Re: [Finale] extend secondary beams

2005-12-28 Thread Noel Stoutenburg

Ryan Beard wrote:


Hi

Mac 2006b. I want to extend secondary beams over rests
only in one passage of a piece. Anyway to do this?

I haven't done exactly what you outline, but I've made use (for other 
purposes) of a technique that I think would meet your needs perfectly.  
I define a custom smartline to have the exact same width as a beam, and 
towards the end of the overall setting process, use this smart line in 
place of the beam, carefully aligning the beam so it exactly fits over 
any existing secondary beam.


ns

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] extend secondary beams

2005-12-28 Thread Owain Sutton



Michael Cook wrote:
For the moment the only way I can think of doing this is to leave 
Extend Secondary Beams Over Rests unchecked and extend them manually 
with the beam extension tool where necessary.


Doesn't the beam extension tool only work on the primary beam?
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] extend secondary beams

2005-12-28 Thread Éric Dussault
No, you can double-click the handle and choose the value you want to extend.Le 05-12-28 à 06:23, Owain Sutton a écrit : Doesn't the beam extension tool only work on the primary beam?  Eric DussaultFinale 2006b for Mac ___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] extend secondary beams

2005-12-28 Thread Owain Sutton

Aha, you're right

However, this still doesn't let me extend the 'stub' secondary beams 
underneath a continuing primary beam, only those at the beginning and 
end of the group.




Éric Dussault wrote:

No, you can double-click the handle and choose the value you want to extend.

Le 05-12-28 à 06:23, Owain Sutton a écrit :



Doesn't the beam extension tool only work on the primary beam?




___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] extend secondary beams

2005-12-28 Thread Robert Patterson
I've had the opposite problem at times. (I normally leave xtend over 
2ndary checked.) Consider a beamed group 16th note, 16th rest, 8th note. 
With 2ndary xtend option checked, Finale gives the 16th rest a beam 
rather than creating a beam stub on the initial 16th note. It is most 
aggravating.


There are some workarounds, but not general ones. What I'm say here is 
that if you'll share your specific example, we might be better able to 
offer a workaround.


(The list consensus is correct. There is no way to apply beaming options 
locally, more's the pity.)


--
Robert Patterson

http://RobertGPatterson.com
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] extend secondary beams

2005-12-28 Thread Owain Sutton



Robert Patterson wrote:
I've had the opposite problem at times. (I normally leave xtend over 
2ndary checked.) Consider a beamed group 16th note, 16th rest, 8th note. 
With 2ndary xtend option checked, Finale gives the 16th rest a beam 
rather than creating a beam stub on the initial 16th note. It is most 
aggravating.




Oh yes, I'd forgotten about that one - you're right that it's 
aggravating!  Does anyone ever actually want it to appear that way?

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] extend secondary beams

2005-12-28 Thread Andrew Stiller


On Dec 28, 2005, at 7:11 AM, Owain Sutton wrote:


Aha, you're right

However, this still doesn't let me extend the 'stub' secondary beams 
underneath a continuing primary beam, only those at the beginning and 
end of the group.




Use layers. In one layer, you have the continuing primary beam; in 
another layer you break the primary beam with the slash key, overlap it 
with the beam in the other layer so the break doesn't show, then use 
the beam-extension tool to create a (graphically) inside 
secondary-beam stub that is really an outside stub projecting into the 
break in the second layer.


Hope that's not too confusing.

Andrew Stiller
Kallisti Music Press
http://home.netcom.com/~kallisti/

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] extend secondary beams

2005-12-28 Thread Owain Sutton



Andrew Stiller wrote:


On Dec 28, 2005, at 7:11 AM, Owain Sutton wrote:


Aha, you're right

However, this still doesn't let me extend the 'stub' secondary beams 
underneath a continuing primary beam, only those at the beginning and 
end of the group.




Use layers. In one layer, you have the continuing primary beam; in 
another layer you break the primary beam with the slash key, overlap it 
with the beam in the other layer so the break doesn't show, then use the 
beam-extension tool to create a (graphically) inside secondary-beam 
stub that is really an outside stub projecting into the break in the 
second layer.


Hope that's not too confusing.

Andrew Stiller




Thanks - that makes sense, albeit as a rather colvoluted workaround.

Now, how would you do it when feathered beams are involved?*dr*
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


[Finale] extend secondary beams

2005-12-27 Thread Ryan Beard
Hi

Mac 2006b. I want to extend secondary beams over rests
only in one passage of a piece. Anyway to do this? Is
there a plug-in I've overlooked? I have full versions
of TGTools and Patterson Plug-Ins, by the way.
Checking the box in the document options isn't really
the solution, since that affects the whole piece, and
I only want it in one passage.

As much as i appreciate the wisdom of the list, I'm
not really looking for opinions on whether this is
correct. I doubt it is correct, especially from a
consistency standpoint, but the client has asked for
it and I hope there's a way to do it. I do think it
makes the rhythms easier to read in this passage, and
that's a good enough reason to break a rule. 

Anyhow, I'd appreciate the input. Thanks!

Ryan



__ 
Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about. 
Just $16.99/mo. or less. 
dsl.yahoo.com 

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] extend secondary beams

2005-12-27 Thread Owain Sutton



Ryan Beard wrote:

Hi

Mac 2006b. I want to extend secondary beams over rests
only in one passage of a piece. Anyway to do this? Is
there a plug-in I've overlooked? I have full versions
of TGTools and Patterson Plug-Ins, by the way.
Checking the box in the document options isn't really
the solution, since that affects the whole piece, and
I only want it in one passage.

As much as i appreciate the wisdom of the list, I'm
not really looking for opinions on whether this is
correct. I doubt it is correct, especially from a
consistency standpoint, but the client has asked for
it and I hope there's a way to do it. I do think it
makes the rhythms easier to read in this passage, and
that's a good enough reason to break a rule. 


Anyhow, I'd appreciate the input. Thanks!

Ryan




I've come across this before, and I believe there's no way to do it - 
the setting is a global one.  And yes, while there's the issue of 
consistency, it's a shame the program forces you to follow a rule, even 
when you might have a good reason to ignore it.


Owain
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


[Finale] Extend secondary beams

2005-03-08 Thread John Roberts
I don't see a way to extend secondary beams, either independently (eg
extending a 16th note beam) or in conjunction with the outer beam.

Thanks for any help,
John

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Extend secondary beams

2005-03-08 Thread Owain Sutton

John Roberts wrote:
I don't see a way to extend secondary beams, either independently (eg
extending a 16th note beam) or in conjunction with the outer beam.
Thanks for any help,
John

I believe there isn't a way of doing this.  This is one of my constant 
annoyances, that Finale's way of breaking secondary beams over rests is 
horrid and unchangable.  I've always resorted to carefully placing lines 
of the appropriate thickness, once everything else is in position.  Not 
good.
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Extend secondary beams

2005-03-08 Thread Aaron Sherber
At 12:06 PM 03/08/2005, John Roberts wrote:
I don't see a way to extend secondary beams, either independently (eg
extending a 16th note beam) or in conjunction with the outer beam.
Under Special Tools, select the Beam Extension Tool, and click the measure 
in question. Handles appear on beamed notes. If you double-click on a 
handle, you get a dialog allowing you to select which beams attached to the 
handle you want to affect.

So for example, if you have eighth, eighth rest, sixteenth and you want to 
adjust the little sixteenth note flag, double-click the handle and make 
sure that only 16th is checked. Then move the handle, and the beam will adjust.

Aaron.
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Extend secondary beams

2005-03-08 Thread Owain Sutton

Aaron Sherber wrote:
At 12:06 PM 03/08/2005, John Roberts wrote:
 I don't see a way to extend secondary beams, either independently (eg
 extending a 16th note beam) or in conjunction with the outer beam.
Under Special Tools, select the Beam Extension Tool, and click the 
measure in question. Handles appear on beamed notes. If you double-click 
on a handle, you get a dialog allowing you to select which beams 
attached to the handle you want to affect.

So for example, if you have eighth, eighth rest, sixteenth and you want 
to adjust the little sixteenth note flag, double-click the handle and 
make sure that only 16th is checked. Then move the handle, and the beam 
will adjust.

Aaron.
I stand corrected!  My moaning reply was evidently about something 
slightly separate...
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Extend secondary beams

2005-03-08 Thread Aaron Sherber
At 01:49 PM 03/08/2005, John Roberts wrote:
But it doesn't seem to help extend the interior end of secondary beams. If I
have, say, an eighth note beamed to a 16th triplet, with a rest on the first
note of the triplet - I'd like to extend the interior beam of the triplet to
cover the rest.
Yes, I believe you're right -- though maybe someone else knows otherwise. I 
suppose I would do this with the custom line tool, which I think is what 
Owain also suggested.

Aaron.
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Extend secondary beams

2005-03-08 Thread Andrew Stiller
On Mar 8, 2005, at 1:49 PM, John Roberts wrote:
 If I
have, say, an eighth note beamed to a 16th triplet, with a rest on the 
first
note of the triplet - I'd like to extend the interior beam of the 
triplet to
cover the rest.
I would do this with layers and overlapping beams. Create the  whole 
figure in one layer, with normal beams, then create a unison of the 
triplet only in another layer, make sure the beams overlap perfectly, 
then extend both beams of the triplet.

Andrew Stiller
Kallisti Music Press
http://home.netcom.com/~kallisti/
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Extend secondary beams

2005-03-08 Thread John Roberts
Thank you Andrew. That will do it.
John


On 3/8/05 4:56 PM, Andrew Stiller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 On Mar 8, 2005, at 1:49 PM, John Roberts wrote:
 
  If I
 have, say, an eighth note beamed to a 16th triplet, with a rest on the
 first
 note of the triplet - I'd like to extend the interior beam of the
 triplet to
 cover the rest.
 
 I would do this with layers and overlapping beams. Create the  whole
 figure in one layer, with normal beams, then create a unison of the
 triplet only in another layer, make sure the beams overlap perfectly,
 then extend both beams of the triplet.
 
 Andrew Stiller
 Kallisti Music Press
 http://home.netcom.com/~kallisti/
 
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Extend secondary beams

2005-03-08 Thread Owain Sutton
Nice workaround - I'll be using that myself.  Thanks!

John Roberts wrote:
Thank you Andrew. That will do it.
John
On 3/8/05 4:56 PM, Andrew Stiller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Mar 8, 2005, at 1:49 PM, John Roberts wrote:

If I
have, say, an eighth note beamed to a 16th triplet, with a rest on the
first
note of the triplet - I'd like to extend the interior beam of the
triplet to
cover the rest.
I would do this with layers and overlapping beams. Create the  whole
figure in one layer, with normal beams, then create a unison of the
triplet only in another layer, make sure the beams overlap perfectly,
then extend both beams of the triplet.
Andrew Stiller
Kallisti Music Press
http://home.netcom.com/~kallisti/
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale