RE: Exchange 2003 OWA default home page
Cheers, but unfortunately, this doesn't appear to exist. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: 05 December 2003 03:27 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA default home page You should be able to create the website and virtual directories manually and point them to \\.\backofficestorage -Original Message- From: Simon Bond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 5:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2003 OWA default home page I have a test system (thank goodness) that I accidentally deleted the default web site on (containing the E2003 files). Not the end of the world I thought, I'll just reinstall Exchange and it'll put all the files back. Oh no. What it seems to do (and please correct me if I'm wrong) is that it rebuilds the directory structure of the site in IIS but the default page it returns when I try to access it from the web (or browsing through IIS) is the C:\Inetpub\wwwroot\iisstart.htm page, which is an error page. The correct page doesn't seem to be restored by the reinstallation. Any ideas? Thanking you in advance, Simon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SV: Dumb question - why OWA cannot get to public folder contacts?
I dit have the same prob and ?, I know use RPC over HTTP, and the solution is far better than OWA solution. That is in my point of view :-) Troels Majlandt Systemconstructor -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] På vegne af Ron Jameson Sendt: 5. december 2003 04:40 Til: Exchange Discussions Emne: Dumb question - why OWA cannot get to public folder contacts? Ever since the early days - I always thought at some point, MS would make the OWA get to all the public folders like outlook (be able to send email by picking a public folder contact list) but alas, Ex2k3 still has no access to a public folder contact list. Grr. I know OWA is meant to be quick, simple and trim - but is this too much to ask? My workaround is to try the RPC over HTTP featurebut still need to roll out Office 2003 first at our client sites. Regards, Ron Jameson IT Division Manager Hamlin Technologies _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup rituals
I finally found the Disaster Recovery Whitepaper Erik was talking about. I will stop asking questions about DR methods. Eric Fretz Could you post the URL? I'm always interested in finding better ways to provide disaster recovery. By the way, we do a full NTBACKUP every night to hard drive. We then do a tape backup every night (full on Fridays and incremental other night) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ideal setup for exch 2003?
Almost identical to our field server specification! Although, I'd consider Advanced Server, simply because we are having a hell of a job with virtual memory fragmentation errors on similar systems with similar amounts of memory. It would appear that Advanced Server handles memory in a different way to ordinary Server. Cheers, Miles -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz Sent: 04 December 2003 15:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ideal setup for exch 2003? Exchange 2000 and 2003 can make good use of dual processors. The configuration will vary based upon the load and number of users you are supporting, but here's an example of the system I just ordered for my company: Dell PowerEdge 4400 Windows 2000 Server Exchange 2000 Enterprise Edition Dual Pentium-4 Xeon 2.8 GHz Processors 2.0 GB of Dual channel DDR RAM (4 x 512 MB DDR) 4-channel PERC Raid card Disks: 2 x 18.2G 10k rpm drives [RAID-1] = C:\ (OS Drive) 2 x 18.2G 15k rpm drives [RAID-1] = D:\ (Directory Store + SMTP Queue + Swapfile) 4 x 73G 15x rpm drives [RAID-5] = E:\ (Information Store) 2 x 36G 15k rpm drives [RAID-0] = F:\ (Secondary Swapfile + free space for doing Information Store maintenance) Quantum VS160 Tape Drive (80/160GB) Note: For those of you who have been following my saga, I was finally able to get the executive board to approve $$$ for a new server NOW instead of 1/2004. I guess when you equate mail downtime to dollars and cents, they tend to listen more closely to the IT guy! E _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange client or mapi
If it's BrightStor Arcserve 9, use the native Arcserve SMTP service. (Remember to patch it otherwise the alert.exe process gobbles more CPU cycles and memory than store.exe!) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ronald Mazzotta Sent: 04 December 2003 17:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange client or mapi When I try to create a mapi profile on my exchange 2003 server it pops up the outlook express profiler instead of the mapi profiler. Is there a way to change this. I need a profile for Arcserves alert service. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ideal setup for exch 2003?
Definitely. On an Exchange server with more than 1GB RAM, Advanced Server is recommended so you can apply the /3GB switch to boot.ini. Neil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Atkinson, Miles Posted At: 05 December 2003 09:16 Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days) Conversation: Ideal setup for exch 2003? Subject: RE: Ideal setup for exch 2003? Almost identical to our field server specification! Although, I'd consider Advanced Server, simply because we are having a hell of a job with virtual memory fragmentation errors on similar systems with similar amounts of memory. It would appear that Advanced Server handles memory in a different way to ordinary Server. Cheers, Miles -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz Sent: 04 December 2003 15:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ideal setup for exch 2003? Exchange 2000 and 2003 can make good use of dual processors. The configuration will vary based upon the load and number of users you are supporting, but here's an example of the system I just ordered for my company: Dell PowerEdge 4400 Windows 2000 Server Exchange 2000 Enterprise Edition Dual Pentium-4 Xeon 2.8 GHz Processors 2.0 GB of Dual channel DDR RAM (4 x 512 MB DDR) 4-channel PERC Raid card Disks: 2 x 18.2G 10k rpm drives [RAID-1] = C:\ (OS Drive) 2 x 18.2G 15k rpm drives [RAID-1] = D:\ (Directory Store + SMTP Queue + Swapfile) 4 x 73G 15x rpm drives [RAID-5] = E:\ (Information Store) 2 x 36G 15k rpm drives [RAID-0] = F:\ (Secondary Swapfile + free space for doing Information Store maintenance) Quantum VS160 Tape Drive (80/160GB) Note: For those of you who have been following my saga, I was finally able to get the executive board to approve $$$ for a new server NOW instead of 1/2004. I guess when you equate mail downtime to dollars and cents, they tend to listen more closely to the IT guy! E _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SBS 4.5 to SBS 2003
Hi, Does anyone know if the in place upgrade of SBS 4.5 to SBS 2003 uses Exmerge(don't really want this as the SIS will be lost and the database would go over 16GB) or does it action a proper database to database upgrade? the documentation just seems to dodge exactly how it's going to deal with the exchange part. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (06) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SBS 4.5 to SBS 2003
AFAIK there is no in-place upgrade from SBS 4.5 to SBS 2003. http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/sbs/upgrade/default.mspx For an in-place upgrade you could probably do an interim upgrade to SBS 2K, but don't know how good the dual upgrade could be. I'm in your same situation and probably will do a server migration to a new box. Cheers, Alberto -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SBS 4.5 to SBS 2003 Hi, Does anyone know if the in place upgrade of SBS 4.5 to SBS 2003 uses Exmerge(don't really want this as the SIS will be lost and the database would go over 16GB) or does it action a proper database to database upgrade? the documentation just seems to dodge exactly how it's going to deal with the exchange part. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (06) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup rituals
This is our plan as well. Fulls every day plus the transaction logs has worked well for us. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals Full plus replaying the trans logs will restore you to the point of failure. -Original Message- From: HOLLIDAY, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 11:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals Wouldn't doing a diff/incremental + weekly full give you a tighter restore point window (restore to the hour instead of to the day)? Eric Holliday - PST's? We don't need no stinkin' PST's!! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley [MVP] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 9:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals Why bother? The only value I would see in that would be if you were backing up off-site. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 2:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals Those of you that do a daily full backup are you doing a diff or incremental during the day? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 7:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals Incrementals flush the logs. Differentials do not. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals While most any other system is quite happy with incremental backups, Exchange is one of those that you want to do full backups on always. The reason being is that incremental do not commit and flush the transaction logs. Only a full backup will do that. In addition, you will want to familiarize yourself with this: http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/administration/55/BackupResto re.a sp Unless you use a different version of Exchange in which case you will what to find the appropriate DR whitepaper. You should setup a DR server to test these processes on. By server I mean any spare PC that has enough disk space. Just to learn it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 7:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup rituals What backup rituals do you guys use on your Exchange sites? I've looked through the FAQs and read most of the relevant Microsoft Qxxx articles on Exchange administration, but I haven't found the way to do good backups. My first blush is to backup the entire databases + logs once a week and then backup the incremental changes to the logs daily. All suggestions, snide remarks and pithy one-liners are welcome... Thanks, Eric Eric Fretz The information contained in this message is confidential and is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have received this message in error or there are any problems please notify the originator immediately. The unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is strictly forbidden. Badger Meter, Inc. will not be liable for direct, special, indirect or consequential damages arising from alteration of the contents of this message by a third party or as a result of any virus being passed on. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
What rights to Exchange do Domain Admins have by default?
Let's say that a Domain Admin sits down at an Exchange server and launches Exchange System Manager. Let's also assume that this user has NOT been granted any Exchange administrative roles through the Exchange Delegation Wizard. What can he do? Can he install a new Exchange server? Dismount stores? Create stores? Create or modify connectors, policies, virtual servers and settings, storage groups, etc, etc? Is anyone aware of a comprehensive table or listing of what a domain admin, *with no specific Exchange rights*, can do to Exchange? Thanks Jason _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup rituals
Go check out -- http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/administration/55/BackupRestore.a sp If you haven't already seen it, go check out Ed's Exchange Administration guide at: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxb.htm (That's just the disaster recovery page. The whole guide is priceless.) Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Hank Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 3:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals I finally found the Disaster Recovery Whitepaper Erik was talking about. I will stop asking questions about DR methods. Eric Fretz Could you post the URL? I'm always interested in finding better ways to provide disaster recovery. By the way, we do a full NTBACKUP every night to hard drive. We then do a tape backup every night (full on Fridays and incremental other night) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange
Mabye I'm just a little naïve, but since Exchange supports IMAP, why not use a unix IMAP client? There are dozens of good unix IMAP clients out there (Netscape Messenger being one of them...). Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 9:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Novell announced that now THEY got their hands on Ximian, right? 'cause Ximian has been out and around for a while. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 7:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Novell connects Linux desktop users to Microsoft Exchange 2003 12/4/2003 http://www.itweb.co.za/sections/enterprise/2003/0312040815.asp?A=HOMEO= FPIN http://tinyurl.com/xsea Novell today announced support for Microsoft Exchange 2003 via its Ximian Connector for Microsoft Exchange. Ximian Connector for Microsoft Exchange enables users of the Ximian Evolution e-mail and workgroup information management application to easily collaborate with Windows users connected to Microsoft Exchange 2000 or 2003 servers. -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Their website says they support Mandrake 9.1. Maybe Ximian have just not updated their site to include 9.2? Wasn't 9.2 only released in October? Did you ask one of their sales people? AW - Original Message - From: Jeremy T. Slater [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 5:44 PM Subject: RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange We looked at that, but they do not support Mandrake 9.2. Thanks! -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 6:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Hi, You can use Ximian Evolution http://www.ximian.com/products/evolution/ with their Exchange Connector http://www.ximian.com/products/connector/ for Exchange 2000 or 20003. The client is free, but the Connector will cost you. I think it costs around $25US per client. I use Evolution on my linux desktop, and it has a very Outlook-y feel. Cheers, Allison W. - Original Message - From: Jeremy T. Slater [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 4:43 AM Subject: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Greetings! Is anyone familiar with a client that will interact with Exchange on the Unix/Linux platform (specifically Mandrake)? I am looking for the same functionality (or similar) as to Outlook. Any comments or thoughts would be appreciated. Thanks, Jeremy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 SMTP Connector
He doesn't have a SMTP Connector. I do on my Org. that is why I am questioning it. Shouldn't he have a SMTP Connector? -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 SMTP Connector Check to see whether the SMTP Connector has the checkbox selected Allow relay to these domains for the * 1 address space. -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 SMTP Connector Is having a SMTP Connector necessary in and Exchange 2000 Organization? I have a friend who has an Exchange server that is somehow relaying spam. My server does not relay spam and has the same settings in the SMTP Virtual server properties. The only difference between his system and mine is that I have a SMTP Connector and he doesn't. Or at least he says he doesn't see a connector in his ESM. I thought it was necessary to have a connector. Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup rituals
Here's the link to download the DR whitepaper from Microsoft http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=df586628-3abe-40c3- 8e8f-beb4122de3d7displaylang=en Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Hank Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 3:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals I finally found the Disaster Recovery Whitepaper Erik was talking about. I will stop asking questions about DR methods. Eric Fretz Could you post the URL? I'm always interested in finding better ways to provide disaster recovery. By the way, we do a full NTBACKUP every night to hard drive. We then do a tape backup every night (full on Fridays and incremental other night) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange
Well... Ximian with the exchange connector has the advantage of being able to view/edit the calendar, tasks, etc... it's very similar in appearance to outlook. Quite a few of our Linux people use it. (it's really going through OWA to get to the additional folders (calendar, tasks)). Seems to work quit well here. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 7:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Mabye I'm just a little naïve, but since Exchange supports IMAP, why not use a unix IMAP client? There are dozens of good unix IMAP clients out there (Netscape Messenger being one of them...). Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 9:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Novell announced that now THEY got their hands on Ximian, right? 'cause Ximian has been out and around for a while. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 7:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Novell connects Linux desktop users to Microsoft Exchange 2003 12/4/2003 http://www.itweb.co.za/sections/enterprise/2003/0312040815.asp?A=HOMEO= FPIN http://tinyurl.com/xsea Novell today announced support for Microsoft Exchange 2003 via its Ximian Connector for Microsoft Exchange. Ximian Connector for Microsoft Exchange enables users of the Ximian Evolution e-mail and workgroup information management application to easily collaborate with Windows users connected to Microsoft Exchange 2000 or 2003 servers. -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Their website says they support Mandrake 9.1. Maybe Ximian have just not updated their site to include 9.2? Wasn't 9.2 only released in October? Did you ask one of their sales people? AW - Original Message - From: Jeremy T. Slater [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 5:44 PM Subject: RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange We looked at that, but they do not support Mandrake 9.2. Thanks! -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 6:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Hi, You can use Ximian Evolution http://www.ximian.com/products/evolution/ with their Exchange Connector http://www.ximian.com/products/connector/ for Exchange 2000 or 20003. The client is free, but the Connector will cost you. I think it costs around $25US per client. I use Evolution on my linux desktop, and it has a very Outlook-y feel. Cheers, Allison W. - Original Message - From: Jeremy T. Slater [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 4:43 AM Subject: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Greetings! Is anyone familiar with a client that will interact with Exchange on the Unix/Linux platform (specifically Mandrake)? I am looking for the same functionality (or similar) as to Outlook. Any comments or thoughts would be appreciated. Thanks, Jeremy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web
Exchange 5.5 OWA install on a Win2000 Server
I getting this message when I try to access OWA. I find something about this in TechNet, but it's only for ISS V.4 in NT 4.0 and not for IIS v.5.0 in Windows 2000. ** Error Type: Microsoft VBScript runtime (0x800A01A8) Object required: 'Application(...)' /exchange/USA/logon.asp, line 12 Browser Type: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) Page: GET /exchange/USA/logon.asp *** Any suggestions to solve my problem ? The Exchange server is an updatet Exchange 5.5 (Include SP3) on a NT4.0 server with servicepack 4 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange
IMAP is fine if you don't care about contacts, calendar or tasks. -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 8:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Mabye I'm just a little naïve, but since Exchange supports IMAP, why not use a unix IMAP client? There are dozens of good unix IMAP clients out there (Netscape Messenger being one of them...). Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 9:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Novell announced that now THEY got their hands on Ximian, right? 'cause Ximian has been out and around for a while. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 7:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Novell connects Linux desktop users to Microsoft Exchange 2003 12/4/2003 http://www.itweb.co.za/sections/enterprise/2003/0312040815.asp?A=HOMEO= FPIN http://tinyurl.com/xsea Novell today announced support for Microsoft Exchange 2003 via its Ximian Connector for Microsoft Exchange. Ximian Connector for Microsoft Exchange enables users of the Ximian Evolution e-mail and workgroup information management application to easily collaborate with Windows users connected to Microsoft Exchange 2000 or 2003 servers. -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Their website says they support Mandrake 9.1. Maybe Ximian have just not updated their site to include 9.2? Wasn't 9.2 only released in October? Did you ask one of their sales people? AW - Original Message - From: Jeremy T. Slater [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 5:44 PM Subject: RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange We looked at that, but they do not support Mandrake 9.2. Thanks! -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 6:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Hi, You can use Ximian Evolution http://www.ximian.com/products/evolution/ with their Exchange Connector http://www.ximian.com/products/connector/ for Exchange 2000 or 20003. The client is free, but the Connector will cost you. I think it costs around $25US per client. I use Evolution on my linux desktop, and it has a very Outlook-y feel. Cheers, Allison W. - Original Message - From: Jeremy T. Slater [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 4:43 AM Subject: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Greetings! Is anyone familiar with a client that will interact with Exchange on the Unix/Linux platform (specifically Mandrake)? I am looking for the same functionality (or similar) as to Outlook. Any comments or thoughts would be appreciated. Thanks, Jeremy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: Exchange 5.5 OWA install on a Win2000 Server
You didn't SP the OWA box did you? Install SP4 for Exchange. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of PEter Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 5:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 OWA install on a Win2000 Server I getting this message when I try to access OWA. I find something about this in TechNet, but it's only for ISS V.4 in NT 4.0 and not for IIS v.5.0 in Windows 2000. ** Error Type: Microsoft VBScript runtime (0x800A01A8) Object required: 'Application(...)' /exchange/USA/logon.asp, line 12 Browser Type: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) Page: GET /exchange/USA/logon.asp *** Any suggestions to solve my problem ? The Exchange server is an updatet Exchange 5.5 (Include SP3) on a NT4.0 server with servicepack 4 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange
What is the cost of the client? -Original Message- From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Well... Ximian with the exchange connector has the advantage of being able to view/edit the calendar, tasks, etc... it's very similar in appearance to outlook. Quite a few of our Linux people use it. (it's really going through OWA to get to the additional folders (calendar, tasks)). Seems to work quit well here. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 7:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Mabye I'm just a little naïve, but since Exchange supports IMAP, why not use a unix IMAP client? There are dozens of good unix IMAP clients out there (Netscape Messenger being one of them...). Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 9:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Novell announced that now THEY got their hands on Ximian, right? 'cause Ximian has been out and around for a while. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 7:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Novell connects Linux desktop users to Microsoft Exchange 2003 12/4/2003 http://www.itweb.co.za/sections/enterprise/2003/0312040815.asp?A=HOMEO= FPIN http://tinyurl.com/xsea Novell today announced support for Microsoft Exchange 2003 via its Ximian Connector for Microsoft Exchange. Ximian Connector for Microsoft Exchange enables users of the Ximian Evolution e-mail and workgroup information management application to easily collaborate with Windows users connected to Microsoft Exchange 2000 or 2003 servers. -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Their website says they support Mandrake 9.1. Maybe Ximian have just not updated their site to include 9.2? Wasn't 9.2 only released in October? Did you ask one of their sales people? AW - Original Message - From: Jeremy T. Slater [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 5:44 PM Subject: RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange We looked at that, but they do not support Mandrake 9.2. Thanks! -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 6:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Hi, You can use Ximian Evolution http://www.ximian.com/products/evolution/ with their Exchange Connector http://www.ximian.com/products/connector/ for Exchange 2000 or 20003. The client is free, but the Connector will cost you. I think it costs around $25US per client. I use Evolution on my linux desktop, and it has a very Outlook-y feel. Cheers, Allison W. - Original Message - From: Jeremy T. Slater [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 4:43 AM Subject: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Greetings! Is anyone familiar with a client that will interact with Exchange on the Unix/Linux platform (specifically Mandrake)? I am looking for the same functionality (or similar) as to Outlook. Any comments or thoughts would be appreciated. Thanks, Jeremy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe:
Mulit-GAL Filter Rule
Does anyone know how to setup a GAL filter that will show both a Group and User filter. I am running a hosted exchange enviroment in E2K. It seems that when I setup a new GAL for the hosted client, I can only filter either by User or by Group. When I filter by user, the distribution groups do not show up, and vice versa. Anyone know how to solve this so that both show up for the users in the Custom GAL? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Need Help Restoring a Deleted pub.edb in 5.5
Have people stored any new info in the public folders since then? No. This is not a concern. If you slide the old pub.edb in there, the new work will be gone. You probably will be better off restoring that old pub.edb to another server (in a separate Exchange organization) and then exporting/importing data from that other server to the production server. Only 1 Exchange Server in this organization. If it is as easy as just sliding the file back to MDBDATA, that would be excellent. What other steps are necessary to do this? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mulit-GAL Filter Rule
Stuff a custom LDAP query in the GAL's filter. That's what I did when I worked for iNNERHOST. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov. Exchange MVP Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Jason Hendricks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 10:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mulit-GAL Filter Rule Does anyone know how to setup a GAL filter that will show both a Group and User filter. I am running a hosted exchange enviroment in E2K. It seems that when I setup a new GAL for the hosted client, I can only filter either by User or by Group. When I filter by user, the distribution groups do not show up, and vice versa. Anyone know how to solve this so that both show up for the users in the Custom GAL? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mulit-GAL Filter Rule
You can use (|(objectclass=user)(objectclass=group)) syntax in that LDAP query. | means OR. -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 11:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mulit-GAL Filter Rule Stuff a custom LDAP query in the GAL's filter. That's what I did when I worked for iNNERHOST. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov. Exchange MVP Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Jason Hendricks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 10:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mulit-GAL Filter Rule Does anyone know how to setup a GAL filter that will show both a Group and User filter. I am running a hosted exchange enviroment in E2K. It seems that when I setup a new GAL for the hosted client, I can only filter either by User or by Group. When I filter by user, the distribution groups do not show up, and vice versa. Anyone know how to solve this so that both show up for the users in the Custom GAL? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Need Help Restoring a Deleted pub.edb in 5.5
By another server I meant - build a new Exchange server in a separate Exchange org. -Original Message- From: Willem Jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 11:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Need Help Restoring a Deleted pub.edb in 5.5 Have people stored any new info in the public folders since then? No. This is not a concern. If you slide the old pub.edb in there, the new work will be gone. You probably will be better off restoring that old pub.edb to another server (in a separate Exchange organization) and then exporting/importing data from that other server to the production server. Only 1 Exchange Server in this organization. If it is as easy as just sliding the file back to MDBDATA, that would be excellent. What other steps are necessary to do this? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 SMTP Connector
I don't think SMTP Connector is that necessary unless you want a tighter control over mail routing and flow. But for relay control the SMTP virtual server has everything that is necessary. -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 8:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 SMTP Connector He doesn't have a SMTP Connector. I do on my Org. that is why I am questioning it. Shouldn't he have a SMTP Connector? -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 SMTP Connector Check to see whether the SMTP Connector has the checkbox selected Allow relay to these domains for the * 1 address space. -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 SMTP Connector Is having a SMTP Connector necessary in and Exchange 2000 Organization? I have a friend who has an Exchange server that is somehow relaying spam. My server does not relay spam and has the same settings in the SMTP Virtual server properties. The only difference between his system and mine is that I have a SMTP Connector and he doesn't. Or at least he says he doesn't see a connector in his ESM. I thought it was necessary to have a connector. Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2003 OWA default home page
That's odd. I did the exact same thing in my lab when I was testing Ex2003 and a reinstall brought it back. - Peter -Original Message- From: Simon Bond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 5:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2003 OWA default home page I have a test system (thank goodness) that I accidentally deleted the default web site on (containing the E2003 files). Not the end of the world I thought, I'll just reinstall Exchange and it'll put all the files back. Oh no. What it seems to do (and please correct me if I'm wrong) is that it rebuilds the directory structure of the site in IIS but the default page it returns when I try to access it from the web (or browsing through IIS) is the C:\Inetpub\wwwroot\iisstart.htm page, which is an error page. The correct page doesn't seem to be restored by the reinstallation. Any ideas? Thanking you in advance, Simon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange
Just thought I would throw in my 2c. I recently took on the charge of moving a company that is running all UNIX mailhosts (Sendmail\Qpopper)...and moving them to Exchange 2000 (and then to 2003...this month..yah). Natually they have a large amount of *NIX clientsso I had this problem as well. I got a copy of the Ximian Exchange Connector the other day and let me tell you...I was really impressed. The only thing that it was missing (which is not Ximian's fault) is creating server side ruleswhich should be fixed in their Exchnage 2003 connector. I would still like to see an Exchange client that supports Regex based rules...but that is another topic. I was able to do everything that I can do with My Ol2003 client (contacts, calendaring, public folders, etc..). The only thing to consider is that you have to allow an additional WebDAV verb if you have locked down your E2k IIS environment (shame on you if you have not). From what I can tell...a very solid product. I would guess that with Novell picking up Suse as well...things should get very interesting in the distant future for the desktop environment. Best regards, Steve Novell connects Linux desktop users to Microsoft Exchange 2003 12/4/2003 http://www.itweb.co.za/sections/enterprise/2003/0312040815.asp?A=HOMEO=FPIN http://tinyurl.com/xsea Novell today announced support for Microsoft Exchange 2003 via its Ximian Connector for Microsoft Exchange. Ximian Connector for Microsoft Exchange enables users of the Ximian Evolution e-mail and workgroup information management application to easily collaborate with Windows users connected to Microsoft Exchange 2000 or 2003 servers. -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Their website says they support Mandrake 9.1. Maybe Ximian have just not updated their site to include 9.2? Wasn't 9.2 only released in October? Did you ask one of their sales people? AW - Original Message - From: Jeremy T. Slater [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 5:44 PM Subject: RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange We looked at that, but they do not support Mandrake 9.2. Thanks! -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 6:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Hi, You can use Ximian Evolution http://www.ximian.com/products/evolution/ with their Exchange Connector http://www.ximian.com/products/connector/ for Exchange 2000 or 20003. The client is free, but the Connector will cost you. I think it costs around $25US per client. I use Evolution on my linux desktop, and it has a very Outlook-y feel. Cheers, Allison W. - Original Message - From: Jeremy T. Slater [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 4:43 AM Subject: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Greetings! Is anyone familiar with a client that will interact with Exchange on the Unix/Linux platform (specifically Mandrake)? I am looking for the same functionality (or similar) as to Outlook. Any comments or thoughts would be appreciated. Thanks, Jeremy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To
RE: Mulit-GAL Filter Rule
I tried your idea, but I still cannot find the correct syntax. How would you write one from the current example; ((objectCategory=user)([EMAIL PROTECTED])) ((objectCategory=group)([EMAIL PROTECTED])) Each on there own displays, but I try combine them to see both nothing happens. Thanks, Jason _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changing web server - OWA OMA
I need some suggestions on how to best configure my IIS / exchange. We have had a very insecure setup with exchange running on our IIS server, but this allowed OWA and OMA to work for us. We are now moving our IIS server to a seperate box and placing it in our DMZ. We are not ready to add an ISA server in our DMZ or a FE Exchange server in the DMZ. So as a compromise we are looking at directing OWA and OMA traffic to the Exchange server /IIS and all other web traffic to our IIS server in the dmz. The corporate web site mysite is now going to be on a new server. My users have accessed owa via mysite\exchange. They access both from intranet as well as internet. Any suggestions or information you can direct me to that will help me figure out a solution that is somewhat transparent to the end user. I am thinking of setting the website on the exchange server to mail.mysite and exchange would be https:\\mail.mysite.com\exchange and traffic going to www.mysite.com\exchange would be redirected to https:\\mail.mysite.com\exchange. Is there a better solution? Also is there a way to help minimize the exposer of the owa / oma website on the IIS server? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mulit-GAL Filter Rule
Do I have to give away all my Exchange hosting secrets? :) (|((objectCategory=user)([EMAIL PROTECTED])) ((objectCategory=group)([EMAIL PROTECTED]))) (the text above is one long line that may have wrapped around) Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Jason Hendricks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 11:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mulit-GAL Filter Rule I tried your idea, but I still cannot find the correct syntax. How would you write one from the current example; ((objectCategory=user)([EMAIL PROTECTED])) ((objectCategory=group)([EMAIL PROTECTED])) Each on there own displays, but I try combine them to see both nothing happens. Thanks, Jason _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 2K
We are running Exchnage 5.5 right now with a planned upgrade to E2K before the end of the year. I am told that in E2k environment you can not have same active directory account associated with multiple exchange mailboxes? Is this correct? Thanks Davinder _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2K
Wow, I totally misread this phrase at first and thought that it was now instead of not. You can still hset permissions in Eexchange 2000 so that people can access someone else's mailbox. Hey why are you planning to upgrade to Exchange 2000 and not 2003? -Original Message- From: Davinder Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 2:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2K We are running Exchnage 5.5 right now with a planned upgrade to E2K before the end of the year. I am told that in E2k environment you can not have same active directory account associated with multiple exchange mailboxes? Is this correct? Thanks Davinder _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ideal setup for exch 2003?
FYI - Any variety of 2003 server can use the /3GB switch -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 4:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ideal setup for exch 2003? Definitely. On an Exchange server with more than 1GB RAM, Advanced Server is recommended so you can apply the /3GB switch to boot.ini. Neil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Atkinson, Miles Posted At: 05 December 2003 09:16 Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days) Conversation: Ideal setup for exch 2003? Subject: RE: Ideal setup for exch 2003? Almost identical to our field server specification! Although, I'd consider Advanced Server, simply because we are having a hell of a job with virtual memory fragmentation errors on similar systems with similar amounts of memory. It would appear that Advanced Server handles memory in a different way to ordinary Server. Cheers, Miles -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz Sent: 04 December 2003 15:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ideal setup for exch 2003? Exchange 2000 and 2003 can make good use of dual processors. The configuration will vary based upon the load and number of users you are supporting, but here's an example of the system I just ordered for my company: Dell PowerEdge 4400 Windows 2000 Server Exchange 2000 Enterprise Edition Dual Pentium-4 Xeon 2.8 GHz Processors 2.0 GB of Dual channel DDR RAM (4 x 512 MB DDR) 4-channel PERC Raid card Disks: 2 x 18.2G 10k rpm drives [RAID-1] = C:\ (OS Drive) 2 x 18.2G 15k rpm drives [RAID-1] = D:\ (Directory Store + SMTP Queue + Swapfile) 4 x 73G 15x rpm drives [RAID-5] = E:\ (Information Store) 2 x 36G 15k rpm drives [RAID-0] = F:\ (Secondary Swapfile + free space for doing Information Store maintenance) Quantum VS160 Tape Drive (80/160GB) Note: For those of you who have been following my saga, I was finally able to get the executive board to approve $$$ for a new server NOW instead of 1/2004. I guess when you equate mail downtime to dollars and cents, they tend to listen more closely to the IT guy! E _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ideal setup for exch 2003?
They meant Windows 2000 Advanced Server -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 4:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ideal setup for exch 2003? FYI - Any variety of 2003 server can use the /3GB switch -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 4:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ideal setup for exch 2003? Definitely. On an Exchange server with more than 1GB RAM, Advanced Server is recommended so you can apply the /3GB switch to boot.ini. Neil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Atkinson, Miles Posted At: 05 December 2003 09:16 Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days) Conversation: Ideal setup for exch 2003? Subject: RE: Ideal setup for exch 2003? Almost identical to our field server specification! Although, I'd consider Advanced Server, simply because we are having a hell of a job with virtual memory fragmentation errors on similar systems with similar amounts of memory. It would appear that Advanced Server handles memory in a different way to ordinary Server. Cheers, Miles -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz Sent: 04 December 2003 15:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ideal setup for exch 2003? Exchange 2000 and 2003 can make good use of dual processors. The configuration will vary based upon the load and number of users you are supporting, but here's an example of the system I just ordered for my company: Dell PowerEdge 4400 Windows 2000 Server Exchange 2000 Enterprise Edition Dual Pentium-4 Xeon 2.8 GHz Processors 2.0 GB of Dual channel DDR RAM (4 x 512 MB DDR) 4-channel PERC Raid card Disks: 2 x 18.2G 10k rpm drives [RAID-1] = C:\ (OS Drive) 2 x 18.2G 15k rpm drives [RAID-1] = D:\ (Directory Store + SMTP Queue + Swapfile) 4 x 73G 15x rpm drives [RAID-5] = E:\ (Information Store) 2 x 36G 15k rpm drives [RAID-0] = F:\ (Secondary Swapfile + free space for doing Information Store maintenance) Quantum VS160 Tape Drive (80/160GB) Note: For those of you who have been following my saga, I was finally able to get the executive board to approve $$$ for a new server NOW instead of 1/2004. I guess when you equate mail downtime to dollars and cents, they tend to listen more closely to the IT guy! E _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2k3 on XP won't connect to My Exchange 5.5
So outlook 2003 doesn't use OST files, only PST? I believe there is a slight difference between the formats of OST and PST. -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 10:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2k3 on XP won't connect to My Exchange 5.5 If you use caching mode with outlook 2003 and exchange 5.5, then your cache is limited to 2gig (it cannot use the new enhanced unicode PST format. This means that if you have anywhere close to 2gig in your server mailbox it will not work (it will fill up the 2gig of an old style PST then give you an error). The only workaround is to stop using cache mode or trim your server storage to much less than 2g (like 1.5gig or less as the PST format is much less efficient than PSTs) Tom -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 5:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2k3 on XP won't connect to My Exchange 5.5 No. You can use cache mode with any flavor of Exchange. I believe E2K3 is optimized for it, but it works with any flavor. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2k3 on XP won't connect to My Exchange 5.5 So what is the correct answer? To use caching mode do you have to be using both Outlook 2003 AND Exchange 2003?? -Original Message- From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 4:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2k3 on XP won't connect to My Exchange 5.5 Right. All mcary was saying is that he thought you HAD to be using Outlook 2003 with Exchange 2003 in order to use cached mode. Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Camara, David Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 4:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2k3 on XP won't connect to My Exchange 5.5 I think what he meant was that he likes the caching mode. Not necessarily using outlook 2003 with exchange 2003. Jose David P. Camara II IT-NT Administration Credit Lyonnais (212)2613868 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 3:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2k3 on XP won't connect to My Exchange 5.5 Are you using Cached mode with Exchange 5.5? I was under the impression that you had to running both Outlook 2003 and Exchange 2003 for Cached mode to work. -Original Message- From: Klosa, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 2:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2k3 on XP won't connect to My Exchange 5.5 This is being sent from Outlook 2003 through a 5.5 server also. It works fine. Cached mode is cool too. -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 6:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2k3 on XP won't connect to My Exchange 5.5 I am using 2003 on XP to 5.5 right now and it works fine. -Original Message- From: Will [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 4:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2k3 on XP won't connect to My Exchange 5.5 Outlook 2003 on Windows 2000 works fine on Exchange v5.5 (I'm using it right now!). Yes, same here. Also, Outlook 2002 on Windows XP works great for me. It's just the combination of XP and Outlook 2003 that is causing me troubles. The information contained in this message is confidential and is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have received this message in error or there are any problems please notify the originator immediately. The unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is strictly forbidden. Badger Meter, Inc. will not be liable for direct, special, indirect or consequential damages arising from alteration of the contents of this message by a third party or as a result of any virus being passed on. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Credit Lyonnais This e-mail contains confidential information or information belonging to Credit Lyonnais and is intended solely for the addressees. The unauthorized disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either whole or partial) of this e-mail, or any information it contains, is prohibited. E-mails are susceptible to alteration and their integrity cannot be guaranteed. Credit Lyonnais shall not be liable for this
Configuring LDAP with exchange 200
I have had it up to my neck with OWA, and I have decided it is time to phase it out of our organization. So far I have been testing IMAP and the method I really prefer is to connect to my VPN and open up outlook. However to be practical (not saying the a VPN is not the best way), I am looking at an IMAP configuration using LDAP. Only problem is I have never touched LDAP before. I only have one question can some one point me in the right direction (docs, faqs, howto...) on where to begin setting up an LDAP server that will work with exchange/AD. Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: S/MIME
Since HHS is a federal agency, you should be using the Federal Bridge Certification Authority (FBCA) to connect to other Federal Agencies. Currently, use of the FBCA requires certain proprietary APIs to do certificate validation. Here is a link to more information about the Federal bridge: http://csrc.nist.gov/pki/fbca/welcome.html Russell W. Chung 800.419.8726 +1/818.957.4925 fax: +1/818.951.5761 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/04/2003 11:48:15 AM: I have a few questions here that I'd like to put out there. Now, mind you. I'm not an expert in this field. That's why I'm turning to the people on this list for advice. With that said. -Since we have a requirement for secure messaging over the internet with other government agencies. We would have to get a third party CA to accomplish this. The other agencies that we would want to communicate with also would have to go through a third party as well to obtain a CA so we can transmit messages securely between one another? -Also, since we also have a requirement for us to have secure messaging internally. We already have a root CA in place within our organization. Setting up S/MIME internally isn't that hard. But if we already have this root CA in place and we needed to obtain a third party CA. How would we implement this third party CA into our already existing root CA? I'm sure if there is a way to do this. Are there any docs that describe how to accomplish this feat? Thank you, _ John Bowles Exchange Engineer OIG/HHS [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 2:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: S/MIME which client will be signing the message? Also which version of Exchange From: Bowles, John (OIG/OMP) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: S/MIME Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 13:39:45 -0500 All, I'm trying to setup S/MIME since we all of a sudden require message security within our organization. I'm trying to get an understanding on how this works in the real world. I've setup a test lab here at work. But that can only help me understand how to get things done internally. I'm looking at a braoder scope of allowing our messages to be secure while passing over the internet to other corporations etc. Can someone point me in the direction on what I need to read to understand this a little bit better I'd really appreciate it. Also, if anyone wants to contact me offline. I have a few questions that I'd like answered if you have time. TIA, _ John Bowles Exchange Engineer OIG/HHS [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl? enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Don't worry if your Inbox will max out while you are enjoying the holidays. Get MSN Extra Storage! http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl? enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl? enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange on a SAN
Not most I've run across. Most I've run across buy the disks as each application comes up. Therefore their SANs are just very expensive equivalents of external direct-attach storage. Snapshots won't be available until the SAN providers complete their integration with Windows 2003. (Are any shipping this yet?) I maintain that anyone who tells you that you can snapshot Windows 2000 and give you a dependably recoverable backup is lying to you. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wohlgemuth, Mike Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 5:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a SAN most sans (at least the ones I am looking at) ARE full of disks AND the storage is virtualized across all of them ... the main reason I am looking into them is for snapshots ... almost instantaneous backups (depending on your san administrative solution) of the storage that can be relocated elsewhere for almost pretty darn quick disaster recovery solutions ... beats tape recovery by being able to recover in 5 minutes rather than 5 hours (or days) this , of course, does not mean we will stop doing tape backups ... it is just another level of backup solutions ... ps .. thanks to everyone for your comments thanks Mike the sooner you fall behind, the more time you will have to catch up - Steven Wright -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 9:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a SAN I don't understand why anyone should bother putting Exchange on a SAN unless it is a big SAN full of disks and the storage is virtualized across all of them. Unfortunately, many customers just buy their shelves and disks separately for each application and they ultimately end up with something that doesn't perform any better than direct-attach storage but costs a lot more. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wohlgemuth, Mike Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange on a SAN Hi all We are going to be purchasing a low/mid end SAN and plan on moving our Exchange Back End Server Storage to it ... Comments? Things to read? Experiences? Choices of SAN? Thanks in advance ... Mike Wohlgemuth To steal ideas from one person is plagiarism; to steal from many is research - Steven Wright _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Resource free/Busy time issues with AutoAccept script
Log into the resource mailbox with Outlook using the /cleanfreebusy switch. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gonzalez, Alex Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 6:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Resource free/Busy time issues with AutoAccept script We are currently using the Auto Accept script for 5.5. We are running SP4. Some of our resources are not posting proper Free/Busy time. We are up to the latest service pack. Anything else I can do to correct this issue? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Converting w2k DNS to BIND
Why are you doing this? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pham, Tuan Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 7:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Converting w2k DNS to BIND Good morning all! I'm in the process of transfering the DNS role from the current W2K/AD DNS to BIND(compliant version). I have two DCs that point to W2K DNS, and two cluster E2K. Now, when I change the DNS on the DCs and the E2K, is there anything I need to look out for or is it just simple changing the DNS in the TCP/IP Properties and ofcourse reboot too? Thanks! TP _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Why are you asking here? We're all just Microsoft vendor whores. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 I have a client that needs help migrating from GroupWise 6.5. I have used the GroupWise 5.2.6 client, the recommended client, to migrate from GroupWise 5 and 6 environments and this client works extremely well. But, I have not specifically done 6.5 yet. Does anyone have any information about whether this client works with GroupWise 6.5 or if there is another GroupWise client that works better? Thanks in advance! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: What rights to Exchange do Domain Admins have by default?
Not much. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Clishe Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 5:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: What rights to Exchange do Domain Admins have by default? Let's say that a Domain Admin sits down at an Exchange server and launches Exchange System Manager. Let's also assume that this user has NOT been granted any Exchange administrative roles through the Exchange Delegation Wizard. What can he do? Can he install a new Exchange server? Dismount stores? Create stores? Create or modify connectors, policies, virtual servers and settings, storage groups, etc, etc? Is anyone aware of a comprehensive table or listing of what a domain admin, *with no specific Exchange rights*, can do to Exchange? Thanks Jason _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Race between client rules and BES server
Due to new corporate policy, I just moved all my mail from the server (Exchange 5.5sp4) to local PST files. I had several rules to move mailing lists emails to server folders that now point to local PST folders. Before, these mailing list messages never showed up in the inbox, and the Blackberry server (BES server) never saw them (and thus never sent them to my blackberry). Now when one of these emails arrives, it briefly appears in the inbox before my PC has a chance to grab it and move it to a local PST. This means that some of the time the BES server sees it and forwards it to my blackberry. Does anyone know of any tricks to avoid this? I may have to switch these back to the server as I can keep stuff there less than 60 days old but this means that I would need to have to manually archive these before the server deletes them. Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange
Last I checked the Ximian connector did not work on Exchange 5.5 (it requires exchange 2000 or newer). -Original Message- From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Well... Ximian with the exchange connector has the advantage of being able to view/edit the calendar, tasks, etc... it's very similar in appearance to outlook. Quite a few of our Linux people use it. (it's really going through OWA to get to the additional folders (calendar, tasks)). Seems to work quit well here. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 7:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Mabye I'm just a little naïve, but since Exchange supports IMAP, why not use a unix IMAP client? There are dozens of good unix IMAP clients out there (Netscape Messenger being one of them...). Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 9:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Novell announced that now THEY got their hands on Ximian, right? 'cause Ximian has been out and around for a while. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 7:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Novell connects Linux desktop users to Microsoft Exchange 2003 12/4/2003 http://www.itweb.co.za/sections/enterprise/2003/0312040815.asp?A=HOMEO= FPIN http://tinyurl.com/xsea Novell today announced support for Microsoft Exchange 2003 via its Ximian Connector for Microsoft Exchange. Ximian Connector for Microsoft Exchange enables users of the Ximian Evolution e-mail and workgroup information management application to easily collaborate with Windows users connected to Microsoft Exchange 2000 or 2003 servers. -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Their website says they support Mandrake 9.1. Maybe Ximian have just not updated their site to include 9.2? Wasn't 9.2 only released in October? Did you ask one of their sales people? AW - Original Message - From: Jeremy T. Slater [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 5:44 PM Subject: RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange We looked at that, but they do not support Mandrake 9.2. Thanks! -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 6:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Hi, You can use Ximian Evolution http://www.ximian.com/products/evolution/ with their Exchange Connector http://www.ximian.com/products/connector/ for Exchange 2000 or 20003. The client is free, but the Connector will cost you. I think it costs around $25US per client. I use Evolution on my linux desktop, and it has a very Outlook-y feel. Cheers, Allison W. - Original Message - From: Jeremy T. Slater [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 4:43 AM Subject: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Greetings! Is anyone familiar with a client that will interact with Exchange on the Unix/Linux platform (specifically Mandrake)? I am looking for the same functionality (or similar) as to Outlook. Any comments or thoughts would be appreciated. Thanks, Jeremy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:
RE: Backup rituals
I could change my spark plugs weekly, but I don't. What kind of failure would take out both the store and the logs? An extremely rare and weird event. There's nothing wrong with what you're doing, my point is just that you're not getting much extra protection. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Hutchings Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 9:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals I do mostly cause i can, my strategy purely from a how quick can i get this working if it breaks p.o.v is to do a full backup nightly using ntbackup to dump to a file on a removable SCSI drive wihch then gets dumped to tape. I also do an incremental to get the logs at lunchtime, the store and logs are on separate physical raid volumes so i figure that covers most scenarios without being over the top.. regards, Paul -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 December 2003 22:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals Those of you that do a daily full backup are you doing a diff or incremental during the day? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 7:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals Incrementals flush the logs. Differentials do not. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals While most any other system is quite happy with incremental backups, Exchange is one of those that you want to do full backups on always. The reason being is that incremental do not commit and flush the transaction logs. Only a full backup will do that. In addition, you will want to familiarize yourself with this: http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/administration/55/B ackupRestore.a sp Unless you use a different version of Exchange in which case you will what to find the appropriate DR whitepaper. You should setup a DR server to test these processes on. By server I mean any spare PC that has enough disk space. Just to learn it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 7:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup rituals What backup rituals do you guys use on your Exchange sites? I've looked through the FAQs and read most of the relevant Microsoft Qxxx articles on Exchange administration, but I haven't found the way to do good backups. My first blush is to backup the entire databases + logs once a week and then backup the incremental changes to the logs daily. All suggestions, snide remarks and pithy one-liners are welcome... Thanks, Eric Eric Fretz The information contained in this message is confidential and is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have received this message in error or there are any problems please notify the originator immediately. The unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is strictly forbidden. Badger Meter, Inc. will not be liable for direct, special, indirect or consequential damages arising from alteration of the contents of this message by a third party or as a result of any virus being passed on. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Need Help Restoring a Deleted pub.edb in 5.5
Take a full online backup. Shut down the Information Store cleanly. Take a full offline backup (so you have a backup copy in case you do something stupid again--Sorry, I couldn't resist) of the full Information Store, both private and public stores. Take another if you want to be really sure. Delete the log files. Replace the pub.edb file with the old one. That ought to work. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Willem Jackson Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Need Help Restoring a Deleted pub.edb in 5.5 Have people stored any new info in the public folders since then? No. This is not a concern. If you slide the old pub.edb in there, the new work will be gone. You probably will be better off restoring that old pub.edb to another server (in a separate Exchange organization) and then exporting/importing data from that other server to the production server. Only 1 Exchange Server in this organization. If it is as easy as just sliding the file back to MDBDATA, that would be excellent. What other steps are necessary to do this? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 SMTP Connector
Or if you have separate routing groups that route SMTP mail through one another's connectors. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 8:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 SMTP Connector I don't think SMTP Connector is that necessary unless you want a tighter control over mail routing and flow. But for relay control the SMTP virtual server has everything that is necessary. -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 8:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 SMTP Connector He doesn't have a SMTP Connector. I do on my Org. that is why I am questioning it. Shouldn't he have a SMTP Connector? -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 SMTP Connector Check to see whether the SMTP Connector has the checkbox selected Allow relay to these domains for the * 1 address space. -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 SMTP Connector Is having a SMTP Connector necessary in and Exchange 2000 Organization? I have a friend who has an Exchange server that is somehow relaying spam. My server does not relay spam and has the same settings in the SMTP Virtual server properties. The only difference between his system and mine is that I have a SMTP Connector and he doesn't. Or at least he says he doesn't see a connector in his ESM. I thought it was necessary to have a connector. Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2k3 on XP won't connect to My Exchange 5.5
The legacy OST and PST are essentially the same format and hence subject to the same limitation. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2k3 on XP won't connect to My Exchange 5.5 So outlook 2003 doesn't use OST files, only PST? I believe there is a slight difference between the formats of OST and PST. -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 10:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2k3 on XP won't connect to My Exchange 5.5 If you use caching mode with outlook 2003 and exchange 5.5, then your cache is limited to 2gig (it cannot use the new enhanced unicode PST format. This means that if you have anywhere close to 2gig in your server mailbox it will not work (it will fill up the 2gig of an old style PST then give you an error). The only workaround is to stop using cache mode or trim your server storage to much less than 2g (like 1.5gig or less as the PST format is much less efficient than PSTs) Tom -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 5:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2k3 on XP won't connect to My Exchange 5.5 No. You can use cache mode with any flavor of Exchange. I believe E2K3 is optimized for it, but it works with any flavor. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2k3 on XP won't connect to My Exchange 5.5 So what is the correct answer? To use caching mode do you have to be using both Outlook 2003 AND Exchange 2003?? -Original Message- From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 4:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2k3 on XP won't connect to My Exchange 5.5 Right. All mcary was saying is that he thought you HAD to be using Outlook 2003 with Exchange 2003 in order to use cached mode. Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Camara, David Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 4:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2k3 on XP won't connect to My Exchange 5.5 I think what he meant was that he likes the caching mode. Not necessarily using outlook 2003 with exchange 2003. Jose David P. Camara II IT-NT Administration Credit Lyonnais (212)2613868 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 3:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2k3 on XP won't connect to My Exchange 5.5 Are you using Cached mode with Exchange 5.5? I was under the impression that you had to running both Outlook 2003 and Exchange 2003 for Cached mode to work. -Original Message- From: Klosa, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 2:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2k3 on XP won't connect to My Exchange 5.5 This is being sent from Outlook 2003 through a 5.5 server also. It works fine. Cached mode is cool too. -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 6:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2k3 on XP won't connect to My Exchange 5.5 I am using 2003 on XP to 5.5 right now and it works fine. -Original Message- From: Will [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 4:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2k3 on XP won't connect to My Exchange 5.5 Outlook 2003 on Windows 2000 works fine on Exchange v5.5 (I'm using it right now!). Yes, same here. Also, Outlook 2002 on Windows XP works great for me. It's just the combination of XP and Outlook 2003 that is causing me troubles. The information contained in this message is confidential and is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have received this message in error or there are any problems please notify the originator immediately. The unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is strictly forbidden. Badger Meter, Inc. will not be liable for direct, special, indirect or consequential damages arising from alteration of the contents of this message by a third party or as a result of any virus being passed on. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Credit Lyonnais
RE: Configuring LDAP with exchange 200
Your domain controller is an LDAP server. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Henry, Christopher M. Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 5:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Configuring LDAP with exchange 200 I have had it up to my neck with OWA, and I have decided it is time to phase it out of our organization. So far I have been testing IMAP and the method I really prefer is to connect to my VPN and open up outlook. However to be practical (not saying the a VPN is not the best way), I am looking at an IMAP configuration using LDAP. Only problem is I have never touched LDAP before. I only have one question can some one point me in the right direction (docs, faqs, howto...) on where to begin setting up an LDAP server that will work with exchange/AD. Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Race between client rules and BES server
That sounds like the stupidest corporate policy imaginable. Well, I guess I can imagine worse, but you get my drift. I have a trick for you. Stop doing that. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alverson, Tom Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 9:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Race between client rules and BES server Due to new corporate policy, I just moved all my mail from the server (Exchange 5.5sp4) to local PST files. I had several rules to move mailing lists emails to server folders that now point to local PST folders. Before, these mailing list messages never showed up in the inbox, and the Blackberry server (BES server) never saw them (and thus never sent them to my blackberry). Now when one of these emails arrives, it briefly appears in the inbox before my PC has a chance to grab it and move it to a local PST. This means that some of the time the BES server sees it and forwards it to my blackberry. Does anyone know of any tricks to avoid this? I may have to switch these back to the server as I can keep stuff there less than 60 days old but this means that I would need to have to manually archive these before the server deletes them. Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
