Re: [Dng] [philosophy] KISS, roots linux and the logo WAS Re: Dng Digest, Vol 5, Issue 11

2015-02-25 Thread Hendrik Boom
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 01:55:02AM +, Isaac Dunham wrote:
 On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 07:10:59PM -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
  On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 10:27:23 -0500
  Hendrik Boom hend...@topoi.pooq.com wrote:
  
   On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 09:57:29AM -0500, Steve Litt wrote:

If you're talking about Devuan, yes, it is! I got on the Devuan
mailing list just to escape systemd, and have been pleasantly
surprised by how Devuan is re-architecting everything.
   
   Does that meerly reflect how systemd is dearchitecting everything?
   Or are there things being rearchitected that aren't systemd issues?
   
   -- hendrik
  
  Well, first of all, understand the only Devuan I've run is Valentines,
  and I didn't peer too deeply under the hood. My opinions come from
  things the Devuan Developers say on this list. I've seen a replacement
  for udev which, if I'm not mistaken, can simply be substituted for udev
  or eudev. snip
 
 As far as I can tell, nothing's available *yet* that can *simply*
 be substituted for (e)udev.

As I understand it, it's necessary to replace udev -- but is it 
necessary to replace eudev?

-- hendrik

___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [Dng] [philosophy] KISS, roots linux and the logo WAS Re: Dng Digest, Vol 5, Issue 11

2015-02-25 Thread Steve Litt
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 08:24:56 -0500
Hendrik Boom hend...@topoi.pooq.com wrote:

 On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 01:55:02AM +, Isaac Dunham wrote:
  On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 07:10:59PM -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
   On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 10:27:23 -0500
   Hendrik Boom hend...@topoi.pooq.com wrote:
   
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 09:57:29AM -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
 
 If you're talking about Devuan, yes, it is! I got on the
 Devuan mailing list just to escape systemd, and have been
 pleasantly surprised by how Devuan is re-architecting
 everything.

Does that meerly reflect how systemd is dearchitecting
everything? Or are there things being rearchitected that aren't
systemd issues?

-- hendrik
   
   Well, first of all, understand the only Devuan I've run is
   Valentines, and I didn't peer too deeply under the hood. My
   opinions come from things the Devuan Developers say on this list.
   I've seen a replacement for udev which, if I'm not mistaken, can
   simply be substituted for udev or eudev. snip
  
  As far as I can tell, nothing's available *yet* that can *simply*
  be substituted for (e)udev.
 
 As I understand it, it's necessary to replace udev -- but is it 
 necessary to replace eudev?
 
 -- hendrik

I understood that both vdev and eudev are aftermarket replacements for
udev, and the three can bolt-in replace each other for the purposes of
getting devices initialized, though only udev does us the favor of
linking to systemd.

SteveT

Steve Litt*  http://www.troubleshooters.com/
Troubleshooting Training  *  Human Performance

___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [Dng] [philosophy] KISS, roots linux and the logo WAS Re: Dng Digest, Vol 5, Issue 11

2015-02-25 Thread Neo Futur
 its a general philosophy of design and openness
 FYI, I'm busy on such a topic for my Ph.D dissertation and will be happy
 to share the results once finished.
 and I ll be happy to read and comment ;)

  it is more about principles. Let's list some:
 
   - freedom of choice,
   - interchangealility of solutions to a given need,
   - reduce inter-dependencies to the strict minimum
  I keep those 3 for my idea of a roots linux foundation
 let me recommend you use the term GNU/Linux. Probably even more than the
 Linux kernel development, it is the GNU project that kept alive such
 principles of design in user-space.
 yes you are rigt and I know it; i ve been trying to say gnu/inux for
years, but not everything is gnu on this linux system . . . perhaps I
should say FOSS/linux or libre/linux . . .or, well, now its going to
be systemd-linux . . .

 also please consider the Dyne.org foundation as an ally in your quest to
 start a new foundation, or perhaps as an existing device you can use to
 bring forward the activities you intend to promote with your idea of a
 foundation.
 Managing an institutional shell for free software projects is an effort
 that can well be shared, if transparence on intentions and coincidence
 of ideals is there.
 for now its just an idea I have, something I feel logical and
necessary , trying to gather the people from devuan, from gentoo, from
eudev, mdev, consolekit2, trios, trinity and probably many more
projects.

 If you like to share, I'd be interested in knowing what you envision
 would be the activities such a foundation should carry on. Even when
 talking about philosophy and design I think it is very important to
 bring examples and concrete projects that are vectors for people's
 action.
 as I said its just an idea i want to share, hoping that more people
will think its something that could be useful for the good cause.

 at the very least, i think the goal and activities of this possible
foundation should be :

* trying to help funding necessary developments, through sponsors and donations
* trying to get people from different projects to work together on the
necessary alternatives, trying to gather efforts one one udev
alternative ( eudev ? ) , on one logind atlternative ( consolekit2 ?
), on one init system alternative ( openrc ? )
* trying to better define the goals and philosophy we defend ( I d say
kiss, architecture allowing alternatives most everywhere, one small
brick doing only one thing but doing well, easy to understand and
customize stuff, what else ?  )

 once again those are just personal ideas, the foundation could be
whatever people think could be useful or necessary for the cause, i
dont even plan to make this foundation myself, I just want people to
think of it ;)


  great idea, KISS is a short and simple word that could summarize most
  of the important ideas, a kiss, for you, from the roots of linux
  could be an idea for a logo !

 I guess this isn't the best way to introduce Devuan to the public: its a
 bit too pretextuous to incarnate the roots of the Linux kernel
 development.
 well we could say the roots of UNIX. Once again, i have to admin when
i say linux, i dont think of the kernel, but as the whole system the
is a new unix, i say linux like you could say solaris or aix

 We are still struggling to produce an alpha and I wish our
 communication reflects the current phase of the progress rather than
 more ideals than those we already stated in the public and that also
 raised some educated skepticism and criticism as they weren't yet based
 on concrete achievements.
agreed, i m anxiously waiting for a beta to try and test on my
thinkpad laptop, after that i plan to contribute by maintaining a
grsec kernel.

 Said that, I hope this message does not discourage you, but helps
 channel the enthusiasm in good productive ways.
 not at all, intelligent criticism is always welcome, and anyway . .
.even insults cant discourage me when I think something is
fair/rightful/needed ;)

 but once again its just an idea i want to share, hoping other people
will be interested.


 ciao

 --
 Jaromil, Dyne.org Free Software Foundry (est. 2000)
 We are free to share code and we code to share freedom
 Web: https://j.dyne.org Contact: https://j.dyne.org/c.vcf
 GPG: 6113 D89C A825 C5CE DD02  C872 73B3 5DA5 4ACB 7D10
 Confidential communications: https://keybase.io/jaromil

___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


[Dng] [philosophy] KISS, roots linux and the logo WAS Re: Dng Digest, Vol 5, Issue 11

2015-02-24 Thread Neo Futur
( renaming the thread )

 I think this question goes together with the badge or logo question.
 It does !

 It  must go beyond sans-systemd;
exactly its much more than just sans systemd, its a general
philosophy of design and openness

 it is more about principles. Let's list some:

  - freedom of choice,
  - interchangealility of solutions to a given need,
  - reduce inter-dependencies to the strict minimum
 I keep those 3 for my idea of a roots linux foundation


 Don't know if KISS goes into details, but maybe it could inspire the
 logo.

 great idea, KISS is a short and simple word that could summarize most
of the important ideas, a kiss, for you, from the roots of linux could
be an idea for a logo !
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [Dng] [philosophy] KISS, roots linux and the logo WAS Re: Dng Digest, Vol 5, Issue 11

2015-02-24 Thread Jaromil

dear Neo Futur,

On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Neo Futur wrote:

 its a general philosophy of design and openness

FYI, I'm busy on such a topic for my Ph.D dissertation and will be happy
to share the results once finished.

  it is more about principles. Let's list some:
 
   - freedom of choice,
   - interchangealility of solutions to a given need,
   - reduce inter-dependencies to the strict minimum
  I keep those 3 for my idea of a roots linux foundation

let me recommend you use the term GNU/Linux. Probably even more than the
Linux kernel development, it is the GNU project that kept alive such
principles of design in user-space.

also please consider the Dyne.org foundation as an ally in your quest to
start a new foundation, or perhaps as an existing device you can use to
bring forward the activities you intend to promote with your idea of a
foundation.

Managing an institutional shell for free software projects is an effort
that can well be shared, if transparence on intentions and coincidence
of ideals is there.

If you like to share, I'd be interested in knowing what you envision
would be the activities such a foundation should carry on. Even when
talking about philosophy and design I think it is very important to
bring examples and concrete projects that are vectors for people's
action.

  great idea, KISS is a short and simple word that could summarize most
  of the important ideas, a kiss, for you, from the roots of linux
  could be an idea for a logo !

I guess this isn't the best way to introduce Devuan to the public: its a
bit too pretextuous to incarnate the roots of the Linux kernel
development. We are still struggling to produce an alpha and I wish our
communication reflects the current phase of the progress rather than
more ideals than those we already stated in the public and that also
raised some educated skepticism and criticism as they weren't yet based
on concrete achievements.

Said that, I hope this message does not discourage you, but helps
channel the enthusiasm in good productive ways.

ciao

-- 
Jaromil, Dyne.org Free Software Foundry (est. 2000)
We are free to share code and we code to share freedom
Web: https://j.dyne.org Contact: https://j.dyne.org/c.vcf
GPG: 6113 D89C A825 C5CE DD02  C872 73B3 5DA5 4ACB 7D10
Confidential communications: https://keybase.io/jaromil



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [Dng] [philosophy] KISS, roots linux and the logo WAS Re: Dng Digest, Vol 5, Issue 11

2015-02-24 Thread Didier Kryn


Le 24/02/2015 10:49, Jaromil a écrit :

dear Neo Futur,

On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Neo Futur wrote:


its a general philosophy of design and openness

FYI, I'm busy on such a topic for my Ph.D dissertation and will be happy
to share the results once finished.


 it is more about principles. Let's list some:
 
   - freedom of choice,
   - interchangealility of solutions to a given need,
   - reduce inter-dependencies to the strict minimum

  I keep those 3 for my idea of a roots linux foundation

let me recommend you use the term GNU/Linux. Probably even more than the
Linux kernel development, it is the GNU project that kept alive such
principles of design in user-space.

also please consider the Dyne.org foundation as an ally in your quest to
start a new foundation, or perhaps as an existing device you can use to
bring forward the activities you intend to promote with your idea of a
foundation.

Managing an institutional shell for free software projects is an effort
that can well be shared, if transparence on intentions and coincidence
of ideals is there.

If you like to share, I'd be interested in knowing what you envision
would be the activities such a foundation should carry on. Even when
talking about philosophy and design I think it is very important to
bring examples and concrete projects that are vectors for people's
action.


  great idea, KISS is a short and simple word that could summarize most
  of the important ideas, a kiss, for you, from the roots of linux
  could be an idea for a logo !

I guess this isn't the best way to introduce Devuan to the public: its a
bit too pretextuous to incarnate the roots of the Linux kernel
development. We are still struggling to produce an alpha and I wish our
communication reflects the current phase of the progress rather than
more ideals than those we already stated in the public and that also
raised some educated skepticism and criticism as they weren't yet based
on concrete achievements.

Said that, I hope this message does not discourage you, but helps
channel the enthusiasm in good productive ways.

ciao
Sorry guys, I think I introduced confusion with the word logo. 
This is because there was a previous discussion about a badge, which I 
understood as something like Powered by XX, GNU inside, Viewable 
with any browser, or POSIX-compliant. I was not speaking of Devuan's 
logo at all.


Inevitably, the idea of a badge leads to a foundation entitled to 
stamp distros with the badge. I am wondering if only a clear phrasing of 
the principles would be enough, without the impediments and the 
sectarism of a foundation.


Didier


___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [Dng] [philosophy] KISS, roots linux and the logo WAS Re: Dng Digest, Vol 5, Issue 11

2015-02-24 Thread Steve Litt
On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 03:44:56 -0500
Neo Futur d...@ww7.be wrote:

 ( renaming the thread )
 
  I think this question goes together with the badge or logo
  question.
  It does !
 
  It  must go beyond sans-systemd;
 exactly its much more than just sans systemd, its a general
 philosophy of design and openness

If you're talking about Devuan, yes, it is! I got on the Devuan mailing
list just to escape systemd, and have been pleasantly surprised by how
Devuan is re-architecting everything.

SteveT

Steve Litt*  http://www.troubleshooters.com/
Troubleshooting Training  *  Human Performance

___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [Dng] [philosophy] KISS, roots linux and the logo WAS Re: Dng Digest, Vol 5, Issue 11

2015-02-24 Thread Hendrik Boom
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 09:57:29AM -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
 
 If you're talking about Devuan, yes, it is! I got on the Devuan mailing
 list just to escape systemd, and have been pleasantly surprised by how
 Devuan is re-architecting everything.

Does that meerly reflect how systemd is dearchitecting everything?  Or 
are there things being rearchitected that aren't systemd issues?

-- hendrik
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [Dng] [philosophy] KISS, roots linux and the logo WAS Re: Dng Digest, Vol 5, Issue 11

2015-02-24 Thread Steve Litt
On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 10:27:23 -0500
Hendrik Boom hend...@topoi.pooq.com wrote:

 On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 09:57:29AM -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
  
  If you're talking about Devuan, yes, it is! I got on the Devuan
  mailing list just to escape systemd, and have been pleasantly
  surprised by how Devuan is re-architecting everything.
 
 Does that meerly reflect how systemd is dearchitecting everything?
 Or are there things being rearchitected that aren't systemd issues?
 
 -- hendrik

Well, first of all, understand the only Devuan I've run is Valentines,
and I didn't peer too deeply under the hood. My opinions come from
things the Devuan Developers say on this list. I've seen a replacement
for udev which, if I'm not mistaken, can simply be substituted for udev
or eudev. I've heard talk of ways to eliminate the need for dbus.
Depending on other stuff, I might be involved in a no-dbus replacement
for NetworkManager. Lots of similar stuff. All of this points to a
distro that's friendly to an architecture of thin linkages between
components, which is how I like it.

SteveT

Steve Litt*  http://www.troubleshooters.com/
Troubleshooting Training  *  Human Performance

___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng