Re: [Finale] Notion music notation software for iPad

2011-12-17 Thread Michael L Meyer
Many thanks for this info, David!  I've been waiting for something like this -- 
Symphony Pro hasn't cut it at all.  Looking forward to trying this out!

-- Mike

On Dec 17, 2011, at 5:48 AM, David H. Bailey wrote:

 
 
 I just wanted to let the iPad users on this list know that Notion
 Software has just released a brand new music notation product for the
 iPad, Notion, which is a very robust product.  It's got many of the
 capabilities of their larger product for computers which has been on the
 market for many years now, and it comes with fantastic instrumental
 sounds included.  I sure hope that Finale and Sibelius are paying 
 attention and are working on such software as well -- Notion can import 
 and export MusicXML files so it will be possible (although I haven't 
 tested it yet) to work on a file in Sibelius or Finale on the computer, 
 export as MusicXML and load that onto the iPad and continue working on 
 it while travelling and then export as MusicXML from Notion on the iPad 
 back to the computer for more work.
 
 They've got an introductory price of just $.99 -- after December 20th
 the price will jump to $14.99.  The product is much more like computer
 notation products (Finale, Sibelius, Notion) than Symphony Pro (the
 other very robust iPad music notation software product).  To get a
 complete set of sounds you need to spend an additional $29.99 but in my
 opinion (as a working musician who is also a composer and arranger) it
 is definitely worth the price.  And for a total of only $30.98 I have
 ended up with a fantastic app.
 
 It is a large download, though, runnning just around 1.9GB for the app
 itself and then an additional 1.5GB to hold the additional sounds I
 bought.  It is possible to purchase just some additional sounds as
 in-app purchases, but I figured I would bite the bullet and just buy the
 whole thing right off the bat.
 
 Here's the link to the Notion software page about the new product:
 http://www.notionmusic.com/products/notionipad.html
 
 You can get to the appstore page from that screen simply by clicking on
 the Available on the AppStore link about half-way down the right hand
 side of the screen (you'll most likely have to scroll to see it).
 
 -- 
 David H. Bailey
 dhbai...@davidbaileymusicstudio.com
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Notion music notation software for iPad

2011-12-17 Thread Michael L Meyer
David --

I've played with it a bit so far too, and it's very impressive.  However, is it 
only instrumental tracks/staves?  When I was checking out starting a new 
document, I didn't see any category that wasn't instruments.

Anyone else who's been playing with the app, I'd love to hear if I've just 
missed something.  The vast majority of my work is in choral/voice.

-- Mike

On Dec 17, 2011, at 2:17 PM, David H. Bailey wrote:

 I've only played with Notion for iPad a little so far (darned holiday 
 stuff is getting in the way!) but note entry is simple, it has 
 articulations, dynamics, effects particular to whatever instrument the 
 staff is set to, tuplets (user defined), it's an incredible app and for 
 the intro price of 99-cents, it is a no-brainer for any musician with an 
 ipad.
 
 I even splurged and spent the $29.99 for the complete sound set, and I 
 have to say that what I've heard so far is incredible in its quality.
 
 It's an incredible piece of software that will leave Finale and Sibelius 
 in the dust.  And with the MusicXML import/export it becomes an 
 excellent adjunct to Finale and Sibelius on the computers.
 
 David H. Bailey
 
 On 12/17/2011 12:54 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
 This is a must buy for iPad owners. The sounds are very nice, a little
 better than the non-garritan sounds finale comes with (smartmusic
 synth stuff).
 
 Yeah, makemusic needs to get into the game. Do they have anything
 useful for ios out? They could easily do a smartmusic app for iOs...or
 at least like sibelius has done, a viewer app.
 
 Sent from my iSomething
 --
 Eric Dannewitz
 Musician/Polymath/Evil Genius
 http://www.ericdannewitz.com
 
 On Dec 17, 2011, at 3:02 AM, David H. Bailey
 dhbai...@davidbaileymusicstudio.com  wrote:
 
 
 
 I just wanted to let the iPad users on this list know that Notion
 Software has just released a brand new music notation product for the
 iPad, Notion, which is a very robust product.  It's got many of the
 capabilities of their larger product for computers which has been on the
 market for many years now, and it comes with fantastic instrumental
 sounds included.  I sure hope that Finale and Sibelius are paying
 attention and are working on such software as well -- Notion can import
 and export MusicXML files so it will be possible (although I haven't
 tested it yet) to work on a file in Sibelius or Finale on the computer,
 export as MusicXML and load that onto the iPad and continue working on
 it while travelling and then export as MusicXML from Notion on the iPad
 back to the computer for more work.
 
 They've got an introductory price of just $.99 -- after December 20th
 the price will jump to $14.99.  The product is much more like computer
 notation products (Finale, Sibelius, Notion) than Symphony Pro (the
 other very robust iPad music notation software product).  To get a
 complete set of sounds you need to spend an additional $29.99 but in my
 opinion (as a working musician who is also a composer and arranger) it
 is definitely worth the price.  And for a total of only $30.98 I have
 ended up with a fantastic app.
 
 It is a large download, though, runnning just around 1.9GB for the app
 itself and then an additional 1.5GB to hold the additional sounds I
 bought.  It is possible to purchase just some additional sounds as
 in-app purchases, but I figured I would bite the bullet and just buy the
 whole thing right off the bat.
 
 Here's the link to the Notion software page about the new product:
 http://www.notionmusic.com/products/notionipad.html
 
 You can get to the appstore page from that screen simply by clicking on
 the Available on the AppStore link about half-way down the right hand
 side of the screen (you'll most likely have to scroll to see it).
 
 --
 David H. Bailey
 dhbai...@davidbaileymusicstudio.com
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 David H. Bailey
 dhbai...@davidbaileymusicstudio.com
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Disappearing hyphens

2011-09-10 Thread Michael L Meyer
On Sep 10, 2011, at 7:35 AM, Haroldo Mauro Jr. wrote:

 This is Finale 2011 for Mac. All hyphens have vanished from the lyrics on my 
 score and soprano part.  They are still there, in the lyrics window, but not 
 in the music, where spaces were substituted for them. They don't print 
 either. What is that? It is amazing how many hours I have spent on Finale 
 trying to figure out what is going on. Things just don't behave as expected. 
 Trying to synchronize expression and repeat texts between score and parts is 
 so time consuming that I just print parts without them and add them by pencil 
 later. That's a lot faster. Has this happen with anyone before, I mean the 
 vanishing hyphens? Thanks.

Hi Haroldo --

This sort of thing has happened to me before, though I don't remember if it was 
all hyphens or just specific ones.  Usually when it happens to me it's an issue 
with the minimum space setting for Smart Hyphens in the Lyrics preferences.  
The default, I think, is 144 (I work in EVPUs), but if I set it to a very small 
number, the missing hyphens reappear.

Hope this helps!

-- Mike
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] re Character names

2011-09-09 Thread Michael L Meyer
Many thanks, both Bonnie and Lance -- I'm sure that between the two of you, 
I've got something that will work!  I really appreciate it.

-- Mike

On Sep 9, 2011, at 1:28 PM, Bonnie Janofsky wrote:

 Mike,
 Use the expressions category Technique Text.  You can create the 
 expressions 
 in that category or move them to that category.  If you move them in 
 Technique 
 Text, you then choose Reset to Category and Fonts and Position.
 
 That category has the closest placement to where you would want character 
 names.  I compose a lot for musical theater and use that all the time for my 
 character names.  You can edit the placement if you'd like then make copies 
 of 
 that expression for the other character names and they will all match.
 Bonnie
 
 Bonnie Ruth Janofsky
 composer / songwriter
 818-784-4466
 www.BonnieRuthJanofsky.com
 
 Message: 2
 Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 18:47:21 -0400
 From: Michael L  Meyer mlmli...@gmail.com
 Subject:  [Finale] Character names
 To: finale@shsu.edu
 Message-ID:  85db3bed-2e68-46de-9d53-48b74ddf6...@gmail.com
 Content-Type:  text/plain; charset=us-ascii
 
 Hi all -- FinMac2011 -- working  on a musical theatre score.  In the past, 
 I've 
 assigned names of  characters (at the beginning of a sung passage) as 
 expressions.  (e.g.  JULIE JORDAN:   or something like that)
 
 In Fin2011, I even made a  category called character names so that each new 
 character name I  made would already use the same font, click placement, etc. 
  
 However,  the category definition forces me to designate a Staff List for  
 assignment -- and there isn't an option that just says place this  
 expression 
 on the staff I place it on, and only that one.  There's top  staff, 
 bottom 
 staff, or any of the staves in the score -- but the  staff I assign these 
 expressions to changes with each use.
 
 Am I  missing something?  Or should I not be using expressions for this, and  
 instead use measure-assigned text boxes?
 
 Thanks in advance for  any help/ideas.
 
 -- Mike
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


[Finale] Character names

2011-09-08 Thread Michael L Meyer
Hi all -- FinMac2011 -- working on a musical theatre score.  In the past, I've 
assigned names of characters (at the beginning of a sung passage) as 
expressions.  (e.g. JULIE JORDAN:   or something like that)

In Fin2011, I even made a category called character names so that each new 
character name I made would already use the same font, click placement, etc.  
However, the category definition forces me to designate a Staff List for 
assignment -- and there isn't an option that just says place this expression 
on the staff I place it on, and only that one.  There's top staff, bottom 
staff, or any of the staves in the score -- but the staff I assign these 
expressions to changes with each use.

Am I missing something?  Or should I not be using expressions for this, and 
instead use measure-assigned text boxes?

Thanks in advance for any help/ideas.

-- Mike
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Deauthorize via Customer Support

2011-08-09 Thread Michael L Meyer
On Aug 9, 2011, at 11:51 AM, Darcy James Argue wrote:

 Hi all,
 
 I thought that some might be interested to have a heads-up that apparently 
 MakeMusic customer support have been instructed to be more... inquisitive, 
 I'll say... when you call up and ask to deauthorize all versions of Finale 
 associated with your serial number.
 

Jeez, Darcy, and you've even done work for them before!  Imagine if any of us 
more common-folk end up having an issue ...



___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Notation app for iPad

2011-01-17 Thread Michael L Meyer
Thanks very much for this, David.  I've been trying to follow music app 
development on the iPad as closely as possible, and have been waiting for a 
notation app.  (Just used my iPad as my digital music folder utilizing ForScore 
and AirTurn at a concert the other night, in fact!  It was WONDERFUL having 
hands-free turning when playing the sax or piano.)

Question (in case you know, and I'll also go check out the description in the 
app store) -- I have the Line6 MIDI Mobilizer for the iPad.  Is Symphony Pro 
compatible?  Meaning, I could hook up a MIDI controller to the iPad and use it 
with the app?

Thanks again for bringing this to our attention!

-- Mike


On Jan 15, 2011, at 7:21 AM, David H. Bailey wrote:

 I just purchased Symphony Pro for my iPad and wanted to share it with these 
 groups.  (I apologize to those who belong to more than one of these groups 
 who will be getting the message multiple times).  I have no connection to the 
 developer other than as a customer who wants to share the news of this app 
 with people who might well find it useful.
 
 Symphony Pro is a music notation app which is in its infancy but already is 
 quite impressive as far as it goes.   It was just released for sale on 
 January 7th.  It's a bit on the high side of expense for iPad apps at $12.99, 
 but when we've spent $300 or more on Finale or Sibelius and countless more 
 money on upgrades, what's another $13?
 
 A score can have multiple staves, so ensembles are possible.   Currently the 
 maximum number of staves per score is only 6, but it possible to have 2 
 voices on each staff, for a total of 12 independent parts, and the stems can 
 be made to go in opposite directions or the same direction on each staff as 
 one choose.  It does include playback and has a selection of brass, string, 
 woodwind, guitar, bass, keyboard and percussion sounds to choose from.  There 
 are onscreen buttons to select between individual staff view or seeing the 
 entire score, and also to select between the voices to set the active voice 
 for entry and editing.  Chords are possible to enter on any of the staves, 
 all in the same voice, so the actual number of independent parts possible to 
 notate could be higher if one wanted, for example, to have rhythmically 
 identical parts in multiple instruments on a single voice on a single staff.  
 One could enter chordal parts for clarinets (for example) in voice one on a 
 staff and also enter chordal parts for bass clarinets in voice two on the 
 same staff.  I haven't tested the limits of playback so I don't know if the 
 range of the instruments is limited to real-world limits (e.g. clarinets not 
 sounding below written E below middle C).
 
 Currently the shortest note or rest value is 32nd notes.  It does allow for 
 triplets, but that's the only tuplet so far. It does allow for ties and 
 dotted notes.  There are two ways to enter notes:  one is to select the value 
 from a palette and then hit the appropriate key on an onscreen musical 
 keyboard or touch the screen where you want the note entered. It is possible 
 to change the pitches once entered by selecting the pitch and using an 
 on-screen set of cursors to move it up or down.
 
 It can do a lot more as well, but I've only begun to investigate it.  It can 
 export as XML (not completely accurate yet, as admitted by the developer, but 
 he's working on improving that), as MIDI, as mp3, as PDF, as LilyPond format 
 and as SYM (the native format so you could share the file with other 
 SymphonyPro users).  The way the files are exported is that they are emailed 
 to whatever address you wish, so you need to be near a wifi or have bought 
 and enabled the model with 3G capability.  I only bought the model with wi-fi 
 so I'll need to be near a wifi hotspot, but that's fine since I can transfer 
 the files at the very least when I'm at home.
 
 You can import files from an online site where you've uploaded them if you 
 wish.
 
 Importing the XML files into Finale or Sibelius produces some errors, which 
 the developer is aware of and is working to fix.  Importing as midi carries 
 along the usual midi import hassles but the pitch and rhythm data imports 
 just fine (so far).  And since it's not possible to have music which is 
 overly complex (nested tuplets aren't possible) midi import shouldn't be too 
 much of a problem.
 
 It's certainly not going to replace Finale or Sibelius, but as a tool to take 
 on the road for sketching out ideas and listening to them playback, I think 
 it's a terrific little app which should get better and better in the months 
 to come.
 
 It may not be for everybody, but for people who have iPads and work with 
 composing/arranging and want a tool to travel with which eliminates bringing 
 along a larger/heavier notebook computer, this is certainly worth looking 
 into.
 
 
 
 -- 
 David H. Bailey
 dhbai...@davidbaileymusicstudio.com
 ___
 

[Finale] Congratulations to Darcy!

2010-08-11 Thread Michael L Meyer
Not that I post here very often, but it was very cool to open my August issue 
of Downbeat and see a familiar name from this list featured!

Darcy was named Rising Star in the Big Band, Composer and Arranger categories 
in this year's Downbeat Critic's Poll.  Very cool -- mazel tov!

-- Mike
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Crediting the copyist

2010-03-30 Thread Michael L Meyer

Hi Rich --

While I would agree with everyone else that for most contemporary  
music it's not common, it IS common in musical theatre -- most  
computer-engraved (but not hand-engraved) scores I've come across  
(especially from MTI) in recent years include the name of the copying  
service, if not the copyist him/herself, on one of the first pages.


-- Mike
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


[Finale] OT: What would you charge for recording?

2010-02-02 Thread Michael L Meyer
Hi all --

Not Finale-related, but hoping to find an answer in the collected experience of 
the people on this list:

A local high school is gearing up for their spring musical, and the company 
they're renting from doesn't provide a RehearseScore or anything like that for 
them to use while rehearsing.  I've been asked to make a recording from the 
piano-conductor score so they have accompaniments to work with during their 
rehearsals.  Nothing fancy -- they give me a chance to practice with it, then I 
come in to the school and they spend an afternoon recording me playing it on 
their piano.

Although I've done some similar things in the past, I've never done a job quite 
like this and I've been asked what I would charge?  How would you do it/how 
have you done it?  Flat rate, hourly charge, and at what rate for either option?

Thanks to anyone who's able to provide me with some guidance.

-- Mike
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] iPhone number keypad

2009-10-29 Thread Michael L Meyer
Downloaded and tried it yesterday -- it worked GREAT with Finale!   
It's very responsive, and the click that you get when you press a key  
is very helpful.


The best part is that I have a USB number pad that I've used for  
years, but it never had an equals sign on it.  So every time I wanted  
to create a tie in Speedy, I had to take my hand off the pad to get to  
the equals sign on the laptop keyboard.  Now I won't have to.


Thanks very much for sending it along, Randolph.

-- Mike

On Oct 28, 2009, at 8:23 PM, Jim Hale wrote:


THAT is pretty cool - I'll have to give it a try. :)

Jim Hale
Hale Recordings
573-727-6511

-Original Message-
From: finale-boun...@shsu.edu [mailto:finale-boun...@shsu.edu] On  
Behalf Of

Randolph Peters
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 1:08 PM
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: [Finale] iPhone number keypad

Finale speedy note entry really relies on having a numeric keypad, but
many laptop computers don't have one. If you've got an iPhone or iPod
touch, this free app can help:

http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=310129994;
mt=8

I haven't tried it yet myself, but apparently it works in both Windows
and the Mac OS.

-Randolph Peters
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale



___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Expressions problem

2009-01-13 Thread Michael L Meyer
Thanks, Christopher.  It's at least nice to know I wasn't going nuts,  
or doing something wrong.  I'll follow your advice -- although, IIRC  
from dragging around as I was first discovering this, the handles and  
the graphics don't move at the same rate when dragged.  Which would  
probably have something to do with Nudge and redraw as necessary.


I will make sure to complain as much as I can.  First time I've ever  
needed the tool.  Interesting.


Thanks again.

-- Mike


On Jan 12, 2009, at 5:30 PM, Christopher Smith wrote:


Hi Mike,

You're doing nothing wrong. Graphic expressions are broken this way  
in Finale 2007-2008 and maybe other versions too. I gave up on them  
because of this.


Place them in page view and redraw. If you are using any staff  
reduction, they will probably shift to where they are going to  
print. Reposition them to the right place while trying to remember  
how much offset there was and redraw again. Nudge and redraw as  
necessary. Complain loudly and ungraciously to MakeMusic for leaving  
this so buggy for so long as to practically make it useless.


Christopher


On Jan 12, 2009, at 5:00 PM, Michael L Meyer wrote:


Hello Great Gurus --

After 14(?) years of using Finale, I finally have need for the  
expression designer.  Go figure ...


FinMac08 -- I'm trying to make an expression (or would it be an  
articulation?) that automatically attaches directly above the note  
(and above the staff) that I attach it to.  The expression uses an  
imported graphic -- basically, I'm arranging a piece that uses an  
iPhone Ocarina, and I'm trying to attach the various pictures of  
the fingerings to each note in the part.


Importing the graphic is no problem, although at the moment it  
appears a bit bigger than I'd like.  The problem is that getting  
the placement right in scroll view isn't translating to anything  
else.  I've uploaded graphic files of four views, which can be  
found at http://public.me.com/mlmmusic   in the folder Expression  
problem.


The view where I place them (file named score view scroll) is  
fine (though, as I said, the graphics are a bit big at the  
moment).  However, when I switch to page view (file score view  
page) the placement is completely offset.  Updating layout,  
redrawing screen, etc. don't change it.


While the difference in part view isn't quite as bad (part view  
scroll), there is still a horizontal offset from the first file.   
And then part view page shows horizontal AND vertical offset.


I can't figure out what I'm doing wrong in the various settings  
that makes the placement change from view to view.  Did I do  
something wrong in the designer?  Should I have set something  
different in the expression placement dialog box?  Is there anyone  
out there who can help me?


Thanks in advance for any assistance provided.

-- Mike
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


[Finale] Expressions problem

2009-01-12 Thread Michael L Meyer

Hello Great Gurus --

After 14(?) years of using Finale, I finally have need for the  
expression designer.  Go figure ...


FinMac08 -- I'm trying to make an expression (or would it be an  
articulation?) that automatically attaches directly above the note  
(and above the staff) that I attach it to.  The expression uses an  
imported graphic -- basically, I'm arranging a piece that uses an  
iPhone Ocarina, and I'm trying to attach the various pictures of the  
fingerings to each note in the part.


Importing the graphic is no problem, although at the moment it appears  
a bit bigger than I'd like.  The problem is that getting the placement  
right in scroll view isn't translating to anything else.  I've  
uploaded graphic files of four views, which can be found at http://public.me.com/mlmmusic 
   in the folder Expression problem.


The view where I place them (file named score view scroll) is fine  
(though, as I said, the graphics are a bit big at the moment).   
However, when I switch to page view (file score view page) the  
placement is completely offset.  Updating layout, redrawing screen,  
etc. don't change it.


While the difference in part view isn't quite as bad (part view  
scroll), there is still a horizontal offset from the first file.  And  
then part view page shows horizontal AND vertical offset.


I can't figure out what I'm doing wrong in the various settings that  
makes the placement change from view to view.  Did I do something  
wrong in the designer?  Should I have set something different in the  
expression placement dialog box?  Is there anyone out there who can  
help me?


Thanks in advance for any assistance provided.

-- Mike
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] IKE

2008-09-12 Thread Michael L Meyer

Best of luck, Prof. Howey!  Stay safe!

-- Mike

On Sep 12, 2008, at 11:14 AM, Howey, Henry wrote:

The universirt is already closed, and I expect we'll lose power over  
Friday night. This may be the last post until power is restored;-)


Henry Howey
Professor of Music
 Sam Houston State University
 Box 2208
 Huntsville, TX  77341
 (936) 294-1364
 http://www.shsu.edu/music/faculty/howey.php
 Owner of FINALE Discussion List

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Lyrics: Is Melisma with System Break Fixed?

2008-09-11 Thread Michael L Meyer

Hey David --

Auto-hyphenation (and for ending syllables, auto-word extensions) take  
care of this in Finale versions since yours, although I know some have  
been bitten by a bug in the past where auto-hyphens would be missing  
from time to time (though I do a lot of choral music, and haven't had  
a problem).  It's seemed (as far as I can tell) to work fine for me in  
FinMac2004, 2007, and nowadays 2008.


Others may be able to speak to whether the bug has been fixed or not.   
I haven't seen anything on here about it in a while.


I also know that many don't use the default settings that Finale  
provides for auto-hyphens, but they seem to work for me just fine as  
is.  I've never changed the defaults.


-- Mike

On Sep 11, 2008, at 4:10 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:


Do recent versions of Finale do anything about the problem of
melismas that cross system breaks? That is, the syllable continuation
dash stops at the end of the first system, and you have to insert a
syllable of some sort at the beginning of the second system to get
proper dashes for the melisma.

I just spent hours redoing a file after I'd screwed up they lyrics
trying to insert a sylllable to anchor the beginning of the system
break (I'm still on WinFin2K3), and would really like to know if this
has been fixed in recent versions of Finale.

There realy is no reason at all why Finale should not simply do
things the right way by default.

--
David W. Fentonhttp://dfenton.com
David Fenton Associates   http://dfenton.com/DFA/

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Lyrics: Is Melisma with System Break Fixed?

2008-09-11 Thread Michael L Meyer

On Sep 11, 2008, at 5:34 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:


Do you only get the proper hyphen at the beginning of system breaks
if you use auto hyphenation?



I believe so - in Document Options, there's a check-box for Use Smart  
Hyphens.  As far as I can tell, you only get automatic placement of  
hyphens at the beginning of systems with that checked.   Although, now  
that I was looking at it, I have changed the default maximum space  
between hyphens setting before -- so I was slightly off when I said I  
haven't changed the defaults.


I posted a JPG screenshot of that part of the lyric options window, if  
you'd like to take a look -- again, from MacFin2k8.  It's in my public  
folder at http://public.me.com/mlmmusic.


-- Mike
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Desktop versus laptop survey

2007-12-13 Thread Michael L. Meyer
Laptop 90% of the time overall, but I use my desktop for most of my  
Finale stuff.


-- Mike


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Text blocks on a single part

2007-11-09 Thread Michael L. Meyer
Thanks very much to Darcy and others for your answers and help.  And  
you're absolutely right, Darcy -- I haven't spent enough time  
learning the new stuff in 07 (and for that matter, 08).  I still have  
absolutely no clue what I'm doing with GPO, for example (I had  
skipped 06) -- but I also haven't gone through your tutorials yet.


Anyway, thanks again to all.

-- Mike


On Nov 8, 2007, at 12:04 PM, Darcy James Argue wrote:


Hi Michael,

When in part view, use the override key when invoking the  
contextual menu to hide the text expression *everywhere*, then,  
without using the override key, use the contextual menu to show the  
text expression only in that part. It's a two-step process, but  
it's much faster than going through the parts one by one.


I don't normally like telling people to RTFM, but the section in  
the Finale documentation on linked parts is very good, and is  
absolutely essential reading for anyone who wants to make use of  
this feature. It explains the use of the override key in detail and  
runs through the easiest way to get the results you want (show in  
score only, show in one part only, show in all parts but not score,  
etc).


- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


[Finale] Text blocks on a single part

2007-11-08 Thread Michael L. Meyer

Hey all --

Working mostly in FinMac07, at the moment 08.  I haven't been able to  
figure out, when working in a linked part, how to create a text block  
that appears in only the part I'm currently working on, without being  
created in all the other parts and the score as well.  Is this  
possible?  I've been looking in the HTML help, but can't find  
anything that addresses this.


TIA

-- Mike
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Text blocks on a single part

2007-11-08 Thread Michael L. Meyer
Thanks very much, Dennis and JD!  That's what I needed to know -- I  
tend not to use contextual menus, though I should more often.  I'd  
definitely speed up my work.


BTW -- this method with the text blocks seems odd to me -- shouldn't  
there be a way to toggle back and forth (as a preference, or menu  
item) between created text blocks appearing in the part only vs.  
score and all parts?  It's a PITA to create the block, then have to  
go through all the parts I DON'T want it to appear in, just so I can  
have it appear in one part only.  And for certain blocks, I prefer  
not to do it as an expression.


-- Mike

On Nov 8, 2007, at 11:13 AM, ThomaStudios wrote:

I've done this in FinMac07.  Create the text block in the score or  
the part, and hide it in the score.  Control-click the handle for  
the option.  IIRC, the keyboard command is Cmd-Opt-Cntl H (or maybe  
L).  My mind is fuzzy right now.


J D  Thomas
ThomaStudios

On Nov 8, 2007, at 7:04 AM, Michael L. Meyer wrote:


Hey all --

Working mostly in FinMac07, at the moment 08.  I haven't been able  
to figure out, when working in a linked part, how to create a text  
block that appears in only the part I'm currently working on,  
without being created in all the other parts and the score as  
well.  Is this possible?  I've been looking in the HTML help, but  
can't find anything that addresses this.


TIA

-- Mike
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Sib 5 Playback

2007-10-26 Thread Michael L. Meyer

Hi Dean --

I'm a lurker, and don't know much about Sibelius, but aren't you on a  
Mac?  And if that's the case, wouldn't you need an AU (Audio Unit)  
version of Kontakt installed, not VST?


Hoping this helps ...

-- Mike

On Oct 25, 2007, at 10:20 PM, Dean M. Estabrook wrote:

Yeah, I've been going though it over and over with Daniel and  
another Sib man, so far, everything seems to be installed and in  
the correct folders. The path from the Kontakt 2 Library to the  
needed files in the Ap Folder seems to be in place ... so far, at  
least,  the answer is not forthcoming. The Sib guys are really  
working hard to try and solve it.


Thanks,

Dean

On Oct 25, 2007, at 12:16 PM, dhbailey wrote:


Dean M. Estabrook wrote:
Yeah, I'm using Kontkt 2, the right hand panel in the set up  
window, at Daniel's suggestion, reads kontakt 2 VST, with the  
sound sets reading Sib essential sounds. This is the only  
combination, that I've found, at least,  that the program will  
allow to make any playback possible. His original suggestion was  
to have that panel read,Kontakt 2 VST, with GPO selected as the  
sound set. All that did was to constantly bring up the message,  
when I tried to play anything back or enter a note, Kontakt 2  
file can not be found. Please check to see it was loaded  
correctly into the Library.   Then, when the OK radio button is  
pushed (the only otion), the message just keeps reappearing,  
causing me to force quit the AP. Nope, as it is, it sounds just  
like the old fin softsynth stuff. So, I dunno. I certainly  
appreciate your time in responding to this. Do  you have the full  
GPO on your computer, or just the fin package?

Thanks,
Dean

[snip]

I do not have the full GPO, but in addition to the FinaleGPO  
stuff, I have the SibeliusGPO stuff (which is part of the Sibelius  
Sounds Essentials stuff).  Are you sure that it all got installed  
when you installed Sibelius?


--
David H. Bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Dean M. Estabrook
http://deanestabrook.googlepages.com/home

Don't worry about the end of the world, it's already tomorrow  
in Australia.


Charles Shultz






___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] OT: choir+piano layout

2007-08-01 Thread Michael L. Meyer
The publisher I see nowadays who almost always prints choral music on  
letter-size (or folded tabloid, same difference) is E.C. Schirmer.   
In fact, I just received a box of scores from them that, when you  
look inside and notice the amount of white space in the margins, are  
reprinted from an old octavo-sized score onto the letter-size paper.


There are a few other publishers who will use letter-size from time  
to time, but everything I've received from E.C. Schirmer in the past  
few years has been on letter-size paper.


-- Mike


On Aug 1, 2007, at 1:43 PM, John Howell wrote:


At 9:24 PM -0400 7/31/07, Lora Crighton wrote:

--- David W. Fenton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:


 On 29 Jul 2007 at 9:29, Christopher Smith wrote:

  The largest choral parts I have   ever seen are 8.5 x 11

 Commercially printed choral music is always octavo
 size, which is, of
 course, smaller than 8.5 x 11.



That didn't seem right, so I checked - I actually own
several pieces commercially printed choral music that
is letter size, and one that is a strange (to me)
size, being a bit taller  a bit narrower than letter.
 Most of my scores are early music, so perhaps that
makes a difference?


Unusual to find commercially printed letter size, but not  
surprising these days.  The taller and narrower pages you describe  
are almost certainly A4 size, the European equivalent of letter  
size.  I am not writing for publication, but for immediate use, and  
I use U.S. letter size exclusively because all U.S. business  
machines are set up to handle that size quickly and painlessly.


(We have a rather large population of international students, and  
every once in a while a student will turn in written work formatted  
for A4 as an electronic file.  Our department's printer is smart  
enough to recognize the difference and to wait for A4 paper, which  
of course we don't have, with the result that that one file holds  
up the queue waiting to be printed until someone notices and tells  
it to print anyway!!)


John


--
John R. Howell
Virginia Tech Department of Music
Blacksburg, Virginia, U.S.A 24061-0240
Vox (540) 231-8411  Fax (540) 231-5034
(mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.music.vt.edu/faculty/howell/howell.html
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] a hopeful sign

2007-07-13 Thread Michael L. Meyer

On Jul 13, 2007, at 7:49 AM, dc wrote:

This reminds me of the hyphen bug, that MM claimed to have solved  
with one of the first 2007 updates. Actually, only a small part of  
it was adressed, and the rest is still there in 2008. I've send  
quite a few messages and files to tech support, the last ones one  
week ago already, and am still waiting to here from them.


Don't know if it'll mean much, but hyphens definitely went missing in  
the arrangement I was just working on in 2007c (.  Once I retyped the  
syllables-plus-hyphens using Type Into Score, they were fine again,  
but it wasn't fun scouring 15 pages to find and fix the missing  
hyphens -- probably about 10 to 15 missing hyphens in all.


I will say, however, that I didn't help my situation -- I typed into  
score all along the way, in an arrangement that I did a few pages at  
a time, with much copying and pasting (including lyrics) between  
sections and between vocal parts.  I haven't wanted to get close to  
seeing what my lyrics look like in the Edit Lyrics window.  I did  
this consciously, knowing I might set myself up for problems, but it  
still doesn't change the fact that the bug is there and shouldn't be.


-- Mike

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Missing systems in Page View

2007-04-27 Thread Michael L. Meyer

Hi Brennon --

On the offchance that something got messed up accidentally -- like a  
huge number in the space between systems area of the Edit System  
Margins window -- here's what I would try:


Open the Edit System Margins window in Page Layout.  Put 0 in the  
Space Between Systems box, then enter From system 1 through 0,  
which will select all systems.  Click Apply and see what happens.


Frankly, I don't think this is the problem, but at least it's  
something else to try.


And also, see Chris's reply about the key command for Update Layout.   
Maybe you've been pressing the wrong thing?


-- Mike

On Apr 27, 2007, at 10:54 AM, Brennon Bortz wrote:

That's the command to show multiple pages on one screen in page  
view.  The problem is, Finale doesn't think there are multiple  
pages to display, so it's only showing me one--regardless of  
whether I've chosen to show multiple pages or not.  Still nothing.


--BB

On Apr 27, 2007, at 5:09 AM, Christopher Smith wrote:



On Apr 27, 2007, at 6:24 AM, dhbailey wrote:


Brennon Bortz wrote:

Hello list,
I've entered a bunch of music in scroll view, and then switched  
to page view.  There should be around 25 pages of music, or so.   
But, when I switched to Page view, only 13 were available.  I  
removed optimization--no help.  I removed system locks-- 
nothing.  I redefined all pages.  After doing so, now only the  
first page of music is available.  When I do something crazy,  
like use Fit Music to fit 99 measures to a system, I do in fact  
see 99 measures on the first page.  I know the music is there,  
but I can't seem to get to it.  I've tried update layout several  
times.  Changed update layout settings to remove system locks  
and reflow--nothing.  When I go into system margins, the  
reported space needed for an additional system is zero, which  
leads me to believe that Finale thinks it doesn't have another  
system to fit.  Tried to use Space Systems Evenly to force a  
second system on the first page.  Trashed preferences (both  
Finale 2006 Preferences and com.MakeMusic.Finale.plist in the  
Users/Library/Preferences folder).  I can successfully insert a  
blank page after the first and view it.  Can't get to any other  
pages by either clicking the arrows at the bottom of the screen  
or by typing in a page number.  Inserting a blank staff system  
after the first does nothing (I'm assuming the system was  
inserted...I just can't see it.)  Resizing all staff systems  
down to 15% still shows only one system on the first page.   
Using FinMac2006d.  I'd appreciate any ideas.


In page layout you need to update the layout to show the added  
pages. On windows machines, that's ctrl-u but I'm not sure what  
it is on a mac.




on Mac it's command-\

But he said he updated layout already, several times.

Whenever Finale starts behaving unexpectedly like this, it's a  
good time to quit, logout and log back in again. A couple of times  
I've needed to restart, but logout and in seems to solve a lot of  
flakiness. Let us know how this works.


Christopher



___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Brennon Bortz
Teaching Assistant and Graduate Student - Music Composition
University of California, Riverside
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Missing systems in Page View

2007-04-27 Thread Michael L. Meyer

On Apr 27, 2007, at 12:33 PM, Brennon C. Bortz wrote:


  Mike,

  I've been trying Command-/ and Command-\ (which both
  seem to be a shortcut for Show Multiple Pages) as
  well as Command-D for Update Layout.



See, now I thought Command-D was to redraw the screen.  What version  
are you on?  I have 2007, but I still mostly use 2004.  Are these  
commands that changed in the newer versions?



  I'm not at that computer now, but I'll try what
  you've suggested in an hour or so.  I appreciate the
  idea, but I'm afraid this isn't the problem either.
  If there was an enourmous amount of space between
  staves, wouldn't this give me even more pages than I
  expect, instead of only one?


Possibly, but I've seen interesting things happen in that window with  
interesting numbers -- always by accident, but interesting  
nonetheless.  Maybe there's a large negative number and Finale  
doesn't know what to do with it either.  I have very little  
confidence that this is actually but the problem, but I feel like  
I've had a similar problem before to what you're having now, and that  
the solution was something really simple that I had overlooked for a  
long time before realizing it.




  As this is a composition that I have to have to
  performers by Monday, I need to find a solution on
  very short order.  I have a huge number of
  expressions to place and notes to place in the
  score--you know how new music goes.  I guess I could
  do this in Scroll View and just wait to find a
  solution, but I'm wondering if there's a better way
  to go about this.  What would happen if I just
  copied everything into a blank document?  I have no
  libraries loaded that aren't already in my default
  document.  I do have a few custom shapes that I've
  created, however.  Is this all that I will lose?
  Obviously, page formatting isn't an issue, as I
  haven't been able to operate in Page View yet.  Any
  thoughts?



I really can't think of anything else, based on what you've said  
you've done.  Whenever I have problems with seeing things the way I  
think I'm supposed to be seeing them, I always do a few things in the  
same order:


1. In Mass Edit, select all and select Apply Note Spacing.  (Of  
course, other people might choose different spacing options.)
2. Make sure (in Page View) that the first page of the document is  
open/active and select Update Layout.  (which usually is Command-\)

3. Select Screen Redraw.  (which usually is Command-D)

That usually takes care of all possible visual problems with Finale.   
But I think you said you've done these things, so I for one am baffled.


If you'd like, feel free to attach the file to an e-mail and send it  
to me off-list, and I can try a couple of things to see what might  
work.  I'm on my MacBook, though, which only has 2007 on it.  (I  
haven't done any of the updaters yet.)


-- Mike


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Missing systems in Page View

2007-04-27 Thread Michael L. Meyer

Sorry -- just to clarify -- I realized that when I wrote:

... but I feel like I've had a similar problem before to what  
you're having now, and that the solution was something really  
simple that I had overlooked for a long time before realizing it.




... it's different than what I meant -- and also really  
condescending, which I didn't mean to be!  I meant that whatever the  
solution was for the problem that I had, I've forgotten what it was  
now, but I remember it was something obvious and overlooked.


And now I think I'm making even less sense.  Sorry.

-- Mike
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] O.T. Joshua Bell at L'Enfant Plaza

2007-04-10 Thread Michael L. Meyer
I must say I'm really enjoying this discussion, and seeing/agreeing  
with points on the different sides of the different issues raised.   
However, this one point:


On Apr 10, 2007, at 12:09 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:


But it is a cultural difference -- a difference between people who
live their lives on inflexible schedules (and leave no time for
anything else) and people who are less rigid about it.


doesn't make sense to me.  I am a person with a pretty definitive  
schedule, and a busy one, at that.  Why should it follow, then, that  
I have no time for anything else?  Or more specifically, don't have  
time to appreciate good aesthetic experiences?  Just because I might  
have to pass by the world-famous violinist in the subway because I  
need to get to work on time in the morning?


And though I may not stop to listen, why does it automatically follow  
that I didn't appreciate the beauty of the music?  Perhaps as I  
walked by I said to myself, Wow, that is beautiful music-making.  I  
wish I could stop to hear more.  Is that reaction less valid than  
that of the person who thinks that AND stops?  That's just unfair.


I went to a concert of one of my all-time favorites, Billy Joel, a  
month or so ago.  The drunk people in the row in front of me were  
whooping, hollering, and dancing to the music.  I stood and listened,  
observed, and took it all in.  Would a third party conclude that the  
people in front of me had a better appreciation for Billy's music  
than me, simply because they showed a more physical response?



And I really think that's what the major contribution of the article
was -- we should consider how our life choices about work have an
effect on our ability to experience and appreciate art and esthetics.


I can see the point about experiencing art, yes.  But not  
appreciating it.  Just because I have more time in the evening to go  
and seek good aesthetic experiences -- to fit them AROUND my  
inflexible schedule -- doesn't change my level of appreciation for  
those experiences, even the ones I don't have time for.


As I said above, just because I don't (or CAN'T) stop to listen to  
the busker, doesn't mean I don't (or can't) appreciate his/her art.


Or in a different context: even though I must do my grocery shopping  
at certain times, I still sing along with that really good song that  
comes on over the speakers.


Perhaps that last sentence doesn't quite make the point the way I'd  
like it to, but the point IS this: my appreciation of art or  
aesthetics isn't dimmed by any time limits put on it by my schedule.


-- Mike
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] O.T. Joshua Bell at L'Enfant Plaza

2007-04-10 Thread Michael L. Meyer

On Apr 10, 2007, at 3:49 PM, Kim Patrick Clow wrote:


Someone wrote (I forget who ;)


I am a person with a pretty definitive
schedule, and a busy one, at that.  Why should it follow, then, that
I have no time for anything else?  Or more specifically, don't have
time to appreciate good aesthetic experiences?  Just because I might
have to pass by the world-famous violinist in the subway because I
need to get to work on time in the morning?


I suppose I'm lucky that I have a job that arriving 5 minutes late
isn't that big of a deal; and considering how many others stop and
watch musicians in NYC's subways, I'm guessing they can be a few
minutes late too.  People take time for things they value, so if
Washingtonians decided to ignore Joshua Bell, then oh well, that's
their loss.


It was me who wrote it.  And you are lucky, Kim, to have a job like  
that.  You're definitely not the norm.  I don't think you quite  
caught the gist of my message, though.


Of course I stop and watch musicians when I am able to do so.  But,  
for example, what if I am really enjoying the music from a person  
performing in the subway, but can't stay to listen, because if I take  
too long, then I will miss the curtain of the other aesthetic  
experience I'm on my way to, like a Broadway show?  And, in fact,  
since I don't live in NYC anymore, this is exactly my experience when  
I am in the City nowadays.


My point here is that my passing by the busker doesn't mean I value  
his art any less than if I had stopped.  It certainly *could* mean  
that, but not necessarily.  And you're right, it *is* my loss, but  
doesn't the fact that I do recognize it as a loss then prove that I  
value it?


I think I'm basically piggybacking on Darcy's (and others') notion  
that people stopping or not stopping doesn't automatically prove  
whether the people in the Washington station valued what they were  
hearing or not.  Hearing something of value in the music is only ONE  
possible reason for stopping or not stopping, and even hearing  
something of value in the music doesn't *determine* whether a person  
would have stopped -- there could be other more pressing concerns  
(like I need to be on time to work).


The unscientific nature of the experiment really does end up  
defeating it: a quantitative measure of whether people stop to  
listen or not is not nearly as effective as qualitatively following  
up with all those commuters afterwards, and asking for their  
reasoning.  I know it would be nearly impossible to do that (and I  
know they did it with a few), but that's part of the point too, isn't  
it?


-- Mike
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Piano selections for a funeral?

2007-01-14 Thread Michael L. Meyer
Thanks very much to everyone who sent suggestions, both on- and off-list.
It is very much appreciated.  There were a number that, I think, were
probably in the back of my mind, but would have taken a long time of sifting
through my music library to make their way to the front.  Thanks for helping
me fast-track!

And thanks for the anecdotes and stories as well!  I'm not sure how my
wife's family feels about it, but I get through just about everything in my
life with humor, so thanks for helping me keep along.

This list continues to amaze.  I appreciate your efforts.

-- Mike


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


[Finale] OT (and kind of depressing): Piano selections for a funeral?

2007-01-12 Thread Michael L. Meyer
Hello all --

Sorry for the OT post -- this is the best place I know to get advice on ALL
things musical.

My wife's grandfather passed away this week, and we will be heading over for
the memorial service on Monday.  I've been asked to play for the service --
there are two hymns during the service (Amazing Grace and The Old Rugged
Cross -- not a problem, even for this Jewish guy), and then I'll need some
music for the 15-20 minutes before the service begins, plus something to
play at the end.

The question is: what music?  I've done more than my share of weddings and
parties and cocktail hours, but never a memorial service.  My
grandmother-in-law asked for what she described as you know, light
classical and my father-in-law said elevator music.  Those of you gigging
keyboardists out there: what are some art (nonpop, whatever you like) music
pieces -- even if cliché -- that I can whip out and read through pretty
easily?

I figured second movement of the Beethoven Pathetique worked pretty well,
but hadn't gotten much beyond there.  I have a decently stocked piano music
library at home, and figured to start browsing through it this evening, but
it would be great if my browsing had some direction to it.

Any and all suggestions are appreciated.  Come to think of it, pop music
choices are fine too.  Please feel free to respond on- or off-list.

TIA!

-- Mike



___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Trouble adding a natural to a note.

2006-12-14 Thread Michael L. Meyer
On 12/14/06 11:48 PM, Kim Patrick Clow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 http://www.bytenet.net/kpclow/finale/flat-to-add.jpg
 
 The note that is pointed with an arrow (G), needs a natural added to
 it. But Finale will not let me (I'm assuming because it thinks this
 note hasn't had a # before). What would be a solution to adding a
 natural sign?

Hi Kim --

I assume you just mean to add a courtesy accidental.  I don't know how you
do it in anything other than Speedy entry, but in Speedy entry, put the
cursor on the note in question and press asterisk (*).

-- Mike


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] O.T. Christmas Trees on the Finale List

2006-12-06 Thread Michael L. Meyer
Thanks very much, Kim!  A little slice of home (I grew up in New York).  I
am most yearning for NYC at holiday-time right now!

-- Mike


On 12/5/06 11:23 PM, Kim Patrick Clow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 With the cold weather and Christmas season upon us, I wanted to share
 with the wonderful people on this list pictures of the Christmas Tree
 that I'm so lucky to see everyday at work.
 
 This is Rockefeller Plaza's tree; and from what I understand, it's one
 of the nicer trees they've had. When I leave work at night, it's
 really beautiful to walk by and listen to the music and enjoy the
 lights--watching the skaters on the rink below.
 
 Since there are so many people on this list, it'd be really wonderful
 to see Christmas trees from your part of the world, so feel free to
 share ;)
 
 
 http://www.bytenet.net/kpclow/christmas_2006/ are the photos I have posted.
 
 
 Thanks much,
 
 Kim Patrick Clow
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale



___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Importing a score

2006-10-26 Thread Michael L. Meyer
On 10/26/06 6:13 AM, dhbailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Yes, and the process can be made even more accurate if several things
 are done:
 
 1) the midi file is quantized in a sequencer program -- PowerTracksPro
 is a very inexpensive sequencer from www.pgmusic.com which can do this.
 The quantization needs to be done to a level where notational accuracy
 can be gotten, even if the actual sound of the midi file isn't what is
 desired.  Such as removing the swing from a jazz file, and quantizing to
 8th notes.
 
 2) the quantization settings in Finale match those used in step 1, so
 that Finale will know how to deal with the data it will find in the midi
 file.  Since Finale shouldn't have to actually apply any quantization to
 the file (assuming that step 1 was done), it won't have a chance to
 screw things up.

If I remember MIDI import correctly (and it's been a long time since I've
used it, so I may not be correct), it will also save a lot of work if the
note values in the MIDI file are long enough to represent the note you want.
For example, I seem to remember that notes meant to be quarter notes where
the key was actually pressed for a shorter amount of time (perhaps because
one was using a sustain pedal or something) would get imported as an eighth
note and an eighth rest.

In most sequencers, this involves dragging the end of the piano-roll
notation to be closer to where it technically should end, given the note
value you want it to be once imported.  Can be a PITA (and will also mess up
the playback of the actual MIDI file to a degree), but probably less of a
PITA than changing eighth-note-eighth-rest combos to full quarter notes once
in Finale.

-- Mike


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Importing a score

2006-10-26 Thread Michael L. Meyer
On 10/26/06 1:01 PM, Randolph Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Michael L. Meyer wrote:
 
 In most sequencers, this involves dragging the end of the piano-roll
 notation to be closer to where it technically should end, given the note
 value you want it to be once imported.  Can be a PITA (and will also mess up
 the playback of the actual MIDI file to a degree), but probably less of a
 PITA than changing eighth-note-eighth-rest combos to full quarter notes once
 in Finale.
 
 I find that it is much more efficient to
 
 1) quantize the endings of notes in a separate pass from quantizing
 the note beginnings (up to the nearest quarter or eighth note or
 whatever), or
 
 2) choose a function that moves the endings of notes to the nearest
 note beginning.
 
 You probably have only a few note endings to drag after doing these
 operations.
 
 -Randolph Peters

That's true -- I forgot that most programs have the ability to quantize
endings -- it's been a while since I've had to do something like that.  And
my main program for sequencing nowadays is Logic, which I don't believe has
functions to work on note endings in Matrix view -- certainly helped me to
forget about programs which can do it!

-- Mike


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] OT: Harmonic Rhythm

2006-09-13 Thread Michael L. Meyer
On 9/12/06 10:45 PM, A-NO-NE Music [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Michael Meyer responded off list, which helped me a lot.  I am not sure
 why he didn't respond to the list and I certainly hope he doesn't mind I
 am mentioning here.

Sorry -- I wasn't sure if what I had to say would have been of interest to
the whole list, but I'm happy to paste my original response to Hiro below.
I hesitated to just call what Hiro was describing form, as it's the
umbrella term and not nearly specific enough to describe the KIND of form he
was talking about.

My original message below:
--
Hi Hiro --

I'm not sure of the term exactly (there may not be one in English), and am
looking forward to seeing if someone has an answer.  But two ideas spring to
mind that might relate (perhaps where an answer might be found):

One is the theoretical idea of hypermeter (most notably espoused by William
Rothstein in _Phrase Rhythm in Tonal Music_).  Hypermeter is more about the
grouping of measures into larger units, not necessarily equal, and not
always with larger sections reflecting the same priorities as smaller
sections -- but it might be a place to start looking for an answer to your
question.

The other, of course, would be the Fibonacci sequence and the Golden Ratio,
which are very much reflected by where the climax occurs in your
description.  And since every smaller division reflects every larger
division in your description, that fits as well.  Fibonacci doesn't explain
all the details of the four sections, but at least its a mathematical
explanation of why the climax is where it is.

Don't know if this helps you at all -- thought I'd give it a shot.  I look
forward to seeing what other listmembers say.

-

-- Mike


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] OT: closing kit gesture at the end of a piece?

2006-09-10 Thread Michael L. Meyer
Back when I sang a cappella in college, and the vocal percussionist was the
one who had to do the aforementioned button, we called it what it sounded
like: a Kick a Jew.  Which, while completely inappropriate, was still
funny because I'm Jewish and was the vocal percussionist.  Except for when
they kicked me.

-- Mike (who's almost sorry to have added absolutely nothing productive to
the discussion)


On 9/10/06 1:54 PM, Andrew Stiller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 On Sep 9, 2006, at 9:06 PM, Matthew Hindson Fastmail acct wrote:
 
 I'm sure the wisdom of this list can help me here:
 
 Is there a name for the drum kit cliche that typically (used to) close
 off the final chord of soft jazz/lounge pieces?  It sort of sounds
 like a triplet down the toms down to the kick drum/snare.
 
 
 Chickaboom. But it starts w. hi-hat and is certainly not a triplet.
 
 Andrew Stiller
 Kallisti Music Press
 http://home.netcom.com/~kallisti/
 
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale



___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] OT: Mac Pro unveiled

2006-08-09 Thread Michael L. Meyer
On 8/9/06 11:49 AM, Eric Dannewitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I just played a classic recording session and they used ProTools.Are
 you saying ProTools isn't a serious pro mastering application? I can't
 think of anyone who doesn't use ProTools...and Digidesign announced
 Intel versions of Protools for Mac OS X in September.

Actually, no -- ProTools isn't a mastering application.  Sure, people use it
for mastering, and it IS of course the industry standard for digital audio
recording (much to my chagrin, since I'm a Logic guy) -- but it is NOT a
serious mastering application.  Not like some of the other ones Johannes
mentioned.

-- Mike


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] TAN: iKeys latest version

2006-07-28 Thread Michael L. Meyer
Robert --

I've been thinking about getting FinMac2007, and I have a possibility at
school to get a MacBook, so if I do both, I won't need to worry about
Rosetta.  If I don't get 2007 and make the Intel move, though, I'd be
running Fin2004 with Rosetta.  It seems from your e-mail that you're using a
pre-2007 version (?) with your Intel mini.  Do you experience any noticeable
slowdowns under Rosetta?

TIA.

-- Mike


On 7/28/06 2:13 PM, Robert Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I never got off of iKey version 1.0.7, since version 2.x was so roundly
 trashed in this forum. Does anyone have anything good to say about the
 latest version of iKey?
 
 BTW: I've been able to use iKey 1.0.7 under Rosetta on an Intel MacMini.
 It works because it is a stand-alone program. So I could continue to use
 v. 1.0.7 indefinitely.
 
 The problem is, it apparently doesn't do sequences. For various arcane
 reasons, I'm going to need to change some of my menu hit macros from a
 single menu hit to 3 menu hits in sequence, and I can't see any way to
 do this in iKey 1.0.7. Perhaps it is time to move up to QuickKeys.

-- 
Michael L. Meyer Music Services
*Original Compositions for Any Occasion 602 Windcrest Road
*Vocal and Instrumental ArrangingDurham, NC 27713
*Vocal and Instrumental Accompanying919.806.3317
*Computer Engraving and Sequencing   919.349.1809
*Keyboard Music for Weddings and Parties[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] OT - Mac keyboard

2006-04-13 Thread Michael L. Meyer
On 4/12/06 11:47 PM, Mark D Lew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Apr 12, 2006, at 3:51 PM, Chuck Israels wrote:
 
 A few days ago I spilled sugared coffee on my keyboard and rendered
 many keys sticky - a mess.  I used this as an excuse to try a new one
 - a Macally iceKEY.  It has short throw, scissor switch based keys -
 like a laptop keyboard.  They don't stick at all, and I find it good
 for what I like to feel under my fingers.  I know, I am an unrepentant
 gadget whore (maybe gadget John is more apropos), but this one seems
 to be quite good.
 
 I wish I had gotten an IceKey.  Someone convinced me that the standard
 Apple extended would be fine, so I got that instead.  The old Apple
 Extended keyboard from way back when was an excellent keyboard, but the
 current one is crap.

Out of curiosity, I went to the MacAlly website to check it out.  Now I'm
still curious -- what's the difference between the IceKey and the iKeySlim,
other than $40 and some small visual differences?  I couldn't really tell
from the website.

-- Mike


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] OT - Mac keyboard

2006-04-13 Thread Michael L. Meyer
Thanks, Chuck.  I guess I should have paid more attention to slim keys
versus ultra slim keys than I did.

It's funny -- most people I talk to hate the feel of laptop keyboards, but I
love the feel of my PowerBook.  Perhaps I'll look into this for my home
computer ...

-- M


On 4/13/06 10:47 AM, Chuck Israels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Mike -
 
 Big difference, as far as I can tell: the kind of keys.  The iceKey
 has short throw, nearly flat, keys that are like those on laptop
 keyboards, rather than keys that are about 3/8ths of an inch high,
 like most separate computer keyboards, and the keys don't have any
 tendency to stick.  If anything gets between the keys of a normal
 keyboard, the side of one can rub against the side of the adjacent
 key, making it sticky.  Can't happen with these short throw keys.
 The switches under the keys are also different.  They feel
 different.  You might like it, or you might not.  I could understand
 a preference for a longer keystroke but, if you like the feel of
 laptop keyboards, you'll like this one.
 
 Chuck
 
 
 On Apr 13, 2006, at 5:34 AM, Michael L. Meyer wrote:
 
 On 4/12/06 11:47 PM, Mark D Lew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 On Apr 12, 2006, at 3:51 PM, Chuck Israels wrote:
 
 A few days ago I spilled sugared coffee on my keyboard and rendered
 many keys sticky - a mess.  I used this as an excuse to try a new
 one
 - a Macally iceKEY.  It has short throw, scissor switch based keys -
 like a laptop keyboard.  They don't stick at all, and I find it good
 for what I like to feel under my fingers.  I know, I am an
 unrepentant
 gadget whore (maybe gadget John is more apropos), but this one seems
 to be quite good.
 
 I wish I had gotten an IceKey.  Someone convinced me that the
 standard
 Apple extended would be fine, so I got that instead.  The old Apple
 Extended keyboard from way back when was an excellent keyboard,
 but the
 current one is crap.
 
 Out of curiosity, I went to the MacAlly website to check it out.
 Now I'm
 still curious -- what's the difference between the IceKey and the
 iKeySlim,
 other than $40 and some small visual differences?  I couldn't
 really tell
 from the website.
 
 -- Mike
 
 
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
 
 Chuck Israels
 230 North Garden Terrace
 Bellingham, WA 98225-5836
 phone (360) 671-3402
 fax (360) 676-6055
 www.chuckisraels.com
 
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale



___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] disk formatting?

2005-11-30 Thread Michael L. Meyer
On 11/30/05 1:13 PM, Andrew Stiller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 As to the point above, tho, I find it hard to believe. 1st-gen. iMacs
 were the first to have no floppy drive. If they can't burn data to a
 CD, then they can't copy to removable media at all!
 

Andrew --

You're right -- they can't.  I have, in fact, a 2nd-generation iMac (one of
the five flavors - mine's tangerine!), and when I bought it, I had to also
buy an Imation SuperDrive to be able to save to floppies (and SuperDisks).
When I moved to my current iMac G4, it was a pain in the butt to move over
all my files, that's for sure.

-- Mike


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Hardware question

2005-11-01 Thread Michael L. Meyer
On 11/1/05 2:51 PM, Morris Inouye [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Which separate Number keypad do you use?
 

I use a Kensington Pocket Keypad with my PowerBook.  (I had an Amazon
Giftcard for $25 and the Keypad cost around $25 with free shipping, so I
basically got it for free!)  It works nicely, easy plug-n-play into USB, and
has two more USB ports in the back, so it works as a hub.  This is really
good for me, since I usually have one USB port already used up with my
little MIDI controller, and I prefer to use a mouse rather than the
trackpad.  This way I can get all three plugged in to the two USB ports on
the PowerBook, and still have one port left over if I need it!

The only drawback is, like the one Johannes mentioned, it doesn't have a =
(equals) on it.  But, the one next to the Delete button on the main keyboard
works just fine.  Just takes a little getting used to.

-- Mike


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] November

2005-10-26 Thread Michael L. Meyer
On 10/26/05 3:44 PM, dhbailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 When I look at all the various publishers who have been in business a
 long long time, with all the various engravers' work, the more I find it
 doesn't matter as long as the music is legible, not hard on the eyes and
 is clearly laid out so time doesn't have to be wasted by musicians
 trying to decipher what's meant.
 
 The vast differences in appearance between BreitkopfHartel,
 BooseyHawkes, Schott, European-American, G. Schirmer, E.C. Schirmer,
 Carl Fischer, Southern Music, plus countless smaller houses, make me
 realize that clarity is the only issue -- if a font looks good to you
 and you lay the music out properly, that's what counts.
 
 House rules govern much of the appearance issues, and they are as
 important as (if not more so than) font issues.

Thanks for sharing your opinion, David -- I very much agree with your
assessment.  I suppose what's got me thinking about this more lately is that
I've never really had a specific problem with Maestro -- it's always been
acceptable for my needs -- but I also haven't been able to shake a certain
feeling that there was something better out there.  Of course, the fact that
I can't put my finger on exactly what it is that gives me that feeling
doesn't really help me to figure out a preferred replacement.

-- Mike


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


[Finale] November

2005-10-25 Thread Michael L. Meyer
All the discussion of fonts recently has got me revisiting my own thoughts
about what I use in Finale.  I'm also about to get back into some serious
arranging for my ensembles at school and thought now would be a good time to
get some of the things I've been considering.  (Just bought Bill Duncan's
Chord Symbols, dontchaknow!)

I'm okay with Maestro, but in the past have considered purchasing the
November font for a little different look, and (as they put it in their
marketing) something a little softer on the eyes.  I'm considering it again
now, and thought the wisdom of members on this list might have something to
share about it.  $80 is a significant plunge for me.

Has anyone here used it?  Have you liked it?  Does it have significant
limitations?  What do you prefer/not prefer in it versus Maestro?  I checked
out/printed out some of the sample PDFs from their website, and it looks
nice, but I'm just worried I'm missing something.

Thanks to anyone who's able to weigh in.

-- Mike


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


[Finale] Finale in education in the States (Was: Is this a Finale or Sibelius list?)

2005-07-14 Thread Michael L. Meyer
On 7/14/05 9:08 AM, Colin Broom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I'd be interested in hearing more about Finale in education elsewhere.  I've
 always had this (probably largely unfounded) idea that Finale is for the
 most part still the prominent product in the States, is this true?
 
 Colin.

Based on my personal experiences, Finale still has the edge -- but the
distance is shrinking.  (I've personally been a Finale user since 1995 or so
-- version 3.0.1).

At the first high school I taught at (a district on Long Island, NY) we had
a computer music lab of about five computers, with Finale installed -- full
version, this was before Allegro and PrintMusic etc. etc.  The middle school
used a few copies as well.  Sibelius was around by then, but I didn't see it
anywhere.

When I went to grad school (large conservatory within a public university)
there were a few Sibelius users here and there, but the overwhelming
majority used Finale.  The school had officially adopted Finale as well (it
was installed on all school computers), and students were even required to
complete assignments within Finale for a jazz arranging class I took.

At my next high school job there were no music department (or music
department accessible) computer labs -- so each teacher chose what they
wanted for their personal work.  I still used Finale, but the Band teacher
used Sibelius, mostly because that's what the guy who did his marching band
arrangements (the band director at the other high school in the district)
used.  I believe Sibelius was used by the majority of elementary/middle
school music teachers in the district as well.

In my current job, we use Finale at the Upper School (9th-12th grades)
level, because I'm the only music teacher at the Upper School, and that's
what I wanted.  The middle school music teachers have chosen Sibelius,
although they don't use it with the kids much yet.  Many of my colleagues in
the area seem to be leaning towards or already using Sibelius.  The learning
curve on Sibelius sucked for me because I was already so used to Finale, but
if the learning curve is that much better for people first coming into
computer notation in general, it makes sense that schools are choosing
Sibelius.  Besides, it's not like elementary, middle, or high schoolers need
professional-quality engraving for their projects ...

So, mostly personal/anecdotal experience, but over the 10-12 years of my
career, I've seen a gradual shift towards Sibelius in education.  I'm also a
Mac guy, and this market change seems rather similar to the gradual change
from Apple towards PC (esp. Dell) in schools.

My $0.02.

-- Mike


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] OT: Shareware Multitrack Audio App for Mac?

2005-06-24 Thread Michael L. Meyer
A quick brainstorming-type suggestion, Darcy -- if the saving of audio in
the four passes and moving it to Audacity worked, and you just want the
multimeasure rests to get out of the way, is it possible for you to
configure each pass with one or two instruments from each family playing in
combination, rather than families at a time?  Then you should come close to
having at least one instrument playing at all times within each pass.

-- Mike


On 6/24/05 3:53 AM, Darcy James Argue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi Don,
 
 When I saved to audio in four passes (i.e., ww's, brass, perc, and
 strings) and tried to align them, the tempo drift seemed to happen
 almost exclusively during long rests -- i.e., the percussion would come
 in several beats too early.  (I'm telling you, it's just like real
 life!)
 
 Luckily, there was no noticeable tempo drift when the GPO instruments
 were actually playing -- so it was really just a matter of lining up
 the initial entrances after every (sectional) multi-measure rest.
 
 What I'm wondering is whether HP takes into account muted (or
 non-soloed) instruments when playing back -- especially when it comes
 to fermattas, etc.  If HP only looks at the instruments that have been
 soloed in the Instrument List, that would explain all those bad
 entrances!  On the one hand, it makes sense for HP to ignore
 muted/non-soloed instruments -- after all, why take into account staves
 that aren't set for playback.  On the other hand, the lack of a
 consistent tempo between takes makes aligning multiple passes an
 incredible chore.
 
 I'm going to CC Robert Piéchaud on this -- perhaps he can shed some
 light on this issue.  I really think that HP should abide by a
 consistent master tempo map no matter which instruments have been
 soloed or muted.
 
 - Darcy
 -
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Brooklyn, NY
 
 
 On 24 Jun 2005, at 3:38 AM, Don Hart wrote:
 
 Glad Audacity worked for you - sorry to hear about the other problems.
 Seems like the barline would be the perfect point of reference to keep
 that
 sort of thing from happening.
 
 If I had to vote, I'd choose Human Playback as the culprit over GPO.
 Sometimes, when I play back a section of a file several times
 consecutively
 and re-humanize it each time, I wonder if I'm not noticing little
 differences from playback to playback.  If that is what I'm hearing,
 while
 not actually looking for discrepancies, it seems the magnitude of those
 differences would easily be capable of making the mess you had to deal
 with.
 
 Seems like a cumulative problem that gets worse over longer, busier
 passages.  Did you try lining up sections of shorter length?
 
 Don Hart
 
 
 
 on 6/24/05 1:35 AM, Darcy James Argue at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Thanks, Don.  Audacity was *exactly* what I was looking for.
 
 On a related note, though, I was surprised how much tempo drift there
 was between the two audio tracks I recorded.  I know GPO sometimes
 drops frames when it gets overloaded (resulting in an accel. effect),
 so I tried splitting the orchestra in four to avoid taxing my poor Mac
 mini, but that was even worse.  I had imagined that if I just got the
 *beginning* of both files aligned, they would stay aligned for the
 entire piece, but that was absolutely not the case.  In fact, I had to
 hand-align practically every entrance.  (It's almost like Human
 Playback is a little *too* human when it comes to counting
 multimeasure
 rests.)
 
 Long story short, it was an incredible PITA to get everything aligned,
 and required hours of trial-and-error hand-tweaking.  So I'm *really*
 hoping NI get their act together on the Mac side, because this is just
 ridiculous.  (Unfortunately, the move to MacIntel doesn't exactly give
 them a lot of incentive to optimize their PPC code.  Sigh.)
 
 - Darcy
 -
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Brooklyn, NY
 
 
 On 24 Jun 2005, at 12:06 AM, Don Hart wrote:
 
 Darcy,
 
 If I have an accurate understanding of what you need and what this
 program
 will do, Audacity is what you're looking for.  I haven't yet needed
 to
 do
 what you're doing, but in my time with the program it was very
 intuitive.
 My experience observing guys use ProTools seemed to help me get
 around
 Audacity.  Anyway, you can check it out:
 
 http://audacity.sourceforge.net/
 
 I was really impressed; I hope it helps.
 
 Don Hart
 
 
 on 6/23/05 10:17 PM, Darcy James Argue at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Okay, it's that time...
 
 I need to make an audio demo of an orchestration I've written.  As
 those of you who have GPO for Mac know only too well, my 1.42 GHz
 Mac
 mini doesn't have nearly enough horsepower to drive GPO through a
 large
 orchestral score ( / 4331 / Timp+Perc / Harp / Solo Vln /
 Strings).
 
 I've done all my usual GPO tricks (*drastically* reduce polyphony on
 percussion and harp, bypass reverb, set sample rate to 22.05 KHz),
 but
 I can still only really get half the orchestra to play back reliably
 at
 any given time.  So that's exactly what 

Re: [Finale] OT: Browsers

2005-02-25 Thread Michael L. Meyer
On 2/25/05 7:22 PM, Simon Troup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 No support for Safari. They need to do more homework.

Actually, it worked fine for me in Safari.  I wonder what the difference was
...?

-- Mike


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] [OT] Curious ... who did it?

2005-01-28 Thread Michael L. Meyer
On 1/28/05 1:12 PM, John Howell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 At 12:40 PM -0500 1/28/05, Michael L. Meyer wrote:
 If your reply was more light-hearted than that, John, then I apologize --
 but it's too hard to read into people's tone of voice on e-mail, and I
 have had too many listserv experiences (here, the Logic-Users forum, heck
 even the listserv for my homeowners' association) with people who take far
 too many liberties while typing on a keyboard that they wouldn't dream of
 when talking to a person face to face.
 
 I did, indeed, intend to be light-hearted, and I appologize to YOU if
 you took it otherwise.  It was not so meant at all.  (I should have
 used a smiley, I guess.  8-)  1936 happens to be the year I was born,
 so maybe I felt a little proprietary!  The only way to copy music was
 by hand, and I did plenty of it.
 
 John
 

All right -- I probably should have known better.  I probably am just
oversensitive due to some of those other experiences.  (Anyone else a member
of my homeowner's association?  Those people are vicious!)  I won't use up
any more of people's bandwidth or time with it.  Thanks, John.

-- Mike


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


[Finale] [OT] Curious ... who did it?

2005-01-25 Thread Michael L. Meyer
Title: [OT] Curious ... who did it?



Hey yall --

Sorry for the OT post, but I figured it was a happy one so no one would mind. I was at rehearsal last night, and got curious. Did anybody on this list engrave the Vaughan Williams Dona Nobis Pacem choral score for Oxford University Press? Im only curious because I wanted to say thanks and congrats ... it is one of the best-looking, easiest-to-read, neatest choral scores Ive ever seen. Which is especially lovely to see considering the difficulty of the actual music.

Unless it was a Sibelius person ... I dont subscribe to that list.

-- Mike



___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] [OT] Curious ... who did it?

2005-01-25 Thread Michael L. Meyer
On 1/25/05 1:05 PM, Andrew Stiller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 On Jan 25, 2005, at 12:31 PM, Dean M. Estabrook wrote:
 
 Perhaps it would not be beyond the pale (sp?) to give credit on a
 score to the engraver, as well as composer, arr., etc. After all, it
 is artistry, no?
 
 
 There is actually a long historical tradition of doing just that. In a
 great many pre-computer editions, you will see an engraver credit at
 the bottom right corner of the last page of music, in the form Joe
 Blow, eng. There's no reason this practice shouldn't be continued.
 
 To the best of my knowledge, such credits are put in by engravers on
 their own initiative, simply as a way of signing  their work.
 

After reading this, Andrew, I checked the back page and found
Processed and printed by Halstan  Co. Ltd., Amersham, Bucks.,
England.  Maybe it's not computer-engraved?  Because it certainly
seems so ... all I know is it impressed this mostly-lurker enough to
post ...

Not that I ever got into the music OR education business for the
glory, but it sure would be nice if engraving credit were given with
regularity/consistency.  I lucked out that the few professional
engraving jobs I've worked happened to have a wide distribution -- if
my name were in the credits I'm sure it could have helped my business,
instead of my having gone back to a day job ... ah, well.  I do like
my day job.

-- Mike





___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] OT: Printer question

2004-10-06 Thread Michael L. Meyer
This is rather late -- I posted my question, then was unable to get back to
the computer and the list for a good couple of weeks -- but I just wanted to
publicly acknowledge and thank those who were able to reply to my printer
question.  Differing viewpoints, as always, and lots of food for thought.
I'm still not sure what the final decision will be, but I at least have a
bit more information and actual user's experiences to go on.  Thanks again.

-- Mike


 Michael L. Meyer wrote:
 Hello all --
 
 I¹ve read some of the printer discussions in the past, and thought I
 might run this question by you all.  Does anyone have/what do you think
 of the HP Deskjet 9650?  I¹m looking for a printer that gives as close
 to laser-quality output as possible (but I by no means do anything that
 requires archival-quality or publishable stuff) and will print on
 large-size paper (at least 11x17, although the 9650 brochure says it
 goes up to 13x19).  At the same time, this printer is for use in our
 home, and my wife and I would like to be able to print out digital
 photos on it as well.
 
 The HP Deskjet 9650 seems to fulfill both of those needs, and I usually
 see it on sale for $250 or $300 at the local OfficeMax or Staples.  Are
 there any alarms I should know about, for those of you who have used it?
  Does anyone have a better product in mind in a similar price range
 ($350 at the absolute upper-most limit)?
 
 Thanks in advance for anyone¹s suggestions.
 
 -- Mike



___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] 2 and 4 hand(s) on One Piano

2004-09-21 Thread Michael L. Meyer
And, of course, there's the P.D.Q. Bach pieces that require four hands plus
that of the page-turner ... I believe the Liebeslieder Polkas make use of
that arrangement.

-- Mike


On 9/21/04 9:17 AM, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 At 05:32 AM 9/21/04 -0700, Lynn Gold wrote:
 Hope the three people are really skinny and have bathed before the
 performance. g,d,rlh
 
 Actually, I have a piece sort of like that -- The Lithuanian Liniment
 March, for piano five hands. It makes quite a sight as the lowest
 part is played with the right hand by a pianist sitting on the very
 edge of the bench. Accidents may happen, but not at any of its
 performances (yet).
 http://maltedmedia.com/people/bathory/music/mp3/pianostrils/lithuanian_linimen
 t_march.m3u
 
 Dennis
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale



___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


[Finale] OT: Printer question

2004-09-18 Thread Michael L. Meyer
Title: OT: Printer question



Hello all --

Ive read some of the printer discussions in the past, and thought I might run this question by you all. Does anyone have/what do you think of the HP Deskjet 9650? Im looking for a printer that gives as close to laser-quality output as possible (but I by no means do anything that requires archival-quality or publishable stuff) and will print on large-size paper (at least 11x17, although the 9650 brochure says it goes up to 13x19). At the same time, this printer is for use in our home, and my wife and I would like to be able to print out digital photos on it as well.

The HP Deskjet 9650 seems to fulfill both of those needs, and I usually see it on sale for $250 or $300 at the local OfficeMax or Staples. Are there any alarms I should know about, for those of you who have used it? Does anyone have a better product in mind in a similar price range ($350 at the absolute upper-most limit)?

Thanks in advance for anyones suggestions.

-- Mike



___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] OT: OS X RAM on original iMac

2004-07-01 Thread Michael L. Meyer
Paul --

I never installed OSX, so I can't help you there, but I did successfully
upgrade the RAM twice on my machine.  Catch -- mine wasn't the original
Bondi blue, but the next-generation, the five flavors iMac -- mine was a
tangerine 266 G3, still tray-loading CD.  I'm assuming the two models were
very similar.

Upgrading the RAM was not simple, but if you follow the instructions they
give you, it is relatively easy to accomplish.  And like I said, I did it
twice during my time with it (have since moved on), and both times it worked
just fine.

Hope this helps.  Sorry I can't answer about OSX.

-- Mike

On 6/29/04 3:03 PM, Paul Hayden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Please respond off-list if you have:
 
 1. successfully installed any version of Mac OS X on an original
 Bondi Blue iMac (233 MHz G3, tray-loading CD), or
 
 2. successfully installed additional RAM.
 
 I may need to do one or both of these things to my sister's iMac, and
 I'd like to know if #1 is feasible (given processor and RAM
 limitations), and how hard #2 is.
 
 Thanks very much.
 
 Paul Hayden


___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale