Re: [Elecraft] K3 linking VFO A and B
John and all, You should consider the Firmware Release Notes as an update to the manual(s). 73, Don W3FPR On 1/23/2018 9:39 PM, VE3NFK wrote: Thanks Don... missed that. Might be helpful to have an updated K3 operators manual 73 John VE3NFK -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to donw...@embarqmail.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] Array Solutions Lightning Arrestor
UG-1185's have captive center pins. 73 ! Ken - K0PP On Jan 23, 2018 15:28,wrote: Pin retraction may depend on your coax. I use a number of N connectors and I have not seen this occur with Belden 8267 or with the various sizes of Heliax at my station. John KK9A K9ZC wrote: While N connectors do have some design and impedance advantages, some of us that have lived in extremely cold climates... have seen the center pins pull out of N connectors due to thermal contraction of the center conductor over distance. A UHF or DIN connector will usually not do that. Dr. William J. Schmidt - K9HZ J68HZ 8P6HK ZF2HZ PJ4/K9HZ VP5/K9HZ PJ2/K9HZ Owner - Operator Big Signal Ranch - K9ZC Staunton, Illinois Owner - Operator Villa Grand Piton - J68HZ Soufriere, St. Lucia W.I. Rent it: www.VillaGrandPiton.com Like us on Facebook! __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to kengk...@gmail.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] Trouble configuring a K3, MicroHAM Microkeyer
The Windows Sound Control Panel and Windows Volume Mixer will vary depending on the sound card(s) in your system, running applications and user configuration. The pictures in the microKEYER II are illustrative only. 73, ... Joe, W4TV On 1/23/2018 8:31 PM, Eric Rosenberg wrote: Joe, I've only ever used it with an Orion 565. My concern is that the Windows sound "panels (volume mixer, playback devices, recording devices) " do not show what the MK12 manual does in re: devices, applications and the like. 73, Eric W3DQ Message: 7 Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 09:42:27 -0500 From: "Joe Subich, W4TV"To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Trouble configuring a K3, MicroHAM Microkeyer 2 and N1MM+ Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed At the moment, CW works as expected, EXCEPT when I use the footswitch. When use it, the PTT1 light stays lit and the radio goes into transmit won't get out of it -- you have to turn off the rig. The PTT! light stays on after the rig's shut off. You have to turn the MK2 on and off for the PTT1 LED to turn off. Was the MK II previously used with an Icom transceiver? Is the I "ICVOX" jumper installed? See: "Preparing MK II for use" in the MK II Users Manual. 73, ... Joe, W4TV __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3 linking VFO A and B
Thanks Don... missed that. Might be helpful to have an updated K3 operators manual 73 John VE3NFK -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3 linking VFO A and B
You forgot to read the firmware release notes: MCU 5.10 / DSP 2.83, 2-2-2015 * EASIER DIVERSITY RECEIVE SELECTION: A regular hold of SUB now goes directly into diversity receive, without first having to go through "LINK". This should benefit most users of the KRX3 sub receiver, since few use the VFO linking function. Those who do use VFO linking can still turn it on by setting CONFIG:VFO LNK to ON. This menu entry can be assigned to a programmable function switch for easy selection if desired, eliminating the need to bring up the menu. Ken K6MR On 23-Jan-18 18:01:24, "VE3NFK"wrote: Hi Must be having a senior moment - but while I have VFO A and B linked nicely on 80 - can't do it on 40.. instructions say "Holding SUB links the VFOs (whether the sub receiver is on or off). The kHz decimal point of VFO B flashes as a reminder. " But the instant you press 'SUB' - it turns on without linking; and then any further 'hold' turns on diversity. What am I doing wrong? Thanks John VE3NFK -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to k...@gmx.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3 linking VFO A and B
John, You apparently missed the Firmware Release notes. VFO Linking has been moved from the SUB button into a menu item. There was a timing relationship on the SUB button - a long hold used to turn on Linking, but it was confusing to a number of operators so it was changed. 73, Don W3FPR On 1/23/2018 9:01 PM, VE3NFK wrote: Hi Must be having a senior moment - but while I have VFO A and B linked nicely on 80 - can't do it on 40.. instructions say "Holding SUB links the VFOs (whether the sub receiver is on or off). The kHz decimal point of VFO B flashes as a reminder. " But the instant you press 'SUB' - it turns on without linking; and then any further 'hold' turns on diversity. What am I doing wrong? Thanks John VE3NFK __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
[Elecraft] K3 linking VFO A and B
Hi Must be having a senior moment - but while I have VFO A and B linked nicely on 80 - can't do it on 40.. instructions say "Holding SUB links the VFOs (whether the sub receiver is on or off). The kHz decimal point of VFO B flashes as a reminder. " But the instant you press 'SUB' - it turns on without linking; and then any further 'hold' turns on diversity. What am I doing wrong? Thanks John VE3NFK -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] Array Solutions Lightning Arrestor
Correct installation is usually the key. The line must be supported no more than 12" from the connector and NEVER at any time by the connector, even during installation. Also, line supports along all vertical and horizontal runs is a must. 73 Bob, K4TAX On 1/23/2018 4:27 PM, j...@kk9a.com wrote: Pin retraction may depend on your coax. I use a number of N connectors and I have not seen this occur with Belden 8267 or with the various sizes of Heliax at my station. John KK9A K9ZC wrote: While N connectors do have some design and impedance advantages, some of us that have lived in extremely cold climates... have seen the center pins pull out of N connectors due to thermal contraction of the center conductor over distance. A UHF or DIN connector will usually not do that. Dr. William J. Schmidt - K9HZ J68HZ 8P6HK ZF2HZ PJ4/K9HZ VP5/K9HZ PJ2/K9HZ Owner - Operator Big Signal Ranch - K9ZC Staunton, Illinois Owner - Operator Villa Grand Piton - J68HZ Soufriere, St. Lucia W.I. Rent it: www.VillaGrandPiton.com Like us on Facebook! __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to rmcg...@blomand.net __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] Trouble configuring a K3, MicroHAM Microkeyer
Joe, I've only ever used it with an Orion 565. My concern is that the Windows sound "panels (volume mixer, playback devices, recording devices) " do not show what the MK12 manual does in re: devices, applications and the like. 73, Eric W3DQ Message: 7 Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 09:42:27 -0500 From: "Joe Subich, W4TV"To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Trouble configuring a K3, MicroHAM Microkeyer 2 and N1MM+ Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed > At the moment, CW works as expected, EXCEPT when I use the > footswitch. When use it, the PTT1 light stays lit and the radio > goes into transmit won't get out of it -- you have to turn off the > rig. The PTT! light stays on after the rig's shut off. You have to > turn the MK2 on and off for the PTT1 LED to turn off. Was the MK II previously used with an Icom transceiver? Is the I "ICVOX" jumper installed? See: "Preparing MK II for use" in the MK II Users Manual. 73, ... Joe, W4TV __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] OT: 3Y0Z Bouvet Island DXoedition
That is correct, I did not make it clear they were operating maritime mobile (call sign 3G9A/MM) on 40 and 20 CW and ft-8 on 20. De K4KAY 73 From: garyk9gs [mailto:garyk...@wi.rr.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2018 5:31 PM To: efortner; 'ab2tc'; elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] OT: 3Y0Z Bouvet Island DXoedition The ship is not even half way to Bouvet. The only activity by the group so far is 3G9A/MM from the ship. 73 -Gary K9GS Original message From: efortnerDate: 1/23/18 4:09 PM (GMT-06:00) To: 'ab2tc' , elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] OT: 3Y0Z Bouvet Island DXoedition It is spotted right now on the cluster. They are working cw on 20 and 40 meters and ft-8 on 14.074. 73 de Earl, K4KAY -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of ab2tc Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2018 4:07 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] OT: 3Y0Z Bouvet Island DXoedition Hi Elecraft community, This is of course OT but relevant information to all K3 owners who are chasing DX. They are well underway on their ship closing in on South Georgia Island. You can trace the ship's course here: https://share.garmin.com/bouvet It takes a while to update, but it will. I find it humorous that their elevation reported appears to change randomly between 100' under water to more than 100' above. Their main web site is quite impressive but not very up to date and is not interactive, here: http://www.bouvetdx.org/ All the action seems to be on Facebook. On their web site there is a link to their Facebook group in the upper right corner. You can browse all the content without having a Facebook account. There are a number of nice videos, mostly from their ship's departure from Punta Arenas. The ship looks super modern with a ultra modern and high tech bridge. Again, I apologize to those who are annoyed by OT postings, but this is after all the DX expedition of this century (likely the most costly in history) and I have been surprised about how low profile it has had on the Internet. They are qrv /MM (but their activity seems to mostly CW on 40m. I have yet to see a spot on the cluster. BTW, Bouvet Island is a Norwegian possession (undisputed as far as I know) and the crew has two veteran members, Erling and Just. AB2TC - Knut -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to efort...@ctc.net __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to garyk...@wi.rr.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3 Power Reading/SWR/ALC Problem
Paul: I had a problem with my K2 with the same identical symptoms you are describing. The fault was diagnosed to an intermittent ground/shield connection in the RF output Cable going to my amplifier. It was an old cable that was out in the weather and when I took it apart you could see the corrosion in the PL259 inside the holes for grounding. This cable worked for me for several years but recently failed. Bring some extra jumper coax with you. Karin Anne Johnson P.E. K3UU Palm Harbor, FL --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K1 and K2 RIP?
The K2 is absolutely still in production :-) Reports of its death are not accurate. 73, Eric /elecraft.com/ On 1/23/2018 1:22 PM, eric norris via Elecraft wrote: I just called Elecraft looking for some parts for my spare K1 and K2 and was told they are out of production. They are still listed on the order page. If true, I am very sorry to see them go. Building my K2 was one of the best experiences of my life. Thank you, Elecraft. 73. Eric WD6DBMOwner, The Last KX1 Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to eric.swa...@elecraft.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] UHF connectors [was: Array Solutions Lightning Arrestor]
It's important to remember that when the "UHF" (239 series) connectors were developed, UHF meant 28 MHz! Almost no work was being done at over 100 MHz and the FCC did not even care what one did over 300 MHz: My 1941 ARRL handbook shows that Hams could do whatever they wanted at such absurdly high frequencies, nor does the handbook show how to produce RF above the 112 MHz band (112 became 144 MHz when the FCC reorganized the early TV channel allocations.) That changed very quickly during WWII. Wars do have a habit of spurring technological development. But the name "UHF" stuck with the SO and PL 239 connectors. As Alan points out, they are quite useful up into what we call VHF and possibly low UHF today. 73, Ron AC7AC -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Alan Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2018 3:18 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] UHF connectors [was: Array Solutions Lightning Arrestor] On 01/23/2018 11:05 AM, Jim Brown wrote: > On 1/23/2018 10:29 AM, Walter Underwood wrote: ... >> But I mostly like them better because they are engineered instead of >> a historical accident.:-) > > The technical superiority of N-connectors for use at HF is a wild > exaggeration, to the extent of being an urban myth. Yes, there is a > SMALL impedance difference at a junction, but it simply doesn't matter > at 6M and below, both because the difference in Zo is relatively > small, because the length is small as a fraction of a wavelength, and > because as frequency increases, small mismatches are reduced by the > loss in the feedline (and NOT loss due to mismatch). > > There is, of course, a FICTIONAL loss called "mismatch loss," which > shows up in the lab with test equipment that is carefully engineered > to have 50 ohm output Z. ... Yup. Here is a posting I made 25 years ago that has actual data: From: ... (Alan Bloom) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 1992 23:03:13 GMT Subject: The Truth about UHF Connectors Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Santa Rosa, CA Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc Ya gotta feel sorry for UHF connectors. Recent strings on this notes group lambasted them as worthless at VHF and above, and barely tolerable at HF. One poster called them "5 dB attenuators", and many agreed that there must be some sort of conspiracy among ham equipment manufacturers to inflict such garbage connectors on the amateur community. Today I finally remembered to bring some UHF adapters from home so I could do some relative measurements of UHF versus type-N. As expected, the type-N showed lower insertion loss at high frequencies, but the UHF connectors were hardly "5 dB attenuators." For the test I connected an HP8753 RF network analyzer through two short BNC cables into the following arrangement: _________ | | | BNC female | | N female- | | N male to | | | __| 10 dB |__| to N male |__| N female |__| BNC female |__| 10 dB |__ | Atten.| | adapter| | adapter | | adapter| | Atten.| |___| || |___| || |___| Then I repeated the measurement with the N adapters replaced with UHF. I normalized the measurements by replacing the 3 adapters with a BNC double-female. (That is, this was assumed to have 0 dB loss.) Since two N or UHF adapters were used, I assume the loss per connector is half the total. The vertical scale was .1 dB/division, so I estimated the insertion loss to the nearest .01 dB or so: - Type N -- UHF -- FREQ (MHz) TOTAL LOSS PER CONNECTOR TOTAL LOSS PER CONNECTOR 1.8 0 dB 0 dB 0 dB 0 dB 30 0 00 0 100 0 00 0 150 0 00.02 0.01 200 0 00.03 0.015 450 0 00.18 0.09 600 0 00.26 0.13 900 0 00.66 0.33 10000.05 0.0250.80.4 13000.10.05 0.86 0.43 16000.05 0.0250.50.25 20000.05 0.0250.02 0.01 Insertion loss increases until about 1300 MHz, and then starts to decrease until it is almost zero for the UHF connector at 2 GHz! At that frequency, the connectors are about 1/4 wave long (1 inch, assuming .66 velocity factor), so I assume that the two adapters are providing a conjugate match to each other. This confirms my assumption that the insertion loss is due to reflections (impedance mismatch), not absorption (true power loss). Bottom line: UHF connectors work fine through the VHF range, and are not too bad even on the 420 MHz band if you can stand about .1 dB mismatch loss per
Re: [Elecraft] Array Solutions Lightning Arrestor
I is not always thermal related. Center pin retraction can also be caused by stress on the coax. I have seen many N male connectors where the shield has slipped in the clamp due to tension on the coax (from the weight of hanging or perhaps other causes). I routinely do 2 things - 1) put a bead of silicone seal around the coax to top of the N connector junction, and 2) support the coax in some manner about 12 inches from the connector. If the shield slips in the connector body, the most obvious result is center pin retraction, but it may also be that the shield has broken (or hanging on by a thread) allowing the coax to come partially out of the connector. The same problem can be found in BNC connectors. In other words, do not let the connector take the stress of the hanging coax weight. Well soldered UHF connectors do not have that problem. 73, Don W3FPR On 1/23/2018 5:27 PM, j...@kk9a.com wrote: Pin retraction may depend on your coax. I use a number of N connectors and I have not seen this occur with Belden 8267 or with the various sizes of Heliax at my station. John KK9A __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K1 and K2 RIP?
Eric, The K2 is still current production, but the K1 is no longer available, as is the KX1. Parts should still be available, although part number substitutes may have to be used in some cases - in the case of the K2, all parts are still available except for those that have been superceded by the current parts. I order parts regularly. If you send me a list of what you need, perhaps I can help. 73, Don W3FPR On 1/23/2018 4:22 PM, eric norris via Elecraft wrote: I just called Elecraft looking for some parts for my spare K1 and K2 and was told they are out of production. They are still listed on the order page. If true, I am very sorry to see them go. Building my K2 was one of the best experiences of my life. Thank you, Elecraft. 73. Eric WD6DBMOwner, The Last KX1 __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
[Elecraft] UHF connectors [was: Array Solutions Lightning Arrestor]
On 01/23/2018 11:05 AM, Jim Brown wrote: On 1/23/2018 10:29 AM, Walter Underwood wrote: ... But I mostly like them better because they are engineered instead of a historical accident.:-) The technical superiority of N-connectors for use at HF is a wild exaggeration, to the extent of being an urban myth. Yes, there is a SMALL impedance difference at a junction, but it simply doesn't matter at 6M and below, both because the difference in Zo is relatively small, because the length is small as a fraction of a wavelength, and because as frequency increases, small mismatches are reduced by the loss in the feedline (and NOT loss due to mismatch). There is, of course, a FICTIONAL loss called "mismatch loss," which shows up in the lab with test equipment that is carefully engineered to have 50 ohm output Z. ... Yup. Here is a posting I made 25 years ago that has actual data: From: ... (Alan Bloom) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 1992 23:03:13 GMT Subject: The Truth about UHF Connectors Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Santa Rosa, CA Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc Ya gotta feel sorry for UHF connectors. Recent strings on this notes group lambasted them as worthless at VHF and above, and barely tolerable at HF. One poster called them "5 dB attenuators", and many agreed that there must be some sort of conspiracy among ham equipment manufacturers to inflict such garbage connectors on the amateur community. Today I finally remembered to bring some UHF adapters from home so I could do some relative measurements of UHF versus type-N. As expected, the type-N showed lower insertion loss at high frequencies, but the UHF connectors were hardly "5 dB attenuators." For the test I connected an HP8753 RF network analyzer through two short BNC cables into the following arrangement: _________ | | | BNC female | | N female- | | N male to | | | __| 10 dB |__| to N male |__| N female |__| BNC female |__| 10 dB |__ | Atten.| | adapter| | adapter | | adapter| | Atten.| |___| || |___| || |___| Then I repeated the measurement with the N adapters replaced with UHF. I normalized the measurements by replacing the 3 adapters with a BNC double-female. (That is, this was assumed to have 0 dB loss.) Since two N or UHF adapters were used, I assume the loss per connector is half the total. The vertical scale was .1 dB/division, so I estimated the insertion loss to the nearest .01 dB or so: - Type N -- UHF -- FREQ (MHz) TOTAL LOSS PER CONNECTOR TOTAL LOSS PER CONNECTOR 1.8 0 dB 0 dB 0 dB 0 dB 30 0 00 0 100 0 00 0 150 0 00.02 0.01 200 0 00.03 0.015 450 0 00.18 0.09 600 0 00.26 0.13 900 0 00.66 0.33 10000.05 0.0250.80.4 13000.10.05 0.86 0.43 16000.05 0.0250.50.25 20000.05 0.0250.02 0.01 Insertion loss increases until about 1300 MHz, and then starts to decrease until it is almost zero for the UHF connector at 2 GHz! At that frequency, the connectors are about 1/4 wave long (1 inch, assuming .66 velocity factor), so I assume that the two adapters are providing a conjugate match to each other. This confirms my assumption that the insertion loss is due to reflections (impedance mismatch), not absorption (true power loss). Bottom line: UHF connectors work fine through the VHF range, and are not too bad even on the 420 MHz band if you can stand about .1 dB mismatch loss per connector. By the way, I did not do the full 2-port calibration on the HP8753, so there was a couple hundredth's dB ripple in the plots. I averaged this out by eye to come up with the numbers in the above chart. AL N1AL P.S. Sorry, I guess I violated the Usenet rule against posting objective data... :=) __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] Array Solutions Lightning Arrestor
N are easier to install than UHF (IMHO), easier to tell that they're installed correctly, and it's difficult to find good quality UHF in larger dia for RG214. UHF for Heliax are very expensive while surplus NOS N-connectors are common. That's why I prefer them. I would say UHF offer no advantages over N ! 73, Josh W6XU Sent from my mobile device > On Jan 23, 2018, at 10:15 AM, Jim Brownwrote: > >> On 1/23/2018 9:40 AM, Walter Underwood wrote: >> And Morgan Manufacturing offers them with N connectors! I’m sold. > > So does Array Solutions. BUT -- for HF, N connections offer no advantages > over UHF connectors. > > 73, Jim K9YC > > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to j...@voodoolab.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] OT: 3Y0Z Bouvet Island DXoedition
The ship is not even half way to Bouvet. The only activity by the group so far is 3G9A/MM from the ship. 73-Gary K9GS Original message From: efortnerDate: 1/23/18 4:09 PM (GMT-06:00) To: 'ab2tc' , elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] OT: 3Y0Z Bouvet Island DXoedition It is spotted right now on the cluster. They are working cw on 20 and 40 meters and ft-8 on 14.074. 73 de Earl, K4KAY -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of ab2tc Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2018 4:07 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] OT: 3Y0Z Bouvet Island DXoedition Hi Elecraft community, This is of course OT but relevant information to all K3 owners who are chasing DX. They are well underway on their ship closing in on South Georgia Island. You can trace the ship's course here: https://share.garmin.com/bouvet It takes a while to update, but it will. I find it humorous that their elevation reported appears to change randomly between 100' under water to more than 100' above. Their main web site is quite impressive but not very up to date and is not interactive, here: http://www.bouvetdx.org/ All the action seems to be on Facebook. On their web site there is a link to their Facebook group in the upper right corner. You can browse all the content without having a Facebook account. There are a number of nice videos, mostly from their ship's departure from Punta Arenas. The ship looks super modern with a ultra modern and high tech bridge. Again, I apologize to those who are annoyed by OT postings, but this is after all the DX expedition of this century (likely the most costly in history) and I have been surprised about how low profile it has had on the Internet. They are qrv /MM (but their activity seems to mostly CW on 40m. I have yet to see a spot on the cluster. BTW, Bouvet Island is a Norwegian possession (undisputed as far as I know) and the crew has two veteran members, Erling and Just. AB2TC - Knut -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to efort...@ctc.net __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to garyk...@wi.rr.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K1 and K2 RIP?
The K1 was discontinued a while ago, I just bought a k2 over the summer after the K1 was discontinued out of concern the K2 might be next, this is the first I have heard the k2 was discontinued however. Hope not, it’s the only one on the market like it that you can build yourself, we can only hope that perhaps they will come out with new kit radio. 73 Tom, k2bew On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 16:23 eric norris via Elecraft < elecraft@mailman.qth.net> wrote: > I just called Elecraft looking for some parts for my spare K1 and K2 and > was told they are out of production. They are still listed on the order > page. > If true, I am very sorry to see them go. Building my K2 was one of the > best experiences of my life. Thank you, Elecraft. > 73. Eric WD6DBMOwner, The Last KX1 > > Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to tombew...@gmail.com -- Sent from my iPad Gmail __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] Array Solutions Lightning Arrestor
Pin retraction may depend on your coax. I use a number of N connectors and I have not seen this occur with Belden 8267 or with the various sizes of Heliax at my station. John KK9A K9ZC wrote: While N connectors do have some design and impedance advantages, some of us that have lived in extremely cold climates... have seen the center pins pull out of N connectors due to thermal contraction of the center conductor over distance. A UHF or DIN connector will usually not do that. Dr. William J. Schmidt - K9HZ J68HZ 8P6HK ZF2HZ PJ4/K9HZ VP5/K9HZ PJ2/K9HZ Owner - Operator Big Signal Ranch - K9ZC Staunton, Illinois Owner - Operator Villa Grand Piton - J68HZ Soufriere, St. Lucia W.I. Rent it: www.VillaGrandPiton.com Like us on Facebook! __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] OT: 3Y0Z Bouvet Island DXoedition
It is spotted right now on the cluster. They are working cw on 20 and 40 meters and ft-8 on 14.074. 73 de Earl, K4KAY -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of ab2tc Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2018 4:07 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] OT: 3Y0Z Bouvet Island DXoedition Hi Elecraft community, This is of course OT but relevant information to all K3 owners who are chasing DX. They are well underway on their ship closing in on South Georgia Island. You can trace the ship's course here: https://share.garmin.com/bouvet It takes a while to update, but it will. I find it humorous that their elevation reported appears to change randomly between 100' under water to more than 100' above. Their main web site is quite impressive but not very up to date and is not interactive, here: http://www.bouvetdx.org/ All the action seems to be on Facebook. On their web site there is a link to their Facebook group in the upper right corner. You can browse all the content without having a Facebook account. There are a number of nice videos, mostly from their ship's departure from Punta Arenas. The ship looks super modern with a ultra modern and high tech bridge. Again, I apologize to those who are annoyed by OT postings, but this is after all the DX expedition of this century (likely the most costly in history) and I have been surprised about how low profile it has had on the Internet. They are qrv /MM (but their activity seems to mostly CW on 40m. I have yet to see a spot on the cluster. BTW, Bouvet Island is a Norwegian possession (undisputed as far as I know) and the crew has two veteran members, Erling and Just. AB2TC - Knut -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to efort...@ctc.net __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
[Elecraft] K1 and K2 RIP?
I just called Elecraft looking for some parts for my spare K1 and K2 and was told they are out of production. They are still listed on the order page. If true, I am very sorry to see them go. Building my K2 was one of the best experiences of my life. Thank you, Elecraft. 73. Eric WD6DBMOwner, The Last KX1 Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
[Elecraft] OT: 3Y0Z Bouvet Island DXoedition
Hi Elecraft community, This is of course OT but relevant information to all K3 owners who are chasing DX. They are well underway on their ship closing in on South Georgia Island. You can trace the ship's course here: https://share.garmin.com/bouvet It takes a while to update, but it will. I find it humorous that their elevation reported appears to change randomly between 100' under water to more than 100' above. Their main web site is quite impressive but not very up to date and is not interactive, here: http://www.bouvetdx.org/ All the action seems to be on Facebook. On their web site there is a link to their Facebook group in the upper right corner. You can browse all the content without having a Facebook account. There are a number of nice videos, mostly from their ship's departure from Punta Arenas. The ship looks super modern with a ultra modern and high tech bridge. Again, I apologize to those who are annoyed by OT postings, but this is after all the DX expedition of this century (likely the most costly in history) and I have been surprised about how low profile it has had on the Internet. They are qrv /MM (but their activity seems to mostly CW on 40m. I have yet to see a spot on the cluster. BTW, Bouvet Island is a Norwegian possession (undisputed as far as I know) and the crew has two veteran members, Erling and Just. AB2TC - Knut -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] Array Solutions Lightning Arrestor
I’m not trying to convince anyone else to use N-type connectors. I’m just happy they are available. wunder K6WRU Walter Underwood CM87wj http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) > On Jan 23, 2018, at 11:05 AM, Jim Brownwrote: > > On 1/23/2018 10:29 AM, Walter Underwood wrote: >> N connectors have better weatherproofing. > > How does that matter for connections inside a weatherproof enclosure that > mounts the arrestors? They also have the problem of cable migration from the > connector. > >> They handle 1500 V instead of 500 V. > > In 60 years of hamming, I've never seen a quality UHF connector that arced. > Of course, I've never run more than 1.5kW, and I try to use antennas that are > close to resonance. :) > >> But I mostly like them better because they are engineered instead of a >> historical accident.:-) > > The technical superiority of N-connectors for use at HF is a wild > exaggeration, to the extent of being an urban myth. Yes, there is a SMALL > impedance difference at a junction, but it simply doesn't matter at 6M and > below, both because the difference in Zo is relatively small, because the > length is small as a fraction of a wavelength, and because as frequency > increases, small mismatches are reduced by the loss in the feedline (and NOT > loss due to mismatch). > > There is, of course, a FICTIONAL loss called "mismatch loss," which shows up > in the lab with test equipment that is carefully engineered to have 50 ohm > output Z. But the output Z of real world transmitters is rarely 50 ohms -- > it's usually a lot lower. Funny -- because it isn't real, we didn't learn > about it in our transmission lines classes back in the '60s. > > What matters a lot more is the QUALITY of the connector. Smart hams don't use > el-cheapo, non-branded connectors. Except for receive antennas, I use only > soldered Amphenol 83-1SP connectors and mating Amphenol jacks and Amphenol > adapters. > > 73, Jim K9YC > > > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to wun...@wunderwood.org __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] Array Solutions Lightning Arrestor
On 1/23/2018 10:29 AM, Walter Underwood wrote: N connectors have better weatherproofing. How does that matter for connections inside a weatherproof enclosure that mounts the arrestors? They also have the problem of cable migration from the connector. They handle 1500 V instead of 500 V. In 60 years of hamming, I've never seen a quality UHF connector that arced. Of course, I've never run more than 1.5kW, and I try to use antennas that are close to resonance. :) But I mostly like them better because they are engineered instead of a historical accident.:-) The technical superiority of N-connectors for use at HF is a wild exaggeration, to the extent of being an urban myth. Yes, there is a SMALL impedance difference at a junction, but it simply doesn't matter at 6M and below, both because the difference in Zo is relatively small, because the length is small as a fraction of a wavelength, and because as frequency increases, small mismatches are reduced by the loss in the feedline (and NOT loss due to mismatch). There is, of course, a FICTIONAL loss called "mismatch loss," which shows up in the lab with test equipment that is carefully engineered to have 50 ohm output Z. But the output Z of real world transmitters is rarely 50 ohms -- it's usually a lot lower. Funny -- because it isn't real, we didn't learn about it in our transmission lines classes back in the '60s. What matters a lot more is the QUALITY of the connector. Smart hams don't use el-cheapo, non-branded connectors. Except for receive antennas, I use only soldered Amphenol 83-1SP connectors and mating Amphenol jacks and Amphenol adapters. 73, Jim K9YC __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] Array Solutions Lightning Arrestor
While N connectors do have some design and impedance advantages, some of us that have lived in extremely cold climates... have seen the center pins pull out of N connectors due to thermal contraction of the center conductor over distance. A UHF or DIN connector will usually not do that. Dr. William J. Schmidt - K9HZ J68HZ 8P6HK ZF2HZ PJ4/K9HZ VP5/K9HZ PJ2/K9HZ Owner - Operator Big Signal Ranch – K9ZC Staunton, Illinois Owner – Operator Villa Grand Piton – J68HZ Soufriere, St. Lucia W.I. Rent it: www.VillaGrandPiton.com Like us on Facebook! email: b...@wjschmidt.com -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Walter Underwood Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2018 2:29 PM To: Reflector ElecraftSubject: Re: [Elecraft] Array Solutions Lightning Arrestor N connectors have better weatherproofing. They handle 1500 V instead of 500 V. But I mostly like them better because they are engineered instead of a historical accident. :-) wunder K6WRU Walter Underwood CM87wj http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) > On Jan 23, 2018, at 10:15 AM, Jim Brown wrote: > > On 1/23/2018 9:40 AM, Walter Underwood wrote: >> And Morgan Manufacturing offers them with N connectors! I’m sold. > > So does Array Solutions. BUT -- for HF, N connections offer no advantages > over UHF connectors. > > 73, Jim K9YC > > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to wun...@wunderwood.org __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to b...@wjschmidt.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] Array Solutions Lightning Arrestor
N connectors have better weatherproofing. They handle 1500 V instead of 500 V. But I mostly like them better because they are engineered instead of a historical accident. :-) wunder K6WRU Walter Underwood CM87wj http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) > On Jan 23, 2018, at 10:15 AM, Jim Brownwrote: > > On 1/23/2018 9:40 AM, Walter Underwood wrote: >> And Morgan Manufacturing offers them with N connectors! I’m sold. > > So does Array Solutions. BUT -- for HF, N connections offer no advantages > over UHF connectors. > > 73, Jim K9YC > > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to wun...@wunderwood.org __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] Array Solutions Lightning Arrestor
On 1/23/2018 9:40 AM, Walter Underwood wrote: And Morgan Manufacturing offers them with N connectors! I’m sold. So does Array Solutions. BUT -- for HF, N connections offer no advantages over UHF connectors. 73, Jim K9YC __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] Array Solutions Lightning Arrestor
And Morgan Manufacturing offers them with N connectors! I’m sold. Thanks for the info. wunder K6WRU Walter Underwood CM87wj http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) > On Jan 23, 2018, at 9:35 AM, Jim N7USwrote: > > Morgan Manufacturing, which, I've heard, was the contract assembly company > for ICE, is also selling some of ICE's product line. > > http://www.morganmfg.us/ > > 73, Jim N7US > > -Original Message- > > > In my experience, they fail shorted, so it's pretty obvious. Although the > app notes for both the ICE and Array Solutions products say that they don't > always fail shorted. > > The design is based on this one, which Array Solutions used to sell, but the > ICE owner died several years ago. The circuit is shown in the link below. > The great thing about this circuit is that the inductor continuously > discharges static. > > https://www.arraysolutions.com/as-303u > > 73, Jim K9YC > > On 1/22/2018 10:51 AM, j...@kk9a.com wrote: > Until K9YC's post I was not aware of the Array Solutions lightning arrestor. > They appear be a nice product. How do GDT's fail - open or closed? If open, > how do you know that they need replacement? > > John KK9A > > K9YC wrote: > > I strongly agree with Bob's advice, EXCEPT that I've gotten really tired of > replacing Polyphasers on my high wire dipoles. I've recently switched to the > arrestors that Array Solutions sells, both because I like the circuit better > and because the gas discharge tubes are user replaceable. > > The Polyphasers are feed-through types mounted to the entry panel. The Array > Solutions are mounted in a big Hoffman box, for which W6GJB built some custom > mounting brackets. It's mounted to the wall next to the plate with the > Polyphasers, with two 2-in PVC conduit stubs going through the wall and holes > drilled at the bottom of the enclosure for coax entry. > > 73, Jim K9YC > > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to wun...@wunderwood.org __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] Array Solutions Lightning Arrestor
Morgan Manufacturing, which, I've heard, was the contract assembly company for ICE, is also selling some of ICE's product line. http://www.morganmfg.us/ 73, Jim N7US -Original Message- In my experience, they fail shorted, so it's pretty obvious. Although the app notes for both the ICE and Array Solutions products say that they don't always fail shorted. The design is based on this one, which Array Solutions used to sell, but the ICE owner died several years ago. The circuit is shown in the link below. The great thing about this circuit is that the inductor continuously discharges static. https://www.arraysolutions.com/as-303u 73, Jim K9YC On 1/22/2018 10:51 AM, j...@kk9a.com wrote: Until K9YC's post I was not aware of the Array Solutions lightning arrestor. They appear be a nice product. How do GDT's fail - open or closed? If open, how do you know that they need replacement? John KK9A K9YC wrote: I strongly agree with Bob's advice, EXCEPT that I've gotten really tired of replacing Polyphasers on my high wire dipoles. I've recently switched to the arrestors that Array Solutions sells, both because I like the circuit better and because the gas discharge tubes are user replaceable. The Polyphasers are feed-through types mounted to the entry panel. The Array Solutions are mounted in a big Hoffman box, for which W6GJB built some custom mounting brackets. It's mounted to the wall next to the plate with the Polyphasers, with two 2-in PVC conduit stubs going through the wall and holes drilled at the bottom of the enclosure for coax entry. 73, Jim K9YC __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] Trouble configuring a K3, MicroHAM Microkeyer 2 and N1MM+
At the moment, CW works as expected, EXCEPT when I use the footswitch. When use it, the PTT1 light stays lit and the radio goes into transmit won't get out of it -- you have to turn off the rig. The PTT! light stays on after the rig's shut off. You have to turn the MK2 on and off for the PTT1 LED to turn off. Was the MK II previously used with an Icom transceiver? Is the I "ICVOX" jumper installed? See: "Preparing MK II for use" in the MK II Users Manual. 73, ... Joe, W4TV On 1/23/2018 12:25 AM, Eric Rosenberg wrote: I've been having issues getting my MK2 work with a new-to-me K3 and N1MM+ At the moment, CW works as expected, EXCEPT when I use the footswitch. When use it, the PTT1 light stays lit and the radio goes into transmit and won't get out of it -- you have to turn off the rig. The PTT! light stays on after the rig's shut off. You have to turn the MK2 on and off for the PTT1 LED to turn off. When in the phone (SSB) mode, I can key the radio and hear wav files (audio) out of the rig's speaker, but no audio is transmitted. Likewise, I don't hear anything from the microphone. The same scenario re-occurs with the footswitch as when in CW. I originally had an issue of the radio keying and staying keyed when I plugged in the MK2’s PTT cable to the rig. That went away, but I'm not quite sure why or how. And yes, I have RTFM and N1MM+ setup notes many times. I clearly could have missed something. Just what that may be, I do not know! Thanks & 73, Eric W3DQ . __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to li...@subich.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to li...@subich.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
[Elecraft] K3 Power Reading/SWR/ALC Problem
I missed the original post that began this thread, so the following may or may not be relevant. I gather the question is about voltage spikes on the antenna or feedline that damaged something nearer the transmitter end. If that is so, I would ask the original submitter if they are using a remote antenna switch that couples the relay DC through the feedline. If so, you might examine the switch to see if the proper diode protections are present on the remote relays. Some time ago I had the PA transistors in a new K2 blown away three times, until Don Wilhelm put me onto an investigation in which I saw on a scope very high voltage short-time-rise spikes on the line when the relay coil fields collapsed, from an MFJ remote switch system that was sold before MFJ changed its design to include those protections. Just a thought from a bad experience. Ted. KN1CBR -- Message: 6 Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 16:14:55 -0600 From: Bob McGraw K4TAXTo: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 Power Reading/SWR/ALC Problem Message-ID: <9ff00d5b-d3ba-c49c-0293-c5d93e346...@blomand.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed From experience, I'd say nearby lightning strikes would be the culprit.?? I strongly urge everyone to use protection devices on all coax and balanced lines at the point where the feed lines and rotor lines enter the house.? I prefer Polyphaser devices.?? Don't buy cheap or ham fest bargain table crap!? Your radio and your house depends on it. I don't disconnect antennas nor do I ground antennas.? I protect for lightning outside and prefer to choose methods where it will not be allowed in the house.??? And I'm on a hill and have two towers? which are? 500 ft above average terrain out to some 35 miles.? I understand lightning and what it can do.? As to lightning, mitigation is the approach, elimination is not physically possible. 73 Bob, K4TAX On 1/21/2018 3:42 PM, ab2tc wrote: > Hi Don and all, > > I really don't understand why static build up on the antenna should be a > problem with the K3. Due to the (good) design of the SWR bridge (a two > transformer design with a voltage transformer right across the output) the > antenna port presents a dead short circuit at DC both in receive and > transmit. I just verified this with an ohm-meter (in receive only - no need > to check in transmit since the SWR bridge is surely present then - don't > want to kill my DMM). > > Maybe we are talking semantics here but it appears to me that the cause of > diode damage in the SWR bridge circuit is more likely caused by transients > induced into the antenna system by nearby lightning strikes than static > buildup. > > Knut - AB2TC > > __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
[Elecraft] OT - Microphones for the K2/K3
I noted with interest on the Elecraft microphone descriptions (http://www.elecraft.com/elecraft_mics.htm) that the Heil microphones have been tested in an *anabolic* chamber! Mikes on steroids? Ray /SM5XLP __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
[Elecraft] Elecraft Power Monitor for P3
Hello, I have a new Elecraft P3 transmit power monitor, and it may have a problem... After install I upgraded the firmware on the P3, etc. When I transmit digital, sometimes it will show full power of 50 watts, with a SWR of 1.32:1, which matches my HF-AUTO, and my Ameritron AWM-30 wattmeter. The next time I transmit, it may show 20 watts, with a SWR of 1:1, while the Ameritron and the HF Auto show all normal at 50 watts, and 1.3ish:1. The next time I transmit, it will show maybe 30 watts, and a 1:1, again, the Ameritron, and the HF-AUTO show 50 watts, and 1.3ish:1. I thought it might just be signal changing due to being digital, so I tried it on CW, same action, the P3 Transmit monitor is all over the place, and showing a 1:1 SWR when failed, but 1.34:1 when correct for power. Next I thought it might be the on and off action from CW showing this... I switched to AM, and with the K3 set at 100 watts, I see 25 watts out, and the same action on the P3, all over, while the other two watt meters and SWR meters are stable from transmit to transmit... So thinking it still might be something in my cabling, I replaced all cables, and ran the output of the radio to the TX monitor, and the TX monitor to a Bird Watt meter, then the Bird to a dummy load... Same thing, the Bird is rock stable, the P3 Transmit monitor seems to be all over. The only thing consistent is that when I get a bad reading on the P3 Transmit monitor I am ALWAYS showing a 1:1 on the P3 Transmit monitor. Just to be sure, I ran the transmit calibration on the K3, and that went perfectly well, and succeeded on all bands, at all power levels. Same results with regards to teh P3 Power Level Monitor... Any ideas? 73s and thanks, Dave NK7Z http://www.nk7z.net __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] Trouble configuring a K3, MicroHAM Microkeyer 2 and N1MM+
At the moment, CW works as expected, EXCEPT when I use the footswitch. When use it, the PTT1 light stays lit and the radio goes into transmit won't get out of it -- you have to turn off the rig. The PTT! light stays on after the rig's shut off. You have to turn the MK2 on and off for the PTT1 LED to turn off. Was the MK II previously used with an Icom transceiver? Is the I "ICVOX" jumper installed? See: "Preparing MK II for use" in the MK II Users Manual. 73, ... Joe, W4TV On 1/23/2018 12:25 AM, Eric Rosenberg wrote: I've been having issues getting my MK2 work with a new-to-me K3 and N1MM+ At the moment, CW works as expected, EXCEPT when I use the footswitch. When use it, the PTT1 light stays lit and the radio goes into transmit and won't get out of it -- you have to turn off the rig. The PTT! light stays on after the rig's shut off. You have to turn the MK2 on and off for the PTT1 LED to turn off. When in the phone (SSB) mode, I can key the radio and hear wav files (audio) out of the rig's speaker, but no audio is transmitted. Likewise, I don't hear anything from the microphone. The same scenario re-occurs with the footswitch as when in CW. I originally had an issue of the radio keying and staying keyed when I plugged in the MK2’s PTT cable to the rig. That went away, but I'm not quite sure why or how. And yes, I have RTFM and N1MM+ setup notes many times. I clearly could have missed something. Just what that may be, I do not know! Thanks & 73, Eric W3DQ . __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to li...@subich.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Feature Ask
Dave, I bought my KX3 primarily for use as144-MHz mw IF. I did some extensive freq measurements at 6m (before the 2m module was available). I added an aftermarket heat sink and then ran the temp comp routine. I simulated running JT65, which has continuous carrier for 50 seconds out of 2 minute sequences and found max drift was about 12-Hz. That existed for the first two sequences and then drift dropped down to about 5-Hz (apparently residual heat held the offset for a longer time). Since the 2m module utilizes a 55-MHz IF I would expect about the same performance. Actually depends on power output and 2m max is 3w vs the 5w test I ran on 6m. Seems 12-Hz variation on 10-GHz would not be troublesome if the mw LO was phase locked to a reference. I have measured my 10-GHz LO to be about 17-Hz off frequency (no discernable drift) mainly due to frequency error in my OCXO on 10-MHz (which is multiplied to 10,224.000 MHz from 1,036 MHz). I drive my DEMI 10G transverter at 1w on 144-MHz so drift would even be better. So freq accuracy is < 17+12 Hz at 10,368 MHz. Much better than the old Xosc system with the FT-817 which could be several KHz off freq. I use an EIP538 mw freq counter which I check against a Rb source (5x E-11). 73, Ed - KL7UW From: Dave AD6ATo: Nr4c Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Feature Ask A great little radio it is, agreed. I have two of them that I use as I.F. radios on my 10 & 24GHz portable microwave station setups. They are perfect for that function, using the 2m option as the I.F. especially when mated with a PX3. I drag my microwave gear all over the place, including mountain tops. I phase lock my microwave transverters to a GPS disciplined 10MHz OCXO and would simply like to be able to do the same with the I.F. radio so that I know exactly what frequency I'm on, especially when looking for exceedingly weak transmissions. I know for sure there are many of us microwavers that do the same thing. FWIW I have a fully loaded K3s in my home station that's also locked to a GPS standard, as is all my RF test equipment. Regards, Dave AD6A 73, Ed - KL7UW http://www.kl7uw.com Dubus-NA Business mail: dubus...@gmail.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com