Re: Re: Electric Shock and Water

2002-01-04 Thread Doug McKean

If your colleage doesn't understand why you shouldn't 
mix water and electricity in general, just tell him that 
water has a tendency to be rather unpredictable and 
can go anywhere.  Someone likened it to a three 
dimensional resistor and that's an excellent example. 
Add to it a very deformable 3D resistor.  And since 
electricity likes to follow water, electricity will also 
end up going anywhere. 

Other than that, I agree it's a pretty naive question. 
I picture the guy in bare feet on the metal ladder in 
water with drill in hand asking, so what's the matter? 

- Doug McKean 



---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old 
messages are imported into the new server.


RE: Re: Electric Shock and Water

2002-01-03 Thread jasonxmallory

Rich

Do you use Google.com for searches. I did a search on water conductivity 
yesterday and got a lot of hits with typical values. Many related to biological 
studies. 

See, for example http://www.dartmouth.edu/~bio59/conductivity.htm

-Jason

Rich Nute ri...@sdd.hp.com wrote:





Hi John:


   Is there a value (or range of values) for the 
resistance of water?  
   
   The data exists; it depends, of course, on solute nature and
   concentration. Try a web search.

I did a web search before my post.  There is lots of
data on the use of water resistance and water 
conductivity, but I found nothing on the values of 
water resistance or water conductivity.  

Somewhere in yesterday's web search, I recall having seen
a reference to DI water has being 18 megohms maximum, and
ordinary water being in the neighborhood of 2 kilohms.  
But, neither of these values was well-documented, and 
questionable as to applicability to the question at hand,
so I did not quote them.  

I did another search today.

Water conductivity measurements are used to estimate the
total dissolved salts (TDS) in the water.  This site 
explains TDS and gives conductivity values for various
lakes:

http://wow.nrri.umn.edu/wow/under/parameters/conductivity.html

(The last two paragraphs of this URL are recommended 
reading.)

This URL has lake and ocean water ranging from 100,000 
ohms to 23 ohms and even 6 ohms.

I found a water conductivity meter that measures up to 
1999 milliSiemens.  This would correspond to 0.5 ohm.  
This would imply the resistance of water would range 
from infinite to something on the order of 50 ohms 
(assuming the meter range would exceed the expected 
values by 100X).  Perhaps this meter is a conductivity 
cell, but the specs do not describe it as such.


 http://www.sentry-products.co.uk/Products/Water%20Conductivity%20Meters$20Body.htm

I find it disturbing that the web does not have more
published values for water conductivity.  I wonder if 
this is because there are no standard values for 
water resistance?  I suspect that the values are 
completely variable and unpredictable.  I would think
that water supply authorities would publish EC and TDS
of the water supplied to customers as these are 
measures of water hardness.

   Is there a standard way of
measuring the resistance of water?
   
   Yes; a conductivity cell. An apparently simple device that isn't. Once
   again, a web search will probably disclose more than you ever wanted to
   know.

Using your suggestion, I did a search and found limited 
(not more than I ever wanted to know) information on the 
conductivity cell:

http://www.ussl.ars.usda.gov/answers/mc0.htm

 http://www.thermo.com/eThermo/CDA/Products/Product_Listing/0,1086,107687-161-161,00.html

The first URL explains the theory of operation in general
terms.  

The second URL is a manufacturer of conductivity cells.


Best regards,
Rich





---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old 
 messages are imported into the new server.

-- 




__
Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas. Experience 
the convenience of buying online with Shop@Netscape! 
http://shopnow.netscape.com/

Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at 
http://webmail.netscape.com/


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old 
messages are imported into the new server.


Re: Electric Shock and Water

2002-01-03 Thread Rich Nute




Hi John:


   Is there a value (or range of values) for the 
resistance of water?  
   
   The data exists; it depends, of course, on solute nature and
   concentration. Try a web search.

I did a web search before my post.  There is lots of
data on the use of water resistance and water 
conductivity, but I found nothing on the values of 
water resistance or water conductivity.  

Somewhere in yesterday's web search, I recall having seen
a reference to DI water has being 18 megohms maximum, and
ordinary water being in the neighborhood of 2 kilohms.  
But, neither of these values was well-documented, and 
questionable as to applicability to the question at hand,
so I did not quote them.  

I did another search today.

Water conductivity measurements are used to estimate the
total dissolved salts (TDS) in the water.  This site 
explains TDS and gives conductivity values for various
lakes:

http://wow.nrri.umn.edu/wow/under/parameters/conductivity.html

(The last two paragraphs of this URL are recommended 
reading.)

This URL has lake and ocean water ranging from 100,000 
ohms to 23 ohms and even 6 ohms.

I found a water conductivity meter that measures up to 
1999 milliSiemens.  This would correspond to 0.5 ohm.  
This would imply the resistance of water would range 
from infinite to something on the order of 50 ohms 
(assuming the meter range would exceed the expected 
values by 100X).  Perhaps this meter is a conductivity 
cell, but the specs do not describe it as such.


http://www.sentry-products.co.uk/Products/Water%20Conductivity%20Meters$20Body.htm

I find it disturbing that the web does not have more
published values for water conductivity.  I wonder if 
this is because there are no standard values for 
water resistance?  I suspect that the values are 
completely variable and unpredictable.  I would think
that water supply authorities would publish EC and TDS
of the water supplied to customers as these are 
measures of water hardness.

   Is there a standard way of
measuring the resistance of water?
   
   Yes; a conductivity cell. An apparently simple device that isn't. Once
   again, a web search will probably disclose more than you ever wanted to
   know.

Using your suggestion, I did a search and found limited 
(not more than I ever wanted to know) information on the 
conductivity cell:

http://www.ussl.ars.usda.gov/answers/mc0.htm

http://www.thermo.com/eThermo/CDA/Products/Product_Listing/0,1086,107687-161-161,00.html

The first URL explains the theory of operation in general
terms.  

The second URL is a manufacturer of conductivity cells.


Best regards,
Rich





---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old 
messages are imported into the new server.


Re: Electric Shock and Water

2002-01-03 Thread Andrew Carson

No risk of electric shock at these voltages. But in salt water environments, a 
greatly increased risk of corrosion.
Which could in turn lead to a shock or fire hazard.

Slightly off topic, but a valid point to be considered.

Peter Merguerian wrote:

 Jason,

 Please explain to your colleague that for North American requirements (as
 depicted in the NEC and CEC) there is no risk of electric shock or fire from
 circuits in wet locations for up to 21.2 V.  For higher voltages you should
 start taking steps to minimize the risk of water ingress and the risk of a
 person coming in touch with the circuits.

 In Europe, I believe the voltage level is somehat lower; if I recall
 correctly, 15 V. Someone correct me if I am wrong!

 This e-mail message may contain privileged or confidential information. If
 you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose, use, disseminate,
 distribute, copy or rely upon this message or attachment in any way. If you
 received this e-mail message in error, please return by forwarding the
 message and its attachments to the sender.

 PETER S. MERGUERIAN
 Technical Director
 I.T.L. (Product Testing) Ltd.
 26 Hacharoshet St., POB 211
 Or Yehuda 60251, Israel
 Tel: + 972-(0)3-5339022  Fax: + 972-(0)3-5339019
 Mobile: + 972-(0)54-838175

 -Original Message-
 From: jasonxmall...@netscape.net [mailto:jasonxmall...@netscape.net]
 Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 12:57 AM
 To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
 Subject: Electric Shock and Water

 My apologies if this is just too naive...

 I am trying to explain to a collegue why there are so many cautions against
 mixing water with electricity. He is not the type to accept common sense
 as an answer. This is what I have reasoned so far...

 MAL-OPERATION
 Water is generally conductive. If it enters the area of a chassis that
 houses control elements such as relays or switches, it can short circuit the
 control elements and cause the affected device to operate unexpectedly,
 and sometimes in unexpected ways.

 ENERGIZING SURFACES
 Water is generally conductive. If it enters a chassis containing hazardous
 voltages it is possible it may act as a conductor of the voltage to an
 otherwise un-energized conductive surface. If the conductive surface, for
 whatever reason, is itself not sufficiently grounded, it can carry hazardous
 voltage potentials.

 INCREASED LEAKAGE CURRENTS
 Water is generally conductive. If you are working on a chassis and
 accidentally touch an energized contact, you may not experience any shock
 because there is no current path between you and the voltage source
 supplying the contact. Let us assume the contact is energized by a local AC
 mains. There is always SOME leakage current possible from where you are
 standing back to a grounded point. Usually it is a very small leakage.
 However, if you are standing in water, the leakage current is likely to be
 much higher, and you may experience a serious electric shock from your
 accidental touching of a contact.

 AVALANCHE EFFECT
 Water is generally conductive. If it enters a chassis with high power
 electrical components, it can instigate an avalanche of failure that results
 in the release of a lot of energy. For example, the water can provide a
 short circuit between two potentials. As it carries current, the water may
 heat up quite rapidly, in doing so it creates steam. The effects of the heat
 and steam may then provide an even lower resistance path for additional
 current flow...and so an avalanche of conductivity (from less conductive to
 more conductive) is started...

 I welcome any comments and additional generic scenarios.

 Regards,

 Jason Mallory
 Product Safety Consultant.

 --

 __
 Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas.
 Experience the convenience of buying online with Shop@Netscape!
 http://shopnow.netscape.com/

 Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at
 http://webmail.netscape.com/

 ---
 This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
 Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

 Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

 To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
  majord...@ieee.org
 with the single line:
  unsubscribe emc-pstc

 For help, send mail to the list administrators:
  Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
  Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

 For policy questions, send mail to:
  Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
  Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

 All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
 No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old
 messages are imported into the new server.

 ---
 This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
 Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

 

Re: Electric Shock and Water

2002-01-03 Thread Andrew Carson

If you work at a site with a large air conditioning plant or a chilled water 
system, then chances are your facilities
manager will have a conductivity cell. They are used as a very quick means to 
monitor water purity and to check for
signs of corrosion.

Units are expressed in uS/cm and technically pure water is non conductive. In 
reality all water will contain
conductive ions as soon as it is exposed to CO2 in the atmosphere. The higher 
the impurity of the water, the more ions
available and the higher the conductivity. Typical example values would be,

Ultra Pure water 1 uS/cm
De Ionized Water 10uS/cm
Drinking water 500-1200uS/cm
Salt Water 5000-10,000uS/cm

Water temperature is also plays a big factor, higher temp, again more ions, to 
higher conductivity.

John Woodgate wrote:

 I read in !emc-pstc that Rich Nute ri...@sdd.hp.com wrote (in
 200201030028.qaa08...@epgc264.sdd.hp.com) about 'Electric Shock and
 Water', on Wed, 2 Jan 2002:
 Is there a value (or range of values) for the
  resistance of water?

 The data exists; it depends, of course, on solute nature and
 concentration. Try a web search.

 Is there a standard way of
  measuring the resistance of water?

 Yes; a conductivity cell. An apparently simple device that isn't. Once
 again, a web search will probably disclose more than you ever wanted to
 know.
 --
 Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
 After swimming across the Hellespont, I felt like a Hero.

 ---
 This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
 Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

 Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

 To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
  majord...@ieee.org
 with the single line:
  unsubscribe emc-pstc

 For help, send mail to the list administrators:
  Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
  Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

 For policy questions, send mail to:
  Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
  Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

 All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
 No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old 
 messages are imported into the new server.

--

Andrew Carson - Product Safety Engineer, Xyratex, UK
Phone: +44 (0)23 9249 6855 Fax: +44 (0)23 9249 6014



---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old 
messages are imported into the new server.


RE: Electric Shock and Water

2002-01-03 Thread Peter Merguerian

Jason,

Please explain to your colleague that for North American requirements (as
depicted in the NEC and CEC) there is no risk of electric shock or fire from
circuits in wet locations for up to 21.2 V.  For higher voltages you should
start taking steps to minimize the risk of water ingress and the risk of a
person coming in touch with the circuits.

In Europe, I believe the voltage level is somehat lower; if I recall
correctly, 15 V. Someone correct me if I am wrong!



This e-mail message may contain privileged or confidential information. If
you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose, use, disseminate,
distribute, copy or rely upon this message or attachment in any way. If you
received this e-mail message in error, please return by forwarding the
message and its attachments to the sender.






PETER S. MERGUERIAN
Technical Director
I.T.L. (Product Testing) Ltd.
26 Hacharoshet St., POB 211
Or Yehuda 60251, Israel
Tel: + 972-(0)3-5339022  Fax: + 972-(0)3-5339019
Mobile: + 972-(0)54-838175






-Original Message-
From: jasonxmall...@netscape.net [mailto:jasonxmall...@netscape.net]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 12:57 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Electric Shock and Water



My apologies if this is just too naive...

I am trying to explain to a collegue why there are so many cautions against
mixing water with electricity. He is not the type to accept common sense
as an answer. This is what I have reasoned so far...

MAL-OPERATION
Water is generally conductive. If it enters the area of a chassis that
houses control elements such as relays or switches, it can short circuit the
control elements and cause the affected device to operate unexpectedly,
and sometimes in unexpected ways. 

ENERGIZING SURFACES
Water is generally conductive. If it enters a chassis containing hazardous
voltages it is possible it may act as a conductor of the voltage to an
otherwise un-energized conductive surface. If the conductive surface, for
whatever reason, is itself not sufficiently grounded, it can carry hazardous
voltage potentials. 

INCREASED LEAKAGE CURRENTS
Water is generally conductive. If you are working on a chassis and
accidentally touch an energized contact, you may not experience any shock
because there is no current path between you and the voltage source
supplying the contact. Let us assume the contact is energized by a local AC
mains. There is always SOME leakage current possible from where you are
standing back to a grounded point. Usually it is a very small leakage.
However, if you are standing in water, the leakage current is likely to be
much higher, and you may experience a serious electric shock from your
accidental touching of a contact. 

AVALANCHE EFFECT
Water is generally conductive. If it enters a chassis with high power
electrical components, it can instigate an avalanche of failure that results
in the release of a lot of energy. For example, the water can provide a
short circuit between two potentials. As it carries current, the water may
heat up quite rapidly, in doing so it creates steam. The effects of the heat
and steam may then provide an even lower resistance path for additional
current flow...and so an avalanche of conductivity (from less conductive to
more conductive) is started...

I welcome any comments and additional generic scenarios.

Regards, 

Jason Mallory
Product Safety Consultant. 
 
-- 




__
Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas.
Experience the convenience of buying online with Shop@Netscape!
http://shopnow.netscape.com/

Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at
http://webmail.netscape.com/


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old
messages are imported into the new server.

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Heald

Re: Electric Shock and Water

2002-01-03 Thread John Woodgate

I read in !emc-pstc that Rich Nute ri...@sdd.hp.com wrote (in
200201030028.qaa08...@epgc264.sdd.hp.com) about 'Electric Shock and
Water', on Wed, 2 Jan 2002:
Is there a value (or range of values) for the 
 resistance of water?  

The data exists; it depends, of course, on solute nature and
concentration. Try a web search.

Is there a standard way of
 measuring the resistance of water?

Yes; a conductivity cell. An apparently simple device that isn't. Once
again, a web search will probably disclose more than you ever wanted to
know.
-- 
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk 
After swimming across the Hellespont, I felt like a Hero. 

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old 
messages are imported into the new server.


Re: Electric Shock and Water

2002-01-03 Thread John Woodgate

I read in !emc-pstc that jasonxmall...@netscape.net wrote (in
738426ed.4080ead3.73ea6...@netscape.net) about 'Electric Shock and
Water', on Wed, 2 Jan 2002:

INCREASED LEAKAGE CURRENTS
Water is generally conductive. If you are working on a chassis and 
accidentally 
touch an energized contact, you may not experience any shock because there is 
no 
current path between you and the voltage source supplying the contact. Let us 
assume the contact is energized by a local AC mains. There is always SOME 
leakage current possible from where you are standing back to a grounded point. 
Usually it is a very small leakage. However, if you are standing in water, the 
leakage current is likely to be much higher, and you may experience a serious 
electric shock from your accidental touching of a contact. 

I think this lacks clarity. I suggest that you explain that you don't
get a shock in the first case because your footwear is non-conducting.
But if your feet are wet, there is a conducting path from them to ground
AND you don't even have the limited protection afforded by the
resistance of dry skin.
-- 
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk 
After swimming across the Hellespont, I felt like a Hero. 

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old 
messages are imported into the new server.


RE: Electric Shock and Water

2002-01-03 Thread John Shinn

Water, as is generally conductive, forms a better surface contact ( to you),
reducing the surface
resistivity (yours), thus allowing a greater flow of lethal current through
the body (yours) from
an energised electrical device.

And when coupled with any, or all of the previous faults, you may kiss it
good-by, or
expect to spend a long vacation in the burn unit of your local hospital.

John Shinn, P.E.


-Original Message-
From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of
jasonxmall...@netscape.net
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 2:57 PM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Electric Shock and Water



My apologies if this is just too naive...

I am trying to explain to a collegue why there are so many cautions against
mixing water with electricity. He is not the type to accept common sense
as an answer. This is what I have reasoned so far...

MAL-OPERATION
Water is generally conductive. If it enters the area of a chassis that
houses control elements such as relays or switches, it can short circuit the
control elements and cause the affected device to operate unexpectedly,
and sometimes in unexpected ways.

ENERGIZING SURFACES
Water is generally conductive. If it enters a chassis containing hazardous
voltages it is possible it may act as a conductor of the voltage to an
otherwise un-energized conductive surface. If the conductive surface, for
whatever reason, is itself not sufficiently grounded, it can carry hazardous
voltage potentials.

INCREASED LEAKAGE CURRENTS
Water is generally conductive. If you are working on a chassis and
accidentally touch an energized contact, you may not experience any shock
because there is no current path between you and the voltage source
supplying the contact. Let us assume the contact is energized by a local AC
mains. There is always SOME leakage current possible from where you are
standing back to a grounded point. Usually it is a very small leakage.
However, if you are standing in water, the leakage current is likely to be
much higher, and you may experience a serious electric shock from your
accidental touching of a contact.

AVALANCHE EFFECT
Water is generally conductive. If it enters a chassis with high power
electrical components, it can instigate an avalanche of failure that results
in the release of a lot of energy. For example, the water can provide a
short circuit between two potentials. As it carries current, the water may
heat up quite rapidly, in doing so it creates steam. The effects of the heat
and steam may then provide an even lower resistance path for additional
current flow...and so an avalanche of conductivity (from less conductive to
more conductive) is started...

I welcome any comments and additional generic scenarios.

Regards,

Jason Mallory
Product Safety Consultant.

--




__
Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas.
Experience the convenience of buying online with Shop@Netscape!
http://shopnow.netscape.com/

Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at
http://webmail.netscape.com/


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old
messages are imported into the new server.


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old 
messages are imported into the new server.


Re: Electric Shock and Water

2002-01-03 Thread Rich Nute




Hi Jason:


Water comprises a 3-dimensional resistor.

The value of the resistor depends on:

* the purity of the water itself (the 
  resistance is inversely proportional to the
  purity);
* the dimensions of the electrodes (i.e., the
  conductors in contact with the water);
* the distance between the two electrodes;
* the cross-sectional dimensions of the current 
  pathway;
* other conductors in the water (which may short
  out some of the water, or may carry some of 
  the current to another load).

The hazard of water is that it displaces air 
insulation in typical electrical products.

Most products rely on air insulation for both 
performance and protection against electric shock
(which is why safety standards include minimum
dimensions for clearance).  If water displaces the
air insulation, then an unintended current path is
created.  If the body happens to touch that water,
then the unintended current path may include the
body.

If your colleague understands that air is commonly
employed as an electrical insulator (e.g., overhead
power lines), then I would hope that he could 
understand that water displaces the air, and thereby
provides an unintended (and uncontrolled) conductive 
path.

(Most of your examples are examples of water displacing
air insulation.)

Water on the skin tends to enlarge the electrical 
connection to the body.  The larger the area of 
electrical connection to the body, the more susceptible
the body is to the same value of current.

(This explains your leakage paragraph.)


Best regards,
Rich


ps:  Is there a value (or range of values) for the 
 resistance of water?  Is there a standard way of
 measuring the resistance of water?



---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old 
messages are imported into the new server.