priority: Minor Fix For: SVN trunk Attachments: productDetailCodeCleanUp.patch, productDetailCodeCleanUp.patch, productDetailCodeCleanUp.patch HTML code cleanup and related layout fixes for product detail page. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3087) Error with accents and special characters rendering at large in PDF
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12777490#action_12777490 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3087: Hi Scott, 1) Use French (for instance : there are accents) 2) In example component create an example with default values. Hopefully they will be in the same order than on a French OS, i tested with is Windows XP French, else look for values with accents in description. 3) use the PDF button you should get something like in the screen copies Mmm, I was to create also a screen copy for trunk, but, not sure why, it does not render the type and status descriptions in French :( Error with accents and special characters rendering at large in PDF --- Key: OFBIZ-3087 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3087 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: ALL COMPONENTS Reporter: Jacques Le Roux Fix For: Release Branch 9.04, SVN trunk Attachments: 9.04.jpg this thread speak about that http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@ofbiz.apache.org/msg29471.html -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3087) Error with accents and special characters rendering at large in PDF
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12777491#action_12777491 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3087: And you know what : I'm able to edit using Ajax, weird :( Error with accents and special characters rendering at large in PDF --- Key: OFBIZ-3087 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3087 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: ALL COMPONENTS Reporter: Jacques Le Roux Fix For: Release Branch 9.04, SVN trunk Attachments: 9.04.jpg this thread speak about that http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@ofbiz.apache.org/msg29471.html -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3087) Error with accents and special characters rendering at large in PDF
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12777499#action_12777499 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3087: Oops, I removed a comment and a screen copy : I used a wrong instance :D. All above is still true so (I checked with another trunk instance) Error with accents and special characters rendering at large in PDF --- Key: OFBIZ-3087 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3087 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: ALL COMPONENTS Reporter: Jacques Le Roux Fix For: Release Branch 9.04, SVN trunk Attachments: 9.04.jpg this thread speak about that http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@ofbiz.apache.org/msg29471.html -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3087) Error with accents and special characters rendering at large in PDF
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-3087: --- Comment: was deleted (was: I finally reproduced with anther instance. But there I can't edit with Ajax. These instances have only config files adapted (differents ports). I begin to wonder if having them running simultaneously could not be a problem, but I really can't see why as it works well (but whne you swith from one to the other sometimes you get (browser?) cache effets but tha't all as far as I can tell) Error with accents and special characters rendering at large in PDF --- Key: OFBIZ-3087 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3087 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: ALL COMPONENTS Reporter: Jacques Le Roux Fix For: Release Branch 9.04, SVN trunk Attachments: 9.04.jpg this thread speak about that http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@ofbiz.apache.org/msg29471.html -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3087) Error with accents and special characters rendering at large in PDF
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-3087: --- Attachment: trunk.jpg I finally reproduced with anther instance. But there I can't edit with Ajax. These instances have only config files adapted (differents ports). I begin to wonder if having them running simultaneously could not be a problem, but I really can't see why as it works well (but whne you swith from one to the other sometimes you get (browser?) cache effets but tha't all as far as I can tell Error with accents and special characters rendering at large in PDF --- Key: OFBIZ-3087 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3087 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: ALL COMPONENTS Reporter: Jacques Le Roux Fix For: Release Branch 9.04, SVN trunk Attachments: 9.04.jpg, trunk.jpg this thread speak about that http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@ofbiz.apache.org/msg29471.html -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3191) Danish translations for ContentEntityLabels
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] André Herbst updated OFBIZ-3191: Attachment: OFBIZ-3191_ContentEntityLabels.patch Danish translations for ContentEntityLabels --- Key: OFBIZ-3191 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3191 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Sub-task Components: content Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: André Herbst Priority: Trivial Fix For: SVN trunk Attachments: OFBIZ-3191_ContentEntityLabels.patch -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-2494) On Windows with FF3 you can't edit a textfield using the inplace ajax editor
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2494?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-2494. -- Resolution: Fixed It works well both in trunk and r9.04. It needed an ant clean-all to work (Itought It could be a browser cache issue but clearing it did not fix the issue) On Windows with FF3 you can't edit a textfield using the inplace ajax editor Key: OFBIZ-2494 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2494 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: ALL COMPONENTS Affects Versions: Release Branch 9.04, SVN trunk Environment: FF3 on Windows. Reporter: Jacques Le Roux Assignee: Scott Gray Priority: Trivial Fix For: Release Branch 9.04, SVN trunk It works with Opera, Chrome, Safari and even IE8. I did not test on Linux. Not to be confused with the other related issue OFBIZ-2491 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3087) Error with accents and special characters rendering at large in PDF
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12777509#action_12777509 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3087: At least I have closed OFBIZ-2494, tt needed an ant clean-all to work Error with accents and special characters rendering at large in PDF --- Key: OFBIZ-3087 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3087 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: ALL COMPONENTS Reporter: Jacques Le Roux Fix For: Release Branch 9.04, SVN trunk Attachments: 9.04.jpg this thread speak about that http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@ofbiz.apache.org/msg29471.html -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-3191) Danish translations for ContentEntityLabels
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-3191. -- Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Jacques Le Roux Thanks André, Your patch is in trunk at r835850 And congratulations for the good work. I know from experience that it's not easy to not duplicate a key here or there ;) By chance we have now the labels manager to check Danish translations for ContentEntityLabels --- Key: OFBIZ-3191 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3191 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Sub-task Components: content Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: André Herbst Assignee: Jacques Le Roux Priority: Trivial Fix For: SVN trunk Attachments: OFBIZ-3191_ContentEntityLabels.patch -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
jdk 1.5 or 1.6
Hi devs, I don't remember why we still use 1.5. Here is a thread from 2006 http://markmail.org/message/5j5es63hpsh543ct. Maybe it's time to think anew about it, don't you think so ? Jacques
[jira] Assigned: (OFBIZ-2984) HTML cleanup for Product Detail page
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ashish Vijaywargiya reassigned OFBIZ-2984: -- Assignee: Ashish Vijaywargiya HTML cleanup for Product Detail page Key: OFBIZ-2984 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2984 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Sub-task Components: specialpurpose/ecommerce Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: Rohit Jain Assignee: Ashish Vijaywargiya Priority: Minor Fix For: SVN trunk Attachments: productDetailCodeCleanUp.patch, productDetailCodeCleanUp.patch, productDetailCodeCleanUp.patch HTML code cleanup and related layout fixes for product detail page. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-2984) HTML cleanup for Product Detail page
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ashish Vijaywargiya closed OFBIZ-2984. -- Resolution: Fixed Thanks Rohit - Done at r835861. -- Ashish Vijaywargiya HTML cleanup for Product Detail page Key: OFBIZ-2984 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2984 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Sub-task Components: specialpurpose/ecommerce Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: Rohit Jain Assignee: Ashish Vijaywargiya Priority: Minor Fix For: SVN trunk Attachments: productDetailCodeCleanUp.patch, productDetailCodeCleanUp.patch, productDetailCodeCleanUp.patch HTML code cleanup and related layout fixes for product detail page. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: jdk 1.5 or 1.6
Running OFBiz on 1.6 is a good idea, because (Sun claims) 1.6 performs better than 1.5. The downside is, there might be servers out there that don't have a 1.6 JRE available. I would like to see us move on to 1.6 (especially now that 1.7 is near), but I'm concerned for existing installations. -Adrian Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi devs, I don't remember why we still use 1.5. Here is a thread from 2006 http://markmail.org/message/5j5es63hpsh543ct. Maybe it's time to think anew about it, don't you think so ? Jacques
Re: jdk 1.5 or 1.6
Thanks Adrian, So it's the same concern than 3 years ago, I will check... Jacques From: Adrian Crum adri...@hlmksw.com Running OFBiz on 1.6 is a good idea, because (Sun claims) 1.6 performs better than 1.5. The downside is, there might be servers out there that don't have a 1.6 JRE available. I would like to see us move on to 1.6 (especially now that 1.7 is near), but I'm concerned for existing installations. -Adrian Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi devs, I don't remember why we still use 1.5. Here is a thread from 2006 http://markmail.org/message/5j5es63hpsh543ct. Maybe it's time to think anew about it, don't you think so ? Jacques
[jira] Created: (OFBIZ-3193) Séparation bet ween products extent into right and left bar
Séparation between products extent into right and left bar -- Key: OFBIZ-3193 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3193 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Sub-task Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: Jacques Le Roux Attachments: screenshot-1.jpg Also I got stuck on this page with only the Pay on one page (it was in French not sure of the label) and Google Checkout buttons working. I then switched to English then only the Google Checkout button was working. How I got there : # I bought the service product, # got to quick checkout # tried to use quick add (I was not able to use somehow :( ) # then I bought a Tiny Gizmo I did not test with R9.04 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3193) Séparation be tween products extent into right and left bar
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12777545#action_12777545 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3193: I tried to go to main : then any buttons is working anymore (the ones between cart and google checkout) Séparation between products extent into right and left bar -- Key: OFBIZ-3193 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3193 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Sub-task Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: Jacques Le Roux Attachments: screenshot-1.jpg Also I got stuck on this page with only the Pay on one page (it was in French not sure of the label) and Google Checkout buttons working. I then switched to English then only the Google Checkout button was working. How I got there : # I bought the service product, # got to quick checkout # tried to use quick add (I was not able to use somehow :( ) # then I bought a Tiny Gizmo I did not test with R9.04 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3193) Séparation bet ween products extent into right and left bar
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-3193: --- Attachment: screenshot-2.jpg If I continue (logout, login, after a try with google checkout) it's even worse : no butttons at al. OK I restart the instance... Séparation between products extent into right and left bar -- Key: OFBIZ-3193 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3193 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Sub-task Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: Jacques Le Roux Attachments: screenshot-1.jpg, screenshot-2.jpg Also I got stuck on this page with only the Pay on one page (it was in French not sure of the label) and Google Checkout buttons working. I then switched to English then only the Google Checkout button was working. How I got there : # I bought the service product, # got to quick checkout # tried to use quick add (I was not able to use somehow :( ) # then I bought a Tiny Gizmo I did not test with R9.04 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3193) Séparation be tween products extent into right and left bar
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12777550#action_12777550 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3193: This works well on the demo server today. So I suspect it's a change in the code since (I tried on 2 local instances). We will see tomorrow... Séparation between products extent into right and left bar -- Key: OFBIZ-3193 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3193 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Sub-task Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: Jacques Le Roux Attachments: screenshot-1.jpg, screenshot-2.jpg Also I got stuck on this page with only the Pay on one page (it was in French not sure of the label) and Google Checkout buttons working. I then switched to English then only the Google Checkout button was working. How I got there : # I bought the service product, # got to quick checkout # tried to use quick add (I was not able to use somehow :( ) # then I bought a Tiny Gizmo I did not test with R9.04 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3193) Dividing lines between products extent into right and left bar
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-3193: --- Summary: Dividing lines between products extent into right and left bar (was: Séparation between products extent into right and left bar) Dividing lines between products extent into right and left bar -- Key: OFBIZ-3193 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3193 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Sub-task Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: Jacques Le Roux Attachments: screenshot-1.jpg, screenshot-2.jpg Also I got stuck on this page with only the Pay on one page (it was in French not sure of the label) and Google Checkout buttons working. I then switched to English then only the Google Checkout button was working. How I got there : # I bought the service product, # got to quick checkout # tried to use quick add (I was not able to use somehow :( ) # then I bought a Tiny Gizmo I did not test with R9.04 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Created: (OFBIZ-3194) Quick look are showing pagination renderNextPrev pagination style when list size is greater than 20
Quick look are showing pagination renderNextPrev pagination style when list
size is greater than 20
---
Key: OFBIZ-3194
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3194
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components: order
Affects Versions: SVN trunk
Reporter: Divesh Dutta
Fix For: SVN trunk
Quick look are showing pagination renderNextPrev pagination style when list
size is greater than 20.
In htmlFormMacroLibrary.ftl below given code snippet is hard-coded. :
{#if listSize gt 20}
This can be changed to
{#if listSize gt viewSize}
as viewSize is passed as parameter in macro renderNextPrev. This is also
reported by Matthieu Bollot in developer mailing list.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3194) Quick look are showing pagination renderNextPrev pagination style when list size is greater than 20
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Divesh Dutta updated OFBIZ-3194:
Attachment: OFBiz-3194.patch
Here is the path for the same.
Avoiding hard-code value and using viewSize instead. This was blocking to show
all the products in Quick look up while placing purchase order
Quick look are showing pagination renderNextPrev pagination style when list
size is greater than 20
---
Key: OFBIZ-3194
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3194
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components: order
Affects Versions: SVN trunk
Reporter: Divesh Dutta
Fix For: SVN trunk
Attachments: OFBiz-3194.patch
Quick look are showing pagination renderNextPrev pagination style when list
size is greater than 20.
In htmlFormMacroLibrary.ftl below given code snippet is hard-coded. :
{#if listSize gt 20}
This can be changed to
{#if listSize gt viewSize}
as viewSize is passed as parameter in macro renderNextPrev. This is also
reported by Matthieu Bollot in developer mailing list.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3194) Quick look are showing pagination renderNextPrev pagination style when list size is greater than 20
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Divesh Dutta updated OFBIZ-3194:
Component/s: (was: order)
framework
Quick look are showing pagination renderNextPrev pagination style when list
size is greater than 20
---
Key: OFBIZ-3194
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3194
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components: framework
Affects Versions: SVN trunk
Reporter: Divesh Dutta
Fix For: SVN trunk
Attachments: OFBiz-3194.patch
Quick look are showing pagination renderNextPrev pagination style when list
size is greater than 20.
In htmlFormMacroLibrary.ftl below given code snippet is hard-coded. :
{#if listSize gt 20}
This can be changed to
{#if listSize gt viewSize}
as viewSize is passed as parameter in macro renderNextPrev. This is also
reported by Matthieu Bollot in developer mailing list.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: svn commit: r831676 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework: common/config/CommonUiLabels.xml widget/src/org/ofbiz/widget/form/MacroFormRenderer.java widget/src/org/ofbiz/widget/form/ModelForm.java widget/tem
Hello Matthieu/ Bilgin ,
I think we should not delete the condition. But we can omit hard-coded
check here and use viewSize instead. I have created jira issue for
this and also updated the patch for the same. Here is the link:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3194
PS: Please commit this patch or give alternate solution for this as soon
as you get time.
Thanks
--
Divesh Dutta.
Matthieu Bollot wrote:
Hi,
Could someone explain me the patch at the bottom ? more precisely the
#if listSize gt 20. It seems that with a view-size less than 20 (eg:
5), and only 19 results (ie between view-size and 20), there will be no
prev/next stuff.
So, should the condition in htmlFormMacroLibrary be deleted, set to
view-size, or should every view-size be set to something greater than
20, or did I miss something ?
Thanks,
Matthieu.
Le dimanche 01 novembre 2009 à 13:51 +, bibr...@apache.org a écrit :
Modified:
ofbiz/trunk/framework/widget/templates/htmlFormMacroLibrary.ftl
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/framework/widget/templates/htmlFormMacroLibrary.ftl?rev=831676r1=831675r2=831676view=diff
==
--- ofbiz/trunk/framework/widget/templates/htmlFormMacroLibrary.ftl (original)
+++ ofbiz/trunk/framework/widget/templates/htmlFormMacroLibrary.ftl Sun Nov 1
13:51:42 2009
@@ -422,7 +422,8 @@
);#rt
img src=${imgSrc}width=15 height=14 border=0 alt=Lookup//a#rt
/#macro
-#macro renderNextPrev paginateStyle paginateFirstStyle viewIndex highIndex
listSize viewSize ajaxEnabled javaScriptEnabled ajaxFirstUrl firstUrl
paginateFirstLabel paginatePreviousStyle ajaxPreviousUrl previousUrl
paginatePreviousLabel pageLabel ajaxSelectUrl selectUrl commonDisplaying
paginateNextStyle ajaxNextUrl nextUrl paginateNextLabel paginateLastStyle ajaxLastUrl
lastUrl paginateLastLabel
+#macro renderNextPrev paginateStyle paginateFirstStyle viewIndex highIndex
listSize viewSize ajaxEnabled javaScriptEnabled ajaxFirstUrl firstUrl
paginateFirstLabel paginatePreviousStyle ajaxPreviousUrl previousUrl
paginatePreviousLabel pageLabel ajaxSelectUrl selectUrl ajaxSelectSizeUrl
selectSizeUrl commonDisplaying paginateNextStyle ajaxNextUrl nextUrl
paginateNextLabel paginateLastStyle ajaxLastUrl lastUrl paginateLastLabel
paginateViewSizeLabel
+#if listSize gt 20
div class=${paginateStyle}nbsp; ul
li class=${paginateFirstStyle}#if viewIndex gt 0a href=#if
ajaxEnabledjavascript:ajaxUpdateAreas('${ajaxFirstUrl}')#else${firstUrl}/#if${paginateFirstLabel}/a#else-disabled${paginateFirstLabel}/#if/li
li class=${paginatePreviousStyle}#if viewIndex gt 0a href=#if
ajaxEnabledjavascript:ajaxUpdateAreas('${ajaxPreviousUrl}')#else${previousUrl}/#if${paginatePreviousLabel}/a#else-disabled${paginatePreviousLabel}/#if/li
@@ -432,11 +433,18 @@
#list 1..x as i
#if i == (viewIndex+1)option selected=selected value=#elseoption
value=/#if${i-1}${i}/option
/#list
-/select/lili${commonDisplaying}/li
-/#if
+/select/li/#if
+li${commonDisplaying}/li
li class=${paginateNextStyle}#if highIndex lt listSizea href=#if
ajaxEnabledjavascript:ajaxUpdateAreas('${ajaxNextUrl}')#else${nextUrl}/#if${paginateNextLabel}/a#else-disabled${paginateNextLabel}/#if/li
li class=${paginateLastStyle}#if highIndex lt listSizea href=#if
ajaxEnabledjavascript:ajaxUpdateAreas('${ajaxLastUrl}')#else${lastUrl}/#if${paginateLastLabel}/a#else-disabled${paginateLastLabel}/#if/li
+#if javaScriptEnabledli class=nav-pagesizeselect name=pageSize size=1 onchange=#if
ajaxEnabledjavascript:ajaxUpdateAreas('${ajaxSelectSizeUrl}')#elselocation.href='${selectSizeUrl}';/#if#rt/
+#assign availPageSizes = [20, 30, 50, 100, 200]
+#list availPageSizes as ps
+ option #if viewSize == psselected=selected /#if
value=${ps}${ps}/option
+/#list
+/select ${paginateViewSizeLabel}/li/#if
/ul/divbr/
+/#if
/#macro
#macro renderFileField className alert name value size maxlength autocompleteinput type=file @renderClass className alert /#if name?has_content name=${name}/#if#if
value?has_content value=${value}/#if#if size?has_content size=${size}/#if#if maxlength?has_content maxlength=${maxlength}/#if#if
autocomplete?has_content autocomplete=off/#if/#rt//#macro
#macro renderPasswordField className alert name value size maxlength id autocompleteinput type=password @renderClass className alert /#if name?has_content name=${name}/#if#if
value?has_content value=${value}/#if#if size?has_content size=${size}/#if#if maxlength?has_content maxlength=${maxlength}/#if#if id?has_content
id=${id}/#if#if autocomplete?has_content autocomplete=off/#if//#macro
[jira] Created: (OFBIZ-3195) next/prev missing
next/prev missing - Key: OFBIZ-3195 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3195 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: order Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: matthieu bollot by default, with view-size set to 5, and with less than 20 results, there is no prev/next navig bar in a lookup two screenshots to be understood and a quick patch follow -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Assigned: (OFBIZ-3194) Quick look are showing pagination renderNextPrev pagination style when list size is greater than 20
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato reassigned OFBIZ-3194:
Assignee: Jacopo Cappellato
Quick look are showing pagination renderNextPrev pagination style when list
size is greater than 20
---
Key: OFBIZ-3194
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3194
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components: framework
Affects Versions: SVN trunk
Reporter: Divesh Dutta
Assignee: Jacopo Cappellato
Fix For: SVN trunk
Attachments: OFBiz-3194.patch
Quick look are showing pagination renderNextPrev pagination style when list
size is greater than 20.
In htmlFormMacroLibrary.ftl below given code snippet is hard-coded. :
{#if listSize gt 20}
This can be changed to
{#if listSize gt viewSize}
as viewSize is passed as parameter in macro renderNextPrev. This is also
reported by Matthieu Bollot in developer mailing list.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: svn commit: r831676 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework: common/config/CommonUiLabels.xml widget/src/org/ofbiz/widget/form/MacroFormRenderer.java widget/src/org/ofbiz/widget/form/ModelForm.java widget/tem
Thank you Divesh,
your code is in rev. 835925
Jacopo
On Nov 13, 2009, at 5:58 PM, Divesh Dutta wrote:
Hello Matthieu/ Bilgin ,
I think we should not delete the condition. But we can omit hard-coded check
here and use viewSize instead. I have created jira issue for this and also
updated the patch for the same. Here is the link:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3194
PS: Please commit this patch or give alternate solution for this as soon as
you get time.
Thanks
--
Divesh Dutta.
Matthieu Bollot wrote:
Hi,
Could someone explain me the patch at the bottom ? more precisely the
#if listSize gt 20. It seems that with a view-size less than 20 (eg:
5), and only 19 results (ie between view-size and 20), there will be no
prev/next stuff.
So, should the condition in htmlFormMacroLibrary be deleted, set to
view-size, or should every view-size be set to something greater than
20, or did I miss something ?
Thanks,
Matthieu.
Le dimanche 01 novembre 2009 à 13:51 +, bibr...@apache.org a écrit :
Modified:
ofbiz/trunk/framework/widget/templates/htmlFormMacroLibrary.ftl
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/framework/widget/templates/htmlFormMacroLibrary.ftl?rev=831676r1=831675r2=831676view=diff
==
--- ofbiz/trunk/framework/widget/templates/htmlFormMacroLibrary.ftl
(original)
+++ ofbiz/trunk/framework/widget/templates/htmlFormMacroLibrary.ftl Sun Nov
1 13:51:42 2009
@@ -422,7 +422,8 @@
);#rt
img src=${imgSrc}width=15 height=14 border=0
alt=Lookup//a#rt
/#macro
-#macro renderNextPrev paginateStyle paginateFirstStyle viewIndex
highIndex listSize viewSize ajaxEnabled javaScriptEnabled ajaxFirstUrl
firstUrl paginateFirstLabel paginatePreviousStyle ajaxPreviousUrl
previousUrl paginatePreviousLabel pageLabel ajaxSelectUrl selectUrl
commonDisplaying paginateNextStyle ajaxNextUrl nextUrl paginateNextLabel
paginateLastStyle ajaxLastUrl lastUrl paginateLastLabel
+#macro renderNextPrev paginateStyle paginateFirstStyle viewIndex
highIndex listSize viewSize ajaxEnabled javaScriptEnabled ajaxFirstUrl
firstUrl paginateFirstLabel paginatePreviousStyle ajaxPreviousUrl
previousUrl paginatePreviousLabel pageLabel ajaxSelectUrl selectUrl
ajaxSelectSizeUrl selectSizeUrl commonDisplaying paginateNextStyle
ajaxNextUrl nextUrl paginateNextLabel paginateLastStyle ajaxLastUrl lastUrl
paginateLastLabel paginateViewSizeLabel
+#if listSize gt 20
div class=${paginateStyle}nbsp; ul
li class=${paginateFirstStyle}#if viewIndex gt 0a href=#if
ajaxEnabledjavascript:ajaxUpdateAreas('${ajaxFirstUrl}')#else${firstUrl}/#if${paginateFirstLabel}/a#else-disabled${paginateFirstLabel}/#if/li
li class=${paginatePreviousStyle}#if viewIndex gt 0a href=#if
ajaxEnabledjavascript:ajaxUpdateAreas('${ajaxPreviousUrl}')#else${previousUrl}/#if${paginatePreviousLabel}/a#else-disabled${paginatePreviousLabel}/#if/li
@@ -432,11 +433,18 @@
#list 1..x as i
#if i == (viewIndex+1)option selected=selected value=#elseoption
value=/#if${i-1}${i}/option
/#list
-/select/lili${commonDisplaying}/li
-/#if
+/select/li/#if
+li${commonDisplaying}/li
li class=${paginateNextStyle}#if highIndex lt listSizea href=#if
ajaxEnabledjavascript:ajaxUpdateAreas('${ajaxNextUrl}')#else${nextUrl}/#if${paginateNextLabel}/a#else-disabled${paginateNextLabel}/#if/li
li class=${paginateLastStyle}#if highIndex lt listSizea href=#if
ajaxEnabledjavascript:ajaxUpdateAreas('${ajaxLastUrl}')#else${lastUrl}/#if${paginateLastLabel}/a#else-disabled${paginateLastLabel}/#if/li
+#if javaScriptEnabledli class=nav-pagesizeselect name=pageSize
size=1 onchange=#if
ajaxEnabledjavascript:ajaxUpdateAreas('${ajaxSelectSizeUrl}')#elselocation.href='${selectSizeUrl}';/#if#rt/
+#assign availPageSizes = [20, 30, 50, 100, 200]
+#list availPageSizes as ps
+ option #if viewSize == psselected=selected /#if
value=${ps}${ps}/option
+/#list
+/select ${paginateViewSizeLabel}/li/#if
/ul/divbr/
+/#if
/#macro
#macro renderFileField className alert name value size maxlength
autocompleteinput type=file @renderClass className alert /#if
name?has_content name=${name}/#if#if value?has_content
value=${value}/#if#if size?has_content size=${size}/#if#if
maxlength?has_content maxlength=${maxlength}/#if#if
autocomplete?has_content autocomplete=off/#if/#rt//#macro
#macro renderPasswordField className alert name value size maxlength id
autocompleteinput type=password @renderClass className alert /#if
name?has_content name=${name}/#if#if value?has_content
value=${value}/#if#if size?has_content size=${size}/#if#if
maxlength?has_content maxlength=${maxlength}/#if#if id?has_content
id=${id}/#if#if autocomplete?has_content
autocomplete=off/#if//#macro
[jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-3194) Quick look are showing pagination renderNextPrev pagination style when list size is greater than 20
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato closed OFBIZ-3194.
Quick look are showing pagination renderNextPrev pagination style when list
size is greater than 20
---
Key: OFBIZ-3194
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3194
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components: framework
Affects Versions: SVN trunk
Reporter: Divesh Dutta
Assignee: Jacopo Cappellato
Fix For: SVN trunk
Attachments: OFBiz-3194.patch
Quick look are showing pagination renderNextPrev pagination style when list
size is greater than 20.
In htmlFormMacroLibrary.ftl below given code snippet is hard-coded. :
{#if listSize gt 20}
This can be changed to
{#if listSize gt viewSize}
as viewSize is passed as parameter in macro renderNextPrev. This is also
reported by Matthieu Bollot in developer mailing list.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Resolved: (OFBIZ-3194) Quick look are showing pagination renderNextPrev pagination style when list size is greater than 20
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato resolved OFBIZ-3194.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Thank you Divesh,
your code is in rev. 835925
Jacopo
Quick look are showing pagination renderNextPrev pagination style when list
size is greater than 20
---
Key: OFBIZ-3194
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3194
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components: framework
Affects Versions: SVN trunk
Reporter: Divesh Dutta
Assignee: Jacopo Cappellato
Fix For: SVN trunk
Attachments: OFBiz-3194.patch
Quick look are showing pagination renderNextPrev pagination style when list
size is greater than 20.
In htmlFormMacroLibrary.ftl below given code snippet is hard-coded. :
{#if listSize gt 20}
This can be changed to
{#if listSize gt viewSize}
as viewSize is passed as parameter in macro renderNextPrev. This is also
reported by Matthieu Bollot in developer mailing list.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3195) next/prev missing
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] matthieu bollot updated OFBIZ-3195: --- Attachment: OFBIZ-3195 may be a reflexion will be needed about this stuff, as I'm sure this will happen in a lot of forms next/prev missing - Key: OFBIZ-3195 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3195 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: order Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: matthieu bollot Attachments: OFBIZ-3195 by default, with view-size set to 5, and with less than 20 results, there is no prev/next navig bar in a lookup two screenshots to be understood and a quick patch follow -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3195) next/prev missing
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] matthieu bollot updated OFBIZ-3195: --- Attachment: Capture-OFBizOrderManagerBulkAddSupplierProductIceweaselwork.png Capture-OFBizOrderManagerBulkAddSupplierProductIceweaseldontwork.png next/prev missing - Key: OFBIZ-3195 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3195 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: order Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: matthieu bollot Attachments: Capture-OFBizOrderManagerBulkAddSupplierProductIceweaseldontwork.png, Capture-OFBizOrderManagerBulkAddSupplierProductIceweaselwork.png, OFBIZ-3195 by default, with view-size set to 5, and with less than 20 results, there is no prev/next navig bar in a lookup two screenshots to be understood and a quick patch follow -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Created: (OFBIZ-3196) Manual refund functionality is broken.
Manual refund functionality is broken. --- Key: OFBIZ-3196 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3196 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: order Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: Divesh Dutta Fix For: SVN trunk Manual refund functionality is broken. I have also reported this on developer mailing list. But creating issue so that this can be tracked well. Steps to reproduce the bug: 1) Create a sales order from Order manager application with two or more items. 2) Then approve and Quick ship the entire Order which will complete the order. 3) Then click on Create Return button on Actions Block. 4) You will land on Create new Return Page: Also attaching the screen shot. Here is the link of image: http://img156.yfrog.com/i/screenshot1jw.png/ 5) Click on select all check box and then click on Return Selected items button. 6) You will find that page is broken. Also attaching the screen shot for the same. Here is the link of image: http://img156.yfrog.com/i/screenshot2kn.png/ -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-3195) next/prev missing
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] matthieu bollot closed OFBIZ-3195. -- Resolution: Fixed corrected by jacopo 20 minutes ago, sorry for the noise, and thanks to jacopo next/prev missing - Key: OFBIZ-3195 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3195 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: order Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: matthieu bollot Attachments: Capture-OFBizOrderManagerBulkAddSupplierProductIceweaseldontwork.png, Capture-OFBizOrderManagerBulkAddSupplierProductIceweaselwork.png, OFBIZ-3195 by default, with view-size set to 5, and with less than 20 results, there is no prev/next navig bar in a lookup two screenshots to be understood and a quick patch follow -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3195) next/prev missing
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12777575#action_12777575 ] Divesh Dutta commented on OFBIZ-3195: - Hello Matthieu, I have already created jira issue for this with my fix. Here is the link https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3194 And this is committed by Jacopo in r: 835925. So you take update and try once more. Hope fully this issue will get resolved. Also you may close this issue if your purpose is solved. Thanks -- Divesh Dutta. next/prev missing - Key: OFBIZ-3195 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3195 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: order Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: matthieu bollot Attachments: Capture-OFBizOrderManagerBulkAddSupplierProductIceweaseldontwork.png, Capture-OFBizOrderManagerBulkAddSupplierProductIceweaselwork.png, OFBIZ-3195 by default, with view-size set to 5, and with less than 20 results, there is no prev/next navig bar in a lookup two screenshots to be understood and a quick patch follow -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3195) next/prev missing
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12777576#action_12777576 ] Divesh Dutta commented on OFBIZ-3195: - oops I am also bit late to see your comments. Sorry and discard my comments. next/prev missing - Key: OFBIZ-3195 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3195 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: order Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: matthieu bollot Attachments: Capture-OFBizOrderManagerBulkAddSupplierProductIceweaseldontwork.png, Capture-OFBizOrderManagerBulkAddSupplierProductIceweaselwork.png, OFBIZ-3195 by default, with view-size set to 5, and with less than 20 results, there is no prev/next navig bar in a lookup two screenshots to be understood and a quick patch follow -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: [jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-3195) next/prev missing
Le vendredi 13 novembre 2009 à 17:29 +, matthieu bollot (JIRA) a corrected by jacopo 20 minutes ago, sorry for the noise, and thanks to jacopo which was written by Divesh… So thx to him too. It's late here, but TGIF !
Re: jdk 1.5 or 1.6
Sun : Java SE Java SE for Business Support Road Map (JDKs End of Life) http://java.sun.com/products/archive/eol.policy.html 1.6 supported systems http://java.sun.com/javase/6/webnotes/install/system-configurations.html 15 supported systems http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/system-configurations.html Conclusion (I don't list what is better, only what miss from 1.5 to 1.6) Better for Solaris (no surprises) Windows x86 no longer : Windows 98 (2nd Edition) and Windows ME (who cares ?) no longer : Windows Server 2003, Web Edition (R2, SP1, SP2) and Windows Server 2003, Standard Edition (R2, SP1, SP2) ( a bit more annoying maybe) but still : Windows Server 2003, Enterprise Edition (R2, SP1, SP2) and Windows Server 2003, DataCenter Edition (R2, SP1, SP2) Windows x64 32-bit mode no longer : Windows Server 2008 Datacenter (SP1, SP2) and Windows Web Server 2008 (SP1, SP2) but still : Windows Server 2008 Standard (SP1, SP2) and Windows Server 2008 Enterprise (SP1, SP2) Linux x86 no longer : TurboLinux 8.0 but : Turbo Linux 10 (ONLY Chinese and Japanese Locales. No English.) Linux x64 32-bit mode new : Turbo Linux 10 (ONLY Chinese and Japanese Locales. No English.) From this I can see only problems with Windows Server 2003, Web Edition and Standard Edition Windows Server 2008 Datacenter and Web Server TurboLinux 8.0 Should this only stop us to migrate to jdk 1.6? Personnaly I don't think so, now it's the community to decide... Jacques PS : Postgres does not really bring much with JDBC4 drivers (could be : http://www.artima.com/lejava/articles/jdbc_four.html) JDK 1.6 - JDBC4. Support for JDBC4 methods is limited. The driver builds, but the majority of new methods are stubbed out. http://jdbc.postgresql.org/download.html I come to it from this discussion http://archives.free.net.ph/thread/20090925.160633.e1923a69.fr.html#20090925.160633.e1923a69 A benchmark while at it http://benjchristensen.com/2009/02/12/java-jdk-15-vs-16-performance/ From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com Thanks Adrian, So it's the same concern than 3 years ago, I will check... Jacques From: Adrian Crum adri...@hlmksw.com Running OFBiz on 1.6 is a good idea, because (Sun claims) 1.6 performs better than 1.5. The downside is, there might be servers out there that don't have a 1.6 JRE available. I would like to see us move on to 1.6 (especially now that 1.7 is near), but I'm concerned for existing installations. -Adrian Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi devs, I don't remember why we still use 1.5. Here is a thread from 2006 http://markmail.org/message/5j5es63hpsh543ct. Maybe it's time to think anew about it, don't you think so ? Jacques
Re: Build Error
Phil Steitz has fixed it in DBCP at r835956 I will give a try, but it's not a reason to not argument about 1.5 vs 1.6 ;o) Thanks Jacques From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com Hi Scott, FYI, I have asked about it on u...@commons.apache.org ... BTW, I can't remember the reasons why we stay to 1.5, are they still valid ? Jacques From: Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com I think Jacques is right about the current source code, there are a few minor issues that make it 1.6 only. I made some changes and got it to compile, I'll give it a test run and see how it goes. Regards Scott On 14/11/2009, at 12:00 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: Hmm... yes you are right, Jacques, sorry for that. I will try to find out more information... Jacopo On Nov 13, 2009, at 11:49 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Thanks Jacopo, These are really old ones or do I miss something ? Jacques From: Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/nightly/commons-dbcp/ Jacopo On Nov 13, 2009, at 11:29 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi Scott, At which date was done this nightly build ? Where did you find it ? BTW I have reverted both trunk and 9.04 Jacques From: Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com BTW, the latest nightly build from dbcp works just fine on 1.5 for me, why are you trying to compile dbcp? Regards Scott On 13/11/2009, at 10:36 PM, Scott Gray wrote: I'd suggest that you revert it for now. Regards Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 13/11/2009, at 10:20 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: I not totally sure but yet it seems that new versions of DBCP needs the 1.6 jdk (or jdk 1.4) . Extract from README.TXT : This release of JDBC compiles with and supports JDK 1.3 (JDBC 2.0), JDK 1.4-1.5 (JDBC 3.0) and JDK 1.6 (JDBC 4.0). I tried to build with 1.5 but it failed and I began to find a way out, not obvious... So the alternative is 1) revert DBCP upgrade (fix a bug) 2) Decide to use jdk 1.6 for OFBiz I would not like to push now for the 2d solution but as this upgrade was intended to fix a bug, I wonder if it's not the right time In the meantime (before a decision is taken), I will continue to search a solution to compile with 1.5 but does not seem easy (conditional ANT compile deal with JDBC versions), and I'd not like to rewrite DBCP, even a part, I've other fish to fry ;o) Jacques From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com Thanks Adrian, Yes I did not care and build with ant from Eclipse where I use the 1.6 JDK. I'm on it, not as simple as I thought some problem appeared... In the meantime can you use 1.6 to build ? BTW, could we not change from 1.5 to 1.6, is there any blocking reasons I don't remember ? Jacques From: Adrian Crum adrian.c...@yahoo.com Latest trunk: Compiling 129 source files to C:\ofbiz\framework\entity \build \classes [javac15] C:\ofbiz\framework\entity\src\org\ofbiz\entity \connection\DBCPConnectionFactory.java:21: cannot access org.apache.commons.dbcp.ConnectionFactory [javac15] bad class file: C:\ofbiz\framework\entity\lib\commons-dbcp-1.3-2009- r834702.jar(org/apache/commons/dbcp/ConnectionFactory.class) [javac15] class file has wrong version 50.0, should be 49.0 [javac15] Please remove or make sure it appears in the correct subdirectory of the classpath. [javac15] import org.apache.commons.dbcp.ConnectionFactory; [javac15]^ [javac15] 1 error
Re: jdk 1.5 or 1.6
Thank you for the info! That certainly helps. -Adrian --- On Fri, 11/13/09, Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com wrote: From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com Subject: Re: jdk 1.5 or 1.6 To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org Date: Friday, November 13, 2009, 11:46 AM Sun : Java SE Java SE for Business Support Road Map (JDKs End of Life) http://java.sun.com/products/archive/eol.policy.html 1.6 supported systems http://java.sun.com/javase/6/webnotes/install/system-configurations.html 15 supported systems http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/system-configurations.html Conclusion (I don't list what is better, only what miss from 1.5 to 1.6) Better for Solaris (no surprises) Windows x86 no longer : Windows 98 (2nd Edition) and Windows ME (who cares ?) no longer : Windows Server 2003, Web Edition (R2, SP1, SP2)   and Windows Server 2003, Standard Edition (R2, SP1, SP2) ( a bit more annoying maybe) but still : Windows Server 2003, Enterprise Edition (R2, SP1, SP2) and Windows Server 2003, DataCenter Edition (R2, SP1, SP2) Windows x64 32-bit mode no longer : Windows Server 2008 Datacenter (SP1, SP2) and Windows Web Server 2008 (SP1, SP2) but still : Windows Server 2008 Standard (SP1, SP2) and Windows Server 2008 Enterprise (SP1, SP2) Linux x86 no longer : TurboLinux 8.0 but : Turbo Linux 10 (ONLY Chinese and Japanese Locales. No English.) Linux x64 32-bit mode new : Turbo Linux 10 (ONLY Chinese and Japanese Locales. No English.) From this I can see only problems with Windows Server 2003, Web Edition and Standard Edition Windows Server 2008 Datacenter and Web Server TurboLinux 8.0 Should this only stop us to migrate to jdk 1.6? Personnaly I don't think so, now it's the community to decide... Jacques PS : Postgres does not really bring much with JDBC4 drivers (could be : http://www.artima.com/lejava/articles/jdbc_four.html) JDK 1.6 - JDBC4. Support for JDBC4 methods is limited. The driver builds, but the majority of new methods are stubbed out. http://jdbc.postgresql.org/download.html I come to it from this discussion http://archives.free.net.ph/thread/20090925.160633.e1923a69.fr.html#20090925.160633.e1923a69 A benchmark while at it http://benjchristensen.com/2009/02/12/java-jdk-15-vs-16-performance/ From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com Thanks Adrian, So it's the same concern than 3 years ago, I will check... Jacques From: Adrian Crum adri...@hlmksw.com Running OFBiz on 1.6 is a good idea, because (Sun claims) 1.6 performs better than 1.5. The downside is, there might be servers out there that don't have a 1.6 JRE available. I would like to see us move on to 1.6 (especially now that 1.7 is near), but I'm concerned for existing installations. -Adrian Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi devs, I don't remember why we still use 1.5. Here is a thread from 2006 http://markmail.org/message/5j5es63hpsh543ct. Maybe it's time to think anew about it, don't you think so ? Jacques
Re: Build Error
It works like a charm, I will replace... Jacques From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com Phil Steitz has fixed it in DBCP at r835956 I will give a try, but it's not a reason to not argument about 1.5 vs 1.6 ;o) Thanks Jacques From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com Hi Scott, FYI, I have asked about it on u...@commons.apache.org ... BTW, I can't remember the reasons why we stay to 1.5, are they still valid ? Jacques From: Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com I think Jacques is right about the current source code, there are a few minor issues that make it 1.6 only. I made some changes and got it to compile, I'll give it a test run and see how it goes. Regards Scott On 14/11/2009, at 12:00 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: Hmm... yes you are right, Jacques, sorry for that. I will try to find out more information... Jacopo On Nov 13, 2009, at 11:49 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Thanks Jacopo, These are really old ones or do I miss something ? Jacques From: Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/nightly/commons-dbcp/ Jacopo On Nov 13, 2009, at 11:29 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi Scott, At which date was done this nightly build ? Where did you find it ? BTW I have reverted both trunk and 9.04 Jacques From: Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com BTW, the latest nightly build from dbcp works just fine on 1.5 for me, why are you trying to compile dbcp? Regards Scott On 13/11/2009, at 10:36 PM, Scott Gray wrote: I'd suggest that you revert it for now. Regards Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 13/11/2009, at 10:20 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: I not totally sure but yet it seems that new versions of DBCP needs the 1.6 jdk (or jdk 1.4) . Extract from README.TXT : This release of JDBC compiles with and supports JDK 1.3 (JDBC 2.0), JDK 1.4-1.5 (JDBC 3.0) and JDK 1.6 (JDBC 4.0). I tried to build with 1.5 but it failed and I began to find a way out, not obvious... So the alternative is 1) revert DBCP upgrade (fix a bug) 2) Decide to use jdk 1.6 for OFBiz I would not like to push now for the 2d solution but as this upgrade was intended to fix a bug, I wonder if it's not the right time In the meantime (before a decision is taken), I will continue to search a solution to compile with 1.5 but does not seem easy (conditional ANT compile deal with JDBC versions), and I'd not like to rewrite DBCP, even a part, I've other fish to fry ;o) Jacques From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com Thanks Adrian, Yes I did not care and build with ant from Eclipse where I use the 1.6 JDK. I'm on it, not as simple as I thought some problem appeared... In the meantime can you use 1.6 to build ? BTW, could we not change from 1.5 to 1.6, is there any blocking reasons I don't remember ? Jacques From: Adrian Crum adrian.c...@yahoo.com Latest trunk: Compiling 129 source files to C:\ofbiz\framework\entity \build \classes [javac15] C:\ofbiz\framework\entity\src\org\ofbiz\entity \connection\DBCPConnectionFactory.java:21: cannot access org.apache.commons.dbcp.ConnectionFactory [javac15] bad class file: C:\ofbiz\framework\entity\lib\commons-dbcp-1.3-2009- r834702.jar(org/apache/commons/dbcp/ConnectionFactory.class) [javac15] class file has wrong version 50.0, should be 49.0 [javac15] Please remove or make sure it appears in the correct subdirectory of the classpath. [javac15] import org.apache.commons.dbcp.ConnectionFactory; [javac15]^ [javac15] 1 error
Re: jdk 1.5 or 1.6
What is not clear to me is what are we missing out on by supporting both as we currently do, I think DBCP is an odd case because they obviously have tried to support 1.5 but it seems there are a couple of very minor bugs that prevent that support. Other than DBCP what would we actually change (and why) that would prevent 1.5 support? Thanks Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 14/11/2009, at 8:46 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Sun : Java SE Java SE for Business Support Road Map (JDKs End of Life) http://java.sun.com/products/archive/eol.policy.html 1.6 supported systems http://java.sun.com/javase/6/webnotes/install/system-configurations.html 15 supported systems http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/system-configurations.html Conclusion (I don't list what is better, only what miss from 1.5 to 1.6) Better for Solaris (no surprises) Windows x86 no longer : Windows 98 (2nd Edition) and Windows ME (who cares ?) no longer : Windows Server 2003, Web Edition (R2, SP1, SP2) and Windows Server 2003, Standard Edition (R2, SP1, SP2) ( a bit more annoying maybe) but still : Windows Server 2003, Enterprise Edition (R2, SP1, SP2) and Windows Server 2003, DataCenter Edition (R2, SP1, SP2) Windows x64 32-bit mode no longer : Windows Server 2008 Datacenter (SP1, SP2) and Windows Web Server 2008 (SP1, SP2) but still : Windows Server 2008 Standard (SP1, SP2) and Windows Server 2008 Enterprise (SP1, SP2) Linux x86 no longer : TurboLinux 8.0 but : Turbo Linux 10 (ONLY Chinese and Japanese Locales. No English.) Linux x64 32-bit mode new : Turbo Linux 10 (ONLY Chinese and Japanese Locales. No English.) From this I can see only problems with Windows Server 2003, Web Edition and Standard Edition Windows Server 2008 Datacenter and Web Server TurboLinux 8.0 Should this only stop us to migrate to jdk 1.6? Personnaly I don't think so, now it's the community to decide... Jacques PS : Postgres does not really bring much with JDBC4 drivers (could be : http://www.artima.com/lejava/articles/jdbc_four.html) JDK 1.6 - JDBC4. Support for JDBC4 methods is limited. The driver builds, but the majority of new methods are stubbed out. http://jdbc.postgresql.org/download.html I come to it from this discussion http://archives.free.net.ph/thread/20090925.160633.e1923a69.fr.html#20090925.160633.e1923a69 A benchmark while at it http://benjchristensen.com/2009/02/12/java-jdk-15-vs-16-performance/ From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com Thanks Adrian, So it's the same concern than 3 years ago, I will check... Jacques From: Adrian Crum adri...@hlmksw.com Running OFBiz on 1.6 is a good idea, because (Sun claims) 1.6 performs better than 1.5. The downside is, there might be servers out there that don't have a 1.6 JRE available. I would like to see us move on to 1.6 (especially now that 1.7 is near), but I'm concerned for existing installations. -Adrian Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi devs, I don't remember why we still use 1.5. Here is a thread from 2006 http://markmail.org/message/5j5es63hpsh543ct. Maybe it's time to think anew about it, don't you think so ? Jacques smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: jdk 1.5 or 1.6
I will commit soon using DBCP r835956 and this problem will have dissapeared. As not much as been done from Postgres to support JDBC 4 we don't need really to turn to new drivers OOTB and if someone needs them (on another DB or context or what else) s/he could do it anyway but will have to replace the DBCP (it's easily done) It's also good to know that not much has been lost, from a platform POV, when using 1.6. Jacques From: Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com What is not clear to me is what are we missing out on by supporting both as we currently do, I think DBCP is an odd case because they obviously have tried to support 1.5 but it seems there are a couple of very minor bugs that prevent that support. Other than DBCP what would we actually change (and why) that would prevent 1.5 support? Thanks Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 14/11/2009, at 8:46 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Sun : Java SE Java SE for Business Support Road Map (JDKs End of Life) http://java.sun.com/products/archive/eol.policy.html 1.6 supported systems http://java.sun.com/javase/6/webnotes/install/system-configurations.html 15 supported systems http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/system-configurations.html Conclusion (I don't list what is better, only what miss from 1.5 to 1.6) Better for Solaris (no surprises) Windows x86 no longer : Windows 98 (2nd Edition) and Windows ME (who cares ?) no longer : Windows Server 2003, Web Edition (R2, SP1, SP2) and Windows Server 2003, Standard Edition (R2, SP1, SP2) ( a bit more annoying maybe) but still : Windows Server 2003, Enterprise Edition (R2, SP1, SP2) and Windows Server 2003, DataCenter Edition (R2, SP1, SP2) Windows x64 32-bit mode no longer : Windows Server 2008 Datacenter (SP1, SP2) and Windows Web Server 2008 (SP1, SP2) but still : Windows Server 2008 Standard (SP1, SP2) and Windows Server 2008 Enterprise (SP1, SP2) Linux x86 no longer : TurboLinux 8.0 but : Turbo Linux 10 (ONLY Chinese and Japanese Locales. No English.) Linux x64 32-bit mode new : Turbo Linux 10 (ONLY Chinese and Japanese Locales. No English.) From this I can see only problems with Windows Server 2003, Web Edition and Standard Edition Windows Server 2008 Datacenter and Web Server TurboLinux 8.0 Should this only stop us to migrate to jdk 1.6? Personnaly I don't think so, now it's the community to decide... Jacques PS : Postgres does not really bring much with JDBC4 drivers (could be : http://www.artima.com/lejava/articles/jdbc_four.html) JDK 1.6 - JDBC4. Support for JDBC4 methods is limited. The driver builds, but the majority of new methods are stubbed out. http://jdbc.postgresql.org/download.html I come to it from this discussion http://archives.free.net.ph/thread/20090925.160633.e1923a69.fr.html#20090925.160633.e1923a69 A benchmark while at it http://benjchristensen.com/2009/02/12/java-jdk-15-vs-16-performance/ From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com Thanks Adrian, So it's the same concern than 3 years ago, I will check... Jacques From: Adrian Crum adri...@hlmksw.com Running OFBiz on 1.6 is a good idea, because (Sun claims) 1.6 performs better than 1.5. The downside is, there might be servers out there that don't have a 1.6 JRE available. I would like to see us move on to 1.6 (especially now that 1.7 is near), but I'm concerned for existing installations. -Adrian Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi devs, I don't remember why we still use 1.5. Here is a thread from 2006 http://markmail.org/message/5j5es63hpsh543ct. Maybe it's time to think anew about it, don't you think so ? Jacques
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3194) Quick look are showing pagination renderNextPrev pagination style when list size is greater than 20
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12777683#action_12777683
]
Bruno Busco commented on OFBIZ-3194:
The value 20 hardcoded was used because it is the minimum of the available
viewSize.
With the change you have done the problem is that when you select, lets say 30
as viewSize, and you have a listSize of 25 there is no way to switch back to
viewSize 20 because the pagination is not rendered anymore.
Quick look are showing pagination renderNextPrev pagination style when list
size is greater than 20
---
Key: OFBIZ-3194
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3194
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components: framework
Affects Versions: SVN trunk
Reporter: Divesh Dutta
Assignee: Jacopo Cappellato
Fix For: SVN trunk
Attachments: OFBiz-3194.patch
Quick look are showing pagination renderNextPrev pagination style when list
size is greater than 20.
In htmlFormMacroLibrary.ftl below given code snippet is hard-coded. :
{#if listSize gt 20}
This can be changed to
{#if listSize gt viewSize}
as viewSize is passed as parameter in macro renderNextPrev. This is also
reported by Matthieu Bollot in developer mailing list.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3156) A draft version of a new theme
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bruno Busco updated OFBIZ-3156: --- Attachment: OFBIZ-3156+newtabbar.patch An updated patch to be used to show correctly the tabbars with this theme. A draft version of a new theme -- Key: OFBIZ-3156 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3156 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Bruno Busco Priority: Minor Attachments: French not translated.jpg, French translated.jpg, newlight.zip, newlight.zip, OFBIZ-3156 newtabbar.patch, OFBIZ-3156+newtabbar.patch, OFBIZ-3156+newtabbar.patch, ss1.GIF, ss2.GIF, ss3.GIF, ss4.GIF, ss5.GIF, ss6.GIF, Sub-menu not visible.jpg Hi, I have a draft version of a new theme I would like to show you. This has been developed (not yet finished) following the great Ryan Foster's suggestions you can read here http://n4.nabble.com/Feedbacks-on-Bluelight-theme-td252746.html#a252817 The main Idea is to make it more clear how the menu selection works combining a breadcrumbs function with a navigation function. The theme is attached as a zip file that should be installed in the themes folder. A further change I propose here is to slightly modify how the application tabbar is rendered. You can find the change in the attached patch. Basically, as you can see in the screenshots, the tab bar is rendered attached to the navigation menu with the same background color. This gives the clear idea that the tabbar is an extension of the selection in the menu. In the patch only some of the screens have been modified to this new pattern but a change in the other themes is also included so that nothing should change when other themes are selected. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-2599) Memory leak due to transaction management
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-2599. -- Resolution: Fixed Finally fixed, after a fix from Phil Steitz in DBCP at r835966. Trunk r836015, R9.04 r836020 Memory leak due to transaction management - Key: OFBIZ-2599 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2599 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: framework Affects Versions: Release Branch 9.04, SVN trunk Environment: jdk5, commons-dbcp-head Reporter: Philippe Mouawad Assignee: Jacques Le Roux Priority: Critical Fix For: Release Branch 9.04, SVN trunk Attachments: commons-dbcp-1.3-r674758-patched.jar, memory.png, patch-DBCPConneectionFactory.txt Hello, We are been using Ofbiz with DBCP based implementation. Ofbiz uses a Head revision of DBCP (package org.apache.commons.dbcp.managed is the same as current TRUNK) and geronimo-transaction-1.0. We are having recurrent OutOfMemory which occur on a 2 days basis. See: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBCP-294 Philippe Mouawad http://www.ubik-ingenierie.com -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3194) Quick look are showing pagination renderNextPrev pagination style when list size is greater than 20
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12777694#action_12777694
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3194:
Then we should reopen, isn'it ?
Quick look are showing pagination renderNextPrev pagination style when list
size is greater than 20
---
Key: OFBIZ-3194
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3194
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components: framework
Affects Versions: SVN trunk
Reporter: Divesh Dutta
Assignee: Jacopo Cappellato
Fix For: SVN trunk
Attachments: OFBiz-3194.patch
Quick look are showing pagination renderNextPrev pagination style when list
size is greater than 20.
In htmlFormMacroLibrary.ftl below given code snippet is hard-coded. :
{#if listSize gt 20}
This can be changed to
{#if listSize gt viewSize}
as viewSize is passed as parameter in macro renderNextPrev. This is also
reported by Matthieu Bollot in developer mailing list.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3156) A draft version of a new theme
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-3156: --- Attachment: Hard to read menu in order creation.jpg Hi Bruno, I really like it, but I find the order creation menu still difficukt to read (FF3.5.5 on XP) Thanks! A draft version of a new theme -- Key: OFBIZ-3156 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3156 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Bruno Busco Priority: Minor Attachments: French not translated.jpg, French translated.jpg, Hard to read menu in order creation.jpg, newlight.zip, newlight.zip, OFBIZ-3156 newtabbar.patch, OFBIZ-3156+newtabbar.patch, OFBIZ-3156+newtabbar.patch, ss1.GIF, ss2.GIF, ss3.GIF, ss4.GIF, ss5.GIF, ss6.GIF, Sub-menu not visible.jpg Hi, I have a draft version of a new theme I would like to show you. This has been developed (not yet finished) following the great Ryan Foster's suggestions you can read here http://n4.nabble.com/Feedbacks-on-Bluelight-theme-td252746.html#a252817 The main Idea is to make it more clear how the menu selection works combining a breadcrumbs function with a navigation function. The theme is attached as a zip file that should be installed in the themes folder. A further change I propose here is to slightly modify how the application tabbar is rendered. You can find the change in the attached patch. Basically, as you can see in the screenshots, the tab bar is rendered attached to the navigation menu with the same background color. This gives the clear idea that the tabbar is an extension of the selection in the menu. In the patch only some of the screens have been modified to this new pattern but a change in the other themes is also included so that nothing should change when other themes are selected. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3156) A draft version of a new theme
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=1206#action_1206 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3156: The screen copy is Hard to read menu in order creation.jpg (sorry to be verbose, tired) A draft version of a new theme -- Key: OFBIZ-3156 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3156 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Bruno Busco Priority: Minor Attachments: French not translated.jpg, French translated.jpg, Hard to read menu in order creation.jpg, newlight.zip, newlight.zip, OFBIZ-3156 newtabbar.patch, OFBIZ-3156+newtabbar.patch, OFBIZ-3156+newtabbar.patch, ss1.GIF, ss2.GIF, ss3.GIF, ss4.GIF, ss5.GIF, ss6.GIF, Sub-menu not visible.jpg Hi, I have a draft version of a new theme I would like to show you. This has been developed (not yet finished) following the great Ryan Foster's suggestions you can read here http://n4.nabble.com/Feedbacks-on-Bluelight-theme-td252746.html#a252817 The main Idea is to make it more clear how the menu selection works combining a breadcrumbs function with a navigation function. The theme is attached as a zip file that should be installed in the themes folder. A further change I propose here is to slightly modify how the application tabbar is rendered. You can find the change in the attached patch. Basically, as you can see in the screenshots, the tab bar is rendered attached to the navigation menu with the same background color. This gives the clear idea that the tabbar is an extension of the selection in the menu. In the patch only some of the screens have been modified to this new pattern but a change in the other themes is also included so that nothing should change when other themes are selected. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3156) A draft version of a new theme
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=1205#action_1205 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3156: I have added a screen-copy. I have not used it much yet. But I believe it will be my prefered... Sober and clean (despite dropping crumbs ;) ) A draft version of a new theme -- Key: OFBIZ-3156 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3156 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Bruno Busco Priority: Minor Attachments: French not translated.jpg, French translated.jpg, Hard to read menu in order creation.jpg, newlight.zip, newlight.zip, OFBIZ-3156 newtabbar.patch, OFBIZ-3156+newtabbar.patch, OFBIZ-3156+newtabbar.patch, ss1.GIF, ss2.GIF, ss3.GIF, ss4.GIF, ss5.GIF, ss6.GIF, Sub-menu not visible.jpg Hi, I have a draft version of a new theme I would like to show you. This has been developed (not yet finished) following the great Ryan Foster's suggestions you can read here http://n4.nabble.com/Feedbacks-on-Bluelight-theme-td252746.html#a252817 The main Idea is to make it more clear how the menu selection works combining a breadcrumbs function with a navigation function. The theme is attached as a zip file that should be installed in the themes folder. A further change I propose here is to slightly modify how the application tabbar is rendered. You can find the change in the attached patch. Basically, as you can see in the screenshots, the tab bar is rendered attached to the navigation menu with the same background color. This gives the clear idea that the tabbar is an extension of the selection in the menu. In the patch only some of the screens have been modified to this new pattern but a change in the other themes is also included so that nothing should change when other themes are selected. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3156) A draft version of a new theme
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=1208#action_1208 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3156: Ha, also it would be maybe preferable to split he 1st long menu in 2 columns (int the same menu, like in BIzness Time) else it's too long A draft version of a new theme -- Key: OFBIZ-3156 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3156 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Bruno Busco Priority: Minor Attachments: French not translated.jpg, French translated.jpg, Hard to read menu in order creation.jpg, newlight.zip, newlight.zip, OFBIZ-3156 newtabbar.patch, OFBIZ-3156+newtabbar.patch, OFBIZ-3156+newtabbar.patch, ss1.GIF, ss2.GIF, ss3.GIF, ss4.GIF, ss5.GIF, ss6.GIF, Sub-menu not visible.jpg Hi, I have a draft version of a new theme I would like to show you. This has been developed (not yet finished) following the great Ryan Foster's suggestions you can read here http://n4.nabble.com/Feedbacks-on-Bluelight-theme-td252746.html#a252817 The main Idea is to make it more clear how the menu selection works combining a breadcrumbs function with a navigation function. The theme is attached as a zip file that should be installed in the themes folder. A further change I propose here is to slightly modify how the application tabbar is rendered. You can find the change in the attached patch. Basically, as you can see in the screenshots, the tab bar is rendered attached to the navigation menu with the same background color. This gives the clear idea that the tabbar is an extension of the selection in the menu. In the patch only some of the screens have been modified to this new pattern but a change in the other themes is also included so that nothing should change when other themes are selected. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3156) A draft version of a new theme
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=1212#action_1212 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3156: I have commited OFBIZ-3156+newtabbar.patch at r836044 A draft version of a new theme -- Key: OFBIZ-3156 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3156 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Bruno Busco Priority: Minor Attachments: French not translated.jpg, French translated.jpg, Hard to read menu in order creation.jpg, newlight.zip, newlight.zip, OFBIZ-3156 newtabbar.patch, OFBIZ-3156+newtabbar.patch, OFBIZ-3156+newtabbar.patch, ss1.GIF, ss2.GIF, ss3.GIF, ss4.GIF, ss5.GIF, ss6.GIF, Sub-menu not visible.jpg Hi, I have a draft version of a new theme I would like to show you. This has been developed (not yet finished) following the great Ryan Foster's suggestions you can read here http://n4.nabble.com/Feedbacks-on-Bluelight-theme-td252746.html#a252817 The main Idea is to make it more clear how the menu selection works combining a breadcrumbs function with a navigation function. The theme is attached as a zip file that should be installed in the themes folder. A further change I propose here is to slightly modify how the application tabbar is rendered. You can find the change in the attached patch. Basically, as you can see in the screenshots, the tab bar is rendered attached to the navigation menu with the same background color. This gives the clear idea that the tabbar is an extension of the selection in the menu. In the patch only some of the screens have been modified to this new pattern but a change in the other themes is also included so that nothing should change when other themes are selected. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: javascript new files
OK I guess the answers are YES Jacques From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com Hi, It seems that there would be more and more new javascript files not parts of a library (Dojo, etc.). Should we not recommend to this OFBiz specific files to use the same best tractices (no tabs, etc.) than for others ? Thanks Jacques
Apache Infrastructure
All, Gavin just closed the issue for setting up everything on Apache Infrastructure. At this point, he is saying that the only thing left to do is move the docs.ofbiz.org stuff over to the Apache based confluence and we should be good to go. I have not had much time to look into what he's been doing over there - other than providing pointers and helpful hints as to how I set this stuff up in the past. For those of you that were looking for this to be on Apache Infra - here's your chance to dive in and make it happen! Please let me know when it's all ready and we can shutdown the servers that we've been maintaining. If you need any additional support from me as to ensuring that nothing's getting missed, I'm happy to provide it as well. Thanks again to everyone who's been helping look at these servers at Contegix - I think they've done an amazing job and will continue to until we get word that the community is ready for the move. Cheers, Ruppert -- Tim Ruppert HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com o:801.649.6594 f:801.649.6595 smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: jdk 1.5 or 1.6
We had to make this decision before with 1.4 - 1.5, and if I remember right from 1.3 - 1.4 too. Sooner or later we need to deprecate support for 1.5 in order to move on, and to more easily be able to update various libraries and such. The 1.5 - 1.6 transition is a bit of a pain because they did a few changes that were not backwards compatible. Because of that it would be particularly nice to deprecate support for 1.5 and require 1.6 (or later, as possible/available). In any case, our criteria before was to deprecate support for the older version of Java as soon as the newer version was widely available. At this point I think 1.6 qualifies well for that... unless there are specific systems people use that still can't run 1.6 then we should just update that requirement. -David On Nov 13, 2009, at 1:02 PM, Scott Gray wrote: What is not clear to me is what are we missing out on by supporting both as we currently do, I think DBCP is an odd case because they obviously have tried to support 1.5 but it seems there are a couple of very minor bugs that prevent that support. Other than DBCP what would we actually change (and why) that would prevent 1.5 support? Thanks Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 14/11/2009, at 8:46 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Sun : Java SE Java SE for Business Support Road Map (JDKs End of Life) http://java.sun.com/products/archive/eol.policy.html 1.6 supported systems http://java.sun.com/javase/6/webnotes/install/system-configurations.html 15 supported systems http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/system-configurations.html Conclusion (I don't list what is better, only what miss from 1.5 to 1.6) Better for Solaris (no surprises) Windows x86 no longer : Windows 98 (2nd Edition) and Windows ME (who cares ?) no longer : Windows Server 2003, Web Edition (R2, SP1, SP2) and Windows Server 2003, Standard Edition (R2, SP1, SP2) ( a bit more annoying maybe) but still : Windows Server 2003, Enterprise Edition (R2, SP1, SP2) and Windows Server 2003, DataCenter Edition (R2, SP1, SP2) Windows x64 32-bit mode no longer : Windows Server 2008 Datacenter (SP1, SP2) and Windows Web Server 2008 (SP1, SP2) but still : Windows Server 2008 Standard (SP1, SP2) and Windows Server 2008 Enterprise (SP1, SP2) Linux x86 no longer : TurboLinux 8.0 but : Turbo Linux 10 (ONLY Chinese and Japanese Locales. No English.) Linux x64 32-bit mode new : Turbo Linux 10 (ONLY Chinese and Japanese Locales. No English.) From this I can see only problems with Windows Server 2003, Web Edition and Standard Edition Windows Server 2008 Datacenter and Web Server TurboLinux 8.0 Should this only stop us to migrate to jdk 1.6? Personnaly I don't think so, now it's the community to decide... Jacques PS : Postgres does not really bring much with JDBC4 drivers (could be : http://www.artima.com/lejava/articles/jdbc_four.html ) JDK 1.6 - JDBC4. Support for JDBC4 methods is limited. The driver builds, but the majority of new methods are stubbed out. http://jdbc.postgresql.org/download.html I come to it from this discussion http://archives.free.net.ph/thread/20090925.160633.e1923a69.fr.html#20090925.160633.e1923a69 A benchmark while at it http://benjchristensen.com/2009/02/12/java-jdk-15-vs-16-performance/ From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com Thanks Adrian, So it's the same concern than 3 years ago, I will check... Jacques From: Adrian Crum adri...@hlmksw.com Running OFBiz on 1.6 is a good idea, because (Sun claims) 1.6 performs better than 1.5. The downside is, there might be servers out there that don't have a 1.6 JRE available. I would like to see us move on to 1.6 (especially now that 1.7 is near), but I'm concerned for existing installations. -Adrian Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi devs, I don't remember why we still use 1.5. Here is a thread from 2006 http://markmail.org/message/5j5es63hpsh543ct. Maybe it's time to think anew about it, don't you think so ? Jacques
Re: jdk 1.5 or 1.6
+1 - I totally agree. People can always run the release branch if they need to stay on 1.5, but the show must go on! Cheers, Ruppert On Nov 13, 2009, at 9:32 PM, David E Jones wrote: We had to make this decision before with 1.4 - 1.5, and if I remember right from 1.3 - 1.4 too. Sooner or later we need to deprecate support for 1.5 in order to move on, and to more easily be able to update various libraries and such. The 1.5 - 1.6 transition is a bit of a pain because they did a few changes that were not backwards compatible. Because of that it would be particularly nice to deprecate support for 1.5 and require 1.6 (or later, as possible/available). In any case, our criteria before was to deprecate support for the older version of Java as soon as the newer version was widely available. At this point I think 1.6 qualifies well for that... unless there are specific systems people use that still can't run 1.6 then we should just update that requirement. -David On Nov 13, 2009, at 1:02 PM, Scott Gray wrote: What is not clear to me is what are we missing out on by supporting both as we currently do, I think DBCP is an odd case because they obviously have tried to support 1.5 but it seems there are a couple of very minor bugs that prevent that support. Other than DBCP what would we actually change (and why) that would prevent 1.5 support? Thanks Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 14/11/2009, at 8:46 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Sun : Java SE Java SE for Business Support Road Map (JDKs End of Life) http://java.sun.com/products/archive/eol.policy.html 1.6 supported systems http://java.sun.com/javase/6/webnotes/install/system-configurations.html 15 supported systems http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/system-configurations.html Conclusion (I don't list what is better, only what miss from 1.5 to 1.6) Better for Solaris (no surprises) Windows x86 no longer : Windows 98 (2nd Edition) and Windows ME (who cares ?) no longer : Windows Server 2003, Web Edition (R2, SP1, SP2) and Windows Server 2003, Standard Edition (R2, SP1, SP2) ( a bit more annoying maybe) but still : Windows Server 2003, Enterprise Edition (R2, SP1, SP2) and Windows Server 2003, DataCenter Edition (R2, SP1, SP2) Windows x64 32-bit mode no longer : Windows Server 2008 Datacenter (SP1, SP2) and Windows Web Server 2008 (SP1, SP2) but still : Windows Server 2008 Standard (SP1, SP2) and Windows Server 2008 Enterprise (SP1, SP2) Linux x86 no longer : TurboLinux 8.0 but : Turbo Linux 10 (ONLY Chinese and Japanese Locales. No English.) Linux x64 32-bit mode new : Turbo Linux 10 (ONLY Chinese and Japanese Locales. No English.) From this I can see only problems with Windows Server 2003, Web Edition and Standard Edition Windows Server 2008 Datacenter and Web Server TurboLinux 8.0 Should this only stop us to migrate to jdk 1.6? Personnaly I don't think so, now it's the community to decide... Jacques PS : Postgres does not really bring much with JDBC4 drivers (could be : http://www.artima.com/lejava/articles/jdbc_four.html ) JDK 1.6 - JDBC4. Support for JDBC4 methods is limited. The driver builds, but the majority of new methods are stubbed out. http://jdbc.postgresql.org/download.html I come to it from this discussion http://archives.free.net.ph/thread/20090925.160633.e1923a69.fr.html#20090925.160633.e1923a69 A benchmark while at it http://benjchristensen.com/2009/02/12/java-jdk-15-vs-16-performance/ From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com Thanks Adrian, So it's the same concern than 3 years ago, I will check... Jacques From: Adrian Crum adri...@hlmksw.com Running OFBiz on 1.6 is a good idea, because (Sun claims) 1.6 performs better than 1.5. The downside is, there might be servers out there that don't have a 1.6 JRE available. I would like to see us move on to 1.6 (especially now that 1.7 is near), but I'm concerned for existing installations. -Adrian Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi devs, I don't remember why we still use 1.5. Here is a thread from 2006 http://markmail.org/message/5j5es63hpsh543ct. Maybe it's time to think anew about it, don't you think so ? Jacques smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3197) Batch payment issue
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3197?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12777823#action_12777823 ] Sumit Pandit commented on OFBIZ-3197: - Proposed solution - Payment Batches are created by assigning of Payments to FinAccount. In batching FinAccountTrans record is created and then it is assigned to Payment. So on canceling payment batch if FinAccountTrans status set to cancel. And then association of Payment to FinAccount break and it will available for another batch. Batch payment issue --- Key: OFBIZ-3197 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3197 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Improvement Components: accounting Reporter: Sumit Pandit Priority: Minor Fix For: SVN trunk On canceling a payment batch (payment group), payment group members (payments) should available for any another batch. Currently it is not happen. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3197) Batch payment issue
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3197?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sumit Pandit updated OFBIZ-3197: Attachment: OFBIZ_3197.patch Patch is attached for specified functionality. Batch payment issue --- Key: OFBIZ-3197 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3197 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Improvement Components: accounting Reporter: Sumit Pandit Priority: Minor Fix For: SVN trunk Attachments: OFBIZ_3197.patch On canceling a payment batch (payment group), payment group members (payments) should available for any another batch. Currently it is not happen. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Assigned: (OFBIZ-3197) Batch payment issue
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3197?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ashish Vijaywargiya reassigned OFBIZ-3197: -- Assignee: Ashish Vijaywargiya Batch payment issue --- Key: OFBIZ-3197 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3197 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Improvement Components: accounting Reporter: Sumit Pandit Assignee: Ashish Vijaywargiya Priority: Minor Fix For: SVN trunk Attachments: OFBIZ_3197.patch On canceling a payment batch (payment group), payment group members (payments) should available for any another batch. Currently it is not happen. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-3197) Batch payment issue
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3197?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ashish Vijaywargiya closed OFBIZ-3197. -- Resolution: Fixed Thanks Sumit - Done at r836129. -- Ashish Batch payment issue --- Key: OFBIZ-3197 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3197 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Improvement Components: accounting Reporter: Sumit Pandit Assignee: Ashish Vijaywargiya Priority: Minor Fix For: SVN trunk Attachments: OFBIZ_3197.patch On canceling a payment batch (payment group), payment group members (payments) should available for any another batch. Currently it is not happen. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: jdk 1.5 or 1.6
+1. -- Ashish On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 10:02 AM, David E Jones d...@me.com wrote: We had to make this decision before with 1.4 - 1.5, and if I remember right from 1.3 - 1.4 too. Sooner or later we need to deprecate support for 1.5 in order to move on, and to more easily be able to update various libraries and such. The 1.5 - 1.6 transition is a bit of a pain because they did a few changes that were not backwards compatible. Because of that it would be particularly nice to deprecate support for 1.5 and require 1.6 (or later, as possible/available). In any case, our criteria before was to deprecate support for the older version of Java as soon as the newer version was widely available. At this point I think 1.6 qualifies well for that... unless there are specific systems people use that still can't run 1.6 then we should just update that requirement. -David
Re: jdk 1.5 or 1.6
+1 -- Ashish On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Tim Ruppert tim.rupp...@hotwaxmedia.comwrote: +1 - I totally agree. People can always run the release branch if they need to stay on 1.5, but the show must go on! Cheers, Ruppert
Re: svn commit: r831098 - /ofbiz/trunk/framework/webapp/src/org/ofbiz/webapp/event/ServiceMultiEventHandler.java (Manual return functionality is broken)
Hi Divesh,
Did you open a Jira for that ?
Thanks
Jacques
From: Divesh Dutta divesh.du...@hotwaxmedia.com
Also Adding urls of the image which I described. Please see my comments inline:
Divesh Dutta wrote:
Hello Bilgin and others,
I found that Manual refund functionality is broken due to this commit . Steps
to reproduce the error:
1) Create a sales order from Order manager application with two or more items.
2) Then approve and Quick ship the entire Order which will complete the order.
3) Then click on Create Return button on Actions Block.
4) You will land on Create new Return Page: Also attaching the screen shot.
(Screenshot-1)
http://img156.yfrog.com/i/screenshot1jw.png/
5) Click on select all check box and then click on Return Selected items
button.
6) You will find that page is broken. Also attaching the screen shot for the
same. (Screenshot-2)
http://img156.yfrog.com/i/screenshot2kn.png/
After doing research on this I found that reason for this code failure is in createReturnAndItemOrAdjustment simple method in
OrderReturnServices.xml. This is because in below given code snippet :
1if-empty field=parameters.returnId
2 set-service-fields service-name=createReturnHeader map=parameters
to-map=returnHeaderInMap/
3 call-service service-name=createReturnHeader
in-map-name=returnHeaderInMap
4 result-to-field result-name=returnId field=returnId/
5 /call-service
6 check-errors/
7 set field=parameters.returnId from-field=returnId/
8 field-to-result field=returnId result-name=returnId/
9 /if-empty
parameters.returnId field is always empty when this service is called as
service-multi even though it is set in line #7.
And if I revert your this commit then this functionality is working fine.
So It will be great if you or any one else, give the reason of this commit and also provide fix or alternate way to solve this
issue.
Thanks
--
Divesh Dutta.
bibr...@apache.org wrote:
Author: bibryam
Date: Thu Oct 29 21:35:49 2009
New Revision: 831098
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=831098view=rev
Log:
Prevent overriding of service results in a service-multi type events.
Modified:
ofbiz/trunk/framework/webapp/src/org/ofbiz/webapp/event/ServiceMultiEventHandler.java
Modified:
ofbiz/trunk/framework/webapp/src/org/ofbiz/webapp/event/ServiceMultiEventHandler.java
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/framework/webapp/src/org/ofbiz/webapp/event/ServiceMultiEventHandler.java?rev=831098r1=831097r2=831098view=diff
==
---
ofbiz/trunk/framework/webapp/src/org/ofbiz/webapp/event/ServiceMultiEventHandler.java (original)
+++
ofbiz/trunk/framework/webapp/src/org/ofbiz/webapp/event/ServiceMultiEventHandler.java
Thu Oct 29 21:35:49 2009
@@ -339,7 +339,7 @@
if
(!UtilValidate.isEmpty(result.get(ModelService.SUCCESS_MESSAGE_LIST))) {
ListString newSuccessMessages =
UtilGenerics.StringcheckList(result.get(ModelService.SUCCESS_MESSAGE_LIST));
for (int j = 0; j newSuccessMessages.size(); j++) {
-String newSuccessMessage =
(String)newSuccessMessages.get(j);
+String newSuccessMessage =
newSuccessMessages.get(j);
if (!successMessages.contains(newSuccessMessage)) {
successMessages.add(newSuccessMessage);
}
@@ -355,7 +355,7 @@
if (resultKey != null !ModelService.RESPONSE_MESSAGE.equals(resultKey)
!ModelService.ERROR_MESSAGE.equals(resultKey)
!ModelService.ERROR_MESSAGE_LIST.equals(resultKey)
!ModelService.ERROR_MESSAGE_MAP.equals(resultKey)
!ModelService.SUCCESS_MESSAGE.equals(resultKey)
!ModelService.SUCCESS_MESSAGE_LIST.equals(resultKey)) {
-request.setAttribute(resultKey, resultValue);
+request.setAttribute(resultKey + curSuffix,
resultValue);
}
}
}
[jira] Created: (OFBIZ-3198) Because of the elevation field in GeoPoint we need a many relationship for (at least) PostalAddress and Facility
Because of the elevation field in GeoPoint we need a many relationship for (at least) PostalAddress and Facility Key: OFBIZ-3198 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3198 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Sub-task Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: Jacques Le Roux Assignee: Jacques Le Roux Priority: Trivial -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
