Re: [E-devel] [feature request] new terminology window in current directory

2014-05-26 Thread Andrew Williams
I would second the request for ctrl+shift+n to open a new window.
I was going to add it myself but I seem to have got quite distracted along the 
way.

Andrew

-
Andy Williams
blog:   http://ajwillia.ms
web:http://andywilliams.me





On 21 May 2014, at 03:35, José Romildo Malaquias j.romi...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 08:11:16AM +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
 On Tue, 20 May 2014 15:17:14 -0300 José Romildo Malaquias 
 j.romi...@gmail.com
 said:
 
 Hello.
 
 I would like to be able to open a new terminal window in the current
 working directory from terminology with a key binding. Is that possible?
 
 terminology 
 
 make an alias in your shell if u want it shorter
 
 alias t='terminology '
 
 The feature I am looking for is more sophisticated than that. I do not
 want to type a command in the shell that is running in the terminal.
 
 I would like to be able to hit a key combination (Control + Shift + N,
 for instance) in Terminology, and a new Terminology window is openned
 running a process in the same directory as the original terminal. This
 would work even when a command is being running in the foreground in the
 shell (like vim, for instance).
 
 Terminology already have something like that bound to the
 Control+Shift+t key combination by default, which creates a new tab. I
 just want to create a new window instead of a new tab.
 
 Some terminals like xfce4-terminal and gnome-terminal have this feature
 and I would like to have it in Terminology too. In those terminals it
 runs a process similar to the one that is running in the current
 terminal. For instance, if the terminal is running mutt instead of the
 shell, then the new window will also run mutt.
 
 Romildo
 
 --
 Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
 Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.
 Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available
 Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free.
 http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
 ___
 enlightenment-devel mailing list
 enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

--
The best possible search technologies are now affordable for all companies.
Download your FREE open source Enterprise Search Engine today!
Our experts will assist you in its installation for $59/mo, no commitment.
Test it for FREE on our Cloud platform anytime!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=145328191iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] [feature request] new terminology window in current directory

2014-05-20 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 20 May 2014 15:17:14 -0300 José Romildo Malaquias j.romi...@gmail.com
said:

 Hello.
 
 I would like to be able to open a new terminal window in the current
 working directory from terminology with a key binding. Is that possible?

terminology 

make an alias in your shell if u want it shorter

alias t='terminology '

 If it is not possible currently, can this feature be added in next
 releases?
 
 Romildo
 
 --
 Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
 Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.
 Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available
 Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free.
 http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
 ___
 enlightenment-devel mailing list
 enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
 


-- 
- Codito, ergo sum - I code, therefore I am --
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)ras...@rasterman.com


--
Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.
Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] [feature request] new terminology window in current directory

2014-05-20 Thread José Romildo Malaquias
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 08:11:16AM +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
 On Tue, 20 May 2014 15:17:14 -0300 José Romildo Malaquias 
 j.romi...@gmail.com
 said:
 
  Hello.
  
  I would like to be able to open a new terminal window in the current
  working directory from terminology with a key binding. Is that possible?
 
 terminology 
 
 make an alias in your shell if u want it shorter
 
 alias t='terminology '

The feature I am looking for is more sophisticated than that. I do not
want to type a command in the shell that is running in the terminal.

I would like to be able to hit a key combination (Control + Shift + N,
for instance) in Terminology, and a new Terminology window is openned
running a process in the same directory as the original terminal. This
would work even when a command is being running in the foreground in the
shell (like vim, for instance).

Terminology already have something like that bound to the
Control+Shift+t key combination by default, which creates a new tab. I
just want to create a new window instead of a new tab.

Some terminals like xfce4-terminal and gnome-terminal have this feature
and I would like to have it in Terminology too. In those terminals it
runs a process similar to the one that is running in the current
terminal. For instance, if the terminal is running mutt instead of the
shell, then the new window will also run mutt.

Romildo

--
Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.
Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] Feature Request: Separate submenu backgrounds

2008-03-04 Thread The Rasterman
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:04:34 +0900 Toma [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:

 After doing a bit of design with this new grunge theme and wanting a
 little skull in the menu, I found that its impossible to set a
 separate submenu background and as such, have the skull on every menu.
 Its a little too much for everywhere. Id like to see it possible to
 have a separate background for it.
 Im aware of  name: e/widgets/menu/default/submenu_bg but that only
 sets the background for the actual submenu item.
 If no-one bothers, I might try copy and pasting some code and seeing
 if I can get it to work, but I really cant code. Only EDJE and GIMP :D
 Thanks,
 Toma-

this is part of a more general limitation - i know we should be able to have
different menu design per menu (toplevel then sub, then sub-sub and sub-sub-sub
etc.) as well as different ones for specific menus (start menu different to
popup menu over some gadget for example).


-- 
- Codito, ergo sum - I code, therefore I am --
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] Feature Request: Option to lock ibar entries

2006-11-19 Thread The Rasterman
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 13:46:36 +1100 Daniel Kasak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
babbled:

 A number of people here at work are 'losing' ibar entries by dragging 
 them off the bar. I suppose I could make 
 ~/.e/e/applications/bar/default/.order read-only ( haven't tested, but 
 should work, right? ), but maybe we could have an option to simply lock 
 it from changes / accidental removals?

well that was the original idea - to remove items. but i can see how it can
lead to accidental removals easily. how about this - you have to drag the icon
a long way away ( 200 pixels) for it to be removed? sound good?

 -- 
 Daniel Kasak
 IT Developer
 NUS Consulting Group
 Level 5, 77 Pacific Highway
 North Sydney, NSW, Australia 2060
 T: (+61) 2 9922-7676 / F: (+61) 2 9922 7989
 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 website: http://www.nusconsulting.com.au
 
 -
 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
 ___
 enlightenment-devel mailing list
 enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
 


-- 
- Codito, ergo sum - I code, therefore I am --
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)[EMAIL PROTECTED]
裸好多
Tokyo, Japan (東京 日本)

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] Feature Request: Option to lock ibar entries

2006-11-19 Thread David Seikel
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 16:49:45 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 13:46:36 +1100 Daniel Kasak
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
 
  A number of people here at work are 'losing' ibar entries by
  dragging them off the bar. I suppose I could make 
  ~/.e/e/applications/bar/default/.order read-only ( haven't tested,
  but should work, right? ), but maybe we could have an option to
  simply lock it from changes / accidental removals?
 
 well that was the original idea - to remove items. but i can see how
 it can lead to accidental removals easily. how about this - you have
 to drag the icon a long way away ( 200 pixels) for it to be removed?
 sound good?

Why not an Are you sure? dialog?


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] Feature Request: Option to lock ibar entries

2006-11-19 Thread Brian Mattern
On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 04:49:45PM +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
 On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 13:46:36 +1100 Daniel Kasak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 babbled:
 
  A number of people here at work are 'losing' ibar entries by dragging 
  them off the bar. I suppose I could make 
  ~/.e/e/applications/bar/default/.order read-only ( haven't tested, but 
  should work, right? ), but maybe we could have an option to simply lock 
  it from changes / accidental removals?
 
 well that was the original idea - to remove items. but i can see how it can
 lead to accidental removals easily. how about this - you have to drag the icon
 a long way away ( 200 pixels) for it to be removed? sound good?
 

As long as the cursor changes in some way to indicate dropping will
remove this item :)

rephorm


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] Feature Request: Option to lock ibar entries

2006-11-19 Thread The Rasterman
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 22:57:18 +1000 David Seikel [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:

 On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 16:49:45 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 13:46:36 +1100 Daniel Kasak
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
  
   A number of people here at work are 'losing' ibar entries by
   dragging them off the bar. I suppose I could make 
   ~/.e/e/applications/bar/default/.order read-only ( haven't tested,
   but should work, right? ), but maybe we could have an option to
   simply lock it from changes / accidental removals?
  
  well that was the original idea - to remove items. but i can see how
  it can lead to accidental removals easily. how about this - you have
  to drag the icon a long way away ( 200 pixels) for it to be removed?
  sound good?
 
 Why not an Are you sure? dialog?

that is also possible - still need the code to put the icon back where it was
tho... :)


-- 
- Codito, ergo sum - I code, therefore I am --
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)[EMAIL PROTECTED]
裸好多
Tokyo, Japan (東京 日本)

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] Feature Request: Option to lock ibar entries

2006-11-19 Thread Виктор Кожухаров
В нд, 2006-11-19 в 16:49 +0900, Carsten Haitzler написа:
 On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 13:46:36 +1100 Daniel Kasak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 babbled:
 
  A number of people here at work are 'losing' ibar entries by dragging 
  them off the bar. I suppose I could make 
  ~/.e/e/applications/bar/default/.order read-only ( haven't tested, but 
  should work, right? ), but maybe we could have an option to simply lock 
  it from changes / accidental removals?
 
 well that was the original idea - to remove items. but i can see how it can
 lead to accidental removals easily. how about this - you have to drag the icon
 a long way away ( 200 pixels) for it to be removed? sound good?
 
We should probably implement this the same way as with the pager windows
dragging. It's actually the same as what you suggested, but with an
option to control the actual length of the drag that will start removing

  -- 
  Daniel Kasak
  IT Developer
  NUS Consulting Group
  Level 5, 77 Pacific Highway
  North Sydney, NSW, Australia 2060
  T: (+61) 2 9922-7676 / F: (+61) 2 9922 7989
  email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  website: http://www.nusconsulting.com.au
  
  -
  Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
  Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
  opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
  http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
  ___
  enlightenment-devel mailing list
  enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
  
 
 
-- 
Виктор Кожухаров /Viktor Kojouharov/


signature.asc
Description: Това е	 цифрово	 подписана	 част от	 писмото
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] Feature Request: Option to lock ibar entries

2006-11-19 Thread Виктор Кожухаров
В нд, 2006-11-19 в 22:57 +1000, David Seikel написа:
 On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 16:49:45 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 13:46:36 +1100 Daniel Kasak
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
  
   A number of people here at work are 'losing' ibar entries by
   dragging them off the bar. I suppose I could make 
   ~/.e/e/applications/bar/default/.order read-only ( haven't tested,
   but should work, right? ), but maybe we could have an option to
   simply lock it from changes / accidental removals?
  
  well that was the original idea - to remove items. but i can see how
  it can lead to accidental removals easily. how about this - you have
  to drag the icon a long way away ( 200 pixels) for it to be removed?
  sound good?
 
 Why not an Are you sure? dialog?

people hate dialogs. and in due time, all of them will press the [yes]
button, without reading what it says.
 -
 Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
 Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
 opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
 ___ enlightenment-devel mailing 
 list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net 
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
-- 
Виктор Кожухаров /Viktor Kojouharov/


signature.asc
Description: Това е	 цифрово	 подписана	 част от	 писмото
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] Feature Request: Option to lock ibar entries

2006-11-19 Thread David Seikel
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 17:11:42 +0200 Виктор Кожухаров
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 В нд, 2006-11-19 в 22:57 +1000, David Seikel написа:
  On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 16:49:45 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 13:46:36 +1100 Daniel Kasak
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
   
A number of people here at work are 'losing' ibar entries by
dragging them off the bar. I suppose I could make 
~/.e/e/applications/bar/default/.order read-only ( haven't
tested, but should work, right? ), but maybe we could have an
option to simply lock it from changes / accidental removals?
   
   well that was the original idea - to remove items. but i can see
   how it can lead to accidental removals easily. how about this -
   you have to drag the icon a long way away ( 200 pixels) for it
   to be removed? sound good?
  
  Why not an Are you sure? dialog?
 
 people hate dialogs. and in due time, all of them will press the [yes]
 button, without reading what it says.

Ah, but if we have a dialog, then we can blame them for their own
stupidity.

Maybe a trash can / garbage can / black hole is the proper thing to
do?  With edje, we should be able to have a cool animated black hole
that spins.  B-)


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] Feature Request: Option to lock ibar entries

2006-11-19 Thread Morten Nilsen
David Seikel wrote:
 Maybe a trash can / garbage can / black hole is the proper thing to
 do?  With edje, we should be able to have a cool animated black hole
 that spins.  B-)

Complete with polar beams of high power radiation that kills all windows
in their path!

-- 
Morten
:wq

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] Feature request!

2006-03-06 Thread The Rasterman
On Mon, 6 Mar 2006 10:06:18 +0100 Anders Troback [EMAIL PROTECTED]
babbled:

 Hi,
 
 it should be very nice if there was a way to have a transparent option
 for the desklocker! Now I'm using xtrlock but it have been nice to have
 it in E!

not really possible - not without grabbing the screen. not going to be doing 
those hacks. you will get trans when finally we do compositing in e18 or e19 
(and xcomposite etc. is ready for use). when that happens the existing design 
will work perfectly and just work (tm). we wont have to REMOVE hacks.

 \\troback
 -- 
 
 
 Microsoft is not the answer.
 Microsoft is the question.
 And 'No' is the answer!
 
 Anders Trobäck
 http://www.troback.com
 
 
 ---
 This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
 that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
 and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
 http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd___
 enlightenment-devel mailing list
 enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
 


-- 
- Codito, ergo sum - I code, therefore I am --
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)[EMAIL PROTECTED]
裸好多
Tokyo, Japan (東京 日本)


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid0944bid$1720dat1642
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] Feature request!

2006-03-06 Thread Hisham Mardam Bey
On 3/6/06, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Mon, 6 Mar 2006 10:06:18 +0100 Anders Troback [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 babbled:

  Hi,
 
  it should be very nice if there was a way to have a transparent option
  for the desklocker! Now I'm using xtrlock but it have been nice to have
  it in E!


 not really possible - not without grabbing the screen. not going to be doing 
 those hacks. you will get trans when finally we do compositing in e18 or e19 
 (and xcomposite etc. is ready for use). when that happens the existing design 
 will work perfectly and just work (tm). we wont have to REMOVE hacks.


I believe Anders want to simply not display desklock's bg, ie, have
the desktop showing, and have it locked, like the first version of
desklock. So we would simply have to not display the desklock bg.


--
Hisham Mardam Bey
MSc (Computer Science)
http://hisham.cc/
+9613609386
Codito Ergo Sum (I Code Therefore I Am)


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid0944bid$1720dat1642
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] Feature request!

2006-03-06 Thread Aleksej Struk
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 12:01:13PM +0200, Hisham Mardam Bey wrote:
// On 3/6/06, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
//  On Mon, 6 Mar 2006 10:06:18 +0100 Anders Troback [EMAIL PROTECTED]
//  babbled:
// 
//   Hi,
//  
//   it should be very nice if there was a way to have a transparent option
//   for the desklocker! Now I'm using xtrlock but it have been nice to have
//   it in E!
// 
// 
//  not really possible - not without grabbing the screen. not going to be 
doing those hacks. you will get trans when finally we do compositing in e18 or 
e19 (and xcomposite etc. is ready for use). when that happens the existing 
design will work perfectly and just work (tm). we wont have to REMOVE hacks.
// 
// 
// I believe Anders want to simply not display desklock's bg, ie, have
// the desktop showing, and have it locked, like the first version of
// desklock. So we would simply have to not display the desklock bg.

Basically create a transparent background.edj and thats all. :)


// --
// Hisham Mardam Bey
// MSc (Computer Science)
// http://hisham.cc/
// +9613609386
// Codito Ergo Sum (I Code Therefore I Am)
// 
// 
// ---
// This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
// that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
// and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
// http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid0944bid$1720dat1642
// ___
// enlightenment-devel mailing list
// enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
// https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

-- 

Aleksej Struk
Master Degree Student
Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
Faculty of Computer Science
phone: +39-0471-061749
cell phone: +39-3204627049 +370-61278908
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid0944bid$1720dat1642
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] Feature request!

2006-03-06 Thread Hisham Mardam Bey
On 3/6/06, Aleksej Struk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 12:01:13PM +0200, Hisham Mardam Bey wrote:
 // On 3/6/06, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 //  On Mon, 6 Mar 2006 10:06:18 +0100 Anders Troback [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 //  babbled:
 // 
 //   Hi,
 //  
 //   it should be very nice if there was a way to have a transparent option
 //   for the desklocker! Now I'm using xtrlock but it have been nice to have
 //   it in E!
 // 
 //
 //  not really possible - not without grabbing the screen. not going to be 
 doing those hacks. you will get trans when finally we do compositing in e18 
 or e19 (and xcomposite etc. is ready for use). when that happens the existing 
 design will work perfectly and just work (tm). we wont have to REMOVE hacks.
 // 
 //
 // I believe Anders want to simply not display desklock's bg, ie, have
 // the desktop showing, and have it locked, like the first version of
 // desklock. So we would simply have to not display the desklock bg.

 Basically create a transparent background.edj and thats all. :)



Perhaps split the edje into two groups:

1) the box where the password typing is shown
2) the bg

And allow the user to hide the bg (option), and make the password box
show only when they start typing (also option)? That way it works just
like xtrlock until you start typing stuff. It would need more work
though, like when you press enter, or escape, the entry box is hidden
etc. so I wonder if its really worth it (=

At any rate, the easy way to do this is to provide the option to not
display the edje hence giving you the transparent xtrlock effect
you're looking for.

--
Hisham Mardam Bey
MSc (Computer Science)
http://hisham.cc/
+9613609386
Codito Ergo Sum (I Code Therefore I Am)


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid0944bid$1720dat1642
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] Feature request!

2006-03-06 Thread Anders Troback
On Mon, 6 Mar 2006 12:01:13 +0200
Hisham Mardam Bey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On 3/6/06, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
  On Mon, 6 Mar 2006 10:06:18 +0100 Anders Troback
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
 
   Hi,
  
   it should be very nice if there was a way to have a transparent
   option for the desklocker! Now I'm using xtrlock but it have been
   nice to have it in E!
 
 
  not really possible - not without grabbing the screen. not going to
  be doing those hacks. you will get trans when finally we do
  compositing in e18 or e19 (and xcomposite etc. is ready for use).
  when that happens the existing design will work perfectly and just
  work (tm). we wont have to REMOVE hacks.
 
 
 I believe Anders want to simply not display desklock's bg, ie, have
 the desktop showing, and have it locked, like the first version of
 desklock. So we would simply have to not display the desklock bg.
 
 

Exactly what I mean:-)

Possible?



---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=110944bid=241720dat=121642
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] Feature request!

2006-03-06 Thread Aleksej Struk
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 12:14:57PM +0200, Hisham Mardam Bey wrote:
// On 3/6/06, Aleksej Struk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
//  On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 12:01:13PM +0200, Hisham Mardam Bey wrote:
//  // On 3/6/06, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
//  //  On Mon, 6 Mar 2006 10:06:18 +0100 Anders Troback [EMAIL PROTECTED]
//  //  babbled:
//  // 
//  //   Hi,
//  //  
//  //   it should be very nice if there was a way to have a transparent 
option
//  //   for the desklocker! Now I'm using xtrlock but it have been nice to 
have
//  //   it in E!
//  // 
//  //
//  //  not really possible - not without grabbing the screen. not going to 
be doing those hacks. you will get trans when finally we do compositing in e18 
or e19 (and xcomposite etc. is ready for use). when that happens the existing 
design will work perfectly and just work (tm). we wont have to REMOVE hacks.
//  // 
//  //
//  // I believe Anders want to simply not display desklock's bg, ie, have
//  // the desktop showing, and have it locked, like the first version of
//  // desklock. So we would simply have to not display the desklock bg.
// 
//  Basically create a transparent background.edj and thats all. :)
// 
// 
// 
// Perhaps split the edje into two groups:
// 
// 1) the box where the password typing is shown
// 2) the bg

This is what is already done. Because of this I said - create an
transparent background. But I think it is not necessarily to have this
transparency.

From my opinion - what locker should do is to lock and not
to show what is on the desktops. :)

// And allow the user to hide the bg (option), and make the password box
// show only when they start typing (also option)? That way it works just
// like xtrlock until you start typing stuff. It would need more work
// though, like when you press enter, or escape, the entry box is hidden
// etc. so I wonder if its really worth it (=

// At any rate, the easy way to do this is to provide the option to not
// display the edje hence giving you the transparent xtrlock effect
// you're looking for.
// 
// --
// Hisham Mardam Bey
// MSc (Computer Science)
// http://hisham.cc/
// +9613609386
// Codito Ergo Sum (I Code Therefore I Am)
// 
// 
// ---
// This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
// that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
// and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
// http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid0944bid$1720dat1642
// ___
// enlightenment-devel mailing list
// enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
// https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

-- 

Aleksej Struk
Master Degree Student
Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
Faculty of Computer Science
phone: +39-0471-061749
cell phone: +39-3204627049 +370-61278908
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid0944bid$1720dat1642
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] Feature request!

2006-03-06 Thread Hisham Mardam Bey
On 3/6/06, Aleksej Struk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 12:14:57PM +0200, Hisham Mardam Bey wrote:
 // On 3/6/06, Aleksej Struk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 //  On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 12:01:13PM +0200, Hisham Mardam Bey wrote:
 //  // On 3/6/06, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 //  //  On Mon, 6 Mar 2006 10:06:18 +0100 Anders Troback [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 //  //  babbled:
 //  // 
 //  //   Hi,
 //  //  
 //  //   it should be very nice if there was a way to have a transparent 
 option
 //  //   for the desklocker! Now I'm using xtrlock but it have been nice 
 to have
 //  //   it in E!
 //  // 
 //  //
 //  //  not really possible - not without grabbing the screen. not going to 
 be doing those hacks. you will get trans when finally we do compositing in 
 e18 or e19 (and xcomposite etc. is ready for use). when that happens the 
 existing design will work perfectly and just work (tm). we wont have to 
 REMOVE hacks.
 //  // 
 //  //
 //  // I believe Anders want to simply not display desklock's bg, ie, have
 //  // the desktop showing, and have it locked, like the first version of
 //  // desklock. So we would simply have to not display the desklock bg.
 // 
 //  Basically create a transparent background.edj and thats all. :)
 // 
 // 
 //
 // Perhaps split the edje into two groups:
 //
 // 1) the box where the password typing is shown
 // 2) the bg

 This is what is already done. Because of this I said - create an
 transparent background. But I think it is not necessarily to have this
 transparency.

 From my opinion - what locker should do is to lock and not
 to show what is on the desktops. :)


I guess since the author doesnt want to do it right now, Anders can
supply us with a patch if he wants to see this feature in (=

 // And allow the user to hide the bg (option), and make the password box
 // show only when they start typing (also option)? That way it works just
 // like xtrlock until you start typing stuff. It would need more work
 // though, like when you press enter, or escape, the entry box is hidden
 // etc. so I wonder if its really worth it (=

 // At any rate, the easy way to do this is to provide the option to not
 // display the edje hence giving you the transparent xtrlock effect
 // you're looking for.



--
Hisham Mardam Bey
MSc (Computer Science)
http://hisham.cc/
+9613609386
Codito Ergo Sum (I Code Therefore I Am)


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid0944bid$1720dat1642
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel