Re: Sound Engineering Practice

2001-09-08 Thread approach

Tongue-In-Check Answer:  Sound Engineering Practice never
makes a mistake.

Practical Answer:  Perform a risk analysis and fix any
hazards.  Remember that the risk analysis covers intended
and unintended uses and normal and abnormal conditions.

In the United States, the signature of a Professional
Engineer on the drawings is usually accepted by a Court that
sound engineering practices were followed.  I think that is
true in Europe, but I do not have personal knowledge of
that.

Best Regards

Bob Schlentz
appro...@minn.net




---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old 
messages are imported into the new server.



RE: Sound Engineering Practice

2001-09-07 Thread Nerad, Daren HS-SNS

John,
mind-enhancing substances:  Is the caffeine in coffee (or tea or
carbonated beverages) a mind-enhancing substance?  IF SO where would many
engineers be without it?!

Program managers would be very upset if engineers were no longer able to
operate under the influence of caffeine!  Many light night / early am
trouble shooting sessions at the OATS have been fueled by caffeine.  In
addition to design efforts...

Have a good Friday chuckle!

Daren A. Nerad
EMC Engineer
815.226.6123


-Original Message-
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 4:47 PM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: Sound Engineering Practice



I read in !emc-pstc that lcr...@tuvam.com wrote (in 3187EE460C488A458D4
dc186f40edc21049...@exchdan.us.tuvworld.com) about 'Sound Engineering
Practice', on Thu, 6 Sep 2001:
I am struggling with one of those darned European directives, the pressure
equipment directive. One aspect of conformance is dependent on the
application of Sound Engineering Practice.

Does anyone have a practical or authoritative definition of Sound
Engineering Practice?. 

It's and idea that easy often thrown about, but it seem very hard to
define.

Sure, it's a catch-all in cases where the engineering is more an art
than a science (i.e. more than seven independent variables!). It's 'what
you see in well-designed products'. For example, where you can't design
something by using recognized mathematical methods, you base your design
on previously successful ones, not on dimensions, etc. revealed to you
under the influence of mind-enhancing substances.
-- 
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk

Eat mink and be dreary!

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old
messages are imported into the new server.

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old 
messages are imported into the new server.



RE: Sound Engineering Practice

2001-09-07 Thread Geoff Lister
Lauren,
I spend a significant part of my free time working with mobile
pressure vessels. As a steam railway locomotive fireman and
repairer, I have to rely, for my continued well-being, on sound
engineering practice.  This has been developed over the last
200 years, often learning from some spectacular failures.
When we rebuild a boiler, it is subjected to detailed third party
inspection and proof testing before we can obtain insurance
cover to use the loco. Every year, a boiler inspector comes to
perform a repeat inspection and safety test, so that we can
continue for the next year. Sometimes this involves an
ultrasound test for plate corrosion. After ten years, all the
fire-tubes are removed and any suspect plates or stays replaced.
This is in addition to the visual inspection I perform before lighting
the fire at the start of the day.
The sound engineering practice relies not only on the original plate
thickness and rivet spacing, but also on regular maintenance,
inspection and testing throughout the working life of the pressure 
vessel. A combination of good original design followed by regular
verification, with the bottom line being the ability to satisfy an
insurance company's inspector.
 
Best regards,
Geoff Lister
Senior Engineer
Motion Media Technology Ltd.,
Bristol, UK.
http://www.motion-media.com http://www.motion-media.com/  

 

-Original Message-
From: lcr...@tuvam.com [mailto:lcr...@tuvam.com]
Sent: 06 September 2001 21:35
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Sound Engineering Practice



I am struggling with one of those darned European directives, the pressure
equipment directive. One aspect of conformance is dependent on the
application of Sound Engineering Practice.

Does anyone have a practical or authoritative definition of Sound
Engineering Practice?. 

It's and idea that easy often thrown about, but it seem very hard to define.


Thanks for any ideas 

Lauren Crane 
TUV Product Service 



Re: Sound Engineering Practice

2001-09-07 Thread Nick Williams


In the case of the PED, it's specifically defined (although I can't 
remember where just now, and don't have time to look). In this 
context, SEP is intended to mean the national practice/standards of a 
member state prior to the implementation of harmonised standards for 
pressure equipment. In the UK, that would be PD5500, but (of likely 
more relevance to you) my understanding is that it also means the 
ASME pressure vessel codes.


Drop me a line if you need more help.

regards

Nick.



At 16:35 -0400 6/9/2001, lcr...@tuvam.com wrote:
I am struggling with one of those darned European directives, the 
pressure equipment directive. One aspect of conformance is dependent 
on the application of Sound Engineering Practice.


Does anyone have a practical or authoritative definition of Sound 
Engineering Practice?.


It's and idea that easy often thrown about, but it seem very hard to define.

Thanks for any ideas

Lauren Crane
TUV Product Service



---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
   No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old messages 
are imported into the new server.



Re: Sound Engineering Practice

2001-09-06 Thread John Woodgate

I read in !emc-pstc that lcr...@tuvam.com wrote (in 3187EE460C488A458D4
dc186f40edc21049...@exchdan.us.tuvworld.com) about 'Sound Engineering
Practice', on Thu, 6 Sep 2001:
I am struggling with one of those darned European directives, the pressure
equipment directive. One aspect of conformance is dependent on the
application of Sound Engineering Practice.

Does anyone have a practical or authoritative definition of Sound
Engineering Practice?. 

It's and idea that easy often thrown about, but it seem very hard to define.

Sure, it's a catch-all in cases where the engineering is more an art
than a science (i.e. more than seven independent variables!). It's 'what
you see in well-designed products'. For example, where you can't design
something by using recognized mathematical methods, you base your design
on previously successful ones, not on dimensions, etc. revealed to you
under the influence of mind-enhancing substances.
-- 
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk 
Eat mink and be dreary!

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old 
messages are imported into the new server.



Re: Sound Engineering Practice

2001-09-06 Thread Rich Nute




Hi Lauren:


   Does anyone have a practical or authoritative definition of Sound
   Engineering Practice?. 

The key word is sound.  Presumably we all know
what engineering practice is.

I checked Merriam-Webster's on-line Collegiate
Dictionary and found the following definition.
The 3rd definition would seem to apply in this
case.
 
Main Entry: sound 
Pronunciation: 'saund
Function: adjective
Etymology: Middle English, from Old English gesund;
akin to Old High German gisunt healthy
Date: 13th century
1 a : free from injury or disease : exhibiting normal
health b : free from flaw, defect, or decay sound
timber
2 : SOLID, FIRM; also : STABLE
3 a : free from error, fallacy, or misapprehension sound
reasoning b : exhibiting or based on thorough
knowledge and experience sound scholarship c :
legally valid a sound title d : logically valid and
having true premises e : agreeing with accepted views :
ORTHODOX
4 a : THOROUGH b : deep and undisturbed a sound
sleep c : HARD, SEVERE a sound whipping
5 : showing good judgment or sense
synonym see HEALTHY, VALID

Presumably, all engineering practice (at least
by the subscribers of this forum) is (or should
be) sound.  Indeed, I suggest that sound 
engineering is nearly a tautology.  (Look that 
up in your dictionary!)

Given the definition, I would suggest that the 
determination of whether a design represents 
sound engineering practice will be in the eyes
of the regulator, not in the eyes of the designer.
Its a lose-win situation.  You lose, the 
regulator wins.

You do the best job you can to soundly design the 
product in accordance with the standard.  This 
may mean that the designer should get up from his 
chair and take specific actions in regard of 3a, 
3b, 3d, and 3e of the definition.  

You said, One aspect of conformance is dependent 
on the application of Sound Engineering Practice.

I think it is smoke.  The statement would be 
nonsense without the word sound.  

Its a weasel-word that says the standard doesn't 
cover everything.  Which they could not say.


Best regards,
Rich




---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old 
messages are imported into the new server.



Sound Engineering Practice

2001-09-06 Thread LCrane
I am struggling with one of those darned European directives, the pressure
equipment directive. One aspect of conformance is dependent on the
application of Sound Engineering Practice.

Does anyone have a practical or authoritative definition of Sound
Engineering Practice?. 

It's and idea that easy often thrown about, but it seem very hard to define.


Thanks for any ideas

Lauren Crane
TUV Product Service