RE: Just a quick question

[Ed Crowley [MVP]]

Them too.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 7:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Just a quick question

People that know Exchange? 

-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 6:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Just a quick question

I know a lot of them!

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 6:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Just a quick question

Would you know a good one? 

-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 5:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Just a quick question

That's a lot of questions in one post.  May I suggest that you hire a
consultant?

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 4:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Just a quick question

Hi all,
I am in the middle of an upgrade to windows 2000 server from an NT 4.0
domain. I plan to run in mixed mode then install exchange 2000, before
transfering the mail over from 5.5, here's what i have so far. Sorry if its
a bit newbie.

I have 1 NT 4 server (sp6) running Exchange 5.5 (sp4) acting as the PDC.

I have purchased 1 new server and have installed NT 4(sp6) and added it to
the domain as a BDC and sychronised the 2 machines.

I now plan to reverse the roles and make the the old PDC with Exchange on it
the BDC and the new one the PDC. I was then planning to insert the windows
2000 server CD in the new PDC and do an in place upgrade.

My problem is, the current domain name is BSI and there actual registered
domain is BSImerch.com, which is what i would like to use ( i inherited it
this way) If i upgrade the new box to 2k and name the domain as i would
like, i'm not quite sure how things are going to go. I really can't afford
for their mail server to go down :(

I was thinking that i should re-name the domain on NT 4 first. Also, should
i have a second BDC standing by or is an inplace a straight forward job? 

Any advice on this would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks in advance

David

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Just a quick question

[Martin Blackstone]

People that know Exchange? 

-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 6:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Just a quick question

I know a lot of them!

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 6:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Just a quick question

Would you know a good one? 

-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 5:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Just a quick question

That's a lot of questions in one post.  May I suggest that you hire a
consultant?

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 4:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Just a quick question

Hi all,
I am in the middle of an upgrade to windows 2000 server from an NT 4.0
domain. I plan to run in mixed mode then install exchange 2000, before
transfering the mail over from 5.5, here's what i have so far. Sorry if its
a bit newbie.

I have 1 NT 4 server (sp6) running Exchange 5.5 (sp4) acting as the PDC.

I have purchased 1 new server and have installed NT 4(sp6) and added it to
the domain as a BDC and sychronised the 2 machines.

I now plan to reverse the roles and make the the old PDC with Exchange on it
the BDC and the new one the PDC. I was then planning to insert the windows
2000 server CD in the new PDC and do an in place upgrade.

My problem is, the current domain name is BSI and there actual registered
domain is BSImerch.com, which is what i would like to use ( i inherited it
this way) If i upgrade the new box to 2k and name the domain as i would
like, i'm not quite sure how things are going to go. I really can't afford
for their mail server to go down :(

I was thinking that i should re-name the domain on NT 4 first. Also, should
i have a second BDC standing by or is an inplace a straight forward job? 

Any advice on this would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks in advance

David

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Just a quick question

[Ed Crowley [MVP]]

I know a lot of them!

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 6:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Just a quick question

Would you know a good one? 

-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 5:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Just a quick question

That's a lot of questions in one post.  May I suggest that you hire a
consultant?

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 4:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Just a quick question

Hi all,
I am in the middle of an upgrade to windows 2000 server from an NT 4.0
domain. I plan to run in mixed mode then install exchange 2000, before
transfering the mail over from 5.5, here's what i have so far. Sorry if its
a bit newbie.

I have 1 NT 4 server (sp6) running Exchange 5.5 (sp4) acting as the PDC.

I have purchased 1 new server and have installed NT 4(sp6) and added it to
the domain as a BDC and sychronised the 2 machines.

I now plan to reverse the roles and make the the old PDC with Exchange on it
the BDC and the new one the PDC. I was then planning to insert the windows
2000 server CD in the new PDC and do an in place upgrade.

My problem is, the current domain name is BSI and there actual registered
domain is BSImerch.com, which is what i would like to use ( i inherited it
this way) If i upgrade the new box to 2k and name the domain as i would
like, i'm not quite sure how things are going to go. I really can't afford
for their mail server to go down :(

I was thinking that i should re-name the domain on NT 4 first. Also, should
i have a second BDC standing by or is an inplace a straight forward job? 

Any advice on this would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks in advance

David

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Just a quick question

[Martin Blackstone]

Would you know a good one? 

-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 5:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Just a quick question

That's a lot of questions in one post.  May I suggest that you hire a
consultant?

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 4:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Just a quick question

Hi all,
I am in the middle of an upgrade to windows 2000 server from an NT 4.0
domain. I plan to run in mixed mode then install exchange 2000, before
transfering the mail over from 5.5, here's what i have so far. Sorry if its
a bit newbie.

I have 1 NT 4 server (sp6) running Exchange 5.5 (sp4) acting as the PDC.

I have purchased 1 new server and have installed NT 4(sp6) and added it to
the domain as a BDC and sychronised the 2 machines.

I now plan to reverse the roles and make the the old PDC with Exchange on it
the BDC and the new one the PDC. I was then planning to insert the windows
2000 server CD in the new PDC and do an in place upgrade.

My problem is, the current domain name is BSI and there actual registered
domain is BSImerch.com, which is what i would like to use ( i inherited it
this way) If i upgrade the new box to 2k and name the domain as i would
like, i'm not quite sure how things are going to go. I really can't afford
for their mail server to go down :(

I was thinking that i should re-name the domain on NT 4 first. Also, should
i have a second BDC standing by or is an inplace a straight forward job? 

Any advice on this would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks in advance

David

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Just a quick question

[Ed Crowley [MVP]]

That's a lot of questions in one post.  May I suggest that you hire a
consultant?

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 4:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Just a quick question

Hi all,
I am in the middle of an upgrade to windows 2000 server from an NT 4.0
domain. I plan to run in mixed mode then install exchange 2000, before
transfering the mail over from 5.5, here's what i have so far. Sorry if its
a bit newbie.

I have 1 NT 4 server (sp6) running Exchange 5.5 (sp4) acting as the PDC.

I have purchased 1 new server and have installed NT 4(sp6) and added it to
the domain as a BDC and sychronised the 2 machines.

I now plan to reverse the roles and make the the old PDC with Exchange on it
the BDC and the new one the PDC. I was then planning to insert the windows
2000 server CD in the new PDC and do an in place upgrade.

My problem is, the current domain name is BSI and there actual registered
domain is BSImerch.com, which is what i would like to use ( i inherited it
this way) If i upgrade the new box to 2k and name the domain as i would
like, i'm not quite sure how things are going to go. I really can't afford
for their mail server to go down :(

I was thinking that i should re-name the domain on NT 4 first. Also, should
i have a second BDC standing by or is an inplace a straight forward job? 

Any advice on this would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks in advance

David

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Question from client

[Ed Crowley [MVP]]

Yeah, the routing thing may be tricky, but one would have to wonder the
reasoning behind it.  Seems to me you could only make such a guarantee with
a completely separate infrastructure.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 3:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Question from client

Correct on the address list part. His big concern was the routing of
internal only for mail between them and the internet mail not to go through
the normal routing. I am going to talk to him to get exactly what  he means
by internet routing being separate from their normal routing for internet. I
am also thinking he has to point those users mail to do the smarthost route.

I will repost when I have all of what he want to accomplish.


From: "Ed Crowley [MVP]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Question from client
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 15:21:49 -0800

You'd have to do it with different address lists.  I don't have the number
handy, but there are KB articles on making separate address lists.  Through
permissions you can control which ones users see.  You would need a group to
effectively assign the permissions.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 3:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Question from client

E2K I was thinking that can be done but he would have to have another group
created and also use a SMTP connector for the internet part


From: "Ed Crowley [MVP]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Question from client
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 15:17:32 -0800

What version of Exchange?

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 10:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Question from client

can we setup a group of users in Exchange that are isolated to a outlook
address book that they can only see.   As well as restrict delivery only
between their group and restrict inbound/outbound internet email?

He currently has a single group. Exchnage 2000 I think he can but would have
to setup another group and set restrictions via the RGC

_
Send instant messages to anyone on your contact list with  MSN Messenger
6.0.  Try it now FREE!  http://msnmessenger-download.com


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Send instant messages to anyone on your contact list with  MSN Messenger
6.0.  Try it now FREE!  http://msnmessenger-download.com


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Fretting that your Hotmail account may expire because you forgot to sign in 
enough? Get Hotmail Extra Storage today!   
http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Excha

Just a quick question

[David]

Hi all,
I am in the middle of an upgrade to windows 2000 server from an NT 4.0
domain. I plan to run in mixed mode then install exchange 2000, before 
transfering the mail over from 5.5, here's what i have so far. Sorry if
its a bit newbie.

I have 1 NT 4 server (sp6) running Exchange 5.5 (sp4) acting as the PDC.

I have purchased 1 new server and have installed NT 4(sp6) and added it to
the domain as a BDC and sychronised the 2 machines.

I now plan to reverse the roles and make the the old PDC with Exchange on
it the BDC and the new one the PDC. I was then planning to insert the
windows 2000 server CD in the new PDC and do an in place upgrade.

My problem is, the current domain name is BSI and there actual registered
domain is BSImerch.com, which is what i would like to use ( i inherited it
this way)
If i upgrade the new box to 2k and name the domain as i would like, i'm
not quite sure how things are going to go. I really can't afford for their
mail server to go down :(

I was thinking that i should re-name the domain on NT 4 first. Also,
should
i have a second BDC standing by or is an inplace a straight forward job? 

Any advice on this would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks in advance

David

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Question from client

[Tony Hlabse]

Correct on the address list part. His big concern was the routing of 
internal only for mail between them and the internet mail not to go through 
the normal routing. I am going to talk to him to get exactly what  he means 
by internet routing being separate from their normal routing for internet. I 
am also thinking he has to point those users mail to do the smarthost route. 
I will repost when I have all of what he want to accomplish.

From: "Ed Crowley [MVP]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Question from client
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 15:21:49 -0800
You'd have to do it with different address lists.  I don't have the number
handy, but there are KB articles on making separate address lists.  Through
permissions you can control which ones users see.  You would need a group to
effectively assign the permissions.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 3:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Question from client
E2K I was thinking that can be done but he would have to have another group
created and also use a SMTP connector for the internet part
From: "Ed Crowley [MVP]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Question from client
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 15:17:32 -0800
What version of Exchange?

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 10:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Question from client
can we setup a group of users in Exchange that are isolated to a outlook
address book that they can only see.   As well as restrict delivery only
between their group and restrict inbound/outbound internet email?
He currently has a single group. Exchnage 2000 I think he can but would have
to setup another group and set restrictions via the RGC
_
Send instant messages to anyone on your contact list with  MSN Messenger
6.0.  Try it now FREE!  http://msnmessenger-download.com
_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
Send instant messages to anyone on your contact list with  MSN Messenger
6.0.  Try it now FREE!  http://msnmessenger-download.com
_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Fretting that your Hotmail account may expire because you forgot to sign in 
enough? Get Hotmail Extra Storage today!   
http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Question from client

[Ed Crowley [MVP]]

You'd have to do it with different address lists.  I don't have the number
handy, but there are KB articles on making separate address lists.  Through
permissions you can control which ones users see.  You would need a group to
effectively assign the permissions.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 3:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Question from client

E2K I was thinking that can be done but he would have to have another group
created and also use a SMTP connector for the internet part


From: "Ed Crowley [MVP]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Question from client
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 15:17:32 -0800

What version of Exchange?

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 10:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Question from client

can we setup a group of users in Exchange that are isolated to a outlook
address book that they can only see.   As well as restrict delivery only
between their group and restrict inbound/outbound internet email?

He currently has a single group. Exchnage 2000 I think he can but would have
to setup another group and set restrictions via the RGC

_
Send instant messages to anyone on your contact list with  MSN Messenger
6.0.  Try it now FREE!  http://msnmessenger-download.com


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Send instant messages to anyone on your contact list with  MSN Messenger 
6.0.  Try it now FREE!  http://msnmessenger-download.com


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Question from client

[Tony Hlabse]

E2K I was thinking that can be done but he would have to have another group 
created and also use a SMTP connector for the internet part

From: "Ed Crowley [MVP]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Question from client
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 15:17:32 -0800
What version of Exchange?

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 10:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Question from client
can we setup a group of users in Exchange that are isolated to a outlook
address book that they can only see.   As well as restrict delivery only
between their group and restrict inbound/outbound internet email?
He currently has a single group. Exchnage 2000 I think he can but would have
to setup another group and set restrictions via the RGC
_
Send instant messages to anyone on your contact list with  MSN Messenger
6.0.  Try it now FREE!  http://msnmessenger-download.com
_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Send instant messages to anyone on your contact list with  MSN Messenger 
6.0.  Try it now FREE!  http://msnmessenger-download.com

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Question from client

[Ed Crowley [MVP]]

What version of Exchange?

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 10:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Question from client

can we setup a group of users in Exchange that are isolated to a outlook 
address book that they can only see.   As well as restrict delivery only 
between their group and restrict inbound/outbound internet email?

He currently has a single group. Exchnage 2000 I think he can but would have
to setup another group and set restrictions via the RGC

_
Send instant messages to anyone on your contact list with  MSN Messenger
6.0.  Try it now FREE!  http://msnmessenger-download.com


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Quick Question

[Jason Clishe]

This is not true...you CAN add DC's to an SBS domain. Obviously those
DC's cannot be SBS servers.

Jason 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dickenson,
Steven
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 11:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Quick Question

You're correct.  SBS can not be added to an existing domain.  It must be
the one and only domain controller.

Steven
---
Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Network Administrator The
Key School, Annapolis Maryland 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 11:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Quick Question


On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, at 10:36am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 1- How this can be when AD works on domain.local

  Email addresses in Exchange do not have to have any connection to your
AD
domain.  I usually just add the Internet domain as an SMTP address, and
make
it the "primary" address.

> 2- should SBS be a member server or a controller

  SBS *has* to be a domain controller.  I'm not even sure it can be
joined 
to an existing domain.

-- 
Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do
|
| not represent the views or policy of any other person or organization.
|
| All information is provided without warranty of any kind.
|


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange 2K & Outlook 2K3 - increase in size of *.stm

[Steve Molkentin]

Neil & Andy (and anyone else interested!),

Firstly thanks for your replies - every bit helps when you have a
conundrum.

I managed to increase the size of the exchange drive, and then last
night dismounted the store and ran eseutil /d. *.stm file went from
approx 9GB to 1.5 GB (what I was expecting!).

To that end - not sure WHY it did it, but that solved the problem. And
Andy, yes - we need bigger drives (however politics dictate that what
the servers have is what they will keep until we upgrade them in 12
months or so). Damn proprietary hard drives!  ;)

Thanks for your help - this list is a goldmine.

themolk. 

> -Original Message-
> From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Thursday, 30 October 2003 10:29 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Exchange 2K & Outlook 2K3 - increase in size of *.stm
> 
> Sounds like you need bigger drives!  Not sure why you want to 
> run eseutil.
> How much space are you going to reclaim if you do?
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Molkentin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 7:34 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Exchange 2K & Outlook 2K3 - increase in size of *.stm
> 
> 
> All advice appreciated...
> 
> We have recently introduced Outlook 2K3 into our Exchange 
> 2000 environment.
> Our laptop users we have configured to run Outlook in "cached exchange
> mode".
> 
> In the same time frame, our *.stm has exploded from about 1.5 
> GB to approx
> 9GB. The *.edb file has not grown (apart from normal mail services).
> 
> Why would this have happened? Is it not related to the introduction of
> Outlook 2K3? Is it related? I have not yet run esutil, as 
> there are other
> space issues this has now highlighted (and means until I free 
> up some space
> elsewhere I can't run it, knowing I need approx 110% free 
> space, and we now
> only have 1.79GB free on the drive the db's live on).
> 
> I have searched the MS-KB and come up with nada. Ideas, 
> suggestions all
> welcome...
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> themolk. 
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
ext_mode=&lang
> =english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface: 
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
ext_mode=&lang=english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Can anybody help with this ?

[Mark Nold]

http://www.help.rr.com/getpage.asp?/asp/networkstatus.asp,memserv

-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 11:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Can anybody help with this ?

Thanks Chuck, for sharing that info with me. Could you send me a link to
this apge where the network status message appears so I can forward it
to
this person ?

-Original Message-
From: Chuck Parkey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 2:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Can anybody help with this ?


Road Runner is apparently having major email problems at the current
time.
We have been having the same issue with emails going to sc.rr.com. If
you
dig around on the Road Runner help pages, you can find the network
status
message. Until they get the problems worked out, I wouldn't try to hard
at
troubleshooting the problem.

Chuck

-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 9:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Can anybody help with this ?


This is getting stranger.
When I do an NSLOOKUP, this is the result I get - tampabay.rr.com MX
preference = 10, mail exchanger = flmx03.mgw.rr.com tampabay.rr.com MX
preference = 10, mail exchanger = flmx04.mgw.rr.com tampabay.rr.com MX
preference = 20, mail exchanger = txmx01.mgw.rr.com tampabay.rr.com MX
preference = 20, mail exchanger = txmx02.mgw.rr.com tampabay.rr.com MX
preference = 30, mail exchanger = florida.mgw.rr.com tampabay.rr.com MX
preference = 100, mail exchanger = vamx02.mgw.rr.com tampabay.rr.com MX
preference = 10, mail exchanger = flmx01.mgw.rr.com tampabay.rr.com MX
preference = 10, mail exchanger = flmx02.mgw.rr.com

flmx03.mgw.rr.com   internet address = 65.32.1.50
flmx04.mgw.rr.com   internet address = 65.32.1.49
txmx01.mgw.rr.com   internet address = 24.93.35.210
txmx02.mgw.rr.com   internet address = 24.93.35.209
vamx02.mgw.rr.com   internet address = 24.30.200.18
flmx01.mgw.rr.com   internet address = 65.32.1.38
flmx02.mgw.rr.com   internet address = 65.32.1.42

However, I tried telnetting to these IP addresses, I can't connect to
them.

I'm receiving emails fine from this person (almost immediately). I
checked
the headers on the email he sent me and the sending server has a
different
IP address: 

Here is the header info:
Received: from ms-smtp-03-smtplb.tampabay.rr.com ([65.32.5.133]) by
cerberus-service.aiim.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2003  -0500 (Eastern Standard
Time)
Received: from homeoffice (653237hfc134.tampabay.rr.com [65.32.37.134])
by ms-smtp-03-eri0.tampabay.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP
id
h9U52PqH004804
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 00:02:31 -0500 (EST)

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: SPAM filtering on a budget

[Lentz, Wayne]

We love and use the setup described here:
http://lawmonkey.org/anti-spam.html

It can be daunting for someone unfamiliar with nix type os's.  But it's free
software and runs great on old hardware.  For us, it filters out 1200-1500
spams per day with about a %94 success rate.

-Wayne


> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
> Plahtinsky
> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 11:22 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: SPAM filtering on a budget
> 
> Hello list,
> I know SPAM filtering products have been covered in great 
> detail but I'm
> having problems finding a good gateway SPAM filtering product 
> that's not
> going to cost me a lot of money. I have a small organization of about
> 100 users.  The products that I have found that are reasonably priced
> are Xwall ($360.00) and SpamAssassin (free). My problem with
> SpamAssassin is that I don't know the first thing about Linux 
> so that's
> out of the question.  Xwall seems like a good product but I want a few
> more to compare.  My budget won't allow for more than about $800.00.
> What cheep products are you using.  Good/Bad experiences.  
> Any help with
> my product search would be great.  
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Matt

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Can you run 2 Outlook with different profiles at the same time

[Fyodorov, Andrey]

I guess if you use a server as a client and it has Terminal Services on
it, then you can run multiple Outlooks in separate Terminal Server
sessions.

Or Windows XP Home Edition and Windows XP Pro - it allows you to switch
to another user profile without logging off. It does not kill the
previous user's programs.

Sincerely,

Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion

-Original Message-
From: Troels Majlandt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 2:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Can you run 2 Outlook with different profiles at the same time

Hi there !

I have my own profile with my own accounts and the I have a profile that
uses my Exchange mailbox (RPC over HTTP)

Is it possible to run 2 Outlook at the same time - one witch uses my
homeprofile and the other my exchange profile

(My prob is that I cant use my home accounts and exchange in the same
profile, becuase they use the same Inbox)

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Public Contact Lists

[Nikki Peterson]

Microsoft Outlook Categories
http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/olcat.htm

Nikki

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 7:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Public Contact Lists

We're using Outlook XP on the workstations on a hosted MS Exchange 2K
backend. I'm the owner of a public contacts list with a customized master
categories list. I'd like for everyone on the system to see the same
categories to choose from - and it isn't happening. Any and all help is
appreciated! [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can you run 2 Outlook with different profiles at the same time

[Troels Majlandt]

Hi there !

I have my own profile with my own accounts and the I have a profile that
uses my Exchange mailbox (RPC over HTTP)

Is it possible to run 2 Outlook at the same time - one witch uses my
homeprofile and the other my exchange profile

(My prob is that I cant use my home accounts and exchange in the same
profile, becuase they use the same Inbox)

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Can anybody help with this ?

[RBHATIA]

Thanks Chuck, for sharing that info with me. Could you send me a link to
this apge where the network status message appears so I can forward it to
this person ?

-Original Message-
From: Chuck Parkey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 2:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Can anybody help with this ?


Road Runner is apparently having major email problems at the current time.
We have been having the same issue with emails going to sc.rr.com. If you
dig around on the Road Runner help pages, you can find the network status
message. Until they get the problems worked out, I wouldn't try to hard at
troubleshooting the problem.

Chuck

-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 9:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Can anybody help with this ?


This is getting stranger.
When I do an NSLOOKUP, this is the result I get - tampabay.rr.com MX
preference = 10, mail exchanger = flmx03.mgw.rr.com tampabay.rr.com MX
preference = 10, mail exchanger = flmx04.mgw.rr.com tampabay.rr.com MX
preference = 20, mail exchanger = txmx01.mgw.rr.com tampabay.rr.com MX
preference = 20, mail exchanger = txmx02.mgw.rr.com tampabay.rr.com MX
preference = 30, mail exchanger = florida.mgw.rr.com tampabay.rr.com MX
preference = 100, mail exchanger = vamx02.mgw.rr.com tampabay.rr.com MX
preference = 10, mail exchanger = flmx01.mgw.rr.com tampabay.rr.com MX
preference = 10, mail exchanger = flmx02.mgw.rr.com

flmx03.mgw.rr.com   internet address = 65.32.1.50
flmx04.mgw.rr.com   internet address = 65.32.1.49
txmx01.mgw.rr.com   internet address = 24.93.35.210
txmx02.mgw.rr.com   internet address = 24.93.35.209
vamx02.mgw.rr.com   internet address = 24.30.200.18
flmx01.mgw.rr.com   internet address = 65.32.1.38
flmx02.mgw.rr.com   internet address = 65.32.1.42

However, I tried telnetting to these IP addresses, I can't connect to them.

I'm receiving emails fine from this person (almost immediately). I checked
the headers on the email he sent me and the sending server has a different
IP address: 

Here is the header info:
Received: from ms-smtp-03-smtplb.tampabay.rr.com ([65.32.5.133]) by
cerberus-service.aiim.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2003  -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
Received: from homeoffice (653237hfc134.tampabay.rr.com [65.32.37.134])
by ms-smtp-03-eri0.tampabay.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id
h9U52PqH004804
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 00:02:31 -0500 (EST)

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exch 5.5 Routing Question

[Woods, Tony]

Ok, thanks. So according to mine, it looks like I have the redundancy.
There's two entries for each site but I just noticed that the MTA Properties
on my server show to 'Only use least cost routes'. With that enabled, it
wouldn't even try the other connector if our link was down now would it? I
un-ticked it but I guess the only way to test is to wait for a failure [:-)

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 5:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exch 5.5 Routing Question


GWART!  :-)

Neil 

-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 28 October 2003 20:39
Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days)
Conversation: Exch 5.5 Routing Question
Subject: Re: Exch 5.5 Routing Question


I believe the Qwart file takes care of that in 5.5 which was elliminated in
2000.


From: "Woods, Tony" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Exch 5.5 Routing Question
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 12:08:19 -0800

Hello,

Exchange 5.5 SP4 on W2K SP4 boxes. 1 ORG, 3 Sites (A, B, C) in three
different cities across N.A.

I have 2 x400 connectors setup in each location. Each site is setup the same
in that they all have two x400 connectors, each going to one of the other
sites. If the VPN link between Site A and Site C goes down and site C is
trying to send mail to Site A, will Site C route it's mail through Site B to
get to Site A? If not, how can I make this so? Thanks in advance.

Cheers,
Tony

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Want to check if your PC is virus-infected?  Get a FREE computer virus scan 
online from McAfee.
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Can anybody help with this ?

[Chuck Parkey]

Road Runner is apparently having major email problems at the current time.
We have been having the same issue with emails going to sc.rr.com. If you
dig around on the Road Runner help pages, you can find the network status
message. Until they get the problems worked out, I wouldn't try to hard at
troubleshooting the problem.

Chuck

-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 9:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Can anybody help with this ?


This is getting stranger.
When I do an NSLOOKUP, this is the result I get -
tampabay.rr.com MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = flmx03.mgw.rr.com
tampabay.rr.com MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = flmx04.mgw.rr.com
tampabay.rr.com MX preference = 20, mail exchanger = txmx01.mgw.rr.com
tampabay.rr.com MX preference = 20, mail exchanger = txmx02.mgw.rr.com
tampabay.rr.com MX preference = 30, mail exchanger = florida.mgw.rr.com
tampabay.rr.com MX preference = 100, mail exchanger = vamx02.mgw.rr.com
tampabay.rr.com MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = flmx01.mgw.rr.com
tampabay.rr.com MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = flmx02.mgw.rr.com

flmx03.mgw.rr.com   internet address = 65.32.1.50
flmx04.mgw.rr.com   internet address = 65.32.1.49
txmx01.mgw.rr.com   internet address = 24.93.35.210
txmx02.mgw.rr.com   internet address = 24.93.35.209
vamx02.mgw.rr.com   internet address = 24.30.200.18
flmx01.mgw.rr.com   internet address = 65.32.1.38
flmx02.mgw.rr.com   internet address = 65.32.1.42

However, I tried telnetting to these IP addresses, I can't connect to them.

I'm receiving emails fine from this person (almost immediately). I checked
the headers on the email he sent me and the sending server has a different
IP address: 

Here is the header info:
Received: from ms-smtp-03-smtplb.tampabay.rr.com ([65.32.5.133]) by
cerberus-service.aiim.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2003  -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
Received: from homeoffice (653237hfc134.tampabay.rr.com [65.32.37.134])
by ms-smtp-03-eri0.tampabay.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id
h9U52PqH004804
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 00:02:31 -0500 (EST)

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Question from client

[Tony Hlabse]

Ok then does he need another server/group or can it be done via his current 
setup with only one site/group that has mutiple servers already? I think he 
needs another group and server to set routing restrictions the address book 
put is pretty easy

From: "Bowles, John (OIG/OMP)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Question from client
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 13:27:01 -0500
yes we can do that...

_
John Bowles
Exchange Engineer
OIG/HHS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 1:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Question from client
can we setup a group of users in Exchange that are isolated to a outlook
address book that they can only see.   As well as restrict delivery only
between their group and restrict inbound/outbound internet email?
He currently has a single group. Exchnage 2000 I think he can but would have
to setup another group and set restrictions via the RGC
_
Send instant messages to anyone on your contact list with  MSN Messenger
6.0.  Try it now FREE!  http://msnmessenger-download.com
_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Fretting that your Hotmail account may expire because you forgot to sign in 
enough? Get Hotmail Extra Storage today!   
http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Question from client

[Bowles, John (OIG/OMP)]

yes we can do that...

_
John Bowles
Exchange Engineer
OIG/HHS
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 1:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Question from client


can we setup a group of users in Exchange that are isolated to a outlook 
address book that they can only see.   As well as restrict delivery only 
between their group and restrict inbound/outbound internet email?

He currently has a single group. Exchnage 2000 I think he can but would have 
to setup another group and set restrictions via the RGC

_
Send instant messages to anyone on your contact list with  MSN Messenger 
6.0.  Try it now FREE!  http://msnmessenger-download.com


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Question from client

[Tony Hlabse]

can we setup a group of users in Exchange that are isolated to a outlook 
address book that they can only see.   As well as restrict delivery only 
between their group and restrict inbound/outbound internet email?

He currently has a single group. Exchnage 2000 I think he can but would have 
to setup another group and set restrictions via the RGC

_
Send instant messages to anyone on your contact list with  MSN Messenger 
6.0.  Try it now FREE!  http://msnmessenger-download.com

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: IronMail

[Walker, Heath]

We are also evaluating the solution.  It offers the SLS (statistical
lookup service) where messages are analyzed and then compared against an
external dbase to see if they have gone out to large numbers of users
(spam).  This appears to be a very quick and efficient process.  They
are of course only leveraging the information other Ironmail boxes
collect. I know of no issues where we have a false positive w/ this
functionality.  Of course we had to exempt some business related list
servers.

We are using a feature where a number of criteria have to fail then
those failures are weighted and based on an aggregate value that you
define whether the mail is or is not flagged as spam.  Those things you
can leverage and weigh are RBL's, Reverse DNS, SLS, and User and system
defined header analysis.  We are currently blocking about 80% of mail
that is inbound to our organization. 

We will be deploying the "end user quarantine" functionality next week
(when it is available w/ service release 5).  Users can then be sent a
single e-mail on a schedule you select and let them see what has been
blocked w/ a URL to release it.  Once that is available, We plan on
implementing more strict policies (once I have that safety net).  

Heath Walker

-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 8:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IronMail

We are looking at the product, the weighted spam filtering seem to be a
lot better choice than the simple filters other products use. The
selling point for us geeks here is the security functions for OWA and
the ability of a user to release their own mail from inbound holding via
a web interface.

The steep price for our configuration of choice is the sticking point
with management.

John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Blouin
Posted At: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 11:45 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: IronMail
Subject: IronMail


Has anyone reviewed, tested, or used the IronMail appliance from Cipher
Trust (http://www.ciphertrust.com/index.html)? We are interested in its
spam filtering and security capabilities.

TIA, Peter

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Quick Question (Solved)

[rsamman]

Found this link in NTSysadmin archives

http://www.microsoft.com/netherlands/download/files/partner/gtm/Adding_Serve
rs_to_Your_SBS2000_Network.doc

In it you can find the following

Configuring an Additional Server
Joining the Small Business Server 2000 Domain
Configuring a File and Print Server
Configuring an Application Server
Configuring Terminal Services for Application Sharing
Configuring an Intranet Server
Configuring an Additional Domain Controller

Thanks for all responses

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of rsamman
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 11:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Quick Question


If you can't add SBS to a domain

Can you add a SBS as a controller to SBS
If it's only one controller there is no redundancy

If yes, Can you add a regular W2K server as a controller to SBS


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dickenson,
Steven
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 11:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Quick Question


You're correct.  SBS can not be added to an existing domain.  It must be the
one and only domain controller.

Steven
---
Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Network Administrator
The Key School, Annapolis Maryland

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 11:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Quick Question


On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, at 10:36am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 1- How this can be when AD works on domain.local

  Email addresses in Exchange do not have to have any connection to your AD
domain.  I usually just add the Internet domain as an SMTP address, and make
it the "primary" address.

> 2- should SBS be a member server or a controller

  SBS *has* to be a domain controller.  I'm not even sure it can be joined
to an existing domain.

--
Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do  |
| not represent the views or policy of any other person or organization. |
| All information is provided without warranty of any kind.  |


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Can anybody help with this ?

[RBHATIA]

This is getting stranger.
When I do an NSLOOKUP, this is the result I get -
tampabay.rr.com MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = flmx03.mgw.rr.com
tampabay.rr.com MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = flmx04.mgw.rr.com
tampabay.rr.com MX preference = 20, mail exchanger = txmx01.mgw.rr.com
tampabay.rr.com MX preference = 20, mail exchanger = txmx02.mgw.rr.com
tampabay.rr.com MX preference = 30, mail exchanger = florida.mgw.rr.com
tampabay.rr.com MX preference = 100, mail exchanger = vamx02.mgw.rr.com
tampabay.rr.com MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = flmx01.mgw.rr.com
tampabay.rr.com MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = flmx02.mgw.rr.com

flmx03.mgw.rr.com   internet address = 65.32.1.50
flmx04.mgw.rr.com   internet address = 65.32.1.49
txmx01.mgw.rr.com   internet address = 24.93.35.210
txmx02.mgw.rr.com   internet address = 24.93.35.209
vamx02.mgw.rr.com   internet address = 24.30.200.18
flmx01.mgw.rr.com   internet address = 65.32.1.38
flmx02.mgw.rr.com   internet address = 65.32.1.42

However, I tried telnetting to these IP addresses, I can't connect to them.

I'm receiving emails fine from this person (almost immediately). I checked
the headers on the email he sent me and the sending server has a different
IP address: 

Here is the header info:
Received: from ms-smtp-03-smtplb.tampabay.rr.com ([65.32.5.133]) by
cerberus-service.aiim.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2003  -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
Received: from homeoffice (653237hfc134.tampabay.rr.com [65.32.37.134])
by ms-smtp-03-eri0.tampabay.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id
h9U52PqH004804
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 00:02:31 -0500 (EST)

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange 2K & Outlook 2K3 - increase in size of *.stm

[Neil Hobson]

Scanning drive M: with file-level AV can increase the size of the STM
file.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Molkentin
Posted At: 30 October 2003 00:34
Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days)
Conversation: Exchange 2K & Outlook 2K3 - increase in size of *.stm
Subject: Exchange 2K & Outlook 2K3 - increase in size of *.stm


All advice appreciated...

We have recently introduced Outlook 2K3 into our Exchange 2000
environment. Our laptop users we have configured to run Outlook in
"cached exchange mode".

In the same time frame, our *.stm has exploded from about 1.5 GB to
approx 9GB. The *.edb file has not grown (apart from normal mail
services).

Why would this have happened? Is it not related to the introduction of
Outlook 2K3? Is it related? I have not yet run esutil, as there are
other space issues this has now highlighted (and means until I free up
some space elsewhere I can't run it, knowing I need approx 110% free
space, and we now only have 1.79GB free on the drive the db's live on).

I have searched the MS-KB and come up with nada. Ideas, suggestions all
welcome...

Thanks,

themolk. 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: On the theme of spam......

[hawkinsgp]

I restrict all kinds of mail attachments - HTML, .exe, .vbs., .vcf...all
kinds of things.  I only let about five attachment types through at all. 
I get a lot of complaints about it, but there's usually a workaround, and
our incidence of email-borne viruses has decreased dramatically.

Geni

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: IronMail

[Blouin, Peter]

It is a pricey solution. I suppose if you were to add up the cost of each
solution it provides from different vendors as well as the system itself, it
would be close. Have you looked at MXtreme solution from Borderware?

Peter Blouin
Head, Messaging Systems
National Research Council
Ottawa, ON   K1A 0R6  Canada

-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: October 30, 2003 9:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IronMail


We are looking at the product, the weighted spam filtering seem to be a lot
better choice than the simple filters other products use. The selling point
for us geeks here is the security functions for OWA and the ability of a
user to release their own mail from inbound holding via a web interface.

The steep price for our configuration of choice is the sticking point with
management.

John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Blouin
Posted At: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 11:45 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion
List
Conversation: IronMail
Subject: IronMail


Has anyone reviewed, tested, or used the IronMail appliance from Cipher
Trust (http://www.ciphertrust.com/index.html)? We are interested in its spam
filtering and security capabilities.

TIA, Peter

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

On the theme of spam......

[Nick Field]

Hi All,

We have experienced a vast increase in the amount of spam our employees have
been getting (in the region of 3-400% increase) over the last 6 months.
Prior to this, our MailSweeper was coping quite well with the problem, but
is having significant problems with HTML based email ( the ones with
words split up like this ).
It got to the point where about 50% of the mail arriving was of this form
and was getting past the filters.

We have recently taken the rather drastic measure (with board backing) to
restrict inbound HTML, with a 'whitelist' for exceptional circumstances.

Understandably, this was not a very popular move, but has reduced the
inbound spam to virtually nil. The way I have designed my whitelist also
means that I have a workably low proportion of false positives.
I am not completely happy with this solution, but am prepared to live with
it until I have an alternative that is as effective.

I have however been asked a question which I would like to relay

Do any of you restrict HTML based email to either a greater or lesser
extent?

Thanks for taking time to respond

Nick 


The information in this e-mail and any attachment(s) is confidential and may be 
legally privileged. This e-mail is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not 
the addressee, dissemination, copying or other use of this e-mail or any of its 
content is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended 
recipient please inform the sender immediately and destroy the e-mail and any copies. 
All liability for viruses is excluded to the fullest extent permitted by law. Any 
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender. No contract may be 
construed by this e-mail.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Quick Question

[rsamman]

If you can't add SBS to a domain

Can you add a SBS as a controller to SBS
If it's only one controller there is no redundancy

If yes, Can you add a regular W2K server as a controller to SBS


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dickenson,
Steven
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 11:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Quick Question


You're correct.  SBS can not be added to an existing domain.  It must be the
one and only domain controller.

Steven
---
Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Network Administrator
The Key School, Annapolis Maryland

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 11:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Quick Question


On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, at 10:36am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 1- How this can be when AD works on domain.local

  Email addresses in Exchange do not have to have any connection to your AD
domain.  I usually just add the Internet domain as an SMTP address, and make
it the "primary" address.

> 2- should SBS be a member server or a controller

  SBS *has* to be a domain controller.  I'm not even sure it can be joined
to an existing domain.

--
Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do  |
| not represent the views or policy of any other person or organization. |
| All information is provided without warranty of any kind.  |


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: SPAM filtering on a budget

[Mark Dewell]

The bayesian filtering in GFI MailEssentials is quite impressive. To give you
an idea of the figures, on Wednesday we had 2336 blocked by the bayesian
filter, 369 blocked by my keyword list, 206 remote images and 199 blocked by
ordb open relay database. This totals approx 26% of our incoming mail.


> -Original Message-
> From: Weathersby, Bryce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: 30 October 2003 16:41
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: SPAM filtering on a budget
> 
> 
> We are also using GFI MailEssentials 9. I have so far only activated
> black/whitelisting and already have a constant 20-30% 
> blockage of spam. Next
> week I will enable the Bayesian filter next week. I highly 
> recommend the GFI
> Products...
> 
> 
> Bryce Weathersby
> Network Specialist I
> Lamar Institute of Technology
> Voice:409-839-2040
> Fax: 409-839-2931
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.lit.edu
>  
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Dewell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 10:20 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: SPAM filtering on a budget
> 
> 
> I doubt the accuracy of these tests if our own experience is 
> anything to go
> by.
> 
> We use GFI and I found version 8 to be blocking approx 13% 
> weekdays and 28%
> at weekends of our incoming mail and the new version 9 (with 
> the intelligent
> bayesian filter) blocks 23% weekdays and 62% at weekends. It 
> does take a bit
> of work to build up the keyword list but seems pretty good to 
> me, although I
> don't know how much spam is getting passed the filter. 
> False-positives are
> less than 1% (and are mainly people sending remote images which is not
> something we encouraged even if the message is innocent).
> 
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 28 October 2003 17:13
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: SPAM filtering on a budget
> > 
> > 
> > http://www.nwfusion.com/reviews/2003/0915spam.html
> > 
> > 
> > Here is how well they work in production.  Not sure about pricing 
> > though, call em.
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt 
> > Plahtinsky
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 11:22 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: SPAM filtering on a budget
> > 
> > Hello list,
> > I know SPAM filtering products have been covered in great
> > detail but I'm
> > having problems finding a good gateway SPAM filtering product 
> > that's not
> > going to cost me a lot of money. I have a small 
> organization of about
> > 100 users.  The products that I have found that are 
> reasonably priced
> > are Xwall ($360.00) and SpamAssassin (free). My problem with
> > SpamAssassin is that I don't know the first thing about Linux 
> > so that's
> > out of the question.  Xwall seems like a good product but I 
> want a few
> > more to compare.  My budget won't allow for more than about $800.00.
> > What cheep products are you using.  Good/Bad experiences.  
> > Any help with
> > my product search would be great.  
> > 
> > Thanks
> > 
> > Matt
> > 
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Web Interface: 
> > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
> ext_mode=&
> lang=english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
ext_mode=&lang
=
english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=
english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Quick Question

[Dickenson, Steven]

You're correct.  SBS can not be added to an existing domain.  It must be the
one and only domain controller.

Steven
---
Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Network Administrator
The Key School, Annapolis Maryland 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 11:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Quick Question


On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, at 10:36am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 1- How this can be when AD works on domain.local

  Email addresses in Exchange do not have to have any connection to your AD
domain.  I usually just add the Internet domain as an SMTP address, and make
it the "primary" address.

> 2- should SBS be a member server or a controller

  SBS *has* to be a domain controller.  I'm not even sure it can be joined 
to an existing domain.

-- 
Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do  |
| not represent the views or policy of any other person or organization. |
| All information is provided without warranty of any kind.  |


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: SPAM filtering on a budget

[Weathersby, Bryce]

We are also using GFI MailEssentials 9. I have so far only activated
black/whitelisting and already have a constant 20-30% blockage of spam. Next
week I will enable the Bayesian filter next week. I highly recommend the GFI
Products...


Bryce Weathersby
Network Specialist I
Lamar Institute of Technology
Voice:409-839-2040
Fax: 409-839-2931
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.lit.edu
 


-Original Message-
From: Mark Dewell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 10:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SPAM filtering on a budget


I doubt the accuracy of these tests if our own experience is anything to go
by.

We use GFI and I found version 8 to be blocking approx 13% weekdays and 28%
at weekends of our incoming mail and the new version 9 (with the intelligent
bayesian filter) blocks 23% weekdays and 62% at weekends. It does take a bit
of work to build up the keyword list but seems pretty good to me, although I
don't know how much spam is getting passed the filter. False-positives are
less than 1% (and are mainly people sending remote images which is not
something we encouraged even if the message is innocent).



> -Original Message-
> From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 28 October 2003 17:13
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: SPAM filtering on a budget
> 
> 
> http://www.nwfusion.com/reviews/2003/0915spam.html
> 
> 
> Here is how well they work in production.  Not sure about pricing 
> though, call em.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt 
> Plahtinsky
> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 11:22 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: SPAM filtering on a budget
> 
> Hello list,
> I know SPAM filtering products have been covered in great
> detail but I'm
> having problems finding a good gateway SPAM filtering product 
> that's not
> going to cost me a lot of money. I have a small organization of about
> 100 users.  The products that I have found that are reasonably priced
> are Xwall ($360.00) and SpamAssassin (free). My problem with
> SpamAssassin is that I don't know the first thing about Linux 
> so that's
> out of the question.  Xwall seems like a good product but I want a few
> more to compare.  My budget won't allow for more than about $800.00.
> What cheep products are you using.  Good/Bad experiences.  
> Any help with
> my product search would be great.  
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Matt
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface: 
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
ext_mode=&
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=
english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Quick Question

[bscott]

On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, at 10:36am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 1- How this can be when AD works on domain.local

  Email addresses in Exchange do not have to have any connection to your AD
domain.  I usually just add the Internet domain as an SMTP address, and make
it the "primary" address.

> 2- should SBS be a member server or a controller

  SBS *has* to be a domain controller.  I'm not even sure it can be joined 
to an existing domain.

-- 
Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do  |
| not represent the views or policy of any other person or organization. |
| All information is provided without warranty of any kind.  |


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Quick Question

[rsamman]

I have a W2K domain domain.local

I will add a SBS2000 to it with exchange 2000

This exchange 2000 should be the mail server for domain.com

1- How this can be when AD works on domain.local

2- should SBS be a member server or a controller

Thanks for your help


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Public Contact Lists

[kathy]

We're using Outlook XP on the workstations on a hosted MS Exchange 2K
backend. I'm the owner of a public contacts list with a customized master
categories list. I'd like for everyone on the system to see the same
categories to choose from - and it isn't happening. Any and all help is
appreciated! [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: SPAM filtering on a budget

[Mark Dewell]

I doubt the accuracy of these tests if our own experience is anything to go
by.

We use GFI and I found version 8 to be blocking approx 13% weekdays and 28%
at weekends of our incoming mail and the new version 9 (with the intelligent
bayesian filter) blocks 23% weekdays and 62% at weekends. It does take a bit
of work to build up the keyword list but seems pretty good to me, although I
don't know how much spam is getting passed the filter. False-positives are
less than 1% (and are mainly people sending remote images which is not
something we encouraged even if the message is innocent).



> -Original Message-
> From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: 28 October 2003 17:13
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: SPAM filtering on a budget
> 
> 
> http://www.nwfusion.com/reviews/2003/0915spam.html
> 
> 
> Here is how well they work in production.  Not sure about pricing
> though, call em.  
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
> Plahtinsky
> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 11:22 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: SPAM filtering on a budget
> 
> Hello list,
> I know SPAM filtering products have been covered in great 
> detail but I'm
> having problems finding a good gateway SPAM filtering product 
> that's not
> going to cost me a lot of money. I have a small organization of about
> 100 users.  The products that I have found that are reasonably priced
> are Xwall ($360.00) and SpamAssassin (free). My problem with
> SpamAssassin is that I don't know the first thing about Linux 
> so that's
> out of the question.  Xwall seems like a good product but I want a few
> more to compare.  My budget won't allow for more than about $800.00.
> What cheep products are you using.  Good/Bad experiences.  
> Any help with
> my product search would be great.  
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Matt
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
ext_mode=&
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=
english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 5.5 SP4 NT 4.0 UPGRADE TO EX2K

[Tony Hlabse]

From: "Matt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: 5.5 SP4 NT 4.0 UPGRADE TO EX2K
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 10:55:55 -0500
I have a box running nt 4.0 sp6 exchange 5.5 sp4. The store.exe every 2
days maxes out the cpu. I have to down the server and restart.
Customer is interested in replacing box with ex2k and win2k. Can I
upgrade this to this via migrate and will it get not only mail boxes and
mail but the public folders they have which are extensive. I have never
upgraded from 5.5 just set up nes ex2k boxes.
Thanks for any help

Matt

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Surf and talk on the phone at the same time with broadband Internet access. 
Get high-speed for as low as $29.95/month (depending on the local service 
providers in your area).  https://broadband.msn.com

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

5.5 SP4 NT 4.0 UPGRADE TO EX2K

[Matt]

I have a box running nt 4.0 sp6 exchange 5.5 sp4. The store.exe every 2
days maxes out the cpu. I have to down the server and restart.

Customer is interested in replacing box with ex2k and win2k. Can I
upgrade this to this via migrate and will it get not only mail boxes and
mail but the public folders they have which are extensive. I have never
upgraded from 5.5 just set up nes ex2k boxes.

Thanks for any help

Matt

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Mailbox Size Limit Msg from Sys Admin

[Tony Hlabse]

short answer is no. You could ask PSS if they have a routine to change but 
they will tell you that it is not recommended

From: "Kevin Dietz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Mailbox Size Limit Msg from Sys Admin
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 07:05:30 -0800
Is there a way to edit the system administrator message that is sent out
to notify users that their mbx has passed a theshold limit.
Thanks

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Fretting that your Hotmail account may expire because you forgot to sign in 
enough? Get Hotmail Extra Storage today!   
http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook 2002/XP Conecting to Exchange 5.5

[RBHATIA]

True. Something I've noticed too - recently upgraded to Outlook XP on the
client side with the server side still hosting Exchange 5.5 SP4 - seems like
it takes longer to read and send emails now using Outlook XP - certainly
some delays.

-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 9:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2002/XP Conecting to Exchange 5.5


Outlook XP seems to be very picky. Even on the LAN.

Sincerely,

Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion


-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 9:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2002/XP Conecting to Exchange 5.5

Upgrade to Outlook 2003 and use cache mode.  I am advised that it works with
back versions of Exchange, though I haven't personally verified it.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of NetNinja
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 11:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2002/XP Conecting to Exchange 5.5

all maybe somebody out there is in a similar predicament.

I have a user who is using Outlook XP/2002 and they are connecting to my
Exchange server via a VPN connection. There is no way in He** that I am
going to setup a pop3 or Imap connection point for them.


Every so often this user starts getting slow response times. A dialog box
pops up and tries to establish a connection with the exchange server.

I have users who have a similar setup. But they are using Outlook 98 and
Outlook 2000 and they don't experience the same delays.

This user lives out in California but when they came to Atlanta they were
experiencing the same thing.

Exchange 5.5 has the latest service pack4.

Please don't say upgrade to Exchange 2003. That's not in our budget and also
we have about 200 email accounts and in Exchange 2003 you have to pay for
every email account you create.

I think we are going Lotus and drop Microsoft all together.

Anybody have any ideas?


Exchange 5.5 has the lastest serivce pack4.

Please don't say upgrade to Exhchange 2003. That's not in our budget and
also we have about 200 email accounts and in Exchange 2003 you have to pay
for evey email acount you create.

I think we are going Lotus and drop microsoft all together.

Anybody have any ideas?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Mailbox Size Limit Msg from Sys Admin

[Kevin Dietz]

Is there a way to edit the system administrator message that is sent out
to notify users that their mbx has passed a theshold limit.

Thanks

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering.

[Paul Hutchings]

It does work, we've used it for a year or so.  I've not used the bayes
filtering but the rest is very flexible, also it's written by a small
company (I suspect it's one guy) and I've found him really quick with
replies to questions, and very amenable to adding sensible features to later
versions.

The one thing I do like about it is the logging - we use 5.5 and smtp
logging sucks, this logs everything to text, and the important info to csv
and all sort of stuff.. well worth a try IMHO.

regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

> -Original Message-
> From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 30 October 2003 14:53
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam
> filtering.
> 
> 
>  Let us all know what you think of Xwall if you get it 
> running.  I looked at
> their web page and it's only $350 per server (any number of 
> users).  If it
> works that sound very reasonable.
> 
> Tom
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 10:15 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering.
> 
> Exchange 5.5
> 
>  
> Sorry if this came through twice.  Had to change the text 
> type and re-send.
> 
> This is a little off-topic.  We are about to deploy XWall for 
> Exchange on
> our front end IMC relays.  One of the requirements is that we 
> change the
> smtp port for Exchange on the IMC's to use 24 since XWall 
> will use port 25
> and get the messages first.  I guess my questions are:
> 
> For users using POP or custom applications that are using the 
> Exchange IMC
> as their relay host, how will changing the ports affect them? 
>  Have I just
> disabled POP by installing XWall?
> 
> We have locked down all unused ports so I guess I need to 
> open port 24 up to
> the front end and back end servers as well.
> 
> Is there anything I need to be careful about or any other 
> gotchas that I
> should know.
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Can anybody help with this ?

[RBHATIA]

Sorry but if I understood correctly, so the problem is on their end ? Why is
it then that they claim that this only affects emails we send them ?

-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 6:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Can anybody help with this ?


Yes, looks like they're down.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RBHATIA
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 2:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Can anybody help with this ?

My organization is having problems sending email to a user @tampabay.rr.com
I tried to do an NSLOOKUP and found a host of different MX records for this
domain. However when I try to telnet to them I can't seem to connect. Can
anybody try and let me know the results ? The problem is that our emails do
reach them but after a long delay. They claim that they haven't had any
problems from other people and that the problem only comes from our end.
Help would be appreciated ! Thanks

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: IronMail

[John Matteson]

We are looking at the product, the weighted spam filtering seem to be a
lot better choice than the simple filters other products use. The
selling point for us geeks here is the security functions for OWA and
the ability of a user to release their own mail from inbound holding via
a web interface.

The steep price for our configuration of choice is the sticking point
with management.

John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Blouin
Posted At: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 11:45 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: IronMail
Subject: IronMail


Has anyone reviewed, tested, or used the IronMail appliance from Cipher
Trust (http://www.ciphertrust.com/index.html)? We are interested in its
spam filtering and security capabilities.

TIA, Peter

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering.

[Alverson, Tom]

 Let us all know what you think of Xwall if you get it running.  I looked at
their web page and it's only $350 per server (any number of users).  If it
works that sound very reasonable.

Tom

-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 10:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering.

Exchange 5.5

 
Sorry if this came through twice.  Had to change the text type and re-send.

This is a little off-topic.  We are about to deploy XWall for Exchange on
our front end IMC relays.  One of the requirements is that we change the
smtp port for Exchange on the IMC's to use 24 since XWall will use port 25
and get the messages first.  I guess my questions are:

For users using POP or custom applications that are using the Exchange IMC
as their relay host, how will changing the ports affect them?  Have I just
disabled POP by installing XWall?

We have locked down all unused ports so I guess I need to open port 24 up to
the front end and back end servers as well.

Is there anything I need to be careful about or any other gotchas that I
should know.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook 2002/XP Conecting to Exchange 5.5

[Alverson, Tom]

Be advised that you cannot use the new biggie sized PST files ("unicode")
for cache mode one Exchange 5.5 (It won't let you).  The result of this is
that it will create a 2g limited pst file, and if your mailbox is over about
1.5g (pst's take more space to save the messages) it will die and you will
have to disable cache mode until you get your mailbox on the server well
below 2g.

Tom 

-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 9:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2002/XP Conecting to Exchange 5.5

Upgrade to Outlook 2003 and use cache mode.  I am advised that it works with
back versions of Exchange, though I haven't personally verified it.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of NetNinja
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 11:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2002/XP Conecting to Exchange 5.5

all maybe somebody out there is in a similar predicament.

I have a user who is using Outlook XP/2002 and they are connecting to my
Exchange server via a VPN connection. There is no way in He** that I am
going to setup a pop3 or Imap connection point for them.


Every so often this user starts getting slow response times. A dialog box
pops up and tries to establish a connection with the exchange server.

I have users who have a similar setup. But they are using Outlook 98 and
Outlook 2000 and they don't experience the same delays.

This user lives out in California but when they came to Atlanta they were
experiencing the same thing.

Exchange 5.5 has the latest service pack4.

Please don't say upgrade to Exchange 2003. That's not in our budget and also
we have about 200 email accounts and in Exchange 2003 you have to pay for
every email account you create.

I think we are going Lotus and drop Microsoft all together.

Anybody have any ideas?


Exchange 5.5 has the lastest serivce pack4.

Please don't say upgrade to Exhchange 2003. That's not in our budget and
also we have about 200 email accounts and in Exchange 2003 you have to pay
for evey email acount you create.

I think we are going Lotus and drop microsoft all together.

Anybody have any ideas?


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: RE : Can I search Exchange for a specific phrase?

[Tony Hlabse]

On track's product is very much like Exmerge. Not sure you may want to check 
it out to see if it searches text. Big thing it allows you to seach DB's 
without them being online.

From: "Fyodorov, Andrey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: RE : Can I search Exchange for a specific phrase?
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 09:44:03 -0500
Did you look on Google for any third-party utilities that may be able to do 
the job?

Sincerely,

Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 7:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RE : Can I search Exchange for a specific phrase?
Doesn't help much after the fact though does it?

-Original Message-
From: Bourque Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 8:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE : Can I search Exchange for a specific phrase?
Build a specific signature that look for the string you are looking for in
your external IDS and once it trigger, correlate the IDS log with your FW
log to look at who was on-line (web e-mail) or what e-mail msg (SMTP) was
sent at the same time...
No need to look in everybody e-mail...

-Message d'origine-
De : Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : 29 octobre, 2003 14:36
À : Exchange Discussions
Objet : Can I search Exchange for a specific phrase?


We have a user who we think maybe sending info to a competitor. Is there a
way to search through all users emails for a specific phrase, namely the
competitors name? We are running Exchange 5.5 sp4
Thanks in advance.

Brian

Ps. I am going to the archives now, but was hoping for a quick answer from
someone knowledgeable on the list.
_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
See when your friends are online with MSN Messenger 6.0. Download it now 
FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: RE : Can I search Exchange for a specific phrase?

[Fyodorov, Andrey]

Did you look on Google for any third-party utilities that may be able to do the job?

Sincerely,

Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion


-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 7:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RE : Can I search Exchange for a specific phrase?

Doesn't help much after the fact though does it?


-Original Message-
From: Bourque Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 8:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE : Can I search Exchange for a specific phrase?


Build a specific signature that look for the string you are looking for in
your external IDS and once it trigger, correlate the IDS log with your FW
log to look at who was on-line (web e-mail) or what e-mail msg (SMTP) was
sent at the same time...

No need to look in everybody e-mail...


-Message d'origine-
De : Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Envoyé : 29 octobre, 2003 14:36
À : Exchange Discussions
Objet : Can I search Exchange for a specific phrase?



We have a user who we think maybe sending info to a competitor. Is there a
way to search through all users emails for a specific phrase, namely the
competitors name? We are running Exchange 5.5 sp4

Thanks in advance.

Brian

Ps. I am going to the archives now, but was hoping for a quick answer from
someone knowledgeable on the list.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: RE : Can I search Exchange for a specific phrase?

[Fyodorov, Andrey]

Do you need to look in message bodies or in subject lines?

I think you could use ExMerge to find all messages with matching subject lines.

Sincerely,

Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion

-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 7:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RE : Can I search Exchange for a specific phrase?

Doesn't help much after the fact though does it?


-Original Message-
From: Bourque Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 8:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE : Can I search Exchange for a specific phrase?


Build a specific signature that look for the string you are looking for in
your external IDS and once it trigger, correlate the IDS log with your FW
log to look at who was on-line (web e-mail) or what e-mail msg (SMTP) was
sent at the same time...

No need to look in everybody e-mail...


-Message d'origine-
De : Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Envoyé : 29 octobre, 2003 14:36
À : Exchange Discussions
Objet : Can I search Exchange for a specific phrase?



We have a user who we think maybe sending info to a competitor. Is there a
way to search through all users emails for a specific phrase, namely the
competitors name? We are running Exchange 5.5 sp4

Thanks in advance.

Brian

Ps. I am going to the archives now, but was hoping for a quick answer from
someone knowledgeable on the list.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange 2K & Outlook 2K3 - increase in size of *.stm

[David, Andy]

Sounds like you need bigger drives!  Not sure why you want to run eseutil.
How much space are you going to reclaim if you do?



-Original Message-
From: Steve Molkentin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 7:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2K & Outlook 2K3 - increase in size of *.stm


All advice appreciated...

We have recently introduced Outlook 2K3 into our Exchange 2000 environment.
Our laptop users we have configured to run Outlook in "cached exchange
mode".

In the same time frame, our *.stm has exploded from about 1.5 GB to approx
9GB. The *.edb file has not grown (apart from normal mail services).

Why would this have happened? Is it not related to the introduction of
Outlook 2K3? Is it related? I have not yet run esutil, as there are other
space issues this has now highlighted (and means until I free up some space
elsewhere I can't run it, knowing I need approx 110% free space, and we now
only have 1.79GB free on the drive the db's live on).

I have searched the MS-KB and come up with nada. Ideas, suggestions all
welcome...

Thanks,

themolk. 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: RE : Can I search Exchange for a specific phrase?

[David, Andy]

Doesn't help much after the fact though does it?


-Original Message-
From: Bourque Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 8:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE : Can I search Exchange for a specific phrase?


Build a specific signature that look for the string you are looking for in
your external IDS and once it trigger, correlate the IDS log with your FW
log to look at who was on-line (web e-mail) or what e-mail msg (SMTP) was
sent at the same time...

No need to look in everybody e-mail...


-Message d'origine-
De : Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Envoyé : 29 octobre, 2003 14:36
À : Exchange Discussions
Objet : Can I search Exchange for a specific phrase?



We have a user who we think maybe sending info to a competitor. Is there a
way to search through all users emails for a specific phrase, namely the
competitors name? We are running Exchange 5.5 sp4

Thanks in advance.

Brian

Ps. I am going to the archives now, but was hoping for a quick answer from
someone knowledgeable on the list.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]