[Flightgear-devel] Re: [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: data/Data/AInimitz_demo.xml, NONE, 1.1
* Vivian Meazza -- Tuesday 16 November 2004 18:06: Melchior FRANZ wrote: OBJECT_SHARED Models/Geometry/Nimitz/nimitz.ac -122.590 37.76 -7.0 90 It should work just with the ai... /ai stuff in my earlier post. Yes. Changed that now. Mathias has put all the necessary stuff here: ftp://ftp.uni-duisburg.de/FlightGear/Misc_maf/carrier/ The code that he sent me works well, but I haven't tried it from that location yet. I applied all the stuff and it worked very well. My first carrier landing with the FA-18A succeeded already. The gear code is great! It's fun to taxi over slopes and actually see the aircraft follow them, rather than strangely sliding up with the nose gear below ground. And the FA-18 is very well done and has a nice cockpit with nice night lighting. The only problems I've encountered: * not really surprisingly, the carrier doesn't replay in replay mode. When I watched my landing in replay, the carrier had already moved along. Tricky to fix. * I observed one segfault that I hadn't seen before. The bt, however, didn't look like it had anything to do with the new code. I haven't saved the core file but will do so if I run into that problem again. Now I hope that I will soon be able to land the bo105 realistically on slight slopes ... m. ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: data/Data/AInimitz_demo.xml, NONE, 1.1
On Mittwoch 17 November 2004 11:29, Melchior FRANZ wrote: I applied all the stuff and it worked very well. My first carrier landing with the FA-18A succeeded already. The gear code is great! It's fun to taxi over slopes and actually see the aircraft follow them, rather than strangely sliding up with the nose gear below ground. And the FA-18 is very well done and has a nice cockpit with nice night lighting. The only problems I've encountered: * not really surprisingly, the carrier doesn't replay in replay mode. When I watched my landing in replay, the carrier had already moved along. Tricky to fix. :) I observed that too. From my point of view, do one by one ... But help is allways welcome :) * I observed one segfault that I hadn't seen before. The bt, however, didn't look like it had anything to do with the new code. I haven't saved the core file but will do so if I run into that problem again. If you see that again, could you please try to find out where that happens? Thanks! Now I hope that I will soon be able to land the bo105 realistically on slight slopes ... Stay tuned :) Greetings Mathias -- Mathias Fröhlich, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
[Flightgear-devel] Re: [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: data/Data/AInimitz_demo.xml, NONE, 1.1
* Mathias Fröhlich -- Wednesday 17 November 2004 21:42: On Mittwoch 17 November 2004 11:29, Melchior FRANZ wrote: * I observed one segfault that I hadn't seen before. The bt, however, didn't look like it had anything to do with the new code. I haven't saved the core file but will do so if I run into that problem again. If you see that again, could you please try to find out where that happens? Thanks! Sure. Actually, I do know where it happened. I checked the backtrace, and wasn't thrilled: It was at program exit when freeing property nodes. That's why I didn't really attribute it to the new changes, although I hadn't seen that before. It was a failure not to save the core file, but I had run fgfs in gdb, and this doesn't produce them automatically. Have tried to reproduce the segfault, but it didn't happen again yet. m. ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: data/Data/AInimitz_demo.xml, NONE, 1.1
Hi, On Mittwoch 17 November 2004 21:52, Melchior FRANZ wrote: Sure. Actually, I do know where it happened. I checked the backtrace, and wasn't thrilled: It was at program exit when freeing property nodes. That's why I didn't really attribute it to the new changes, although I hadn't seen that before. It was a failure not to save the core file, but I had run fgfs in gdb, and this doesn't produce them automatically. Have tried to reproduce the segfault, but it didn't happen again yet. Ok, thanks! Mathias -- Mathias Fröhlich, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
RE: [Flightgear-devel] Re: [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: data/Data/AInimitz_demo.xml, NONE, 1.1
Melchior FRANZ wrote: To be honest: I don't see any carrier. It isn't anywhere in the scenery yet -- just in cvs. You have to add it yourself, or replace the saratoga with it. I added this in file $FG_ROOT/Scenery/Terrain/w130n30/w123n37/942057.stg: OBJECT_SHARED Models/Geometry/Nimitz/nimitz.ac -122.590 37.76 -7.0 90 It should work just with the ai... /ai stuff in my earlier post. And the whole wire/hook thing will AFAIK not work anyway, because it needs Mathias' changes, which are probably only in his branch in the JSBSim repository, but not in FlightGear. All just AFAIK, of course. Mathias has put all the necessary stuff here: ftp://ftp.uni-duisburg.de/FlightGear/Misc_maf/carrier/ The code that he sent me works well, but I haven't tried it from that location yet. Regards Vivian ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
