Re: [Elecraft] K3-Latest K3 Review on EHAM

2008-02-27 Thread Dave Andrus
What also doesn't get much weight, at least for me, are the bad eHam  
reviews that are themselves bad.


They often show the reviewer has poor command of such things as, say,  
the english language, his keyboard (love those all caps reviews!),  
his emotions, etc.  Far too many of these:


It dosent' werk!  I hate cmpany X.  Dont by there stuff! [sic, sic,  
sic, sic and sic]
I PLUGGED IT IN W/O READING MANUAL--IT BLOWED UP!  THEY SUX!! [sic,  
etc.]


Sometimes I'm embarrassed to admit I'm a ham...

On the other hand, the well-written, balanced, but negative reviews  
are so very useful--when they can be found.  They are often in very  
short supply.  I don't mean that the reviewer be capable of writing  
the next great novel, but for a hobby that prides itself on being a  
group of communicators, more than a few seem to be incapable of  
communicating at a basic level.


73,

Dave K7DAA
http://www.k7daa.com

On Feb 26, 2008, at 6:22 AM, Joseph M. Durnal wrote:


When it comes to reviews, I tend to focus on the bad ones as the good
ones could simply represent someones feeling that they spent plenty of
money on something, it must be good.  When it comes to ham gear, a bad
review without a call sign doesn't get much weight.  I suppose the
reviewer in this case could have made up for it by giving the serial
number of his K3, but that wasn't included either.  I don't think it
is a true review.  Of course, my K3 has been ordered, my review will
follow after I feel I know the radio, it could be a few weeks, or it
could be a few months, I won't know until I know.

73 de Joseph Durnal NE3R

On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 3:29 AM, Bob DeHaney [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
wrote:
The reviewer (Solardx, no call sign) gives a very bad transmitter  
(SSB)
review.  He claims lots of splatter and ineffective speech  
processing as
well as high IMD products.  I have yet to hear a K3 but no one else  
has

noticed such problems?

Vy 73, Bob WU5T/DJ0MBC

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3-Latest K3 Review on EHAM

2008-02-27 Thread Hisashi T Fujinaka

I should quit now, but I just realized that a bad review is a good thing
in one respect, it shows that if you get a bad radio, you're not alone.
There's probably TWO out there. :)

Honestly, I doubt all the radios are working at the time they're
received, but if you listen to some of the goings on here you'd think
that a bad radio means it's all your fault and you might as well find a
new hobby.

The good thing is that Elecraft (and Don, and Tom, and please excuse me
if I forgot your name here) will help you fix things. If we could only
focus on that.

On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Joseph M. Durnal wrote:


When it comes to reviews, I tend to focus on the bad ones as the good
ones could simply represent someones feeling that they spent plenty of
money on something, it must be good.  When it comes to ham gear, a bad
review without a call sign doesn't get much weight.  I suppose the
reviewer in this case could have made up for it by giving the serial
number of his K3, but that wasn't included either.  I don't think it
is a true review.  Of course, my K3 has been ordered, my review will
follow after I feel I know the radio, it could be a few weeks, or it
could be a few months, I won't know until I know.

73 de Joseph Durnal NE3R

On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 3:29 AM, Bob DeHaney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

The reviewer (Solardx, no call sign) gives a very bad transmitter (SSB)
review.  He claims lots of splatter and ineffective speech processing as
well as high IMD products.  I have yet to hear a K3 but no one else has
noticed such problems?

Vy 73, Bob WU5T/DJ0MBC


--
Hisashi T Fujinaka - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BSEE(6/86) + BSChem(3/95) + BAEnglish(8/95) + MSCS(8/03) + $2.50 = latte
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3-Latest K3 Review on EHAM

2008-02-26 Thread Joseph M. Durnal
When it comes to reviews, I tend to focus on the bad ones as the good
ones could simply represent someones feeling that they spent plenty of
money on something, it must be good.  When it comes to ham gear, a bad
review without a call sign doesn't get much weight.  I suppose the
reviewer in this case could have made up for it by giving the serial
number of his K3, but that wasn't included either.  I don't think it
is a true review.  Of course, my K3 has been ordered, my review will
follow after I feel I know the radio, it could be a few weeks, or it
could be a few months, I won't know until I know.

73 de Joseph Durnal NE3R

On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 3:29 AM, Bob DeHaney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 The reviewer (Solardx, no call sign) gives a very bad transmitter (SSB)
 review.  He claims lots of splatter and ineffective speech processing as
 well as high IMD products.  I have yet to hear a K3 but no one else has
 noticed such problems?

 Vy 73, Bob WU5T/DJ0MBC
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] K3-Latest K3 Review on EHAM

2008-02-24 Thread Gary Hvizdak
At 03:29:43 EST on Sun 24  Feb 2008 Bob DeHaney (WU5T/DJ0MBC) wrote ...

 
The reviewer (Solardx, no call sign) gives a very bad transmitter (SSB)
review.  He claims lots of splatter and ineffective speech processing as
well as high IMD products.  I have yet to hear a K3 but no one else has
noticed such problems?

 

--

 

Since the IMD products only occur over 10 W he did mention that his PA might
be defective, but he didn't mention any attempt to verify whether or not it
was or to swap it out via a replacement.  I'm certain Elecraft would be very
interested in having a look at it.

 

73,
Gary  KI4GGX

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3-Latest K3 Review on EHAM

2008-02-24 Thread Ian J Maude

Bob DeHaney wrote:

The reviewer (Solardx, no call sign) gives a very bad transmitter (SSB)
review.  He claims lots of splatter and ineffective speech processing as
well as high IMD products.  I have yet to hear a K3 but no one else has
noticed such problems?
  
I am always suspicious of anonymous reviews.  I have no such problems 
with my K3, it works as expected.  I am still not convinced by the tx 
'punch' discussion either.  I will fully agree that the tx audio never 
sounds processed.  Personally I do not want this.  I am simply not 
convinced that the audio should sound this way.  To me, the audio should 
be clean and as free of distortion products as possible.  Just listen to 
VP6DX and you will hear what I mean.  Their audio has been superb even 
at low signal levels, always readable and simply 'out there'.  What more 
does one need?
Would the owner of that pseudonym on eHam care to share his views on 
this list?


73 Ian

--

Ian J Maude, G0VGS
SysOp GB7MBC DX Cluster
Member RSGB, GQRP
K2 #4044 |K3 #455

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3-Latest K3 Review on EHAM

2008-02-24 Thread Simon Brown (HB9DRV)
I think he's getting RF into his installation, maybe through the power 
cabling? I wonder whether his is driving an after-burner?


I do not suspect a malicious posting - even with the best will in the world 
things can go wrong.


Simon Brown, HB9DRV

--
From: Ian J Maude [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I am always suspicious of anonymous reviews. 


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] K3-Latest K3 Review on EHAM

2008-02-24 Thread Brett Howard
I believe the closest English proverb would be Trust but verify.   

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of paolo.gramigna
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2008 12:55 AM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: R: [Elecraft] K3-Latest K3 Review on EHAM

 

Hi all,
We have a proverb in Italy: To suspect of someone is a sin, but usually
there is substance in it. (I'll be glad to hear the corresponding English
proverb, if existing).

By sheer chance, that review will ruin the 5 over 5 record previously held
by K3. By sheer chance, the reviewer does not sign with a call sign, and
does not submit his name and address in his Eham profile. To me it looks
like an alien, or MAYBE a close relative to some other Ham Radio related
Brand.

It looks like an unsigned letter to me; and the folks at Eham should not
allow anonymous posting, at least on my opinion.

Paolo Gramigna, IK4YNG and formerly I4GGP from Italy. My address is on
QRZ.com


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3-Latest K3 Review on EHAM

2008-02-24 Thread Toby Deinhardt

Hi Bob,

 I have yet to hear a K3 but no one else has noticed such problems?

A small yes and a big no.

Several BCC members (DD5FZ, DL6RAI, DK4YJ, DG7RO usw.) feel that the 
speech processor is not as effective as it could be and that for 
contesting the modulation is too nice and needs more punch. Apart 
from this minor gripe (I just got home from CQWW 160m SSB) K3 #67 does 
very very well indeed in SSB, TX as well as RX. See:


http://www.bavarian-contest-club.de/projects/K3.pdf or
http://www.bavarian-contest-club.de/projects/K3_english.pdf


happy_dance
We worked VP6DX on 160m in SSB after our local sunrise...
/happy_dance

vy 73 de toby
--
DD5FZ (ex 4n6fz, dj7mgq, dg5mgq, dd5fz)
K2/10  #885
K2/100 #3248
K3/100 #67
DOK C12, BCC, DL-QRP-AG, JN58td
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3-Latest K3 Review on EHAM

2008-02-24 Thread David Cutter
For a new rig to be so bad, he will presumably want it repaired.  My first 
thought would be to email Elecraft not Eham.


David
G3UNA




The reviewer (Solardx, no call sign) gives a very bad transmitter (SSB)
review.  He claims lots of splatter and ineffective speech processing as
well as high IMD products.  I have yet to hear a K3 but no one else has
noticed such problems?

Vy 73, Bob WU5T/DJ0MBC


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3-Latest K3 Review on EHAM

2008-02-24 Thread Bill W4ZV



Simon Brown (HB9DRV) wrote:
 
 I think he's getting RF into his installation, maybe through the power 
 cabling? I wonder whether his is driving an after-burner?
 
 I do not suspect a malicious posting - even with the best will in the
 world 
 things can go wrong.
 
 

My first thought is RF feedback via the KXV3's RX ANT port.  There is a
known isolation problem with it which I believe has been fixed in production
units, but I'm uncertain about the exact transition point in serial numbers. 
I agree with Simon that his posting does not appear to be malicious but
simply to highlight some problem areas, some of which may be valid and some
not.  I believe many agree that the K3 speech processor could be more
effective and am sure Elecraft will address this eventually.  As for the TX
IMD issues, I would wait to see what ARRL and others measure...I'm very
suspicious about the RX ANT issue.
 
73,  Bill  W4ZV

P.S.  Toby it's amazing you worked VP6DX on 160 SSB...in the contest QRM no
less!

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/K3-Latest-K3-Review-on-EHAM-tp15661902p15663970.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3-Latest K3 Review on EHAM

2008-02-24 Thread Gary Scott
Eham reviews are a great idea ,But the problem is folks are posting reviews 
that either just got the product ,and as I have seen in one product a few 
months ago did not even own the product they were commenting on.I think the 
reviews would be worth alot more on Eham if people actually waiting 6 months 
plus *BEFORE* posting a review on ANY product ,this includes reviewing the 
K3. I love my K3 as much as the rest of you that have received yours already 
and will add comments at some point on eham,but it will be mid summer at the 
earliest ,  Just my 2 cents worth!

73 Gary W4GNS


I am always suspicious of anonymous reviews.  I have no such problems with 
my K3, it works as expected.  I am still not convinced by the tx 'punch' 
discussion either.  I will fully agree that the tx audio never sounds 
processed.  Personally I do not want this.  I am simply not convinced that 
the audio should sound this way.  To me, the audio should 


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3-Latest K3 Review on EHAM

2008-02-24 Thread Bill W4ZV



Gary Scott-4 wrote:
 
 Eham reviews are a great idea ,But the problem is folks are posting
 reviews 
 that either just got the product ,and as I have seen in one product a few 
 months ago did not even own the product they were commenting on.I think
 the 
 reviews would be worth alot more on Eham if people actually waiting 6
 months 
 plus *BEFORE* posting a review on ANY product ,this includes reviewing the 
 K3. I love my K3 as much as the rest of you that have received yours
 already 
 and will add comments at some point on eham,but it will be mid summer at
 the 
 earliest ,  Just my 2 cents worth!
 73 Gary W4GNS
 
 

I would also hope folks have enough common sense to first check with
Elecraft or this list before  posting problems on eHam.  If I had written a
review when I first got my unit there would have been several issues. 
Instead I contacted Elecraft and they were promptly resolved...two of them
resulting in nearly instantaneous production changes.   

73,  Bill  W4ZV
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/K3-Latest-K3-Review-on-EHAM-tp15661902p15664420.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] K3-Latest K3 Review on EHAM

2008-02-24 Thread Gary Hvizdak
At 08:56:21 EST on Sun 24 Feb 2008 Paul Ferguson (K5ESW) wrote ...

... Surely 
there are others out there with a K3 and the equipment necessary to repeat
his tests.  The outcome of the tests will determine if Solardx's results are

typical. 

I await the results while I wait for my K3 (wave 3).

--

Paul,

Don't hold your breath!  FYI, I work at an aerospace manufacturing
facility and we can't even duplicate EMI tests for which we have detailed
test descriptions.  It would be next impossible to configure a setup like
his, even if we had a detailed description of its configuration.  The fact
that we don't have any description ensures that it won't happen!

That said, other K3 owners could attempt to duplicate what he did and
report back with a detailed description of their test setup (including
filter settings and options) and their results.  BTW, personally I don't
like the idea of transmitting into another rig.

73,
Gary  KI4GGX


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3-Latest K3 Review on EHAM

2008-02-24 Thread S Sacco
The problem with eHam reviews is not the reviews themselves, but that
folks get too caught up in caring about other people's mostly subject
impressions/opinions.

Remember: Everyone's entitled to an opinion, but that doesn't mean
that everyone's opinion should be given equal weight.

Now, back to assembling my K3.  Anyone else have clearance problems
with the KBPF3 standoff, and the torroid?

73,

Steve NN4X


On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Gary Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Eham reviews are a great idea ,But the problem is folks are posting reviews
  that either just got the product ,and as I have seen in one product a few
  months ago did not even own the product they were commenting on.I think the
  reviews would be worth alot more on Eham if people actually waiting 6 months
  plus *BEFORE* posting a review on ANY product ,this includes reviewing the
  K3. I love my K3 as much as the rest of you that have received yours already
  and will add comments at some point on eham,but it will be mid summer at the
  earliest ,  Just my 2 cents worth!
  73 Gary W4GNS
  
   I am always suspicious of anonymous reviews.  I have no such problems with
   my K3, it works as expected.  I am still not convinced by the tx 'punch'
   discussion either.  I will fully agree that the tx audio never sounds
   processed.  Personally I do not want this.  I am simply not convinced that
   the audio should sound this way.  To me, the audio should



  ___
  Elecraft mailing list
  Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
  You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
  Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
   http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

  Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
  Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3-Latest K3 Review on EHAM

2008-02-24 Thread Paul Ferguson
The reviewer (Solardx) gives the results of a test he ran on his K3. Surely 
there are others out there with a K3 and the equipment necessary to repeat his 
tests. The outcome of the tests will determine if Solardx's results are 
typical. 

I await the results while I wait for my K3 (wave 3).

73,
Paul
K5ESW
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3-Latest K3 Review on EHAM

2008-02-24 Thread N2EY
In a message dated 2/24/08 8:57:10 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


 The reviewer (Solardx) gives the results of a test he ran on his K3. 

With all due respect

We don't know if the reviewer has a problem K3 or a problem test setup. For 
that matter, we don't know if the reviewer even has a K3! 

IMHO, 99%+ of eham.net reviews are not reviews at all, (in the sense of 
objectice reports) but are really just personal opinions. In some cases they 
are 
based on very little experience with the rig, too.

Anybody with internet access can write an eham review on anything. I could go 
on eham and say the IC-7800 is ten times better than the K3 - even though 
I've never seen nor used either rig!

Solardx is completely anonymous - no call, no name, no K3 serial number.  
Yet his rating affects the score as much as somebody who's got one of the first 
ones and has many hours of experience testing and using it, and who signs his 
name to his words.

73 de Jim, N2EY


**
Ideas to please picky eaters. Watch video on AOL 
Living.
  
(http://living.aol.com/video/how-to-please-your-picky-eater/rachel-campos-duffy/2050827?NCID=aolcmp0030002598)
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3-Latest K3 Review on EHAM

2008-02-24 Thread Hisashi T Fujinaka

On Sun, 24 Feb 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


In a message dated 2/24/08 8:57:10 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:



The reviewer (Solardx) gives the results of a test he ran on his K3.


Solardx is completely anonymous - no call, no name, no K3 serial number.
Yet his rating affects the score as much as somebody who's got one of the first
ones and has many hours of experience testing and using it, and who signs his
name to his words.


It was me, I was hoping to clear out the queue before I ordered mine.
(I'm KIDDING.)

--
Hisashi T Fujinaka - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BSEE(6/86) + BSChem(3/95) + BAEnglish(8/95) + MSCS(8/03) + $2.50 = latte
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3-Latest K3 Review on EHAM

2008-02-24 Thread AD6XY - Mike

My goodness - this is absolutely terrible. Someone posts an honest review of
their experience and loads of people attack them for criticising their baby
by not giving it full marks? I really expected more of the Elecraft
community.

Perhaps the transmitter is faulty - it is entirely possible the PA bias has
failed or there is a problem with the driver, in the alignment or elsewhere. 
Perhaps solardx really has a point. Whatever, their experience is still just
as valid as anyone elses.

I am really concerned now that all the good reviews of the K3 might not be
as honest and unbiased as I thought.

Mike
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/K3-Latest-K3-Review-on-EHAM-tp15661902p15667553.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] K3-Latest K3 Review on EHAM

2008-02-24 Thread Greg
Steve,

If the torroid is rubbing against the standoff and you cannot gently
adjust the torroid so that it is not touching, place a piece of heatshring
tubing over the standoff.  Touching is not a problem provided there is no
wearing of the enamal on the torroid.  Putting the heatshring over the
standoff will avoid any problem even if the enamal is worn.

73
Greg
AB7R


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of S Sacco
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2008 6:23 AM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3-Latest K3 Review on EHAM


The problem with eHam reviews is not the reviews themselves, but that
folks get too caught up in caring about other people's mostly subject
impressions/opinions.

Remember: Everyone's entitled to an opinion, but that doesn't mean
that everyone's opinion should be given equal weight.

Now, back to assembling my K3.  Anyone else have clearance problems
with the KBPF3 standoff, and the torroid?

73,

Steve NN4X


On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Gary Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Eham reviews are a great idea ,But the problem is folks are posting
reviews
  that either just got the product ,and as I have seen in one product a few
  months ago did not even own the product they were commenting on.I think
the
  reviews would be worth alot more on Eham if people actually waiting 6
months
  plus *BEFORE* posting a review on ANY product ,this includes reviewing
the
  K3. I love my K3 as much as the rest of you that have received yours
already
  and will add comments at some point on eham,but it will be mid summer at
the
  earliest ,  Just my 2 cents worth!
  73 Gary W4GNS
  
   I am always suspicious of anonymous reviews.  I have no such problems
with
   my K3, it works as expected.  I am still not convinced by the tx
'punch'
   discussion either.  I will fully agree that the tx audio never sounds
   processed.  Personally I do not want this.  I am simply not convinced
that
   the audio should sound this way.  To me, the audio should



  ___
  Elecraft mailing list
  Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
  You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
  Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
   http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

  Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
  Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3-Latest K3 Review on EHAM

2008-02-24 Thread W6NEK

Hi Mike,
I agree with you that, from his prospective, Solardx feels like he has 
posted an honest review.  However, I further feel that without any feedback 
to Elecraft, to allow them to participate with Solardx, to confirm that he 
has a defective unit, is a rush to judgment and a premature post to eHam. 
In his review, Solardx states (and I quote) I might have a faulty unit and 
I am not really sure.  At that point I would expect Solardx to contact 
Elecraft and turn over the problem for them to resolve.  This would have 
provided Elecraft engineering with valuable information and would also 
remove the burden from Solardx to eventually get his K3 transmit problem 
fixed.  A premature post on eHam will not bring the quickest response from 
Elecraft.  However, an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] will.


I know this to be true because of a problem I had with my K3/100 (SN312).
When I finished assembly of my K3 I had no receive audio from the built-in 
speaker and I also had no Line Out audio either.  All other modes and 
functions on the K3 worked fine.  I emailed Elecraft support, at the link 
above, and got a quick response from Gary Surrency.  I described my problem 
and it was though that I had a faulty KIO3 assembly.  I requested the 
replacement and Scott King sent a new KIO3 assembly immediately. 
Unfortunately, the new KIO3 did not fix my problem.  I updated Gary and he 
arranged for me to receive an RSA # and I returned the unit to Elecraft for 
their inspection.  Once the unit arrived at Elecraft I received an email 
from Rene Morris.  He did preliminary tests and then called me on the 
telephone to discuss his findings and to ensure that once they returned my 
K3 that everything was going to be 100% operational.  He replaced the DSP 
board and the unit will be given a full factory alignment.  I should receive 
the repaired radio back by the middle of this week.  The point is that 
unless you bring a failure, or suspected failure, to the attention of 
Elecraft then all you're doing is making yourself frustrated.  Making 
frustrated eHam posts is not really helping to FIX the problem.  Given the 
fantastic response I experienced from Elecraft Support there is no excuse to 
not call upon them to take the lead and provide the final solution to your 
problem.  Weather it's a simple repair or a change to the design/firmware, 
give Elecraft a chance to participate!


Given the fact that Solardx admitted: I might have a faulty unit and I am 
not really sure, tells me he made a frustrated, disappointed, premature 
eHam post.


Best 73,
Frank - W6NEK

- Original Message - 
From: AD6XY - Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2008 10:38 AM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3-Latest K3 Review on EHAM




My goodness - this is absolutely terrible. Someone posts an honest review 
of
their experience and loads of people attack them for criticising their 
baby

by not giving it full marks? I really expected more of the Elecraft
community.

Perhaps the transmitter is faulty - it is entirely possible the PA bias 
has
failed or there is a problem with the driver, in the alignment or 
elsewhere.
Perhaps solardx really has a point. Whatever, their experience is still 
just

as valid as anyone elses.

I am really concerned now that all the good reviews of the K3 might not be
as honest and unbiased as I thought.

Mike


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3-Latest K3 Review on EHAM

2008-02-24 Thread Bruce Bowman
I have no doubt that Elecraft will make-right anything that is wrong 
with hardware they delivered whether to Solardx or any other owner. The 
important point, assuming the failure info is right, is that either a 
unit got thru final test that shouldn't have, or a unit failed in 
transit. Yeah, he/she needs to work it out with Elecraft, but this is an 
indication of what might be a procedural smoking gun.

Once the problem is resolved, and I have no doubt it will be, it would 
sure be nice to hear a follow-up.

Bruce, NM5B
Santa Fe, NM


 Hi Mike,
 I agree with you that, from his prospective, Solardx feels like he has 
 posted an honest review.  However, I further feel that without any 
 feedback to Elecraft, to allow them to participate with Solardx, to 
 confirm that he has a defective unit, is a rush to judgment and a 
 premature post to eHam... 


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3-Latest K3 Review on EHAM

2008-02-24 Thread Bill NY9H
as far as audio crunch  I agree the current  iteration is not 
as penetrating as a good RF clipper could give it albeit it IS 
distortion but deem favorable by many.  KEY WORK :  CURRENT.


Hard to believe that solardx contributes to Eham , yet is not on the reflector.
Perhaps by another moniker ??

Perhaps someone should find him and invite him aboard.

bill


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3-Latest K3 Review on EHAM

2008-02-24 Thread Tom Hammond

Watch out Don... he might just take you up on your offer!

73,

Tom   N0SS

At 13:26 02/24/2008, Don Rasmussen wrote:

Hisashi - you can have my K3. Now that it no longer
has a perfect score on eHAM, the joy of ownership has
been tarnished forever for me. Would you like me to
retrieve it from the recycling bin and send it to you?

It was new 4 weeks ago and works perfectly except for
the flaw exposed by the anonymous poster.
Your address please. I will pay postage - okay??
Please don't change your mind now, everyone has seen
your post, you must take it.

de wb8yqj... ;-)


[Elecraft] K3-Latest K3 Review on EHAM
Hisashi T Fujinaka htodd at twofifty.com
Sun Feb 24 13:26:25 EST 2008

Previous message: [Elecraft] K3-Latest K3 Review on
EHAM
Next message: [Elecraft] VP6DX with K2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [
author ]



On Sun, 24 Feb 2008, N2EY at aol.com wrote:

 In a message dated 2/24/08 8:57:10 AM Eastern
Standard Time,
 Paul at PaulFerguson.us writes:


 The reviewer (Solardx) gives the results of a test
he ran on his K3.

 Solardx is completely anonymous - no call, no
name, no K3 serial number.
 Yet his rating affects the score as much as somebody
who's got one of the first
 ones and has many hours of experience testing and
using it, and who signs his
 name to his words.

It was me, I was hoping to clear out the queue before
I ordered mine.
(I'm KIDDING.)

--
Hisashi T Fujinaka - htodd at twofifty.com
BSEE(6/86) + BSChem(3/95) + BAEnglish(8/95) +
MSCS(8/03) + $2.50 = latte


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3-Latest K3 Review on EHAM

2008-02-24 Thread N2EY
In a message dated 2/24/08 1:40:27 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


 Someone posts an honest review of
 their experience and loads of people attack them for criticising their baby
 by not giving it full marks?

No.

The criticism is that someone is posting an anonymous review saying the K3 
SSB transmit audio is terrible *without* giving the company a chance to solve 
the problem. A company which has a hard-earned and well-deserved reputation 
for service, service, and more service. 

That is, if there even really is a problem - since the reviewer is anonymous, 
we don't know for sure if the review is for-real or not. *Anybody* can post 
a review on eham even if they've never even seen the rig they're reviewing.

 Perhaps the transmitter is faulty - it is entirely possible the PA bias has
 failed or there is a problem with the driver, in the alignment or elsewhere. 
 

Of course that's possible. Perhaps the rig was damaged in shipping, or, if a 
kit, assembled improperly.

Or perhaps there's something wrong with the test setup, and nothing wrong 
with the K3. 


 Perhaps solardx really has a point. 

Perhaps - but why not contact the company and try to fix it? 

Whatever, their experience is still just
 
 as valid as anyone elses.
 

If, indeed, it's a real experience. We don't know for sure if solardx has 
ever been near a K3.

73 de Jim, N2EY


**
Ideas to please picky eaters. Watch video on AOL 
Living.
  
(http://living.aol.com/video/how-to-please-your-picky-eater/rachel-campos-duffy/2050827?NCID=aolcmp0030002598)
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3-Latest K3 Review on EHAM

2008-02-24 Thread AD6XY - Mike

Funny isn't it. I suggest that we should not put down people who don't like
what we do and I become attacked myself by many Emails.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/K3-Latest-K3-Review-on-EHAM-tp15661902p15669831.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3-Latest K3 Review on EHAM

2008-02-24 Thread Toby Deinhardt

We are a opening a sanctuary for unwanted and unloved K3s...

Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled K3s...

vy 73 de toby

Tom Hammond wrote:

Watch out Don... he might just take you up on your offer!

73,

Tom   N0SS

At 13:26 02/24/2008, Don Rasmussen wrote:

Hisashi - you can have my K3. Now that it no longer
has a perfect score on eHAM, the joy of ownership has
been tarnished forever for me. Would you like me to
retrieve it from the recycling bin and send it to you?

It was new 4 weeks ago and works perfectly except for
the flaw exposed by the anonymous poster.
Your address please. I will pay postage - okay??
Please don't change your mind now, everyone has seen
your post, you must take it.

de wb8yqj... ;-)


[Elecraft] K3-Latest K3 Review on EHAM
Hisashi T Fujinaka htodd at twofifty.com
Sun Feb 24 13:26:25 EST 2008

Previous message: [Elecraft] K3-Latest K3 Review on
EHAM
Next message: [Elecraft] VP6DX with K2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [
author ]

 



On Sun, 24 Feb 2008, N2EY at aol.com wrote:

 In a message dated 2/24/08 8:57:10 AM Eastern
Standard Time,
 Paul at PaulFerguson.us writes:


 The reviewer (Solardx) gives the results of a test
he ran on his K3.

 Solardx is completely anonymous - no call, no
name, no K3 serial number.
 Yet his rating affects the score as much as somebody
who's got one of the first
 ones and has many hours of experience testing and
using it, and who signs his
 name to his words.

It was me, I was hoping to clear out the queue before
I ordered mine.
(I'm KIDDING.)

--
Hisashi T Fujinaka - htodd at twofifty.com
BSEE(6/86) + BSChem(3/95) + BAEnglish(8/95) +
MSCS(8/03) + $2.50 = latte


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm

Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3-Latest K3 Review on EHAM

2008-02-24 Thread Alexander Ponomarenko
The speech processor, mic gain and ALC circuits need some design attention. 
The transmitter in the K3 is very poor. The RF speech processor produces a 
lot of IMD on the signal. It's a raspy and nasty kind of product that bleeds 
from the transmit signal. What I was hearing was not pleasant. The K3 has 
the infamous ALC induced leading edge splatter/IMD problem. Even the older 
K2 is better in this area. If you test the K2 under same conditions at 
5,10,15 and 20khz you get almost no IMD or splatter. As you reduce the power 
level on the K2 between 50 and 70 watts there is no detectable splatter with 
the speech processor set to 2:1 or 3:1 compression ratio. In contrast the 
moment you turn the K3's speech processor on you can hear leading edge 
splatter at 10,15 and 20khz. I might have a faulty unit and I am not really 
sure.


==

I think, that the SOLARDX is really not K3 user.

And it IMD-problems are from another HAM-RIG - not K3.

All these problems I read in opinion for other radio.

73! Alex de UR5LAM

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3-Latest K3 Review on EHAM

2008-02-24 Thread DW Holtman

Hello,

About a week ago, I asked the group what they thought about several bad 
comments on E-Ham about SSB on the K2. I received a bunch of great E-Mail 
telling me that it is probably an alignment problem. But, I also received 
several E-Mails bordering on hate mail. It was strange to read some of the 
responses I received. This rig almost has a cult type following by some of 
the true believers.


I'm not saying there is anything wrong with really appreciating a quality 
radio with an unheard of support from the factory. That is why I'm sold on 
them. I know these rigs are the best money can buy, I operate a K1, in the 
process of building a K2 and have a K3 on order. With this kind of support I 
really hope Electraft does very well and continues to come out with products 
of this quality.


Best,
DW Holtman
WB7SSN



- Original Message - 
From: AD6XY - Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2008 2:47 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3-Latest K3 Review on EHAM




Funny isn't it. I suggest that we should not put down people who don't 
like

what we do and I become attacked myself by many Emails.
--
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/K3-Latest-K3-Review-on-EHAM-tp15661902p15669831.html

Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com 


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3-Latest K3 Review on EHAM

2008-02-24 Thread Tom AK2B

There are over 475 K3's sold and only 30 reviews on eHam. If this one bad
review bothers you, write your own!

Tom, AK2B
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/K3-Latest-K3-Review-on-EHAM-tp15661902p15671173.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3-Latest K3 Review on EHAM

2008-02-24 Thread w6jd
Anyone who has spent anytime at all listening to the VP6DX operaton
knows that solardx's eham review is either bogus or he happened
to get a bad radio. I suspect he is an ICOM operative.

Doug
W6JD
-- Original message -- 
From: Tom AK2B [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

 
 There are over 475 K3's sold and only 30 reviews on eHam. If this one bad 
 review bothers you, write your own! 
 
 Tom, AK2B 
 -- 
 View this message in context: 
 http://www.nabble.com/K3-Latest-K3-Review-on-EHAM-tp15661902p15671173.html 
 Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. 
 
 ___ 
 Elecraft mailing list 
 Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net 
 You must be a subscriber to post to the list. 
 Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): 
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft 
 
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm 
 Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com 
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3-Latest K3 Review on EHAM

2008-02-24 Thread Matt Zilmer
I was wondering when someone would bring that possibility up...

It happens all the time.

matt, W6NIA

On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 00:19:32 +, you wrote:

Anyone who has spent anytime at all listening to the VP6DX operaton
knows that solardx's eham review is either bogus or he happened
to get a bad radio. I suspect he is an ICOM operative.

Doug
W6JD
-- Original message -- 
From: Tom AK2B [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

 
 There are over 475 K3's sold and only 30 reviews on eHam. If this one bad 
 review bothers you, write your own! 
 
 Tom, AK2B 
 -- 
 View this message in context: 
 http://www.nabble.com/K3-Latest-K3-Review-on-EHAM-tp15661902p15671173.html 
 Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. 
 
 ___ 
 Elecraft mailing list 
 Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net 
 You must be a subscriber to post to the list. 
 Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): 
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft 
 
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm 
 Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com 
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com