Re: [Flightgear-users] PLEASE HELP-Let 410 Aircraft Installation
Hi Gerard Can you please explain again cause I could not make head or tail with your explanation. Thanks! Shelton. Le vendredi 04 novembre 2005 à 16:45 +1030, George Patterson a écrit : On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 19:08 +1300, T J wrote: I have the Let 410 Source Code and Aircraft Files Downloaded. I have extracted the aircraft files to the FlightGear Aircraft Folder. What do I do next? The instructions say to extract to Source Code Where is this (what folder?) I also dont't understand how to do this: Unpack the source code patch into your FG source directory. Some of the old files will be overwritten, some files will be added. Then rebuild FG by using commands ./configure make make install Could somebody please send me step by step instructions on how to do this and install the Let 410 aircraft. Many thanks. TJ, (Or whatever you name is) What about helping yourself? Given it is not a standard aircraft, give us a few details. Which version of Flightgear are you running? Which platform? As Shelton said yesterday to your original email on this subject, What is the Let 410 aircraft and where did you download it from? A web address would be helpful. :-) George Hi, George TJ is talking about the L410 coming from http://javky.rozhled.cz/ I gave an an answer to Shelton about it. Sheers ___ Flightgear-users mailing list Flightgear-users@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
[Flightgear-users] So what do you fly?
As I make my way down the list of so called Flyable planes, the only real contender is the B1900D - quite disheartening - really how many Cessna's do we really need?? and the rest - well they are too incomplete to fly!! Quite disappointing in fact. You can forget about flying these: 737 Boeing 737 747 Boeing 747-400 (YASim) 747-100 Boeing 747-100 (JSBSim) A320 The others are mostly incomplete - anyone else find this as well? And pity the Citation - which is possessed. Regards Shelton. ___ Flightgear-users mailing list Flightgear-users@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
Re: [Flightgear-users] So what do you fly?
Ok Guys I am going to test each aircraft and write down what is inadequate with that particular aircraft - from this I will put it in a HTML table format and will get it uploaded somewhere so everyone can see whats wrong with them and hence what needs to be done. So send me feedback with what you think is not right with the aircrafts you fly and I will compile them in a HTML document and upload it. Regards Shelton. On Friday 04 November 2005 06:32 am, Shelton D'Cruz wrote: .. and the rest - well they are too incomplete to fly!! A bit picky, aren't we? Let me know what your minimum requirements are and I'll put some more hours in. Be a part of the solution. Dave ___ Flightgear-users mailing list Flightgear-users@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d ___ Flightgear-users mailing list Flightgear-users@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
Re: [Flightgear-users] So what do you fly?
Hi Gerard I greatly appreciate what the authors have done with the aircraft, but some of them are not up to the standard of flyable - I mean the other day I took off in one, forgot which one, and as I moved the hat switch to change views, the dash board moved along with it LOL - Hence I will test each one and compile a list. Regards Shelton Le vendredi 04 novembre 2005 à 15:11 +0100, Gerard ROBIN a écrit : Le vendredi 04 novembre 2005 à 22:32 +1000, Shelton D'Cruz a écrit : As I make my way down the list of so called Flyable planes, the only real contender is the B1900D - quite disheartening - really how many Cessna's do we really need?? and the rest - well they are too incomplete to fly!! Quite disappointing in fact. You can forget about flying these: 737 Boeing 737 747 Boeing 747-400 (YASim) 747-100 Boeing 747-100 (JSBSim) A320 The others are mostly incomplete - anyone else find this as well? And pity the Citation - which is possessed. Regards Shelton. Hi Shelton, Do you known the time spent by the authors to build the aircrafts, Being a user from the old times i could discover the progress on each a/c, i cannot give a specific good example without any risk to disappoint the others. If you are able to fly and to explain the characteristics of each one, so you are able to make one from yourself. In addition to: don't forget = FG is not a game Every a/c could be flyable in a MSFS standard, The target is to be as close as possible to the reality. Each author try to find the REAL characteristics, data, it takes time. ___ Flightgear-users mailing list Flightgear-users@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
Re: [Flightgear-users] So what do you fly?
Andy - I know the B1900D is not a Cessna Regards Shelton. Shelton D'Cruz wrote: As I make my way down the list of so called Flyable planes, the only real contender is the B1900D - quite disheartening - really how many Cessna's do we really need?? and the rest - well they are too incomplete to fly!! The B1900 is a Beechcraft, not a Cessna, and a twin engine commuter turboprop. Even interpreting cessna as a single engine light aircraft, the 1900 ain't. And I'm on record that the most fun, most instructive time I've had with FlightGear is practicing STOL techniques with the Harrier -- an aircraft with no 3D model nor cockpit. I guess I wasn't flying then. Thanks for setting me straight. Help or go home, basically. If you want eye candy and polish over fixability and variety, stay with MSFS. Andy ___ Flightgear-users mailing list Flightgear-users@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d ___ Flightgear-users mailing list Flightgear-users@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
Re: [Flightgear-users] So what do you fly?
and by the way guys, this is the impression I got from a new user - Regards Shelton. ___ Flightgear-users mailing list Flightgear-users@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
Re: [Flightgear-users] So what do you fly?
Oh well then I may as well not do it - and I am not critising - only commenting. Le samedi 05 novembre 2005 à 10:57 +1000, Shelton D'Cruz a écrit : Ok Guys I am going to test each aircraft and write down what is inadequate with that particular aircraft - from this I will put it in a HTML table format and will get it uploaded somewhere so everyone can see whats wrong with them and hence what needs to be done. So send me feedback with what you think is not right with the aircrafts you fly and I will compile them in a HTML document and upload it. Regards Shelton. You are free to do what you want, and we are free to do what we want. Will you give a prize to the best one ? You should better spend your time to make your own a/c. Criticism is easy. Regards ___ Flightgear-users mailing list Flightgear-users@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
RE: [Flightgear-users] So what do you fly?
Hi Jon I would like to compile such a list so that newbies now exactly the status of each aircraft, however, others here don't think thats neccessary so I will give it a miss. Regards Shelton. As I make my way down the list of so called Flyable planes, the only real contender is the B1900D - quite disheartening - really how many Cessna's do we really need?? and the rest - well they are too incomplete to fly!! Quite disappointing in fact. You can forget about flying these: 737 Boeing 737 747 Boeing 747-400 (YASim) 747-100 Boeing 747-100 (JSBSim) A320 The others are mostly incomplete - anyone else find this as well? And pity the Citation - which is possessed. Hi, Shelton: It's true that some of the aircraft are not well shaken-down. I'm heads-down in serious coding, and have been for months. JSBSim is undergoing a major upgrade. One of the things I really want to do when that settles down is to evaluate our aircraft models and refine or cull the ones that don't fly well. Feedback from users is valuable. What really helps the project, though, is more specific information about what is wrong with a plane. Is it documentation? What seems wrong about an aircraft? If you could take a few moments to fill in some details, that would be a valuable contribution to our efforts. Thanks! Jon Berndt Development Coordinator JSBSim Project ___ Flightgear-users mailing list Flightgear-users@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d ___ Flightgear-users mailing list Flightgear-users@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
Re: [Flightgear-users] Re: So what do you fly?
Ok thats good to know - how about stalls - how does it react? Shelton D'Cruz wrote: hi Ray The Citation, although very nice, is not really flyable - I stalled her the other day and could not come out of the spin. The Citation is actually one of my favorite airplanes to fly. It hits the published performance numbers pretty close in terms of climb rate, speeds, etc. Curt. ___ Flightgear-users mailing list Flightgear-users@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
Re: [Flightgear-users] PLEASE HELP-Let 410 Aircraft Installation
Ok thanks Gerard! Regards Shelton. Le vendredi 04 novembre 2005 à 22:30 +1000, Shelton D'Cruz a écrit : Hi Gerard Can you please explain again cause I could not make head or tail with your explanation. Thanks! Shelton. Sorry , i cannot tell more. You just need 1/ to download the right files ( i told you how to access and to choose) 2/ to patch FG source And .3/.to rebuild FG which will be dedicated to L410 only L410. ___ Flightgear-users mailing list Flightgear-users@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
Re: [Flightgear-users] Re: So what do you fly?
Hi Willie Your WiKi is excellent! - I will add some comments to it. Regards Shelton. I have started a page for each aircraft on the wiki http://www.seedwiki.com/wiki/flight_gear/aircraft_wishlist.cfm where folks can leave comments on their favourite aircraft-models. I've phrased it thusly, though, being a wiki, please change it if you have better ideas :-) Aircraft-model titlethumbnail link to airliners.net Categories: Version: FDM: Status: Author/Maintainer: Features: To do: Help wanted? Yes please /No thanks==This bit is for the use of the author/maintainer only please. Please give your comments on this aircraft below. Please indicate if you think it is * just great - needs no further development * shows promise but needs further development - please be specific and say if you are willing to help * just needs a little tweaking - please be specific and say if you are willing to help * 'hanger queen' - stays in CVS but shouldn't be part of a release Im working through it now, starting to fill in the blanks, and weed out the aliases, though I think I'll be deleting the link to airliners.net and finding photos elsewhere. Is it OK to link the wiki to the thumbnails on the download page BTW? Please feel free to dive in and fill in info, links screenshots and comments. Hopefully after a week or so we'll get a feel for which aircraft are most popular and hopefully find more effort to finish some that are already started. Categories, I'm going to shamelessly steal from Ray Mc. Fantasy - Santa, UFO etc Experimental - X-15, YF-23 etc GA - Citation, C-182 etc Gliders Commercial - 737, DC-3, etc Pre WWII Wright Flyer, Sopwith Camel, etc WWII - P-51, Spitfire, etc Post WWI - B-52, F-16 etc Cheers Willie Fleming ___ Flightgear-users mailing list Flightgear-users@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d ___ Flightgear-users mailing list Flightgear-users@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
Re: [Flightgear-users] Re: So what do you fly?
Hi Curt Yep good points - so besides the AOA issue, I think this jet is pretty much done. BTW - checked out your nice pics with you in the simulator - must have been a ball. Regards Shelton. Shelton D'Cruz wrote: Ok thats good to know - how about stalls - how does it react? YAsim models some simple stalls. You definitely know when you've stalled. True life stall behavior is very difficult to model because it can be so different from aircraft to aircraft. There seems to be a small issue in YAsim with some strange behavior when your aoa goes a little past negative. I was looking at that last night and today, but quickly got in over my head. Hopefully Andy can figure this out without too much additional work. When you fly in the normal regimes you should almost never run into this problem. For whatever it's worth, some people like to hop into a sim and evaluate the flight dynamics model by taking it to the extreme edges of the flight regime before looking at anything else. If it feels right, the sim is great, if not the sim stinks. In this case, who here has stalled a Citation Jet? Who would know exactly how it reacts or doesn't react? How easy is it to recover in real life? If I told you it stalled exactly right would you be able to prove me wrong? If you told me it didn't stall right, could I prove you wrong? I'm not a full scale pilot, but I have flown a variety of R/C aircraft. They all have wildly different stall characteristics. So who knows... I think the YAsim Citation has a plausible stall but I have no way to say if it's anything close to realistic or not. Curt. ___ Flightgear-users mailing list Flightgear-users@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
Re: [Flightgear-users] So what do you fly?
Hi Syd No I don't think the aircraft are crap Regards Shelton. Shelton D'Cruz wrote: As I make my way down the list of so called Flyable planes, the only real contender is the B1900D - quite disheartening - really how many Cessna's do we really need?? and the rest - well they are too incomplete to fly!! Quite disappointing in fact. You can forget about flying these: 737 Boeing 737 747 Boeing 747-400 (YASim) 747-100 Boeing 747-100 (JSBSim) A320 The others are mostly incomplete - anyone else find this as well? And pity the Citation - which is possessed. Regards Shelton. ___ Flightgear-users mailing list Flightgear-users@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d well I have to put my 2 cents worth in .If you think the aircraft are crap ... how about helping out by giving us some of that aircraft knowledge you apparently have that we dont .That would be much more useful. Personally I like them all ,(Santa is great!) but for my own , finding the information for these aircraft isn't always easy.Maybe you could point out specific problems, then we would have a better idea of what to fix. Thanx ___ Flightgear-users mailing list Flightgear-users@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d ___ Flightgear-users mailing list Flightgear-users@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
Re: [Flightgear-users] So what do you fly?
Hi Innis This is what I get in the console when running the 737: This aircraft model is a BETA release!!! This aircraft model probably will not fly as expected. Use this model for development purposes ONLY!!! Regards Shelton. Hi Shelton Ok I will be first cab off the rank I would like to know what you find wrong with the 737 which you term forget about. As I am in the middle of an upgrade of that aircraft it will give me an opportunity to see if there are things I have missed. Also it will give us an insite into what you see as shortcomings with the aircraft as up untill now your comments have been pretty general. Shelton D'Cruz writes and by the way guys, this is the impression I got from a new user - Regards Shelton. Cheers Innis ___ Flightgear-users mailing list Flightgear-users@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d ___ Flightgear-users mailing list Flightgear-users@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
Re: [Flightgear-users] Let Aircraft Help
what is the LET? Regards Shelton. Could Someone please help me by going through step by step how I install the Let Aircraft. Thanks _ Need more speed? Get Xtra Broadband @ http://jetstream.xtra.co.nz/chm/0,,202853-1000,00.html ___ Flightgear-users mailing list Flightgear-users@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d ___ Flightgear-users mailing list Flightgear-users@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
[Flightgear-users] CitatiionII
Hi Anyone else notice a strange problem with the Citation II - after a while flying her, she will all of a sudden go up and down in a yo-yo fashion - only happens to the Citation. Regards, Shelton. ___ Flightgear-users mailing list Flightgear-users@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
[Flightgear-users] Re: Problem running fgfs (0.9.8)
OK I removed 0.9.8 (flightgear-0.9.8-1mdk.i586.rpm) and reinstalled flightgear-0.9.4-54941cl.i386.rpm and FG runs fine - so is there something that I am missing with 0.9.8 ?? Regards Shelton. Hi I have removed the previous version of FG and have got the packages for FG (mandrake 10.1) but now when I execute fgfs I get the following error message: Adding subsystem environment Adding subsystem lighting Initializing OpenAL sound manager /usr/games/fgfs: symbol lookup error: /usr/games/fgfs: undefined symbol: alutInit Any suggestions ? Regards Shelton. --- ___ Flightgear-users mailing list Flightgear-users@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
[Flightgear-users] Problem running fgfs (0.9.8)
Hi I have removed the previous version of FG and have got the packages for FG (mandrake 10.1) but now when I execute fgfs I get the following error message: Adding subsystem environment Adding subsystem lighting Initializing OpenAL sound manager /usr/games/fgfs: symbol lookup error: /usr/games/fgfs: undefined symbol: alutInit Any suggestions ? Regards Shelton. ___ Flightgear-users mailing list Flightgear-users@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
Re: [Flightgear-users] Problem running fgfs (0.9.8)
Hi Erik Well 0.9.4 works fine - does it not use OpenAL ?? Regards Shelton. Shelton D'Cruz wrote: Hi I have removed the previous version of FG and have got the packages for FG (mandrake 10.1) but now when I execute fgfs I get the following error message: Adding subsystem environment Adding subsystem lighting Initializing OpenAL sound manager /usr/games/fgfs: symbol lookup error: /usr/games/fgfs: undefined symbol: alutInit You will also need to install openal. Erik ___ Flightgear-users mailing list Flightgear-users@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d ___ Flightgear-users mailing list Flightgear-users@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
Re: [Flightgear-users] Problem running fgfs (0.9.8)
Ok thanks Erik I will look into it further, It says I have OpenAL installed but obviously not. Thanks again Shelton. Shelton D'Cruz wrote: Hi Erik Well 0.9.4 works fine - does it not use OpenAL ?? Nope, it's used plib's SL library. Erik ___ Flightgear-users mailing list Flightgear-users@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d ___ Flightgear-users mailing list Flightgear-users@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
Re: [Flightgear-users] Problem running fgfs (0.9.8)
Ok that didn't work - I installed * rpm -i libopenal0-0.0.8-1.20050312.1mdk.i586.rpm then * rpm -i flightgear-0.9.8-1mdk.i586.rpm and still same error when trying to run fgfs. regards Shelton. Ok thanks Erik I will look into it further, It says I have OpenAL installed but obviously not. Thanks again Shelton. Shelton D'Cruz wrote: Hi Erik Well 0.9.4 works fine - does it not use OpenAL ?? Nope, it's used plib's SL library. Erik ___ Flightgear-users mailing list Flightgear-users@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d ___ Flightgear-users mailing list Flightgear-users@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d ___ Flightgear-users mailing list Flightgear-users@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
Re: [Flightgear-users] Problem running fgfs (0.9.8)
this is what that libopenal package installs: /usr/lib/libopenal.so.0.0.8 /usr/share/doc/libopenal0-0.0.8 /usr/share/doc/libopenal0-0.0.8/CHANGES /usr/share/doc/libopenal0-0.0.8/CREDITS /usr/share/doc/libopenal0-0.0.8/ChangeLog /usr/share/doc/libopenal0-0.0.8/NOTES /usr/share/doc/libopenal0-0.0.8/PLATFORM /usr/share/doc/libopenal0-0.0.8/README /usr/share/doc/libopenal0-0.0.8/TODO I will look into it further, It says I have OpenAL installed but obviously not. Thanks again Shelton. Shelton D'Cruz wrote: Hi Erik Well 0.9.4 works fine - does it not use OpenAL ?? Nope, it's used plib's SL library. Erik ___ Flightgear-users mailing list Flightgear-users@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d ___ Flightgear-users mailing list Flightgear-users@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d ___ Flightgear-users mailing list Flightgear-users@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
Re: [Flightgear-users] AI Aircraft
Hi Guys WOW i just saw the 737 AI takeoff from KSFO - this is amazing !! Hope to contribute to this fantastic piece of software!! Regards Shelton. Hi Durk Well I will be more than interested in the alpha version of the AI traffic files. So please send me the documenation and other associated material. In the mean time, I have located and downloaded the 0.9.8 mdk rpms (for Mandriva) as well as SimGear - Hopefully I will not encounter problems installing the latest version. So please send me the details about the alpha version of the AI part in FG. Let me know what needs to be done :) Regards, Shelton. Quoting Durk Talsma [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi Shelton, Well, I guess David Luff and David Culp have already explained quite a bit. If you're interested in helping with AI traffic generation, you're mostly welcome. I do have some documentation concerning the generation of traffic files that I could send you off-list if you're interested (It's not quite ready for general release). In addition, as I mentioned earlier, I am currently working on a traffic pattern editor that should eliminate the need to understand the details of the AI traffic files. So if you would like to test out an early alpha version, I'm more than happy to send you a pre-release. This might take a while though, as I just started this project last weekend... :-) As for your question why we have only 737's for AI traffic. The reason is that most of the traffic manager AI is in a relatively early stage of development and the supplied patterns serve mainly as a proof of principle. The 737 is one of the aircraft that is supplied by default in the base package. With the new traffic pattern editor, I'm moving away from the idea of using regular aircraft for AI traffic, but use dedicated AI models, which are somewhat lower in detail, because they're not regularly seen from small distances. However, this is again still in it's early stages. Cheers, Durk On Monday 31 October 2005 01:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Durk Thank you very much for the explanation - Let me know if you need a hand with the AI part of FlightGear. I have some knowledge in XML. BTW, how is the AI traffic generated in FlightGear - is there somewhere where I can take a look, I would like to see some more heavy traffic landing in KSFO. I mean if the 737s are implementated in KSFO, why not the A320? Let me know if you want a hand at this. I used to play Flight Unlimited 2 and 3 before I moved onto Linux, and they did an exceptional job when it came to AI traffic. Regards, Shelton. ___ Flightgear-users mailing list Flightgear-users@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d This email was sent from Netspace Webmail: http://www.netspace.net.au ___ Flightgear-users mailing list Flightgear-users@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d ___ Flightgear-users mailing list Flightgear-users@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
[Flightgear-users] AI Aircraft
Hi Just installed FlightGear and I am quite impressed. I just did a flight from Half Moon Bay to KSFO and was little disappointed because I did not see any AI (moving) aircraft, only 1 static one that was ready for take off but did not have any wheels!! I have the AI setting to 3 . Regards, Shelton. ___ Flightgear-users mailing list Flightgear-users@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
