Oh come on LG, Life is good, I beg you - please don't spoil the fun. If you were the ref you would refuse to blow the whistle unless the side who scored a touchdown agreed to let the other one score a TD as well. It will then be all tied games and everyone lifts the trophy.
I like your suggestions to the plot. I propose another change - I am sure feste would want to be the defense attorney - a la Perry Mason and try to protect Share - the damsel in distress. P.S. FYI - Divine Vodka is my patented drink and Reality will never find me immobile with any belief - I am always ever vulnerable so I can fluidly, gracefully adapt to the ever shifting reality. On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 6:31 PM, laughinggull108 <no_re...@yahoogroups.com>wrote: > ** > > > > > Ravi, I know you're having alot of fun with this because I've felt the > same way when I think I'm on a roll. Then, reality comes crashing in and I > suddenly realize what a fool I've made of myself. I can only take that > Divine Vodka in small sips or not at all. > > Revealing how you view this as a trial with Share as the defendent rather > than the plaintiff. Anyway, my thoughts for what they're worth: too much > attention has been given to this already and I'm beginning to think certain > people thrive on that attention (similar to getting drunk on Divine Vodka), > so why don't we have the judge (who would that be...Judge Judy?) at the > very least find replacements for jurors 1-5 (get what I'm saying jurors > 1-5?) or at best, dismiss the case entirely (get what I'm saying > defendent?) so that FFL can get on with what life is left in it. > Whadayasay, huh? > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@...> > wrote: > > > > *State of FFL vs Share Long* > > * > > * > > *Dec 2nd, 2012* > > * > > * > > *Exhibit D* > > > > > The jurors dubbed the "3 Idiots" - feste, Buck, Steve continue to view > this > > as another example of the innocence, sincerity of the defendant Share > Long. > > > > Juror#4 - Laughinggull insists on fair play much to the annoyance of > > everyone. > > > > Juror#5 - Barry continues to be hostile and demeaning towards the > defendant > > and may soon be dismissed because of contempt of court. > > > > The other jurors dubbed the "wts seven" rightly see this as yet another > > pattern of the defendant's deceptive damsel-in-distress plea of > innocence. > > > > > > On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Share Long <sharelong60@...> wrote: > > > > > ** > > > > > > > > > > 1. Do you think that any benefits can come from Judy Share and Emily > > > continuing to communicate with each other? > > > 2. If yes, what do you think are the benefits that can come of it? > > > 3. What do you think would be a viable next step to move closer to > those > > > benefits with a minimum of what's not beneficial? > > > > > > I began to think of these questions while driving to the Dome this > > > evening. I have not discussed them with anyone. > > > I look forward to any answers especially to numbers 2 and 3. > > > In some ways I don't think the answer to number 1 matters. > > > > > > My answers: > > > 2. I hope that more peace and enjoyment for those on FFL would come of > it. > > > 3. This post IS my viable next step! > > > 1. I'm not sure. But I'm open to the possibility of yes. > > > > > > I'm hoping for some fun answers too (-: > > > Thank you everyone for your time and thoughts and caring. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
