Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors Pass Large Hog Confinement Master Matrix

2018-08-31 Thread dhamiltony...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
Yes, it is an analogy and simply reducing it down in narrow formula seems a 
narrow mentation as thinking strictly about it and evidently misses what is 
going on in the experience of the Meissner-like effect (ME) as two or more are 
gathered in proximity meditating. The certainty of the research now should urge 
people out to get their meditations checked and come meditate with the group 
for good reason. JGD
 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The reductionism in linear fashion is simply the square root of 1% which I 
believe is Hagelin's formula which is based on analogy with super radiance in 
lasers. This in turn is loosely correlated with some comment Patanjali made in 
the Yoga Sutras.
 

 What I think you are doing is trying to fudge the formula, which does not 
appear to work, so that it looks like it works. Fairfield, IA itself has a 
population of about 10,000. 
 

 One percent is 100 and the square root of 100 is 10, so you only need 10 
people or perhaps a couple of more for the local area doing superradiance. 
Certainly the sidhas in the area can manage that in spite of trying to make a 
post hoc adjustment to make it look as if the formula works.
 

 It appears the formula really does not work, or if it does, the results are 
not to your liking. Frankly I think Maharishi used it as a ploy to get people 
to keep meditating and doing more advanced programs so they would progress 
toward enlightenment and not slack off.
 

 When "nature supports" exactly how does that work, and who does it benefit? 
Just the person, or those near them, or everyone around in the area, even 
people who have never even heard of meditation?
 

 It seems to me nature does what it does regardless, and that we have far less 
influence than we think, because we do not think clearly, don't have a clue as 
to the results of our actions even when we think we are performing "good" 
actions.
 

 I am all for people performing actions that lead in the direction of 
enlightenment, which to me is the realization that our essential nature is 
consciousness and that everything is in fact consciousness. But that doesn't 
say a word about how that knowledge affects the environment, only that it is 
the knowledge that consciousness is the environment.
 

 On Tuesday, August 28, 2018, 7:45:39 PM GMT, dhamiltony...@yahoo.com 
[FairfieldLife]  wrote: 
 

 

   
 No, both your reductionisms are boil down in only linear fashion. The puny 
Dome and the fragmented Fairfield program halls (..eleven (11) program halls 
scattered around the County and also people off by themselves) as numbers are 
just too small for the dull weight they lift.  

 The larger tragedy here is that apparatchiks of the Patterson-Morris-Maharishi 
era let the Dome numbers get so bad. Or that ill-disciplined good meditators 
like some.. abandoned their posts. 

 Superradiance critical mass evidently happens with numbers in proximity. 
Numbers and their proximity is in the basic science from the beginning, like 
the Bible says, where gathered ..there is superradiance. That superradiance 
lives as a reality of spiritual practice evident in the science and by 
experience while the peer science is still good in principle as it is 
replicated. In doubt you seem trying too hard to disgrace those who are here 
and what is at hand in contending simple linear reductions. Quite instead, you 
all should be here meditating for all sorts of good reasons in life. 
 Jai Guru Dev 
 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 I was about to put up similar figures. The current estimated population of 
Iowa for 2018 is 3.16 million. 0.01% is 31,600  and √31,600 = 177.763888 which 
means you only need 178 people for program in Iowa.
 

 So that means if more hogs in Iowa near Fairfield represent the lack of 
support of the laws of nature, then the ME formula is false. Alternately if the 
formula is correct, then the presence of additional hog farms represents 
support of the laws of nature for the greater population of Iowa, and not based 
on the desire of a small contingent community with contrary ideas.
 

 Again, alternately, were the formula true, and more hogs come, the program 
itself must be faulty and not be implementing the effect.
 

 Regardless of a small part of the universe, the whole remains in balance. You 
have (at least seeming) control over action alone, never its fruits. This point 
in the Bhagavad-Gita always seems to be forgotten.
 

 Desiring a certain result and expecting it to always come true is known as 
spiritual materialism, and represents a lack of understanding of the nature of 
consciousness.
 

 

 On Tuesday, August 28, 2018, 1:18:27 PM GMT, skymt...@yahoo.com 
[FairfieldLife]  wrote: 
 

 

 

 As simple and hopeful as the ME theory sounds, from my calcs, it does not add 
up.  
 

 Iowa has 3 million people.  Square root of .1% = 173. FF has 10,000 so 10 is 
ME threshold number for FF. From what I have read the low range of 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors Pass Large Hog Confinement Master Matrix

2018-08-29 Thread Archer Angel archonan...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
The reductionism in linear fashion is simply the square root of 1% which I 
believe is Hagelin's formula which is based on analogy with super radiance in 
lasers. This in turn is loosely correlated with some comment Patanjali made in 
the Yoga Sutras.
What I think you are doing is trying to fudge the formula, which does not 
appear to work, so that it looks like it works. Fairfield, IA itself has a 
population of about 10,000. 
One percent is 100 and the square root of 100 is 10, so you only need 10 people 
or perhaps a couple of more for the local area doing superradiance. Certainly 
the sidhas in the area can manage that in spite of trying to make a post hoc 
adjustment to make it look as if the formula works.
It appears the formula really does not work, or if it does, the results are not 
to your liking. Frankly I think Maharishi used it as a ploy to get people to 
keep meditating and doing more advanced programs so they would progress toward 
enlightenment and not slack off.
When "nature supports" exactly how does that work, and who does it benefit? 
Just the person, or those near them, or everyone around in the area, even 
people who have never even heard of meditation?
It seems to me nature does what it does regardless, and that we have far less 
influence than we think, because we do not think clearly, don't have a clue as 
to the results of our actions even when we think we are performing "good" 
actions.
I am all for people performing actions that lead in the direction of 
enlightenment, which to me is the realization that our essential nature is 
consciousness and that everything is in fact consciousness. But that doesn't 
say a word about how that knowledge affects the environment, only that it is 
the knowledge that consciousness is the environment.
   On Tuesday, August 28, 2018, 7:45:39 PM GMT, dhamiltony...@yahoo.com 
[FairfieldLife]  wrote:  
 
     


No, both your reductionisms are boil down in only linear fashion. The puny Dome 
and the fragmented Fairfield program halls (..eleven (11) program halls 
scattered around the County and also people off by themselves) as numbers are 
just too small for the dull weight they lift.  


The larger tragedy here is that apparatchiks of the Patterson-Morris-Maharishi 
era let the Dome numbers get so bad. Or that ill-disciplined good meditators 
like some.. abandoned their posts. 


Superradiance critical mass evidently happens with numbers in proximity. 
Numbers and their proximity is in the basic science from the beginning, like 
the Bible says, where gathered ..there is superradiance. That superradiance 
lives as a reality of spiritual practice evident in the science and by 
experience while the peer science is still good in principle as it is 
replicated. In doubt you seem trying too hard to disgrace those who are here 
and what is at hand in contending simple linear reductions. Quite instead, you 
all should be here meditating for all sorts of good reasons in life. 

Jai Guru Dev 



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

I was about to put up similar figures. The current estimated population of Iowa 
for 2018 is 3.16 million. 0.01% is 31,600  and √31,600 = 177.763888 which means 
you only need 178 people for program in Iowa.
So that means if more hogs in Iowa near Fairfield represent the lack of support 
of the laws of nature, then the ME formula is false. Alternately if the formula 
is correct, then the presence of additional hog farms represents support of the 
laws of nature for the greater population of Iowa, and not based on the desire 
of a small contingent community with contrary ideas.
Again, alternately, were the formula true, and more hogs come, the program 
itself must be faulty and not be implementing the effect.
Regardless of a small part of the universe, the whole remains in balance. You 
have (at least seeming) control over action alone, never its fruits. This point 
in the Bhagavad-Gita always seems to be forgotten.
Desiring a certain result and expecting it to always come true is known as 
spiritual materialism, and represents a lack of understanding of the nature of 
consciousness.


 On Tuesday, August 28, 2018, 1:18:27 PM GMT, skymt...@yahoo.com 
[FairfieldLife]  wrote:



As simple and hopeful as the ME theory sounds, from my calcs, it does not add 
up.  
Iowa has 3 million people.  Square root of .1% = 173. FF has 10,000 so 10 is ME 
threshold number for FF. From what I have read the low range of attendance in 
domes is around 400, which ME predicts should powerfully and positively affect 
across a much larger region, an area of 16 million.  The ME effects in FF and 
Iowa, one would expect from the ME theory to be extraordinary, after 30 years 
of constant practice in the domes of at least 400, much larger in some eras.  
The ME threshold is exceeded by at least a factor of 40 in FF, and a factor of 
2 - 10 for Iowa over the years. 
Yet FF and Iowa, on a comparative basis,  do not have exceptional crime 
reduction, 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors Pass Large Hog Confinement Master Matrix

2018-08-28 Thread dhamiltony...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
No, both your reductionisms are boil down in only linear fashion. The puny Dome 
and the fragmented Fairfield program halls (..eleven (11) program halls 
scattered around the County and also people off by themselves) as numbers are 
just too small for the dull weight they lift.  

 The larger tragedy here is that apparatchiks of the Patterson-Morris-Maharishi 
era let the Dome numbers get so bad. Or that ill-disciplined good meditators 
like some.. abandoned their posts. 

 Superradiance critical mass evidently happens with numbers in proximity. 
Numbers and their proximity is in the basic science from the beginning, like 
the Bible says, where gathered ..there is superradiance. That superradiance 
lives as a reality of spiritual practice evident in the science and by 
experience while the peer science is still good in principle as it is 
replicated. In doubt you seem trying too hard to disgrace those who are here 
and what is at hand in contending simple linear reductions. Quite instead, you 
all should be here meditating for all sorts of good reasons in life. 
 Jai Guru Dev 
 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 I was about to put up similar figures. The current estimated population of 
Iowa for 2018 is 3.16 million. 0.01% is 31,600  and √31,600 = 177.763888 which 
means you only need 178 people for program in Iowa.
 

 So that means if more hogs in Iowa near Fairfield represent the lack of 
support of the laws of nature, then the ME formula is false. Alternately if the 
formula is correct, then the presence of additional hog farms represents 
support of the laws of nature for the greater population of Iowa, and not based 
on the desire of a small contingent community with contrary ideas.
 

 Again, alternately, were the formula true, and more hogs come, the program 
itself must be faulty and not be implementing the effect.
 

 Regardless of a small part of the universe, the whole remains in balance. You 
have (at least seeming) control over action alone, never its fruits. This point 
in the Bhagavad-Gita always seems to be forgotten.
 

 Desiring a certain result and expecting it to always come true is known as 
spiritual materialism, and represents a lack of understanding of the nature of 
consciousness.
 

 

 On Tuesday, August 28, 2018, 1:18:27 PM GMT, skymt...@yahoo.com 
[FairfieldLife]  wrote: 
 

 

 

 As simple and hopeful as the ME theory sounds, from my calcs, it does not add 
up.  
 

 Iowa has 3 million people.  Square root of .1% = 173. FF has 10,000 so 10 is 
ME threshold number for FF. From what I have read the low range of attendance 
in domes is around 400, which ME predicts should powerfully and positively 
affect across a much larger region, an area of 16 million.  The ME effects in 
FF and Iowa, one would expect from the ME theory to be extraordinary, after 30 
years of constant practice in the domes of at least 400, much larger in some 
eras.  The ME threshold is exceeded by at least a factor of 40 in FF, and a 
factor of 2 - 10 for Iowa over the years. 
 

 Yet FF and Iowa, on a comparative basis,  do not have exceptional crime 
reduction, or economic performance -- or any other measures that I can find.  
(And per the topic of this thread, CAFOs in Iowa have quadrupled since 2001, 
and are a growing problem negatively affecting the quality of life on many 
levels.) 
 

 What are the effects of ME in FF and Iowa that are consistent with its 
predictions?
 

 And beyond lack of noticeable effects on crime and economy in FF and Iowa,  
are there any studies indicating ME affects climate change? 
 

 I wish the challenge of climate change was as simple as having groups of ME 
practitioners totaling < 10,000 worldwide. However,  given the above, it does 
not seem credible or plausible. Better perhaps, that people world-wide meditate 
and then act with clearer minds to transform our economies and cultures towards 
a thriving civilization with zero to negative (via sequestration)  greenhouse 
gas emissions  
 


 












Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors Pass Large Hog Confinement Master Matrix

2018-08-28 Thread Archer Angel archonan...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
I was about to put up similar figures. The current estimated population of Iowa 
for 2018 is 3.16 million. 0.01% is 31,600  and √31,600 = 177.763888 which means 
you only need 178 people for program in Iowa.
So that means if more hogs in Iowa near Fairfield represent the lack of support 
of the laws of nature, then the ME formula is false. Alternately if the formula 
is correct, then the presence of additional hog farms represents support of the 
laws of nature for the greater population of Iowa, and not based on the desire 
of a small contingent community with contrary ideas.
Again, alternately, were the formula true, and more hogs come, the program 
itself must be faulty and not be implementing the effect.
Regardless of a small part of the universe, the whole remains in balance. You 
have (at least seeming) control over action alone, never its fruits. This point 
in the Bhagavad-Gita always seems to be forgotten.
Desiring a certain result and expecting it to always come true is known as 
spiritual materialism, and represents a lack of understanding of the nature of 
consciousness.


   On Tuesday, August 28, 2018, 1:18:27 PM GMT, skymt...@yahoo.com 
[FairfieldLife]  wrote:  
 
     

Doug, 
As simple and hopeful as the ME theory sounds, from my calcs, it does not add 
up.  
Iowa has 3 million people.  Square root of .1% = 173. FF has 10,000 so 10 is ME 
threshold number for FF. From what I have read the low range of attendance in 
domes is around 400, which ME predicts should powerfully and positively affect 
across a much larger region, an area of 16 million.  The ME effects in FF and 
Iowa, one would expect from the ME theory to be extraordinary, after 30 years 
of constant practice in the domes of at least 400, much larger in some eras.  
The ME threshold is exceeded by at least a factor of 40 in FF, and a factor of 
2 - 10 for Iowa over the years. 
Yet FF and Iowa, on a comparative basis,  do not have exceptional crime 
reduction, or economic performance -- or any other measures that I can find.  
(And per the topic of this thread, CAFOs in Iowa have quadrupled since 2001, 
and are a growing problem negatively affecting the quality of life on many 
levels.) 
What are the effects of ME in FF and Iowa that are consistent with its 
predictions?    
And beyond lack of noticeable effects on crime and economy in FF and Iowa,  are 
there any studies indicating ME affects climate change? 
I wish the challenge of climate change was as simple as having groups of ME 
practitioners totaling < 10,000 worldwide. However,  given the above, it does 
not seem credible or plausible. Better perhaps, that people world-wide meditate 
and then act with clearer minds to transform our economies and cultures towards 
a thriving civilization with zero to negative (via sequestration)  greenhouse 
gas emissions  


[FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors Pass Large Hog Confinement Master Matrix

2018-08-27 Thread dhamiltony...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
Answering part of your posed criticism about the superradiance effect of 
meditators, while the Domes are fabulous places for meditating but there has 
not been many times of super radiant numbers meditating together for decades. 
 From the late 1980’s and through the 1990’s and ‘00’s the Morris-Patterson era 
administration of the movement with Maharishi fragmented the super radiant 
effect of the group, dividing granting socioeconomic specialness and separating 
people by fealty from the larger group administratively. 
 

 The metrics for the American movement were in the tank whence the American 
assembly was initiated in the summer of 2006. For some months then meditators 
came from all over to the group meditation in Fairfield coming from Western 
Europe, Canada, the UK, Asia, Israel and from what was left of the US movement 
then. That was super radiant then for a while, 10 years ago. So it is not 
acceptable to assert that the proliferation of hog confinements now is some 
failure of the group practice. It is a better example of the failure of the 
administration facilitating the meditation.

 However Fairfield is still okay for now, as much as the Hog industrialists 
would love to get back at Fairfielders by crossing it up with confinements. 
 

 x
 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Why You Don’t Want More CAFOs in Jefferson County
 

 1. Property Values Plummet Near CAFOs
 

 Property values of residences drop up to 40 percent near factory farms. 
(Colorado State University study of Iowa properties).
 

 2. People Living Near CAFOs Experience Health Problems
 

 Neighbors living within two miles of a CAFO (confined animal feeding 
operation, or factory farm) have experienced wheezing, chest tightness, 
shortness of breath, excessive coughing, nausea, diarrhea, sore throat, eye 
irritation, headache, runny nose and weakness. (Numerous University of North 
Carolina studies)
 Children who attend schools near CAFOs suffer higher incidences of asthma. 
(Study in Pediatrics journal)
 Neighbors living near a hog confinement experienced more depression, tension, 
anger, fatigue, and confusion and less vigor. (North Carolina study)
 Factory farms emit over 200 gases and particulates. Here are just a few that 
you will breathe in: ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, particulates such as fecal 
matter and skin cells, volatile organic compounds, methane, and viruses. A 2002 
report by Iowa State University and the University of Iowa determined that 
hydrogen sulfide and ammonia emissions from CAFOs are a health risk for humans.
 Antibiotic-resistant bacteria (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, 
known as MRSA), is found in Iowa hogs and CAFO workers. (University of Iowa 
study) MRSA is difficult to treat, can be fatal in people with weakened immune 
systems, and is becoming more common because of the heavy use of antibiotics on 
factory farms.
 3. CAFOs Stink
 

 Confined hogs generate three times the amount of raw waste as humans. (EPA). 
The liquid manure goes into concrete pits below the confinement where it sits 
and putrefies for 6-12 months. Huge fans blow the poisonous air out of the 
confinements, and residents breathe it in. If you live within 3-4 miles of a 
CAFO, your air is going to stink. If you live near a field where manure will be 
applied, it will stink there, too. Breathing in this air can make you sick.
 

 4. Your Quality of Life Will Diminish
 

 People who live near factory farms report that they don’t enjoy their homes 
any longer. Some experiences people report include:
 

 No longer opening windows to get fresh air into their homes. (There is no 
fresh air anymore.)
 Living in basements to get away from the smell that seeps through closed 
windows.
 Coping with overwhelming fly infestations. Flies may also contribute to the 
spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
 Ending all outdoor entertaining with family and friends.
 5. Your Community Will Deteriorate
 

 Increased traffic from tractor-trailer feed trucks breaks down community 
roads, and local tax money pays for repairs. Fuel taxes don’t come close to 
covering costs. Taxes often rise, and local community services get reduced to 
keep up with maintenance. It’s common to see businesses close and people move 
out when factory farms move in.
 

 6. The Environment Suffers
 

 Iowa has some of the worst waterways in the nation. Over 800 manure spills 
have occurred in the last 10 years. Fish kills are common. Children can’t play 
in streams without concerns of exposure to E. coli or other bacteria.
 

 JFAN works to keep CAFOs out of Jefferson County, safeguarding your health, 
property values, quality of life, and the environment.
 

 Jefferson County Farmers & Neighbors, Inc




[FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors Pass Large Hog Confinement Master Matrix

2018-08-27 Thread skymt...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
Why You Don’t Want More CAFOs in Jefferson County
 

 1. Property Values Plummet Near CAFOs
 

 Property values of residences drop up to 40 percent near factory farms. 
(Colorado State University study of Iowa properties).
 

 2. People Living Near CAFOs Experience Health Problems
 

 Neighbors living within two miles of a CAFO (confined animal feeding 
operation, or factory farm) have experienced wheezing, chest tightness, 
shortness of breath, excessive coughing, nausea, diarrhea, sore throat, eye 
irritation, headache, runny nose and weakness. (Numerous University of North 
Carolina studies)
 Children who attend schools near CAFOs suffer higher incidences of asthma. 
(Study in Pediatrics journal)
 Neighbors living near a hog confinement experienced more depression, tension, 
anger, fatigue, and confusion and less vigor. (North Carolina study)
 Factory farms emit over 200 gases and particulates. Here are just a few that 
you will breathe in: ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, particulates such as fecal 
matter and skin cells, volatile organic compounds, methane, and viruses. A 2002 
report by Iowa State University and the University of Iowa determined that 
hydrogen sulfide and ammonia emissions from CAFOs are a health risk for humans.
 Antibiotic-resistant bacteria (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, 
known as MRSA), is found in Iowa hogs and CAFO workers. (University of Iowa 
study) MRSA is difficult to treat, can be fatal in people with weakened immune 
systems, and is becoming more common because of the heavy use of antibiotics on 
factory farms.
 3. CAFOs Stink
 

 Confined hogs generate three times the amount of raw waste as humans. (EPA). 
The liquid manure goes into concrete pits below the confinement where it sits 
and putrefies for 6-12 months. Huge fans blow the poisonous air out of the 
confinements, and residents breathe it in. If you live within 3-4 miles of a 
CAFO, your air is going to stink. If you live near a field where manure will be 
applied, it will stink there, too. Breathing in this air can make you sick.
 

 4. Your Quality of Life Will Diminish
 

 People who live near factory farms report that they don’t enjoy their homes 
any longer. Some experiences people report include:
 

 No longer opening windows to get fresh air into their homes. (There is no 
fresh air anymore.)
 Living in basements to get away from the smell that seeps through closed 
windows.
 Coping with overwhelming fly infestations. Flies may also contribute to the 
spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
 Ending all outdoor entertaining with family and friends.
 5. Your Community Will Deteriorate
 

 Increased traffic from tractor-trailer feed trucks breaks down community 
roads, and local tax money pays for repairs. Fuel taxes don’t come close to 
covering costs. Taxes often rise, and local community services get reduced to 
keep up with maintenance. It’s common to see businesses close and people move 
out when factory farms move in.
 

 6. The Environment Suffers
 

 Iowa has some of the worst waterways in the nation. Over 800 manure spills 
have occurred in the last 10 years. Fish kills are common. Children can’t play 
in streams without concerns of exposure to E. coli or other bacteria.
 

 JFAN works to keep CAFOs out of Jefferson County, safeguarding your health, 
property values, quality of life, and the environment.
 

 Jefferson County Farmers & Neighbors, Inc


[FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors Pass Large Hog Confinement Master Matrix

2018-08-27 Thread skymt...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]


 

 The Explosion of CAFOs in Iowa and Its Impact on Water Quality
 and Public Health

https://www.iowapolicyproject.org/2018docs/180125-CAFO.pdf 
https://www.iowapolicyproject.org/2018docs/180125-CAFO.pdf 

 
 

 


 
 

 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors Oppose Gay Marriage

2009-04-27 Thread off_world_beings

Vermont republicans and democrats already passed the right to gay
marriage - and beat down the Republican governer's childish veto, and
they are now focused on more important issues. Vermont is already in a
better position economically due to intelligent decisions of past decade
or more, and now they are focused on the economy and people's quality of
life -- not on pathetic squabbling over such a childish argument.

The rest of the country will eventually follow Vermont's lead. Period.

OffWorld



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , raunchydog raunchy...@...
wrote:

 Fairfield Daily Ledger
 Supervisors call for action on same-sex marriages
 The resolution asks the Legislature to resolve the discrepancy between
the April 3 Iowa Supreme Court ruling and the 1998 Defense of Marriage
Act, which states marriage in Iowa is only between one man and
 By LACEY JACOBS
 Ledger staff writer
 Published:
 Monday, April 27, 2009 2:58 PM CDT

 Before the state's Supreme Court ruling legalizing same-sex marriages
took effect this morning, interested residents packed a meeting room in
the Jefferson County Courthouse to hear what the local board of
supervisors had to say about the issue.

 Following a brief discussion, the supervisors unanimously passed a
resolution calling on the Iowa Legislature to pass legislation providing
for a public vote to amend the Iowa Constitution or to pass legislation
conforming Iowa Code to the Supreme Court's ruling.

 I think the Legislature and the governor have really not done their
job. We now have conflicting Supreme Court opinion and law, and I
personally I would like to see the Legislature address the issue,
supervisor Steve Burgmeier said.

 The resolution he drafted Friday was reviewed and amended by the
county attorney and assistant county attorney.

 It may not do what I want it to do, but it does what the county
attorney says I can have it do, and that's important, Burgmeier said.

 Assistant county attorney Pat McAvan said the board has the ability to
lobby the Legislature for action, and it's not uncommon for the board to
do so.

 You're certainly allowed to do this. What you're not allowed to do is
make legislation on this issue, he said.

 Supervisor Dick Reed said certain issues should take into account the
voices of everyone concerned and he supports a public vote on the issue
of same-sex marriage.

 My concern is that the Legislature in this state and the governor in
this state have taken a position where they've stated that because the
court has issued an opinion, that somehow or another that has become the
law of the land. I'm sorry, but I don't accept that premise, supervisor
Lee Dimmitt said.

 For the complete article, see the Monday, April 27, 2009, Fairfield
Ledger.

 http://tinyurl.com/d32gav http://tinyurl.com/d32gav

http://goldentrianglenewspapers.com/articles/2009/04/27/fairfield_daily_\
ledger/top_stories/doc49f60d0051629780627547.txt
http://goldentrianglenewspapers.com/articles/2009/04/27/fairfield_daily\
_ledger/top_stories/doc49f60d0051629780627547.txt


 • Jefferson County Supervisors this morning unanimously passed a
resolution this morning asking lawmakers to take action against same-sex
marriage.

 We expect the Iowa legislature to resolve the issue, said Stephen
Burgmeier, chairman of the three-member, all-Republican board. We hope
it either leads to a public vote or to a constitutional amendment.

 About 40 people attended the 7:30 a.m. meeting, a meeting that
typically attracts three or four people, Burgmeier said. Almost all at
the meeting were against same-sex marriage, he said. A group of
residents also brought a petition that asks County Recorder Charlotte
Fleig to deny the licenses.

 Fleig acknowledged that she was aware of the petition but hadn't
received it as of 9 a.m. this morning. She said she will issue the
licenses but, as of 9 a.m., no same-sex couples had requested a license
although there was at least one same-sex couple who called to inquire
about the process.

 http://tinyurl.com/coczoh http://tinyurl.com/coczoh

http://www.desmoinesregister.com/article/20090427/NEWS/90427010/0/NEWS11
http://www.desmoinesregister.com/article/20090427/NEWS/90427010/0/NEWS1\
1





[FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors

2008-10-09 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 
 
 --- On Wed, 10/8/08, Alex Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  From: Alex Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors
  To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
  Date: Wednesday, October 8, 2008, 3:24 PM
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
  drpetersutphen@ wrote:
  
   The Ru's only have themselves to blame for this
  sort of
   nonsense. They have treated townies like
  shit whenever
   there was a conflict and this is what happens. 
   
  It was an out-of-town Ru firing up anti-townie sentiment
  with a single
  email that got the two Rus on the ballot in the first
  place. So, the
  anti-Ru backlash is to be expected. The biggest bummer is
  that there
  were two locals running in the Dem. primary who would have
  been well
  respected by both Rus and locals. With the two Rus on the
  ballot,
  there are probably a lot of local Dems who will vote for
  the two local
  GOP supervisors.
 
 So many Ru's have such a pathetic elitist attitude towards non-ru's because 
 of the 
spiritually superior zeitgeist (damn, I love dat word!) the Maharishi espoused 
for so many 
years in the TMO.

Ironically enough, while MMY himself often fell into the trap, the SCI theory 
he 
expounded never supported this attitude: *at best* you could assume you were 
better off, spiritually, than before you started TM, but because it was always 
possible that the person you were most hostile towards was spiritually superior 
to you, you could never judge yourself against anyone else in that respect...

Though of course, everyone no doubt did (and does).

Lawson



[FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors

2008-10-09 Thread nablusoss1008
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On Behalf Of enlightened_dawn11
 Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 11:13 PM
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors
 
  
 
 the pathetic elitist attitude comes not from the Maharishi's 
 message, but rather from their misunderstanding of reality, being 
 locked into a dualistic perspective. Duality breeds conflict. It 
has 
 nothing to do with the Maharishi's message.
 
 Maharishi was very much into hierarchies and establishing pecking 
orders,
 usually based on how much money one had. He also regarded the 
common man as
 incapable of making sensible decisions, hence his damning of 
democracy. He
 once said of the Labor Party in the UK, They are laborers. They 
shouldn't
 be running the government. Just give them a shovel and tell them 
where to
 dig.

And He was right, as usual. Now these silly laborers are suing the 
icelanders for borrowing them money ! HaHa




RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors

2008-10-09 Thread Rick Archer
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of bob_brigante
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 12:17 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors

 

You are not capable of understanding what MMY said. Of course you don't hand
the govt to oafs -- the current U.S. govt is proof that this is unwise. But
MMY did not intend that people should be locked into low levels of life,
lorded over by somebody. The whole point of the revival of Vedic wisdom (the
centerpiece of which is TM, for unfolding  total awareness for all
individuals) is that people will be able to live happily without being
administered by anybody:

Sounds good in principle, but then why, in practice, has there always been
such heavy-handed administration in the TMO, of which you have been one of
the most outspoken critics?



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors

2008-10-09 Thread Peter



--- On Thu, 10/9/08, enlightened_dawn11 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 From: enlightened_dawn11 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Thursday, October 9, 2008, 12:13 AM
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:
 
  
  
  
  --- On Wed, 10/8/08, Alex Stanley
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   From: Alex Stanley
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County
 Supervisors
   To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
   Date: Wednesday, October 8, 2008, 3:24 PM
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
   drpetersutphen@ wrote:
   
The Ru's only have themselves to blame
 for this
   sort of
nonsense. They have treated
 townies like
   shit whenever
there was a conflict and this is what
 happens. 

   It was an out-of-town Ru firing up anti-townie
 sentiment
   with a single
   email that got the two Rus on the ballot in the
 first
   place. So, the
   anti-Ru backlash is to be expected. The biggest
 bummer is
   that there
   were two locals running in the Dem. primary who
 would have
   been well
   respected by both Rus and locals. With the two
 Rus on the
   ballot,
   there are probably a lot of local Dems who will
 vote for
   the two local
   GOP supervisors.
  
  So many Ru's have such a pathetic elitist attitude
 towards non-
 ru's because of the spiritually superior zeitgeist
 (damn, I love dat 
 word!) the Maharishi espoused for so many years in the TMO.
  
  
 the pathetic elitist attitude comes not from the
 Maharishi's 
 message, but rather from their misunderstanding of reality,
 being 
 locked into a dualistic perspective. Duality breeds
 conflict. It has 
 nothing to do with the Maharishi's message.

Unitary or Dualistic perspective is irrelevant here. Maharishi treated many 
groups of people as intrinsically inferior to others. This is very typical for 
Indians of Maharishi's generation who have a strong caste system mentality. 






 
 
 
 
 To subscribe, send a message to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Or go to: 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
 and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 

  


[FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors

2008-10-09 Thread raunchydog
Earl and Will are well intentioned but hapless candidates fallen
victim to the whims of a TM voting block of about 2000. No one
bothered to tell the TM'ers that they would need another 2000 votes
for their candidates to win in the general election. Now that the
Republicans have pushed back with scare tactics, there's no time for
whining. If the TM'ers want to have any chance of winning at least one
seat, they should plunk for just one candidate or the the other. That
is vote for just one instead of two. I have no opinion on who this
should be. I think they are both very good candidates.
 
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Email going around: 
 
 October 6, 2008
 
 Dear  Friends, 
 
 I am writing to you not as a Republican or a Democrat but as a very
 concerned citizen of Jefferson County. Recently a group of men were
drinking
 coffee at Hy-Vee and discussing the county supervisor race. A woman
from the
 meditating community heard them and said to them, We are going to
take over
 this county and there is nothing you can do about it. That statement is
 true if we don't defeat the two meditators running for county
supervisors.  
 
 William Richards and Earl Shepard are the candidates for Jefferson
County
 Supervisor on the Democrat ticket. These men are associated with MUM
and the
 meditating movement.  They will not represent you and your tax
dollars with
 regard to county business.
 
 During the past year the meditating community has attempted to give tax
 breaks to organic farmers, stop livestock production and use eminent
domain
 to take farm land.They have demolished historical landmarks on the
Parsons
 College campus because of the building design. If they controlled
the county
 dollars would they demolish our hundred year old courthouse?  
 
 The meditating community is mounting a well organized effort to put
their
 candidates in power. It is very important for us to take action and
vote.
 Also... spread the word to your neighbors, friends and family.   
 Be sure to vote for Stephen Burgmeier and Lee Dimmitt, long time
 Jefferson County residents. Also, spread the word to your neighbors,
friends
 and family.
 
 Thank you  
 
 Dave Dickey





[FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors

2008-10-09 Thread enlightened_dawn11
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 
 
 
 --- On Thu, 10/9/08, enlightened_dawn11 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
 
  From: enlightened_dawn11 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors
  To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
  Date: Thursday, October 9, 2008, 12:13 AM
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
  drpetersutphen@ 
  wrote:
  
   
   
   
   --- On Wed, 10/8/08, Alex Stanley
  j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
   
From: Alex Stanley
  j_alexander_stanley@
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County
  Supervisors
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, October 8, 2008, 3:24 PM
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
drpetersutphen@ wrote:

 The Ru's only have themselves to blame
  for this
sort of
 nonsense. They have treated
  townies like
shit whenever
 there was a conflict and this is what
  happens. 
 
It was an out-of-town Ru firing up anti-townie
  sentiment
with a single
email that got the two Rus on the ballot in the
  first
place. So, the
anti-Ru backlash is to be expected. The biggest
  bummer is
that there
were two locals running in the Dem. primary who
  would have
been well
respected by both Rus and locals. With the two
  Rus on the
ballot,
there are probably a lot of local Dems who will
  vote for
the two local
GOP supervisors.
   
   So many Ru's have such a pathetic elitist attitude
  towards non-
  ru's because of the spiritually superior zeitgeist
  (damn, I love dat 
  word!) the Maharishi espoused for so many years in the TMO.
   
   
  the pathetic elitist attitude comes not from the
  Maharishi's 
  message, but rather from their misunderstanding of reality,
  being 
  locked into a dualistic perspective. Duality breeds
  conflict. It has 
  nothing to do with the Maharishi's message.
 
 Unitary or Dualistic perspective is irrelevant here. Maharishi 
treated many groups of people as intrinsically inferior to others. 
This is very typical for Indians of Maharishi's generation who have 
a strong caste system mentality. 
 
so are you saying that:
1. the Maharishi accepted the caste system.
2. the Western members of the TMO were considered mixed caste and 
therefore lower than untouchables.
3. the Maharishi elevated the Western members of the TMO above those 
who were not in the TMO.
4. therefore any Indians not in the TMO, whatever their caste, would 
then be considered lower than the lower than untouchable TMO members?



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors

2008-10-09 Thread Peter



--- On Thu, 10/9/08, enlightened_dawn11 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


   the pathetic elitist attitude comes not from the
   Maharishi's 
   message, but rather from their misunderstanding
 of reality,
   being 
   locked into a dualistic perspective. Duality
 breeds
   conflict. It has 
   nothing to do with the Maharishi's message.
  
  Unitary or Dualistic perspective is irrelevant here.
 Maharishi 
 treated many groups of people as intrinsically inferior to
 others. 
 This is very typical for Indians of Maharishi's
 generation who have 
 a strong caste system mentality. 
  
 so are you saying that:
 1. the Maharishi accepted the caste system.
 2. the Western members of the TMO were considered mixed
 caste and 
 therefore lower than untouchables.
 3. the Maharishi elevated the Western members of the TMO
 above those 
 who were not in the TMO.
 4. therefore any Indians not in the TMO, whatever their
 caste, would 
 then be considered lower than the lower than untouchable
 TMO members?

I'm only speaking about a general attitude that MMY had and was certainly 
present in the TMO and MIU/MUM administration towards non-ru's. I'm assuming 
MMY was that way because his personality/laisha vidya was very much a product 
of his genes and culture. So many Indians, especially of his generation, are 
spiritual/religious snobs. You notice less of this attitude in contemporary 
Indians.  




 
 
 
 
 To subscribe, send a message to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Or go to: 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
 and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 

  


[FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors

2008-10-09 Thread nablusoss1008
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
   
  so are you saying that:
  1. the Maharishi accepted the caste system.
  2. the Western members of the TMO were considered mixed
  caste and 
  therefore lower than untouchables.
  3. the Maharishi elevated the Western members of the TMO
  above those 
  who were not in the TMO.
  4. therefore any Indians not in the TMO, whatever their
  caste, would 
  then be considered lower than the lower than untouchable
  TMO members?
 
 I'm only speaking about a general attitude that MMY had and was 
certainly present in the TMO and MIU/MUM administration towards non-
ru's. I'm assuming MMY was that way because his personality/laisha 
vidya was very much a product of his genes and culture. So many 
Indians, especially of his generation, are spiritual/religious snobs. 
You notice less of this attitude in contemporary Indians.  

Just for the record; what peter is saying is 180 degrees from how I 
experienced Maharishi. If anyone anywhere was not a snob it was 
certainly Maharishi. Quite the contrary; He always invited everyone 
anywhere to enjoy the benefits of His programmes regardless of class, 
age or status. 



RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors

2008-10-09 Thread Rick Archer
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of nablusoss1008
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 11:51 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors

 

Just for the record; what peter is saying is 180 degrees from how I 
experienced Maharishi. If anyone anywhere was not a snob it was 
certainly Maharishi. Quite the contrary; He always invited everyone 
anywhere to enjoy the benefits of His programmes regardless of class, 
age or status. 

At least in developed countries, he usually practiced trickle-down
economics: set the price for initiation high so the wealthy and influential
will value and appreciate it. They will then make it available to the masses
who can't afford it. Didn't quite work out that way.



RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors

2008-10-09 Thread gullible fool



Maharishi was very much into hierarchies and establishing pecking orders, 
usually based on how much money one had. He also regarded the common man as 
incapable of making sensible decisions, hence his “damning” of democracy. He 
once said of the Labor Party in the UK, “They are laborers. They shouldn’t be 
running the government. Just give them a shovel and tell them where to dig.”
 
There are two kinds of people in the world, my friend. Those who have a loaded 
gun and those who dig. You, dig. 
 
Cline Eastwood to Eli Wallach - from The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
 
Love will swallow you, eat you up completely until there is no `you,' only 
love. 
 
- Amma  

--- On Thu, 10/9/08, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

From: Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, October 9, 2008, 12:59 AM










From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
enlightened_dawn11
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 11:13 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors
 




the pathetic elitist attitude comes not from the Maharishi's 
message, but rather from their misunderstanding of reality, being 
locked into a dualistic perspective. Duality breeds conflict. It has 
nothing to do with the Maharishi's message.
Maharishi was very much into hierarchies and establishing pecking orders, 
usually based on how much money one had. He also regarded the common man as 
incapable of making sensible decisions, hence his “damning” of democracy. He 
once said of the Labor Party in the UK, “They are laborers. They shouldn’t be 
running the government. Just give them a shovel and tell them where to dig.” 



  

[FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors

2008-10-09 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On Behalf Of nablusoss1008
 Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 11:51 AM
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors
 
  
 
 Just for the record; what peter is saying is 180 degrees from how I 
 experienced Maharishi. If anyone anywhere was not a snob it was 
 certainly Maharishi. Quite the contrary; He always invited everyone 
 anywhere to enjoy the benefits of His programmes regardless of class, 
 age or status. 
 
 At least in developed countries, he usually practiced trickle-down
 economics: set the price for initiation high so the wealthy and influential
 will value and appreciate it. They will then make it available to the masses
 who can't afford it. Didn't quite work out that way.


H


Lawson



[FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors

2008-10-09 Thread bob_brigante
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On Behalf Of bob_brigante
 Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 12:17 AM
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors
 
  
 
 You are not capable of understanding what MMY said. Of course you 
don't hand
 the govt to oafs -- the current U.S. govt is proof that this is 
unwise. But
 MMY did not intend that people should be locked into low levels of 
life,
 lorded over by somebody. The whole point of the revival of Vedic 
wisdom (the
 centerpiece of which is TM, for unfolding  total awareness for all
 individuals) is that people will be able to live happily without 
being
 administered by anybody:
 


 Sounds good in principle, but then why, in practice, has there 
always been
 such heavy-handed administration in the TMO, of which you have been 
one of
 the most outspoken critics?


*

There is a constantly repeating cycle of Yugas, 4,320,000 years long, 
of which 10% is a era in which life is lived at a very low level: our 
epoch, the Kali Yuga.

The transition to the Sat Yuga starts in the Kali Yuga -- it can't 
start anywhere else -- so naturally the level of behavior is poor on 
the way to the Sat. But once Guru Dev decided to terminate the Kali 
Yuga early, it is just a matter of time before onset of Sat Yuga, no 
matter how many difficulties seem to be blocking this from within and 
from without the TM movement. 

It's like a bottle of ketchup: Shake and shake the ketchup bottle. 
None'll come, and then a lot'll. --Richard Armour

http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2002/07jun_elastic_fluids.htm





[FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors

2008-10-09 Thread nablusoss1008
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  
 
 Just for the record; what peter is saying is 180 degrees from how I 
 experienced Maharishi. If anyone anywhere was not a snob it was 
 certainly Maharishi. Quite the contrary; He always invited everyone 
 anywhere to enjoy the benefits of His programmes regardless of class, 
 age or status. 
 
 At least in developed countries, he usually practiced trickle-down
 economics: set the price for initiation high so the wealthy and 
influential
 will value and appreciate it. They will then make it available to the 
masses
 who can't afford it. Didn't quite work out that way.


Yes it did. And you are on another planet, as usual.

The rich west payed for countless projects in developing contries. Bob 
Brigante will probably have the full list, it could easily include most 
of the un-developed world that benefitted from His attention in some 
way or another. 

Now David Lynch is doing the same thing regarding poor americans.
 
Two blessed souls indeed.

These days the USA and India particularily is reaping the benefits of 
His historic and altruistic activities.




[FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors

2008-10-09 Thread nablusoss1008
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 There is a constantly repeating cycle of Yugas, 4,320,000 years long, 
 of which 10% is a era in which life is lived at a very low level: our 
 epoch, the Kali Yuga.
 
 The transition to the Sat Yuga starts in the Kali Yuga -- it can't 
 start anywhere else -- so naturally the level of behavior is poor on 
 the way to the Sat. But once Guru Dev decided to terminate the Kali 
 Yuga early, it is just a matter of time before onset of Sat Yuga, no 
 matter how many difficulties seem to be blocking this from within and 
 from without the TM movement. 

The TM movement was instituted by Guru Dev. And Guru Dev Himself was 
not alone in the descision to termiate Kali Yuga. He is one of the most 
illustrious in a long line of Masters, many of whom are incarnating 
today to help us into Sat Yuga through the total demolishing of old 
systems, including capitalism.

Now that communism is gone the next to go is capitalism
- Maharishi

To understand more of the Hierarchy of the Masters Wisdom, please see:
http://shareintl.org/magazine/SI_current.htm




[FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors

2008-10-08 Thread Alex Stanley
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 The Ru's only have themselves to blame for this sort of
 nonsense. They have treated townies like shit whenever
 there was a conflict and this is what happens. 
 
It was an out-of-town Ru firing up anti-townie sentiment with a single
email that got the two Rus on the ballot in the first place. So, the
anti-Ru backlash is to be expected. The biggest bummer is that there
were two locals running in the Dem. primary who would have been well
respected by both Rus and locals. With the two Rus on the ballot,
there are probably a lot of local Dems who will vote for the two local
GOP supervisors.



[FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors

2008-10-08 Thread curtisdeltablues
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 The Ru's only have themselves to blame for this sort of nonsense.
They have treated townies like shit whenever there was a conflict
and this is what happens. 

They should have kept that beautiful chapel.  Tearing it down was such
a FU to Fairfield and its Christians. Plus it was the most beautiful
building on campus and a great place to hear music.  It was a symbol
for respecting Western religions that had real PR value.  Tearing it
down signaled the end of pretending to be more than another Hindu cult.

My favorite line: stop livestock production.

In Iowa?  Yeah, that's gunna fly about as far as yogic flying.



 
 --- On Wed, 10/8/08, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 From: Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Jefferson County Supervisors
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Wednesday, October 8, 2008, 1:53 PM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Email going around:  
 
 October
 6, 2008 
 
 Dear 
 Friends,  
 
 I am writing to
 you not as a Republican or a Democrat but as a very concerned citizen of
 Jefferson County. Recently a group of men were drinking coffee at
Hy-Vee and
 discussing the county supervisor race. A woman from the meditating
community
 heard them and said to them, We are going to take over this county
and there
 is nothing you can do about it. That statement is true if we don't
defeat the
 two meditators running for county supervisors.   
 
 William Richards and Earl Shepard are the candidates for Jefferson
 County Supervisor on the Democrat ticket. These men are associated
with MUM and
 the meditating movement.  They will not represent you and your tax
 dollars with regard to county business. 
 
 During
 the past year the meditating community has attempted to give tax
breaks to
 organic farmers, stop livestock production and use eminent domain to
take farm
 land.They have demolished historical landmarks on the Parsons
College campus
 because of the building design. If they controlled the county
dollars would
 they demolish our hundred year old courthouse?   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 The meditating
 community is mounting a well organized effort to put their
candidates in power.
 It is very important for us to take action and vote. Also….. spread
the word to
 your neighbors, friends and family.   
 

 Be sure to vote for Stephen Burgmeier and Lee Dimmitt, long
 time Jefferson County residents.
 Also, spread the word to your neighbors, friends and family.
 
 
 
 Thank you  
 
 
 
 Dave Dickey





[FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors

2008-10-08 Thread mainstream20016
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutphen@ wrote:
 
  The Ru's only have themselves to blame for this sort of nonsense.
 They have treated townies like shit whenever there was a conflict
 and this is what happens. 
 
 They should have kept that beautiful chapel.  Tearing it down was such
 a FU to Fairfield and its Christians. Plus it was the most beautiful
 building on campus and a great place to hear music.  It was a symbol
 for respecting Western religions that had real PR value.  Tearing it
 down signaled the end of pretending to be more than another Hindu cult.



Had there been a joint town/gown  campaign to fund an endowment for perpetual 
maintenance of the Barhydt Chapel, instead of the abrupt MUM announcement of 
the 
chapel's pending fate at the hands of a wrecking crew, relations would have 
been 
improved. 

Parsons College alums still gather in Fairfield for reunions.  Parsons alums 
might have 
even made the bulk of  donations for the chapel's preservation. 
MUM could have gained a large group of off-campus and nation-wide allies by 
retaining 
the chapel. By tearing down the chapel, MUM stuck a stick in the eyes of 
old-line 
Fairfielders and Parsons alums, instead.



 My favorite line: stop livestock production.
 
 In Iowa?  Yeah, that's gunna fly about as far as yogic flying.
 
 
 
  
  --- On Wed, 10/8/08, Rick Archer rick@ wrote:
  From: Rick Archer rick@
  Subject: [FairfieldLife] Jefferson County Supervisors
  To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
  Date: Wednesday, October 8, 2008, 1:53 PM
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
   
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Email going around:  
  
  October
  6, 2008 
  
  Dear 
  Friends,  
  
  I am writing to
  you not as a Republican or a Democrat but as a very concerned citizen of
  Jefferson County. Recently a group of men were drinking coffee at
 Hy-Vee and
  discussing the county supervisor race. A woman from the meditating
 community
  heard them and said to them, We are going to take over this county
 and there
  is nothing you can do about it. That statement is true if we don't
 defeat the
  two meditators running for county supervisors.   
  
  William Richards and Earl Shepard are the candidates for Jefferson
  County Supervisor on the Democrat ticket. These men are associated
 with MUM and
  the meditating movement.  They will not represent you and your tax
  dollars with regard to county business. 
  
  During
  the past year the meditating community has attempted to give tax
 breaks to
  organic farmers, stop livestock production and use eminent domain to
 take farm
  land.They have demolished historical landmarks on the Parsons
 College campus
  because of the building design. If they controlled the county
 dollars would
  they demolish our hundred year old courthouse?   
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  The meditating
  community is mounting a well organized effort to put their
 candidates in power.
  It is very important for us to take action and vote. Also….. spread
 the word to
  your neighbors, friends and family.   
  
 
  Be sure to vote for Stephen Burgmeier and Lee Dimmitt, long
  time Jefferson County residents.
  Also, spread the word to your neighbors, friends and family.
  
  
  
  Thank you  
  
  
  
  Dave Dickey
 






RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors

2008-10-08 Thread Rick Archer
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of mainstream20016
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 5:18 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors

 

Had there been a joint town/gown campaign to fund an endowment for perpetual

maintenance of the Barhydt Chapel, instead of the abrupt MUM announcement of
the 
chapel's pending fate at the hands of a wrecking crew, relations would have
been 
improved.

MUM claimed expensive upkeep of the chapel as the reason for razing it, but
it was really all about the fact that it wasn't MSV, and MMY was strongly
encouraging the demolition of all such buildings.



[FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors

2008-10-08 Thread mainstream20016
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On Behalf Of mainstream20016
 Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 5:18 PM
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors
 
  
 
 Had there been a joint town/gown campaign to fund an endowment for perpetual
 
 maintenance of the Barhydt Chapel, instead of the abrupt MUM announcement of
 the 
 chapel's pending fate at the hands of a wrecking crew, relations would have
 been 
 improved.
 
 MUM claimed expensive upkeep of the chapel as the reason for razing it, but
 it was really all about the fact that it wasn't MSV, and MMY was strongly
 encouraging the demolition of all such buildings.



The Baryhdt Chapel's main entrance faced EAST, did it not ?








RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors

2008-10-08 Thread Rick Archer
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of mainstream20016
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 5:34 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors

 

 MUM claimed expensive upkeep of the chapel as the reason for razing it,
but
 it was really all about the fact that it wasn't MSV, and MMY was strongly
 encouraging the demolition of all such buildings.


The Baryhdt Chapel's main entrance faced EAST, did it not ?

A little bit S, probably ESE.



[FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors

2008-10-08 Thread Alex Stanley
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On Behalf Of mainstream20016
 Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 5:18 PM
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors
 
  
 
  Had there been a joint town/gown campaign to fund an endowment
  for perpetual maintenance of the Barhydt Chapel, instead of the
  abrupt MUM announcement of the chapel's pending fate at the 
  hands of a wrecking crew, relations would have been improved.
 
 MUM claimed expensive upkeep of the chapel as the reason for
 razing it, but it was really all about the fact that it wasn't
 MSV, and MMY was strongly encouraging the demolition of all such
 buildings.

MSV was definitely a huge reason for tearing it down, however, the
structural issues were very real. They spent a hundred-some-odd
thousand dollars fixing the roof and repairing water damage, but it
started leaking again because the building was shifting on its
foundation. It was going to take a half-million dollars to fix the
foundation. That's a lot of money to spend on a university building
that served little purpose for the university.

Having had to do group meditation in the chapel while an MIU student,
I have less than fond memories of it. To me, it was a cold, drafty,
uncomfortable, mildew-infested shithole, and I'm not the least bit
bothered that it was torn down.



[FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors

2008-10-08 Thread bob_brigante
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ wrote:
 
  From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  On Behalf Of mainstream20016
  Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 5:18 PM
  To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors
  
   
  
   Had there been a joint town/gown campaign to fund an endowment
   for perpetual maintenance of the Barhydt Chapel, instead of the
   abrupt MUM announcement of the chapel's pending fate at the 
   hands of a wrecking crew, relations would have been improved.
  
  MUM claimed expensive upkeep of the chapel as the reason for
  razing it, but it was really all about the fact that it wasn't
  MSV, and MMY was strongly encouraging the demolition of all such
  buildings.
 



 MSV was definitely a huge reason for tearing it down, however, the
 structural issues were very real. They spent a hundred-some-odd
 thousand dollars fixing the roof and repairing water damage, but it
 started leaking again because the building was shifting on its
 foundation. It was going to take a half-million dollars to fix the
 foundation. That's a lot of money to spend on a university building
 that served little purpose for the university.
 

 Having had to do group meditation in the chapel while an MIU 
student,
 I have less than fond memories of it. To me, it was a cold, drafty,
 uncomfortable, mildew-infested shithole, and I'm not the least bit
 bothered that it was torn down.


***

Yeah, it was a piece of crap, but a piece of crap that was treasured 
by some. It probably would have been smarter politically to ask these 
people who wanted to save Barhydt to put their money where their 
mouth is, and when that didn't happen, say that the school had no 
choice but to tear it down. 

Actually, I think either MUM or somebody in town did start a Barhydt 
preservation fund, but it went nowhere, naturally. The chapel did not 
have enough of a footprint on a 160 acre campus to be a problem -- 
MUM could have left the building closed up and unused if the 
foundation problems had been addressed, which would, of course, cost 
a shitload of money that nobody was willing to put up.



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors

2008-10-08 Thread Jonathan Chadwick
Actually I think it credits the university that they didn't act politically.

--- On Wed, 10/8/08, bob_brigante [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

From: bob_brigante [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, October 8, 2008, 6:56 PM






--- In FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com, Alex Stanley 
j_alexander_ [EMAIL PROTECTED] .. wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com, Rick Archer rick@ wrote:
 
  From: FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com
 [mailto:FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com]
  On Behalf Of mainstream20016
  Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 5:18 PM
  To: FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com
  Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors
  
  
  
   Had there been a joint town/gown campaign to fund an endowment
   for perpetual maintenance of the Barhydt Chapel, instead of the
   abrupt MUM announcement of the chapel's pending fate at the 
   hands of a wrecking crew, relations would have been improved.
  
  MUM claimed expensive upkeep of the chapel as the reason for
  razing it, but it was really all about the fact that it wasn't
  MSV, and MMY was strongly encouraging the demolition of all such
  buildings.
 

 MSV was definitely a huge reason for tearing it down, however, the
 structural issues were very real. They spent a hundred-some- odd
 thousand dollars fixing the roof and repairing water damage, but it
 started leaking again because the building was shifting on its
 foundation. It was going to take a half-million dollars to fix the
 foundation. That's a lot of money to spend on a university building
 that served little purpose for the university.
 

 Having had to do group meditation in the chapel while an MIU 
student,
 I have less than fond memories of it. To me, it was a cold, drafty,
 uncomfortable, mildew-infested shithole, and I'm not the least bit
 bothered that it was torn down.


***

Yeah, it was a piece of crap, but a piece of crap that was treasured 
by some. It probably would have been smarter politically to ask these 
people who wanted to save Barhydt to put their money where their 
mouth is, and when that didn't happen, say that the school had no 
choice but to tear it down. 

Actually, I think either MUM or somebody in town did start a Barhydt 
preservation fund, but it went nowhere, naturally. The chapel did not 
have enough of a footprint on a 160 acre campus to be a problem -- 
MUM could have left the building closed up and unused if the 
foundation problems had been addressed, which would, of course, cost 
a shitload of money that nobody was willing to put up.

 














  

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors

2008-10-08 Thread Peter



--- On Wed, 10/8/08, Alex Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 From: Alex Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Wednesday, October 8, 2008, 3:24 PM
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  The Ru's only have themselves to blame for this
 sort of
  nonsense. They have treated townies like
 shit whenever
  there was a conflict and this is what happens. 
  
 It was an out-of-town Ru firing up anti-townie sentiment
 with a single
 email that got the two Rus on the ballot in the first
 place. So, the
 anti-Ru backlash is to be expected. The biggest bummer is
 that there
 were two locals running in the Dem. primary who would have
 been well
 respected by both Rus and locals. With the two Rus on the
 ballot,
 there are probably a lot of local Dems who will vote for
 the two local
 GOP supervisors.

So many Ru's have such a pathetic elitist attitude towards non-ru's because of 
the spiritually superior zeitgeist (damn, I love dat word!) the Maharishi 
espoused for so many years in the TMO.





 
 
 
 
 To subscribe, send a message to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Or go to: 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
 and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 

  


[FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors

2008-10-08 Thread enlightened_dawn11
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 
 
 
 --- On Wed, 10/8/08, Alex Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  From: Alex Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors
  To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
  Date: Wednesday, October 8, 2008, 3:24 PM
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
  drpetersutphen@ wrote:
  
   The Ru's only have themselves to blame for this
  sort of
   nonsense. They have treated townies like
  shit whenever
   there was a conflict and this is what happens. 
   
  It was an out-of-town Ru firing up anti-townie sentiment
  with a single
  email that got the two Rus on the ballot in the first
  place. So, the
  anti-Ru backlash is to be expected. The biggest bummer is
  that there
  were two locals running in the Dem. primary who would have
  been well
  respected by both Rus and locals. With the two Rus on the
  ballot,
  there are probably a lot of local Dems who will vote for
  the two local
  GOP supervisors.
 
 So many Ru's have such a pathetic elitist attitude towards non-
ru's because of the spiritually superior zeitgeist (damn, I love dat 
word!) the Maharishi espoused for so many years in the TMO.
 
 
the pathetic elitist attitude comes not from the Maharishi's 
message, but rather from their misunderstanding of reality, being 
locked into a dualistic perspective. Duality breeds conflict. It has 
nothing to do with the Maharishi's message.



RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors

2008-10-08 Thread Rick Archer
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of enlightened_dawn11
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 11:13 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors

 

the pathetic elitist attitude comes not from the Maharishi's 
message, but rather from their misunderstanding of reality, being 
locked into a dualistic perspective. Duality breeds conflict. It has 
nothing to do with the Maharishi's message.

Maharishi was very much into hierarchies and establishing pecking orders,
usually based on how much money one had. He also regarded the common man as
incapable of making sensible decisions, hence his damning of democracy. He
once said of the Labor Party in the UK, They are laborers. They shouldn't
be running the government. Just give them a shovel and tell them where to
dig.



[FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors

2008-10-08 Thread bob_brigante


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On Behalf Of enlightened_dawn11
 Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 11:13 PM
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Jefferson County Supervisors



 the pathetic elitist attitude comes not from the Maharishi's
 message, but rather from their misunderstanding of reality, being
 locked into a dualistic perspective. Duality breeds conflict. It has
 nothing to do with the Maharishi's message.





 Maharishi was very much into hierarchies and establishing pecking
orders,
 usually based on how much money one had. He also regarded the common
man as
 incapable of making sensible decisions, hence his damning of
democracy. He
 once said of the Labor Party in the UK, They are laborers. They
shouldn't
 be running the government. Just give them a shovel and tell them where
to
 dig.



***



You are not capable of understanding what MMY said. Of course you don't
hand the govt to oafs -- the current U.S. govt is proof that this is
unwise. But MMY did not intend that people should be locked into low
levels of life, lorded over by somebody. The whole point of the revival
of Vedic wisdom (the centerpiece of which is TM, for unfolding  total
awareness for all individuals) is that people will be able to live
happily without being administered by anybody:

Highlights from the page below:

there is no ruler, no ruled There is nothing to administer

When there was lot of administration, there was a lot of controversy to
be reconciled here and there and there so far. So for the assembly of
mankind there was administration needed, but now today that
administration will be just a name, and a name may show some shadow of
it. But in reality the world is going to be administered on its own
which is the ultimate level of, for want of a word we say, Being, Being,
Being, Being.
http://www.globalgoodnews.com/world-peace-a.html?art=1193940660953239
http://www.globalgoodnews.com/world-peace-a.html?art=1193940660953239
http://tinyurl.com/2sk9ax http://tinyurl.com/2sk9axCelebrating the
tenth and final day of the global Coronation of six new Rajas of the
Global Country of World Peace: Maharishi's address - Part II
by Global Good News Staff Writer

Global Good NewsTranslate This Article
http://www.globalgoodnews.com/world-peace-a.html?art=1193940660953239#t\
ranslate
2 November 2007

During the second session on the tenth day of the global Coronation,
Maharishi said, 'Today is the Puja [Vedic ceremony of gratitude] where
that omniscient, omnipresent, almighty characteristic quality of the
ruler of the ever-expanding universe is open to our awareness. . . . Now
we are at the basis of the Constitution where the Constitution is
applicable to oneself, and when Constitution is applicable to one's
Self, there is no ruler, no ruled—simple Unity prevails.'

At the beginning of his talk, Maharishi said, 'Jai Guru Dev. Jai Guru
Dev. Jai Guru Dev. Today's Puja to Guru Dev* takes us completely,
completely on the lap of Guru Dev. The supreme affection of Guru Dev, we
are expressing, we are experiencing today, now, on this 10th Day of
Purusha Coronation. Something concrete that is coming to our
awareness—the nature of Purusha, which was so far hidden by the
divided eight Prakritis. Since yesterday, when we did the 9th day Puja
of the Coronation, Paraprakriti** has been awakened in our awareness,
Paraprakriti has been awakened on the experiential level of our
awareness.

'This is Rishitau, the Sakshitau, the witnessing quality of our Self.
It's difficult to say, but the reality is that the witnessing quality of
our Self is in that warmth, in that absolute softness where silence is
being crowned with dynamism, eternal silence with eternal dynamism, for
eternal supreme quality of administration wherever administration is in
our world, or in our heaven, wherever, wherever, wherever.

'Purusha***, being open to his own nature, and what is in the nature of
Purusha? Pure silence, fully awake in itself, that wakefulness for which
the Vedic expression is Yatah Raja—''As is the Ruler, as is the
administrator,'' Tatah Prajya—''so is the administered.'' The
process of administration and the administered come on a level that in
itself is completely, eternally unified in its infinite diversity of the
action principle.

'In the action principle there is an actor, process of acting, and the
object of action. Three values are there, but three values in one
awareness. That is the Purusha, Purusha, the eternal ruler of all
dynamism, the eternal ruler of the ever-expanding diverse universe. The
ruler in the oneness is omnipresent, omniscient.

'So today is the Puja where that omniscient, omnipresent, almighty
characteristic quality of the ruler of the ever-expanding universe is
open to our awareness. Puja at the feet of Guru Dev, with the Purusha,
who are officially embarking upon