Re: [dev] DEV300_m29: compiling ERROR: File not found: ScriptFramework.jar

2008-09-10 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Nguyen,

On Thursday, 2008-09-04 12:17:58 +0900, Nguyen Vu Hung wrote:

  unxlngi6 folder is 6GB big and it takes a long time.
 
  It should't be that big. All unxlngi* folders together shouldn't be that 
  big.
  You really shouldn't try a debug build at first attempt...
 I didn't try to debug.

Well, for DEV300_m29 my */unxlngi6 folders (without solver) total up to
3.7G, that's with --disable-binfilter and several other --disable-...
and --without-..., but with --enable-dbgutil. So 6GB may not be totally
off the road, especially if you included binfilter and built mozilla and
maybe others from source. You may save some diskspace by delivering hard
links to the solver, add option  --dlv_switch -link  to the build
command, which needs using

cd $SRC_ROOT/instsetoo_native
build --all --dlv_switch -link

instead of calling dmake in $SRC_ROOT though. The root makefile.mk is
just a wrapper around that.

 My question, for dmake, is what is equivalent to GNU make clean
 for a *fresh* build?

cd $SRC_ROOT
dmake clean

(surprise ;-)

There's also  dmake distclean  that additionally clears config.cache


 I've specified --with-lang=en vi ja but it turned out that only en_Us
 is built. Why?
 How to enable vi and ja?

Looks like you omitted quotes: --with-lang=en-US vi ja

Note also that it is not en but en-US, as opposed to en-GB.

  Eike

-- 
 OOo/SO Calc core developer. Number formatter stricken i18n transpositionizer.
 SunSign   0x87F8D412 : 2F58 5236 DB02 F335 8304  7D6C 65C9 F9B5 87F8 D412
 OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
 Please don't send personal mail to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] account, which I use 
for
 mailing lists only and don't read from outside Sun. Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Thanks.


pgpfcUpG278r0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [dev] DEV300_m29: compiling ERROR: File not found: ScriptFramework.jar

2008-09-03 Thread Nguyen Vu Hung
2008/8/22 Christian Lohmaier [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 Hi *,

 On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 5:17 AM, Hung Nguyen Vu
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 1:49 AM, tora - Takamichi Akiyama 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 [...]
 The reason why I add some --disable-something is that I want to save
 compiling time.

 Oh, then you're missing the most-important-to-save-time switch:
 --disable-binfilter
 (and wrt --disable-mozilla: While it is right that building mozilla
 takes quite some time as well, you can build mozilla once and then
 create precompiled mozilla packages - that way you don't lose the
 features but still save compile time)
In fact, compiling bifilter doesn't take too long. I wil leave it there.

Why OOo requires Mozilla source code? What is the relation between them?

Now I am using --enable-mozilla because ccache saves the compilation
time from the second build.





-- 
Best Regards,
Nguyen Hung Vu ( Nguyễn Vũ Hưng )
[EMAIL PROTECTED] , YIM: vuhung16 , Skype: vuhung16dg
Japan through an eye of a gaijin:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/vuhung/tags/fav/


Re: [dev] DEV300_m29: compiling ERROR: File not found: ScriptFramework.jar

2008-09-03 Thread Nguyen Vu Hung
2008/8/22 Christian Lohmaier [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 4. mv unxlngi6.pro unxlngi6.pro-failed

 Is it equivalent to dmake clean
 unxlngi6 folder is 6GB big and it takes a long time.

 It should't be that big. All unxlngi* folders together shouldn't be that big.
 You really shouldn't try a debug build at first attempt...
I didn't try to debug.

My question, for dmake, is what is equivalent to GNU make clean
for a *fresh* build?


 How long does it take to compile OOo?( pen IV 3.2GB, 2GB Memory, SCSI 320
 HDD)

 If ccache is filled, it should take about 5 hours or something like that.
It really depends on ccache but my last build took about 6 hours.

Question:

I've specified --with-lang=en vi ja but it turned out that only en_Us
is built. Why?
How to enable vi and ja?


-- 
Best Regards,
Nguyen Hung Vu ( Nguyễn Vũ Hưng )
[EMAIL PROTECTED] , YIM: vuhung16 , Skype: vuhung16dg
Japan through an eye of a gaijin:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/vuhung/tags/fav/


Re: [dev] DEV300_m29: compiling ERROR: File not found: ScriptFramework.jar

2008-09-03 Thread Nguyen Vu Hung
2008/8/22 Christian Lohmaier [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
  $ ./configure --prefix=/home/vuhung
 --with-jdk-home=/home/vuhung/opt/j2sdk1.4.2_18
 --with-ant-home=/usr/local/ant --with-system-stdlibs --with-lang=en vi
 ja
 

FYI for those will want to compile DEV300_m29:

1. Use java 1.4.x
java 1.6 won't work.

2. Use default ./configure if you can. Or use less configure options.
Dependency checking in dmake is not that perfect :)

-- 
Best Regards,
Nguyen Hung Vu ( Nguyễn Vũ Hưng )
[EMAIL PROTECTED] , YIM: vuhung16 , Skype: vuhung16dg
Japan through an eye of a gaijin:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/vuhung/tags/fav/


Re: [dev] DEV300_m29: compiling ERROR: File not found: ScriptFramework.jar

2008-08-22 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi *,

On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 5:17 AM, Hung Nguyen Vu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 1:49 AM, tora - Takamichi Akiyama 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 [...]
 The reason why I add some --disable-something is that I want to save
 compiling time.

Oh, then you're missing the most-important-to-save-time switch:
--disable-binfilter
(and wrt --disable-mozilla: While it is right that building mozilla
takes quite some time as well, you can build mozilla once and then
create precompiled mozilla packages - that way you don't lose the
features but still save compile time)

ciao
Christian

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [dev] DEV300_m29: compiling ERROR: File not found: ScriptFramework.jar

2008-08-22 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi *,

On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 5:29 AM, Hung Nguyen Vu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 2:23 AM, Christian Lohmaier [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
 [...]
 I make the whole source tree viewable, as well as the env file.
 http://aoclife.ddo.jp/~vuhung/foss/src/DEV300_m29/
 http://aoclife.ddo.jp/~vuhung/foss/src/DEV300_m29/LinuxX86Env.Set.sh
 [...]
 Though --with-use-shell=bash was set in ./configure,

It was not specified according to config.log from the above tree:

It was created by configure, which was
generated by GNU Autoconf 2.61.  Invocation command line was

  $ ./configure --prefix=/home/vuhung
--with-jdk-home=/home/vuhung/opt/j2sdk1.4.2_18
--with-ant-home=/usr/local/ant --with-system-stdlibs --with-lang=en vi
ja


So it doesn't reflect what you thought it should be.

And you did run configure in a shell that already had variables from a
previous attempt set. (this is clrear fom e.g. the path-settings in
the environment file).

Always run configure in a new, clean shell without the
build-environment variables set.


 java, python, uno are not my goals at the moment.
 I need a binary first.

Might be, but java is used in a couple of places during the build nevertheless.

  Question: Why with  --without-java, dmake still looks for a .jar file?

 Congratulations, you found a dependency bug.

 Where should I commit a bug?
 http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/enter_bug.cgi
 What component does this bug belong to?

as it fails in scripting, and scripting is part of framework, I'd
assign it to framework.
(well it doesn't actually fail in scripting, but it is in scripting
where that jar should have been built)

ciao
Christian

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [dev] DEV300_m29: compiling ERROR: File not found: ScriptFramework.jar

2008-08-22 Thread Christian Lohmaier
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 6:43 AM, Hung Nguyen Vu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 1:01 PM, tora - Takamichi Akiyama 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 1. Do the ./configure in the directory config_office with appropriate
   options on the new terminal emulator.
 2. source LinuxX86Env.Set.sh

 3. cd $SRC_ROOT/scripting

 At this point, I've run build  and everything was fine.

 So far so good, it may take a while until I get OOo binary compiled or next
 error :)


 4. mv unxlngi6.pro unxlngi6.pro-failed

 Is it equivalent to dmake clean
 unxlngi6 folder is 6GB big and it takes a long time.

It should't be that big. All unxlngi* folders together shouldn't be that big.
You really shouldn't try a debug build at first attempt...


 How long does it take to compile OOo?( pen IV 3.2GB, 2GB Memory, SCSI 320
 HDD)

If ccache is filled, it should take about 5 hours or something like that.
ciao
Christian

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [dev] DEV300_m29: compiling ERROR: File not found: ScriptFramework.jar

2008-08-21 Thread Hung Nguyen Vu
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 11:50 PM, tora - Takamichi Akiyama 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   ERROR: File not found: ScriptFramework.jar

 To find the module from which a missing file should come,

  1. Build OpenOffice.org completely.

What do you mean by  Build OpenOffice.org completely.?

All the commands I've typed are ./configure and dmake.
Now dmake has failed.


  2. Look for a name of the missing file from log files.

  e.g.
   grep ScriptFramework.jar $SOLARVER/$INPATH/inc/*/deliver.log

  In my case, the commend above prints:
   /x/solver/300/unxsoli4.pro/inc/scripting/deliver.log:COPY scripting/
 unxsoli4.pro/class/ScriptFramework.jar
 unxsoli4.pro/bin/ScriptFramework.jar


ScriptFramework.jar was not found in deliver log.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] scripting]$ pwd
/home/vuhung/public_html/foss/src/DEV300_m29/solver/300/
unxlngi6.pro/inc/scripting
[EMAIL PROTECTED] scripting]$ grep ScriptFramework.jar *
[EMAIL PROTECTED] scripting]$ LANG=en_US grep ScriptFramework.jar */*
grep: */*: No such file or directory
[EMAIL PROTECTED] scripting]$ ls
build.lstdeliver.log  storage/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] scripting]$ ls storage/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] scripting]$

So, in your case, building a module 'scripting' failed and/or
 'deliver' command has not been executed in the module yet,
 or the module has not been built at all.

What should I do now?


 gcc version 4.1.2 20071124 (Red Hat 4.1.2-42)


 I don't know whether gcc 4.1.2 works fine for building current OOo.

What is the recommended version of gcc as well as other prerequisite
libraries?
And I will try to build with latest gcc 4.3.1.

Btw, the problem I am facing now has nothing to do with gcc version.

I am on another thread with Caolan and he says that (older) OOo can be built
with gcc 4.1.2 ,
but the binary will crash.



 export CC=ccache gcc
 export CXX=ccache g++


 I don't know whether ccache works fine for building current OOo.

It is recommended by OOo team :). For faster build time.


 The command 'dmake' works depending on its own dependency files.

In my first try,  cd DEV300_m29; dmake cannot be found, so I specify its
full path.
Ignore it.



  export CXXFLAGS=-Werror
 export CFLAGS=-Werror -fvisibility=hidden

 ./configure --prefix=$HOME \
--disable-cups \
--disable-pam \
--with-jdk-home=/usr/local/jdk1.6.0_07/ \
--disable-mozilla \
--disable-qadevooo \
--without-system-stdlibs \
--disable-odk \
--with-use-shell=bash \
--with-vendor=Vietnamese Localization Build \
--disable-vba \
--with-use-shell=bash \
--with-ant-home=/usr/local/ant/ \
--without-java \


 Looks too complicated. I cannot make any comments on that...

I just tried to disable anything I don't need.
 --with-jdk-home=/usr/local/jdk1.6.0_07 and  --without-java seems to be
abnormal but I hope it is fine(?).

Question: Why with  --without-java, dmake still looks for a .jar file?



  source LinuxX86Env.Set.sh http://linuxx86env.set.sh/
 export SOLENV=`pwd`/solenv/
 ./solenv/unxlngi6/bin/dmake


 Why do you need to explicitly specify the path to dmake instead of
 simply type dmake? A PATH environment variable should be set properly
 by LinuxX86Env.Set.sh and should help your command shell find dmake.

 Try type the following to check your environment:

  which dmake

 See above,
I've checked and which dmake *IS* ./solenv/unxlngi6/bin/dmake.
Sorry for the confusion.

If your command shell answers another dmake, something goes wrongly.

 Additionally, in the next time, try to log everything:

  e.g.
  dmake 21 | tee dmake_`date +%Y%m%d_%H%M`.log

 And then look for outputs beginning with a line Building project
 scripting
 in the log file.

I didn't find that string. However Building module scripting is found and
it is nothing unusual.

Full dmake log:
http://aoclife.ddo.jp/~vuhung/foss/src/DEV300_m29/dmake_20080822_0013.log

One more question:

My configure output contains a warning:

checking for xrandr = 1.2... checking X11/extensions/Xrandr.h usability...
no
checking X11/extensions/Xrandr.h presence... yes
configure: WARNING: X11/extensions/Xrandr.h: present but cannot be compiled
configure: WARNING: X11/extensions/Xrandr.h: check for missing
prerequisite headers?
configure: WARNING: X11/extensions/Xrandr.h: see the Autoconf documentation
configure: WARNING: X11/extensions/Xrandr.h: section Present But Cannot
Be Compiled
configure: WARNING: X11/extensions/Xrandr.h: proceeding with the
preprocessor's result
configure: WARNING: X11/extensions/Xrandr.h: in the future, the compiler
will take precedence

Is that safe to ignore?






-- 
Best Regards,
Nguyen Hung Vu ( Nguyễn Vũ Hưng )
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED], YIM: vuhung16 , Skype:
vuhung16dg
Japan through an eye of a gaijin:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/vuhung/tags/fav/


Re: [dev] DEV300_m29: compiling ERROR: File not found: ScriptFramework.jar

2008-08-21 Thread tora - Takamichi Akiyama

Hi,

What i can propose here is not to disable any options of ./configure
since there would be possibilities of unexpected behaviors.

 ./configure --disable-something
   will set or unset some environment variables defined in LinuxX86Env.Set.sh

 'dmake' or 'build' will work depending on the values of the environment
 variables.

 'solenv/bin/make_installer.pl' would work depending on the value of
 the same environment variables as expected or would ignore the values.


I mean that there is possibility that the following situation might happen:

 One or more options you specified by --disable-something suppressed
 creation of ScriptFramework.jar, but make_installer.pl does not take
 care of the options and expected the existence of ScriptFramework.jar
 but it was not created. Consequently, build process resulted in failure.


Hung Nguyen Vu wrote:
 What should I do now?

If you want to make all options work as expected, you can investigate
your results more deeply and propose some patches for the Tools project.

If you want to just build OOo, try not to disable any options of
./configure, including Java and install somewhat old versions of tools
and use them. Those would be the simplest way to successfully go through
the build process, I think.

For example, some modules will be built with a tool Ant. Ant requires Java.
Hence, a process of building OOo definitely requires Java.


 --with-jdk-home=/usr/local/jdk1.6.0_07 and  --without-java seems to be
abnormal but I hope it is fine(?).


That seems not to make sense. But I am not sure about that since I have
no experience in disabling Java.

Some old versions of Ant does not work with the latest version of Java, 1.6.
For instance, /usr/bin/ant Apache Ant version 1.6.2 embedded in Fedora
Core 4 does not work with /usr/java/jdk1.6.0_03 from java.com.
It unfortunately stops with the following error message:

 Exception in thread main java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: 
org/apache/tools/ant/launch/Launcher

It, however, works fine with both /usr/java/j2sdk1.4.1_03 from java.com
and /usr/bin/java embedded in Fedora Core 4.

$ /usr/bin/java -version
java version 1.4.2
gij (GNU libgcj) version 4.0.0 20050519 (Red Hat 4.0.0-8)

Therefore, using the latest tools might brings you some difficulties.



One more question:

My configure output contains a warning:

checking for xrandr = 1.2... checking X11/extensions/Xrandr.h usability...
no
checking X11/extensions/Xrandr.h presence... yes
configure: WARNING: X11/extensions/Xrandr.h: present but cannot be compiled
configure: WARNING: X11/extensions/Xrandr.h: check for missing
prerequisite headers?
configure: WARNING: X11/extensions/Xrandr.h: see the Autoconf documentation
configure: WARNING: X11/extensions/Xrandr.h: section Present But Cannot
Be Compiled
configure: WARNING: X11/extensions/Xrandr.h: proceeding with the
preprocessor's result
configure: WARNING: X11/extensions/Xrandr.h: in the future, the compiler
will take precedence

Is that safe to ignore?


I am sorry, i have no information on that.

caio,
Tora


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [dev] DEV300_m29: compiling ERROR: File not found: ScriptFramework.jar

2008-08-21 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi *,

On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Hung Nguyen Vu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 11:50 PM, tora - Takamichi Akiyama 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 [...]
 So, in your case, building a module 'scripting' failed and/or
 'deliver' command has not been executed in the module yet,
 or the module has not been built at all.

 What should I do now?

cd to the $SRC_ROOT/scripting directory and try to run build there

 export CC=ccache gcc
 export CXX=ccache g++


 I don't know whether ccache works fine for building current OOo.

 It is recommended by OOo team :). For faster build time.

Yes, and it definitely works. (although I prefer the symlink approach,
not the environment variables, but that doesn't matter)

 The command 'dmake' works depending on its own dependency files.

 In my first try,  cd DEV300_m29; dmake cannot be found, so I specify its
 full path.
 Ignore it.

No, Don't ignore it. Since that clearly shows that something is wrong
with your environment. Better work on fixing it before trying
workarounds that break in even more obscure ways.

If you cannot just run dmake after sourcing the environment file,
then something is really wrong, and you should post your environment
file.

  export CXXFLAGS=-Werror
 export CFLAGS=-Werror -fvisibility=hidden

This doesn't work. And it is begging for build-problems. Only enable
-Werror after you finished a build successfuly. Only fiddle with
additional compiler flags once you succesfully finished a plain build.
Furthermore these two are unneccessary anyway. configure checks for
the visibility feature anyway, and if you want warnings=errors, pass
--enable-werror to configure.

 ./configure --prefix=$HOME \
--disable-cups \

Don't want to print with your OOo on modern distros/make use of cups features?
Hmm...

--disable-pam \
--with-jdk-home=/usr/local/jdk1.6.0_07/ \

OK, but...

--disable-mozilla \
--disable-qadevooo \
--without-system-stdlibs \
--disable-odk \
--with-use-shell=bash \
--with-vendor=Vietnamese Localization Build \
--disable-vba \
--with-use-shell=bash \

this is specified twice...

--with-ant-home=/usr/local/ant/ \
--without-java \

and this is a problem.

 Looks too complicated. I cannot make any comments on that...

I can..

 I just tried to disable anything I don't need.
  --with-jdk-home=/usr/local/jdk1.6.0_07 and  --without-java seems to be
 abnormal but I hope it is fine(?).

No. apparently it is not. and jar sounds like it is java, isn't it?
So when you tell OOo not to use java during the build, it cannot
compile java stuff...

 Question: Why with  --without-java, dmake still looks for a .jar file?

Congratulations, you found a dependency bug.

ciao
Christian

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [dev] DEV300_m29: compiling ERROR: File not found: ScriptFramework.jar

2008-08-21 Thread Hung Nguyen Vu
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 2:23 AM, Christian Lohmaier [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:

 Hi *,

 On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Hung Nguyen Vu
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 11:50 PM, tora - Takamichi Akiyama 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  [...]
  So, in your case, building a module 'scripting' failed and/or
  'deliver' command has not been executed in the module yet,
  or the module has not been built at all.
 
  What should I do now?

 cd to the $SRC_ROOT/scripting directory and try to run build there

It didn't work. I got the same error ( could not find jar file ).



  export CC=ccache gcc
  export CXX=ccache g++
 Yes, and it definitely works. (although I prefer the symlink approach,
 not the environment variables, but that doesn't matter)

alias gcc=ccache gcc works as well.

 In my first try,  cd DEV300_m29; dmake cannot be found, so I specify its

 No, Don't ignore it. Since that clearly shows that something is wrong
 with your environment. Better work on fixing it before trying
 workarounds that break in even more obscure ways.

Only in my first try, I did something wrong and dmake could not be found.
Now, it is fine.


 If you cannot just run dmake after sourcing the environment file,
 then something is really wrong, and you should post your environment
 file.

I make the whole source tree viewable, as well as the env file.
http://aoclife.ddo.jp/~vuhung/foss/src/DEV300_m29/
http://aoclife.ddo.jp/~vuhung/foss/src/DEV300_m29/LinuxX86Env.Set.sh


   export CXXFLAGS=-Werror
  export CFLAGS=-Werror -fvisibility=hidden

 This doesn't work. And it is begging for build-problems. Only enable
 -Werror after you finished a build successfuly. Only fiddle with
 additional compiler flags once you succesfully finished a plain build.
 Furthermore these two are unneccessary anyway. configure checks for
 the visibility feature anyway, and if you want warnings=errors, pass
 --enable-werror to configure.

I will remove CXXFLAGS and CFLAGS in the next build.
I thought with -Werror, the standard output in my terminal will be cleaner,
which is worng.



  ./configure --prefix=$HOME \
 --disable-cups \

 Don't want to print with your OOo on modern distros/make use of cups
 features?
 Hmm...

I don't use cups. But I will build OOo with cups support next time.


 --disable-mozilla \

Do we really need this?
Mozilla is too big!

--with-use-shell=bash \
--with-use-shell=bash \

this is specified twice...

I weird thing I've noticed:

Though --with-use-shell=bash was set in ./configure,

./configure reports:

The variable SHELL is set to: /bin/tcsh

after its run.
# I always use bash!



No. apparently it is not. and jar sounds like it is java, isn't it?
 So when you tell OOo not to use java during the build, it cannot
 compile java stuff...

java, python, uno are not my goals at the moment.
I need a binary first.


  Question: Why with  --without-java, dmake still looks for a .jar file?

 Congratulations, you found a dependency bug.

Where should I commit a bug?
http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/enter_bug.cgi
What component does this bug belong to?



-- 
Best Regards,
Nguyen Hung Vu ( Nguyễn Vũ Hưng )
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED], YIM: vuhung16 , Skype:
vuhung16dg
Japan through an eye of a gaijin:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/vuhung/tags/fav/


Re: [dev] DEV300_m29: compiling ERROR: File not found: ScriptFramework.jar

2008-08-21 Thread tora - Takamichi Akiyama

Hi,


So, in your case, building a module 'scripting' failed and/or

'deliver' command has not been executed in the module yet,
or the module has not been built at all.


What should I do now?

cd to the $SRC_ROOT/scripting directory and try to run build there


It didn't work. I got the same error ( could not find jar file ).


1. Do the ./configure in the directory config_office with appropriate
   options on the new terminal emulator.
2. source LinuxX86Env.Set.sh

3. cd $SRC_ROOT/scripting
4. mv unxlngi6.pro unxlngi6.pro-failed
  or
   build depend=1
5. cd $SRC_ROOT and then build OOo entirely.
  (date; time dmake; date) 21 | tee dmake_`date +%Y%m%d_%H%M`.log

or

3. cd $SRC_ROOT/scripting
4. mv unxlngi6.pro unxlngi6.pro-failed
5. (date; time build.pl product=full; date) 21 | tee build_`date 
+%Y%m%d_%H%M`.log
6. (date; time deliver.pl; date) 21 | tee deliver_`date +%Y%m%d_%H%M`.log
7. cd $SRC_ROOT/instsetoo_native
8. (date; time build.pl --from scripting product=full; date) 21 | tee 
build_`date +%Y%m%d_%H%M`.log

caio,
Tora

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]