RE: RE : Can I search Exchange for a specific phrase?
Doesn't help much after the fact though does it? -Original Message- From: Bourque Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 8:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE : Can I search Exchange for a specific phrase? Build a specific signature that look for the string you are looking for in your external IDS and once it trigger, correlate the IDS log with your FW log to look at who was on-line (web e-mail) or what e-mail msg (SMTP) was sent at the same time... No need to look in everybody e-mail... -Message d'origine- De : Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : 29 octobre, 2003 14:36 À : Exchange Discussions Objet : Can I search Exchange for a specific phrase? We have a user who we think maybe sending info to a competitor. Is there a way to search through all users emails for a specific phrase, namely the competitors name? We are running Exchange 5.5 sp4 Thanks in advance. Brian Ps. I am going to the archives now, but was hoping for a quick answer from someone knowledgeable on the list. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2K Outlook 2K3 - increase in size of *.stm
Sounds like you need bigger drives! Not sure why you want to run eseutil. How much space are you going to reclaim if you do? -Original Message- From: Steve Molkentin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 7:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2K Outlook 2K3 - increase in size of *.stm All advice appreciated... We have recently introduced Outlook 2K3 into our Exchange 2000 environment. Our laptop users we have configured to run Outlook in cached exchange mode. In the same time frame, our *.stm has exploded from about 1.5 GB to approx 9GB. The *.edb file has not grown (apart from normal mail services). Why would this have happened? Is it not related to the introduction of Outlook 2K3? Is it related? I have not yet run esutil, as there are other space issues this has now highlighted (and means until I free up some space elsewhere I can't run it, knowing I need approx 110% free space, and we now only have 1.79GB free on the drive the db's live on). I have searched the MS-KB and come up with nada. Ideas, suggestions all welcome... Thanks, themolk. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RE : Can I search Exchange for a specific phrase?
Do you need to look in message bodies or in subject lines? I think you could use ExMerge to find all messages with matching subject lines. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 7:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RE : Can I search Exchange for a specific phrase? Doesn't help much after the fact though does it? -Original Message- From: Bourque Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 8:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE : Can I search Exchange for a specific phrase? Build a specific signature that look for the string you are looking for in your external IDS and once it trigger, correlate the IDS log with your FW log to look at who was on-line (web e-mail) or what e-mail msg (SMTP) was sent at the same time... No need to look in everybody e-mail... -Message d'origine- De : Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : 29 octobre, 2003 14:36 À : Exchange Discussions Objet : Can I search Exchange for a specific phrase? We have a user who we think maybe sending info to a competitor. Is there a way to search through all users emails for a specific phrase, namely the competitors name? We are running Exchange 5.5 sp4 Thanks in advance. Brian Ps. I am going to the archives now, but was hoping for a quick answer from someone knowledgeable on the list. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RE : Can I search Exchange for a specific phrase?
Did you look on Google for any third-party utilities that may be able to do the job? Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 7:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RE : Can I search Exchange for a specific phrase? Doesn't help much after the fact though does it? -Original Message- From: Bourque Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 8:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE : Can I search Exchange for a specific phrase? Build a specific signature that look for the string you are looking for in your external IDS and once it trigger, correlate the IDS log with your FW log to look at who was on-line (web e-mail) or what e-mail msg (SMTP) was sent at the same time... No need to look in everybody e-mail... -Message d'origine- De : Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : 29 octobre, 2003 14:36 À : Exchange Discussions Objet : Can I search Exchange for a specific phrase? We have a user who we think maybe sending info to a competitor. Is there a way to search through all users emails for a specific phrase, namely the competitors name? We are running Exchange 5.5 sp4 Thanks in advance. Brian Ps. I am going to the archives now, but was hoping for a quick answer from someone knowledgeable on the list. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RE : Can I search Exchange for a specific phrase?
On track's product is very much like Exmerge. Not sure you may want to check it out to see if it searches text. Big thing it allows you to seach DB's without them being online. From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: RE : Can I search Exchange for a specific phrase? Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 09:44:03 -0500 Did you look on Google for any third-party utilities that may be able to do the job? Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 7:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RE : Can I search Exchange for a specific phrase? Doesn't help much after the fact though does it? -Original Message- From: Bourque Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 8:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE : Can I search Exchange for a specific phrase? Build a specific signature that look for the string you are looking for in your external IDS and once it trigger, correlate the IDS log with your FW log to look at who was on-line (web e-mail) or what e-mail msg (SMTP) was sent at the same time... No need to look in everybody e-mail... -Message d'origine- De : Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : 29 octobre, 2003 14:36 À : Exchange Discussions Objet : Can I search Exchange for a specific phrase? We have a user who we think maybe sending info to a competitor. Is there a way to search through all users emails for a specific phrase, namely the competitors name? We are running Exchange 5.5 sp4 Thanks in advance. Brian Ps. I am going to the archives now, but was hoping for a quick answer from someone knowledgeable on the list. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ See when your friends are online with MSN Messenger 6.0. Download it now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2002/XP Conecting to Exchange 5.5
Be advised that you cannot use the new biggie sized PST files (unicode) for cache mode one Exchange 5.5 (It won't let you). The result of this is that it will create a 2g limited pst file, and if your mailbox is over about 1.5g (pst's take more space to save the messages) it will die and you will have to disable cache mode until you get your mailbox on the server well below 2g. Tom -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 9:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2002/XP Conecting to Exchange 5.5 Upgrade to Outlook 2003 and use cache mode. I am advised that it works with back versions of Exchange, though I haven't personally verified it. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of NetNinja Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 11:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook 2002/XP Conecting to Exchange 5.5 all maybe somebody out there is in a similar predicament. I have a user who is using Outlook XP/2002 and they are connecting to my Exchange server via a VPN connection. There is no way in He** that I am going to setup a pop3 or Imap connection point for them. Every so often this user starts getting slow response times. A dialog box pops up and tries to establish a connection with the exchange server. I have users who have a similar setup. But they are using Outlook 98 and Outlook 2000 and they don't experience the same delays. This user lives out in California but when they came to Atlanta they were experiencing the same thing. Exchange 5.5 has the latest service pack4. Please don't say upgrade to Exchange 2003. That's not in our budget and also we have about 200 email accounts and in Exchange 2003 you have to pay for every email account you create. I think we are going Lotus and drop Microsoft all together. Anybody have any ideas? Exchange 5.5 has the lastest serivce pack4. Please don't say upgrade to Exhchange 2003. That's not in our budget and also we have about 200 email accounts and in Exchange 2003 you have to pay for evey email acount you create. I think we are going Lotus and drop microsoft all together. Anybody have any ideas? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering.
Let us all know what you think of Xwall if you get it running. I looked at their web page and it's only $350 per server (any number of users). If it works that sound very reasonable. Tom -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering. Exchange 5.5 Sorry if this came through twice. Had to change the text type and re-send. This is a little off-topic. We are about to deploy XWall for Exchange on our front end IMC relays. One of the requirements is that we change the smtp port for Exchange on the IMC's to use 24 since XWall will use port 25 and get the messages first. I guess my questions are: For users using POP or custom applications that are using the Exchange IMC as their relay host, how will changing the ports affect them? Have I just disabled POP by installing XWall? We have locked down all unused ports so I guess I need to open port 24 up to the front end and back end servers as well. Is there anything I need to be careful about or any other gotchas that I should know. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IronMail
We are looking at the product, the weighted spam filtering seem to be a lot better choice than the simple filters other products use. The selling point for us geeks here is the security functions for OWA and the ability of a user to release their own mail from inbound holding via a web interface. The steep price for our configuration of choice is the sticking point with management. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Blouin Posted At: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 11:45 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: IronMail Subject: IronMail Has anyone reviewed, tested, or used the IronMail appliance from Cipher Trust (http://www.ciphertrust.com/index.html)? We are interested in its spam filtering and security capabilities. TIA, Peter _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can anybody help with this ?
Sorry but if I understood correctly, so the problem is on their end ? Why is it then that they claim that this only affects emails we send them ? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 6:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can anybody help with this ? Yes, looks like they're down. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RBHATIA Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 2:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Can anybody help with this ? My organization is having problems sending email to a user @tampabay.rr.com I tried to do an NSLOOKUP and found a host of different MX records for this domain. However when I try to telnet to them I can't seem to connect. Can anybody try and let me know the results ? The problem is that our emails do reach them but after a long delay. They claim that they haven't had any problems from other people and that the problem only comes from our end. Help would be appreciated ! Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering.
It does work, we've used it for a year or so. I've not used the bayes filtering but the rest is very flexible, also it's written by a small company (I suspect it's one guy) and I've found him really quick with replies to questions, and very amenable to adding sensible features to later versions. The one thing I do like about it is the logging - we use 5.5 and smtp logging sucks, this logs everything to text, and the important info to csv and all sort of stuff.. well worth a try IMHO. regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 October 2003 14:53 To: Exchange Discussions Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering. Let us all know what you think of Xwall if you get it running. I looked at their web page and it's only $350 per server (any number of users). If it works that sound very reasonable. Tom -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering. Exchange 5.5 Sorry if this came through twice. Had to change the text type and re-send. This is a little off-topic. We are about to deploy XWall for Exchange on our front end IMC relays. One of the requirements is that we change the smtp port for Exchange on the IMC's to use 24 since XWall will use port 25 and get the messages first. I guess my questions are: For users using POP or custom applications that are using the Exchange IMC as their relay host, how will changing the ports affect them? Have I just disabled POP by installing XWall? We have locked down all unused ports so I guess I need to open port 24 up to the front end and back end servers as well. Is there anything I need to be careful about or any other gotchas that I should know. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mailbox Size Limit Msg from Sys Admin
Is there a way to edit the system administrator message that is sent out to notify users that their mbx has passed a theshold limit. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2002/XP Conecting to Exchange 5.5
True. Something I've noticed too - recently upgraded to Outlook XP on the client side with the server side still hosting Exchange 5.5 SP4 - seems like it takes longer to read and send emails now using Outlook XP - certainly some delays. -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2002/XP Conecting to Exchange 5.5 Outlook XP seems to be very picky. Even on the LAN. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 9:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2002/XP Conecting to Exchange 5.5 Upgrade to Outlook 2003 and use cache mode. I am advised that it works with back versions of Exchange, though I haven't personally verified it. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of NetNinja Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 11:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook 2002/XP Conecting to Exchange 5.5 all maybe somebody out there is in a similar predicament. I have a user who is using Outlook XP/2002 and they are connecting to my Exchange server via a VPN connection. There is no way in He** that I am going to setup a pop3 or Imap connection point for them. Every so often this user starts getting slow response times. A dialog box pops up and tries to establish a connection with the exchange server. I have users who have a similar setup. But they are using Outlook 98 and Outlook 2000 and they don't experience the same delays. This user lives out in California but when they came to Atlanta they were experiencing the same thing. Exchange 5.5 has the latest service pack4. Please don't say upgrade to Exchange 2003. That's not in our budget and also we have about 200 email accounts and in Exchange 2003 you have to pay for every email account you create. I think we are going Lotus and drop Microsoft all together. Anybody have any ideas? Exchange 5.5 has the lastest serivce pack4. Please don't say upgrade to Exhchange 2003. That's not in our budget and also we have about 200 email accounts and in Exchange 2003 you have to pay for evey email acount you create. I think we are going Lotus and drop microsoft all together. Anybody have any ideas? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mailbox Size Limit Msg from Sys Admin
short answer is no. You could ask PSS if they have a routine to change but they will tell you that it is not recommended From: Kevin Dietz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mailbox Size Limit Msg from Sys Admin Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 07:05:30 -0800 Is there a way to edit the system administrator message that is sent out to notify users that their mbx has passed a theshold limit. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Fretting that your Hotmail account may expire because you forgot to sign in enough? Get Hotmail Extra Storage today! http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
5.5 SP4 NT 4.0 UPGRADE TO EX2K
I have a box running nt 4.0 sp6 exchange 5.5 sp4. The store.exe every 2 days maxes out the cpu. I have to down the server and restart. Customer is interested in replacing box with ex2k and win2k. Can I upgrade this to this via migrate and will it get not only mail boxes and mail but the public folders they have which are extensive. I have never upgraded from 5.5 just set up nes ex2k boxes. Thanks for any help Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 5.5 SP4 NT 4.0 UPGRADE TO EX2K
From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 5.5 SP4 NT 4.0 UPGRADE TO EX2K Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 10:55:55 -0500 I have a box running nt 4.0 sp6 exchange 5.5 sp4. The store.exe every 2 days maxes out the cpu. I have to down the server and restart. Customer is interested in replacing box with ex2k and win2k. Can I upgrade this to this via migrate and will it get not only mail boxes and mail but the public folders they have which are extensive. I have never upgraded from 5.5 just set up nes ex2k boxes. Thanks for any help Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Surf and talk on the phone at the same time with broadband Internet access. Get high-speed for as low as $29.95/month (depending on the local service providers in your area). https://broadband.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SPAM filtering on a budget
I doubt the accuracy of these tests if our own experience is anything to go by. We use GFI and I found version 8 to be blocking approx 13% weekdays and 28% at weekends of our incoming mail and the new version 9 (with the intelligent bayesian filter) blocks 23% weekdays and 62% at weekends. It does take a bit of work to build up the keyword list but seems pretty good to me, although I don't know how much spam is getting passed the filter. False-positives are less than 1% (and are mainly people sending remote images which is not something we encouraged even if the message is innocent). -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 28 October 2003 17:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPAM filtering on a budget http://www.nwfusion.com/reviews/2003/0915spam.html Here is how well they work in production. Not sure about pricing though, call em. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Plahtinsky Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SPAM filtering on a budget Hello list, I know SPAM filtering products have been covered in great detail but I'm having problems finding a good gateway SPAM filtering product that's not going to cost me a lot of money. I have a small organization of about 100 users. The products that I have found that are reasonably priced are Xwall ($360.00) and SpamAssassin (free). My problem with SpamAssassin is that I don't know the first thing about Linux so that's out of the question. Xwall seems like a good product but I want a few more to compare. My budget won't allow for more than about $800.00. What cheep products are you using. Good/Bad experiences. Any help with my product search would be great. Thanks Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang= english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Public Contact Lists
We're using Outlook XP on the workstations on a hosted MS Exchange 2K backend. I'm the owner of a public contacts list with a customized master categories list. I'd like for everyone on the system to see the same categories to choose from - and it isn't happening. Any and all help is appreciated! [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quick Question
I have a W2K domain domain.local I will add a SBS2000 to it with exchange 2000 This exchange 2000 should be the mail server for domain.com 1- How this can be when AD works on domain.local 2- should SBS be a member server or a controller Thanks for your help _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Quick Question
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, at 10:36am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1- How this can be when AD works on domain.local Email addresses in Exchange do not have to have any connection to your AD domain. I usually just add the Internet domain as an SMTP address, and make it the primary address. 2- should SBS be a member server or a controller SBS *has* to be a domain controller. I'm not even sure it can be joined to an existing domain. -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do | | not represent the views or policy of any other person or organization. | | All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SPAM filtering on a budget
We are also using GFI MailEssentials 9. I have so far only activated black/whitelisting and already have a constant 20-30% blockage of spam. Next week I will enable the Bayesian filter next week. I highly recommend the GFI Products... Bryce Weathersby Network Specialist I Lamar Institute of Technology Voice:409-839-2040 Fax: 409-839-2931 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lit.edu -Original Message- From: Mark Dewell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 10:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPAM filtering on a budget I doubt the accuracy of these tests if our own experience is anything to go by. We use GFI and I found version 8 to be blocking approx 13% weekdays and 28% at weekends of our incoming mail and the new version 9 (with the intelligent bayesian filter) blocks 23% weekdays and 62% at weekends. It does take a bit of work to build up the keyword list but seems pretty good to me, although I don't know how much spam is getting passed the filter. False-positives are less than 1% (and are mainly people sending remote images which is not something we encouraged even if the message is innocent). -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 28 October 2003 17:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPAM filtering on a budget http://www.nwfusion.com/reviews/2003/0915spam.html Here is how well they work in production. Not sure about pricing though, call em. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Plahtinsky Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SPAM filtering on a budget Hello list, I know SPAM filtering products have been covered in great detail but I'm having problems finding a good gateway SPAM filtering product that's not going to cost me a lot of money. I have a small organization of about 100 users. The products that I have found that are reasonably priced are Xwall ($360.00) and SpamAssassin (free). My problem with SpamAssassin is that I don't know the first thing about Linux so that's out of the question. Xwall seems like a good product but I want a few more to compare. My budget won't allow for more than about $800.00. What cheep products are you using. Good/Bad experiences. Any help with my product search would be great. Thanks Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang = english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Quick Question
You're correct. SBS can not be added to an existing domain. It must be the one and only domain controller. Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Quick Question On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, at 10:36am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1- How this can be when AD works on domain.local Email addresses in Exchange do not have to have any connection to your AD domain. I usually just add the Internet domain as an SMTP address, and make it the primary address. 2- should SBS be a member server or a controller SBS *has* to be a domain controller. I'm not even sure it can be joined to an existing domain. -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do | | not represent the views or policy of any other person or organization. | | All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SPAM filtering on a budget
The bayesian filtering in GFI MailEssentials is quite impressive. To give you an idea of the figures, on Wednesday we had 2336 blocked by the bayesian filter, 369 blocked by my keyword list, 206 remote images and 199 blocked by ordb open relay database. This totals approx 26% of our incoming mail. -Original Message- From: Weathersby, Bryce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 October 2003 16:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPAM filtering on a budget We are also using GFI MailEssentials 9. I have so far only activated black/whitelisting and already have a constant 20-30% blockage of spam. Next week I will enable the Bayesian filter next week. I highly recommend the GFI Products... Bryce Weathersby Network Specialist I Lamar Institute of Technology Voice:409-839-2040 Fax: 409-839-2931 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lit.edu -Original Message- From: Mark Dewell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 10:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPAM filtering on a budget I doubt the accuracy of these tests if our own experience is anything to go by. We use GFI and I found version 8 to be blocking approx 13% weekdays and 28% at weekends of our incoming mail and the new version 9 (with the intelligent bayesian filter) blocks 23% weekdays and 62% at weekends. It does take a bit of work to build up the keyword list but seems pretty good to me, although I don't know how much spam is getting passed the filter. False-positives are less than 1% (and are mainly people sending remote images which is not something we encouraged even if the message is innocent). -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 28 October 2003 17:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPAM filtering on a budget http://www.nwfusion.com/reviews/2003/0915spam.html Here is how well they work in production. Not sure about pricing though, call em. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Plahtinsky Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SPAM filtering on a budget Hello list, I know SPAM filtering products have been covered in great detail but I'm having problems finding a good gateway SPAM filtering product that's not going to cost me a lot of money. I have a small organization of about 100 users. The products that I have found that are reasonably priced are Xwall ($360.00) and SpamAssassin (free). My problem with SpamAssassin is that I don't know the first thing about Linux so that's out of the question. Xwall seems like a good product but I want a few more to compare. My budget won't allow for more than about $800.00. What cheep products are you using. Good/Bad experiences. Any help with my product search would be great. Thanks Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang = english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang= english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Quick Question
If you can't add SBS to a domain Can you add a SBS as a controller to SBS If it's only one controller there is no redundancy If yes, Can you add a regular W2K server as a controller to SBS -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dickenson, Steven Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Question You're correct. SBS can not be added to an existing domain. It must be the one and only domain controller. Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Quick Question On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, at 10:36am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1- How this can be when AD works on domain.local Email addresses in Exchange do not have to have any connection to your AD domain. I usually just add the Internet domain as an SMTP address, and make it the primary address. 2- should SBS be a member server or a controller SBS *has* to be a domain controller. I'm not even sure it can be joined to an existing domain. -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do | | not represent the views or policy of any other person or organization. | | All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On the theme of spam......
Hi All, We have experienced a vast increase in the amount of spam our employees have been getting (in the region of 3-400% increase) over the last 6 months. Prior to this, our MailSweeper was coping quite well with the problem, but is having significant problems with HTML based email ( the ones with w!xyzords split up like th!dfgis ). It got to the point where about 50% of the mail arriving was of this form and was getting past the filters. We have recently taken the rather drastic measure (with board backing) to restrict inbound HTML, with a 'whitelist' for exceptional circumstances. Understandably, this was not a very popular move, but has reduced the inbound spam to virtually nil. The way I have designed my whitelist also means that I have a workably low proportion of false positives. I am not completely happy with this solution, but am prepared to live with it until I have an alternative that is as effective. I have however been asked a question which I would like to relay Do any of you restrict HTML based email to either a greater or lesser extent? Thanks for taking time to respond Nick The information in this e-mail and any attachment(s) is confidential and may be legally privileged. This e-mail is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the addressee, dissemination, copying or other use of this e-mail or any of its content is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient please inform the sender immediately and destroy the e-mail and any copies. All liability for viruses is excluded to the fullest extent permitted by law. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender. No contract may be construed by this e-mail. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IronMail
It is a pricey solution. I suppose if you were to add up the cost of each solution it provides from different vendors as well as the system itself, it would be close. Have you looked at MXtreme solution from Borderware? Peter Blouin Head, Messaging Systems National Research Council Ottawa, ON K1A 0R6 Canada -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: October 30, 2003 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IronMail We are looking at the product, the weighted spam filtering seem to be a lot better choice than the simple filters other products use. The selling point for us geeks here is the security functions for OWA and the ability of a user to release their own mail from inbound holding via a web interface. The steep price for our configuration of choice is the sticking point with management. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Blouin Posted At: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 11:45 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: IronMail Subject: IronMail Has anyone reviewed, tested, or used the IronMail appliance from Cipher Trust (http://www.ciphertrust.com/index.html)? We are interested in its spam filtering and security capabilities. TIA, Peter _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: On the theme of spam......
I restrict all kinds of mail attachments - HTML, .exe, .vbs., .vcf...all kinds of things. I only let about five attachment types through at all. I get a lot of complaints about it, but there's usually a workaround, and our incidence of email-borne viruses has decreased dramatically. Geni _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can anybody help with this ?
This is getting stranger. When I do an NSLOOKUP, this is the result I get - tampabay.rr.com MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = flmx03.mgw.rr.com tampabay.rr.com MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = flmx04.mgw.rr.com tampabay.rr.com MX preference = 20, mail exchanger = txmx01.mgw.rr.com tampabay.rr.com MX preference = 20, mail exchanger = txmx02.mgw.rr.com tampabay.rr.com MX preference = 30, mail exchanger = florida.mgw.rr.com tampabay.rr.com MX preference = 100, mail exchanger = vamx02.mgw.rr.com tampabay.rr.com MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = flmx01.mgw.rr.com tampabay.rr.com MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = flmx02.mgw.rr.com flmx03.mgw.rr.com internet address = 65.32.1.50 flmx04.mgw.rr.com internet address = 65.32.1.49 txmx01.mgw.rr.com internet address = 24.93.35.210 txmx02.mgw.rr.com internet address = 24.93.35.209 vamx02.mgw.rr.com internet address = 24.30.200.18 flmx01.mgw.rr.com internet address = 65.32.1.38 flmx02.mgw.rr.com internet address = 65.32.1.42 However, I tried telnetting to these IP addresses, I can't connect to them. I'm receiving emails fine from this person (almost immediately). I checked the headers on the email he sent me and the sending server has a different IP address: Here is the header info: Received: from ms-smtp-03-smtplb.tampabay.rr.com ([65.32.5.133]) by cerberus-service.aiim.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time) Received: from homeoffice (653237hfc134.tampabay.rr.com [65.32.37.134]) by ms-smtp-03-eri0.tampabay.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id h9U52PqH004804 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 00:02:31 -0500 (EST) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Quick Question (Solved)
Found this link in NTSysadmin archives http://www.microsoft.com/netherlands/download/files/partner/gtm/Adding_Serve rs_to_Your_SBS2000_Network.doc In it you can find the following Configuring an Additional Server Joining the Small Business Server 2000 Domain Configuring a File and Print Server Configuring an Application Server Configuring Terminal Services for Application Sharing Configuring an Intranet Server Configuring an Additional Domain Controller Thanks for all responses -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of rsamman Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Question If you can't add SBS to a domain Can you add a SBS as a controller to SBS If it's only one controller there is no redundancy If yes, Can you add a regular W2K server as a controller to SBS -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dickenson, Steven Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Question You're correct. SBS can not be added to an existing domain. It must be the one and only domain controller. Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Quick Question On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, at 10:36am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1- How this can be when AD works on domain.local Email addresses in Exchange do not have to have any connection to your AD domain. I usually just add the Internet domain as an SMTP address, and make it the primary address. 2- should SBS be a member server or a controller SBS *has* to be a domain controller. I'm not even sure it can be joined to an existing domain. -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do | | not represent the views or policy of any other person or organization. | | All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IronMail
We are also evaluating the solution. It offers the SLS (statistical lookup service) where messages are analyzed and then compared against an external dbase to see if they have gone out to large numbers of users (spam). This appears to be a very quick and efficient process. They are of course only leveraging the information other Ironmail boxes collect. I know of no issues where we have a false positive w/ this functionality. Of course we had to exempt some business related list servers. We are using a feature where a number of criteria have to fail then those failures are weighted and based on an aggregate value that you define whether the mail is or is not flagged as spam. Those things you can leverage and weigh are RBL's, Reverse DNS, SLS, and User and system defined header analysis. We are currently blocking about 80% of mail that is inbound to our organization. We will be deploying the end user quarantine functionality next week (when it is available w/ service release 5). Users can then be sent a single e-mail on a schedule you select and let them see what has been blocked w/ a URL to release it. Once that is available, We plan on implementing more strict policies (once I have that safety net). Heath Walker -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 8:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IronMail We are looking at the product, the weighted spam filtering seem to be a lot better choice than the simple filters other products use. The selling point for us geeks here is the security functions for OWA and the ability of a user to release their own mail from inbound holding via a web interface. The steep price for our configuration of choice is the sticking point with management. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Blouin Posted At: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 11:45 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: IronMail Subject: IronMail Has anyone reviewed, tested, or used the IronMail appliance from Cipher Trust (http://www.ciphertrust.com/index.html)? We are interested in its spam filtering and security capabilities. TIA, Peter _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Question from client
can we setup a group of users in Exchange that are isolated to a outlook address book that they can only see. As well as restrict delivery only between their group and restrict inbound/outbound internet email? He currently has a single group. Exchnage 2000 I think he can but would have to setup another group and set restrictions via the RGC _ Send instant messages to anyone on your contact list with MSN Messenger 6.0. Try it now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Question from client
yes we can do that... _ John Bowles Exchange Engineer OIG/HHS [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 1:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Question from client can we setup a group of users in Exchange that are isolated to a outlook address book that they can only see. As well as restrict delivery only between their group and restrict inbound/outbound internet email? He currently has a single group. Exchnage 2000 I think he can but would have to setup another group and set restrictions via the RGC _ Send instant messages to anyone on your contact list with MSN Messenger 6.0. Try it now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Question from client
Ok then does he need another server/group or can it be done via his current setup with only one site/group that has mutiple servers already? I think he needs another group and server to set routing restrictions the address book put is pretty easy From: Bowles, John (OIG/OMP) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Question from client Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 13:27:01 -0500 yes we can do that... _ John Bowles Exchange Engineer OIG/HHS [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 1:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Question from client can we setup a group of users in Exchange that are isolated to a outlook address book that they can only see. As well as restrict delivery only between their group and restrict inbound/outbound internet email? He currently has a single group. Exchnage 2000 I think he can but would have to setup another group and set restrictions via the RGC _ Send instant messages to anyone on your contact list with MSN Messenger 6.0. Try it now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Fretting that your Hotmail account may expire because you forgot to sign in enough? Get Hotmail Extra Storage today! http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can anybody help with this ?
Road Runner is apparently having major email problems at the current time. We have been having the same issue with emails going to sc.rr.com. If you dig around on the Road Runner help pages, you can find the network status message. Until they get the problems worked out, I wouldn't try to hard at troubleshooting the problem. Chuck -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can anybody help with this ? This is getting stranger. When I do an NSLOOKUP, this is the result I get - tampabay.rr.com MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = flmx03.mgw.rr.com tampabay.rr.com MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = flmx04.mgw.rr.com tampabay.rr.com MX preference = 20, mail exchanger = txmx01.mgw.rr.com tampabay.rr.com MX preference = 20, mail exchanger = txmx02.mgw.rr.com tampabay.rr.com MX preference = 30, mail exchanger = florida.mgw.rr.com tampabay.rr.com MX preference = 100, mail exchanger = vamx02.mgw.rr.com tampabay.rr.com MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = flmx01.mgw.rr.com tampabay.rr.com MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = flmx02.mgw.rr.com flmx03.mgw.rr.com internet address = 65.32.1.50 flmx04.mgw.rr.com internet address = 65.32.1.49 txmx01.mgw.rr.com internet address = 24.93.35.210 txmx02.mgw.rr.com internet address = 24.93.35.209 vamx02.mgw.rr.com internet address = 24.30.200.18 flmx01.mgw.rr.com internet address = 65.32.1.38 flmx02.mgw.rr.com internet address = 65.32.1.42 However, I tried telnetting to these IP addresses, I can't connect to them. I'm receiving emails fine from this person (almost immediately). I checked the headers on the email he sent me and the sending server has a different IP address: Here is the header info: Received: from ms-smtp-03-smtplb.tampabay.rr.com ([65.32.5.133]) by cerberus-service.aiim.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time) Received: from homeoffice (653237hfc134.tampabay.rr.com [65.32.37.134]) by ms-smtp-03-eri0.tampabay.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id h9U52PqH004804 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 00:02:31 -0500 (EST) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exch 5.5 Routing Question
Ok, thanks. So according to mine, it looks like I have the redundancy. There's two entries for each site but I just noticed that the MTA Properties on my server show to 'Only use least cost routes'. With that enabled, it wouldn't even try the other connector if our link was down now would it? I un-ticked it but I guess the only way to test is to wait for a failure [:-) -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 5:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exch 5.5 Routing Question GWART! :-) Neil -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 28 October 2003 20:39 Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days) Conversation: Exch 5.5 Routing Question Subject: Re: Exch 5.5 Routing Question I believe the Qwart file takes care of that in 5.5 which was elliminated in 2000. From: Woods, Tony [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Exch 5.5 Routing Question Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 12:08:19 -0800 Hello, Exchange 5.5 SP4 on W2K SP4 boxes. 1 ORG, 3 Sites (A, B, C) in three different cities across N.A. I have 2 x400 connectors setup in each location. Each site is setup the same in that they all have two x400 connectors, each going to one of the other sites. If the VPN link between Site A and Site C goes down and site C is trying to send mail to Site A, will Site C route it's mail through Site B to get to Site A? If not, how can I make this so? Thanks in advance. Cheers, Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Want to check if your PC is virus-infected? Get a FREE computer virus scan online from McAfee. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.silversands.co.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can anybody help with this ?
Thanks Chuck, for sharing that info with me. Could you send me a link to this apge where the network status message appears so I can forward it to this person ? -Original Message- From: Chuck Parkey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can anybody help with this ? Road Runner is apparently having major email problems at the current time. We have been having the same issue with emails going to sc.rr.com. If you dig around on the Road Runner help pages, you can find the network status message. Until they get the problems worked out, I wouldn't try to hard at troubleshooting the problem. Chuck -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can anybody help with this ? This is getting stranger. When I do an NSLOOKUP, this is the result I get - tampabay.rr.com MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = flmx03.mgw.rr.com tampabay.rr.com MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = flmx04.mgw.rr.com tampabay.rr.com MX preference = 20, mail exchanger = txmx01.mgw.rr.com tampabay.rr.com MX preference = 20, mail exchanger = txmx02.mgw.rr.com tampabay.rr.com MX preference = 30, mail exchanger = florida.mgw.rr.com tampabay.rr.com MX preference = 100, mail exchanger = vamx02.mgw.rr.com tampabay.rr.com MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = flmx01.mgw.rr.com tampabay.rr.com MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = flmx02.mgw.rr.com flmx03.mgw.rr.com internet address = 65.32.1.50 flmx04.mgw.rr.com internet address = 65.32.1.49 txmx01.mgw.rr.com internet address = 24.93.35.210 txmx02.mgw.rr.com internet address = 24.93.35.209 vamx02.mgw.rr.com internet address = 24.30.200.18 flmx01.mgw.rr.com internet address = 65.32.1.38 flmx02.mgw.rr.com internet address = 65.32.1.42 However, I tried telnetting to these IP addresses, I can't connect to them. I'm receiving emails fine from this person (almost immediately). I checked the headers on the email he sent me and the sending server has a different IP address: Here is the header info: Received: from ms-smtp-03-smtplb.tampabay.rr.com ([65.32.5.133]) by cerberus-service.aiim.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time) Received: from homeoffice (653237hfc134.tampabay.rr.com [65.32.37.134]) by ms-smtp-03-eri0.tampabay.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id h9U52PqH004804 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 00:02:31 -0500 (EST) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can you run 2 Outlook with different profiles at the same time
Hi there ! I have my own profile with my own accounts and the I have a profile that uses my Exchange mailbox (RPC over HTTP) Is it possible to run 2 Outlook at the same time - one witch uses my homeprofile and the other my exchange profile (My prob is that I cant use my home accounts and exchange in the same profile, becuase they use the same Inbox) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Public Contact Lists
Microsoft Outlook Categories http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/olcat.htm Nikki -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 7:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Contact Lists We're using Outlook XP on the workstations on a hosted MS Exchange 2K backend. I'm the owner of a public contacts list with a customized master categories list. I'd like for everyone on the system to see the same categories to choose from - and it isn't happening. Any and all help is appreciated! [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can you run 2 Outlook with different profiles at the same time
I guess if you use a server as a client and it has Terminal Services on it, then you can run multiple Outlooks in separate Terminal Server sessions. Or Windows XP Home Edition and Windows XP Pro - it allows you to switch to another user profile without logging off. It does not kill the previous user's programs. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Troels Majlandt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 2:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Can you run 2 Outlook with different profiles at the same time Hi there ! I have my own profile with my own accounts and the I have a profile that uses my Exchange mailbox (RPC over HTTP) Is it possible to run 2 Outlook at the same time - one witch uses my homeprofile and the other my exchange profile (My prob is that I cant use my home accounts and exchange in the same profile, becuase they use the same Inbox) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SPAM filtering on a budget
We love and use the setup described here: http://lawmonkey.org/anti-spam.html It can be daunting for someone unfamiliar with nix type os's. But it's free software and runs great on old hardware. For us, it filters out 1200-1500 spams per day with about a %94 success rate. -Wayne -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Plahtinsky Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SPAM filtering on a budget Hello list, I know SPAM filtering products have been covered in great detail but I'm having problems finding a good gateway SPAM filtering product that's not going to cost me a lot of money. I have a small organization of about 100 users. The products that I have found that are reasonably priced are Xwall ($360.00) and SpamAssassin (free). My problem with SpamAssassin is that I don't know the first thing about Linux so that's out of the question. Xwall seems like a good product but I want a few more to compare. My budget won't allow for more than about $800.00. What cheep products are you using. Good/Bad experiences. Any help with my product search would be great. Thanks Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can anybody help with this ?
http://www.help.rr.com/getpage.asp?/asp/networkstatus.asp,memserv -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 11:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can anybody help with this ? Thanks Chuck, for sharing that info with me. Could you send me a link to this apge where the network status message appears so I can forward it to this person ? -Original Message- From: Chuck Parkey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can anybody help with this ? Road Runner is apparently having major email problems at the current time. We have been having the same issue with emails going to sc.rr.com. If you dig around on the Road Runner help pages, you can find the network status message. Until they get the problems worked out, I wouldn't try to hard at troubleshooting the problem. Chuck -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can anybody help with this ? This is getting stranger. When I do an NSLOOKUP, this is the result I get - tampabay.rr.com MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = flmx03.mgw.rr.com tampabay.rr.com MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = flmx04.mgw.rr.com tampabay.rr.com MX preference = 20, mail exchanger = txmx01.mgw.rr.com tampabay.rr.com MX preference = 20, mail exchanger = txmx02.mgw.rr.com tampabay.rr.com MX preference = 30, mail exchanger = florida.mgw.rr.com tampabay.rr.com MX preference = 100, mail exchanger = vamx02.mgw.rr.com tampabay.rr.com MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = flmx01.mgw.rr.com tampabay.rr.com MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = flmx02.mgw.rr.com flmx03.mgw.rr.com internet address = 65.32.1.50 flmx04.mgw.rr.com internet address = 65.32.1.49 txmx01.mgw.rr.com internet address = 24.93.35.210 txmx02.mgw.rr.com internet address = 24.93.35.209 vamx02.mgw.rr.com internet address = 24.30.200.18 flmx01.mgw.rr.com internet address = 65.32.1.38 flmx02.mgw.rr.com internet address = 65.32.1.42 However, I tried telnetting to these IP addresses, I can't connect to them. I'm receiving emails fine from this person (almost immediately). I checked the headers on the email he sent me and the sending server has a different IP address: Here is the header info: Received: from ms-smtp-03-smtplb.tampabay.rr.com ([65.32.5.133]) by cerberus-service.aiim.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time) Received: from homeoffice (653237hfc134.tampabay.rr.com [65.32.37.134]) by ms-smtp-03-eri0.tampabay.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id h9U52PqH004804 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 00:02:31 -0500 (EST) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2K Outlook 2K3 - increase in size of *.stm
Neil Andy (and anyone else interested!), Firstly thanks for your replies - every bit helps when you have a conundrum. I managed to increase the size of the exchange drive, and then last night dismounted the store and ran eseutil /d. *.stm file went from approx 9GB to 1.5 GB (what I was expecting!). To that end - not sure WHY it did it, but that solved the problem. And Andy, yes - we need bigger drives (however politics dictate that what the servers have is what they will keep until we upgrade them in 12 months or so). Damn proprietary hard drives! ;) Thanks for your help - this list is a goldmine. themolk. -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 30 October 2003 10:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2K Outlook 2K3 - increase in size of *.stm Sounds like you need bigger drives! Not sure why you want to run eseutil. How much space are you going to reclaim if you do? -Original Message- From: Steve Molkentin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 7:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2K Outlook 2K3 - increase in size of *.stm All advice appreciated... We have recently introduced Outlook 2K3 into our Exchange 2000 environment. Our laptop users we have configured to run Outlook in cached exchange mode. In the same time frame, our *.stm has exploded from about 1.5 GB to approx 9GB. The *.edb file has not grown (apart from normal mail services). Why would this have happened? Is it not related to the introduction of Outlook 2K3? Is it related? I have not yet run esutil, as there are other space issues this has now highlighted (and means until I free up some space elsewhere I can't run it, knowing I need approx 110% free space, and we now only have 1.79GB free on the drive the db's live on). I have searched the MS-KB and come up with nada. Ideas, suggestions all welcome... Thanks, themolk. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Quick Question
This is not true...you CAN add DC's to an SBS domain. Obviously those DC's cannot be SBS servers. Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dickenson, Steven Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Question You're correct. SBS can not be added to an existing domain. It must be the one and only domain controller. Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Quick Question On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, at 10:36am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1- How this can be when AD works on domain.local Email addresses in Exchange do not have to have any connection to your AD domain. I usually just add the Internet domain as an SMTP address, and make it the primary address. 2- should SBS be a member server or a controller SBS *has* to be a domain controller. I'm not even sure it can be joined to an existing domain. -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do | | not represent the views or policy of any other person or organization. | | All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Question from client
What version of Exchange? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Question from client can we setup a group of users in Exchange that are isolated to a outlook address book that they can only see. As well as restrict delivery only between their group and restrict inbound/outbound internet email? He currently has a single group. Exchnage 2000 I think he can but would have to setup another group and set restrictions via the RGC _ Send instant messages to anyone on your contact list with MSN Messenger 6.0. Try it now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Question from client
E2K I was thinking that can be done but he would have to have another group created and also use a SMTP connector for the internet part From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Question from client Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 15:17:32 -0800 What version of Exchange? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Question from client can we setup a group of users in Exchange that are isolated to a outlook address book that they can only see. As well as restrict delivery only between their group and restrict inbound/outbound internet email? He currently has a single group. Exchnage 2000 I think he can but would have to setup another group and set restrictions via the RGC _ Send instant messages to anyone on your contact list with MSN Messenger 6.0. Try it now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Send instant messages to anyone on your contact list with MSN Messenger 6.0. Try it now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Question from client
You'd have to do it with different address lists. I don't have the number handy, but there are KB articles on making separate address lists. Through permissions you can control which ones users see. You would need a group to effectively assign the permissions. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 3:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Question from client E2K I was thinking that can be done but he would have to have another group created and also use a SMTP connector for the internet part From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Question from client Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 15:17:32 -0800 What version of Exchange? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Question from client can we setup a group of users in Exchange that are isolated to a outlook address book that they can only see. As well as restrict delivery only between their group and restrict inbound/outbound internet email? He currently has a single group. Exchnage 2000 I think he can but would have to setup another group and set restrictions via the RGC _ Send instant messages to anyone on your contact list with MSN Messenger 6.0. Try it now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Send instant messages to anyone on your contact list with MSN Messenger 6.0. Try it now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Question from client
Correct on the address list part. His big concern was the routing of internal only for mail between them and the internet mail not to go through the normal routing. I am going to talk to him to get exactly what he means by internet routing being separate from their normal routing for internet. I am also thinking he has to point those users mail to do the smarthost route. I will repost when I have all of what he want to accomplish. From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Question from client Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 15:21:49 -0800 You'd have to do it with different address lists. I don't have the number handy, but there are KB articles on making separate address lists. Through permissions you can control which ones users see. You would need a group to effectively assign the permissions. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 3:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Question from client E2K I was thinking that can be done but he would have to have another group created and also use a SMTP connector for the internet part From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Question from client Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 15:17:32 -0800 What version of Exchange? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Question from client can we setup a group of users in Exchange that are isolated to a outlook address book that they can only see. As well as restrict delivery only between their group and restrict inbound/outbound internet email? He currently has a single group. Exchnage 2000 I think he can but would have to setup another group and set restrictions via the RGC _ Send instant messages to anyone on your contact list with MSN Messenger 6.0. Try it now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Send instant messages to anyone on your contact list with MSN Messenger 6.0. Try it now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Fretting that your Hotmail account may expire because you forgot to sign in enough? Get Hotmail Extra Storage today! http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just a quick question
Hi all, I am in the middle of an upgrade to windows 2000 server from an NT 4.0 domain. I plan to run in mixed mode then install exchange 2000, before transfering the mail over from 5.5, here's what i have so far. Sorry if its a bit newbie. I have 1 NT 4 server (sp6) running Exchange 5.5 (sp4) acting as the PDC. I have purchased 1 new server and have installed NT 4(sp6) and added it to the domain as a BDC and sychronised the 2 machines. I now plan to reverse the roles and make the the old PDC with Exchange on it the BDC and the new one the PDC. I was then planning to insert the windows 2000 server CD in the new PDC and do an in place upgrade. My problem is, the current domain name is BSI and there actual registered domain is BSImerch.com, which is what i would like to use ( i inherited it this way) If i upgrade the new box to 2k and name the domain as i would like, i'm not quite sure how things are going to go. I really can't afford for their mail server to go down :( I was thinking that i should re-name the domain on NT 4 first. Also, should i have a second BDC standing by or is an inplace a straight forward job? Any advice on this would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Question from client
Yeah, the routing thing may be tricky, but one would have to wonder the reasoning behind it. Seems to me you could only make such a guarantee with a completely separate infrastructure. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 3:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Question from client Correct on the address list part. His big concern was the routing of internal only for mail between them and the internet mail not to go through the normal routing. I am going to talk to him to get exactly what he means by internet routing being separate from their normal routing for internet. I am also thinking he has to point those users mail to do the smarthost route. I will repost when I have all of what he want to accomplish. From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Question from client Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 15:21:49 -0800 You'd have to do it with different address lists. I don't have the number handy, but there are KB articles on making separate address lists. Through permissions you can control which ones users see. You would need a group to effectively assign the permissions. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 3:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Question from client E2K I was thinking that can be done but he would have to have another group created and also use a SMTP connector for the internet part From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Question from client Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 15:17:32 -0800 What version of Exchange? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Question from client can we setup a group of users in Exchange that are isolated to a outlook address book that they can only see. As well as restrict delivery only between their group and restrict inbound/outbound internet email? He currently has a single group. Exchnage 2000 I think he can but would have to setup another group and set restrictions via the RGC _ Send instant messages to anyone on your contact list with MSN Messenger 6.0. Try it now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Send instant messages to anyone on your contact list with MSN Messenger 6.0. Try it now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Fretting that your Hotmail account may expire because you forgot to sign in enough? Get Hotmail Extra Storage today! http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL
RE: Just a quick question
That's a lot of questions in one post. May I suggest that you hire a consultant? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 4:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Just a quick question Hi all, I am in the middle of an upgrade to windows 2000 server from an NT 4.0 domain. I plan to run in mixed mode then install exchange 2000, before transfering the mail over from 5.5, here's what i have so far. Sorry if its a bit newbie. I have 1 NT 4 server (sp6) running Exchange 5.5 (sp4) acting as the PDC. I have purchased 1 new server and have installed NT 4(sp6) and added it to the domain as a BDC and sychronised the 2 machines. I now plan to reverse the roles and make the the old PDC with Exchange on it the BDC and the new one the PDC. I was then planning to insert the windows 2000 server CD in the new PDC and do an in place upgrade. My problem is, the current domain name is BSI and there actual registered domain is BSImerch.com, which is what i would like to use ( i inherited it this way) If i upgrade the new box to 2k and name the domain as i would like, i'm not quite sure how things are going to go. I really can't afford for their mail server to go down :( I was thinking that i should re-name the domain on NT 4 first. Also, should i have a second BDC standing by or is an inplace a straight forward job? Any advice on this would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Just a quick question
Would you know a good one? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 5:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Just a quick question That's a lot of questions in one post. May I suggest that you hire a consultant? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 4:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Just a quick question Hi all, I am in the middle of an upgrade to windows 2000 server from an NT 4.0 domain. I plan to run in mixed mode then install exchange 2000, before transfering the mail over from 5.5, here's what i have so far. Sorry if its a bit newbie. I have 1 NT 4 server (sp6) running Exchange 5.5 (sp4) acting as the PDC. I have purchased 1 new server and have installed NT 4(sp6) and added it to the domain as a BDC and sychronised the 2 machines. I now plan to reverse the roles and make the the old PDC with Exchange on it the BDC and the new one the PDC. I was then planning to insert the windows 2000 server CD in the new PDC and do an in place upgrade. My problem is, the current domain name is BSI and there actual registered domain is BSImerch.com, which is what i would like to use ( i inherited it this way) If i upgrade the new box to 2k and name the domain as i would like, i'm not quite sure how things are going to go. I really can't afford for their mail server to go down :( I was thinking that i should re-name the domain on NT 4 first. Also, should i have a second BDC standing by or is an inplace a straight forward job? Any advice on this would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Just a quick question
I know a lot of them! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 6:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Just a quick question Would you know a good one? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 5:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Just a quick question That's a lot of questions in one post. May I suggest that you hire a consultant? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 4:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Just a quick question Hi all, I am in the middle of an upgrade to windows 2000 server from an NT 4.0 domain. I plan to run in mixed mode then install exchange 2000, before transfering the mail over from 5.5, here's what i have so far. Sorry if its a bit newbie. I have 1 NT 4 server (sp6) running Exchange 5.5 (sp4) acting as the PDC. I have purchased 1 new server and have installed NT 4(sp6) and added it to the domain as a BDC and sychronised the 2 machines. I now plan to reverse the roles and make the the old PDC with Exchange on it the BDC and the new one the PDC. I was then planning to insert the windows 2000 server CD in the new PDC and do an in place upgrade. My problem is, the current domain name is BSI and there actual registered domain is BSImerch.com, which is what i would like to use ( i inherited it this way) If i upgrade the new box to 2k and name the domain as i would like, i'm not quite sure how things are going to go. I really can't afford for their mail server to go down :( I was thinking that i should re-name the domain on NT 4 first. Also, should i have a second BDC standing by or is an inplace a straight forward job? Any advice on this would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Just a quick question
People that know Exchange? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 6:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Just a quick question I know a lot of them! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 6:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Just a quick question Would you know a good one? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 5:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Just a quick question That's a lot of questions in one post. May I suggest that you hire a consultant? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 4:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Just a quick question Hi all, I am in the middle of an upgrade to windows 2000 server from an NT 4.0 domain. I plan to run in mixed mode then install exchange 2000, before transfering the mail over from 5.5, here's what i have so far. Sorry if its a bit newbie. I have 1 NT 4 server (sp6) running Exchange 5.5 (sp4) acting as the PDC. I have purchased 1 new server and have installed NT 4(sp6) and added it to the domain as a BDC and sychronised the 2 machines. I now plan to reverse the roles and make the the old PDC with Exchange on it the BDC and the new one the PDC. I was then planning to insert the windows 2000 server CD in the new PDC and do an in place upgrade. My problem is, the current domain name is BSI and there actual registered domain is BSImerch.com, which is what i would like to use ( i inherited it this way) If i upgrade the new box to 2k and name the domain as i would like, i'm not quite sure how things are going to go. I really can't afford for their mail server to go down :( I was thinking that i should re-name the domain on NT 4 first. Also, should i have a second BDC standing by or is an inplace a straight forward job? Any advice on this would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Just a quick question
Them too. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 7:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Just a quick question People that know Exchange? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 6:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Just a quick question I know a lot of them! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 6:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Just a quick question Would you know a good one? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 5:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Just a quick question That's a lot of questions in one post. May I suggest that you hire a consultant? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 4:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Just a quick question Hi all, I am in the middle of an upgrade to windows 2000 server from an NT 4.0 domain. I plan to run in mixed mode then install exchange 2000, before transfering the mail over from 5.5, here's what i have so far. Sorry if its a bit newbie. I have 1 NT 4 server (sp6) running Exchange 5.5 (sp4) acting as the PDC. I have purchased 1 new server and have installed NT 4(sp6) and added it to the domain as a BDC and sychronised the 2 machines. I now plan to reverse the roles and make the the old PDC with Exchange on it the BDC and the new one the PDC. I was then planning to insert the windows 2000 server CD in the new PDC and do an in place upgrade. My problem is, the current domain name is BSI and there actual registered domain is BSImerch.com, which is what i would like to use ( i inherited it this way) If i upgrade the new box to 2k and name the domain as i would like, i'm not quite sure how things are going to go. I really can't afford for their mail server to go down :( I was thinking that i should re-name the domain on NT 4 first. Also, should i have a second BDC standing by or is an inplace a straight forward job? Any advice on this would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
