[Bug 1496616] perl-Locale-TextDomain-OO-1.031 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1496616



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Locale-TextDomain-OO-1.031-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-9c1f89c16a

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

jplesnik pushed to perl-Locale-TextDomain-OO (f27). "1.031 bump"

[notifications]

From 09d26c91401ca683467f4b7e7598040c6bbdfa51 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova 
Date: Sep 28 2017 05:44:55 +
Subject: 1.031 bump


---

diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 48e3190..9954f99 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
 /Locale-TextDomain-OO-1.028.tar.gz
 /Locale-TextDomain-OO-1.029.tar.gz
 /Locale-TextDomain-OO-1.030.tar.gz
+/Locale-TextDomain-OO-1.031.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Locale-TextDomain-OO.spec b/perl-Locale-TextDomain-OO.spec
index b6ee05b..2007541 100644
--- a/perl-Locale-TextDomain-OO.spec
+++ b/perl-Locale-TextDomain-OO.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 Name:   perl-Locale-TextDomain-OO
-Version:1.030
+Version:1.031
 Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Perl object-oriented Interface to Uniforum Message Translation
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -107,6 +107,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Sep 28 2017 Jitka Plesnikova  - 1.031-1
+- 1.031 bump
+
 * Wed Aug 30 2017 Jitka Plesnikova  - 1.030-1
 - 1.030 bump
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 7470efb..39faaa5 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-SHA512 (Locale-TextDomain-OO-1.030.tar.gz) = 
a812c73d9376c99e93848baf0880342bbac8e3a818d4b48d839af2e3393fae59185f0409dcceb7afb68dc0d7cc3d0c6f9c5d6e1e11dc1a493a12f3126f80b12b
+SHA512 (Locale-TextDomain-OO-1.031.tar.gz) = 
dffef6f096028f463a5fd7dc0e2f56053cd853552baa7f9dd2920a5f905403c0939e901bdef76fe957bbf1a2d4616fd2e18ff655b5d613db03a8d1c207ff2c18



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Locale-TextDomain-OO/c/09d26c91401ca683467f4b7e7598040c6bbdfa51?branch=f27
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1496616] perl-Locale-TextDomain-OO-1.031 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1496616

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Locale-TextDomain-OO-1
   ||.031-1.fc28



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

jplesnik pushed to perl-Locale-TextDomain-OO (master). "1.031 bump"

[notifications]

From 09d26c91401ca683467f4b7e7598040c6bbdfa51 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova 
Date: Sep 28 2017 05:44:55 +
Subject: 1.031 bump


---

diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 48e3190..9954f99 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
 /Locale-TextDomain-OO-1.028.tar.gz
 /Locale-TextDomain-OO-1.029.tar.gz
 /Locale-TextDomain-OO-1.030.tar.gz
+/Locale-TextDomain-OO-1.031.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Locale-TextDomain-OO.spec b/perl-Locale-TextDomain-OO.spec
index b6ee05b..2007541 100644
--- a/perl-Locale-TextDomain-OO.spec
+++ b/perl-Locale-TextDomain-OO.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 Name:   perl-Locale-TextDomain-OO
-Version:1.030
+Version:1.031
 Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Perl object-oriented Interface to Uniforum Message Translation
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -107,6 +107,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Sep 28 2017 Jitka Plesnikova  - 1.031-1
+- 1.031 bump
+
 * Wed Aug 30 2017 Jitka Plesnikova  - 1.030-1
 - 1.030 bump
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 7470efb..39faaa5 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-SHA512 (Locale-TextDomain-OO-1.030.tar.gz) = 
a812c73d9376c99e93848baf0880342bbac8e3a818d4b48d839af2e3393fae59185f0409dcceb7afb68dc0d7cc3d0c6f9c5d6e1e11dc1a493a12f3126f80b12b
+SHA512 (Locale-TextDomain-OO-1.031.tar.gz) = 
dffef6f096028f463a5fd7dc0e2f56053cd853552baa7f9dd2920a5f905403c0939e901bdef76fe957bbf1a2d4616fd2e18ff655b5d613db03a8d1c207ff2c18



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Locale-TextDomain-OO/c/09d26c91401ca683467f4b7e7598040c6bbdfa51?branch=master
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

jplesnik uploaded Locale-TextDomain-OO-1.031.tar.gz for perl-Locale-TextDomain-OO

[notifications]

dffef6f096028f463a5fd7dc0e2f56053cd853552baa7f9dd2920a5f905403c0939e901bdef76fe957bbf1a2d4616fd2e18ff655b5d613db03a8d1c207ff2c18
  Locale-TextDomain-OO-1.031.tar.gz

https://src.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Locale-TextDomain-OO/Locale-TextDomain-OO-1.031.tar.gz/sha512/dffef6f096028f463a5fd7dc0e2f56053cd853552baa7f9dd2920a5f905403c0939e901bdef76fe957bbf1a2d4616fd2e18ff655b5d613db03a8d1c207ff2c18/Locale-TextDomain-OO-1.031.tar.gz
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora 27 Beta 1.5 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

Missing expected images:

Workstation live i386
Server boot i386
Kde live i386

Failed openQA tests: 14/126 (x86_64), 2/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm)

New failures (same test did not fail in 27 Beta 1.3):

ID: 148093  Test: i386 universal install_btrfs
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/148093

Old failures (same test failed in 27 Beta 1.3):

ID: 147962  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/147962
ID: 147968  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/147968
ID: 147989  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/147989
ID: 147999  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/147999
ID: 148006  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/148006
ID: 148008  Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/148008
ID: 148026  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/148026
ID: 148028  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/148028
ID: 148031  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/148031
ID: 148038  Test: x86_64 universal install_shrink_ext4
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/148038
ID: 148039  Test: x86_64 universal install_shrink_ntfs
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/148039
ID: 148041  Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/148041
ID: 148042  Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/148042
ID: 148048  Test: x86_64 universal install_rescue_encrypted@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/148048
ID: 148080  Test: x86_64 universal install_rescue_encrypted
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/148080
ID: 148084  Test: i386 universal upgrade_desktop_32bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/148084

Soft failed openQA tests: 3/126 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

New soft failures (same test did not soft fail in 27 Beta 1.3):

ID: 147996  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_no_user
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/147996

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in 27 Beta 1.3):

ID: 147980  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/147980
ID: 147981  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/147981

Passed openQA tests: 105/126 (x86_64), 16/18 (i386)

New passes (same test did not pass in 27 Beta 1.3):

ID: 147979  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_no_user
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/147979
ID: 147997  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/147997
ID: 147998  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/147998
ID: 148057  Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_lvmthin
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/148057
ID: 148097  Test: i386 universal install_repository_http_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/148097

Skipped openQA tests: 1 of 146

Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi: 
System load changed from 0.09 to 0.23
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/147033#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/147953#downloads

Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default: 
System load changed from 0.05 to 0.25
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/147034#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/147954#downloads

Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi: 
System load changed from 0.12 to 0.24
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/147036#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/147956#downloads

Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload: 
System load changed from 0.17 to 0.32
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/147037#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/147957#downloads

Installed system changes in test x86_64 Workstation-live-iso 
install_default_upload: 
System load changed from 0.23 to 0.94
Average CPU usage changed from 2.70476190 to 36.09523810
Used mem changed from 832 MiB to 972 MiB
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/147061#downloads
Current test data: 

Re: Python 3 porting Bugzilla guidance

[Troy Curtis Jr]

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 7:01 AM Petr Viktorin  wrote:

> It's only automatic for Bugzilla. If upstream is not using the Fedora/RH
> bugzilla (which it shouldn't, really), a URL for the upstream discussion
> needs to be added manually. And of course you can open a portingdb
> ticket for that.
>
>
> Nowadays I don't want portingdb to have too much info about upstream,
> because:
> - Upstream discussions for a projects are usually not hard to find.
> - Bugzilla is Fedora-specific, so people from other OSs won't look there.
> - portingdb is mainly used by the Fedora Python SIG; both upstreams and
> other Fedorans aren't likely to look there.
>
> So I prefer portingdb having just an URL for the upstream discussion –
> and even that isn't needed if interested people can easily find that
> discussion.
>
>
So if there are pending issues, patches, or merge requests upstream related
to the python3 porting effort there should be a portingdb ticket created
requesting a link to the upstream discussion/status be added? And I should
*not* create a bugzilla ticket blocking
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1322027 like I did with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1492382 ?  Or perhaps both
should/could be done as perhaps they are used by separate teams tracking
different status?  Just trying to get a handle on the preferred route.

Thanks,
Troy


>
> Once there's a py3-compatible release upstream, it's enough to open a
> bugzilla for the Fedora package and link it to the tracking bug (see
> [Python 3 Bug Filing]). Then portingdb will eventually update.
>
>
> [Python 3 Bug Filing]:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pviktori/Python_3_Bug_Filing
>
> --
> Petr Viktorin
>
___
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Build failed in Jenkins: NIGHTLY #92

[mareynol]

See 


--
[...truncated 6809 lines...]
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/threading.py", line 804, in __bootstrap_inner
self.run()
  File 
"
 line 51, in run
conn = self.openConnection(self.inst)
  File 
"
 line 45, in openConnection
server.open()
  File 
"
 line 1127, in open
raise e
SERVER_DOWN: {'\''desc'\'': "Can'\''t contact LDAP server"}

INFO:dirsrvtests.tests.suites.replication.cleanallruv_test:test_stress_clean: 
put master 4 into read-only mode...
CRITICAL:dirsrvtests.tests.suites.replication.cleanallruv_test:test_stress_clean:
 Failed to put master 4 into read-only mode: error Can'\''t contact LDAP server
 test_multiple_tasks_with_force 

topology_m4 = 

def test_multiple_tasks_with_force(topology_m4):
"""Check that multiple tasks with a '\''force'\'' option work properly

:ID: eb76a93d-8d1c-405e-9f25-6e8d5a781098
:feature: CleanAllRUV
:setup: Replication setup with four masters
:steps: 1. Stop master 3
2. Add a bunch of updates to master 4
3. Disable replication on master 4
4. Start master 3
5. Remove agreements to master 4 from other masters
6. Run a cleanallruv task on master 1 with a '\''force'\'' 
option '\''on'\''
7. Run one more cleanallruv task on master 1 with a 
'\''force'\'' option '\''off'\''
8. Check that everything was cleaned and no hanging tasks left
:expectedresults: Everything was cleaned and no hanging tasks left
"""

log.info('\''Running test_multiple_tasks_with_force...'\'')

# Stop master 3, while we update master 4, so that 3 is behind the 
other masters
topology_m4.ms["master3"].stop(timeout=10)

# Add a bunch of updates to master 4
m4_add_users = AddUsers(topology_m4.ms["master4"], 1500)
m4_add_users.start()
m4_add_users.join()

# Disable master 4
log.info('\''test_multiple_tasks_with_force: disable master 4...'\'')
>   topology_m4.ms["master4"].replica.disableReplication(DEFAULT_SUFFIX)

:817:
 
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 
:453:
 in disableReplication
mtents = self.conn.mappingtree.list(suffix=nsuffix)
:70:
 in list
filt)
:162:
 in inner
return f(*args, **kwargs)
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ldap/ldapobject.py:597: in search_s
return 
self.search_ext_s(base,scope,filterstr,attrlist,attrsonly,None,None,timeout=self.timeout)
:162:
 in inner
return f(*args, **kwargs)
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ldap/ldapobject.py:590: in search_ext_s
msgid = 
self.search_ext(base,scope,filterstr,attrlist,attrsonly,serverctrls,clientctrls,timeout,sizelimit)
:162:
 in inner
return f(*args, **kwargs)
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ldap/ldapobject.py:586: in search_ext
timeout,sizelimit,
:162:
 in inner
return f(*args, **kwargs)
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 

self = 
func = 
args = ('\''cn=mapping tree,cn=config'\'', 1, '\''(cn=dc=example,dc=com)'\'', 
None, 0, None, ...)
kwargs = {}, diagnostic_message_success = None
e = SERVER_DOWN({'\''desc'\'': "Can'\''t contact LDAP server"},)

def _ldap_call(self,func,*args,**kwargs):
  """
Wrapper method mainly for serializing calls into OpenLDAP libs
and trace logs
"""
  self._ldap_object_lock.acquire()
  if __debug__:
if self._trace_level>=1:
  self._trace_file.write('\''*** %s %s - %s\n%s\n'\'' % (
repr(self),
self._uri,

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2017-09-28 16:00 UTC)

[James Antill]

 Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2017-09-28 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.

 Local time information (via. uitime):

= Day: Thursday ==
2017-09-28 09:00 PDT  US/Pacific
2017-09-28 12:00 EDT  --> US/Eastern <--
2017-09-28 16:00 UTC  UTC   
2017-09-28 17:00 BST  Europe/London 
2017-09-28 18:00 CEST Europe/Berlin 
2017-09-28 18:00 CEST Europe/Paris  
2017-09-28 21:30 IST  Asia/Calcutta 
 New Day: Friday -
2017-09-29 00:00 HKT  Asia/Hong_Kong
2017-09-29 00:00 +08  Asia/Singapore
2017-09-29 01:00 JST  Asia/Tokyo
2017-09-29 02:00 AEST Australia/Brisbane

 Links to all tickets below can be found at: 

https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issues?status=Open=meeting

= Followups =

#topic #654 glibc file triggers
.fpc 654
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/654

#topic #691 noarch *sub*packages with arch-specific dependencies
.fpc 691
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/691

#topic #693 Wiki:Packaging:RPMMacros
.fpc 693
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/693

#topic #708 Allocating a static uid and gid for openvswitch
.fpc 708
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/708

#topic #710 Ruby packaging guidelines update
.fpc 710
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/710

#topic #713 Forward-looking conditionals by default
.fpc 713
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/713

#topic #714 let's kill file deps!
.fpc 714
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/714

#topic #715 Separately building package documentation
.fpc 715
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/715

= Open Floor = 

 For more complete details, please visit each individual ticket.  The
report of the agenda items can be found at:

https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issues?status=Open=meeting

 If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to
this e-mail, file a new ticket at https://pagure.io/packaging-committee,
e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the end of the meeting, during
the open floor topic. Note that added topics may be deferred until
the following meeting. 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] I'm back! Please review 49378

[William Brown]

In typical fashion, I'm taking it slow on my return. Which means I have
two patches for review.

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49378

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/9f43e2d45818aa9adba4bea8a41f732c565a5e03510c24b984a808e2759cabbc-0001-Ticket-49378-server-init-fails.patch



-- 
Sincerely,

William Brown
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Australia/Brisbane



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Please review, /49372

[William Brown]

Fixes to the filter optimiser,
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49372


https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/60d7f2c562f8e4d2f2ac2b1a3dd610e0c482e3e20ef290b901260d40292a2dd6-0001-Ticket-49372-filter-optimisation-improvements-for-co.patch


-- 
Sincerely,

William Brown
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Australia/Brisbane



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1496627] New: perl-PAR-Packer-1.038 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1496627

Bug ID: 1496627
   Summary: perl-PAR-Packer-1.038 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-PAR-Packer
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com



Latest upstream release: 1.038
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.037-8.fc28
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/PAR-Packer/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

Based on the information from anitya: 
https://release-monitoring.org/project/3189/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1496616] New: perl-Locale-TextDomain-OO-1.031 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1496616

Bug ID: 1496616
   Summary: perl-Locale-TextDomain-OO-1.031 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-Locale-TextDomain-OO
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com



Latest upstream release: 1.031
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.030-1.fc28
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Locale-TextDomain-OO/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

Based on the information from anitya: 
https://release-monitoring.org/project/15659/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Re: revised: Ticket 49305 - Need to wrap atomic functions for certain platforms

[William Brown]

On Tue, 2017-09-26 at 16:56 -0400, Mark Reynolds wrote:
> https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/7249aa3bf493cffef4c7e3a3eb843d2626b3a4e6c3802a3d246e0f5cfeafbb33-0001-Ticket-49305-Need-to-wrap-atomic-calls.patch
> 

Cool, so I think this patch touches on something that we need to
consider for the future - HPUX support.

Today, we can't test this, and we are really shooting blind in our
support for it.

I've already opened this ticket to drop 32bit:

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49365

I think that for 1.4.x we should drop HPUX support also.

This would limit our support to:

* x86_64
* aarch64
* ppc64 (le)


And for OS this would put us at:

100% support of Linux
Partial support for FreeBSD
Someone is working on re-adding Solaris


With that in mind, I think that given this atomic wrapper exists *just*
for hpux perhaps this patch should *only* be in 1.3.7 branch? I'd like
to see it cleaned out/reverted for 1.4.x. perhaps. We have a lot of old
legacy support, and I think we really need to take a clearer line on
what we do and don't support, and we need to cleanup these shim layers
because they *do* add overheads. 



-- 
Sincerely,

William Brown
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Australia/Brisbane



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Re: PR_ASSERT problem

[William Brown]

On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 14:30 +0200, Carsten Grzemba wrote:
> my build on OpenIndiana with the IllumOS provided NSPR cores on startup of 
> some commands:
> 
> $ pwdhash 
> Assertion failure: 0 == lock->notified.length, at 
> /jenkins/jobs/oi-userland/workspace/components/library/mozilla-nspr/nspr-4.12/nspr/pr/src/pthreads/ptsynch.c:159
> /usr/bin/pwdhash: line 60: 5993: Abort(coredump)
> 
> $ pstack core
> core 'core' of 5993: /usr/bin/amd64/pwdhash-bin
>  fd7fff2b4eda _lwp_kill () + a
>  fd7fff2480e0 raise (6) + 20
>  fd7fff220818 abort () + 98
>  fd7ff943fda2  ()
>  fd7ff9457828 PR_DestroyLock () + d8
>  fd7ff978bc2a slapi_entry_free () + 11a
>  00402888 init_config () + 2d8
>  00402d43 main () + 353
>  0040235c _start () + 6c
> 
> Before I dive in the source code, has anyone a hint where I can start to 
> search what happens here?
> 

Sounds like the lock may not have been created properly? Sadly I think
you need to dive into the source,

:( 

Let me know if you need any other advice. 

-- 
Sincerely,

William Brown
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Australia/Brisbane



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Is it possible to upload new sources of a package from a URL?

[Kevin Kofler]

Emmanuel Seyman wrote:

> * Gerald Henriksen [26/09/2017 09:02] :
>>
>> That may be fine for any packagers who are actually paid to package
>> (though even then I would have my doubts that every line of source has
>> been checked), but it is clearly an impossible task in terms of time
>> required for all the volunteer packagers.
> 
> The solution in this case is to not volunteer to do things you are
> not able to do.

It is just plain impossible to audit something like QtWebEngine line by 
line. By the time the whole code would be audited, there would already be a 
completely different new version.

Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Is it possible to upload new sources of a package from a URL?

[Kevin Kofler]

Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
> :O Great! Currently, I can't even imagine maintaining any packages over
> few megabytes (maybe 100MiB tops, which will be a pain!), but not much
> long before, I had a hard time uploading a 21MiB data... specially since
> there is no way to resume uploading a source to look-aside cash (AFAIK).
> I was forced to retry a few times and pray so that it can be completed! :)

What I did several times for qt5-qtwebengine is that I SSHed into a remote 
VPS and uploaded the tarball from there. (I actually SFTPed it from my 
machine to the VPS first, because QtWebEngine tarballs have to be cleaned 
from patent-encumbered stuff, but for most packages, you can just wget them 
directly on the remote server and never download them locally to begin 
with.) Of course, you need to have access to a suitable server or VPS to 
pull that off though.

Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Package add request

[Kevin Kofler]

adel...@zegrapher.com wrote:
> and Boost for only one small function

Since I was curious, I looked for that function and found it in 
polynomial.cpp. But why do you include the headers in polynomial.h? The 
usage of Boost in Polynomial::translateX is an implementation detail and so 
the headers should be included only in the implementation file 
polynomial.cpp.

Of course, this is not a big issue, it only increases the compile time by 
some fraction of a second, but I wanted to give you the hint anyway.

Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Using amdgpu as default for all GCN cards

[Kevin Kofler]

Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> Distribution override has been done before in the past to gather data for
> fixing issues (kdbus came in mind).

Is that really a good example? Kdbus was withdrawn by its submitters before 
ever entering a mainline kernel (mainly because Linus did not like the 
idea). All the testing that was done on it in Fedora was wasted.

Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Improving Linux laptop battery life: Testers Wanted

[Germano Massullo]

> It might be that systemd does not like that rc.local is owned
> by "user" rather then "root"
Unfortunately
# chown root:root /etc/rc.d/rc.local
did not solve the problem, instead manually running the script as root,
changed the
/sys/class/scsi_host/host0/link_power_management_policy
state to
med_power_with_dipm

In powertop I noticed a saving of ~1 Watt. I will send you complete test
results as you requested in
https://hansdegoede.livejournal.com/18412.html

For people who wants to stress the disk:

# dnf install phoronix-test-suite
$ phoronix-test-suite install disk
$ phoronix-test-suite run disk

I will run disk suite tests many times per day for 2 weeks
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: CI projects in Copr

[Michal Novotny]

Hello,

On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Petr Stodulka  wrote:

>
>
> On 4.9.2017 19:27, Michal Novotny wrote:
> > I might contact you for more information, but alright, if you feel the
> custom script is more convenient,
> > then I am all for it. But first, I would like to make a proposal of each
> option (with screenshots and
> > just complete feature request description) so that users can clearly
> see  the options and pick what
> > they like the best. We can work with Pavel on it.
> >
> > If you agree, I would post the two proposals here before actual
> implementation.
> >
>
> Yes, it would be fine see concrete proposals to discuss it before
> implementation. Thanks.
>

in the end, we decided, we will probably try out both ways. I will likely
implement the 'make srpm'
command in addition to 'tito', 'tito --test', 'rpkg' options in the SCM tab
and Pavel will make new
source type called 'Custom' (or something similar) where user can script
out the way how sources
for a subsequent srpm build are going to be fetched. This script will be
stored in DB and will
launched in a chroot initialized by a set of predefined buildroot packages
(i.e. fedpkg, wget,). Both
solutions will be fairly equivalent, except in the first case the script
will be stored in a Git repository,
whereas in the second, it will be stored in the COPR database. The latter
will likely offer more
more freedom in where to fetch sources from (i.e. launchpad.net or CPAN)
whereas the former
will be focused mainly on Git and SVN (likely) sources.

Consider this still to be in a proposal state. We will see how well the
actual implementation goes.


>
> P.
>
>
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Kernel 4.13 rebase plans

[jack smith]

Hello Laura,

Is it possible that these 2 bugs, that are probably due to a wrong config, be 
fixed in 4.13 ?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1491521
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470995

More infos : https://github.com/MattDevo/firmware/issues/74

Thanks !
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: State of Sparkeshare in Fedora

[Luya Tshimbalanga]

On 21/09/17 08:02 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
>
> s sparkleshare doesn't have its dependency satisfied.
>
> According to the sparkleshare release notes[0] the 1.3.0; release
> added the gtk3 bindings... so any of those ought to help.
>
> The build dependencies are more complex than I can do in a few minutes
> though[1]
>
> The 2.0 release the release notes states has breaking changes from 1.X
> ... 
>
> To get this updated someone needs to package webkit2-sharp (and any
> dependencies that needs to build) ... gtk-sharp3 is already packaged
> though which should help.
>
webkit2-sharp is now packaged for the first step:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=25135

Update for sparkleshare can proceed


-- 
Luya Tshimbalanga
Graphic & Web Designer
E: l...@fedoraproject.org
W: http://www.coolest-storm.net

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Please review 48973: Indexing a ExactIA5Match attribute with a IgnoreIA5Match matching rule triggers a warning

[thierry bordaz]

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/48973

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/e9c88aa920e588d5fd279b2671c5824ae5366b2faf2cbf196eed4c73cc3058c4-0001-Ticket-48973-Indexing-a-ExactIA5Match-attribute-with.patch
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Beta release Go/No-Go Meeting - 3rd round

[jkurik]

Dear all,

You are kindly invited to the meeting:
   Beta release Go/No-Go Meeting - 3rd round on 2017-09-28 from 17:00:00 to 
19:00:00 UTC
   At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net

The meeting will be about:

Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering meet to 
determine if the release criteria are met for a particular release. This 
meeting is called the Go/No-Go Meeting.

Verifying that the Release criteria are met is the responsibility of the QA 
Team. Release Candidate (RC) availability and good QA coverage are 
prerequisites for the Go/No-Go meeting.

If you have any bug on the list, please help us with Beta release. If we won't 
be ready by Thursday, we will use this meeting to review blockers and decide 
what to do.


Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/6787/

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Improving Linux laptop battery life: Testers Wanted

[Hans de Goede]

Hi,

On 26-09-17 16:59, Germano Massullo wrote:

This message may be useful to others having my similar problem.
On a Thinkpad X220, after having booted the custom kernel, running

[root@machine]# cat /sys/class/scsi_host/host0/link_power_management_policy

I get

max_performance

instead of

med_power_with_dipm


Here some machine details

[root@machine]# cat /etc/rc.d/rc.local
#!/bin/sh

for i in /sys/class/scsi_host/host*/link_power_management_policy; do
     echo med_power_with_dipm > $i
done


[root@machine]# ls -latr /etc/rc.d/rc.local
-rwxrwxr-x. 1 user user 119 13 set 14.53 /etc/rc.d/rc.local


It might be that systemd does not like that rc.local is owned
by "user" rather then "root" ? Have you tried manually
executing rc.local as root:

/etc/rc.d/rc.local

And / or have you tried to do the echo manually as root ?

Regards,

Hans
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Please review 48085: CI tests - replication - encryption changelog

[Sankar Ramalingam]

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/48085
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/0c948151c8e29b905b0a96203a835d21f5992d450856cf6277e0acd77b989845-0001-Encryption-changelog-tests.patch
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] No Steering Committee Meeting this week

[Stephen John Smoogen]

I am cancelling this weeks meeting. Will have our next meeting at
2017-10-04 if all goes well.

-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Please review 48085: CI tests - replication - mmr state tests

[Sankar Ramalingam]

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/48085/comment/465453/edit
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/b76ff898d193193379fab90a1edd92ba78472d56654e2ccea0694020deb83355-0001-mmrepl-state-tests.patch
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Please review 48085: CI tests - replication - encryption changelog

[Sankar Ramalingam]

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/48085
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/3f8653a217454e37fc3b06819a8e3e70b2f0114f6ba9a204a37ec245efc2a038-0001-Encryption-changelog-tests.patch
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: F28 System Wide Change: Annobin

[Florian Weimer]

On 09/27/2017 03:11 PM, Chris Adams wrote:

Once upon a time, Jan Kurik  said:

This change causes extra information to be stored in binary files
compiled by gcc. This information can be used by scripts to check on
various features of the file, such as the hardening options used of
potential ABI conflicts.


One thing that is not mentioned: how much information is stored in the
binaries?  How much larger will the resulting binaries be?


Nick should be able to provide some statistics.  It's designed to be 
very small.

Would it be possible to include this in the debuginfo, rather than the
binaries?


Debuginfo packages are only available for bulk download after a compose. 
 They are not available for the buildroots.  This makes it more 
difficult to see, in a timely fashion, if changes to the build process 
have the intended effect.


Thanks,
Florian
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: F28 System Wide Change: Annobin

[Chris Adams]

Once upon a time, Jan Kurik  said:
> This change causes extra information to be stored in binary files
> compiled by gcc. This information can be used by scripts to check on
> various features of the file, such as the hardening options used of
> potential ABI conflicts.

One thing that is not mentioned: how much information is stored in the
binaries?  How much larger will the resulting binaries be?

Would it be possible to include this in the debuginfo, rather than the
binaries?  It would seem that this additional data has a small area of
interest, but will increase storage and transfer for everybody.

-- 
Chris Adams 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: F28 System Wide Change: Annobin

[Florian Weimer]

To enable this change it is proposed that the redhat-rpm-config
package should be extended to add the "-fplugin=annobin" option to the
__global_compiler-flags macro. In theory such a change will be
completely invisible to Fedora users but should prove to be very
helpful to Fedora Release Management, assuming that they like the idea
of these annotated binaries.


One desired effect of this change is that we will have a way to quickly 
spot binaries which were not compiled with the redhat-rpm-config 
compiler flags, so this has the side effect that we might contemplate 
packaging changes for those packages which are not coupled to 
redhat-rpm-config yet.


Thanks,
Florian
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

F28 System Wide Change: Annobin

[Jan Kurik]

= Proposed System Wide Change: Annobin =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Annobin

Change owner(s):
* Nick Clifton 

This change causes extra information to be stored in binary files
compiled by gcc. This information can be used by scripts to check on
various features of the file, such as the hardening options used of
potential ABI conflicts.


== Detailed Description ==

The plan is to use a plugin to gcc to record extra information in the
object files it creates. This information can then be examined by
static analysis tools. The information is recorded in a compact,
extensible format, described here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Toolchain/Watermark

The Fedora annobin package is an implementation of the plugin for gcc.
It also includes some example scripts that demonstrate how the
recorded information can be used to, for example, check that an
executable has been compiled with the correct hardening options, or
detect if any conflicting ABI options have been used when compiling
various parts of the executable.

To enable this change it is proposed that the redhat-rpm-config
package should be extended to add the "-fplugin=annobin" option to the
__global_compiler-flags macro. In theory such a change will be
completely invisible to Fedora users but should prove to be very
helpful to Fedora Release Management, assuming that they like the idea
of these annotated binaries.



== Scope ==
* Proposal owners:
Make sure the annobin plugin is ready.

* Other developers:
An update is needed to the redhat-rpm-config package in order for the
plugin to be invoked when gcc is used to compile programs, and to add
a dependency upon the annobin package.

* Release engineering: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7069
- Coordination with release engineering is needed.
- A mass rebuild will be required.

* List of deliverables:
All delivered images are affected, however there no changes to the list it self.

* Policies and guidelines:
No updates needed

* Trademark approval:
N/A (not needed for this Change)
-- 
Jan Kuřík
Platform & Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic
___
devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

F28 System Wide Change: Annobin

[Jan Kurik]

= Proposed System Wide Change: Annobin =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Annobin

Change owner(s):
* Nick Clifton 

This change causes extra information to be stored in binary files
compiled by gcc. This information can be used by scripts to check on
various features of the file, such as the hardening options used of
potential ABI conflicts.


== Detailed Description ==

The plan is to use a plugin to gcc to record extra information in the
object files it creates. This information can then be examined by
static analysis tools. The information is recorded in a compact,
extensible format, described here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Toolchain/Watermark

The Fedora annobin package is an implementation of the plugin for gcc.
It also includes some example scripts that demonstrate how the
recorded information can be used to, for example, check that an
executable has been compiled with the correct hardening options, or
detect if any conflicting ABI options have been used when compiling
various parts of the executable.

To enable this change it is proposed that the redhat-rpm-config
package should be extended to add the "-fplugin=annobin" option to the
__global_compiler-flags macro. In theory such a change will be
completely invisible to Fedora users but should prove to be very
helpful to Fedora Release Management, assuming that they like the idea
of these annotated binaries.



== Scope ==
* Proposal owners:
Make sure the annobin plugin is ready.

* Other developers:
An update is needed to the redhat-rpm-config package in order for the
plugin to be invoked when gcc is used to compile programs, and to add
a dependency upon the annobin package.

* Release engineering: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7069
- Coordination with release engineering is needed.
- A mass rebuild will be required.

* List of deliverables:
All delivered images are affected, however there no changes to the list it self.

* Policies and guidelines:
No updates needed

* Trademark approval:
N/A (not needed for this Change)
-- 
Jan Kuřík
Platform & Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Re: Opportunist for Outreachy

[Ilias Stamatis]

2017-09-27 14:57 GMT+03:00 M.S. :

> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm a research student pursuing my Masters in IIIT-Hyderabad. I am keen on
> working on the 389 Directory Server project for Outreachy.
>
> I have prior experience in configuring, maintaining and managing systems
> in an MHRD(Ministry of Human Resource Development, India) funded project. I
> have completed the required course credits towards my degree and am working
> on my Thesis currently. This would be great a opportunity for me to learn
> and start contributing to the open source community at Fedora.
>
> As I am a bit new to the community it would be nice if anyone could guide
> me to a few useful resources to get me started. I started reading the
> documentation [1].
>
> [1] http://www.port389.org/
>
> Cheers,
> Soumya
>
> ___
> 389-devel mailing list -- 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
>
Hello and welcome!

You can find some general guidelines about contributing to the project
here: http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/contributing.html

If you haven't setup the server already I suggest you start by building the
server and try some basic operations like ldapsearch or creating users and
groups in order to experiment a bit. You can find build instructions on the
above link as well.

RHDS documentation will also be your friend, especially the Administration
Guide: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en/red-hat-directory-server/

Don't waste too much time with these guides now, just skim through them.
You'll refer to them when needed.

I don't know what the Outreachy project will be about, but if it involves
lib389, wibrown offers some initial directions here:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@
lists.fedoraproject.org/message/TJS7IS7MGERQIME53DSIYMDUHEYTJYZ4/

You could try to install lib389 and experiment with the cli tools (dsconf,
dsctl, dsidm) as well and see what's there and what's missing.

Hope that helps,

Ilias
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1496447] New: perl-Search-Xapian-1.2.25.0 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1496447

Bug ID: 1496447
   Summary: perl-Search-Xapian-1.2.25.0 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-Search-Xapian
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: emman...@seyman.fr, perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org



Latest upstream release: 1.2.25.0
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.2.24.0-6.fc27
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Search-Xapian/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

Based on the information from anitya: 
https://release-monitoring.org/project/6580/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Opportunist for Outreachy

[M.S.]

Hello everyone,

I'm a research student pursuing my Masters in IIIT-Hyderabad. I am keen on
working on the 389 Directory Server project for Outreachy.

I have prior experience in configuring, maintaining and managing systems in
an MHRD(Ministry of Human Resource Development, India) funded project. I
have completed the required course credits towards my degree and am working
on my Thesis currently. This would be great a opportunity for me to learn
and start contributing to the open source community at Fedora.

As I am a bit new to the community it would be nice if anyone could guide
me to a few useful resources to get me started. I started reading the
documentation [1].

[1] http://www.port389.org/

Cheers,
Soumya
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1496272] Perl's ccflags do not include a -Wformat option

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1496272

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
Last Closed||2017-09-27 07:56:11



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Please review 48085: CI tests - replication - mmr state tests

[Sankar Ramalingam]

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/48085
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/2e205ae74cad722f0ffed668b306fb8bdb15fd1eba5f75a564cdcf0358f91411-0001-mmrepl-state-tests.patch
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1492094] CVE-2017-12837 CVE-2017-12883 perl: various flaws [ fedora-all]

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1492094



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-5.24.3-389.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-2008fdd7e2

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

jplesnik pushed to perl-PAR-Packer (f25). "Rebuild against Perl 5.24.3"

[notifications]

From 37360c702b50fae165b3195388b4fce7a66bc281 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova 
Date: Sep 27 2017 08:34:59 +
Subject: Rebuild against Perl 5.24.3


---

diff --git a/perl-PAR-Packer.spec b/perl-PAR-Packer.spec
index edf7f9f..3ba9259 100644
--- a/perl-PAR-Packer.spec
+++ b/perl-PAR-Packer.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-PAR-Packer
 Version:1.035
-Release:4%{?dist}
+Release:5%{?dist}
 Summary:PAR Packager
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/PAR-Packer/
@@ -154,7 +154,10 @@ fi
 %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/tkpp.png
 
 %changelog
-* Wed Aug 16 2017 Petr Pisar  - 1.036-4
+* Wed Sep 27 2017 Jitka Plesnikova  - 1.035-5
+- Rebuild against Perl 5.24.3
+
+* Wed Aug 16 2017 Petr Pisar  - 1.035-4
 - Rebuild against Perl 5.24.2 (bug #1470542)
 
 * Thu Jul 13 2017 Petr Pisar  - 1.035-3



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-PAR-Packer/c/37360c702b50fae165b3195388b4fce7a66bc281?branch=f25
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

jplesnik pushed to perl-PAR-Packer (f26). "Rebuild against Perl 5.24.3"

[notifications]

From 510ce6a7ce5e16e951dd0b4ba2228d96155d3c3d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova 
Date: Sep 27 2017 08:27:53 +
Subject: Rebuild against Perl 5.24.3


---

diff --git a/perl-PAR-Packer.spec b/perl-PAR-Packer.spec
index 7d8e82e..e47708d 100644
--- a/perl-PAR-Packer.spec
+++ b/perl-PAR-Packer.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-PAR-Packer
 Version:1.036
-Release:5%{?dist}
+Release:6%{?dist}
 Summary:PAR Packager
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/PAR-Packer/
@@ -155,6 +155,9 @@ fi
 %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/tkpp.png
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Sep 27 2017 Jitka Plesnikova  - 1.036-6
+- Rebuild against Perl 5.24.3
+
 * Wed Aug 16 2017 Petr Pisar  - 1.036-5
 - Rebuild against Perl 5.24.2 (bug #1470542)
 



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-PAR-Packer/c/510ce6a7ce5e16e951dd0b4ba2228d96155d3c3d?branch=f26
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

jplesnik pushed to perl-PAR-Packer (f27). "Rebuild for Perl 5.26.1"

[notifications]

From c34790516b1912072245815831aa6cc69e981a34 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova 
Date: Sep 27 2017 08:12:28 +
Subject: Rebuild for Perl 5.26.1


---

diff --git a/perl-PAR-Packer.spec b/perl-PAR-Packer.spec
index 7c8b600..287eae9 100644
--- a/perl-PAR-Packer.spec
+++ b/perl-PAR-Packer.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-PAR-Packer
 Version:1.037
-Release:7%{?dist}
+Release:8%{?dist}
 Summary:PAR Packager
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/PAR-Packer/
@@ -155,6 +155,9 @@ fi
 %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/tkpp.png
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Sep 27 2017 Jitka Plesnikova  - 1.037-8
+- Rebuild for Perl 5.26.1
+
 * Thu Aug 03 2017 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.037-7
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Binutils_Mass_Rebuild
 



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-PAR-Packer/c/c34790516b1912072245815831aa6cc69e981a34?branch=f27
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

jplesnik pushed to perl-PAR-Packer (master). "Rebuild for Perl 5.26.1"

[notifications]

From c34790516b1912072245815831aa6cc69e981a34 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova 
Date: Sep 27 2017 08:12:28 +
Subject: Rebuild for Perl 5.26.1


---

diff --git a/perl-PAR-Packer.spec b/perl-PAR-Packer.spec
index 7c8b600..287eae9 100644
--- a/perl-PAR-Packer.spec
+++ b/perl-PAR-Packer.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-PAR-Packer
 Version:1.037
-Release:7%{?dist}
+Release:8%{?dist}
 Summary:PAR Packager
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/PAR-Packer/
@@ -155,6 +155,9 @@ fi
 %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/tkpp.png
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Sep 27 2017 Jitka Plesnikova  - 1.037-8
+- Rebuild for Perl 5.26.1
+
 * Thu Aug 03 2017 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.037-7
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Binutils_Mass_Rebuild
 



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-PAR-Packer/c/c34790516b1912072245815831aa6cc69e981a34?branch=master
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1494883] perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts-0.035 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1494883

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-MooseX-AttributeShortc
   ||uts-0.035-1.fc28
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2017-09-27 03:55:04



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

ppisar pushed to perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts (master). "0.035 bump"

[notifications]

From 58f194f48080864e850f40be81e34ac601d4ad1b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Písař 
Date: Sep 25 2017 11:45:04 +
Subject: 0.035 bump


---

diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index a087659..d2efb2e 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -19,3 +19,4 @@
 /MooseX-AttributeShortcuts-0.032.tar.gz
 /MooseX-AttributeShortcuts-0.033.tar.gz
 /MooseX-AttributeShortcuts-0.034.tar.gz
+/MooseX-AttributeShortcuts-0.035.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts.spec 
b/perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts.spec
index 93494f6..cb76029 100644
--- a/perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts.spec
+++ b/perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts.spec
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
 %{bcond_without perl_MooseX_AttributeShortcuts_enables_optional_test}
 
 Name:   perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts
-Version:0.034
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Version:0.035
+Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Shorthand for common Moose attribute options
 License:LGPLv2
 URL:http://metacpan.org/release/MooseX-AttributeShortcuts/
@@ -28,9 +28,10 @@ BuildRequires:  perl(MooseX::Meta::TypeConstraint::Mooish)
 BuildRequires:  perl(MooseX::Role::Parameterized)
 BuildRequires:  perl(MooseX::Types::Common::String)
 BuildRequires:  perl(MooseX::Types::Moose)
+BuildRequires:  perl(MooseX::Util)
 BuildRequires:  perl(namespace::autoclean) >= 0.24
 # Tests only:
-BuildRequires:  perl(blib) >= 1.01
+BuildRequires:  perl(blib)
 BuildRequires:  perl(constant)
 BuildRequires:  perl(File::Spec)
 BuildRequires:  perl(IO::Handle)
@@ -42,7 +43,7 @@ BuildRequires:  perl(Path::Class)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::CheckDeps) >= 0.010
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Fatal)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Moose)
-BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Moose::More) >= 0.047
+BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Moose::More) >= 0.049
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::More) >= 0.94
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Requires)
 %if %{with perl_MooseX_AttributeShortcuts_enables_optional_test}
@@ -84,6 +85,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Mon Sep 25 2017 Petr Pisar  - 0.035-1
+- 0.035 bump
+
 * Fri Aug 11 2017 Petr Pisar  - 0.034-2
 - Rebuild to deal with a clash after merging f27-rebuild tag
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index fc33b30..84fcbf3 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-SHA512 (MooseX-AttributeShortcuts-0.034.tar.gz) = 
d842ff97801683fe40affbec3cb9c1ac985b3995ab157ab8d43445baf2e30e7cc1e37088285682c7a9de3a1c4d8e1c95aa0f7a51b59a6fd6f4c076c451ad74ef
+SHA512 (MooseX-AttributeShortcuts-0.035.tar.gz) = 
f6a2a5189fde9e3e35c2c869d76ee90820360a6bfe1e4342c7499d958b621acb5de8a4d1c6aa566c42cd3f8c840e28fe0bcbc7d2aeabf89f7760d02170914631



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts/c/58f194f48080864e850f40be81e34ac601d4ad1b?branch=master
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1494883] perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts-0.035 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1494883
Bug 1494883 depends on bug 1495257, which changed state.

Bug 1495257 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Util - Moose::Util extensions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1495257

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1496272] Perl's ccflags do not include a -Wformat option

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1496272



--- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova  ---
I look at man page and there is mention "-Wformat is enabled by -Wall."

-Wall is included in ccflags.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Package add request

[Hedayat Vatankhah]

/*Jason L Tibbitts Iii*/ wrote on Tue, 26 Sep 2017 22:49:18 -0500:

"HV" == Hedayat Vatankhah  writes:

HV> I'd say to stick with upstream naming, which is the Fedora
HV> way. Changing the names to lower case is a must in Debian, they
HV> simply don't allow upper case letters to be in package names. The
HV> developer clearly prefers ZeGrapher, so I think according to Fedora
HV> naming guidelines, ZeGrapher is preferred.

Well, those guidelines do say:

"Package names should be in lower case and use dashes in preference to
underscores."

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Naming, under "General Naming".

Upper case names aren't forbidden, of course, but there is a definite
and clearly-stated preference for lower case names.

What about this:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Naming#Case_Sensitivity

Keep in mind to respect the wishes of the upstream maintainers. If they 
refer to their application as "ORBit", you should use "ORBit" as the 
package name, and not "orbit". However, if they do not express any 
preference of case, you should default to lowercase naming.





  - J<

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1494826] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20170923 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1494826



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Module-CoreList-5.20170923-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-ebb472530b

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1495026] perl-File-Fetch-0.54 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1495026



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-File-Fetch-0.54-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-113a554702

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1493797] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.36 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1493797



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.38-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-6b6ea99218

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1494820] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.38 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1494820



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.38-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-6b6ea99218

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1492094] CVE-2017-12837 CVE-2017-12883 perl: various flaws [ fedora-all]

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1492094



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-5.24.3-395.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-89492f7161

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1492094] CVE-2017-12837 CVE-2017-12883 perl: various flaws [ fedora-all]

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1492094



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-5.24.3-388.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e141cece09

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1494826] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20170923 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1494826



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Module-CoreList-5.20170923-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-5119997b1b

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1495026] perl-File-Fetch-0.54 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1495026



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-File-Fetch-0.54-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-b9596ff93f

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1493804] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20170920 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1493804

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Module-CoreList-5.20170923-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-5119997b1b

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1494820] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.38 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1494820



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.38-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-af2e240516

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1493797] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.36 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1493797

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.38-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-af2e240516

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Package add request

[James Hogarth]

On 27 Sep 2017 04:50, "Jason L Tibbitts III"  wrote:

> "HV" == Hedayat Vatankhah  writes:

HV> I'd say to stick with upstream naming, which is the Fedora
HV> way. Changing the names to lower case is a must in Debian, they
HV> simply don't allow upper case letters to be in package names. The
HV> developer clearly prefers ZeGrapher, so I think according to Fedora
HV> naming guidelines, ZeGrapher is preferred.

Well, those guidelines do say:

"Package names should be in lower case and use dashes in preference to
underscores."

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Naming, under "General Naming".

Upper case names aren't forbidden, of course, but there is a definite
and clearly-stated preference for lower case names.

 -


That refers to the package name, which he's already made lowercase, and not
the installed binaries though
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Self Introduction: Sergey Avseyev

[Sergey Avseyev]

On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:57 PM, Igor Gnatenko
 wrote:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1495985
>>
> Quickly checked spec file and gave some notes 

Thank you, Igor. I have fixed all your notes and updated the ticket
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org