RE: NDR's (was content)
There ain't no mx records for chemie-uni-regensburg.de. No mx records = no mailhost for chemie-uni-regensburg.de. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 2:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NDR's (was content) when I do local resolving it gives me these: Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: INTAS Young Scientist Fellowship YSF 00-204 Type D Prolongation Sent: 20-Mar-02 11:12 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 20-Mar-02 11:12 AM The e-mail system was unable to deliver the message, but did not report a specific reason. Check the address and try again. If it still fails, contact your system administrator. mailserver.intas.be #5.4.0 Kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can exchange 5.5 be set up as a list server?
I know.. I KNOW!! http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxj.htm What did I win? -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 8:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can exchange 5.5 be set up as a list server? Any idea where I can find a comprehensive list of attachments I could block from entering my exchange server, assuming I have an application that will do such? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 7:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can exchange 5.5 be set up as a list server? You are my hero. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 6:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can exchange 5.5 be set up as a list server? It doesn't really make a good list server, but there are applications that will help. Such as: http://www.ikakura.com/ Others include: www.lyris.com www.lsoft.com William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ -Original Message- From: Baer, Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 8:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Can exchange 5.5 be set up as a list server? Can exchange 5.5 be set up as a list server? I was told it is possible with some plug-ins. If so were can the plug-ins be found? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can exchange 5.5 be set up as a list server?
What secret cabal? -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can exchange 5.5 be set up as a list server? You get to join the secret cabal. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 12:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can exchange 5.5 be set up as a list server? I know.. I KNOW!! http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxj.htm What did I win? -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 8:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can exchange 5.5 be set up as a list server? Any idea where I can find a comprehensive list of attachments I could block from entering my exchange server, assuming I have an application that will do such? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 7:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can exchange 5.5 be set up as a list server? You are my hero. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 6:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can exchange 5.5 be set up as a list server? It doesn't really make a good list server, but there are applications that will help. Such as: http://www.ikakura.com/ Others include: www.lyris.com www.lsoft.com William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ -Original Message- From: Baer, Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 8:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Can exchange 5.5 be set up as a list server? Can exchange 5.5 be set up as a list server? I was told it is possible with some plug-ins. If so were can the plug-ins be found? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.338 / Virus Database: 189 - Release Date: 3/14/2002 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Moved svr Via Appx A- Ed method But...
Err.. Cause it's still in the site...and not turned on. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 1:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Moved svr Via Appx A- Ed method But... Anybody have an idea for me why I would be getting these in the Application event log? Exch 55 sp4, NT4 sp6a BDC An RPC communications error occurred. Unable to bind over RPC. Locality Table (LTAB) index: 233, NT/MTA error code: 1722. Comms error 1722, Bind error 0, Remote Server Name RIKER [MAIN BASE 1 500 %10] (14) I'm puzzled as to why this is still happening.I'm pretty sure 98~99% that I rehomed evrrything as I shoudl have. Could use some idea on where to look for these problem Note: I have not removed the orginial server yet. It is Physically OFF but still insite. bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Moved svr Via Appx A- Ed method But...
You said, Note: I have not removed the original server yet. It is Physically OFF but still insite. Finish the process and remove the server from the site. It's the last step in the article. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 1:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moved svr Via Appx A- Ed method But... But if everything was moved from the old svr to the new. Why would the new continue to try and communicate with the old? obviously i'm missing some understanding of the bowles of exchange here. what am i missing? -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 4:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moved svr Via Appx A- Ed method But... Err.. Cause it's still in the site...and not turned on. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 1:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Moved svr Via Appx A- Ed method But... Anybody have an idea for me why I would be getting these in the Application event log? Exch 55 sp4, NT4 sp6a BDC An RPC communications error occurred. Unable to bind over RPC. Locality Table (LTAB) index: 233, NT/MTA error code: 1722. Comms error 1722, Bind error 0, Remote Server Name RIKER [MAIN BASE 1 500 %10] (14) I'm puzzled as to why this is still happening.I'm pretty sure 98~99% that I rehomed evrrything as I shoudl have. Could use some idea on where to look for these problem Note: I have not removed the orginial server yet. It is Physically OFF but still insite. bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OOF replies to the Internet
create a distribution list and a public folder set the email address for the public folder to [EMAIL PROTECTED] add the public folder as a member of the distribution list. go to the permissions tab of the public folder properties in Outlook. Give the folder default permissions contributor (Exchange 2000 set anonymous to contributor) Go to the properties of the public folder in outlook and click on stuff until you find the folder assistant. Add rule. In the to: field, select the distribution list created in the beginning. Select reply with template and type in the reply text and subject save and close. click ok.. Blah, blah. Be sure to note in the body of the reply that This is an autoresponse. Please do not respond to this message. click add rule, select delete, say ok to this rule will fire for all incoming messages... (make sure that the reply rule is noted before the delete rule.) -Original Message- From: Whitlock, Teresa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 2:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOF replies to the Internet What is *correctly*? I'm getting a request from someone for an auto-reply and I'd like to know if it's possible to do without a problem. -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOF replies to the Internet Automatic replies that are setup *correctly* will NOT cause mail loops... Allowing OOFS to the internet: Tom Meunier I'm not in, but you have hit and now verified a live address. Please put me on your A list for resale to other spammers. I'm the president of the company, and obviously wealthy. Since I've just told you I'm away for two weeks, please go to the county tax assessor's web site and look up the location of my residence. Help yourself. Hello customer. I'm not in, and you can try contacting someone else in my firm who wants your business. The bonus is, however, all on you, as I'm too lazy to delegate my email to somebody else while away. Please don't go visit our competitor, who is far too professional to send you an ascii answering machine message like this. /Tom Meunier -Original Message- From: Sargent, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OOF replies to the Internet Though we'd never open automatic replies to the Internet, in reading some of the discussions in the archives it appears some don't see a problem with allowing OOFs to the Internet. How does this work to avoid mail loops? ...does it just send one reply per sender, in the same way it works internally? Also, I'm assuming that the auto-reply to the Internet issue remains the same for Exchange 2000 as in 5.5 = BAD. True? Thanks! Rob Sargent _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OOF replies to the Internet
Err.. yes..that's a good idea. Out of Office Reply: Thank you for contacting Fluke Networks! -Original Message- From: Andrew Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 3:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOF replies to the Internet Out of office assistant should not cause any mail loops, since it will only fire up once per unique email address. Andrew, MCSE (NT W2K) + CCNA -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 2:44 PM Posted To: DiscussionGroup Conversation: OOF replies to the Internet Subject: RE: OOF replies to the Internet create a distribution list and a public folder set the email address for the public folder to [EMAIL PROTECTED] add the public folder as a member of the distribution list. go to the permissions tab of the public folder properties in Outlook. Give the folder default permissions contributor (Exchange 2000 set anonymous to contributor) Go to the properties of the public folder in outlook and click on stuff until you find the folder assistant. Add rule. In the to: field, select the distribution list created in the beginning. Select reply with template and type in the reply text and subject save and close. click ok.. Blah, blah. Be sure to note in the body of the reply that This is an autoresponse. Please do not respond to this message. click add rule, select delete, say ok to this rule will fire for all incoming messages... (make sure that the reply rule is noted before the delete rule.) -Original Message- From: Whitlock, Teresa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 2:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOF replies to the Internet What is *correctly*? I'm getting a request from someone for an auto-reply and I'd like to know if it's possible to do without a problem. -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOF replies to the Internet Automatic replies that are setup *correctly* will NOT cause mail loops... Allowing OOFS to the internet: Tom Meunier I'm not in, but you have hit and now verified a live address. Please put me on your A list for resale to other spammers. I'm the president of the company, and obviously wealthy. Since I've just told you I'm away for two weeks, please go to the county tax assessor's web site and look up the location of my residence. Help yourself. Hello customer. I'm not in, and you can try contacting someone else in my firm who wants your business. The bonus is, however, all on you, as I'm too lazy to delegate my email to somebody else while away. Please don't go visit our competitor, who is far too professional to send you an ascii answering machine message like this. /Tom Meunier -Original Message- From: Sargent, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OOF replies to the Internet Though we'd never open automatic replies to the Internet, in reading some of the discussions in the archives it appears some don't see a problem with allowing OOFs to the Internet. How does this work to avoid mail loops? ...does it just send one reply per sender, in the same way it works internally? Also, I'm assuming that the auto-reply to the Internet issue remains the same for Exchange 2000 as in 5.5 = BAD. True? Thanks! Rob Sargent _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: OOF replies to the Internet
Automatic replies that are setup *correctly* will NOT cause mail loops... Allowing OOFS to the internet: Tom Meunier I'm not in, but you have hit and now verified a live address. Please put me on your A list for resale to other spammers. I'm the president of the company, and obviously wealthy. Since I've just told you I'm away for two weeks, please go to the county tax assessor's web site and look up the location of my residence. Help yourself. Hello customer. I'm not in, and you can try contacting someone else in my firm who wants your business. The bonus is, however, all on you, as I'm too lazy to delegate my email to somebody else while away. Please don't go visit our competitor, who is far too professional to send you an ascii answering machine message like this. /Tom Meunier -Original Message- From: Sargent, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OOF replies to the Internet Though we'd never open automatic replies to the Internet, in reading some of the discussions in the archives it appears some don't see a problem with allowing OOFs to the Internet. How does this work to avoid mail loops? ...does it just send one reply per sender, in the same way it works internally? Also, I'm assuming that the auto-reply to the Internet issue remains the same for Exchange 2000 as in 5.5 = BAD. True? Thanks! Rob Sargent _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OOF replies to the Internet
I'm lurking. Same questions different year. My spellchecker didn't change it, I did. I was actually being cordial. Ed is more my type. He's got the geek look goin' on. Yum. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOF replies to the Internet a. Your spell-chunker changed onus to bonus. b. Ed C. said much of the same stuff before I did. I'm handsomer, though. Well, taller. c. Good to see you're still with us. -tom -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, March 04, 2002 02:25 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: OOF replies to the Internet Subject: RE: OOF replies to the Internet Automatic replies that are setup *correctly* will NOT cause mail loops... Allowing OOFS to the internet: Tom Meunier I'm not in, but you have hit and now verified a live address. Please put me on your A list for resale to other spammers. I'm the president of the company, and obviously wealthy. Since I've just told you I'm away for two weeks, please go to the county tax assessor's web site and look up the location of my residence. Help yourself. Hello customer. I'm not in, and you can try contacting someone else in my firm who wants your business. The bonus is, however, all on you, as I'm too lazy to delegate my email to somebody else while away. Please don't go visit our competitor, who is far too professional to send you an ascii answering machine message like this. /Tom Meunier -Original Message- From: Sargent, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OOF replies to the Internet Though we'd never open automatic replies to the Internet, in reading some of the discussions in the archives it appears some don't see a problem with allowing OOFs to the Internet. How does this work to avoid mail loops? ...does it just send one reply per sender, in the same way it works internally? Also, I'm assuming that the auto-reply to the Internet issue remains the same for Exchange 2000 as in 5.5 = BAD. True? Thanks! Rob Sargent __ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Changing where the M drive is mapped to. . .
Which part of ig nore do you not understand? -Original Message- From: Olds, Dominic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 11:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing where the M drive is mapped to. . . Mount the new disks from a folder on C within disk manager. Regards Dom. -Original Message- From: Scott Hendry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 February 2002 14:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: Changing where the M drive is mapped to. . . We currently are running Exchange 2000 SP2 on Win2K server SP2. The when we installed Exchange we did not have a storage device attached. Now that we have a storage device we would like to change where the M drive is mapped, currently it is mapped to C which has less than 2 gigs remaining. Any suggestions? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [idea] Antivirus Suite recommendations
I just peed my pants. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 12:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: [idea] Antivirus Suite recommendations Hey j-jaded You got your brick level backups But they're unrecoverable, uh huh So jaded You thought CA was where it was at But is that where it's s'posed to be You're gettin' it all over me X-rated -Original Message- From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 12:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: [idea] Antivirus Suite recommendations Hey j-jaded You got your mamma's style But you're yesterday's child to me So jaded You think that's where it's at But is that where it's s'posed to be You're gettin' it all over me X-rated -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 3:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: [idea] Antivirus Suite recommendations Jaded -Original Message- From: Gary Aiston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 12:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: [idea] Antivirus Suite recommendations cynic :-) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hunter, Lori Sent: 25 January 2002 20:40 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: [idea] Antivirus Suite recommendations What's the FAQ? Why u no answer my question! -Original Message- From: Boettcher, Keith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 6:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: [idea] Antivirus Suite recommendations You are referring to the FAQ (indicated at the bottoms of these messages) Section 4.6, right? Keith Boettcher -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: [idea] Antivirus Suite recommendations LOL! Clearly you haven't been here as long as those of us who are now thoroughly jaded. Why do you think we revel in being sarcastic smartasses?!? At least it's a skill we can hone while typing out the same answers over and over again. -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE:[idea] Antivirus Suite recommendations I think once a week we need to post a list of links to the faq that answer: AV, Backup, moving a server, upgrading, and why not to run eseutil. Then we could have more time to answer real questions that don't get asked 3 times a day. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Antivirus Suite recommendations You're not buying the product. You get a term license for its use. Same with Antigen. - Original Message - From: Matt Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:14 PM Subject: RE: Antivirus Suite recommendations I'm noting that CDW does have the NeaTSuite package for 250 users listed at under $8000. This is certainly a bit cheaper than NAI's package, however, what is Trend's licensing like? NAI wants you to re-license every two years. How about Trend? Is it similar? Maybe I'll get lucky and they only want you to buy it ONCE? -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus Suite recommendations ...and they do have the funniest radio ads. I sympathize on your situation with NAI. We saw a similar price increase from them while actually reducing the number of nodes. I looked at it as a good excuse to get some good software, Antigen in our case. -Peter -Original Message- From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus Suite recommendations So far CDW has been pretty good to me. I've usually received product from them within a couple days of submitting a PO to them. Again, not necessarily the cheapest place around, but ease of ordering and service are still a big part of why I decide to purchase from them. -Original Message- From: Joel Musheno [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus Suite recommendations And they have gotten parts to me next day even when I ordered at 5. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus Suite recommendations CDW...Not exactly the low cost specialists, but they always have what I am
RE: View Internet Headers
Who's your daddy! -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 2:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: View Internet Headers The question you originally asked was a microcosm of a possibly misguided 'solution' of the actual problem which was described in the second post. I guess you couldn't have made the actual meaning more simple, but by making a more technically complete problem statement you might have gotten better answers. As someone who answers thousands of technical questions a year, I feel somewhat qualified to comment on the quality of questions being asked. I give your first post a 17; the lyrics sucked and I couldn't dance to it. -Original Message- From: fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 4:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: View Internet Headers Whose complaning this is great! You think my question was technical? The question itself was phrased perfectly. The actual meaning how could I have made that more simple? I love message boards! Everyone is so quick to show how smart and witty they are. I love people who fail to phrase a proper technical question and then complain when others don't divine the actual meaning of the original question and answer it for them. It's good to have something to love isn't it? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folders in System Manager Error
Cool, an AGGIE. Did you look at Q289492? Do you see the folder under the folders/public folders object of the root org in ESM? -Original Message- From: Bloom, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 10:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folders in System Manager Error I'm in the processing of upgrading from Exch 5.5 to 2000. Yesterday I replicated my public folders from the 5.5 server to the 2000 server; they're still homed on the 5.5 server, but they appear in Administrative Groups\My Group\My 2000 Server\First Storage Group\Public Information Store\Public Folders. When I try to open any folder's Properties, I receive the error The object is no longer available. Press F5 to refresh the display, and then try again. ID no 80040e19 Exchange System Manager. Pressing F5 doesn't help. I've looked at Q282125 and everything on my server appears to be configured correctly. This problem has been posted a couple of times in the MS newsgroups but there have been no replies. Any ideas would be appreciated. Tom Bloom Department of Student Life Texas AM University _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT - Exchange bitmap
Search google for Bare-Naked Ladies. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT - Exchange bitmap Does anyone know where I might find a decent bitmap for an Exchange 2000 server. My manager would like to use the lakside view from his condo. I prefer something more easily recognizable. Thanks, Dot _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folders in System Manager Error
No, but I know a lot of Aggie jokes. My sis is majoring in Marine Biology at AM in Galveston. -Original Message- From: Bloom, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders in System Manager Error Are you an Aggie, too? It's not a bad place to be. I solved the problem. A person who posted the same question on a MS newsgroup replied to my email. I had assigned two IP addresses to my Exch 2000 server and was using the 2nd one for the default web site (a naming thing). Either changing the default web site to All Unassigned IP addresses or the first IP address I assigned fixed the problem. Thanks for your help. Tom Bloom Systems Analyst Department of Student Life Texas AM University (979) 862-7990 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders in System Manager Error Cool, an AGGIE. Did you look at Q289492? Do you see the folder under the folders/public folders object of the root org in ESM? -Original Message- From: Bloom, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 10:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folders in System Manager Error I'm in the processing of upgrading from Exch 5.5 to 2000. Yesterday I replicated my public folders from the 5.5 server to the 2000 server; they're still homed on the 5.5 server, but they appear in Administrative Groups\My Group\My 2000 Server\First Storage Group\Public Information Store\Public Folders. When I try to open any folder's Properties, I receive the error The object is no longer available. Press F5 to refresh the display, and then try again. ID no 80040e19 Exchange System Manager. Pressing F5 doesn't help. I've looked at Q282125 and everything on my server appears to be configured correctly. This problem has been posted a couple of times in the MS newsgroups but there have been no replies. Any ideas would be appreciated. Tom Bloom Department of Student Life Texas AM University _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Message tracking tools
WordPad and Q173364. -Original Message- From: fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 4:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Message tracking tools Greetings all, What tools do you use for message tracking in Exchange 5.5, besides the default. Thanks Fred _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folder Message
Go to the properties then administration tab of the folder in outlook. There are several things you can do with the folder assistant. -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 11:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folder Message I am redoing my PF Hierarchy, and have a question. Is there any way to have an automatic message sent to certain individuals when a message is received in a PF. Say I created the Exchange PF. I send a message to this PF, I want an auto message to be sent from the PF telling me that there is new mail in the Exchange PF. Using Exchange 5.5 SP4 on a NT SP6a Machine. Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification
http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/200201/msg0019 9.html May wrap. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition
1. An hour. 2. A day. 3. Compaq proliant dlxxx 4. One. 5. about 200 bucks per user (cals, e2k server license, hardware, etc.) -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition Folks, Let's ask a couple of questions, based on the premise of Money isn't an option: 1. What's the absolute fastest amount of time that it would take to plan an AD/E2K structure? 2. How long would it take to implement an AD/E2K structure? 3. What kind of hardware do we need to have in place before we do this? 4. How many personnel will it take? 5. Roughly what can we expect the cost to be? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition
I concur. But, he did sayabsolute fastest time.. and provided no details. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 2:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition As others have intimated, it is not an easy assessment through a forum like this. As Ed stopped short of saying, perhaps a call to Compaq might be in order. Do they do estimates? I will almost always favour the patient, methodical, testing and retesting, documenting mode. I would deploy a two-step strategy there. The AD deployment first. Connecting Exchange5.5 using ADC. Then plan E2K. But that's me. There's that axiom about: Cheap, Fast, Well done: You get to choose two. William -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 2:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition William, We are looking at roughly 100 total servers in the domain. Right now in our current NT 4.0 domain, we have our server room with the majority of our servers, about a dozen servers 45 miles away, connected by a fiber backbone. Approximately a dozen T-1's terminate in our server room for various locations on this site and we have (I believe) 3 microwave connections coming off of the end of the backbone, 45 miles away. All connections between servers is either fiber or 100 mbps switched. Couple of Linux print servers with a dozen people on them, sitting at the end of a couple of T-1's. Jim -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 2:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition Still depends. Number of users? Number of servers? Locations (different cities?)? Connectivity between servers? Etc... I think it is a two step process. AD, then E2K. AD should have a disaster recovery plan in place and tested before the next step. William -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition Folks, Let's ask a couple of questions, based on the premise of Money isn't an option: 1. What's the absolute fastest amount of time that it would take to plan an AD/E2K structure? 2. How long would it take to implement an AD/E2K structure? 3. What kind of hardware do we need to have in place before we do this? 4. How many personnel will it take? 5. Roughly what can we expect the cost to be? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 as a file server (IXFS, Web Folder, http://serv er/public/files)
Can't get any better than that. Except for, you'd rather stick a sharp object in your eye than do that again. -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 12:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 as a file server (IXFS, Web Folder, http://server/public/files) Tried it .. didn't work out and I'm never going to do it again. Is that what you were looking for? -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com -- - Original Message - From: Jean-Francois Bourdeau [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 3:26 AM Subject: Exchange 2000 as a file server (IXFS, Web Folder, http://server/public/files) does anyone use EX 2k as a file server to have one central location for accessing files on the road or from the office ? I tried to create a network shortcut in w2k Pro and XP Pro, connecting to http://server/public/files It was prompting very often for authentification. I could drag files to that folder but was having error when saving file from Word or Excel... But could drag those .doc or .xls file to the folder manually From what I understand, I heard that sharing a Folder from the M drive could be dangerous (corruption of the exchange database) We must create webFolder if we want to hare ordinary folder within our w2k server. but for exchange public Folder I was expecting that it would work smoothly... Any comment is appreciated... JF _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange WebMonitor
Finally got my test lab back. If you edit the anonymous access account under the directory security tab of the virtual folder in IIS admin by changing the user to an Exchange Admin it will not fail at the impersonation command in WMI. I am sure that giving this user less permissions will work, but I haven't gotten that far yet. -Original Message- From: Saul Gonzalez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 3:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange WebMonitor Privileged account? How would I do that? Thanks again Saul -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 3:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange WebMonitor Technical Information (for support personnel) Error Type: (0x80041003) /Monitor/servers_and_connectors.asp, line 30 This means access denied. You will need to run it as a privileged account. -Original Message- From: Saul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 3:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange WebMonitor :-( Can you explain this to me. Where do I put this and what is it? Thank you so much for you help. Saul WBEM_E_ACCESS_DENIED 0x80041003 -Original Message- From: Saul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 2:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange WebMonitor I am no programmer so I have no idea. This is what I found at line 30. Any ideas? ' Get the WMI instances of the Exchange Servers. line 30 set ExchServers = GetObject(winmgmts: impersonationLevel=impersonate}!/root/cimv2/applications/exchange).Inst ance sOf(ExchangeServerState) For each ExchServer in ExchServers if ExchServer.version = 3000 then ' Exchange 2000 version Did you see what was at line 30 in the script? You might want to start there. -Original Message- From: Saul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 2:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange WebMonitor Exchange 2000 resource kit comes with a webmonitor? Has anyone gotten this to work? I followed the instructions and I am getting an error? Here is the error Im getting; The page cannot be displayed There is a problem with the page you are trying to reach and it cannot be displayed. Please try the following: Click the Refresh button, or try again later. Open the xx.xx.xx.xx home page, and then look for links to the information you want. HTTP 500.100 - Internal Server Error - ASP error Internet Information Services Technical Information (for support personnel) Error Type: (0x80041003) /Monitor/servers_and_connectors.asp, line 30 Browser Type: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0) Page: GET /Monitor/servers_and_connectors.asp Time: Wednesday, January 02, 2002, 2:29:57 PM More information: Microsoft Support _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL
RE: 0ut 0f 0ffice
Tell them to migrate to sendmail. The vacation program resets weekly. -Original Message- From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 2:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 0ut 0f 0ffice Exchange 5.5, Outlook 2000. I suspect this discussion is going to head deep into There are seldom technological solutions... country. Please bear with me. A number of our users are moaning about OoO only sending out one response per OoO setting. It seems that they send a message to a user near the start of their three week holiday, get the OoO response, then promptly forget about this (and the fact that they can view the users calendar at any time) and send the user mail some time the next week and wonder why the work they sent never gets done. As the client doesn't have to be running for OoO to be working (it would be pretty useless, if it did) I'm guessing that OoO must be handled on the server somehow. My guess is that Exchange is going to set some kind of sent-OoO-flag Does anybody know if/where this flag is set? Presuming this is the case, is it possible to write a batch job that ran as an overnight process resetting these flags to zero, so that you got one OoO response, per user, per day - which seems like a reasonable compromise. This would remind users that their correspondents were on holiday, even three weeks after the last e-mail was sent, but would prevent mailing loops. (PS I know you can use rules to automatically reply, but the idea of a rule automatically replying to every message, fills me with a dread fear of mail loops.) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: clustering wireless
If I throw a stick, will you go away? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 5:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: clustering wireless No dick it wasnt me -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: clustering wireless You're an idea guy, aren't you, Richard? I think I've met you before. You go to MCP classes and sit in the front row and constantly ask the teacher about things that aren't remotely related to the course subject, causing lengthy hours-long digressions. You ask questions like, What happens if I try to run my Exchange server on a MacIntosh? or What would happen if I moved my information store to DECTape? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tener, Richard Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 6:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: clustering wireless Hello, Has anyone ever set MCSC between two building over a wireless bridge. I was wondering if it is possible to cluster two exchange servers over a Cisco Aironet 340. Thanks Richard _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Filtering virus file extensions.
I recall a former tech lead removing all attachments on an Exchange server because he put a wrong value in the registry (he just want to remove the I love you attachments). I had to restore that server, which is why I remember. I don't remember where exactly this was set, but if I come across it later this evening I will post it. -Original Message- From: adam voorhies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Filtering virus file extensions. I know there is a way to filter virus file extensions on an exchange server by adding keys tot he registry. I cannot remember the exact keys and syntax needed to do this. If any of you Exchange Gurus out there may know what I am talking about, I would really appreciate the memory refresh. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Filtering virus file extensions.
Yes, that would be relevant wouldn't it? I would need to find the solution and test it to answer that question. It's probably something that an exchange developer just whipped up to help out with the Melissa virus. -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Filtering virus file extensions. Did that block future messages with attachments or did that just kill the attachments already in the store? (or both) Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 9:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Filtering virus file extensions. I recall a former tech lead removing all attachments on an Exchange server because he put a wrong value in the registry (he just want to remove the I love you attachments). I had to restore that server, which is why I remember. I don't remember where exactly this was set, but if I come across it later this evening I will post it. -Original Message- From: adam voorhies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Filtering virus file extensions. I know there is a way to filter virus file extensions on an exchange server by adding keys tot he registry. I cannot remember the exact keys and syntax needed to do this. If any of you Exchange Gurus out there may know what I am talking about, I would really appreciate the memory refresh. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Filtering virus file extensions.
No, but I can whip you up. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 11:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Filtering virus file extensions. While you are at it, can you whip me up a sandwich and chips as well? -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Filtering virus file extensions. Yes, that would be relevant wouldn't it? I would need to find the solution and test it to answer that question. It's probably something that an exchange developer just whipped up to help out with the Melissa virus. -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Filtering virus file extensions. Did that block future messages with attachments or did that just kill the attachments already in the store? (or both) Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 9:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Filtering virus file extensions. I recall a former tech lead removing all attachments on an Exchange server because he put a wrong value in the registry (he just want to remove the I love you attachments). I had to restore that server, which is why I remember. I don't remember where exactly this was set, but if I come across it later this evening I will post it. -Original Message- From: adam voorhies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Filtering virus file extensions. I know there is a way to filter virus file extensions on an exchange server by adding keys tot he registry. I cannot remember the exact keys and syntax needed to do this. If any of you Exchange Gurus out there may know what I am talking about, I would really appreciate the memory refresh. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: A better description of my forward issues
Andy and Ben already gave you a solution. Did you try it? -Original Message- From: Fred W. Macondray Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: A better description of my forward issues Hi All, Thanks for your help so far. In trying to create a test model of what I'm trying to do, here's what needs to happen. First note that the boss actually doesn't have an exchange mailbox, Exchange forwards his mail to an external pop account. So this is what needs to happen: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] I need to find a way that will preserve the original From: address as well, but I'm having trouble figuring this out. I just tried creating an account that forwards to my personal POP account, but the From address gets changed so it looks like it's from me and not the original sender. Thanks in advance, Fred Fred Macondray Systems Administrator Virtual Purchase Card, Inc. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.virtualpurchasecard.com - Guaranteed B2B Purchases _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange publications
I registered for a free subscription at their website. I'm going to buy 3 Cadillac Watermelon margaritas with my refund. -Original Message- From: David Florea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 1:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange publications I got a letter today from .NET magazine saying EO had been folded into .NET magazine, and my remaining subscription would be converted to .NET unless I wanted a refund. I guess I'll wait take a look... David -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 3:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange publications I don't know if it's considered an alternative but I know that a bunch of the editorial staff of EO were transferred over to .NET magazine. They're both Fawcette Publications so you might find some info at: http://www.fawcette.com Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 1:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange publications Exchange Outlook Mag is apparently not being published anymore. Are there any subscribers out there who have been contacted by the publisher regarding a refund or subscribing to an alternative? -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 6:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange publications Windows 2000, Exchange Outlook, and Exchange Administrator would be a few good ones. Tom -Original Message- From: Michael Brandon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 8:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange publications I'd appreciate your information on what publications exist covering Microsoft Exchange; I'm interested in both printed magazines and email newsletters. Many thanks, Michael _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic - Encryption
Not that bill, this bill: http://www.apocalypse.org/pub/u/gilly/Schoolhouse_Rock/HTML/history/bill.htm l Amateur. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption http://www.lilbill.net/index.html William -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption I'm just a bill, yes I'm only a bill... -Original Message- From: William Rettig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption Bill, Thank you. -Original Message- From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption Bill, http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnw2kmag01/ html/NT4_0Encryption.asp (link may wrap) makes a good read about this. You are getting encryption free of charge with RPC. -- be - MOS I remember a bigger, older guy we called Dad. We'd eat some stuff, or not, and then I think we went home. I guess some things never leave you. -Original Message- From: William Rettig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off Topic - Encryption I am quite new to Exchange and Exchange Clients like Outlook. We are using Exchange 5.5. Any documentation I've seen talks about the need to configure with secure RPC if encryption is desired between the client and server. Here is what puzzles us. We have not selected any form of encryption. However, when we read email from the inbox we notice that there is no human readable text within the packets on the LAN. Can someone please explain. Thank you, _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Microsoft Exchange Routing Wizard
http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=5041 -Original Message- From: Lee, Poh Ling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 6:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Microsoft Exchange Routing Wizard Sorry if i confuse u. What I expect is after I send the message to the Public Folder, Microsoft Exchange Server will automatically route the item to recipients for approval. thanks. Poh Ling -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 10:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Microsoft Exchange Routing Wizard You've lost me. You say you can see the message that you sent in the Public Folder. If the message appears on the folder, what's not working the way you expect it to? Darcy -Original Message- From: Lee, Poh Ling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 5:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Microsoft Exchange Routing Wizard How to check whether the folder is set up to accept messages or not? I can see the message that i send in that public folder. I select the folder from the Global Address list. thanks. Poh Ling -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 9:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Microsoft Exchange Routing Wizard Is the folder set up to accept messages? If you set it as a calendar or contacts folder that could be an issue. How did you address the message? Did you select the folder from the Global address list or enter the SMTP address manually? Darcy -Original Message- From: Lee, Poh Ling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Microsoft Exchange Routing Wizard I send the message inside my site, using a profile which is owner of that Public Folder. The default permission on the Public Folder is Author. I'm using Exchange Server 5.5 SP4. thanks. Poh Ling -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 8:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Microsoft Exchange Routing Wizard We need more details - how did you send the message? From inside your site or from an external address? What are the permissions on the Public Folder (especially the default permission)? What version of Exchange server are you using? Darcy -Original Message- From: Poh Ling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Microsoft Exchange Routing Wizard I already install a route to a public folder, but the message didn't route like what i have set after i post or send a message to that folder. anybody can help me? thank you. Poh Ling _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
RE: Anti-Spam
Soysal Rest assured that Richard Cranium in accounting will subscribe to the cooking channel mailing list, or Jenny the Office Manager will forward the Good Luck Totem to everybody in her address book. At that point Richard and Jenny will complain even louder when they receive spam because the content filter that YOU put in place doesn't work. Then Johnny the PHB will tell you to increase the effectiveness of your content filter or lose your job. You'll do it and Richard and Jenny will complain to Johnny that they are not receiving business critical e-mails. Then Johnny will order you to go through all blocked messages and forward anything that is business critical. Soon, you'll discover that you can't do anything else but review the quarantined messages. You'll advise Johnny the PHB to promote Avi the OfficeBoy to Information Delivery Specialist position where he can go through all the messages so you can go back to installing service packs. Should I go on? /Soysal -Original Message- From: Denise [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 7:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Anti-Spam Or purchase a third party software such as Mail Essentials to block as much of the spam and inappropriate mail as possible. - Original Message - From: Hunter, Lori [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 4:45 PM Subject: RE: Anti-Spam Make sure you don't relay for them and that's about it. Teach your users well... -Original Message- From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 7:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anti-Spam Dear List, How can I control spammers on my Exchange 2000. Thanks in Advance Irfan. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Message disappeared during link outage
Did you track the message or look in the tracking.logs? Use article Q173364 to decipher the event numbers. Regarding connectivity try Q220976. And you'll need this to: http://www.millerhats.com/899.jpg I always where mine in situations such as this. -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 6:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Message disappeared during link outage Dear All, We have 5 offices connected via VPN provided by Sonicwall ADSL routers. Each office has an Exchange Server 5.5 SP3 on NT Server 4 SP6a, with 1 of them having an IMC. There is one Organisation/Site with multiple servers to represent the different offices, and all staff at each office have their mailboxes on their local servers. It was reported to me that a Director (isnt it always?) sent an email to the Managing Director (arrrgh!) within the same organisation, but whose mailbox was located on another server, seperated by the ADSL VPN link. The mail never arrived, and no error was received by sender or recipient. Upon closer inspection, the following event is noted in the senders local NT server event log at the same time that they sent the message. Event ID - 9316 Source - MSExchangeMTA An RPC communications error occurred. No data was sent over the RPC connection. Locality table (LTAB) index: 238. Windows NT error: 9317. The MTA will attempt to recover the RPC connection. (BASE IL INCOMING RPC 40 522) (12) There were no errors immediately before or after this event (closest 5 hours) and I assume there was some problem with the ADSL link at that time, not uncommon, and also suggested by some errors on the main server (the 'hub' of the VPN). What I need to know is a) why wasn't the mail delivered when the link was restored and b) why was no non delivery error returned. Mail normally flows fine between all servers. I have followed the instructions in technet doc - http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q247782 but the concurrent xapi sessions was already at 50. Its not so important to ensure mail delivery, as it is to make sure we know when a message has not been delivered. Thanks in advance for any help Nik _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public folder limits
Size limits can not be enforced in on Public folders in 5.5. Users will only be warned. This will help with the last two questions: http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=4839 -Original Message- From: Bansal, Jaspal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 6:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public folder limits William, Thanks for your reply. I am trying to set up a public folder hierarchy for a Department in our company but want to ensure that they do not go overboard by creating large folders and sending huge mails that will have an adverse impact on the WAN. Therefore I am trying to restrict the size of public folder hierarchy and also the size of an individual message that can be posted on the public folder. Though I have set the limits on the public folder, all that it does is send a warning message and that too is not a correct one!. It does not do anything else. To restrict the size of messages I have created a rule using the public folder assistant that restricts any message that exceeds a particular limit to be posted to the public folder. Is this the best way to achieve this or is there any other way ?. Will the limits apply only to the top level folder or to all folders below that ?. Jaspal -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2002 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public folder limits Certainly. From the public folder properties tab in Exchange admin, select the limits tab. Here you can control the maximum size of the folder, when you are warned about the size. You also can set the deleted item retention and the age limit for items within the folder. Have a boo. Ya. William -Original Message- From: Bansal, Jaspal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 4:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public folder limits Hi all, Is there a way to limit size of Public Folders in Exchange 5.5 SP4 and how does it work ?. Thanks in advance. Jaspal _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public folder limits
Yes, according to q294671. -Original Message- From: Bansal, Jaspal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public folder limits We are upgrading to E2k in a month or two, can size limits on PFs be enforced in E2k ? Jaspal -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2002 1:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public folder limits Size limits can not be enforced in on Public folders in 5.5. Users will only be warned. This will help with the last two questions: http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=4839 -Original Message- From: Bansal, Jaspal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 6:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public folder limits William, Thanks for your reply. I am trying to set up a public folder hierarchy for a Department in our company but want to ensure that they do not go overboard by creating large folders and sending huge mails that will have an adverse impact on the WAN. Therefore I am trying to restrict the size of public folder hierarchy and also the size of an individual message that can be posted on the public folder. Though I have set the limits on the public folder, all that it does is send a warning message and that too is not a correct one!. It does not do anything else. To restrict the size of messages I have created a rule using the public folder assistant that restricts any message that exceeds a particular limit to be posted to the public folder. Is this the best way to achieve this or is there any other way ?. Will the limits apply only to the top level folder or to all folders below that ?. Jaspal -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2002 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public folder limits Certainly. From the public folder properties tab in Exchange admin, select the limits tab. Here you can control the maximum size of the folder, when you are warned about the size. You also can set the deleted item retention and the age limit for items within the folder. Have a boo. Ya. William -Original Message- From: Bansal, Jaspal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 4:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public folder limits Hi all, Is there a way to limit size of Public Folders in Exchange 5.5 SP4 and how does it work ?. Thanks in advance. Jaspal _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The message being sent exceeds the message size established f or t his user
Which is why we have a 14 meg limit on the ims and a 10 meg limit on the mta. Does this compute? -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The message being sent exceeds the message size established f or t his user Conversion at the server can add up to 40% (approx) to the message size. William -Original Message- From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: The message being sent exceeds the message size established for t his user Hi All, I am getting the bellow error when trying to attach a 1.4 mb Excel sheet to an email in outlook 98. Both the Sender and reviver have a mail limit size of 2100KB on your exchange server (NT4.0 EXCHsvr 5.5 SP'd). The message being sent exceeds the message size established for this user Why is the message popping up? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The message being sent exceeds the message size established f or t his user
John Fluke is going to haunt you for that one. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The message being sent exceeds the message size established f or t his user I doubt that's a fluke. I had a good explanation of the MIME conversion process at the IMS as posted by Andy Webb about a year ago, but I seem to have lost it. Among other things. Regards, William -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The message being sent exceeds the message size established f or t his user Which is why we have a 14 meg limit on the ims and a 10 meg limit on the mta. Does this compute? -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The message being sent exceeds the message size established f or t his user Conversion at the server can add up to 40% (approx) to the message size. William -Original Message- From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: The message being sent exceeds the message size established for t his user Hi All, I am getting the bellow error when trying to attach a 1.4 mb Excel sheet to an email in outlook 98. Both the Sender and reviver have a mail limit size of 2100KB on your exchange server (NT4.0 EXCHsvr 5.5 SP'd). The message being sent exceeds the message size established for this user Why is the message popping up? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: configuration question
I have no idea if it will work and I don't give a poop. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 7:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question Jennifer, Is that going to work? In his 8:35am post, he clarified that he was using Ex5.5. Isn't the dsa.msc the Active Directory Users and Computers MMC snap-in? Wouldn't he be using this only if he was running E2k? Or is Tim so confused that he doesn't even realize what version of Exchange he is running? Have to admit, it sure looks like E2k to me, as I don't recognize the format of the solution at the bottom of the numerical code error. Jim Blunt -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 8:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question Start run dsa.msc ok action find -Original Message- From: Tim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 8:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question ?? where would I look for that -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 11:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question Do you have a contact and user object for this person? -Original Message- From: Tim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 8:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question Jen I seen that article but I really don't understand the steps to take and where to go to even start with that resolution I am by no means an exchange expert and I really appreciate any time you take with this! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 11:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question I am guessing you saw this and your issue is you want to know how to fix it: Numerical Code: 5.4.6 Possible Cause: Categorizer forward loop detected. targetAddress attribute is set on a mailbox-enabled user. Hosting Pack: This is a common hosting configuration problem when someone creates a contact in OU1 and creates a user in OU2 with the same e-mail address via user provisioning tool. Troubleshooting: This happens when contactA has an alternate recipient that points to contactB which then has an alternate recipient that points back to contactA . Check the contact's alternate recipient. Check and remove targetAddress attribute from mailbox-enabled users. For hosting where you want to send mail from one user in one company (OU) to another company (OU), you should configure the following two related objects: User: SMTP proxy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact: targetAddress: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; SMTP proxy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 8:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question this is what is sent back to a user that is trying to e-mail any one in my organization This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Delivery to the following recipients failed. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reporting-MTA: dns;server1.mgi Received-From-MTA: dns;server1.mgi Arrival-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 12:00:38 -0500 Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: failed Status: 5.4.6 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 11:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question Post the entire error. Smtp codes would help: Delivery to the following recipients failed. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 8:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question I've been int he business for about four years this is the first with exchange sorry if I'm not giving enough. I'm using a pop3 connector. What is actually happening is when people out side the company send e-mail they receive this: This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Delivery to the following recipients failed. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Leeann McCallum Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 11:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question Sounds like the custom receipient address is wrong. Look for the globe thingy in your address book and check that's it's valid address if you are forwarding a users mail externally. The article below reads a mail look to me however. Clarify: Are you sending to a client running exchange that is not part of your exchange organisation? What does the NDR say? What happens when you try sending
RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus
Need a date? -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 10:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus Actually, I saw it last Thursday. Tonight was going to be a second viewing, but the friend who was going to see it with me bailed. I might skip tonight. No fun watching the same movie twice - alone. Darcy -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus Enjoy! I actually saw it there on Christmas Eve, and it is quite the spectacle on that screen. Just be sure not to trip over the two guys who are already in line for Star Wars Episode 2. -Peter -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 8:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus I'm about to go see LOTR at the Cinerama - 4:00 showing tonight. -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus Well, Paul Allen will be disappointed, but I guess that's a valid excuse. -Peter -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 13:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus Well...I'm actually in the Tri-Cities (3.5 hours across the state in the SE corner) so I'll be going to the new Carmike 12-plex in Kennewick. Jim -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 1:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus I'm in downtown Seattle, and I trust you'll be seeing Lord of the Rings at the Cinerama. -Peter -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus Sounds like a lot of fun and I would really like to meet the group of gurus you associate with in Seattle!! Unfortunately for me, I already agreed to take off work early and take a non-techie friend of mine to see the Lord of the Rings. Maybe next time? Dang...would have been nice to meet Don before he left though. Guess I'll have a chance to meet him at MEC this year though. Who else is in the Washington State/Idaho/Oregon/Lower Cananda area? Jim -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus A bunch of us are headed out tonight to Pacific Crest Brew Pub, to say good Bye to Don Ely. He is leavening the PNW for the other coast next week. Come on up. You have about 4 hours to make it. Right at the North end of Boeing field. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Blunt, James H (Jim) Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus Dr. Dogg! Yer in Seattle? Cool! If you ever need someone to go to a Sonics/Mariners/Seachickens game with ya, just let me know...I'm in the Tri-Cities...Richland to be specific. ;0) Jim Blunt -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus That's the AB I know.. Way to go, High Five man. I was just given 2 tickets, BOX seats for tonight's Sonics game. Guess where I will be at 7:00 Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus Screw em! I just did it -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus You sure? It is on my server? Wait I remember this, We had this conversation, didn't we AB? Your owners would not let you block that extension. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus Well isn't that a nice onecrap! -Original Message- From: Corney, Alan
RE: Ed's Svr Move Method- Exch Svc account Q
Then wipe my a$$ with it. Thanks! -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 1:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ed's Svr Move Method- Exch Svc account Q Can you read it for me, and then put it in an email and send it to me. Then print it. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 1:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ed's Svr Move Method- Exch Svc account Q If you read it, you would know the answer. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 4:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ed's Svr Move Method- Exch Svc account Q Ok if I use the Ed svr move meth when adding the new/second server Does the new server with exchange need to use the existing Exchange service account OR can I make a new Exchange service account for it? FAQ: readit, reading it, loving it, learning it thx bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ed's Svr Move Method- Exch Svc account Q
Sorry about that, I just had a heated discussion with a team member. I meant to send that to Martin. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 1:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ed's Svr Move Method- Exch Svc account Q Nice Language Jennifer..LOL ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 4:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ed's Svr Move Method- Exch Svc account Q Then wipe my a$$ with it. Thanks! -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 1:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ed's Svr Move Method- Exch Svc account Q Can you read it for me, and then put it in an email and send it to me. Then print it. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 1:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ed's Svr Move Method- Exch Svc account Q If you read it, you would know the answer. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 4:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ed's Svr Move Method- Exch Svc account Q Ok if I use the Ed svr move meth when adding the new/second server Does the new server with exchange need to use the existing Exchange service account OR can I make a new Exchange service account for it? FAQ: readit, reading it, loving it, learning it thx bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help reqd with error - Object Required: Application(RenderAp plication)
Do you have Exchange Admin installed on your workstation? If so, try upgrading to SP4. -Original Message- From: Brian McBride [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 6:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Help reqd with error - Object Required: Application(RenderApplication) From what I've seen on various knowledge bases, I'm sure the above error is fairly basic fodder to many people using this user group, but since I'm very new to CDO, what it does and how it's implemented, could someone please tell me what I need to do to resolve it? Basically, our operating system is NT workstation, our server runs Exchange 5.5, my workstation runs Outlook 2000 and I'm trying to run a bespoke application under IIS 4.0 which utilises CDO that runs perfectly well on several users' workstations but not on mine. I've read several articles which refer to files CDO.DLL, CDONTS.DLL, and CDOHTML.DLL as being necessary components. Our IT Support people have copied these three files to me but firstly, I'm not sure that this is the solution, nor am I sure where to put them or whether I have to register them. Could anyone offer any clear steps to resolve it please? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K SP2 should be Mail Relay
http://www.google.com http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q310336 -Original Message- From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Fw: E2K SP2 should be Mail Relay I was reading Appendix H - How to configure the IIS SMTP service as a mail relay. and wondered if this can be ported to IIS 5.0 E2K! I need a mail relay solution A.S.A.P. Any comments apprecaited. -John Q Jr. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Need advice from the Gurus (mobile users question)
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/pcat/3000.htm#xtocid0 This works for us. Looks good on the resume too. -Original Message- From: Michael Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Need advice from the Gurus (mobile users question) Greetings All, If this is getting OT, I am sure you will let me know real fast. Regarding this VPN stuff - I understand completely, the concepts behind it - now I need to implement it. This doesn't necessarily need to be hardware related does it? Can't I simply install some software on the Clients and the Server that allows them to login to the server, and begin an encrypted session? This is getting a little beyond my expertise. What kind of products are you all using to accomplish this complicated task? I remember in the past when PPTP came out from Microsoft, but have not heard much about it lately. Thanks again everyone, you are all lifesavers! Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael Anderson Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 1:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Need advice from the Gurus (mobile users question) AWESOME! - That's precisely the answer I was looking for. This list is awesome :) Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joe Pochedley Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 12:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Need advice from the Gurus (mobile users question) We have 60+ salesmen and engineers who connect via 56K modem dial up while on the road to access their email with Outlook/Exchange through a VPN... Everything works well, though a bit slowly at times, but not so slow as to be unusable or unbearable. You can do away with IMAP completely if you like... Outlook allows you to create an Offline Folder file, which is a local copy of the information stored on the Exchange server... With the offline folder file, users can continue to work with Outlook and maintain full functionality whether they're connected or not and will automatically synchronize (send, receive mail, update calendar, contacts, tasks, etc) whenever they are connected... Look in the help files for Outlook for help setting up Offline Access... There's also plenty of info at Microsoft and other sites that explain how to set this up and use it (it's pretty simple) Joe Pochedley I like deadlines, cartoonist Scott Adams once said. I especially like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by. -Original Message- From: Michael Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Need advice from the Gurus (mobile users question) Okay - I like the VPN route - and use Outlook 2000 as it was intended. BUT, what kind of Network Overhead is involved - when connecting remotely over a potentially slow connection? Will it take forever for folders to come up, especially if they are unusually large? Also, if the client cannot connect for some reason (which has been happening A LOT lately - due to massive service problems), what is the best solution to still have your old e-mail inside of Outlook? I was thinking this would be where IMAP really comes into it's own - because you can still keep your mail local, and on the server too - and when the connection comes back up, you just resynchronize everything - and you are good to go. Thanks for your continued responses, Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Need advice from the Gurus (mobile users question) Get rid of POP IMAP could work OWA is great Best: Get a VPN and use the regular Exch/OL combo. -Original Message- From: Michael Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 8:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Need advice from the Gurus (mobile users question) Hello, Our present scenario is the following: Corporate users, that have a PC on their desk. These users, *may* travel to another location in which they will use a PC sitting on someone else's desk. And about half of these employees will have a laptop - in which they work from home, and travel on the road. Either way, they need to have access to all new mail that comes in, in addition to all their old mail, so they can always have the ability to refer to any old messages. In all of these cases, they need access to their e-mail. Before we installed our Exchange Server, we were using POP3 access exclusively and as we all know, POP3 clients typically pull their mail from the server, when retrieving their messages. Yes, you CAN set things up to leave their mail on the server, but things get funny once in a while, and their mail clients lose track of what messages they have already retrieved
RE: changing Outlook client mail profile
Earth rumbling Uh-oh. /Earth rumbling -Original Message- From: Sakti Chakravarty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: changing Outlook client mail profile For your information I have been a member of this list for long enough to have read the FAQs. If a colleague of mine has suggested that Outlook 97 clients do not reconnect automatically to the new server, what harm is there in sending a message to this list to check up? That's what it's here for! If you cannot respond to such questions without being useless and sarcastic, don't respond at all, I would hope you might have something better to do with your time. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: changing Outlook client mail profile You don't do a thing except go read Ed's Move Server Method, which you clearly did not yet read, or you would have brilliantly awed us with your knowledge that you do not need to do a thing on the client. FAQ FAQ FAQ FAQ -Original Message- From: Sakti Chakravarty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 12:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: changing Outlook client mail profile Hi folks, We are installing an Exchange 5.5 server in an organisation with one other Exchange 5.5 server and are going to move everything from the old server to the new server. There are about 150 clients running Outlook version 5.0.2653.22 or less (which I understand implies they are all on Outlook97?). After moving the mailboxes, we need to point mail profiles to the new server, what is the best way to go about doing this? We were thinking of enforcing a registry change on each Windows client using the logon script (obviously this won't work for the Macs, but that's ok). I've discovered utilities like NEWPROF ... but I wonder if anyone can confirm this is the best way? Thanks Sakti _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Need advice from the Gurus (mobile users question)
It was meant to be Martin. Don't fight it. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Need advice from the Gurus (mobile users question) That's what I have too!! -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Need advice from the Gurus (mobile users question) http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/pcat/3000.htm#xtocid0 This works for us. Looks good on the resume too. -Original Message- From: Michael Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Need advice from the Gurus (mobile users question) Greetings All, If this is getting OT, I am sure you will let me know real fast. Regarding this VPN stuff - I understand completely, the concepts behind it - now I need to implement it. This doesn't necessarily need to be hardware related does it? Can't I simply install some software on the Clients and the Server that allows them to login to the server, and begin an encrypted session? This is getting a little beyond my expertise. What kind of products are you all using to accomplish this complicated task? I remember in the past when PPTP came out from Microsoft, but have not heard much about it lately. Thanks again everyone, you are all lifesavers! Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael Anderson Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 1:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Need advice from the Gurus (mobile users question) AWESOME! - That's precisely the answer I was looking for. This list is awesome :) Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joe Pochedley Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 12:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Need advice from the Gurus (mobile users question) We have 60+ salesmen and engineers who connect via 56K modem dial up while on the road to access their email with Outlook/Exchange through a VPN... Everything works well, though a bit slowly at times, but not so slow as to be unusable or unbearable. You can do away with IMAP completely if you like... Outlook allows you to create an Offline Folder file, which is a local copy of the information stored on the Exchange server... With the offline folder file, users can continue to work with Outlook and maintain full functionality whether they're connected or not and will automatically synchronize (send, receive mail, update calendar, contacts, tasks, etc) whenever they are connected... Look in the help files for Outlook for help setting up Offline Access... There's also plenty of info at Microsoft and other sites that explain how to set this up and use it (it's pretty simple) Joe Pochedley I like deadlines, cartoonist Scott Adams once said. I especially like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by. -Original Message- From: Michael Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Need advice from the Gurus (mobile users question) Okay - I like the VPN route - and use Outlook 2000 as it was intended. BUT, what kind of Network Overhead is involved - when connecting remotely over a potentially slow connection? Will it take forever for folders to come up, especially if they are unusually large? Also, if the client cannot connect for some reason (which has been happening A LOT lately - due to massive service problems), what is the best solution to still have your old e-mail inside of Outlook? I was thinking this would be where IMAP really comes into it's own - because you can still keep your mail local, and on the server too - and when the connection comes back up, you just resynchronize everything - and you are good to go. Thanks for your continued responses, Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Need advice from the Gurus (mobile users question) Get rid of POP IMAP could work OWA is great Best: Get a VPN and use the regular Exch/OL combo. -Original Message- From: Michael Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 8:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Need advice from the Gurus (mobile users question) Hello, Our present scenario is the following: Corporate users, that have a PC on their desk. These users, *may* travel to another location in which they will use a PC sitting on someone else's desk. And about half of these employees will have a laptop - in which they work from home, and travel on the road. Either way, they need to have access to all new mail that comes in, in addition to all their old mail, so
RE: Need advice from the Gurus (mobile users question)
Anybody? Even Richard Tener? -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Need advice from the Gurus (mobile users question) sureanybody can use appropriate technolgy that is reliable and works. It's the challange of two tin can's and a piece of string... cellular sound quality with virus protection, and low capital cost with high ROI -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 5:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Need advice from the Gurus (mobile users question) http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/pcat/3000.htm#xtocid0 This works for us. Looks good on the resume too. -Original Message- From: Michael Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Need advice from the Gurus (mobile users question) Greetings All, If this is getting OT, I am sure you will let me know real fast. Regarding this VPN stuff - I understand completely, the concepts behind it - now I need to implement it. This doesn't necessarily need to be hardware related does it? Can't I simply install some software on the Clients and the Server that allows them to login to the server, and begin an encrypted session? This is getting a little beyond my expertise. What kind of products are you all using to accomplish this complicated task? I remember in the past when PPTP came out from Microsoft, but have not heard much about it lately. Thanks again everyone, you are all lifesavers! Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael Anderson Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 1:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Need advice from the Gurus (mobile users question) AWESOME! - That's precisely the answer I was looking for. This list is awesome :) Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joe Pochedley Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 12:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Need advice from the Gurus (mobile users question) We have 60+ salesmen and engineers who connect via 56K modem dial up while on the road to access their email with Outlook/Exchange through a VPN... Everything works well, though a bit slowly at times, but not so slow as to be unusable or unbearable. You can do away with IMAP completely if you like... Outlook allows you to create an Offline Folder file, which is a local copy of the information stored on the Exchange server... With the offline folder file, users can continue to work with Outlook and maintain full functionality whether they're connected or not and will automatically synchronize (send, receive mail, update calendar, contacts, tasks, etc) whenever they are connected... Look in the help files for Outlook for help setting up Offline Access... There's also plenty of info at Microsoft and other sites that explain how to set this up and use it (it's pretty simple) Joe Pochedley I like deadlines, cartoonist Scott Adams once said. I especially like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by. -Original Message- From: Michael Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Need advice from the Gurus (mobile users question) Okay - I like the VPN route - and use Outlook 2000 as it was intended. BUT, what kind of Network Overhead is involved - when connecting remotely over a potentially slow connection? Will it take forever for folders to come up, especially if they are unusually large? Also, if the client cannot connect for some reason (which has been happening A LOT lately - due to massive service problems), what is the best solution to still have your old e-mail inside of Outlook? I was thinking this would be where IMAP really comes into it's own - because you can still keep your mail local, and on the server too - and when the connection comes back up, you just resynchronize everything - and you are good to go. Thanks for your continued responses, Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Need advice from the Gurus (mobile users question) Get rid of POP IMAP could work OWA is great Best: Get a VPN and use the regular Exch/OL combo. -Original Message- From: Michael Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 8:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Need advice from the Gurus (mobile users question) Hello, Our present scenario is the following: Corporate users, that have a PC on their desk. These users, *may* travel to another location in which they will use a PC sitting on someone else's desk. And about half of these employees will have
RE: Exchange publications
Exchange Outlook Mag is apparently not being published anymore. Are there any subscribers out there who have been contacted by the publisher regarding a refund or subscribing to an alternative? -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 6:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange publications Windows 2000, Exchange Outlook, and Exchange Administrator would be a few good ones. Tom -Original Message- From: Michael Brandon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 8:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange publications I'd appreciate your information on what publications exist covering Microsoft Exchange; I'm interested in both printed magazines and email newsletters. Many thanks, Michael _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Information Store Stopping...
If the event log is full in exchange 2000, the store stops unexpectedly? Just say no. -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 6:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Information Store Stopping... Are you sure the event log isnt full, causing the IS to shutdown? Have you re-installed service packs? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Colin J Revell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 January 2002 14:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Information Store Stopping... We had heard about this, but we were already loaded the 4.1.60 engine. I have since this morning compacted the databases and reduced them by about 5 Gb. I have also run the isinteg with the -fix option and fixed all but 58 warnings. but The IS has just stopped again Help! PS. I love computers -Original Message- From: Eric Sedore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 January 2002 13:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Information Store Stopping... There is a semi well known problem with Groupshield on Exchange 2000 stopping the store. We came across the problem with engine 4.1.50, if you are running this engine you should upgrade to 4.1.60 which has seemed to resolve the problem. -Eric -Original Message- From: Colin J Revell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 5:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Information Store Stopping... Hi all, My Exchange 2000 server's IS has just started to stop randomly. I thought that it may be because I had Netshield as well as Group shield installed. I rebuilt the server - Exchange SP2 all updates etc including Groupshield and did not install Netshield. The IS has just stopped again. I have set the automatic recovery to restart it for the time being. Could someone confirm that I should NOT install Netshield Has any one got any idea about the IS stopping Thanks in anticipation, Colin J Revell MCSE IS Manager Oakham School _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anti-Spam software
Dr. Pepper hurts. -Original Message- From: Denis Baldwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anti-Spam software hah :) It took me twice to realize I wasn't dreaming. Then I blew milk out of my nose. Thanks guys, that ruled. Denis -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anti-Spam software Some 13 year old geek in 8th grade. He knows everything about projectors. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anti-Spam software What are you using for AV? -Original Message- From: Jonathan Beeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anti-Spam software Does anyone know of any anti-spam software out there that works with Exchange 5.5? Personally, I don't care if user's receive it. It's their own fault for putting their email address all over the web, but since people have requested that I look into it, I will do so. Any suggestions would be of help. Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public IS Lost Email Addresses
Still the the email addresses are messed up on my public folders?! What do you mean by messed up? (mismatched, gone, stoned..) -Original Message- From: Chad Gibson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public IS Lost Email Addresses EX 5.5 SP4 NT 4.0 SP 6a Per the request of PSS, they had me export my pub is to a pst then restore it back into a clear pub is. When I did that it lost all of the email addresses associated with the public folders. I still have a copy of my orginal pub.edb so I removed the new one with the messed up address and put it back in, did an isinteg -patch, cleared logs, and brought the server back up. Still the the email addresses are messed up on my public folders?! Anyone tell me what I am doing wrong to get the correct addresses to the correct folders? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public IS Lost Email Addresses
Guess they should have told you to use dsexport and include secondary-proxy-addresses in your header. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q185018 I have the dsexport utility compiled on my machine if you need it. It will not recover your email addresses, but it may make things a little easier. -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public IS Lost Email Addresses Still the the email addresses are messed up on my public folders?! What do you mean by messed up? (mismatched, gone, stoned..) -Original Message- From: Chad Gibson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public IS Lost Email Addresses EX 5.5 SP4 NT 4.0 SP 6a Per the request of PSS, they had me export my pub is to a pst then restore it back into a clear pub is. When I did that it lost all of the email addresses associated with the public folders. I still have a copy of my orginal pub.edb so I removed the new one with the messed up address and put it back in, did an isinteg -patch, cleared logs, and brought the server back up. Still the the email addresses are messed up on my public folders?! Anyone tell me what I am doing wrong to get the correct addresses to the correct folders? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: highlight
He meant just in Canada. -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 4:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Are you smoking crack, drunk and on acid? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jad Mouracadé Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 4:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Sex should be banned world-wide for the next 3 generations. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul Bouzan Sent: January 14, 2002 5:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight I know, that Mr Blackstone and the Dogg-person really get my goat up with their constant references to sexual inuendo. It shouldn't be allowed! Mr Lefkovics only fuels the fire! PBB -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 January 2002 22:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight This is related. At least he said Spack it, instead of Spank it! ;o) -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Mr Blackstone, I am totally disgusted at your flagrant disregard for some decorum on this list. Would you please stick to the subject in hand i.e. Exchange Issues and not some idle banter that wastes our time. Kind regards PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 January 2002 21:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Is it XP? Did you SPack it? -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight That is the Fifth Bloody time today. I am going home now. Will reformat in the morning at 2am when I get back to fix that blasted router. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight It isn't unless you are a server or a female -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight I don't see how being hung is a problem. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight I have a server I am building right now that is hung. It is at Exodus, so I sent em an email to reboot it. Other than that, everything is peachy! -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight You have problems? W -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight It is total therapy. Plus it is funner to work on others problems than your own. -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Not a problem. It is all in fun. In my world this list is therapy for my work day. As well as a great resource. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Smith Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Fair enough. Again my apologies for taking it so seriously. W -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Being someone who has the links to a good 100 plus TechNet articles memorized, and a good friend of Mr. Blackstone. Trust me I have been in the TechNet. Would never post a question with out a good few hours search. I think I am offended. =] but that's ok, I would have said the same thing you had said on a different day. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Smith Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Other then verifying that this is a real problem and not my bizarre setup Actually confirming that it is not your setup can be very helpful at times. Now maybe you know you can find something on TechNet. Which is the only type of help I'd give you after a response like yours. W Hint: Don't blast the people who are willing to try to help you. -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14,
RE: configuration question
I concur. Maybe, right click on the user object in dsa.msc and go to the E-mail Addresses tab. -Original Message- From: Leeann McCallum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 7:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question I'm not sure I understand what you are trying to do. An mail user on your exchange server? -Original Message- From: Tim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 15 January 2002 5:00 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question ?help! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim McGrath Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: configuration question Hey could anyone tell me how to check the target address attribute on a enabled mail user where I would create the following objects..User: SMTP proxy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact: targetAddress: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; SMTP proxy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tim McGrath mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: configuration question
Post the entire error. Smtp codes would help: Delivery to the following recipients failed. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 8:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question I've been int he business for about four years this is the first with exchange sorry if I'm not giving enough. I'm using a pop3 connector. What is actually happening is when people out side the company send e-mail they receive this: This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Delivery to the following recipients failed. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Leeann McCallum Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 11:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question Sounds like the custom receipient address is wrong. Look for the globe thingy in your address book and check that's it's valid address if you are forwarding a users mail externally. The article below reads a mail look to me however. Clarify: Are you sending to a client running exchange that is not part of your exchange organisation? What does the NDR say? What happens when you try sending not to the client's mailbox, but there supposed alternate recipient address? -Original Message- From: Tim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 15 January 2002 5:10 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question yes I have a client with a small business server running exchange. I'm new to exchange and I'm having some problems. When you try and send them e-mail you get an NDR. I found an article with the fix for it but I'm not sure how to configure it here is the fix from the article Troubleshooting: This happens when contactA has an alternate recipient that points to contactB which then has an alternate recipient that points back to contactA . Check the contact's alternate recipient. Check and remove targetAddress attribute from mailbox-enabled users. For hosting where you want to send mail from one user in one company (OU) to another company (OU), you should configure the following two related objects: User: SMTP proxy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact: targetAddress: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; SMTP proxy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Leeann McCallum Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question I'm not sure I understand what you are trying to do. An mail user on your exchange server? -Original Message- From: Tim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 15 January 2002 5:00 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question ?help! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim McGrath Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: configuration question Hey could anyone tell me how to check the target address attribute on a enabled mail user where I would create the following objects..User: SMTP proxy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact: targetAddress: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; SMTP proxy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tim McGrath mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail
RE: configuration question
I am guessing you saw this and your issue is you want to know how to fix it: Numerical Code: 5.4.6 Possible Cause: Categorizer forward loop detected. targetAddress attribute is set on a mailbox-enabled user. Hosting Pack: This is a common hosting configuration problem when someone creates a contact in OU1 and creates a user in OU2 with the same e-mail address via user provisioning tool. Troubleshooting: This happens when contactA has an alternate recipient that points to contactB which then has an alternate recipient that points back to contactA . Check the contact's alternate recipient. Check and remove targetAddress attribute from mailbox-enabled users. For hosting where you want to send mail from one user in one company (OU) to another company (OU), you should configure the following two related objects: User: SMTP proxy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact: targetAddress: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; SMTP proxy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 8:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question this is what is sent back to a user that is trying to e-mail any one in my organization This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Delivery to the following recipients failed. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reporting-MTA: dns;server1.mgi Received-From-MTA: dns;server1.mgi Arrival-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 12:00:38 -0500 Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: failed Status: 5.4.6 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 11:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question Post the entire error. Smtp codes would help: Delivery to the following recipients failed. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 8:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question I've been int he business for about four years this is the first with exchange sorry if I'm not giving enough. I'm using a pop3 connector. What is actually happening is when people out side the company send e-mail they receive this: This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Delivery to the following recipients failed. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Leeann McCallum Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 11:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question Sounds like the custom receipient address is wrong. Look for the globe thingy in your address book and check that's it's valid address if you are forwarding a users mail externally. The article below reads a mail look to me however. Clarify: Are you sending to a client running exchange that is not part of your exchange organisation? What does the NDR say? What happens when you try sending not to the client's mailbox, but there supposed alternate recipient address? -Original Message- From: Tim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 15 January 2002 5:10 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question yes I have a client with a small business server running exchange. I'm new to exchange and I'm having some problems. When you try and send them e-mail you get an NDR. I found an article with the fix for it but I'm not sure how to configure it here is the fix from the article Troubleshooting: This happens when contactA has an alternate recipient that points to contactB which then has an alternate recipient that points back to contactA . Check the contact's alternate recipient. Check and remove targetAddress attribute from mailbox-enabled users. For hosting where you want to send mail from one user in one company (OU) to another company (OU), you should configure the following two related objects: User: SMTP proxy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact: targetAddress: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; SMTP proxy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Leeann McCallum Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question I'm not sure I understand what you are trying to do. An mail user on your exchange server? -Original Message- From: Tim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 15 January 2002 5:00 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question ?help! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim McGrath Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: configuration question Hey could anyone tell me how to check the target address attribute on a enabled mail user where I would create the following objects..User: SMTP proxy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact: targetAddress: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; SMTP proxy
RE: configuration question
Do you have a contact and user object for this person? -Original Message- From: Tim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 8:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question Jen I seen that article but I really don't understand the steps to take and where to go to even start with that resolution I am by no means an exchange expert and I really appreciate any time you take with this! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 11:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question I am guessing you saw this and your issue is you want to know how to fix it: Numerical Code: 5.4.6 Possible Cause: Categorizer forward loop detected. targetAddress attribute is set on a mailbox-enabled user. Hosting Pack: This is a common hosting configuration problem when someone creates a contact in OU1 and creates a user in OU2 with the same e-mail address via user provisioning tool. Troubleshooting: This happens when contactA has an alternate recipient that points to contactB which then has an alternate recipient that points back to contactA . Check the contact's alternate recipient. Check and remove targetAddress attribute from mailbox-enabled users. For hosting where you want to send mail from one user in one company (OU) to another company (OU), you should configure the following two related objects: User: SMTP proxy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact: targetAddress: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; SMTP proxy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 8:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question this is what is sent back to a user that is trying to e-mail any one in my organization This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Delivery to the following recipients failed. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reporting-MTA: dns;server1.mgi Received-From-MTA: dns;server1.mgi Arrival-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 12:00:38 -0500 Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: failed Status: 5.4.6 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 11:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question Post the entire error. Smtp codes would help: Delivery to the following recipients failed. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 8:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question I've been int he business for about four years this is the first with exchange sorry if I'm not giving enough. I'm using a pop3 connector. What is actually happening is when people out side the company send e-mail they receive this: This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Delivery to the following recipients failed. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Leeann McCallum Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 11:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question Sounds like the custom receipient address is wrong. Look for the globe thingy in your address book and check that's it's valid address if you are forwarding a users mail externally. The article below reads a mail look to me however. Clarify: Are you sending to a client running exchange that is not part of your exchange organisation? What does the NDR say? What happens when you try sending not to the client's mailbox, but there supposed alternate recipient address? -Original Message- From: Tim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 15 January 2002 5:10 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question yes I have a client with a small business server running exchange. I'm new to exchange and I'm having some problems. When you try and send them e-mail you get an NDR. I found an article with the fix for it but I'm not sure how to configure it here is the fix from the article Troubleshooting: This happens when contactA has an alternate recipient that points to contactB which then has an alternate recipient that points back to contactA . Check the contact's alternate recipient. Check and remove targetAddress attribute from mailbox-enabled users. For hosting where you want to send mail from one user in one company (OU) to another company (OU), you should configure the following two related objects: User: SMTP proxy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact: targetAddress: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; SMTP proxy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Leeann McCallum Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question I'm not sure I understand what you are trying to do. An mail user
RE: new to exchange having some problems!!!
That's too short you little eunuch. -Original Message- From: Tim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 11:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: new to exchange having some problems!!! good come back Ed I feel my face turning all red from the embarrassment now I can no longer deal with this petty shit, I'm 24 life is to short to deal with whole asses like yourself!!! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: new to exchange having some problems!!! That would be patience, you little eunuch. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim McGrath Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 11:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: new to exchange having some problems!!! well Ed thanks for your patients...I'm not an exchange person and I'm trying to do someone a favor, And I never asked you to be drug into this. Exchange is not my specialty and I have picked myself up a few books but when time is kind of important reading an entire book isn't always your answer! Especially when I'm trying to finish up other certs! I give credit to the 2 ladies that pointed me in the right direction or at least a directionI guess since you have a prick you feel that you should be a prick!!! I got on this little discussion forum to see if an expert out there could help someone new to the game, in a timely fashion!!! So you can get yourself out of this little conversation and go back to your internet porn or what ever you need to get by in your miserable little world!!! Spring for a hooker it may help! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 1:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: new to exchange having some problems!!! If you have nothing wrong, you don't need to troubleshoot. The reason you aren't getting any help is that you aren't stating your problem. You're asking What does this mean? Well, nobody really feels like translating random error messaages. Sit down, think a while, compose your problem in clear text and then after you are sure what you've composed describes your problem then, and only then, hit the Send button. I've read through all the threads between you and those trying to help you and I do not plan to be dragged into that. While you're waiting for answers, buy Paul Robichaux's and Tony Redmond's Exchange 5.5 books (spring for the overnight shipping) and read them. You need a foundation of knowledge and you aren't going to get that quickly from this list. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim McGrath Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: new to exchange having some problems!!! that's my problem I'm trying to figure out what I should be doing?? At the end of that article it gives 2 trouble shooting tips configuring 2 objects and removing a check on the targetaddress attribute I'm not how to do either of those -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 1:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: new to exchange having some problems!!! I read that. That isn't your problem. That is a symptom. You didn't explain what you are trying to do. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim McGrath Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: new to exchange having some problems!!! Sorry Ed. I'm new to exchange and was having some problems. I think a couple people from an earlier discussion helped me out. But Here is my problem. I have a client that set up a small business server running exchange 5.5. Periodically people that are sending them e-mails will receive a NDR that says: This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Delivery to the following recipients failed. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reporting-MTA: dns;server1.mgi Received-From-MTA: dns;server1.mgi Arrival-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 12:00:38 -0500 Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: failed Status: 5.4.6 This is happening to about 3 out of 5 people in the company I found this article but I'm not sure how to do the steps in the touble shooting section. So some people where trying to explain them to me. Numerical Code: 5.4.6 Possible Cause:
RE: Exchange 2000 Failure Reports
NDRs in 2000 have been improved. Bookmark this: http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/q284/2/04.asp The eventid 2028 occurs because public folders do not send delivery reports. I don't have the mmc sitting in front of me at the moment, but I believe you can create a group that will get delivery status notifications (you could in 5.5). -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 5:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 Failure Reports Hello All, In Exchange 5.5 you could configure the system to deliver outbound and inbound mail failures to a particular mailbox. We have just installed exchange 2000 and would like to have these same reports delivered to a public folder. My questions are: Are Non-delivery reports in exchange 2000 the same as exchange 5.5's mail delivery failures? Is event id 2028 Non delivery reports deleted the reason we are not seeing these reports appearing in the mail enabled public folder we have created to receive these reports? How can we setup some sort of notification to the administrators of any additions to this or any other public folder without using a mail forward rule? A mouthfuul indeed. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks Sherwin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Inherited Permissions
The service account is hooked into all of the exchange services and various 3rd party software (fax, voice, anti-virus). Removing it is not applicable. Changing the password would be the only option. http://www.lanicu.com or 800-829-6269 Ask for Karl Freedle. -Original Message- From: Pat Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 7:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Inherited Permissions On Exchange 5.5, user properties, the permissions tab displays a list of Windows NT Accounts with inherited permissions. How can I remove a Service Account Administrator who is no longer needed? Thank you in advance. PM _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: What would you buy?
Nah, drive on down to Richman, Poorman and buy some generic parts for a clone. -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 2:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What would you buy? Acer baby. eMachines has some cool server stuff too. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 2:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: What would you buy? Not nessicarily brand, cause I'm stuck with IBM. Exchange 2000 server for roughly 1000 users, mailbox storage/OWA/KM not smtp, limits around 100mb to 200mb( negotiable ) per mailbox, some public folder usage under 5gig db. Enviroment will have a projected growth of 20-27% anually. Based on the previous IBM5000 w/2 p2-450's and the current IBM5100 w/2 p3-800 I was thinking of a quad xeon 900 with an oodle of drives and maybe agrigated fiber cards. What would you recommend for such a senario? e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: In Washington State (Was: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gig ger. A@mm Virus)
Washington State Corrections Center for Women -Original Message- From: Wendel, Jesse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: In Washington State (Was: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger. A@mm Virus) Bellevue. Jesse Wendel Sr. Messaging Analyst Primary Messaging/DNS Administrator www.pse.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 3:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus SW Washington. Ken Powell Systems Administrator Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 Fax: (360) 759-6001 -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:32 PM To: Powell, Ken Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus Sounds like a lot of fun and I would really like to meet the group of gurus you associate with in Seattle!! Unfortunately for me, I already agreed to take off work early and take a non-techie friend of mine to see the Lord of the Rings. Maybe next time? Dang...would have been nice to meet Don before he left though. Guess I'll have a chance to meet him at MEC this year though. Who else is in the Washington State/Idaho/Oregon/Lower Cananda area? Jim -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus A bunch of us are headed out tonight to Pacific Crest Brew Pub, to say good Bye to Don Ely. He is leavening the PNW for the other coast next week. Come on up. You have about 4 hours to make it. Right at the North end of Boeing field. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Blunt, James H (Jim) Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus Dr. Dogg! Yer in Seattle? Cool! If you ever need someone to go to a Sonics/Mariners/Seachickens game with ya, just let me know...I'm in the Tri-Cities...Richland to be specific. ;0) Jim Blunt -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus That's the AB I know.. Way to go, High Five man. I was just given 2 tickets, BOX seats for tonight's Sonics game. Guess where I will be at 7:00 Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus Screw em! I just did it -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus You sure? It is on my server? Wait I remember this, We had this conversation, didn't we AB? Your owners would not let you block that extension. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus Well isn't that a nice onecrap! -Original Message- From: Corney, Alan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus The virus is not in the wild yet ,The extension is htm , which is not on Martins blocking list. http://www.antivirus.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=JS_GIGGER .A _ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL
RE: In Washington State (Was: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gig ger. A@mm Virus)
Mary Kay Letourneau says hi and wants to know how old you are. -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 4:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: In Washington State (Was: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gig ger. A@mm Virus) Sounds like a captive audience. Do they qualify as lusers? - Original Message - From: Jennifer Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 5:46 PM Subject: RE: In Washington State (Was: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gig ger. A@mm Virus) Washington State Corrections Center for Women -Original Message- From: Wendel, Jesse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: In Washington State (Was: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger. A@mm Virus) Bellevue. Jesse Wendel Sr. Messaging Analyst Primary Messaging/DNS Administrator www.pse.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 3:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus SW Washington. Ken Powell Systems Administrator Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 Fax: (360) 759-6001 -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:32 PM To: Powell, Ken Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus Sounds like a lot of fun and I would really like to meet the group of gurus you associate with in Seattle!! Unfortunately for me, I already agreed to take off work early and take a non-techie friend of mine to see the Lord of the Rings. Maybe next time? Dang...would have been nice to meet Don before he left though. Guess I'll have a chance to meet him at MEC this year though. Who else is in the Washington State/Idaho/Oregon/Lower Cananda area? Jim -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus A bunch of us are headed out tonight to Pacific Crest Brew Pub, to say good Bye to Don Ely. He is leavening the PNW for the other coast next week. Come on up. You have about 4 hours to make it. Right at the North end of Boeing field. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Blunt, James H (Jim) Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus Dr. Dogg! Yer in Seattle? Cool! If you ever need someone to go to a Sonics/Mariners/Seachickens game with ya, just let me know...I'm in the Tri-Cities...Richland to be specific. ;0) Jim Blunt -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus That's the AB I know.. Way to go, High Five man. I was just given 2 tickets, BOX seats for tonight's Sonics game. Guess where I will be at 7:00 Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus Screw em! I just did it -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus You sure? It is on my server? Wait I remember this, We had this conversation, didn't we AB? Your owners would not let you block that extension. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus Well isn't that a nice onecrap! -Original Message- From: Corney, Alan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus The virus is not in the wild yet ,The extension is htm , which is not on Martins blocking list. http://www.antivirus.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=JS_GIGGER .A _ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http
RE: remeber server freezing
Yeah int. 1. An informal voice of the affirmative. 2. A generalization of the fact that the speaker simply does not give a flying rat's ass. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: remeber server freezing yeah -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 12:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: remeber server freezing Them Zip drives don't hold much. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 5:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: remeber server freezing Then what do you mean by It seemed to finish one drive? What are you backing up? What the errors in the event logs? Can you do a backup with NTBACKUP? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: remeber server freezing yup -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: remeber server freezing Are we talking about an Exchange online backup here? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: remeber server freezing Ok I think I found out why my server is freezing in the morning. I came in today the backup (backup Exec 8.0) was still running it seemed to finish one drive but the other did not finish. So I attempted to cancel the job that was running but it wouldnt cancel. Then I tried to stop the backup exec services and thats when my server locked up. I couldnt do anything wasnt able to log on to exchange or even log off the server. Has anyone ever had a problem like this with their backup software? Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:
RE: Strange ...
sigh Please don't go there... -Original Message- From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 11:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Strange ... All It seems strange to me that with the amount of knowledge about exchange that is avaliable from people in this list, that so many of them have Out-Of-Office assistants replying to the internet ! Surely this is not good practice ??? Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd London Road Henley Road Teynham Paddock Wood Kent Kent ME9 9PR TN12 6DN Tel: 01795 523200Tel: 01892 831400 Fax: 01795 523241Fax: 01892 831411 All business is conducted in accordance with the company's terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on request. For the avoidance of doubt, all orders initiated by ourselves must be signed by an authorised signatory of this company. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange ...
But, of course, this reminds me: When will [EMAIL PROTECTED] be removed from this list? -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 12:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange ... sigh Please don't go there... -Original Message- From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 11:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Strange ... All It seems strange to me that with the amount of knowledge about exchange that is avaliable from people in this list, that so many of them have Out-Of-Office assistants replying to the internet ! Surely this is not good practice ??? Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd London Road Henley Road Teynham Paddock Wood Kent Kent ME9 9PR TN12 6DN Tel: 01795 523200Tel: 01892 831400 Fax: 01795 523241Fax: 01892 831411 All business is conducted in accordance with the company's terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on request. For the avoidance of doubt, all orders initiated by ourselves must be signed by an authorised signatory of this company. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Solicitation
No firewall? Connecting to Ldap://servername could be misleading from where you are sitting. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 10:10 AM To: Baker, Jennifer Subject: RE: Solicitation Geez...Had anonymous LDAP access turned on here as well...turned it off. However, under the Authentication tab, do I want to uncheck the Basic (Clear Text) and the Basic (Clear Text) using SSL authentication methods? Jim -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Solicitation Andy, By ldap://yourexchangeserver, I'm assuming you mean the name of your OWA server, correct? Not the name of your BE Exchange server? Jim Blunt -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 5:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Solicitation Just type : ldap://yourexchangeserver in your browser... -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 8:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Solicitation Hi there At the risk of sounding stupid, how do you do this? I would like to know how this is done so I can prevent this on my own network. Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 5:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Solicitation Yikes, I see your whole address book. No firewall, eh? -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 14:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Solicitation Hi On a system that is Exchange 5.5 sp4hot and 2k sp2hot, and also relay secure, is there a way for someone to scan my site for all the email addresses? In the last 48 hours many many users in the company have seen a RASH of solicitaiton emails. I have blocked the home servers and IP's for most of them but I am concerend how these solicitation agencies got a hold of all these addresses. Most of these addresses arent things we have published on a web site or anywhere. Maybe they got it out of the public access for OWA but that would take a lot of work cause OWA limits the number of addresses it will display at a given time. Ideas? E- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives
RE: Solicitation
Buy a cheap firewall. Or remove the everyone group from pre-windows 2000 compatibility group which will break your pre-w2k clients. -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 10:04 AM To: Baker, Jennifer Subject: RE: Solicitation Well then. How does one turn off anonymous LDAP access in AD? =p Mike Carlson http://www.domitianx.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Solicitation E2K isn't an LDAP server. AD on the other hand Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Solicitation This may be a real dumb question, but how do disable anonymous LDAP access to the Exchange Server? I did not see that option anywhere in E2k. Thanks, Mike Carlson http://www.domitianx.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Solicitation It would be the exchange server that the LDAP protocol is running on that you want to hit. ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |+--- || Blunt, James H (Jim) | || [EMAIL PROTECTED]| || Sent by: | || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| || .swynk.com | || | || | || 01/10/2002 12:44 PM | || Please respond to| || Exchange Discussions | || | |+--- - -- - -| | | | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: RE: Solicitation | - -- - -| Andy, By ldap://yourexchangeserver, I'm assuming you mean the name of your OWA server, correct? Not the name of your BE Exchange server? Jim Blunt -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 5:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Solicitation Just type : ldap://yourexchangeserver in your browser... -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 8:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Solicitation Hi there At the risk of sounding stupid, how do you do this? I would like to know how this is done so I can prevent this on my own network. Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 5:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Solicitation Yikes, I see your whole address book. No firewall, eh? -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 14:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Solicitation Hi On a system that is Exchange 5.5 sp4hot and 2k sp2hot, and also relay secure, is there a way for someone to scan my site for all the email addresses? In the last 48 hours many many users in the company have seen a RASH of solicitaiton emails. I have blocked the home servers and IP's for most of them but I am concerend how these solicitation agencies got a hold of all these addresses. Most of these addresses arent things we have published on a web site or anywhere. Maybe they got it out of the public access for OWA but that would take a lot of work cause OWA limits the number of addresses it will display at a given time. Ideas? E- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you
RE: Solicitation
Well the second part was a wild guess, so good. -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:13 AM To: Baker, Jennifer Subject: RE: Solicitation I have a firewall. I have no pre windows 2000 anything. Everything is in native mode. I am asking the question out of curiosity not to fix something. Mike Carlson http://www.domitianx.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 1:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Solicitation Buy a cheap firewall. Or remove the everyone group from pre-windows 2000 compatibility group which will break your pre-w2k clients. -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 10:04 AM To: Baker, Jennifer Subject: RE: Solicitation Well then. How does one turn off anonymous LDAP access in AD? =p Mike Carlson http://www.domitianx.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Solicitation E2K isn't an LDAP server. AD on the other hand Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Solicitation This may be a real dumb question, but how do disable anonymous LDAP access to the Exchange Server? I did not see that option anywhere in E2k. Thanks, Mike Carlson http://www.domitianx.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Solicitation It would be the exchange server that the LDAP protocol is running on that you want to hit. ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |+--- || Blunt, James H (Jim) | || [EMAIL PROTECTED]| || Sent by: | || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| || .swynk.com | || | || | || 01/10/2002 12:44 PM | || Please respond to| || Exchange Discussions | || | |+--- - -- - -| | | | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: RE: Solicitation | - -- - -| Andy, By ldap://yourexchangeserver, I'm assuming you mean the name of your OWA server, correct? Not the name of your BE Exchange server? Jim Blunt -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 5:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Solicitation Just type : ldap://yourexchangeserver in your browser... -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 8:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Solicitation Hi there At the risk of sounding stupid, how do you do this? I would like to know how this is done so I can prevent this on my own network. Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 5:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Solicitation Yikes, I see your whole address book. No firewall, eh? -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 14:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Solicitation Hi On a system that is Exchange 5.5 sp4hot and 2k sp2hot, and also relay secure, is there a way for someone to scan my site for all the email addresses? In the last 48 hours many many users in the company have seen a RASH of solicitaiton emails. I have blocked the home servers and IP's for most of them but I am concerend how these solicitation agencies got a hold of all these addresses. Most of these addresses arent things we
RE: Solicitation
Just because it was a wild guess doesn't mean it wasn't right. Use ldp.exe to connect and bind to the service. It's in the 2k resource kit. -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Solicitation So... Since no one seems to want to share this super secret information on turning off anonymous LDAP, am I to assume that it is something as simple like disabling the guest account? BTW: when I try ldap://server I get an error returned saying that An error occurred while performing the search. You computer, your ISP, or the specified directory service may be disconnected. Check you connections and try again. What does that error indicate? Mike Carlson http://www.domitianx.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 1:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Solicitation Well the second part was a wild guess, so good. -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:13 AM To: Baker, Jennifer Subject: RE: Solicitation I have a firewall. I have no pre windows 2000 anything. Everything is in native mode. I am asking the question out of curiosity not to fix something. Mike Carlson http://www.domitianx.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 1:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Solicitation Buy a cheap firewall. Or remove the everyone group from pre-windows 2000 compatibility group which will break your pre-w2k clients. -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 10:04 AM To: Baker, Jennifer Subject: RE: Solicitation Well then. How does one turn off anonymous LDAP access in AD? =p Mike Carlson http://www.domitianx.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Solicitation E2K isn't an LDAP server. AD on the other hand Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Solicitation This may be a real dumb question, but how do disable anonymous LDAP access to the Exchange Server? I did not see that option anywhere in E2k. Thanks, Mike Carlson http://www.domitianx.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Solicitation It would be the exchange server that the LDAP protocol is running on that you want to hit. ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |+--- || Blunt, James H (Jim) | || [EMAIL PROTECTED]| || Sent by: | || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| || .swynk.com | || | || | || 01/10/2002 12:44 PM | || Please respond to| || Exchange Discussions | || | |+--- - -- - -| | | | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: RE: Solicitation | - -- - -| Andy, By ldap://yourexchangeserver, I'm assuming you mean the name of your OWA server, correct? Not the name of your BE Exchange server? Jim Blunt -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 5:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Solicitation Just type : ldap://yourexchangeserver in your browser... -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 8:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Solicitation
RE: www.seconddomain.com/exchange
What's a white paper? -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: www.seconddomain.com/exchange Bind another IP address to the interface. It will pretty much talk you through it, and then there is the online help. You should add a new ip address to make thing easier, as we say. You know, you might want to go to http://www.microsoft.com/exchange and click on Exchange 2000 Outlook Web Access and print out the white paper. Just a thought. -Original Message- From: Jean-Francois Bourdeau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, January 10, 2002 05:22 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: www.seconddomain.com/exchange Subject: Re: www.seconddomain.com/exchange Tom if both server are on the same Ip address ? jf I will add a new ip adress to make thing easier - Original Message - From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 6:07 PM Subject: RE: www.seconddomain.com/exchange You mean Outlook Web Access? In Exchange System Manager, make a new virtual server for www.hisdomain.com. ESM Servers Servername Protocols HTTP New Virtual Server. It's all there. Have fun. -Original Message- From: Jean-Francois Bourdeau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, January 10, 2002 04:29 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: www.seconddomain.com/exchange Subject: Re: www.seconddomain.com/exchange btw it's exchange 2000 JF - Original Message - From: Jean-Francois Bourdeau [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 5:28 PM Subject: www.seconddomain.com/exchange Hi My customer has a second domain (company) that will be on the same exchange server. He want everything to be under his name. Is there a way to make something so he can go to www.hisdomain.com/exchange ? JF _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Built-in filter criteria for junk email (O2002)
You're right. It was a case of mistaken identity. -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 7:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Built-in filter criteria for junk email (O2002) My understanding is that the document is only there to show what the rule set is. Everything I could find says that Outlook does not actually use the document to process the rule set. What they recommended was that if the built in rules did not meet your needs, that you should disable the built in feature and make your own rules. If you've got it working by modifying filters.txt, please let me know. I'm really curious. Tom. -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Built-in filter criteria for junk email (O2002) I removed the Subject contains Advertisement rule and it appears that it is accepting the changes using the turn junk gray option. -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 7:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Built-in filter criteria for junk email (O2002) Look for a file named filters.txt (probably in c:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\Office10\1033 That file contains the criteria. It's there for your edification. You cannot modify the rules. Tom. -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Built-in filter criteria for junk email (O2002) Does anybody know where I can find the built-in criteria Outlook 2002 uses to filter junk email? I can guess what it uses (i.e.. Advertisement in the subject, etc.) but I would like to have the hidden agenda. OL2002: The Junk Sender's Rule Incorrectly Filters Messages http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN;q298734 States: This behavior occurs because a property of the message that you do not wanted filtered matches one of the built-in filter criteria for the Junk Sender's Adult Content rules. You cannot edit this built-in criteria. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 Directory Replication
http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=4962 -Original Message- From: mike martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 12:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 Directory Replication I had to remove site and directory replication connectors between two exchange 5.5 servers two weeks ago. I reconnected them 18 hours ago with a new site connector and directory replication connector. Replication is ok from site B to site A all objects have replicated. Replication from Site A to B does not complete. All items replicate from site A, except 400 mailboxes from site A's recipient container. Message traffic is ok between sites, there are no message backlogs in either sites MTA queue. I am running exchange 5.5 service pack 4, Winnt service 6a. Thanks, Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Solicitation
Yikes, I see your whole address book. No firewall, eh? -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 14:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Solicitation Hi On a system that is Exchange 5.5 sp4hot and 2k sp2hot, and also relay secure, is there a way for someone to scan my site for all the email addresses? In the last 48 hours many many users in the company have seen a RASH of solicitaiton emails. I have blocked the home servers and IP's for most of them but I am concerend how these solicitation agencies got a hold of all these addresses. Most of these addresses arent things we have published on a web site or anywhere. Maybe they got it out of the public access for OWA but that would take a lot of work cause OWA limits the number of addresses it will display at a given time. Ideas? E- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Solicitation
Restart directory service. Let me know when you're done. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 2:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Solicitation Ok now I'm getting scared. Ideas??? I took out ldap anonymous. -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Solicitation Yikes, I see your whole address book. No firewall, eh? -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 14:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Solicitation Hi On a system that is Exchange 5.5 sp4hot and 2k sp2hot, and also relay secure, is there a way for someone to scan my site for all the email addresses? In the last 48 hours many many users in the company have seen a RASH of solicitaiton emails. I have blocked the home servers and IP's for most of them but I am concerend how these solicitation agencies got a hold of all these addresses. Most of these addresses arent things we have published on a web site or anywhere. Maybe they got it out of the public access for OWA but that would take a lot of work cause OWA limits the number of addresses it will display at a given time. Ideas? E- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Solicitation
Access Denied. It's all good. -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 3:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Solicitation Restart directory service. Let me know when you're done. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 2:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Solicitation Ok now I'm getting scared. Ideas??? I took out ldap anonymous. -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Solicitation Yikes, I see your whole address book. No firewall, eh? -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 14:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Solicitation Hi On a system that is Exchange 5.5 sp4hot and 2k sp2hot, and also relay secure, is there a way for someone to scan my site for all the email addresses? In the last 48 hours many many users in the company have seen a RASH of solicitaiton emails. I have blocked the home servers and IP's for most of them but I am concerend how these solicitation agencies got a hold of all these addresses. Most of these addresses arent things we have published on a web site or anywhere. Maybe they got it out of the public access for OWA but that would take a lot of work cause OWA limits the number of addresses it will display at a given time. Ideas? E- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange X400 connector
http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=6014 -Original Message- From: Steve Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 6:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange X400 connector I apologise in advance if this question has been asked before. I am trying to change my X400 configuration and have noticed that a number of the settings do not seem to work. As an example:On the Restrictions tab of an X400 connector's address space the restriction This site only is meant to send only messages through the connector that originate in the local site however I have noticed that messages from other sites are still routed through this connector. Either this is a bug or my knowledge is insufficient. Does anyone know of a source of comprehensive information dealing with the X400 connector? I would really like an in-depth explanation of each of the fields and how they interact. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MAPI Client Problems
97, I think. Ok, I wasn't 12. so, I was off by 1 or 10 years. -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 5:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems When was it released? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 January 2002 13:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems When I was 12, we were all shaking our booties and Ponch could still fit into those 28 inch waist Speedos. -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 1:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems I was 12 when 5.0 was released so maybe someone else on this list may have a suggestion. -Original Message- From: MATTSON, Winston AJ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 10:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems I just gave this a shot but it haven't helped. Is there anyway to see if a mailbox is corrupt or to do an check on it ? -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 8 January 2002 15:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems Maybe outlook /cleanreminders will clear that particular issue up. -Original Message- From: Jon Lucas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems I vaguely recall that OL2K and a different client using same mailbox might create that error about turning off the reminder. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems I *was* going to say.. I'm impressed that he got it to work. I couldn't. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems I guess that's better than running Exch2K and the Exch 5.0 client -Original Message- From: MATTSON, Winston AJ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems They are running Outlook 2000 and Exchange 5.0 with I have tried both (I mixed up the versions in the original post sorry...) -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 8 January 2002 14:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MAPI Client Problems My suggestion would be to upgrade your clients. That one has been out for about five years... - Original Message - From: MATTSON, Winston AJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 7:49 PM Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems Sorry Exchange Client 5.0 -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 8 January 2002 11:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems What is Outlook 5.0? Can't be Outlook Express from the error messages you are describing. -Original Message- From: MATTSON, Winston AJ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 4:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems Yes I also tried a different PC too but this didn't make a difference. I can open the mailboxes individually but if I try to have them all in the same profile with his primary mailbox they wont open. Other users on the same exchange server and not having any problems, they some have 3 or 4 mailboxes with there primary mailbox. Winston -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 8 January 2002 11:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI Client Problems And you have already tried recreating the profile? -Original Message- From: MATTSON, Winston AJ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 4:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MAPI Client Problems Hello All, I was just wondering if any body has any ideas on the problems I am having with one user. I have checked the permissions and everything works fine through Outlook Web Access. When they are using Outlook 5.0 / Exchange 2000 as a mail client the following error messages are displayed when they try to use a any of there secondary mailboxes, the error Unable to expand the folder. The set of folders could not be opened. The operation failed. displayed. (Primary mailbox opens fine) Also when reminders pop up, the following message is displayed Cannot turn off the reminder. You may be reminded again. The operation failed. The Exchange Server is 2000 Enterprise Edition Service Pack 1... Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated
RE: SNMP on an Exchange server.
The one file I was referring to was the one file he was asking about. Setting this up is not *as* painful under NT4 if your data center looks like a clone farm. -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 7:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SNMP on an Exchange server. Having the mib isn't enough. You also need the MIB.BIN file and the PERFMIB.INI files as well. And they are matched - they all must come from the same build. Enabling SNMP reading of perfmon variables (at least under NT4/MSX5.5) is an ugly and somewhat convoluted process. I once tried to build a master set of files, but I gave up after finding that lots of perfmon variables collided with existing MIB variable names. I tried to fix a few by hand, but it just seemed like far too much work. -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 5:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SNMP on an Exchange server. Try this: http://www.robichaux.net/writing/exchange/goodies.html Search for MIB. -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SNMP on an Exchange server. 404 -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SNMP on an Exchange server. You only need one file. This one: http://www.robichaux.net/files/NTexchperf.mib.zip -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SNMP on an Exchange server. Good afternoon to you all: I am in the process of building a MIB file for Exchange based on the PerfMon MIB from Microsoft. My question is this; do I need to customize the MIB file for the individual configuration of the Exchange server (some have IMC's, others don't, different drive configurations, etc). OR, can I use one generic MIB file and trust that the SNMP service won't choke when I rebuild MIB.BIN. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Believe nothing because it is written in books. Believe nothing because wise men say it is so. Believe nothing because it is religious doctrine. Believe it only because you yourself know it to be true. -- Buddha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SNMP on an Exchange server.
You *could* start with technet or google and then post any problems you run into. -Original Message- From: Byron Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SNMP on an Exchange server. has anyone been able to expose permon data to snmp for exch 5.5 running on win 2k? what do i need to do to get this running. thx.byron -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SNMP on an Exchange server. The one file I was referring to was the one file he was asking about. Setting this up is not *as* painful under NT4 if your data center looks like a clone farm. -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 7:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SNMP on an Exchange server. Having the mib isn't enough. You also need the MIB.BIN file and the PERFMIB.INI files as well. And they are matched - they all must come from the same build. Enabling SNMP reading of perfmon variables (at least under NT4/MSX5.5) is an ugly and somewhat convoluted process. I once tried to build a master set of files, but I gave up after finding that lots of perfmon variables collided with existing MIB variable names. I tried to fix a few by hand, but it just seemed like far too much work. -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 5:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SNMP on an Exchange server. Try this: http://www.robichaux.net/writing/exchange/goodies.html Search for MIB. -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SNMP on an Exchange server. 404 -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SNMP on an Exchange server. You only need one file. This one: http://www.robichaux.net/files/NTexchperf.mib.zip -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SNMP on an Exchange server. Good afternoon to you all: I am in the process of building a MIB file for Exchange based on the PerfMon MIB from Microsoft. My question is this; do I need to customize the MIB file for the individual configuration of the Exchange server (some have IMC's, others don't, different drive configurations, etc). OR, can I use one generic MIB file and trust that the SNMP service won't choke when I rebuild MIB.BIN. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Believe nothing because it is written in books. Believe nothing because wise men say it is so. Believe nothing because it is religious doctrine. Believe it only because you yourself know it to be true. -- Buddha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http
RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions
You are absolutely right. From now on, no more jokes. For the rest of my career, I promise to become a serious and prudish Exchange citizen. I also vow not to go postal from the lack of humor while working in the wee hours of the morning. Thank you for setting me straight. Let's hope others follow. Together we can make this list the most solemn Exchange List in the world. Continued success. Jennifer Baker -Original Message- From: Mike Lagase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions Man, try to help people out and you get slammed. I thought this was supposed to be an Exchange question and answer group and not a group that has to knock down or create a joke about everything that is being thrown out here. These are real world scenarios and you obviously have way too much time on your hands to reply to this. Mike - Original Message - From: Jennifer Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 12:35 AM Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions What does this have to do with the Honeymooners? -Original Message- From: Mike Lagase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions What you need to do is add the Total Ops column to your Exchange admin program. This will show you what mailbox is doing the most amount of operations on your exchange server. It is most likely a rule that is forwarding to the internet so you will need to login to that mailbox and see what is going on. Mike -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions Bang! Zoom! Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions One of these days, Alice. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:15 PM To: Baker, Jennifer Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions Is that an auotresponse? -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions Duh I was being sarcastic. /Duh -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions I know but it is a potential cause of this problem PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions Nobody on this list does that. If they do, I hope they don't admit it. -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions Also Mailbox Level Backups PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions I also noticed in Exchange Admin on the Mailboxes resources table it quite frequently shows the Exchange Administrative Account as the NT Acccount. Virus scanning would cause this. -Original Message- From: Osama S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 3:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions Hi, (Exchange 5.5/ SP4) my IS is suddenly growing very rapidly. I checked the integrity of the priv.edb using ISINTEG and also used ESEUTIL to do an offline defrag. The offline Defrag recovered about 1GB. Now the IS has grown again about +2GB since that defrag (2GB in 8h). When I checked the Mailbox sizes now and compared them to the mailbox sizes before the defrag I found the difference to be 27MB only and not 2GB. Also weiredm, the total of my mailboxes is only 8.5GB while my priv.edb is now 20.5GB. I have mailbox limitations on most mailboxes and none are unusually high. The biggest two mailboxes are 200MB each. I also noticed in Exchange Admin
RE: SNMP on an Exchange server.
Post the issues you are concerned about. We're not running w2k but maybe I'll get lucky. -Original Message- From: Byron Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:58 AM To: Baker, Jennifer Subject: RE: SNMP on an Exchange server. after a good bit of research and testing I've discovered there are specific issues with exch 5.5 and win2000 snmp. I was hoping that some others may have overcome these limitations [1]. Jennifer, if you have had, or know of any other specific successes related to my post I'd welcome your feedback. [1] thx for the tip martin ;) byron -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SNMP on an Exchange server. You *could* start with technet or google and then post any problems you run into. -Original Message- From: Byron Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SNMP on an Exchange server. has anyone been able to expose permon data to snmp for exch 5.5 running on win 2k? what do i need to do to get this running. thx.byron -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SNMP on an Exchange server. The one file I was referring to was the one file he was asking about. Setting this up is not *as* painful under NT4 if your data center looks like a clone farm. -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 7:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SNMP on an Exchange server. Having the mib isn't enough. You also need the MIB.BIN file and the PERFMIB.INI files as well. And they are matched - they all must come from the same build. Enabling SNMP reading of perfmon variables (at least under NT4/MSX5.5) is an ugly and somewhat convoluted process. I once tried to build a master set of files, but I gave up after finding that lots of perfmon variables collided with existing MIB variable names. I tried to fix a few by hand, but it just seemed like far too much work. -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 5:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SNMP on an Exchange server. Try this: http://www.robichaux.net/writing/exchange/goodies.html Search for MIB. -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SNMP on an Exchange server. 404 -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SNMP on an Exchange server. You only need one file. This one: http://www.robichaux.net/files/NTexchperf.mib.zip -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SNMP on an Exchange server. Good afternoon to you all: I am in the process of building a MIB file for Exchange based on the PerfMon MIB from Microsoft. My question is this; do I need to customize the MIB file for the individual configuration of the Exchange server (some have IMC's, others don't, different drive configurations, etc). OR, can I use one generic MIB file and trust that the SNMP service won't choke when I rebuild MIB.BIN. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Believe nothing because it is written in books. Believe nothing because wise men say it is so. Believe nothing because it is religious doctrine. Believe it only because you yourself know it to be true. -- Buddha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange
RE: DL Management
Autodl in the Exchange 2000 Resource Kit. http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/administration/2000/AutoDL_WP.asp -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DL Management Anybody know of utilities that allow maintenance (import/change maintenance) of Distribution Lists for W2K and E2K. Ones I found allow list management of Security groups but not Distribution Groups aka DL's for email. I am hoping to here that it is on the W2K Resource Kit _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: fix monitor
See what you did. I was actually looking for something work-related in the
archives:
HTTP Error 500-13 - Server too busy
The request cannot be processed at this time. The amount of traffic exceeds
the Web site's configured capacity.
-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 1:35 PM
To: Baker, Jennifer
Subject: RE: fix monitor
Daniel, you can see many photos of Kelly on her Website. The link is in the
archives.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 1:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: fix monitor
Kelly barefoot... bellydance... drops to floor with loud thud
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 12:34 PM
Subject: RE: fix monitor
Who, me? I belly dance, and that is generally done barefoot.
~
-K.Borndale
Network Administrator
Sybari Software
631.630.8569 -direct dial
631.439.0689 -fax
http://www.sybari.com
One man's ceiling is another man's floor
|+---
|| John Matteson|
|| [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|| Sent by: |
|| bounce-exchange-148870@ls|
|| .swynk.com |
|| |
|| |
|| 01/08/2002 01:17 PM |
|| Please respond to|
|| Exchange Discussions |
|| |
|+---
---
--|
|
|
| To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
| cc:
|
| Subject: RE: fix monitor
|
---
--|
Roger:
Has she flamencos danced on you with her high heels?
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
Believe nothing because it is written in books. Believe nothing
because wise men say it is so. Believe nothing because it is religious
doctrine.
Believe
it only because you yourself know it to be true. -- Buddha
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: fix monitor
Dude - Ms. Baker can take you. Trust me.
And please know from experience you don't want to be on her special
list.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
-Original Message-
From: Osborn, Joel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: fix monitor
Sorry, but you forgot to add your Kelly Only disclaimer, so you
can't make any threats.
If, in the future, you want to send messages for only Kelly to read,
you should add the following:
Warning: This message was intended for Kelly only. Anyone else
reading this message will die.
Of course, you should probably run it by legal and have them punch
it up a bit. But then you wouldn't have to worry about anyone else
on the list reading your messages for Kelly. 8-{)
...Joel
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 9:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: fix monitor
That was for Kelly only...now you must die.
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 7:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: fix monitor
Did someone say lightsaber?
___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 10:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: fix monitor
The real question is: Are you willing to try it?
That was for the light saber thing. love ya
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 7:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: fix monitor
Would that taste like chicken too?
~
-K.Borndale
Network Administrator
Sybari Software
631.630.8569 -direct dial
631.439.0689 -fax
http://www.sybari.com
RE: SNMP on an Exchange server.
It's the cousin that they don't talk about. There's a peaboy too, but I signed an agreement stating that I wouldn't reveal the exact location. -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 1:17 PM To: Baker, Jennifer Subject: RE: SNMP on an Exchange server. Well FOO! Why do they keep sites like this hidden. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Believe nothing because it is written in books. Believe nothing because wise men say it is so. Believe nothing because it is religious doctrine. Believe it only because you yourself know it to be true. -- Buddha -Original Message- From: Davis,Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 1:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SNMP on an Exchange server. There is some useful information at the following site: http://snmpboy.rte.microsoft.com/ -Original Message- From: Byron Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 1:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SNMP on an Exchange server. has anyone been able to expose permon data to snmp for exch 5.5 running on win 2k? what do i need to do to get this running. thx.byron -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SNMP on an Exchange server. The one file I was referring to was the one file he was asking about. Setting this up is not *as* painful under NT4 if your data center looks like a clone farm. -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 7:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SNMP on an Exchange server. Having the mib isn't enough. You also need the MIB.BIN file and the PERFMIB.INI files as well. And they are matched - they all must come from the same build. Enabling SNMP reading of perfmon variables (at least under NT4/MSX5.5) is an ugly and somewhat convoluted process. I once tried to build a master set of files, but I gave up after finding that lots of perfmon variables collided with existing MIB variable names. I tried to fix a few by hand, but it just seemed like far too much work. -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 5:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SNMP on an Exchange server. Try this: http://www.robichaux.net/writing/exchange/goodies.html Search for MIB. -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SNMP on an Exchange server. 404 -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SNMP on an Exchange server. You only need one file. This one: http://www.robichaux.net/files/NTexchperf.mib.zip -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SNMP on an Exchange server. Good afternoon to you all: I am in the process of building a MIB file for Exchange based on the PerfMon MIB from Microsoft. My question is this; do I need to customize the MIB file for the individual configuration of the Exchange server (some have IMC's, others don't, different drive configurations, etc). OR, can I use one generic MIB file and trust that the SNMP service won't choke when I rebuild MIB.BIN. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Believe nothing because it is written in books. Believe nothing because wise men say it is so. Believe nothing because it is religious doctrine. Believe it only because you yourself know it to be true. -- Buddha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http
RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
An Exchange Dogfood guy pushing Gordon (VP of Exchange Dev at the time) on a rolling toilet during the Exchange RTM parade from the Exchange building towards the Windows building. Sheesh. Isn't it obvious? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 2:31 PM To: Baker, Jennifer Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) What is that?? -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) http://www.lemson.com/lemson/pictures/exchange2000rtm/IMG_0873.JPG.html Just past this stage is too far. -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) Question: I'm probably one of the newest people on this list, and I think its great that you guys are throwing in a little fun to the thing, but how do I know when enough is enough? PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Allowing e-mail to be forwarded by rules to outsided Internet addresses
System Manager. Double-click Global Settings, and then click Internet Message Formats. In the details pane, right-click a name, and then click Properties I may have missed a step or three, but it's somewhere in there. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 1:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Allowing e-mail to be forwarded by rules to outsided Internet addresses Hi Can anyone please help. I cannot find a way to allow e-mails to be forwarded by rules to outsided Internet addresses in Exchange 2000. It seems like it is disabled by default but there is no enable box anywhere. It is used to be in IMC properties in Exchange 5.5 but there is nothing like it in SMTP properties in 2000. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MTA logs
Exchsrvr\Mtadata Mtaview is in the x2k resource kit. It's in a couple of other places as well. -Original Message- From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 3:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MTA logs In EX 5.5, Where are the MTA logs stored? Is there an application to make sense of them? -John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Built-in filter criteria for junk email (O2002)
Does anybody know where I can find the built-in criteria Outlook 2002 uses to filter junk email? I can guess what it uses (i.e.. Advertisement in the subject, etc.) but I would like to have the hidden agenda. OL2002: The Junk Sender's Rule Incorrectly Filters Messages http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN;q298734 States: This behavior occurs because a property of the message that you do not wanted filtered matches one of the built-in filter criteria for the Junk Sender's Adult Content rules. You cannot edit this built-in criteria. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
I'm brushing up on my lame Boudreaux and Thibodeaux jokes for technet 2002. -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 6:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) Only if the owner's name is Suessereaux... NB: for the uninformed - Louisianna is home to a particular group of folks called Cajuns. The vast majority of them have names ending in -eaux. - Original Message - From: Robert Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 1:54 PM Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) WOW, this list is not only informative but funny! Keep up the good work! BTW does the Hog Bog Dog jump on a Log? -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) Well then LET THE GAMES BEGIN!!! ;) PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) In that case, there will almost never be enough... There'd be a lot of engineers going postal if they weren't allowed to crack a few jokes and smile once in a while. :o) D -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) Its not the thickness of my Skin I'm worried about PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 2:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) That would depend on the thickness of your skin... :o) D -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) Question: I'm probably one of the newest people on this list, and I think its great that you guys are throwing in a little fun to the thing, but how do I know when enough is enough? PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: David Florea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 2:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) Cool. A hog bog dog. -Original Message- From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) We have bog dogs here in Louisiana. They run after hogs in the swamp. Their classy name is Catahoula Cur, they are the official Louisiana dog. Their origin goes back to DeSoto's war dogs cross bread with the red wolf. Whoo ... some kind of fierce dog. Walt Brannon University of New Orleans -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) Yea, WTF is a Bog Dog? :) ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
RE: Built-in filter criteria for junk email (O2002)
I removed the Subject contains Advertisement rule and it appears that it is accepting the changes using the turn junk gray option. -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 7:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Built-in filter criteria for junk email (O2002) Look for a file named filters.txt (probably in c:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\Office10\1033 That file contains the criteria. It's there for your edification. You cannot modify the rules. Tom. -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Built-in filter criteria for junk email (O2002) Does anybody know where I can find the built-in criteria Outlook 2002 uses to filter junk email? I can guess what it uses (i.e.. Advertisement in the subject, etc.) but I would like to have the hidden agenda. OL2002: The Junk Sender's Rule Incorrectly Filters Messages http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN;q298734 States: This behavior occurs because a property of the message that you do not wanted filtered matches one of the built-in filter criteria for the Junk Sender's Adult Content rules. You cannot edit this built-in criteria. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Containers
Not only that, but an x500 address needs to be added to the new mailbox as well. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers Martin, Once this admin uses exmerge does the new janitor have to rebuild his profile? Thanks.. I like things explained so I can understand. You did that well. Thanks again. Mike -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers Here is a favorite... Company makes containers based on departments. Joe works for Executive Management and is put in the appropriate container. Joe gets a demotion to janitorial staff. Lame Exch admin now has to Exmerge his email out, delete the account and then put it in the container for janitors. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers What nightmare do you create by using different containers? Thanks. -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers Just use the recipients container. You will create a nightmare for your self if you do anything else. -Original Message- From: Sparrow, Teresa (GOT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Containers Wanting to gather information. In a large Exchange 5.5 environment organization would you place everyone in the recipients container or make different containers for organizational levels? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Containers
So old mail sitting in other mailboxes originally from or to the old mailbox will not ndr if there is a continued conversation. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers Why does the X500 address need to be added? -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers Not only that, but an x500 address needs to be added to the new mailbox as well. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers Martin, Once this admin uses exmerge does the new janitor have to rebuild his profile? Thanks.. I like things explained so I can understand. You did that well. Thanks again. Mike -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers Here is a favorite... Company makes containers based on departments. Joe works for Executive Management and is put in the appropriate container. Joe gets a demotion to janitorial staff. Lame Exch admin now has to Exmerge his email out, delete the account and then put it in the container for janitors. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers What nightmare do you create by using different containers? Thanks. -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers Just use the recipients container. You will create a nightmare for your self if you do anything else. -Original Message- From: Sparrow, Teresa (GOT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Containers Wanting to gather information. In a large Exchange 5.5 environment organization would you place everyone in the recipients container or make different containers for organizational levels? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions
I also noticed in Exchange Admin on the Mailboxes resources table it quite frequently shows the Exchange Administrative Account as the NT Acccount. Virus scanning would cause this. -Original Message- From: Osama S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 3:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions Hi, (Exchange 5.5/ SP4) my IS is suddenly growing very rapidly. I checked the integrity of the priv.edb using ISINTEG and also used ESEUTIL to do an offline defrag. The offline Defrag recovered about 1GB. Now the IS has grown again about +2GB since that defrag (2GB in 8h). When I checked the Mailbox sizes now and compared them to the mailbox sizes before the defrag I found the difference to be 27MB only and not 2GB. Also weiredm, the total of my mailboxes is only 8.5GB while my priv.edb is now 20.5GB. I have mailbox limitations on most mailboxes and none are unusually high. The biggest two mailboxes are 200MB each. I also noticed in Exchange Admin on the Mailboxes resources table it quite frequently shows the Exchange Administrative Account as the NT Acccount. On double clicking the mailbox I can see the correct NT account in that view. What is going on? Would appreciate any help. Osama Salah _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions
Nobody on this list does that. If they do, I hope they don't admit it. -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions Also Mailbox Level Backups PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions I also noticed in Exchange Admin on the Mailboxes resources table it quite frequently shows the Exchange Administrative Account as the NT Acccount. Virus scanning would cause this. -Original Message- From: Osama S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 3:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions Hi, (Exchange 5.5/ SP4) my IS is suddenly growing very rapidly. I checked the integrity of the priv.edb using ISINTEG and also used ESEUTIL to do an offline defrag. The offline Defrag recovered about 1GB. Now the IS has grown again about +2GB since that defrag (2GB in 8h). When I checked the Mailbox sizes now and compared them to the mailbox sizes before the defrag I found the difference to be 27MB only and not 2GB. Also weiredm, the total of my mailboxes is only 8.5GB while my priv.edb is now 20.5GB. I have mailbox limitations on most mailboxes and none are unusually high. The biggest two mailboxes are 200MB each. I also noticed in Exchange Admin on the Mailboxes resources table it quite frequently shows the Exchange Administrative Account as the NT Acccount. On double clicking the mailbox I can see the correct NT account in that view. What is going on? Would appreciate any help. Osama Salah _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions
Duh I was being sarcastic. /Duh -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions I know but it is a potential cause of this problem PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions Nobody on this list does that. If they do, I hope they don't admit it. -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions Also Mailbox Level Backups PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions I also noticed in Exchange Admin on the Mailboxes resources table it quite frequently shows the Exchange Administrative Account as the NT Acccount. Virus scanning would cause this. -Original Message- From: Osama S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 3:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions Hi, (Exchange 5.5/ SP4) my IS is suddenly growing very rapidly. I checked the integrity of the priv.edb using ISINTEG and also used ESEUTIL to do an offline defrag. The offline Defrag recovered about 1GB. Now the IS has grown again about +2GB since that defrag (2GB in 8h). When I checked the Mailbox sizes now and compared them to the mailbox sizes before the defrag I found the difference to be 27MB only and not 2GB. Also weiredm, the total of my mailboxes is only 8.5GB while my priv.edb is now 20.5GB. I have mailbox limitations on most mailboxes and none are unusually high. The biggest two mailboxes are 200MB each. I also noticed in Exchange Admin on the Mailboxes resources table it quite frequently shows the Exchange Administrative Account as the NT Acccount. On double clicking the mailbox I can see the correct NT account in that view. What is going on? Would appreciate any help. Osama Salah _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Redundant OWA
If you have a farm of owa servers, it may be worth it to apply the poor man's failover method. In DNS create an alias SierraMail or whatever. Write or steal an Is-Alive script that removes dns entries for each owa server that does not respond to http or https commands every minute or so. -Original Message- From: Phillip Yan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 1:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Redundant OWA Exchange 5.5 OWA This is a dedicated OWA server that has only OWA component installed. It is set up to connect to a Exchange server. The name of the server can be found at the MSExchangeWEB registry key at: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\MSExchangeWEB\Parameter s\Server Is it possible to add one more Exchange server names there to let it be kind of redundant? In the event of failure of the primary Exchange server that the OWA is connecting to, the OWA server can pick up the secondary Exchange server. Let me know. Thank you. Phillip _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions
One of these days, Alice. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:15 PM To: Baker, Jennifer Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions Is that an auotresponse? -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions Duh I was being sarcastic. /Duh -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions I know but it is a potential cause of this problem PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions Nobody on this list does that. If they do, I hope they don't admit it. -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions Also Mailbox Level Backups PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions I also noticed in Exchange Admin on the Mailboxes resources table it quite frequently shows the Exchange Administrative Account as the NT Acccount. Virus scanning would cause this. -Original Message- From: Osama S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 3:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions Hi, (Exchange 5.5/ SP4) my IS is suddenly growing very rapidly. I checked the integrity of the priv.edb using ISINTEG and also used ESEUTIL to do an offline defrag. The offline Defrag recovered about 1GB. Now the IS has grown again about +2GB since that defrag (2GB in 8h). When I checked the Mailbox sizes now and compared them to the mailbox sizes before the defrag I found the difference to be 27MB only and not 2GB. Also weiredm, the total of my mailboxes is only 8.5GB while my priv.edb is now 20.5GB. I have mailbox limitations on most mailboxes and none are unusually high. The biggest two mailboxes are 200MB each. I also noticed in Exchange Admin on the Mailboxes resources table it quite frequently shows the Exchange Administrative Account as the NT Acccount. On double clicking the mailbox I can see the correct NT account in that view. What is going on? Would appreciate any help. Osama Salah _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: SNMP on an Exchange server.
You only need one file. This one: http://www.robichaux.net/files/NTexchperf.mib.zip -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SNMP on an Exchange server. Good afternoon to you all: I am in the process of building a MIB file for Exchange based on the PerfMon MIB from Microsoft. My question is this; do I need to customize the MIB file for the individual configuration of the Exchange server (some have IMC's, others don't, different drive configurations, etc). OR, can I use one generic MIB file and trust that the SNMP service won't choke when I rebuild MIB.BIN. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Believe nothing because it is written in books. Believe nothing because wise men say it is so. Believe nothing because it is religious doctrine. Believe it only because you yourself know it to be true. -- Buddha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SNMP on an Exchange server.
Try this: http://www.robichaux.net/writing/exchange/goodies.html Search for MIB. -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SNMP on an Exchange server. 404 -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SNMP on an Exchange server. You only need one file. This one: http://www.robichaux.net/files/NTexchperf.mib.zip -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SNMP on an Exchange server. Good afternoon to you all: I am in the process of building a MIB file for Exchange based on the PerfMon MIB from Microsoft. My question is this; do I need to customize the MIB file for the individual configuration of the Exchange server (some have IMC's, others don't, different drive configurations, etc). OR, can I use one generic MIB file and trust that the SNMP service won't choke when I rebuild MIB.BIN. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Believe nothing because it is written in books. Believe nothing because wise men say it is so. Believe nothing because it is religious doctrine. Believe it only because you yourself know it to be true. -- Buddha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
