Re: Fwd: [www] NEW language Selection Dropdown!

2014-07-13 Thread Marcus (OOo)

Am 07/13/2014 12:13 PM, schrieb Tal Daniel:

On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Marcus (OOo)  wrote:


Am 07/12/2014 10:10 PM, schrieb Tal Daniel:

  I reordered the language list, and fixed the spacing to line separator.




[...] Have you seen already that the current sorting looks a bit
incomplete? The languages with latin characters should be sorted via their
native names and the non-latin languages maybe via ISO code.



Thanks for reviewing this, Marcus. I'll reorder the Latin lang. list
alphabetically. Sorry to override your changes, yesterday :)


don't worry. Maybe you can rescue some:

- For Khmer (km) the data is commented out, so the redirect will not
  work. You can use this code:

ភាសាខ្មែរ (km)

- The English list item should be shown as "English (en)" to be
  consistent to the others.

- The ISO code for Norwegian [Bokmal] is "nb".

- The brackets for "Norwegian, and both Portuguese should be written
  like for Serbian.

Thanks

Marcus

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Fwd: [www] NEW language Selection Dropdown!

2014-07-13 Thread Tal Daniel
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Marcus (OOo)  wrote:

> Am 07/12/2014 10:10 PM, schrieb Tal Daniel:
>
>  I reordered the language list, and fixed the spacing to line separator.
>>
>
> [...] Have you seen already that the current sorting looks a bit
> incomplete? The languages with latin characters should be sorted via their
> native names and the non-latin languages maybe via ISO code.
>

Thanks for reviewing this, Marcus. I'll reorder the Latin lang. list
alphabetically. Sorry to override your changes, yesterday :)


Re: Fwd: [www] NEW language Selection Dropdown!

2014-07-12 Thread Marcus (OOo)

Am 07/12/2014 10:10 PM, schrieb Tal Daniel:

I reordered the language list, and fixed the spacing to line separator.


looks good.

Have you seen already that the current sorting looks a bit incomplete? 
The languages with latin characters should be sorted via their native 
names and the non-latin languages maybe via ISO code.


Then the visible order is perfect.


Take into account that styles may change in the future, as there are
requests to use Bootstrap library, or sorts.


I hope so. :-)

Marcus




On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 12:42 AM, Marcus (OOo)  wrote:


Am 07/09/2014 02:30 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:

  On 08/07/2014 Tal Daniel wrote:



Regarding the ORDER of languages, we have a tie. Should we take that to a
VOTE? --



No need to. It's a minor thing. I think that the bottom line is: sort by
something that is visible and sort in a way that a native speaker of a
language based on a non-Latin alphabet would find normal. So long as it
has a logic, I'm fine with that and I think others will be too.



+1
Whatever the sorting will look like, it has to be traceable for the user.


  Indeed here there are different conventions around, for example

http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/locale.aspx (just to pick one with a long
list, but any "corporate" site will do) lists all Latin first, then
Greek, Cyrillic and others, by alphabet. While



wow, that must be a nearly complete list. ;-)

I've done some more researching and found the following website with the
same sorting rule:

- Youtube (see footer)
- Facebook (see header)
- Google+ (see footer)
- Twitter (see header)

All sort first via Latin, then Cyrillic, then Arabic, then Indian, then
Far-East.

So, the bigger and most known websites seem to have a common sorting.


  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer for some reason puts Hebrew

between "Italiano" and "Basa Jawa" (does this sound "natural" to you?).



Of course, it's again the sorting via ISO codes. Just have a look into the
HTML code: :-P

it - Italiano
he - Hebrew
jv - Basa Jawa

But to answer your (rhetorical ;-) ) question: No, I would expect a more
visible and therefore reasonable sorting.

BTW:
It's the same for Mozilla (see the language button in the footer). Even
when the visible result is different to Wikipedia.


  We also expose ISO codes, so sorting by codes could be a way to make it

simpler. Whatever works best for you, Tal, will probably work for us too!



@Tal:

Finally:

It seems the common sorting rule is first via Latin, then Cyrillic, then
Arabic, then Indian, then Far-East (more or less this way as I cannot
interprete every character set of this world).

So, I would suggest to sort this way, too.

And yes, I know that I wrote something different in my previous mails. But
after looking closer on other websites I think I have to change my opinion.

Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Fwd: [www] NEW language Selection Dropdown!

2014-07-12 Thread Tal Daniel
I reordered the language list, and fixed the spacing to line separator.
Take into account that styles may change in the future, as there are
requests to use Bootstrap library, or sorts.




On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 12:42 AM, Marcus (OOo)  wrote:

> Am 07/09/2014 02:30 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
>
>  On 08/07/2014 Tal Daniel wrote:
>>
>>> Regarding the ORDER of languages, we have a tie. Should we take that to a
>>> VOTE? --
>>>
>>
>> No need to. It's a minor thing. I think that the bottom line is: sort by
>> something that is visible and sort in a way that a native speaker of a
>> language based on a non-Latin alphabet would find normal. So long as it
>> has a logic, I'm fine with that and I think others will be too.
>>
>
> +1
> Whatever the sorting will look like, it has to be traceable for the user.
>
>
>  Indeed here there are different conventions around, for example
>> http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/locale.aspx (just to pick one with a long
>> list, but any "corporate" site will do) lists all Latin first, then
>> Greek, Cyrillic and others, by alphabet. While
>>
>
> wow, that must be a nearly complete list. ;-)
>
> I've done some more researching and found the following website with the
> same sorting rule:
>
> - Youtube (see footer)
> - Facebook (see header)
> - Google+ (see footer)
> - Twitter (see header)
>
> All sort first via Latin, then Cyrillic, then Arabic, then Indian, then
> Far-East.
>
> So, the bigger and most known websites seem to have a common sorting.
>
>
>  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer for some reason puts Hebrew
>> between "Italiano" and "Basa Jawa" (does this sound "natural" to you?).
>>
>
> Of course, it's again the sorting via ISO codes. Just have a look into the
> HTML code: :-P
>
> it - Italiano
> he - Hebrew
> jv - Basa Jawa
>
> But to answer your (rhetorical ;-) ) question: No, I would expect a more
> visible and therefore reasonable sorting.
>
> BTW:
> It's the same for Mozilla (see the language button in the footer). Even
> when the visible result is different to Wikipedia.
>
>
>  We also expose ISO codes, so sorting by codes could be a way to make it
>> simpler. Whatever works best for you, Tal, will probably work for us too!
>>
>
> @Tal:
>
> Finally:
>
> It seems the common sorting rule is first via Latin, then Cyrillic, then
> Arabic, then Indian, then Far-East (more or less this way as I cannot
> interprete every character set of this world).
>
> So, I would suggest to sort this way, too.
>
> And yes, I know that I wrote something different in my previous mails. But
> after looking closer on other websites I think I have to change my opinion.
>
> Marcus
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>


-- 
טל


Re: Fwd: [www] NEW language Selection Dropdown!

2014-07-09 Thread Marcus (OOo)

Am 07/09/2014 02:30 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:

On 08/07/2014 Tal Daniel wrote:

Regarding the ORDER of languages, we have a tie. Should we take that to a
VOTE? --


No need to. It's a minor thing. I think that the bottom line is: sort by
something that is visible and sort in a way that a native speaker of a
language based on a non-Latin alphabet would find normal. So long as it
has a logic, I'm fine with that and I think others will be too.


+1
Whatever the sorting will look like, it has to be traceable for the user.


Indeed here there are different conventions around, for example
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/locale.aspx (just to pick one with a long
list, but any "corporate" site will do) lists all Latin first, then
Greek, Cyrillic and others, by alphabet. While


wow, that must be a nearly complete list. ;-)

I've done some more researching and found the following website with the 
same sorting rule:


- Youtube (see footer)
- Facebook (see header)
- Google+ (see footer)
- Twitter (see header)

All sort first via Latin, then Cyrillic, then Arabic, then Indian, then 
Far-East.


So, the bigger and most known websites seem to have a common sorting.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer for some reason puts Hebrew
between "Italiano" and "Basa Jawa" (does this sound "natural" to you?).


Of course, it's again the sorting via ISO codes. Just have a look into 
the HTML code: :-P


it - Italiano
he - Hebrew
jv - Basa Jawa

But to answer your (rhetorical ;-) ) question: No, I would expect a more 
visible and therefore reasonable sorting.


BTW:
It's the same for Mozilla (see the language button in the footer). Even 
when the visible result is different to Wikipedia.



We also expose ISO codes, so sorting by codes could be a way to make it
simpler. Whatever works best for you, Tal, will probably work for us too!


@Tal:

Finally:

It seems the common sorting rule is first via Latin, then Cyrillic, then 
Arabic, then Indian, then Far-East (more or less this way as I cannot 
interprete every character set of this world).


So, I would suggest to sort this way, too.

And yes, I know that I wrote something different in my previous mails. 
But after looking closer on other websites I think I have to change my 
opinion.


Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Fwd: [www] NEW language Selection Dropdown!

2014-07-09 Thread Andrea Pescetti

On 08/07/2014 Tal Daniel wrote:

Regarding the ORDER of languages, we have a tie. Should we take that to a
VOTE? --


No need to. It's a minor thing. I think that the bottom line is: sort by 
something that is visible and sort in a way that a native speaker of a 
language based on a non-Latin alphabet would find normal. So long as it 
has a logic, I'm fine with that and I think others will be too.


Indeed here there are different conventions around, for example 
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/locale.aspx (just to pick one with a long 
list, but any "corporate" site will do) lists all Latin first, then 
Greek, Cyrillic and others, by alphabet. While 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer for some reason puts Hebrew 
between "Italiano" and "Basa Jawa" (does this sound "natural" to you?). 
We also expose ISO codes, so sorting by codes could be a way to make it 
simpler. Whatever works best for you, Tal, will probably work for us too!


Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Fwd: [www] NEW language Selection Dropdown!

2014-07-08 Thread Tal Daniel
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 11:22 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:

> Am 06/26/2014 01:56 PM, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:59:19PM +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>
>>> On 25/06/2014 Tal Daniel wrote:
>>>
 Published new language selection dropdown [again]. From now on,
 visitors can quickly select their language, if available. This
 affects all NL sites.  Developers&  translators are called to add

 2 new variables to {lang}/brand.mdtext, and change according to their
 language

>>>
>>>

Regarding the ORDER of languages, we have a tie. Should we take that to a
VOTE? --

[Andrea wrote:]  Maybe sort by Name (with non-Latin at the end) or by
language code?

[Aviaras wrote:] In indices containing entries of different alphabets, it
is a good practice to sort them separately, e.g. starting with the Latin
entries, then moving to the Cyrillic ones, and so on.

[Ariel wrote:] Mozilla has a language listbox at the bottom of their site,
and they sort via ISO codes. Wikipedia as a language list at the side, it
seems that both sort the list according to the Latin transliteration, or
something similar.

[Marcus:] For OpenOffice I would suggest to do the sorting via ISO code. As
they are shown in the list it's understandable for all - also for
non-native speakers.



> [Marcus:] Tal, I know that Hebrew is working from right-to-left. However,
> it doesn't look good compared to the other list items. Would you mind to
> change it to left-to-right?


OK Marcus, I suggest to leave it RTL, but left align it. Will fix it.


Re: Fwd: [www] NEW language Selection Dropdown!

2014-07-03 Thread Marcus (OOo)

Am 06/26/2014 01:56 PM, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:

On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:59:19PM +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote:

On 25/06/2014 Tal Daniel wrote:

Published new language selection dropdown [again]. From now on,
visitors can quickly select their language, if available. This
affects all NL sites.  Developers&  translators are called to add
2 new variables to {lang}/brand.mdtext, and change according to their
language


Done for Italian. Works nicely, thanks for developing it.

Just the sorting is not intuitive... Maybe sort by Name (with
non-Latin at the end) or by language code?


Mozilla has a language listbox at the bottom of their site, and


they sort via ISO codes.


Wikipedia as a language list at the side, it seems that both sort the
list according to the Latin transliteration, or something similar.


They sort alphabetically via the native language names. But it's 
followed not really consequently.


For OpenOffice I would suggest to do the sorting via ISO code. As they 
are shown in the list it's understandable for all - also for non-native 
speakers.


BTW:
Tal, I know that Hebrew is working from right-to-left. However, it 
doesn't look good compared to the other list items. Would you mind to 
change it to left-to-right?


Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Fwd: [www] NEW language Selection Dropdown!

2014-06-26 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:59:19PM +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 25/06/2014 Tal Daniel wrote:
> >Published new language selection dropdown [again]. From now on,
> >visitors can quickly select their language, if available. This
> >affects all NL sites.  Developers & translators are called to add
> >2 new variables to {lang}/brand.mdtext, and change according to their
> >language
> 
> Done for Italian. Works nicely, thanks for developing it.
> 
> Just the sorting is not intuitive... Maybe sort by Name (with
> non-Latin at the end) or by language code?

Mozilla has a language listbox at the bottom of their site, and
Wikipedia as a language list at the side, it seems that both sort the
list according to the Latin transliteration, or something similar.


Regards
-- 
Ariel Constenla-Haile
La Plata, Argentina


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Fwd: [www] NEW language Selection Dropdown!

2014-06-25 Thread Andrea Pescetti

On 25/06/2014 Tal Daniel wrote:

Published new language selection dropdown [again]. From now on, visitors
can quickly select their language, if available. This affects all NL sites.
Developers & translators are called to add 2 new variables to
{lang}/brand.mdtext, and change according to their language


Done for Italian. Works nicely, thanks for developing it.

Just the sorting is not intuitive... Maybe sort by Name (with non-Latin 
at the end) or by language code? I can't figure out if there is a sort 
in place at the moment, it seems rather random to me. Or maybe it's 
sorted by English name, but since we don't show the English name this 
doesn't help the visitor.


Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Fwd: [www] NEW language Selection Dropdown!

2014-06-25 Thread Marcus (OOo)

Am 06/25/2014 01:19 PM, schrieb Tal Daniel:

Published new language selection dropdown [again]. From now on, visitors
can quickly select their language, if available. This affects all NL sites.


thanks for this nice little feature. Good work!


Developers&  translators are called to add 2 new variables to
{lang}/brand.mdtext, and change according to their language:

selectedlang: en *
language: Language **

(* change to your language code; ** translate title to your language)


Done for German, works great.

Keep up the good work, what's next? ;-)

Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Fwd: [www] NEW language Selection Dropdown!

2014-06-25 Thread Tal Daniel
Published new language selection dropdown [again]. From now on, visitors
can quickly select their language, if available. This affects all NL sites.

Developers & translators are called to add 2 new variables to
{lang}/brand.mdtext, and change according to their language:

selectedlang: en *
language: Language **

(* change to your language code; ** translate title to your language)

For example, choose Hebrew from the dropdown, or see /he/brand.mdtext, or
/xx/brand.mdtext.


Note: "Native Languages" link from the menu would probably be removed in
the future, when the language dropdown would be more familiar and adopted.

Enjoy,
Tal