RE: FOP schema
Victor Mote and Peter West wrote: I noticed from your commt that the 'country-name's had lost their spaces, e.g., MACEDONIA,THEFORMERYUGOSLAVREPUBLICOF. . . . However, the 3-letter language codes are the ones we need. I took the text for that section from one of the ISO standards. I wasn't sure which standard I should be applying. The text in there should track with the valid values for those fields. The country name text isn't actually used in the schema but, It is very useful for populating drop-down lists etc. in any interface generated from the schema. While working on an FAQ for FO dtd schema, I see that we have two schema in docs/foschema: fop4f.xsd fop4.xsd. I then did similar clanups on fop4g.xsd, and committed that as a change to fop4.xsd. (etc.) See http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-devm=103547432006815w=4 If no one objects, I would like to move this information to fop.xsd let CVS handle the revision issues. The viewcvs program allows us to append a revision number, so we could even branch tag this to keep it tied to releases. Victor Mote Guys, I created the FOP schema for me and posted it to the list so everyone else could benefit from my work. Feel free to change it however you like. I put some stuff in there in the documentation sections so I could generate automated tests, I segregated the FOP implemented and non-implemented features etc. Someone else posted that they'd like to put in some schematron extensions. That would be cool too. Chuck Chuck, if you want me to post a copy of the file to you, let me know. Yes, please cross post the changes to me since I'm not hooked up to the CVS. Chuck Paussa - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: FOP schema
Peter B. West wrote: Victor Mote wrote: While working on an FAQ for FO dtd schema, I see that we have two schema in docs/foschema: fop4f.xsd fop4.xsd. They are similar. Does anyone know what the purpose for both is, why we have 2, or the 4 4f designations? Victor, I think that Chuck was appending a letter to each version of the schema. When he submitted fop4g.xsd, I cleaned the tabs out of fop4f.xsd, and committed that file as fop4.xsd. I then did similar clanups on fop4g.xsd, and committed that as a change to fop4.xsd. So from fop4.xsd, you can recover the latest two versions of the file. fop4f.xsd is for historical reference only, left in case there were any problems with my cleanups of fop4.xsd. At the time I let Chuck know what I had done, and asked him if he could submit a diff against that file as his next version. See http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-devm=103547432006815w=4 If no one objects, I would like to move this information to fop.xsd let CVS handle the revision issues. The viewcvs program allows us to append a revision number, so we could even branch tag this to keep it tied to releases. Victor Mote - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FOP schema
Victor Mote wrote: If no one objects, I would like to move this information to fop.xsd let CVS handle the revision issues. The viewcvs program allows us to append a revision number, so we could even branch tag this to keep it tied to releases. Sounds OK. Peter -- Peter B. West [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.powerup.com.au/~pbwest/ Lord, to whom shall we go? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FOP schema
Victor Mote wrote: While working on an FAQ for FO dtd schema, I see that we have two schema in docs/foschema: fop4f.xsd fop4.xsd. They are similar. Does anyone know what the purpose for both is, why we have 2, or the 4 4f designations? I think fop4f.xsd is the latest one. Anyway Chuck Paussa [EMAIL PROTECTED] knows better. -- Oleg Tkachenko eXperanto team Multiconn Technologies, Israel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FOP schema
Victor Mote wrote: While working on an FAQ for FO dtd schema, I see that we have two schema in docs/foschema: fop4f.xsd fop4.xsd. They are similar. Does anyone know what the purpose for both is, why we have 2, or the 4 4f designations? Victor, I think that Chuck was appending a letter to each version of the schema. When he submitted fop4g.xsd, I cleaned the tabs out of fop4f.xsd, and committed that file as fop4.xsd. I then did similar clanups on fop4g.xsd, and committed that as a change to fop4.xsd. So from fop4.xsd, you can recover the latest two versions of the file. fop4f.xsd is for historical reference only, left in case there were any problems with my cleanups of fop4.xsd. At the time I let Chuck know what I had done, and asked him if he could submit a diff against that file as his next version. See http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-devm=103547432006815w=4 Peter -- Peter B. West [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.powerup.com.au/~pbwest/ Lord, to whom shall we go? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
