Oh dear, I mean, "raunchy, I still can't figure out whether I love you or Ann more." What a way to diss you both.
________________________________ From: Emily Reyn <[email protected]> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, December 2, 2012 6:43 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: 3 ques to Judy Emily & anyone else interested This is far too complicated Laughingatyou. Ravi, very very funny - "wts seven" - ah ha ha ha. I am sorry I am forced to withdraw from the case as I have a conflict of interest. Thank you all for putting up with me. I promise to start taking my holiday depressive antidote tomorrow. I have no antibodies built up to handle the pghlem I am sneezing out. Barry, it's all about ME - have you noticed that yet? Oh yeah, you have. raunchy, I still can figure out whether I love or Ann more. Maybe Judy can search the archives and establish the facts on that. I am teasing her because I love her the most - except for Ravi. And, I'm developing a real crush on Alex. Now, Robin has posted, in his brilliance, something that will be sure to shut me up for a good long while. Tee Hee. ________________________________ From: laughinggull108 <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Sunday, December 2, 2012 6:31 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: 3 ques to Judy Emily & anyone else interested Ravi, I know you're having alot of fun with this because I've felt the same way when I think I'm on a roll. Then, reality comes crashing in and I suddenly realize what a fool I've made of myself. I can only take that Divine Vodka in small sips or not at all. Revealing how you view this as a trial with Share as the defendent rather than the plaintiff. Anyway, my thoughts for what they're worth: too much attention has been given to this already and I'm beginning to think certain people thrive on that attention (similar to getting drunk on Divine Vodka), so why don't we have the judge (who would that be...Judge Judy?) at the very least find replacements for jurors 1-5 (get what I'm saying jurors 1-5?) or at best, dismiss the case entirely (get what I'm saying defendent?) so that FFL can get on with what life is left in it. Whadayasay, huh? --- In [email protected], Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@...> wrote: > > *State of FFL vs Share Long* > * > * > *Dec 2nd, 2012* > * > * > *Exhibit D* > > The jurors dubbed the "3 Idiots" - feste, Buck, Steve continue to view this > as another example of the innocence, sincerity of the defendant Share Long. > > Juror#4 - Laughinggull insists on fair play much to the annoyance of > everyone. > > Juror#5 - Barry continues to be hostile and demeaning towards the defendant > and may soon be dismissed because of contempt of court. > > The other jurors dubbed the "wts seven" rightly see this as yet another > pattern of the defendant's deceptive damsel-in-distress plea of innocence. > > > On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Share Long <sharelong60@...> wrote: > > > ** > > > > > > 1. Do you think that any benefits can come from Judy Share and Emily > > continuing to communicate with each other? > > 2. If yes, what do you think are the benefits that can come of it? > > 3. What do you think would be a viable next step to move closer to those > > benefits with a minimum of what's not beneficial? > > > > I began to think of these questions while driving to the Dome this > > evening. I have not discussed them with anyone. > > I look forward to any answers especially to numbers 2 and 3. > > In some ways I don't think the answer to number 1 matters. > > > > My answers: > > 2. I hope that more peace and enjoyment for those on FFL would come of it. > > 3. This post IS my viable next step! > > 1. I'm not sure. But I'm open to the possibility of yes. > > > > I'm hoping for some fun answers too (-: > > Thank you everyone for your time and thoughts and caring. > > > > > > >
