Re: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Extend the ack section of the Release Notes

[Vincent Massol]

Yes, I’d do that only for final releases (but including the participations for 
the RC ofc).

Thanks
-Vincent

> On 9 Feb 2017, at 13:24, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)  wrote:
> 
> +1
> 
> Hope it won't slow down the release process too much, especially since we
> release now more often. Should we do this only for final versions?
> 
> Thanks,
> Caty
> 
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 8:46 PM, Thomas Mortagne 
> wrote:
> 
>> (This is all modifications made to documents containing a translation
>> object)
>> 
>> 
>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 8:45 PM, Thomas Mortagne
>>  wrote:
>>> There is a typo in the previous URL:
>>> http://l10n.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/L10NCode/BestContributorsSheet?
>> lowerBound=20161201=20170106
>>> 
>>> I'm surprised $datetool.toDate does not complain about a weird date
>>> like "201601201".
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 8:35 PM, Thomas Mortagne
>>>  wrote:
 Already exist: http://l10n.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/L10NCode/
>> BestContributorsSheet?lowerBound=201601201=20170106
 
 What is missing is find out the dates to pass as parameters.
 
 On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 5:33 PM, Vincent Massol 
>> wrote:
> 
>> On 6 Feb 2017, at 10:39, Thomas Mortagne 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> +1 for adding any source of contributions as long as it's automated or
>> close to automated (like executing one command/request and
>> copy/pasting the result)
> 
> @Thomas: Could I let you write some script to generate:
> "B) The people who’ve contributed translations done after the start of
>> the release development.”
> 
> ?
> 
> :)
> 
> So the idea is to give a start and end date and get the list of
>> translators during that period.
> 
> Thanks
> -Vincent
> 
>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea
>>  wrote:
>>> +1
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Marius
>>> 
>>> On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Vincent Massol 
>> wrote:
>>> 
 Hi devs,
 
 Right now we’ve started acknowledging the committers in the Release
>> notes.
 
 I’d like to propose to extend that try to ack everyone who
>> participates in
 one way or another to a release, and not just developers.
 
 I can think of 3 more items to add:
 
 A) All the JIRA issue reporters that have had an issue fixed for the
 release (bug, improvement, new feature, etc). They took the time to
>> report
 an issue and thus they’ve helped the committers to improve the
>> quality of
 the release and thus they should be acknowledged. This allows us to
>> also
 ack QA. We could decide to exclude the reporters who’ve also been
 committers or leave them in.
 
 B) The people who’ve contributed translations done after the start
>> of the
 release development.
 
 Ideally we would also ack:
 
 C) The people who’ve helped on the list for the release
 D) The people who’ve helped on the Design and made proposals that
>> made it
 to the release. I’m thinking of Caty for example. Luckily Caty also
>> commits
 some code and often she’s recognised through commits.
 
 The problem with C) and D) is that they’re hard to gather. But we
>> could do
 it on an ad-hoc basis by adding them to the RN during the
>> development (when
 they help) instead of doing it at the end.
 
 In any case I’d like to focus on A) and B) FTM and I’m proposing to
>> add
 them to the Release Plan since they’re easy to find out.
 
 WDYT?
 
 Thanks
 -Vincent
 
 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Thomas Mortagne
> 
 
 
 
 --
 Thomas Mortagne
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Thomas Mortagne
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Thomas Mortagne
>> 

Re: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Extend the ack section of the Release Notes

[Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)]

+1

Hope it won't slow down the release process too much, especially since we
release now more often. Should we do this only for final versions?

Thanks,
Caty

On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 8:46 PM, Thomas Mortagne 
wrote:

> (This is all modifications made to documents containing a translation
> object)
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 8:45 PM, Thomas Mortagne
>  wrote:
> > There is a typo in the previous URL:
> > http://l10n.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/L10NCode/BestContributorsSheet?
> lowerBound=20161201=20170106
> >
> > I'm surprised $datetool.toDate does not complain about a weird date
> > like "201601201".
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 8:35 PM, Thomas Mortagne
> >  wrote:
> >> Already exist: http://l10n.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/L10NCode/
> BestContributorsSheet?lowerBound=201601201=20170106
> >>
> >> What is missing is find out the dates to pass as parameters.
> >>
> >> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 5:33 PM, Vincent Massol 
> wrote:
> >>>
>  On 6 Feb 2017, at 10:39, Thomas Mortagne 
> wrote:
> 
>  +1 for adding any source of contributions as long as it's automated or
>  close to automated (like executing one command/request and
>  copy/pasting the result)
> >>>
> >>> @Thomas: Could I let you write some script to generate:
> >>> "B) The people who’ve contributed translations done after the start of
> the release development.”
> >>>
> >>> ?
> >>>
> >>> :)
> >>>
> >>> So the idea is to give a start and end date and get the list of
> translators during that period.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>> -Vincent
> >>>
>  On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea
>   wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Marius
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Vincent Massol 
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi devs,
> >>
> >> Right now we’ve started acknowledging the committers in the Release
> notes.
> >>
> >> I’d like to propose to extend that try to ack everyone who
> participates in
> >> one way or another to a release, and not just developers.
> >>
> >> I can think of 3 more items to add:
> >>
> >> A) All the JIRA issue reporters that have had an issue fixed for the
> >> release (bug, improvement, new feature, etc). They took the time to
> report
> >> an issue and thus they’ve helped the committers to improve the
> quality of
> >> the release and thus they should be acknowledged. This allows us to
> also
> >> ack QA. We could decide to exclude the reporters who’ve also been
> >> committers or leave them in.
> >>
> >> B) The people who’ve contributed translations done after the start
> of the
> >> release development.
> >>
> >> Ideally we would also ack:
> >>
> >> C) The people who’ve helped on the list for the release
> >> D) The people who’ve helped on the Design and made proposals that
> made it
> >> to the release. I’m thinking of Caty for example. Luckily Caty also
> commits
> >> some code and often she’s recognised through commits.
> >>
> >> The problem with C) and D) is that they’re hard to gather. But we
> could do
> >> it on an ad-hoc basis by adding them to the RN during the
> development (when
> >> they help) instead of doing it at the end.
> >>
> >> In any case I’d like to focus on A) and B) FTM and I’m proposing to
> add
> >> them to the Release Plan since they’re easy to find out.
> >>
> >> WDYT?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> -Vincent
> >>
> >>
> 
> 
> 
>  --
>  Thomas Mortagne
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Thomas Mortagne
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Thomas Mortagne
>
>
>
> --
> Thomas Mortagne
>

Re: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Extend the ack section of the Release Notes

[Thomas Mortagne]

(This is all modifications made to documents containing a translation object)


On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 8:45 PM, Thomas Mortagne
 wrote:
> There is a typo in the previous URL:
> http://l10n.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/L10NCode/BestContributorsSheet?lowerBound=20161201=20170106
>
> I'm surprised $datetool.toDate does not complain about a weird date
> like "201601201".
>
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 8:35 PM, Thomas Mortagne
>  wrote:
>> Already exist: 
>> http://l10n.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/L10NCode/BestContributorsSheet?lowerBound=201601201=20170106
>>
>> What is missing is find out the dates to pass as parameters.
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 5:33 PM, Vincent Massol  wrote:
>>>
 On 6 Feb 2017, at 10:39, Thomas Mortagne  wrote:

 +1 for adding any source of contributions as long as it's automated or
 close to automated (like executing one command/request and
 copy/pasting the result)
>>>
>>> @Thomas: Could I let you write some script to generate:
>>> "B) The people who’ve contributed translations done after the start of the 
>>> release development.”
>>>
>>> ?
>>>
>>> :)
>>>
>>> So the idea is to give a start and end date and get the list of translators 
>>> during that period.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> -Vincent
>>>
 On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea
  wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks,
> Marius
>
> On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Vincent Massol  
> wrote:
>
>> Hi devs,
>>
>> Right now we’ve started acknowledging the committers in the Release 
>> notes.
>>
>> I’d like to propose to extend that try to ack everyone who participates 
>> in
>> one way or another to a release, and not just developers.
>>
>> I can think of 3 more items to add:
>>
>> A) All the JIRA issue reporters that have had an issue fixed for the
>> release (bug, improvement, new feature, etc). They took the time to 
>> report
>> an issue and thus they’ve helped the committers to improve the quality of
>> the release and thus they should be acknowledged. This allows us to also
>> ack QA. We could decide to exclude the reporters who’ve also been
>> committers or leave them in.
>>
>> B) The people who’ve contributed translations done after the start of the
>> release development.
>>
>> Ideally we would also ack:
>>
>> C) The people who’ve helped on the list for the release
>> D) The people who’ve helped on the Design and made proposals that made it
>> to the release. I’m thinking of Caty for example. Luckily Caty also 
>> commits
>> some code and often she’s recognised through commits.
>>
>> The problem with C) and D) is that they’re hard to gather. But we could 
>> do
>> it on an ad-hoc basis by adding them to the RN during the development 
>> (when
>> they help) instead of doing it at the end.
>>
>> In any case I’d like to focus on A) and B) FTM and I’m proposing to add
>> them to the Release Plan since they’re easy to find out.
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>> Thanks
>> -Vincent
>>
>>



 --
 Thomas Mortagne
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thomas Mortagne
>
>
>
> --
> Thomas Mortagne



-- 
Thomas Mortagne

Re: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Extend the ack section of the Release Notes

[Thomas Mortagne]

There is a typo in the previous URL:
http://l10n.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/L10NCode/BestContributorsSheet?lowerBound=20161201=20170106

I'm surprised $datetool.toDate does not complain about a weird date
like "201601201".

On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 8:35 PM, Thomas Mortagne
 wrote:
> Already exist: 
> http://l10n.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/L10NCode/BestContributorsSheet?lowerBound=201601201=20170106
>
> What is missing is find out the dates to pass as parameters.
>
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 5:33 PM, Vincent Massol  wrote:
>>
>>> On 6 Feb 2017, at 10:39, Thomas Mortagne  wrote:
>>>
>>> +1 for adding any source of contributions as long as it's automated or
>>> close to automated (like executing one command/request and
>>> copy/pasting the result)
>>
>> @Thomas: Could I let you write some script to generate:
>> "B) The people who’ve contributed translations done after the start of the 
>> release development.”
>>
>> ?
>>
>> :)
>>
>> So the idea is to give a start and end date and get the list of translators 
>> during that period.
>>
>> Thanks
>> -Vincent
>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea
>>>  wrote:
 +1

 Thanks,
 Marius

 On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Vincent Massol  wrote:

> Hi devs,
>
> Right now we’ve started acknowledging the committers in the Release notes.
>
> I’d like to propose to extend that try to ack everyone who participates in
> one way or another to a release, and not just developers.
>
> I can think of 3 more items to add:
>
> A) All the JIRA issue reporters that have had an issue fixed for the
> release (bug, improvement, new feature, etc). They took the time to report
> an issue and thus they’ve helped the committers to improve the quality of
> the release and thus they should be acknowledged. This allows us to also
> ack QA. We could decide to exclude the reporters who’ve also been
> committers or leave them in.
>
> B) The people who’ve contributed translations done after the start of the
> release development.
>
> Ideally we would also ack:
>
> C) The people who’ve helped on the list for the release
> D) The people who’ve helped on the Design and made proposals that made it
> to the release. I’m thinking of Caty for example. Luckily Caty also 
> commits
> some code and often she’s recognised through commits.
>
> The problem with C) and D) is that they’re hard to gather. But we could do
> it on an ad-hoc basis by adding them to the RN during the development 
> (when
> they help) instead of doing it at the end.
>
> In any case I’d like to focus on A) and B) FTM and I’m proposing to add
> them to the Release Plan since they’re easy to find out.
>
> WDYT?
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thomas Mortagne
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Thomas Mortagne



-- 
Thomas Mortagne

Re: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Extend the ack section of the Release Notes

[Thomas Mortagne]

Already exist: 
http://l10n.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/L10NCode/BestContributorsSheet?lowerBound=201601201=20170106

What is missing is find out the dates to pass as parameters.

On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 5:33 PM, Vincent Massol  wrote:
>
>> On 6 Feb 2017, at 10:39, Thomas Mortagne  wrote:
>>
>> +1 for adding any source of contributions as long as it's automated or
>> close to automated (like executing one command/request and
>> copy/pasting the result)
>
> @Thomas: Could I let you write some script to generate:
> "B) The people who’ve contributed translations done after the start of the 
> release development.”
>
> ?
>
> :)
>
> So the idea is to give a start and end date and get the list of translators 
> during that period.
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea
>>  wrote:
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Marius
>>>
>>> On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Vincent Massol  wrote:
>>>
 Hi devs,

 Right now we’ve started acknowledging the committers in the Release notes.

 I’d like to propose to extend that try to ack everyone who participates in
 one way or another to a release, and not just developers.

 I can think of 3 more items to add:

 A) All the JIRA issue reporters that have had an issue fixed for the
 release (bug, improvement, new feature, etc). They took the time to report
 an issue and thus they’ve helped the committers to improve the quality of
 the release and thus they should be acknowledged. This allows us to also
 ack QA. We could decide to exclude the reporters who’ve also been
 committers or leave them in.

 B) The people who’ve contributed translations done after the start of the
 release development.

 Ideally we would also ack:

 C) The people who’ve helped on the list for the release
 D) The people who’ve helped on the Design and made proposals that made it
 to the release. I’m thinking of Caty for example. Luckily Caty also commits
 some code and often she’s recognised through commits.

 The problem with C) and D) is that they’re hard to gather. But we could do
 it on an ad-hoc basis by adding them to the RN during the development (when
 they help) instead of doing it at the end.

 In any case I’d like to focus on A) and B) FTM and I’m proposing to add
 them to the Release Plan since they’re easy to find out.

 WDYT?

 Thanks
 -Vincent


>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thomas Mortagne
>



-- 
Thomas Mortagne

Re: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Extend the ack section of the Release Notes

[Vincent Massol]

> On 6 Feb 2017, at 10:39, Thomas Mortagne  wrote:
> 
> +1 for adding any source of contributions as long as it's automated or
> close to automated (like executing one command/request and
> copy/pasting the result)

@Thomas: Could I let you write some script to generate:
"B) The people who’ve contributed translations done after the start of the 
release development.”

?

:)

So the idea is to give a start and end date and get the list of translators 
during that period.

Thanks
-Vincent

> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea
>  wrote:
>> +1
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Marius
>> 
>> On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Vincent Massol  wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi devs,
>>> 
>>> Right now we’ve started acknowledging the committers in the Release notes.
>>> 
>>> I’d like to propose to extend that try to ack everyone who participates in
>>> one way or another to a release, and not just developers.
>>> 
>>> I can think of 3 more items to add:
>>> 
>>> A) All the JIRA issue reporters that have had an issue fixed for the
>>> release (bug, improvement, new feature, etc). They took the time to report
>>> an issue and thus they’ve helped the committers to improve the quality of
>>> the release and thus they should be acknowledged. This allows us to also
>>> ack QA. We could decide to exclude the reporters who’ve also been
>>> committers or leave them in.
>>> 
>>> B) The people who’ve contributed translations done after the start of the
>>> release development.
>>> 
>>> Ideally we would also ack:
>>> 
>>> C) The people who’ve helped on the list for the release
>>> D) The people who’ve helped on the Design and made proposals that made it
>>> to the release. I’m thinking of Caty for example. Luckily Caty also commits
>>> some code and often she’s recognised through commits.
>>> 
>>> The problem with C) and D) is that they’re hard to gather. But we could do
>>> it on an ad-hoc basis by adding them to the RN during the development (when
>>> they help) instead of doing it at the end.
>>> 
>>> In any case I’d like to focus on A) and B) FTM and I’m proposing to add
>>> them to the Release Plan since they’re easy to find out.
>>> 
>>> WDYT?
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> -Vincent
>>> 
>>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Thomas Mortagne

Re: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Extend the ack section of the Release Notes

[Vincent Massol]

> On 5 Feb 2017, at 11:07, Vincent Massol  wrote:
> 
> Hi devs,
> 
> Right now we’ve started acknowledging the committers in the Release notes.
> 
> I’d like to propose to extend that try to ack everyone who participates in 
> one way or another to a release, and not just developers.
> 
> I can think of 3 more items to add:
> 
> A) All the JIRA issue reporters that have had an issue fixed for the release 
> (bug, improvement, new feature, etc). They took the time to report an issue 
> and thus they’ve helped the committers to improve the quality of the release 
> and thus they should be acknowledged. This allows us to also ack QA. We could 
> decide to exclude the reporters who’ve also been committers or leave them in.

Here’s how to automate this:

{{groovy}}
def jql = URLEncoder.encode('category = "Top Level Projects" AND (fixVersion = 
"9.0-rc-1" OR fixVersion = "9.0") AND resolution = Fixed AND component != 
"Development Issues only"', "UTF-8")
def columns = "field=reporter"

def url = 
"http://jira.xwiki.org/sr/jira.issueviews:searchrequest-xml/temp/SearchRequest.xml?jqlQuery=${jql}&${columns}".toURL().text
def root = new XmlSlurper().parseText(url)

def reporters = [] as TreeSet
root.channel.item.each() {
  reporters.add(it.reporter.toString())
}

println "{{{"
reporters.each() {
  println "* ${it}"
}
println "}}}"
{{/groovy}}

Thanks
-Vincent

> 
> B) The people who’ve contributed translations done after the start of the 
> release development.
> 
> Ideally we would also ack:
> 
> C) The people who’ve helped on the list for the release
> D) The people who’ve helped on the Design and made proposals that made it to 
> the release. I’m thinking of Caty for example. Luckily Caty also commits some 
> code and often she’s recognised through commits.
> 
> The problem with C) and D) is that they’re hard to gather. But we could do it 
> on an ad-hoc basis by adding them to the RN during the development (when they 
> help) instead of doing it at the end.
> 
> In any case I’d like to focus on A) and B) FTM and I’m proposing to add them 
> to the Release Plan since they’re easy to find out.
> 
> WDYT?
> 
> Thanks
> -Vincent
> 

Re: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Extend the ack section of the Release Notes

[Guillaume Delhumeau]

Same as Thomas too.

2017-02-06 16:13 GMT+01:00 Sergiu Dumitriu :

> Same as Thomas.
>
> On 02/06/2017 04:39 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
> > +1 for adding any source of contributions as long as it's automated or
> > close to automated (like executing one command/request and
> > copy/pasting the result)
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea
> >  wrote:
> >> +1
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Marius
> >>
> >> On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Vincent Massol 
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi devs,
> >>>
> >>> Right now we’ve started acknowledging the committers in the Release
> notes.
> >>>
> >>> I’d like to propose to extend that try to ack everyone who
> participates in
> >>> one way or another to a release, and not just developers.
> >>>
> >>> I can think of 3 more items to add:
> >>>
> >>> A) All the JIRA issue reporters that have had an issue fixed for the
> >>> release (bug, improvement, new feature, etc). They took the time to
> report
> >>> an issue and thus they’ve helped the committers to improve the quality
> of
> >>> the release and thus they should be acknowledged. This allows us to
> also
> >>> ack QA. We could decide to exclude the reporters who’ve also been
> >>> committers or leave them in.
> >>>
> >>> B) The people who’ve contributed translations done after the start of
> the
> >>> release development.
> >>>
> >>> Ideally we would also ack:
> >>>
> >>> C) The people who’ve helped on the list for the release
> >>> D) The people who’ve helped on the Design and made proposals that made
> it
> >>> to the release. I’m thinking of Caty for example. Luckily Caty also
> commits
> >>> some code and often she’s recognised through commits.
> >>>
> >>> The problem with C) and D) is that they’re hard to gather. But we
> could do
> >>> it on an ad-hoc basis by adding them to the RN during the development
> (when
> >>> they help) instead of doing it at the end.
> >>>
> >>> In any case I’d like to focus on A) and B) FTM and I’m proposing to add
> >>> them to the Release Plan since they’re easy to find out.
> >>>
> >>> WDYT?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>> -Vincent
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Sergiu Dumitriu
> http://purl.org/net/sergiu
>



-- 
Guillaume Delhumeau (guillaume.delhum...@xwiki.com)
Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
Committer on the XWiki.org project

Re: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Extend the ack section of the Release Notes

[Sergiu Dumitriu]

Same as Thomas.

On 02/06/2017 04:39 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
> +1 for adding any source of contributions as long as it's automated or
> close to automated (like executing one command/request and
> copy/pasting the result)
> 
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea
>  wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Marius
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Vincent Massol  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi devs,
>>>
>>> Right now we’ve started acknowledging the committers in the Release notes.
>>>
>>> I’d like to propose to extend that try to ack everyone who participates in
>>> one way or another to a release, and not just developers.
>>>
>>> I can think of 3 more items to add:
>>>
>>> A) All the JIRA issue reporters that have had an issue fixed for the
>>> release (bug, improvement, new feature, etc). They took the time to report
>>> an issue and thus they’ve helped the committers to improve the quality of
>>> the release and thus they should be acknowledged. This allows us to also
>>> ack QA. We could decide to exclude the reporters who’ve also been
>>> committers or leave them in.
>>>
>>> B) The people who’ve contributed translations done after the start of the
>>> release development.
>>>
>>> Ideally we would also ack:
>>>
>>> C) The people who’ve helped on the list for the release
>>> D) The people who’ve helped on the Design and made proposals that made it
>>> to the release. I’m thinking of Caty for example. Luckily Caty also commits
>>> some code and often she’s recognised through commits.
>>>
>>> The problem with C) and D) is that they’re hard to gather. But we could do
>>> it on an ad-hoc basis by adding them to the RN during the development (when
>>> they help) instead of doing it at the end.
>>>
>>> In any case I’d like to focus on A) and B) FTM and I’m proposing to add
>>> them to the Release Plan since they’re easy to find out.
>>>
>>> WDYT?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> -Vincent
>>>
>>>
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu

Re: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Extend the ack section of the Release Notes

[Alexandru Cotiuga]

+1

Thanks,
Alex

On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Thomas Mortagne 
wrote:

> +1 for adding any source of contributions as long as it's automated or
> close to automated (like executing one command/request and
> copy/pasting the result)
>
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea
>  wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Marius
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Vincent Massol 
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi devs,
> >>
> >> Right now we’ve started acknowledging the committers in the Release
> notes.
> >>
> >> I’d like to propose to extend that try to ack everyone who participates
> in
> >> one way or another to a release, and not just developers.
> >>
> >> I can think of 3 more items to add:
> >>
> >> A) All the JIRA issue reporters that have had an issue fixed for the
> >> release (bug, improvement, new feature, etc). They took the time to
> report
> >> an issue and thus they’ve helped the committers to improve the quality
> of
> >> the release and thus they should be acknowledged. This allows us to also
> >> ack QA. We could decide to exclude the reporters who’ve also been
> >> committers or leave them in.
> >>
> >> B) The people who’ve contributed translations done after the start of
> the
> >> release development.
> >>
> >> Ideally we would also ack:
> >>
> >> C) The people who’ve helped on the list for the release
> >> D) The people who’ve helped on the Design and made proposals that made
> it
> >> to the release. I’m thinking of Caty for example. Luckily Caty also
> commits
> >> some code and often she’s recognised through commits.
> >>
> >> The problem with C) and D) is that they’re hard to gather. But we could
> do
> >> it on an ad-hoc basis by adding them to the RN during the development
> (when
> >> they help) instead of doing it at the end.
> >>
> >> In any case I’d like to focus on A) and B) FTM and I’m proposing to add
> >> them to the Release Plan since they’re easy to find out.
> >>
> >> WDYT?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> -Vincent
> >>
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> Thomas Mortagne
>

Re: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Extend the ack section of the Release Notes

[Thomas Mortagne]

+1 for adding any source of contributions as long as it's automated or
close to automated (like executing one command/request and
copy/pasting the result)

On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea
 wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks,
> Marius
>
> On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Vincent Massol  wrote:
>
>> Hi devs,
>>
>> Right now we’ve started acknowledging the committers in the Release notes.
>>
>> I’d like to propose to extend that try to ack everyone who participates in
>> one way or another to a release, and not just developers.
>>
>> I can think of 3 more items to add:
>>
>> A) All the JIRA issue reporters that have had an issue fixed for the
>> release (bug, improvement, new feature, etc). They took the time to report
>> an issue and thus they’ve helped the committers to improve the quality of
>> the release and thus they should be acknowledged. This allows us to also
>> ack QA. We could decide to exclude the reporters who’ve also been
>> committers or leave them in.
>>
>> B) The people who’ve contributed translations done after the start of the
>> release development.
>>
>> Ideally we would also ack:
>>
>> C) The people who’ve helped on the list for the release
>> D) The people who’ve helped on the Design and made proposals that made it
>> to the release. I’m thinking of Caty for example. Luckily Caty also commits
>> some code and often she’s recognised through commits.
>>
>> The problem with C) and D) is that they’re hard to gather. But we could do
>> it on an ad-hoc basis by adding them to the RN during the development (when
>> they help) instead of doing it at the end.
>>
>> In any case I’d like to focus on A) and B) FTM and I’m proposing to add
>> them to the Release Plan since they’re easy to find out.
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>> Thanks
>> -Vincent
>>
>>



-- 
Thomas Mortagne

Re: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Extend the ack section of the Release Notes

[Marius Dumitru Florea]

+1

Thanks,
Marius

On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Vincent Massol  wrote:

> Hi devs,
>
> Right now we’ve started acknowledging the committers in the Release notes.
>
> I’d like to propose to extend that try to ack everyone who participates in
> one way or another to a release, and not just developers.
>
> I can think of 3 more items to add:
>
> A) All the JIRA issue reporters that have had an issue fixed for the
> release (bug, improvement, new feature, etc). They took the time to report
> an issue and thus they’ve helped the committers to improve the quality of
> the release and thus they should be acknowledged. This allows us to also
> ack QA. We could decide to exclude the reporters who’ve also been
> committers or leave them in.
>
> B) The people who’ve contributed translations done after the start of the
> release development.
>
> Ideally we would also ack:
>
> C) The people who’ve helped on the list for the release
> D) The people who’ve helped on the Design and made proposals that made it
> to the release. I’m thinking of Caty for example. Luckily Caty also commits
> some code and often she’s recognised through commits.
>
> The problem with C) and D) is that they’re hard to gather. But we could do
> it on an ad-hoc basis by adding them to the RN during the development (when
> they help) instead of doing it at the end.
>
> In any case I’d like to focus on A) and B) FTM and I’m proposing to add
> them to the Release Plan since they’re easy to find out.
>
> WDYT?
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>

Re: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Extend the ack section of the Release Notes

[Vincent Massol]

> On 5 Feb 2017, at 11:07, Vincent Massol  wrote:
> 
> Hi devs,
> 
> Right now we’ve started acknowledging the committers in the Release notes.
> 
> I’d like to propose to extend that try to ack everyone who participates in 
> one way or another to a release, and not just developers.
> 
> I can think of 3 more items to add:

s/3/a few

> A) All the JIRA issue reporters that have had an issue fixed for the release 
> (bug, improvement, new feature, etc). They took the time to report an issue 
> and thus they’ve helped the committers to improve the quality of the release 
> and thus they should be acknowledged. This allows us to also ack QA. We could 
> decide to exclude the reporters who’ve also been committers or leave them in.
> 
> B) The people who’ve contributed translations done after the start of the 
> release development.
> 
> Ideally we would also ack:
> 
> C) The people who’ve helped on the list for the release
> D) The people who’ve helped on the Design and made proposals that made it to 
> the release. I’m thinking of Caty for example. Luckily Caty also commits some 
> code and often she’s recognised through commits.

E) People helping having improved xwiki.org by contributing doc. We would need 
tor remove people who modified pages by scripts (such as scheduler jobs).

Maybe E) is not that hard to do and could be included now.

WDYT?

Thanks
-Vincent

> The problem with C) and D) is that they’re hard to gather. But we could do it 
> on an ad-hoc basis by adding them to the RN during the development (when they 
> help) instead of doing it at the end.
> 
> In any case I’d like to focus on A) and B) FTM and I’m proposing to add them 
> to the Release Plan since they’re easy to find out.
> 
> WDYT?
> 
> Thanks
> -Vincent
> 

[xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Extend the ack section of the Release Notes

[Vincent Massol]

Hi devs,

Right now we’ve started acknowledging the committers in the Release notes.

I’d like to propose to extend that try to ack everyone who participates in one 
way or another to a release, and not just developers.

I can think of 3 more items to add:

A) All the JIRA issue reporters that have had an issue fixed for the release 
(bug, improvement, new feature, etc). They took the time to report an issue and 
thus they’ve helped the committers to improve the quality of the release and 
thus they should be acknowledged. This allows us to also ack QA. We could 
decide to exclude the reporters who’ve also been committers or leave them in.

B) The people who’ve contributed translations done after the start of the 
release development.

Ideally we would also ack:

C) The people who’ve helped on the list for the release
D) The people who’ve helped on the Design and made proposals that made it to 
the release. I’m thinking of Caty for example. Luckily Caty also commits some 
code and often she’s recognised through commits.

The problem with C) and D) is that they’re hard to gather. But we could do it 
on an ad-hoc basis by adding them to the RN during the development (when they 
help) instead of doing it at the end.

In any case I’d like to focus on A) and B) FTM and I’m proposing to add them to 
the Release Plan since they’re easy to find out.

WDYT?

Thanks
-Vincent