[jQuery] Autocompleter update
Plugin: Autocompleter Url: http://www.dyve.net/jquery?autocomplete Docs: http://www.dyve.net/jquery/autocomplete.txt New options: The options below provide a better user experience (automatically picking results) and advanced markup options (the approach is a little different, but this could be used to duplicate the script.aculo.us demo with pictures in the results). selectFirst (default value: false) If this is set to true, the first autocomplete value will be automatically selected on tab/return, even if it has not been handpicked by keyboard or mouse action. If there is a handpicked (highlighted) result, that result will take precedence. selectOnly (default value: false) If this is set to true, and there is only one autocomplete when the user hits tab/return, it will be selected even if it has not been handpicked by keyboard or mouse action. This overrides selectFirst. formatItem (default value: none) A JavaScript funcion that can provide advanced markup for an item. For each row of results, this function will be called. The returned value will be displayed inside an LI element in the results list. See the source code of http://www.dyve.net/jquery?autocomplete for an example. None of this will break compatibility, you can just use the new js without any changes to your existing code. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] IE opacity change weirdresult
Somewhere on the web told that adding background-color: transparent also works, but I couldn't make it work. On 9/5/06, Klaus Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > kawikak schrieb: > > You need to give the element your are changing opactiy for "layout". The > > easiest way to do this is to give the element a background color. > > > I'm very sorry, it is not true that background will trigger layout. > Please read the following regarding "layout" in IE: > http://www.satzansatz.de/cssd/onhavinglayout.html > > The distorted fonts bug is related to the alpha filter applied to an > element with bold font. The only known fix by now is to apply a > background color to the element that has the filter. > > True is, that the filter will only work if the element has "layout". > > > -- Klaus > > ___ > jQuery mailing list > discuss@jquery.com > http://jquery.com/discuss/ > ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] IE opacity change weirdresult
Thank you Dave. > Is it possible that it's related to ClearType? The IE blog describes a > similar wierdness that they supposedly fixed in IE7 by disabling ClearType > if a transform was being applied. > > Does the problem go away if you disable ClearType? I disabled ClearType but the problem also exists when font size is bigger than a limit (e.g. 20pt for Arial). I found some posts on weblogs that mentioned this problem with bold fonts, and the only solution there is to add a background to it. > Maybe it would work to remove the filter when z.now==1, right now it seems > to set it to 100%. > y.filter = "alpha(opacity=" + z.now*100 + ")"; No it is correct. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] So I guess Ajax is the end of the web
> Flash 9 and Flex 2 are awesome, but its horses for courses. Flex 2 is > for full on applications. JavaScript CAN achieve some of the same > things in web applications, but it's power is that it works well with > HTML and CSS in enhancing a web site, whereas Flex can do no such > thing without making the site less accessible (IMO, though I think > most would agree). This was my main point in my original blog posting and what lead to my subsequent debate with Ryan on his blog. Flex 2 is not the "end all, be all" of RIA development and while Flex 2 does provide some really nice features, it is IMO, too heavy of a product for building RIA's for the Internet that most people use day to day, especially those on dialup. This is where technologies such as Javascript/Ajax/Interface/moo.fx et al. really shine. Rey... ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] So I guess Ajax is the end of the web
On Tuesday 05 September 2006 22:04, Justin Carter wrote: > On 9/6/06, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Figured you all might take a gander at this and weigh in: > > > > http://blogs.zdnet.com/Stewart/?p=101 > > > > He and I have been having our own little "discussion". :P > > > > Rey... > > Ugh, I stopped reading half way and just skimmed the rest :P > > Flash 9 and Flex 2 are awesome, but its horses for courses. Flex 2 is > for full on applications. JavaScript CAN achieve some of the same > things in web applications, but it's power is that it works well with > HTML and CSS in enhancing a web site, whereas Flex can do no such > thing without making the site less accessible (IMO, though I think > most would agree). When I can write Flash in the open source text editor of my choice and have it play in full glory in an open source web browser on an open source OS with an open source flash player that isn't 3 versions behind, then I'll care about Flash. Until then, it's dead to me. -- Larry Garfield AIM: LOLG42 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 6817012 "If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all others of exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power called an idea, which an individual may exclusively possess as long as he keeps it to himself; but the moment it is divulged, it forces itself into the possession of every one, and the receiver cannot dispossess himself of it." -- Thomas Jefferson ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Test Suit Update
I know Konquer isn't a supported browser, but it's what I use so here's results from it anyway: 11. tests/011-css.js (1, 0, 1) 15. tests/015-wrap.js (1, 0, 1) 32. tests/032-is.js (1, 21, 22) 34. tests/034-$.find.js (1, 48, 49) 41. tests/041-eventTesting.js (1, 2, 3) Those came back red/failed. Everything else got a green light. On Tuesday 05 September 2006 13:01, Jörn Zaefferer wrote: > Hi folks, > > there are now much more test cases in the jQuery code, together with > some changes to the test suit itself. The difficulty of writing tests: > The test code itself is error prone, too.Please have a look at this > preview ( http://joern.jquery.com/test/ ) and check it with different > browsers and operating systems. There should be two tests failing in the > current suite, please report any other failures directly to me, post it > on this list or file a bug report marked with [tests]. > > If anyone has an idea how to test the FX module, in other words, all > those animations, I'd appreciate them! > > -- Jörn > > ___ > jQuery mailing list > discuss@jquery.com > http://jquery.com/discuss/ -- Larry Garfield AIM: LOLG42 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 6817012 "If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all others of exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power called an idea, which an individual may exclusively possess as long as he keeps it to himself; but the moment it is divulged, it forces itself into the possession of every one, and the receiver cannot dispossess himself of it." -- Thomas Jefferson ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] So I guess Ajax is the end of the web
On 9/6/06, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Figured you all might take a gander at this and weigh in: > > http://blogs.zdnet.com/Stewart/?p=101 > > He and I have been having our own little "discussion". :P > > Rey... Ugh, I stopped reading half way and just skimmed the rest :P Flash 9 and Flex 2 are awesome, but its horses for courses. Flex 2 is for full on applications. JavaScript CAN achieve some of the same things in web applications, but it's power is that it works well with HTML and CSS in enhancing a web site, whereas Flex can do no such thing without making the site less accessible (IMO, though I think most would agree). I wish people would draw the line in the sand a little more rather than trying to put one up against the other every time - they both have very good strengths :) ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] So I guess Ajax is the end of the web
Yeah... all browsers supporting all standards.. that would be too easy! That will never happen!On 9/5/06, Rey Bango < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Figured you all might take a gander at this and weigh in: http://blogs.zdnet.com/Stewart/?p=101He and I have been having our own little "discussion". :PRey...___ jQuery mailing listdiscuss@jquery.comhttp://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] On-Demand Javascript?
Hi, > For example, Christof's scriptloader could use jQ's ajax code, or could > merge with it. That is something that won't happen. I whanted it to be as small as possible. I felt that the JSAN core had to many functions that are not necessary for the basic functionalitiy of resolving dependencies and loading scripts dynamically. If I had to load jQuery and the ajax-plugin before I'd be better off to user JSAN. As I said I use it to load jQuery and the plugins as well and sometimes I load them delayed like e.g. in an event Handler. Christof ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] So I guess Ajax is the end of the web
Figured you all might take a gander at this and weigh in: http://blogs.zdnet.com/Stewart/?p=101 He and I have been having our own little "discussion". :P Rey... ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] Bug with .css('z-index', '2')
Wanted to say that $().css('z-index', '2') does not work in IE but does work
in FF. What will work in both browsers is $().css('zIndex', '2').
Not sure if this is a bug but it did throw me for a loop for a few minutes.
I actually just noticed it because 'z-index' was working fine pre-1.0. I'm
currently using "Rev: 249".
Can anyone else confirm this?
-Aaron
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Bug-with-.css%28%27z-index%27%2C-%272%27%29-tf2224146.html#a6162855
Sent from the JQuery forum at Nabble.com.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Confused German User
> http://praegnanz.de/weblog/elegantere-programmierung-der-blogtoys
John, he's saying that << $(".blogtoy
h2").find("div").toggle("slow"); >> does not work.
He's a little confused with the Moo.fx toggle function or something
like that, my german not awesome. At least I tried. =P
~Sean
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] Confused German User
Hello Everyone - I ran across a blog today, in German, and the author seems to be having difficulties using/understanding jQuery. I'd like to help, but Google Translate is failing me. If anyone can figure out what he's asking about, I'd be most appreciative: http://praegnanz.de/weblog/elegantere-programmierung-der-blogtoys Thanks! --John ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Problems with 'each' function in IE
In Opera 9.01 I get no errors, but the textbox is blank. Firefox 1.5.0.6 is fine, and IE6 displays the error you describedOn 9/5/06, Tom Poole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks to everyone.John - I made a quick test case, uploaded it to here:http://www.weekinwilts.com/xml/ Hope it helps...___ jQuery mailing listdiscuss@jquery.comhttp://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Problems with 'each' function in IE
Thanks to everyone. John - I made a quick test case, uploaded it to here: http://www.weekinwilts.com/xml/ Hope it helps... ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Font-weight modifier in jQuery
Woo! I discovered a bug! Sorta! I'm happy, and yet also quite sad! :) John Resig wrote: > >> I don't see it either, which is why I proposed using a camelCase example >> to >> make it clear that was the way to handle css properties that have a dash >> in >> them. > > This is actually a mistake on my part, I think. I originally had it > such that you could provide "font-weight" or "fontWeight" and either > would work in Firefox and IE (parsing the text where necessary). I > think it must've regressed at some point. > > The bug report for it is contained here: > http://jquery.com/dev/bugs/bug/170/ > > --John > > ___ > jQuery mailing list > discuss@jquery.com > http://jquery.com/discuss/ > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Font-weight-modifier-in-jQuery-tf2220759.html#a6160726 Sent from the JQuery forum at Nabble.com. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Problems with 'each' function in IE
Sam - Thanks for your reply. I forgot to mention the XML file loads correctly. I tried doing a simple alert(this); All other browsers return '[object Element]' whilst IE only returns '[object]'. On 9/5/06, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Don't know if this is your problem: IE's Ajax service won't load XML from > your local drive. It's got to come from a http service. > > Sam > > > > > > ___ > jQuery mailing list > discuss@jquery.com > http://jquery.com/discuss/ > ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Problems with 'each' function in IE
Hi Tom -
I think this is a "known issue" - and there's currently a bug for it:
http://jquery.com/dev/bugs/bug/174/
Do you think you could try and make a simple test case for this - one
that I can use to help duplicate the problem? That would be most
helpful, thanks.
--John
On 9/5/06, Tom Poole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> Sorry if this is blindly obvious, but I'm having a few problems with
> this function in IE. It works fine in the Gecko browsers, Safari and
> Opera.
>
> The function is a simple ajax post which returns back the xml
> document. I then use the 'each' function to display the text of each
> 'yelement'. Internet Explorer's ever helpful debugger informs me that
> the 'Object doesn't support this property or method'.
>
> Can someone tell me what is going on here? I'm not sure if I'm being
> stupid or IE is being a pain (again). Any help would be great!
>
>
> function ajax_post()
> {
> $.post("foo.php", { x: q }, function(xml){
>
> $("yelement",xml).each(function(i){
> alert($(this).text()); // this doesn't work in IE.
> });
>
> });
>
> }
>
> - Tom
>
> ___
> jQuery mailing list
> discuss@jquery.com
> http://jquery.com/discuss/
>
--
John Resig
http://ejohn.org/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Problems with 'each' function in IE
Hi Tom,
IE is a pain again, I created a ticket for this already:
http://jquery.com/dev/bugs/bug/164/
See also here:
http://jquery.com/discuss/2006-August/010246/
John, this has been working in pre 1.0, any chance to fix this soon?
-- Klaus
Tom Poole schrieb:
> Hello,
> Sorry if this is blindly obvious, but I'm having a few problems with
> this function in IE. It works fine in the Gecko browsers, Safari and
> Opera.
>
> The function is a simple ajax post which returns back the xml
> document. I then use the 'each' function to display the text of each
> 'yelement'. Internet Explorer's ever helpful debugger informs me that
> the 'Object doesn't support this property or method'.
>
> Can someone tell me what is going on here? I'm not sure if I'm being
> stupid or IE is being a pain (again). Any help would be great!
>
>
> function ajax_post()
> {
> $.post("foo.php", { x: q }, function(xml){
>
> $("yelement",xml).each(function(i){
> alert($(this).text()); // this doesn't work in IE.
> });
>
> });
>
> }
>
> - Tom
>
> ___
> jQuery mailing list
> discuss@jquery.com
> http://jquery.com/discuss/
>
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Problems with 'each' function in IE
Don't know if this is your problem: IE's Ajax service won't load XML from your local drive. It's got to come from a http service. Sam ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Need help with the CSS selector - :not()
Mogrol schrieb:
> Thanks for the reply Klaus
>
> Both links matches if I, inside the function, do: if (this.href == src)
> and when I run the script and watch the output of the alert they also
> match. I tried your tip just to be sure though but it still doesn't
> exclude the matching href :-/
>
> Did'nt know that different browsers gave a different href reply in
> javascript if the links are relative though - thanks for the tip!
>
> Regards
> Jimmy
You may still have the problem because this.href !=
this.getAttribute('href'). Browsers put the resolved URL in the href
property, but for getAttribute('href') some return the source value,
some also the resolved value.
If jQuery uses getAttribute for its attribute selector - and that is
what I assume - than your filter will not work, since you say that
this.href == src, thus src must be an absolute url.
this.href == 'http://foo.com/bar' (resolved value)
src == 'http://foo.com/bar' (the value you put in)
getAttribute('href') == '/bar' != 'http://foo.com/bar' (this is what
jQuery looks for in your :not expression)
So with your expression jQuery tries to filter all the links for which
getAttribute('href') returns the value of your src variable without any
match if and only if the link in question is a relative link in your
html source.
Some more information about that topic:
http://www.quirksmode.org/bugreports/archives/2005/02/getAttributeHREF_is_always_absolute.html
http://www.glennjones.net/Post/809/getAttributehrefbug.htm (seems to be
down at the moment).
-- klaus
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] Problems with 'each' function in IE
Hello,
Sorry if this is blindly obvious, but I'm having a few problems with
this function in IE. It works fine in the Gecko browsers, Safari and
Opera.
The function is a simple ajax post which returns back the xml
document. I then use the 'each' function to display the text of each
'yelement'. Internet Explorer's ever helpful debugger informs me that
the 'Object doesn't support this property or method'.
Can someone tell me what is going on here? I'm not sure if I'm being
stupid or IE is being a pain (again). Any help would be great!
function ajax_post()
{
$.post("foo.php", { x: q }, function(xml){
$("yelement",xml).each(function(i){
alert($(this).text()); // this doesn't work in IE.
});
});
}
- Tom
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Font-weight modifier in jQuery
> This is actually a mistake on my part, I think. I originally had it
> such that you could provide "font-weight" or "fontWeight" and either
> would work in Firefox and IE (parsing the text where necessary). I
> think it must've regressed at some point.
Ah! So I wasn't suddenly crazy :)
And for a dashed name as "font-weigth" I remember had to quote it, as
in {'font-weight': 'bold'}
-- Fil
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Font-weight modifier in jQuery
> I don't see it either, which is why I proposed using a camelCase example to > make it clear that was the way to handle css properties that have a dash in > them. This is actually a mistake on my part, I think. I originally had it such that you could provide "font-weight" or "fontWeight" and either would work in Firefox and IE (parsing the text where necessary). I think it must've regressed at some point. The bug report for it is contained here: http://jquery.com/dev/bugs/bug/170/ --John ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] XML as a database...?
> I've used XML to read and locate elements. Have solutions been developed to > police multiple clients updating an XML file without overwriting each other? Native XML Databases are awesome. Some info: http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2001/10/31/nativexmldb.html However, if you think XML, XPath, and the DOM is hard - just wait until you get into XML Schema, XQuery, and XUpdate. --John ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Need help with the CSS selector - :not()
Thanks for the reply Klaus
Both links matches if I, inside the function, do: if (this.href == src)
and when I run the script and watch the output of the alert they also
match. I tried your tip just to be sure though but it still doesn't
exclude the matching href :-/
Did'nt know that different browsers gave a different href reply in
_javascript_ if the links are relative though - thanks for the tip!
Regards
Jimmy
Mogrol schrieb:
Hi
I'm trying to get all links from the body in a page and in the same time
excluding a single element with the matching href attribute using the
:not css-selector but it does'nt seem to be working.
Is this not supported in the latest jQuery (1.0.1) or is there
something wrong with my code? The _expression_ returns all links matching
the rel but also returns the one with the matching href.
I know I could simply insert a: if (this.href != src) in the function to
fix this but for my purposes the best way to do it is directly using jquery.
I'd be grateful for advices on this.
---
$('body [EMAIL PROTECTED]' + rel + ']:not([EMAIL PROTECTED]' + src +'])').each(function() {
alert(this.href + '\n' + src);
});
Hi, maybe you ran into the problem that different browsers return
different values for the href attribute if the value itself (in your
html source) is a relative link.
If src is something like "/relative/path/to/somewhere" try the following
snippet:
$('[EMAIL PROTECTED]' + rel + ']:not([EMAIL PROTECTED]' + src +'])').each(function() {
alert(this.href + '\n' + src);
});
I think you can leave out the body selector here, links cannot occur
outside the body anyway.
Or you can try to use the not function, but this should have the same
result:
$('[EMAIL PROTECTED]' + rel + ']).not('[EMAIL PROTECTED]' + src +'])').each(function() {
alert(this.href + '\n' + src);
});
-- Klaus
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Need help with the CSS selector - :not()
Mogrol schrieb:
> Hi
>
> I'm trying to get all links from the body in a page and in the same time
> excluding a single element with the matching href attribute using the
> :not css-selector but it does'nt seem to be working.
>
> Is this not supported in the latest jQuery (1.0.1) or is there
> something wrong with my code? The expression returns all links matching
> the rel but also returns the one with the matching href.
>
> I know I could simply insert a: if (this.href != src) in the function to
> fix this but for my purposes the best way to do it is directly using jquery.
>
> I'd be grateful for advices on this.
>
> ---
>
> $('body [EMAIL PROTECTED]' + rel + ']:not([EMAIL PROTECTED]' + src
> +'])').each(function() {
>alert(this.href + '\n' + src);
> });
Hi, maybe you ran into the problem that different browsers return
different values for the href attribute if the value itself (in your
html source) is a relative link.
If src is something like "/relative/path/to/somewhere" try the following
snippet:
$('[EMAIL PROTECTED]' + rel + ']:not([EMAIL PROTECTED]' + src
+'])').each(function() {
alert(this.href + '\n' + src);
});
I think you can leave out the body selector here, links cannot occur
outside the body anyway.
Or you can try to use the not function, but this should have the same
result:
$('[EMAIL PROTECTED]' + rel + ']).not('[EMAIL PROTECTED]' + src
+'])').each(function() {
alert(this.href + '\n' + src);
});
-- Klaus
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Need help with the CSS selector - :not()
> $('body [EMAIL PROTECTED]' + rel + ']:not([EMAIL PROTECTED]' + src
> +'])').each(function() {
>alert(this.href + '\n' + src);
> });
If I had to guess, it's an issue with your @href selector - which is
probably the most problematic selector to use - simply because
browsers inconsistently return what they "think" the href value is. If
I were you, I'd start my simply doing a regular [EMAIL PROTECTED] *= src]
selector, figuring out what URL you can use that will best match the
specified . @href *= matches anything within the @href attribute,
giving you more room to breath. Hope that helps.
--John
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] jquery.history.js and Safari
Hello ! I wanted to mention that the script at http://www.mikage.to/jquery/jquery_history.html fails in Safari. The cause is that Safari doesn't update the location.hash value when you press the "Back" button (though the address bar is correct). Another error was that it added %23 in the URL (that became #%231 instead of #1). This I fixed at line 52 with: - location.hash = newhash; + location.hash = jQuery.browser.safari?hash:newhash; Alas, I don't know how to fix the bigger bug. And I get nightmares just reading a solution given at http://bloomd.home.mchsi.com/histapi/howitworks.html -- Fil ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] Need help with the CSS selector - :not()
Hi
I'm trying to get all links from the body in a page and in the same time
excluding a single element with the matching href attribute using the
:not css-selector but it does'nt seem to be working.
Is this not supported in the latest jQuery (1.0.1) or is there
something wrong with my code? The expression returns all links matching
the rel but also returns the one with the matching href.
I know I could simply insert a: if (this.href != src) in the function to
fix this but for my purposes the best way to do it is directly using jquery.
I'd be grateful for advices on this.
---
$('body [EMAIL PROTECTED]' + rel + ']:not([EMAIL PROTECTED]' + src
+'])').each(function() {
alert(this.href + '\n' + src);
});
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] IE opacity change weirdresult
kawikak schrieb: > You need to give the element your are changing opactiy for "layout". The > easiest way to do this is to give the element a background color. I'm very sorry, it is not true that background will trigger layout. Please read the following regarding "layout" in IE: http://www.satzansatz.de/cssd/onhavinglayout.html The distorted fonts bug is related to the alpha filter applied to an element with bold font. The only known fix by now is to apply a background color to the element that has the filter. True is, that the filter will only work if the element has "layout". -- Klaus ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] On-Demand Javascript?
Well, that is one conclusion you could reach. The other is that perhaps jQuery needs a couple of components extracted and turned into external libraries that it then depends on (ajax, etc). A bit blasphemous, I know, considering jQuery is supposed to be easy to download as a standalone, but there's no reason the libraries + jQuery couldn't be stitched together into a 'standalone' package for download on the jQ server. This would also open up the well-vetted sub-systems of the jQ universe to other developers without requiring all of jQuery. For example, Christof's scriptloader could use jQ's ajax code, or could merge with it. The mandate of the ajax library would certainly include the sorts of things that he and JSAN have in mind. -Stephen Jörn Zaefferer wrote: > Stephen Howard wrote: > >> jQuery remains coherent and quantifiable, rather than an ever expanding >> kitchen sink, >> and we get peer libraries that the community knows will play well with >> the beloved jQ. Remember the old Unix saw about doing one thing and >> doing it well (aside from Emacs, of course). I think it ought to >> pertain here as well. >> >> > You make a good point. Its similar to the idea of integrating a class > creating facility in jQuery that came up a few days ago. Should this be > seperated from jQuery as it has nothing to do with DOM manipulation? I'm > not so sure, because most aspects of the class creation facility are > already available in the jQuery code. This is also true for OnDemand-JS, > as all the AJAX stuff is already covered. I'd like to see jQuery > concentrate on its strength, but on the other hand, I don't like > duplicating code. > > jQuery itself claims to change the way you write javascript. With > helpers like $.each, $.map and $.trim it does just this, without > touching DOM, FX or AJAX at all. > > I therefore vote to integrate an On-Demand Javascript facility into jQuery. > > -- Jörn > > ___ > jQuery mailing list > discuss@jquery.com > http://jquery.com/discuss/ > ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Font-weight modifier in jQuery
And it's updated in Visual jQuery. The wording could use some tightening, though. And it'd be nice if css(prop) pointed ppl to css(name) for the details.On 9/5/06, Fil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Maybe John can set up an email reminder when someone commits to the > repository :-)You can use RSS too -- though not linked from thehttp://jquery.com/dev/recent/ page, it works : http://jquery.com/dev/recent/?changeset=on&max=10&daysback=3&format=rss(Syndicated at http://www.jquery.info/sedna/?id_syndic=7&lang=en )BTW there's a bug on tracfor example at http://jquery.com/dev/svn/rev/271/I can't set a cookie to "view differences / side by side" (which is my favorite view of changes)-- Fil___jQuery mailing listdiscuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/-- Yehuda KatzWeb Developer(ph) 718.877.1325 ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Font-weight modifier in jQuery
> Maybe John can set up an email reminder when someone commits to the > repository :-) You can use RSS too -- though not linked from the http://jquery.com/dev/recent/ page, it works : http://jquery.com/dev/recent/?changeset=on&max=10&daysback=3&format=rss (Syndicated at http://www.jquery.info/sedna/?id_syndic=7&lang=en ) BTW there's a bug on trac for example at http://jquery.com/dev/svn/rev/271/ I can't set a cookie to "view differences / side by side" (which is my favorite view of changes) -- Fil ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] XML as a database...?
Sam wrote: > I've used XML to read and locate elements. Have solutions been > developed to police multiple clients updating an XML file without > overwriting each other? Whatever script or language you are using, there should be a mechanism to lock a file. Lock a file before writing into it and unlock it when the write is finished. Check if a file is locked before opening it and wait until it is not locked anymore. I hope that helps. But please keep in mind that this question does neither concern jQuery nor javascript in general. There should be lots of resources about transactions, concurreny and file locking elsewhere. -- Jörn ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Font-weight modifier in jQuery
Yehuda Katz wrote: > If you update it in the svn, it'll get into visual jQuery within a day > or so max (I'm working to reduce the lag-time). It's up! Maybe John can set up an email reminder when someone commits to the repository :-) This can be done quite easily with cruisecontrol ( http://cruisecontrol.sourceforge.net/ ), but I guess thats another story... -- Jörn ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] On-Demand Javascript?
Stephen Howard wrote: > jQuery remains coherent and quantifiable, rather than an ever expanding > kitchen sink, > and we get peer libraries that the community knows will play well with > the beloved jQ. Remember the old Unix saw about doing one thing and > doing it well (aside from Emacs, of course). I think it ought to > pertain here as well. > You make a good point. Its similar to the idea of integrating a class creating facility in jQuery that came up a few days ago. Should this be seperated from jQuery as it has nothing to do with DOM manipulation? I'm not so sure, because most aspects of the class creation facility are already available in the jQuery code. This is also true for OnDemand-JS, as all the AJAX stuff is already covered. I'd like to see jQuery concentrate on its strength, but on the other hand, I don't like duplicating code. jQuery itself claims to change the way you write javascript. With helpers like $.each, $.map and $.trim it does just this, without touching DOM, FX or AJAX at all. I therefore vote to integrate an On-Demand Javascript facility into jQuery. -- Jörn ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] IE opacity change weirdresult
You need to give the element your are changing opactiy for "layout". The easiest way to do this is to give the element a background color. Mohsen Saboorian-4 wrote: > > Hi, > Is there any workaround for the problem of changing opacity in IE, > which leads to text being displayed bold and weird? > > I could do that by setting background color to the element whose > opacity is changed, but I want to have it's background transparent. > > A sample result is seen in download section of interface (see the > attachment). > > Thanks. > > ___ > jQuery mailing list > discuss@jquery.com > http://jquery.com/discuss/ > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/IE-opacity-change-weirdresult-tf2221396.html#a6157902 Sent from the JQuery forum at Nabble.com. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Test Suit Update
tests/001-jQuery.js (0, 7, 7) Array.push() Function.apply() getElementById getElementsByTagName RegExp jQuery $() tests/002-length.js (0, 1, 1) Get Number of Elements Found tests/003-size.js (0, 1, 1) Get Number of Elements Found tests/004-get.js (0, 1, 1) Get All Elements tests/005-get.js (0, 1, 1) Get A Single Element tests/006-each.js (0, 1, 1) Execute a function, Relative tests/007-index.js (0, 8, 8) Check for index of elements Check for index of elements Check for index of elements Check for index of elements Check for index of elements Check for index of elements Check for not found index Check for not found index tests/008-attr.js (0, 4, 4) Check for value attribute Check for type attribute Check for type attribute Check for type attribute tests/009-attr.js (0, 1, 1) Set Multiple Attributes tests/010-attr.js (0, 1, 1) Set Attribute tests/011-css.js (0, 1, 1) Check for css property "display" tests/012-css.js (0, 3, 3) Modifying CSS display: Assert element is visible Modified CSS display: Assert element is hidden Modified CSS display: Assert element is visible tests/013-css.js (0, 3, 3) Modifying CSS display: Assert element is visible Modified CSS display: Assert element is hidden Modified CSS display: Assert element is visible tests/014-text.js (0, 1, 1) Check for merged text of more then one element. tests/015-wrap.js (1, 0, 1) Died on test #1: [object Error] tests/016-append.js (0, 1, 1) Check if text appending works tests/017-append.js (0, 1, 1) Check for appending of element tests/018-append.js (0, 1, 1) Check for appending of array of elements tests/019-prepend.js (0, 1, 1) Check if text prepending works tests/020-prepend.js (0, 1, 1) Check for prepending of element tests/021-prepend.js (0, 1, 1) Check for prepending of array of elements tests/022-before.js (0, 1, 1) Insert String before tests/023-before.js (0, 1, 1) Insert element before tests/024-before.js (0, 1, 1) Insert array of elements before tests/025-after.js (0, 1, 1) Insert String after tests/026-after.js (0, 1, 1) Insert element after tests/027-after.js (0, 1, 1) Insert array of elements after tests/028-end.js (0, 1, 1) Check for end tests/029-find.js (0, 1, 1) Check for find tests/030-clone.js (0, 3, 3) Assert text for #en Check for clone Reassert text for #en tests/031-not.js (0, 1, 1) .not tests/032-is.js (0, 22, 22) Check for element: A form must be a form Check for element: A form is not a div Check for class: Expected class "blog" Check for class: Did not expect class "link" Check for multiple classes: Expected classes "blog" and "link" Check for multiple classes: Expected classes "blog" and "link", but not "blogTest" Check for attribute: Expected attribute lang to be "en" Check for attribute: Expected attribute lang to be "en", not "de" Check for attribute: Expected attribute type to be "text" Check for attribute: Expected attribute type to be "text", not "radio" Check for pseudoclass: Expected to be disabled Check for pseudoclass: Expected not disabled Check for pseudoclass: Expected to be checked Check for pseudoclass: Expected not checked Check for child: Expected a child "p" element Check for child: Did not expect "ul" element Check for childs: Expected "p", "a" and "code" child elements Check for childs: Expected "p", "a" and "code" child elements, but no "ol" Expected false for an invalid expression - 0 Expected false for an invalid expression - null Expected false for an invalid expression - "" Expected false for an invalid expression - undefined tests/033-$.extend.js (0, 2, 2) Check if extended: settings must be extended Check if not modified: options must not be modified tests/034-$.find.js (0, 79, 79) Element Selector (div) Element Selector (body) Element Selector (html) Element Selector Parent Element (div div) ID Selector (#body) ID Selector w/ Element (body#body) ID Selector w/ Element (ul#first) Class Selector (.blog) Class Selector (.blog.link) Class Selector w/ Element (a.blog) Parent Class Selector (p .blog) Comma Support (a.blog, div) Comma Support (a.blog , div) Comma Support (a.blog ,div) Comma Support (a.blog,div) Child (p > a) Child (p> a) Child (p >a) Child (p>a) Child w/ Class (p > a.blog) All Children (code > *) All Grandchildren (p > * > *) Adjacent (a + a) Adjacent (a +a) Adjacent (a+ a) Adjacent (a+a) Adjacent (p + p) Comma, Child, and Adjacent (a + a, code > a) First Child (p:first-child) Attribute Exists ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Attribute Exists ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Attribute Exists ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Attribute Equals ([EMAIL PROTECTED]'bookmark']) Attribute Equals ([EMAIL PROTECTED]"bookmark"]) Attribute Equals ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Multiple Attribute Equals ([EMAIL PROTECTED]'hidden'],[EMAIL PROTECTED]'radio']) Multiple Attribute Equals ([EMAIL PROTECTED]"hidden"],[EMAIL PROTECTED]'radio']) Multiple Attribute Equals ([EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]) Attribute Begins With ([EMAIL PROTECTED] ^= 'http://www']) Attribute Ends With ([EMAIL PROTECTED] $= 'org/']) Attribute Contains ([EMAIL PROTECTED] *=
Re: [jQuery] Test Suit Update
Test 11 stops the Test Suite in safari. In FF, tests 15 and 41-3 fail. Same with IE (which also has a serious slowdown on test 33).-- YehudaOn 9/5/06, Jörn Zaefferer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Hi folks, there are now much more test cases in the jQuery code, together withsome changes to the test suit itself. The difficulty of writing tests:The test code itself is error prone, too.Please have a look at this preview ( http://joern.jquery.com/test/ ) and check it with differentbrowsers and operating systems. There should be two tests failing in thecurrent suite, please report any other failures directly to me, post it on this list or file a bug report marked with [tests].If anyone has an idea how to test the FX module, in other words, allthose animations, I'd appreciate them!-- Jörn___ jQuery mailing listdiscuss@jquery.comhttp://jquery.com/discuss/-- Yehuda Katz Web Developer(ph) 718.877.1325 ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] On-Demand Javascript?
Well, as I've put it down below, this isn't really an issue of code purity (although I'm sure that bugs me too). What I was trying to say was that it is an issue of readability. At least to me, seeing $ in my javascript code indicates DOM manipulation. So my preference is to make anything not pertaining to DOM manipulation not look like jQuery. I certainly wouldn't have any issues if John or the jQ community wanted to write/sponsor/host solutions that didn't fall under the jQ mandate, but what harm is there in putting them into their own namespace? I'd argue that it would only add clarity to the situation. jQuery remains coherent and quantifiable, rather than an ever expanding kitchen sink, and we get peer libraries that the community knows will play well with the beloved jQ. Remember the old Unix saw about doing one thing and doing it well (aside from Emacs, of course). I think it ought to pertain here as well. -Stephen Dan Atkinson wrote: > I'd be -for- having something like this inside jQuery. > > For all the other non-element additions that there in jQuery, something like > this would be a great feature to have. > > As much as code purity is a good thing, there comes a point when you say > 'well, this might just make things better...'. > > > Stephen Howard wrote: > >> >> Christof Donat wrote: >> >>> Cons: >>> - either you need to do synchronous loading like JSON does or you need to >>> work >>> with callbacks as I do. Synchronous loading blocks the browser, callbacks >>> are >>> not understood by everyone. >>> >>> >>> >> I believe Christof is referring here to JSAN (openjsan.org) not JSON >> (data format) when he is referring to the synchronous loading >> >> >> I'd like to throw in my voice in support of Christof's call for keeping >> things like this out of jQuery proper. To me 'doing different things >> should look different'. When i see raw ajax calls and such hanging off >> $ that looks wrong, as I think of $ signifying that I'm selecting and >> manipulating the DOM. If I'm doing something that doesn't have to do >> with DOM selection, I shouldn't see the $ in my code, because that's >> what I associate it with, and anything else interrupts the visual >> texture of my code. >> >> -Stephen >> >> ___ >> jQuery mailing list >> discuss@jquery.com >> http://jquery.com/discuss/ >> >> >> > > ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Font-weight modifier in jQuery
If you update it in the svn, it'll get into visual jQuery within a day or so max (I'm working to reduce the lag-time).-- YehudaOn 9/5/06, Jörn Zaefferer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Hi Dave!> I don't see it either, which is why I proposed using a camelCase example to
> make it clear that was the way to handle css properties that have a dash in> them. In essence, change the .css example from this:>> $("p").css("color");> Test Paragraph.
> red>> To this:>> $("p").css("fontWeight");> Test Paragraph.> bold>I uploaded an update preview, please check if it is ok:
http://joern.jquery.com/docs/index.xmlAnyway, I'll correct it and commit it to svn. After that, it's only amatter of time that it goes live, thats in John's hands :-)
-- Jörn___jQuery mailing listdiscuss@jquery.comhttp://jquery.com/discuss/
-- Yehuda KatzWeb Developer(ph) 718.877.1325
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] Test Suit Update
Hi folks, there are now much more test cases in the jQuery code, together with some changes to the test suit itself. The difficulty of writing tests: The test code itself is error prone, too.Please have a look at this preview ( http://joern.jquery.com/test/ ) and check it with different browsers and operating systems. There should be two tests failing in the current suite, please report any other failures directly to me, post it on this list or file a bug report marked with [tests]. If anyone has an idea how to test the FX module, in other words, all those animations, I'd appreciate them! -- Jörn ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Font-weight modifier in jQuery
> I uploaded an update preview, please check if it is ok: > http://joern.jquery.com/docs/index.xml Looks good to me, I totally forgot that the docs are now in the source--despite seeing them there... ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] XML as a database...?
I've used XML to read and locate elements. Have solutions been developed to police multiple clients updating an XML file without overwriting each other? Sam ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Font-weight modifier in jQuery
Hi Dave!
> I don't see it either, which is why I proposed using a camelCase example to
> make it clear that was the way to handle css properties that have a dash in
> them. In essence, change the .css example from this:
>
> $("p").css("color");
> Test Paragraph.
> red
>
> To this:
>
> $("p").css("fontWeight");
> Test Paragraph.
> bold
>
I uploaded an update preview, please check if it is ok:
http://joern.jquery.com/docs/index.xml
Anyway, I'll correct it and commit it to svn. After that, it's only a
matter of time that it goes live, thats in John's hands :-)
-- Jörn
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] visualjquery.comnot available for Safari (2) users?
It does work in Safari. I just tried it. Try again.On 9/5/06, Stefan Nagtegaal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Well, like it has to be a very descriptive subject which imo says itall..It does not work on Safari (2) atm, so I'm using FireFox. But it would be very nice if Safari would display the docs either..Steef___jQuery mailing listdiscuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/-- Yehuda KatzWeb Developer(ph) 718.877.1325 ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] JQuery and HTTPS bug
Ignore me. My updates were saving to the wrong place on my server :/
On Sep 5, 2006, at 12:11 PM, Jack Shedd wrote:
> This doesn't seem to be resolved. The jquery file continues to trip
> IE's "secure items" pop-up.
>
> I've isolated the problem to jquery.js within:
>
> https://www.greenmoortrading.com
>
> Any updates on this particular bug?
>
> On Aug 9, 2006, at 11:14 AM, Michael Geary wrote:
>
>> Get the latest svn version; it has a fix for this that doesn't
>> require an
>> external file.
>>
>> -Mike
>>
>>> I was working on a redesign of my company's website when I
>>> noticed that we had a problem in IE when loading up a page
>>> via HTTPS... Specifically, it's this line:
>>>
>>> document.write(">> "src=javascript:void(0)><\/script>");
>>
>>
>> ___
>> jQuery mailing list
>> discuss@jquery.com
>> http://jquery.com/discuss/
>>
>
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] JQuery and HTTPS bug
This doesn't seem to be resolved. The jquery file continues to trip
IE's "secure items" pop-up.
I've isolated the problem to jquery.js within:
https://www.greenmoortrading.com
Any updates on this particular bug?
On Aug 9, 2006, at 11:14 AM, Michael Geary wrote:
> Get the latest svn version; it has a fix for this that doesn't
> require an
> external file.
>
> -Mike
>
>> I was working on a redesign of my company's website when I
>> noticed that we had a problem in IE when loading up a page
>> via HTTPS... Specifically, it's this line:
>>
>> document.write("> "src=javascript:void(0)><\/script>");
>
>
> ___
> jQuery mailing list
> discuss@jquery.com
> http://jquery.com/discuss/
>
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] On-Demand Javascript?
Hi,
> Can you show how you modified the JQuery library to generate the
> package-object? Code?
In case of jQuery I simply appended:
$package('jquery',{});
The plugins are wrapped with:
$using('jquery',function() {
...
$package('jquery.myplugin',{});
});
You can also define multiple dependencies like this:
$using(['jquery.fx','jquery.dom'],function{
... // here we use the two plugins.
});
For code that needs these two plugins loaded. Since they are wrapped with
$using() like I have written above this will load jQuery as well.
Christof
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Font-weight modifier in jQuery
>> If the example in the API reference for .css used a camelCase
>> attribute I think it would be clear. How do we edit that?
> I don't see any use of camelcase for CSS keys here:
> http://jquery.com/api/
I don't see it either, which is why I proposed using a camelCase example to
make it clear that was the way to handle css properties that have a dash in
them. In essence, change the .css example from this:
$("p").css("color");
Test Paragraph.
red
To this:
$("p").css("fontWeight");
Test Paragraph.
bold
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] On-Demand Javascript?
2006/9/5, Dan Atkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I'd be -for- having something like this inside jQuery. There's an undocumented function in the core of the current SVN version which imo already implements it: $.getScript(url, data, callback) Of course, you can't use it to load jQuery. Franck. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] On-Demand Javascript?
I'd be -for- having something like this inside jQuery. For all the other non-element additions that there in jQuery, something like this would be a great feature to have. As much as code purity is a good thing, there comes a point when you say 'well, this might just make things better...'. Stephen Howard wrote: > > > > Christof Donat wrote: >> >> Cons: >> - either you need to do synchronous loading like JSON does or you need to >> work >> with callbacks as I do. Synchronous loading blocks the browser, callbacks >> are >> not understood by everyone. >> >> > I believe Christof is referring here to JSAN (openjsan.org) not JSON > (data format) when he is referring to the synchronous loading > > > I'd like to throw in my voice in support of Christof's call for keeping > things like this out of jQuery proper. To me 'doing different things > should look different'. When i see raw ajax calls and such hanging off > $ that looks wrong, as I think of $ signifying that I'm selecting and > manipulating the DOM. If I'm doing something that doesn't have to do > with DOM selection, I shouldn't see the $ in my code, because that's > what I associate it with, and anything else interrupts the visual > texture of my code. > > -Stephen > > ___ > jQuery mailing list > discuss@jquery.com > http://jquery.com/discuss/ > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/On-Demand-Javascript--tf2220945.html#a6155814 Sent from the JQuery forum at Nabble.com. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] On-Demand Javascript?
Christof, Can you show how you modified the JQuery library to generate the package-object? Code? Rey... Christof Donat wrote: > Hi, > > >>So from the docs, this looks like its library agnostic correct (ie: not >>dependent on JQuery)? > > > Yes, that is tue. I use it to load jQuery. You need to modify the libraries > you load so that they generate the package-Object. Otherwise the > callback-Function will never be called. > > Christof > > ___ > jQuery mailing list > discuss@jquery.com > http://jquery.com/discuss/ > ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] On-Demand Javascript?
Christof,
Thanks for the clarification.
Dan
Christof Donat wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> Christof Donat wrote:
>> > - either you need to do synchronous loading like JSON does or you need
>> to
>> > work
>> > with callbacks as I do. Synchronous loading blocks the browser,
>> callbacks
>> > are
>> > not understood by everyone.
>>
>> You mention that not everyone understands callbacks (maybe I read it
>> wrongly). Well, it would also be true that not everyone understands
>> JavaScript, and an even smaller number understand jQuery (however easy it
>> may be, the missus just doesn't see the magic that I do).
>
> I just thought of the recurring questions why te following won't work in
> jQuery:
>
> $('#myNiceElement').load('http://www.example.com/');
> $('#thisElementWillBeCreatedByLoad').css({backgroundColor:'red'});
>
>> Christof Donat wrote:
>> > - to load all the scripts your page needs multiple HTTP-Requests are
>> > necessary
>> > which increases the overhead.
>>
>> While multiple HTTP-Requests do increase overall overhead, that is based
>> on
>> the assumption that the total sum of code loaded is the same as a normal
>> page load (ie, the user loads all or nearly all the modules through their
>> page interaction). I'll actually give this a bye though, because I'm not
>> fully au fait with the performance statistics of multiple on-request HTTP
>> requests, versus single all-in-one HTTP Requests.
>
> I totaly agree with you that this is only a problem in case you would load
> all
> the code anyway. As I wrote I use dynamic loading myself, because in my
> projects the cons are really weak. In other projects this might be an
> issue.
>
> Christof
>
> ___
> jQuery mailing list
> discuss@jquery.com
> http://jquery.com/discuss/
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/On-Demand-Javascript--tf2220945.html#a6155430
Sent from the JQuery forum at Nabble.com.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Font-weight modifier in jQuery
Ok, which API are you folks looking at?! I don't see any use of camelcase for CSS keys here: http://jquery.com/api/ http://jquery.com/api/ Dan dave.methvin wrote: > > >>> Every time you have a '-' in a property, remove it and replace the >>> next character with an uppercase representation of itself. > >> Is this documented anywhere though? > > If the example in the API reference for .css used a camelCase attribute I > think it would be clear. How do we edit that? > > > ___ > jQuery mailing list > discuss@jquery.com > http://jquery.com/discuss/ > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Font-weight-modifier-in-jQuery-tf2220759.html#a6155301 Sent from the JQuery forum at Nabble.com. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] On-Demand Javascript?
Hi, > > Cons: > > - either you need to do synchronous loading like JSON does or you need to > > work with callbacks as I do. Synchronous loading blocks the browser, > > callbacks are not understood by everyone. > > I believe Christof is referring here to JSAN (openjsan.org) not JSON > (data format) when he is referring to the synchronous loading Yes, sorry. I was typing to fast :-) Christof ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] On-Demand Javascript?
Christof Donat wrote: > > Cons: > - either you need to do synchronous loading like JSON does or you need to > work > with callbacks as I do. Synchronous loading blocks the browser, callbacks are > not understood by everyone. > > I believe Christof is referring here to JSAN (openjsan.org) not JSON (data format) when he is referring to the synchronous loading I'd like to throw in my voice in support of Christof's call for keeping things like this out of jQuery proper. To me 'doing different things should look different'. When i see raw ajax calls and such hanging off $ that looks wrong, as I think of $ signifying that I'm selecting and manipulating the DOM. If I'm doing something that doesn't have to do with DOM selection, I shouldn't see the $ in my code, because that's what I associate it with, and anything else interrupts the visual texture of my code. -Stephen ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] On-Demand Javascript?
Hi, > So from the docs, this looks like its library agnostic correct (ie: not > dependent on JQuery)? Yes, that is tue. I use it to load jQuery. You need to modify the libraries you load so that they generate the package-Object. Otherwise the callback-Function will never be called. Christof ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] On-Demand Javascript?
Hi,
> Christof Donat wrote:
> > - either you need to do synchronous loading like JSON does or you need to
> > work
> > with callbacks as I do. Synchronous loading blocks the browser, callbacks
> > are
> > not understood by everyone.
>
> You mention that not everyone understands callbacks (maybe I read it
> wrongly). Well, it would also be true that not everyone understands
> JavaScript, and an even smaller number understand jQuery (however easy it
> may be, the missus just doesn't see the magic that I do).
I just thought of the recurring questions why te following won't work in
jQuery:
$('#myNiceElement').load('http://www.example.com/');
$('#thisElementWillBeCreatedByLoad').css({backgroundColor:'red'});
> Christof Donat wrote:
> > - to load all the scripts your page needs multiple HTTP-Requests are
> > necessary
> > which increases the overhead.
>
> While multiple HTTP-Requests do increase overall overhead, that is based on
> the assumption that the total sum of code loaded is the same as a normal
> page load (ie, the user loads all or nearly all the modules through their
> page interaction). I'll actually give this a bye though, because I'm not
> fully au fait with the performance statistics of multiple on-request HTTP
> requests, versus single all-in-one HTTP Requests.
I totaly agree with you that this is only a problem in case you would load all
the code anyway. As I wrote I use dynamic loading myself, because in my
projects the cons are really weak. In other projects this might be an issue.
Christof
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] visualjquery.comnot available for Safari (2) users?
Well, like it has to be a very descriptive subject which imo says it all.. It does not work on Safari (2) atm, so I'm using FireFox. But it would be very nice if Safari would display the docs either.. Steef ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Font-weight modifier in jQuery
>> Every time you have a '-' in a property, remove it and replace the >> next character with an uppercase representation of itself. > Is this documented anywhere though? If the example in the API reference for .css used a camelCase attribute I think it would be clear. How do we edit that? ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] On-Demand Javascript?
Awesome Christoff. Thanks for the help!
Rey
Christof Donat wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>>which discusses Dynamic Script Pattern or On-Demand Javascript. I think
>>this is a VERY cool feature. Does Jquery support something like this?
>
>
> I wouldn't put it into jQuery itsself, because then you would need to load
> jQuery before you can use the dynamic Script loading. I have developed
> something like this which you can se at http://jspax.cdonat.de . I am using
> it to load jQuery, jQuery Plugins and some other of my code.
>
>
>>What are the pros and cons of something like this?
>
>
> Pros:
> - don't need to load everything at startup of your page - faster startup
> - don't need to load all the code you don't need on the page:
> $('#myElement').click(function() {
> $using('jquery.fx',function() {
> $(this).slideUp('slow');
> });
> });
> The fx-Plugin is loaded after the first click on the Element and as soon as
> it
> is available the slideUp is executed.
> - you can easier modularize your code
> - the dynamic script loader can handle dependencies:
> $using('com.example.test',function() {...});
> Now com/example/test.js could contain
> $using('com.example.test2',function() {
> ...;
> $package('com.example.test',{});
> });
> the dependency is automatically resolved.
>
> Cons:
> - you can not be shure that your code was loaded and executed as usual while
> the page was loading - document.write() e.g. may behave differently.
> - either you need to do synchronous loading like JSON does or you need to
> work
> with callbacks as I do. Synchronous loading blocks the browser, callbacks are
> not understood by everyone.
> - to load all the scripts your page needs multiple HTTP-Requests are
> necessary
> which increases the overhead.
>
> I hope that helps.
>
> Christof
>
> ___
> jQuery mailing list
> discuss@jquery.com
> http://jquery.com/discuss/
>
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] On-Demand Javascript?
So from the docs, this looks like its library agnostic correct (ie: not
dependent on JQuery)?
Rey...
Christof Donat wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>>which discusses Dynamic Script Pattern or On-Demand Javascript. I think
>>this is a VERY cool feature. Does Jquery support something like this?
>
>
> I wouldn't put it into jQuery itsself, because then you would need to load
> jQuery before you can use the dynamic Script loading. I have developed
> something like this which you can se at http://jspax.cdonat.de . I am using
> it to load jQuery, jQuery Plugins and some other of my code.
>
>
>>What are the pros and cons of something like this?
>
>
> Pros:
> - don't need to load everything at startup of your page - faster startup
> - don't need to load all the code you don't need on the page:
> $('#myElement').click(function() {
> $using('jquery.fx',function() {
> $(this).slideUp('slow');
> });
> });
> The fx-Plugin is loaded after the first click on the Element and as soon as
> it
> is available the slideUp is executed.
> - you can easier modularize your code
> - the dynamic script loader can handle dependencies:
> $using('com.example.test',function() {...});
> Now com/example/test.js could contain
> $using('com.example.test2',function() {
> ...;
> $package('com.example.test',{});
> });
> the dependency is automatically resolved.
>
> Cons:
> - you can not be shure that your code was loaded and executed as usual while
> the page was loading - document.write() e.g. may behave differently.
> - either you need to do synchronous loading like JSON does or you need to
> work
> with callbacks as I do. Synchronous loading blocks the browser, callbacks are
> not understood by everyone.
> - to load all the scripts your page needs multiple HTTP-Requests are
> necessary
> which increases the overhead.
>
> I hope that helps.
>
> Christof
>
> ___
> jQuery mailing list
> discuss@jquery.com
> http://jquery.com/discuss/
>
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] On-Demand Javascript?
Christof, While I agree with your cons in theory, a couple of them can be discounted. Christof Donat wrote: > > - either you need to do synchronous loading like JSON does or you need to > work > with callbacks as I do. Synchronous loading blocks the browser, callbacks > are > not understood by everyone. > You mention that not everyone understands callbacks (maybe I read it wrongly). Well, it would also be true that not everyone understands JavaScript, and an even smaller number understand jQuery (however easy it may be, the missus just doesn't see the magic that I do). Christof Donat wrote: > > - to load all the scripts your page needs multiple HTTP-Requests are > necessary > which increases the overhead. > While multiple HTTP-Requests do increase overall overhead, that is based on the assumption that the total sum of code loaded is the same as a normal page load (ie, the user loads all or nearly all the modules through their page interaction). I'll actually give this a bye though, because I'm not fully au fait with the performance statistics of multiple on-request HTTP requests, versus single all-in-one HTTP Requests. It'd be great if there was some further discussion on this though. For anyone looking for a quick resource on lazy loading/on demand JS: http://ajaxpatterns.org/On-Demand_Javascript http://ajaxpatterns.org/On-Demand_Javascript Cheers, Dan -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/On-Demand-Javascript--tf2220945.html#a6154824 Sent from the JQuery forum at Nabble.com. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] IE opacity change weirdresult
> Is there any workaround for the problem of changing opacity in IE, > which leads to text being displayed bold and weird? Is it possible that it's related to ClearType? The IE blog describes a similar wierdness that they supposedly fixed in IE7 by disabling ClearType if a transform was being applied. http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2006/08/31/730887.aspx http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2006/03/03/543181.aspx http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2006/02/03/524367.aspx Does the problem go away if you disable ClearType? Maybe it would work to remove the filter when z.now==1, right now it seems to set it to 100%. > y.filter = "alpha(opacity=" + z.now*100 + ")"; ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] On-Demand Javascript?
Hi,
> which discusses Dynamic Script Pattern or On-Demand Javascript. I think
> this is a VERY cool feature. Does Jquery support something like this?
I wouldn't put it into jQuery itsself, because then you would need to load
jQuery before you can use the dynamic Script loading. I have developed
something like this which you can se at http://jspax.cdonat.de . I am using
it to load jQuery, jQuery Plugins and some other of my code.
> What are the pros and cons of something like this?
Pros:
- don't need to load everything at startup of your page - faster startup
- don't need to load all the code you don't need on the page:
$('#myElement').click(function() {
$using('jquery.fx',function() {
$(this).slideUp('slow');
});
});
The fx-Plugin is loaded after the first click on the Element and as soon as it
is available the slideUp is executed.
- you can easier modularize your code
- the dynamic script loader can handle dependencies:
$using('com.example.test',function() {...});
Now com/example/test.js could contain
$using('com.example.test2',function() {
...;
$package('com.example.test',{});
});
the dependency is automatically resolved.
Cons:
- you can not be shure that your code was loaded and executed as usual while
the page was loading - document.write() e.g. may behave differently.
- either you need to do synchronous loading like JSON does or you need to work
with callbacks as I do. Synchronous loading blocks the browser, callbacks are
not understood by everyone.
- to load all the scripts your page needs multiple HTTP-Requests are necessary
which increases the overhead.
I hope that helps.
Christof
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] filter() on attributes?
On 2006.09.05, Sam Collett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 05/09/06, Dossy Shiobara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > $("#foo input").filter("/[name=bar]").val();
>
> I use:
> $("#foo [EMAIL PROTECTED]").val();
>
> i.e. put @ before the attribute you want.
*facepalm* Ah, yes. Duh. Thanks!
-- Dossy
--
Dossy Shiobara | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://dossy.org/
Panoptic Computer Network | http://panoptic.com/
"He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own
folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70)
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] IE opacity change weirdresult
Hi, Is there any workaround for the problem of changing opacity in IE, which leads to text being displayed bold and weird? I could do that by setting background color to the element whose opacity is changed, but I want to have it's background transparent. A sample result is seen in download section of interface (see the attachment). Thanks. ie-opac.png Description: PNG image ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] filter() on attributes?
Try $('#foo [EMAIL PROTECTED]"bar"]').val()
Dossy Shiobara wrote:
> Then, get the value with something like:
>
> $("#foo input[name=bar]").val();
>
>
>
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Font-weight modifier in jQuery
Cheers m'dears. Is this documented anywhere though? Sam Collett wrote: > > On 05/09/06, Dan Atkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Wycats, >> >> I used that code from visualjQ as a template, and it didn't work. In IE, >> I >> get a debug error saying that it expects ':'. I changed font-weight:... >> to >> 'font-weight':... and IE went straight over it, without modifying the >> weight. >> >> Klaus, Class would be a simple option. But now this has me thinking! :) >> >> > > Every time you have a '-' in a property, remove it and replace the > next character with an uppercase representation of itself. For > example: > > fontWeight > fontSize > fontFamily > borderWidth > borderStyle > borderBottomWidth > > etc > > ___ > jQuery mailing list > discuss@jquery.com > http://jquery.com/discuss/ > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Font-weight-modifier-in-jQuery-tf2220759.html#a6153914 Sent from the JQuery forum at Nabble.com. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] On-Demand Javascript?
Lazy loading is indeed a great feature to have in any framework and I'd be interested in any information on this. Rey Bango-2 wrote: > > I was reading this article on Ajaxian: > > http://ajaxian.com/archives/prototype-extension-dynamic-script-pattern-support > > which discusses Dynamic Script Pattern or On-Demand Javascript. I think > this is a VERY cool feature. Does Jquery support something like this? > > What are the pros and cons of something like this? > > Rey... > > ___ > jQuery mailing list > discuss@jquery.com > http://jquery.com/discuss/ > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/On-Demand-Javascript--tf2220945.html#a6153887 Sent from the JQuery forum at Nabble.com. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] filter() on attributes?
On 05/09/06, Dossy Shiobara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't want to assign an id attribute to all my fields, but
> instead want to do something like this:
>
>
>
>
>
> Then, get the value with something like:
>
> $("#foo input[name=bar]").val();
>
> That didn't work. So, I tried:
>
> $("#foo input").filter("[name=bar]").val();
>
> That didn't work either. I'm thinking I might have to use $.grep() but
> I can't seem to get it to work:
>
> $.grep($("#foo input"), function(a, i) { return (a[i].attr("name") ==
> "bar"); })[0].val();
>
> That one causes a JS error complaining that "a[i] has no properties."
>
> The filter() docs say I should be able to use an XPath expression ...
> so, this should work:
>
> $("#foo input").filter("/[name=bar]").val();
>
> Aha! It does. Is this the best way of doing this? Are there any
> pitfalls I need to worry about? Can I collapse this into a more concise
> form?
>
> -- Dossy
>
> --
> Dossy Shiobara | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://dossy.org/
> Panoptic Computer Network | http://panoptic.com/
> "He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own
> folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70)
>
I use:
$("#foo [EMAIL PROTECTED]").val();
i.e. put @ before the attribute you want.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Font-weight modifier in jQuery
Yup,
That'll be the one!
Cheers Petre!
I wonder why this isn't written down?
Or, if it is, where is it? I tried looking through.
Stefan Petre wrote:
>
> $('p').css({fontWeight: 'normal'});
>
>
>
> Dan Atkinson wrote:
>> Wycats,
>>
>> I used that code from visualjQ as a template, and it didn't work. In IE,
>> I
>> get a debug error saying that it expects ':'. I changed font-weight:...
>> to
>> 'font-weight':... and IE went straight over it, without modifying the
>> weight.
>>
>> Klaus, Class would be a simple option. But now this has me thinking! :)
>>
>>
>>
>> wycats wrote:
>>
>>> Take a look under CSS on the visual documentation at "css(prop)" -- it's
>>> exactly what you're looking for.
>>>
>>> http://www.visualjquery.com
>>>
>>> -- Yehuda
>>>
>>> On 9/5/06, Dan Atkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
Hey all!
I'm sorry if this has been discussed before (I did a search without any
results on the subject), but does jQuery have the ability to change the
font-weight with the css method (or a font-weight method)?
I had a look in the API documentation and VisualjQuery, but neither
show
anything for it.
For instance, for something like this:
$("p").css({ color: "black", font-weight: "normal" });
or
$("p").css({ color: "red", font-weight: "bolder" });
Here you can see the first is normal text, while the other is red and
bold(er) for a warning.
Anyhow, just wondering if font-weight was inside jQuery at all?
Cheers,
Dan
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Font-weight-modifier-in-jQuery-tf2220759.html#a6151779
Sent from the JQuery forum at Nabble.com.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
>>>
>>> --
>>> Yehuda Katz
>>> Web Developer
>>> (ph) 718.877.1325
>>> (fax) 718.686.4288
>>>
>>> ___
>>> jQuery mailing list
>>> discuss@jquery.com
>>> http://jquery.com/discuss/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> ___
> jQuery mailing list
> discuss@jquery.com
> http://jquery.com/discuss/
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Font-weight-modifier-in-jQuery-tf2220759.html#a6153823
Sent from the JQuery forum at Nabble.com.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Font-weight modifier in jQuery
On 05/09/06, Dan Atkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Wycats, > > I used that code from visualjQ as a template, and it didn't work. In IE, I > get a debug error saying that it expects ':'. I changed font-weight:... to > 'font-weight':... and IE went straight over it, without modifying the > weight. > > Klaus, Class would be a simple option. But now this has me thinking! :) > > Every time you have a '-' in a property, remove it and replace the next character with an uppercase representation of itself. For example: fontWeight fontSize fontFamily borderWidth borderStyle borderBottomWidth etc ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] filter() on attributes?
Hi,
I don't want to assign an id attribute to all my fields, but
instead want to do something like this:
Then, get the value with something like:
$("#foo input[name=bar]").val();
That didn't work. So, I tried:
$("#foo input").filter("[name=bar]").val();
That didn't work either. I'm thinking I might have to use $.grep() but
I can't seem to get it to work:
$.grep($("#foo input"), function(a, i) { return (a[i].attr("name") ==
"bar"); })[0].val();
That one causes a JS error complaining that "a[i] has no properties."
The filter() docs say I should be able to use an XPath expression ...
so, this should work:
$("#foo input").filter("/[name=bar]").val();
Aha! It does. Is this the best way of doing this? Are there any
pitfalls I need to worry about? Can I collapse this into a more concise
form?
-- Dossy
--
Dossy Shiobara | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://dossy.org/
Panoptic Computer Network | http://panoptic.com/
"He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own
folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70)
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Font-weight modifier in jQuery
$('p').css({fontWeight: 'normal'});
Dan Atkinson wrote:
> Wycats,
>
> I used that code from visualjQ as a template, and it didn't work. In IE, I
> get a debug error saying that it expects ':'. I changed font-weight:... to
> 'font-weight':... and IE went straight over it, without modifying the
> weight.
>
> Klaus, Class would be a simple option. But now this has me thinking! :)
>
>
>
> wycats wrote:
>
>> Take a look under CSS on the visual documentation at "css(prop)" -- it's
>> exactly what you're looking for.
>>
>> http://www.visualjquery.com
>>
>> -- Yehuda
>>
>> On 9/5/06, Dan Atkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey all!
>>>
>>> I'm sorry if this has been discussed before (I did a search without any
>>> results on the subject), but does jQuery have the ability to change the
>>> font-weight with the css method (or a font-weight method)?
>>>
>>> I had a look in the API documentation and VisualjQuery, but neither show
>>> anything for it.
>>>
>>> For instance, for something like this:
>>> $("p").css({ color: "black", font-weight: "normal" });
>>> or
>>> $("p").css({ color: "red", font-weight: "bolder" });
>>>
>>> Here you can see the first is normal text, while the other is red and
>>> bold(er) for a warning.
>>>
>>> Anyhow, just wondering if font-weight was inside jQuery at all?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Dan
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
>>> http://www.nabble.com/Font-weight-modifier-in-jQuery-tf2220759.html#a6151779
>>> Sent from the JQuery forum at Nabble.com.
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> jQuery mailing list
>>> discuss@jquery.com
>>> http://jquery.com/discuss/
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Yehuda Katz
>> Web Developer
>> (ph) 718.877.1325
>> (fax) 718.686.4288
>>
>> ___
>> jQuery mailing list
>> discuss@jquery.com
>> http://jquery.com/discuss/
>>
>>
>>
>
>
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Anything similar to scriptaculous for JQuery
Yep. Maybe we'll have to build JQueryCFC. LOL! Rey... Andy Matthews wrote: > Hope it helps. Always good to have more Coldfusion representation. > > andy matthews > web developer > certified advanced coldfusion programmer > ICGLink, Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 615.370.1530 x737 > --//-> > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of Rey Bango > Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 8:47 AM > To: jQuery Discussion. > Subject: Re: [jQuery] Anything similar to scriptaculous for JQuery > > > Hey Andy!! Thanks for the welcome. BTW, thanks for the sample code. I'll > be poking through it today. > > Rey... > > ___ > jQuery mailing list > discuss@jquery.com > http://jquery.com/discuss/ > ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] jCarousel
Andy Matthews wrote: > > This is AWESOME. I was just looking for something like this. > Thanks :) Andy Matthews wrote: > > In IE 6.0.2 (PC): > > The vertical carousel: > http://sorgalla.com/projects/jcarousel/example_static_vertical.html > the 3 pictures appear to be off by about 30 pixels vertically. > Thats because the IE isn't standard compliant. Its a css formatting issue. I already fixed that in my dev-version. http://sorgalla.com/projects/jcarousel-dev/example_static_vertical.html Andy Matthews wrote: > > The dynamic AJAX example: > http://sorgalla.com/projects/jcarousel/example_dynamic_ajax.html > Clicking the next button until you get to the end of the pictures and > instead of just wrapping around to the end, the pictures slide back to the > left until you get to the beginning. > Thats the "wrap" feature. There are only 10 items loaded from the text file: http://sorgalla.com/projects/jcarousel/example_dynamic_ajax.txt Andy Matthews wrote: > > On the flickr example: > http://sorgalla.com/projects/jcarousel/example_dynamic_flickr.html > You might consider buffering two or three pictures ahead instead of just > one. That way the user doesn't have to wait after every picture. > The problem with that is, that the loadItemHandler must call carousel.loaded() after the next range is loaded. jCarousel needs that for calculating some things, ie. if the ext-button can be enabled or not. But you might handle that with callback function, ie. preloading more images after calling carousel.loaded(). Jan -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/jCarousel-tf2205628.html#a6152474 Sent from the JQuery forum at Nabble.com. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] On-Demand Javascript?
I was reading this article on Ajaxian: http://ajaxian.com/archives/prototype-extension-dynamic-script-pattern-support which discusses Dynamic Script Pattern or On-Demand Javascript. I think this is a VERY cool feature. Does Jquery support something like this? What are the pros and cons of something like this? Rey... ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Font-weight modifier in jQuery
Wycats,
I used that code from visualjQ as a template, and it didn't work. In IE, I
get a debug error saying that it expects ':'. I changed font-weight:... to
'font-weight':... and IE went straight over it, without modifying the
weight.
Klaus, Class would be a simple option. But now this has me thinking! :)
wycats wrote:
>
> Take a look under CSS on the visual documentation at "css(prop)" -- it's
> exactly what you're looking for.
>
> http://www.visualjquery.com
>
> -- Yehuda
>
> On 9/5/06, Dan Atkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hey all!
>>
>> I'm sorry if this has been discussed before (I did a search without any
>> results on the subject), but does jQuery have the ability to change the
>> font-weight with the css method (or a font-weight method)?
>>
>> I had a look in the API documentation and VisualjQuery, but neither show
>> anything for it.
>>
>> For instance, for something like this:
>> $("p").css({ color: "black", font-weight: "normal" });
>> or
>> $("p").css({ color: "red", font-weight: "bolder" });
>>
>> Here you can see the first is normal text, while the other is red and
>> bold(er) for a warning.
>>
>> Anyhow, just wondering if font-weight was inside jQuery at all?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Dan
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Font-weight-modifier-in-jQuery-tf2220759.html#a6151779
>> Sent from the JQuery forum at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>> ___
>> jQuery mailing list
>> discuss@jquery.com
>> http://jquery.com/discuss/
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Yehuda Katz
> Web Developer
> (ph) 718.877.1325
> (fax) 718.686.4288
>
> ___
> jQuery mailing list
> discuss@jquery.com
> http://jquery.com/discuss/
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Font-weight-modifier-in-jQuery-tf2220759.html#a6152395
Sent from the JQuery forum at Nabble.com.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Anything similar to scriptaculous for JQuery
Hope it helps. Always good to have more Coldfusion representation. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rey Bango Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 8:47 AM To: jQuery Discussion. Subject: Re: [jQuery] Anything similar to scriptaculous for JQuery Hey Andy!! Thanks for the welcome. BTW, thanks for the sample code. I'll be poking through it today. Rey... ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Anything similar to scriptaculous for JQuery
Hey Andy!! Thanks for the welcome. BTW, thanks for the sample code. I'll be poking through it today. Rey... Andy Matthews wrote: > Welcome Rey! Glad to have you on yet another list of which I'm a part. > > andy matthews > web developer > certified advanced coldfusion programmer > ICGLink, Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 615.370.1530 x737 > --//-> > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of Rey Bango > Sent: Sunday, September 03, 2006 4:41 PM > To: jQuery Discussion. > Subject: [jQuery] Anything similar to scriptaculous for JQuery > ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Thickbox 2.0 and dynamic content
One question I've got about the Thickbox/Lightbox libraries...
Currently there's no way to bookmark an image on a specific page. Does
anyone have any ideas about how to create a link that will load the correct
page, but auto-display the chosen image?
That's the main thing keeping me from using one of these systems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Dylan Verheul
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 12:30 AM
To: jQuery Discussion.
Subject: [jQuery] Thickbox 2.0 and dynamic content
I think I've seen this subject before, so I thought I'd share my solution.
Case:
- I want to use Thickbox
- Some of my content is dynamically provided through AJAX
- The Thickbox urls in the AJAX content aren't thickboxed in
$(document).ready()
- Thickboxing twice gives me errors
My solution:
I changed the TB_init from Thickbox to:
function TB_init(elem) {
if (!elem) elem = document;
$("a.thickbox", elem).click(function() {
var t = this.title || this.name || null;
var g = this.rel || false;
TB_show(t,this.href,g);
this.blur();
return false;
});
}
Now I can provide this function with a DOM element to search in. So
when I load content into , I can call
TB_init($("#ajaxHere")[0]).
I might even extend this by adding a $.fn.thickbox that does this for
the entire jQuery chain to make it look better and play nice with
other jQuery stuff, but I'm hoping Cody might want to add some of this
into Thickbox.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Font-weight modifier in jQuery
Take a look under CSS on the visual documentation at "css(prop)" -- it's exactly what you're looking for.http://www.visualjquery.com-- Yehuda
On 9/5/06, Dan Atkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey all!I'm sorry if this has been discussed before (I did a search without anyresults on the subject), but does jQuery have the ability to change thefont-weight with the css method (or a font-weight method)?
I had a look in the API documentation and VisualjQuery, but neither showanything for it.For instance, for something like this:$("p").css({ color: "black", font-weight: "normal" });
or$("p").css({ color: "red", font-weight: "bolder" });Here you can see the first is normal text, while the other is red andbold(er) for a warning.Anyhow, just wondering if font-weight was inside jQuery at all?
Cheers,Dan--View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Font-weight-modifier-in-jQuery-tf2220759.html#a6151779
Sent from the JQuery forum at Nabble.com.___jQuery mailing listdiscuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/-- Yehuda KatzWeb Developer(ph) 718.877.1325(fax) 718.686.4288
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Anything similar to scriptaculous for JQuery
Welcome Rey! Glad to have you on yet another list of which I'm a part. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rey Bango Sent: Sunday, September 03, 2006 4:41 PM To: jQuery Discussion. Subject: [jQuery] Anything similar to scriptaculous for JQuery Hi everyone, Prototype users have the scriptaculous library for all the cool UI stuff. Does JQuery have an equivalent effort going on? Can scriptaculous be used with JQuery or is it so intertwined with Prototype that decoupling the two is impossible? What moo.fx? Usable with JQuery? Alternatives? Thanks. Just trying to piece all of the options together. Rey... ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Font-weight modifier in jQuery
Dan Atkinson schrieb:
> Hey all!
>
> I'm sorry if this has been discussed before (I did a search without any
> results on the subject), but does jQuery have the ability to change the
> font-weight with the css method (or a font-weight method)?
>
> I had a look in the API documentation and VisualjQuery, but neither show
> anything for it.
>
> For instance, for something like this:
> $("p").css({ color: "black", font-weight: "normal" });
> or
> $("p").css({ color: "red", font-weight: "bolder" });
>
> Here you can see the first is normal text, while the other is red and
> bold(er) for a warning.
>
> Anyhow, just wondering if font-weight was inside jQuery at all?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dan
Dan, your code should actually work as is. Nonetheless I recommend to
separate behavior and presentation and would instead add a class (avoid
presentational naming!) to the element:
$("p").addClass('warning');
.warning {
color: red;
font-weight: bolder;
}
That way you have also much more control for print and other style
sheets as if you would use the style attribute...
-- Klaus
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Font-weight modifier in jQuery
> $("p").css({ color: "red", font-weight: "bolder" });
Try
$("p").css({ color: "red", "font-weight": "bolder" });
(The dash needs quoting, I think.)
-- Fil
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] Font-weight modifier in jQuery
Hey all!
I'm sorry if this has been discussed before (I did a search without any
results on the subject), but does jQuery have the ability to change the
font-weight with the css method (or a font-weight method)?
I had a look in the API documentation and VisualjQuery, but neither show
anything for it.
For instance, for something like this:
$("p").css({ color: "black", font-weight: "normal" });
or
$("p").css({ color: "red", font-weight: "bolder" });
Here you can see the first is normal text, while the other is red and
bold(er) for a warning.
Anyhow, just wondering if font-weight was inside jQuery at all?
Cheers,
Dan
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Font-weight-modifier-in-jQuery-tf2220759.html#a6151779
Sent from the JQuery forum at Nabble.com.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] jCarousel
This is AWESOME. I was just looking for something like this. It works wonderfully, but I did notice one or two oddities. In IE 6.0.2 (PC): The vertical carousel: http://sorgalla.com/projects/jcarousel/example_static_vertical.html the 3 pictures appear to be off by about 30 pixels vertically. The dynamic AJAX example: http://sorgalla.com/projects/jcarousel/example_dynamic_ajax.html Clicking the next button until you get to the end of the pictures and instead of just wrapping around to the end, the pictures slide back to the left until you get to the beginning. On the flickr example: http://sorgalla.com/projects/jcarousel/example_dynamic_flickr.html You might consider buffering two or three pictures ahead instead of just one. That way the user doesn't have to wait after every picture. Other than these minor things this is a fantastic plugin!! Kudos. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of jsorgalla Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 8:29 PM To: discuss@jquery.com Subject: [jQuery] jCarousel Hi there, i'm the next one staying in the line of jQuery plugin authors. I've created a new plugin called jCarousel. Its inspired by Bill Scott's "Carousel Component" for YUI. Check it out at http://sorgalla.com/pages/jcarousel.html and let me know what you think. Thanks, Jan -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/jCarousel-tf2205628.html#a6108635 Sent from the JQuery forum at Nabble.com. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] discuss Digest, Vol 9, Issue 7
George Smith: > > Perhaps this is a problem ajax shouldn't be trying to fix? With an > application that size, surely breaking back button and creating > bookmarking problems isn't something you should be doing? There are no bookmarking problems because there is no bookmarking to begin with. Users are required to authenticate to access the site, bookmarks don't work. This is an internal web application remember, it's a portal for viewing clinical data on cancer patients. Matt. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] jCarousel
On Sep 4, 2006, at 5:41 PM, digital spaghetti wrote: > It's just a pity at the moment I can't use jQuery, as it seems to > be affecting > some prototype stuff on my site. Try making sure that your reference to jquery.js comes last to help with compatibility. Also, you might want to look into the svn version of compat.js, which John is working on to get jquery and prototype working nicely together: http://jquery.com/dev/svn/plugins/compat/ Cheers, Karl ___ Karl Swedberg www.englishrules.com ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Searching for XML attribute
John
Tried that version - still the same error.
Debug came up with error in this line (639)
>> } else if ( elem.getAttribute ) {
in this function
attr: function(elem, name, value){
error is elem.getAttribute Wrong number of arguments or invalid property
assignment
Changing the function to
attr: function(elem, name, value){
var fix = {
"for": "htmlFor",
"class": "className",
"float": "cssFloat",
innerHTML: "innerHTML",
className: "className",
value: "value",
disabled: "disabled"
};
if ( fix[name] ) {
if ( value != undefined ) elem[fix[name]] = value;
return elem[fix[name]];
} else if ( elem.getAttribute(name) ) {
if ( value != undefined ) elem.setAttribute( name,
value );
return elem.getAttribute( name);
} else {
name = name.replace(/-([a-z])/ig,function(z,b){return
b.toUpperCase();});
if ( value != undefined ) elem[name] = value;
return elem[name];
}
},
works, but probably breaks other stuff 'cos I'm nowhere near good enough a
coder:-)
Thanks
Ian
Ian -
Could you try that with jQuery 1.0.1?
http://jquery.com/src/jquery-1.0.1.js
And let me know if you get the same bug? Also, in 1.0+ jQuery has the
method .text() that allows you to easily get the text contents of an
element, making your code simply:
$('[EMAIL PROTECTED]"Abbreviated Name"]', xml).text()
--John
On 9/4/06, Ian B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I seem to be having a problem with the latest release of Jquery
> Given this XML:-
>
>
> noteid="4806" siblings="1">
>
> Janine Porter/Operations/Ventura
> House/Wath
>
>
> Janine Porter
>
>
>
>
> Then this did work
> $('[EMAIL PROTECTED]"Abbreviated Name"]', xml).get(0).text) - giving me
> 'Janine
> Porter/Operations/Ventura House/Wath' from the above.
>
> Putting the latest Jquery in (* $Rev: 249 $) - compressed - IE6 gives me
> 'wrong number of arguments or invalid property assignment'
> I'm sure the error will be mine but I didn't think the attribute syntax
> had
> been changed!
>
> Thanks
> Ian
--
John Resig
http://ejohn.org/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Searching-for-XML-attribute-tf2215205.html#a6147813
Sent from the JQuery forum at Nabble.com.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Form fields: bug or request
A checkbox or a radiobox value is commonly used to determine if a value
should be stored or not, therefore the value of a check/radio box is
static and has nothing to do with the state of the checkbox.
This is just to clarify what the common understanding is . I like to
know the reason behind what people do too so that's why i'm sending this.
Dylan Verheul schreef:
> OK, I'll do it like that then. Thanks for the response.
>
> On 9/5/06, John Resig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> That's not my understanding as to how checkbox values work. If you
>> really want to uncheck a checkbox, you have to remove the checked
>> attribute - changing the value does /not/ have the same effect.
>>
>> So, to uncheck it you could do:
>> $("#foo").removeAttr("checked");
>>
>> --John
>>
>> On 9/5/06, Dylan Verheul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> I have a checkbox like this
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I would expect this code to uncheck it:
>>> $("#foo").val(0); // any value != 1 should uncheck it
>>> and this code to check it
>>> $("#foo").val(1);
>>>
>>> It doesn't.
>>>
>>> The value attribute of a checkbox is imho not dynamic like a texbox's,
>>> but static, and can only be toggled to on or off.
>>>
>>> When manipulating form fields (don't get me started on radio button
>>> sets), jQuery seems to lose its beauty.
>>>
>>> Any ideas?
>>>
>>>
>
--
David Duymelinck
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] opacity in msie?
El Rocco ,
I think john posted something similar as a bug tonight , there is a
problem w/ fadeTo in IE in the .css function.
Will
> Hi there guys!
>
> Just wanted to make sure that if I check the opacity css property, IE
> will not return null (it was in some tests I did).
>
> I checked the source and on lines 389 to 393, this is what I see :
>
> 389 } else if ( p == "opacity" && jQuery.browser.msie )
> 390 return parseFloat( jQuery.curCSS(e,"filter").replace(/
> [^0-9.]/,"") ) || 1;
> 391
> 392 return jQuery.curCSS( e, p );
> 393 },
>
> This part makes me think that if I check
> $(this).css("opacity");
>
> I should get the right value even if i'm in IE right? If not, what
> does this do? Is it just to SET the right value in IE?
>
> If I use the BUILT-IN fade functions, everything works fine in IE but
> as said in a previous thread (http://www.mail-archive.com/
> discuss@jquery.com/msg00660.html) things are now queued if I do
> something like this :
>
> $(this).width("37px").fadeTo("fast",0.5);
>
> If I want to use the animate() function to do what I want, as
> specified by John in the aforementioned thread, I'd have to do
> something like this :
>
> $(this).animate({width:37,opacity:.5},"fast");
>
> I'll try this when I get in the office tomorrow (I don't have a pc
> with IE here) and will post my results.
>
> Tnx!
>
> ___
> jQuery mailing list
> discuss@jquery.com
> http://jquery.com/discuss/
>
>
>
>
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
