Re: [xwiki-devs] [PROPOSAL] So, what display name for the new default flavor ?

[Thomas Mortagne]

On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 10:19 AM, daniel glazman
 wrote:
>
>> Le 16 juin 2017 à 10:17, Thomas Mortagne  a écrit 
>> :
>>
>> I'm not talking specifically to you.
>
> Ok. That wasn't clear since you were replying to my message.
>
>> This is just a summary of the
>> thread and everything got a -1 except "Standard".
>
> Not sure it's the best choice from a Sales' point of view.

It's very possible but I need a name for Monday :)

We can discuss that more later and change the display name, its just a
line to change in a pom.xml.

>
> 
>



-- 
Thomas Mortagne

Re: [xwiki-devs] [PROPOSAL] So, what display name for the new default flavor ?

[Vincent Massol]

Hi Daniel,

> On 16 Jun 2017, at 10:19, daniel glazman  wrote:
> 
> 
>> Le 16 juin 2017 à 10:17, Thomas Mortagne  a écrit 
>> :
>> 
>> I'm not talking specifically to you.
> 
> Ok. That wasn't clear since you were replying to my message.
> 
>> This is just a summary of the
>> thread and everything got a -1 except "Standard".
> 
> Not sure it's the best choice from a Sales' point of view.

There’s no sales involved here...This is an open source project and it’s not 
sold ;) Maybe you meant “marketing” (which has a meaning in open source 
projects).

Sure, that’s your opinion (you may even be right!) but not the one of the 
others who replied.

We’ll still be able to change the name between 9.5RC1 and final, and even in 
the future if we find it’s not good enough or if we find a better one that we 
like more.

You should also know that this project is a meritocracy and has a Governance 
defined and the binding votes/decisions are done by the XWiki Committers (see 
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/Governance and 
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/Committership).

Thanks
-Vincent

> 
> 

Re: [xwiki-devs] [PROPOSAL] So, what display name for the new default flavor ?

[daniel glazman]

> Le 16 juin 2017 à 10:17, Thomas Mortagne  a écrit :
> 
> I'm not talking specifically to you.

Ok. That wasn't clear since you were replying to my message.

> This is just a summary of the
> thread and everything got a -1 except "Standard".

Not sure it's the best choice from a Sales' point of view.

Re: [xwiki-devs] [PROPOSAL] So, what display name for the new default flavor ?

[Thomas Mortagne]

I'm not talking specifically to you. This is just a summary of the
thread and everything got a -1 except "Standard".

On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 10:08 AM, daniel glazman
 wrote:
>
>> Le 16 juin 2017 à 09:22, Thomas Mortagne  a écrit 
>> :
>>
>> So the last proposal still standing is "Standard", release is Monday
>> so let's declare it the winner :)
>
> Wait.
> I never said my preference goes to "Standard" !
> You asked me what would be my choice between a given name and the same name 
> with a trailing "Flavor". I said the former is better, that's all.
>
> 



-- 
Thomas Mortagne

Re: [xwiki-devs] [PROPOSAL] So, what display name for the new default flavor ?

[daniel glazman]

> Le 16 juin 2017 à 09:22, Thomas Mortagne  a écrit :
> 
> So the last proposal still standing is "Standard", release is Monday
> so let's declare it the winner :)

Wait.
I never said my preference goes to "Standard" !
You asked me what would be my choice between a given name and the same name 
with a trailing "Flavor". I said the former is better, that's all.

Re: [xwiki-devs] [PROPOSAL] So, what display name for the new default flavor ?

[Thomas Mortagne]

So the last proposal still standing is "Standard", release is Monday
so let's declare it the winner :)

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 3:41 PM, daniel glazman
 wrote:
>> So you`re suggesting "XWiki Standard" instead of "Standard XWiki Flavor",
>> right? Sounds good to me, specially since I`m not a fan of dragging along
>> the word "Flavor" when the result will be displayed in a list of "flavors"
>> (i.e. it's redundant).
>
> Yes.
>
>> I think you`re mixing it with the Minimal (/Base/Core) flavor.
>
> No, I'm not making that confusion.
>
> 
>



-- 
Thomas Mortagne

Re: [xwiki-devs] [PROPOSAL] So, what display name for the new default flavor ?

[daniel glazman]

> So you`re suggesting "XWiki Standard" instead of "Standard XWiki Flavor",
> right? Sounds good to me, specially since I`m not a fan of dragging along
> the word "Flavor" when the result will be displayed in a list of "flavors"
> (i.e. it's redundant).

Yes.

> I think you`re mixing it with the Minimal (/Base/Core) flavor. 

No, I'm not making that confusion.

Re: [xwiki-devs] [PROPOSAL] So, what display name for the new default flavor ?

[Thomas Mortagne]

The examples given are the names of the extension so what you see in
Extension Manager which is not a specific Flavor context.

As for having a different name in the Flavor picker and Extension
Manager this is a feature that would need to be added since there is
no flavor name property right now in the extension descriptor (but
sure it's not very complex technically).

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Vincent Massol  wrote:
>
>> On 13 Jun 2017, at 14:48, Eduard Moraru  wrote:
>>
>> Hi, Daniel,
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 1:42 PM, daniel glazman 
>> wrote:
>>
> * "Base XWiki Flavor”
> * “Classic XWiki Flavor”
> * “Raw XWiki Flavor”
> * “Starter XWiki Flavor”
> * "Default XWiki Flavor”
> * "Generic XWiki Flavor”
> * “Standard XWiki Flavor”
> * "XWiki Flavor”
> * "Vanilla XWiki"
>>>
>>> Sorry to send this message without the threading references; I just
>>> subscribed to the devs@xwiki.org mailing-list and I would like to
>>> contribute my €0.02 to the discussion The items below are numbered for
>>> commenting convenience but are not ordered in any way.
>>>
>>> 1. The name XWiki already has its first letter at the end of the alphabet.
>>> Marketing-wise in the Software ecosystem, lists of apps are most often
>>> alphabetically sorted, granting a bonus to apps with a name in A, B or C,
>>> and a minus to the end of the alphabet. So all names there have to
>>> counterbalance that handicap and I think "self-descriptiveness" does
>>> matter.
>>>
>>
>>> 2. if you except "XWiki Flavor", the word "XWiki" comes in second position
>>> in all proposals, and that is not the best thing ever.
>>>
>>
>> So you`re suggesting "XWiki Standard" instead of "Standard XWiki Flavor",
>> right? Sounds good to me, specially since I`m not a fan of dragging along
>> the word "Flavor" when the result will be displayed in a list of "flavors"
>> (i.e. it's redundant).
>
> This is what I said in my previous email too. And BTW we may not need to drag 
> “XWiki” either, especially since I’ve suggested to display the “developed by” 
> in the DW UI so that users know who developed it and who’s supporting it.
>
> Now, the full name outside of the DW context would still be " 
>  Flavor”, as in "XWiki Standard Flavor”, “XWiki SAS Procedure 
> Flavor”, “XWiki Demo Flavor”, etc.
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>>
>>> 3. the name must be chosen wrt the targeted audience and the product's
>>> position on the market. I think Olivier has a point when he writes « what
>>> is the audience and the objectives ? »
>>>
>>> 4. more specifically about the proposals above:
>>>
>>>   4.1. a "flavor" holds the notion of specialization.
>>>
>>>   4.2. "Classic" can mean "legacy" in the Software world. Use carefully...
>>>
>>>   4.3. "Vanilla" is a geeky choice. Nobody else but geeks will get
>>> it,sorry.
>>>
>>>
>>> IMHO, "XWiki Foundation", "XWiki Core" or "XWiki Starter Kit" represent
>>> quite well what this is all about.
>>>
>>
>> I think you`re mixing it with the Minimal (/Base/Core) flavor. We`re
>> currently addressing the flavor that is to mirror the current XE
>> distribution, with all the bells and whistles (hence the
>> "Standard"/"Default" suggestions). It builds upon the Minimal distribution
>> (like other flavors should do).
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Eduard
>>
>>>
>>> 
>



-- 
Thomas Mortagne

Re: [xwiki-devs] [PROPOSAL] So, what display name for the new default flavor ?

[Vincent Massol]

> On 13 Jun 2017, at 14:48, Eduard Moraru  wrote:
> 
> Hi, Daniel,
> 
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 1:42 PM, daniel glazman 
> wrote:
> 
 * "Base XWiki Flavor”
 * “Classic XWiki Flavor”
 * “Raw XWiki Flavor”
 * “Starter XWiki Flavor”
 * "Default XWiki Flavor”
 * "Generic XWiki Flavor”
 * “Standard XWiki Flavor”
 * "XWiki Flavor”
 * "Vanilla XWiki"
>> 
>> Sorry to send this message without the threading references; I just
>> subscribed to the devs@xwiki.org mailing-list and I would like to
>> contribute my €0.02 to the discussion The items below are numbered for
>> commenting convenience but are not ordered in any way.
>> 
>> 1. The name XWiki already has its first letter at the end of the alphabet.
>> Marketing-wise in the Software ecosystem, lists of apps are most often
>> alphabetically sorted, granting a bonus to apps with a name in A, B or C,
>> and a minus to the end of the alphabet. So all names there have to
>> counterbalance that handicap and I think "self-descriptiveness" does
>> matter.
>> 
> 
>> 2. if you except "XWiki Flavor", the word "XWiki" comes in second position
>> in all proposals, and that is not the best thing ever.
>> 
> 
> So you`re suggesting "XWiki Standard" instead of "Standard XWiki Flavor",
> right? Sounds good to me, specially since I`m not a fan of dragging along
> the word "Flavor" when the result will be displayed in a list of "flavors"
> (i.e. it's redundant).

This is what I said in my previous email too. And BTW we may not need to drag 
“XWiki” either, especially since I’ve suggested to display the “developed by” 
in the DW UI so that users know who developed it and who’s supporting it.

Now, the full name outside of the DW context would still be " 
 Flavor”, as in "XWiki Standard Flavor”, “XWiki SAS Procedure 
Flavor”, “XWiki Demo Flavor”, etc.

Thanks
-Vincent

> 
>> 3. the name must be chosen wrt the targeted audience and the product's
>> position on the market. I think Olivier has a point when he writes « what
>> is the audience and the objectives ? »
>> 
>> 4. more specifically about the proposals above:
>> 
>>   4.1. a "flavor" holds the notion of specialization.
>> 
>>   4.2. "Classic" can mean "legacy" in the Software world. Use carefully...
>> 
>>   4.3. "Vanilla" is a geeky choice. Nobody else but geeks will get
>> it,sorry.
>> 
>> 
>> IMHO, "XWiki Foundation", "XWiki Core" or "XWiki Starter Kit" represent
>> quite well what this is all about.
>> 
> 
> I think you`re mixing it with the Minimal (/Base/Core) flavor. We`re
> currently addressing the flavor that is to mirror the current XE
> distribution, with all the bells and whistles (hence the
> "Standard"/"Default" suggestions). It builds upon the Minimal distribution
> (like other flavors should do).
> 
> Thanks,
> Eduard
> 
>> 
>> 

Re: [xwiki-devs] [PROPOSAL] So, what display name for the new default flavor ?

[Eduard Moraru]

Hi, Daniel,

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 1:42 PM, daniel glazman 
wrote:

> > > * "Base XWiki Flavor”
> > > * “Classic XWiki Flavor”
> > > * “Raw XWiki Flavor”
> > > * “Starter XWiki Flavor”
> > > * "Default XWiki Flavor”
> > > * "Generic XWiki Flavor”
> > > * “Standard XWiki Flavor”
> > > * "XWiki Flavor”
> > > * "Vanilla XWiki"
>
> Sorry to send this message without the threading references; I just
> subscribed to the devs@xwiki.org mailing-list and I would like to
> contribute my €0.02 to the discussion The items below are numbered for
> commenting convenience but are not ordered in any way.
>
> 1. The name XWiki already has its first letter at the end of the alphabet.
> Marketing-wise in the Software ecosystem, lists of apps are most often
> alphabetically sorted, granting a bonus to apps with a name in A, B or C,
> and a minus to the end of the alphabet. So all names there have to
> counterbalance that handicap and I think "self-descriptiveness" does
> matter.
>

> 2. if you except "XWiki Flavor", the word "XWiki" comes in second position
> in all proposals, and that is not the best thing ever.
>

So you`re suggesting "XWiki Standard" instead of "Standard XWiki Flavor",
right? Sounds good to me, specially since I`m not a fan of dragging along
the word "Flavor" when the result will be displayed in a list of "flavors"
(i.e. it's redundant).


>
> 3. the name must be chosen wrt the targeted audience and the product's
> position on the market. I think Olivier has a point when he writes « what
> is the audience and the objectives ? »
>
> 4. more specifically about the proposals above:
>
>4.1. a "flavor" holds the notion of specialization.
>
>4.2. "Classic" can mean "legacy" in the Software world. Use carefully...
>
>4.3. "Vanilla" is a geeky choice. Nobody else but geeks will get
> it,sorry.
>
>
> IMHO, "XWiki Foundation", "XWiki Core" or "XWiki Starter Kit" represent
> quite well what this is all about.
>

I think you`re mixing it with the Minimal (/Base/Core) flavor. We`re
currently addressing the flavor that is to mirror the current XE
distribution, with all the bells and whistles (hence the
"Standard"/"Default" suggestions). It builds upon the Minimal distribution
(like other flavors should do).

Thanks,
Eduard

>
> 
>
>

Re: [xwiki-devs] [PROPOSAL] So, what display name for the new default flavor ?

[daniel glazman]

> > * "Base XWiki Flavor”
> > * “Classic XWiki Flavor”
> > * “Raw XWiki Flavor”
> > * “Starter XWiki Flavor”
> > * "Default XWiki Flavor”
> > * "Generic XWiki Flavor”
> > * “Standard XWiki Flavor”
> > * "XWiki Flavor”
> > * "Vanilla XWiki"

Sorry to send this message without the threading references; I just subscribed 
to the devs@xwiki.org mailing-list and I would like to contribute my €0.02 to 
the discussion The items below are numbered for commenting convenience but are 
not ordered in any way.

1. The name XWiki already has its first letter at the end of the alphabet. 
Marketing-wise in the Software ecosystem, lists of apps are most often 
alphabetically sorted, granting a bonus to apps with a name in A, B or C, and a 
minus to the end of the alphabet. So all names there have to counterbalance 
that handicap and I think "self-descriptiveness" does matter.

2. if you except "XWiki Flavor", the word "XWiki" comes in second position in 
all proposals, and that is not the best thing ever.

3. the name must be chosen wrt the targeted audience and the product's position 
on the market. I think Olivier has a point when he writes « what is the 
audience and the objectives ? »

4. more specifically about the proposals above:

   4.1. a "flavor" holds the notion of specialization.

   4.2. "Classic" can mean "legacy" in the Software world. Use carefully...

   4.3. "Vanilla" is a geeky choice. Nobody else but geeks will get it,sorry.


IMHO, "XWiki Foundation", "XWiki Core" or "XWiki Starter Kit" represent quite 
well what this is all about.

Re: [xwiki-devs] [PROPOSAL] So, what display name for the new default flavor ?

[Olivier Seres]

Question that I think should be answered first : what is the audience and
the objectives ?

On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 4:09 PM, Guillaume Delhumeau <
guillaume.delhum...@xwiki.com> wrote:

> +0 for "Standard" (the definition is accurate but it definitively miss some
> sex-appeal)
> -1 for "Default" which is the opposite of sex-appeal.
>
> Vanilla might be a problem for users, but at least it was a cool name :)
>
> 2017-06-12 13:18 GMT+02:00 Vincent Massol :
>
> >
> > > On 12 Jun 2017, at 12:42, Eduard Moraru  wrote:
> > >
> > > "XWiki Vanilla", because it`s the *standard flavor* :D Sounds so funny
> > that
> > > I kind of like it :)
> > >
> > > However, I`m not so sure about non-techinical users or how that goes
> with
> > > other stuff that we already or might produce, since we don`t really
> have
> > a
> > > pattern on that. Fun proposal, though.
> >
> > My POV:
> >
> > * The wikipedia page on “Vanilla” shows that the name is perfect from a
> > technical POV. It really represents what we want.
> > * I think most of our users are non-tech and wouldn’t understand it since
> > I don’t think the “Vanilla” terminology is that common outside of tech
> > circles
> >
> > So I agree that it’s a fun proposal but we’ll get users asking us
> > frequently why we chose an ice-cream flavor for an XWiki flavor ;)
> >
> > Thus I’m also hesitating but I think I’m more -0 since “XWiki Vanilla"
> > sounds more like a code name than a real name. I think that I still
> prefer
> > “Standard” or “Default” ATM (with a small preference for “Standard” which
> > has a bit more meaning than “Default” for me). Now if everyone else
> prefers
> > “Vanilla”, I wouldn’t oppose it, as I also find it fun and to the point.
> >
> > Thanks
> > -Vincent
> >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Eduard
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 8:07 PM, Marta Girdea 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> I'm jumping in a bit late, but I was just wondering if anyone
> considered
> > >> "Vanilla" [1]. It was the absolute first thing that popped to my mind
> > when
> > >> I saw the discussion about naming the standard flavour.
> > >>
> > >> Just my 2 cents,
> > >> Marta
> > >>
> > >> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vanilla_software
> > >>
> > >> On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 7:07 AM, Vincent Massol 
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi Denis and all,
> > >>>
> >  On 10 Jun 2017, at 11:46, Denis Gervalle  wrote:
> > 
> >  Hi All,
> >  Sorry to jump in after an already long discussion since we are
> getting
> > >>> close to a conclusion, so I just don’t want my intervention to cause
> > more
> > >>> fuzz than good.
> >  I am in accordance with most of what was said so far, but “Default”
> > >>> looks to me a less valuable naming than “Standard”, it is not a
> strong
> > >>> opinion, so I give my +1 to “Standard” and +0 to “Default”. I will
> use
> > >>> “Standard" in the following, just to be clearer, but you can
> substitute
> > >> it
> > >>> with “Default” if you wish (you might notice further subtle
> > differences,
> > >> or
> > >>> not).
> >  So, what I am not sure about now is why all proposals end with
> “XWiki
> > >>> flavor” (and this is not really about the American spelling of
> flavour
> > !
> > >>> :D). All flavours we gonna have surely will be XWiki ones, won’t it ?
> > So
> > >> if
> > >>> we start with the “Standard XWiki Flavor”, I am afraid we are going
> to
> > >> lead
> > >>> a movement where everyone will name their flavour with that same
> > suffix.
> > >> Is
> > >>> that our intention ?
> >  “XWiki Standard Flavor” would already carry a different meaning,
> since
> > >>> it would say more “Standard flavour made by the XWiki team”. However,
> > if
> > >>> our intent was more to say this is a generic wiki flavour, using
> > >> “Standard
> > >>> Wiki Flavor” looks more in line with our intended meaning. And if our
> > >>> meaning is more that this is just a generic flavour, ending with
> > >> “Standard
> > >>> Flavor” is probably simpler, clearer and better.
> >  WDYT ?
> > >>>
> > >>> I agree with you.
> > >>>
> > >>> I think we have 2 choices for the name that appears in the DW UI:
> > >>> * “Standard”. We may not even need the “Flavor” suffix in the same
> way
> > as
> > >>> we don’t add an “Extension” suffix in the EM UI. IMO the DW UI for
> > >> flavors
> > >>> should indicate the author in the UI, something like ”Standard” and
> > then
> > >>> “developed by XWiki Development Team” or “developed by XWiki SAS” or
> > >>> “developed by Denis Gervalle”.
> > >>> * "XWiki Standard” or “XWiki Standard Flavor” to indicate it’s the
> one
> > >>> made by the XWiki open source dev team. So that could be the full
> name
> > >> but
> > >>> the name we display in the DW UI could simply be “Standard Flavor”
> and
> > >> then
> > >>> “developed by XWiki Development Team”, etc.
> > >>>
> > >>> If we want to use the term “Wiki” then it 

Re: [xwiki-devs] [PROPOSAL] So, what display name for the new default flavor ?

[Guillaume Delhumeau]

+0 for "Standard" (the definition is accurate but it definitively miss some
sex-appeal)
-1 for "Default" which is the opposite of sex-appeal.

Vanilla might be a problem for users, but at least it was a cool name :)

2017-06-12 13:18 GMT+02:00 Vincent Massol :

>
> > On 12 Jun 2017, at 12:42, Eduard Moraru  wrote:
> >
> > "XWiki Vanilla", because it`s the *standard flavor* :D Sounds so funny
> that
> > I kind of like it :)
> >
> > However, I`m not so sure about non-techinical users or how that goes with
> > other stuff that we already or might produce, since we don`t really have
> a
> > pattern on that. Fun proposal, though.
>
> My POV:
>
> * The wikipedia page on “Vanilla” shows that the name is perfect from a
> technical POV. It really represents what we want.
> * I think most of our users are non-tech and wouldn’t understand it since
> I don’t think the “Vanilla” terminology is that common outside of tech
> circles
>
> So I agree that it’s a fun proposal but we’ll get users asking us
> frequently why we chose an ice-cream flavor for an XWiki flavor ;)
>
> Thus I’m also hesitating but I think I’m more -0 since “XWiki Vanilla"
> sounds more like a code name than a real name. I think that I still prefer
> “Standard” or “Default” ATM (with a small preference for “Standard” which
> has a bit more meaning than “Default” for me). Now if everyone else prefers
> “Vanilla”, I wouldn’t oppose it, as I also find it fun and to the point.
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
> > Thanks,
> > Eduard
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 8:07 PM, Marta Girdea 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'm jumping in a bit late, but I was just wondering if anyone considered
> >> "Vanilla" [1]. It was the absolute first thing that popped to my mind
> when
> >> I saw the discussion about naming the standard flavour.
> >>
> >> Just my 2 cents,
> >> Marta
> >>
> >> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vanilla_software
> >>
> >> On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 7:07 AM, Vincent Massol 
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Denis and all,
> >>>
>  On 10 Jun 2017, at 11:46, Denis Gervalle  wrote:
> 
>  Hi All,
>  Sorry to jump in after an already long discussion since we are getting
> >>> close to a conclusion, so I just don’t want my intervention to cause
> more
> >>> fuzz than good.
>  I am in accordance with most of what was said so far, but “Default”
> >>> looks to me a less valuable naming than “Standard”, it is not a strong
> >>> opinion, so I give my +1 to “Standard” and +0 to “Default”. I will use
> >>> “Standard" in the following, just to be clearer, but you can substitute
> >> it
> >>> with “Default” if you wish (you might notice further subtle
> differences,
> >> or
> >>> not).
>  So, what I am not sure about now is why all proposals end with “XWiki
> >>> flavor” (and this is not really about the American spelling of flavour
> !
> >>> :D). All flavours we gonna have surely will be XWiki ones, won’t it ?
> So
> >> if
> >>> we start with the “Standard XWiki Flavor”, I am afraid we are going to
> >> lead
> >>> a movement where everyone will name their flavour with that same
> suffix.
> >> Is
> >>> that our intention ?
>  “XWiki Standard Flavor” would already carry a different meaning, since
> >>> it would say more “Standard flavour made by the XWiki team”. However,
> if
> >>> our intent was more to say this is a generic wiki flavour, using
> >> “Standard
> >>> Wiki Flavor” looks more in line with our intended meaning. And if our
> >>> meaning is more that this is just a generic flavour, ending with
> >> “Standard
> >>> Flavor” is probably simpler, clearer and better.
>  WDYT ?
> >>>
> >>> I agree with you.
> >>>
> >>> I think we have 2 choices for the name that appears in the DW UI:
> >>> * “Standard”. We may not even need the “Flavor” suffix in the same way
> as
> >>> we don’t add an “Extension” suffix in the EM UI. IMO the DW UI for
> >> flavors
> >>> should indicate the author in the UI, something like ”Standard” and
> then
> >>> “developed by XWiki Development Team” or “developed by XWiki SAS” or
> >>> “developed by Denis Gervalle”.
> >>> * "XWiki Standard” or “XWiki Standard Flavor” to indicate it’s the one
> >>> made by the XWiki open source dev team. So that could be the full name
> >> but
> >>> the name we display in the DW UI could simply be “Standard Flavor” and
> >> then
> >>> “developed by XWiki Development Team”, etc.
> >>>
> >>> If we want to use the term “Wiki” then it could come as a replacement
> for
> >>> the “Standard” term, to mention that it’s a generic wiki flavor, as
> >> opposed
> >>> to an intranet flavor, a knowledge base flavor, etc. But I agree that
> >> “Wiki
> >>> Flavor” is a good contender (and one that Ludovic mentioned too, he
> even
> >>> mentioned Structured Wiki Flavor). I’d be +0 on “Wiki Flavor”.
> “Standard
> >>> Wiki Flavor” is also possible and hints that there can be other generic
> >>> Wiki 

Re: [xwiki-devs] [PROPOSAL] So, what display name for the new default flavor ?

[Vincent Massol]

> On 12 Jun 2017, at 12:42, Eduard Moraru  wrote:
> 
> "XWiki Vanilla", because it`s the *standard flavor* :D Sounds so funny that
> I kind of like it :)
> 
> However, I`m not so sure about non-techinical users or how that goes with
> other stuff that we already or might produce, since we don`t really have a
> pattern on that. Fun proposal, though.

My POV:

* The wikipedia page on “Vanilla” shows that the name is perfect from a 
technical POV. It really represents what we want.
* I think most of our users are non-tech and wouldn’t understand it since I 
don’t think the “Vanilla” terminology is that common outside of tech circles

So I agree that it’s a fun proposal but we’ll get users asking us frequently 
why we chose an ice-cream flavor for an XWiki flavor ;)

Thus I’m also hesitating but I think I’m more -0 since “XWiki Vanilla" sounds 
more like a code name than a real name. I think that I still prefer “Standard” 
or “Default” ATM (with a small preference for “Standard” which has a bit more 
meaning than “Default” for me). Now if everyone else prefers “Vanilla”, I 
wouldn’t oppose it, as I also find it fun and to the point.

Thanks
-Vincent

> Thanks,
> Eduard
> 
> On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 8:07 PM, Marta Girdea 
> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I'm jumping in a bit late, but I was just wondering if anyone considered
>> "Vanilla" [1]. It was the absolute first thing that popped to my mind when
>> I saw the discussion about naming the standard flavour.
>> 
>> Just my 2 cents,
>> Marta
>> 
>> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vanilla_software
>> 
>> On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 7:07 AM, Vincent Massol 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Denis and all,
>>> 
 On 10 Jun 2017, at 11:46, Denis Gervalle  wrote:
 
 Hi All,
 Sorry to jump in after an already long discussion since we are getting
>>> close to a conclusion, so I just don’t want my intervention to cause more
>>> fuzz than good.
 I am in accordance with most of what was said so far, but “Default”
>>> looks to me a less valuable naming than “Standard”, it is not a strong
>>> opinion, so I give my +1 to “Standard” and +0 to “Default”. I will use
>>> “Standard" in the following, just to be clearer, but you can substitute
>> it
>>> with “Default” if you wish (you might notice further subtle differences,
>> or
>>> not).
 So, what I am not sure about now is why all proposals end with “XWiki
>>> flavor” (and this is not really about the American spelling of flavour !
>>> :D). All flavours we gonna have surely will be XWiki ones, won’t it ? So
>> if
>>> we start with the “Standard XWiki Flavor”, I am afraid we are going to
>> lead
>>> a movement where everyone will name their flavour with that same suffix.
>> Is
>>> that our intention ?
 “XWiki Standard Flavor” would already carry a different meaning, since
>>> it would say more “Standard flavour made by the XWiki team”. However, if
>>> our intent was more to say this is a generic wiki flavour, using
>> “Standard
>>> Wiki Flavor” looks more in line with our intended meaning. And if our
>>> meaning is more that this is just a generic flavour, ending with
>> “Standard
>>> Flavor” is probably simpler, clearer and better.
 WDYT ?
>>> 
>>> I agree with you.
>>> 
>>> I think we have 2 choices for the name that appears in the DW UI:
>>> * “Standard”. We may not even need the “Flavor” suffix in the same way as
>>> we don’t add an “Extension” suffix in the EM UI. IMO the DW UI for
>> flavors
>>> should indicate the author in the UI, something like ”Standard” and then
>>> “developed by XWiki Development Team” or “developed by XWiki SAS” or
>>> “developed by Denis Gervalle”.
>>> * "XWiki Standard” or “XWiki Standard Flavor” to indicate it’s the one
>>> made by the XWiki open source dev team. So that could be the full name
>> but
>>> the name we display in the DW UI could simply be “Standard Flavor” and
>> then
>>> “developed by XWiki Development Team”, etc.
>>> 
>>> If we want to use the term “Wiki” then it could come as a replacement for
>>> the “Standard” term, to mention that it’s a generic wiki flavor, as
>> opposed
>>> to an intranet flavor, a knowledge base flavor, etc. But I agree that
>> “Wiki
>>> Flavor” is a good contender (and one that Ludovic mentioned too, he even
>>> mentioned Structured Wiki Flavor). I’d be +0 on “Wiki Flavor”. “Standard
>>> Wiki Flavor” is also possible and hints that there can be other generic
>>> Wiki flavors that are not standard. So I’m also +0 for it.
>>> 
>>> Now outside of the DW UI, the full name of the flavors done by the XWiki
>>> Dev Team could be prefixed with XWiki as in “the XWiki Standard Flavor”
>> (or
>>> “XWiki Demo Flavor”). Other companies or individuals would name is with
>>> their identity, such as “the  Procedure Flavor”.
>>> 
>>> WDYT?
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> -Vincent
>>> 
 --
 Denis Gervalle
 SOFTEC sa - CEO
 On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 16:48, Thomas Mortagne <
>> 

Re: [xwiki-devs] [PROPOSAL] So, what display name for the new default flavor ?

[Eduard Moraru]

"XWiki Vanilla", because it`s the *standard flavor* :D Sounds so funny that
I kind of like it :)

However, I`m not so sure about non-techinical users or how that goes with
other stuff that we already or might produce, since we don`t really have a
pattern on that. Fun proposal, though.

Thanks,
Eduard

On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 8:07 PM, Marta Girdea 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm jumping in a bit late, but I was just wondering if anyone considered
> "Vanilla" [1]. It was the absolute first thing that popped to my mind when
> I saw the discussion about naming the standard flavour.
>
> Just my 2 cents,
> Marta
>
> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vanilla_software
>
> On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 7:07 AM, Vincent Massol 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Denis and all,
> >
> > > On 10 Jun 2017, at 11:46, Denis Gervalle  wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi All,
> > > Sorry to jump in after an already long discussion since we are getting
> > close to a conclusion, so I just don’t want my intervention to cause more
> > fuzz than good.
> > > I am in accordance with most of what was said so far, but “Default”
> > looks to me a less valuable naming than “Standard”, it is not a strong
> > opinion, so I give my +1 to “Standard” and +0 to “Default”. I will use
> > “Standard" in the following, just to be clearer, but you can substitute
> it
> > with “Default” if you wish (you might notice further subtle differences,
> or
> > not).
> > > So, what I am not sure about now is why all proposals end with “XWiki
> > flavor” (and this is not really about the American spelling of flavour !
> > :D). All flavours we gonna have surely will be XWiki ones, won’t it ? So
> if
> > we start with the “Standard XWiki Flavor”, I am afraid we are going to
> lead
> > a movement where everyone will name their flavour with that same suffix.
> Is
> > that our intention ?
> > > “XWiki Standard Flavor” would already carry a different meaning, since
> > it would say more “Standard flavour made by the XWiki team”. However, if
> > our intent was more to say this is a generic wiki flavour, using
> “Standard
> > Wiki Flavor” looks more in line with our intended meaning. And if our
> > meaning is more that this is just a generic flavour, ending with
> “Standard
> > Flavor” is probably simpler, clearer and better.
> > > WDYT ?
> >
> > I agree with you.
> >
> > I think we have 2 choices for the name that appears in the DW UI:
> > * “Standard”. We may not even need the “Flavor” suffix in the same way as
> > we don’t add an “Extension” suffix in the EM UI. IMO the DW UI for
> flavors
> > should indicate the author in the UI, something like ”Standard” and then
> > “developed by XWiki Development Team” or “developed by XWiki SAS” or
> > “developed by Denis Gervalle”.
> > * "XWiki Standard” or “XWiki Standard Flavor” to indicate it’s the one
> > made by the XWiki open source dev team. So that could be the full name
> but
> > the name we display in the DW UI could simply be “Standard Flavor” and
> then
> > “developed by XWiki Development Team”, etc.
> >
> > If we want to use the term “Wiki” then it could come as a replacement for
> > the “Standard” term, to mention that it’s a generic wiki flavor, as
> opposed
> > to an intranet flavor, a knowledge base flavor, etc. But I agree that
> “Wiki
> > Flavor” is a good contender (and one that Ludovic mentioned too, he even
> > mentioned Structured Wiki Flavor). I’d be +0 on “Wiki Flavor”. “Standard
> > Wiki Flavor” is also possible and hints that there can be other generic
> > Wiki flavors that are not standard. So I’m also +0 for it.
> >
> > Now outside of the DW UI, the full name of the flavors done by the XWiki
> > Dev Team could be prefixed with XWiki as in “the XWiki Standard Flavor”
> (or
> > “XWiki Demo Flavor”). Other companies or individuals would name is with
> > their identity, such as “the  Procedure Flavor”.
> >
> > WDYT?
> >
> > Thanks
> > -Vincent
> >
> > > --
> > > Denis Gervalle
> > > SOFTEC sa - CEO
> > > On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 16:48, Thomas Mortagne <
> thomas.morta...@xwiki.com>
> > wrote:
> > > So here is the current situation
> > >
> > > = Proposition which don't annoy people enough to get a veto
> > >
> > > * "Default XWiki Flavor" (+3)
> > > * "Standard XWiki Flavor" (+2)
> > >
> > > = Someone gave a veto on those
> > >
> > > * "Base XWiki Flavor"
> > > * "Classic XWiki Flavor" (good success for this one until it hits Edy
> > > and Vincent)
> > > * "Raw XWiki Flavor"
> > > * "Starter XWiki Flavor"
> > > * "XWiki Flavor”
> > > * "Generic XWiki Flavor"
> > >
> > > Anyone want to change his votes ?
> > >
> > > I don't really have a preference between "Default" and "Standard".
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Vincent Massol 
> > wrote:
> > >> So I’ve read this thread and here’s my POV:
> > >>
> > >> * "Base XWiki Flavor” -1 (same reason as Thomas)
> > >> * “Classic XWiki Flavor” -1 (same reason as Edy, it means there’s a
> non
> > classic and 

Re: [xwiki-devs] [PROPOSAL] So, what display name for the new default flavor ?

[Marta Girdea]

Hi,

I'm jumping in a bit late, but I was just wondering if anyone considered
"Vanilla" [1]. It was the absolute first thing that popped to my mind when
I saw the discussion about naming the standard flavour.

Just my 2 cents,
Marta

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vanilla_software

On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 7:07 AM, Vincent Massol  wrote:

> Hi Denis and all,
>
> > On 10 Jun 2017, at 11:46, Denis Gervalle  wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> > Sorry to jump in after an already long discussion since we are getting
> close to a conclusion, so I just don’t want my intervention to cause more
> fuzz than good.
> > I am in accordance with most of what was said so far, but “Default”
> looks to me a less valuable naming than “Standard”, it is not a strong
> opinion, so I give my +1 to “Standard” and +0 to “Default”. I will use
> “Standard" in the following, just to be clearer, but you can substitute it
> with “Default” if you wish (you might notice further subtle differences, or
> not).
> > So, what I am not sure about now is why all proposals end with “XWiki
> flavor” (and this is not really about the American spelling of flavour !
> :D). All flavours we gonna have surely will be XWiki ones, won’t it ? So if
> we start with the “Standard XWiki Flavor”, I am afraid we are going to lead
> a movement where everyone will name their flavour with that same suffix. Is
> that our intention ?
> > “XWiki Standard Flavor” would already carry a different meaning, since
> it would say more “Standard flavour made by the XWiki team”. However, if
> our intent was more to say this is a generic wiki flavour, using “Standard
> Wiki Flavor” looks more in line with our intended meaning. And if our
> meaning is more that this is just a generic flavour, ending with “Standard
> Flavor” is probably simpler, clearer and better.
> > WDYT ?
>
> I agree with you.
>
> I think we have 2 choices for the name that appears in the DW UI:
> * “Standard”. We may not even need the “Flavor” suffix in the same way as
> we don’t add an “Extension” suffix in the EM UI. IMO the DW UI for flavors
> should indicate the author in the UI, something like ”Standard” and then
> “developed by XWiki Development Team” or “developed by XWiki SAS” or
> “developed by Denis Gervalle”.
> * "XWiki Standard” or “XWiki Standard Flavor” to indicate it’s the one
> made by the XWiki open source dev team. So that could be the full name but
> the name we display in the DW UI could simply be “Standard Flavor” and then
> “developed by XWiki Development Team”, etc.
>
> If we want to use the term “Wiki” then it could come as a replacement for
> the “Standard” term, to mention that it’s a generic wiki flavor, as opposed
> to an intranet flavor, a knowledge base flavor, etc. But I agree that “Wiki
> Flavor” is a good contender (and one that Ludovic mentioned too, he even
> mentioned Structured Wiki Flavor). I’d be +0 on “Wiki Flavor”. “Standard
> Wiki Flavor” is also possible and hints that there can be other generic
> Wiki flavors that are not standard. So I’m also +0 for it.
>
> Now outside of the DW UI, the full name of the flavors done by the XWiki
> Dev Team could be prefixed with XWiki as in “the XWiki Standard Flavor” (or
> “XWiki Demo Flavor”). Other companies or individuals would name is with
> their identity, such as “the  Procedure Flavor”.
>
> WDYT?
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
> > --
> > Denis Gervalle
> > SOFTEC sa - CEO
> > On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 16:48, Thomas Mortagne 
> wrote:
> > So here is the current situation
> >
> > = Proposition which don't annoy people enough to get a veto
> >
> > * "Default XWiki Flavor" (+3)
> > * "Standard XWiki Flavor" (+2)
> >
> > = Someone gave a veto on those
> >
> > * "Base XWiki Flavor"
> > * "Classic XWiki Flavor" (good success for this one until it hits Edy
> > and Vincent)
> > * "Raw XWiki Flavor"
> > * "Starter XWiki Flavor"
> > * "XWiki Flavor”
> > * "Generic XWiki Flavor"
> >
> > Anyone want to change his votes ?
> >
> > I don't really have a preference between "Default" and "Standard".
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Vincent Massol 
> wrote:
> >> So I’ve read this thread and here’s my POV:
> >>
> >> * "Base XWiki Flavor” -1 (same reason as Thomas)
> >> * “Classic XWiki Flavor” -1 (same reason as Edy, it means there’s a non
> classic and *better* one and we don’t have one so it doesn’t make sense)
> >> * “Raw XWiki Flavor” -1 (not enough meaning IMO and a bit deprecatory)
> >> * “Starter XWiki Flavor” -1 (would mean there’s another flavor which
> isn’t the case)
> >> * "Default XWiki Flavor” +1
> >> * "Generic XWiki Flavor” +1
> >> * “Standard XWiki Flavor” +1 (makes the most sense IMO)
> >> * "XWiki Flavor”. Here it’s hard to understand that “XWiki” actually
> means “developed by the XWiki project” and it would work only if other
> flavors don’t have “XWiki” in the name. This is why I’m -1 ATM for it. IMO
> it’s not easy enough to differentiate and 

Re: [xwiki-devs] [PROPOSAL] So, what display name for the new default flavor ?

[Vincent Massol]

Hi Denis and all,

> On 10 Jun 2017, at 11:46, Denis Gervalle  wrote:
> 
> Hi All,
> Sorry to jump in after an already long discussion since we are getting close 
> to a conclusion, so I just don’t want my intervention to cause more fuzz than 
> good.
> I am in accordance with most of what was said so far, but “Default” looks to 
> me a less valuable naming than “Standard”, it is not a strong opinion, so I 
> give my +1 to “Standard” and +0 to “Default”. I will use “Standard" in the 
> following, just to be clearer, but you can substitute it with “Default” if 
> you wish (you might notice further subtle differences, or not).
> So, what I am not sure about now is why all proposals end with “XWiki flavor” 
> (and this is not really about the American spelling of flavour ! :D). All 
> flavours we gonna have surely will be XWiki ones, won’t it ? So if we start 
> with the “Standard XWiki Flavor”, I am afraid we are going to lead a movement 
> where everyone will name their flavour with that same suffix. Is that our 
> intention ?
> “XWiki Standard Flavor” would already carry a different meaning, since it 
> would say more “Standard flavour made by the XWiki team”. However, if our 
> intent was more to say this is a generic wiki flavour, using “Standard Wiki 
> Flavor” looks more in line with our intended meaning. And if our meaning is 
> more that this is just a generic flavour, ending with “Standard Flavor” is 
> probably simpler, clearer and better.
> WDYT ?

I agree with you. 

I think we have 2 choices for the name that appears in the DW UI:
* “Standard”. We may not even need the “Flavor” suffix in the same way as we 
don’t add an “Extension” suffix in the EM UI. IMO the DW UI for flavors should 
indicate the author in the UI, something like ”Standard” and then “developed by 
XWiki Development Team” or “developed by XWiki SAS” or “developed by Denis 
Gervalle”.
* "XWiki Standard” or “XWiki Standard Flavor” to indicate it’s the one made by 
the XWiki open source dev team. So that could be the full name but the name we 
display in the DW UI could simply be “Standard Flavor” and then “developed by 
XWiki Development Team”, etc.

If we want to use the term “Wiki” then it could come as a replacement for the 
“Standard” term, to mention that it’s a generic wiki flavor, as opposed to an 
intranet flavor, a knowledge base flavor, etc. But I agree that “Wiki Flavor” 
is a good contender (and one that Ludovic mentioned too, he even mentioned 
Structured Wiki Flavor). I’d be +0 on “Wiki Flavor”. “Standard Wiki Flavor” is 
also possible and hints that there can be other generic Wiki flavors that are 
not standard. So I’m also +0 for it.

Now outside of the DW UI, the full name of the flavors done by the XWiki Dev 
Team could be prefixed with XWiki as in “the XWiki Standard Flavor” (or “XWiki 
Demo Flavor”). Other companies or individuals would name is with their 
identity, such as “the  Procedure Flavor”.

WDYT?

Thanks
-Vincent

> --
> Denis Gervalle
> SOFTEC sa - CEO
> On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 16:48, Thomas Mortagne  
> wrote:
> So here is the current situation
> 
> = Proposition which don't annoy people enough to get a veto
> 
> * "Default XWiki Flavor" (+3)
> * "Standard XWiki Flavor" (+2)
> 
> = Someone gave a veto on those
> 
> * "Base XWiki Flavor"
> * "Classic XWiki Flavor" (good success for this one until it hits Edy
> and Vincent)
> * "Raw XWiki Flavor"
> * "Starter XWiki Flavor"
> * "XWiki Flavor”
> * "Generic XWiki Flavor"
> 
> Anyone want to change his votes ?
> 
> I don't really have a preference between "Default" and "Standard".
> 
> On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Vincent Massol  wrote:
>> So I’ve read this thread and here’s my POV:
>> 
>> * "Base XWiki Flavor” -1 (same reason as Thomas)
>> * “Classic XWiki Flavor” -1 (same reason as Edy, it means there’s a non 
>> classic and *better* one and we don’t have one so it doesn’t make sense)
>> * “Raw XWiki Flavor” -1 (not enough meaning IMO and a bit deprecatory)
>> * “Starter XWiki Flavor” -1 (would mean there’s another flavor which isn’t 
>> the case)
>> * "Default XWiki Flavor” +1
>> * "Generic XWiki Flavor” +1
>> * “Standard XWiki Flavor” +1 (makes the most sense IMO)
>> * "XWiki Flavor”. Here it’s hard to understand that “XWiki” actually means 
>> “developed by the XWiki project” and it would work only if other flavors 
>> don’t have “XWiki” in the name. This is why I’m -1 ATM for it. IMO it’s not 
>> easy enough to differentiate and understand what it means compared to other 
>> listed flavors such “Procedure Flavor” from XWiki SAS or “Demo Flavor” from 
>> contrib.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> -Vincent
>> 
>>> On 24 May 2017, at 11:51, Thomas Mortagne  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi devs,
>>> 
>>> I'm getting closer to finish with the hard work around new platform
>>> flavor which is going to replace XE.
>>> 
>>> Need to decide what user will see in the Flavor picker when installed 

Re: [xwiki-devs] [PROPOSAL] So, what display name for the new default flavor ?

[Denis Gervalle]

Hi All,
Sorry to jump in after an already long discussion since we are getting close to 
a conclusion, so I just don’t want my intervention to cause more fuzz than good.
I am in accordance with most of what was said so far, but “Default” looks to me 
a less valuable naming than “Standard”, it is not a strong opinion, so I give 
my +1 to “Standard” and +0 to “Default”. I will use “Standard" in the 
following, just to be clearer, but you can substitute it with “Default” if you 
wish (you might notice further subtle differences, or not).
So, what I am not sure about now is why all proposals end with “XWiki flavor” 
(and this is not really about the American spelling of flavour ! :D). All 
flavours we gonna have surely will be XWiki ones, won’t it ? So if we start 
with the “Standard XWiki Flavor”, I am afraid we are going to lead a movement 
where everyone will name their flavour with that same suffix. Is that our 
intention ?
“XWiki Standard Flavor” would already carry a different meaning, since it would 
say more “Standard flavour made by the XWiki team”. However, if our intent was 
more to say this is a generic wiki flavour, using “Standard Wiki Flavor” looks 
more in line with our intended meaning. And if our meaning is more that this is 
just a generic flavour, ending with “Standard Flavor” is probably simpler, 
clearer and better.
WDYT ?
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 16:48, Thomas Mortagne  wrote:
So here is the current situation

= Proposition which don't annoy people enough to get a veto

* "Default XWiki Flavor" (+3)
* "Standard XWiki Flavor" (+2)

= Someone gave a veto on those

* "Base XWiki Flavor"
* "Classic XWiki Flavor" (good success for this one until it hits Edy
and Vincent)
* "Raw XWiki Flavor"
* "Starter XWiki Flavor"
* "XWiki Flavor”
* "Generic XWiki Flavor"

Anyone want to change his votes ?

I don't really have a preference between "Default" and "Standard".

On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Vincent Massol  wrote:
> So I’ve read this thread and here’s my POV:
>
> * "Base XWiki Flavor” -1 (same reason as Thomas)
> * “Classic XWiki Flavor” -1 (same reason as Edy, it means there’s a non 
> classic and *better* one and we don’t have one so it doesn’t make sense)
> * “Raw XWiki Flavor” -1 (not enough meaning IMO and a bit deprecatory)
> * “Starter XWiki Flavor” -1 (would mean there’s another flavor which isn’t 
> the case)
> * "Default XWiki Flavor” +1
> * "Generic XWiki Flavor” +1
> * “Standard XWiki Flavor” +1 (makes the most sense IMO)
> * "XWiki Flavor”. Here it’s hard to understand that “XWiki” actually means 
> “developed by the XWiki project” and it would work only if other flavors 
> don’t have “XWiki” in the name. This is why I’m -1 ATM for it. IMO it’s not 
> easy enough to differentiate and understand what it means compared to other 
> listed flavors such “Procedure Flavor” from XWiki SAS or “Demo Flavor” from 
> contrib.
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>> On 24 May 2017, at 11:51, Thomas Mortagne  wrote:
>>
>> Hi devs,
>>
>> I'm getting closer to finish with the hard work around new platform
>> flavor which is going to replace XE.
>>
>> Need to decide what user will see in the Flavor picker when installed XWiki 
>> now.
>>
>> As a reminder we decided that this would be a generic flavor, not tied
>> to any specific use case (so forget about "Knwonledge Base Flavor"
>> :)).
>>
>> Here is a few ideas gathered in previous mails:
>> * "XWiki Flavor"
>> * "Default XWiki Flavor"
>> * "Generic XWiki Flavor"
>> * "Base XWiki Flavor"
>>
>> "Generic" is probably a way too technical term.
>>
>> "Base" would be misleading IMO since it's not really a base flavor.
>> Its primary goal is not to be used as a dependency (of course it's
>> fine to have it as dependency if you just want to add pre installed
>> extensions to the default flavor). It's a -1 for me.
>>
>> Frankly I would simply go for "XWiki Flavor". I know, it's not going
>> to be the only flavor for XWiki but it's obvious when you actually see
>> severals of those in the picker anyway and I find it nicer than
>> "Default XWiki Flavor" which basically means the same thing since the
>> XWiki core project does not plan to provide any other flavor. I'm also
>> fine with "Default XWiki Favor" if others think it's a better name.
>>
>> WDYT ?
>>
>> --
>> Thomas Mortagne
>



--
Thomas Mortagne

Re: [xwiki-devs] [PROPOSAL] So, what display name for the new default flavor ?

[Thomas Mortagne]

So here is the current situation

= Proposition which don't annoy people enough to get a veto

* "Default XWiki Flavor" (+3)
* "Standard XWiki Flavor" (+2)

= Someone gave a veto on those

* "Base XWiki Flavor"
* "Classic XWiki Flavor" (good success for this one until it hits Edy
and Vincent)
* "Raw XWiki Flavor"
* "Starter XWiki Flavor"
* "XWiki Flavor”
* "Generic XWiki Flavor"

Anyone want to change his votes ?

I don't really have a preference between "Default" and "Standard".

On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Vincent Massol  wrote:
> So I’ve read this thread and here’s my POV:
>
> * "Base XWiki Flavor” -1 (same reason as Thomas)
> * “Classic XWiki Flavor” -1 (same reason as Edy, it means there’s a non 
> classic and *better* one and we don’t have one so it doesn’t make sense)
> * “Raw XWiki Flavor” -1 (not enough meaning IMO and a bit deprecatory)
> * “Starter XWiki Flavor” -1 (would mean there’s another flavor which isn’t 
> the case)
> * "Default XWiki Flavor” +1
> * "Generic XWiki Flavor” +1
> * “Standard XWiki Flavor” +1 (makes the most sense IMO)
> * "XWiki Flavor”. Here it’s hard to understand that “XWiki” actually means 
> “developed by the XWiki project” and it would work only if other flavors 
> don’t have “XWiki” in the name. This is why I’m -1 ATM for it. IMO it’s not 
> easy enough to differentiate and understand what it means compared to other 
> listed flavors such “Procedure Flavor” from XWiki SAS or “Demo Flavor” from 
> contrib.
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>> On 24 May 2017, at 11:51, Thomas Mortagne  wrote:
>>
>> Hi devs,
>>
>> I'm getting closer to finish with the hard work around new platform
>> flavor which is going to replace XE.
>>
>> Need to decide what user will see in the Flavor picker when installed XWiki 
>> now.
>>
>> As a reminder we decided that this would be a generic flavor, not tied
>> to any specific use case (so forget about "Knwonledge Base Flavor"
>> :)).
>>
>> Here is a few ideas gathered in previous mails:
>> * "XWiki Flavor"
>> * "Default XWiki Flavor"
>> * "Generic XWiki Flavor"
>> * "Base XWiki Flavor"
>>
>> "Generic" is probably a way too technical term.
>>
>> "Base" would be misleading IMO since it's not really a base flavor.
>> Its primary goal is not to be used as a dependency (of course it's
>> fine to have it as dependency if you just want to add pre installed
>> extensions to the default flavor). It's a -1 for me.
>>
>> Frankly I would simply go for "XWiki Flavor". I know, it's not going
>> to be the only flavor for XWiki but it's obvious when you actually see
>> severals of those in the picker anyway and I find it nicer than
>> "Default XWiki Flavor" which basically means the same thing since the
>> XWiki core project does not plan to provide any other flavor. I'm also
>> fine with "Default XWiki Favor" if others think it's a better name.
>>
>> WDYT ?
>>
>> --
>> Thomas Mortagne
>



-- 
Thomas Mortagne

Re: [xwiki-devs] [PROPOSAL] So, what display name for the new default flavor ?

[Vincent Massol]

So I’ve read this thread and here’s my POV:

* "Base XWiki Flavor” -1 (same reason as Thomas)
* “Classic XWiki Flavor” -1 (same reason as Edy, it means there’s a non classic 
and *better* one and we don’t have one so it doesn’t make sense)
* “Raw XWiki Flavor” -1 (not enough meaning IMO and a bit deprecatory)
* “Starter XWiki Flavor” -1 (would mean there’s another flavor which isn’t the 
case)
* "Default XWiki Flavor” +1
* "Generic XWiki Flavor” +1
* “Standard XWiki Flavor” +1 (makes the most sense IMO)
* "XWiki Flavor”. Here it’s hard to understand that “XWiki” actually means 
“developed by the XWiki project” and it would work only if other flavors don’t 
have “XWiki” in the name. This is why I’m -1 ATM for it. IMO it’s not easy 
enough to differentiate and understand what it means compared to other listed 
flavors such “Procedure Flavor” from XWiki SAS or “Demo Flavor” from contrib.

Thanks
-Vincent

> On 24 May 2017, at 11:51, Thomas Mortagne  wrote:
> 
> Hi devs,
> 
> I'm getting closer to finish with the hard work around new platform
> flavor which is going to replace XE.
> 
> Need to decide what user will see in the Flavor picker when installed XWiki 
> now.
> 
> As a reminder we decided that this would be a generic flavor, not tied
> to any specific use case (so forget about "Knwonledge Base Flavor"
> :)).
> 
> Here is a few ideas gathered in previous mails:
> * "XWiki Flavor"
> * "Default XWiki Flavor"
> * "Generic XWiki Flavor"
> * "Base XWiki Flavor"
> 
> "Generic" is probably a way too technical term.
> 
> "Base" would be misleading IMO since it's not really a base flavor.
> Its primary goal is not to be used as a dependency (of course it's
> fine to have it as dependency if you just want to add pre installed
> extensions to the default flavor). It's a -1 for me.
> 
> Frankly I would simply go for "XWiki Flavor". I know, it's not going
> to be the only flavor for XWiki but it's obvious when you actually see
> severals of those in the picker anyway and I find it nicer than
> "Default XWiki Flavor" which basically means the same thing since the
> XWiki core project does not plan to provide any other flavor. I'm also
> fine with "Default XWiki Favor" if others think it's a better name.
> 
> WDYT ?
> 
> -- 
> Thomas Mortagne

Re: [xwiki-devs] [PROPOSAL] So, what display name for the new default flavor ?

[Eduard Moraru]

"Standard" -> Current, generalist, non-specialized, all-round solution,
good for everybody to use or to start with
* https://www.google.ro/search?q=define+standard
* http://www.dictionary.com/browse/standard

"Classic" -> Old, legacy, historical, proven reliable by time, etc. (when
comparing to the modern, current version); generally implies "old", in one
way or another
* https://www.google.ro/search?q=define+classic
* http://www.dictionary.com/browse/classic

You usually have this in software when you have 2 versions: current/modern
one (standard) and the older one (classic).

IMO, "classic", by itself, does not make sense (i.e. when you don`t have a
"standard" to compare with) and it would be sending the wrong message.

Also, everything we do (developing, manual and automated testing, roadmap,
etc.) is around this flavor, so it is the "standard" to which we relate.

I also have nothing against "Generic" or "Default" (i.e. +0) which focus
more on the functional objective of the flavor, but they get a bit
technical by going into these details, so that`s why I felt "Standard" was
abstract enough and also clear enough in sending the right message, which
is "Pick me if you don`t know what you want".

P.S.: "classic" bikeshedding :) (but I guess it's OK on this type of thread
:) )

Thanks,
Eduard

On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 5:20 PM, Guillaume Delhumeau <
guillaume.delhum...@xwiki.com> wrote:

> I'm not keen on the "Standard" terminology because it can make people think
> other flavors (such as Knowleged Flavor) are not standard which could be
> seen as pejorative.
>
> "Classic" does not imply being better or worse and describes what this
> flavor really is: the "classical" version of XWiki that we have distributed
> for years. Which also means: not specialized for a special use-case.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Guillaume
>
> 2017-05-26 14:59 GMT+02:00 Eduard Moraru :
>
> > On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Thomas Mortagne <
> > thomas.morta...@xwiki.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > No there is no default UI in this distribution, just flavors.
> > >
> > > As I said in the previous mail you will have a flavor picker in which
> > > you will see the classic one and the others.
> > >
> > > Of course other distributions of XWiki may still have default UI and
> > > don't let you choose a flavor like XE does.
> > >
> >
> > I feel we`re having a bit of duplication here between the "default UI"
> and
> > the "Flavor" steps. AFAICT, they do pretty much the same thing and should
> > ideally be merged. Basically, the default UI mechanism should indicate
> the
> > recommended flavor/ui (if any) for the war you have, but should also not
> > enforce it, allowing you to go with whatever flavor you like. There's
> > really no point in separating the 2 and I guess we are here because they
> > were developed in separate efforts.
> >
> > Anyway, back to the original question of the thread, I reiterate my +1
> for
> > "Standard" (I'm not a fan of "classic", which I find awkward and a bit
> > old-fashion/outdated :), specially if you consider people new to XWiki).
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Eduard
> >
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 12:50 PM, Eduard Moraru 
> > > wrote:
> > > > When you download the war, you have no UI. At that point, I guess you
> > > will
> > > > be proposed to install the default UI associated to your war (which,
> in
> > > > this case, will be one and the same with the "Standard XWiki Flavor")
> > OR
> > > > choose from a list of available Flavors. In this case, I guess that
> > > > "Standard XWiki Flavor" will not be listed in the flavors list, to
> > avoid
> > > > duplication.
> > > >
> > > > If I got things right, then it sounds good to me to see the first
> > option
> > > > (i.e. featured) to be the "standard" and, below it, various
> > alternatives
> > > > for various/specialized use cases.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Eduard
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Thomas Mortagne <
> > > thomas.morta...@xwiki.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Eduard Moraru <
> enygma2...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> > Hi,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > What about "Standard XWiki Flavor"? I think it was mentioned in
> > > previous
> > > >> > discussions.
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >> > It`s basically what you get when you download. Once you start
> > > customizing
> > > >> > or installing some other Flavor, it`s no longer "standard".
> > > >>
> > > >> Note exactly. When you download XWiki you don't have any Flavor
> > > >> installed, you choose the classic/standard one among several others
> > > >> (ok maybe not several right now :)), it's just the first one listed.
> > > >>
> > > >> >
> > > >> > That and the fact that we used to have, in older versions, a
> > packaging
> > > >> (for
> > > >> > the xar or war module, don`t remember) that featured "standard" in
> > > it`s
> > > >> > name.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Thanks,
> > > >> > Eduard
> > > >> >
> > > >> 

Re: [xwiki-devs] [PROPOSAL] So, what display name for the new default flavor ?

[Guillaume Delhumeau]

I'm not keen on the "Standard" terminology because it can make people think
other flavors (such as Knowleged Flavor) are not standard which could be
seen as pejorative.

"Classic" does not imply being better or worse and describes what this
flavor really is: the "classical" version of XWiki that we have distributed
for years. Which also means: not specialized for a special use-case.

Thanks,

Guillaume

2017-05-26 14:59 GMT+02:00 Eduard Moraru :

> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Thomas Mortagne <
> thomas.morta...@xwiki.com>
> wrote:
>
> > No there is no default UI in this distribution, just flavors.
> >
> > As I said in the previous mail you will have a flavor picker in which
> > you will see the classic one and the others.
> >
> > Of course other distributions of XWiki may still have default UI and
> > don't let you choose a flavor like XE does.
> >
>
> I feel we`re having a bit of duplication here between the "default UI" and
> the "Flavor" steps. AFAICT, they do pretty much the same thing and should
> ideally be merged. Basically, the default UI mechanism should indicate the
> recommended flavor/ui (if any) for the war you have, but should also not
> enforce it, allowing you to go with whatever flavor you like. There's
> really no point in separating the 2 and I guess we are here because they
> were developed in separate efforts.
>
> Anyway, back to the original question of the thread, I reiterate my +1 for
> "Standard" (I'm not a fan of "classic", which I find awkward and a bit
> old-fashion/outdated :), specially if you consider people new to XWiki).
>
> Thanks,
> Eduard
>
> >
> > On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 12:50 PM, Eduard Moraru 
> > wrote:
> > > When you download the war, you have no UI. At that point, I guess you
> > will
> > > be proposed to install the default UI associated to your war (which, in
> > > this case, will be one and the same with the "Standard XWiki Flavor")
> OR
> > > choose from a list of available Flavors. In this case, I guess that
> > > "Standard XWiki Flavor" will not be listed in the flavors list, to
> avoid
> > > duplication.
> > >
> > > If I got things right, then it sounds good to me to see the first
> option
> > > (i.e. featured) to be the "standard" and, below it, various
> alternatives
> > > for various/specialized use cases.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Eduard
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Thomas Mortagne <
> > thomas.morta...@xwiki.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Eduard Moraru  >
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > Hi,
> > >> >
> > >> > What about "Standard XWiki Flavor"? I think it was mentioned in
> > previous
> > >> > discussions.
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> > It`s basically what you get when you download. Once you start
> > customizing
> > >> > or installing some other Flavor, it`s no longer "standard".
> > >>
> > >> Note exactly. When you download XWiki you don't have any Flavor
> > >> installed, you choose the classic/standard one among several others
> > >> (ok maybe not several right now :)), it's just the first one listed.
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >> > That and the fact that we used to have, in older versions, a
> packaging
> > >> (for
> > >> > the xar or war module, don`t remember) that featured "standard" in
> > it`s
> > >> > name.
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks,
> > >> > Eduard
> > >> >
> > >> > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea <
> > >> > mariusdumitru.flo...@xwiki.com> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Guillaume Delhumeau <
> > >> >> guillaume.delhum...@xwiki.com> wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> > +1 for Classic
> > >> >> >
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Classic sounds good. +1
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > 2017-05-24 14:16 GMT+02:00 Olivier Seres :
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > > I m also in flavor of Classic Flavor for 3 reasons :
> > >> >> > > For the last 10 years, it was THE (only one) proposed flavor,
> > now we
> > >> >> > might
> > >> >> > > have more than one
> > >> >> > > There is "Class" in classic , sound positive to me
> > >> >> > > It has a distinguishable name
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > I find "xwiki flavour"  confusing ( it implies that other
> flavors
> > >> are
> > >> >> > > non-xwiki ones...)
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > Olivier Sérès
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > > Le 24 mai 2017 à 14:03, Thomas Mortagne <
> > >> thomas.morta...@xwiki.com>
> > >> >> a
> > >> >> > > écrit :
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > > >> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <
> > >> ser...@xwiki.org>
> > >> >> > > wrote:
> > >> >> > > >>> On 05/24/2017 05:51 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
> > >> >> > > >>> Hi devs,
> > >> >> > > >>>
> > >> >> > > >>> I'm getting closer to finish with the hard work around new
> > >> platform
> > >> >> > > >>> flavor which is going to replace XE.
> > >> >> > > >>>
> > >> >> > > >>> Need to decide what user will see in the Flavor picker when
> > >> >> installed
> > >> >> > > XWiki now.
> > >> 

Re: [xwiki-devs] [PROPOSAL] So, what display name for the new default flavor ?

[Eduard Moraru]

On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Thomas Mortagne 
wrote:

> No there is no default UI in this distribution, just flavors.
>
> As I said in the previous mail you will have a flavor picker in which
> you will see the classic one and the others.
>
> Of course other distributions of XWiki may still have default UI and
> don't let you choose a flavor like XE does.
>

I feel we`re having a bit of duplication here between the "default UI" and
the "Flavor" steps. AFAICT, they do pretty much the same thing and should
ideally be merged. Basically, the default UI mechanism should indicate the
recommended flavor/ui (if any) for the war you have, but should also not
enforce it, allowing you to go with whatever flavor you like. There's
really no point in separating the 2 and I guess we are here because they
were developed in separate efforts.

Anyway, back to the original question of the thread, I reiterate my +1 for
"Standard" (I'm not a fan of "classic", which I find awkward and a bit
old-fashion/outdated :), specially if you consider people new to XWiki).

Thanks,
Eduard

>
> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 12:50 PM, Eduard Moraru 
> wrote:
> > When you download the war, you have no UI. At that point, I guess you
> will
> > be proposed to install the default UI associated to your war (which, in
> > this case, will be one and the same with the "Standard XWiki Flavor") OR
> > choose from a list of available Flavors. In this case, I guess that
> > "Standard XWiki Flavor" will not be listed in the flavors list, to avoid
> > duplication.
> >
> > If I got things right, then it sounds good to me to see the first option
> > (i.e. featured) to be the "standard" and, below it, various alternatives
> > for various/specialized use cases.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Eduard
> >
> > On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Thomas Mortagne <
> thomas.morta...@xwiki.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Eduard Moraru 
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > What about "Standard XWiki Flavor"? I think it was mentioned in
> previous
> >> > discussions.
> >> >
> >>
> >> > It`s basically what you get when you download. Once you start
> customizing
> >> > or installing some other Flavor, it`s no longer "standard".
> >>
> >> Note exactly. When you download XWiki you don't have any Flavor
> >> installed, you choose the classic/standard one among several others
> >> (ok maybe not several right now :)), it's just the first one listed.
> >>
> >> >
> >> > That and the fact that we used to have, in older versions, a packaging
> >> (for
> >> > the xar or war module, don`t remember) that featured "standard" in
> it`s
> >> > name.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Eduard
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea <
> >> > mariusdumitru.flo...@xwiki.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Guillaume Delhumeau <
> >> >> guillaume.delhum...@xwiki.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > +1 for Classic
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> Classic sounds good. +1
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> > 2017-05-24 14:16 GMT+02:00 Olivier Seres :
> >> >> >
> >> >> > > I m also in flavor of Classic Flavor for 3 reasons :
> >> >> > > For the last 10 years, it was THE (only one) proposed flavor,
> now we
> >> >> > might
> >> >> > > have more than one
> >> >> > > There is "Class" in classic , sound positive to me
> >> >> > > It has a distinguishable name
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > I find "xwiki flavour"  confusing ( it implies that other flavors
> >> are
> >> >> > > non-xwiki ones...)
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > Olivier Sérès
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > > Le 24 mai 2017 à 14:03, Thomas Mortagne <
> >> thomas.morta...@xwiki.com>
> >> >> a
> >> >> > > écrit :
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > >> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <
> >> ser...@xwiki.org>
> >> >> > > wrote:
> >> >> > > >>> On 05/24/2017 05:51 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
> >> >> > > >>> Hi devs,
> >> >> > > >>>
> >> >> > > >>> I'm getting closer to finish with the hard work around new
> >> platform
> >> >> > > >>> flavor which is going to replace XE.
> >> >> > > >>>
> >> >> > > >>> Need to decide what user will see in the Flavor picker when
> >> >> installed
> >> >> > > XWiki now.
> >> >> > > >>>
> >> >> > > >>> As a reminder we decided that this would be a generic flavor,
> >> not
> >> >> > tied
> >> >> > > >>> to any specific use case (so forget about "Knwonledge Base
> >> Flavor"
> >> >> > > >>> :)).
> >> >> > > >>>
> >> >> > > >>> Here is a few ideas gathered in previous mails:
> >> >> > > >>> * "XWiki Flavor"
> >> >> > > >>> * "Default XWiki Flavor"
> >> >> > > >>> * "Generic XWiki Flavor"
> >> >> > > >>> * "Base XWiki Flavor"
> >> >> > > >>
> >> >> > > >> A few more ideas:
> >> >> > > >>
> >> >> > > >> * Classic
> >> >> > > >> * Raw
> >> >> > > >> * Starter
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > > Not a fan or "Raw".
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > > I like "Classic", might sound better than "Default" for most
> >> 

Re: [xwiki-devs] [PROPOSAL] So, what display name for the new default flavor ?

[Thomas Mortagne]

No there is no default UI in this distribution, just flavors.

As I said in the previous mail you will have a flavor picker in which
you will see the classic one and the others.

Of course other distributions of XWiki may still have default UI and
don't let you choose a flavor like XE does.

On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 12:50 PM, Eduard Moraru  wrote:
> When you download the war, you have no UI. At that point, I guess you will
> be proposed to install the default UI associated to your war (which, in
> this case, will be one and the same with the "Standard XWiki Flavor") OR
> choose from a list of available Flavors. In this case, I guess that
> "Standard XWiki Flavor" will not be listed in the flavors list, to avoid
> duplication.
>
> If I got things right, then it sounds good to me to see the first option
> (i.e. featured) to be the "standard" and, below it, various alternatives
> for various/specialized use cases.
>
> Thanks,
> Eduard
>
> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Thomas Mortagne 
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Eduard Moraru 
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > What about "Standard XWiki Flavor"? I think it was mentioned in previous
>> > discussions.
>> >
>>
>> > It`s basically what you get when you download. Once you start customizing
>> > or installing some other Flavor, it`s no longer "standard".
>>
>> Note exactly. When you download XWiki you don't have any Flavor
>> installed, you choose the classic/standard one among several others
>> (ok maybe not several right now :)), it's just the first one listed.
>>
>> >
>> > That and the fact that we used to have, in older versions, a packaging
>> (for
>> > the xar or war module, don`t remember) that featured "standard" in it`s
>> > name.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Eduard
>> >
>> > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea <
>> > mariusdumitru.flo...@xwiki.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Guillaume Delhumeau <
>> >> guillaume.delhum...@xwiki.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > +1 for Classic
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> Classic sounds good. +1
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > 2017-05-24 14:16 GMT+02:00 Olivier Seres :
>> >> >
>> >> > > I m also in flavor of Classic Flavor for 3 reasons :
>> >> > > For the last 10 years, it was THE (only one) proposed flavor, now we
>> >> > might
>> >> > > have more than one
>> >> > > There is "Class" in classic , sound positive to me
>> >> > > It has a distinguishable name
>> >> > >
>> >> > > I find "xwiki flavour"  confusing ( it implies that other flavors
>> are
>> >> > > non-xwiki ones...)
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Olivier Sérès
>> >> > >
>> >> > > > Le 24 mai 2017 à 14:03, Thomas Mortagne <
>> thomas.morta...@xwiki.com>
>> >> a
>> >> > > écrit :
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <
>> ser...@xwiki.org>
>> >> > > wrote:
>> >> > > >>> On 05/24/2017 05:51 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
>> >> > > >>> Hi devs,
>> >> > > >>>
>> >> > > >>> I'm getting closer to finish with the hard work around new
>> platform
>> >> > > >>> flavor which is going to replace XE.
>> >> > > >>>
>> >> > > >>> Need to decide what user will see in the Flavor picker when
>> >> installed
>> >> > > XWiki now.
>> >> > > >>>
>> >> > > >>> As a reminder we decided that this would be a generic flavor,
>> not
>> >> > tied
>> >> > > >>> to any specific use case (so forget about "Knwonledge Base
>> Flavor"
>> >> > > >>> :)).
>> >> > > >>>
>> >> > > >>> Here is a few ideas gathered in previous mails:
>> >> > > >>> * "XWiki Flavor"
>> >> > > >>> * "Default XWiki Flavor"
>> >> > > >>> * "Generic XWiki Flavor"
>> >> > > >>> * "Base XWiki Flavor"
>> >> > > >>
>> >> > > >> A few more ideas:
>> >> > > >>
>> >> > > >> * Classic
>> >> > > >> * Raw
>> >> > > >> * Starter
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Not a fan or "Raw".
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > I like "Classic", might sound better than "Default" for most
>> users.
>> >> > > > Not sure about "Starter".
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >>
>> >> > > >>> "Generic" is probably a way too technical term.
>> >> > > >>>
>> >> > > >>> "Base" would be misleading IMO since it's not really a base
>> flavor.
>> >> > > >>> Its primary goal is not to be used as a dependency (of course
>> it's
>> >> > > >>> fine to have it as dependency if you just want to add pre
>> installed
>> >> > > >>> extensions to the default flavor). It's a -1 for me.
>> >> > > >>>
>> >> > > >>> Frankly I would simply go for "XWiki Flavor". I know, it's not
>> >> going
>> >> > > >>> to be the only flavor for XWiki but it's obvious when you
>> actually
>> >> > see
>> >> > > >>> severals of those in the picker anyway and I find it nicer than
>> >> > > >>> "Default XWiki Flavor" which basically means the same thing
>> since
>> >> the
>> >> > > >>> XWiki core project does not plan to provide any other flavor.
>> I'm
>> >> > also
>> >> > > >>> fine with "Default XWiki Favor" if others think it's a better
>> name.
>> >> > > >>>
>> >> > > >>> WDYT ?
>> 

Re: [xwiki-devs] [PROPOSAL] So, what display name for the new default flavor ?

[Eduard Moraru]

When you download the war, you have no UI. At that point, I guess you will
be proposed to install the default UI associated to your war (which, in
this case, will be one and the same with the "Standard XWiki Flavor") OR
choose from a list of available Flavors. In this case, I guess that
"Standard XWiki Flavor" will not be listed in the flavors list, to avoid
duplication.

If I got things right, then it sounds good to me to see the first option
(i.e. featured) to be the "standard" and, below it, various alternatives
for various/specialized use cases.

Thanks,
Eduard

On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Thomas Mortagne 
wrote:

> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Eduard Moraru 
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > What about "Standard XWiki Flavor"? I think it was mentioned in previous
> > discussions.
> >
>
> > It`s basically what you get when you download. Once you start customizing
> > or installing some other Flavor, it`s no longer "standard".
>
> Note exactly. When you download XWiki you don't have any Flavor
> installed, you choose the classic/standard one among several others
> (ok maybe not several right now :)), it's just the first one listed.
>
> >
> > That and the fact that we used to have, in older versions, a packaging
> (for
> > the xar or war module, don`t remember) that featured "standard" in it`s
> > name.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Eduard
> >
> > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea <
> > mariusdumitru.flo...@xwiki.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Guillaume Delhumeau <
> >> guillaume.delhum...@xwiki.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > +1 for Classic
> >> >
> >>
> >> Classic sounds good. +1
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> > 2017-05-24 14:16 GMT+02:00 Olivier Seres :
> >> >
> >> > > I m also in flavor of Classic Flavor for 3 reasons :
> >> > > For the last 10 years, it was THE (only one) proposed flavor, now we
> >> > might
> >> > > have more than one
> >> > > There is "Class" in classic , sound positive to me
> >> > > It has a distinguishable name
> >> > >
> >> > > I find "xwiki flavour"  confusing ( it implies that other flavors
> are
> >> > > non-xwiki ones...)
> >> > >
> >> > > Olivier Sérès
> >> > >
> >> > > > Le 24 mai 2017 à 14:03, Thomas Mortagne <
> thomas.morta...@xwiki.com>
> >> a
> >> > > écrit :
> >> > > >
> >> > > >> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <
> ser...@xwiki.org>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > > >>> On 05/24/2017 05:51 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
> >> > > >>> Hi devs,
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>> I'm getting closer to finish with the hard work around new
> platform
> >> > > >>> flavor which is going to replace XE.
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>> Need to decide what user will see in the Flavor picker when
> >> installed
> >> > > XWiki now.
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>> As a reminder we decided that this would be a generic flavor,
> not
> >> > tied
> >> > > >>> to any specific use case (so forget about "Knwonledge Base
> Flavor"
> >> > > >>> :)).
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>> Here is a few ideas gathered in previous mails:
> >> > > >>> * "XWiki Flavor"
> >> > > >>> * "Default XWiki Flavor"
> >> > > >>> * "Generic XWiki Flavor"
> >> > > >>> * "Base XWiki Flavor"
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> A few more ideas:
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> * Classic
> >> > > >> * Raw
> >> > > >> * Starter
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Not a fan or "Raw".
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I like "Classic", might sound better than "Default" for most
> users.
> >> > > > Not sure about "Starter".
> >> > > >
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>> "Generic" is probably a way too technical term.
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>> "Base" would be misleading IMO since it's not really a base
> flavor.
> >> > > >>> Its primary goal is not to be used as a dependency (of course
> it's
> >> > > >>> fine to have it as dependency if you just want to add pre
> installed
> >> > > >>> extensions to the default flavor). It's a -1 for me.
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>> Frankly I would simply go for "XWiki Flavor". I know, it's not
> >> going
> >> > > >>> to be the only flavor for XWiki but it's obvious when you
> actually
> >> > see
> >> > > >>> severals of those in the picker anyway and I find it nicer than
> >> > > >>> "Default XWiki Flavor" which basically means the same thing
> since
> >> the
> >> > > >>> XWiki core project does not plan to provide any other flavor.
> I'm
> >> > also
> >> > > >>> fine with "Default XWiki Favor" if others think it's a better
> name.
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>> WDYT ?
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> --
> >> > > >> Sergiu Dumitriu
> >> > > >> http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > --
> >> > > > Thomas Mortagne
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Guillaume Delhumeau (guillaume.delhum...@xwiki.com)
> >> > Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
> >> > Committer on the XWiki.org project
> >> >
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> Thomas Mortagne
>

Re: [xwiki-devs] [PROPOSAL] So, what display name for the new default flavor ?

[Thomas Mortagne]

On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Eduard Moraru  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What about "Standard XWiki Flavor"? I think it was mentioned in previous
> discussions.
>

> It`s basically what you get when you download. Once you start customizing
> or installing some other Flavor, it`s no longer "standard".

Note exactly. When you download XWiki you don't have any Flavor
installed, you choose the classic/standard one among several others
(ok maybe not several right now :)), it's just the first one listed.

>
> That and the fact that we used to have, in older versions, a packaging (for
> the xar or war module, don`t remember) that featured "standard" in it`s
> name.
>
> Thanks,
> Eduard
>
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea <
> mariusdumitru.flo...@xwiki.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Guillaume Delhumeau <
>> guillaume.delhum...@xwiki.com> wrote:
>>
>> > +1 for Classic
>> >
>>
>> Classic sounds good. +1
>>
>>
>> >
>> > 2017-05-24 14:16 GMT+02:00 Olivier Seres :
>> >
>> > > I m also in flavor of Classic Flavor for 3 reasons :
>> > > For the last 10 years, it was THE (only one) proposed flavor, now we
>> > might
>> > > have more than one
>> > > There is "Class" in classic , sound positive to me
>> > > It has a distinguishable name
>> > >
>> > > I find "xwiki flavour"  confusing ( it implies that other flavors are
>> > > non-xwiki ones...)
>> > >
>> > > Olivier Sérès
>> > >
>> > > > Le 24 mai 2017 à 14:03, Thomas Mortagne 
>> a
>> > > écrit :
>> > > >
>> > > >> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu 
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >>> On 05/24/2017 05:51 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
>> > > >>> Hi devs,
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> I'm getting closer to finish with the hard work around new platform
>> > > >>> flavor which is going to replace XE.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> Need to decide what user will see in the Flavor picker when
>> installed
>> > > XWiki now.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> As a reminder we decided that this would be a generic flavor, not
>> > tied
>> > > >>> to any specific use case (so forget about "Knwonledge Base Flavor"
>> > > >>> :)).
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> Here is a few ideas gathered in previous mails:
>> > > >>> * "XWiki Flavor"
>> > > >>> * "Default XWiki Flavor"
>> > > >>> * "Generic XWiki Flavor"
>> > > >>> * "Base XWiki Flavor"
>> > > >>
>> > > >> A few more ideas:
>> > > >>
>> > > >> * Classic
>> > > >> * Raw
>> > > >> * Starter
>> > > >
>> > > > Not a fan or "Raw".
>> > > >
>> > > > I like "Classic", might sound better than "Default" for most users.
>> > > > Not sure about "Starter".
>> > > >
>> > > >>
>> > > >>> "Generic" is probably a way too technical term.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> "Base" would be misleading IMO since it's not really a base flavor.
>> > > >>> Its primary goal is not to be used as a dependency (of course it's
>> > > >>> fine to have it as dependency if you just want to add pre installed
>> > > >>> extensions to the default flavor). It's a -1 for me.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> Frankly I would simply go for "XWiki Flavor". I know, it's not
>> going
>> > > >>> to be the only flavor for XWiki but it's obvious when you actually
>> > see
>> > > >>> severals of those in the picker anyway and I find it nicer than
>> > > >>> "Default XWiki Flavor" which basically means the same thing since
>> the
>> > > >>> XWiki core project does not plan to provide any other flavor. I'm
>> > also
>> > > >>> fine with "Default XWiki Favor" if others think it's a better name.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> WDYT ?
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> --
>> > > >> Sergiu Dumitriu
>> > > >> http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > Thomas Mortagne
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Guillaume Delhumeau (guillaume.delhum...@xwiki.com)
>> > Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
>> > Committer on the XWiki.org project
>> >
>>



-- 
Thomas Mortagne

Re: [xwiki-devs] [PROPOSAL] So, what display name for the new default flavor ?

[Eduard Moraru]

Hi,

What about "Standard XWiki Flavor"? I think it was mentioned in previous
discussions.

It`s basically what you get when you download. Once you start customizing
or installing some other Flavor, it`s no longer "standard".

That and the fact that we used to have, in older versions, a packaging (for
the xar or war module, don`t remember) that featured "standard" in it`s
name.

Thanks,
Eduard

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea <
mariusdumitru.flo...@xwiki.com> wrote:

> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Guillaume Delhumeau <
> guillaume.delhum...@xwiki.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 for Classic
> >
>
> Classic sounds good. +1
>
>
> >
> > 2017-05-24 14:16 GMT+02:00 Olivier Seres :
> >
> > > I m also in flavor of Classic Flavor for 3 reasons :
> > > For the last 10 years, it was THE (only one) proposed flavor, now we
> > might
> > > have more than one
> > > There is "Class" in classic , sound positive to me
> > > It has a distinguishable name
> > >
> > > I find "xwiki flavour"  confusing ( it implies that other flavors are
> > > non-xwiki ones...)
> > >
> > > Olivier Sérès
> > >
> > > > Le 24 mai 2017 à 14:03, Thomas Mortagne 
> a
> > > écrit :
> > > >
> > > >> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu 
> > > wrote:
> > > >>> On 05/24/2017 05:51 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
> > > >>> Hi devs,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I'm getting closer to finish with the hard work around new platform
> > > >>> flavor which is going to replace XE.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Need to decide what user will see in the Flavor picker when
> installed
> > > XWiki now.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> As a reminder we decided that this would be a generic flavor, not
> > tied
> > > >>> to any specific use case (so forget about "Knwonledge Base Flavor"
> > > >>> :)).
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Here is a few ideas gathered in previous mails:
> > > >>> * "XWiki Flavor"
> > > >>> * "Default XWiki Flavor"
> > > >>> * "Generic XWiki Flavor"
> > > >>> * "Base XWiki Flavor"
> > > >>
> > > >> A few more ideas:
> > > >>
> > > >> * Classic
> > > >> * Raw
> > > >> * Starter
> > > >
> > > > Not a fan or "Raw".
> > > >
> > > > I like "Classic", might sound better than "Default" for most users.
> > > > Not sure about "Starter".
> > > >
> > > >>
> > > >>> "Generic" is probably a way too technical term.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> "Base" would be misleading IMO since it's not really a base flavor.
> > > >>> Its primary goal is not to be used as a dependency (of course it's
> > > >>> fine to have it as dependency if you just want to add pre installed
> > > >>> extensions to the default flavor). It's a -1 for me.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Frankly I would simply go for "XWiki Flavor". I know, it's not
> going
> > > >>> to be the only flavor for XWiki but it's obvious when you actually
> > see
> > > >>> severals of those in the picker anyway and I find it nicer than
> > > >>> "Default XWiki Flavor" which basically means the same thing since
> the
> > > >>> XWiki core project does not plan to provide any other flavor. I'm
> > also
> > > >>> fine with "Default XWiki Favor" if others think it's a better name.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> WDYT ?
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> Sergiu Dumitriu
> > > >> http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Thomas Mortagne
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Guillaume Delhumeau (guillaume.delhum...@xwiki.com)
> > Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
> > Committer on the XWiki.org project
> >
>

Re: [xwiki-devs] [PROPOSAL] So, what display name for the new default flavor ?

[Marius Dumitru Florea]

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Guillaume Delhumeau <
guillaume.delhum...@xwiki.com> wrote:

> +1 for Classic
>

Classic sounds good. +1


>
> 2017-05-24 14:16 GMT+02:00 Olivier Seres :
>
> > I m also in flavor of Classic Flavor for 3 reasons :
> > For the last 10 years, it was THE (only one) proposed flavor, now we
> might
> > have more than one
> > There is "Class" in classic , sound positive to me
> > It has a distinguishable name
> >
> > I find "xwiki flavour"  confusing ( it implies that other flavors are
> > non-xwiki ones...)
> >
> > Olivier Sérès
> >
> > > Le 24 mai 2017 à 14:03, Thomas Mortagne  a
> > écrit :
> > >
> > >> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu 
> > wrote:
> > >>> On 05/24/2017 05:51 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
> > >>> Hi devs,
> > >>>
> > >>> I'm getting closer to finish with the hard work around new platform
> > >>> flavor which is going to replace XE.
> > >>>
> > >>> Need to decide what user will see in the Flavor picker when installed
> > XWiki now.
> > >>>
> > >>> As a reminder we decided that this would be a generic flavor, not
> tied
> > >>> to any specific use case (so forget about "Knwonledge Base Flavor"
> > >>> :)).
> > >>>
> > >>> Here is a few ideas gathered in previous mails:
> > >>> * "XWiki Flavor"
> > >>> * "Default XWiki Flavor"
> > >>> * "Generic XWiki Flavor"
> > >>> * "Base XWiki Flavor"
> > >>
> > >> A few more ideas:
> > >>
> > >> * Classic
> > >> * Raw
> > >> * Starter
> > >
> > > Not a fan or "Raw".
> > >
> > > I like "Classic", might sound better than "Default" for most users.
> > > Not sure about "Starter".
> > >
> > >>
> > >>> "Generic" is probably a way too technical term.
> > >>>
> > >>> "Base" would be misleading IMO since it's not really a base flavor.
> > >>> Its primary goal is not to be used as a dependency (of course it's
> > >>> fine to have it as dependency if you just want to add pre installed
> > >>> extensions to the default flavor). It's a -1 for me.
> > >>>
> > >>> Frankly I would simply go for "XWiki Flavor". I know, it's not going
> > >>> to be the only flavor for XWiki but it's obvious when you actually
> see
> > >>> severals of those in the picker anyway and I find it nicer than
> > >>> "Default XWiki Flavor" which basically means the same thing since the
> > >>> XWiki core project does not plan to provide any other flavor. I'm
> also
> > >>> fine with "Default XWiki Favor" if others think it's a better name.
> > >>>
> > >>> WDYT ?
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Sergiu Dumitriu
> > >> http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Thomas Mortagne
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Guillaume Delhumeau (guillaume.delhum...@xwiki.com)
> Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
> Committer on the XWiki.org project
>

Re: [xwiki-devs] [PROPOSAL] So, what display name for the new default flavor ?

[Guillaume Delhumeau]

+1 for Classic

2017-05-24 14:16 GMT+02:00 Olivier Seres :

> I m also in flavor of Classic Flavor for 3 reasons :
> For the last 10 years, it was THE (only one) proposed flavor, now we might
> have more than one
> There is "Class" in classic , sound positive to me
> It has a distinguishable name
>
> I find "xwiki flavour"  confusing ( it implies that other flavors are
> non-xwiki ones...)
>
> Olivier Sérès
>
> > Le 24 mai 2017 à 14:03, Thomas Mortagne  a
> écrit :
> >
> >> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu 
> wrote:
> >>> On 05/24/2017 05:51 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
> >>> Hi devs,
> >>>
> >>> I'm getting closer to finish with the hard work around new platform
> >>> flavor which is going to replace XE.
> >>>
> >>> Need to decide what user will see in the Flavor picker when installed
> XWiki now.
> >>>
> >>> As a reminder we decided that this would be a generic flavor, not tied
> >>> to any specific use case (so forget about "Knwonledge Base Flavor"
> >>> :)).
> >>>
> >>> Here is a few ideas gathered in previous mails:
> >>> * "XWiki Flavor"
> >>> * "Default XWiki Flavor"
> >>> * "Generic XWiki Flavor"
> >>> * "Base XWiki Flavor"
> >>
> >> A few more ideas:
> >>
> >> * Classic
> >> * Raw
> >> * Starter
> >
> > Not a fan or "Raw".
> >
> > I like "Classic", might sound better than "Default" for most users.
> > Not sure about "Starter".
> >
> >>
> >>> "Generic" is probably a way too technical term.
> >>>
> >>> "Base" would be misleading IMO since it's not really a base flavor.
> >>> Its primary goal is not to be used as a dependency (of course it's
> >>> fine to have it as dependency if you just want to add pre installed
> >>> extensions to the default flavor). It's a -1 for me.
> >>>
> >>> Frankly I would simply go for "XWiki Flavor". I know, it's not going
> >>> to be the only flavor for XWiki but it's obvious when you actually see
> >>> severals of those in the picker anyway and I find it nicer than
> >>> "Default XWiki Flavor" which basically means the same thing since the
> >>> XWiki core project does not plan to provide any other flavor. I'm also
> >>> fine with "Default XWiki Favor" if others think it's a better name.
> >>>
> >>> WDYT ?
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Sergiu Dumitriu
> >> http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Thomas Mortagne
>



-- 
Guillaume Delhumeau (guillaume.delhum...@xwiki.com)
Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
Committer on the XWiki.org project

Re: [xwiki-devs] [PROPOSAL] So, what display name for the new default flavor ?

[Olivier Seres]

I m also in flavor of Classic Flavor for 3 reasons :
For the last 10 years, it was THE (only one) proposed flavor, now we might have 
more than one 
There is "Class" in classic , sound positive to me
It has a distinguishable name

I find "xwiki flavour"  confusing ( it implies that other flavors are non-xwiki 
ones...)

Olivier Sérès

> Le 24 mai 2017 à 14:03, Thomas Mortagne  a écrit :
> 
>> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu  wrote:
>>> On 05/24/2017 05:51 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
>>> Hi devs,
>>> 
>>> I'm getting closer to finish with the hard work around new platform
>>> flavor which is going to replace XE.
>>> 
>>> Need to decide what user will see in the Flavor picker when installed XWiki 
>>> now.
>>> 
>>> As a reminder we decided that this would be a generic flavor, not tied
>>> to any specific use case (so forget about "Knwonledge Base Flavor"
>>> :)).
>>> 
>>> Here is a few ideas gathered in previous mails:
>>> * "XWiki Flavor"
>>> * "Default XWiki Flavor"
>>> * "Generic XWiki Flavor"
>>> * "Base XWiki Flavor"
>> 
>> A few more ideas:
>> 
>> * Classic
>> * Raw
>> * Starter
> 
> Not a fan or "Raw".
> 
> I like "Classic", might sound better than "Default" for most users.
> Not sure about "Starter".
> 
>> 
>>> "Generic" is probably a way too technical term.
>>> 
>>> "Base" would be misleading IMO since it's not really a base flavor.
>>> Its primary goal is not to be used as a dependency (of course it's
>>> fine to have it as dependency if you just want to add pre installed
>>> extensions to the default flavor). It's a -1 for me.
>>> 
>>> Frankly I would simply go for "XWiki Flavor". I know, it's not going
>>> to be the only flavor for XWiki but it's obvious when you actually see
>>> severals of those in the picker anyway and I find it nicer than
>>> "Default XWiki Flavor" which basically means the same thing since the
>>> XWiki core project does not plan to provide any other flavor. I'm also
>>> fine with "Default XWiki Favor" if others think it's a better name.
>>> 
>>> WDYT ?
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Sergiu Dumitriu
>> http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Thomas Mortagne

Re: [xwiki-devs] [PROPOSAL] So, what display name for the new default flavor ?

[Thomas Mortagne]

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu  wrote:
> On 05/24/2017 05:51 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
>> Hi devs,
>>
>> I'm getting closer to finish with the hard work around new platform
>> flavor which is going to replace XE.
>>
>> Need to decide what user will see in the Flavor picker when installed XWiki 
>> now.
>>
>> As a reminder we decided that this would be a generic flavor, not tied
>> to any specific use case (so forget about "Knwonledge Base Flavor"
>> :)).
>>
>> Here is a few ideas gathered in previous mails:
>> * "XWiki Flavor"
>> * "Default XWiki Flavor"
>> * "Generic XWiki Flavor"
>> * "Base XWiki Flavor"
>
> A few more ideas:
>
> * Classic
> * Raw
> * Starter

Not a fan or "Raw".

I like "Classic", might sound better than "Default" for most users.
Not sure about "Starter".

>
>> "Generic" is probably a way too technical term.
>>
>> "Base" would be misleading IMO since it's not really a base flavor.
>> Its primary goal is not to be used as a dependency (of course it's
>> fine to have it as dependency if you just want to add pre installed
>> extensions to the default flavor). It's a -1 for me.
>>
>> Frankly I would simply go for "XWiki Flavor". I know, it's not going
>> to be the only flavor for XWiki but it's obvious when you actually see
>> severals of those in the picker anyway and I find it nicer than
>> "Default XWiki Flavor" which basically means the same thing since the
>> XWiki core project does not plan to provide any other flavor. I'm also
>> fine with "Default XWiki Favor" if others think it's a better name.
>>
>> WDYT ?
>>
>
>
> --
> Sergiu Dumitriu
> http://purl.org/net/sergiu/



-- 
Thomas Mortagne

Re: [xwiki-devs] [PROPOSAL] So, what display name for the new default flavor ?

[Sergiu Dumitriu]

On 05/24/2017 05:51 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
> Hi devs,
> 
> I'm getting closer to finish with the hard work around new platform
> flavor which is going to replace XE.
> 
> Need to decide what user will see in the Flavor picker when installed XWiki 
> now.
> 
> As a reminder we decided that this would be a generic flavor, not tied
> to any specific use case (so forget about "Knwonledge Base Flavor"
> :)).
> 
> Here is a few ideas gathered in previous mails:
> * "XWiki Flavor"
> * "Default XWiki Flavor"
> * "Generic XWiki Flavor"
> * "Base XWiki Flavor"

A few more ideas:

* Classic
* Raw
* Starter

> "Generic" is probably a way too technical term.
> 
> "Base" would be misleading IMO since it's not really a base flavor.
> Its primary goal is not to be used as a dependency (of course it's
> fine to have it as dependency if you just want to add pre installed
> extensions to the default flavor). It's a -1 for me.
> 
> Frankly I would simply go for "XWiki Flavor". I know, it's not going
> to be the only flavor for XWiki but it's obvious when you actually see
> severals of those in the picker anyway and I find it nicer than
> "Default XWiki Flavor" which basically means the same thing since the
> XWiki core project does not plan to provide any other flavor. I'm also
> fine with "Default XWiki Favor" if others think it's a better name.
> 
> WDYT ?
> 


-- 
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/

Re: [xwiki-devs] [PROPOSAL] So, what display name for the new default flavor ?

[Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)]

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Thomas Mortagne  wrote:

> Hi devs,
>
> I'm getting closer to finish with the hard work around new platform
> flavor which is going to replace XE.
>
> Need to decide what user will see in the Flavor picker when installed
> XWiki now.
>
> As a reminder we decided that this would be a generic flavor, not tied
> to any specific use case (so forget about "Knwonledge Base Flavor"
> :)).
>
> Here is a few ideas gathered in previous mails:
> * "XWiki Flavor"
> * "Default XWiki Flavor"
>

+1 for Default XWiki Flavor


> * "Generic XWiki Flavor"
> * "Base XWiki Flavor"
>
> "Generic" is probably a way too technical term.
>
> "Base" would be misleading IMO since it's not really a base flavor.
> Its primary goal is not to be used as a dependency (of course it's
> fine to have it as dependency if you just want to add pre installed
> extensions to the default flavor). It's a -1 for me.
>
> Frankly I would simply go for "XWiki Flavor". I know, it's not going
> to be the only flavor for XWiki but it's obvious when you actually see
> severals of those in the picker anyway and I find it nicer than
> "Default XWiki Flavor" which basically means the same thing since the
> XWiki core project does not plan to provide any other flavor.


I really hope that in future we will change our mind (and have the
resources) to support more than 1 flavor.

Thanks,
Caty


> I'm also
> fine with "Default XWiki Favor" if others think it's a better name.
>
> WDYT ?
>
> --
> Thomas Mortagne
>

[xwiki-devs] [PROPOSAL] So, what display name for the new default flavor ?

[Thomas Mortagne]

Hi devs,

I'm getting closer to finish with the hard work around new platform
flavor which is going to replace XE.

Need to decide what user will see in the Flavor picker when installed XWiki now.

As a reminder we decided that this would be a generic flavor, not tied
to any specific use case (so forget about "Knwonledge Base Flavor"
:)).

Here is a few ideas gathered in previous mails:
* "XWiki Flavor"
* "Default XWiki Flavor"
* "Generic XWiki Flavor"
* "Base XWiki Flavor"

"Generic" is probably a way too technical term.

"Base" would be misleading IMO since it's not really a base flavor.
Its primary goal is not to be used as a dependency (of course it's
fine to have it as dependency if you just want to add pre installed
extensions to the default flavor). It's a -1 for me.

Frankly I would simply go for "XWiki Flavor". I know, it's not going
to be the only flavor for XWiki but it's obvious when you actually see
severals of those in the picker anyway and I find it nicer than
"Default XWiki Flavor" which basically means the same thing since the
XWiki core project does not plan to provide any other flavor. I'm also
fine with "Default XWiki Favor" if others think it's a better name.

WDYT ?

-- 
Thomas Mortagne