Re: [Elecraft] KPA100 recommended max power for digital modes?

2014-02-24 Thread Lynn W. Taylor, WB6UUT

... and I would have asked why are you running more?

PSK-31 is not a QRO mode.

It's also not necessarily a weak-signal mode, so comments about the 
various JT modes do not apply to PSK-31.


73 -- Lynn

On 2/22/2014 2:26 PM, Don Wilhelm wrote:
While low power may have been the recommendation, I started in PSK31 
in 2000 when I had only a K2/10.  I ran it in the 5 to 10 watt range.  
When I revealed my power level, many ops asked why I was running only 
that much power.

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] KPA100 recommended max power for digital modes?

2014-02-23 Thread Edward R Cole


Glenn,

My guess is most figured you were referring to the KXPA100, but your 
question even has more general reach.


Since full output for the KXPA-100 is cited with 10w drive, it is a 
good guess that 3w = 30w, 4w= 40w, etc.  In reality the gain curve 
for amplifiers is not that flat and often you get a little more gain 
at lower inputs.  One advantage is that linearity is usually much 
better when an amp is driven below its max specs, so that is good for 
running psk-31 and other digital modes.  The K3 and KX3 are much 
better transmitters than most so maybe that is not as much of a concern.


Just a general comment about digital modes:  psk-31 was something I 
tried when it was fairly new and I generally ran at 15-25w with my 
FT-847.  I did well with a 20m dipole running at that level.  There 
were no locals to cause me grief so power level was not an issue.  I 
recall most contacts as nice chats and not certificate chasing.  I am 
looking forward to returning to psk-31 or its variants with 10w from 
my K3 or 3-5w from my KX3.  On 20-10m bands I use a three element 
yagi at 50-feet so that gives gain advantage of more ERP and 
selective reception if a neighbor is operating (I now have a 
multi-multi class station located about 12mi north of me).  But then 
I am not on for the contests so we have no issues (not even heard 
him).  He is big on RTTY and CW.


WSJT suite of digital modes was primarily developed for super 
weak-signal operation such as meteor scatter or eme.  They have 
evolved to weak-signal proponents on HF and LF, and up to mw, so I 
agree that a plain-text version is needed for chat style 
operating.  There are so many different digital modes these days so 
one has more to chose (eg: FLdigi).


73, Ed - KL7UW
17 bands: 600m - 3cm

--
From: WA7SPY wa7...@comcast.net
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA100 recommended max power for digital
modes?
Message-ID: 4144055f-7458-437a-a581-459369add...@comcast.net
Content-Type: text/plain;   charset=us-ascii

Thank you for all the replies they were very informative. In my 
original post I stated KPA100. It should have been KXPA100 my bad on 
my part. Most of you figured out what I meant.


I agree about the hi and bye PSK31 QSO's these days. That being said 
I will say I have had some really nice rag chew QSO's lately on 
PSK31. I typically start turning my power down during a QSO to see 
how low I can go and still have a good copy.


I do have my KX3 connected to a Hard Rock 50, 50 watt amplifier. I 
run the Hard Rock at 20 watts or less on PSK31.


In regard to the KXPA100 my original question was to find out what 
the max output power would be safe to go to without causing damage to 
the amp. If I am correct the answer is the amp will protect itself 
and automatically throttle itself back if the temp to the finals gets too hot.


Now in regard to the KX3 without the amp 2-3 watts is recommended for 
PSK31. What does 2 -3 watts driving the KXPA100 equate to for output 
power from the amp. I will be using the Elecraft cable set to 
integrate the amp. So from what I have read that means the PA menu is 
selected to on on the KX3. That means the power control on the KX3 is 
re-indexed. So does that mean it is safe to run in the 20-30 watt 
range with the amp without over driving the KX3 for PSK31?


Thank you
Glenn Maclean WA7SPY



73, Ed - KL7UW
http://www.kl7uw.com
Kits made by KL7UW
Dubus Mag business:
dubus...@gmail.com

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] KPA100 recommended max power for digital modes?

2014-02-22 Thread Walter Underwood
Well-protected is not quite the same thing as continuous service or maximum 
linearity. The KX3 is fine at 10-12W for CW or SSB, but people generally run it 
at 3-5W for FM or digital modes.

Of course, when you need the juice, you need it, regardless of mode.

wunder
K6WRU

On Feb 21, 2014, at 11:04 PM, Jim Brown j...@audiosystemsgroup.com wrote:

 On 2/21/2014 7:43 PM, WA7SPY wrote:
 I was looking at the operating manual online and did not see any recommended 
 power setting for operating the amp with digital modes.
 
 Elecraft output stages are very well protected. In general, I feel 
 comfortable running them balls to the wall with keydown modes, with all the 
 lights lit. With well matched antennas, I run keydown modes at full power. If 
 the output stage gets warm, the fan will run faster, and if that isn't 
 enough, the rig will back off the drive.
 
 Remember that the WSJT modes are weak signal modes, NOT low power modes. 
 There is a big difference. We may get lots of distance per watt and be happy 
 with QRP for easy paths, but for the most difficult paths (EME, 
 transcontinental 160M), great digital ops pile on the watts and use their 
 best antennas. I do a lot of QRP, but I also know when to turn on the big 
 amp. :)
 
 73, Jim K9YC
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 
 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

--
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] KPA100 recommended max power for digital modes?

2014-02-22 Thread Richard Ferch

On 2/21/2014 7:43 PM, WA7SPY wrote:
 What is the recommended max power setting for the amp using PSK31 
with a KX3?


In the K3, the limiting factor in some digital modes (notably PSK) is 
not thermal capability of the radio or amplifier, it is linearity. The 
linearity limit depends on the particular digital mode in use, and it 
may also vary depending on the mode used in the radio. For PSK31 and its 
higher-speed brethren, using the radio's DATA A mode, power settings no 
higher than half the maximum power rating of the transmitter should be 
used. This will ensure that the maximum instantaneous peaks of the 
transmitted signal are not clipped (in PSK these peaks can be up to 
twice as high as the average transmitted power). I can't speak from 
personal experience for the KX3, but given the similarity in the way the 
transmitter power is controlled, I would expect it to be the same as the 
K3. Using the KXPA100, keeping the power setting below 50 watts should 
avoid non-linearity.


73,
Rich VE3KI
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] KPA100 recommended max power for digital modes?

2014-02-22 Thread WILLIS COOKE
I don't think that Elecraft recommends any particular power.  The amplifier 
will put out full power with acceptable distortion, but the lower quality 
receivers of others will easily overload and if you use more than a few watts 
it will prevent the use of the pass band by your neighbors and you will not be 
popular with them.  They will tell you as they all want to be in the same SSB 
pass band so that they can see everybody at one time.  Elecraft can't do 
anything about the quality of their competitors receivers.
 
Willis 'Cookie' Cooke, TDXS DX Chairman
K5EWJ  Trustee N5BPS, USS Cavalla, USS Stewart



 From: WA7SPY wa7...@comcast.net
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net elecraft@mailman.qth.net 
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 9:43 PM
Subject: [Elecraft] KPA100 recommended max power for digital modes?
 

I just ordered a KPA100 with the auto tuner for my KX3. In anticipation of the 
arrival of the amp  I was looking at the operating manual online and did not 
see any recommended power setting for operating the amp with digital modes. I 
plan to use the amp for PSK31. What is the recommended max power setting for 
the amp using PSK31 with a KX3?

Thanks,
Glenn Maclean WA7SPY
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] KPA100 recommended max power for digital modes?

2014-02-22 Thread Lynn W. Taylor, WB6UUT

For PSK-31, you really want to run the minimal amount of power necessary.

Remember that the entire PSK-31 subband fits in your receiver filters -- 
you don't tune the VFO at all.


If you transmit a strong signal, and propagation is good, I'll be able 
to work you, but when my receiver AGC cuts in all the rest of the PSK-31 
stations on the band will go away.


If I happened to be working one of those other stations, my QSO is over.

As a rule of thumb, you don't want to exceed half the output power, 
unless the amp is rated for 100% key down.  Monitor the temperature.


50 watts is a lot of power on PSK-31.

73 -- Lynn

On 2/21/2014 7:43 PM, WA7SPY wrote:

I just ordered a KPA100 with the auto tuner for my KX3. In anticipation of the 
arrival of the amp  I was looking at the operating manual online and did not 
see any recommended power setting for operating the amp with digital modes. I 
plan to use the amp for PSK31. What is the recommended max power setting for 
the amp using PSK31 with a KX3?

Thanks,
Glenn Maclean WA7SPY
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] KPA100 recommended max power for digital modes?

2014-02-22 Thread Gerald Manthey
I run 25 watts on my K3. I adjusted it by watching my peaks on a scope. At
25 watts and my alc set I have a clean signal. There are those that splat
more power and we all see them in the waterfall. 25 watts will work the
world on PSK.
Just my observations and my .02 cents.
73 Gerald
 On Feb 22, 2014 9:40 AM, Lynn W. Taylor, WB6UUT 
k...@coldrockshotbrooms.com wrote:

 For PSK-31, you really want to run the minimal amount of power necessary.

 Remember that the entire PSK-31 subband fits in your receiver filters --
 you don't tune the VFO at all.

 If you transmit a strong signal, and propagation is good, I'll be able to
 work you, but when my receiver AGC cuts in all the rest of the PSK-31
 stations on the band will go away.

 If I happened to be working one of those other stations, my QSO is over.

 As a rule of thumb, you don't want to exceed half the output power, unless
 the amp is rated for 100% key down.  Monitor the temperature.

 50 watts is a lot of power on PSK-31.

 73 -- Lynn

 On 2/21/2014 7:43 PM, WA7SPY wrote:

 I just ordered a KPA100 with the auto tuner for my KX3. In anticipation
 of the arrival of the amp  I was looking at the operating manual online and
 did not see any recommended power setting for operating the amp with
 digital modes. I plan to use the amp for PSK31. What is the recommended max
 power setting for the amp using PSK31 with a KX3?

 Thanks,
 Glenn Maclean WA7SPY
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] KPA100 recommended max power for digital modes?

2014-02-22 Thread Doug VE3VS
Hi Glenn,
I started using PSK31 many, many years ago, when it was first introduced by
a ham in the UK. It was made very clear to operators that minimum power
should always be used for a QSO.  It was suggested that more than 10 watts
was excessive. As mentioned in one of the other replies, many transmissions
can fall within the receiver passband when using this mode. If you, or
anyone else uses much higher power, that strongest signal will take over
the passband on most receivers, spoiling other QSOs that are going on at the
time.

I have noticed over the past five years or more there has been a steady
increase in the power being used by thoughtless or unknowing operators. As a
result of this power creep, I have drifted away from a mode that I once
thoroughly enjoyed.

With your KX3, you should not normally need an amp to use PSK31.

Doug, VE3VS




--
View this message in context: 
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/KPA100-recommended-max-power-for-digital-modes-tp7584537p7584569.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] KPA100 recommended max power for digital modes?

2014-02-22 Thread Don Wilhelm

Doug,

While low power may have been the recommendation, I started in PSK31 in 
2000 when I had only a K2/10.  I ran it in the 5 to 10 watt range.  When 
I revealed my power level, many ops asked why I was running only that 
much power.


So the push for higher power has been going on since shortly after the 
beginning of PSK31.


While I do use it occasionally, that factor and the preponderance of 
hello, brag sheet, goodbye QSOs has soured me on the mode.  It used to 
be a lot of keyboard to keyboard ragchew QSOs, but that is rare these 
days.  No opportunity to get to know something about the ham you are in 
QSO with.


73,
Don W3FPR

On 2/22/2014 5:05 PM, Doug VE3VS wrote:

Hi Glenn,
I started using PSK31 many, many years ago, when it was first introduced by
a ham in the UK. It was made very clear to operators that minimum power
should always be used for a QSO.  It was suggested that more than 10 watts
was excessive. As mentioned in one of the other replies, many transmissions
can fall within the receiver passband when using this mode. If you, or
anyone else uses much higher power, that strongest signal will take over
the passband on most receivers, spoiling other QSOs that are going on at the
time.

I have noticed over the past five years or more there has been a steady
increase in the power being used by thoughtless or unknowing operators. As a
result of this power creep, I have drifted away from a mode that I once
thoroughly enjoyed.

With your KX3, you should not normally need an amp to use PSK31.



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] KPA100 recommended max power for digital modes?

2014-02-22 Thread Gerald Manthey
I agree with Don! I like to chat, learn about the op or Qth. It is a major
draw back to Jt 65 or Jt9.
 On Feb 22, 2014 4:26 PM, Don Wilhelm w3...@embarqmail.com wrote:

 Doug,

 While low power may have been the recommendation, I started in PSK31 in
 2000 when I had only a K2/10.  I ran it in the 5 to 10 watt range.  When I
 revealed my power level, many ops asked why I was running only that much
 power.

 So the push for higher power has been going on since shortly after the
 beginning of PSK31.

 While I do use it occasionally, that factor and the preponderance of
 hello, brag sheet, goodbye QSOs has soured me on the mode.  It used to be
 a lot of keyboard to keyboard ragchew QSOs, but that is rare these days.
  No opportunity to get to know something about the ham you are in QSO with.

 73,
 Don W3FPR

 On 2/22/2014 5:05 PM, Doug VE3VS wrote:

 Hi Glenn,
 I started using PSK31 many, many years ago, when it was first introduced
 by
 a ham in the UK. It was made very clear to operators that minimum power
 should always be used for a QSO.  It was suggested that more than 10 watts
 was excessive. As mentioned in one of the other replies, many
 transmissions
 can fall within the receiver passband when using this mode. If you, or
 anyone else uses much higher power, that strongest signal will take over
 the passband on most receivers, spoiling other QSOs that are going on at
 the
 time.

 I have noticed over the past five years or more there has been a steady
 increase in the power being used by thoughtless or unknowing operators.
 As a
 result of this power creep, I have drifted away from a mode that I once
 thoroughly enjoyed.

 With your KX3, you should not normally need an amp to use PSK31.


 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] KPA100 recommended max power for digital modes?

2014-02-22 Thread Jack Chomley
Don,

I go hide on the WARC bands for PSK31 these days :-) Too many big guns on the 
other bands,  I have a hard time trying to filter them out, my receiver always 
gets swamped!

73,

Jack VK4JRC

Club.www.cqara.org.au
Member WIA SARL ARRL 
GQRP   #14392
QRPARCI #15068
VKQRP.#833

 On 23 Feb 2014, at 8:26 am, Don Wilhelm w3...@embarqmail.com wrote:
 
 Doug,
 
 While low power may have been the recommendation, I started in PSK31 in 2000 
 when I had only a K2/10.  I ran it in the 5 to 10 watt range.  When I 
 revealed my power level, many ops asked why I was running only that much 
 power.
 
 So the push for higher power has been going on since shortly after the 
 beginning of PSK31.
 
 While I do use it occasionally, that factor and the preponderance of hello, 
 brag sheet, goodbye QSOs has soured me on the mode.  It used to be a lot of 
 keyboard to keyboard ragchew QSOs, but that is rare these days.  No 
 opportunity to get to know something about the ham you are in QSO with.
 
 73,
 Don W3FPR
 
 On 2/22/2014 5:05 PM, Doug VE3VS wrote:
 Hi Glenn,
 I started using PSK31 many, many years ago, when it was first introduced by
 a ham in the UK. It was made very clear to operators that minimum power
 should always be used for a QSO.  It was suggested that more than 10 watts
 was excessive. As mentioned in one of the other replies, many transmissions
 can fall within the receiver passband when using this mode. If you, or
 anyone else uses much higher power, that strongest signal will take over
 the passband on most receivers, spoiling other QSOs that are going on at the
 time.
 
 I have noticed over the past five years or more there has been a steady
 increase in the power being used by thoughtless or unknowing operators. As a
 result of this power creep, I have drifted away from a mode that I once
 thoroughly enjoyed.
 
 With your KX3, you should not normally need an amp to use PSK31.
 
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 
 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] KPA100 recommended max power for digital modes?

2014-02-22 Thread Bill Frantz
When I went back to New Hampshire last Christmas, I decided that 
the trip would be a rag chew trip. Since the only radio I had 
was the Small Wonder Labs PSK-20 -- The K3 is too big to carry 
and I don't yet have a KX3 -- it had to be rag chewing on 20M 
PSK. I found a number of people to chat with and had a good time 
on the radio.


I have a few thoughts on how to encourage rag chewing. Since 
people are used to the 5NN QRZ type of interchange, start 
chatting early in the QSO. I use macros for the boiler plate -- 
name, QTH, and call signs and use the keyboard for everything 
else. I'm lucky that after 40+ years as a computer programmer, I 
can type quite rapidly. Don't worry about typing slowly however. 
Rag chewing isn't a contest or a DX pileup.


In my first exchange after exchanging call signs, I try to give 
meaningful signal reports, I'll start with:


Hi OM, you are 569 569 569
and then run my QTH macro. If the other OP has already sent a 
name I'll use it in place of OM. Later in the QSO, if the 
other OP has already described the station, I'll try to include 
something about his station when I describe mine. By then we 
should be ready to branch out and talk about ARES/RACES, 
contesting, DX, WX, family, Christmas dinner -- anything that 
might come up.


It doesn't always work, but then just move on and do/answer 
another CQ.


As to being overpowered by strong stations, the K3 with a 250 Hz 
filter works wonders. However, for me, the real problem stations 
have been local running well under 50 watts. When you're in the 
target of a beam 1/4 mile away, it doesn't take much power to 
overload the A/D converter driving the computer.


The PSK-20 doesn't have any narrow filters like the K3 does, but 
in New Hampshire there aren't any close by PSK operators either. 
I rarely see any New England stations on my waterfall. (20 
meters is that way. I had a devil of a time working Nevada from 
the Los Gatos too.)


Now there are times and places for rag chewing. Contests, DX 
pileups, and rare opening aren't them. At times when it is 
appropriate, try to encourage it.


Cheers - Bill, AE6JV

On 2/23/14 at 2:46 PM, vk4...@gmail.com (Jack Chomley) wrote:

I go hide on the WARC bands for PSK31 these days :-) Too many 
big guns on the other bands,  I have a hard time trying to 
filter them out, my receiver always gets swamped!


On 2/22/14 at 2:41 PM, kc6...@gmail.com (Gerald Manthey) wrote:


I agree with Don! I like to chat, learn about the op or Qth. It is a major
draw back to Jt 65 or Jt9.

On Feb 22, 2014 4:26 PM, Don Wilhelm w3...@embarqmail.com wrote:


Doug,

...

While I do use [PSK] occasionally, that factor and the preponderance of
hello, brag sheet, goodbye QSOs has soured me on the mode.  It used to be
a lot of keyboard to keyboard ragchew QSOs, but that is rare these days.
No opportunity to get to know something about the ham you are in QSO with.


---
Bill Frantz| I like the farmers' market   | Periwinkle
(408)356-8506  | because I can get fruits and | 16345 
Englewood Ave
www.pwpconsult.com | vegetables without stickers. | Los Gatos, 
CA 95032


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] KPA100 recommended max power for digital modes?

2014-02-22 Thread Bill Turner

ORIGINAL MESSAGE:  (may be snipped)

On 2/22/2014 2:05 PM, Doug VE3VS wrote:

If you, or
anyone else uses much higher power, that strongest signal will take over
the passband on most receivers, spoiling other QSOs that are going on at the
time.


REPLY:

This has been true forever, not just with PSK31, and this is why 
narrowband receivers were invented in the first place. PSK31 is a very 
narrowband mode so why not receive accordingly? Narrow your RX bandwidth 
down to 100 Hz or so and the problem goes away and everyone can run 
whatever power they like.


73, Bill W6WRT

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] KPA100 recommended max power for digital modes?

2014-02-22 Thread WA7SPY
Thank you for all the replies they were very informative. In my original post I 
stated KPA100. It should have been KXPA100 my bad on my part. Most of you 
figured out what I meant. 

I agree about the hi and bye PSK31 QSO's these days. That being said I will say 
I have had some really nice rag chew QSO's lately on PSK31. I typically start 
turning my power down during a QSO to see how low I can go and still have a 
good copy. 

I do have my KX3 connected to a Hard Rock 50, 50 watt amplifier. I run the Hard 
Rock at 20 watts or less on PSK31.

In regard to the KXPA100 my original question was to find out what the max 
output power would be safe to go to without causing damage to the amp. If I am 
correct the answer is the amp will protect itself and automatically throttle 
itself back if the temp to the finals gets too hot.

Now in regard to the KX3 without the amp 2-3 watts is recommended for PSK31. 
What does 2 -3 watts driving the KXPA100 equate to for output power from the 
amp. I will be using the Elecraft cable set to integrate the amp. So from what 
I have read that means the PA menu is selected to on on the KX3. That means the 
power control on the KX3 is re-indexed. So does that mean it is safe to run in 
the 20-30 watt range with the amp without over driving the KX3 for PSK31?

Thank you
Glenn Maclean WA7SPY

 On Feb 22, 2014, at 4:07 PM, Bill Frantz fra...@pwpconsult.com wrote:
 
 When I went back to New Hampshire last Christmas, I decided that the trip 
 would be a rag chew trip. Since the only radio I had was the Small Wonder 
 Labs PSK-20 -- The K3 is too big to carry and I don't yet have a KX3 -- it 
 had to be rag chewing on 20M PSK. I found a number of people to chat with and 
 had a good time on the radio.
 
 I have a few thoughts on how to encourage rag chewing. Since people are used 
 to the 5NN QRZ type of interchange, start chatting early in the QSO. I use 
 macros for the boiler plate -- name, QTH, and call signs and use the keyboard 
 for everything else. I'm lucky that after 40+ years as a computer programmer, 
 I can type quite rapidly. Don't worry about typing slowly however. Rag 
 chewing isn't a contest or a DX pileup.
 
 In my first exchange after exchanging call signs, I try to give meaningful 
 signal reports, I'll start with:
 
 Hi OM, you are 569 569 569
 and then run my QTH macro. If the other OP has already sent a name I'll use 
 it in place of OM. Later in the QSO, if the other OP has already described 
 the station, I'll try to include something about his station when I describe 
 mine. By then we should be ready to branch out and talk about ARES/RACES, 
 contesting, DX, WX, family, Christmas dinner -- anything that might come up.
 
 It doesn't always work, but then just move on and do/answer another CQ.
 
 As to being overpowered by strong stations, the K3 with a 250 Hz filter works 
 wonders. However, for me, the real problem stations have been local running 
 well under 50 watts. When you're in the target of a beam 1/4 mile away, it 
 doesn't take much power to overload the A/D converter driving the computer.
 
 The PSK-20 doesn't have any narrow filters like the K3 does, but in New 
 Hampshire there aren't any close by PSK operators either. I rarely see any 
 New England stations on my waterfall. (20 meters is that way. I had a devil 
 of a time working Nevada from the Los Gatos too.)
 
 Now there are times and places for rag chewing. Contests, DX pileups, and 
 rare opening aren't them. At times when it is appropriate, try to encourage 
 it.
 
 Cheers - Bill, AE6JV
 
 On 2/23/14 at 2:46 PM, vk4...@gmail.com (Jack Chomley) wrote:
 
 I go hide on the WARC bands for PSK31 these days :-) Too many big guns on 
 the other bands,  I have a hard time trying to filter them out, my receiver 
 always gets swamped!
 
 On 2/22/14 at 2:41 PM, kc6...@gmail.com (Gerald Manthey) wrote:
 
 I agree with Don! I like to chat, learn about the op or Qth. It is a major
 draw back to Jt 65 or Jt9.
 
 On Feb 22, 2014 4:26 PM, Don Wilhelm w3...@embarqmail.com wrote:
 
 Doug,
 
 ...
 
 While I do use [PSK] occasionally, that factor and the preponderance of
 hello, brag sheet, goodbye QSOs has soured me on the mode.  It used to be
 a lot of keyboard to keyboard ragchew QSOs, but that is rare these days.
 No opportunity to get to know something about the ham you are in QSO with.
 
 ---
 Bill Frantz| I like the farmers' market   | Periwinkle
 (408)356-8506  | because I can get fruits and | 16345 Englewood Ave
 www.pwpconsult.com | vegetables without stickers. | Los Gatos, CA 95032
 
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 
 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Re: [Elecraft] KPA100 recommended max power for digital modes?

2014-02-22 Thread Jack
Minimum power to accomplish your communication goals, Bill. That still 
*is* part of the FCC regulations, is it not?


Jack, W6NF/VE4SNA

On 2/22/2014 5:45 PM, Bill Turner wrote:

ORIGINAL MESSAGE:  (may be snipped)

On 2/22/2014 2:05 PM, Doug VE3VS wrote:

If you, or
anyone else uses much higher power, that strongest signal will take 
over
the passband on most receivers, spoiling other QSOs that are going on 
at the

time.


REPLY:

This has been true forever, not just with PSK31, and this is why 
narrowband receivers were invented in the first place. PSK31 is a very 
narrowband mode so why not receive accordingly? Narrow your RX 
bandwidth down to 100 Hz or so and the problem goes away and everyone 
can run whatever power they like.


73, Bill W6WRT

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html




---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection 
is active.
http://www.avast.com

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] KPA100 recommended max power for digital modes?

2014-02-22 Thread Matt Zilmer
Hi Glenn,

Typically, the KX3 runs 5W to get 100W output from the KXPA100 (13 dB
gain).  There are minor varations due to calibration, but that's the
gist of it.

73,
matt

Now in regard to the KX3 without the amp 2-3 watts is recommended for PSK31. 
What does 2 -3 watts driving the KXPA100 equate to for output power from the 
amp. I will be using the Elecraft cable set to integrate the amp. So from what 
I have read that means the PA menu is selected to on on the KX3. That means 
the power control on the KX3 is re-indexed. So does that mean it is safe to 
run in the 20-30 watt range with the amp without over driving the KX3 for 
PSK31?

Glenn Maclean WA7SPY

Matt Zilmer, W6NIA
www.elecraft.com
831-763-4211  x129
Skype: matt.zilmer

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] KPA100 recommended max power for digital modes?

2014-02-22 Thread Bill Turner

ORIGINAL MESSAGE:  (may be snipped)

On 2/22/2014 6:20 PM, Jack wrote:
Minimum power to accomplish your communication goals, Bill. That still 
*is* part of the FCC regulations, is it not?


Jack, W6NF/VE4SNA 


REPLY:

Of course it is. Nothing I said contradicts that.

73, Bill W6WRT

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] KPA100 recommended max power for digital modes?

2014-02-21 Thread WA7SPY
I just ordered a KPA100 with the auto tuner for my KX3. In anticipation of the 
arrival of the amp  I was looking at the operating manual online and did not 
see any recommended power setting for operating the amp with digital modes. I 
plan to use the amp for PSK31. What is the recommended max power setting for 
the amp using PSK31 with a KX3?

Thanks,
Glenn Maclean WA7SPY
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] KPA100 recommended max power for digital modes?

2014-02-21 Thread Matt Zilmer
In Navy-Marine Corps MARS, we use a *lot* of digital modes, including
PSK31 and a double handful of others.  On this KX3/KXPA100, I normally
use no more than 25W for PSK and a little more for some of the others.
On MT63, I use 30W.  Most data modes don't need a lot of SNR to
decode.  It also depends on transmission length.  If I'm going to
transmit MT63 for five minutes straight, I run the power down to 20W.

I'm not sure there is a recommended output power setting for data
modes using the KX3/KXPA100, but you can find out yourself by
monitoring the PA.X temp on the VFO B display (your room temperature
is different from others').  If you see the temp rise to more than
you're comfortable with, back down on the power.  Using the settings
stated above keeps the KXPA temp at comfortable levels at this
station, usually  50C, but sometimes a bit over.  The amp will
protect itself by lowering output power if the temp runs too hot. Like
everything Elecraft makes, the hardware and software are very robust.

73,
matt W6NIA


On Fri, 21 Feb 2014 19:43:42 -0800, you wrote:

I just ordered a KPA100 with the auto tuner for my KX3. In anticipation of the 
arrival of the amp  I was looking at the operating manual online and did not 
see any recommended power setting for operating the amp with digital modes. I 
plan to use the amp for PSK31. What is the recommended max power setting for 
the amp using PSK31 with a KX3?

Thanks,
Glenn Maclean WA7SPY
Matt Zilmer, W6NIA
--
Give me six hours to chop down a tree and I will
spend the first four sharpening the axe. -A. Lincoln
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] KPA100 recommended max power for digital modes?

2014-02-21 Thread Jim Brown

On 2/21/2014 7:43 PM, WA7SPY wrote:

I was looking at the operating manual online and did not see any recommended 
power setting for operating the amp with digital modes.


Elecraft output stages are very well protected. In general, I feel 
comfortable running them balls to the wall with keydown modes, with 
all the lights lit. With well matched antennas, I run keydown modes at 
full power. If the output stage gets warm, the fan will run faster, and 
if that isn't enough, the rig will back off the drive.


Remember that the WSJT modes are weak signal modes, NOT low power 
modes. There is a big difference. We may get lots of distance per watt 
and be happy with QRP for easy paths, but for the most difficult paths 
(EME, transcontinental 160M), great digital ops pile on the watts and 
use their best antennas. I do a lot of QRP, but I also know when to turn 
on the big amp. :)


73, Jim K9YC
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html