Announcing FUDCon Toronto 2009

2009-08-18 Thread Paul W. Frields
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Thanks to the dedicated efforts of some of our ardent fans and friends
in the Fedora community in the great nation of Canada, we are heading
across the border for the next North American Fedora Users and
Developers Conference (FUDCon)!  The next FUDCon will happen December
5-7, 2009, in Toronto, Canada at the Seneca @York campus.

Over the next few days planners will be setting up more information at
the event wiki page:

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon:Toronto_2009

As you may know, FUDCon travels around the globe during the year.  In
the summer we had not just one but *two* separate FUDCon events.  One
was held in Latin America around the world-famous FISL conference.
The other occurred around the equally important LinuxTag event in
Berlin, Germany.  We have held many North American FUDCons of the past
in Boston, Massachusetts, and we wanted to try a different location
for this event.

Now you might be asking yourself, why are we going north in the
winter?  Well, as some of you know -- especially people who talk with
me and Max Spevack, the Red Hat manager of community architecture --
FUDCon planning is an enormous undertaking for one person.  We look at
FUDCon partly as something Red Hat can give back to the community a
few times a year, beyond resources or people.  But we also need to be
realize when we need assistance to get FUDCon planned and executed, so
we can continue to scale our event efforts.

Key community members in the Toronto area had been asking us for some
time about holding a FUDCon in Toronto.  They were able to provide an
ideal location, in terms of size, space, layout, flexibility, and
network infrastructure.  They also know of our penchant for bringing
wifi to its knees anywhere we travel, and planning accordingly!
Furthermore, since there's a Red Hat office in Toronto, we can look
forward to a core of engineers who will bring their experience and
subject matter expertise to FUDCon.  Because many of them have not
attended a FUDCon before, there should be many fascinating new talks
and hackfests happening at this event.

There will be more details about FUDCon Toronto 2009 over the next few
days -- we will be trying some new things this time out, to make this
event as inclusive and appealing as possible.  More on that later.

For now, I encourage everyone in the US and elsewhere who plans to
attend to make sure that you have your passports or other travel
documentation ready to go!  For those of you in the US, you can find
passport information here:

http://travel.state.gov/passport/

- -- 
Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFKitBtrNvJN70RNxcRAgGBAKD7aob2O6wLb49RlhcutAr5kqsUJgCcCaWC
uD/xNUTZkQ0ur2fdMxnjVRE=
=Yhpe
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
fedora-announce-list mailing list
fedora-announce-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-announce-list


Re:Fedora-buildsys-list Digest, Vol 54, Issue 5

2009-08-18 Thread lixiao-a
Hi,
I have a koji server running locally at my workplace.
Recently, I am unable to execute some koji cli commands. I get the following 
error:

[kojiad...@linux-dev koji]$ koji add-user kojira
ServerOffline: database outage,anyone can help me?Thanks.
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list

Re: Fedora-buildsys-list Digest, Vol 54, Issue 5

2009-08-18 Thread 李建
Sometimes, it because your postgresql setting have error:

on my host, /etc/koji-hub/hub.conf have some info:

  3 ## Basic options ##
  4 DBName = koji
  5 DBUser = koji
  6 DBHost = 127.0.0.1
  7 DBPass = password for user koji login datebase koji from 127.0.0.1
==

good luck.




2009/8/18, lixiao-a lixia...@163.com:

 Hi,
 I have a koji server running locally at my workplace.
 Recently, I am unable to execute some koji cli commands. I get the
 following error:

 [kojiad...@linux-dev koji]$ koji add-user kojira
 ServerOffline: database outage,anyone can help me?Thanks.


 --
 没有广告的终身免费邮箱,www.yeah.net http://www.yeah.net/?from=footer
 --
 Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
 Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list




-- 
李建

主页  http://jianlee.ylinux.org
msn   lijian@gmail.com
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list

postgresql-server

2009-08-18 Thread Larry Brigman
I have a server running several applications.  They typically have the
best support for mysql.
Is there a hard reason for postgresql-server over mysql for koji?

--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list


Re: postgresql-server

2009-08-18 Thread Mike McLean

On 08/18/2009 11:46 AM, Larry Brigman wrote:

I have a server running several applications.  They typically have the
best support for mysql.
Is there a hard reason for postgresql-server over mysql for koji?


It hasn't been a priority to support multiple dbs. Postgres was chosen 
because we placed a high value on data integrity.


The tables in Koji use a lot of 'serial' fields (integer fields linked 
to a sequence). In MySQL, the analog of this is an AUTO_INCREMENT field. 
It does not appear that this is a perfect analog. In any case, there 
would have to be a number of code changes due to this.


If one were to use MySQL, they would most definitely want to use InnoDB 
tables, because Koji makes use of many foreign key constraints.


Almost every table in Koji's schema has a CHECK clause somewhere in it. 
MySQL parses these, but /does not enforce them/. The types of data 
corruption that would result from entries that violate these checks 
would be quite insidious.


I also expect there would be a number of subtle issues due to other 
behavior differences between the databases. With MySQL's reputation for 
quietly rolling along despite serious errors, you might not notice until 
the db was full of corruptions.


So short answer: non-trivial amount of work to implement, even more for 
proper testing, questionable return for that effort.


Running a Koji server is not intended to be lightweight. I don't think 
the postgres requirement is unreasonable.


--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list


Re: Visiting webpage causes ~hard lock - round 2!

2009-08-18 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 08/18/2009 06:39 AM, Dr. Diesel wrote:
 This happened a little while ago:
 
 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498131
 
 Seems to be happening again (tried 3x, same result) on a different
 website and most likely something different but could someone please
 confirm before I BZ this?
 
 Please save your work and visit (tech website):
 
 http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1391450page=13
 http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1391450page=13
 
 Screen freezes, mouse has jerky movement, vt switch fails.
 
 F11.i368 all updates as of today, nothing good in /var/log/messages

No problems here.  My hardware profile

http://smolts.org/show?uuid=pub_de7ca5e0-60e7-458b-96d7-961c2c150cf7

Rahul

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: source file audit - 2009-08-10

2009-08-18 Thread Christoph Wickert
Am Montag, den 10.08.2009, 10:15 -0600 schrieb Kevin Fenzi:

 cwickert:BADURL:glista-0.4.tar.gz:glista

works with spectool

 cwickert:BADURL:gwget-1.0.1.tar.bz2:gwget

404, new version, fixed.

 cwickert:BADURL:lxde-settings-daemon-0.4.tar.bz2:lxde-settings-daemon

301, due to sf changes I guess. lxde-settings-deamon will be orphaned
soon, because it will become part of lxsession.

 cwickert:BADURL:termit-2.2.0.tar.bz2:termit

works with spectool

 cwickert:BADURL:thunar-volman-0.3.80.tar.bz2:thunar-volman

404, Xfce download archive reorganization.

 cwickert:BADURL:timer-applet-2.1.2.tar.gz:gnome-applet-timer

works spectool, SF.net

 cwickert:BADURL:xfburn-0.4.2.tar.bz2:xfburn

404, Xfce download archive reorganization.

Regards,
Christoph

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Visiting webpage causes ~hard lock - round 2!

2009-08-18 Thread Dr. Diesel
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Garry T. Williams gtwilli...@gmail.comwrote:

 On Monday 17 August 2009 21:09:05 Dr. Diesel wrote:
  This happened a little while ago:
 
  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498131
 
  Seems to be happening again (tried 3x, same result) on a different
  website and most likely something different but could someone please
  confirm before I BZ this?
 
  Please save your work and visit (tech website):
 
  http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1391450page=13
 
  Screen freezes, mouse has jerky movement, vt switch fails.
 
  F11.i368 all updates as of today, nothing good in /var/log/messages

 I can confirm this.

  Video:
 
  Display controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS/GME,
  943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03)
  Subsystem: Toshiba America
  Info Systems Device ff02

 Display controller: Intel Corporation 82G965 Integrated Graphics
 Controller (rev 02)

 --
 Garry T. Williams --- +1 678 656-4579


Gary, thanks for confirming.  This one appears selective!

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517987

Sam is probably right though, I should have sent this to fedora-list, my
bad, way too many lists!


-- 
projecthuh.com
All of my bits are free, are yours?  Fedoraproject.org
I'd rather have dead offenders than repeat offenders - Ted Nugent
-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Kernel 2.6.29 for F10

2009-08-18 Thread Reindl Harald

Hi

Is there a reason that since longer time 2.6.29-Kernels for Fedora 10 landing in
Updates-testing followed with 2.6.27-Builds in the meantime?

On machines with kmods this is a real problem because yum detetects the kmod for
2.6.27-Build and wants to install the 2.6.27 kernel which conflicts with the 
installed one

I use the 2.6.29 since months in the meantime, F11 has it since the release and 
i do not
realize why F10 does not get him

-- 


Reindl Harald
the lounge interactive design GmbH
A-1060 Vienna | Hofmühlgasse 17
software-development / cms-solutions

phone:+43 (1) 595 3999 33
cellular: +43 (676) 40 221 40
icq:  154546673

mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net
http://www.thelounge.net/



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

rawhide report: 20090818 changes

2009-08-18 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Tue Aug 18 06:15:04 UTC 2009

Summary:
Added Packages: 0
Removed Packages: 0
Modified Packages: 0
Broken deps for i386
--
389-ds-1.1.3-4.fc12.noarch requires 389-ds-admin
R-RScaLAPACK-0.5.1-19.fc11.i586 requires openmpi-libs
asterisk-fax-1.6.1-0.24.rc1.fc12.i686 requires libspandsp.so.1
bigboard-0.6.4-12.fc12.i686 requires mugshot = 0:1.1.90-1
clutter-cairomm-0.7.4-2.fc11.i586 requires libclutter-cairo-0.8.so.0
clutter-cairomm-0.7.4-2.fc11.i586 requires libcluttermm-0.8.so.2
clutter-cairomm-0.7.4-2.fc11.i586 requires libclutter-glx-0.8.so.0
clutter-cairomm-devel-0.7.4-2.fc11.i586 requires 
pkgconfig(cluttermm-0.8)
clutter-cairomm-devel-0.7.4-2.fc11.i586 requires pkgconfig(clutter-0.8)
clutter-gtkmm-0.9.4-1.fc12.i586 requires libclutter-glx-0.9.so.0
clutter-gtkmm-0.9.4-1.fc12.i586 requires libclutter-gtk-0.9.so.0
clutter-gtkmm-devel-0.9.4-1.fc12.i586 requires 
pkgconfig(clutter-gtk-0.9)
cluttermm-0.9.4-1.fc12.i586 requires libclutter-glx-0.9.so.0
cluttermm-devel-0.9.4-1.fc12.i586 requires pkgconfig(clutter-0.9)
dap-hdf4_handler-3.7.9-2.fc11.i586 requires libdap.so.9
dap-hdf4_handler-3.7.9-2.fc11.i586 requires libdapserver.so.6
entertainer-0.4.2-5.fc12.noarch requires pyclutter-cairo
octave-forge-20080831-10.fc12.i686 requires octave(api) = 0:api-v32
perl-DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader-0.04006-4.fc12.noarch requires 
perl(DBIX::Class)
php-layers-menu-3.2.0-0.2.rc.fc12.noarch requires 
php-pear(HTML_Template_PHPLIB)
plplot-octave-5.9.4-1.fc12.i586 requires octave(api) = 0:api-v32
ppl-yap-0.10.2-5.fc12.i686 requires libYap.so
python-repoze-what-quickstart-1.0-2.fc12.noarch requires 
python-repoze-who-plugins-sql
qtparted-0.4.5-19.fc11.i586 requires libparted-1.8.so.8
rubygem-main-2.8.4-3.fc12.noarch requires rubygem(fattr) = 0:1.0.3
sems-1.1.1-2.fc12.i586 requires libspandsp.so.1
sems-g722-1.1.1-2.fc12.i586 requires libspandsp.so.1
sems-gsm-1.1.1-2.fc12.i586 requires libspandsp.so.1
sems-speex-1.1.1-2.fc12.i586 requires libspandsp.so.1
serpentine-0.9-5.fc12.noarch requires gnome-python2-nautilus-cd-burner
showimg-pgsql-0.9.5-22.fc11.i586 requires libpqxx-2.6.8.so
sugar-pippy-34-2.fc12.i686 requires libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit)
sugar-pippy-34-2.fc12.i686 requires libc.so.6()(64bit)
sugar-pippy-34-2.fc12.i686 requires libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
sugar-pippy-34-2.fc12.i686 requires libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
sugar-pippy-34-2.fc12.i686 requires libm.so.6()(64bit)
sugar-pippy-34-2.fc12.i686 requires libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
sugar-pippy-34-2.fc12.i686 requires libstdc++.so.6()(64bit)
sugar-pippy-34-2.fc12.i686 requires libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit)
sugar-pippy-34-2.fc12.i686 requires libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
thunderbird-lightning-1.0-0.8.20090513hg.fc12.i686 requires thunderbird 
 0:3.0-3.6.b4



Broken deps for x86_64
--
389-ds-1.1.3-4.fc12.noarch requires 389-ds-admin
R-RScaLAPACK-0.5.1-19.fc11.x86_64 requires openmpi-libs
asterisk-fax-1.6.1-0.24.rc1.fc12.x86_64 requires 
libspandsp.so.1()(64bit)
bigboard-0.6.4-12.fc12.x86_64 requires mugshot = 0:1.1.90-1
clutter-cairomm-0.7.4-2.fc11.i586 requires libclutter-cairo-0.8.so.0
clutter-cairomm-0.7.4-2.fc11.i586 requires libcluttermm-0.8.so.2
clutter-cairomm-0.7.4-2.fc11.i586 requires libclutter-glx-0.8.so.0
clutter-cairomm-0.7.4-2.fc11.x86_64 requires 
libclutter-cairo-0.8.so.0()(64bit)
clutter-cairomm-0.7.4-2.fc11.x86_64 requires 
libcluttermm-0.8.so.2()(64bit)
clutter-cairomm-0.7.4-2.fc11.x86_64 requires 
libclutter-glx-0.8.so.0()(64bit)
clutter-cairomm-devel-0.7.4-2.fc11.i586 requires 
pkgconfig(cluttermm-0.8)
clutter-cairomm-devel-0.7.4-2.fc11.i586 requires pkgconfig(clutter-0.8)
clutter-cairomm-devel-0.7.4-2.fc11.x86_64 requires 
pkgconfig(cluttermm-0.8)
clutter-cairomm-devel-0.7.4-2.fc11.x86_64 requires 
pkgconfig(clutter-0.8)
clutter-gtkmm-0.9.4-1.fc12.i586 requires libclutter-glx-0.9.so.0
clutter-gtkmm-0.9.4-1.fc12.i586 requires libclutter-gtk-0.9.so.0
clutter-gtkmm-0.9.4-1.fc12.x86_64 requires 
libclutter-glx-0.9.so.0()(64bit)
clutter-gtkmm-0.9.4-1.fc12.x86_64 requires 
libclutter-gtk-0.9.so.0()(64bit)
clutter-gtkmm-devel-0.9.4-1.fc12.i586 requires 
pkgconfig(clutter-gtk-0.9)
clutter-gtkmm-devel-0.9.4-1.fc12.x86_64 requires 
pkgconfig(clutter-gtk-0.9)
cluttermm-0.9.4-1.fc12.i586 requires libclutter-glx-0.9.so.0
cluttermm-0.9.4-1.fc12.x86_64 requires libclutter-glx-0.9.so.0()(64bit)
cluttermm-devel-0.9.4-1.fc12.i586 

Re: Kernel 2.6.29 for F10

2009-08-18 Thread Roberto Ragusa
Reindl Harald wrote:
 Hi
 
 Is there a reason that since longer time 2.6.29-Kernels for Fedora 10 landing 
 in
 Updates-testing followed with 2.6.27-Builds in the meantime?
 
 On machines with kmods this is a real problem because yum detetects the kmod 
 for
 2.6.27-Build and wants to install the 2.6.27 kernel which conflicts with the 
 installed one
 
 I use the 2.6.29 since months in the meantime, F11 has it since the release 
 and i do not
 realize why F10 does not get him

I've been personally using 2.6.29.4-75 successfully for a while (uptime 
currently is 32 days),
so I join you in asking why there are no recent kernels for f10.

On this route, why no 2.6.30? There is a driver I need which is included in = 
2.6.30.

These days upstream 2.6.31 is almost released... BTW

-- 
   Roberto Ragusamail at robertoragusa.it

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Kernel 2.6.29 for F10

2009-08-18 Thread Joe Nall


On Aug 18, 2009, at 5:16 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:



Hi

Is there a reason that since longer time 2.6.29-Kernels for Fedora  
10 landing in

Updates-testing followed with 2.6.27-Builds in the meantime?

On machines with kmods this is a real problem because yum detetects  
the kmod for
2.6.27-Build and wants to install the 2.6.27 kernel which conflicts  
with the installed one


I use the 2.6.29 since months in the meantime, F11 has it since the  
release and i do not

realize why F10 does not get him


I tried to ask this on the fedora kernel list and the moderator never  
approved the message. I too would like to see F10 move up to 2.6.29+  
prior to end-of-life.


joe


--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Last call for talking points - what makes you excited about F12?

2009-08-18 Thread Mel Chua

If you've got a moment for some last-minute help...

We (Marketing) will be freezing the F12 talking points list today, and 
are still somewhat light in the what makes Fedora awesome for admins 
and developers? categories.


Right now we have libguestfs and kvm improvements for admins and 
maybe moblin for developers, but there must be more - and more reasons 
why they're awesome (why *is* libguestfs something that makes admins 
happy?). We figured you would know.


The features list is at 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/12/FeatureList. If you've got a 
moment, please take a look at that, then edit 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/F12_talking_points with the things that 
are making you (as admins and devels) happy about F12 coming out.


Help us promote the heck out of your work. ;)

Thanks!

--Mel

PS: I know this is last-minute notice - sorry about that. We're still 
learning how to do things on a schedule, and next time around we'll put 
the call out here much earlier.


--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Kernel 2.6.29 for F10

2009-08-18 Thread Dave Jones
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:13:10AM -0500, Joe Nall wrote:
  
  On Aug 18, 2009, at 5:16 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
  
  
   Hi
  
   Is there a reason that since longer time 2.6.29-Kernels for Fedora  
   10 landing in
   Updates-testing followed with 2.6.27-Builds in the meantime?
  
   On machines with kmods this is a real problem because yum detetects  
   the kmod for
   2.6.27-Build and wants to install the 2.6.27 kernel which conflicts  
   with the installed one
  
   I use the 2.6.29 since months in the meantime, F11 has it since the  
   release and i do not
   realize why F10 does not get him
  
  I tried to ask this on the fedora kernel list and the moderator never  
  approved the message.

Odd, I don't recall seeing it, and there's no non-spam messages in
the queue right now.

  I too would like to see F10 move up to 2.6.29+  
  prior to end-of-life.

In days of old, we were able to get rebases out pretty quickly after
their upstream release.  These days, we're hindered by the kernel modesetting
stuff we're carrying.  It's closely tied to the userspace X drivers,
and isn't easy to retrofit to a different kernel.
One of the reasons we haven't pushed them as proper updates is that
getting the regressions fixed is pretty time consuming, and the limited
X/KMS manpower we have is better focused on making the F12 stuff work right,
and getting it upstream.

I really can't wait for the day that it all gets upstream, and we can
get back to the old routine of rebasing.  Until then, we're kinda stuck.

Dave

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Last call for talking points - what makes you excited about F12?

2009-08-18 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 08/18/2009 09:00 PM, Mel Chua wrote:

 
 PS: I know this is last-minute notice - sorry about that. We're still
 learning how to do things on a schedule, and next time around we'll put
 the call out here much earlier.

Is there a particular reason today is the last day instead of some date
closer to the release?

Rahul

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Last call for talking points - what makes you excited about F12?

2009-08-18 Thread Mel Chua

PS: I know this is last-minute notice - sorry about that. We're still
learning how to do things on a schedule, and next time around we'll put
the call out here much earlier.


Is there a particular reason today is the last day instead of some date
closer to the release?


We need to brief Ambassadors on Talking Points at Beta release (9/22) so 
they need to be complete by then, so we have to freeze the list asap to 
give us enough time to find writers, and give the writers enough time to 
write them. 
(http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-12/f-12-marketing-tasks.html)


(Feel free to push back if this schedule sounds unreasonable, btw; it 
probably could use some patches for the next cycle in terms of having 
more time for getting dev feedback.)


--Mel

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Last call for talking points - what makes you excited about F12?

2009-08-18 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 08/18/2009 10:15 PM, Mel Chua wrote:
 PS: I know this is last-minute notice - sorry about that. We're still
 learning how to do things on a schedule, and next time around we'll put
 the call out here much earlier.

 Is there a particular reason today is the last day instead of some date
 closer to the release?
 
 We need to brief Ambassadors on Talking Points at Beta release (9/22) so
 they need to be complete by then, so we have to freeze the list asap to
 give us enough time to find writers, and give the writers enough time to
 write them.
 (http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-12/f-12-marketing-tasks.html)
 
 (Feel free to push back if this schedule sounds unreasonable, btw; it
 probably could use some patches for the next cycle in terms of having
 more time for getting dev feedback.)

The schedule itself might have been fine but it still looks rather early
to me. If you want to collect feedback from developers, one day is
definitely not going to be enough. Atleast three days or so needs to be
provided and you usually need more than one reminder to get as much
feedback as you can. Otherwise you are going to end up with a rather
small list which is not meaningful.

Rahul

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Last call for talking points - what makes you excited about F12?

2009-08-18 Thread John Poelstra

Peter Robinson said the following on 08/18/2009 09:42 AM Pacific Time:

On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Mel Chuam...@redhat.com wrote:

If you've got a moment for some last-minute help...

We (Marketing) will be freezing the F12 talking points list today, and are
still somewhat light in the what makes Fedora awesome for admins and
developers? categories.

Right now we have libguestfs and kvm improvements for admins and maybe
moblin for developers, but there must be more - and more reasons why
they're awesome (why *is* libguestfs something that makes admins happy?). We
figured you would know.


Please remove moblin. Its not a feature. Its been removed from the
Feature list for F-12 (although I'm not sure why).

Peter



FESCo dropped it because it was not considered ready.

http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2009-08-07/fedora-meeting.2009-08-07-17.00.html

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Last call for talking points - what makes you excited about F12?

2009-08-18 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 08/18/2009 10:12 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
 On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Mel Chuam...@redhat.com wrote:
 If you've got a moment for some last-minute help...

 We (Marketing) will be freezing the F12 talking points list today, and are
 still somewhat light in the what makes Fedora awesome for admins and
 developers? categories.

 Right now we have libguestfs and kvm improvements for admins and maybe
 moblin for developers, but there must be more - and more reasons why
 they're awesome (why *is* libguestfs something that makes admins happy?). We
 figured you would know.
 
 Please remove moblin. Its not a feature. Its been removed from the
 Feature list for F-12 (although I'm not sure why).

If you are the feature owner and do not know why it is being dropped,
the meeting mins when it was decided by FESCo should have some
rationale. If not, please ask again.

The work is definitely most appreciated anyway.

Rahul

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Last call for talking points - what makes you excited about F12?

2009-08-18 Thread Mel Chua

(http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-12/f-12-marketing-tasks.html)

(Feel free to push back if this schedule sounds unreasonable, btw; it
probably could use some patches for the next cycle in terms of having
more time for getting dev feedback.)


The schedule itself might have been fine but it still looks rather early
to me. If you want to collect feedback from developers, one day is
definitely not going to be enough. Atleast three days or so needs to be
provided and you usually need more than one reminder to get as much
feedback as you can. Otherwise you are going to end up with a rather
small list which is not meaningful.


Yep. I agree completely - time for developer/admin feedback isn't built 
into the marketing schedule, but should be.


I'll make sure this gets changed for F13. 
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Talk:Marketing_F12_schedule) Thanks for 
the feedback on feedback. :)


--Mel

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Last call for talking points - what makes you excited about F12?

2009-08-18 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Rahul
Sundaramsunda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
 On 08/18/2009 10:12 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
 On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Mel Chuam...@redhat.com wrote:
 If you've got a moment for some last-minute help...

 We (Marketing) will be freezing the F12 talking points list today, and are
 still somewhat light in the what makes Fedora awesome for admins and
 developers? categories.

 Right now we have libguestfs and kvm improvements for admins and maybe
 moblin for developers, but there must be more - and more reasons why
 they're awesome (why *is* libguestfs something that makes admins happy?). We
 figured you would know.

 Please remove moblin. Its not a feature. Its been removed from the
 Feature list for F-12 (although I'm not sure why).

 If you are the feature owner and do not know why it is being dropped,
 the meeting mins when it was decided by FESCo should have some
 rationale. If not, please ask again.

The fesco meeting notes posted to the list are one of the hardest
things I've ever tried to read. I'm not sure if there's a nice
annotated version somewhere else but I've never had much luck
searching the wiki using anything other than google.

Peter

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Last call for talking points - what makes you excited about F12?

2009-08-18 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 22:18 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
 On 08/18/2009 10:15 PM, Mel Chua wrote:
  PS: I know this is last-minute notice - sorry about that. We're still
  learning how to do things on a schedule, and next time around we'll put
  the call out here much earlier.
 
  Is there a particular reason today is the last day instead of some date
  closer to the release?
  
  We need to brief Ambassadors on Talking Points at Beta release (9/22) so
  they need to be complete by then, so we have to freeze the list asap to
  give us enough time to find writers, and give the writers enough time to
  write them.
  (http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-12/f-12-marketing-tasks.html)
  
  (Feel free to push back if this schedule sounds unreasonable, btw; it
  probably could use some patches for the next cycle in terms of having
  more time for getting dev feedback.)
 
 The schedule itself might have been fine but it still looks rather early
 to me. If you want to collect feedback from developers, one day is
 definitely not going to be enough. Atleast three days or so needs to be
 provided and you usually need more than one reminder to get as much
 feedback as you can. Otherwise you are going to end up with a rather
 small list which is not meaningful.

To a first approximation, the relevant information should already be in
the feature pages, no ? I don't think it is wise to establish the
feature process as painfully as we've done over the last few releases,
only to then start new, different initiatives to collect marketing
talking points...

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Last call for talking points - what makes you excited about F12?

2009-08-18 Thread Mike McGrath
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009, Matthias Clasen wrote:

 On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 22:18 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
  On 08/18/2009 10:15 PM, Mel Chua wrote:
   PS: I know this is last-minute notice - sorry about that. We're still
   learning how to do things on a schedule, and next time around we'll put
   the call out here much earlier.
  
   Is there a particular reason today is the last day instead of some date
   closer to the release?
  
   We need to brief Ambassadors on Talking Points at Beta release (9/22) so
   they need to be complete by then, so we have to freeze the list asap to
   give us enough time to find writers, and give the writers enough time to
   write them.
   (http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-12/f-12-marketing-tasks.html)
  
   (Feel free to push back if this schedule sounds unreasonable, btw; it
   probably could use some patches for the next cycle in terms of having
   more time for getting dev feedback.)
 
  The schedule itself might have been fine but it still looks rather early
  to me. If you want to collect feedback from developers, one day is
  definitely not going to be enough. Atleast three days or so needs to be
  provided and you usually need more than one reminder to get as much
  feedback as you can. Otherwise you are going to end up with a rather
  small list which is not meaningful.

 To a first approximation, the relevant information should already be in
 the feature pages, no ? I don't think it is wise to establish the
 feature process as painfully as we've done over the last few releases,
 only to then start new, different initiatives to collect marketing
 talking points...


I think the point is to take the technical feature list and sort of run a
filter around it so it's more general purpose / markety.  Additionally I
don't see any need to tie talking points and marketing directly to the
feature list in a 1:1 because we may miss things.

-Mike

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Last call for talking points - what makes you excited about F12?

2009-08-18 Thread Paul W. Frields
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 01:15:27PM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
 On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 22:18 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
  On 08/18/2009 10:15 PM, Mel Chua wrote:
   PS: I know this is last-minute notice - sorry about that. We're still
   learning how to do things on a schedule, and next time around we'll put
   the call out here much earlier.
  
   Is there a particular reason today is the last day instead of some date
   closer to the release?
   
   We need to brief Ambassadors on Talking Points at Beta release (9/22) so
   they need to be complete by then, so we have to freeze the list asap to
   give us enough time to find writers, and give the writers enough time to
   write them.
   (http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-12/f-12-marketing-tasks.html)
   
   (Feel free to push back if this schedule sounds unreasonable, btw; it
   probably could use some patches for the next cycle in terms of having
   more time for getting dev feedback.)
  
  The schedule itself might have been fine but it still looks rather early
  to me. If you want to collect feedback from developers, one day is
  definitely not going to be enough. Atleast three days or so needs to be
  provided and you usually need more than one reminder to get as much
  feedback as you can. Otherwise you are going to end up with a rather
  small list which is not meaningful.
 
 To a first approximation, the relevant information should already be in
 the feature pages, no ? I don't think it is wise to establish the
 feature process as painfully as we've done over the last few releases,
 only to then start new, different initiatives to collect marketing
 talking points...

The talking points really do come from the feature pages, and to that
end I revisited the feature list to pull out a couple features that
are comprehensible and interesting for developers, and added them to
the developer-centric talking points.  The list for each audience
(desktop users, sysadmins, developers) is short, as it should be.  We
do have entries in the list now, although we'll be fleshing them out
with more descriptive information over the next few days.

The purpose of the talking points is to call out specific features, so
Ambassadors and other people can explain what they are to a variety of
audiences, and why they're important in terms of advancing FOSS.  To
do this, we develop additional material like podcast and print
interviews with the people responsible for or involved with the
features.  Developing that material takes time and energy so it
behooves us to get an early start, shortly after feature freeze since
the list is complete at that point.  The list is short so that we can
concentrate on the most compelling features from the audience's
standpoint.  So yes, the feature pages have a lot from which we can
pull at this point.

-- 
Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Last call for talking points - what makes you excited about F12?

2009-08-18 Thread Paul W. Frields
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 12:27:53PM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
 On Tue, 18 Aug 2009, Matthias Clasen wrote:
 
  On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 22:18 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
   On 08/18/2009 10:15 PM, Mel Chua wrote:
PS: I know this is last-minute notice - sorry about that. We're still
learning how to do things on a schedule, and next time around we'll 
put
the call out here much earlier.
   
Is there a particular reason today is the last day instead of some date
closer to the release?
   
We need to brief Ambassadors on Talking Points at Beta release (9/22) so
they need to be complete by then, so we have to freeze the list asap to
give us enough time to find writers, and give the writers enough time to
write them.
(http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-12/f-12-marketing-tasks.html)
   
(Feel free to push back if this schedule sounds unreasonable, btw; it
probably could use some patches for the next cycle in terms of having
more time for getting dev feedback.)
  
   The schedule itself might have been fine but it still looks rather early
   to me. If you want to collect feedback from developers, one day is
   definitely not going to be enough. Atleast three days or so needs to be
   provided and you usually need more than one reminder to get as much
   feedback as you can. Otherwise you are going to end up with a rather
   small list which is not meaningful.
 
  To a first approximation, the relevant information should already be in
  the feature pages, no ? I don't think it is wise to establish the
  feature process as painfully as we've done over the last few releases,
  only to then start new, different initiatives to collect marketing
  talking points...
 
 
 I think the point is to take the technical feature list and sort of run a
 filter around it so it's more general purpose / markety.  Additionally I
 don't see any need to tie talking points and marketing directly to the
 feature list in a 1:1 because we may miss things.

That's fairly dead on, Mike.  We can include an item beyond the
feature list if there's a compelling story to tell the appropriate
audience about that item.  These talking points become the basis for
Ambassadors to talk to their local communities, I often refer to them
in interviews with press, and so forth.

-- 
Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Trouble formatting flash disk

2009-08-18 Thread Eric Sandeen
Casimiro de Almeida Barreto wrote:
 Hello,
 
 I have a pendrive (flash memory) which lists in /proc/bus/usb/devices as:

...

 And I've tried to format it as ext2 (so I can backup my home directory).
 It happens that no matter what I do (and I've tried almost everything)
 it formats but no matter what I do when I record a large file (2GBytes)
 it generates file system inconsistencies.
 
 First I thought that perhaps the device was defective. But when I try to
 write and read it, everything seems to be OK. It even passes badblock -w ...
 
 Any suggestions on what may be wrong?

Could you take this to the linux-ext4 list?  It'd be the more
appropriate place for the discussion.

It'd be good to know the details of the errors you see, too.

Thanks,
-Eric

 Best regards,
 
 CdAB
 

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Trouble formatting flash disk

2009-08-18 Thread Casimiro de Almeida Barreto
Em 18-08-2009 15:13, Eric Sandeen escreveu:
 (...)
 Could you take this to the linux-ext4 list?  It'd be the more
 appropriate place for the discussion.

 It'd be good to know the details of the errors you see, too.

 Thanks,
 -Eric

   
 Best regards,

 CdAB

 
   
Yes, if I know where I can subscribe this list.

Besides, when I format the device as Fat (F16 or F32) it works properly
only if I disable multibyte char encoding for directories (by doing:
LANG=pt_BR.ISO8859-1 and LC_ALL=pt_BR.ISO8859-1. That should be OK but
system should convert file names to proper encoding.

When I format as ext-2 and create a large file, after writing the file I
can't write anything else. If I unmount the fs, I am able to mount again
and even read the file, but I'm not able to write anything else. But if
I fsck it, I'm warned that system was uncleanly unmounted. Several
errors appear (I'll repeat the procedure and log the errors).

Basically what I do is:

# FILE_NAME_PREFIX=`date +%y%m%d%H%M`
# tar cjf - /home /opt /usr/local | gpg -c -a -z0 --cipher-algo=aes256
-o /media/kingston/${FILE_NAME_PREFIX}.asc
# md5sum ${FILE_NAME_PREFIX}.asc  ${FILE_NAME_PREFIX}.md5 (this won't
execute - cannot write to device).

But if I do:

# df -m /dev/sdd1

it is still plenty of free memory (64GBytes minus about 10GBytes)...

One thing I was thinking is that this flash memory stores data in blocks
of 512 bytes and minimum ext2 blocking is 1024 bytes...



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Re: Trouble formatting flash disk

2009-08-18 Thread Eric Sandeen
Casimiro de Almeida Barreto wrote:
 Em 18-08-2009 15:13, Eric Sandeen escreveu:
 (...)
 Could you take this to the linux-ext4 list?  It'd be the more
 appropriate place for the discussion.

 It'd be good to know the details of the errors you see, too.

 Thanks,
 -Eric

   
 Best regards,

 CdAB

 
   
 Yes, if I know where I can subscribe this list.

http://vger.kernel.org/vger-lists.html#linux-ext4


-Eric

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


KDE-SIG weekly report (34/2009)

2009-08-18 Thread Sebastian Vahl
This is a report of the weekly KDE-SIG-Meeting with a summary of the 
topics that were discussed. If you want to add a comment please reply
 to this email or add it to the related meeting page.

--

= Weekly KDE Summary =

Week: 34/2009

Time: 2009-08-18 14:00 UTC

Meeting page: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/KDE/Meetings/2009-08-18

Meeting log: http://fedoraproject.org/w/uploads/d/dc/KDE-SIG-2009-08-18.txt

--

= Participants =

* JaroslavReznik
* KevinKofler
* LukasTinkl
* RexDieter
* SebastianVahl
* StevenParrish
* ThanNgo 

--

= Agenda =

* add yum-presto to KDE live images as default? (see [1])
* PolicyKit 1 Authentication Agent
* KDE 4.3.0 update status 

= Summary =

o yum-presto as default on KDE live images?:
* yum-presto was recently added to the GNOME (a.k.a. Desktop) live images to 
be used by default.
* It will also be added to the KDE live images. 

o PolicyKit 1 Authentication Agent:
* The Polkit1 Authentification agent is not ready to use with KPackageKit.
* Although PackageKit-qt shouldn't need to be updated (up to RichardHughes) 
only a ported KPackageKit is working.
* With the current KPackageKit gnome-authentification-agent is also not 
working.
* A newer KPackageKit (with updated method calls) will be released by the end 
of the week. With it gnome-authentification-agent should be working.
* But a KDE based authentification agent would still be a good thing. 

o KDE 4.3.0 update status:
* The received feedback was quite good so far.
* An updated selinux-policy [2] is needed to be pushed to stable with/before 
KDE 4.3.0 to don't fail suspend to ram in enforcing mode. (#516824).
* It also needs to be checked if F-10 is also affected by this.
* Two known regressions are left:
- #516445: Show Dashboard Shortcut (ctrl-f12) doesn't work after upgrade to 
kde 4.3.0.
- #518000: suspend/hibernate from menu not working after update to KDE 4.3 
* The first one needs a kconf_update script to be written. (plasma binary was 
renamed to plasma-desktop).
* Updated extragear packages are already in updates-testing for F-10 and F-11 
and will hit Rawhide after the freeze.
* akonadi has become a direct dependency of kdebase-workspace at compile time.
* We'll need to investigate if akonadi is really an optional package and if we
 a) could split the dependency into a subpackage of kdebase-workspace and
 b) disable the requirement for other packages without loosing functionality. 


--

= Next Meeting =

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/KDE/Meetings/2009-08-25

--

= Links =

[1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-
August/msg00932.html
[2] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8536
[3] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-8551
[4] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8522

= Buglist =

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516445
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516824
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518000


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Re: yum-presto plugin by default

2009-08-18 Thread Christopher Brown
2009/8/18 Chuck Anderson c...@wpi.edu:
 On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 01:35:37AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
 On 07/26/2009 06:40 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
  Hi,
 
  Can we make it a default in comps for Rawhide?
 
  Rahul

 No answer here after weeks.

 After some lengthy discussion with rel-eng team in irc, not much care
 either way. Talked to desktop team and based on their recommendation, I
 have added yum-presto to the GNOME Desktop group by default.

 If rel-eng wants to add it a base group for the DVD image, feel free to
 do so. Spin owners - likewise. Thanks.

 I've been using yum-presto since before F11 came out, and it is great.
 +1 to installing it by default in F12.

FWIW, I have also experienced zero problems with it and believe it
would be better enabled by default, retaining the option to disable.
Updates would get done faster and mirrors would be able to cope with
more connections, especially in the first push after release day... :)

-- 
Christopher Brown

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: yum-presto plugin by default

2009-08-18 Thread drago01
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 11:47 PM, Jeff Spaletajspal...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Christopher Brownsnecklif...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 FWIW, I have also experienced zero problems with it and believe it
 would be better enabled by default, retaining the option to disable.
 Updates would get done faster and mirrors would be able to cope with
 more connections, especially in the first push after release day... :)

 Only potential side effect is cpu consumption that the delta unpacking
 process requires.  User on single core systems may notice that unless
 presto renices itself down in priority.

Most users are using packagekit so the update process is reniced to 10
and the io prio is set to idle.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: yum-presto plugin by default

2009-08-18 Thread Jesse Keating
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 13:47 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
 Only potential side effect is cpu consumption that the delta unpacking
 process requires.  User on single core systems may notice that unless
 presto renices itself down in priority.

The hit on slow disks is pretty bad too, even non-slow disks.  With a
local mirror the time to re-make the deltas is far longer than the time
to just pull down the entire packages.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Troubleshooting pendrive ext2fs

2009-08-18 Thread Casimiro de Almeida Barreto
Hello,

I've trouble creating an ext2/ext3/ext4 file system in a 64GBytes pendrive.

The device appears at /proc/bus/usb/devices as:

T:  Bus=01 Lev=01 Prnt=01 Port=04 Cnt=01 Dev#=  4 Spd=480 MxCh= 0
D:  Ver= 2.00 Cls=00(ifc ) Sub=00 Prot=00 MxPS=64 #Cfgs=  1
P:  Vendor=1043 ProdID=8012 Rev= 1.00
S:  Manufacturer=Generic
S:  Product=Flash Disk
C:* #Ifs= 1 Cfg#= 1 Atr=80 MxPwr=100mA
I:* If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 2 Cls=08(stor.) Sub=06 Prot=50 Driver=usb-storage
E:  Ad=81(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms
E:  Ad=02(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms

It's partioned as:

Disk /dev/sdd: 67.1 GB, 67108864512 bytes
64 heads, 32 sectors/track, 64000 cylinders
Units = cilindros of 2048 * 512 = 1048576 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x4a26a3ed

Dispositivo Boot  Start End  Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sdd1   1   6400065535984   83  Linux

And raw partition table data is:

Disk /dev/sdd: 64 heads, 32 sectors, 64000 cylinders

Nr AF  Hd Sec  Cyl  Hd Sec  Cyl Start  Size ID
 1 00   1   10  63  32 1023 32  131071968 83
 2 00   0   00   0   00  0  0 00
 3 00   0   00   0   00  0  0 00
 4 00   0   00   0   00  0  0 00

Disk was formatted with the following command:

[r...@localhost ~]# mkfs.ext2 -L kingston -M /media/kingston -O
large_file,extent /dev/sdd1
mke2fs 1.41.4 (27-Jan-2009)
Filesystem label=kingston
OS type: Linux
Block size=4096 (log=2)
Fragment size=4096 (log=2)
4096000 inodes, 16383996 blocks
819199 blocks (5.00%) reserved for the super user
First data block=0
Maximum filesystem blocks=0
500 block groups
32768 blocks per group, 32768 fragments per group
8192 inodes per group
Superblock backups stored on blocks:
32768, 98304, 163840, 229376, 294912, 819200, 884736, 1605632, 2654208,
4096000, 7962624, 11239424

Writing inode tables: done   
Writing superblocks and filesystem accounting information: done

This filesystem will be automatically checked every 33 mounts or
180 days, whichever comes first.  Use tune2fs -c or -i to override.

And then checked:

# fsck -f -v /dev/sdd1

Resulting in:

[r...@localhost ~]# fsck -v -f /dev/sdd1
fsck 1.41.4 (27-Jan-2009)
e2fsck 1.41.4 (27-Jan-2009)
Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
Pass 2: Checking directory structure
Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
Pass 4: Checking reference counts
Pass 5: Checking group summary information
Block bitmap differences:  +(32768--34306) +(65536--66049)
+(98304--99842) +(131072--131585) +(163840--165378) +(196608--197121)
+(229376--230914) +(262144--262657) +(294912--296450) +(327680--328193)
+(360448--360961) +(393216--393729) +(425984--426497) +(458752--459265)
+(491520--492033) +(524288--524801) +(557056--557569) +(589824--590337)
+(622592--623105) +(655360--655873) +(688128--688641) +(720896--721409)
+(753664--754177) +(786432--786945) +(819200--820738) +(851968--852481)
+(884736--886274) +(917504--918017) +(950272--950785) +(983040--983553)
+(1015808--1016321) +(1048576--1049089) +(1081344--1081857)
+(1114112--1114625) +(1146880--1147393) +(1179648--1180161)
+(1212416--1212929) +(1245184--1245697) +(1277952--1278465)
+(1310720--1311233) +(1343488--1344001) +(1376256--1376769)
+(1409024--1409537) +(1441792--1442305) +(1474560--1475073)
+(1507328--1507841) +(1540096--1540609) +(1572864--1573377)
+(1605632--1607170) +(1638400--1638913) +(1671168--1671681)
+(1703936--1704449) +(1736704--1737217) +(1769472--1769985)
+(1802240--1802753) +(1835008--1835521) +(1867776--1868289)
+(1900544--1901057) +(1933312--1933825) +(1966080--1966593)
+(1998848--1999361) +(2031616--2032129) +(2064384--2064897)
+(2097152--2097665) +(2129920--2130433) +(2162688--2163201)
+(2195456--2195969) +(2228224--2228737) +(2260992--2261505)
+(2293760--2294273) +(2326528--2327041) +(2359296--2359809)
+(2392064--2392577) +(2424832--2425345) +(2457600--2458113)
+(2490368--2490881) +(2523136--2523649) +(2555904--2556417)
+(2588672--2589185) +(2621440--2621953) +(2654208--2655746)
+(2686976--2687489) +(2719744--2720257) +(2752512--2753025)
+(2785280--2785793) +(2818048--2818561) +(2850816--2851329)
+(2883584--2884097) +(2916352--2916865) +(2949120--2949633)
+(2981888--2982401) +(3014656--3015169) +(3047424--3047937)
+(3080192--3080705) +(3112960--3113473) +(3145728--3146241)
+(3178496--3179009) +(3211264--3211777) +(3244032--3244545)
+(3276800--3277313) +(3309568--3310081) +(3342336--3342849)
+(3375104--3375617) +(3407872--3408385) +(3440640--3441153)
+(3473408--3473921) +(3506176--3506689) +(3538944--3539457)
+(3571712--3572225) +(3604480--3604993) +(3637248--3637761)
+(3670016--3670529) +(3702784--3703297) +(3735552--3736065)
+(3768320--3768833) +(3801088--3801601) +(3833856--3834369)
+(3866624--3867137) +(3899392--3899905) +(3932160--3932673)
+(3964928--3965441) +(3997696--3998209) +(4030464--4030977)
+(4063232--4063745) +(4096000--4097538) +(4128768--4129281)
+(4161536--4162049) +(4194304--4194817) +(4227072--4227585)

glibc error reports go to the bit bucket in koji

2009-08-18 Thread Tom Lane
I've been poking away at the mysql crashes I mentioned a few days ago,
and have just realized something that explains why I've been at such a
loss to interpret the failure reports from koji.  It seems that what
has been getting triggered is glibc's malloc-error aborts, the ones that
look like

*** glibc detected *** 
/home/tgl/rpmwork/BUILD/mysql-5.1.37/client/.libs/lt-mysqlslap: free(): invalid 
pointer: 0x01dc6eb0 ***
=== Backtrace: =
/lib64/libc.so.6[0x309a275a96]
/home/tgl/rpmwork/BUILD/mysql-5.1.37/libmysql_r/.libs/libmysqlclient_r.so.16(my_thread_end+0x62)[0x7fb1910b9612]
/home/tgl/rpmwork/BUILD/mysql-5.1.37/client/.libs/lt-mysqlslap(run_task+0x2df)[0x4033ef]
/lib64/libpthread.so.0[0x309ae0686a]
/lib64/libc.so.6(clone+0x6d)[0x309a2de39d]
=== Memory map: 
0040-00408000 r-xp  fd:01 1522370
/home/tgl/rpmwork/BUILD/mysql-5.1.37/client/.libs/lt-mysqlslap
00608000-0060a000 rw-p 8000 fd:01 1522370
/home/tgl/rpmwork/BUILD/mysql-5.1.37/client/.libs/lt-mysqlslap
.. etc etc ..

**The build logs from koji do not contain this rather critical
information**.  I haven't dug into the glibc sources, but what it
looks like on my own machine is that these reports go to /dev/tty
not to stderr (and thus not into any log file).

I will not presume to question the sanity of the /dev/tty default,
but surely this is a *completely* undesirable behavior within the
koji environment.  Can't we fix things so that such reports show up
in the build.log?

regards, tom lane

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: yum-presto plugin by default

2009-08-18 Thread Jeff Spaleta
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Jesse Keatingjkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
 The hit on slow disks is pretty bad too, even non-slow disks.  With a
 local mirror the time to re-make the deltas is far longer than the time
 to just pull down the entire packages.

Time isn't the only metric...people may also be concerned about
metered bandwidth. CPU overchurn we can limit via process
priority..but finding a heuristic to determine what too slow means
when it comes to disk io versus bandwidth is probably something we
can't do.


-jefspeaking of metered bandwidth..I need to remember to work from
barnes and nobles instead of working from home this winter..so i can
steal power, wireless and a nice warm firespaleta

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: glibc error reports go to the bit bucket in koji

2009-08-18 Thread Mike Bonnet

On 08/18/2009 06:14 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

I've been poking away at the mysql crashes I mentioned a few days ago,
and have just realized something that explains why I've been at such a
loss to interpret the failure reports from koji.  It seems that what
has been getting triggered is glibc's malloc-error aborts, the ones that
look like

*** glibc detected *** 
/home/tgl/rpmwork/BUILD/mysql-5.1.37/client/.libs/lt-mysqlslap: free(): invalid 
pointer: 0x01dc6eb0 ***
=== Backtrace: =
/lib64/libc.so.6[0x309a275a96]
/home/tgl/rpmwork/BUILD/mysql-5.1.37/libmysql_r/.libs/libmysqlclient_r.so.16(my_thread_end+0x62)[0x7fb1910b9612]
/home/tgl/rpmwork/BUILD/mysql-5.1.37/client/.libs/lt-mysqlslap(run_task+0x2df)[0x4033ef]
/lib64/libpthread.so.0[0x309ae0686a]
/lib64/libc.so.6(clone+0x6d)[0x309a2de39d]
=== Memory map: 
0040-00408000 r-xp  fd:01 1522370
/home/tgl/rpmwork/BUILD/mysql-5.1.37/client/.libs/lt-mysqlslap
00608000-0060a000 rw-p 8000 fd:01 1522370
/home/tgl/rpmwork/BUILD/mysql-5.1.37/client/.libs/lt-mysqlslap
.. etc etc ..

**The build logs from koji do not contain this rather critical
information**.  I haven't dug into the glibc sources, but what it
looks like on my own machine is that these reports go to /dev/tty
not to stderr (and thus not into any log file).

I will not presume to question the sanity of the /dev/tty default,
but surely this is a *completely* undesirable behavior within the
koji environment.  Can't we fix things so that such reports show up
in the build.log?


This is more of a mock issue, since mock is responsible for capturing 
the output of the build process and directing it to build.log, which 
koji simply stores.  Is this reproduceable in mock on a local machine?


How would mock go about capturing output sent directly to /dev/tty? 
Could we get away with hard/sym-linking it to /dev/stderr?  Does this 
have the potential to break other things?


--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: glibc error reports go to the bit bucket in koji

2009-08-18 Thread Roland McGrath
IMHO koji (and mock for that matter) ought to be running the builds inside
a captive pty whose ouytput it logs anyway, even if they redirect
everything.  You never know what crazy nonsense some package is going to try.

You can put LIBC_FATAL_STDERR_=1 in the environment to get those messages
to stderr instead of /dev/tty.  setuid programs will still use /dev/tty.
Or, it would use stderr by default if there was no /dev/tty.

If you're not going to capture the tty output, then you really should
disassociate from the tty (setsid) so /dev/tty does not work at all.
I'd call the failure to do one or the other of these a bug in mock or koji.


Thanks,
Roland

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: glibc error reports go to the bit bucket in koji

2009-08-18 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 06:14:20PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
 I've been poking away at the mysql crashes I mentioned a few days ago,
 and have just realized something that explains why I've been at such a
 loss to interpret the failure reports from koji.  It seems that what
 has been getting triggered is glibc's malloc-error aborts, the ones that
 look like
 
 *** glibc detected *** 
 /home/tgl/rpmwork/BUILD/mysql-5.1.37/client/.libs/lt-mysqlslap: free(): 
 invalid pointer: 0x01dc6eb0 ***
 === Backtrace: =
 /lib64/libc.so.6[0x309a275a96]
 /home/tgl/rpmwork/BUILD/mysql-5.1.37/libmysql_r/.libs/libmysqlclient_r.so.16(my_thread_end+0x62)[0x7fb1910b9612]
 /home/tgl/rpmwork/BUILD/mysql-5.1.37/client/.libs/lt-mysqlslap(run_task+0x2df)[0x4033ef]
 /lib64/libpthread.so.0[0x309ae0686a]
 /lib64/libc.so.6(clone+0x6d)[0x309a2de39d]
 === Memory map: 
 0040-00408000 r-xp  fd:01 1522370
 /home/tgl/rpmwork/BUILD/mysql-5.1.37/client/.libs/lt-mysqlslap
 00608000-0060a000 rw-p 8000 fd:01 1522370
 /home/tgl/rpmwork/BUILD/mysql-5.1.37/client/.libs/lt-mysqlslap
 .. etc etc ..
 
 **The build logs from koji do not contain this rather critical
 information**.  I haven't dug into the glibc sources, but what it
 looks like on my own machine is that these reports go to /dev/tty
 not to stderr (and thus not into any log file).

One of koji/mock/rpm could export
LIBC_FATAL_STDERR_=1
in the environment to force this to go to stdout for non-setuid/setgid
processes.

Jakub

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: glibc error reports go to the bit bucket in koji

2009-08-18 Thread Jesse Keating
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 15:36 -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
 IMHO koji (and mock for that matter) ought to be running the builds inside
 a captive pty whose ouytput it logs anyway, even if they redirect
 everything.  You never know what crazy nonsense some package is going to try.

How does one setup one of these things?

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Re: glibc error reports go to the bit bucket in koji

2009-08-18 Thread Roland McGrath
 How does one setup one of these things?

Since I assume you are implementing it in Python, you might have to ask,
you know, someone who knows Python.  I don't, but I have a web browser.
I even have locate '*python*pty*'.  So maybe:

import pty

(pid, fd) = pty.fork()

or pty.spawn(...)

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: yum-presto plugin by default

2009-08-18 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 14:17 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:

 -jefspeaking of metered bandwidth..I need to remember to work from
 barnes and nobles instead of working from home this winter..so i can
 steal power, wireless and a nice warm firespaleta

Nice warm fire? you're going to burn all the books? :)

-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: glibc error reports go to the bit bucket in koji

2009-08-18 Thread Tom Lane
Mike Bonnet mi...@redhat.com writes:
 On 08/18/2009 06:14 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
 **The build logs from koji do not contain this rather critical
 information**.  I haven't dug into the glibc sources, but what it
 looks like on my own machine is that these reports go to /dev/tty
 not to stderr (and thus not into any log file).

 This is more of a mock issue, since mock is responsible for capturing 
 the output of the build process and directing it to build.log, which 
 koji simply stores.  Is this reproduceable in mock on a local machine?

I think so, but the last few days are kind of a haze of irreproducible
crashes :-(.  And it was only just now that I realized that the logs
showing mysql terminating for no apparent reason looked exactly like
my stdout/stderr captures from terminal sessions that included glibc
reports.  I don't have any way to prove that those sessions actually
included some glibc output that I never saw ... it just seems pretty
likely.  Anyway, given other comments, it seems clear that (1) glibc
does send these things to /dev/tty by default, and (2) nothing in the
koji environment is doing anything to capture such output.

regards, tom lane

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


F12 Feature Status Requested

2009-08-18 Thread John Poelstra

Greetings Feature Owners,

The Alpha Release of Fedora 12 is scheduled for public availability one 
week from today on Tuesday, August 25, 2009.  As a result of our 
announcements around this release many journalists and other people 
curious to find out what's on the way for Fedora 12 will come to read 
your feature page.


The features listed below (which are not 100% complete) and have not 
been updated in the last two weeks. Please update your feature page by 
next Tuesday, August 25, 2009 so we can provide people with the latest 
and greatest information about your feature!


https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Dracut
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Anaconda/Features/FCoE
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/KDE43
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/liblvm
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/PowerManagementF12
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Ovirt_Node
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SystemTapEclipseGUI
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/XZRpmPayloads
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F12X86Support

If nothing has changed on your feature page as it currently stands, 
simply update the Last updated date to the current date so we'll know 
you've been there.


REMINDER: all features must be 100% complete at Final Freeze, currently 
scheduled for Tuesday, September 29, 2009.


Thank you for your help and contributing to next great release of Fedora!

John

p.s. Individual feature owners have also been bcc'd on this message

___
Fedora-devel-announce mailing list
fedora-devel-annou...@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-announce

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Updated Fedora 12 Schedule--Final Release Date 2009-11-10

2009-08-18 Thread John Poelstra
As a follow-up to last week's announcement changing the date for the 
Fedora 12 Alpha release,


https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-announce/2009-August/msg6.html
the remaining tasks in the Fedora 12 schedule have been adjusted by one 
week.


https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/12#Key_Milestones

The new milestones are as follows:

2009-08-25  Alpha Release
2009-09-22  Software Translation Deadline
2009-09-29  Beta (Final Development) Freeze
2009-10-13  Beta Release
2009-10-27  Compose  Stage Release Candidate
2009-11-10  Fedora 12 Final Release

Updated detailed schedules are available here:
http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-12/f-12-key-tasks.html

iCal files for each team are here (files ending in .ics):
http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-12

John

___
Fedora-devel-announce mailing list
fedora-devel-annou...@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-announce

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: yum-presto plugin by default

2009-08-18 Thread Steven James Drinnan
I would hold off on the default thing. 

I have found that it has played havoc with intel video drivers and
NetworkManager. I do not know how but for me it was a pain in the neck.

All I know is that after I re-installed and upgraded I have had no
problems

-1 to installing it by default in F12.

Steven

On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 22:40 +0100, Christopher Brown wrote:
 2009/8/18 Chuck Anderson c...@wpi.edu:
  On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 01:35:37AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
  On 07/26/2009 06:40 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
   Hi,
  
   Can we make it a default in comps for Rawhide?
  
   Rahul
 
  No answer here after weeks.
 
  After some lengthy discussion with rel-eng team in irc, not much care
  either way. Talked to desktop team and based on their recommendation, I
  have added yum-presto to the GNOME Desktop group by default.
 
  If rel-eng wants to add it a base group for the DVD image, feel free to
  do so. Spin owners - likewise. Thanks.
 
  I've been using yum-presto since before F11 came out, and it is great.
  +1 to installing it by default in F12.
 
 FWIW, I have also experienced zero problems with it and believe it
 would be better enabled by default, retaining the option to disable.
 Updates would get done faster and mirrors would be able to cope with
 more connections, especially in the first push after release day... :)
 
 -- 
 Christopher Brown
 

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Kernel 2.6.29 for F10

2009-08-18 Thread Rodd Clarkson

   I too would like to see F10 move up to 2.6.29+  
   prior to end-of-life.
 
 In days of old, we were able to get rebases out pretty quickly after
 their upstream release.  These days, we're hindered by the kernel modesetting
 stuff we're carrying.  It's closely tied to the userspace X drivers,
 and isn't easy to retrofit to a different kernel.
 One of the reasons we haven't pushed them as proper updates is that
 getting the regressions fixed is pretty time consuming, and the limited
 X/KMS manpower we have is better focused on making the F12 stuff work right,
 and getting it upstream.

Dave,

Is this an offer to try and help me get the f12 kernel to boot on my
system so that I can test it for you? ;-]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513528


Rodd

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: yum-presto plugin by default

2009-08-18 Thread Chuck Anderson
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:03:44AM +0800, Steven James Drinnan wrote:
 I would hold off on the default thing. 
 
 I have found that it has played havoc with intel video drivers and
 NetworkManager. I do not know how but for me it was a pain in the neck.
 
 All I know is that after I re-installed and upgraded I have had no
 problems
 
 -1 to installing it by default in F12.

What the heck does yum-presto have to do with the quality of the 
xorg-x11-drv-intel and NetworkManager packages?

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: yum-presto plugin by default

2009-08-18 Thread Chuck Anderson
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:36:15AM -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote:
 On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:03:44AM +0800, Steven James Drinnan wrote:
  I would hold off on the default thing. 
  
  I have found that it has played havoc with intel video drivers and
  NetworkManager. I do not know how but for me it was a pain in the neck.
  
  All I know is that after I re-installed and upgraded I have had no
  problems
  
  -1 to installing it by default in F12.
 
 What the heck does yum-presto have to do with the quality of the 
 xorg-x11-drv-intel and NetworkManager packages?

Responding to myself, are you perhaps confusing yum-presto with 
presto?

Name   : yum-presto
Arch   : noarch
Version: 0.5.0
Release: 1.fc11
Size   : 78 k
Repo   : installed
Summary: Presto plugin for yum
URL: http://www.lesbg.com/jdieter/presto/
License: GPLv2+
Description: Yum-presto is a plugin for yum that looks for deltarpms rather than
   : rpms whenever they are available.  This has the potential of saving
   : a lot of bandwidth when downloading updates.
   : 
   : A Deltarpm is the difference between two rpms.  If you already have
   : foo-1.0 installed and foo-1.1 is available, yum-presto will
   : download the deltarpm for foo-1.0 = 1.1 rather than the full
   : foo-1.1 rpm, and then build the full foo-1.1 package from your
   : installed foo-1.0 and the downloaded deltarpm.

Name   : presto
Arch   : x86_64
Version: 0.1.3
Release: 6.fc11
Size   : 35 k
Repo   : fedora
Summary: A tilemap engine using the Allegro game programming library
URL: http://www.hypersonicsoft.org/projects/showproject.php?id=29
License: GPLv3+
Description: Presto is a general-use tilemap engine coded in C that uses Allegro
   : for graphics rendering, and therefore is intended for use in games
   : using Allegro. It can handle rectangular tiles of any height and
   : width (and different height from width), loading tilemaps from
   : files, tile blending, and the capability to change most of these
   : elements on the fly.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Fedora Education Spin Nightly Builds now available!

2009-08-18 Thread Sebastian Dziallas
Just a quick heads-up to note that daily builds of our education spin 
based on Rawhide are available thanks to the great work of the Infra  
Spin SIG folks.


http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/

Those builds conclude what is supposed to become the Fedora Education 
Spin for F12 and follow the concept of POSSE's Education Fedora Remix 
[1]. If you've any suggestions how we can improve the experience on this 
spin or what additional apps to include, please let us know!


--Sebastian

[1] 
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2009-July/msg7.html


___
Fedora-education-list mailing list
Fedora-education-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-education-list


[Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts

2009-08-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617


Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||psatp...@redhat.com
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|psatp...@redhat.com




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts

2009-08-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617


Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|psatp...@redhat.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up on F-11

2009-08-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369


Tim Niemueller t...@niemueller.de changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||t...@niemueller.de




--- Comment #43 from Tim Niemueller t...@niemueller.de  2009-08-18 06:12:03 
EDT ---
On my laptop
(http://www.smolts.org/client/show/pub_d3521300-de3d-40ee-be30-5c99bb593c3b) I
see similar problems. From time to time some letters get corrupted (especially
in Firefox, Emacs does not show this problem). After some time they are gone,
and then come back again. This is not on powerpc, but on x86_64. Very annoying,
any information I can provide to get this fixed?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


rpms/smc-fonts/devel .cvsignore, 1.3, 1.4 smc-fonts.spec, 1.8, 1.9 sources, 1.3, 1.4

2009-08-18 Thread Rajeesh K Nambiar
Author: rajeeshknambiar

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/smc-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv13892

Modified Files:
.cvsignore smc-fonts.spec sources 
Log Message:
Update to 04.2 with bugfix for RHBZ#484536


Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/smc-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -p -r1.3 -r1.4
--- .cvsignore  29 Jul 2008 09:14:48 -  1.3
+++ .cvsignore  18 Aug 2009 15:46:31 -  1.4
@@ -1,2 +1 @@
-malayalam-fonts-04.zip
-malayalam-fonts-04.1.zip
+malayalam-fonts-04.2.zip


Index: smc-fonts.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/smc-fonts/devel/smc-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -p -r1.8 -r1.9
--- smc-fonts.spec  27 Jul 2009 04:29:39 -  1.8
+++ smc-fonts.spec  18 Aug 2009 15:46:31 -  1.9
@@ -7,8 +7,8 @@ The SMC Fonts package contains fonts for
 traditional and new Malayalam Script.
 
 Name:  %{fontname}-fonts
-Version:   04.1
-Release:   7%{?dist}
+Version:   04.2
+Release:   1%{?dist}
 Summary:   Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script
 Group: User Interface/X
 License:   GPLv3+ with exceptions and GPLv2+ with exceptions and GPLv2+ 
and  GPLv2
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ Group: User Interface/X 
 Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
 License: GPLv2+ with exceptions
 Provides: %{fontname}-fonts-meera = %{version}-%{release}
-Obsoletes: %{name}-meera  04.1-4
+Obsoletes: %{name}-meera  04.2-1
 %description -n %{fontname}-meera-fonts
 The Meera font package contains fonts for the display of
 traditional Malayalam Scripts.
@@ -152,6 +152,9 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot}
 %dir %{_fontdir}
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Aug 18 2009 Rajeesh K Nambiar rajeeshknamb...@gmail.com 04.2-1
+- bugfix 484536 for Meera
+
 * Sun Jul 26 2009 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
- 04.1-7
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild
 


Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/smc-fonts/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -p -r1.3 -r1.4
--- sources 29 Jul 2008 09:14:48 -  1.3
+++ sources 18 Aug 2009 15:46:31 -  1.4
@@ -1 +1 @@
-492cb9ec6bf69d775e987c1ca06b4003  malayalam-fonts-04.1.zip
+82e50d2bfed3111612e6b36070356a58  malayalam-fonts-04.2.zip

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 484536] [ml_IN] various smc-fonts have wrong default glyphs

2009-08-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484536





--- Comment #6 from Rajeesh rajeeshknamb...@gmail.com  2009-08-18 12:34:46 
EDT ---
Fixed all the bugs identified in Meera in new upstream source archive
http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/smc/fonts/malayalam-fonts-04.2.zip

Updated smc-fonts package, koji build here :
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1612642

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 3512] Implement font-stretch property

2009-08-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512





--- Comment #61 from Magne Andersson bugzi...@zirro.se  2009-08-18 12:54:28 
PDT ---
Will this make it in for 1.9.2, or is it for a later version?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 504272] [Fonts-Indic][te_IN] - Character 'HA' showing wrong shape in Composition

2009-08-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504272


Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||kkrot...@redhat.com




--- Comment #4 from Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com  2009-08-19 01:17:46 
EDT ---
Satyabrata,

I will work on this, adding krishnababu in cc


Krishababu,

can you please update me on this with respect to lohit-telugu-fonts

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


Re: Wan't to join and why

2009-08-18 Thread Steven M. Parrish
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:

 On 08/17/2009 03:48 PM, Steven M. Parrish wrote:
 Hi guys and gals,
 
 I am looking to join both the sysadmin-test and sysadmin-cvs groups.  Why
 you
 might ask?  Well I'll tell you.  I wan't to get more involved in Fedora.
 
 Here is my current Fedora resume...
 
 - BugZapper for both KDE and Packagekit.
 - Maintain 20+ packages and am a Sponsor in the packaging group.
 - Work closely with the OLPC and Sugar folks at getting and maintaining
 the packages in Fedora
 - Responsible for creating builds of F11 with Sugar specifically for the
 OLPC XO-1 (Hope to get an XO-1.5 soon) see
 http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_XO-1 for info on this.
 
 What I am looking to do now is create a very simplified bugzilla
 interface that can be used by OLPC users, mostly children, to report
 issues with Sugar
 Activities in Fedora.  Will develop in PHP and would like to develop and
 test it on one of the publictest servers.
 
 Also would like to help maintain the cvs servers and projects contained
 there.
 
 Any questions just ask.
 
 Is this intended to be deployed onto Fedora Infrastructure boxes
 eventually or just be developed/demoed on the publictest infrastructure?
  We haven't had development of known-non-Fedora stuff done previously
 but this might be a valid first case.  If it's intended to run on Fedora
 Infrastructure, we very much prefer developing them in python.  In fact,
 I don't think we have any non-python developed stuff.
 
 -Toshio

It is intended to run on Fedora infrastructure.  It is going to be an 
alternate front end to our current bugzilla instance.  It could be built 
upon to create different front ends for other user groups as well.

Developing it in Python will not be a problem.  I am just in the beginning 
design stage atm. 

Steven

=
Steven M. Parrish
-
gpg fingerprint: 4B6C 8357 059E B7ED 8095 0FD6 1F4B EDA0 A9A6 13C0
http://tuxbrewr.fedorapeople.org/
irc.freenode.net: SMParrish @ #fedora-kde, #fedora-devel, #fedora-olpc, 
#sugar


___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: Wan't to join and why

2009-08-18 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 08/18/2009 05:51 PM, Steven M. Parrish wrote:

 What I am looking to do now is create a very simplified bugzilla
 interface that can be used by OLPC users, mostly children, to report
 issues with Sugar
 Activities in Fedora.  Will develop in PHP and would like to develop and
 test it on one of the publictest servers.

 Also would like to help maintain the cvs servers and projects contained
 there.

 Any questions just ask.

 Is this intended to be deployed onto Fedora Infrastructure boxes
 eventually or just be developed/demoed on the publictest infrastructure?
  We haven't had development of known-non-Fedora stuff done previously
 but this might be a valid first case.  If it's intended to run on Fedora
 Infrastructure, we very much prefer developing them in python.  In fact,
 I don't think we have any non-python developed stuff.

 -Toshio
 
 It is intended to run on Fedora infrastructure.  It is going to be an 
 alternate front end to our current bugzilla instance.  It could be built 
 upon to create different front ends for other user groups as well.
 
 Developing it in Python will not be a problem.  I am just in the beginning 
 design stage atm. 

Very interesting. A related project

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bugzilla_Desktop_Client

Rahul

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: Wan't to join and why

2009-08-18 Thread Steven M. Parrish
Rahul Sundaram wrote:

 On 08/18/2009 05:51 PM, Steven M. Parrish wrote:
 
 What I am looking to do now is create a very simplified bugzilla
 interface that can be used by OLPC users, mostly children, to report
 issues with Sugar
 Activities in Fedora.  Will develop in PHP and would like to develop
 and test it on one of the publictest servers.

 Also would like to help maintain the cvs servers and projects contained
 there.

 Any questions just ask.

 Is this intended to be deployed onto Fedora Infrastructure boxes
 eventually or just be developed/demoed on the publictest infrastructure?
  We haven't had development of known-non-Fedora stuff done previously
 but this might be a valid first case.  If it's intended to run on Fedora
 Infrastructure, we very much prefer developing them in python.  In fact,
 I don't think we have any non-python developed stuff.

 -Toshio
 
 It is intended to run on Fedora infrastructure.  It is going to be an
 alternate front end to our current bugzilla instance.  It could be built
 upon to create different front ends for other user groups as well.
 
 Developing it in Python will not be a problem.  I am just in the
 beginning design stage atm.
 
 Very interesting. A related project
 
 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bugzilla_Desktop_Client
 
 Rahul

Sounds like we both have similar goals here.  I think having both a OS based 
app and a simple web interface for our bugreporting is a great idea.  

Anything that makes it easier for normal users to report issues and give 
feedback will only lead to making Fedora a more user friendly distro.

Steven

-- 
=
Steven M. Parrish
-
gpg fingerprint: 4B6C 8357 059E B7ED 8095 0FD6 1F4B EDA0 A9A6 13C0
http://tuxbrewr.fedorapeople.org/
irc.freenode.net: SMParrish @ #fedora-kde, #fedora-devel, #fedora-olpc, 
#sugar

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: Wan't to join and why

2009-08-18 Thread Paul W. Frields
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 09:15:48AM -0400, Steven M. Parrish wrote:
 Rahul Sundaram wrote:
 
  On 08/18/2009 05:51 PM, Steven M. Parrish wrote:
  
  What I am looking to do now is create a very simplified bugzilla
  interface that can be used by OLPC users, mostly children, to report
  issues with Sugar
  Activities in Fedora.  Will develop in PHP and would like to develop
  and test it on one of the publictest servers.
 
  Also would like to help maintain the cvs servers and projects contained
  there.
 
  Any questions just ask.
 
  Is this intended to be deployed onto Fedora Infrastructure boxes
  eventually or just be developed/demoed on the publictest infrastructure?
   We haven't had development of known-non-Fedora stuff done previously
  but this might be a valid first case.  If it's intended to run on Fedora
  Infrastructure, we very much prefer developing them in python.  In fact,
  I don't think we have any non-python developed stuff.
 
  -Toshio
  
  It is intended to run on Fedora infrastructure.  It is going to be an
  alternate front end to our current bugzilla instance.  It could be built
  upon to create different front ends for other user groups as well.
  
  Developing it in Python will not be a problem.  I am just in the
  beginning design stage atm.
  
  Very interesting. A related project
  
  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bugzilla_Desktop_Client
  
  Rahul
 
 Sounds like we both have similar goals here.  I think having both a OS based 
 app and a simple web interface for our bugreporting is a great idea.  
 
 Anything that makes it easier for normal users to report issues and give 
 feedback will only lead to making Fedora a more user friendly distro.

I know that there were folks in the Desktop SIG who were interested
in a more friendly bug filing Web interface, as well as other
possibilities for lowering the fright factor of Bugzilla.

-- 
Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: Wan't to join and why

2009-08-18 Thread Steven M. Parrish
Paul W. Frields wrote:

 On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 09:15:48AM -0400, Steven M. Parrish wrote:
 Rahul Sundaram wrote:
 
  On 08/18/2009 05:51 PM, Steven M. Parrish wrote:
  
  What I am looking to do now is create a very simplified bugzilla
  interface that can be used by OLPC users, mostly children, to report
  issues with Sugar
  Activities in Fedora.  Will develop in PHP and would like to develop
  and test it on one of the publictest servers.
 
  Also would like to help maintain the cvs servers and projects
  contained there.
 
  Any questions just ask.
 
  Is this intended to be deployed onto Fedora Infrastructure boxes
  eventually or just be developed/demoed on the publictest
  infrastructure?
   We haven't had development of known-non-Fedora stuff done previously
  but this might be a valid first case.  If it's intended to run on
  Fedora
  Infrastructure, we very much prefer developing them in python.  In
  fact, I don't think we have any non-python developed stuff.
 
  -Toshio
  
  It is intended to run on Fedora infrastructure.  It is going to be an
  alternate front end to our current bugzilla instance.  It could be
  built upon to create different front ends for other user groups as
  well.
  
  Developing it in Python will not be a problem.  I am just in the
  beginning design stage atm.
  
  Very interesting. A related project
  
  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bugzilla_Desktop_Client
  
  Rahul
 
 Sounds like we both have similar goals here.  I think having both a OS
 based app and a simple web interface for our bugreporting is a great
 idea.
 
 Anything that makes it easier for normal users to report issues and give
 feedback will only lead to making Fedora a more user friendly distro.
 
 I know that there were folks in the Desktop SIG who were interested
 in a more friendly bug filing Web interface, as well as other
 possibilities for lowering the fright factor of Bugzilla.
 

Yes its something that was discussed at FudCon in January, but now that 
Sugar/OLPC is basing itself on Fedora I feel its important to get something 
going.

-- 
=
Steven M. Parrish
-
gpg fingerprint: 4B6C 8357 059E B7ED 8095 0FD6 1F4B EDA0 A9A6 13C0
http://tuxbrewr.fedorapeople.org/
irc.freenode.net: SMParrish @ #fedora-kde, #fedora-devel, #fedora-olpc, 
#sugar

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Last call for talking points - what makes you excited about F12?

2009-08-18 Thread Mel Chua

If you've got a moment for some last-minute help...

We (Marketing) will be freezing the F12 talking points list today, and 
are still somewhat light in the what makes Fedora awesome for admins 
and developers? categories.


Right now we have libguestfs and kvm improvements for admins and 
maybe moblin for developers, but there must be more - and more reasons 
why they're awesome (why *is* libguestfs something that makes admins 
happy?). We figured you would know.


The features list is at 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/12/FeatureList. If you've got a 
moment, please take a look at that, then edit 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/F12_talking_points with the things that 
are making you (as admins and devels) happy about F12 coming out.


Help us promote the heck out of your work. ;)

Thanks!

--Mel

PS: I know this is last-minute notice - sorry about that. We're still 
learning how to do things on a schedule, and next time around we'll put 
the call out here much earlier.


___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Seeking comments on my proposal

2009-08-18 Thread Steven M. Parrish

Got the outline of my proposal here  
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SugarZilla

I welcome any comments

Steven

-- 
=
Steven M. Parrish
-
gpg fingerprint: 4B6C 8357 059E B7ED 8095 0FD6 1F4B EDA0 A9A6 13C0
http://tuxbrewr.fedorapeople.org/
irc.freenode.net: SMParrish @ #fedora-kde, #fedora-devel, #fedora-olpc, 
#sugar

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: Seeking comments on my proposal

2009-08-18 Thread Mel Chua

Got the outline of my proposal here
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SugarZilla


Nifty. My only comment: How can we make sure that the workflow/interface 
for SugarZilla is what its intended userbase needs? (It's easy for us to 
sit here and say yes, that will be better for 8-year-olds, but how do 
we know that?)


Might be a good thing to get a Design team consultation on.

--Mel

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: Seeking comments on my proposal

2009-08-18 Thread Steven M. Parrish
Mel Chua wrote:

 Got the outline of my proposal here
 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SugarZilla
 
 Nifty. My only comment: How can we make sure that the workflow/interface
 for SugarZilla is what its intended userbase needs? (It's easy for us to
 sit here and say yes, that will be better for 8-year-olds, but how do
 we know that?)
 
 Might be a good thing to get a Design team consultation on.
 
 --Mel

I had planned to get some design folks involved, in fact I will need help in 
that area.  I am shooting for the simplest interface possible that is able 
to gather the needed info.

Steven

-- 
=
Steven M. Parrish
-
gpg fingerprint: 4B6C 8357 059E B7ED 8095 0FD6 1F4B EDA0 A9A6 13C0
http://tuxbrewr.fedorapeople.org/
irc.freenode.net: SMParrish @ #fedora-kde, #fedora-devel, #fedora-olpc, 
#sugar

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Freeze break request for sigul fine tuning

2009-08-18 Thread Jesse Keating
Sigul changes are very low risk, as we're mostly done with the signing
and puppet is currently disabled on these hosts.  However vault may be
rebuilt tomorrow and if so I want the puppet modules to be correct for
the rebuild.

--
Jes


___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: Freeze break request for sigul fine tuning

2009-08-18 Thread Ricky Zhou
On 2009-08-18 11:28:04 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
 Sigul changes are very low risk, as we're mostly done with the signing
 and puppet is currently disabled on these hosts.  However vault may be
 rebuilt tomorrow and if so I want the puppet modules to be correct for
 the rebuild.
+1

Thanks,
Ricky


pgpPb3NIMbaE5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: Freeze break request for sigul fine tuning

2009-08-18 Thread Mike McGrath
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009, Ricky Zhou wrote:

 On 2009-08-18 11:28:04 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
  Sigul changes are very low risk, as we're mostly done with the signing
  and puppet is currently disabled on these hosts.  However vault may be
  rebuilt tomorrow and if so I want the puppet modules to be correct for
  the rebuild.
 +1


+1 here as well though techncally they're not frozen yet only because
we've not yet added them to the is frozen doc :)

-Mike

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: Recompile kernel without SMP

2009-08-18 Thread Jarod Wilson
On Monday 17 August 2009 20:17:29 Paul Grinberg wrote:
 Josh,
 
 I have a good reason for that. I use Cisco VPN client for Linux, and it
 does not work with SMP kernel.  

I vaguely recall using the cisco vpn client for linux on an smp kernel
just fine, but I stopped using it years ago, as vpnc works well enough
as a replacement for it.

 Thank you for the reply! Do you know how to fix it. What needs to be
 done to compile non-SMP?

I do know how, but its semi-involved, and I'm afraid I'm a bit tied up
with other slightly more pressing work. Short version is that you need
to add a config-foo target in merge.pl, iirc, add that to the spec as
another Source, tweak instances of %with_up within the spec file, and
that would at least get you close.

But again, I think this is really pointless, since 1) I'm pretty sure
the cisco vpn client runs fine on smp 2) if it doesn't, vpnc works
reasonably well to replace it and 3) you can likely just boot the 
current smp-enabled kernel with maxcpus=1 added to the command line
to get up behavior if you absolutely must run the cisco vpn client in
a single-processor environment.

-- 
Jarod Wilson
ja...@redhat.com

___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list


Re: (no subject)

2009-08-18 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 08/18/2009 09:24 AM, gil...@altern.org wrote:

 Unfortunately, the legal approach of Mr Sundaram still doesn't answer this
 enigma: if proprietary document formatting is just defining an awfully
 more complex and secret way of producing bold than B/B, then what are
 media codecs exactly?

Already answered in the FAQ. Read it carefully.

Rahul

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


kmod-nvidia for kernel -217 please ?

2009-08-18 Thread Linuxguy123
'yum update' is showing a new kernel is available.  However, those of us
running non open source video drivers (for various reasons) cannot
update because the new kmod-nvidia driver isn't built for the new
kernel.

Could someone build it and push it out to the repositories ?

Thanks 

PS: Thanks for supplying the kmod-nvidia driver.  I used to have to
build it myself.  I'm glad I don't have to.  Good job.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: kmod-nvidia for kernel -217 please ?

2009-08-18 Thread Joachim Backes

Linuxguy123 wrote:

'yum update' is showing a new kernel is available.  However, those of us
running non open source video drivers (for various reasons) cannot
update because the new kmod-nvidia driver isn't built for the new
kernel.

Could someone build it and push it out to the repositories ?

Thanks 


PS: Thanks for supplying the kmod-nvidia driver.  I used to have to
build it myself.  I'm glad I don't have to.  Good job.



Why not install akmod-nvidia (rpmfusion-nonfree-updates)? Then you are 
independent from the current kernel (the module will be rebuilt on the 
first boot of a new kernel).


--

Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de

http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: HDA Intel sound card problem

2009-08-18 Thread Paulo Cavalcanti

 The default alsa drivers version in f11 is 1.0.18.  The current version
 is 1.0.20 and there are lots of intel-hda fixes in the update.  The
 reason f11 is running the old version is because the kernel it is using
 doesn't support the new drivers.


What do you mean by that? I have been using driver 1.0.20
since I installed F11, a long time ago. There is nothing in kernel 2.6.29
that precludes its installation.



-- 
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
LCG - UFRJ
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: Akmod-nvidia problem

2009-08-18 Thread Mike Chambers
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 14:17 +0930, Tim wrote:

 I just tried akmod-nvidia on Fedora 11 for the first time, the other
 day.  I had to install kernel-devel myself, afterwards, before it could
 do what it was supposed to.  Surely it ought to drag that in as a
 dependency, then?  Installing akmod-nvidia certainly dragged in a pile
 of other things.

When you all say fresh install, does that include all updates (not
testing) as well?  Is this done before trying to install nvidia or
after?  

1 - Fresh install and configured (firewall, selinux, networking, etc) to
your liking
2 - Updates installed plus programs you like/want added
3 - Make sure your booted into the latest kernel you have installed
4 - Install akmod-nvidia and deps, then reboot.


Somewhat of how I do it and don't think I've had any problems installing
the akmod or any extra deps as it pulls it all in itself.


-- 
Mike Chambers
Madisonville, KY

Fedora Project - Bugzapper, Tester, User, etc..

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Akmod-nvidia problem

2009-08-18 Thread Andre Robatino
Tim wrote:

 I just tried akmod-nvidia on Fedora 11 for the first time, the other
 day.  I had to install kernel-devel myself, afterwards, before it
 could do what it was supposed to.  Surely it ought to drag that in as
 a dependency, then?  Installing akmod-nvidia certainly dragged in a
 pile of other things.

On my x86_64 box, akmod-nvidia does in fact depend on kernel-devel.  On
i386, it would be kernel-PAE-devel.  You could check /var/log/yum.log to
see what was installed along with akmod-nvidia.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: Akmod-nvidia problem

2009-08-18 Thread Roger

On 08/18/2009 02:29 PM, gil...@altern.org wrote:

Richard Shaw wrote:

   

On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 5:29 PM,gil...@altern.org  wrote:
 
   

Of course, YMMV, but, as far as I'm concerned, I wouldn't advise anybody
to use akmod-nvidia.

Any way out of this mess?
   

I know I've been guilty of it at times but you have to be careful
drawing those types of conclusions from one experience. I've used the
akmod-nvidia package for some time without issue and since this is the
first posting I've read where someone did have an issue it doesn't
look to be that common.
 

As I said, YMMV :)

For now, there's a new kernel again and I'll see how it works with
kmod-nvidia tomorrow.

   
Whats YMMV

My kmod-nvidia doesnt work with the new kernel
Roger
   


--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Akmod-nvidia problem

2009-08-18 Thread Tim
Tim:
 I just tried akmod-nvidia on Fedora 11 for the first time, the other
 day.  I had to install kernel-devel myself, afterwards, before it
 could do what it was supposed to.  Surely it ought to drag that in as
 a dependency, then?  Installing akmod-nvidia certainly dragged in a
 pile of other things.

Mike Chambers:
 When you all say fresh install, does that include all updates (not
 testing) as well?  Is this done before trying to install nvidia or
 after? 

I booted the DVD, let it install (onto a new, unused, hard drive) with
the default options, didn't do any updates, the only things I added to
the installation, was first trying kmod-nvidia, but it was missing
something, so it wouldn't install, and I noticed I had a pae kernel.
Then I installed the ordinary kernel package (yum install kernel), went
to install akmod-nvidia (yum install akmod-kernel), it installed but
didn't work.  Looking at the failure messages during reboot, I thought
adding kernel-devel might fix it up.  I did a yum install kernel-devel,
rebooted, and everything did what it was supposed to.

That's it.  I forgot about the pae kernel thing, before.  The only thing
I've done since then was edit the menus, as there was no entry showing
to start an email program.  Evolution was installed, but the menu entry
for it was hidden.

Since then, I've pulled the drive.  I need to work, and don't have the
time to try and get used to a new OS just before doing something I want
to rely on the computer for.  Experimenting will have to wait a bit.

I wasted ages TRYING to install, before then.  DVD/CD installs always
take an age, and didn't want to use another blank DVD up, so I like to
use the smaller net install disc, to boot the machine, and then install
from the main image on an external drive.  The computer never found my
USB hard drive (CentOS 5.3 wouldn't, either).  I also tried a NFS
install, and that didn't work, either.  It'd start, then bog down.  I
couldn't even ping the machine from another.

I seem to recall something about extracting install.img from the ISO,
and putting it in the same directory as the main DVD ISO.  That didn't
work, neither did putting it into a images sub-directory.


-- 
[...@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.  I
read messages from the public lists.



-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


OpenSSH FIPS compliance

2009-08-18 Thread Noam Meltzer
Hi,

I saw many commits of patches to OpenSSH relating FIPS in the
fedora-extra-commits mailing list.
I was wondering if anyone here can provide me some info on what those
patches are and whether OpenSSH is FIPS compliant.

Best regards,
Noam Meltzer
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: Testdisk error for LVM partition recover

2009-08-18 Thread Arun Shrimali
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Arun Shrimali arun.r...@gmail.com wrote:



 On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 10:14 PM, Mikkel L. Ellertson
 mik...@infinity-ltd.com wrote:
  Arun Shrimali wrote:
  Dear All,
 
  Recently I have loaded Fedora 11, but yesterday fedora refused to boot.
  on googling I have found that testdisk is the best tool to recover the
  data, but end of it ...
 
  Weather testdisk is the best tool depends on what the problem is.
  What happens when you try to boot? Do you get an error message? If
  so, what is it? If Grub is loading, you may be able to boot with the
  previous kernel. If Grub is not loading, you can probably use the
  install disk in the rescue mode to re-install Grub.
 
  Mikkel
  --
 
   Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons,
  for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup!
 
 
  --
  fedora-list mailing list
  fedora-list@redhat.com
  To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
  Guidelines:
 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
 

 Weather testdisk is the best tool depends on what the problem is.
 *I really don't know *

  What happens when you try to boot? Do you get an error message? If
  so, what is it?

 *Boot disk failure*

 If Grub is loading, you may be able to boot with the
  previous kernel. If Grub is not loading, you can probably use the
  install disk in the rescue mode to re-install Grub.

 *I tried to reinstall the grub with live CD, but it says file not found*

 *Arun*



Fedora 11 use the ext4 file system
Is there any tools through which I can recover files from crashed HDD which
has ext4 file system

Arun
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Lirc problems latest F11 kernel

2009-08-18 Thread Dunc

Hi guys

Since the last 2 updates to the F11 kernel, my lirc receiver has 
stoppped being loaded on boot.


with 2.6.29.6-217.2.3.fc11.x86_64 i get the following on boot in dmesg:


~]# dmesg |grep lirc
lirc_dev: IR Remote Control driver registered, major 248
lirc_mceusb2: Philips eHome USB IR Transceiver and Microsoft MCE 2005 
Remote Control driver for LIRC 1.48
lirc_mceusb2: Daniel Melander l...@rajidae.se, Martin Blatter 
martin_a_blat...@yahoo.com

lirc_dev: lirc_register_driver: sample_rate: 0
lirc_mceusb2[2]: Philips eHome Infrared Transceiver on usb3:2
usbcore: registered new interface driver lirc_mceusb2

With the 2.7 and 2.8 kernels, i get nothing

Trying to do a modprobe lirc_dev or lirc_mceusb2 just gives a module not 
found


Any ideas whats up?

cheers

Dunc



--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Miro and My Audio Problems

2009-08-18 Thread Marc Ferguson
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Marc Ferguson marcfergu...@gmail.comwrote:

 On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.comwrote:

 On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 08:10:32 -0400, Marc wrote:

  Hi Folks,
 
  I'm running Fedora 11 x86_64 and I recently installed Miro 2.0.5-3. Now
 I
  normally have video and audio issues right out of the box because I
 don't
  have all the packages needed. I stumbled upon a quick fix one day while
  running Fedora 10. I installed mythtv and it seemed to have installed
 all
  the video and audio support I needed.  So; this time I did a
 yum-depbuild
  mythtv which installed all the dependent packages and not the main
 package.

 ?? Do you mean yum-builddep? If so, please re-read its manual page,
 because what the tool does is not related to what you thought it would do.

 --
 fedora-list mailing list
 fedora-list@redhat.com
 To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
 Guidelines:
 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


 Hey Michael you are absolutely right about yum-builddep. It's not what I
 thought it was. Is there such a procedure of installing dependent packages
 without installing the main package? In this scenario, I guess I'm looking
 for MP4 and M4V support.


 --
 Marc Ferguson

 www.fergytech.com
 www.digitalalias.net

 When life gives me lemons... I make Linuxaide, hmm good stuff!


Thanks for the reply. It helped me to realize that I probably needed another
flavor of gstreamer installed. I went ahead installed gstreamer-plugin-bad
and all worked fine after that.

-- 
Marc Ferguson

www.fergytech.com
www.digitalalias.net

When life gives me lemons... I make Linuxaide, hmm good stuff!
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: HDA Intel sound card problem

2009-08-18 Thread dariusz rojewski
2009/8/18 Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com





 The default alsa drivers version in f11 is 1.0.18.  The current version
 is 1.0.20 and there are lots of intel-hda fixes in the update.  The
 reason f11 is running the old version is because the kernel it is using
 doesn't support the new drivers.


 What do you mean by that? I have been using driver 1.0.20
 since I installed F11, a long time ago. There is nothing in kernel 2.6.29
 that precludes its installation.




Thanks for your replies. unfortunately it still doesn't work. I tried
pulseaudio, the current alsa version with kernel-2.6.30, another backend and
some other fixes which were suggested by Google.
I'll have to propably listen my mp3 player or radio :) my laptop doesn't
want to cooperate with me.

-- 
darekr
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: kmod-nvidia for kernel -217 please ?

2009-08-18 Thread Linuxguy123
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 09:04 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
 Linuxguy123 wrote:
  'yum update' is showing a new kernel is available.  However, those of us
  running non open source video drivers (for various reasons) cannot
  update because the new kmod-nvidia driver isn't built for the new
  kernel.
  
  Could someone build it and push it out to the repositories ?
  
  Thanks 
  
  PS: Thanks for supplying the kmod-nvidia driver.  I used to have to
  build it myself.  I'm glad I don't have to.  Good job.
  
 
 Why not install akmod-nvidia (rpmfusion-nonfree-updates)? Then you are 
 independent from the current kernel (the module will be rebuilt on the 
 first boot of a new kernel).

I'll give it a try.



-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: The ideal mail client?

2009-08-18 Thread José Matos
On Tuesday 04 August 2009 15:16:04 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
 
  I use cached imap on kmail with good results. It is fast and since the
  messages are also stored locally it is quite fast.

 Is that a setting? If so, I hadn't noticed it.

That is set when the account is initially configured. There are two options 
for IMAP:
 - IMAP
 - Disconnected IMAP

 The dimap allows stores a copy of all email locally. I understand that this 
is not appropriate if the accounts are high volume and the network is slow.

 When the connection is established all email is downloaded. When there is no 
network connection the operations are stacked so that when the network is 
restored the mail box is synchronised.

All my IMAP accounts are dealt that way.

  The only precaution worth of note is not to subscribe the All Mail
  folder for gmail accounts.

 Of course :-)

 poc

-- 
José Abílio

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


comand-line driven image editor

2009-08-18 Thread Hiisi

Dear Fedora Folks!
I want to write a script that would browse the WEB (Internet shops) and 
using wget will download goods description and pictures. I will parse 
resulted htmls then and represent data into another form (SQL INSERT 
command). I can imagine how to do all that but pictures are the most 
complicated part of the job. I need to change their dimensions and some 
other characteristics, like contrast and brightness. Is there a command 
that will do the task?

Respectfully
--
Hiisi.
Registered Linux User #487982. Be counted at: http://counter.li.org/

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: F11 abd Twitter

2009-08-18 Thread Aaron Konstam
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 17:00 -0400, Ted Roche wrote:
 On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Aaron Konstamakons...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
  After wasting an hour it became clear that you can not create Twitter
  accounts using firefox under F1. Using User Agent addon to get Internet
  explorer doesn't seem to help that much.
 
  Anyone have contrary experiences,
  --
 
 I've been having a lot of contrary experiences with Twitter lately.
 Over the weekend, FireFox 3.5 under Fedora 11 dis not appear to be
 working on Twitter. On an older machine running FireFox 3.0.x Twitter
 was working fine. Today, I was able to post again with FireFox 3.5. I
 suspect the folks at Twitter are messing with their javascript and
 have found some differences between the two versions of the browser.
 
It is not so much posting that is the problem. It is creating an account
which fails in firefox and uploading an icon which fails in firefox. I
have no problem posting.
--
===
The surest protection against temptation is cowardice. -- Mark Twain
===
Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akons...@sbcglobal.net

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: (no subject)

2009-08-18 Thread David Liguori



Rahul Sundaram wrote:

On 08/18/2009 09:24 AM, gil...@altern.org wrote:

  

Unfortunately, the legal approach of Mr Sundaram still doesn't answer this
enigma: if proprietary document formatting is just defining an awfully
more complex and secret way of producing bold than B/B, then what are
media codecs exactly?



Already answered in the FAQ. Read it carefully.

Rahul

  
Media formats almost always involve lossy compression  There are reasons 
for selecting one lossy compression scheme over another that are very 
different from considerations of document formatting, which do seem to 
be primarily a way of keeping things proprietary.  Lossy compression is 
still very much a topic of ongoing research.  If someone comes up with a 
clever scheme for lowering the bit count while minimizing the subjective 
loss, that person could reasonably claim it as intellectual property.  
I'm not plugging the proprietary software distribution paradigm, just 
saying.


Of course, media formats are also entangled with digital rights 
management,  which has everything to do with the issues addressed in 
your FAQ.  Generally these work against usability, data efficiency and 
quality. 

I won't touch here the debate over music wanting to be free vs. 
musicians wanting to be paid and the extent to which DRM accomplishes 
the latter, other than to point out that it is frequently and plausibly 
argued that musicians are pretty much the last people DRM protects, if 
at all.


--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: How do I get sound in GNOME without pulseaudio

2009-08-18 Thread Aaron Konstam
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 19:27 -0700, stan wrote:
 On Sun, 16 Aug 2009 21:21:59 +0200
 lars.bjorn...@broadpark.no (Lars Bjørndal) wrote:
 
  Dear list
  
  Could you please advice me in how to get sound within GNOME without
  pulseaudio, e.g. with ALSA/ESD?
 
 I don't think this is possible anymore.  I am not an expert at this but
 I believe that pulse is so closely integrated with Gnome now that it 
 requires pulse in order to generate sounds.  I know that if I use something
 from Gnome that needs sound, pulse is automatically started even though I 
 have it disabled.  
 
 I think this is the culprit.
 
 /usr/libexec/pulse/gconf-helper
 
 Can you afford to install a cheap sound card that you can give over 
 exclusively to pulse, and remove your existing card from it's purview?
 Or vice versa.
 
 Then you use one card for orca and espeak, and let pulse use the other
 for Gnome to produce system sounds.
 
It's my experiennce that removing alsa-plugind-pulseaudio disables
pulseaudio and you are back to just alsa. Running alsamixer leads me to
that conclusion.
--
===
Today is the first day of the rest of your lossage.
===
Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akons...@sbcglobal.net

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: How Extract The Fedorecore iso cd

2009-08-18 Thread Aaron Konstam
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 23:31 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
 Hi Michael,
 
 Michael Wright wrote:
  Hi Told i'm downloading the Cd iso from fedoracore website atm i
  want to put it to a clean dvd Hi Told sorry about that what i am
  doing is downloading the iso cd from Fedoracore website how do i put
  it to a dvd hope that helps
 
 There is some documentation on burning the .iso images at:
 
 http://docs.fedoraproject.org/readme-burning-isos/en-US.html
 
 Note that the section on validating the downloaded image is a little
 outdated as of Fedora 11, because we switched to sha256 for generating
 the .iso checksums.  The documentation is being fixed, but what was
 produced for Fedora 11 is unfortunately not entirely correct on that
 on point.
This is a Fedora List. Why inwstall iso files onto cDs and DVDs using
Windows tools.
--
===
Due to circumstances beyond your control, you are master of your fate
and captain of your soul.
===
Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akons...@sbcglobal.net

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: comand-line driven image editor

2009-08-18 Thread Tim
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 17:21 +0400, Hiisi wrote:
 pictures are the most complicated part of the job. I need to change
 their dimensions and some other characteristics, like contrast and
 brightness. Is there a command that will do the task?

Possibly convert with the -normalize option.  It's a part of the
ImageMagick package.

NB:  When tweaking image contrast and brightness, be careful that you're
not mal-adjusting an image to compensate for a mal-adjusted monitor.

-- 
[...@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.  I
read messages from the public lists.



-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: kmod-nvidia for kernel -217 please ?

2009-08-18 Thread Linuxguy123
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 06:58 -0600, Linuxguy123 wrote:
 On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 09:04 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
  Linuxguy123 wrote:
   'yum update' is showing a new kernel is available.  However, those of us
   running non open source video drivers (for various reasons) cannot
   update because the new kmod-nvidia driver isn't built for the new
   kernel.
   
   Could someone build it and push it out to the repositories ?
   
   Thanks 
   
   PS: Thanks for supplying the kmod-nvidia driver.  I used to have to
   build it myself.  I'm glad I don't have to.  Good job.
   
  
  Why not install akmod-nvidia (rpmfusion-nonfree-updates)? Then you are 
  independent from the current kernel (the module will be rebuilt on the 
  first boot of a new kernel).
 
 I'll give it a try.

I didn't build when I rebooted.  The boot hung.  

For some reason my wifi card doesn't connect to the network during the
boot.  It establishes a connection and works just fine during my KDE
session, but it doesn't establish a connection during the boot.

I'm still waiting for kmod-nvidia so I can use the new kernel. 

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: RPM Spec File - %define into %pre section

2009-08-18 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 20:46 -0300, Bruno Galindro da Costa wrote:
 It works! Thank you very much!
 
 2009/8/17 Todd Zullinger t...@pobox.com
[...]
 (Please don't top post.  Trim the quotes and reply after.)

Which part of the above did you not understand?

poc


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Problem with nautilus and smb:// links

2009-08-18 Thread tkonto
It looks the problem is with the SAMBA upgrade to 3.4.0.

Downgrade solves the problem.

Waiting for a patch for gvfs.
Thank you all for reading this.

Sincerely,


-- 
This is an email sent via The Fedora Community Portal https://fcp.surfsite.org
https://fcp.surfsite.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?post_id=363059topic_id=75134forum=10#forumpost363059
If you think, this is spam, please report this to webmas...@fcp.surfsite.org 
and/or blame theophanis_kontogian...@yahoo.gr.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Testdisk error for LVM partition recover

2009-08-18 Thread Mikkel L. Ellertson
Please, do not post is HTML!

Arun Shrimali wrote:
 
 
 On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 10:14 PM, Mikkel wrote:
 
 What happens when you try to boot? Do you get an error message? If
 so, what is it?
 
 /Boot disk failure/
 
 If Grub is loading, you may be able to boot with the
 previous kernel. If Grub is not loading, you can probably use the
 install disk in the rescue mode to re-install Grub.
 
 /I tried to reinstall the grub with live CD, but it says file not found/
 
 /Arun/
 
You are much better off using a normal install disk, or the net
install CD, and using the rescue mode. You let it mount your file
systems, and then run chroot /mnt/sysimage. You run grub-install
from there.

If this does not work, report back the error messages. Do not
respond with a HTML message.

Mikkel
-- 

  Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons,
for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup!



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: kmod-nvidia for kernel -217 please ?

2009-08-18 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 00:56:23 -0600,
  Linuxguy123 linuxguy...@gmail.com wrote:
 'yum update' is showing a new kernel is available.  However, those of us
 running non open source video drivers (for various reasons) cannot
 update because the new kmod-nvidia driver isn't built for the new
 kernel.
 
 Could someone build it and push it out to the repositories ?

It would probably better to ask this on an rpm fusion list.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: How Extract The Fedorecore iso cd

2009-08-18 Thread Anne Wilson
On Tuesday 18 August 2009 14:38:46 Aaron Konstam wrote:
 This is a Fedora List. Why inwstall iso files onto cDs and DVDs using
 Windows tools.

How else do you get a first install?

Anne
-- 
New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
Just found a cool new feature?  Add it to UserBase


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: How do I get sound in GNOME without pulseaudio

2009-08-18 Thread Tim
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 08:31 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
 It's my experiennce that removing alsa-plugind-pulseaudio disables
 pulseaudio and you are back to just alsa. Running alsamixer leads me
 to that conclusion.

Do you mean that alsamixer says something about how it's running, or
that playing with the mixer levels in alsamixer leads you to that
conclusion?

Alsamixer just plays with the mixer controls, turning up/down PCM, CD,
or other audio signals, still works even when pulseaudio is on your
system.  You're just adjusting the signals part way through the chain.

-- 
[...@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.  I
read messages from the public lists.



-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: How Extract The Fedorecore iso cd

2009-08-18 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 08:38 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
 This is a Fedora List. Why inwstall iso files onto cDs and DVDs using
 Windows tools.

Because some people are coming from Windows and don't yet have a working
Linux system? IIRC the Fedora Install docs deal with this explicitly.

poc

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: F11 abd Twitter

2009-08-18 Thread Ed Greshko
Aaron Konstam wrote:
 On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 17:00 -0400, Ted Roche wrote:
   
 On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Aaron Konstamakons...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
 
 After wasting an hour it became clear that you can not create Twitter
 accounts using firefox under F1. Using User Agent addon to get Internet
 explorer doesn't seem to help that much.

 Anyone have contrary experiences,
 --
   
 I've been having a lot of contrary experiences with Twitter lately.
 Over the weekend, FireFox 3.5 under Fedora 11 dis not appear to be
 working on Twitter. On an older machine running FireFox 3.0.x Twitter
 was working fine. Today, I was able to post again with FireFox 3.5. I
 suspect the folks at Twitter are messing with their javascript and
 have found some differences between the two versions of the browser.

 
 It is not so much posting that is the problem. It is creating an account
 which fails in firefox and uploading an icon which fails in firefox. I
 have no problem posting.

   
I just created a new account for my cat.  No problem at all


-- 
Cheops' Law: Nothing ever gets built on schedule or within budget.
mei-mei.gres...@greshko.com http://tw.youtube.com/watch?v=cCSz_koUhSg



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: F11 abd Twitter

2009-08-18 Thread Ed Greshko
Ed Greshko wrote:
 Aaron Konstam wrote:
   
 On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 17:00 -0400, Ted Roche wrote:
   
 
 On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Aaron Konstamakons...@sbcglobal.net 
 wrote:
 
   
 After wasting an hour it became clear that you can not create Twitter
 accounts using firefox under F1. Using User Agent addon to get Internet
 explorer doesn't seem to help that much.

 Anyone have contrary experiences,
 --
   
 
 I've been having a lot of contrary experiences with Twitter lately.
 Over the weekend, FireFox 3.5 under Fedora 11 dis not appear to be
 working on Twitter. On an older machine running FireFox 3.0.x Twitter
 was working fine. Today, I was able to post again with FireFox 3.5. I
 suspect the folks at Twitter are messing with their javascript and
 have found some differences between the two versions of the browser.

 
   
 It is not so much posting that is the problem. It is creating an account
 which fails in firefox and uploading an icon which fails in firefox. I
 have no problem posting.

   
 
 I just created a new account for my cat.  No problem at all


   
Sorry  I have been corrected.  I created a new account for the
cat.  She objects to the use of the term my cat since that implies
ownership and 3 cats grace us with their presence.  Oh, and I uploaded a
photo for her which she considers an Icon.

-- 
Even a hawk is an eagle among crows. mei-mei.gres...@greshko.com
http://tw.youtube.com/watch?v=cCSz_koUhSg



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

  1   2   3   >