Re: [expert] VMware finding Win98

2000-11-01 Thread Buchan Milne

Then again, why run VMWare for Office when it runs under wine ?

Larry Marshall wrote:
 
  i got the idea but it only anoys me because i am trying to save room on my
  hard drive and if you use a mock install of booting of the cd into empty
  space or my ram then the problem is i have to install windows every time i
  want to use a windows app and with only a 6gb hard drive i would still have
  the problem of conserving space, if i did a complete install.
  this is why i would rather have a decent emulator so it can lie its ass off
  to the ap i am running and i would have the best of both worlds!
 
 I'm not completely sold on the idea of emulation vs dual-boot but consider
 that if you do use the emulation you only need enough disk space to hold
 the apps you're going to run under Windows and a minimal Windows
 installation.  There's no need to replicate browsers, all the utility
 programs, graphics/sound apps, dial-up, etc.  If you carefully install
 Windows, removing all that stuff, it'll take up very little space.  At the
 moment I've got Windows, MS Word and Excel loaded into 370meg.
 
 Cheers --- Larry
 
   
 Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com:
 Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.

-- 
|--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone   +27824722231
email   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Centre for Automotive Engineering   http://www.cae.co.za
South Africas first satellite:http://sunsat.ee.sun.ac.za
Control Models  http://www.control.co.za
|Registered Linux User #182071-|



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] VMware finding Win98

2000-11-01 Thread Ken Thompson

On Wed, 01 Nov 2000, you wrote:
 
 Then again, why run VMWare for Office when it runs under wine ?
 
 Larry Marshall wrote:
I have had no success in trying to run office 2000 under wine,
any tips that may help?
I do have Visual Basic operational to about 99% under Wine
release 20001002.
 -- 
Ken Thompson
Electrocom Computer Services, Payette, Idaho
1-888-642-7101 (toll free) 642-7101 (local)
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ# 988809
Registered Linux User #183936



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] VMware finding Win98

2000-11-01 Thread Larry Marshall

  
  Then again, why run VMWare for Office when it runs under wine ?
  
  Larry Marshall wrote:
 I have had no success in trying to run office 2000 under wine,
 any tips that may help?
 I do have Visual Basic operational to about 99% under Wine
 release 20001002.
  -- 
 Ken Thompson
 Electrocom Computer Services, Payette, Idaho
 1-888-642-7101 (toll free) 642-7101 (local)
 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ICQ# 988809
 Registered Linux User #183936
 
 




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] VMware finding Win98

2000-10-31 Thread Alexander Skwar

So sprach Larry Marshall am Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 09:36:17PM -0500:
 that if you do use the emulation you only need enough disk space to hold
 the apps you're going to run under Windows and a minimal Windows

Right, and what's more important at least for me, is that you don't need to
shutdown Linux when you must use a Windows app.  And you're also able to
have multiple installations of Windows running at the same time, heck, even
Windows NT + Windows 9x + BeOS + ...  all at the same time (if you're
machine is strong enough, that is.  For something like this I'd suggest an
Athlon 1.1 GHz with at least a gig of RAM .])

Alexander Skwar
-- 
Homepage:   http://www.digitalprojects.com | http://www.dp.ath.cx
Sichere Mail?   Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] fuer GnuPG Keys
ICQ:7328191



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] VMware finding Win98

2000-10-31 Thread Larry Marshall

 Right, and what's more important at least for me, is that you don't need to
 shutdown Linux...

Absolutely.  This is the number one reason I'm spending time with it.

 have multiple installations of Windows running at the same time, heck, even
 Windows NT + Windows 9x + BeOS + ...  all at the same time (if you're
 machine is strong enough, that is.  For something like this I'd suggest an
 Athlon 1.1 GHz with at least a gig of RAM .])

Yep...I don't think conventional machinery need apply.  I haven't tweeked
VMware yet but with only 64megs assigned to it on a 500mhz machine, it's
pretty clunky in terms of performance.  Still might do what I need to run
a word processor though :-)  

Just talking out loud, my big problem right now if figuring out how to
get files into/out of it.  My understanding was that there's some sort of
'super-Samba' that's supposed to be running to allow dragging files but it
sure doesn't work here.  I have been able to mount the *.dsk using
vmware-mount and it looks like I can copy from it to a Linux directory but
I can't go the other way around.  I'd sure like to spend one day NOT doing
something to make all this stuff run :-) 

Cheers --- Larry





Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] VMware finding Win98

2000-10-31 Thread Buchan Milne



Ken Thompson wrote:
 
 On Sun, 29 Oct 2000, you wrote:
 
 
  
  VMware is virtual machine. It is not same your real computer.  You must
 
  Uh huhI'm with you so far.
 
  configure this virtual machine how you want and install on it Win98 or any
  other OS. You can start two or more VM with different OS together and they
  will
  work as real computers in local network.
 
  How would you respond to someone who answers "How do you set up VM so it
  can load the OS?" with "You have to configure it."?  Inquiring minds wanna
  know and I'm at a loss.
 
  Cheers --- Larry
 Uh, Larry,
 Pretend that there is NO Win 98 on your machine now. Install
 Win98 IN VM Ware.. Virtual Machine is just that, a make-believe
 computer.. The software tricks your system into thinking there
 is another computer in there with it..
 

Just because it tricks the software (OS) into thinking it's running on
real hardware, does not mean it won't allow you to run a pre-isntalled
copy.

I must admin I haven't the time or the diskspace to play with VMWare on
linux, but last time I installed VMWare on NT, I could boot both my
existing Linux (Redhat at that stage, I think) and win98.


Of course, before running your original OS in VMWare, it's best to
configure hardware profiles for the machine so it doesn't get confused.
I assume you know that there are the vmware utils (drivers for emulated
hardware basically) that you need to install on win98 after you get it
running.

Buchan

 --
 Ken Thompson
 Electrocom Computer Services, Payette, Idaho
 1-888-642-7101 (toll free) 642-7101 (local)
 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ICQ# 988809
 Registered Linux User #183936
 
   
 Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com:
 Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.

-- 
|--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone   +27824722231
email   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Centre for Automotive Engineering   http://www.cae.co.za
South Africas first satellite:http://sunsat.ee.sun.ac.za
Control Models  http://www.control.co.za
|Registered Linux User #182071-|



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] VMware finding Win98

2000-10-31 Thread Stephen Bosch



Larry Marshall wrote:

 Yep...I don't think conventional machinery need apply.  I haven't tweeked
 VMware yet but with only 64megs assigned to it on a 500mhz machine, it's
 pretty clunky in terms of performance.  Still might do what I need to run
 a word processor though :-)
 
 Just talking out loud, my big problem right now if figuring out how to
 get files into/out of it.  My understanding was that there's some sort of
 'super-Samba' that's supposed to be running to allow dragging files but it
 sure doesn't work here.  I have been able to mount the *.dsk using
 vmware-mount and it looks like I can copy from it to a Linux directory but
 I can't go the other way around.  I'd sure like to spend one day NOT doing
 something to make all this stuff run :-)

Here's a solution: don't use VMWare at all. Just get StarOffice and
mount your Windows partition in Linux, then you never even have to
bother with the Microsoft products and you don't need to move your files
anywhere because, well, they're already there!

The pressure on me to run a virtual machine lessens with each passing
week. I can do nearly anything I need to in Linux alone.

-Stephen-



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] VMware finding Win98

2000-10-31 Thread Larry Marshall

 
 Here's a solution: don't use VMWare at all. 

Great idea.

Just get StarOffice and mount your Windows partition in Linux, then you never even 
have to
 bother with the Microsoft products and you don't need to move your files

Another good one...if my needs were the same as yours.  I'd agree that
this is a reasonable solution for most people, though I still don't like
that silly Star Office desktop.

Unfortunately, while Star Office is very good at import/export of Word
documents, it's not good enough to suit my needs.  First, it doesn't have
sufficient font support, though I suppose that can be fixed with some
work.  But more importantly, I do a lot of work requiring a lot of
graphics imbedding and fairly precise page layout.  Often these documents
are also very large (2-3 megabytes).  All of this stretches the limits of
Star Office beyond it's ability to do Word import/export.  Also, there is
no ability whatever to import/export Word Perfect documents.  This is
another thing I need as I have to provide this format at times.

 The pressure on me to run a virtual machine lessens with each passing
 week. I can do nearly anything I need to in Linux alone.

Note the personal pronoun "I".  I'd be thrilled to be in your position as
I'm wasting far too much time fumbling with dual-boot this or that and
emulators trying to solve this problem.

Cheers --- Larry




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] VMware finding Win98

2000-10-31 Thread Charles Curley

On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 11:37:04AM -0500, Larry Marshall wrote:
  
  Here's a solution: don't use VMWare at all. 
 
 Great idea.
 
 Just get StarOffice and mount your Windows partition in Linux, then you never even 
have to
  bother with the Microsoft products and you don't need to move your files
 
 Another good one...if my needs were the same as yours.  I'd agree that
 this is a reasonable solution for most people, though I still don't like
 that silly Star Office desktop.
 
 Unfortunately, while Star Office is very good at import/export of Word
 documents, it's not good enough to suit my needs.  First, it doesn't have
 sufficient font support, though I suppose that can be fixed with some
 work.  But more importantly, I do a lot of work requiring a lot of
 graphics imbedding and fairly precise page layout.  Often these documents
 are also very large (2-3 megabytes).  All of this stretches the limits of
 Star Office beyond it's ability to do Word import/export.  Also, there is
 no ability whatever to import/export Word Perfect documents.  This is
 another thing I need as I have to provide this format at times.

Let me suggest two things.

First, Word format is flakey, and varies even from versions of Word with
the same version number. If you can get your correspondents to export
documents as RTF, you may have better luck. Similarly when they re-import
your files they will have better luck if you ship as RTF.

However, I have had serious problems with Word re-reading 2-3 MB documents
that it had just spat out. Word is buggy. The more sophisticated your
document formatting, the worse Word is. I doubt anyone at Microsoft has
ever done up an entire book in Word, with ToC, indexes, appendicies,
tables of illos, etc. I know I shan't again.

Second, I use Applix 4.x quite sucessfully with both RTF and Word formatted
documents. I have just ordered the latest version, 5.x. It meets the
requirements you set out above.

-- 

-- C^2

No windows were crashed in the making of this email.

Looking for fine software and/or web pages?
http://w3.trib.com/~ccurley



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] VMware finding Win98

2000-10-31 Thread Larry Marshall


 First, Word format is flakey, and varies even from versions of Word with

Uh huh...sure.

 the same version number. If you can get your correspondents to export
 documents as RTF, you may have better luck. Similarly when they re-import
 your files they will have better luck if you ship as RTF.

You don't make a living in a service business do you (grin)?  If my
customers want itin Word format, I give it to them in Word format.  That
aside, I fail to see how going Word-RTF addresses any of your ideas that
"Word is flakey".

 However, I have had serious problems with Word re-reading 2-3 MB
documents  that it had just spat out. Word is buggy. The more
sophisticated your document formatting, the worse Word is.

Yep..uh huhI do all this several times a day.  You wouldn't be
referring to Word97 would you?  I skipped that abomination completely but
I have none of the problems you suggest with Word2000.

 Second, I use Applix 4.x quite sucessfully with both RTF and Word formatted
 documents. I have just ordered the latest version, 5.x. It meets the
 requirements you set out above.

I'm not sure how you could possibly know this as my biggest problem with
Star Office has to do with very slight positioning problems when importing
Word documents.  It seems hard for you to suggest that ANY program can do
this as you've just chewed on MS to the point of suggesting that even Word
can't do it.  

What I will say is that if Applixware would let me try their
software I probably would.  I didn't see any evidence of a trial version.

Cheers --- Larry   




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] VMware finding Win98

2000-10-30 Thread BillK

Larry, something that while it might not help a lot, at least will
provide a reason for whats happened.  Unix/Linux is a different way of
thinking to MS.  It depends a lot on "knowing" where to go for
documentation (i.e., standard places on the system) and be able to go
from there.  MS does a lot of handholding (which in my opinion is better
for the user!, wake up Linuxworld, we need good help docs).  Looking
from the outside, your problems stem from expecting documentation/help
to be presented in the MS way - sorry, but aint gonna happen here!

For vmware, the install should have given you a set of (excellent) html
docs accessable from the help button on the VM window.  "man vmware"
gives a good basic intro - a standard unix "thing", dont know something,
so type "man keyword" or "man -K search_for_Keyword", and obviously to a
unix person, "man man" for help on help.  "/usr/doc/vmware" has some
basic files including an excellent readme for problems, again a standard
place for docs.  If all else fails, do a "find / -name vmware\*" as root
and check out all the obvious files it returns until you know how its
structured.

Its all very well for someone to say RTFM, but you do have to know where
to find it first!

BillK

Larry Marshall wrote:

 
 Thanks to all who have helped me fumble my way into this.  I still found
 it a struggle to find the documentation on the website.  It's unclear to
 me why they don't just put the help point directly on the
 documentation.  They dump me onto the main page which has absolutely no
 reference to it.  In fact, I can't find a reference to the documentation
 anywhere but in their site map.




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] VMware finding Win98

2000-10-30 Thread Alfredo Carlos López

Hi!

I was reading this thread and I want to comment what happens to me.
I have win98 installed in /dev/hda1 and linux somewhere else (suppose
/dev/hda5 or something like that)
If I configured vmware to boot from /dev/hda1 it gives an error...
but if I configure to boot from /dev/hda.,  vmware goes to lilo... then
I could choose to boot the already running linux (muy loco esto :) ...)
o boot win98 from /dev/hda1.
What I see is that if you use vmware you must think that is another machine
making use of your hard disk. in this case /dev/hda and you can't
boot
/dev/hda1 without lilo... except that you have the mbr clean...
(remember format /MBR from MS-DOS).

ALF



--
"I'm trying to free your mind, Neo. But I can only show you the door.
You're the one that has to walk through it."
   -Morpheus, The Matrix
-
Lic. Alfredo Carlos López

INIFTA - Universidad Nacional De La Plata
Calle 64 y Diag. 113, C.C. 16  Suc. 4, La Plata, Bs. As., Argentina
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel. +54 221 425-7291/7430 ext. 175
Fax  +54 221 425-4642
-






Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] VMware finding Win98

2000-10-30 Thread Larry Marshall

 Larry, something that while it might not help a lot, at least will
 provide a reason for whats happened.  Unix/Linux is a different way of
 thinking to MS.  It depends a lot on "knowing" where to go for

Yes...and that's fine.  And as long as the Linux world doesn't want to
dominate the individual desktop market, there's no reason to change
that.  But that's NOT what they're saying; in fact they're saying exactly
the opposite.  If they want to move onto the desktop they're going to have
to make it a lot more stable, a lot more predictable and they're going to
have to stop breaking installations every time they release a product.   

Documentation just won't do it.  Until there's an adherence to simple
things like file location standards and until making the programs
bullet-proof rather than glitzy, we're going to have a bunch of stuff
hanging on top of a rock-solid Linux that's just going to frustrate
people.  My "maintenance" time has gone up by a couple orders of magnitude
relative to Windows.  How many people are going to deal with that when
their goal isn't to play with computer but rather get their work done.

I know it's not popular to say such things in a Linux conference but
please understand, I love Linux.  I'm just disappointed that it's no
easier to operate this Linux than it was to operate Solaris 5 years ago.  
In many respects it's harder as we're dealing with a much looser
development model.

 For vmware, the install should have given you a set of (excellent) html
 docs accessable from the help button on the VM window.  "man vmware"

This is my fault...or almost.I've got it running, MS Office seems to
work, my CAD system won't install and I'm going to have to go back to the
docs to figure out how to get access to my documents. 

 gives a good basic intro - a standard unix "thing", dont know something,
 so type "man keyword" or "man -K search_for_Keyword", and obviously to a
 unix person, "man man" for help on help.  "/usr/doc/vmware" has some

grin  I've typed man  more times than I can reveal Bill.

 Its all very well for someone to say RTFM, but you do have to know where
 to find it first!

This was my problem with vmware.  You're right, though, the manual is
nice.  

Cheers --- Larry





Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] VMware finding Win98

2000-10-30 Thread Matthew Micene

On Sunday 29 October 2000 19:58, you wrote:
 grin...inside a box?  I can certainly understand that VMware might
 want to diddle with its own copy of W'98 that's not installed in
 standard fashion.  From Bill's comment it seems I've missed a chunk of
 documentation.

Ok, just to weigh in on this, b/c its monday and I don't want to work just 
yet ...  VMWare can diddle with all sorts of different operating systems, 
Windoze included.  It can read from an existing install or you can install 
the guest operating system into a special file that VMWare creates.  The 
first step is to install and configure VMWare, which its sounds like you 
did just fine.  The next is to configure the guest operating system.  USE 
THE WIZARD!! Its a little confusing the first time through but a whole lot 
easier than trying to get it right yourself the first time.  I know...   

There is an option for getting VMWare to look at an existing install of 
the guest operating system.  Just point it at the right partition.  If 
Lilo is installed in the MBR of that disk, you WILL get the lilo boot 
prompt!  VMWare contains its own bios, a Phoenix bios if I am not 
mistaken, and this is what reads the boot device.  To install Windows, 
either put a boot floppy in the A drive or change the bios settings to 
boot off of the CD.  This will NOT affect the real bios for your box.  
Then be prepared to run one of the scariest commands on a running box 
format c:\ :)  It took two of us a full minute to actually press the enter 
key :)  We actually flipped back and forth between the install window and 
a few other windows just to make sure nothing was happening to any of our 
actual partitions :)

Basically, what VMWare does is intercept all hardware level accesses and 
makes the guest operating system think its in control and really doing 
things.  In reality, you can only give up half of your total memory, and 
if you have installed the guest operating system under VM, it lives in a 
special file and touches no other parts of the drives.  It also means if 
you have VMWare running, you need to tell it to let go of the floppy or CD 
if you want to use them.  



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] VMware finding Win98

2000-10-30 Thread Andrew George

 
 While I'm very aware of what a virtual machine is what has been unclear to
 me was how to set it up.  There's absolutely no reason I can see why
 VMware couldn't grab the OS from a partition with Windows installed on
 it.  They just prefer to hold it in a file instead.

Yep by default the VM uses a virtual disk that is saved as a fileif you
want to use existing installations...check the VMware documents for a section
entitled "RAW Disk Access" (I think)..admittedly there isn't a lot there...one
of the problems with it is you essentially have to set up two hardware profiles
with the windows stuff  (one for the VM and one for the normal boot).
Never tried it myself becasue for me it's sounded like a really bad idea...good
luck with it.

Andrew



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] VMware finding Win98

2000-10-30 Thread Deryk Barker

Thus spake Larry Marshall ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
[...]
 This, however, is beyond my comprehension.  The only way I could stick W98
 into a "boot device" is if that boot device is a CDROM.  Since VMware is
 booted off the hard drive where it's installed itself and configured
 itself, you have lost me.

VMWare provides a *complete* virtual environment, including its own
BIOS. So yes, you can configure its boot device to be the CDROM.

-- 
|Deryk Barker, Computer Science Dept. | Music does not have to be understood|
|Camosun College, Victoria, BC, Canada| It has to be listened to.   |
|email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |
|phone: +1 250 370 4452   | Hermann Scherchen.  |




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] VMware finding Win98

2000-10-30 Thread Mwinold

In a message dated 30-Oct-00 14:31:44 Central Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


 VMWare provides a *complete* virtual environment, including its own
 BIOS. So yes, you can configure its boot device to be the CDROM.
 

i got the idea but it only anoys me because i am trying to save room on my 
hard drive and if you use a mock install of booting of the cd into empty 
space or my ram then the problem is i have to install windows every time i 
want to use a windows app and with only a 6gb hard drive i would still have 
the problem of conserving space, if i did a complete install.
this is why i would rather have a decent emulator so it can lie its ass off 
to the ap i am running and i would have the best of both worlds!



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] VMware finding Win98

2000-10-30 Thread Michael R. Batchelor

i got the idea but it only anoys me because i am trying to save room on
my
hard drive
[...]
then the problem is i have to install windows every time i
want to use a windows app

No, you can make vmware use your existing windows install, but you've
got to do it right. First boot into windows and create a few new
hardware profiles. (Have a few to screw up before you break
something.;)) Then set up a virtual machine which uses an existing
physical disk (hda1 probably) rather than the virtual disk. When windows
boots tell it you in profile xyz and it will reconfigure itself for the
video, etc it finds in the vmware environment.

This way you can boot into windows native and let it run with your abc
video, sound card, other hardware, or start windows in vmware and let it
use the vmware xyz hardware.  All the same software available in both
environments.

MB




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] VMware finding Win98

2000-10-30 Thread Larry Marshall


 i got the idea but it only anoys me because i am trying to save room on my 
 hard drive and if you use a mock install of booting of the cd into empty 
 space or my ram then the problem is i have to install windows every time i 
 want to use a windows app and with only a 6gb hard drive i would still have 
 the problem of conserving space, if i did a complete install.
 this is why i would rather have a decent emulator so it can lie its ass off 
 to the ap i am running and i would have the best of both worlds!

I'm not completely sold on the idea of emulation vs dual-boot but consider
that if you do use the emulation you only need enough disk space to hold
the apps you're going to run under Windows and a minimal Windows
installation.  There's no need to replicate browsers, all the utility
programs, graphics/sound apps, dial-up, etc.  If you carefully install
Windows, removing all that stuff, it'll take up very little space.  At the
moment I've got Windows, MS Word and Excel loaded into 370meg.

Cheers --- Larry 




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] VMware finding Win98

2000-10-29 Thread BillK

Larry Marshall wrote:
Have you installed win98 INSIDE vmware?  Sounds like you are trying to
use an existing install of win98 which I dont think vmware will do - you
need to go the full fdisk/format/install route within the vmware virtual
machine - read the docs, they are quite good.  Quite figtening the first
time you see fdisk run inside a VM, hoping it doesnt escape!

BillK



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] VMware finding Win98

2000-10-29 Thread Deryk Barker

Thus spake [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):

 In a message dated 29-Oct-00 15:49:22 Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 writes:
 
 
  VMware is virtual machine. It is not same your real computer.  You must
  configure this virtual machine how you want and install on it Win98 or any
  other OS. You can start two or more VM with different OS together and they 
  will
  work as real computers in local network.
  
 
 somehow this just confused me even more how about you larry?

Think about this: when you install W98 it loads the drivers etc it
needs for you particularly hardware.

VMWare provides a virtual machine 'inside a box' that has a standard
set of virtual hardware (video, network, etc). Even if it could find
your existing W98 install, the chances of your install using the same
hardware that VMWare provides virutally are very small.


You need to install W98 inside VMWare. Use the configuration wizard to
configure a VM and then boot the VM with an installation medium
(e.g. CD) of W98 in the boot device.

I know it works, because I've done it.
-- 
|Deryk Barker, Computer Science Dept. | Music does not have to be understood|
|Camosun College, Victoria, BC, Canada| It has to be listened to.   |
|email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |
|phone: +1 250 370 4452   | Hermann Scherchen.  |




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] VMware finding Win98

2000-10-29 Thread Larry Marshall

 Have you installed win98 INSIDE vmware?  Sounds like you are trying to
 use an existing install of win98 which I dont think vmware will do - you

No, which seemed odd since they have you set up a virtual disk.

 need to go the full fdisk/format/install route within the vmware virtual
 machine - read the docs, they are quite good.  Quite figtening the first
 time you see fdisk run inside a VM, hoping it doesnt escape!

This must be the part I'm missing as I don't see any good docs.  There's a
man page but when I click on the help they take me to tech support on
their site.  I guess I need to go back there and look a lot more closely
as all I found was some trouble-shooting stuff.

Thanks Bill 


Cheers --- Larry




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] VMware finding Win98

2000-10-29 Thread Larry Marshall

 VMWare provides a virtual machine 'inside a box' that has a standard
 set of virtual hardware (video, network, etc). Even if it could find
 your existing W98 install, the chances of your install using the same
 hardware that VMWare provides virutally are very small.

grin...inside a box?  I can certainly understand that VMware might want
to diddle with its own copy of W'98 that's not installed in standard
fashion.  From Bill's comment it seems I've missed a chunk of
documentation.
   
 You need to install W98 inside VMWare. Use the configuration wizard to
 configure a VM and then boot the VM with an installation medium
 (e.g. CD) of W98 in the boot device.

This, however, is beyond my comprehension.  The only way I could stick W98
into a "boot device" is if that boot device is a CDROM.  Since VMware is
booted off the hard drive where it's installed itself and configured
itself, you have lost me.

 I know it works, because I've done it.

I'm sure it does.  This is definitely an "I'm stupid, not you" situation
:-)  

Cheers --- Larry





Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] VMware finding Win98

2000-10-29 Thread Andrew George


  You need to install W98 inside VMWare. Use the configuration wizard to
  configure a VM and then boot the VM with an installation medium
  (e.g. CD) of W98 in the boot device.
 
 This, however, is beyond my comprehension.  The only way I could stick W98
 into a "boot device" is if that boot device is a CDROM.  Since VMware is
 booted off the hard drive where it's installed itself and configured
 itself, you have lost me.

umm...the VMware machine is a full Virtual Machine...with it's own bios..when
you start the machine you may notice a nice little message saying "Press f2 for
setup" thats like a normal setup bios...just change it to boot of the CD and
feed your win98 cd into your cd-rom

I think your getting confusedVMware reads a config file to make a
machine...but after that it acts pretty much exactly like a normal PC (just in
a window). The doco on the vmware site is quite good...I think you should
really read it

Andrew



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] VMware finding Win98

2000-10-29 Thread Larry Marshall


 umm...the VMware machine is a full Virtual Machine...with it's own bios..when
 you start the machine you may notice a nice little message saying "Press f2 for
 setup" thats like a normal setup bios...just change it to boot of the CD and
 feed your win98 cd into your cd-rom

Just tried this Andrew.  Set the CD as the boot location and stuffed the
W98 disk in it.  still no joy.
 
 I think your getting confusedVMware reads a config file to make a

A constant state of affairs here :-)

 machine...but after that it acts pretty much exactly like a normal PC (just in
 a window). The doco on the vmware site is quite good...I think you should
 really read it

Absolutely.  I must have missed it on my first excursion there.  Thanks.
I will RTFM.
I will RTFM.
I will RTFM. 
I will RTFM. 
I will RTFM. 
I will RTFM. 
I will RTFM. 
I will RTFM. 
I will RTFM. 
I will RTFM. 
I will RTFM. 
I will RTFM. 
I will RTFM. 
 
Cheers --- Larry




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] VMware finding Win98

2000-10-29 Thread Ken Thompson

On Sun, 29 Oct 2000, you wrote:
 
 
 
 VMware is virtual machine. It is not same your real computer.  You must
 
 Uh huhI'm with you so far.
 
 configure this virtual machine how you want and install on it Win98 or any
 other OS. You can start two or more VM with different OS together and they 
 will
 work as real computers in local network.
 
 How would you respond to someone who answers "How do you set up VM so it 
 can load the OS?" with "You have to configure it."?  Inquiring minds wanna 
 know and I'm at a loss.
 
 Cheers --- Larry
Uh, Larry,
Pretend that there is NO Win 98 on your machine now. Install
Win98 IN VM Ware.. Virtual Machine is just that, a make-believe
computer.. The software tricks your system into thinking there
is another computer in there with it..

-- 
Ken Thompson
Electrocom Computer Services, Payette, Idaho
1-888-642-7101 (toll free) 642-7101 (local)
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ# 988809
Registered Linux User #183936



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] VMware finding Win98

2000-10-29 Thread Larry Marshall

 Pretend that there is NO Win 98 on your machine now. Install
 Win98 IN VM Ware.. Virtual Machine is just that, a make-believe
 computer.. The software tricks your system into thinking there
 is another computer in there with it..

While I'm very aware of what a virtual machine is what has been unclear to
me was how to set it up.  There's absolutely no reason I can see why
VMware couldn't grab the OS from a partition with Windows installed on
it.  They just prefer to hold it in a file instead.

For what it's worth, I seem to have it running, or at least I'm finishing
up the W'98 install right now.  I hope it works half as good as VMware
says it does :-)  

Thanks to all who have helped me fumble my way into this.  I still found
it a struggle to find the documentation on the website.  It's unclear to
me why they don't just put the help point directly on the
documentation.  They dump me onto the main page which has absolutely no
reference to it.  In fact, I can't find a reference to the documentation
anywhere but in their site map.  

Cheers --- Larry 




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] VMware finding Win98

2000-10-29 Thread stephen

On Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 05:01:04PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 In a message dated 29-Oct-00 15:49:22 Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 writes:
 
 
  VMware is virtual machine. It is not same your real computer.  You must
  configure this virtual machine how you want and install on it Win98 or any
  other OS. You can start two or more VM with different OS together and they 
  will
  work as real computers in local network.
  
 
 somehow this just confused me even more how about you larry?
 

you did start virtual machine and install w98 on to it.

you're original w98 install is completely separate :-)


 Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
 Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] VMware finding Win98

2000-10-29 Thread Nikolay V. Kursov


 I've just downloaded/registered VMware under their 30 day trial.  
 
 I've gone through the configuration and it seemed happy.  I set up
 Windows 98 as the guest OS (I'm doing this on a dual-boot machine where
 Windows is on /dev/hda1) and this generated a /vmware/win98 directory that
 holds what appears to be a proper config file.
 
 All loads well with one small exception.  The boot is initiated,
 CDROMs/floppy/etc are found and then it says it can't find the
 operating system.  I can't see anything in the system config file
 (/etc/vmware) or the operating config file (~/vmware/win98) where it's
 specified where Windows is located so it's unclear to me what I should do
 to point it in the right direction.  I can't even find this being stated
 as a possible problem on the vmware site so I are confused.  Can someone
 help?
 
 Cheers --- Larry

VMware is virtual machine. It is not same your real computer.  You must
configure this virtual machine how you want and install on it Win98 or any
other OS. You can start two or more VM with different OS together and they will
work as real computers in local network.

-- 
Regards,
Nikolay V. Kursov
IT,Co. 380(512)500388
ICQ #57477715



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] VMware finding Win98

2000-10-29 Thread Larry Marshall

 
  VMware is virtual machine. It is not same your real computer.  You must
  configure this virtual machine how you want and install on it Win98 or any
  other OS. You can start two or more VM with different OS together and they 
  will
  work as real computers in local network.
  
 
 somehow this just confused me even more how about you larry?

Not sure why as I didn't write what you quoted :-)

Cheers --- Larry





Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] VMware finding Win98

2000-10-29 Thread Larry Marshall

  
  somehow this just confused me even more how about you larry?
 
 Not sure why as I didn't write what you quoted :-)

Mike...ignore this.  I misread it and thought you were saying I confused
you...which is normally the case when I write something :-)

I really get a chuckle out of a lot of the software being sold (or
free) in the Linux world.  They've just not dealt with the marketing
pressure of the Mac or Windows world I guess.  I also downloaded
and installed Win4Lin tonight.  They are most courteous in given a 15 day
evaluation and their installation seems to go well.  They even mediate the
installation of the virtual "machine" using your W'98 disk.  Then you're
dumped back at the Linux prompt.

After much searching and many "let's try this" operations, I found that
you can actually make something happen by typing "win".  This, however,
pops up some more menus with absolutely no explanation of what the options
are but they are things that must be configured.  Making reasonable
guesses I proceeded and ultimately I got it to run...or at least now it
will give me _No work-you lose due to insufficient memory, insufficient
file space or something else_  How the heck do they expect to move Windows
user anywhere with this sort of mess?  

I've come to the conclusion that the notion of typical Windows users
moving to Linux is a fantasy, mot because Linux isn't up to the task but
rather that the Linux developers/marketers are computer geeks who like to
play computers too much and don't like to stabilize and document.  This
was always the problem I had when I contracted programmers and it appears
that things haven't changed much.   
 
Cheers --- Larry




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] VMware finding Win98

2000-10-29 Thread Mwinold

In a message dated 29-Oct-00 15:49:22 Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:


 VMware is virtual machine. It is not same your real computer.  You must
 configure this virtual machine how you want and install on it Win98 or any
 other OS. You can start two or more VM with different OS together and they 
 will
 work as real computers in local network.
 

somehow this just confused me even more how about you larry?



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] VMware finding Win98

2000-10-29 Thread Nikolay V. Kursov


 
 How would you respond to someone who answers "How do you set up VM so it 
 can load the OS?" with "You have to configure it."?  Inquiring minds wanna 
 know and I'm at a loss.
 
 Cheers --- Larry
 

Ok. Sorry. To boot installed OS you need select "Existing physical disk" in
"Disk Type Setting" configuration menu. Only you need r/w access to /dev/hdx or
you have to be root.  Then you can try to boot Windows. But it will reconfigure
itself for VM "hardware" during two or more rebooting as seems after changing
motherboard, video etc in your computer. 

-- 
Regards,
Nikolay V. Kursov
IT,Co. 380(512)500388
ICQ #57477715



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] VMware finding Win98

2000-10-29 Thread Larry Marshall



VMware is virtual machine. It is not same your real computer.  You must

Uh huhI'm with you so far.

configure this virtual machine how you want and install on it Win98 or any
other OS. You can start two or more VM with different OS together and they 
will
work as real computers in local network.

How would you respond to someone who answers "How do you set up VM so it 
can load the OS?" with "You have to configure it."?  Inquiring minds wanna 
know and I'm at a loss.

Cheers --- Larry




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.