[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-26 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
 
  It's been a kind of revelation, realizing that 
  random violence is *not* an ever-present possi-
  bility. I walk where I want, when I want, in all
  types of neighborhoods and at all hours of the
  night and day, and have never in 4-1/2 years felt 
  as if there was the possibility of violence.
  
  After a lifetime of living in US cities where that
  awareness was rarely far away, especially at night,
  it's been really fascinating living in a place
  where it's just not a part of the environment.
  
  Oh, sure, there is the occasional violence and
  mugging in Europe, but I've never run into even
  a *hint* of it personally. The contrast has been
  quite interesting to try to get used to.
 
 I've never run into even
 a *hint* of it personally. In the US. In Asia. Or Europe. 

You are fortunate. During many of my years in
Santa Fe I commuted to Detroit for consulting
work. Not paying attention to where you're walk-
ing in Detroit can earn you a new incarnation
tout de suite. :-) Murder capital of the US
at the time...more per year in that one city
than France and Spain combined IIRC.





[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-26 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@ 
 wrote:
 snip
  THIS IS SHOTOKAN (that I learned, and these are just people 
  trying to qualify for black belt or 2nd dan) 
  http://youtube.com/watch?v=ZlAFJHEu8go
 
 Boy, to the utterly untrained eye, that's pretty
 darned impressive stuff.

Exactly. Well said. 

This is fighting the way you like to debate,
playing by the rules (especially if you get 
to make up the rules). In a real fight there
are none.

Please don't get me wrong...I *loved* Shotokan-
style karate. But I found that there were more
reality-based styles out there that taught
what to do if you found yourself in a situation
in which there is no referee and no rules and
the other person really wants to do you harm.
One is more applicable for theorhetical situa-
tions; the other for (sadly, occasionally) real 
life. 

There are *definitely* some Shotokan karatekas
who could kick ass in a real-life situation. But
my five years in that study convinced me that
for every one of them there are 20 who only
believe that they could kick ass in a real-life
situation. Kinda like TMers and their assessment
of where they stand importance-wise in the
cosmic scheme of things.  :-)





[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-26 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 The videos on your tape were students in point matches and highly
 choreographed demos with people playing the part of an attacker but
 then giving no resistance and rolling out of the way when the 
 master
 touched them.  Ever try to flip someone using one hand who doesn't
 want to flip over?
 
 We are exactly 15 years too late for any argument about traditional
 karate styles, the issue has been settled in the ring by guys 
 willing
 to put their traditions on the line to really find out what works. 
 Any dojo that isn't cross training now is running an aerobics class. 
 Not that there is anything wrong with that.  Any attention on any
 martial art is great IMO.  So high five for that.  But comparing
 choreographed demos to challenge matches is not realistic.

What he said. Especially the part about, Have 
you ever tried to flip someone who doesn't want
to be flipped?

Some strong lessons there for the Rajas who find
the audiences they're speaking to less receptive
than they expect them to be.





[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-26 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
 curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
 
  The videos on your tape were students in point matches and highly
  choreographed demos with people playing the part of an attacker 
  but then giving no resistance and rolling out of the way when the 
  master touched them.  Ever try to flip someone using one hand 
  who doesn't want to flip over?
  
  We are exactly 15 years too late for any argument about 
  traditional karate styles, the issue has been settled in the ring 
  by guys willing to put their traditions on the line to really 
  find out what works. Any dojo that isn't cross training now is 
  running an aerobics class. 
  Not that there is anything wrong with that.  Any attention on any
  martial art is great IMO.  So high five for that.  But comparing
  choreographed demos to challenge matches is not realistic.
 
 What he said. Especially the part about, Have 
 you ever tried to flip someone who doesn't want
 to be flipped?
 
 Some strong lessons there for the Rajas who find
 the audiences they're speaking to less receptive
 than they expect them to be.

I'll follow up on this because the more I think
about it, the more parallels I see to the TM
approach to meditation and self-discovery.

Not only is the tradition not willing to put itself
on the line with regard to proving its claims (except
with arguably bogus science), it actively discourages
any of its followers from ever *trying* any other tech-
nique to do comparisons of their relative effectiveness 
themselves.

Try another style of meditation as a TMer and you're 
out on your ass. And the remaining TB followers are 
actively discouraged from having anything to do with 
you. You hear things like, You can't believe anything 
they say -- they're Off The Program and thus obviously 
unstressing, and thus nothing they say can be believed. 
Or, They never really learned TM 'correctly' in the 
first place.

The last buzzphrase really amuses me. The whole TM
schtick is the effectiveness of its teaching method.
Everyone gets the same perfect quality of instruction;
the very purity of the teaching concept insures
it. But it seems that whenever anyone who once learned 
TM expresses a preference for another style of medi-
tation on this forum, several people pop out of the
woodwork and claim that either these people never 
learned TM in the first place or (even more hilarious)
that they learned incorrectly.

The people who say this never seem to realize that if
they really *believe* what they're saying, they are
stating that they *don't* believe the TM claim that
its teaching method is universally effective because
of the purity of the teaching. 

In my case, whenever someone says that I never learned
TM properly or never understood its dogma correctly,
what they are saying is that my initiator (Jerry Jarvis)
was a fuckup, and the person whose lectures I attended
literally hundreds of hours of (Maharishi) was a fuckup.

:-)

Curtis' one-liner about Have you ever tried to throw
someone who isn't willing to be thrown? is just *perfect*
to describe the TMO environment. Almost all lectures are
given to believers -- preaching to the converted. We've
heard reports of the automaton-like applause given to
almost anyone who says what the audience wants to hear.

True Believers *want* to be thrown. It's like watching
a public demonstration of Aikido, in which the teacher
seemingly tosses his students around the mat effortlessly,
without ever breaking a sweat. The truth about those demos
is (having studied Aikido and participated in the charade
myself) is that the students are *cooperating* with the
throw. They are *anticipating* the throw and going with
it, whether consciously or unconsciously. 

But I've seen what happens when my Aikido master tried
his throws on a Jiu-Jitsu guy who *wasn't* cooperating.
The Jiu-Jitsu guy just stood there, unmoved by the ki
that the Aikido master was using. Now, since both of 
the guys in question were really *good* at what they did,
the Jiu-Jitsu guy couldn't throw the Aikido guy EITHER,
so they just danced around each other for awhile. But
that's a stalemate, not a victory for either side.

I'm just rappin' about this particular 'tude in the
martial arts (My kung-fu is better than your kung-fu.)
because I think it's an accurate parallel to the claims
of best and highest path that come out of the TMO
(or any other tradition that claims its path to be the
best). In almost every case, when you look into it,
there have never been anything BUT claims, by those
who make them.

And often, those who MAKE the claims go out of their
way to make sure that their students never have any
opportunity to validate the claims themselves. Making
sure that anyone who tries is thrown out of the tradition
and demonized to people still within it is a grand way
of doing this.

It would be an interesting thing in my opinion to have
a 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-26 Thread curtisdeltablues
It would be an interesting thing in my opinion to have
a Meditation Smack-down Match, in which advanced
practitioners of several techniques sit in a room
together and go for samadhi, each of them hooked up
to EEG machines and other testing devices to see if
anything is happening on any other level than the
subjective. It would be fascinating to me to see who
kicks ass in such a contest.

Now that's entertainment!  Excellent riffs off my odd exchange with Off.

I'll give MMY credit for giving us criteria to judge the failure of
his own program.  No sidhi, no enlightenment.  Now it seems to be
fashionable to evade this clear connection and just go with inner
feelings of expansion, evaluating coincidences or the ordinary weird
stuff that happens in life, and very vivid imaginations, as signs of
sidhis and enlightenment.

Likewise point matches and choreographed demos ignore that for the
last 50 years in Brazil there is a way to prove that your system of
martial arts really works, Vale Tudo or no holds barred fighting
matches.  When it came to the US 15 years ago it revolutionized
martial arts.  It separated the posers from the fighters.  It also
created a sport that is the fastest growing sport in the world right
now, mixed martial arts.  Guys willing to actually test their theories
in the ring.  And the posers continue to give explanations about why
they can't join the tests just as you predict the movement would in
your Meditation Smack-down Match. 


Let's get ready to ruuumble!  






--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
  curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
  
   The videos on your tape were students in point matches and highly
   choreographed demos with people playing the part of an attacker 
   but then giving no resistance and rolling out of the way when the 
   master touched them.  Ever try to flip someone using one hand 
   who doesn't want to flip over?
   
   We are exactly 15 years too late for any argument about 
   traditional karate styles, the issue has been settled in the ring 
   by guys willing to put their traditions on the line to really 
   find out what works. Any dojo that isn't cross training now is 
   running an aerobics class. 
   Not that there is anything wrong with that.  Any attention on any
   martial art is great IMO.  So high five for that.  But comparing
   choreographed demos to challenge matches is not realistic.
  
  What he said. Especially the part about, Have 
  you ever tried to flip someone who doesn't want
  to be flipped?
  
  Some strong lessons there for the Rajas who find
  the audiences they're speaking to less receptive
  than they expect them to be.
 
 I'll follow up on this because the more I think
 about it, the more parallels I see to the TM
 approach to meditation and self-discovery.
 
 Not only is the tradition not willing to put itself
 on the line with regard to proving its claims (except
 with arguably bogus science), it actively discourages
 any of its followers from ever *trying* any other tech-
 nique to do comparisons of their relative effectiveness 
 themselves.
 
 Try another style of meditation as a TMer and you're 
 out on your ass. And the remaining TB followers are 
 actively discouraged from having anything to do with 
 you. You hear things like, You can't believe anything 
 they say -- they're Off The Program and thus obviously 
 unstressing, and thus nothing they say can be believed. 
 Or, They never really learned TM 'correctly' in the 
 first place.
 
 The last buzzphrase really amuses me. The whole TM
 schtick is the effectiveness of its teaching method.
 Everyone gets the same perfect quality of instruction;
 the very purity of the teaching concept insures
 it. But it seems that whenever anyone who once learned 
 TM expresses a preference for another style of medi-
 tation on this forum, several people pop out of the
 woodwork and claim that either these people never 
 learned TM in the first place or (even more hilarious)
 that they learned incorrectly.
 
 The people who say this never seem to realize that if
 they really *believe* what they're saying, they are
 stating that they *don't* believe the TM claim that
 its teaching method is universally effective because
 of the purity of the teaching. 
 
 In my case, whenever someone says that I never learned
 TM properly or never understood its dogma correctly,
 what they are saying is that my initiator (Jerry Jarvis)
 was a fuckup, and the person whose lectures I attended
 literally hundreds of hours of (Maharishi) was a fuckup.
 
 :-)
 
 Curtis' one-liner about Have you ever tried to throw
 someone who isn't willing to be thrown? is just *perfect*
 to describe the TMO environment. Almost all lectures are
 given to believers -- preaching to the converted. We've
 heard reports of the automaton-like applause given 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-26 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 It would be an interesting thing in my opinion to have
 a Meditation Smack-down Match, in which advanced
 practitioners of several techniques sit in a room
 together and go for samadhi, each of them hooked up
 to EEG machines and other testing devices to see if
 anything is happening on any other level than the
 subjective. It would be fascinating to me to see who
 kicks ass in such a contest.
 
 Now that's entertainment!  

Exactly. And *only* entertainment. I for one wouldn't
really CARE who kicked ass or which technique comes
out best. I'd just like to see it done so we could
put all these My technique is better than your 
technique braggarts behind us once and for all.





[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-26 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings 
no_reply@ 
  wrote:
  snip
   THIS IS SHOTOKAN (that I learned, and these are just people 
   trying to qualify for black belt or 2nd dan) 
   http://youtube.com/watch?v=ZlAFJHEu8go
  
  Boy, to the utterly untrained eye, that's pretty
  darned impressive stuff.
 
 Exactly. Well said. 
 
 This is fighting the way you like to debate,
 playing by the rules (especially if you get 
 to make up the rules). In a real fight there
 are none.

You might want to rethink that analogy. In a
real fight, there's no question who won.

What's the parallel, debate-wise, to a real
fight?

(Oh, and by the way, I don't make up the rules.
They're quite well established. Making up the rules
is something *you* do when you find it impossible to
win under the accepted rules. Unfortunately, the
result is that your win is made up as well.)

snip
 There are *definitely* some Shotokan karatekas
 who could kick ass in a real-life situation. But
 my five years in that study convinced me that
 for every one of them there are 20 who only
 believe that they could kick ass in a real-life
 situation. Kinda like TMers and their assessment
 of where they stand importance-wise in the
 cosmic scheme of things.  :-)

You should probably be careful to say some TMers
when you make generalizations like this.




[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-26 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
 curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
 
  It would be an interesting thing in my opinion to have
  a Meditation Smack-down Match, in which advanced
  practitioners of several techniques sit in a room
  together and go for samadhi, each of them hooked up
  to EEG machines and other testing devices to see if
  anything is happening on any other level than the
  subjective. It would be fascinating to me to see who
  kicks ass in such a contest.
  
  Now that's entertainment!  
 
 Exactly. And *only* entertainment. I for one wouldn't
 really CARE who kicked ass or which technique comes
 out best. I'd just like to see it done so we could
 put all these My technique is better than your 
 technique braggarts behind us once and for all.

As far as I can tell, you are the ONLY ONE on here playing that 
particular game. You are the only one on here continuously driving 
the dichotomy between other seekers and your particular brand of 
spiritual correctness. So would this smack down really silence you? 
Methinks not. At all.



[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-26 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 It would be an interesting thing in my opinion to have
 a Meditation Smack-down Match, in which advanced
 practitioners of several techniques sit in a room
 together and go for samadhi, each of them hooked up
 to EEG machines and other testing devices to see if
 anything is happening on any other level than the
 subjective. It would be fascinating to me to see who
 kicks ass in such a contest.
 
 Now that's entertainment!  Excellent riffs off my odd exchange 
with Off.
 
 I'll give MMY credit for giving us criteria to judge the failure of
 his own program.  No sidhi, no enlightenment.  Now it seems to be
 fashionable to evade this clear connection and just go with inner
 feelings of expansion, evaluating coincidences or the ordinary 
weird
 stuff that happens in life, and very vivid imaginations, as signs 
of
 sidhis and enlightenment.
 
LOL! good one! Yes, enlightenment is one big fantasy, designed to 
make those who have worked so hard to achieve this state feel good 
and disassociate from Reality! Whoo HA! See if you can sell that 
load of malarkey to someone-- oh wait, you just bought it-- LOL!



[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-26 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
 I'll follow up on this because the more I think
 about it, the more parallels I see to the TM
 approach to meditation and self-discovery.
 
 Not only is the tradition not willing to put itself
 on the line with regard to proving its claims (except
 with arguably bogus science),

And how would it put itself on the line except
via science?

 it actively discourages
 any of its followers from ever *trying* any other tech-
 nique to do comparisons of their relative effectiveness 
 themselves.
 
 Try another style of meditation as a TMer and you're 
 out on your ass. And the remaining TB followers are 
 actively discouraged from having anything to do with 
 you. You hear things like, You can't believe anything 
 they say -- they're Off The Program and thus obviously 
 unstressing, and thus nothing they say can be believed.

Have you heard things like this? I haven't.
 
 Or, They never really learned TM 'correctly' in the 
 first place.
 
 The last buzzphrase really amuses me. The whole TM
 schtick is the effectiveness of its teaching method.
 Everyone gets the same perfect quality of instruction;
 the very purity of the teaching concept insures
 it.

Actually, the instruction doesn't ensure anything.
What it does is *minimize* the possibility of
getting it wrong.

 But it seems that whenever anyone who once learned 
 TM expresses a preference for another style of medi-
 tation on this forum, several people pop out of the
 woodwork and claim that either these people never 
 learned TM in the first place or (even more hilarious)
 that they learned incorrectly.

Actually, it depends on what the person who expressed
the preference says to justify it.

 The people who say this never seem to realize that if
 they really *believe* what they're saying, they are
 stating that they *don't* believe the TM claim that
 its teaching method is universally effective because
 of the purity of the teaching.

I've never heard such a claim from TM. Have you?

 In my case, whenever someone says that I never learned
 TM properly or never understood its dogma correctly,
 what they are saying is that my initiator (Jerry Jarvis)
 was a fuckup, and the person whose lectures I attended
 literally hundreds of hours of (Maharishi) was a fuckup.

That sure isn't what *I'm* saying when I say you've
never understood what MMy teaches. (I think you probably
learned the technique correctly, but you never got why
it's unique.)

snip
 It would be an interesting thing in my opinion to have
 a Meditation Smack-down Match, in which advanced 
 practitioners of several techniques sit in a room 
 together and go for samadhi, each of them hooked up
 to EEG machines and other testing devices to see if
 anything is happening on any other level than the 
 subjective. It would be fascinating to me to see who
 kicks ass in such a contest.
 
 It would be even more fascinating to see who refuses
 to participate. My bet is that the TM organization 
 would be the first to send in its polite refusal.

Possibly because anyone who is going for samadhi in
their meditation wouldn't be practicing TM, don'cha
think?





[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-26 Thread curtisdeltablues
  
 LOL! good one! Yes, enlightenment is one big fantasy, designed to 
 make those who have worked so hard to achieve this state feel good 
 and disassociate from Reality! Whoo HA! See if you can sell that 
 load of malarkey to someone-- oh wait, you just bought it-- LOL!


I am just talking about the formulation of enlightenment by MMY.  In
his system sidhis are needed as sigh posts of enlightenment. No sidhis
mastery, no enlightenment.  I admire him for his lack of wiggle room
about this connection.  Anyone enlightened without sidhis is using a
different system of evaluation from MMY. 

BTW do you believe that the rapture of Christianity is a fantasy? 
Same thing for me so far about enlightenment.  But perhaps someone
will hover in the air someday and I can happily amend my opinion.   



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues 
 curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
 
  It would be an interesting thing in my opinion to have
  a Meditation Smack-down Match, in which advanced
  practitioners of several techniques sit in a room
  together and go for samadhi, each of them hooked up
  to EEG machines and other testing devices to see if
  anything is happening on any other level than the
  subjective. It would be fascinating to me to see who
  kicks ass in such a contest.
  
  Now that's entertainment!  Excellent riffs off my odd exchange 
 with Off.
  
  I'll give MMY credit for giving us criteria to judge the failure of
  his own program.  No sidhi, no enlightenment.  Now it seems to be
  fashionable to evade this clear connection and just go with inner
  feelings of expansion, evaluating coincidences or the ordinary 
 weird
  stuff that happens in life, and very vivid imaginations, as signs 
 of
  sidhis and enlightenment.
  
 LOL! good one! Yes, enlightenment is one big fantasy, designed to 
 make those who have worked so hard to achieve this state feel good 
 and disassociate from Reality! Whoo HA! See if you can sell that 
 load of malarkey to someone-- oh wait, you just bought it-- LOL!





[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-26 Thread new . morning
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues 
 curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
 
 LOL! good one! Yes, enlightenment is one big fantasy, designed to 
 make those who have worked so hard to achieve this state feel good 
 and disassociate from Reality! Whoo HA! See if you can sell that 
 load of malarkey to someone-- oh wait, you just bought it-- LOL!

As did you apparently. Curtis being a  particle of your / our self. A
particle seeking, apparently, healing and wholeness. And you give your
self / particle nothing but ridicule and derision. I must heal this
you-particle of my self, for such aberrant behavior. Oh, nice
particle, what has made you feel so maligned? What can we do to make
you more whole, and for your to feel the Love? So that you can realign
and be part of this wonderful wholeness, and not an isolated aberrant
and non-caring, cutting derisive particle?








[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-26 Thread new . morning
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   
  LOL! good one! Yes, enlightenment is one big fantasy, designed to 
  make those who have worked so hard to achieve this state feel good 
  and disassociate from Reality! Whoo HA! See if you can sell that 
  load of malarkey to someone-- oh wait, you just bought it-- LOL!
 
 
 I am just talking about the formulation of enlightenment by MMY.  In
 his system sidhis are needed as sigh posts of enlightenment. No sidhis
 mastery, no enlightenment.  I admire him for his lack of wiggle room
 about this connection.  Anyone enlightened without sidhis is using a
 different system of evaluation from MMY. 
 
 BTW do you believe that the rapture of Christianity is a fantasy? 
 Same thing for me so far about enlightenment.  But perhaps someone
 will hover in the air someday and I can happily amend my opinion. 


And may the someone be Maria Sharipova, or Kiera Knightly.




[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-26 Thread curtisdeltablues
  BTW do you believe that the rapture of Christianity is a fantasy? 
  Same thing for me so far about enlightenment.  But perhaps someone
  will hover in the air someday and I can happily amend my opinion. 
 
 
 And may the someone be Maria Sharipova, or Kiera Knightly.



And may they hover just above eye level...

Brilliant dude!  I'll bet it would take a lot less consciousness than
it would to lift Bevan off the ground!




--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
 curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
 

   LOL! good one! Yes, enlightenment is one big fantasy, designed to 
   make those who have worked so hard to achieve this state feel
good 
   and disassociate from Reality! Whoo HA! See if you can sell
that 
   load of malarkey to someone-- oh wait, you just bought it-- LOL!
  
  
  I am just talking about the formulation of enlightenment by MMY.  In
  his system sidhis are needed as sigh posts of enlightenment. No sidhis
  mastery, no enlightenment.  I admire him for his lack of wiggle room
  about this connection.  Anyone enlightened without sidhis is using a
  different system of evaluation from MMY. 
  
  BTW do you believe that the rapture of Christianity is a fantasy? 
  Same thing for me so far about enlightenment.  But perhaps someone
  will hover in the air someday and I can happily amend my opinion. 
 
 
 And may the someone be Maria Sharipova, or Kiera Knightly.





[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-26 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   
  LOL! good one! Yes, enlightenment is one big fantasy, designed 
to 
  make those who have worked so hard to achieve this state feel 
good 
  and disassociate from Reality! Whoo HA! See if you can sell 
that 
  load of malarkey to someone-- oh wait, you just bought it-- LOL!
 
 
 I am just talking about the formulation of enlightenment by MMY.  
In
 his system sidhis are needed as sigh posts of enlightenment. No 
sidhis
 mastery, no enlightenment.  I admire him for his lack of wiggle 
room
 about this connection.  Anyone enlightened without sidhis is 
using a
 different system of evaluation from MMY.
 
 BTW do you believe that the rapture of Christianity is a fantasy? 
 Same thing for me so far about enlightenment.  But perhaps someone
 will hover in the air someday and I can happily amend my 
opinion.   
 
I doubt that very much Curtis. There are people on this forum that 
would and do renounce the reality of enlightenment, no matter what 
is presented to them. Why? Because all enlightenment is, is a 
radical departure from how we see ourselves in terms of our 
relationship with our universe; with no longer any stories or 
concepts filtering our immediate experience. That is a very 
threatening reality to many, despite in most cases their former 
years being supposedly committed to the dissolution of such stories 
and filters. As I like to say of such peoples' thinking, unbounded 
awareness is great, but enough is enough. 

So continue as you choose to doubt and question and challenge, and 
in general protect all that you think is yours. Make every statement 
in favor of enlightenment, here and now, a rebuttal of 
your precious and protected self. Define each statement in favor 
of eternal freedom, available right now, in terms of a strange 
dualistic concept, where everything stated as Real is found to be 
either above or below you, either inferior or superior. Continue to 
ridicule and cast doubt on those who have awakened to life's 
Reality. 

I see clearly that there is nothing to be done about it, unless and 
until you and others choose to literally change your minds and 
hearts. I have nothing to prove to you, nor do I write for your 
benefit, as you have amply demonstrated. 



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-26 Thread Vaj


On Nov 26, 2007, at 2:47 PM, jim_flanegin wrote:


I doubt that very much Curtis. There are people on this forum that
would and do renounce the reality of enlightenment, no matter what
is presented to them. Why? Because all enlightenment is, is a
radical departure from how we see ourselves in terms of our
relationship with our universe; with no longer any stories or
concepts filtering our immediate experience



Or so the story goes.




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-26 Thread Angela Mailander
Is it possible to perceive the world without the filter of concepts?  If that's 
the case, why does someone blind from birth who gains sight have to learn to 
see?  

Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:   

On Nov 26, 2007, at 2:47 PM, jim_flanegin wrote:

I doubt that very much Curtis. There are people on this forum that 
would and do renounce the reality of enlightenment, no matter what 
is presented to them. Why? Because all enlightenment is, is a 
radical departure from how we see ourselves in terms of our 
relationship with our universe; with no longer any stories or 
concepts filtering our immediate experience



Or so the story goes.





 
   

 Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-26 Thread jim_flanegin
I thought about the particular passage Vaj has taken exception to 
when I wrote it, because I am making a relative comparison, not an 
absolute one. To say that enlightenment is a state where all prior 
knowledge disappears is not accurate, and this isn't what I meant. 
There seems to be a basic level of conceptual knowledge that is 
necessary for our fulflling existence. Thanks for the question. 

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Is it possible to perceive the world without the filter of 
concepts?  If that's the case, why does someone blind from birth who 
gains sight have to learn to see?  
 
 Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:   
 
 On Nov 26, 2007, at 2:47 PM, jim_flanegin wrote:
 
 I doubt that very much Curtis. There are people on this forum that 
 would and do renounce the reality of enlightenment, no matter what 
 is presented to them. Why? Because all enlightenment is, is a 
 radical departure from how we see ourselves in terms of our 
 relationship with our universe; with no longer any stories or 
 concepts filtering our immediate experience
 
 
 
 Or so the story goes.
 
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-26 Thread off_world_beings
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
 curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
 
  The videos on your tape were students in point matches and highly
  choreographed demos with people playing the part of an attacker 
but
  then giving no resistance and rolling out of the way when the 
  master
  touched them.  Ever try to flip someone using one hand who doesn't
  want to flip over?
  
  We are exactly 15 years too late for any argument about 
traditional
  karate styles, the issue has been settled in the ring by guys 
  willing
  to put their traditions on the line to really find out what 
works. 
  Any dojo that isn't cross training now is running an aerobics 
class. 
  Not that there is anything wrong with that.  Any attention on any
  martial art is great IMO.  So high five for that.  But comparing
  choreographed demos to challenge matches is not realistic.
 
 What he said. Especially the part about, Have 
 you ever tried to flip someone who doesn't want
 to be flipped?

No, it is very easy for the properly trained person and takes no 
strength at all.

OffWorld



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-26 Thread Vaj


On Nov 26, 2007, at 3:18 PM, jim_flanegin wrote:


I thought about the particular passage Vaj has taken exception to
when I wrote it, because I am making a relative comparison, not an
absolute one. To say that enlightenment is a state where all prior
knowledge disappears is not accurate, and this isn't what I meant.
There seems to be a basic level of conceptual knowledge that is
necessary for our fulflling existence. Thanks for the question.



It wasn't a question, it was a comment.

Thoughts or emotions don't stop per se, but in the higher bodhisattva  
levels emotional and cognitive obscurations (Skt.: avarana) are lost  
forever. This is the POV of a gradual path (not a sudden path,  
although a sudden path (or pathless path) would naturally contain all  
the bodhisattva levels nonetheless). In a gradual path, eventually you  
lose a certain type of thought (or style of thought).

[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-26 Thread off_world_beings
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ 
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
  curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
  
   It would be an interesting thing in my opinion to have
   a Meditation Smack-down Match, in which advanced
   practitioners of several techniques sit in a room
   together and go for samadhi, each of them hooked up
   to EEG machines and other testing devices to see if
   anything is happening on any other level than the
   subjective. It would be fascinating to me to see who
   kicks ass in such a contest.
   
   Now that's entertainment!  
  
  Exactly. And *only* entertainment. I for one wouldn't
  really CARE who kicked ass or which technique comes
  out best. I'd just like to see it done so we could
  put all these My technique is better than your 
  technique braggarts behind us once and for all.
 
 As far as I can tell, you are the ONLY ONE on here playing that 
 particular game. You are the only one on here continuously driving 
 the dichotomy between other seekers and your particular brand of 
 spiritual correctness. So would this smack down really silence you? 
 Methinks not. At all.

Excellent point Jim. Totally spot on. The man is thinks FFL is a 
version of the game show Survivor.

Hey Turq, I've got news for you. There's no million dollars prize 
money ( Rick should have told him that at least ) 

OffWorld



[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-25 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Actually Mainstream, if you were not so stupid, and stopped thinking 
 that your silly whining comments on FFl have any value, meaning, or 
 effect in the world ...at all...
 ...then, you the might be smart enough to realize that it is YOU who 
 said all those things about yourself. Bw ha ha !
 
 Alas, you are not smart enough for that, therefore you are consigned 
 to the garbage can of history with the rest of the 20th century 
 neanderthals that never made it into the new era.

And people claim that those involved in spiritual
groups or New Age groups aren't the types who
would get involved in fascistic or authoritarian
systems. 

Get over it. Give Off a Brown Shirt and he'd have
fit right in to 1930s Germany.





[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-25 Thread off_world_beings
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@
 wrote:
 
  Actually Mainstream, if you were not so stupid, and stopped 
thinking 
  that your silly whining comments on FFl have any value, meaning, 
or 
  effect in the world ...at all...
  ...then, you the might be smart enough to realize that it is YOU 
who 
  said all those things about yourself. Bw ha ha !
  
  Alas, you are not smart enough for that, therefore you are 
consigned 
  to the garbage can of history with the rest of the 20th century 
  neanderthals that never made it into the new era.
 
 And people claim that those involved in spiritual
 groups or New Age groups aren't the types who
 would get involved in fascistic or authoritarian
 systems. 
 
 Get over it. Give Off a Brown Shirt and he'd have
 fit right in to 1930s Germany.

Yes, I am blonde haired, blue eyed and beautiful too. 

Cheer up.
I'm just playin' wit ya. 
This is just a game.

OffWorld



[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-25 Thread off_world_beings
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mainstream20016 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 why would anyone listen to 
  people 
who are saying they were s stupid in the past but now are 
correct, and we should listen to you?
Ain't gonna happen people. Hate to bust your bubble folks, 
but no-
  one 
is listening to your whining Vaj, Turq., Mainstream, Shemp, 
etc. 

Keep whining about how you made such huge mistakes in your 
life 
  and 
were really really stupid in the past and told everyone to 
listen 
  to 
you back then, but now everyone should listen to you now.

ROFLMAO !

Bunch of old jokers. No one is listening to your baby whining.

OffWorld
   
   
   There must be something of value in the message of criticism of 
the 
  TMO, for the 
   messengers are attacked  thusly:
   
   these people made huge mistakes made bad decisions 
made 
  fools of themselves... 
   and wasted yearsstupid mistake of theirsjackals here 
are 
  saying... you idiots...
   they were s stupid... you made such huge mistakes in your 
  life... were really really 
   stupid...
  
  Actually Mainstream, if you were not so stupid, and stopped 
thinking 
  that your silly whining comments on FFl have any value, meaning, 
or 
  effect in the world ...at all...
  ...then, you the might be smart enough to realize that it is YOU 
who 
  said all those things about yourself. Bw ha ha !
  
  Alas, you are not smart enough for that, therefore you are 
consigned 
  to the garbage can of history with the rest of the 20th century 
  neanderthals that never made it into the new era.
  
  OffWorld
 
 
 Judge, jury, and executioner ensuring  obedience to the royal 
rule of rajas. May your 
 permanent delusion of grandeur limit  your range of influence to 
the frozen, barren, 
 formerly productive corn fields now known as MVC.

Cheer up.
I'm just playin' wit ya. 
This is just a game.

Well, see you folks, I'm off skiing for the the day, no snow at my 
house but plenty in the mountains here in Vermont. Wooh !

OffWorld



[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-25 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@
  wrote:
  
   Actually Mainstream, if you were not so stupid, and stopped 
   thinking 
   that your silly whining comments on FFl have any value, meaning, 
   or 
   effect in the world ...at all...
   ...then, you the might be smart enough to realize that it is YOU 
   who 
   said all those things about yourself. Bw ha ha !
   
   Alas, you are not smart enough for that, therefore you are 
   consigned 
   to the garbage can of history with the rest of the 20th century 
   neanderthals that never made it into the new era.
  
  And people claim that those involved in spiritual
  groups or New Age groups aren't the types who
  would get involved in fascistic or authoritarian
  systems. 
  
  Get over it. Give Off a Brown Shirt and he'd have
  fit right in to 1930s Germany.
 
 Yes, I am blonde haired, blue eyed and beautiful too. 
 
 Cheer up.
 I'm just playin' wit ya. 
 This is just a game.

Your game also tends to involve, after several
exchanges, challenging anyone who pushes your 
buttons and disagrees with you to a fist fight.

They'd all kick your ass, of course, but still
it's pretty classic Brown Shirt behavior.

 



[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-25 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ 
wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings 
no_reply@
   wrote:
   
Actually Mainstream, if you were not so stupid, and stopped 
thinking 
that your silly whining comments on FFl have any value, 
meaning, 
or 
effect in the world ...at all...
...then, you the might be smart enough to realize that it is 
YOU 
who 
said all those things about yourself. Bw ha ha !

Alas, you are not smart enough for that, therefore you are 
consigned 
to the garbage can of history with the rest of the 20th 
century 
neanderthals that never made it into the new era.
   
   And people claim that those involved in spiritual
   groups or New Age groups aren't the types who
   would get involved in fascistic or authoritarian
   systems. 
   
   Get over it. Give Off a Brown Shirt and he'd have
   fit right in to 1930s Germany.
  
  Yes, I am blonde haired, blue eyed and beautiful too. 
  
  Cheer up.
  I'm just playin' wit ya. 
  This is just a game.
 
 Your game also tends to involve, after several
 exchanges, challenging anyone who pushes your 
 buttons and disagrees with you to a fist fight.
 
 They'd all kick your ass, of course, but still
 it's pretty classic Brown Shirt behavior.

Barry, who insists he himself is never to be taken
seriously, has always had a bit of a problem 
recognizing when others don't intend for themselves
to be taken seriously.





[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-25 Thread tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
Rory Goff writes snipped:

But to know itself as Self is not like any other knowledge, which 
is indeed dualistic and based on a comparison, on an either-or 
discrimination. 

That's why this Self-knowledge is so mind-blowing -- literally. It is 
so ordinary and so special, so still and so dynamic, so Dead and so 
Alive, so *this* and so *that* -- so slippery, so concrete, so in-
your-face paradoxical. Literally unimaginable, literally unspeakable. 

Yet it IS; I AM. 

Discrimination cannot capture it; discrimination can only surrender 
awe-struck.

TomT:
From Jean Klein Transmission of the Flame page 65 
...We have very often repeated that the seeker is the sought. An
object is a fraction; it appears in your wholeness, in your globality.
When you really come to the understanding that the seeker is the
sought, there is a natural giving-up of all energy to find something.
It is an instantaneous apperception. I don't say perception, because
in perception there is a perceiver and something perceived. An
apperception is an instantaneous perceiving of what is perceiving. So
it can never be in relation of subject-object, just as an eye can
never see its own seeing. ...you will find a glimpse of
non-subject-object relationship. This glimpse is seen with your whole
intelligence, which is there in the absence of the person, the
thinker, the doer. Understanding, being the understanding, is
enlightenment




[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-25 Thread Rory Goff

 TomT:
 From Jean Klein Transmission of the Flame page 65 snip
 Understanding, being the understanding, is enlightenment

YES -- Understanding is probably a better word than Knowledge as 
Now we both figuratively and literally Under-stand ourSelf, and it is 
truly and simply a whole-body BEing. 

It is the rock-solid bottom of the inquiry, Under-standing itSelf :-)




[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-25 Thread off_world_beings
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ 
wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings 
no_reply@
   wrote:
   
Actually Mainstream, if you were not so stupid, and stopped 
thinking 
that your silly whining comments on FFl have any value, 
meaning, 
or 
effect in the world ...at all...
...then, you the might be smart enough to realize that it is 
YOU 
who 
said all those things about yourself. Bw ha ha !

Alas, you are not smart enough for that, therefore you are 
consigned 
to the garbage can of history with the rest of the 20th 
century 
neanderthals that never made it into the new era.
   
   And people claim that those involved in spiritual
   groups or New Age groups aren't the types who
   would get involved in fascistic or authoritarian
   systems. 
   
   Get over it. Give Off a Brown Shirt and he'd have
   fit right in to 1930s Germany.
  
  Yes, I am blonde haired, blue eyed and beautiful too. 
  
  Cheer up.
  I'm just playin' wit ya. 
  This is just a game.
 
 Your game also tends to involve, after several
 exchanges, challenging anyone who pushes your 
 buttons and disagrees with you to a fist fight.

Yea right.
You are the only one that has made the most henious, disgusting, 
childish, practically libalous, statements to people on this forum. 
(Don't make me post them again;-)

 
 They'd all kick your ass, of course, but still
 it's pretty classic Brown Shirt behavior.

Uhu, unlikely.
( 3 years of intense karate training, full blooded perfect health, 
Scottish with a tinge of English just for measure, and not one ounce 
of fear within this physique.  How about you? )

But by the way, don't forget you are way more of a Ru now, than I 
will ever be.

But cheer up, I'm just playin' wit' ya
(like a cat playin' with the mouse)

Have a nice day, I'm just taking a break between skiing up in 
Vermont. It's awesome, wish you were here.

Luv from Tommy.

OffWorld as usual.






[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-25 Thread curtisdeltablues
Uhu, unlikely.
( 3 years of intense karate training, full blooded perfect health,
Scottish with a tinge of English just for measure, and not one ounce
of fear within this physique. How about you? )


So how's your ground game?  Seen any UFCs in the last decade?




--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@
  wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ 
 wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings 
 no_reply@
wrote:

 Actually Mainstream, if you were not so stupid, and stopped 
 thinking 
 that your silly whining comments on FFl have any value, 
 meaning, 
 or 
 effect in the world ...at all...
 ...then, you the might be smart enough to realize that it is 
 YOU 
 who 
 said all those things about yourself. Bw ha ha !
 
 Alas, you are not smart enough for that, therefore you are 
 consigned 
 to the garbage can of history with the rest of the 20th 
 century 
 neanderthals that never made it into the new era.

And people claim that those involved in spiritual
groups or New Age groups aren't the types who
would get involved in fascistic or authoritarian
systems. 

Get over it. Give Off a Brown Shirt and he'd have
fit right in to 1930s Germany.
   
   Yes, I am blonde haired, blue eyed and beautiful too. 
   
   Cheer up.
   I'm just playin' wit ya. 
   This is just a game.
  
  Your game also tends to involve, after several
  exchanges, challenging anyone who pushes your 
  buttons and disagrees with you to a fist fight.
 
 Yea right.
 You are the only one that has made the most henious, disgusting, 
 childish, practically libalous, statements to people on this forum. 
 (Don't make me post them again;-)
 
  
  They'd all kick your ass, of course, but still
  it's pretty classic Brown Shirt behavior.
 
 Uhu, unlikely.
 ( 3 years of intense karate training, full blooded perfect health, 
 Scottish with a tinge of English just for measure, and not one ounce 
 of fear within this physique.  How about you? )
 
 But by the way, don't forget you are way more of a Ru now, than I 
 will ever be.
 
 But cheer up, I'm just playin' wit' ya
 (like a cat playin' with the mouse)
 
 Have a nice day, I'm just taking a break between skiing up in 
 Vermont. It's awesome, wish you were here.
 
 Luv from Tommy.
 
 OffWorld as usual.





[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-25 Thread off_world_beings
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Uhu, unlikely.
 ( 3 years of intense karate training, full blooded perfect health,
 Scottish with a tinge of English just for measure, and not one ounce
 of fear within this physique. How about you? )
 
 
 So how's your ground game?  Seen any UFCs in the last decade?


Shotokan, not yer sloppy bar-room brawlers.


Shotokan:
True karate is this: that in daily life one's mind and body be 
trained and developed in a spirit of humility, and that in critical 
times, one be devoted utterly to the cause of justice.
--Gichin Funakoshi

OffWorld




[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-25 Thread new . morning
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues 
 curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
 
  Uhu, unlikely.
  ( 3 years of intense karate training, full blooded perfect health,
  Scottish with a tinge of English just for measure, and not one ounce
  of fear within this physique. How about you? )

Yes. But are you  Invincible? 

Do you have no enemies (e.g.,  people who think you are an angry,
egotistical,  potty mouth?) Have you created a field where no such
enemies could ever arise? 



[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-25 Thread curtisdeltablues
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues 
 curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
 
  Uhu, unlikely.
  ( 3 years of intense karate training, full blooded perfect health,
  Scottish with a tinge of English just for measure, and not one ounce
  of fear within this physique. How about you? )
  
  
  So how's your ground game?  Seen any UFCs in the last decade?
 
 
 Shotokan, not yer sloppy bar-room brawlers.

Shotakan is a venerable ancient art.  Certainly better than barroom
brawlers.  However it doesn't work as well on the ground as the
technical fighters in mixed martial arts in UFC have discovered.  Here
is an example of how it looks:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=W-SltgKQHDUfeature=related

Here is Shotokan specifically:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=NWegy3_mhLE

This is not to say that you aren't a total badass.  Warrior spirit
goes a long way.  But the evolution of mixed martial arts is really
amazing. All the top fighters these days are crosstrained in Thai
boxing for striking, Brazilian Ju-jitsu for ground game and wrestling
for take downs and position control.  You might enjoy a UFC.  I think
you would find it is a long way from the bar room.  




 
 
 Shotokan:
 True karate is this: that in daily life one's mind and body be 
 trained and developed in a spirit of humility, and that in critical 
 times, one be devoted utterly to the cause of justice.
 --Gichin Funakoshi
 
 OffWorld





[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-25 Thread curtisdeltablues
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues 
  curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
  
   Uhu, unlikely.
   ( 3 years of intense karate training, full blooded perfect health,
   Scottish with a tinge of English just for measure, and not one ounce
   of fear within this physique. How about you? )
 
 Yes. But are you  Invincible? 
 
 Do you have no enemies (e.g.,  people who think you are an angry,
 egotistical,  potty mouth?) Have you created a field where no such
 enemies could ever arise?

Hey, um put up your dukes, um, anagitam.  









[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-25 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@
 wrote:
 
  Shotokan, not yer sloppy bar-room brawlers.
 
 Shotakan is a venerable ancient art.  Certainly better than barroom
 brawlers.  However it doesn't work as well on the ground as the
 technical fighters in mixed martial arts in UFC have discovered.  
 Here
 is an example of how it looks:
 
 http://youtube.com/watch?v=W-SltgKQHDUfeature=related
 
 Here is Shotokan specifically:
 
 http://youtube.com/watch?v=NWegy3_mhLE
 
 This is not to say that you aren't a total badass.  Warrior spirit
 goes a long way.  But the evolution of mixed martial arts is really
 amazing. All the top fighters these days are crosstrained in Thai
 boxing for striking, Brazilian Ju-jitsu for ground game and 
 wrestling for take downs and position control. You might enjoy a 
 UFC.  I think you would find it is a long way from the bar room.  

Having studied Shotokan for a number of years
before investigating other styles, I have to
agree with Curtis about its applicability in
the real world. It's similar to what someone 
said about Maharishi and the Rajas earlier
today -- the idea of being able to fight is
a great deal more important than being able
to fight.





[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-25 Thread curtisdeltablues
 Having studied Shotokan for a number of years
 before investigating other styles, I have to
 agree with Curtis about its applicability in
 the real world. It's similar to what someone 
 said about Maharishi and the Rajas earlier
 today -- the idea of being able to fight is
 a great deal more important than being able
 to fight.

With UFC now more popular among the under 35 demographic than
football, the chances of finding the old windmill style bar fighter
may be over.  Since I spend some time around alcohol and testosterone
in my work I would never count on my Jiu Jitsu training in a public
place.  My favorite plan B after not mouthing off is a Kubaton. 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kubotan

I learned about it from a cop and it is a good plan B.  Great for
ladies to carry on their key chain too.  Strikes are just not
reliable, but with this you have some stun power. I always have one in
my hand on the way to my car at night.  Of course I also have a plan C
but discussing it would be very uncool...


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
 curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@
  wrote:
  
   Shotokan, not yer sloppy bar-room brawlers.
  
  Shotakan is a venerable ancient art.  Certainly better than barroom
  brawlers.  However it doesn't work as well on the ground as the
  technical fighters in mixed martial arts in UFC have discovered.  
  Here
  is an example of how it looks:
  
  http://youtube.com/watch?v=W-SltgKQHDUfeature=related
  
  Here is Shotokan specifically:
  
  http://youtube.com/watch?v=NWegy3_mhLE
  
  This is not to say that you aren't a total badass.  Warrior spirit
  goes a long way.  But the evolution of mixed martial arts is really
  amazing. All the top fighters these days are crosstrained in Thai
  boxing for striking, Brazilian Ju-jitsu for ground game and 
  wrestling for take downs and position control. You might enjoy a 
  UFC.  I think you would find it is a long way from the bar room.  
 
 Having studied Shotokan for a number of years
 before investigating other styles, I have to
 agree with Curtis about its applicability in
 the real world. It's similar to what someone 
 said about Maharishi and the Rajas earlier
 today -- the idea of being able to fight is
 a great deal more important than being able
 to fight.





[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-25 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Having studied Shotokan for a number of years
  before investigating other styles, I have to
  agree with Curtis about its applicability in
  the real world. It's similar to what someone 
  said about Maharishi and the Rajas earlier
  today -- the idea of being able to fight is
  a great deal more important than being able
  to fight.
 
 With UFC now more popular among the under 35 demographic than
 football, the chances of finding the old windmill style bar 
 fighter may be over. Since I spend some time around alcohol 
 and testosterone in my work I would never count on my Jiu Jitsu 
 training in a public place. My favorite plan B after not 
 mouthing off is a Kubaton. 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kubotan
 
 I learned about it from a cop and it is a good plan B. Great 
 for ladies to carry on their key chain too. Strikes are just 
 not reliable, but with this you have some stun power. I always 
 have one in my hand on the way to my car at night. Of course 
 I also have a plan C but discussing it would be very uncool...

Just as input, from someone who studied martial
arts for over a decade and, in the US, always had
some aspect of my attention keeping a lookout 
for potential danger, it's been interesting to
live in Europe for the last four and a half years.

I can honestly that not *once* in all that time
has there been any necessity to reserve any part
of my attention for scanning for danger, much less 
carrying a weapon of any kind. 

It's been a kind of revelation, realizing that 
random violence is *not* an ever-present possi-
bility. I walk where I want, when I want, in all
types of neighborhoods and at all hours of the
night and day, and have never in 4-1/2 years felt 
as if there was the possibility of violence.

After a lifetime of living in US cities where that
awareness was rarely far away, especially at night,
it's been really fascinating living in a place
where it's just not a part of the environment.

Oh, sure, there is the occasional violence and
mugging in Europe, but I've never run into even
a *hint* of it personally. The contrast has been
quite interesting to try to get used to.





[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-25 Thread new . morning
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Having studied Shotokan for a number of years
  before investigating other styles, I have to
  agree with Curtis about its applicability in
  the real world. It's similar to what someone 
  said about Maharishi and the Rajas earlier
  today -- the idea of being able to fight is
  a great deal more important than being able
  to fight.
 
 With UFC now more popular among the under 35 demographic than
 football, the chances of finding the old windmill style bar fighter
 may be over.  Since I spend some time around alcohol and testosterone
 in my work I would never count on my Jiu Jitsu training in a public
 place.  My favorite plan B after not mouthing off 


Well if Invincibility and not creating enemies doesn't work, I would
of course try, Plan B, Turn the other check. 

As for your stuff, mmy said,  watch for what these chineese  boys
do. Direct quote. More in reference to chineese medicine -- but I am
sure he meant it to apply across the board.  

Plan C -- well a rip roaring lecture to my assailants on the bad karma
they were creating could be really powerful. 

Plan D -- well, if I could manage to get them under a vat of hot
sessame oil, to drp on their forehead, I am sure that the anger and
tension would simply instantly vanish. And we would become great chums. 

Plan E, wave my hand, full of jyotish woo woo ray gems and gold. That
ought to work just fine.

Plan F, Bashti!







[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-25 Thread new . morning
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 It's been a kind of revelation, realizing that 
 random violence is *not* an ever-present possi-
 bility. I walk where I want, when I want, in all
 types of neighborhoods and at all hours of the
 night and day, and have never in 4-1/2 years felt 
 as if there was the possibility of violence.
 
 After a lifetime of living in US cities where that
 awareness was rarely far away, especially at night,
 it's been really fascinating living in a place
 where it's just not a part of the environment.
 
 Oh, sure, there is the occasional violence and
 mugging in Europe, but I've never run into even
 a *hint* of it personally. The contrast has been
 quite interesting to try to get used to.

I've never run into even
a *hint* of it personally. In the US. In Asia. Or Europe. Though once
when a vendor led me through the extensive, 4 foot wide maze of
alleys, with large bulls with larger horns, in Benares, at night, I
was thinking I could easily disappear and never surface again. But, no
problemo.

The lack of contrast has not been very interesting, nothing to get
used to. Maybe i should move to some of the finer cities you
inhabited. (Or was the danger usually from the husband or bf coming
home at 3am?)



[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-25 Thread off_world_beings
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues 
  curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
  
   Uhu, unlikely.
   ( 3 years of intense karate training, full blooded perfect 
health,
   Scottish with a tinge of English just for measure, and not one 
ounce
   of fear within this physique. How about you? )
   
   
   So how's your ground game?  Seen any UFCs in the last decade?
  
  
  Shotokan, not yer sloppy bar-room brawlers.
 
 Shotakan is a venerable ancient art.  Certainly better than barroom
 brawlers.  However it doesn't work as well on the ground as the
 technical fighters in mixed martial arts in UFC have discovered.  
Here
 is an example of how it looks:
 
 http://youtube.com/watch?v=W-SltgKQHDUfeature=related
 
 Here is Shotokan specifically:
 
 http://youtube.com/watch?v=NWegy3_mhLE


DUDE !  'scuse me butTHAT IS NOT SHOTOKAN ! !

I don't WTF that is. but is NOTHING like Shotokan.

There is ABSOLUTELY NO wrestling in Shotokan. All strikes are from a 
distance, and a Shotakan master would annihilate those UFC people 
ESPECIALLY if it was in a real situation, because the Shotokan black 
belt in sparring HAS to hold back 99% of their annihilation power so 
as not to kill someone.

THIS IS SHOTOKAN (that I learned, and these are just people trying to 
qualify for black belt or 2nd dan) 
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ZlAFJHEu8go

OffWorld




[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-25 Thread off_world_beings
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues 
  curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
  
   Uhu, unlikely.
   ( 3 years of intense karate training, full blooded perfect 
health,
   Scottish with a tinge of English just for measure, and not one 
ounce
   of fear within this physique. How about you? )
 
 Yes. But are you  Invincible? 
 
 Do you have no enemies (e.g.,  people who think you are an angry,
 egotistical,  potty mouth?) Have you created a field where no such
 enemies could ever arise?

No, because I am the enem-er, and the enem-ee, both.
(it is Turq that is the third category, the enima)

OffWorld




[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-25 Thread off_world_beings
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
 curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@
  wrote:
  
   Shotokan, not yer sloppy bar-room brawlers.
  
  Shotakan is a venerable ancient art.  Certainly better than 
barroom
  brawlers.  However it doesn't work as well on the ground as the
  technical fighters in mixed martial arts in UFC have discovered.  
  Here
  is an example of how it looks:
  
  http://youtube.com/watch?v=W-SltgKQHDUfeature=related
  
  Here is Shotokan specifically:
  
  http://youtube.com/watch?v=NWegy3_mhLE
  
  This is not to say that you aren't a total badass.  Warrior spirit
  goes a long way.  But the evolution of mixed martial arts is 
really
  amazing. All the top fighters these days are crosstrained in Thai
  boxing for striking, Brazilian Ju-jitsu for ground game and 
  wrestling for take downs and position control. You might enjoy a 
  UFC.  I think you would find it is a long way from the bar room.  
 
 Having studied Shotokan for a number of years
 before investigating other styles, I have to
 agree with Curtis about its applicability in
 the real world. It's similar to what someone 
 said about Maharishi and the Rajas earlier
 today -- the idea of being able to fight is
 a great deal more important than being able
 to fight.

True, which is like the quote I posted in the beginning: True 
karate is this: that in daily life one's mind and body be trained and 
developed in a spirit of humility, and that in critical times, one be 
devoted utterly to the cause of justice.
--Gichin Funakoshi

... but if you think those videos that Curtis posted are Shotokan, 
then you know nothing of Shotokan as you claimed. 

Those videos Curt posted are an insult to Shotokan.

THIS IS SHOTOKAN (that I learned, and these are just people trying to 
qualify for black belt or 2nd dan) 
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ZlAFJHEu8go

OffWorld





[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-25 Thread new . morning
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
 in daily life one's mind and body be trained and 
 developed in a spirit of humility, 

Yup. Describes you perfectly.




[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-25 Thread off_world_beings
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@
 wrote:
  in daily life one's mind and body be trained and 
  developed in a spirit of humility, 
 
 Yup. Describes you perfectly.

No , I failed the test, so I took up TM. That failed that too. So fuck 
it, humility is for the dogs. Good luck with that.

OffWorld





[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-25 Thread off_world_beings
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues 
  curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
  
   Uhu, unlikely.
   ( 3 years of intense karate training, full blooded perfect 
health,
   Scottish with a tinge of English just for measure, and not one 
ounce
   of fear within this physique. How about you? )
 
 Yes. But are you  Invincible? 
 
 Do you have no enemies (e.g.,  people who think you are an angry,
 egotistical,  potty mouth?) Have you created a field where no such
 enemies could ever arise?

Tell that to Arjunalol !3 million people drawn up on the 
battlefield ready for COMPLETE anihilation, and he is in the middle 
of it prayin' to jesus for help.

OffWorld




[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-25 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
snip
 THIS IS SHOTOKAN (that I learned, and these are just people trying to 
 qualify for black belt or 2nd dan) 
 http://youtube.com/watch?v=ZlAFJHEu8go

Boy, to the utterly untrained eye, that's pretty
darned impressive stuff.




[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-25 Thread curtisdeltablues
 ... but if you think those videos that Curtis posted are Shotokan, 
 then you know nothing of Shotokan as you claimed. 
 
 Those videos Curt posted are an insult to Shotokan.
 
 THIS IS SHOTOKAN (that I learned, and these are just people trying to 
 qualify for black belt or 2nd dan) 
 http://youtube.com/watch?v=ZlAFJHEu8go
 


I thought you were a pro science guy.  You know peer reviewed studies?
 The review of martial arts has been settled in the octagon ring.  The
videos I showed were challenge matches by brave Shotokan fighters
against a martial art designed to counter striking arts by grappling.
I have nothing but respect for those guys.  The guys who hide in dojos
and never test their system should be washing their GIs. 

The videos on your tape were students in point matches and highly
choreographed demos with people playing the part of an attacker but
then giving no resistance and rolling out of the way when the master
touched them.  Ever try to flip someone using one hand who doesn't
want to flip over?

We are exactly 15 years too late for any argument about traditional
karate styles, the issue has been settled in the ring by guys willing
to put their traditions on the line to really find out what works. 
Any dojo that isn't cross training now is running an aerobics class. 
Not that there is anything wrong with that.  Any attention on any
martial art is great IMO.  So high five for that.  But comparing
choreographed demos to challenge matches is not realistic.



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
  curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@
   wrote:
   
Shotokan, not yer sloppy bar-room brawlers.
   
   Shotakan is a venerable ancient art.  Certainly better than 
 barroom
   brawlers.  However it doesn't work as well on the ground as the
   technical fighters in mixed martial arts in UFC have discovered.  
   Here
   is an example of how it looks:
   
   http://youtube.com/watch?v=W-SltgKQHDUfeature=related
   
   Here is Shotokan specifically:
   
   http://youtube.com/watch?v=NWegy3_mhLE
   
   This is not to say that you aren't a total badass.  Warrior spirit
   goes a long way.  But the evolution of mixed martial arts is 
 really
   amazing. All the top fighters these days are crosstrained in Thai
   boxing for striking, Brazilian Ju-jitsu for ground game and 
   wrestling for take downs and position control. You might enjoy a 
   UFC.  I think you would find it is a long way from the bar room.  
  
  Having studied Shotokan for a number of years
  before investigating other styles, I have to
  agree with Curtis about its applicability in
  the real world. It's similar to what someone 
  said about Maharishi and the Rajas earlier
  today -- the idea of being able to fight is
  a great deal more important than being able
  to fight.
 
 True, which is like the quote I posted in the beginning: True 
 karate is this: that in daily life one's mind and body be trained and 
 developed in a spirit of humility, and that in critical times, one be 
 devoted utterly to the cause of justice.
 --Gichin Funakoshi
 
 ... but if you think those videos that Curtis posted are Shotokan, 
 then you know nothing of Shotokan as you claimed. 
 
 Those videos Curt posted are an insult to Shotokan.
 
 THIS IS SHOTOKAN (that I learned, and these are just people trying to 
 qualify for black belt or 2nd dan) 
 http://youtube.com/watch?v=ZlAFJHEu8go
 
 OffWorld





[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-25 Thread off_world_beings
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 
 I thought you were a pro science guy.  You know peer reviewed 
studies?
  The review of martial arts has been settled in the octagon ring. 
The
 videos I showed were challenge matches by brave Shotokan fighters
 against a martial art designed to counter striking arts by 
grappling.

You have absolutley no understanding of martial arts. 
You cannot compare the grappler to the Shotokan fighter. It would be 
like comparing a bicyle to a race car with no gas in it. Sure the 
bucycle will win ...LOL...what a joke.
You have no understanding of martial arts. 
 In Shotokan the Shotokan fighters KNOW that once ONE strike is made 
the fight is stopped, for a few seconds, because the Shotokan expert 
knows that if you put your full trained force behind it then the guy 
would be dead or severely knocked over. You cannot compare a Shotokan 
fighter to any of those other styles. They stop the Shotokan fight 
instantly for a second or two, you see it in this video below, the 
untrained eye does not see that the fight is stopped for a second or 
two every few seconds of fighting becasue a point was given, and the 
Shotokan people KNOW that that IS A VERY SERIOUS BLOW if full force 
were given. It never is given in the sparring. Only mild 
representaions of it. Therefore your idiots on the UFC stuff etc. 
have no clue about the reality of it, that is why a Shotokan sparring 
match stops the fight after one strike, but many of the other martial 
arts do not appear to understand this, so they continue the fight as 
if nothing happened. Lol !...the Shotokan fighter has knocked your 
stupid head off and you don't even know it because you know so LITTLE 
about true martial arts. 

There is no way inder the sun that a grappler will get near an expert 
in Shotokan. It is over before the grappler knows what has happened.

You need to watch this next video to understand that SHotokan 
dominates the world of martial arts...by far. Don't discuss this 
anymore with me until you watch this and understand why the fight is 
stopped every few seconds...because they are trained to kill someone 
with one SINGLE blow.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=292RJFjGCKAfeature=related

OffWorld



[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-25 Thread jyouells2000
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@
  wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues 
   curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
   
Uhu, unlikely.
( 3 years of intense karate training, full blooded perfect health,
Scottish with a tinge of English just for measure, and not one
ounce
of fear within this physique. How about you? )
  
  Yes. But are you  Invincible? 
  
  Do you have no enemies (e.g.,  people who think you are an angry,
  egotistical,  potty mouth?) Have you created a field where no such
  enemies could ever arise?
 
 Hey, um put up your dukes, um, anagitam.  
 

Punning in Sanskrit  ;) 

JohnY



[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-25 Thread curtisdeltablues
I am very familiar with full contact tournaments.  They have many more
rules than a mixed martial arts matches.  It is a great sport.  But we
started the discussion about actual fighting without rules about
takedowns.  One punch one kill is a fantasy perpetuated by people who
stay our of the Octagon.  Hitting someone who doesn't want to get hit
is actually very hard.  Ever spar with a boxer?  All that straight
line traditional attack stuff gets stuffed fast.  

 There is no way inder the sun that a grappler will get near an expert 
 in Shotokan. It is over before the grappler knows what has happened.

This theory has been falsified many times over.  If you are close
enough to strike, you are close enough to be taken down.  Don't watch
UFC 1-6 if you want to keep your illusions in place. All the one
strike boys end up on the grown tapping out before they pass out.  it
is not that people can't be knocked out by one punch.  Sure they can.
 Its just that it isn't easy to do while someone is taking you to the
ground. Now that all the strikers are cross trained in boxing and Muay
Thai the effectiveness of the traditional karate strikes are very
limited.  Just watch the videos of people actually using the
techniques you are theorizing about.  

You talk a good game about scientific studies but you are an
fantasist.  But prove me wrong.  I have provided video references for
my POV.  Show me some examples of strikers staying on their feet
against someone who wants them on the ground.

Like I said the jury has been in for over a decade on this issue.  You
are arguing a flat world theory.  All serious martial arts schools do
cross training unless they are traditionalist who don't do challenge
matches. 

 Shotokan people KNOW that that IS A VERY SERIOUS BLOW if full force 
 were given. It never is given in the sparring.

Oh reaallly!  I know all about matches. Now show me how Shotakan
People KNOW this if they don't ever do it in full contact, full power
fights like in UFC?  Actually some brave karate master have.  They
were willing to learn the truth. But as I am finding out, that isn't
your interest is it? 



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues 
 curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
 
  
  
  I thought you were a pro science guy.  You know peer reviewed 
 studies?
   The review of martial arts has been settled in the octagon ring. 
 The
  videos I showed were challenge matches by brave Shotokan fighters
  against a martial art designed to counter striking arts by 
 grappling.
 
 You have absolutley no understanding of martial arts. 
 You cannot compare the grappler to the Shotokan fighter. It would be 
 like comparing a bicyle to a race car with no gas in it. Sure the 
 bucycle will win ...LOL...what a joke.
 You have no understanding of martial arts. 
  In Shotokan the Shotokan fighters KNOW that once ONE strike is made 
 the fight is stopped, for a few seconds, because the Shotokan expert 
 knows that if you put your full trained force behind it then the guy 
 would be dead or severely knocked over. You cannot compare a Shotokan 
 fighter to any of those other styles. They stop the Shotokan fight 
 instantly for a second or two, you see it in this video below, the 
 untrained eye does not see that the fight is stopped for a second or 
 two every few seconds of fighting becasue a point was given, and the 
 Shotokan people KNOW that that IS A VERY SERIOUS BLOW if full force 
 were given. It never is given in the sparring. Only mild 
 representaions of it. Therefore your idiots on the UFC stuff etc. 
 have no clue about the reality of it, that is why a Shotokan sparring 
 match stops the fight after one strike, but many of the other martial 
 arts do not appear to understand this, so they continue the fight as 
 if nothing happened. Lol !...the Shotokan fighter has knocked your 
 stupid head off and you don't even know it because you know so LITTLE 
 about true martial arts. 
 
 There is no way inder the sun that a grappler will get near an expert 
 in Shotokan. It is over before the grappler knows what has happened.
 
 You need to watch this next video to understand that SHotokan 
 dominates the world of martial arts...by far. Don't discuss this 
 anymore with me until you watch this and understand why the fight is 
 stopped every few seconds...because they are trained to kill someone 
 with one SINGLE blow.
 
 http://youtube.com/watch?v=292RJFjGCKAfeature=related
 
 OffWorld





[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-25 Thread new . morning
This seems to be a quite powerful and apt analogy to spiritual
traditions and their one punch knockouts of ignorance and bondage. A
UFC of masters of pure traditions would be interesting. More to the
point would be having them come up against cross-training masters.  

I liked the story Jerry used to tell of sadhus on the baks of the
Ganges, jumping in with their dohti or robes, and the sitting on the
banks, in contests with each other, to see who could dry their clothes
fastest from eternal heat from their bodies. 

Perhaps way to crude and earthy a demonstration for pure consciousness
junkies. But on a day that Sankara uses a brilliantly discusses the
dynamics of duality within unity based on a analogy of a wet dream, a
little earthiness in spiritual matters seems fitting. 

Hook up 10 masters to real time brain imaging machines, results
displayed on huge high definition wall panels in the collosium, an
them them, in peace and brotherly love, have at. Who can create
cosmic brain images fastest. Create the most stable. Create them in
others via transmission. 

I can't wait to see those trash talking cross-training yogis swagger
into  the stadium and strut their stuff. Hey Mr South indian yogi
man, I will eat your  blissful samadi for lunch! And show you the all
powerful punch of Shatki Love  before your most blessed head hits the
mat. i have the power of 10 indras to hold absolute and relative
together in Brahman. Namaste.   

No you most venerable, yet deluded one. I will dance like shiva on
your chest as you lay prone why all the devas chant in sorrow yet joy
for your most blessed mahsamadi. Namaste



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I am very familiar with full contact tournaments.  They have many more
 rules than a mixed martial arts matches.  It is a great sport.  But we
 started the discussion about actual fighting without rules about
 takedowns.  One punch one kill is a fantasy perpetuated by people who
 stay our of the Octagon.  Hitting someone who doesn't want to get hit
 is actually very hard.  Ever spar with a boxer?  All that straight
 line traditional attack stuff gets stuffed fast.  
 
  There is no way inder the sun that a grappler will get near an expert 
  in Shotokan. It is over before the grappler knows what has happened.
 
 This theory has been falsified many times over.  If you are close
 enough to strike, you are close enough to be taken down.  Don't watch
 UFC 1-6 if you want to keep your illusions in place. All the one
 strike boys end up on the grown tapping out before they pass out.  it
 is not that people can't be knocked out by one punch.  Sure they can.
  Its just that it isn't easy to do while someone is taking you to the
 ground. Now that all the strikers are cross trained in boxing and Muay
 Thai the effectiveness of the traditional karate strikes are very
 limited.  Just watch the videos of people actually using the
 techniques you are theorizing about.  
 
 You talk a good game about scientific studies but you are an
 fantasist.  But prove me wrong.  I have provided video references for
 my POV.  Show me some examples of strikers staying on their feet
 against someone who wants them on the ground.
 
 Like I said the jury has been in for over a decade on this issue.  You
 are arguing a flat world theory.  All serious martial arts schools do
 cross training unless they are traditionalist who don't do challenge
 matches. 
 
  Shotokan people KNOW that that IS A VERY SERIOUS BLOW if full force 
  were given. It never is given in the sparring.
 
 Oh reaallly!  I know all about matches. Now show me how Shotakan
 People KNOW this if they don't ever do it in full contact, full power
 fights like in UFC?  Actually some brave karate master have.  They
 were willing to learn the truth. But as I am finding out, that isn't
 your interest is it? 
 
 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues 
  curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
  
   
   
   I thought you were a pro science guy.  You know peer reviewed 
  studies?
The review of martial arts has been settled in the octagon ring. 
  The
   videos I showed were challenge matches by brave Shotokan fighters
   against a martial art designed to counter striking arts by 
  grappling.
  
  You have absolutley no understanding of martial arts. 
  You cannot compare the grappler to the Shotokan fighter. It would be 
  like comparing a bicyle to a race car with no gas in it. Sure the 
  bucycle will win ...LOL...what a joke.
  You have no understanding of martial arts. 
   In Shotokan the Shotokan fighters KNOW that once ONE strike is made 
  the fight is stopped, for a few seconds, because the Shotokan expert 
  knows that if you put your full trained force behind it then the guy 
  would be dead or severely knocked over. You cannot compare a Shotokan 
  fighter to any of those other styles. They stop the 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself (full text)

2007-11-24 Thread hugheshugo
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, hugheshugo 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 
 Maharishi announced his retiremnet from running the movement on the 
 channel a few days ago.

This has just been forwarded to me;

1. The Rajas, under Maharishi's guidance, have made a resolution 
today to enable that half the world is invincible by Christmas.  
Maharishi is sending a number of Vedic couples to provide checking 
and refresher for every sidha.  In this country we should have 8 
couples travelling around the country.  


2. 22 November 2007 – Maharishi's broadcast:
 
Having done complete justice to the teachings of his spiritual 
Master, Shri Guru Dev, for over fifty years, which has changed the 
destiny of the human race and secured invincibility for every nation, 
Maharishi inaugurates Administration through Silence, which he has 
defined as-'the most ideal adorable system of administration which is 
spontaneously and all the time conducted through the innumerable 
values of creativity on the level of Veda.' 
 
In an historic address on 22 November, MERU, Holland, Maharishi 
disclosed to the First European Parliament of National Leaders of the 
Global Country of World Peace, that the supreme goals of his 
Spiritual Regeneration Movement are fulfilled. 
 
'You are 192 Super(powers). When we say 'Super', then the whole thing 
becomes unified. No more 192 countries, but one Global Country 
administered by Total Administrative power, and Total Administrative 
Power is in two sections-Total Knowledge and Total Activity. Gyan 
Shakti, Kriya Shakti. 
 
 'So, what I am feeling just now, with the opinion of all the Europe 
rising to Invincibility, that Kriya Shakti has started to show its 
performance. Kriya Shakti divided in 192 sections, has worked out its 
own unification. United Nations for the world. But in actuality, it 
was still disunited. Now, somehow, somehow, the Gyan Shakti is awake. 
And Gyan Shakti waking up is, Kriya Shakti woken up. Gyan Shakti, 
Kriya Shakti. 
 
 'And I feel, I feel now, that having been active for all these 50 
years, the Kriya Shakti has woken up, and has started to show the 
evidence of its waking up. At least, 24 countries are invincible out 
of 192. So I am tempted to tell you my feelings, that with 24 
countries rising to invincibility, and with all these Rajas and the 
National Leaders, during the next week, the Rajas will take over the 
Kriya Shakti in silence. 
 
 'So I am thinking of shifting my role from Kriya Shakti to Gyan 
Shakti, because I feel the awakening of Kriya Shakti has been through 
my basing the Kriya Shakti in the Gyan Shakti. 
 
 'People opened up to their self-referral intelligence, and now-
enough. Enough, I say. But not complete yet, in my assessment. Quite 
a lot of Kriya Shakti is woken up on the basis of, I'll say, one 
tenth or, accurately, we say one fourth, of the Gyan Shakti, and I 
feel now responsible to make that one fourth of Gyan Shakti, should 
be raised to 100% Gyan Shakti. 


 
 'And how it is going to be done? 'The field of Gyan Shakti which we 
have realized to be Veda, and Veda we have realized to be the flow of 
Atma. And the flow of Atma, has been put to practice from the level 
of Kriya Shakti. Transcending. Transcending into the first stage of 
transcending, second stage of transcending. Consciousness-getting to 
consciousness, getting to Transcendental Consciousness, and its 
telling the transcendental consciousness to make it function. 
Enabling the Transcendental Consciousness to function, through our 
intention on it. Now the Gyan Shakti, to be fully 100% awake, what is 
needed is, a remaining of the intellectual understanding, and I want 
to devote my time to that. And that, in simple words is, bringing out 
the commentary of the Veda. 
 
 'I have not yet spelled out in complete clarity, from A to Z, the 
flow of the Veda in terms of the flow of 8 Prakritis. But whatever 
has been done, amounts to maybe 10%, 8%, 4%, whatever percent, a part 
of the Total Knowledge aspect of it, even a part of Total Knowledge 
unfolded has unfolded. 
 
 'Along with its unfoldment, the Kriya Shakti, and I see that the 
Kriya Shakti is in good hands. Rajas Conference will be from 
tomorrow, and I'm going to finally lay out my intellectual 
understanding and from that level I think, I have created a competent 
body to continue reinforcing action. Continue Kriya Shakti. The body 
of the Rajas, and so many Yogic Flyers, Ministers, all that, will 
continue on the Kriya Shakti, and I'll devote my time, whatever is 
left, in the unfoldment of pure Gyan Shakti. 
 
 'And this will be, I'll have to lay out all the details of how Atma 
flows in terms of the Veda, how the first letter of Atma is the flow 
of total Veda, and how total Veda, on the level of knowledge, how it 
flows in the diversity of knowledge. All the Veda expanding to become 
the universe. How knowledge expands from its compactified state in 
one syllable, 'A' to 'Ma', and Atma to Veda, 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself (full text)

2007-11-24 Thread TurquoiseB
Too much silliness here not to make fun of. My 
apologies in advance to the True Believers.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, hugheshugo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, hugheshugo 
 richardhughes103@ wrote:
 
  Maharishi announced his retiremnet from running the movement 
  on the channel a few days ago.
 
 This has just been forwarded to me;
 
 1. The Rajas, under Maharishi's guidance, have made a resolution 
 today to enable that half the world is invincible by Christmas. 

It's now official. Not only do Maharishi and the Rajas
still believe in Santa Claus, they're convinced that
they ARE Santa Claus.  :-)

 2. 22 November 2007 – Maharishi's broadcast:
  
 Having done complete justice to the teachings of his spiritual 
 Master, Shri Guru Dev, for over fifty years, which has changed 
 the destiny of the human race and secured invincibility for 
 every nation, Maharishi inaugurates Administration through 
 Silence, which he has defined as-'the most ideal adorable 
 system of administration which is spontaneously and all the 
 time conducted through the innumerable values of creativity 
 on the level of Veda.' 

One of the inherent problems with claiming that one
is doing nothing and accomplishing everything, and
at the same time asking for hefty donations from 
people and governments, is that the people you're 
begging from might catch on to the fact that you 
want them to pay you for doing nothing.

 In an historic address on 22 November, MERU, Holland, Maharishi 
 disclosed to the First European Parliament of National Leaders 
 of the Global Country of World Peace...

It is worth noting that this is a 'Parliament' for
a country that does not exist.

 ...that the supreme goals of his 
 Spiritual Regeneration Movement are fulfilled. 

His Spiritual Regeneration Movement? I beg your
pardon. Wasn't Guru Dev the guy who told Maharishi 
to go meditate in a cave and who never once suggested 
that he was qualified to teach? But now it's his 
movement because Maharishi sez so? Yeah, right.

 'You are 192 Super(powers). When we say 'Super', then the 
 whole thing becomes unified. 

Let's ALL say it. Super. Super. Super. Yup, I 
sure feel more unified now.  :-)

Interestingly, this seems to be the end point of 
a lifetime indulging in magical thinking, and 
believing in the magical power of mantras. If you 
believe that some Sanskrit words have magical power, 
sooner or later you start to imagine that any word 
you choose to believe has magical power really
does have magical power.

 No more 192 countries, but one Global Country 
 administered by Total Administrative power, and Total Administrative 
 Power is in two sections-Total Knowledge and Total Activity. Gyan 
 Shakti, Kriya Shakti. 

More magical words. I'm feeling more unified by
the minute.  :-)

 'So, what I am feeling just now, with the opinion of all 
 the Europe rising to Invincibility, that Kriya Shakti has 
 started to show its performance. Kriya Shakti divided in 
 192 sections, has worked out its own unification. United 
 Nations for the world. But in actuality, it was still 
 disunited. Now, somehow, somehow, the Gyan Shakti is awake. 
 And Gyan Shakti waking up is, Kriya Shakti woken up. Gyan 
 Shakti, Kriya Shakti. 

If I say these magical words enough times, magical 
things will happen. Just wait till you see what I
can do with the handful of beans I traded the cow for.  :-)

. . .

 'I have not yet spelled out in complete clarity, from A to Z, 
 the flow of the Veda in terms of the flow of 8 Prakritis. 

Dude, I hate to break the news to you, but you have 
not yet spelled out in complete clarity how a bunch
of people playing dress-up and talking about imaginary
countries and imaginary invincibility has anything 
to do with *reality*, much less the Veda.

I *understand* that living in this fantasy world gives
you pleasure, and that you've convinced enough easy
marks that this fantasy is real that they give you 
millions of dollars to perpetuate it and allow them
to play dress-up. But just as feedback, here's a short
letter from one of your former teachers that you'll
never read because even if I sent it to you, your 
handlers would never let you read it:

Dear Maharishi,

You don't have a country.

You don't have a Parliament.

Calling real-life countries invincible doesn't make 
them invincible.

Calling twits wearing robes and crowns Super doesn't
make them super. Or even less laughable.

Silly costumes and absurd pronouncements do not impress
99% of people on this planet. They see them as what they
are -- silly costumes and absurd pronouncements.

Your contribution to this planet was synthesizing an
easily-learned form of meditation from existing sources
and marketing it such that it became popular. And then
you pissed that all away with silliness like the above.

I understand that you're pondering your own death and
trying to pontificate about all the things you accom-
plished while alive, but you're 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-24 Thread hugheshugo
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On Behalf Of hugheshugo
 Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2007 1:49 AM
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Maharishi announces new role for himself.
 
  
 
 So anyone who's been wondering what will happen to the TMO without 
MMY, 
 we're about to find out.
 
 I heard him make the same announcement several times as early as 1974.
 

But he's 90 now and obviously unwell, my first thought on hearing him 
speak a few weeks ago was that he'd be better off propped up in bed. So 
I was reading between the lines of his announcement about finishing his 
research, but you obviously never know for sure do you?.



[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-24 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  On Behalf Of hugheshugo
 
  So anyone who's been wondering what will happen to the 
  TMO without MMY, we're about to find out.
 
 I heard him make the same announcement several times as 
 early as 1974.

It seems to me that a similar I'm outa the 
everyday affairs of the movement pronouncement 
was reposted here on FFL only a few months ago. 

Isn't it fascinating, though, that there are 
hundreds of people among the TM TBs who literally 
are incapable of remembering back that far. They
live in a world more ephemeral in its way than 
that of pop music. (A common trait among people 
who work in the marketing side of the music biz 
is that they seem incapable of remembering any 
song or album that came out any further back 
than last month, or in some cases, last week.) 

From one point of view, I guess one could regard 
this as living in the moment. From another, it
can be regarded as Never learning from the lessons
of history because one can't *remember* history.

I have a good friend who was always fun to go to
the movies with because on exiting the theater
he would invariably give the same review to what-
ever film it was that we had seen: That was the
BEST film I've ever seen.

I often laughed, because sometimes the film really
wasn't any good at all, but after awhile I realized
that my friend was serious, every time. It really
*was* the best movie he'd ever seen, because he
couldn't really remember any others. He got so 
completely into the moment that no other film he'd
ever seen in his life was available as a reference,
or to practice discrimination with using it as a
reference. Only the latest film existed.

I sometimes envy him this ability. But most of the
time I don't. Discrimination is important. As long
as one still perceives both shit and shinola in the
world, discrimination helps you tell one from the
other.  

I remain open to the claim from some folks that they
no longer perceive a difference between shit and
shinola -- both are just particles of their Self. 
It's possible, and more power to 'em if they really do
perceive that way. But to be honest I don't want to
smell their shoes after they shine them.  :-)





[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-24 Thread Rory Goff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I remain open to the claim from some folks that they
 no longer perceive a difference between shit and
 shinola -- both are just particles of their Self. 
 It's possible, and more power to 'em if they really do
 perceive that way. But to be honest I don't want to
 smell their shoes after they shine them.  :-)

I think Judy has pointed out could not function in this world without 
*some* discrimination; after Death it simply is not predominant, more 
like a fine, multi-colored oil-layer of variety on an ocean of 
ThatSelf. Call it leshavidya if you like, or simply keeping one eye 
on the movie :-)




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself (full text)

2007-11-24 Thread Vaj


On Nov 24, 2007, at 6:21 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:


Too much silliness here not to make fun of. My
apologies in advance to the True Believers.



What a drama queen! Liberace couldn't have done a more dramatic  
retirement and retirement buildup! Doesn't anyone just retire anymore?


Raja Vaj



[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-24 Thread dhamiltony2k5
The King Lear model,  It's more like working out old-man losing-
control issues analysis by Turq the other morning seems an accurate 
assessment of what is going on inside given what we know of the old 
man and the folks around him.  Great theatre and we're not even at 
the last act yet. –Doug in FF

Turq writing:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/155614

I don't get the feeling from his demeanor and
facial expressions and the ways that he talks
in the videos I've seen that he's having fun.
It's more like working out old-man losing-
control issues.

The image of King Lear has sprung to mind more
than a few times lately. I mean, we've got Reagan
(Hagelin) and Goneril (Bevan) jockeying to take
over things in the background, Lear (MMY) making
absurd demands of people to test their loyalty,
etc. If someone highly-placed but who still has
a brain gives MMY some real feedback and gets
sent away in disgrace, that'll be Cordelia.

What is needed IMO is a Fool, who could tell him
the truth.

And before Jim and Rory come running in to suggest
that I'm perfect for the position :-), I no longer
work for the company. Haven't for 30 years now.
What happens to the TMO is only entertainment for
me, not a matter of identification. AS entertainment,
it's fabulous. 

But I really do feel for those who
still identify, and have to put themselves through
the same ups and downs they see in the machinations
of the court and its courtiers at the end of an
old king's reign.


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, hugheshugo 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 
 Maharishi announced his retiremnet from running the movement on the 
 channel a few days ago.
 
 Apparently the rajas are to take control, as they ought to know 
what 
 they are doing by now, and M is going to concentrate on working on 
 aspects of the vedas. Not intellectually of course but by trusting 
his 
 intuition. I'm no expert and the terms he used went in one ear and 
out 
 the other so I can't give any details, but it's something to do 
with 
 unfinished business in explaining the flow of Atma and shrakriti 
maybe.
 
 I would post a link to a TM website but it hasn't featured on them 
yet 
 for some reason. Maybe they'll get round to it soon when they are 
over 
 the shock.
 
 So anyone who's been wondering what will happen to the TMO without 
MMY, 
 we're about to find out.





[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself (full text)

2007-11-24 Thread off_world_beings
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 On Nov 24, 2007, at 6:21 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
 
  Too much silliness here not to make fun of. My
  apologies in advance to the True Believers.
 
 
 What a drama queen! Liberace couldn't have done a more dramatic  
 retirement and retirement buildup! Doesn't anyone just retire 
anymore?

He's 90 years old, when will you retire Vaj?

OffWorld



[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself (full text)

2007-11-24 Thread mainstream20016
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, hugheshugo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, hugheshugo 
 richardhughes103@ wrote:
 
  
  
  Maharishi announced his retiremnet from running the movement on the 
  channel a few days ago.
 
 This has just been forwarded to me;
 
 1. The Rajas, under Maharishi's guidance, have made a resolution 
 today to enable that half the world is invincible by Christmas.  
 Maharishi is sending a number of Vedic couples to provide checking 
 and refresher for every sidha.  In this country we should have 8 
 couples travelling around the country.  
 
 
 2. 22 November 2007 – Maharishi's broadcast:
  
 Having done complete justice to the teachings of his spiritual 
 Master, Shri Guru Dev, for over fifty years, which has changed the 
 destiny of the human race and secured invincibility for every nation, 
 Maharishi inaugurates Administration through Silence, which he has 
 defined as-'the most ideal adorable system of administration which is 
 spontaneously and all the time conducted through the innumerable 
 values of creativity on the level of Veda.' 
  
 In an historic address on 22 November, MERU, Holland, Maharishi 
 disclosed to the First European Parliament of National Leaders of the 
 Global Country of World Peace, that the supreme goals of his 
 Spiritual Regeneration Movement are fulfilled. 
  
 'You are 192 Super(powers). When we say 'Super', then the whole thing 
 becomes unified. No more 192 countries, but one Global Country 
 administered by Total Administrative power, and Total Administrative 
 Power is in two sections-Total Knowledge and Total Activity. Gyan 
 Shakti, Kriya Shakti. 
  
  'So, what I am feeling just now, with the opinion of all the Europe 
 rising to Invincibility, that Kriya Shakti has started to show its 
 performance. Kriya Shakti divided in 192 sections, has worked out its 
 own unification. United Nations for the world. But in actuality, it 
 was still disunited. Now, somehow, somehow, the Gyan Shakti is awake. 
 And Gyan Shakti waking up is, Kriya Shakti woken up. Gyan Shakti, 
 Kriya Shakti. 
  
  'And I feel, I feel now, that having been active for all these 50 
 years, the Kriya Shakti has woken up, and has started to show the 
 evidence of its waking up. At least, 24 countries are invincible out 
 of 192. So I am tempted to tell you my feelings, that with 24 
 countries rising to invincibility, and with all these Rajas and the 
 National Leaders, during the next week, the Rajas will take over the 
 Kriya Shakti in silence. 
  
  'So I am thinking of shifting my role from Kriya Shakti to Gyan 
 Shakti, because I feel the awakening of Kriya Shakti has been through 
 my basing the Kriya Shakti in the Gyan Shakti. 
  
  'People opened up to their self-referral intelligence, and now-
 enough. Enough, I say. But not complete yet, in my assessment. Quite 
 a lot of Kriya Shakti is woken up on the basis of, I'll say, one 
 tenth or, accurately, we say one fourth, of the Gyan Shakti, and I 
 feel now responsible to make that one fourth of Gyan Shakti, should 
 be raised to 100% Gyan Shakti. 
 
 
  
  'And how it is going to be done? 'The field of Gyan Shakti which we 
 have realized to be Veda, and Veda we have realized to be the flow of 
 Atma. And the flow of Atma, has been put to practice from the level 
 of Kriya Shakti. Transcending. Transcending into the first stage of 
 transcending, second stage of transcending. Consciousness-getting to 
 consciousness, getting to Transcendental Consciousness, and its 
 telling the transcendental consciousness to make it function. 
 Enabling the Transcendental Consciousness to function, through our 
 intention on it. Now the Gyan Shakti, to be fully 100% awake, what is 
 needed is, a remaining of the intellectual understanding, and I want 
 to devote my time to that. And that, in simple words is, bringing out 
 the commentary of the Veda. 
  
  'I have not yet spelled out in complete clarity, from A to Z, the 
 flow of the Veda in terms of the flow of 8 Prakritis. But whatever 
 has been done, amounts to maybe 10%, 8%, 4%, whatever percent, a part 
 of the Total Knowledge aspect of it, even a part of Total Knowledge 
 unfolded has unfolded. 
  
  'Along with its unfoldment, the Kriya Shakti, and I see that the 
 Kriya Shakti is in good hands. Rajas Conference will be from 
 tomorrow, and I'm going to finally lay out my intellectual 
 understanding and from that level I think, I have created a competent 
 body to continue reinforcing action. Continue Kriya Shakti. The body 
 of the Rajas, and so many Yogic Flyers, Ministers, all that, will 
 continue on the Kriya Shakti, and I'll devote my time, whatever is 
 left, in the unfoldment of pure Gyan Shakti. 
  
  'And this will be, I'll have to lay out all the details of how Atma 
 flows in terms of the Veda, how the first letter of Atma is the flow 
 of total Veda, and how total Veda, on the level of knowledge, how it 
 flows in the 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-24 Thread off_world_beings
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ wrote:
 
   On Behalf Of hugheshugo
  
   So anyone who's been wondering what will happen to the 
   TMO without MMY, we're about to find out.
  
  I heard him make the same announcement several times as 
  early as 1974.
 
 It seems to me that a similar I'm outa the 
 everyday affairs of the movement pronouncement 
 was reposted here on FFL only a few months ago. 
 
 Isn't it fascinating, though, that there are 
 hundreds of people among the TM TBs who literally 
 are incapable of remembering back that far. They
 live in a world more ephemeral in its way than 
 that of pop music. (A common trait among people 
 who work in the marketing side of the music biz 
 is that they seem incapable of remembering any 
 song or album that came out any further back 
 than last month, or in some cases, last week.) 
 
 From one point of view, I guess one could regard 
 this as living in the moment. From another, it
 can be regarded as Never learning from the lessons
 of history because one can't *remember* history.


He's 90 years old, and his TERRIBLE statement that he made at 90 
years old is: I want to work more on the Vedic knowledge details. 
You guys can carry on without me

Big Deal, why are the vultures here on FFL rushing in like demented 
jackals. 

OffWorld



 I have a good friend who was always fun to go to
 the movies with because on exiting the theater
 he would invariably give the same review to what-
 ever film it was that we had seen: That was the
 BEST film I've ever seen.
 
 I often laughed, because sometimes the film really
 wasn't any good at all, but after awhile I realized
 that my friend was serious, every time. It really
 *was* the best movie he'd ever seen, because he
 couldn't really remember any others. He got so 
 completely into the moment that no other film he'd
 ever seen in his life was available as a reference,
 or to practice discrimination with using it as a
 reference. Only the latest film existed.
 
 I sometimes envy him this ability. But most of the
 time I don't. Discrimination is important. As long
 as one still perceives both shit and shinola in the
 world, discrimination helps you tell one from the
 other.  
 
 I remain open to the claim from some folks that they
 no longer perceive a difference between shit and
 shinola -- both are just particles of their Self. 
 It's possible, and more power to 'em if they really do
 perceive that way. But to be honest I don't want to
 smell their shoes after they shine them.  :-)





[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself (full text)

2007-11-24 Thread off_world_beings
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mainstream20016 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

snip need the theory of it to be brought to the 
  awareness of those who will be engaged in the field of action, 
  action. To know the Gyan Shakti, I know how many pockets of 
different 
  values of Gyan Shakti have to be brought to light, and have to be 
put 
  together in one glass of every Raja. 
   
 
 Get ready Rajas, for MMY's latest concoction, Gyan Shakti. He's 
behind the bar mixing a 
 new elixir, Gyan Shakti, designed for your consumption. The Berlin 
Raja fiasco will limit 
 new Rajas from joining the club and infusing fresh funds, so MMY is 
setting the stage for 
 offering new knowledge,  Gyan Shakti, for only the most 
discriminating - existing Rajas 
 with remaining discretionary funds.  When do you think it will be 
offered ? As soon as Jan. 
 12th ? At what price ? 

Why are you so afraid of and attached to money?

If you want to complain about money being spent how about complaining 
about the 10 billion a month in Iraq
..an all for what?

Would you then deny the chance to try another solution for 1 billion 
dollars for many years? Even if it doesn't work it is worth a try 
over loosing 10 billion a month, which I believe is about $40,000 a 
month per person. That's you, spending AT LEAST 40,000  a month on 
this war, and that does not include the huge knock on effects.

And you people here on FFL want to complain about a few million here 
and there and some silly gowns and crowns for a man who has ADVOCATED 
NOTHING BUT PEACE ALL HIS LIFE, and has never had any personal use 
for the money. 

Shame on you.

OffWorld




[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself (full text)

2007-11-24 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mainstream20016
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Get ready Rajas, for MMY's latest concoction, Gyan Shakti. 
 He's behind the bar mixing a new elixir, Gyan Shakti, 
 designed for your consumption. The Berlin Raja fiasco 
 will limit new Rajas from joining the club and infusing 
 fresh funds, so MMY is setting the stage for offering 
 new knowledge, Gyan Shakti, for only the most 
 discriminating - existing Rajas with remaining 
 discretionary funds. When do you think it will be 
 offered? As soon as Jan. 12th? At what price? 

Good questions, and good fodder for the betting man. 

I'll take it one step further -- how long after 
Maharishi starts describing the attributes of some-
one who is experiencing Gyan Shakti will it be
before people start claiming to be experiencing 
these things on a daily basis? 

Brahman will no longer be enough, doncha know? Ya
gotta keep up with the latest buzzwords to still
impress the rubes.  :-)





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself (full text)

2007-11-24 Thread Vaj


On Nov 24, 2007, at 9:24 AM, mainstream20016 wrote:

Get ready Rajas, for MMY's latest concoction, Gyan Shakti. He's  
behind the bar mixing a
new elixir, Gyan Shakti, designed for your consumption. The Berlin  
Raja fiasco will limit
new Rajas from joining the club and infusing fresh funds, so MMY is  
setting the stage for
offering new knowledge, Gyan Shakti, for only the most  
discriminating - existing Rajas
with remaining discretionary funds. When do you think it will be  
offered ? As soon as Jan.

12th ? At what price ?



Good point, but no one seems to have noticed, once again, where these  
new buzz phrases come from. From the Ved? Oh no sonny, this is again  
straight out of the tantras (the triad of jyana-shakti, kriya-shakti  
and iccha-shakti - or he could be using the fivefold version which  
adds cit-shakti (the power of pure consciousness) ananda-shakti (the  
power of bliss) -- their are numerous different schemes. They are the  
reflection of Shiva, his svatantrya: pure sahaj (spontaneity).


TMO translation: there's an upcoming retirement special. You might not  
be able to sell the Vedas, but you sure can sell the tantras and just  
tell 'em it's duh Ved.


Now that they're rolling out the rajas, who wants to bet they'll be  
doing their latest version of the royalty title scam (and that's what  
it really is) and giving out lesser titles. You can easily sell your  
house now and get one for 108,000 euros converted to raams.

[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-24 Thread Rory Goff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
 
  I remain open to the claim from some folks that they
  no longer perceive a difference between shit and
  shinola -- both are just particles of their Self. 
  It's possible, and more power to 'em if they really do
  perceive that way. But to be honest I don't want to
  smell their shoes after they shine them.  :-)
 
 I think Judy has pointed out could not function in this world without 
 *some* discrimination; after Death it simply is not predominant, 
more 
 like a fine, multi-colored oil-layer of variety on an ocean of 
 ThatSelf. Call it leshavidya if you like, or simply keeping one eye 
 on the movie :-)

This simile still implies that the oil-slick and the ocean are in 
someway different though, and that's not true. 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-24 Thread do.rflex
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
  
   I remain open to the claim from some folks that they
   no longer perceive a difference between shit and
   shinola -- both are just particles of their Self. 
   It's possible, and more power to 'em if they really do
   perceive that way. But to be honest I don't want to
   smell their shoes after they shine them.  :-)
  
  I think Judy has pointed out could not function in this world without 
  *some* discrimination; after Death it simply is not predominant, 
 more 
  like a fine, multi-colored oil-layer of variety on an ocean of 
  ThatSelf. Call it leshavidya if you like, or simply keeping one eye 
  on the movie :-)
 
 This simile still implies that the oil-slick and the ocean are in 
 someway different though, and that's not true.


Thank God you cleared that up!!!  Now I can sleep peacefully tonight.







[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-24 Thread Rory Goff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 This simile still implies that the oil-slick and the ocean are in 
 someway different though, and that's not true.

More accurate would be that old analogy of the ocean's depths and the 
minute vibration of its surface waves.

More like a constant collapse-and-return of the unbounded into the 
particle(s) and vice versa, with the particles' being essentially 
nothing but programmed unbounded; unbounded dreaming and acting out  
a what-if or let's pretend scenario.





[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-24 Thread Rory Goff
R: This simile still implies that the oil-slick and the ocean are 
in 
  someway different though, and that's not true.
 
 do.rflex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Thank God you cleared that up!!!  Now I can sleep peacefully tonight.

*lol* Saving the worldone particle at a time!

(DISCLAIMER to ANY and ALL of mySelf: The above is only a joke, an 
obsolete program, a work of fiction, which does not in any way reflect 
any true belief, attitude or opinion of anyone, or of no-one. More 
truly perhaps, there is no world to be saved, hence no savior(s) and no 
savee(s)...nothing good or bad, but thinking makes it so)





[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself (full text)

2007-11-24 Thread Richard J. Williams
Vaj wrote:
 Good point, but no one seems to have noticed, once 
 again, where these new buzz phrases come from. From 
 the Ved? Oh no sonny, this is again straight out 
 of the tantras 

So, we are agreed that TM practice comes straight out of
the tantras, yet in a previous post you denied this.

 (the triad of jyana-shakti, kriya-shakti and iccha-shakti
 - or he could be using the fivefold version which adds 
 cit-shakti (the power of pure consciousness) ananda-shakti 
 (the power of bliss) -- their are numerous different schemes.
 They are the reflection of Shiva, his svatantrya: pure sahaj
 (spontaneity).
 
Well d'oh! How many times has Marshy said that Self 
Realization was easy, sahaj (spontaneity), reflection 
of Maheshvara (Shiva)? Are you some kind of nut who can't
read?

Obviously you haven't been within a thousand miles of 
a Maharishi Golden Dome in your life! According to Marshy, 
all TMers should be practicing TM before having sex. 

There's nothing like having sexual relations when 
you're high on that TM feeling - it's simply the 
greatest technique on the planet. According to Marshy, 
we all should enjoy. Plenty of energy to bounce after 
practicing TM. 

Newsgroups: alt.meditation.transcendental, alt.religion.tantra
From: Willytex
Date: Thurs, Dec 15 2005 9:56 pm 
Subject: TM and sexual Tantra
http://tinyurl.com/2de79o



[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-24 Thread Richard J. Williams
Doug wrote: 
 But I really do feel for those who still identify, 
 and have to put themselves through the same ups 
 and downs they see in the machinations of the court 
 and its courtiers at the end of an old king's reign.
 
So, you quit the TMO years and years ago, but you still 
live in Fairfield, IA; you're one of the leading 
informers on FFL. But WE still identify with the court 
and its courtiers and put ourselves through the same 
ups and downs?






[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-24 Thread curtisdeltablues
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@ wrote:
 
  
  This simile still implies that the oil-slick and the ocean are in 
  someway different though, and that's not true.
 
 More accurate would be that old analogy of the ocean's depths and the 
 minute vibration of its surface waves.
 
 More like a constant collapse-and-return of the unbounded into the 
 particle(s) and vice versa, with the particles' being essentially 
 nothing but programmed unbounded; unbounded dreaming and acting out  
 a what-if or let's pretend scenario.


Any chance I can get a baguette with this word soup?  A nice crusty
one would be nice. 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-24 Thread Rory Goff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@ 
wrote:
  
   
   This simile still implies that the oil-slick and the ocean 
are in 
   someway different though, and that's not true.
  
  More accurate would be that old analogy of the ocean's depths and 
the 
  minute vibration of its surface waves.
  
  More like a constant collapse-and-return of the unbounded into 
the 
  particle(s) and vice versa, with the particles' being essentially 
  nothing but programmed unbounded; unbounded dreaming and acting 
out  
  a what-if or let's pretend scenario.
 
 
 Any chance I can get a baguette with this word soup?  A nice crusty
 one would be nice.

You can pretend anything you like, crusty or not, as always :-)




[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-24 Thread new . morning
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On Behalf Of hugheshugo
 Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2007 1:49 AM
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Maharishi announces new role for himself.
 
  
 
 So anyone who's been wondering what will happen to the TMO without MMY, 
 we're about to find out.
 
 I heard him make the same announcement several times as early as 1974.
 

I heard it in 1967 (or 68). I just started TM and MMY said he was
going to retire. Bummer. He was going to go into silence for 20 years
or something.




[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-24 Thread curtisdeltablues
 You can pretend anything you like, crusty or not, as always :-)


Since nothing means anything, I'm sure you wont object to my taking
the role of being rooted in absolute reality and you just
pretending.  Think of it as that cute thing the unenlightened do.


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues 
 curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@ wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@ 
 wrote:
   

This simile still implies that the oil-slick and the ocean 
 are in 
someway different though, and that's not true.
   
   More accurate would be that old analogy of the ocean's depths and 
 the 
   minute vibration of its surface waves.
   
   More like a constant collapse-and-return of the unbounded into 
 the 
   particle(s) and vice versa, with the particles' being essentially 
   nothing but programmed unbounded; unbounded dreaming and acting 
 out  
   a what-if or let's pretend scenario.
  
  
  Any chance I can get a baguette with this word soup?  A nice crusty
  one would be nice.
 
 You can pretend anything you like, crusty or not, as always :-)





[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-24 Thread Rory Goff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  You can pretend anything you like, crusty or not, as always :-)
 
 
 Since nothing means anything, I'm sure you wont object to my taking
 the role of being rooted in absolute reality and you just
 pretending.  Think of it as that cute thing the unenlightened do.

I believe I have made it abundantly clear I am just pretending, 
Curtis. 

You may take any role you like, as always :-)



[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-24 Thread new . morning
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues 
 curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
 
   You can pretend anything you like, crusty or not, as always :-)
  
  
  Since nothing means anything, I'm sure you wont object to my taking
  the role of being rooted in absolute reality and you just
  pretending.  Think of it as that cute thing the unenlightened do.
 
 I believe I have made it abundantly clear I am just pretending, 
 Curtis. 
 
 You may take any role you like, as always :-)

I heard Curtis likes the top. 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-24 Thread new . morning
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 R: This simile still implies that the oil-slick and the ocean are 
 in 
   someway different though, and that's not true.
  


That well explains why some are so eternally slippery.



[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-24 Thread Rory Goff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@ wrote:
 
  R: This simile still implies that the oil-slick and the ocean 
are 
  in 
someway different though, and that's not true.
   
 
 
 That well explains why some are so eternally slippery.

Braman is slippery -- MMY said it, too, so it must be true :-)

Seriously (more or less), what do you expect of something that is 
subtler than either-or, a priori to language? 

How many here understand that the Self is prior to discrimination? 
Mmm?

... Almost everybody.




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-24 Thread Angela Mailander
Self prior to all distinction?  Doesn't that necessarily turn out to be a 
verbal quibble?  To know itself as Self, doesn't it have to posit a  non-self?  
 

Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:   --- In 
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@ wrote:
  
   R: This simile still implies that the oil-slick and the ocean 
 are 
   in 
 someway different though, and that's not true.

  
  
  That well explains why some are so eternally slippery.
 
 Braman is slippery -- MMY said it, too, so it must be true :-)
 
 Seriously (more or less), what do you expect of something that is 
 subtler than either-or, a priori to language? 
 
 How many here understand that the Self is prior to discrimination? 
 Mmm?
 
 ... Almost everybody.
 
 
 
   

 Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-24 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@ 
wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ 
wrote:
  
   I remain open to the claim from some folks that they
   no longer perceive a difference between shit and
   shinola -- both are just particles of their Self. 
   It's possible, and more power to 'em if they really do
   perceive that way. But to be honest I don't want to
   smell their shoes after they shine them.  :-)
  
  I think Judy has pointed out could not function in this world 
without 
  *some* discrimination; after Death it simply is not 
predominant, 
 more 
  like a fine, multi-colored oil-layer of variety on an ocean of 
  ThatSelf. Call it leshavidya if you like, or simply keeping 
one eye 
  on the movie :-)
 
 This simile still implies that the oil-slick and the ocean are 
in 
 someway different though, and that's not true.

This idea that after enlightenment, differences fade away, or become 
secondary to carrying out the thoughts and tasks of an active life, 
or the looniest conclusion of all, that we cannot tell the 
difference between one thing and another, are just feeble attempts  
by the coarse intellect which can only see two, to make sense out of 
the One, which it does not see before enlightenment.

My experience is now I am constantly creating, experiencing, 
observing, and just having a great time. There is not enough time in 
the day or night to enjoy it all. Problems are solved in the blink 
of an eye, and new tasks accomplished quickly and with satisfaction. 
With the ocean of infinite silence and potential to support me, I 
have an endless supply of discrimination available, attached to 
nothing and so always clean and sharp. 

My prior life was restricted by so many judgments and stories and 
preconcieved ideas and concepts, all of it to protect a me that was 
ephemeral and false, that I was far less dynamic and successful.

The sense that anyone would deliberately keep themselves locked in 
ignorance because of the supposed inability to discriminate after 
their eternal freedom has been accomplished, is silliness itself.



[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-24 Thread Rory Goff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Self prior to all distinction?  Doesn't that necessarily turn out to 
be a verbal quibble?  

Not IME, no.

To know itself as Self, doesn't it have to posit a  non-self?   

The memory of non-self remains, by which and through which the Self 
knows itself as the Self. It's not that *all* discrimination vanishes, 
necessarily; it just no longer predominates. It now serves the Self, 
rather than obscuring it.



[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-24 Thread Rory Goff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander 
 mailander111@ wrote:
 
  Self prior to all distinction?  Doesn't that necessarily turn out 
to 
 be a verbal quibble?  
 
 Not IME, no.
 
 To know itself as Self, doesn't it have to posit a  non-self?   
 
 The memory of non-self remains, by which and through which the Self 
 knows itself as the Self. It's not that *all* discrimination 
vanishes, 
 necessarily; it just no longer predominates. It now serves the 
Self, 
 rather than obscuring it.

But to know itself as Self is not like any other knowledge, which 
is indeed dualistic and based on a comparison, on an either-or 
discrimination. 

That's why this Self-knowledge is so mind-blowing -- literally. It is 
so ordinary and so special, so still and so dynamic, so Dead and so 
Alive, so *this* and so *that* -- so slippery, so concrete, so in-
your-face paradoxical. Literally unimaginable, literally unspeakable. 

Yet it IS; I AM. 

Discrimination cannot capture it; discrimination can only surrender 
awe-struck.




[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-24 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On Behalf Of hugheshugo
 Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2007 1:49 AM
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Maharishi announces new role for himself.
 
  
 
 So anyone who's been wondering what will happen to the TMO without 
MMY, 
 we're about to find out.
 
 I heard him make the same announcement several times as early as 
1974.




Las Vegas should be taking odds as to how long he will actually keep 
his hands off running even the minutest detail of the TMO...




 
 
 No virus found in this outgoing message.
 Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
 Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.5/1148 - Release Date: 
11/23/2007
 7:39 PM





[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-24 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ wrote:
  
On Behalf Of hugheshugo
   
So anyone who's been wondering what will happen to the 
TMO without MMY, we're about to find out.
   
   I heard him make the same announcement several times as 
   early as 1974.
  
  It seems to me that a similar I'm outa the 
  everyday affairs of the movement pronouncement 
  was reposted here on FFL only a few months ago. 
  
  Isn't it fascinating, though, that there are 
  hundreds of people among the TM TBs who literally 
  are incapable of remembering back that far. They
  live in a world more ephemeral in its way than 
  that of pop music. (A common trait among people 
  who work in the marketing side of the music biz 
  is that they seem incapable of remembering any 
  song or album that came out any further back 
  than last month, or in some cases, last week.) 
  
  From one point of view, I guess one could regard 
  this as living in the moment. From another, it
  can be regarded as Never learning from the lessons
  of history because one can't *remember* history.
 
 
 He's 90 years old, and his TERRIBLE statement that he made at 90 
 years old is: I want to work more on the Vedic knowledge details. 
 You guys can carry on without me
 
 Big Deal, why are the vultures here on FFL rushing in like demented 
 jackals. 




...because about half of those vultures devoted not 90 years but, 
combined, probably 500 years working for nothing or next to nothing 
doing the bidding of someone who they feel abandoned what he stood 
for...








 
 OffWorld
 
 
 
  I have a good friend who was always fun to go to
  the movies with because on exiting the theater
  he would invariably give the same review to what-
  ever film it was that we had seen: That was the
  BEST film I've ever seen.
  
  I often laughed, because sometimes the film really
  wasn't any good at all, but after awhile I realized
  that my friend was serious, every time. It really
  *was* the best movie he'd ever seen, because he
  couldn't really remember any others. He got so 
  completely into the moment that no other film he'd
  ever seen in his life was available as a reference,
  or to practice discrimination with using it as a
  reference. Only the latest film existed.
  
  I sometimes envy him this ability. But most of the
  time I don't. Discrimination is important. As long
  as one still perceives both shit and shinola in the
  world, discrimination helps you tell one from the
  other.  
  
  I remain open to the claim from some folks that they
  no longer perceive a difference between shit and
  shinola -- both are just particles of their Self. 
  It's possible, and more power to 'em if they really do
  perceive that way. But to be honest I don't want to
  smell their shoes after they shine them.  :-)
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-24 Thread mainstream20016
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ wrote:
  
On Behalf Of hugheshugo
   
So anyone who's been wondering what will happen to the 
TMO without MMY, we're about to find out.
   
   I heard him make the same announcement several times as 
   early as 1974.
  
  It seems to me that a similar I'm outa the 
  everyday affairs of the movement pronouncement 
  was reposted here on FFL only a few months ago. 
  
  Isn't it fascinating, though, that there are 
  hundreds of people among the TM TBs who literally 
  are incapable of remembering back that far. They
  live in a world more ephemeral in its way than 
  that of pop music. (A common trait among people 
  who work in the marketing side of the music biz 
  is that they seem incapable of remembering any 
  song or album that came out any further back 
  than last month, or in some cases, last week.) 
  
  From one point of view, I guess one could regard 
  this as living in the moment. From another, it
  can be regarded as Never learning from the lessons
  of history because one can't *remember* history.
 
 
 He's 90 years old, and his TERRIBLE statement that he made at 90 
 years old is: I want to work more on the Vedic knowledge details. 
 You guys can carry on without me
 
 Big Deal, why are the vultures here on FFL rushing in like demented 
 jackals. 
 
 OffWorld
 

The world is as you are 


 
  I have a good friend who was always fun to go to
  the movies with because on exiting the theater
  he would invariably give the same review to what-
  ever film it was that we had seen: That was the
  BEST film I've ever seen.
  
  I often laughed, because sometimes the film really
  wasn't any good at all, but after awhile I realized
  that my friend was serious, every time. It really
  *was* the best movie he'd ever seen, because he
  couldn't really remember any others. He got so 
  completely into the moment that no other film he'd
  ever seen in his life was available as a reference,
  or to practice discrimination with using it as a
  reference. Only the latest film existed.
  
  I sometimes envy him this ability. But most of the
  time I don't. Discrimination is important. As long
  as one still perceives both shit and shinola in the
  world, discrimination helps you tell one from the
  other.  
  
  I remain open to the claim from some folks that they
  no longer perceive a difference between shit and
  shinola -- both are just particles of their Self. 
  It's possible, and more power to 'em if they really do
  perceive that way. But to be honest I don't want to
  smell their shoes after they shine them.  :-)
 






[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-24 Thread off_world_beings
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@ 
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ 
wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ 
wrote:
   
 On Behalf Of hugheshugo

 So anyone who's been wondering what will happen to the 
 TMO without MMY, we're about to find out.

I heard him make the same announcement several times as 
early as 1974.
   
   It seems to me that a similar I'm outa the 
   everyday affairs of the movement pronouncement 
   was reposted here on FFL only a few months ago. 
   
   Isn't it fascinating, though, that there are 
   hundreds of people among the TM TBs who literally 
   are incapable of remembering back that far. They
   live in a world more ephemeral in its way than 
   that of pop music. (A common trait among people 
   who work in the marketing side of the music biz 
   is that they seem incapable of remembering any 
   song or album that came out any further back 
   than last month, or in some cases, last week.) 
   
   From one point of view, I guess one could regard 
   this as living in the moment. From another, it
   can be regarded as Never learning from the lessons
   of history because one can't *remember* history.
  
  
  He's 90 years old, and his TERRIBLE statement that he made at 90 
  years old is: I want to work more on the Vedic knowledge 
details. 
  You guys can carry on without me
  
  Big Deal, why are the vultures here on FFL rushing in like 
demented 
  jackals. 
 
 
 
 
 ...because about half of those vultures devoted not 90 years but, 
 combined, probably 500 years working for nothing or next to nothing 
 doing the bidding of someone who they feel abandoned what he stood 
 for...

I see.
So you are saying that these people made huge mistakes in their 
lives, made bad decisions, made fools of themselves, and wasted years 
on this stupid mistake of theirs?

THAT is what you and the other jackals here are saying.

Therefore, I must ask you idiots, why would anyone listen to people 
who are saying they were s stupid in the past but now are 
correct, and we should listen to you?
Ain't gonna happen people. Hate to bust your bubble folks, but no-one 
is listening to your whining Vaj, Turq., Mainstream, Shemp, etc. 

Keep whining about how you made such huge mistakes in your life and 
were really really stupid in the past and told everyone to listen to 
you back then, but now everyone should listen to you now.

ROFLMAO !

Bunch of old jokers. No one is listening to your baby whining.

OffWorld



[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-24 Thread feste37
Well said, Off. This thread should be retitled Great Man Attacked by
Pygmies. Pygmies Lose.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ 
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@ 
  wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ 
 wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ 
 wrote:

  On Behalf Of hugheshugo
 
  So anyone who's been wondering what will happen to the 
  TMO without MMY, we're about to find out.
 
 I heard him make the same announcement several times as 
 early as 1974.

It seems to me that a similar I'm outa the 
everyday affairs of the movement pronouncement 
was reposted here on FFL only a few months ago. 

Isn't it fascinating, though, that there are 
hundreds of people among the TM TBs who literally 
are incapable of remembering back that far. They
live in a world more ephemeral in its way than 
that of pop music. (A common trait among people 
who work in the marketing side of the music biz 
is that they seem incapable of remembering any 
song or album that came out any further back 
than last month, or in some cases, last week.) 

From one point of view, I guess one could regard 
this as living in the moment. From another, it
can be regarded as Never learning from the lessons
of history because one can't *remember* history.
   
   
   He's 90 years old, and his TERRIBLE statement that he made at 90 
   years old is: I want to work more on the Vedic knowledge 
 details. 
   You guys can carry on without me
   
   Big Deal, why are the vultures here on FFL rushing in like 
 demented 
   jackals. 
  
  
  
  
  ...because about half of those vultures devoted not 90 years but, 
  combined, probably 500 years working for nothing or next to nothing 
  doing the bidding of someone who they feel abandoned what he stood 
  for...
 
 I see.
 So you are saying that these people made huge mistakes in their 
 lives, made bad decisions, made fools of themselves, and wasted years 
 on this stupid mistake of theirs?
 
 THAT is what you and the other jackals here are saying.
 
 Therefore, I must ask you idiots, why would anyone listen to people 
 who are saying they were s stupid in the past but now are 
 correct, and we should listen to you?
 Ain't gonna happen people. Hate to bust your bubble folks, but no-one 
 is listening to your whining Vaj, Turq., Mainstream, Shemp, etc. 
 
 Keep whining about how you made such huge mistakes in your life and 
 were really really stupid in the past and told everyone to listen to 
 you back then, but now everyone should listen to you now.
 
 ROFLMAO !
 
 Bunch of old jokers. No one is listening to your baby whining.
 
 OffWorld





[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-24 Thread mainstream20016
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ 
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@ 
  wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ 
 wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ 
 wrote:

  On Behalf Of hugheshugo
 
  So anyone who's been wondering what will happen to the 
  TMO without MMY, we're about to find out.
 
 I heard him make the same announcement several times as 
 early as 1974.

It seems to me that a similar I'm outa the 
everyday affairs of the movement pronouncement 
was reposted here on FFL only a few months ago. 

Isn't it fascinating, though, that there are 
hundreds of people among the TM TBs who literally 
are incapable of remembering back that far. They
live in a world more ephemeral in its way than 
that of pop music. (A common trait among people 
who work in the marketing side of the music biz 
is that they seem incapable of remembering any 
song or album that came out any further back 
than last month, or in some cases, last week.) 

From one point of view, I guess one could regard 
this as living in the moment. From another, it
can be regarded as Never learning from the lessons
of history because one can't *remember* history.
   
   
   He's 90 years old, and his TERRIBLE statement that he made at 90 
   years old is: I want to work more on the Vedic knowledge 
 details. 
   You guys can carry on without me
   
   Big Deal, why are the vultures here on FFL rushing in like 
 demented 
   jackals. 
  
  
  
  
  ...because about half of those vultures devoted not 90 years but, 
  combined, probably 500 years working for nothing or next to nothing 
  doing the bidding of someone who they feel abandoned what he stood 
  for...
 
 I see.
 So you are saying that these people made huge mistakes in their 
 lives, made bad decisions, made fools of themselves, and wasted years 
 on this stupid mistake of theirs?
 
 THAT is what you and the other jackals here are saying.
 
 Therefore, I must ask you idiots, why would anyone listen to people 
 who are saying they were s stupid in the past but now are 
 correct, and we should listen to you?
 Ain't gonna happen people. Hate to bust your bubble folks, but no-one 
 is listening to your whining Vaj, Turq., Mainstream, Shemp, etc. 
 
 Keep whining about how you made such huge mistakes in your life and 
 were really really stupid in the past and told everyone to listen to 
 you back then, but now everyone should listen to you now.
 
 ROFLMAO !
 
 Bunch of old jokers. No one is listening to your baby whining.
 
 OffWorld


There must be something of value in the message of criticism of the TMO, for 
the 
messengers are attacked  thusly:

these people made huge mistakes made bad decisions made fools of 
themselves... 
and wasted yearsstupid mistake of theirsjackals here are saying... you 
idiots...
they were s stupid... you made such huge mistakes in your life... were 
really really 
stupid...
  












[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-24 Thread off_world_beings
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mainstream20016 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@ 
wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk 
shempmcgurk@ 
  wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings 
no_reply@ 
   wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ 
  wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ 
  wrote:
 
   On Behalf Of hugheshugo
  
   So anyone who's been wondering what will happen to the 
   TMO without MMY, we're about to find out.
  
  I heard him make the same announcement several times as 
  early as 1974.
 
 It seems to me that a similar I'm outa the 
 everyday affairs of the movement pronouncement 
 was reposted here on FFL only a few months ago. 
 
 Isn't it fascinating, though, that there are 
 hundreds of people among the TM TBs who literally 
 are incapable of remembering back that far. They
 live in a world more ephemeral in its way than 
 that of pop music. (A common trait among people 
 who work in the marketing side of the music biz 
 is that they seem incapable of remembering any 
 song or album that came out any further back 
 than last month, or in some cases, last week.) 
 
 From one point of view, I guess one could regard 
 this as living in the moment. From another, it
 can be regarded as Never learning from the lessons
 of history because one can't *remember* history.


He's 90 years old, and his TERRIBLE statement that he made at 
90 
years old is: I want to work more on the Vedic knowledge 
  details. 
You guys can carry on without me

Big Deal, why are the vultures here on FFL rushing in like 
  demented 
jackals. 
   
   
   
   
   ...because about half of those vultures devoted not 90 years 
but, 
   combined, probably 500 years working for nothing or next to 
nothing 
   doing the bidding of someone who they feel abandoned what he 
stood 
   for...
  
  I see.
  So you are saying that these people made huge mistakes in their 
  lives, made bad decisions, made fools of themselves, and wasted 
years 
  on this stupid mistake of theirs?
  
  THAT is what you and the other jackals here are saying.
  
  Therefore, I must ask you idiots, why would anyone listen to 
people 
  who are saying they were s stupid in the past but now are 
  correct, and we should listen to you?
  Ain't gonna happen people. Hate to bust your bubble folks, but no-
one 
  is listening to your whining Vaj, Turq., Mainstream, Shemp, etc. 
  
  Keep whining about how you made such huge mistakes in your life 
and 
  were really really stupid in the past and told everyone to listen 
to 
  you back then, but now everyone should listen to you now.
  
  ROFLMAO !
  
  Bunch of old jokers. No one is listening to your baby whining.
  
  OffWorld
 
 
 There must be something of value in the message of criticism of the 
TMO, for the 
 messengers are attacked  thusly:
 
 these people made huge mistakes made bad decisions made 
fools of themselves... 
 and wasted yearsstupid mistake of theirsjackals here are 
saying... you idiots...
 they were s stupid... you made such huge mistakes in your 
life... were really really 
 stupid...

Actually Mainstream, if you were not so stupid, and stopped thinking 
that your silly whining comments on FFl have any value, meaning, or 
effect in the world ...at all...
...then, you the might be smart enough to realize that it is YOU who 
said all those things about yourself. Bw ha ha !

Alas, you are not smart enough for that, therefore you are consigned 
to the garbage can of history with the rest of the 20th century 
neanderthals that never made it into the new era.

OffWorld




[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-24 Thread mainstream20016
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mainstream20016 
 mainstream20016@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@ 
 wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk 
 shempmcgurk@ 
   wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings 
 no_reply@ 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ 
   wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ 
   wrote:
  
On Behalf Of hugheshugo
   
So anyone who's been wondering what will happen to the 
TMO without MMY, we're about to find out.
   
   I heard him make the same announcement several times as 
   early as 1974.
  
  It seems to me that a similar I'm outa the 
  everyday affairs of the movement pronouncement 
  was reposted here on FFL only a few months ago. 
  
  Isn't it fascinating, though, that there are 
  hundreds of people among the TM TBs who literally 
  are incapable of remembering back that far. They
  live in a world more ephemeral in its way than 
  that of pop music. (A common trait among people 
  who work in the marketing side of the music biz 
  is that they seem incapable of remembering any 
  song or album that came out any further back 
  than last month, or in some cases, last week.) 
  
  From one point of view, I guess one could regard 
  this as living in the moment. From another, it
  can be regarded as Never learning from the lessons
  of history because one can't *remember* history.
 
 
 He's 90 years old, and his TERRIBLE statement that he made at 
 90 
 years old is: I want to work more on the Vedic knowledge 
   details. 
 You guys can carry on without me
 
 Big Deal, why are the vultures here on FFL rushing in like 
   demented 
 jackals. 




...because about half of those vultures devoted not 90 years 
 but, 
combined, probably 500 years working for nothing or next to 
 nothing 
doing the bidding of someone who they feel abandoned what he 
 stood 
for...
   
   I see.
   So you are saying that these people made huge mistakes in their 
   lives, made bad decisions, made fools of themselves, and wasted 
 years 
   on this stupid mistake of theirs?
   
   THAT is what you and the other jackals here are saying.
   
   Therefore, I must ask you idiots, why would anyone listen to 
 people 
   who are saying they were s stupid in the past but now are 
   correct, and we should listen to you?
   Ain't gonna happen people. Hate to bust your bubble folks, but no-
 one 
   is listening to your whining Vaj, Turq., Mainstream, Shemp, etc. 
   
   Keep whining about how you made such huge mistakes in your life 
 and 
   were really really stupid in the past and told everyone to listen 
 to 
   you back then, but now everyone should listen to you now.
   
   ROFLMAO !
   
   Bunch of old jokers. No one is listening to your baby whining.
   
   OffWorld
  
  
  There must be something of value in the message of criticism of the 
 TMO, for the 
  messengers are attacked  thusly:
  
  these people made huge mistakes made bad decisions made 
 fools of themselves... 
  and wasted yearsstupid mistake of theirsjackals here are 
 saying... you idiots...
  they were s stupid... you made such huge mistakes in your 
 life... were really really 
  stupid...
 
 Actually Mainstream, if you were not so stupid, and stopped thinking 
 that your silly whining comments on FFl have any value, meaning, or 
 effect in the world ...at all...
 ...then, you the might be smart enough to realize that it is YOU who 
 said all those things about yourself. Bw ha ha



The rant of the purely partisan - consistently void of citation, yet certain of 
the 
decrepitude of the opponent.  You're doing a heck of a job, Brownie.



 Alas, you are not smart enough for that, therefore you are consigned 
 to the garbage can of history with the rest of the 20th century 
 neanderthals that never made it into the new era.
 
 OffWorld






[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-24 Thread mainstream20016
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mainstream20016 
 mainstream20016@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@ 
 wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk 
 shempmcgurk@ 
   wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings 
 no_reply@ 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ 
   wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ 
   wrote:
  
On Behalf Of hugheshugo
   
So anyone who's been wondering what will happen to the 
TMO without MMY, we're about to find out.
   
   I heard him make the same announcement several times as 
   early as 1974.
  
  It seems to me that a similar I'm outa the 
  everyday affairs of the movement pronouncement 
  was reposted here on FFL only a few months ago. 
  
  Isn't it fascinating, though, that there are 
  hundreds of people among the TM TBs who literally 
  are incapable of remembering back that far. They
  live in a world more ephemeral in its way than 
  that of pop music. (A common trait among people 
  who work in the marketing side of the music biz 
  is that they seem incapable of remembering any 
  song or album that came out any further back 
  than last month, or in some cases, last week.) 
  
  From one point of view, I guess one could regard 
  this as living in the moment. From another, it
  can be regarded as Never learning from the lessons
  of history because one can't *remember* history.
 
 
 He's 90 years old, and his TERRIBLE statement that he made at 
 90 
 years old is: I want to work more on the Vedic knowledge 
   details. 
 You guys can carry on without me
 
 Big Deal, why are the vultures here on FFL rushing in like 
   demented 
 jackals. 




...because about half of those vultures devoted not 90 years 
 but, 
combined, probably 500 years working for nothing or next to 
 nothing 
doing the bidding of someone who they feel abandoned what he 
 stood 
for...
   
   I see.
   So you are saying that these people made huge mistakes in their 
   lives, made bad decisions, made fools of themselves, and wasted 
 years 
   on this stupid mistake of theirs?
   
   THAT is what you and the other jackals here are saying.
   
   Therefore, I must ask you idiots, why would anyone listen to 
 people 
   who are saying they were s stupid in the past but now are 
   correct, and we should listen to you?
   Ain't gonna happen people. Hate to bust your bubble folks, but no-
 one 
   is listening to your whining Vaj, Turq., Mainstream, Shemp, etc. 
   
   Keep whining about how you made such huge mistakes in your life 
 and 
   were really really stupid in the past and told everyone to listen 
 to 
   you back then, but now everyone should listen to you now.
   
   ROFLMAO !
   
   Bunch of old jokers. No one is listening to your baby whining.
   
   OffWorld
  
  
  There must be something of value in the message of criticism of the 
 TMO, for the 
  messengers are attacked  thusly:
  
  these people made huge mistakes made bad decisions made 
 fools of themselves... 
  and wasted yearsstupid mistake of theirsjackals here are 
 saying... you idiots...
  they were s stupid... you made such huge mistakes in your 
 life... were really really 
  stupid...
 
 Actually Mainstream, if you were not so stupid, and stopped thinking 
 that your silly whining comments on FFl have any value, meaning, or 
 effect in the world ...at all...
 ...then, you the might be smart enough to realize that it is YOU who 
 said all those things about yourself. Bw ha ha !
 
 Alas, you are not smart enough for that, therefore you are consigned 
 to the garbage can of history with the rest of the 20th century 
 neanderthals that never made it into the new era.
 
 OffWorld


Judge, jury, and executioner ensuring  obedience to the royal rule of 
rajas. May your 
permanent delusion of grandeur limit  your range of influence to the frozen, 
barren, 
formerly productive corn fields now known as MVC.  






[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-24 Thread off_world_beings
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mainstream20016 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@ 
wrote:
Keep whining about how you made such huge mistakes in your life 
  and 
were really really stupid in the past and told everyone to 
listen 
  to 
you back then, but now everyone should listen to you now.

ROFLMAO !

Bunch of old jokers. No one is listening to your baby whining.

OffWorld

   There must be something of value in the message of criticism of 
the 
  TMO, for the 
   messengers are attacked  thusly:
   
   these people made huge mistakes made bad decisions 
made 
  fools of themselves... 
   and wasted yearsstupid mistake of theirsjackals here 
are 
  saying... you idiots...
   they were s stupid... you made such huge mistakes in your 
  life... were really really 
   stupid...
  
  Actually Mainstream, if you were not so stupid, and stopped 
thinking 
  that your silly whining comments on FFl have any value, meaning, 
or 
  effect in the world ...at all...
  ...then, you the might be smart enough to realize that it is YOU 
who 
  said all those things about yourself. Bw ha ha
 
 
 
 The rant of the purely partisan - consistently void of citation, 
yet certain of the 
 decrepitude of the opponent. 


Your words persist in a frameless rectilinear trapezoid.
You have not reversed the seculorum superium, and in such a way there 
is no subject within the restitude to which you adhere so fervently. 
Prepare your partisanilicious drivel carefully, and then rent it 
inward toward the surrender zone of your ever-present self-deficating 
world. There you will find yourself deeply entrenched and may find 
peace within that vile hole that you find so holy.


 You're doing a heck of a job, Brownie.

In your dreams bigboy.

OffWorld




[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi announces new role for himself.

2007-11-24 Thread off_world_beings
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mainstream20016 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@ 
wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mainstream20016 
  mainstream20016@ wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings 
no_reply@ 
  wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk 
  shempmcgurk@ 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings 
  no_reply@ 
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB 
no_reply@ 
wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer 
rick@ 
wrote:
   
 On Behalf Of hugheshugo

 So anyone who's been wondering what will happen to 
the 
 TMO without MMY, we're about to find out.

I heard him make the same announcement several times 
as 
early as 1974.
   
   It seems to me that a similar I'm outa the 
   everyday affairs of the movement pronouncement 
   was reposted here on FFL only a few months ago. 
   
   Isn't it fascinating, though, that there are 
   hundreds of people among the TM TBs who literally 
   are incapable of remembering back that far. They
   live in a world more ephemeral in its way than 
   that of pop music. (A common trait among people 
   who work in the marketing side of the music biz 
   is that they seem incapable of remembering any 
   song or album that came out any further back 
   than last month, or in some cases, last week.) 
   
   From one point of view, I guess one could regard 
   this as living in the moment. From another, it
   can be regarded as Never learning from the lessons
   of history because one can't *remember* history.
  
  
  He's 90 years old, and his TERRIBLE statement that he 
made at 
  90 
  years old is: I want to work more on the Vedic knowledge 
details. 
  You guys can carry on without me
  
  Big Deal, why are the vultures here on FFL rushing in 
like 
demented 
  jackals. 
 
 
 
 
 ...because about half of those vultures devoted not 90 
years 
  but, 
 combined, probably 500 years working for nothing or next to 
  nothing 
 doing the bidding of someone who they feel abandoned what 
he 
  stood 
 for...

I see.
So you are saying that these people made huge mistakes in 
their 
lives, made bad decisions, made fools of themselves, and 
wasted 
  years 
on this stupid mistake of theirs?

THAT is what you and the other jackals here are saying.

Therefore, I must ask you idiots, why would anyone listen to 
  people 
who are saying they were s stupid in the past but now are 
correct, and we should listen to you?
Ain't gonna happen people. Hate to bust your bubble folks, 
but no-
  one 
is listening to your whining Vaj, Turq., Mainstream, Shemp, 
etc. 

Keep whining about how you made such huge mistakes in your 
life 
  and 
were really really stupid in the past and told everyone to 
listen 
  to 
you back then, but now everyone should listen to you now.

ROFLMAO !

Bunch of old jokers. No one is listening to your baby whining.

OffWorld
   
   
   There must be something of value in the message of criticism of 
the 
  TMO, for the 
   messengers are attacked  thusly:
   
   these people made huge mistakes made bad decisions 
made 
  fools of themselves... 
   and wasted yearsstupid mistake of theirsjackals here 
are 
  saying... you idiots...
   they were s stupid... you made such huge mistakes in your 
  life... were really really 
   stupid...
  
  Actually Mainstream, if you were not so stupid, and stopped 
thinking 
  that your silly whining comments on FFl have any value, meaning, 
or 
  effect in the world ...at all...
  ...then, you the might be smart enough to realize that it is YOU 
who 
  said all those things about yourself. Bw ha ha !
  
  Alas, you are not smart enough for that, therefore you are 
consigned 
  to the garbage can of history with the rest of the 20th century 
  neanderthals that never made it into the new era.
  
  OffWorld
 
 
 Judge, jury, and executioner ensuring  obedience to the royal 
rule of rajas. May your 
 permanent delusion of grandeur limit  your range of influence to 
the frozen, barren, 
 formerly productive corn fields now known as MVC.

Vermont is Heaven on Earth. It is unlikely that you will enter here-
in, therfore you are stuck in your voidworld.

OffWorld