Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: 3 ques to Judy Emily anyone else interested
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 8:45 PM, awoelflebater no_re...@yahoogroups.comwrote: ** --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... wrote: *State of FFL vs Share Long* * * *Dec 2nd, 2012* * * *Exhibit D* The jurors dubbed the 3 Idiots - feste, Buck, Steve continue to view this as another example of the innocence, sincerity of the defendant Share Long. Juror#4 - Laughinggull insists on fair play much to the annoyance of everyone. Juror#5 - Barry continues to be hostile and demeaning towards the defendant and may soon be dismissed because of contempt of court. The other jurors dubbed the wts seven rightly see this as yet another pattern of the defendant's deceptive damsel-in-distress plea of innocence. OK Ravi, I officially loved this. Thank you dear Ann- I'm glad you enjoyed it :-)
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: 3 ques to Judy Emily anyone else interested to Judy
Judy, what do you mean by actual communication? Why is my original post not an example of actual communication? I don't think Windex on my navel is the ...next single thing for me to do or know for me to be in a state of Divine Grace. But I could be wrong (-: PS Thanks for replying. From: authfriend authfri...@yahoo.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, December 3, 2012 5:10 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: 3 ques to Judy Emily anyone else interested --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote: 1. Do you think that any benefits can come from Judy Share and Emily continuing to communicate with each other? Well, Share doesn't engage in communication with Emily and Judy, so there's no such thing as continuing to communicate in the first place. 2. If yes, what do you think are the benefits that can come of it? There's no point in speculating about benefits unless Share becomes willing to engage in actual communication. 3. What do you think would be a viable next step to move closer to those benefits with a minimum of what's not beneficial? Again, the first thing that has to happen is for Share to be willing to engage in actual communication. The post I'm responding to, just for the record, is not an example. I began to think of these questions while driving to the Dome this evening. I have not discussed them with anyone. I look forward to any answers especially to numbers 2 and 3. In some ways I don't think the answer to number 1 matters. My answers: 2. I hope that more peace and enjoyment for those on FFL would come of it. 3. This post IS my viable next step! 1. I'm not sure. But I'm open to the possibility of yes. I'm hoping for some fun answers too (-: Before you take a next step, use some Windex on your navel. How's that? Thank you everyone for your time and thoughts and caring.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: 3 ques to Judy Emily anyone else interested to Judy
Do you think what we are doing now is communicating with or at each other? And if I'm doing the latter, can you show me an example of where I am and how it could be changed to being communicating with you? Should I therefore be considering my navel as my fourth eye? From: authfriend authfri...@yahoo.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 10:46 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: 3 ques to Judy Emily anyone else interested to Judy --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote: Judy, what do you mean by actual communication? I mean the same thing as Emily meant when she said in her response that you and she weren't communicating *with* each other but *at* each other. As to using Windex on your navel, it's a metaphor. You're likely to stumble if you take steps without being able to see where you're going.  Why is my original post not an example of actual communication? I don't think Windex on my navel is the ...next single thing for me to do or know for me to be in a state of Divine Grace. But I could be wrong (-: PS Thanks for replying. From: authfriend authfriend@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, December 3, 2012 5:10 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: 3 ques to Judy Emily anyone else interested  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@ wrote: 1. Do you think that any benefits can come from Judy Share and Emily continuing to communicate with each other? Well, Share doesn't engage in communication with Emily and Judy, so there's no such thing as continuing to communicate in the first place. 2. If yes, what do you think are the benefits that can come of it? There's no point in speculating about benefits unless Share becomes willing to engage in actual communication. 3. What do you think would be a viable next step to move closer to those benefits with a minimum of what's not beneficial? Again, the first thing that has to happen is for Share to be willing to engage in actual communication. The post I'm responding to, just for the record, is not an example. I began to think of these questions while driving to the Dome this evening. I have not discussed them with anyone. I look forward to any answers especially to numbers 2 and 3. In some ways I don't think the answer to number 1 matters. My answers: 2. I hope that more peace and enjoyment for those on FFL would come of it. 3. This post IS my viable next step! 1. I'm not sure. But I'm open to the possibility of yes. I'm hoping for some fun answers too (-: Before you take a next step, use some Windex on your navel. How's that? Thank you everyone for your time and thoughts and caring.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: 3 ques to Judy Emily anyone else interested to Judy
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 2:34 PM, turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@ wrote: snip Should I therefore be considering my navel as my fourth eye? No, not your fourth eye. Have you ever heard of navel gazing? Um, different significance of navel than in my formulation, Ann: one doesn't gaze into it, one gazes out of it. There's that Crohn's Disease chronically upset stomach thang again. What's up with that? :-) Oh so cute to watch Barry baby's antics. Ravi, all teary eyed, to a stranger - Isn't Barry like baby Krishna? Stranger - No - Barry is mean and paranoid, he is not even supposed to be reading Judy and Ann. Ravi - Fuck you stranger.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: 3 ques to Judy Emily anyone else interested
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 4:14 AM, laughinggull108 no_re...@yahoogroups.comwrote: OK Ravi...wanna play at recess? And can Susan come play too? And can you please stop using the word retarded or retard (at least in your posts) because it has such negative connotations associated with its use? That's what the truly ignorant used to refer to those who are mentally-challenged, and it kind of, you know, might illicit bad feelings in others, kind of like calling a woman a bitch or calling a man a barry. Thanking you in advance. See ya at recess! Dear laughinggull - thank you, I have had lot of discussions with myself on the pros and cons of using that word and even the last time I have had this I haven't found a compelling reason to stop but the future is potent. I think there's only one who can put an end to it but she doesn't care enough at this point. (Just a little more below.) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... wrote: P.S. FYI - Divine Vodka is my patented drink and Reality will never find me immobile with any belief - I am always ever vulnerable so I can fluidly, gracefully adapt to the ever shifting reality. Why don't you start bottling your Divine Vodka like Puff Daddy, Diddy, P. Diddy, Sean Combs did? I think it would be a great business venture. A great idea - but I haven't found a way yet to package the Divine Vodka for the thirsty masses. BTW, I think Robin may have patented the always ever vulnerable so I can fluidity, gracefully adapt to the ever shifting reality philosophy, however I'm sure that he doesn't mind if you use it. No the old man hasn't ever used these words let alone patent is, may be the word reality threw you off or even if he did he must have been in a sweet remembrance of my Krishna style undressing antics.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: 3 ques to Judy Emily anyone else interested
This is far too complicated Laughingatyou. Ravi, very very funny - wts seven - ah ha ha ha. I am sorry I am forced to withdraw from the case as I have a conflict of interest. Thank you all for putting up with me. I promise to start taking my holiday depressive antidote tomorrow. I have no antibodies built up to handle the pghlem I am sneezing out. Barry, it's all about ME - have you noticed that yet? Oh yeah, you have. raunchy, I still can figure out whether I love or Ann more. Maybe Judy can search the archives and establish the facts on that. I am teasing her because I love her the most - except for Ravi. And, I'm developing a real crush on Alex. Now, Robin has posted, in his brilliance, something that will be sure to shut me up for a good long while. Tee Hee. From: laughinggull108 no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, December 2, 2012 6:31 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: 3 ques to Judy Emily anyone else interested Ravi, I know you're having alot of fun with this because I've felt the same way when I think I'm on a roll. Then, reality comes crashing in and I suddenly realize what a fool I've made of myself. I can only take that Divine Vodka in small sips or not at all. Revealing how you view this as a trial with Share as the defendent rather than the plaintiff. Anyway, my thoughts for what they're worth: too much attention has been given to this already and I'm beginning to think certain people thrive on that attention (similar to getting drunk on Divine Vodka), so why don't we have the judge (who would that be...Judge Judy?) at the very least find replacements for jurors 1-5 (get what I'm saying jurors 1-5?) or at best, dismiss the case entirely (get what I'm saying defendent?) so that FFL can get on with what life is left in it. Whadayasay, huh? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... wrote: *State of FFL vs Share Long* * * *Dec 2nd, 2012* * * *Exhibit D* The jurors dubbed the 3 Idiots - feste, Buck, Steve continue to view this as another example of the innocence, sincerity of the defendant Share Long. Juror#4 - Laughinggull insists on fair play much to the annoyance of everyone. Juror#5 - Barry continues to be hostile and demeaning towards the defendant and may soon be dismissed because of contempt of court. The other jurors dubbed the wts seven rightly see this as yet another pattern of the defendant's deceptive damsel-in-distress plea of innocence. On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote: ** 1. Do you think that any benefits can come from Judy Share and Emily continuing to communicate with each other? 2. If yes, what do you think are the benefits that can come of it? 3. What do you think would be a viable next step to move closer to those benefits with a minimum of what's not beneficial? I began to think of these questions while driving to the Dome this evening. I have not discussed them with anyone. I look forward to any answers especially to numbers 2 and 3. In some ways I don't think the answer to number 1 matters. My answers: 2. I hope that more peace and enjoyment for those on FFL would come of it. 3. This post IS my viable next step! 1. I'm not sure. But I'm open to the possibility of yes. I'm hoping for some fun answers too (-: Thank you everyone for your time and thoughts and caring.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: 3 ques to Judy Emily anyone else interested
Oh dear, I mean, raunchy, I still can't figure out whether I love you or Ann more. What a way to diss you both. From: Emily Reyn emilymae.r...@yahoo.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, December 2, 2012 6:43 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: 3 ques to Judy Emily anyone else interested This is far too complicated Laughingatyou. Ravi, very very funny - wts seven - ah ha ha ha. I am sorry I am forced to withdraw from the case as I have a conflict of interest. Thank you all for putting up with me. I promise to start taking my holiday depressive antidote tomorrow. I have no antibodies built up to handle the pghlem I am sneezing out. Barry, it's all about ME - have you noticed that yet? Oh yeah, you have. raunchy, I still can figure out whether I love or Ann more. Maybe Judy can search the archives and establish the facts on that. I am teasing her because I love her the most - except for Ravi. And, I'm developing a real crush on Alex. Now, Robin has posted, in his brilliance, something that will be sure to shut me up for a good long while. Tee Hee. From: laughinggull108 no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, December 2, 2012 6:31 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: 3 ques to Judy Emily anyone else interested Ravi, I know you're having alot of fun with this because I've felt the same way when I think I'm on a roll. Then, reality comes crashing in and I suddenly realize what a fool I've made of myself. I can only take that Divine Vodka in small sips or not at all. Revealing how you view this as a trial with Share as the defendent rather than the plaintiff. Anyway, my thoughts for what they're worth: too much attention has been given to this already and I'm beginning to think certain people thrive on that attention (similar to getting drunk on Divine Vodka), so why don't we have the judge (who would that be...Judge Judy?) at the very least find replacements for jurors 1-5 (get what I'm saying jurors 1-5?) or at best, dismiss the case entirely (get what I'm saying defendent?) so that FFL can get on with what life is left in it. Whadayasay, huh? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... wrote: *State of FFL vs Share Long* * * *Dec 2nd, 2012* * * *Exhibit D* The jurors dubbed the 3 Idiots - feste, Buck, Steve continue to view this as another example of the innocence, sincerity of the defendant Share Long. Juror#4 - Laughinggull insists on fair play much to the annoyance of everyone. Juror#5 - Barry continues to be hostile and demeaning towards the defendant and may soon be dismissed because of contempt of court. The other jurors dubbed the wts seven rightly see this as yet another pattern of the defendant's deceptive damsel-in-distress plea of innocence. On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote: ** 1. Do you think that any benefits can come from Judy Share and Emily continuing to communicate with each other? 2. If yes, what do you think are the benefits that can come of it? 3. What do you think would be a viable next step to move closer to those benefits with a minimum of what's not beneficial? I began to think of these questions while driving to the Dome this evening. I have not discussed them with anyone. I look forward to any answers especially to numbers 2 and 3. In some ways I don't think the answer to number 1 matters. My answers: 2. I hope that more peace and enjoyment for those on FFL would come of it. 3. This post IS my viable next step! 1. I'm not sure. But I'm open to the possibility of yes. I'm hoping for some fun answers too (-: Thank you everyone for your time and thoughts and caring.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: 3 ques to Judy Emily anyone else interested
Oh come on LG, Life is good, I beg you - please don't spoil the fun. If you were the ref you would refuse to blow the whistle unless the side who scored a touchdown agreed to let the other one score a TD as well. It will then be all tied games and everyone lifts the trophy. I like your suggestions to the plot. I propose another change - I am sure feste would want to be the defense attorney - a la Perry Mason and try to protect Share - the damsel in distress. P.S. FYI - Divine Vodka is my patented drink and Reality will never find me immobile with any belief - I am always ever vulnerable so I can fluidly, gracefully adapt to the ever shifting reality. On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 6:31 PM, laughinggull108 no_re...@yahoogroups.comwrote: ** Ravi, I know you're having alot of fun with this because I've felt the same way when I think I'm on a roll. Then, reality comes crashing in and I suddenly realize what a fool I've made of myself. I can only take that Divine Vodka in small sips or not at all. Revealing how you view this as a trial with Share as the defendent rather than the plaintiff. Anyway, my thoughts for what they're worth: too much attention has been given to this already and I'm beginning to think certain people thrive on that attention (similar to getting drunk on Divine Vodka), so why don't we have the judge (who would that be...Judge Judy?) at the very least find replacements for jurors 1-5 (get what I'm saying jurors 1-5?) or at best, dismiss the case entirely (get what I'm saying defendent?) so that FFL can get on with what life is left in it. Whadayasay, huh? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... wrote: *State of FFL vs Share Long* * * *Dec 2nd, 2012* * * *Exhibit D* The jurors dubbed the 3 Idiots - feste, Buck, Steve continue to view this as another example of the innocence, sincerity of the defendant Share Long. Juror#4 - Laughinggull insists on fair play much to the annoyance of everyone. Juror#5 - Barry continues to be hostile and demeaning towards the defendant and may soon be dismissed because of contempt of court. The other jurors dubbed the wts seven rightly see this as yet another pattern of the defendant's deceptive damsel-in-distress plea of innocence. On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote: ** 1. Do you think that any benefits can come from Judy Share and Emily continuing to communicate with each other? 2. If yes, what do you think are the benefits that can come of it? 3. What do you think would be a viable next step to move closer to those benefits with a minimum of what's not beneficial? I began to think of these questions while driving to the Dome this evening. I have not discussed them with anyone. I look forward to any answers especially to numbers 2 and 3. In some ways I don't think the answer to number 1 matters. My answers: 2. I hope that more peace and enjoyment for those on FFL would come of it. 3. This post IS my viable next step! 1. I'm not sure. But I'm open to the possibility of yes. I'm hoping for some fun answers too (-: Thank you everyone for your time and thoughts and caring.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: 3 ques to Judy Emily anyone else interested
Dear Susan - now that you have, as usual, added nothing to the discussion by your *it only happens once a month* meaningless post - LEAVE US ALONE PLEASE. I'm sure you have other very important things to do like - walk the dogs, feed the cats, yoga class, meditation, attend to family - so please don't let this affect your mental health. On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Susan waybac...@yahoo.com wrote: ** Share, I think you should drop this topic and move on. Just my opinion, and of course if it means a great deal to you, fine. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote: 1. Do you think that any benefits can come from Judy Share and Emily continuing to communicate with each other? 2. If yes, what do you think are the benefits that can come of it? 3. What do you think would be a viable next step to move closer to those benefits with a minimum of what's not beneficial? I began to think of these questions while driving to the Dome this evening. I have not discussed them with anyone. I look forward to any answers especially to numbers 2 and 3. In some ways I don't think the answer to number 1 matters. My answers: 2. I hope that more peace and enjoyment for those on FFL would come of it. 3. This post IS my viable next step! 1. I'm not sure. But I'm open to the possibility of yes. I'm hoping for some fun answers too (-: Thank you everyone for your time and thoughts and caring.
