Re: [EVDL] FW: Design News: Why Aren't Electrical Cars Sales Better? It's the battery.

2015-05-20 Thread Paul Dove via EV
Well I am sorry he got annoyed and left but I still disagree. All we are seeing 
is the adoption curve. Any new technology takes time to be mass accepted. 
Before the lithium battery electric vehicles were a novelty. Now they are here 
to stay.

Sent from my iPhone

 On May 20, 2015, at 1:45 AM, EVDL Administrator via EV ev@lists.evdl.org 
 wrote:
 
 On 19 May 2015 at 22:52, jerry freedomev via EV wrote:
 
 Hi Arak and all, Well you did say that since EV's didn't fit 30% of the
 population needs it wasn't good on an EV list kind of should expect
 blowback.   
 
 Well said Jerry, but Arak isn't listening. Thus challenged, he got indignant 
 and unsubscribed.  :-(
 
 Let us not forget the immortal Fidonet Principles:
Thou shalt not be too annoying.
Thou shalt not be too easily annoyed.
 
 I'm sympathetic with some of his points, though.  Most of us here don't 
 think EVs have to manage all the missions and trips that ICEVs can, but 
 we're not normal vehicle buyers.  The average person is not going to pay an 
 ICEV price for a car that does less and covers fewer of his transporation 
 needs than an ICEV does.  That's just normal, rational consumer behavior.
 
 To really take off, EVs that look and cost like ICEVs have to work like 
 ICEVs.  EVs that don't, don't.  Hint, hint.
 
 David Roden - Akron, Ohio, USA
 EVDL Administrator
 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
 EVDL Information: http://www.evdl.org/help/
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 
 Note: mail sent to evpost and etpost addresses will not 
 reach me.  To send a private message, please obtain my 
 email address from the webpage http://www.evdl.org/help/ .
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
 
 
 ___
 UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
 http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
 For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
 (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
 
___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)



[EVDL] FW: Design News: Why Aren't Electrical Cars Sales Better? It's the battery.

2015-05-19 Thread Arak Leatham via EV
I admit I'm not sure how that plays out for everyone. 
 
I had the decision myself recently, I drive 42 miles each way. I had to balance 
out a moderate credit score and a super tight budget, and monthly costs. And I 
don't want or have the ability to charge at my work location. (unless it were 
flow batteries and as easy as petrol, 5min ok, 10min not so much)
 
No way in heck I could get approval for a EV that could work for me. I got a 
2014 PriusC at $216/mo, trade-in 2007 Prius. Am I EV? Not so much, but I do get 
50-60mpg often. You do the math on all costs involved. But I still couldn't get 
a loan approved over $25k(-6k trade-in) or so.
 
So for me it wasn't an issue of adoption of the idea. I would love a full on 
EV, if it suited the use cycle I need. It was budgetary and situational.
I belong to the 99%. A good portion of us are in my same boat.
 





Arak Leatham - ( My hobby: I want 300 MPG )
 
 Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 11:39:33 -0500
 To: ev@lists.evdl.org
 Subject: Re: [EVDL] Design News: Why Aren't Electrical Cars Sales Better? 
 It's the battery.
 From: ev@lists.evdl.org
 
 It's the same old argument only its not valid. All we are witnessing now is 
 the adoption curve. All new technology takes time to catch on.
 
 Everyone I have let drive my car said, oh, this is just like a car. 
 
 1 out of ten go out and buy one after driving one. In my experience
 
 Sent from my iPhone
 
  On May 19, 2015, at 11:08 AM, Arak Leatham via EV ev@lists.evdl.org wrote:
  
  Not stupid at all. You just resent the facts presented in the case.  If you 
  want EV's to succeed, you need to face what potential customers think. 
  Solve their issues, and whalla, Success! Stupid or not, those are your 
  customers. The article just simply laid out their thinking.  
  
  
  
  
  Arak Leatham - ( My hobby: I want 300 MPG )
  
  Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 11:31:52 -0400
  To: ev@lists.evdl.org
  Subject: Re: [EVDL] Design News: Why Aren't Electrical Cars Sales Better? 
  It's the battery.
  From: ev@lists.evdl.org
  
  How trite!... Also, completely wrong.
  The current battery is what makes electric cars viable...
  http://www.designnews.com/author.asp?section_id=3710doc_id=277584
  
  Here is my response to this stupid article:
  
  The basis of your uninformed claim Yes, Electric Cars Still Need an
  Innovative Battery is your century and 3 generation old legacy of
  gas-tank/gas-station narrow minded thinking.
  
  Authors who write about EV's with that legacy are blind to the value of
  EV's.  Yes, EV's do not meet ALL of the versatility of the gas car, but
  they DO meet (and far exceed by a factor of three or more) the value of
  local travel and commuting which is over 80% of our national vehicle
  transportation (and emissions)!
  
  Why are you so dead set against the 80% solution (which every EV owner
  will tell you gives them 100% satisfaction and in fact saves them 3:to:1
  on operating costs. And costs LESS than the average Gas car?
  
  You are quoting 2008 technology, and market, and thinking.  Sure in 2010,
  the first EV's cost more than comparable gas cars.  But by 2013 with 15
  EV's on the market and the $5k price drop by Nissan and GM, the average
  cost* of an EV broke even with the average costs of all gas cars sold in
  America ($31k).  By 2015, the average price* of all EV's  ($29k) is now
  $3k LESS than the average gas car and if you ignore the Luxury Tesla, then
  the average EV cost* ($26k) is now $5k less than the average gas car?
  
  And by the end of 2015, there are 40 EV's on the market further bringing
  down that average cost (*after incentives).
  
  So where on earth can you make your outlandish (outdated legacy-thinking)
  claim about batteries when people who buy EV's represent the HIGHEST
  satisfied car customers and their cars fully meet their needs?
  
  What is missing is awareness and education . of which your article is
  completely misguided and fails.
  
  Please see http://aprs.org/EV-misinformation.html
  
  Sorry for the tone.  But it is gas driving authors with articles like
  yours that are holding back EV sales, not the battery.  The battery HAS
  SUCCEEDED in bringing us the ideal local-travel and commuter car.  Let
  those that can use it buy it and get out of the way.
  
  Sorry for the tone.  But rants feel good sometimes..
  
  Bob, WB4APR
  ___
  UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
  http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
  For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
  (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
  
  
  -- next part --
  An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
  URL: 
  http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20150519/5806538e/attachment.htm
  ___
  UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
  http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
  For EV drag 

Re: [EVDL] FW: Design News: Why Aren't Electrical Cars Sales Better? It's the battery.

2015-05-19 Thread paul dove via EV
The BMW would work
  From: Arak Leatham via EV ev@lists.evdl.org
 To: ev@lists.evdl.org ev@lists.evdl.org 
 Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 12:05 PM
 Subject: [EVDL] FW: Design News: Why Aren't Electrical Cars Sales Better? It's 
the battery.
   
I admit I'm not sure how that plays out for everyone. 
 
I had the decision myself recently, I drive 42 miles each way. I had to balance 
out a moderate credit score and a super tight budget, and monthly costs. And I 
don't want or have the ability to charge at my work location. (unless it were 
flow batteries and as easy as petrol, 5min ok, 10min not so much)
 
No way in heck I could get approval for a EV that could work for me. I got a 
2014 PriusC at $216/mo, trade-in 2007 Prius. Am I EV? Not so much, but I do get 
50-60mpg often. You do the math on all costs involved. But I still couldn't get 
a loan approved over $25k(-6k trade-in) or so.
 
So for me it wasn't an issue of adoption of the idea. I would love a full on 
EV, if it suited the use cycle I need. It was budgetary and situational.
I belong to the 99%. A good portion of us are in my same boat.
 





Arak Leatham - ( My hobby: I want 300 MPG )
 
 Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 11:39:33 -0500
 To: ev@lists.evdl.org
 Subject: Re: [EVDL] Design News: Why Aren't Electrical Cars Sales Better?    
 It's the battery.
 From: ev@lists.evdl.org
 
 It's the same old argument only its not valid. All we are witnessing now is 
 the adoption curve. All new technology takes time to catch on.
 
 Everyone I have let drive my car said, oh, this is just like a car. 
 
 1 out of ten go out and buy one after driving one. In my experience
 
 Sent from my iPhone
 
  On May 19, 2015, at 11:08 AM, Arak Leatham via EV ev@lists.evdl.org wrote:
  
  Not stupid at all. You just resent the facts presented in the case.  If you 
  want EV's to succeed, you need to face what potential customers think. 
  Solve their issues, and whalla, Success! Stupid or not, those are your 
  customers. The article just simply laid out their thinking.  
  
  
  
  
  Arak Leatham - ( My hobby: I want 300 MPG )
  
  Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 11:31:52 -0400
  To: ev@lists.evdl.org
  Subject: Re: [EVDL] Design News: Why Aren't Electrical Cars Sales Better? 
  It's the battery.
  From: ev@lists.evdl.org
  
  How trite!... Also, completely wrong.
  The current battery is what makes electric cars viable...
  http://www.designnews.com/author.asp?section_id=3710doc_id=277584
  
  Here is my response to this stupid article:
  
  The basis of your uninformed claim Yes, Electric Cars Still Need an
  Innovative Battery is your century and 3 generation old legacy of
  gas-tank/gas-station narrow minded thinking.
  
  Authors who write about EV's with that legacy are blind to the value of
  EV's.  Yes, EV's do not meet ALL of the versatility of the gas car, but
  they DO meet (and far exceed by a factor of three or more) the value of
  local travel and commuting which is over 80% of our national vehicle
  transportation (and emissions)!
  
  Why are you so dead set against the 80% solution (which every EV owner
  will tell you gives them 100% satisfaction and in fact saves them 3:to:1
  on operating costs. And costs LESS than the average Gas car?
  
  You are quoting 2008 technology, and market, and thinking.  Sure in 2010,
  the first EV's cost more than comparable gas cars.  But by 2013 with 15
  EV's on the market and the $5k price drop by Nissan and GM, the average
  cost* of an EV broke even with the average costs of all gas cars sold in
  America ($31k).  By 2015, the average price* of all EV's  ($29k) is now
  $3k LESS than the average gas car and if you ignore the Luxury Tesla, then
  the average EV cost* ($26k) is now $5k less than the average gas car?
  
  And by the end of 2015, there are 40 EV's on the market further bringing
  down that average cost (*after incentives).
  
  So where on earth can you make your outlandish (outdated legacy-thinking)
  claim about batteries when people who buy EV's represent the HIGHEST
  satisfied car customers and their cars fully meet their needs?
  
  What is missing is awareness and education . of which your article is
  completely misguided and fails.
  
  Please see http://aprs.org/EV-misinformation.html
  
  Sorry for the tone.  But it is gas driving authors with articles like
  yours that are holding back EV sales, not the battery.  The battery HAS
  SUCCEEDED in bringing us the ideal local-travel and commuter car.  Let
  those that can use it buy it and get out of the way.
  
  Sorry for the tone.  But rants feel good sometimes..
  
  Bob, WB4APR
  ___
  UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
  http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
  For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
  (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
  
                         
  -- next part --
  An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
  URL: 
  http

Re: [EVDL] FW: Design News: Why Aren't Electrical Cars Sales Better? It's the battery.

2015-05-19 Thread jerry freedomev via EV
    Hi Arak and All,   Well you did say that since EV's didn't 
fit 30% of the population needs it wasn't good on an EV list kind of should 
expect blowback.   EV's to sell millions only needs 10% of the 
market range isn't the problem.    The problem is lack of choices, 
lack of salespeople to sell what there is, advertising by those selling them.   
 And their lack of RE plug, mounting points so any EV can have 
unlimited range.   Or for Alum/Zinc/air RE giving 1,000 mile range. 
These RE's are proven, viable solution big auto won't use is why EV's are 
moving slow.    But you have other solutions like a used Volt or 
something you could do easily, get a Karman Ghia and convert to a Volt or other 
15kw+ pack should get an easy 120 mile range for around $10k.  On lead they 
have used just 100wthr/mile.   Or make a BrubakerBox type Van on a 
VW chassis.On living near work you take 400+ hrs or 10 work 
weeks just going to, coming from work plus transport costs so he had a valid 
point even if you can't do anything about it.   
 Jerry Dycus
   From: Arak Leatham via EV ev@lists.evdl.org
 To: ev@lists.evdl.org ev@lists.evdl.org 
 Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 3:35 PM
 Subject: Re: [EVDL] FW: Design News: Why Aren't Electrical Cars Sales Better? 
It's the battery.
   
wow, so I see, your answer for the general public is to live where EV's will 
work? That's very draconic of you, and presumptive. I live where I live because 
I must.
 
This is the reason many people drop out of the EV interest, obtuse requirements 
and limitations. 
 
If you are trying to save the planet, by scrunching all people to less than 
30mi from work? That's not a sustainable goal(for many reasons). But of course, 
everyone living more than 30 isn't either. The real answer is limiting world 
population's to less than 5billion and we know that won't fly either.
 
Seriously, I checked with BMW, the price is $46k. The range is 70-80miles. The 
price is way too high and range too short to suit my need. 
 
Anyway, I'm back to dropping out until a more amenable world of ideas prevails. 
Point done. I leave the floor.
 





Arak Leatham - ( My hobby: I want 300 MPG )
 
 Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 15:14:18 -0400
 To: ev@lists.evdl.org
 Subject: Re: [EVDL] FW: Design News: Why Aren't Electrical Cars Sales Better? 
 It's the battery.
 From: ev@lists.evdl.org
 
 I would argue that you're living or working in the wrong place. 42 miles 
 each way is a waste of your time and of gasoline or electricity.
 
 --Rick
 
 On 05/19/2015 01:05 PM, Arak Leatham via EV wrote:
  I admit I'm not sure how that plays out for everyone.
 
  I had the decision myself recently, I drive 42 miles each way. I had
  to balance out a moderate credit score and a super tight budget, and
  monthly costs. And I don't want or have the ability to charge at my
  work location. (unless it were flow batteries and as easy as petrol,
  5min ok, 10min not so much)
 ___
 UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
 http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
 For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
 (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
 
                         
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20150519/5d81fab1/attachment.htm


___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)



  
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20150519/57f10915/attachment-0001.htm
___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)



Re: [EVDL] FW: Design News: Why Aren't Electrical Cars Sales Better? It's the battery.

2015-05-19 Thread Zeke Yewdall via EV
Part of the problem is that for a lot of the population there aren't 15
different EV's available... there are two.  The Nissan Leaf and and Tesla
S.  And maybe the Mitsubishi -- not sure if they are still offering it
here.  I see the Leafs everywhere around here, and usually see a Tesla at
least a few times a week -- so sales of those are doing pretty well here.
Since we aren't in a compliance state, all of the other dealerships can't
get their manufacturers EV's to sell though.   I would prefer the utility
of a Kia Soul or even a NV200 van over the Leaf, but can't get those here
(I've asked.).

On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Stephen via EV ev@lists.evdl.org wrote:

 EVs aren't the answer for everyone... Different horses for different
 courses...

 Regards,
 Stephen

 On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Paul Dove via EV ev@lists.evdl.org
 wrote:

  First off, there are hundreds of options in personal transportation. Not
  one vehicle fits all needs so person must choose. This doesn't change
 just
  because you're driving and electric vehicle it doesn't suit all needs but
  neither does a truck or station wagon or Corvette you get the picture. As
  for the BMW it has extended range have another 70 or 80 miles on
 gasoline.
 
  Sent from my iPhone
 
   On May 19, 2015, at 2:35 PM, Arak Leatham via EV ev@lists.evdl.org
  wrote:
  
   wow, so I see, your answer for the general public is to live where EV's
  will work? That's very draconic of you, and presumptive. I live where I
  live because I must.
  
   This is the reason many people drop out of the EV interest, obtuse
  requirements and limitations.
  
   If you are trying to save the planet, by scrunching all people to less
  than 30mi from work? That's not a sustainable goal(for many reasons). But
  of course, everyone living more than 30 isn't either. The real answer is
  limiting world population's to less than 5billion and we know that won't
  fly either.
  
   Seriously, I checked with BMW, the price is $46k. The range is
  70-80miles. The price is way too high and range too short to suit my
 need.
  
   Anyway, I'm back to dropping out until a more amenable world of ideas
  prevails. Point done. I leave the floor.
  
  
  
  
  
  
   Arak Leatham - ( My hobby: I want 300 MPG )
  
   Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 15:14:18 -0400
   To: ev@lists.evdl.org
   Subject: Re: [EVDL] FW: Design News: Why Aren't Electrical Cars Sales
  Better? It's the battery.
   From: ev@lists.evdl.org
  
   I would argue that you're living or working in the wrong place. 42
 miles
   each way is a waste of your time and of gasoline or electricity.
  
   --Rick
  
   On 05/19/2015 01:05 PM, Arak Leatham via EV wrote:
   I admit I'm not sure how that plays out for everyone.
  
   I had the decision myself recently, I drive 42 miles each way. I had
   to balance out a moderate credit score and a super tight budget, and
   monthly costs. And I don't want or have the ability to charge at my
   work location. (unless it were flow batteries and as easy as petrol,
   5min ok, 10min not so much)
   ___
   UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
   http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
   For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA (
  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
  
   -- next part --
   An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
   URL: 
 
 http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20150519/5d81fab1/attachment.htm
  
   ___
   UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
   http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
   For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA (
  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
  
  ___
  UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
  http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
  For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA (
  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
 
 
 -- next part --
 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL: 
 http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20150519/120e6c20/attachment.htm
 
 ___
 UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
 http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
 For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA (
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)


-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20150519/f6b986ee/attachment.htm
___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)



Re: [EVDL] FW: Design News: Why Aren't Electrical Cars Sales Better? It's the battery.

2015-05-19 Thread Stephen via EV
EVs aren't the answer for everyone... Different horses for different
courses...

Regards,
Stephen

On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Paul Dove via EV ev@lists.evdl.org
wrote:

 First off, there are hundreds of options in personal transportation. Not
 one vehicle fits all needs so person must choose. This doesn't change just
 because you're driving and electric vehicle it doesn't suit all needs but
 neither does a truck or station wagon or Corvette you get the picture. As
 for the BMW it has extended range have another 70 or 80 miles on gasoline.

 Sent from my iPhone

  On May 19, 2015, at 2:35 PM, Arak Leatham via EV ev@lists.evdl.org
 wrote:
 
  wow, so I see, your answer for the general public is to live where EV's
 will work? That's very draconic of you, and presumptive. I live where I
 live because I must.
 
  This is the reason many people drop out of the EV interest, obtuse
 requirements and limitations.
 
  If you are trying to save the planet, by scrunching all people to less
 than 30mi from work? That's not a sustainable goal(for many reasons). But
 of course, everyone living more than 30 isn't either. The real answer is
 limiting world population's to less than 5billion and we know that won't
 fly either.
 
  Seriously, I checked with BMW, the price is $46k. The range is
 70-80miles. The price is way too high and range too short to suit my need.
 
  Anyway, I'm back to dropping out until a more amenable world of ideas
 prevails. Point done. I leave the floor.
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Arak Leatham - ( My hobby: I want 300 MPG )
 
  Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 15:14:18 -0400
  To: ev@lists.evdl.org
  Subject: Re: [EVDL] FW: Design News: Why Aren't Electrical Cars Sales
 Better? It's the battery.
  From: ev@lists.evdl.org
 
  I would argue that you're living or working in the wrong place. 42 miles
  each way is a waste of your time and of gasoline or electricity.
 
  --Rick
 
  On 05/19/2015 01:05 PM, Arak Leatham via EV wrote:
  I admit I'm not sure how that plays out for everyone.
 
  I had the decision myself recently, I drive 42 miles each way. I had
  to balance out a moderate credit score and a super tight budget, and
  monthly costs. And I don't want or have the ability to charge at my
  work location. (unless it were flow batteries and as easy as petrol,
  5min ok, 10min not so much)
  ___
  UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
  http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
  For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA (
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
 
  -- next part --
  An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
  URL: 
 http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20150519/5d81fab1/attachment.htm
 
  ___
  UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
  http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
  For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA (
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
 
 ___
 UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
 http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
 For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA (
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)


-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20150519/120e6c20/attachment.htm
___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)



Re: [EVDL] FW: Design News: Why Aren't Electrical Cars Sales Better? It's the battery.

2015-05-19 Thread Paul Dove via EV
First off, there are hundreds of options in personal transportation. Not one 
vehicle fits all needs so person must choose. This doesn't change just because 
you're driving and electric vehicle it doesn't suit all needs but neither does 
a truck or station wagon or Corvette you get the picture. As for the BMW it has 
extended range have another 70 or 80 miles on gasoline. 

Sent from my iPhone

 On May 19, 2015, at 2:35 PM, Arak Leatham via EV ev@lists.evdl.org wrote:
 
 wow, so I see, your answer for the general public is to live where EV's will 
 work? That's very draconic of you, and presumptive. I live where I live 
 because I must.
 
 This is the reason many people drop out of the EV interest, obtuse 
 requirements and limitations. 
 
 If you are trying to save the planet, by scrunching all people to less than 
 30mi from work? That's not a sustainable goal(for many reasons). But of 
 course, everyone living more than 30 isn't either. The real answer is 
 limiting world population's to less than 5billion and we know that won't fly 
 either.
 
 Seriously, I checked with BMW, the price is $46k. The range is 70-80miles. 
 The price is way too high and range too short to suit my need. 
 
 Anyway, I'm back to dropping out until a more amenable world of ideas 
 prevails. Point done. I leave the floor.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Arak Leatham - ( My hobby: I want 300 MPG )
 
 Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 15:14:18 -0400
 To: ev@lists.evdl.org
 Subject: Re: [EVDL] FW: Design News: Why Aren't Electrical Cars Sales 
 Better? It's the battery.
 From: ev@lists.evdl.org
 
 I would argue that you're living or working in the wrong place. 42 miles 
 each way is a waste of your time and of gasoline or electricity.
 
 --Rick
 
 On 05/19/2015 01:05 PM, Arak Leatham via EV wrote:
 I admit I'm not sure how that plays out for everyone.
 
 I had the decision myself recently, I drive 42 miles each way. I had
 to balance out a moderate credit score and a super tight budget, and
 monthly costs. And I don't want or have the ability to charge at my
 work location. (unless it were flow batteries and as easy as petrol,
 5min ok, 10min not so much)
 ___
 UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
 http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
 For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
 (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
 
 -- next part --
 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL: 
 http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20150519/5d81fab1/attachment.htm
 ___
 UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
 http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
 For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
 (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
 
___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)



Re: [EVDL] FW: Design News: Why Aren't Electrical Cars Sales Better? It's the battery.

2015-05-19 Thread Rick Beebe via EV
I would argue that you're living or working in the wrong place. 42 miles 
each way is a waste of your time and of gasoline or electricity.


--Rick

On 05/19/2015 01:05 PM, Arak Leatham via EV wrote:

I admit I'm not sure how that plays out for everyone.

I had the decision myself recently, I drive 42 miles each way. I had
to balance out a moderate credit score and a super tight budget, and
monthly costs. And I don't want or have the ability to charge at my
work location. (unless it were flow batteries and as easy as petrol,
5min ok, 10min not so much)

___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)



Re: [EVDL] FW: Design News: Why Aren't Electrical Cars Sales Better? It's the battery.

2015-05-19 Thread Arak Leatham via EV
wow, so I see, your answer for the general public is to live where EV's will 
work? That's very draconic of you, and presumptive. I live where I live because 
I must.
 
This is the reason many people drop out of the EV interest, obtuse requirements 
and limitations. 
 
If you are trying to save the planet, by scrunching all people to less than 
30mi from work? That's not a sustainable goal(for many reasons). But of course, 
everyone living more than 30 isn't either. The real answer is limiting world 
population's to less than 5billion and we know that won't fly either.
 
Seriously, I checked with BMW, the price is $46k. The range is 70-80miles. The 
price is way too high and range too short to suit my need. 
 
Anyway, I'm back to dropping out until a more amenable world of ideas prevails. 
Point done. I leave the floor.
 





Arak Leatham - ( My hobby: I want 300 MPG )
 
 Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 15:14:18 -0400
 To: ev@lists.evdl.org
 Subject: Re: [EVDL] FW: Design News: Why Aren't Electrical Cars Sales Better? 
 It's the battery.
 From: ev@lists.evdl.org
 
 I would argue that you're living or working in the wrong place. 42 miles 
 each way is a waste of your time and of gasoline or electricity.
 
 --Rick
 
 On 05/19/2015 01:05 PM, Arak Leatham via EV wrote:
  I admit I'm not sure how that plays out for everyone.
 
  I had the decision myself recently, I drive 42 miles each way. I had
  to balance out a moderate credit score and a super tight budget, and
  monthly costs. And I don't want or have the ability to charge at my
  work location. (unless it were flow batteries and as easy as petrol,
  5min ok, 10min not so much)
 ___
 UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
 http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
 For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
 (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
 
  
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20150519/5d81fab1/attachment.htm
___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)