[Elecraft] K2 firmware request (minor)

2007-03-02 Thread Mike Markowski
I know there's loads of room for more firmware mods...  :-)  Ok, so I've
really heard the opposite is true, but for rig control software I notice
a small shortcoming of the cmd set.  The DS command is described in the
KIO2 manual as a cmd that, Returns everything needed to reproduce the
information shown on the K2 LCD.  But this isn't quite true as far as I
can tell.  It doesn't return the state of the annunciators showing
whether the variable or value is underlined during MENU or EDIT.  Same
for turning off the annunciators with the various non-frequency DISPLAY
choices.

That wouldn't be a problem but it seems there's no way to find out which
mode the rig is in, regular, MENU, EDIT, DISPLAY, etc.  Maybe the MD
command could be extended by one byte so there'd be a few bits to
indicate mode?  (It just occurred to me that I haven't tried AI2 yet, so
maybe it returns an SW05 or SW21...)

Without the rig returning the info in some way, the software needs to
maintain state.  But it's easy for software to get out of sync with the
rig if the op uses the software sometimes and rig buttons sometimes.

Thanks,
Mike ab3ap
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K2 Firmware request

2006-12-09 Thread Tom Althoff
I'm sure this has been asked before but I sure would like to have VFO-B have 
its own 'mode' register so I could store 28.025 as CW and 28.500 as USB.

Is that possible or is there no room at the inn?

Also, does the RS-232 command set allow querying which VFO is active?   I use B 
for SSB during contests and A for CW.

Tom K2TA
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K2 Firmware request

2006-12-09 Thread Tom Althoff
I should have said ..so I could store 28.025 as CW on VFO-A and 28.500 as
USB on VFO-B

- Original Message - 
From: Tom Althoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Elecraft elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Saturday, December 09, 2006 7:37 AM
Subject: [Elecraft] K2 Firmware request


I'm sure this has been asked before but I sure would like to have VFO-B have
its own 'mode' register so I could store 28.025 as CW and 28.500 as USB.

Is that possible or is there no room at the inn?

Also, does the RS-232 command set allow querying which VFO is active?   I
use B for SSB during contests and A for CW.

Tom K2TA
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K2 Firmware request

2006-12-09 Thread Mike Harris
G'day,

| I'm sure this has been asked before but I sure would like to have VFO-B 
have
| its own 'mode' register so I could store 28.025 as CW and 28.500 as USB.
|
| Is that possible or is there no room at the inn?

This has been asked for for years.  Sadly it will fall on totally deaf 
ears at Elecraft.  Not even a hint if it's possible or not.

Regards,

Mike VP8NO

ps. US 10M contest stations blasting in at 9++ here. 

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K2 Firmware request

2006-12-09 Thread Ian Stirling
On Saturday 09 December 2006 09:55, Mike Harris wrote:

 This has been asked for for years.  Sadly it will fall on totally deaf 
 ears at Elecraft.  Not even a hint if it's possible or not.

  This is the problem with proprietary firmware.
Does Elecraft think that someone could make a rival
product if the source code were released?
Any determined capable person could write the firmware
for the K2, or a rival product.

  The original Lego Mindstorms programmable brick was
proprietary closed source firmware. At first, their
lawyers descended on the hackers who were writing
a more capable operating system for it with cease and
desist orders.  But Lego came to realise that they
would sell more hardware if they encouraged independent
development.
  Lego have firmly embraced this concept with the new
Mindstorms brick (NXT) - they have released the firmware
source code. According to their technical FAQ, hackers
have already implemented Lua, Java and C for the NXT.

 I would like the tuning knob to behave like my IC-735,
a variable rate depending on the knob rotation rate.
I don't like the three tuning rates that require one
or two button presses.

  So, how about it Elecraft?
Release the source code - show us the complete design
without the proprietary black box in the middle.
  You might increase your sales of the K2.

Ian, G4ICV, AB2GR, K2 #4962
--
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K2 Firmware request

2006-12-09 Thread Vic K2VCO

Ian Stirling wrote:


  This is the problem with proprietary firmware.
Does Elecraft think that someone could make a rival
product if the source code were released?
Any determined capable person could write the firmware
for the K2, or a rival product.


You would have to be *very* determined and *very* capable.  The firmware 
for the K2 is complicated, and lots of things are highly interdependent 
in any real-time application.


No I haven't seen the source code, but I'm a programmer and do know what 
functions it performs. I think I can safely make the above statement.


The main problem is this:  How would Elecraft support the K2 if the 
firmware could be changed?  Could anyone guarantee that his change to, 
for example, the frequency control, didn't impact the t/r switching? 
Note that slowing down the code in one place might make it impossible to 
perform another function in time.

--
73,
Vic, K2VCO
Fresno CA
http://www.qsl.net/k2vco
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K2 Firmware request

2006-12-09 Thread Leigh L Klotz, Jr.
I keep trying to think of a reason I need to know the auxbus protocol 
but I haven't yet.  Most of the things I would want would require K2 
firmware changes as well, and I agree that is not going to happen.


My closest call has been wanting to make the power knob work with a 
non-Elecraft external amplifier.  But after discussions with a number of 
Elecrafters, I came to the conclusion that the KPA100 integration is 
greater than it appears, mostly because of the ALC loop and its apparent 
knowledge of the KPA100 gain and response characteristics.


Leigh/WA5ZNU
On Sat, 9 Dec 2006 10:59 am, Vic K2VCO wrote:

Ian Stirling wrote:


  This is the problem with proprietary firmware.
Does Elecraft think that someone could make a rival
product if the source code were released?
Any determined capable person could write the firmware
for the K2, or a rival product.


You would have to be *very* determined and *very* capable.  The 
firmware for the K2 is complicated, and lots of things are highly 
interdependent in any real-time application.


No I haven't seen the source code, but I'm a programmer and do know 
what functions it performs. I think I can safely make the above 
statement.


The main problem is this:  How would Elecraft support the K2 if the 
firmware could be changed?  Could anyone guarantee that his change to, 
for example, the frequency control, didn't impact the t/r switching? 
Note that slowing down the code in one place might make it impossible 
to perform another function in time.

--
73,
Vic, K2VCO
Fresno CA
http://www.qsl.net/k2vco
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraftHelp: 
http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm

Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K2 Firmware request

2006-12-09 Thread w6jd
I can only agree 100% with Vic! As one who spent most of his professional 
career trying to force the most code into the least amount of memory and make 
every nano-second count (I became king of the self-modifying instruction) I can 
say without hesitation that you DO NOT want the source code. And, if God forbid 
you get it, and modify it, please don't release it to the world. Good grief, 
mutant K2s!

73,
Doug
W6JD

-- Original message -- 
From: Vic K2VCO [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

 Ian Stirling wrote: 
 
  This is the problem with proprietary firmware. 
  Does Elecraft think that someone could make a rival 
  product if the source code were released? 
  Any determined capable person could write the firmware 
  for the K2, or a rival product. 
 
 You would have to be *very* determined and *very* capable. The firmware 
 for the K2 is complicated, and lots of things are highly interdependent 
 in any real-time application. 
 
 No I haven't seen the source code, but I'm a programmer and do know what 
 functions it performs. I think I can safely make the above statement. 
 
 The main problem is this: How would Elecraft support the K2 if the 
 firmware could be changed? Could anyone guarantee that his change to, 
 for example, the frequency control, didn't impact the t/r switching? 
 Note that slowing down the code in one place might make it impossible to 
 perform another function in time. 
 -- 
 73, 
 Vic, K2VCO 
 Fresno CA 
 http://www.qsl.net/k2vco 
 ___ 
 Elecraft mailing list 
 Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net 
 You must be a subscriber to post to the list. 
 Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): 
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft 
 
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm 
 Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com 
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K2 Firmware request

2006-12-09 Thread Ian Stirling
On Saturday 09 December 2006 13:59, Vic wrote:

 The main problem is this:  How would Elecraft support the K2 if the 
 firmware could be changed?  Could anyone guarantee that his change to, 
 for example, the frequency control, didn't impact the t/r switching? 
 Note that slowing down the code in one place might make it impossible to 
 perform another function in time.

  It's not a problem.  Elecraft could refuse to give support
except for K2s with original firmware.
  Experimenting is a big part of Amateur Radio.
I wouldn't be afraid to change the firmware and programme a
new chip, keeping the original in case of problems.
 A condition of using the source could be that derivations,
binary and source can't be published but may be submitted
to Elecraft to see if they're worthy to be included in the next
offical issue.   Lots of people working on software can improve
it beyond the ability of the original author, or any one of the
contributors - Linus Torvalds keeps control over the gnu/linux
kernel but he encourages others to contribute.

Ian, G4ICV, AB2GR, K2 #4962
--
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com