RE: How to delete a mailbox (manually)
That sounds like a simple solution. So simple in fact that there is no way that it could work. You sir are out of line for even suggesting it. Now play nice, before I go after your other eye and mark my territory. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: How to delete a mailbox (manually) Hmmm...well, here's a stupid thought. How about highlight it and hit the delete key? I have a mailbox that has no account associated with it. When I run clean up agent I does not mark the account for deletion, how can I delete it? - John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Foreign Connector to Win2K Exchange
Where is it bombing. And how are you setting up a SMTP connector? Is that just for email routing? Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Smith, Robert A. Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 6:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Foreign Connector to Win2K Exchange We have recently setup a test AD Test environment with W2k Exchange and Exchange 5.5 we elected to choose the new environment as opposed to the join existing, we seem to be having a connection issue, we trying to create a SMTP connector from 5.5 to Win2k it keeps bombing, and complaining about rights. Any Help, Suggestions. Thanks In Advance, Robert A. Smith Systems Architect MFS Investment Management Phone: (617) 954-4975 Fax: (617) 954-7542 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How to delete a mailbox (manually)
Care to place a 100$ on that. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How to delete a mailbox (manually) I rule nothing. But I am the master of my own domain. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 4:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How to delete a mailbox (manually) Thou wouldst not even dare to commit such a treasonous act! I have in my possession an official Letter of Marque from the good and noble Prince Andy, joint ruler of this list and all that he can see from his computer chair. Now, shouldst thou wish to join young John in walking the plank, that can be arranged good sir. That sounds like a simple solution. So simple in fact that there is no way that it could work. You sir are out of line for even suggesting it. Now play nice, before I go after your other eye and mark my territory. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: How to delete a mailbox (manually) Hmmm...well, here's a stupid thought. How about highlight it and hit the delete key? I have a mailbox that has no account associated with it. When I run clean up agent I does not mark the account for deletion, how can I delete it? - John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How to delete a mailbox (manually)
I believe a copy of said letter would satisfy me. Or a mail header that did not come from the web interface. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How to delete a mailbox (manually) Thou wouldst not even dare to commit such a treasonous act! I have in my possession an official Letter of Marque from the good and noble Prince Andy, joint ruler of this list and all that he can see from his computer chair. Now, shouldst thou wish to join young John in walking the plank, that can be arranged good sir. That sounds like a simple solution. So simple in fact that there is no way that it could work. You sir are out of line for even suggesting it. Now play nice, before I go after your other eye and mark my territory. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: How to delete a mailbox (manually) Hmmm...well, here's a stupid thought. How about highlight it and hit the delete key? I have a mailbox that has no account associated with it. When I run clean up agent I does not mark the account for deletion, how can I delete it? - John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Foreign Connector to Win2K Exchange
We may just have to go Nuclear over that one. One cannot pick on Fare William of Canada. That is just not allowed. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Foreign Connector to Win2K Exchange So, good William... Art thou saying by trying to get me to reply from my original account, that thou canst not determine who I am? I believe this would be an admission on your part that thy Exchange Guru status is indeed in jeopardy, as our own dear Dr. Dogg has already solved that puzzle. I believe the Dr. has a squire position open, should you require some tutelage. ;o) Do you have the correct permissions on the Configuration container and the IMS? William -Original Message- From: Smith, Robert A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Foreign Connector to Win2K Exchange My apologize for the Non-Technical terms. We are trying to setup a SMTP Connector on Exchange 5.5 to connect to the Exchange 2000 server, When we go to create the connection we get an error message stating Insufficient Access Rights. In trying to debug the issue we have giving the Service account full control. I have supplied the error below. Error: ID No: DS_E_Insufficent_Access_Rights You do not have the permissions to complete this operation. Thank you for any assistance, Bob Smith -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 4:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Foreign Connector to Win2K Exchange I suspect the Captain has no choice since he ransacked his server room in a drunken fit and destroyed his mail server. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 3:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Foreign Connector to Win2K Exchange Bombing and complaining aren't very technical terms, so you might only get good answers from some chicken captain who chooses to use the lyris web interface. Is this Exchange5.5 to Exchange2000 or one Exchange5.5 to another Exchange5.5 (assuming different sites, and same org)? William _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MSX5.5 hacked
You have but one Choice, Reformat the server. There is no way to be 100% sure that you have cleaned this. I am not joking. Be sure to search for any good Warez before you reformat. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bravo, Liliana Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 9:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MSX5.5 hacked Importance: High HI all MSX5.5/SP4 We have found ftp1.exe, nc.exe and cmd1.exe in c:\inetpub also nc.exe and ftp1.exe are running in memory. After reading our logfiles those files are there since Feb 24. Does anybody know what kind of hack is that and how to get red of those whitout causing any post-hack attack. Tia -er _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MSX5.5 hacked
Your SERVER was hacked Period it needs to be reformatted. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Durkee, Peter Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 10:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MSX5.5 hacked It's not exactly fair to say that Exchange was hacked. Inetpub is part of IIS, not Exchange. -Peter -Original Message- From: Milton R. Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 10:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MSX5.5 hacked You have but one Choice, Reformat the server. There is no way to be 100% sure that you have cleaned this. I am not joking. Be sure to search for any good Warez before you reformat. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bravo, Liliana Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 9:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MSX5.5 hacked Importance: High HI all MSX5.5/SP4 We have found ftp1.exe, nc.exe and cmd1.exe in c:\inetpub also nc.exe and ftp1.exe are running in memory. After reading our logfiles those files are there since Feb 24. Does anybody know what kind of hack is that and how to get red of those whitout causing any post-hack attack. Tia -er _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Service Pack 2 Problem
Now! I really have a taste for some Pretzel bread... Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Service Pack 2 Problem :;high five:: -Original Message- From: Milton R. Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Service Pack 2 Problem That is an understatement. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 9:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Service Pack 2 Problem I'm not part of the solution. I'm part of the problem -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Service Pack 2 Problem Yea if your not going to help why don't you just crawl back into your hole -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Service Pack 2 Problem Fdisk Format c: /u Put in Windows 95 CD D:\win95\setup.exe -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 9:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Service Pack 2 Problem Could you walk me though how you did this? -Chris -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Maclaren, Andrew Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 9:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Service Pack 2 Problem I had a pretty similar thing and re-doing setup /domainprep solved the problem. Some of the permissions needed by the server had mysteriously gone missing after the sp2 install. Andrew -- From: Christopher Hummert[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 11 March 2002 16:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Service Pack 2 Problem So I updated Exchange 2000 to SP2 and now the Metabase won't load up. Anyone else have this problem? I'm getting 3 errors in the log file and here they are: Here are the 3 errors I'm receiving Metabase Update agent failed to start. Error code is 80040a01. Event 1002 MSExchangeMU The Metabase Update service failed to start, error '80040a01'. Event 9004 MSExchangeSA Unexpected error An unknown error has occurred. ID no: 80040a01 Microsoft Exchange System Attendant occurred. Event 1005 MSExchangeSA This is for a client that I do work for every once in a great while. They installed Exchange 2000 themselves and I'm not sure if they did it correctly but it's been working for a long time. If anyone can help me here I would appreciate it. Thanks Chris Hummert Network Administrator - Albany Agency of Insurance Webmaster for Noghri.net http://www.noghri.net MS Beta tester ID #: 388366 Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contacts us. - from Calvin and Hobbes _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: deleting mail
Send out an email to all users, telling them to delete this message. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 10:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: deleting mail Hello Is there a way of deleting a specific email recieved by some users. There was an email that a lot of users got of gambling and casinos. i just want to know if there is a way of deleting that message from peoples mailbox through administrator. I am using exchange 5.5 sp3 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: deleting mail
I'm not part of the solution. I'm part of the problem - Martin Blackstone March 11 Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: deleting mail Yea if your not going to help why don't you just crawl back into your hole -Original Message- From: Milton R. Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: deleting mail Send out an email to all users, telling them to delete this message. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 10:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: deleting mail Hello Is there a way of deleting a specific email recieved by some users. There was an email that a lot of users got of gambling and casinos. i just want to know if there is a way of deleting that message from peoples mailbox through administrator. I am using exchange 5.5 sp3 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: FREE HOT XXX EMAIL ADMINS!!! ADULTS ONLY!!!
My dog ate them.. Sorry. Who wants to follow him around with the baggy? Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Matteson Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 8:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: FREE HOT XXX EMAIL ADMINS!!! ADULTS ONLY!!! Alright, who hid Chris's medications? John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys! *** WARNING: Unencrypted electronic mail is not secure and may not be authentic. If you have any doubts as to the contents of this e-mail, please telephone the Geac representative who appears to be the sender to confirm the validity of this communication . NOTE: This electronic transmission is intended only for those to whom it is addressed. It may contain information that is confidential and/or privileged by law. Any claim to privilege is not waived or lost by reason of mistaken transmission of this information. If you are not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivery to the intended recipient, you must not review, distribute, copy or make any use of this transmission. In such case, please notify the sender by return e-mail and destroy all copies of same. *** -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 4:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FREE HOT XXX EMAIL ADMINS!!! ADULTS ONLY!!! Hi! My name is Chris and I want to tell you all about what I've got under my pink sundress! I've done a brick-level backup of my Private Information Store and run file-level antivirus scanning on my M: drive, so you know I've been *very bad*!![1] [1] Anything else I can do for you Dean? [2] [2] Sorry for the spam folks. ;) -- Chris Scharff The Mail Resource Center http://www.Mail-Resources.com The Home Page for Mail Administrators. Software pick of the month: EasyDNS http://www.easydns.com Exchange FAQs: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exchange.htm _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Gota read Q article
That is a very good Q, but not I would recommend to the same person who needs to see the DR white paper, as that is normally a beginners document. And this a bit more advanced. But very good Q non the less. Thanks for sharing. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Leeann McCallum Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2002 1:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Gota read Q article Q314917 should be included as a must read along with Disaster Recovery dox. I've been looking for something like this for ages. Rgds, NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Routing SMTP
The virtual SMTP server will work with no configuration at all. It will create a connector [1] on demand, per site. Then remove the connector after a certain time. Works very well. So if you send email to joe.com and bob.com your Virtual SMTP server will create 2 connectors one for each. Then remove them after a short period of time. [1] A connector is what you can create in the routing group. They are the same thing. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of RB Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2002 1:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Routing SMTP David, this is excellent and the way I hoped I could do it. Many Many Many thanks. I do have one question regarding this. In exchange 2000 there are two types of smtp connector, one uses the smtp service from IIS in Win2k known as the Default SMTP virtual server (found under servername\protocols) and the other the more traditional smtp connector (found under first routing groups\connectors). I have had recomendations that I should use the IIS SMTP connector. I suspect this is due to scalability. My question is this, how do I use (if at all) the default SMTP virtual server from IIS when using multiple smtp connectors in the manner you recommend. I obviously want to ensure routing works and am concerned about this virtual smtp connector. Would it interfere with this set up? Do I just stop the service or do I have to configure it in any particular way? Regards RB _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Requesting data from Microsoft Exchange
Nope this is a separate bar. What kind of server states do you have? Is it being beat up? Is this a large mail box? Are you running a good hub / switch stack in the office? Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Joyce, Louis Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 6:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Requesting data from Microsoft Exchange Is it the same progress bar that pops up when you press F5 in Outlook XP? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 February 2002 14:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Requesting data from Microsoft Exchange I am running Windows 2000 with Exchange 2000, both with SP2. The clients are running Office XP. It seems that periodically a message pop up that says Requesting data from Microsoft Exchange and a progress bar slowly moves. I pretty much need to wait for this to finish. It has been happening quite a bit to one of my users. He does have a large contact list, but is still under the 100M limit of his mailbox. Is the message normal or do I really have a network connectivity issue? Seems strange that multiple people plugged into multiple ports on a 100mb switch would be having this issue. Any insight is appreciated. Thanks -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Requesting data from Microsoft Exchange
Network and server related from what I have seen. Mail box size does not seem to matter. This message has appeared on my screen from a 10,000 message or 2 message mail box. Only seem to get them when the mail box is first opened. My hopes are that the 10 meg back bone that will be replaced next week will get ride of this problem. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Vincent Avallone Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 6:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Requesting data from Microsoft Exchange Still investigating the server states (not sure how to check it yet) The mailbox is ~40mb and he is on a 10/100 hub. First thing I am going to do is put him on the switch. I guess these messages are most likely network related? -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 9:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Requesting data from Microsoft Exchange Nope this is a separate bar. What kind of server states do you have? Is it being beat up? Is this a large mail box? Are you running a good hub / switch stack in the office? Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Joyce, Louis Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 6:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Requesting data from Microsoft Exchange Is it the same progress bar that pops up when you press F5 in Outlook XP? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 February 2002 14:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Requesting data from Microsoft Exchange I am running Windows 2000 with Exchange 2000, both with SP2. The clients are running Office XP. It seems that periodically a message pop up that says Requesting data from Microsoft Exchange and a progress bar slowly moves. I pretty much need to wait for this to finish. It has been happening quite a bit to one of my users. He does have a large contact list, but is still under the 100M limit of his mailbox. Is the message normal or do I really have a network connectivity issue? Seems strange that multiple people plugged into multiple ports on a 100mb switch would be having this issue. Any insight is appreciated. Thanks -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC 2002: Predictions of a psychic dog
Well as a matter of fact I do, but this did not come from me. Neither did this. http://www.oracle.com I thought they were unbreakable?? Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Joyce, Louis Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 8:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC 2002: Predictions of a psychic dog Who is the psychic dog? Does Milton have a crystal ball next to his monitor or something? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 30 January 2002 16:40 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC 2002: Predictions of a psychic dog Only 3 days? Oh well, at least I can make this one! -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 5:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MEC 2002: Predictions of a psychic dog I bet you all wish you had a psychic dog consultant... well, actually I'll be happy to rent out mine. $12.95 per question and I believe he accepts PayPaw. MEC 2002: Anaheim, CA in October http://www.mail-resources.com/modules.php?op=modloadname=Newsfile=arti cle sid=126mode=order=0 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC 2002: Predictions of a psychic dog
That works much better for us. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 9:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC 2002: Predictions of a psychic dog Milton is the Psycho dogg -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 8:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC 2002: Predictions of a psychic dog Who is the psychic dog? Does Milton have a crystal ball next to his monitor or something? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 30 January 2002 16:40 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC 2002: Predictions of a psychic dog Only 3 days? Oh well, at least I can make this one! -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 5:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MEC 2002: Predictions of a psychic dog I bet you all wish you had a psychic dog consultant... well, actually I'll be happy to rent out mine. $12.95 per question and I believe he accepts PayPaw. MEC 2002: Anaheim, CA in October http://www.mail-resources.com/modules.php?op=modloadname=Newsfile=arti cle sid=126mode=order=0 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SPAM Blocking List
I have dont have one of those, but I do have this Really cool green bridge in the Pacific northwest for sale. Real cheap. How do you list something that changes on a hourly basis? Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hooks, Tim Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 8:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SPAM Blocking List Does anyone out there have a list they would be willing to post of domains or email addresses you block to keep out spam? Thanks in advance. Timothy J. Hooks, MCSE KBHR Columbus, Ohio _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 and relay
Prove it.. Give me the name of the customer. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jean-Francois Bourdeau Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 6:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 and relay Hi My customer Exchange 2000 server is properly configure to not relay email from external users and is relaying email... Anyone had this problem ? JF _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: LoudPC
I agree, That is how I am right now sitting in my living room, working on my Work Pc just like I was there. Windows XP Ts session. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kevin Miller Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: LoudPC There is one solution for remote home access of your work pc in my world Windows XP. This loudpc thing is nothing compared to that. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Did I just say that out loud? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: LoudPC Sometimes your friendly neighbourhood CFO will read an ad [1]. And because the ad says something can be done like 'access your work PC from anywhere' [2] then it should be done. Ignoring the spelling of 'compared': www.loudpc.com/what-is/comparisons/exchange.htm Has anyone here played with this product? William [1] That's how we got our Red Hat Linux box. [2] Or your home PC from work [3] [3] gotomypc.com blocked at the proxy [4] [4] High-5! [5] [5] Hi Sherry _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE:[idea] Antivirus Suite recommendations
I think once a week we need to post a list of links to the faq that answer: AV, Backup, moving a server, upgrading, and why not to run eseutil. Then we could have more time to answer real questions that dont get asked 3 times a day. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Antivirus Suite recommendations You're not buying the product. You get a term license for its use. Same with Antigen. - Original Message - From: Matt Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:14 PM Subject: RE: Antivirus Suite recommendations I'm noting that CDW does have the NeaTSuite package for 250 users listed at under $8000. This is certainly a bit cheaper than NAI's package, however, what is Trend's licensing like? NAI wants you to re-license every two years. How about Trend? Is it similar? Maybe I'll get lucky and they only want you to buy it ONCE? -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus Suite recommendations ...and they do have the funniest radio ads. I sympathize on your situation with NAI. We saw a similar price increase from them while actually reducing the number of nodes. I looked at it as a good excuse to get some good software, Antigen in our case. -Peter -Original Message- From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus Suite recommendations So far CDW has been pretty good to me. I've usually received product from them within a couple days of submitting a PO to them. Again, not necessarily the cheapest place around, but ease of ordering and service are still a big part of why I decide to purchase from them. -Original Message- From: Joel Musheno [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus Suite recommendations And they have gotten parts to me next day even when I ordered at 5. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus Suite recommendations CDW...Not exactly the low cost specialists, but they always have what I am searching for on a moments notice. -Original Message- From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus Suite recommendations Most of the time, yes. The quotes I got for NAI's suite were supposedly at a 42% discount, but wre still winding up at around $86 a pop. That's far too much for us to be paying. I've been told that using one set of products on the desktop and anotehr on the servers is a good idea, as one product may catch things that anothr does not. That seems like a sound idea. So, maybe my solution ought to be to look at Trend for the servers and keep things simple for my users and stick with McAfee on the desktops (so they won't freak out, which they so often do with anything new). BTW, where did you find that cost estimate? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus Suite recommendations I found 150 Users, $4500 Don't you guys get some kind of discount, like schools? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus Suite recommendations 100 users is about 3300 list. Yes, it is all centrally managed. The server DL's that Dats, etc and then distributes them out. I dotn think you will find a more reliable suite of products. Every one of them is awesome. -Original Message- From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus Suite recommendations Martin, since I have no experience with Trend, I assume that there are similar methods for updating workstations with the latest virus definitions and engine upgrades? Is the cost reasonable? Unfortunately, Ohio libraries (like us) are losing money this year due to state budget cuts. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus Suite recommendations Well, for Exchange AV, Trend and Antigen are THE names. For a suite, I would definitely go with Trend. -Original Message- From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL
RE: [idea] Antivirus Suite recommendations
Been around for a few years. This list is for a number of people personal therapy. While Ripping on the guy that says Bricks with archserv are the only way to go is super entertaining. Good point. Never mind. Bring on someone to rip up. Going back to my movie now. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hunter, Lori Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: [idea] Antivirus Suite recommendations LOL! Clearly you haven't been here as long as those of us who are now thoroughly jaded. Why do you think we revel in being sarcastic smartasses?!? At least it's a skill we can hone while typing out the same answers over and over again. -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE:[idea] Antivirus Suite recommendations I think once a week we need to post a list of links to the faq that answer: AV, Backup, moving a server, upgrading, and why not to run eseutil. Then we could have more time to answer real questions that don't get asked 3 times a day. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Antivirus Suite recommendations You're not buying the product. You get a term license for its use. Same with Antigen. - Original Message - From: Matt Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:14 PM Subject: RE: Antivirus Suite recommendations I'm noting that CDW does have the NeaTSuite package for 250 users listed at under $8000. This is certainly a bit cheaper than NAI's package, however, what is Trend's licensing like? NAI wants you to re-license every two years. How about Trend? Is it similar? Maybe I'll get lucky and they only want you to buy it ONCE? -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus Suite recommendations ...and they do have the funniest radio ads. I sympathize on your situation with NAI. We saw a similar price increase from them while actually reducing the number of nodes. I looked at it as a good excuse to get some good software, Antigen in our case. -Peter -Original Message- From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus Suite recommendations So far CDW has been pretty good to me. I've usually received product from them within a couple days of submitting a PO to them. Again, not necessarily the cheapest place around, but ease of ordering and service are still a big part of why I decide to purchase from them. -Original Message- From: Joel Musheno [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus Suite recommendations And they have gotten parts to me next day even when I ordered at 5. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus Suite recommendations CDW...Not exactly the low cost specialists, but they always have what I am searching for on a moments notice. -Original Message- From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus Suite recommendations Most of the time, yes. The quotes I got for NAI's suite were supposedly at a 42% discount, but wre still winding up at around $86 a pop. That's far too much for us to be paying. I've been told that using one set of products on the desktop and anotehr on the servers is a good idea, as one product may catch things that anothr does not. That seems like a sound idea. So, maybe my solution ought to be to look at Trend for the servers and keep things simple for my users and stick with McAfee on the desktops (so they won't freak out, which they so often do with anything new). BTW, where did you find that cost estimate? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus Suite recommendations I found 150 Users, $4500 Don't you guys get some kind of discount, like schools? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus Suite recommendations 100 users is about 3300 list. Yes, it is all centrally managed. The server DL's that Dats, etc and then distributes
RE: [idea] Antivirus Suite recommendations
same product new name.. They think they can make more managers buy it and force it on their IT people.. New name Same Crap. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 1:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: [idea] Antivirus Suite recommendations I'll bite. I saw a CA commercial on TV, it was advertising a new Backup software for them (forgot the name). If one product doesn't always work? sell another? to help out. -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 4:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: [idea] Antivirus Suite recommendations Been around for a few years. This list is for a number of people personal therapy. While Ripping on the guy that says Bricks with archserv are the only way to go is super entertaining. Good point. Never mind. Bring on someone to rip up. Going back to my movie now. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hunter, Lori Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: [idea] Antivirus Suite recommendations LOL! Clearly you haven't been here as long as those of us who are now thoroughly jaded. Why do you think we revel in being sarcastic smartasses?!? At least it's a skill we can hone while typing out the same answers over and over again. -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE:[idea] Antivirus Suite recommendations I think once a week we need to post a list of links to the faq that answer: AV, Backup, moving a server, upgrading, and why not to run eseutil. Then we could have more time to answer real questions that don't get asked 3 times a day. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Antivirus Suite recommendations You're not buying the product. You get a term license for its use. Same with Antigen. - Original Message - From: Matt Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:14 PM Subject: RE: Antivirus Suite recommendations I'm noting that CDW does have the NeaTSuite package for 250 users listed at under $8000. This is certainly a bit cheaper than NAI's package, however, what is Trend's licensing like? NAI wants you to re-license every two years. How about Trend? Is it similar? Maybe I'll get lucky and they only want you to buy it ONCE? -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus Suite recommendations ...and they do have the funniest radio ads. I sympathize on your situation with NAI. We saw a similar price increase from them while actually reducing the number of nodes. I looked at it as a good excuse to get some good software, Antigen in our case. -Peter -Original Message- From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus Suite recommendations So far CDW has been pretty good to me. I've usually received product from them within a couple days of submitting a PO to them. Again, not necessarily the cheapest place around, but ease of ordering and service are still a big part of why I decide to purchase from them. -Original Message- From: Joel Musheno [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus Suite recommendations And they have gotten parts to me next day even when I ordered at 5. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus Suite recommendations CDW...Not exactly the low cost specialists, but they always have what I am searching for on a moments notice. -Original Message- From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus Suite recommendations Most of the time, yes. The quotes I got for NAI's suite were supposedly at a 42% discount, but wre still winding up at around $86 a pop. That's far too much for us to be paying. I've been told that using one set of products on the desktop and anotehr on the servers is a good idea, as one product may catch things that anothr does not. That seems like a sound idea. So, maybe my solution ought to be to look at Trend for the servers
RE: [idea] Antivirus Suite recommendations
This happens once every 3.2 days. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Joel Musheno Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 1:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: [idea] Antivirus Suite recommendations Wasn't there a big discussion about CA software culminating in that it sucked a few days back? -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 4:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: [idea] Antivirus Suite recommendations I'll bite. I saw a CA commercial on TV, it was advertising a new Backup software for them (forgot the name). If one product doesn't always work? sell another? to help out. -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 4:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: [idea] Antivirus Suite recommendations Been around for a few years. This list is for a number of people personal therapy. While Ripping on the guy that says Bricks with archserv are the only way to go is super entertaining. Good point. Never mind. Bring on someone to rip up. Going back to my movie now. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hunter, Lori Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: [idea] Antivirus Suite recommendations LOL! Clearly you haven't been here as long as those of us who are now thoroughly jaded. Why do you think we revel in being sarcastic smartasses?!? At least it's a skill we can hone while typing out the same answers over and over again. -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE:[idea] Antivirus Suite recommendations I think once a week we need to post a list of links to the faq that answer: AV, Backup, moving a server, upgrading, and why not to run eseutil. Then we could have more time to answer real questions that don't get asked 3 times a day. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Antivirus Suite recommendations You're not buying the product. You get a term license for its use. Same with Antigen. - Original Message - From: Matt Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:14 PM Subject: RE: Antivirus Suite recommendations I'm noting that CDW does have the NeaTSuite package for 250 users listed at under $8000. This is certainly a bit cheaper than NAI's package, however, what is Trend's licensing like? NAI wants you to re-license every two years. How about Trend? Is it similar? Maybe I'll get lucky and they only want you to buy it ONCE? -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus Suite recommendations ...and they do have the funniest radio ads. I sympathize on your situation with NAI. We saw a similar price increase from them while actually reducing the number of nodes. I looked at it as a good excuse to get some good software, Antigen in our case. -Peter -Original Message- From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus Suite recommendations So far CDW has been pretty good to me. I've usually received product from them within a couple days of submitting a PO to them. Again, not necessarily the cheapest place around, but ease of ordering and service are still a big part of why I decide to purchase from them. -Original Message- From: Joel Musheno [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus Suite recommendations And they have gotten parts to me next day even when I ordered at 5. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus Suite recommendations CDW...Not exactly the low cost specialists, but they always have what I am searching for on a moments notice. -Original Message- From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus Suite recommendations Most of the time, yes. The quotes I got for NAI's suite were supposedly at a 42% discount, but wre still winding up at around $86 a pop. That's far too much for us to be paying. I've been told that using one set of products on the desktop
RE: System Manager for XP Pro?
There are all kinds of people listening to this list. Look for more functionality in the final release of .net server. until then the TS option is about all that is really supported Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Fred W. Macondray Jr. Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 12:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System Manager for XP Pro? Thanks for all the replies. I may wait until it's supported. The reason I want to do this is less to get the Exchange System Manager as I do use TSvcs, but to add the Exchange functionality to the Active Directory Users and Computers that was installed by the adminpak.msi beta 3. Anyone from MS on this list. Anyone from MS on this list and listening ? :) Thanks All, Fred -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 5:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System Manager for XP Pro? Terminal server is the answer. Go use it. Don't bother with it on your WS. With terminal server you can get to it from anywhere. Much more functional then having it installed on your WS./ Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dan Bartley Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 5:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System Manager for XP Pro? Hmm. I installed the adminpak.msi from Windows.NET beta3 on XP Pro and I still get the You need to have Windows 2000 Administration Tools error when I try to install Exchange2000 ESM. I even did it 3 times. Am I missing something? Dan Bartley [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 20:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System Manager for XP Pro? Say that three times fast: Deploy the adminpak.msi from Windows.net beta3 on XP Pro, then install the Exchange2000 ESM Deploy the adminpak.msi from Windows.net beta3 on XP Pro, then install the Exchange2000 ESM Deploy the adminpak.msi from Windows.net beta3 on XP Pro, then install the Exchange2000 ESM -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 8:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System Manager for XP Pro? I believe this is currently unsupported. Some people have successfully deployed the adminpak.msi from Windows.net beta3 on XP Pro, then installed the Exchange2000 ESM, but this is also not supported. William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ -Original Message- From: Fred W. Macondray Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: System Manager for XP Pro? Hi All, Anyone know if there is a version of Exchange Manager for Windows XP Professional? I tried doing the install from the Exchange 2000 CD but it warns of needing the Windows 2000 Support Tools. I do have the Admin Tools for XP installed, but obviously that's not enough. Thanks, Fred Fred Macondray Systems Administrator Virtual Purchase Card, Inc. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http
RE: exchange discovery
HUH??? Why would you want to do this? Please explain the why. So that I can figure out if you need this knowledge. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Darisi, Raghava Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 4:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: exchange discovery hello iam working on a project where i need to discover all the exchange servers(both 2000 and 5.5) in the whole network. i tried out this by querying to MX records on DNS but this is not enough bcoz MX records give only the server names listed. can anyone guide me the way where i can find all the servers on the network like broadcasting a RPC call on to the network for some services advertised by the exchange servers regards raghava _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: exchange discovery
I would just look in Exchange manager, or at the services on the servers, maybe look at the network documentation, best bet would be to ask one of the network admins. If you dont have admin rights on the network, what project would require you to know of all the Exchange servers? I try to avoid teaching how to Hack. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Darisi, Raghava Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 8:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exchange discovery hello Milton I couldnt find an other way of getting all the servers running echange in my network..i even dont have administrative rights on the network..this is juss a blind thought, but if u have any better way of doing this please explain me...' raghava -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 9:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exchange discovery HUH??? Why would you want to do this? Please explain the why. So that I can figure out if you need this knowledge. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Darisi, Raghava Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 4:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: exchange discovery hello iam working on a project where i need to discover all the exchange servers(both 2000 and 5.5) in the whole network. i tried out this by querying to MX records on DNS but this is not enough bcoz MX records give only the server names listed. can anyone guide me the way where i can find all the servers on the network like broadcasting a RPC call on to the network for some services advertised by the exchange servers regards raghava _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Data Recovery
Ontrack ezrestore. Worth the 2k it costs for the professional version. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Morgan, Joshua Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 7:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Data Recovery Does anyone know of any Data Recovery tools? To find Data that was deleted off a hard drive less than 24 hours ago? Joshua Morgan PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] One is glad to be of service --Robin Williams (Bicentennial Man)-- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition
REALLY depends on what you have, need and who are you. The last big one I did. 4000 users in at all kinds of sites. 1. 20 minutes. I was in the mood to upgrade something 2. Ad took a few hours, Ex2k is stuck in politics 3. used all existing Dell hardware 4. Took me and just me 5. Software assurance thing at this place, so it was free. Usage my very depending on what you want, what you have and how big you plan. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Blunt, James H (Jim) Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 4:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition Folks, Let's ask a couple of questions, based on the premise of Money isn't an option: 1. What's the absolute fastest amount of time that it would take to plan an AD/E2K structure? 2. How long would it take to implement an AD/E2K structure? 3. What kind of hardware do we need to have in place before we do this? 4. How many personnel will it take? 5. Roughly what can we expect the cost to be? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition
Must be some great business need for Ad, Like management promised to have a product implemented that required it, not knowing of the requirement. Something Dilbertish. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition I concur. But, he did sayabsolute fastest time.. and provided no details. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 2:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition As others have intimated, it is not an easy assessment through a forum like this. As Ed stopped short of saying, perhaps a call to Compaq might be in order. Do they do estimates? I will almost always favour the patient, methodical, testing and retesting, documenting mode. I would deploy a two-step strategy there. The AD deployment first. Connecting Exchange5.5 using ADC. Then plan E2K. But that's me. There's that axiom about: Cheap, Fast, Well done: You get to choose two. William -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 2:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition William, We are looking at roughly 100 total servers in the domain. Right now in our current NT 4.0 domain, we have our server room with the majority of our servers, about a dozen servers 45 miles away, connected by a fiber backbone. Approximately a dozen T-1's terminate in our server room for various locations on this site and we have (I believe) 3 microwave connections coming off of the end of the backbone, 45 miles away. All connections between servers is either fiber or 100 mbps switched. Couple of Linux print servers with a dozen people on them, sitting at the end of a couple of T-1's. Jim -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 2:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition Still depends. Number of users? Number of servers? Locations (different cities?)? Connectivity between servers? Etc... I think it is a two step process. AD, then E2K. AD should have a disaster recovery plan in place and tested before the next step. William -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition Folks, Let's ask a couple of questions, based on the premise of Money isn't an option: 1. What's the absolute fastest amount of time that it would take to plan an AD/E2K structure? 2. How long would it take to implement an AD/E2K structure? 3. What kind of hardware do we need to have in place before we do this? 4. How many personnel will it take? 5. Roughly what can we expect the cost to be? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unbreakable Oracle 9i
I believe there product and claims are insane. Search the archives on this one. We discussed it at length a month or so ago when this product was first announced. Geography and band width sometimes dictates more servers. Very few companies have 100,000 plus employees, but oracle seems to think in this ad that everyone does? 10,000 people on one server X 50 megs a user = 500 gigs of data. Could you imagine backing up and restoring that in a timely manor? I could go one for hours. Bottom line this is an insane product that will disappear soon. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jim Brady Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 9:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Unbreakable Oracle 9i Anyone have an opinions on Oracle's claim to make exchange unbreakable (ie replace the backend with 9i (100 exchange = 1 oracle) and keep the clients on Outlook? Thanks ... Jim Here's the blurb ... -- Save Millions and Save Headaches Oracle9iAS Unified Messaging - combining email, voicemail, fax - is the most cost effective, reliable and secure messaging system. All messages are stored in a single repository - Oracle9i Database, with central management in the data center. Save $$$ on hardware, software and administration with unified e-mail, voicemail and fax. Use Real Application Clusters for a highly scalable, available, and fault tolerant enterprise messaging system. Enjoy security of messages stored in Oracle's database - backed by 14 international security evaluations Oracle Customers Save $$$ with Consolidation Oracle saved $13 million in the first year and $11 million per subsequent year by consolidating 97 servers into 2. Landis ICT Group migrated from 44 Exchange servers to one Oracle email server, saving $900K on fixed costs and $1.1 million annually on administration. Oracle saved $100K by implementing unified messaging for 1000 users in a new office instead of purchasing a conventional voicemail system. Make Microsoft Email Unbreakable You love your Microsoft Email - but you're worried about security and reliability. Simply keep Microsoft Outlook and replace your Microsoft Exchange servers - up to 100 of them - with one Oracle Database Server. Suddenly Microsoft Email is unbreakable. The only change the users notice is that their e-mail is faster and always available. Oracle Consulting's Email Migration Service provides all the assistance you need to migrate from Microsoft Exchange to Oracle9i. - _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unbreakable Oracle 9i
So all what they are really suggesting is a send mail product with an over blown database. Gee that excites me. Somehow I have come to rely a bit more on the functionality of a groupware product. If all I want is email then Send mail would be much cheaper. I still think Oracle is insane. Or maybe it is just Ellison and his wild claims that are insane. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Lemson Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unbreakable Oracle 9i I believe they're suggesting that you use POP or IMAP and SMTP as the protocols from Outlook to the server. Of course, you could do the same with Exchange, but look at the functionality difference. David -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unbreakable Oracle 9i I believe there product and claims are insane. Search the archives on this one. We discussed it at length a month or so ago when this product was first announced. Geography and band width sometimes dictates more servers. Very few companies have 100,000 plus employees, but oracle seems to think in this ad that everyone does? 10,000 people on one server X 50 megs a user = 500 gigs of data. Could you imagine backing up and restoring that in a timely manor? I could go one for hours. Bottom line this is an insane product that will disappear soon. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jim Brady Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 9:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Unbreakable Oracle 9i Anyone have an opinions on Oracle's claim to make exchange unbreakable (ie replace the backend with 9i (100 exchange = 1 oracle) and keep the clients on Outlook? Thanks ... Jim Here's the blurb ... -- Save Millions and Save Headaches Oracle9iAS Unified Messaging - combining email, voicemail, fax - is the most cost effective, reliable and secure messaging system. All messages are stored in a single repository - Oracle9i Database, with central management in the data center. Save $$$ on hardware, software and administration with unified e-mail, voicemail and fax. Use Real Application Clusters for a highly scalable, available, and fault tolerant enterprise messaging system. Enjoy security of messages stored in Oracle's database - backed by 14 international security evaluations Oracle Customers Save $$$ with Consolidation Oracle saved $13 million in the first year and $11 million per subsequent year by consolidating 97 servers into 2. Landis ICT Group migrated from 44 Exchange servers to one Oracle email server, saving $900K on fixed costs and $1.1 million annually on administration. Oracle saved $100K by implementing unified messaging for 1000 users in a new office instead of purchasing a conventional voicemail system. Make Microsoft Email Unbreakable You love your Microsoft Email - but you're worried about security and reliability. Simply keep Microsoft Outlook and replace your Microsoft Exchange servers - up to 100 of them - with one Oracle Database Server. Suddenly Microsoft Email is unbreakable. The only change the users notice is that their e-mail is faster and always available. Oracle Consulting's Email Migration Service provides all the assistance you need to migrate from Microsoft Exchange to Oracle9i. - _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http
RE: System Manager for XP Pro?
Terminal server is the answer. Go use it. Don't bother with it on your WS. With terminal server you can get to it from anywhere. Much more functional then having it installed on your WS./ Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dan Bartley Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 5:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System Manager for XP Pro? Hmm. I installed the adminpak.msi from Windows.NET beta3 on XP Pro and I still get the You need to have Windows 2000 Administration Tools error when I try to install Exchange2000 ESM. I even did it 3 times. Am I missing something? Dan Bartley [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 20:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System Manager for XP Pro? Say that three times fast: Deploy the adminpak.msi from Windows.net beta3 on XP Pro, then install the Exchange2000 ESM Deploy the adminpak.msi from Windows.net beta3 on XP Pro, then install the Exchange2000 ESM Deploy the adminpak.msi from Windows.net beta3 on XP Pro, then install the Exchange2000 ESM -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 8:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System Manager for XP Pro? I believe this is currently unsupported. Some people have successfully deployed the adminpak.msi from Windows.net beta3 on XP Pro, then installed the Exchange2000 ESM, but this is also not supported. William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ -Original Message- From: Fred W. Macondray Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: System Manager for XP Pro? Hi All, Anyone know if there is a version of Exchange Manager for Windows XP Professional? I tried doing the install from the Exchange 2000 CD but it warns of needing the Windows 2000 Support Tools. I do have the Admin Tools for XP installed, but obviously that's not enough. Thanks, Fred Fred Macondray Systems Administrator Virtual Purchase Card, Inc. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: clustering wireless
That is what happens when you use the words cluster and exchange in the same post. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tener, Richard Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 6:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: clustering wireless Is anyone seeing this message when posting to the board Trend SMEX Content Filter has detected sensitive content. Place = Exchange Discussions; ; ; Exchange Discussions Sender = Tener, Richard Subject = RE: clustering wireless Delivery Time = January 17, 2002 (Thursday) 08:46:23 Policy = Anti-Spam Action on this mail = Quarantine message Warning message from administrator: Content filter has detected a sensitive e-mail. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: clustering wireless so i should get another t1 or possible fiber line/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: clustering wireless This is just a bad idea. A cluster across a shared 11mbs link while broadcasting all your data on a product with weak encryption is just not good. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: clustering wireless
No. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tener, Richard Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 7:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: clustering wireless Is that possible though to have two exchange servers on the same netowrk so if one fails I can take the tape backup from the other server and just put the info on the other server temporarily. So if one building went on fire and the server got fried can I take the information from the tape and put it on the other server that doesnt have that info on it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: clustering wireless
Read these.. Then let us know what you think about that question. 5.5 DR white paper http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/administration/55/BackupResto re.asp 2k DR white paper http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/e2krecovery.a sp Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tener, Richard Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 7:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: clustering wireless no, a little -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: clustering wireless No. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tener, Richard Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 7:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: clustering wireless Is that possible though to have two exchange servers on the same netowrk so if one fails I can take the tape backup from the other server and just put the info on the other server temporarily. So if one building went on fire and the server got fried can I take the information from the tape and put it on the other server that doesnt have that info on it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Question
With some good programming, Or a custom mail client, sure. But why would you want to? You in the mood to tell someone to piss off and stop watching you? Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mike Carlson Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 7:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Question Is it possible to create a custom read receipt? Thanks, Mike Carlson http://www.domitianx.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
highlight
This has been a problem for me on all versions of outlook. When changing folders the highlight, to tell you what folder you are in, will stay on one folder. So I can be looking in my inbox and the highlight is in my exchange folder still. This happens to me about 2 times a day. I have to restart outlook to fix this problem. Any one have a clue what I can do to fix this? Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: highlight
You are not much help to me then.. Other then verifying that this is a real problem and not my bizarre setup. Thanks Mr. Blackstone for that. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight I never had that happen till OLXPI havent been able to stop it. -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: highlight This has been a problem for me on all versions of outlook. When changing folders the highlight, to tell you what folder you are in, will stay on one folder. So I can be looking in my inbox and the highlight is in my exchange folder still. This happens to me about 2 times a day. I have to restart outlook to fix this problem. Any one have a clue what I can do to fix this? Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: highlight
Being someone who has the links to a good 100 plus TechNet articles memorized, and a good friend of Mr. Blackstone. Trust me I have been in the TechNet. Would never post a question with out a good few hours search. I think I am offended. =] but thats ok, I would have said the same thing you had said on a different day. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Smith Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Other then verifying that this is a real problem and not my bizarre setup Actually confirming that it is not your setup can be very helpful at times. Now maybe you know you can find something on TechNet. Which is the only type of help I'd give you after a response like yours. W Hint: Don't blast the people who are willing to try to help you. -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight You are not much help to me then.. Other then verifying that this is a real problem and not my bizarre setup. Thanks Mr. Blackstone for that. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight I never had that happen till OLXPI havent been able to stop it. -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: highlight This has been a problem for me on all versions of outlook. When changing folders the highlight, to tell you what folder you are in, will stay on one folder. So I can be looking in my inbox and the highlight is in my exchange folder still. This happens to me about 2 times a day. I have to restart outlook to fix this problem. Any one have a clue what I can do to fix this? Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: highlight
sarcasmI forgot the bloody tag. /sarcasm Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight I think there was sarcasm there. -Original Message- From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Other then verifying that this is a real problem and not my bizarre setup Actually confirming that it is not your setup can be very helpful at times. Now maybe you know you can find something on TechNet. Which is the only type of help I'd give you after a response like yours. W Hint: Don't blast the people who are willing to try to help you. -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight You are not much help to me then.. Other then verifying that this is a real problem and not my bizarre setup. Thanks Mr. Blackstone for that. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight I never had that happen till OLXPI havent been able to stop it. -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: highlight This has been a problem for me on all versions of outlook. When changing folders the highlight, to tell you what folder you are in, will stay on one folder. So I can be looking in my inbox and the highlight is in my exchange folder still. This happens to me about 2 times a day. I have to restart outlook to fix this problem. Any one have a clue what I can do to fix this? Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: highlight
Not a problem. It is all in fun. In my world this list is therapy for my work day. As well as a great resource. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Smith Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Fair enough. Again my apologies for taking it so seriously. W -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Being someone who has the links to a good 100 plus TechNet articles memorized, and a good friend of Mr. Blackstone. Trust me I have been in the TechNet. Would never post a question with out a good few hours search. I think I am offended. =] but that's ok, I would have said the same thing you had said on a different day. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Smith Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Other then verifying that this is a real problem and not my bizarre setup Actually confirming that it is not your setup can be very helpful at times. Now maybe you know you can find something on TechNet. Which is the only type of help I'd give you after a response like yours. W Hint: Don't blast the people who are willing to try to help you. -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight You are not much help to me then.. Other then verifying that this is a real problem and not my bizarre setup. Thanks Mr. Blackstone for that. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight I never had that happen till OLXPI havent been able to stop it. -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: highlight This has been a problem for me on all versions of outlook. When changing folders the highlight, to tell you what folder you are in, will stay on one folder. So I can be looking in my inbox and the highlight is in my exchange folder still. This happens to me about 2 times a day. I have to restart outlook to fix this problem. Any one have a clue what I can do to fix this? Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
RE: highlight
I am the Admin you Bloody Voodoo doll clone. Any how, you are using a PST when you get this aren't you?? I know William is not. This means I have to downgrade my server back to win2k so I can install exchange on it again. Or get Sp3 beta?? M sounds like I have a mission for the day. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight That rules thing is a PITA too. You should talk to your network/email administrator and see if he can help -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight After closing with this issue the first mail dump I get does not process against my rules. No relation to the other problem, just another annoyance. You are both Store stored for your email? Maybe I should build another Exchange server just for email again instead of purging this PST file once every 3 days. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Lefkovics, William Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight I have not had this eXPerience. The hilight moves around fine in my Outlook2000 installs. I do, however, accidentally close Outlook about once a week and there is no Are you sure? question. William -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: highlight This has been a problem for me on all versions of outlook. When changing folders the highlight, to tell you what folder you are in, will stay on one folder. So I can be looking in my inbox and the highlight is in my exchange folder still. This happens to me about 2 times a day. I have to restart outlook to fix this problem. Any one have a clue what I can do to fix this? Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: highlight
Checking my background You still look just like the doll. Have you had this problem since you got the exchange server? Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight No I am not! You know I finally got an Exchange server. I do however Dean excessively. -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight I am the Admin you Bloody Voodoo doll clone. Any how, you are using a PST when you get this aren't you?? I know William is not. This means I have to downgrade my server back to win2k so I can install exchange on it again. Or get Sp3 beta?? M sounds like I have a mission for the day. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight That rules thing is a PITA too. You should talk to your network/email administrator and see if he can help -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight After closing with this issue the first mail dump I get does not process against my rules. No relation to the other problem, just another annoyance. You are both Store stored for your email? Maybe I should build another Exchange server just for email again instead of purging this PST file once every 3 days. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Lefkovics, William Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight I have not had this eXPerience. The hilight moves around fine in my Outlook2000 installs. I do, however, accidentally close Outlook about once a week and there is no Are you sure? question. William -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: highlight This has been a problem for me on all versions of outlook. When changing folders the highlight, to tell you what folder you are in, will stay on one folder. So I can be looking in my inbox and the highlight is in my exchange folder still. This happens to me about 2 times a day. I have to restart outlook to fix this problem. Any one have a clue what I can do to fix this? Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: highlight
No coke this morning you missed with that one... Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Lefkovics, William Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Mr Dogg. Is Nate your son? http://www.dogg-foundation.fr.st/ -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight After closing with this issue the first mail dump I get does not process against my rules. No relation to the other problem, just another annoyance. You are both Store stored for your email? Maybe I should build another Exchange server just for email again instead of purging this PST file once every 3 days. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Lefkovics, William Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight I have not had this eXPerience. The hilight moves around fine in my Outlook2000 installs. I do, however, accidentally close Outlook about once a week and there is no Are you sure? question. William -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: highlight This has been a problem for me on all versions of outlook. When changing folders the highlight, to tell you what folder you are in, will stay on one folder. So I can be looking in my inbox and the highlight is in my exchange folder still. This happens to me about 2 times a day. I have to restart outlook to fix this problem. Any one have a clue what I can do to fix this? Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PLEASE HELP!!!
-- Login as the Exchange service account. Do you have outlook or some Mapi client installed on the machine you are using Exmerge on? And on that machine does the default profile login with admin rights? Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Flynn Hansen Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PLEASE HELP!!! Tim, Have you read the blurb in Q284204? -Snipped from Technet- - Numerical Code: 5.4.6 Possible Cause: Categorizer forward loop detected. targetAddress attribute is set on a mailbox-enabled user. Hosting Pack: This is a common hosting configuration problem when someone creates a contact in OU1 and creates a user in OU2 with the same email address via user provisioning tool. Troubleshooting: This happens when contactA has an alternate recipient that points to contactB which then has an alternate recipient that points back to contactA. Check the contact?s alternate recipient. Check and remove targetAddress attribute from mailbox-enabled users. For hosting where you want to send mail from one user in one company (OU) to another company (OU), you should configure the following two related objects: User: SMTP proxy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact: targetAddress: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; SMTP proxy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Good luck. Flynn -Original Message- From: Tim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 3:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PLEASE HELP!!! When you try to send anyone in the company a message this is what you would receive. This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Delivery to the following recipients failed. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reporting-MTA: dns;server1.mgi Received-From-MTA: dns;server1.mgi Arrival-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 12:00:38 -0500 Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: failed Status: 5.4.6 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 3:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PLEASE HELP!!! please post the full text of the NDR -Original Message- From: Tim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 3:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PLEASE HELP!!! I'm new to the exchange world and I'm having some issues. I have a small business server at a client site running exchange. When user try and send internet mail to them they receive a Delivery Status Notification. This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Delivery to the following recipients failed. [EMAIL PROTECTED] It also contains a .DAT file which contains the following: Reporting-MTA: dns;server1.mgi Received-From-MTA: dns;server1.mgi Arrival-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 12:00:38 -0500 Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: failed Status: 5.4.6 If anyone has any thoughts on this please help. I've been in the field about 4 years and have recently got to play with exchange, Could use any help I can get!!! thanks Tim McGrath mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: highlight
That is the Fifth Bloody time today. I am going home now. Will reformat in the morning at 2am when I get back to fix that blasted router. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight It isn't unless you are a server or a female -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight I don't see how being hung is a problem. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight I have a server I am building right now that is hung. It is at Exodus, so I sent em an email to reboot it. Other than that, everything is peachy! -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight You have problems? W -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight It is total therapy. Plus it is funner to work on others problems than your own. -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Not a problem. It is all in fun. In my world this list is therapy for my work day. As well as a great resource. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Smith Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Fair enough. Again my apologies for taking it so seriously. W -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Being someone who has the links to a good 100 plus TechNet articles memorized, and a good friend of Mr. Blackstone. Trust me I have been in the TechNet. Would never post a question with out a good few hours search. I think I am offended. =] but that's ok, I would have said the same thing you had said on a different day. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Smith Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Other then verifying that this is a real problem and not my bizarre setup Actually confirming that it is not your setup can be very helpful at times. Now maybe you know you can find something on TechNet. Which is the only type of help I'd give you after a response like yours. W Hint: Don't blast the people who are willing to try to help you. -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight You are not much help to me then.. Other then verifying that this is a real problem and not my bizarre setup. Thanks Mr. Blackstone for that. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight I never had that happen till OLXPI havent been able to stop it. -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: highlight This has been a problem for me on all versions of outlook. When changing folders the highlight, to tell you what folder you are in, will stay on one folder. So I can be looking in my inbox and the highlight is in my exchange folder still. This happens to me about 2 times a day. I have to restart outlook to fix this problem. Any one have a clue what I can do to fix this? Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
RE: highlight
Are you smoking crack, drunk and on acid? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jad Mouracadé Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 4:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Sex should be banned world-wide for the next 3 generations. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul Bouzan Sent: January 14, 2002 5:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight I know, that Mr Blackstone and the Dogg-person really get my goat up with their constant references to sexual inuendo. It shouldn't be allowed! Mr Lefkovics only fuels the fire! PBB -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 January 2002 22:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight This is related. At least he said Spack it, instead of Spank it! ;o) -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Mr Blackstone, I am totally disgusted at your flagrant disregard for some decorum on this list. Would you please stick to the subject in hand i.e. Exchange Issues and not some idle banter that wastes our time. Kind regards PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 January 2002 21:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Is it XP? Did you SPack it? -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight That is the Fifth Bloody time today. I am going home now. Will reformat in the morning at 2am when I get back to fix that blasted router. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight It isn't unless you are a server or a female -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight I don't see how being hung is a problem. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight I have a server I am building right now that is hung. It is at Exodus, so I sent em an email to reboot it. Other than that, everything is peachy! -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight You have problems? W -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight It is total therapy. Plus it is funner to work on others problems than your own. -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Not a problem. It is all in fun. In my world this list is therapy for my work day. As well as a great resource. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Smith Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Fair enough. Again my apologies for taking it so seriously. W -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Being someone who has the links to a good 100 plus TechNet articles memorized, and a good friend of Mr. Blackstone. Trust me I have been in the TechNet. Would never post a question with out a good few hours search. I think I am offended. =] but that's ok, I would have said the same thing you had said on a different day. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Smith Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Other then verifying that this is a real problem and not my bizarre setup Actually confirming that it is not your setup can be very helpful at times. Now maybe you know you can find something on TechNet. Which is the only type of help I'd give you after a response like yours. W Hint: Don't blast the people who are willing to try to help you. -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight You are not much help to me then.. Other then verifying that this is a real problem and not my bizarre setup. Thanks Mr
RE: highlight
In that case. Ok go for it... Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 4:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight He meant just in Canada. -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 4:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Are you smoking crack, drunk and on acid? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jad Mouracadé Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 4:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Sex should be banned world-wide for the next 3 generations. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul Bouzan Sent: January 14, 2002 5:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight I know, that Mr Blackstone and the Dogg-person really get my goat up with their constant references to sexual inuendo. It shouldn't be allowed! Mr Lefkovics only fuels the fire! PBB -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 January 2002 22:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight This is related. At least he said Spack it, instead of Spank it! ;o) -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Mr Blackstone, I am totally disgusted at your flagrant disregard for some decorum on this list. Would you please stick to the subject in hand i.e. Exchange Issues and not some idle banter that wastes our time. Kind regards PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 January 2002 21:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Is it XP? Did you SPack it? -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight That is the Fifth Bloody time today. I am going home now. Will reformat in the morning at 2am when I get back to fix that blasted router. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight It isn't unless you are a server or a female -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight I don't see how being hung is a problem. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight I have a server I am building right now that is hung. It is at Exodus, so I sent em an email to reboot it. Other than that, everything is peachy! -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight You have problems? W -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight It is total therapy. Plus it is funner to work on others problems than your own. -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Not a problem. It is all in fun. In my world this list is therapy for my work day. As well as a great resource. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Smith Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Fair enough. Again my apologies for taking it so seriously. W -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Being someone who has the links to a good 100 plus TechNet articles memorized, and a good friend of Mr. Blackstone. Trust me I have been in the TechNet. Would never post a question with out a good few hours search. I think I am offended. =] but that's ok, I would have said the same thing you had said on a different day. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Smith Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Other then verifying that this is a real problem and not my bizarre setup Actually confirming that it is not your setup can be very helpful at times. Now maybe you know you can find
RE: Migration to Exchange 2000
Ad is the directory service for exchange 2k. As well, IIS5 SMTP Server is used for Exchange 2k. Thusly AD and win2k are required Go here and do some reading: Beginners. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q155269 http://www.exchange-mail.org/books.html http://www.swinc.com/resource/books.asp http://www.swinc.com/resource/exchange.htm http://www.microsoft.com/exchange Upgrades http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q295922 Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of kukar kothari Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 3:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Migration to Exchange 2000 Dear All, I am new to Exchange and have a couple of q's about migration to E2K. Can I build and deploy an E2k Server in NT4 domain now and eventually migrate to Windows 2000 AD domain at a later stage. Is it necessary to have Active Directory Installed in order to migrate from Exchange 55 sp4 to E2K. Thanks Kukar __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: High Physical Memory Utilization
We are Different people but we Most always agree. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization Unless Don and Dr. Dogg are the same person I do not see your relevance. I made a definitive statement (accusation). Which, in hindsight, was inappropriate. Sometimes I can be too direct. I officially apologize to Dr. Dogg for that inappropriate statement. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization You know, had you not sent out that quickie sharp comment no you don't when faced with Dr. Dogg's server specs, your opinion might hold some water. But when you start out the conversation confrontationally, basically accusing the fine doctor of lying to us all, you gets what you deserves. Your comment was not an opinion - Don's was. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization And another comment Mr. Ely. Let's keep this in mind next time you decide to flame me or someone else on the list. I'm simply giving my opinion. Acceptance is optional. I'm giving my opinion of a server spec for exchange server that in my opinion has giving me the best level of performance and least amount of headaches over a 10 year period. Whether you choose this type of hardware is irrelevant being that I'm the one stating an opinion. You have the option of lending your alternative option to the discussion. This would give the person whom made the original post more alternatives. Second, I have never claimed to be the foremost expert on Exchange Server. I am here with an open mind and willing and needing to learn just like everyone else. However, I do intend to post my opinions. Thanks for your time. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization Someone would have to be on some good drugs to over-spec a server like that. I guess we're the unfortunate bunch with actual real world budgets to work with... ;o) D -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 6:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization Ha ha ha ha LOL. Crack pipe. Nice one Don. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 January 2002 14:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization What crack pipe are you smoking out of? Those specs are way beyond what's necessary! D -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 12:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization 400 Mailboxes and 1 gig of Ram does not sound right. Your primary problem is hardware. This is my minimum recommendation for your hardware requirements. Dual Pentium III 550 + Separate Raid Controller running in Raid 5 config. (2 partitions logical) 2 Gig physical memory. 3 Gig Page File on second partition Run optimizer and move the databases and log files to 2nd partition. -Original Message- From: Frazer J Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: High Physical Memory Utilization One of my colleagues recently reinstalled a 5.5 SP4 Exchange Server on NT4 SP5 (only Exchange was reinstalled) and have noticed that the Physical Memory Utilization sits at around 99% (prior to the rebuild it was around 60%). The server has about 400 mailboxes on it and has 1Gb of physical memory and 1Gb page file. It is the same spec as 4 other servers in the site which all sit at around 60% utilization. As it is a 24x7 service we offer on our server, down time is very limited. Is there any way I can check the performance optimizer settings without stopping the store? Or are there any other pointers that anyone can think of I can check? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe
RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus
You sure? It is on my server? Wait I remember this, We had this conversation, didnt we AB? Your owners would not let you block that extension. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus Well isn't that a nice onecrap! -Original Message- From: Corney, Alan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus The virus is not in the wild yet ,The extension is htm , which is not on Martins blocking list. http://www.antivirus.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=JS_GIGGER .A _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus
That's the AB I know.. Way to go, High Five man. I was just given 2 tickets, BOX seats for tonight's Sonics game. Guess where I will be at 7:00 Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus Screw em! I just did it -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus You sure? It is on my server? Wait I remember this, We had this conversation, didn't we AB? Your owners would not let you block that extension. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus Well isn't that a nice onecrap! -Original Message- From: Corney, Alan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus The virus is not in the wild yet ,The extension is htm , which is not on Martins blocking list. http://www.antivirus.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=JS_GIGGER .A _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus
The Irish Gal Hillary gave them to me. We were planning on going, I had forgotten all about it. She came up with some other plans So they are all mine now. Going to take my son. Should be a blast, It is one of the owners Boxes Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus Lucky! Vendor give em to you? -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus That's the AB I know.. Way to go, High Five man. I was just given 2 tickets, BOX seats for tonight's Sonics game. Guess where I will be at 7:00 Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus Screw em! I just did it -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus You sure? It is on my server? Wait I remember this, We had this conversation, didn't we AB? Your owners would not let you block that extension. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus Well isn't that a nice onecrap! -Original Message- From: Corney, Alan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus The virus is not in the wild yet ,The extension is htm , which is not on Martins blocking list. http://www.antivirus.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=JS_GIGGER .A _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: High Physical Memory Utilization
You sir get an A+ star for that opinion. You can go pick 2 things from the goodie box. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of McGilligan, Sean Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization more is better I'm afraid your logic is flawed The biggest problem with Microsoft products is they have made it easy for a multiple of click and go people to install the product and hence in the real world Microsoft's name is taken down by people who don't know how to design. Hence a revised emphasize on design in Microsoft 2000 testing. And yes testing is a good and bad thing but nothing mirrors real world experience. If we are rational; MS has bought an understanding of corporate systems to the masses which has it pros and cons Just to set the record straight I came from a mainframe and unix background Anyone who designs a system for 10 years from a server prospective is in the insanity bracket. Rational: Moores Law My $0.02 Sean McGilligan -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: January 11 2002 1:02 PM Posted To: exchange Conversation: High Physical Memory Utilization Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization More is better. -Original Message- From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization Just to ask a question?. Frazer never implied any hardware except RAM. Why include the dual Pentium scenario? Windows 2000 can take advantage of SMP but Exchange 2000?. I'm interested in what Exchange can do with SMP?. Sean McGilligan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: January 10 2002 4:48 PM Posted To: exchange Conversation: High Physical Memory Utilization Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization 400 Mailboxes and 1 gig of Ram does not sound right. Your primary problem is hardware. This is my minimum recommendation for your hardware requirements. Dual Pentium III 550 + Separate Raid Controller running in Raid 5 config. (2 partitions logical) 2 Gig physical memory. 3 Gig Page File on second partition Run optimizer and move the databases and log files to 2nd partition. -Original Message- From: Frazer J Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: High Physical Memory Utilization One of my colleagues recently reinstalled a 5.5 SP4 Exchange Server on NT4 SP5 (only Exchange was reinstalled) and have noticed that the Physical Memory Utilization sits at around 99% (prior to the rebuild it was around 60%). The server has about 400 mailboxes on it and has 1Gb of physical memory and 1Gb page file. It is the same spec as 4 other servers in the site which all sit at around 60% utilization. As it is a 24x7 service we offer on our server, down time is very limited. Is there any way I can check the performance optimizer settings without stopping the store? Or are there any other pointers that anyone can think of I can check? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com
RE: High Physical Memory Utilization
Now If each of those users could find 4 more users, and those new users could all find 2 more users, and so on. You could have your self a nice network there. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization I have 60 users -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization Let's see - I have about 10 servers around the world that are 1GB machines with 300-500 users on them - with 100MB limits. His hardware is fine. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 11:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization Nope. Disagree. This problem could have been avoided with proper implementation of hardware. In my opinion. My solution is not to throw hardware at a problem. My solution is to implement a proper hardware solution in the beginning! I was not trying to solve the person's problem. I simply made an statement reflecting my opinion that they should evaluate their hardware. 400 users and 1 gig of ram did not seem like an appropriate solution that would provide current stability and room for future growth. Besides, who wants to replace their Exchange Server Hardware every 2 years? What's wrong with building a system that will last 3-4 years reliably? Are you guys saying this is a bad thing? It sure seems that way. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization No - you were not giving an opinion. You were giving an ill-conceived solution to a stated problem. People who have been here pick up on who to listen to and to whom they should not listen. Not everyone has been here that long. Fortunately, for the person who originally asked the question, a few of us who do know good solutions addressed to the specific problems. It would appear that your first solution is to throw hardware at the problem. I used to think the same thing. 5 Years ago. Before I learned a LOT about this stuff. Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization And another comment Mr. Ely. Let's keep this in mind next time you decide to flame me or someone else on the list. I'm simply giving my opinion. Acceptance is optional. I'm giving my opinion of a server spec for exchange server that in my opinion has giving me the best level of performance and least amount of headaches over a 10 year period. Whether you choose this type of hardware is irrelevant being that I'm the one stating an opinion. You have the option of lending your alternative option to the discussion. This would give the person whom made the original post more alternatives. Second, I have never claimed to be the foremost expert on Exchange Server. I am here with an open mind and willing and needing to learn just like everyone else. However, I do intend to post my opinions. Thanks for your time. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization Someone would have to be on some good drugs to over-spec a server like that. I guess we're the unfortunate bunch with actual real world budgets to work with... ;o) D -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 6:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization Ha ha ha ha LOL. Crack pipe. Nice one Don. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 January 2002 14:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization What crack pipe are you smoking out of? Those specs are way beyond what's necessary! D -Original Message- From: [EMAIL
RE: High Physical Memory Utilization
Ya, so. Does the rock have a thong? Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization I got a rock. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization I have 60 users -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization Let's see - I have about 10 servers around the world that are 1GB machines with 300-500 users on them - with 100MB limits. His hardware is fine. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 11:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization Nope. Disagree. This problem could have been avoided with proper implementation of hardware. In my opinion. My solution is not to throw hardware at a problem. My solution is to implement a proper hardware solution in the beginning! I was not trying to solve the person's problem. I simply made an statement reflecting my opinion that they should evaluate their hardware. 400 users and 1 gig of ram did not seem like an appropriate solution that would provide current stability and room for future growth. Besides, who wants to replace their Exchange Server Hardware every 2 years? What's wrong with building a system that will last 3-4 years reliably? Are you guys saying this is a bad thing? It sure seems that way. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization No - you were not giving an opinion. You were giving an ill-conceived solution to a stated problem. People who have been here pick up on who to listen to and to whom they should not listen. Not everyone has been here that long. Fortunately, for the person who originally asked the question, a few of us who do know good solutions addressed to the specific problems. It would appear that your first solution is to throw hardware at the problem. I used to think the same thing. 5 Years ago. Before I learned a LOT about this stuff. Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization And another comment Mr. Ely. Let's keep this in mind next time you decide to flame me or someone else on the list. I'm simply giving my opinion. Acceptance is optional. I'm giving my opinion of a server spec for exchange server that in my opinion has giving me the best level of performance and least amount of headaches over a 10 year period. Whether you choose this type of hardware is irrelevant being that I'm the one stating an opinion. You have the option of lending your alternative option to the discussion. This would give the person whom made the original post more alternatives. Second, I have never claimed to be the foremost expert on Exchange Server. I am here with an open mind and willing and needing to learn just like everyone else. However, I do intend to post my opinions. Thanks for your time. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization Someone would have to be on some good drugs to over-spec a server like that. I guess we're the unfortunate bunch with actual real world budgets to work with... ;o) D -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 6:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization Ha ha ha ha LOL. Crack pipe. Nice one Don. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 January 2002 14:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization What crack pipe are you smoking out of? Those specs are way beyond
RE: Exchange 5.5 W2k
Server Nic Bind order. Go there look at it.. Make sure all is well. Anything in the event log Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul Love Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 5:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 W2k Hello chaps, ive got a weird problem, win2k server running exchange 5.5. sp4, all apears ok, the i go into the IMC to configure a new connection inofrmation and when i double lick on the imc in connections get the follwig error Extension SMTP could not be loaded. The specified module could not be found. Microsoft Windows NT ID NO:0xc002007e anyone seen this before, only thing that has changed is i have installed remote access and routing, then unistaled it. ? Any ideas on the fix gratefully recieved. Paul _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: High Physical Memory Utilization
You took this all very well. Good job. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization Exactly. You make a recommendation based on an appropriate solution to handle present needs in addition to future needs. Basing your buying decisions on the hope that prices would go down is like purchasing a small cap stock that trades on the ANDS. You have no idea what the prices of hardware are going to be 6 months from now. My original Exchange system has seen 3 mergers, and has continually been given new responsibilities without requiring additional hardware or hardware changes because I planned accordingly. One of those responsibilities added recently is to service our 1,000,000 plus donor recipients with monthly announcements from my Oracle Database. This responsibility adds quiet a significant overheadHowever, it's only once a month. Of coarse, some of you might argue the overhead would be caused from the WAN connection. This could be true I suppose, however, this is not the case because I have a dedicated T3 for my mail. But hopefully you see my point. Even though the additional overhead may not adversely affect the amount of RAM being utilized by the Information Store it does significantly affect your Disk IO performance if not configured properly. This equates to a higher processor utilization. My recommendation takes all of this into consideration. Hopefully this answers the question pondered earlier about the dual processor role. But listen guys... I believe in democracy. It appears that the majority of you believe in the least amount to perform to current expectations. So, I will limit my opinions whenever possible on this subject. Besides, I don't want to spend what's left of my vacation creating enemies in a discussion group I wish to participate in. However, there is something to be said for disagreements. At least it allows me to contemplate a different mind set when it comes to certain issues. For this, I thank you. Thanks for your time again. Murphy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization Secondly, getting what you want from upper management is a skill and requires good salesmanship and good political tactics. I would think you guys and gals would consider this an asset. In my experience, I have found that my upper management trusts me to recommend appropriate solutions for the simple reason that I don't waste their money by buying too big of a server for our needs. They know that it will cost less real money to buy what we need (with a bit of growth allowed) and then upgrade later when component prices have come down. If I get a great deal on some mondo equipment, great, we're golden, but otherwise I choose my money battles wisely. Also, critical big or in the case of your recommendation, abso-fscking-HUGE. -Michèle, MOS+BP, TSCSP, soon to be a California Girl Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com The Miata has gone to live with Grandma for a little while: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - You're telling Chris how to unsubscribe? Now that's funny. - Andy David, July 26, 2001 - -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization I guess it depends on your situation. If policy dictates that Exchange Server is classified as a critical system I would think you would want to spec the system appropriately. Secondly, getting what you want from upper management is a skill and requires good salesmanship and good political tactics. I would think you guys and gals would consider this an asset. If I can get a nice, big, powerful server...I'm going to do it. -Original Message- From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization Don - lack of experience - ouch! The real world has to adapt. I could spend far too much money on a server that should last 5-8 years. But then I would rather spend money on a server that suits the company needs now and for the next 3-4 years and replace it with one after that time. And if I ask for silly money now, I am not going to get it for anything else that may need it (you never know what's around the corner). Its experience that is showing all of us that we don't need a server with a spec that high. If a change occurs that should suddenly change your user
RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus
A bunch of us are headed out tonight to Pacific Crest Brew Pub, to say good Bye to Don Ely. He is leavening the PNW for the other coast next week. Come on up. You have about 4 hours to make it. Right at the North end of Boeing field. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Blunt, James H (Jim) Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus Dr. Dogg! Yer in Seattle? Cool! If you ever need someone to go to a Sonics/Mariners/Seachickens game with ya, just let me know...I'm in the Tri-Cities...Richland to be specific. ;0) Jim Blunt -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus That's the AB I know.. Way to go, High Five man. I was just given 2 tickets, BOX seats for tonight's Sonics game. Guess where I will be at 7:00 Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus Screw em! I just did it -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus You sure? It is on my server? Wait I remember this, We had this conversation, didn't we AB? Your owners would not let you block that extension. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus Well isn't that a nice onecrap! -Original Message- From: Corney, Alan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus The virus is not in the wild yet ,The extension is htm , which is not on Martins blocking list. http://www.antivirus.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=JS_GIGGER .A _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Steps toward Exchange Server 2000
To properly answer a question of that length, the clock will start running would you like to enter into a contract? Upgrades http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q295922 Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 1:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Steps toward Exchange Server 2000 Step one: Admit you have a problem -Original Message- From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Steps toward Exchange Server 2000 Dear DL Members, I am not getting very far with my own research on this particular matter, and thought that I would run it past all of you. Wawa has four Exchange Servers, constituting one Exchange Site, in one NT Domain. I need to prepare the Exchange Servers for each of the following steps / phases. 01. Current Environment Two Domain Controllers PDC is NT Server 4.0 with SP 6a BDC is NT Server 4.0 with SP 6a Four Exchange Servers (stand alone servers) NT Server 4.0 with SP 6a Exchange Server 5.5 with SP 4 02. Domain Controllers From NT Server 4.0 to Windows 2000 Server 03. Exchange Servers From NT Server 4.0 to Windows 2000 Server 04. Exchange Servers From Exchange Server 5.5 to Exchange Server 2000 I am able to find documents (white papers) to describe the change (step) from 03 to 04, but I am not able to find anything about the changes from 01 to 02, or 02 to 03. In particular, my questions are: 05. Does the Domain Controller upgrade to Windows 2000 (02) impact the Exchange Servers at all? 06. Is the Active Directory Connector installed during 02? 07. If so, how does it impact Exchange 5.5? 08. How does upgrading the Exchange Servers to Windows 2000 impact Exchange 5.5? Let me know if you have any ideas. Thanks. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: error message every morning at 0:15
Go here, call the number, get help, fell better. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=FH;EN-US;offer11AFR=0SD =GNLN=EN-US -- Dr Milton R Dogg Of the Dogg Foundation -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Etts, Russell Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 7:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: error message every morning at 0:15 Hi There PSS = Microsoft product support and service. The calls are normally in the neighborhood of 245.00 each. Trust me, they're worth every penny of it. Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: error message every morning at 0:15 Neil Thanks for the answer but I already run isinteg at least 10 times... At couple of first times it did come up with some sort of errors but then no errors were found. But error messages still appear. What is PSS? Is there any way to find out from those error messages which attachments in which e-mails it is talking about? David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: dcpromo on existing server
Yes Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Greg Sachs Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: dcpromo on existing server Is it possible to upgrade an existing Exchange 2000 (Win2k Server sp2, exchange2k std sp2) to a domain controller for the Active Directory? Its a lab environment, not production... Thanks. Greg --- Greg Sachs [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: High Physical Memory Utilization
Start with these links, read for a few days. Then realize that this function is by design, why have the memory if you are not going to use it? You do not buy a Dodge v10 Pickup and get angry if the engine uses more then 3 cylinders do you? Exchange for beginners http://www.exchange-mail.org/books.html http://www.swinc.com/resource/books.asp http://www.swinc.com/resource/exchange.htm http://www.microsoft.com/exchange Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Frazer J Clark Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 9:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: High Physical Memory Utilization One of my colleagues recently reinstalled a 5.5 SP4 Exchange Server on NT4 SP5 (only Exchange was reinstalled) and have noticed that the Physical Memory Utilization sits at around 99% (prior to the rebuild it was around 60%). The server has about 400 mailboxes on it and has 1Gb of physical memory and 1Gb page file. It is the same spec as 4 other servers in the site which all sit at around 60% utilization. As it is a 24x7 service we offer on our server, down time is very limited. Is there any way I can check the performance optimizer settings without stopping the store? Or are there any other pointers that anyone can think of I can check? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Moving Exchange Server 5.5 to new NT4 Domain
Ouch!! You just hurt my brain. How many users we talking here and will everything stay nt4? Try it in the lab and see what happens. You would also have to change the server domain member ship as well correct? Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Duane Klinge Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 12:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Moving Exchange Server 5.5 to new NT4 Domain Currently we have 2 NT4 trusted Domains (ex: DomainA DomainB) with Exchange Server 5.5(member server) having a DomainA computer account and Exchange Service Account under DomainA. Users from both Domains have mailboxes that are located on this central Exchange Server. The plan is to moved everyone to a single domain model (DomainB), so Exchange Server will be configured to be a member of DomainB and we will retain the same Org,site,server configuration and move DomainA mailboxes to DomainB. Is this just a manner of creating a new exchange service account under DomainB and adding it to the Exchange Service Account with appropriate permissions using the Exchange Administrator and then moving Exchange Servers computer account to DomainB ? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: High Physical Memory Utilization
I have 4000 users running off of less then a Gig or ram. And almost a gig Page file. How many users you planning maintaining? Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 12:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization 400 Mailboxes and 1 gig of Ram does not sound right. Your primary problem is hardware. This is my minimum recommendation for your hardware requirements. Dual Pentium III 550 + Separate Raid Controller running in Raid 5 config. (2 partitions logical) 2 Gig physical memory. 3 Gig Page File on second partition Run optimizer and move the databases and log files to 2nd partition. -Original Message- From: Frazer J Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: High Physical Memory Utilization One of my colleagues recently reinstalled a 5.5 SP4 Exchange Server on NT4 SP5 (only Exchange was reinstalled) and have noticed that the Physical Memory Utilization sits at around 99% (prior to the rebuild it was around 60%). The server has about 400 mailboxes on it and has 1Gb of physical memory and 1Gb page file. It is the same spec as 4 other servers in the site which all sit at around 60% utilization. As it is a 24x7 service we offer on our server, down time is very limited. Is there any way I can check the performance optimizer settings without stopping the store? Or are there any other pointers that anyone can think of I can check? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: High Physical Memory Utilization
4079 recipients in the, opps just got 2 more, 4081 recipients. Taskmgr says I have 523,700 Total Physical memory, Explorer says my priv is 85,754,376kb Looks like I do? Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 1:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization No you don't. -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization I have 4000 users running off of less then a Gig or ram. And almost a gig Page file. How many users you planning maintaining? Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 12:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization 400 Mailboxes and 1 gig of Ram does not sound right. Your primary problem is hardware. This is my minimum recommendation for your hardware requirements. Dual Pentium III 550 + Separate Raid Controller running in Raid 5 config. (2 partitions logical) 2 Gig physical memory. 3 Gig Page File on second partition Run optimizer and move the databases and log files to 2nd partition. -Original Message- From: Frazer J Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: High Physical Memory Utilization One of my colleagues recently reinstalled a 5.5 SP4 Exchange Server on NT4 SP5 (only Exchange was reinstalled) and have noticed that the Physical Memory Utilization sits at around 99% (prior to the rebuild it was around 60%). The server has about 400 mailboxes on it and has 1Gb of physical memory and 1Gb page file. It is the same spec as 4 other servers in the site which all sit at around 60% utilization. As it is a 24x7 service we offer on our server, down time is very limited. Is there any way I can check the performance optimizer settings without stopping the store? Or are there any other pointers that anyone can think of I can check? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: High Physical Memory Utilization
He tells me stories about Mr. Scharff, Yelling at the Exchange teams is too much ask that If put the feature in, the it works? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 1:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization Explorer talks to you? -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 4:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization 4079 recipients in the, opps just got 2 more, 4081 recipients. Taskmgr says I have 523,700 Total Physical memory, Explorer says my priv is 85,754,376kb Looks like I do? Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 1:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization No you don't. -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization I have 4000 users running off of less then a Gig or ram. And almost a gig Page file. How many users you planning maintaining? Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 12:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization 400 Mailboxes and 1 gig of Ram does not sound right. Your primary problem is hardware. This is my minimum recommendation for your hardware requirements. Dual Pentium III 550 + Separate Raid Controller running in Raid 5 config. (2 partitions logical) 2 Gig physical memory. 3 Gig Page File on second partition Run optimizer and move the databases and log files to 2nd partition. -Original Message- From: Frazer J Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: High Physical Memory Utilization One of my colleagues recently reinstalled a 5.5 SP4 Exchange Server on NT4 SP5 (only Exchange was reinstalled) and have noticed that the Physical Memory Utilization sits at around 99% (prior to the rebuild it was around 60%). The server has about 400 mailboxes on it and has 1Gb of physical memory and 1Gb page file. It is the same spec as 4 other servers in the site which all sit at around 60% utilization. As it is a 24x7 service we offer on our server, down time is very limited. Is there any way I can check the performance optimizer settings without stopping the store? Or are there any other pointers that anyone can think of I can check? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received
RE: High Physical Memory Utilization
20 megs. IT REALLY needs some work. This was not my design, I was hired to come in and clean up. This server is about the only thing functioning with stability so it has been at the bottom of my fix list. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 1:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization Hmm. Do you have your mailboxes restricted to 1 Meg each. -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization 4079 recipients in the, opps just got 2 more, 4081 recipients. Taskmgr says I have 523,700 Total Physical memory, Explorer says my priv is 85,754,376kb Looks like I do? Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 1:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization No you don't. -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization I have 4000 users running off of less then a Gig or ram. And almost a gig Page file. How many users you planning maintaining? Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 12:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization 400 Mailboxes and 1 gig of Ram does not sound right. Your primary problem is hardware. This is my minimum recommendation for your hardware requirements. Dual Pentium III 550 + Separate Raid Controller running in Raid 5 config. (2 partitions logical) 2 Gig physical memory. 3 Gig Page File on second partition Run optimizer and move the databases and log files to 2nd partition. -Original Message- From: Frazer J Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: High Physical Memory Utilization One of my colleagues recently reinstalled a 5.5 SP4 Exchange Server on NT4 SP5 (only Exchange was reinstalled) and have noticed that the Physical Memory Utilization sits at around 99% (prior to the rebuild it was around 60%). The server has about 400 mailboxes on it and has 1Gb of physical memory and 1Gb page file. It is the same spec as 4 other servers in the site which all sit at around 60% utilization. As it is a 24x7 service we offer on our server, down time is very limited. Is there any way I can check the performance optimizer settings without stopping the store? Or are there any other pointers that anyone can think of I can check? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL
RE: High Physical Memory Utilization
The box is a Dual Xeon 550 Compaq server with an External RAID array. I get that too. Takes me a few minutes to load the admin mail box. Then there are about 2000 new NDR'S and such in there every day when I load it. That box hates me. But thanks to Mr. Lefkovics that is getting better. paste NDR's By William Lefkovics The black hole is to create a DL that has multiple SMTP addresses of ex-employees, but make sure there's no members in the DL. Messages sent to the relevant SMTP addresses simply vanish. Shame you can't put a few selected people into the DL as well. :-) /paste Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Saul Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 1:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization How many, and what speed is your processor on your Exchange Box? I am running 1gMhz, with 1g Ram, for about 200 users, and I still get Requesting data from the Microsoft Exchange Server Share your secret on how you do that? Thanks Saul _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: High Physical Memory Utilization
My secret so far, has been to keep My email off of the server [1], and listen the people on this list that know what they are doing. [1] read way to much volume Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Aaron Brasslett Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 2:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization Hmmm... I must have the magic touch too 120 users 17Gb priv, 6Gb pub single PIII 550, 256MB, mirrored sys drive, mirrored log drive, RAID 5+1 database drive and the server sits idle most of the day... Aaron PS It also runs IIS for OWA and AV software... -Original Message- From: Saul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 4:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization How many, and what speed is your processor on your Exchange Box? I am running 1gMhz, with 1g Ram, for about 200 users, and I still get Requesting data from the Microsoft Exchange Server Share your secret on how you do that? Thanks Saul _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RIM pagers
I think it is the ISP version, The guy is telling me they use a software called Elink. I dont think he know I had a clue what I was talking about. He does now : -- Dr. Milton R. Dogg Of the Dogg Foundation -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 1:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RIM pagers The Exchange version or the ISP?? I have never seen the Exch version do it. -Original Message- From: Milton R. Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 1:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RIM pagers I just noticed that on messages my users have been sending me from there RIM email pagers, the message as a RE: added every time there is a reply. so I can get a message with a subject of RE: RE: RE: RE: re: what's up The company that provided this service to me tells me that is a feature. of the device. I have never seen that before with a blackberry.??? -- Dr. Milton R. Dogg Of the Dogg Foundation _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Some system can not reache us
Dns problems.. Go play with Nslookup. Here are the basics. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q203204 You may want to do some Whois on you and see where you name servers live. Make sure they are being nice to you. -- Dr. Milton R. Dogg Of the Dogg Foundation -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Bruess Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 6:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Some system can not reache us I have been trying to solve a problem that I am sure is simple and equally sure it is beyond me. I am running Exchange 5.5 with latest SP. Everything seems to be fine except I find there are some servers (maybe 1 in 300), which do not deliver mail to us. The sender gets an NDR which states Host Not Found. This happens for incoming delivery only. Mail going out to the same server works fine works fine. I have tried working with the folks at the other end but most of the time they are large ISPs and do not care about not being able to reach one system. Any suggestions would be great [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Disaster Server
What you are describing is not possible with out of the box exchange. Win2k Advanced will not allow for load balanced fail over. At best the load balancing service is a glorified round robin DNS implementation. That allows for users to see one name while many answer the call. That is all you will get. At best you can have a duplicate DC/GC on the other end and a similar exchange server that could take over, house that building email. You will also need a recover network so you can recover the other server to get the old mail boxes from a tape drive. You vision is a very hard one to accomplish and once you saw my bill not a cost effective one. -- Dr. Milton R. Dogg Of the Dogg Foundation -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tener, Richard Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 1:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Disaster Server I have one exchange server in my office nt4 exchange 5.5sp4. We have two buildings across the street from each other connected by a aironet bridge. The other building doesnt have a server but we want one there as an exchange server 2000 with clustering to the other server. The old exchange server will be upgraded with exchange 2000 with windows 2000 advance server to replicate with the server across the street. With the aironet bridge are we able to cluster over this or should we use a partial T1. We want this server to be in the other building so if one building was to burn down we could pick up the in the other building on the same day and not lose any time. Any suggestions would be great thanks RT _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig
What is wrong with being a smartass? Are we running out of room and cant handle anymore? -- Dr. Milton R. Dogg Of the Dogg Foundation -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Woodruff, Michael Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 8:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig This guy sure is a smart ass. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 11:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig Hmmm. I think I covered that in my review of Antigen 6.0. ;) Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig You can use the Sophos engine with Antigen. ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |+--- || Chris Scharff| || chris_scharff@messageone| || .com| || Sent by: | || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| || .swynk.com | || | || | || 12/14/2001 11:22 AM | || Please respond to| || Exchange Discussions | || | |+--- - -- | | | | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig | - -- | Sophos doesn't appear to have an Exchange 5.5 aware AV product, so I don't know how great of a solution it would be for poor Thomas' Exchange server. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig Being from the UK I would think you would use SOPHOS. Sophos is by far the greatest Anti Virus Software. -Original Message- From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 10:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig I am running NAV 2.12 in MAPI/VAPI and it seems to work fine IF the background scanning option is enabled. The only drawback is that every time the definitions are updated it must rescan the whole IS in the background (about 24 hours for our 20G store). In version 2.14 the added an option to inhibit the automatic rescanning when new definitions are installed. How did you get version 2.17? We paid extra for a year of updates and had to call and bug them to get the corporate 7.6 update but they sent no navmse update. Tom -Original Message- From: Halliday S (ISELS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 5:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig If you check the archives, I had and still have the same problem here with NAV and users not being able to move attachments. I had MS look at it and Symantec and both blamed each other. I ran optimiser and that didn't cure it. The next stage (which I still haven't got round to yet) is checking the IS for corruption. What I have found is that when I upgrade to a new version of NAV (uninstall/reinstall) it starts of working fine and then gradually performance becomes a real issue with alot of stuff being quarantined (when quarantining is disabled!) and users start to get mail sitting
RE: Don Rickles and this list
Rickles?? His last name is Ely son. -- Dr. Milton R. Dogg Of the Dogg Foundation -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 9:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Don Rickles and this list Not that the people here know how to rip into someone. The all time champ is Don. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig
For more information on bouncing please visit the source. http://www.tiggercam.co.uk -- Dr. Milton R. Dogg Of the Dogg Foundation -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig Ohh...so THAT's what you mean by bouncingduh...and here I thought it was an Exchange thing... Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig m running women... -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 12:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig Don't pick on women. We run off and cry. - Original Message - From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 12:47 PM Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig Sorry, I thought she was a male. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig Mike, If you want to disrespect me, that's fine. Bring it on. I've got your LART right here pal. But you'd be well advised to treat a lady, such as Mrs. Hunter with proper deference. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig That's funny seeing how you are commenting on this. It looks as if you have been called everything already. I'm sorry did I hurt your feelings? -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig Mike, friendly advice. Do yourself a big favor and read the list for a few weeks before you decide who is a smartass, a wiseass, a dickhead, a moron, a troll, a goddess, etc. Some of the people you may define as smartass, the rest of us might define as guru with an edge. I'll take the edge as long as I get the guru knowledge along with it. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 11:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig Not long. I actually joined to get some useful information and aslo give some. I didn't join to compete with certain people on right answers. Michael Woodruff System Administrator inChord Communications Inc. A group of communications companies providing clients unlimited visibility 614.543.6405 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig Mike, exactly how long have you been on the list? Tom. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 11:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig This guy sure is a smart ass. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 11:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig Hmmm. I think I covered that in my review of Antigen 6.0. ;) Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig You can use the Sophos engine with Antigen. ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |+--- || Chris Scharff| || chris_scharff@messageone| || .com| || Sent by: | || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| || .swynk.com
RE: Don Rickles and this list
Dr. Dogg is a master of useless knowledge. -- Dr. Milton R. Dogg Of the Dogg Foundation -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Don Rickles and this list Gee another trivia question answered. - Original Message - From: Milton R. Dogg [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 1:07 PM Subject: RE: Don Rickles and this list Rickles?? His last name is Ely son. -- Dr. Milton R. Dogg Of the Dogg Foundation -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 9:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Don Rickles and this list Not that the people here know how to rip into someone. The all time champ is Don. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig
Those who answer the most, are the smart asses??? Mmmm what have we discovered here? -- Dr. Milton R. Dogg Of the Dogg Foundation -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig Sorry, I forgot a few others. Drew, Daniel, Ed, Lori, Kelly, Ms Sharik, Etc. For anyone I left out, I sincerely apologize. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 10:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig No way! I am a major smart ass. So is Andy, William, Kevin, DON, and a few others. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 9:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig I see he is not the only smart ass here. Michael Woodruff System Administrator inChord Communications Inc. A group of communications companies providing clients unlimited visibility 614.543.6405 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 12:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig Its a discussion list. Not a technical helpdesk. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 December 2001 17:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig Not long. I actually joined to get some useful information and aslo give some. I didn't join to compete with certain people on right answers. Michael Woodruff System Administrator inChord Communications Inc. A group of communications companies providing clients unlimited visibility 614.543.6405 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig Mike, exactly how long have you been on the list? Tom. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 11:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig This guy sure is a smart ass. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 11:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig Hmmm. I think I covered that in my review of Antigen 6.0. ;) Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig You can use the Sophos engine with Antigen. ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |+--- || Chris Scharff| || chris_scharff@messageone| || .com| || Sent by: | || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| || .swynk.com | || | || | || 12/14/2001 11:22 AM | || Please respond to| || Exchange Discussions | || | |+--- - -- | | | | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: RE: Antivirus causing move errors thingamajig | - -- | Sophos doesn't appear to have an Exchange 5.5 aware AV product, so I don't know how great
RE: Exchange Reply
No... -- Dr. Milton R. Dogg Of the Dogg Foundation -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Doug Eubank Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 8:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Reply Is there a way to set up an auto reply through Exchange Administrator for a mailbox or DL, rather than setting it up through Outlook? We are running Exch 5.5 on NT4, with Outlook 2000 clients. Thanks. Doug _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Don Rickles and this list
Dr. Dogg is beyond Certifications. He does not need letters after his name to be smarter. But thank you very much for the offer Mr. Nicholson. -- Dr. Milton R. Dogg Of the Dogg Foundation -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Drewski Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 11:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Don Rickles and this list a MOUK, if you will... -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! Freedom is hard. For freedom is never guaranteed as long as there are those who prefer domination, yet freedom itself cannot be imposed upon anyone and still be freedom. Freedom is hard. (Wren Walker) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Milton R. Dogg Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 12:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Don Rickles and this list Dr. Dogg is a master of useless knowledge. -- Dr. Milton R. Dogg Of the Dogg Foundation -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Don Rickles and this list Gee another trivia question answered. - Original Message - From: Milton R. Dogg [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 1:07 PM Subject: RE: Don Rickles and this list Rickles?? His last name is Ely son. -- Dr. Milton R. Dogg Of the Dogg Foundation -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 9:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Don Rickles and this list Not that the people here know how to rip into someone. The all time champ is Don. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Reply
Again.. The answer is still no. -- Dr. Milton R. Dogg Of the Dogg Foundation -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Doug Eubank Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Reply Is there a way to set up an auto reply through Exchange Administrator for a mailbox or DL, rather than setting it up through Outlook? We are running Exch 5.5 on NT4, with Outlook 2000 clients. Thanks. Doug _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
