Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for Athos Ribeiro,(athoscr)
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 03:13:31PM -0400, Ben Beasley wrote: Does anyone know how to contact Athos Ribeiro (FAS: athoscr)? This email is part of the non-responsive maintainer process (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223422). Hi Ben, Thanks for the contact :) I haven't been able to give those some love due to ENOTIME different job in a while. I am setting up my fedora dev env once again this week and will start either giving some love to each of those or start passing the one I am no longer interested in maintaining forward! The following PR and bug/NEEDINFO have received no response in 7-9 months: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-defcon/pull-request/1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936574 The activity report at https://src.fedoraproject.org/user/athoscr/ shows no activity in the past year, and fedora-active-user reports: $ python3 fedora_active_user.py --user athoscr --nofas Last action on koji: Wed, 31 May 2023 tag_package_owners entry created by bodhi [still active] Last package update on bodhi: 2021-02-19 23:00:32 on package hugo-0-1 Last actions performed according to fedmsg: - io.pagure.prod.pagure.issue.comment.added on 2023-02-15 07:07:42 A list of some other apparently-neglected bugs follows. Updates available for a long time with the release-monitoring.org bugs still in the NEW state: flawfinder: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1914559 python-fontMath: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974954 python-glyphsLib: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881116 python-pyclipper: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=194 rubygem-chake: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1907051 rubygem-fakefs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2209178 rubygem-pathspec: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1912644 A Python 3.12 compatibility bug has also received no response since late last year: python-firehose: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2154946 Additionally, a request to consider fixing or retiring a package: rubygem-sinatra-rabbit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880144 -- Athos Ribeiro ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Review swap: hugo container image
Hi, I am packaging a container image and I would love to get a review on it: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1930236 I can review either a container image or an RPM package back for you :) regards, Athos ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: fedora-minimal container and registry negative feedback
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 09:22:45AM +, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: The tag page for fedora-minimal seems to be working https://registry.fedoraproject.org/repo/fedora-minimal/tags/. Do you have a link of the page that is blank ? I get a blank page for this one as well (and for all the other tag pages). This used to work though, and there hasn't been any changes in the reg package. Could anyone take a look in the `reg server` logs and also check if the static content has been generated? That's the very link from which I get a blank page, and Firefox reports an empty resource (^U to view source). The developer console on the other hand gives me the following warning: The character encoding of the HTML document was not declared. The document will render with garbled text in some browser configurations if the document contains characters from outside the US-ASCII range. The character encoding of the page must be declared in the document or in the transfer protocol. Which is logical since the content-type header doesn't give a charset and the response body is empty. Trying with curl -v I see the following response: < HTTP/2 200 < date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 09:18:47 GMT < server: Apache < strict-transport-security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload < x-frame-options: SAMEORIGIN < x-xss-protection: 1; mode=block < x-content-type-options: nosniff < referrer-policy: same-origin < last-modified: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 08:25:07 GMT < etag: "0-5a948e9b307cf" < accept-ranges: bytes < content-length: 0 < apptime: D=193 < x-fedora-proxyserver: proxy10.iad2.fedoraproject.org < x-fedora-requestid: XvsDdwgZ9DOnVuTIdll6NQE < content-type: text/html Note the explicit zero content length. HTH, Dridi ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Orphaning my golang packages
On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 04:57:53PM -0400, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: On Tue, 7 Jul 2020 at 13:05, Fabio Valentini wrote: Hi everybody, I have to finally admit that I'll never again be able to play catch-up with the ever-changing sprawling go library dependency tree of syncthing. I have switched to using bundled dependencies for syncthing ~years ago already, and I do not have the time nor the energy to do the amount of work that would be necessary to un-bundle everything again. The following packages are now orphaned: - golang-github-calmh-du - golang-github-calmh-xdr - golang-github-chmduquesne-rollinghash - golang-github-d4l3k-messagediff - golang-github-gobwas-glob This one is used by hugo, and you're already admin, so you probably want to become primary maintainer, Athos. Taken. Thanks for the heads up here :) - golang-github-jackpal-gateway - golang-github-minio-sha256-simd - golang-github-petermattis-goid - golang-github-syncthing-notify - golang-github-thejerf-suture - golang-github-vitrun-qart - golang-gopkg-asn1-ber-1 - golang-gopkg-ldap-2 These two are used by golang-vitess, Robert-André. I think most of them have never been used for anything but building syncthing, so they have been useless baggage for me for years. Some are also used by other packages, and I hope that those few can find a new home. The packages should comply with the latest Packaging Guidelines for Go, should be up-to-date, and are all building successfully, with passing test suites. Thanks. Fabio -- Elliott -- Athos Ribeiro ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Please BuildRequire python3-setuptools explicitly
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 06:26:23PM +0200, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: Hello everyone, there are plenty of Python packages in Fedora currently using setuptools at buildtime but not all of them are BuildRequiring it explicitly. This only works because python3-devel (transitively) depends on python3-setuptools. We would like to kindly ask you to add explicit BuildRequires for python3-setuptools to packages where setuptools is used. It will help us with testing new versions of setuptools in the future or with decoupling Python and setuptools. Today, if we want to know if a package is using setuptools, we have to do `fedpkg prep` and use grep to search for setuptools. Using a repoquery is much more convenient. Several packages can successfully build either with or without setuptools (they use try-except import and fallback to distutils from the standard library). Such packages are especially dangerous when not BuildRequiring setuptools -- they can produce different results depending on the presence of setuptools: either an .egg-info metadata directory (w/setuptools) or .egg-info text file (w/distutils). RPM has troubles when upgrading directories to files [1]. [1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Directory_Replacement/ According to our grep based query on Fedora Rawhide, there are 621 known packages using setuptools without BuildRequiring it at this point: Thank you very much for your help with this. On behalf of python-setuptools maintainers, Tomáš Hrnčiar [snip...] flawfinder athoscr Fixed in rawhide [snip...] ___ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Please BuildRequire python3-setuptools explicitly
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 06:26:23PM +0200, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: Hello everyone, there are plenty of Python packages in Fedora currently using setuptools at buildtime but not all of them are BuildRequiring it explicitly. This only works because python3-devel (transitively) depends on python3-setuptools. We would like to kindly ask you to add explicit BuildRequires for python3-setuptools to packages where setuptools is used. It will help us with testing new versions of setuptools in the future or with decoupling Python and setuptools. Today, if we want to know if a package is using setuptools, we have to do `fedpkg prep` and use grep to search for setuptools. Using a repoquery is much more convenient. Several packages can successfully build either with or without setuptools (they use try-except import and fallback to distutils from the standard library). Such packages are especially dangerous when not BuildRequiring setuptools -- they can produce different results depending on the presence of setuptools: either an .egg-info metadata directory (w/setuptools) or .egg-info text file (w/distutils). RPM has troubles when upgrading directories to files [1]. [1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Directory_Replacement/ According to our grep based query on Fedora Rawhide, there are 621 known packages using setuptools without BuildRequiring it at this point: Thank you very much for your help with this. On behalf of python-setuptools maintainers, Tomáš Hrnčiar [snip...] flawfinder athoscr Fixed in rawhide [snip...] ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Intent to retire python-ufolib
The upstream project has been deprecated upstream in favor of shipping ufolib2 (available as python3-ufolib2) as part of the fonttools project (python-fonttools). I will retire python-ufolib at some point during this week, unless someone raises any concerns for not proceeding in this manner. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Orphaning rubygem-echoe
Hi, I am orphaning rubygem-echoe. The upstream project is dead, some of its dependencies upstreams are dead and it's past time to let it go. Regards, Athos ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Non-responsive maintainer: pcpa
On Sat, May 09, 2020 at 09:57:18PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: Hello all, Hi Neal, I've been trying to get python-flask-babel[0] updated to v1.0.0 via PR[1]. Unfortunately, pcpa hasn't been responding to pings in the PR or emails. I've also filed the requisite non-responsive maintainer check bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833723 Does anyone know how to get in touch with him? I am Cc'ing Paulo in another email address here. [0]: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-flask-babel [1]: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-flask-babel/pull-request/5 -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Packages with broken dependencies on Python 3.7
On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 12:39:23AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: python-epub athoscr Skipping some tests due to toxml attributes order for now. -- Athos Ribeiro ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: 15 nonresponsive maintainers
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 07:17:52PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: ape...@gmail.com apevec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731531 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1705932 athoscribe...@gmail.com athoscr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731532 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1705391 Still active. I recently moved to a different country and am still finding my way to my normal routine. Sorry for that! :) aurel...@bompard.org abompard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731533 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1715598 gho...@fedoraproject.org gholms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731534 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1706032 chkumar...@gmail.com chandankumar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731535 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1714177 james.hoga...@gmail.com jhogarth https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731536 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1707051 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1675762 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605796 jpoko...@redhat.com jpokorny https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731537 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1706194 jspal...@gmail.com jspaleta https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731538 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687959 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698305 karlthe...@gmail.com hguemar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731539 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718363 ktdre...@ktdreyer.com ktdreyer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731540 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1706223 kumarpraveen.nit...@gmail.com kumarpraveen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731541 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1712005 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1675742 mi...@redhat.com mikeb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731542 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672098 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1706003 mschm...@redhat.com michich https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731543 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1706166 pabelan...@redhat.com pabelanger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731544 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1714212 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689885 space...@gmail.com brouhaha https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731545 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1706066 Anyone knows how to contact the maintainers? ;) -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Golang SIG for Fedora
On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 09:18:29AM -0400, Zachary Snyder wrote: > I will be interested in joining the sig! Frequent GO user and Fedora is my > daily driver. I will not be at flock but I will see everyone on IRC! I will definitely join the sig as well, since I do maintain a few golang packages. -- Athos Ribeiro http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/2XVZ73QBEYKK7MPWAEATVG62VNSNG7UH/
Re: Golang SIG for Fedora
On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 02:45:54PM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > On 07/27/2018 08:28 AM, Jakub Cajka wrote: > >There are few big outstanding issues that needs to be solved that need > > more than individual work, most notably the Go packaging guidelines and > > tooling. I think that should be one of the first tasks for the SIG. > > I'm not looking to join the SIG, but I will share my experience with golang > in Fedora. > > It appears that packages are being dumped into Fedora and forgotten about. > I'm trying to package "Packer"[1] and ran into multiple dependencies that > were committed once and never updated. This has to change. In my experience, the tough parts about these dependencies that got forgot about are: 1) they are only dependencies, nobody uses them for anything else; 2) many of them are not versioned upstream (we just have references to commits) 3) different applications that depend on them may need different revisions of them. while solving 3 is part of our duty as packagers (making sure to port the dependencies to use the latest versions of their dependencies), 2 seems to be quite common in the golang community... -- Athos Ribeiro http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/AID5NXKVSVTU55E4GRUK6LE2XZRL5YPL/
Re: new section for 'Join the package collection maintainers'
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:54:07AM +0100, René Genz wrote: > Taking feedback from Athos and you into account here is a new proposal: > ---8<--- > 3. One-off contributions > > Changes to existing packages can be suggested by submitting (https://docs.pagure.org/pagure/usage/pull_requests.html)>. > You must have a to create a pull > request. > > If your account is not a member of the 'packager' group: > * cloning your fork works only with the HTTPS URL and > * you cannot write to your fork > That is why you must upload your changes to an external Git hosting platform > (e.g. https://pagure.io/new)>) and use a (https://docs.pagure.org/pagure/usage/pull_requests.html#remote-git-to-pagure-pull-request)>. Looks great. I'd suggest the following substitution: s/That is why/Hence,/ > > The requirement for accounts to be a member of the 'packager' group in order > to be able to write to their forks on src.fedoraproject.org is being worked > on. > ---8<--- I believe this last paragraph does not add anything to the documentation and could be ommited. Whenever the feature is implemented, the whole section will need to be refactored anyway. > > Anything that should be changed? Thanks for the effort :) -- Athos Ribeiro http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: new section for 'Join the package collection maintainers'
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 02:13:14PM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: [snip...] > How about: > > 3. One-off contributions > > Changes to existing packages can be suggested by submitting requests (https://docs.pagure.org/pagure/usage/pull_requests.html)>. > You must have a to create > a pull request. If your account is not in the 'packager' group then > you cannot create a fork on src.fedoraproject.org so must use an > external Git hosting platform (e.g. https://pagure.io/new) and use a > (https://docs.pagure.org/pagure/usage/pull_requests.html#remote-git-to-pagure-pull-request)>. > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org I believe this will do it. +1 -- Athos Ribeiro http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: new section for 'Join the package collection maintainers'
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 12:35:19AM +0100, René Genz wrote: > the other day I wanted to contribute a fix to an RPM package's spec file. > > I struggled with uploading my changes to my fork on src.fedoraproject.org. > puiterwijk and clime from #fedora-admin IRC channel on freenode.net pointed > me in the right direction: > * 'packager' status for FAS account required, else all repos, including > forks, are read-only > * workaround is to use a "Remote pull-request" > * requirement of 'packager' status is being worked on. > > With this information contributing the fix was easy. > [snip...] > > Now I try to add the information to Fedora's documentation. > From my point of view, this would be a good website: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers > > > I propose to: > add a new major point 2, so: > "2. How to join the Fedora Package Collection Maintainers?" > will be: > "3. How to join the Fedora Package Collection Maintainers?" > > The new major point 2 would be something like: > ---8<--- > 2. Notes for one-off contributors > > Your contribution is welcome. > > At first you must (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers?rd=PackageMaintainers/Join#Create_a_Fedora_Account)>. > > Before proceeding, please sync your account by login on > https://src.fedoraproject.org/ using your FAS credentials. See 2.3.1 - It deals with the FAS account creation. Maybe you could link there to avoid replication :) > > At the moment any repos, including forks, on https://src.fedoraproject.org > require your FAS account to have 'packager' status for write access (and read > access if you use the "SSH" Source GIT URL). > > Either you get the status or you use a (https://docs.pagure.org/pagure/usage/pull_requests.html#remote-git-to-pagure-pull-request)>, > f.e. with https://pagure.io/new)>, as a workaround. > The requirement to be a packager is being worked on. > ---8<--- I would rather see something like: If you are not an Fedora packager, i.e., you are not in the 'packager' FAS group, you can send pull requests to src.fedoraproject.org. To do so, you must use a https://docs.pagure.org/pagure/usage/pull_requests.html#remote-git-to-pagure-pull-request)>, f.e. with https://pagure.io/new)> Also, I do not understood what you meant with "The requirement to be a packager is being worked on." > > What do you think? I think it is valuable information and should be added to the wiki :) Thanks! > I can edit the wiki. Can you? Note that to edit the wiki you must be in at least one extra FAS group other the the CLA ones. -- Athos Ribeiro http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Spring cleaning my golang packages (orphaning now unused stuff)
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 07:29:35PM +, Fabio Valentini wrote: [snip...] > > Also, Athos, if you're reading this, I see that hugo is also using my > package golang-github-gobwas-glob - I can make you a co-maintainer if you > want. Yes, please :) Thank you, Fabio -- Athos Ribeiro http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Re: Trying out More Go Packaging: Bugs and Questions
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 07:22:42PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le mardi 27 février 2018 à 18:34 +0100, Robert-André Mauchin a écrit : > > > > > > How do we test this? I installedtho go-srpm-macros from Rawhide but it > > doesn't seem to have the required macros? > > Yes in rawhide go-compilers and go-srpm-macros are in an intermediary > not fully tested/integrated state. > > The original PR that matched what's in the wiki and is known to work is > here > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/go-compilers/pull-request/2 > > Just grab the files rebuild the resulting go-compilers package and > you're set to try it on your projects (in a fedora-devel buildroot) > > I'll try to mix it with all the nice work Jan did to keep all the parts > where he improved the implementation without the loss of integration > polish of the go-srpm-macros and go-compilers packages he pushed to > fedora-devel. And I definitely do not want something that requires > rewriting the wiki once again :) Are there any intentions to push the macros into f28? I really liked the improvements in the spec file sizes, but porting too many packages now and keep them updated in both f28 and rawhide (making the branches completely different) would mean a lot of extra work. Or maybe I am just too late here since we are quite close from the beta freeze. Thanks for the hard work though :) -- Athos Ribeiro http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Removal of BuildRoot
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 09:13:22AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 10:37:08PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 4:25 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III <ti...@math.uh.edu> > > wrote: > > >>>>>> "DS" == David Sommerseth <d...@eurephia.org> writes: > > > > > > DS> False positives are also easily filtered out by adding .rpmlint to > > > DS> the dist-git repository. > > > > > > Which is an absolutely terrible name for that. Really. Why would > > > anyone at all ever think it is a good idea to _hide_ the file that > > > controls that? > > > > > > > I agree. What do we need to do to change this to .rpmlintrc? > > A pull-request to fedpkg or rpkg sounds like a good start :) https://pagure.io/rpkg/pull-request/293 -- Athos Ribeiro http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 11:09 AM, Igor Gnatenko < ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > If you fixed package(s), found false positive, found missing packages in > list > or anything else -- please let me know. python-compreffor rats Fixed in rawhide -- Athos Ribeiro http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Looking for some (Python) Package Review Request for a sponsee
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 01:53:23PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hi, Hi Miro, > > I want to sponsor Aivar Annamaa [1]. I would like him to review some > packages first. Are you working on something? Anyone who will need a package > review, please ping us (Aivar is CC'ed and also subscribed to this list). > Python packages would be appreciated, but anything at least a bit related > would do. I am sponsoring David Silva at the moment, I started the review of his first package [1], but it still needs a more detailed review. It is a very simple package, but if the idea is to let Aivar to review a few packages, this could be a good start point :) [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1512226 -- Athos Ribeiro http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr ___ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: common location of spec files in upstream sources
2017-10-26 15:02 GMT-06:00 Mátyás Selmeci <mselmeci...@gmail.com > > For upstream projects that provide spec files in their > repositories, do y'all tend to see a common location for the spec > files? Like dist/.spec or rpm/.spec, etc. My > organization is trying to standardize on a location for the > software we maintain, and it would be better to use something that > many in the open source community also use. Here are some ideas. The following projects are either strongly related to Fedora or widely used in the project. These are just some projects I had cloned in my personal PC for some reason, so, randomly picked: - koji, copr-cli, FedoraReview, python-bugzilla ship spec files in the project root directory - pagure and mote ship spec files under the 'files/' directory - mock ships it as 'mock/mock.spec' - ansible ships it as 'packaging/rpm/ansible.spec' - gofed ships it as 'hacking/gofed.spec' - RPM does not ship a .spec file in the rpm repository (maybe somewhere else?) As mentioned here, Debian ships it under the debian directory in the root dir because that's how their tooling searches for packaging data. As pointed above, it seems that there are no default paths to ship the spec file. Just let packagers know it exists. When packaging for different distros, chances are the spec file will need changes anyway. -- Athos Ribeiro http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: "New" developer here
Welcome :) On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 02:36:01PM +0100, Will Crawford wrote: > Mainly I want to not duplicate effort if anyone else is working on the > same things, but I don't see anything awaiting review. I started looking into bringing ggplot2 and caret into Fedora, but when I realized the number of dependencies I would need to package I got a bit doscouraged (been a bit busy with some golang packages anyway). Let me know if you need any help reviewing new packages or packaging dependencies. -- Athos Ribeiro http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: apple swift fedora support
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 10:58:32AM +, abdul@wipro.com wrote: > Please could you remove me from the distribution list . > I'm no more working with Red hat stuff. > And this emails are triggering to my official email id which I don't want to. Just send a message to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org and you will be unsubscribed from the list. -- Athos Ribeiro http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Hi
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 09:30:13AM -0400, Jiri Kucera wrote: > Hi all, Welcome Jiri, > > my name is Jiri Kucera and I am a new hire at Red Hat Czech. I will be > focusing on Go packaging and development and maintenance of tooling for Go > source code analysis. I am interested in both :) Please let us know what you will be doing in the golang mailing list :) -- Athos Ribeiro http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Why is Fx 57 in Updates Testing?
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 01:14:50PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > All the energy devoted to this thread would imho be better spent on > trying to encourage the authors of popular extensions to update to the > new model, or trying to find alternatives that work with FF57+. > Personally, I now have µBlock Origin, Gnome Shell Integration, and > uMatrix as a replacement for noScript, and that covers my basic needs. > The rest I can live without. I'd encourage everybody else to make similar > reckoning, and identify the missing _essential_ extensions, and > concentrate on them. +1 Although some extensions are hopeless, as pointed out earlier in the thread. I maintain a small extension to toggle proxy configurations and had to completely rewrite it to support webextensions and even though it still carries the same name/branding, it is a completely different extension regarding its features (still better than letting users down). I feel sorry for people who put a lot of effort maintaining their extensions who now have to either abandon them and their users or completely rewrite their extensions. -- Athos Ribeiro http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Brave New Packaging World
On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 10:40:46AM -0500, Greg Hellings wrote: > So I have a new package that's gotten through review. Previously requesting > git access was handled by pkgdb. > > Where is that functionality now? Is it still there? Is there a new way to > do it under Pagure? You want to use fedrepo-req https://pagure.io/fedrepo_req -- Athos Ribeiro http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Self Introduction: Clement Verna
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 09:42:16PM +0200, Clement Verna wrote: > Hello all, Hi, > > I have been contributing to Fedora by helping the infrastructure team mostly > on development tasks ( pagure, bodhi, pagure-importer, etc). I recently > volunteer to give some love to fedora-packages[0]. Nice! :) > That brings me here since I would like to move fedora-packages from rhel6 to > rhel7, to do so I need to unretire python-xappy package. > > I have created a review [1] for it, and as it is my first package , I am > looking after a sponsor :). > I am also interested to contribute further by getting more involved in python > packaging. Great! You are around for a while now, so I am not sure we need to welcome you again, but well... welcome! I started reviewing your package and I will be happy to sponsor you in the packagers group once we are done with the review and you provide a few informal reviews in that same review request. I did not assign the package to myself, and I believe it would be nice to have someone else formally reviewing your package, since I am already sponsoring you (if no one does it by the time we are done, I will). -- Athos Ribeiro http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: How to change upstream release monitoring in pagure?
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 04:33:13PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > You can change the anitya integration by opening a pull-request on > https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests > As you can see in the git repo there are files for each container/modules/rpm > having a specific setting. > You can simply add a file corresponding to your container/modules/rpms with > one of: > monitoring: monitoring-with-scratch > monitoring: no-monitoring > monitoring: monitoring This is nice to know... are there any plans to have a feature for toggling those options in pagure as the one we had in pkgdb? I mean, does it make any sense having it in pagure? -- Athos Ribeiro http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Packages giveaway
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 09:57:02AM +0200, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote: > python-lxml -- XML processing library combining libxml2/libxslt with the Actually, someone already requested to adopt this package :) -- Athos Ribeiro http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Packages giveaway
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 09:57:02AM +0200, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I've been tried for the past 1+ year to be active on the Fedora Project > throught packaging and in other ways, even if my daily job is absorbing a > big part of my energies and time. Also, lately, even more things are > absorbing my energy and time. > > Clearly this is not working very well, so I'm giving up all my Point of > Contacts position on packages. > I will try to work on them, even if I'm not th PoC anymore, but I don't > want to keep those packages stuck due to my (un)availability. > > > Those are the list of packages I just orphanated: > > > golang-github-stretchr-objx -- Go package for dealing with maps, slices, > golang-github-stretchr-testify -- Tools for testifying that your code will I need this two packages as dependencies, but you are not listed as POC for them (maybe someone has taken it, in this case, I'm glad they did) > python-colorama -- Cross-platform colored terminal text I need this one as well, but again, you are not listed as the POC for this one either. > python-lxml -- XML processing library combining libxml2/libxslt with the I will take this one > rats -- Rough Auditing Tool for Security I am interested in this one as well, but there are co-maintainers there, so I will wait to see if any of them would like to take it. If they do not, I will take it in a week or two. Also, thanks for all the effort you put maintaining mutt! Happy user here :) -- Athos Ribeiro http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: I need your reviews
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 06:45:57PM +0200, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > - golang-github-jlaffaye-ftp - A FTP client package for Go >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475817 > - golang-github-golang-sync - Go concurrency primitives >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475872 > - golang-github-billziss-gh-cgofuse - Cross-platform FUSE library for Go >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475741 I am taking these 3 for now :) -- Athos Ribeiro http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: git push fails for new packages
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 03:18:54PM +0800, Chenxiong Qi wrote: > I just forked fedpkg minutes ago when writing this mail. I also can't > push to my forked repo. > > I got these fetch and push urls. > > mydev ssh://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/forks/cqi/rpms/fedpkg.git > (fetch) > mydev ssh://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/forks/cqi/rpms/fedpkg.git > (push) > > and got similar error reported originally in this thread, > > FATAL: W any forks/cqi/rpms/fedpkg cqi DENIED by fallthru > (or you mis-spelled the reponame) > fatal: Could not read from remote repository. > > Please make sure you have the correct access rights > and the repository exists. I am getting the same error while trying to push to a repository created this morning. $ git push origin master FATAL: W any rpms/golang-github-shogo82148-go-shuffle athoscr DENIED by fallthru (or you mis-spelled the reponame) fatal: Could not read from remote repository. Please make sure you have the correct access rights and the repository exists. -- Athos Ribeiro http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Need reviewer for golang based packages
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 02:46:26AM +0900, Tomofumi Hayashi wrote: > Hi all, Hello, > > I need reviewer who is good at golang rpm packages because its > reviewer asks me to have more reviewers who is good at golang rpm > packages in Fedora. > Could someone help review the following RPM packaging? > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1463492 I will help with the review. Feel free to join (not many of) us in #fedora-golang -- Athos Ribeiro http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Spam
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 10:41:13AM -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > I haven't seen any spam on the devel list. I even checked my spam folder. > Maybe the messages are being sent directly to you, not the list? I am getting those messages as well :) -- Athos Ribeiro http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Review Swaps: Simple golang packages (for syncthing)
On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 09:05:23AM +, Fabio Valentini wrote: > Hi everybody, Hi Fabio, > > I need somebody to take on the Review Requests of the only 3 golang > dependencies that are still blocking a syncthing package: > > golang-github-cznic-zappy: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431743 > golang-github-cznic-lldb: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431745 > golang-github-cznic-ql: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431748 > > When that's done, I need somebody to do the package review of syncthing > itself ;) > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427634 > > and the inotify extension: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431868 > I am taking them all. I am traveling today, but I will start these reviews later today or tomorrow morning. I will tell you the packages I would like to get reviewed back in the tickets! :) -- Athos Ribeiro http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Review swap: watchman - a file watching service
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 02:03:12PM +0100, Matthew Smith wrote: > Hello all, I am looking for a review swap, here is a link to my bug: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1450590 > > Also I'm looking to get sponsored. > > Thank you :) Hello Matthew, As I pointed out in the other thread, it would be nice if you performed informal reviews on other packages that are waiting for a review while you wait for a sponsor, since shuch sponsor may ask you to do so (and it will show you understand the Fedora packaging guidelines). [1] shows a list of packages waiting for review. I am willing to sponsor you in the end of this process, after you show you do understand how to read and apply the packaging guidelines and that you are willing to maintain you packages. In order to perform an official review and approve a package into Feodra, you must be in the packager FAS group. In this case, I am not sure if you can offer a review swap, since someone can review your package and not sponsor you, meaning you would not be able t (officially) review their package back. You can include the links for your informal reviews in your review request. [1] http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html -- Athos Ribeiro http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Self introduction: David Carlos - Gsoc Student
Welcome, David On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 11:05:43PM +0200, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > > The main ideia is to monitor repositories, and when a new package or > > a new version of an existent package is released, we download the package > > source code, > > and run several static analyzers on it. Each monitored distribution will be > > a kiskadee > > plugin, that implements an interface that we will define. The result of > > these > > analyses, which is parsed using the Fedora Firehose project, will be > > stored in a relational database (this idea has been discussed a while ago > > in the > > devel mailing lists, by the guys in the Static Analysis SIG [2]). With this > > database several analyses can be made, and by using several static > > analyzers we > > want to find heuristics to identify false positives (this is not part of > > GSoC > > though). > > Having myself recently found a bug in zlib thanks to static analysis I > was a bit surprised that such a critical library wouldn't get more > "static" eyes on it. > > > A similar tool exists in the Debian distribution, but it is way > > dependent on their infrastructure, and one of our objetives is to keep > > kiskadee > > simple, and extensible. > > Naive question, but wouldn't it be interesting to piggyback on > release-monitoring.org and fedmsg for the monitoring part? And start > static analysis when notified of new upstream releases? That is a great idea which we haven't considered yet. We will definitely consider doing so (the idea is to have an extensible tool which we could point to different software repositories). Thank you for the input! I Cc'd the summer-coding mailing list here :) -- Athos Ribeiro http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Self Introduction: Matthew Smith
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 10:47:29AM +0100, Matthew Smith wrote: > Whoops yeah, I meant to include that. It's bug 1450590. Here is a link, in case anyone wants to check it out: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1450590 > I ran the package review tool against my own bug and there are a few problems. > > Should I make the appropriate changes, upload the new spec and SRPM with a > bumped version number and link to those in a new comment of the bug? I believe you meant Release number, in this case, yes, you can upload the new spec and srpm in a new comment with a new release number! Some people also like to show rpmlint output in the review request. Since you already ran fedora-review in it, it wouldn't hurt to show that as well. -- Athos Ribeiro http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Self Introduction: Matthew Smith
On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 02:53:12PM +0100, Matthew Smith wrote: > The Fedora wiki suggests that new people introduce themselves and > point out their review request on this mailing list, so here I am :) Welcome :) > > I've attempted to package the Facebook watchman tool, I suppose it's > just a wrapper around inotify and friends but it ends up being quite > useful. It would be nice to provide a link to that review request. In the meanwhile, you probably want to perform some package reviews [1] and provide links for them in your review request. You will need a sponsor and he/she will probably ask you to perform those reviews. Make sure to let the packagers know you are not a packager yet so your reviews are not formal ones. > > I don't have much prior experience with open source but learning is > fun and it all seems so interesting. Awesome, I hope we can help with that! [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines -- Athos Ribeiro http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: co-owner wanted on wordpress and roundcubemail
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 04:06:37PM +0200, Remi Collet wrote: > Hi, > > I try to maintain Wordpress and Roundcubemail, > but I will prefer to have some co-owner on these. > > Especially to allow (security) update when I'm offline, > or busy with some important downstream work (PHP). > > Feel free to contact me, or request ACL on pkgdb. I'd love to help (and learn) with wordpress :) -- Athos Ribeiro http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fonts packaging Help wanted
Hey, On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 11:29:26AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > https://github.com/googlei18n/fontmake - a python based font compiler. I have initial package versions for fontmake deps (and fontmake) needing reviews: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433757 glyphsLib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434410 compreffor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435230 ufo2ft https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440971 pyclipper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440968 setuptools_scm_git_archive https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440992 booleanOperations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441023 fontmake I will package trufont next :) -- Athos Ribeiro http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Is Pagure slow for you too?
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 11:14:58AM +0100, Jiri Eischmann wrote: > I wonder if it's just me or others also have problems with performance > of Pagure. Pagure is always slower for me than e.g. Github, but it's > bearable. However, there are times when I have to wait easily 30-60 sec > to load a page which makes Pagure almost impossible to work with. It is not just with Pagure here, most of Fedora infra is really slow for me (it has always been). Sometimes I do wait 8~12 seconds for a page to load (wiki, pagure, mailman archives, etc). I always thought it had some relation with my location (I am in Brazil). Maybe this thread belongs to the infrastructure list? -- Athos Ribeiro http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fonts packaging Help wanted
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 11:29:26AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings. > > I thought I would toss this out in case anyone was looking for things to > package up. I can help with that. > https://github.com/googlei18n/fontmake - a python based font compiler. > Here are the dependencies that need packaging for fontmake (and the review requests for 2 of them) ufolibhttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433623 defconhttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433626 MutatorMath glyphsLib cu2qu compreffor ufo2ft pyclipper booleanOperations -- Athos Ribeiro http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Review Swaps: (mostly) very simple golang packages
> 6) golang-github-cznic-fileutil - File utility functions for Go (depends on > [2]) > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431732 I will take this as well, would you take a look at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394923 ? Thanks! -- Athos Ribeiro http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Gitignore configuration for packages
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:33:15PM +0100, Guido Aulisi wrote: > Il giorno gio, 16/03/2017 alle 11.10 +, Tom Hughes ha scritto: > > On 16/03/17 10:47, Guido Aulisi wrote: > > > Il giorno gio, 16/03/2017 alle 10.38 +, Tom Hughes ha scritto: > > > > On 16/03/17 10:32, Guido Aulisi wrote: > > > > > > > > > I was thinking about adding some default gitignores to package > > > > > repositories, I think we need at least: > > > > > > > > > > /results_* > > > > > /*.src.rpm > > > > > > > > > > This is to ignore fedpkg mockbuild output > > > > > > > > > > What do you think about that? > > > > > Should I add that gitignore lines by myself in every package I > > > > > manintain or should it be a global fedora config? It would be nice to have that. > > > > > > > > No, because if you do that then "fedpkg clean" won't cleanup > > > > those > > > > files > > > > anymore... What if we patch fedpkg first, so the 'clean' command would always remove the srpm files (even if in the gitignore)? Is there any situation where this is not desired? A new packager asked me once if they should include the SRPM in the repository. I explained why they shouldn't, but it took me some time to find a link with documentation supporting that [1] (maybe this should be included in the guidelines or in the package maintance guide). [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Source_Control#Repository_Contents -- Athos Ribeiro http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Review Swaps: (mostly) very simple golang packages
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:52:06PM +, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > 1) golang-github-edsrzf-mmap-go - Portable mmap package for Go > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431568 This is duplicated (closed) > > 2) golang-github-cznic-mathutil - Supplemental utilities for Go's rand and > math packages > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431587 This is duplicated (closed) > > 3) golang-github-oschwald-maxminddb-golang - MaxMind DB Reader for Go > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431759 I took this one > 5) golang-github-zillode-notify - File system event notification library on > steroids > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431867 I took this one as well Would you be able to review these packages (simple golang packages as well)? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394576 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426965 -- Athos Ribeiro http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: How to ask for package co-maintaining
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:32:09AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > BTW it is always good idea to contact package maintainer prior asking > ACLs. Most of the maintainers are interested in your intentions ... A couple weeks ago someone said one tends do ignore random ACL requests not followed by an email or some other sort of contact. -- Athos Ribeiro http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
New packager: Olivier Lemasle
Hello everyone, I just sposored Olivier Lemasle in the packager group. He is helping me package a few Go dependencies for a static webpage generator. His fas name is olem. Welcome, Olivier. -- Athos Ribeiro http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Self Introduction: Olivier Lemasle
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 12:06:33AM +0100, Olivier Lemasle wrote: > Hi everyone, Welcome, Olivier > I use GNU/Linux since 2007 and Fedora since 2014, and I'd like to > contribute to Fedora community ; that's why I'm willing to become a Fedora > Package Manager. > > Here are my first review requests (for Go libraries required by Hugo [3]): > - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344936 > - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1345887 > > And an informal package review: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332267 > I'll continue doing informal package reviews in the coming days. > > Looking forward to contributing this great community, I will review both of your packages. In the meanwhile, keep positing links to more informal reviews in the same ticket you posted this first one. If you are interested in hugo, we are packaging it and you can check the current status in [1]. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Athoscr/packaging_hugo -- Athos Ribeiro http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Self introduction/GSoC '17
On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 08:37:34AM -, vinayakagarwal6...@gmail.com wrote: > Hello everyone! > My name is Vinayak Agarwal. I am a Computer Science student currently > pursuing Bachelors. I would like to be participate in this group. Hello, Vinayak > > I would some assistance in getting started in contributing to Fedora. > > I was looking at the project idea 'Integration between package managers: dnf > pip plugin' and was quite interested in the same. I wrote a basic script to > emulate the functionality. > > Could someone please guide me on how to go ahead? You can start by creating an account in Fedora Account System at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/ You can start hanging out in #fedora-python @ freenode and checking the dnf repositories at https://github.com/rpm-software-management/ (is this moving to pagure?) While at IRC, you can also ping the guys in the channel to get more information on the project. Now, if you also want to know other areas of the project, you can also check https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join Welcome :) -- Athos Ribeiro http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr ___ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: New pastebin service on paste.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 04:47:45PM +, Richard Hughes wrote: > I'm not sure if this is the right mailing list for this issue. > Basically, the paste.fedoraproject.org site has been recently changed, > and it's basically useless for me now. This screenshot shows the > issue: > https://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/Screenshot%20from%202017-02-23%2016-38-52.png > > My frustration is that with all the beautifully designed CSS and > padded chrome around everything we can only fit 22 lines of actual > text on the screen. That's about half of the lines that I can get when > using http://pastebin.com and a third of what I can get with > https://paste.opensuse.org. The paste URLs from the latter are also > https://paste.opensuse.org/53391866 (35 chars) compared to > https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/3epoM9U0i4oKyPlw7Z6nfl5M1UNdIGYhyRLivL9gydE= > (82 chars) > > I find myself no longer using paste.fedoraproject.org -- it can't just > be me being a grumpy old man, can it? Am I holding it wrong? I agree with the url being too long. About the sizes, you can alway append '/raw' in the end of the URL or use --rawurl on fpaste. I am not aware of the details on why we moved to this new paste, but I also agree that we do not need a fancy website for that and maybe that was not the reason we moved. -- Athos Ribeiro http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Orphaning packages
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 09:50:57AM +0100, Filip Szymański wrote: > - python-epub I am taking this one -- Athos Ribeiro http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Self Introduction: Matej Marusak
On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 02:07:43PM -, Matej Marusak wrote: > Hello everyone, > My name is Matej Marušák. I am student at the Brno University of Technology. > I > joined ABRT's team (https://github.com/abrt/) in RedHat as intern. I am very > thankful for having this great opportunity to learn so many new and cool > thinks. Now I would love to learn how to package and maintain packages in > Fedora. I plan to maintain and release new packages mainly from ABRT team. > > > Welcome :) -- Athos Ribeiro http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Ruby packages free to grap
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 03:31:59PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Hi all, > > Michal Fojtík recently orphaned all his packages due to lack of the > resources to maintain them properly (thans to taking care of them). Feel > free to grab some: I took _most_ of the packages without co-maintainers: rubygem-rack-accept rubygem-cri rubygem-xml-simple rubygem-sinatra-rabbit rubygem-simple-navigation rubygem-echoe -- Athos Ribeiro http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Orphaning two rubygems, co-maintainters wanted for others
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 01:33:13PM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote: > I've just orphaned: > > rpms/rubygem-pathspec -- Use to match path patterns such as gitignore ( > master f25 f24 epel7 ) > rpms/rubygem-semantic -- Utility class for parsing, storing, and comparing > versions ( master f25 f24 epel7 ) I am taking both rubygems -- Athos Ribeiro http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Self Introduction: Brian Exelbierd
Hi Brian, On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 07:15:01PM +0100, Brian Exelbierd wrote: > I have been active in several other areas of the project with my current > focus being on budgeting, documentation and my work as the Fedora > Community Action and Impact Coordinator. My background includes many > years spent as a developer and doing light system administration. > > I am looking for both a sponsor and reviewers for my package request. I see that Igor Gnatenko and Neal Gompa are reviewing the package and sponsoring you. Welcome to the packagers group :) -- Athos Ribeiro http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Python packages tests directory co-ownership
tl;dr: different packages own /usr/lib/pythonX/site-packages/tests and different files with the same name inside that directory. Hi all, I was going through a package review and realized the package under review owns /usr/lib/pythonX/site-packages/tests and some files inside the directory. since there were no subdirectories and there were no namespaces for the file names inside the directory, I went further and realized that the following packages are doing the same: python3-custodia-0:0.1.0-3.fc24.noarch python3-django-federated-login-0:1.0.0-9.fc24.noarch python3-journal-brief-0:1.1.3-3.fc24.noarch python3-oauth2-0:1.9.0-2.post1.fc24.noarch python3-repoze-who-plugins-sa-0:1.0.1-10.20160106gite1a36c5.fc24.noarch python-custodia-0:0.1.0-3.fc24.noarch python-django-federated-login-0:1.0.0-9.fc24.noarch python-libturpial-0:1.7.0-4.fc24.noarch python-repoze-who-plugins-sa-0:1.0.1-10.20160106gite1a36c5.fc24.noarch what's the problem with that? Well what if we would have a package named python-tests? shouldn't it own that directory? Also, since there are no namespaces inside that directory for each package owning files in there, they could end up owning different files with the same name. Actually, the following packages own /usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/tests/__init__.py python3-custodia-0:0.1.0-3.fc24.noarch python3-django-federated-login-0:1.0.0-9.fc24.noarch python3-oauth2-0:1.9.0-2.post1.fc24.noarch python3-repoze-who-plugins-sa-0:1.0.1-10.20160106gite1a36c5.fc24.noarch or /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/tests/__init__.py python-custodia-0:0.1.0-3.fc24.noarch python-django-federated-login-0:1.0.0-9.fc24.noarch python-libturpial-0:1.7.0-4.fc24.noarch python-repoze-who-plugins-sa-0:1.0.1-10.20160106gite1a36c5.fc24.noarch Is that all really a problem or am I missing something in the guidelines? -- Athos Ribeiro http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Self Introduction: Mike Miller
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 10:15:11AM -0400, Mike Miller wrote: > > I am looking forward to being a part of the community! Welcome :) -- Athos Ribeiro http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: FAS name change
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 08:21:31AM +0200, Sylvia wrote: > > Hello Athos! > > Did you solve your problem in Bodhi? Not yet! I was a little busy these days (moving to a cool new apartment). I will report the bug and ping Justing for the badges thing later this afternoon. Thank you guys! -- Athos Ribeiro http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Orphaned packages seeking new point of contact
> perl-Graph (f23) > perl-Graph (f24) > perl-Graph (f25) > perl-Graph (master) > perl-PostScript (f23) > perl-PostScript (f24) > perl-PostScript (f25) > perl-PostScript (master) > python-pysmell (f23) > python-pysmell (f24) > python-pysmell (f25) > python-pysmell (master) > python-webm (el6) > python-webm (f23) > python-webm (f24) > python-webm (f25) > python-webm (master) I took those -- Athos Ribeiro http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Self Introduction: Cody Hiar
> On Jun 13, 2016 10:09 PM, "Cody Hiar" <thornycrack...@fedoraproject.org> > wrote: > > > > Hello! > > > > My name is Cody Hiar and I'm dude that spends almost all my time during > the week on the command line. I've always wanted to start contributing to > open source and the only thing that has stayed constant through my limited > career so far is working on Linux so here I am trying to learn some new > tricks. I'm primarily interested in co-maintaining some python packages > since I think those would be the easiest to pick up. Hopefully after > co-maintaining with some guidance I'll be able to pick up some orphaned > packages. Welcome :) -- Athos Ribeiro http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Self Introduction: Athos Ribeiro
Hi, My name is Athos Ribeiro, I have been using Fedora for a while now and just submitted my first package (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242056). I am a Brazilian Software Engineering student at Universidade de Brasília (Brazil) and have been working on a project where we integrate some tools to in order to host Brazilian government Free Software. The package I am submitting is related to our project and is already present in the Debian project. I do work with the upstream developer of the package and do fix some bugs in there now and then. I will keep submitting the other packages we use in our projects whenever we decide they may be useful for other people. I am happy to be able to contribute to the project and hope I can keep contributing when possible. Thank you! -- Athos Ribeiro -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
